[Freeswitch-users] many outgoing calls with mod_lcr at thesame time possible?

[Rupa Schomaker]

I'll need to investigate the bug some more, I don't see it here.  I
routinely do forked lcr calls.  The dialstring ends up looking
something like:

 <bridge_early_media=true,origination_caller_id_number=214XXXYYYY,forked_call=true>lcr/1214XXXYYYY:_:lcr/1214XXXYYYY:_:user/1 at voip.rupa.com,user/2 at voip.rupa.com,user/3 at voip.rupa.com,user/4 at voip.rupa.com,user/5 at voip.rupa.com,user/foo at voip.rupa.com

hm.. I'm using enterprise originate rather than regular originate.
This is an artifact of when lcr didn't work as an endpoint and I had
to loop through loopback.

As for my regular dialplan, I use lcr as a dialplan:

        <action application="execute_extension" data="$1$2 lcr default"/>

$1$2 is the number, lcr is the dialplan module (lcr), default is the
lcr configuration.

I try to use lcr in the less-than-common ways to ensure I don't break
it when I make changes...


On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Anestis Mavro <devel at omninet.eu> wrote:
> Yes, it is the bug…
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Anestis
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Peter
> Olsson
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 10:45 AM
>
> To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] many outgoing calls with mod_lcr at thesame
> time possible?
>
>
>
> There is a Jira reported for when using lcr as an endpoint – you probably
> hit the same bug?
>
>
>
> Check out Jira FS-3109.
>
>
>
> /Peter
>
>
>
> Från: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] För Anestis Mavro
> Skickat: den 10 maj 2011 09:28
> Till: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
> Ämne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] many outgoing calls with mod_lcr at the same
> time possible?
>
>
>
> Hello Avi,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the hint.
>
>
>
> I’ve tried it but unfortunately without success.
>
>
>
> I’ve done these two tests:
>
>
>
> 1) Try to set two variables for the two destinations and bridge
>
> Run application LCR with the called number
>
> Set a variable phoneA (inline=true) with the first result of
> ${lcr_auto_route}
>
> Run again application LCR with the second number to call
>
> Set another variable phoneB (inline=true) with the second result
>
> Bridge to phoneA,phoneB
>
>
>
> The problem is that they don’t get the value of ${lcr_auto_route}
>
>
>
> This is the line that should do this:
>
> <action application=”set” inline=”true” data=”phoneA=${lcr_auto_route}”/>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2) Try to have the endpoint directly in the bridge, as you suggested J
>
>
>
> <action application=”bridge” data=”lcr/XXXXX”/>
>
> (where XXXXX is the number)
>
>
>
> This time the phone gets the call, it is ringing, but the a-leg gets dropped
> before the ringing. This a-leg stays in the channel list and you can not
> kill it with uuid_kill
>
>
>
> (not to forget to mention: CentOS, latest Git)
>
>
>
> Any idea?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Anestis
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Avi
> Marcus
> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 8:48 PM
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] many outgoing calls with mod_lcr at the same
> time possible?
>
>
>
> Since LCR registers itself as an endpoint, I suppose you can bridge to both
> that way.
>
> It's mentioned here, but the sample is actually for something
> else: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_lcr#Endpoint
>
> If you could update the wiki with your use case, that would be great.
>
> -Avi
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Anestis Mavro <devel at omninet.eu> wrote:
>
> Hello Freeswitchers,
>
>
>
> Is it possible to make many outgoing calls with mod_lcr at the same time? An
> example would be to redirect an incoming call to two mobile phones and ring
> them simultaneously.
>
> With a “normal” bridge we can achieve this, but what about having also LCR
> (billing and limit included) involved?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Anestis
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5054 (20100423) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5054 (20100423) __________
>
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5054 (20100423) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
> !DSPAM:4dc8ea5f32761708520604!
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5054 (20100423) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5054 (20100423) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>



-- 
-Rupa