From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 00:45:55 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:45:55 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use mod_mp4 In-Reply-To: <1306858803865-6423457.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1306486049569-6410226.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306841276439-6422324.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306858803865-6423457.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: I only heard of the module today, but let's take a look... src/mod/applications/mod_mp4/Makefile contains: LOCAL_LDFLAGS=-lmp4v2 So it's trying to use the mp4v2 library, probably packaged as libmp4v2-dev or libmp4v2-devel, or something similar It's website is http://resare.com/libmp4v2/ if your distribution doesn't have a package. -Steve On 31 May 2011 17:20, mazilo wrote: > Steven, > > Do you know what library package is needed to compile applications/mod_mp4? > > ----- > FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 > Watts of electricity. > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/how-to-use-mod-mp4-tp6410226p6423457.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110531/6e24d649/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 1 00:58:26 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:58:26 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Any way to limit the ability to create conference rooms on demand? In-Reply-To: <4DE3532A.9000004@omigos.de> References: <4DE3532A.9000004@omigos.de> Message-ID: There are only two practical ways to do this: hard-code your conference rooms in the dialplan or use a database-backed solution like mod_xml_curl. How are you currently managing the list of available conferences? -MC 2011/5/30 Andr? Rosowski > Hi there, > > I'm using Bigbluebutton (online conferencing) with Freeswitch so that > users can call a number and then have to enter the "voicebridge" number > to be put into a voice conference. The problem, however, is that if a > user dialed the wrong "voicebridge" number he will be put into a new > conference thus creating one on demand as stated in the describtion of > "mod_conference". Is there any way to manually create conference rooms > and make them static...not allowing for new conference "rooms" to be > created on demand. > > default.xml in dialplan: > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help : ) > > Regards, > > Realdoe > > -- > Omigos Labs UG (haftungsbeschr?nkt) - Meisenstra?e 96 - 33607 Bielefeld > Fon: +49 521 2997 200 - Fax: +49 521 2997 101 > info at omigos.de - www.omigos.de > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: BSc Andr? Rosowski, Benjamin Bittner, Julian Klima > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bielefeld - Registernummer: HRB 40255 > USt-IdNr.: 305/5860/1585 > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110531/d9af366d/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 1 01:10:58 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:10:58 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Bridging Gateway from another server In-Reply-To: <4DE36FB2.5080802@xofap.com> References: <4DDE2633.2030002@xofap.com> <4DDF6FFA.9060108@xofap.com> <4DE36FB2.5080802@xofap.com> Message-ID: We still need to see a debug w/ sip trace if you want us to help you with this. -MC On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:21 AM, William Alianto wrote: > I found out that it's codec problem. I enabled the wrong codec, so it > didn't connect. After I fixed the codec, the call still not successful. I > didn't see any incoming log on FS2 either. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110531/988f87dd/attachment.html From freeswitch-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl Wed Jun 1 02:06:43 2011 From: freeswitch-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl (Patrick Lists) Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:06:43 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch tts russian voice 'ele' or other? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DE56673.4090109@puzzled.xs4all.nl> On 05/31/2011 08:12 PM, Anton VG wrote: > Hi! > > In ru.xml it's mentioned > > tts-engine="cepstral" tts-voice="elena"> > > But after hours of googling I found nothing where and how to get the > mentioned russian 'elena' voice for cepstral > > Any info? There are Elena sound files at http://files.freeswitch.org/ Regards, Patrick From marketing at cluecon.com Wed Jun 1 02:08:55 2011 From: marketing at cluecon.com (marketing at cluecon.com) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:08:55 +0000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 News and Notes Message-ID: <00000130481a3868-69cf136f-c857-407d-90c0-e75120e27c52-000000@email.amazonses.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110531/225a277f/attachment.html From anton.vazir at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 08:32:59 2011 From: anton.vazir at gmail.com (Anton VG) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:32:59 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch tts russian voice 'ele' or other? In-Reply-To: <4DE56673.4090109@puzzled.xs4all.nl> References: <4DE56673.4090109@puzzled.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: This is sounds, I'm looking for TTS voice 2011/6/1 Patrick Lists : > On 05/31/2011 08:12 PM, Anton VG wrote: >> Hi! >> >> In ru.xml it's mentioned >> >> tts-engine="cepstral" tts-voice="elena"> >> >> But after hours of googling I found nothing where and how to get the >> mentioned russian 'elena' voice for cepstral >> >> Any info? > > There are Elena sound files at http://files.freeswitch.org/ > > Regards, > Patrick > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From zetruger at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 10:19:05 2011 From: zetruger at gmail.com (=?KOI8-R?B?6dfBziD+ydPU0cvP1w==?=) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:19:05 +0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch tts russian voice 'ele' or other? In-Reply-To: References: <4DE56673.4090109@puzzled.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: I am using festival. sudo apt-get install festival festvox-ru session.execute("speak", "tts_commandline|voice_msu_ru_nsh_clunits|??????.") 2011/6/1 Anton VG : > This is sounds, I'm looking for TTS voice > > 2011/6/1 Patrick Lists : >> On 05/31/2011 08:12 PM, Anton VG wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> In ru.xml it's mentioned >>> >>> tts-engine="cepstral" tts-voice="elena"> >>> >>> But after hours of googling I found nothing where and how to get the >>> mentioned russian 'elena' voice for cepstral >>> >>> Any info? >> >> There are Elena sound files at http://files.freeswitch.org/ >> >> Regards, >> Patrick >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From infos at madovsky.org Wed Jun 1 10:23:24 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_msn Message-ID: <931F80EC287F4BBEA4174FFBE344D831@e1705> Do you think it's technically feasible to make a module that connect to MSN network ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/8b905f77/attachment.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 10:47:33 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:17:33 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_msn In-Reply-To: <931F80EC287F4BBEA4174FFBE344D831@e1705> References: <931F80EC287F4BBEA4174FFBE344D831@e1705> Message-ID: What will the module do? And why not -- as long as you are able to write C code for it... its possible... On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Madovsky wrote: > Do you think it's technically feasible to > make a module that connect to MSN network ? > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/97eae5e5/attachment.html From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 10:48:35 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:48:35 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_msn In-Reply-To: <931F80EC287F4BBEA4174FFBE344D831@e1705> References: <931F80EC287F4BBEA4174FFBE344D831@e1705> Message-ID: When I first read that line I thought, oh, my anthm is at it again... Technically I think is feasible for such a module. We could use libpurple to interface it with FS, but only the text part has been done so far. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Madovsky wrote: > Do you think it's technically feasible to > make a module that connect to MSN network ? > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From anton.vazir at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 10:53:09 2011 From: anton.vazir at gmail.com (Anton VG) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:53:09 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch tts russian voice 'ele' or other? In-Reply-To: References: <4DE56673.4090109@puzzled.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: Ivan, The question is specific on 'elena' or other russian, business quality voice for cepstral, since it confusingly mentioned in tts settings. 1 ???? 2011??. 11:19 ???????????? ???? ???????? ???????: > I am using festival. > > > sudo apt-get install festival festvox-ru > > > ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? > > > session.execute("speak", "tts_commandline|voice_msu_ru_nsh_clunits|??????.") > > > > 2011/6/1 Anton VG : >> This is sounds, I'm looking for TTS voice >> >> 2011/6/1 Patrick Lists : >>> On 05/31/2011 08:12 PM, Anton VG wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> In ru.xml it's mentioned >>>> >>>> tts-engine="cepstral" tts-voice="elena"> >>>> >>>> But after hours of googling I found nothing where and how to get the >>>> mentioned russian 'elena' voice for cepstral >>>> >>>> Any info? >>> >>> There are Elena sound files at http://files.freeswitch.org/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> Patrick >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From infos at madovsky.org Wed Jun 1 10:59:06 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_msn References: <931F80EC287F4BBEA4174FFBE344D831@e1705> Message-ID: <26661ECBCB7E455A8F293DBA50FC4D8A@e1705> text and audio/video ----- Original Message ----- From: Sidharth Kshatriya To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 2:47 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_msn What will the module do? And why not -- as long as you are able to write C code for it... its possible... On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Madovsky wrote: Do you think it's technically feasible to make a module that connect to MSN network ? _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/3aaaaaee/attachment.html From awais-nazeer at hotmail.com Wed Jun 1 12:33:53 2011 From: awais-nazeer at hotmail.com (awais nazir) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:33:53 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call jumping Message-ID: Hi I want to achieve a scenario like Calls try to hit on first carrier and if return code is 503 or 504 (may be more) then it should hit on second carrier (carriers list can also go on) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/effaf24f/attachment.html From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Wed Jun 1 12:52:46 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:52:46 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call jumping In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DE5494D3@cooper> Check out http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_bridge It basically works like this; /Peter Mvh Peter Olsson Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r awais nazir Skickat: den 1 juni 2011 10:34 Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] Call jumping Hi I want to achieve a scenario like Calls try to hit on first carrier and if return code is 503 or 504 (may be more) then it should hit on second carrier (carriers list can also go on) !DSPAM:4de5fa9e32761556550103! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/7927dce3/attachment-0001.html From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Wed Jun 1 13:06:41 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:06:41 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 News and Notes In-Reply-To: <00000130481a3868-69cf136f-c857-407d-90c0-e75120e27c52-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <00000130481a3868-69cf136f-c857-407d-90c0-e75120e27c52-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DE5494FE@cooper> I booked everything today, for me and a collegue - I'm really looking forward to it! /Peter Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r marketing at cluecon.com Skickat: den 1 juni 2011 00:09 Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 News and Notes ClueCon 2011 Reminder: Extra Chances to Win We wanted to remind everyone that you still have one more day to book ClueCon 2011 and receive FOUR entries into big giveaways for the coolest laptop and iPad. (Promotion ends on June 1.) Will you be the big winner? Book now and increase your chances! For those wanting to know more about what's happening at ClueCon this year we've posted our preliminary schedule. There are some great talks planned and, of course, a few surprises. Be sure to check back often to see the latest speakers and sponsors. Visit us at http://www.cluecon.com for more information, or call us at 877.742.CLUE (2583) to inquire about registration, sponsorships, or any other questions you may have. See you in August! The ClueCon Team http://www.cluecon.com 877.742.CLUE [cid:~WRD000.jpg] !DSPAM:4de567b932761932211873! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/f80b4cd9/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ~WRD000.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 823 bytes Desc: ~WRD000.jpg Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/f80b4cd9/attachment.jpg From chrisg.lists at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 13:45:45 2011 From: chrisg.lists at gmail.com (Chris Graham) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:45:45 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] XML error with static and dynamic XML Message-ID: Hi List, Apologies if this is received twice.. I am getting the malformed XML error below: 2011-05-31 13:32:09.392074 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing 1000 <1000>->0112341111 in context lcr_trunks 2011-05-31 13:32:09.432080 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1611 Error[[error near line 11]: unexpected closing tag ] 2011-05-31 13:32:09.432080 [WARNING] mod_dialplan_xml.c:361 Context lcr_trunks not found 2011-05-31 13:32:09.432080 [INFO] switch_core_state_machine.c:142 No Route, Aborting My static XML file being called: My dynamic XML being served up by xml_curl:
