[Freeswitch-users] FS does not uses the IP/PORT resolved using STUN.
DEVARAHALLI, PRAKASH (PRAKASH)
p.devarahalli at alcatel-lucent.com
Wed Jun 8 08:03:32 MSD 2011
Thanks for the response. I agree that the solution proposed by you works perfectly. But purpose of my test is to specifically use the STUN for NAT traversing.
From: guru singh [mailto:grsingh750 at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 2:44 PM
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS does not uses the IP/PORT resolved using STUN.
I've never used STUN but if you have a router that supports UPnP/PMP,
you could try configuring your sofia profile to use auto-nat , it
usually does the job.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, DEVARAHALLI, PRAKASH (PRAKASH)
<p.devarahalli at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> I configured FS to use the STUN server to find the public IP address used by
> the NAT.
> FS sends the request to STUN and receives the reply from the STUN Server ,
> But it does
> not uses this info ( IP and port obtained from STUN) neither while
> negotiation ( in SDP)
> nor in the RTP.
> My testbed:
> < FreeSwitch > ---- < NAT > ---+----<NAT>--- < SIP Phone Client >
> [ STUN Server]
> File conf/sip_profiles/internal.xml has below configuration.
> <param name="ext-rtp-ip" value="stun:220.127.116.11"/> ; This is the
> local STUN server.
> <param name="ext-sip-ip" value="stun:18.104.22.168"/>
> <param name="stun-auto-disable" value="false"/>
> <param name="rtp-ip" value="auto"/>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users