[Freeswitch-users] Questions

[Steven Ayre]

I couldn't get mod_opal to compile (probably because I was on debian lenny
at the time). mod_h323 worked better, but did have stability issues. We've
actually moved to being 100% SIP now though and it's some time since I tried
using either.

We used to use Yate as a H323->SIP proxy, the configuration details are
here:
http://yate.null.ro/pmwiki/index.php?n=Main.H323ToSIPSignallingProxy

-Steve


On 7 June 2011 13:11, David Ponzone <david.ponzone at ipeva.fr> wrote:

> Fabian,
>
> I would really recommend staying away from H323 on FS.
> As far as I know, both modules are far from perfect, and you would have to
> be closely in touch with the devs to get them working as you need.
> I know people who went for Yate, just to convert H323 into SIP, and then
> FS.
>
> About the virtual interfaces, FS does not have to deal with that.
> It's the network layer of the Linux kernel which decides which interface to
> use.
>
>  David Ponzone  Direction Technique
> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr
> tel:      01 74 03 18 97
> gsm:   06 66 98 76 34
>
> Service Client IPeva
> tel:      0811 46 26 26
> www.ipeva.fr  -   www.ipeva-studio.com
>
> *Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à
> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion
> non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible
> d'altération. **IPeva** décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce
> message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas
> destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir
> l'expéditeur.*
> *
> *
>
>
>
> Le 06/06/2011 à 21:16, Fabian Borot a écrit :
>
> Hello
>
> We are giving Freeswitch a try in our organization to provide H323 <-> SIP
> functionality. We have 2 main questions/requests before starting
> installing/configuring:
>
> 1- What would be the most recommended module for H323? I see there are two
> [opal and mod_h323] both both say that are in development stages.
>
> 2- Does FS fully supports virtual interfaces [eth0:1]? I mean:
>         2- 1 listening on several virtual interfaces,
>         2-2 replying from the virtual interface that the request came in
> instead of replying from the primary interface
>         2-3 and also we need to specify the interface to send the call out
> instead of using the primary interface
>
> Thank you
>
> Fabian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/96f88082/attachment-0001.html