Why is the dynamic XML having an issue with "" tag? Looks legal to me? Thanks in advance, Chris From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 13:57:13 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:57:13 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_msn In-Reply-To: <26661ECBCB7E455A8F293DBA50FC4D8A@e1705> References: <931F80EC287F4BBEA4174FFBE344D831@e1705> <26661ECBCB7E455A8F293DBA50FC4D8A@e1705> Message-ID: Text should be simple the protocol ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Notification_Protocol) has been successfully reverse engineered and used by several open source projects (e.g. Pidgin, libmsn). Audio/video is probably not possible because that hasn't been reverse engineered. Sounds like Microsoft are working on developing interop with Google Talk though, so mod_dingaling might be able to be used in future (but not yet). http://www.liveside.net/2007/10/31/messenger-9-gtalk-integration-messenger-api-new-client-for-mac-os-x-news-unveiled-at-georgia-tech-presentation-whew/ -Steve On 1 June 2011 07:59, Madovsky wrote: > text and audio/video > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Sidharth Kshatriya > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2011 2:47 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_msn > > What will the module do? And why not -- as long as you are able to write C > code for it... its possible... > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Madovsky wrote: > >> Do you think it's technically feasible to >> make a module that connect to MSN network ? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > -- > Sidharth Kshatriya > www.sidk.info > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/48edf31c/attachment.html From Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com Wed Jun 1 15:17:28 2011 From: Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com (mazilo) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use mod_mp4 In-Reply-To: References: <1306486049569-6410226.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306841276439-6422324.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306858803865-6423457.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1306927048156-6426476.post@n2.nabble.com> Steven Ayre wrote: > > I only heard of the module today, but let's take a look... > > src/mod/applications/mod_mp4/Makefile contains: > LOCAL_LDFLAGS=-lmp4v2 > > So it's trying to use the mp4v2 library, probably packaged as libmp4v2-dev > or libmp4v2-devel, or something similar > > It's website is http://resare.com/libmp4v2/ if your distribution doesn't > have a package. Steve, thank you. Apparently, the development of libmp4v2 stopped @ v1.6.1 back in 2007. Hopefully, the new http://code.google.com/p/mp4v2 mp4v2 will work just fine. ----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/how-to-use-mod-mp4-tp6410226p6426476.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 15:36:11 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:36:11 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use mod_mp4 In-Reply-To: <1306927048156-6426476.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1306486049569-6410226.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306841276439-6422324.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306858803865-6423457.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306927048156-6426476.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Should do, it's the same library. :) Much better website you found there - I just pulled the first one I saw out of Google. -Steve On 1 June 2011 12:17, mazilo wrote: > > Steven Ayre wrote: > > > > I only heard of the module today, but let's take a look... > > > > src/mod/applications/mod_mp4/Makefile contains: > > LOCAL_LDFLAGS=-lmp4v2 > > > > So it's trying to use the mp4v2 library, probably packaged as > libmp4v2-dev > > or libmp4v2-devel, or something similar > > > > It's website is http://resare.com/libmp4v2/ if your distribution doesn't > > have a package. > Steve, thank you. > > Apparently, the development of libmp4v2 stopped @ v1.6.1 back in 2007. > Hopefully, the new http://code.google.com/p/mp4v2 mp4v2 will work just > fine. > > ----- > FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 > Watts of electricity. > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/how-to-use-mod-mp4-tp6410226p6426476.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/3529b423/attachment-0001.html From freeswitch at simpot.com Wed Jun 1 17:45:41 2011 From: freeswitch at simpot.com (Dmitry Saratsky) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:45:41 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem Message-ID: <000001cc2062$3ae1c460$b0a54d20$@com> Hi All, I'm suffering from dtmf "double digit" problem for incoming calls that destined to IVR on my FS. I tryed to identify and workaround the provlem with no success... I have already tryed to change dtmf-mode, use sonus-fixup etc with no luck... I have: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) I would like to ask you some questions and I'm attaching some relevant output (see below) 1. According to output (see below), is it right to say, that my provider sends me DTMF events both in "DTMF INFO" and "RTP DTMF - rfc2833" way? 2. If so, may be this is the reason for "double digit" I suffer? 3. If so, can I filter incoming "DTMF INFO" events in FS? 4. If so, do FS have some workaround for this? Any ideas? Thanks, Dmitry. ------------------------------------------------- FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) ------- ------- 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(0) 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event for INFO 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 digits t/o 2000 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event for INFO 2011-06-01 10:21:30.966061 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 0:4360 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '00' 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '00' ------- 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(7) 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event for INFO 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 digits t/o 2000 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event for INFO 2011-06-01 10:23:24.083260 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 7:2760 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '77' 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '77' -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/aff3d521/attachment.html From vkozak at abisoft.spb.ru Wed Jun 1 18:50:06 2011 From: vkozak at abisoft.spb.ru (Kozak Vladimir) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:50:06 +0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] PLAY_AND_GET_DIGITS dialplann application: set and to SAY subcommand Message-ID: Hello all. In example for "play_and_get_digits" dialplan app I see next extension. http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits This extension say somethin and get user DTMF. I need say digits and numbers on various (EN and ES) languages. It's possible to specify these vars for "say" dialplan application http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_say. And it works correctly. Could you tell me How can I set language and say_type for tts_engine in "play_and_get_digits" app case? I try to use next extension, but it don't work (FS take 'es NUMBER 1234567' as and say all this text on English): Also I try to set vars: and get failed result: EXECUTE sofia/internal/1007 at 172.26.200.250:5060 play_and_get_digits(1 1 1 3000 # say:'1234567' /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/starpound/silence.wav read_result \d+) 2011-06-05 22:58:33.661014 [ERR] switch_core_speech.c:61 Invalid speech module [cepstral]! 2011-06-05 22:58:33.661014 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:2361 Invalid TTS module! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/493c932b/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 1 19:14:34 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:14:34 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Conference Call Today Message-ID: Hello all! Here is today's agenda page: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FS_weekly_2011_06_01 We have a guest from Shacast.com (Vuong Nguyen) who will be talking to us. Visit http://www.shacast.com and click on the PowerPoint download link to download the PPT that Vuong will be referencing for his presentation. Thanks, Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/a3f9f9aa/attachment.html From simpot at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 11:40:24 2011 From: simpot at gmail.com (Dmitry Saratsky) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:40:24 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem Message-ID: Hi All, I'm suffering from dtmf "double digit" problem for incoming calls that destined to IVR on my FS. I tryed to identify and workaround the provlem with no success... I have already tryed to change dtmf-mode, use sonus-fixup etc with no luck... I have: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) I would like to ask you some questions and I'm attaching some relevant output (see below) 1. According to output (see below), is it right to say, that my provider sends me DTMF events both in "DTMF INFO" and "RTP DTMF - rfc2833" way? 2. If so, may be this is the reason for "double digit" I suffer? 