[Freeswitch-users] HA: Starting FreeSWITCH empties the calls table?

[Vik Killa]

was FS 3277: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3277 actually committed?
If not, why? Seems like a good addition.

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:24 AM,  <B.Tietz at pinguin.ag> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That is the reason. I think FS is able to act as a cluster. So many machines act as one and should have the same name...
> Just an idea.
>
> greets.
>
>
>
>>Can I ask when exactly the "switchname" should be used then?
>>
>>FS 3277: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3277
>>
>>Suggests it was implemented for the exact reason of keeping the names of two switches in an HA configuration identical, but it seems they are best >left separate.
>>
>>I don't mind cleaning up some of the detail in the HA Wiki but would just like to know when the names should be the same and when they should be >different i.e. shoudl the names be the same for kind kind of active / active setup?
>
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>