3. If so, can I filter incoming "DTMF INFO" events in FS? 4. If so, do FS have some workaround for this? Thanks, Dmitry. ------------------------------------------------- FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) ------- ------- 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(0) 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event for INFO 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 digits t/o 2000 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event for INFO 2011-06-01 10:21:30.966061 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 0:4360 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '00' 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '00' ------- 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(7) 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event for INFO 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 digits t/o 2000 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event for INFO 2011-06-01 10:23:24.083260 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 7:2760 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '77' 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '77' 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/01de05cd/attachment-0001.html From yungwei at resolvity.com Wed Jun 1 20:52:32 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC74C@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <0454EB31-E9EA-4594-9FDD-29D69F5B6126@ipeva.fr> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC7E2@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <1306499299750-6410887.post@n2.nabble.com> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC8B0@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC938@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3ACA1B@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net>, Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F3@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Here's the log with siptrace. http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16424 Here's the content of transfer.js: session.answer(); if (session.ready()) { session.execute("bridge", "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); } ________________________________ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins [msc at freeswitch.org] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:21 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone Something is not right with the outbound leg of the call. It looks like there is an immediate hangup after the b leg answers. Get a siptrace of that traffic and look to see what is causing the hangup. -MC On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Yungwei Chen > wrote: The whole picture looks like the following: A land-line<-->SIP provider A<-->FS<-->SIP provider A<-->a cell phone Is there any configuration setting that needs to be enabled or set differently so that those 2 endpoints can talk to each other? Btw, the same scenario works with Asterisk so my SIP provider shouldn't be the problem. From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Yungwei Chen Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:34 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone Here's the debug log, http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16398 From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 10:08 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone You need to put a debug log on pastebin.freeswitch.org. Be sure to use "FreeSWITCH Log" for the syntax highlighting. -MC On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Yungwei Chen > wrote: No. I just verified that making an outbound call to my cell phone still works. I even recorded the session just to make sure, and in the recording I hear things both ways. I first dial 9911 from my SIP client (behind freeswitch), and this leads to the javascript program below. session.answer(); var new_session = new Session("{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/sip_provider/1231231234"); session.hangup(16); // disconnects the session between the SIP client and freeswitch new_session.execute("record_session", "/tmp/call-from-js-to-cell.wav"); while (new_session.ready()) { new_session.streamFile("/path/to/local/wav/file"); } Now back to the case I'm having problem with. In this case, I first make a call from a landline to freeswitch through my sip provider, and then a javascript program takes over. I want to transfer the call to a cell phone so that the landline and the cell phone can communicate with each other. Here's the javascript program: session.answer(); if (session.ready()) { session.execute("bridge", "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/sip_provider/1231231234"); } So what am I missing here? -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of mazilo Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:28 AM To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone Yungwei Chen wrote: > > Thanks for your reply. Using bridge fixed the problem. But I cannot hear > anything both ways. Any idea? After switching to using bridge function, does this also happen when you make an outbound call to your cell phone using your javascript? ----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Transferring-to-a-cell-phone-tp6408246p6410887.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/ff35ba2e/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 22:44:45 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:44:45 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem In-Reply-To: <000001cc2062$3ae1c460$b0a54d20$@com> References: <000001cc2062$3ae1c460$b0a54d20$@com> Message-ID: update to latest git, I added suport to ignore INFO unless you explicitly configure it. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I'm suffering from dtmf "double digit" problem for incoming calls that > destined?to IVR on my FS. > > I tryed to identify and workaround the provlem with no success... > > I have already tryed to change dtmf-mode, use sonus-fixup etc with no > luck... > > I have: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) > > I would like to ask you some questions and I'm attaching some relevant > output (see below) > > > > 1. According to output (see below), is it right to say, that my provider > sends me DTMF events both in "DTMF INFO" and "RTP DTMF - rfc2833" way? > > 2. If so, may be this is the reason for "double digit" I suffer? > > 3. If so, can I filter incoming "DTMF INFO" events in FS? > > 4. If so, do FS have some workaround for this? > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitry. > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) > > ------- > > > > > ? > ??? > ? > > ? > ? > > ? > ??? > ? > > ? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > > ??? > ??? > ??? > > ??? > > ??? > ??? > > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > > ? > > > ------- > > > > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(0) > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing > file > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 > digits t/o 2000 > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.966061 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 0:4360 > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '00' > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] > [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] > [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu > 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '00' > > > > ------- > > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(7) > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing > file > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 > digits t/o 2000 > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:23:24.083260 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 7:2760 > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '77' > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] > [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] > [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu > 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '77' > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From freeswitch at aastral.net Thu Jun 2 00:10:18 2011 From: freeswitch at aastral.net (Bill W.) Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR Message-ID: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> Hey All, About once or twice a day, I'm getting an EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR failure. I've enabled debugging, including logging SIP messages, and can't seem to find the cause of the error. Freeswitch goes from setting variables to exchange routing error: switch_channel.c:935 EXPORTING[export_vars] to switch_ivr_originate.c:2447 Cannot create outgoing channel of type [sofia] cause: [EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR] Whenever that happens, "switch_channel.c:816 New Channel" is never called and I don't see any outbound SIP messages to the IP in question. So if no new channel is created, how can there be a routing error? Any insight or advice on how to debug this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 00:36:22 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR In-Reply-To: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> References: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: routing loop, its transferring more that 73 times inside the dialplan On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Bill W. wrote: > Hey All, > > About once or twice a day, I'm getting an EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR failure. > > I've enabled debugging, including logging SIP messages, and can't seem > to find the cause of the error. > > > Freeswitch goes from setting variables to exchange routing error: > switch_channel.c:935 EXPORTING[export_vars] > to > switch_ivr_originate.c:2447 Cannot create outgoing channel of type > [sofia] cause: [EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR] > > > Whenever that happens, "switch_channel.c:816 New Channel" is never > called and I don't see any outbound SIP messages to the IP in question. > > So if no new channel is created, how can there be a routing error? > > Any insight or advice on how to debug this would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks! > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 2 00:42:51 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:42:51 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 News and Notes In-Reply-To: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DE5494FE@cooper> References: <00000130481a3868-69cf136f-c857-407d-90c0-e75120e27c52-000000@email.amazonses.com> <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DE5494FE@cooper> Message-ID: Peter, Can you give me the names and contact information of everyone in your party? Thanks! -MC On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Peter Olsson < peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se> wrote: > I booked everything today, for me and a collegue ? I?m really looking > forward to it! > > > > /Peter > > > > *Fr?n:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *F?r *marketing at cluecon.com > *Skickat:* den 1 juni 2011 00:09 > *Till:* freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > *?mne:* [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 News and Notes > > > ClueCon 2011 Reminder: Extra Chances to Win > > We wanted to remind everyone that you still have one more day to book > ClueCon 2011 and receive FOUR entries into big giveaways for the coolest > laptop and iPad . (Promotion ends on June > 1.) Will you be the big winner? Book now and increase your chances! > > For those wanting to know more about what's happening at ClueCon this year > we've posted our preliminary schedule . > There are some great talks planned and, of course, a few surprises. Be sure > to check back often to see the latest speakers and sponsors. > > Visit us at http://www.cluecon.com for more information, or call us at > 877.742.CLUE (2583) to inquire about registration, sponsorships, or any > other questions you may have. See you in August! > > The ClueCon Team > http://www.cluecon.com > 877.742.CLUE > > [image: Bild som tagits bort av avs?ndaren.] > > !DSPAM:4de567b932761932211873! > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/6a43a7ca/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 823 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/6a43a7ca/attachment.jpe From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 2 01:32:32 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:32:32 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F3@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC74C@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <0454EB31-E9EA-4594-9FDD-29D69F5B6126@ipeva.fr> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC7E2@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <1306499299750-6410887.post@n2.nabble.com> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC8B0@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC938@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3ACA1B@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F3@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: I'm not really sure what's happening here. The first BYE message that I see comes in at line #548 from the provider side of what I assume is the A leg. For now I would try using a very simple bridge app right in the public context and avoid all the javascript so that you can get the simplest scenario. SImply route the A leg to the bridge app and bridge it to the broadvoice gateway: A call coming in from one SIP endpoint and being bridged to another SIP endpoint is pretty much the core and fundamental functionality of FreeSWITCH, so I'm thinking that the javascript is doing something unintended. -MC On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > Here's the log with siptrace. > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16424 > > Here's the content of transfer.js: > session.answer(); > if (session.ready()) > { > session.execute("bridge", > "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); > } > > ------------------------------ > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [ > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Collins [msc at freeswitch.org] > *Sent:* Friday, May 27, 2011 6:21 PM > > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone > > Something is not right with the outbound leg of the call. It looks like > there is an immediate hangup after the b leg answers. Get a siptrace of that > traffic and look to see what is causing the hangup. > > -MC > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > >> The whole picture looks like the following: >> >> A land-line<-->SIP provider A<-->FS<-->SIP provider A<-->a cell phone >> >> >> >> Is there any configuration setting that needs to be enabled or set >> differently so that those 2 endpoints can talk to each other? >> >> Btw, the same scenario works with Asterisk so my SIP provider shouldn't be >> the problem. >> >> >> >> *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: >> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Yungwei >> Chen >> *Sent:* Friday, May 27, 2011 11:34 AM >> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help >> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone >> >> >> >> Here's the debug log, http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16398 >> >> >> >> *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: >> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael >> Collins >> *Sent:* Friday, May 27, 2011 10:08 AM >> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help >> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone >> >> >> >> You need to put a debug log on pastebin.freeswitch.org. Be sure to use >> "FreeSWITCH Log" for the syntax highlighting. >> >> -MC >> >> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Yungwei Chen >> wrote: >> >> No. >> >> I just verified that making an outbound call to my cell phone still works. >> I even recorded the session just to make sure, and in the recording I hear >> things both ways. >> I first dial 9911 from my SIP client (behind freeswitch), and this leads >> to the javascript program below. >> session.answer(); >> >> var new_session = new >> Session("{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/sip_provider/1231231234"); >> >> session.hangup(16); // disconnects the session between the SIP client >> and freeswitch >> new_session.execute("record_session", "/tmp/call-from-js-to-cell.wav"); >> while (new_session.ready()) >> { >> new_session.streamFile("/path/to/local/wav/file"); >> } >> >> Now back to the case I'm having problem with. >> In this case, I first make a call from a landline to freeswitch through my >> sip provider, and then a javascript program takes over. >> I want to transfer the call to a cell phone so that the landline and the >> cell phone can communicate with each other. >> Here's the javascript program: >> session.answer(); >> >> if (session.ready()) >> { >> session.execute("bridge", >> "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/sip_provider/1231231234"); >> } >> >> So what am I missing here? >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: >> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of mazilo >> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:28 AM >> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone >> >> >> Yungwei Chen wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for your reply. Using bridge fixed the problem. But I cannot hear >> > anything both ways. Any idea? >> After switching to using bridge function, does this also happen when you >> make an outbound call to your cell phone using your javascript? >> >> ----- >> FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 >> Watts of electricity. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Transferring-to-a-cell-phone-tp6408246p6410887.html >> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/95423941/attachment-0001.html From freeswitch at aastral.net Thu Jun 2 01:38:14 2011 From: freeswitch at aastral.net (Bill W.) Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR In-Reply-To: References: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: <1QRt7M-0002Zm-GE@mail.aastral.net> Hey Anthony, Thanks very much for your input. Can you recommend a way I can prove that to myself? Is there some sort of logging to turn on to see that? The reason I ask is that for this instance I receive a call in on one sofia profile and then use the bridge command to send it out another sofia profile. I don't use the transfer application to complete the call. On 6/1/11 4:36 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > routing loop, its transferring more that 73 times inside the dialplan > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Bill W. wrote: >> Hey All, >> >> About once or twice a day, I'm getting an EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR failure. >> >> I've enabled debugging, including logging SIP messages, and can't seem >> to find the cause of the error. >> >> >> Freeswitch goes from setting variables to exchange routing error: >> switch_channel.c:935 EXPORTING[export_vars] >> to >> switch_ivr_originate.c:2447 Cannot create outgoing channel of type >> [sofia] cause: [EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR] >> >> >> Whenever that happens, "switch_channel.c:816 New Channel" is never >> called and I don't see any outbound SIP messages to the IP in question. >> >> So if no new channel is created, how can there be a routing error? >> >> Any insight or advice on how to debug this would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 2 01:46:31 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:46:31 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR In-Reply-To: <1QRt7M-0002Zm-GE@mail.aastral.net> References: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> <1QRt7M-0002Zm-GE@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: Well, if it's inside the dialplan you'll see it in the log. You may want to rotate logs frequently while tracking this down. It might also help if you enable uuid logging so that you can filter down to just a single call's log lines. You may also wish to examine the XML CDRs for these calls. I'd be curious to see what's in the call flows. -MC On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Bill W. wrote: > Hey Anthony, > > Thanks very much for your input. Can you recommend a way I can prove > that to myself? Is there some sort of logging to turn on to see that? > > The reason I ask is that for this instance I receive a call in on one > sofia profile and then use the bridge command to send it out another > sofia profile. I don't use the transfer application to complete the call. > > > > On 6/1/11 4:36 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > > routing loop, its transferring more that 73 times inside the dialplan > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Bill W. wrote: > >> Hey All, > >> > >> About once or twice a day, I'm getting an EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR > failure. > >> > >> I've enabled debugging, including logging SIP messages, and can't seem > >> to find the cause of the error. > >> > >> > >> Freeswitch goes from setting variables to exchange routing error: > >> switch_channel.c:935 EXPORTING[export_vars] > >> to > >> switch_ivr_originate.c:2447 Cannot create outgoing channel of type > >> [sofia] cause: [EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR] > >> > >> > >> Whenever that happens, "switch_channel.c:816 New Channel" is never > >> called and I don't see any outbound SIP messages to the IP in question. > >> > >> So if no new channel is created, how can there be a routing error? > >> > >> Any insight or advice on how to debug this would be greatly appreciated. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/154bbcb9/attachment.html From freeswitch at simpot.com Thu Jun 2 01:47:29 2011 From: freeswitch at simpot.com (Dmitry Saratsky) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:47:29 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem In-Reply-To: References: <000001cc2062$3ae1c460$b0a54d20$@com> Message-ID: <000001cc20a5$817a7280$846f5780$@com> Thanks man, It is working great now!!! Thanks again. -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Minessale Sent: 01 Jun 2011 21:45 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem update to latest git, I added suport to ignore INFO unless you explicitly configure it. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I'm suffering from dtmf "double digit" problem for incoming calls that > destined?to IVR on my FS. > > I tryed to identify and workaround the provlem with no success... > > I have already tryed to change dtmf-mode, use sonus-fixup etc with no > luck... > > I have: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) > > I would like to ask you some questions and I'm attaching some relevant > output (see below) > > > > 1. According to output (see below), is it right to say, that my provider > sends me DTMF events both in "DTMF INFO" and "RTP DTMF - rfc2833" way? > > 2. If so, may be this is the reason for "double digit" I suffer? > > 3. If so, can I filter incoming "DTMF INFO" events in FS? > > 4. If so, do FS have some workaround for this? > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitry. > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) > > ------- > > > > > ? > ??? > ? > > ? > ? > > ? > ??? > ? > > ? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > > ??? > ??? > ??? > > ??? > > ??? > ??? > > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > > ? > > > ------- > > > > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(0) > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing > file > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 > digits t/o 2000 > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.966061 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 0:4360 > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '00' > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] > [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] > [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu > 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '00' > > > > ------- > > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(7) > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing > file > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 > digits t/o 2000 > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:23:24.083260 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 7:2760 > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '77' > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] > [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] > [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu > 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '77' > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org From freeswitch at simpot.com Thu Jun 2 02:36:29 2011 From: freeswitch at simpot.com (Dmitry Saratsky) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:36:29 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem In-Reply-To: References: <000001cc2062$3ae1c460$b0a54d20$@com> Message-ID: <000101cc20ac$598c1c40$0ca454c0$@com> One more question: Is this behavior not just may be called as "unusual", but definitely prohibited by protocol description/rfc/etc? bcz I'm thinking to make mega-BOOM to my provider, but I have to know if it "strange" or "prohibited" behavior... Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Minessale Sent: 01 Jun 2011 21:45 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem update to latest git, I added suport to ignore INFO unless you explicitly configure it. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I'm suffering from dtmf "double digit" problem for incoming calls that > destined?to IVR on my FS. > > I tryed to identify and workaround the provlem with no success... > > I have already tryed to change dtmf-mode, use sonus-fixup etc with no > luck... > > I have: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) > > I would like to ask you some questions and I'm attaching some relevant > output (see below) > > > > 1. According to output (see below), is it right to say, that my provider > sends me DTMF events both in "DTMF INFO" and "RTP DTMF - rfc2833" way? > > 2. If so, may be this is the reason for "double digit" I suffer? > > 3. If so, can I filter incoming "DTMF INFO" events in FS? > > 4. If so, do FS have some workaround for this? > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitry. > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) > > ------- > > > > > ? > ??? > ? > > ? > ? > > ? > ??? > ? > > ? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > > ??? > ??? > ??? > > ??? > > ??? > ??? > > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ??? > > ? > > > ------- > > > > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(0) > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing > file > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 > digits t/o 2000 > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:21:30.966061 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 0:4360 > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '00' > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] > [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] > [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu > 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '00' > > > > ------- > > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(7) > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing > file > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 > digits t/o 2000 > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal > 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch event > for INFO > 2011-06-01 10:23:24.083260 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 7:2760 > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '77' > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] > [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] > [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] > 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu > 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '77' > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 2 02:45:18 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:45:18 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] PLAY_AND_GET_DIGITS dialplann application: set and to SAY subcommand In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: There is a difference between "say" and "speak". The say modules require you to download sound files. The speak application requires at least one TTS engine installed and running. I think you might need to go back and re-read the say and speak entries on the wiki to make sure that you know which one you should be using. -MC 2011/6/1 Kozak Vladimir > Hello all. > In example for "play_and_get_digits" dialplan app I see next extension. > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits > > > > > > > > This extension say somethin and get user DTMF. > I need say digits and numbers on various (EN and ES) languages. > It's possible to specify these vars for "say" dialplan application > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_say. And it works > correctly. > > Could you tell me How can I set language and say_type for tts_engine in > "play_and_get_digits" app case? > > I try to use next extension, but it don't work (FS take 'es NUMBER > 1234567' as and say all this text on English): > > > > > > > data="Event-App-Type=READ-EXECUTED,Read-Result=${read_result}"/> > > > > > > Also I try to set vars: > > > > and get failed result: > EXECUTE sofia/internal/1007 at 172.26.200.250:5060 play_and_get_digits(1 1 1 > 3000 # say:'1234567' /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/starpound/silence.wav > read_result \d+) > 2011-06-05 22:58:33.661014 [ERR] switch_core_speech.c:61 Invalid speech > module [cepstral]! > 2011-06-05 22:58:33.661014 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:2361 Invalid TTS > module! > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/564ca6ff/attachment-0001.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 03:13:02 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:13:02 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem In-Reply-To: <000101cc20ac$598c1c40$0ca454c0$@com> References: <000001cc2062$3ae1c460$b0a54d20$@com> <000101cc20ac$598c1c40$0ca454c0$@com> Message-ID: its kind of silly but I can see some kind of rationale for it if you are trying to allow both the signalling and the media to see dtmf for sure but you certainly need to ignore one of them. Technically, INFO dtmf does not exist, the draft expired and was not adopted so it's a rogue method now. Everyone already uses it so i'm sure it will stay around. I don't think there is a real way to negotiate it however. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > One more question: > > Is this behavior not just may be called as "unusual", but definitely > prohibited by protocol description/rfc/etc? bcz I'm thinking to make > mega-BOOM to my provider, but I have to know if it "strange" or "prohibited" > behavior... > > Thanks. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anthony > Minessale > Sent: 01 Jun 2011 21:45 > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) > problem > > update to latest git, I added suport to ignore INFO unless you > explicitly configure it. > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Dmitry Saratsky > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> I'm suffering from dtmf "double digit" problem for incoming calls that >> destined?to IVR on my FS. >> >> I tryed to identify and workaround the provlem with no success... >> >> I have already tryed to change dtmf-mode, use sonus-fixup etc with no >> luck... >> >> I have: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 > -0500) >> >> I would like to ask you some questions and I'm attaching some relevant >> output (see below) >> >> >> >> 1. According to output (see below), is it right to say, that my provider >> sends me DTMF events both in "DTMF INFO" and "RTP DTMF - rfc2833" way? >> >> 2. If so, may be this is the reason for "double digit" I suffer? >> >> 3. If so, can I filter incoming "DTMF INFO" events in FS? >> >> 4. If so, do FS have some workaround for this? >> >> >> >> Any ideas? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dmitry. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) >> >> ------- >> >> >> >> >> ? >> ??? >> ? >> >> ? >> ? >> >> ? >> ??? >> ? >> >> ? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> >> ??? >> >> ??? >> ??? >> >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> >> ? >> >> >> ------- >> >> >> >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(0) >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch > event >> for INFO >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing >> file >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 >> digits t/o 2000 >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch > event >> for INFO >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.966061 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 0:4360 >> 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '00' >> 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] >> [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] >> 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] >> [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] >> 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu >> 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '00' >> >> >> >> ------- >> >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(7) >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch > event >> for INFO >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing >> file >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 >> digits t/o 2000 >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch > event >> for INFO >> 2011-06-01 10:23:24.083260 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 7:2760 >> 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '77' >> 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] >> [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] >> 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] >> [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] >> 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu >> 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '77' >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From yungwei at resolvity.com Thu Jun 2 03:28:01 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Unable to get events from freeswitch using java ESL client Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F7@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Hi, I am using org.freeswitch.esl.client-0.9.2 to ask freeswitch to make an outbound call in the following java class. I want to be able to get notified when a call is not answered for whatever reason. However, I don't get any events from freeswitch. What am I missing here? Thanks. public class esl implements IEslEventListener { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { esl e = new esl(); Client client = new Client(); EslMessage response = null; try { client.connect("192.168.6.18", 8021, "ClueCon", 10); client.addEventListener(e); response = client.sendSyncApiCommand("originate", "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/1112223333 9886"); CommandResponse cr = client.close(); System.out.println("Done."); } catch (InboundConnectionFailure ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); } } @Override public void backgroundJobResultReceived(EslEvent arg0) { System.out.println("backgroundJobResultReceived"); } @Override public void eventReceived(EslEvent arg0) { System.out.println(String.format("eventReceived, event name=%s", arg0.getEventName())); } } -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110601/97f6e076/attachment.html From freeswitch at simpot.com Thu Jun 2 03:34:34 2011 From: freeswitch at simpot.com (Dmitry Saratsky) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:34:34 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem In-Reply-To: References: <000001cc2062$3ae1c460$b0a54d20$@com> <000101cc20ac$598c1c40$0ca454c0$@com> Message-ID: <000201cc20b4$77012e70$65038b50$@com> Ok, thanks. -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Minessale Sent: 02 Jun 2011 02:13 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem its kind of silly but I can see some kind of rationale for it if you are trying to allow both the signalling and the media to see dtmf for sure but you certainly need to ignore one of them. Technically, INFO dtmf does not exist, the draft expired and was not adopted so it's a rogue method now. Everyone already uses it so i'm sure it will stay around. I don't think there is a real way to negotiate it however. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > One more question: > > Is this behavior not just may be called as "unusual", but definitely > prohibited by protocol description/rfc/etc? bcz I'm thinking to make > mega-BOOM to my provider, but I have to know if it "strange" or "prohibited" > behavior... > > Thanks. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anthony > Minessale > Sent: 01 Jun 2011 21:45 > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) > problem > > update to latest git, I added suport to ignore INFO unless you > explicitly configure it. > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Dmitry Saratsky > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> I'm suffering from dtmf "double digit" problem for incoming calls that >> destined?to IVR on my FS. >> >> I tryed to identify and workaround the provlem with no success... >> >> I have already tryed to change dtmf-mode, use sonus-fixup etc with no >> luck... >> >> I have: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 > -0500) >> >> I would like to ask you some questions and I'm attaching some relevant >> output (see below) >> >> >> >> 1. According to output (see below), is it right to say, that my provider >> sends me DTMF events both in "DTMF INFO" and "RTP DTMF - rfc2833" way? >> >> 2. If so, may be this is the reason for "double digit" I suffer? >> >> 3. If so, can I filter incoming "DTMF INFO" events in FS? >> >> 4. If so, do FS have some workaround for this? >> >> >> >> Any ideas? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dmitry. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) >> >> ------- >> >> >> >> >> ? >> ??? >> ? >> >> ? >> ? >> >> ? >> ??? >> ? >> >> ? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> >> ??? >> >> ??? >> ??? >> >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> ??? >> >> ? >> >> >> ------- >> >> >> >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(0) >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.585146 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch > event >> for INFO >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing >> file >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.604196 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 >> digits t/o 2000 >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.845091 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch > event >> for INFO >> 2011-06-01 10:21:30.966061 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 0:4360 >> 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '00' >> 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] >> [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] >> 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [00] >> [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] >> 2011-06-01 10:21:32.976879 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu >> 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '00' >> >> >> >> ------- >> >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6236 INFO DTMF(7) >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.902331 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch > event >> for INFO >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing >> file >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.922329 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:343 waiting for 2/3 >> digits t/o 2000 >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6207 Bad signal >> 2011-06-01 10:23:23.942304 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6310 dispatched freeswitch > event >> for INFO >> 2011-06-01 10:23:24.083260 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 7:2760 >> 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:390 digits '77' >> 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] >> [/^(20[1-2])$/] [0] >> 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:484 action regex [77] >> [/^[3-9*#]$/] [0] >> 2011-06-01 10:23:26.084811 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_menu.c:574 IVR menu >> 'main_ivr_heb' caught invalid input '77' >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org From bobc at devassert.com Thu Jun 2 03:38:29 2011 From: bobc at devassert.com (Bob Coleman) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:38:29 +1200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Are you using start_dtmf in the ivr? If so try it without. You could also go the other way and change the dtmf_type to "info" and use start_dtmf in the ivr Bob On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm suffering from dtmf "double digit" problem for incoming calls that > destined?to IVR on my FS. > I tryed to identify and workaround the provlem with no success... > I have already tryed to change dtmf-mode, use sonus-fixup etc with no > luck... > I have: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) > I would like to ask you some questions and I'm attaching some relevant > output (see below) > From freeswitch at simpot.com Thu Jun 2 03:48:39 2011 From: freeswitch at simpot.com (Dmitry Saratsky) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:48:39 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000301cc20b6$6e5f0740$4b1d15c0$@com> Hi Bob, Thank you for your input. Problem already fixed, see http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2011-June/073155.html For some reason my first post was not posted for a long time (~6 hours)... so I posted it through my second account immediately... Sorry for double post... I have no idea how (if it possible at all) to remove my first cross-post now... -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Bob Coleman Sent: 02 Jun 2011 02:38 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS vs provider's Sonus DTMF (double digit) problem Are you using start_dtmf in the ivr? If so try it without. You could also go the other way and change the dtmf_type to "info" and use start_dtmf in the ivr Bob On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm suffering from dtmf "double digit" problem for incoming calls that > destined?to IVR on my FS. > I tryed to identify and workaround the provlem with no success... > I have already tryed to change dtmf-mode, use sonus-fixup etc with no > luck... > I have: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1086cba 2011-05-23 22-51-43 -0500) > I would like to ask you some questions and I'm attaching some relevant > output (see below) > _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org From yungwei at resolvity.com Thu Jun 2 04:17:53 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC74C@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <0454EB31-E9EA-4594-9FDD-29D69F5B6126@ipeva.fr> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC7E2@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <1306499299750-6410887.post@n2.nabble.com> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC8B0@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC938@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3ACA1B@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F3@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net>, Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F8@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Using bridge in the dialplan directly works. I tried putting only the following line in transfer.js, but it doesn't work. session.execute("bridge", "sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); Putting the following instead doesn't work either. session.execute("bridge", "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); Using the following instead doesn't work either. session.answer(); session.execute("bridge", "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); Still don't understand why. From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins [msc at freeswitch.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 4:32 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone I'm not really sure what's happening here. The first BYE message that I see comes in at line #548 from the provider side of what I assume is the A leg. For now I would try using a very simple bridge app right in the public context and avoid all the javascript so that you can get the simplest scenario. SImply route the A leg to the bridge app and bridge it to the broadvoice gateway: A call coming in from one SIP endpoint and being bridged to another SIP endpoint is pretty much the core and fundamental functionality of FreeSWITCH, so I'm thinking that the javascript is doing something unintended. -MC On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: Here's the log with siptrace. http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16424 Here's the content of transfer.js: session.answer(); if (session.ready()) { session.execute("bridge", "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); } From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins [msc at freeswitch.org] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:21 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone Something is not right with the outbound leg of the call. It looks like there is an immediate hangup after the b leg answers. Get a siptrace of that traffic and look to see what is causing the hangup. -MC On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote: The whole picture looks like the following: A land-line<-->SIP provider A<-->FS<-->SIP provider A<-->a cell phone Is there any configuration setting that needs to be enabled or set differently so that those 2 endpoints can talk to each other? Btw, the same scenario works with Asterisk so my SIP provider shouldn't be the problem. From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Yungwei Chen Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:34 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone Here's the debug log, http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16398 From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 10:08 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone You need to put a debug log on pastebin.freeswitch.org. Be sure to use "FreeSWITCH Log" for the syntax highlighting. -MC On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: No. I just verified that making an outbound call to my cell phone still works. I even recorded the session just to make sure, and in the recording I hear things both ways. I first dial 9911 from my SIP client (behind freeswitch), and this leads to the javascript program below. session.answer(); var new_session = new Session("{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/sip_provider/1231231234"); session.hangup(16); // disconnects the session between the SIP client and freeswitch new_session.execute("record_session", "/tmp/call-from-js-to-cell.wav"); while (new_session.ready()) { new_session.streamFile("/path/to/local/wav/file"); } Now back to the case I'm having problem with. In this case, I first make a call from a landline to freeswitch through my sip provider, and then a javascript program takes over. I want to transfer the call to a cell phone so that the landline and the cell phone can communicate with each other. Here's the javascript program: session.answer(); if (session.ready()) { session.execute("bridge", "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/sip_provider/1231231234"); } So what am I missing here? -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of mazilo Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:28 AM To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone Yungwei Chen wrote: > > Thanks for your reply. Using bridge fixed the problem. But I cannot hear > anything both ways. Any idea? After switching to using bridge function, does this also happen when you make an outbound call to your cell phone using your javascript? ----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Transferring-to-a-cell-phone-tp6408246p6410887.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org From dujinfang at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 06:15:47 2011 From: dujinfang at gmail.com (Seven Du) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:15:47 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] this gona be fun? Message-ID: <01E082F916D24B77ACD886187B1EF913@gmail.com> http://sites.google.com/site/webrtc/faq also, does that means iSAC available freely? -- Seven Du About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn Sent with Sparrow -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/c99cb7ee/attachment.html From u2nsam at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 10:48:49 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:18:49 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] manipulate CID Message-ID: Hello, How do i manipulate callerid number ... i have the below statement here i want to prefix caller id with 66 so the effective caller id becomes 66 + original callerid . using above statement the caller id passed was just 66 to the far end. below is the dialplan i used. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is from header i get . From: "" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action info() Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action set(effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}) Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action ring_ready() Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx) 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal FreeTDM/1:29/7001 [BREAK] 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State EXECUTE 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 CHANNEL EXECUTE 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Standard EXECUTE EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 set(call_timeout=20) 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 SET [call_timeout]=[20] EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 info() 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] Channel-State-Number: [4] Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] Call-Direction: [inbound] Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] Channel-Call-UUID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] Answer-State: [ringing] Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] Caller-Direction: [inbound] Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] Caller-Dialplan: [XML] Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] Caller-ANI: [8097328707] Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] Caller-Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] Caller-RDNIS: [7001] Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] Caller-Profile-Index: [2] Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1306997028110372] Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1306997028103773] Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] variable_direction: [inbound] variable_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] variable_read_codec: [PCMA] variable_read_rate: [8000] variable_write_codec: [PCMA] variable_write_rate: [8000] variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] variable_freetdm_chan_number: [29] variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] variable_dialed_extension: [7001] variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] variable_#: [true] variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] variable_bind_meta_key: [#] variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] variable_continue_on_fail: [true] variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] variable_dialed_user: [7001] variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] variable_call_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] variable_max_forwards: [70] variable_call_timeout: [20] variable_current_application: [info] Regards Sam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/0bf7ef27/attachment.html From avi at avimarcus.net Thu Jun 2 11:30:22 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:30:22 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] manipulate CID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: If you check that info list, ${outbound_caller_id_number} doesn't exist. It's not a variable programmed into FS by default, although I think the default dial plan does use it. Try again with ${effective_caller_id_number} -Avi On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Sam wrote: > Hello, > > > How do i manipulate callerid number ... i have the below statement > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > here i want to prefix caller id with 66 so the effective caller id becomes > 66 + original callerid . > > using above statement the caller id passed was just 66 to the far end. > > below is the dialplan i used. > > > continue="false"> > > > data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx"/> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This is from header i get . > > From: "" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action info() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action ring_ready() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 [BREAK] > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 > CHANNEL EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 set(call_timeout=20) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 SET > [call_timeout]=[20] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 info() > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: > Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] > Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] > Channel-State-Number: [4] > Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Call-Direction: [inbound] > Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] > Channel-Call-UUID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Answer-State: [ringing] > Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Caller-Direction: [inbound] > Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] > Caller-Dialplan: [XML] > Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] > Caller-ANI: [8097328707] > Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] > Caller-Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] > Caller-RDNIS: [7001] > Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Caller-Profile-Index: [2] > Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1306997028110372] > Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1306997028103773] > Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] > Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] > variable_direction: [inbound] > variable_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_read_codec: [PCMA] > variable_read_rate: [8000] > variable_write_codec: [PCMA] > variable_write_rate: [8000] > variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] > variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] > variable_freetdm_chan_number: [29] > variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] > variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] > variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] > variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] > variable_dialed_extension: [7001] > variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] > variable_#: [true] > variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] > variable_bind_meta_key: [#] > variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] > variable_continue_on_fail: [true] > variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] > variable_dialed_user: [7001] > variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] > variable_call_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] > variable_max_forwards: [70] > variable_call_timeout: [20] > variable_current_application: [info] > > > > Regards > Sam > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/99b68fb9/attachment-0001.html From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Thu Jun 2 13:10:46 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:10:46 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 News and Notes In-Reply-To: References: <00000130481a3868-69cf136f-c857-407d-90c0-e75120e27c52-000000@email.amazonses.com> <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DE5494FE@cooper>, Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DE2B6324@cooper> Here we go! Peter Olsson Email: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Phone: +46 708 389 002 Mikael Norberg Email: mikael.norberg at visionutveckling.se Phone: +46 708 389 078 We both work for the company "Visionutveckling AB", you can check our homepage http://www.visionutveckling.se - however, the information in English is quite limited :) If you want any further information, please contact me. /Peter ________________________________________ Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Michael Collins [msc at freeswitch.org] Skickat: den 1 juni 2011 22:42 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 News and Notes Peter, Can you give me the names and contact information of everyone in your party? Thanks! -MC On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Peter Olsson > wrote: I booked everything today, for me and a collegue ? I?m really looking forward to it! /Peter Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r marketing at cluecon.com Skickat: den 1 juni 2011 00:09 Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 News and Notes ClueCon 2011 Reminder: Extra Chances to Win We wanted to remind everyone that you still have one more day to book ClueCon 2011 and receive FOUR entries into big giveaways for the coolest laptop and iPad. (Promotion ends on June 1.) Will you be the big winner? Book now and increase your chances! For those wanting to know more about what's happening at ClueCon this year we've posted our preliminary schedule. There are some great talks planned and, of course, a few surprises. Be sure to check back often to see the latest speakers and sponsors. Visit us at http://www.cluecon.com for more information, or call us at 877.742.CLUE (2583) to inquire about registration, sponsorships, or any other questions you may have. See you in August! The ClueCon Team http://www.cluecon.com 877.742.CLUE [cid:~WRD000.jpg] _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4de6a4ed32761769813168! From u2nsam at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 13:26:39 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:56:39 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] manipulate CID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I forgot to mention, If i use just then the cli is passed but when i use prefix 66 before ${outbound_caller_id_number} the cli is not passed. my aim is to get the prefix in cli . Regards Sam On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: > If you check that info list, ${outbound_caller_id_number} doesn't exist. > It's not a variable programmed into FS by default, although I think the > default dial plan does use it. > Try again with ${effective_caller_id_number} > > -Avi > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Sam wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> How do i manipulate callerid number ... i have the below statement >> >> > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> >> >> here i want to prefix caller id with 66 so the effective caller id becomes >> 66 + original callerid . >> >> using above statement the caller id passed was just 66 to the far end. >> >> below is the dialplan i used. >> >> >> > continue="false"> >> >> >> > data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> >> >> > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> >> >> > data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> This is from header i get . >> >> From: "" >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action info() >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action >> set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action >> set(effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}) >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action ring_ready() >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action >> bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx) >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 >> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> FreeTDM/1:29/7001 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State EXECUTE >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 >> CHANNEL EXECUTE >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >> FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Standard EXECUTE >> EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 set(call_timeout=20) >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 >> SET [call_timeout]=[20] >> EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 info() >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: >> Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] >> Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] >> Channel-State-Number: [4] >> Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] >> Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> Call-Direction: [inbound] >> Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] >> Channel-Call-UUID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> Answer-State: [ringing] >> Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] >> Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] >> Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] >> Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] >> Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] >> Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] >> Caller-Direction: [inbound] >> Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] >> Caller-Dialplan: [XML] >> Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] >> Caller-ANI: [8097328707] >> Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] >> Caller-Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] >> Caller-RDNIS: [7001] >> Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] >> Caller-Profile-Index: [2] >> Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1306997028110372] >> Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1306997028103773] >> Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] >> Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] >> Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] >> Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] >> Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] >> Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] >> Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] >> Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] >> variable_direction: [inbound] >> variable_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> variable_read_codec: [PCMA] >> variable_read_rate: [8000] >> variable_write_codec: [PCMA] >> variable_write_rate: [8000] >> variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] >> variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] >> variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] >> variable_freetdm_chan_number: [29] >> variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] >> variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] >> variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] >> variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] >> variable_dialed_extension: [7001] >> variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] >> variable_#: [true] >> variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] >> variable_bind_meta_key: [#] >> variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] >> variable_continue_on_fail: [true] >> variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] >> variable_dialed_user: [7001] >> variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] >> variable_call_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] >> variable_max_forwards: [70] >> variable_call_timeout: [20] >> variable_current_application: [info] >> >> >> >> Regards >> Sam >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/43a0f073/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Thu Jun 2 14:25:34 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:25:34 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp Message-ID: Hi, I would like to communicate with MRCP to control TTS and ASR from a C module - how can I do that easiest? Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/37d14273/attachment.html From ovvenkatesan at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 14:33:05 2011 From: ovvenkatesan at gmail.com (ovvenkat) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:03:05 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch Server getting down Message-ID: Hi to all, I dont know whether this problem related to PRI line (OR) wanpipe driver ( OR ) PRI Card I use Linux fedora 13 and Sangoma A101 PRI card to handle incoming calls from E1 lines. Everything works fine for some time. After that, I could see cli debug output saying, all the channels are disconnected and then immediately it says that "signaling status changed to UP". After some time, freeswitch getting shutdown saying ftmod_wanpipe.c:967 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from sangoma device: No buffer space available (-65) I pastebin debug logs for the same. http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16432 I am failed to identify the problem. Can you anyone guide me what is going wrong? Regards Venkatesan OV. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/23ae4ec2/attachment-0001.html From avi at avimarcus.net Thu Jun 2 15:12:08 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:12:08 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] manipulate CID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: In the exact same part of the dialplan? If so, weird. Can you pastebin a trace on /log 7 from the fs_cli with the xml this way, and then prefix 66 to the xml, and do a second trace? -Avi On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Sam wrote: > I forgot to mention, > > If i use just > data="effective_caller_id_number=${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > then the cli is passed but when i use prefix 66 before > ${outbound_caller_id_number} the cli is not passed. > > my aim is to get the prefix in cli . > > Regards > Sam > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: > >> If you check that info list, ${outbound_caller_id_number} doesn't exist. >> It's not a variable programmed into FS by default, although I think the >> default dial plan does use it. >> Try again with ${effective_caller_id_number} >> >> -Avi >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Sam wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> How do i manipulate callerid number ... i have the below statement >>> >>> >> data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> >>> >>> here i want to prefix caller id with 66 so the effective caller id >>> becomes 66 + original callerid . >>> >>> using above statement the caller id passed was just 66 to the far end. >>> >>> below is the dialplan i used. >>> >>> >>> >> continue="false"> >>> >>> >>> >> data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> >>> >>> >> data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> >>> >>> >> data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx"/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> This is from header i get . >>> >>> From: "" >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action info() >>> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action >>> set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) >>> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action >>> set(effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}) >>> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action ring_ready() >>> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action >>> bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx) >>> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 >>> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> FreeTDM/1:29/7001 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep >>> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 >>> CHANNEL EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>> FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Standard EXECUTE >>> EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 set(call_timeout=20) >>> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 >>> SET [call_timeout]=[20] >>> EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 info() >>> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: >>> Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] >>> Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] >>> Channel-State-Number: [4] >>> Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] >>> Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >>> Call-Direction: [inbound] >>> Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] >>> Channel-Call-UUID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >>> Answer-State: [ringing] >>> Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] >>> Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] >>> Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] >>> Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] >>> Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] >>> Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] >>> Caller-Direction: [inbound] >>> Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] >>> Caller-Dialplan: [XML] >>> Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] >>> Caller-ANI: [8097328707] >>> Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] >>> Caller-Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >>> Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] >>> Caller-RDNIS: [7001] >>> Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] >>> Caller-Profile-Index: [2] >>> Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1306997028110372] >>> Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1306997028103773] >>> Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] >>> Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] >>> Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] >>> Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] >>> Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] >>> Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] >>> Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] >>> Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] >>> variable_direction: [inbound] >>> variable_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >>> variable_read_codec: [PCMA] >>> variable_read_rate: [8000] >>> variable_write_codec: [PCMA] >>> variable_write_rate: [8000] >>> variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] >>> variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] >>> variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] >>> variable_freetdm_chan_number: [29] >>> variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] >>> variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] >>> variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] >>> variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] >>> variable_dialed_extension: [7001] >>> variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] >>> variable_#: [true] >>> variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] >>> variable_bind_meta_key: [#] >>> variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] >>> variable_continue_on_fail: [true] >>> variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] >>> variable_dialed_user: [7001] >>> variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] >>> variable_call_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >>> variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] >>> variable_max_forwards: [70] >>> variable_call_timeout: [20] >>> variable_current_application: [info] >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Sam >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/7cf603f9/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 15:43:38 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:43:38 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_unimrcp :) On 2 June 2011 11:25, Jan Berger wrote: > Hi, > > > > I would like to communicate with MRCP to control TTS and ASR from a C > module - how can I do that easiest? > > > > Jan > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/2ea7ef18/attachment.html From freeswitch at aastral.net Thu Jun 2 17:29:57 2011 From: freeswitch at aastral.net (Bill W.) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR In-Reply-To: References: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> <1QRt7M-0002Zm-GE@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: <1QS7yM-0005cW-8h@mail.aastral.net> Hey Michael, Thanks so much for the advice. I've already enabled uuid logging, and have grepped the log for the uuid of the call that failed. As in my initial email, it just goes from 'setting variables' to the error. No new channel is created. There are no transfers in the dialplan nor in freeswitch.log. I don't have XML CDRs enabled, but the cdr-csv log entry is unremarkable. I'll enable XML CDR and see if that can provide some more information. On 6/1/11 5:46 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Well, if it's inside the dialplan you'll see it in the log. You may want > to rotate logs frequently while tracking this down. It might also help > if you enable uuid logging so that you can filter down to just a single > call's log lines. You may also wish to examine the XML CDRs for these > calls. I'd be curious to see what's in the call flows. > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Bill W. > wrote: > > Hey Anthony, > > Thanks very much for your input. Can you recommend a way I can prove > that to myself? Is there some sort of logging to turn on to see that? > > The reason I ask is that for this instance I receive a call in on one > sofia profile and then use the bridge command to send it out another > sofia profile. I don't use the transfer application to complete the > call. > > > > On 6/1/11 4:36 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > > routing loop, its transferring more that 73 times inside the dialplan > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Bill W. > wrote: > >> Hey All, > >> > >> About once or twice a day, I'm getting an EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR > failure. > >> > >> I've enabled debugging, including logging SIP messages, and can't > seem > >> to find the cause of the error. > >> > >> > >> Freeswitch goes from setting variables to exchange routing error: > >> switch_channel.c:935 EXPORTING[export_vars] > >> to > >> switch_ivr_originate.c:2447 Cannot create outgoing channel of type > >> [sofia] cause: [EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR] > >> > >> > >> Whenever that happens, "switch_channel.c:816 New Channel" is never > >> called and I don't see any outbound SIP messages to the IP in > question. > >> > >> So if no new channel is created, how can there be a routing error? > >> > >> Any insight or advice on how to debug this would be greatly > appreciated. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 18:02:58 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR In-Reply-To: <1QS7yM-0005cW-8h@mail.aastral.net> References: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> <1QRt7M-0002Zm-GE@mail.aastral.net> <1QS7yM-0005cW-8h@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: its not only transfers, its possibly a call looping in a circle to the same box. Are you using your own domain in a bridge app somewhere for instance: And if your own box is domain.com and you mistakenly are trying to call the extension registered to 1234 you would actually call yourself over sip in a loop up to 73 times until it hungup with that cause. On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Bill W. wrote: > Hey Michael, > > Thanks so much for the advice. ?I've already enabled uuid logging, and > have grepped the log for the uuid of the call that failed. ?As in my > initial email, it just goes from 'setting variables' to the error. ?No > new channel is created. > > There are no transfers in the dialplan nor in freeswitch.log. > > I don't have XML CDRs enabled, but the cdr-csv ?log entry is unremarkable. > > I'll enable XML CDR and see if that can provide some more information. > > > On 6/1/11 5:46 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> Well, if it's inside the dialplan you'll see it in the log. You may want >> to rotate logs frequently while tracking this down. It might also help >> if you enable uuid logging so that you can filter down to just a single >> call's log lines. You may also wish to examine the XML CDRs for these >> calls. I'd be curious to see what's in the call flows. >> >> -MC >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Bill W. > > wrote: >> >> ? ? Hey Anthony, >> >> ? ? Thanks very much for your input. ?Can you recommend a way I can prove >> ? ? that to myself? ?Is there some sort of logging to turn on to see that? >> >> ? ? The reason I ask is that for this instance I receive a call in on one >> ? ? sofia profile and then use the bridge command to send it out another >> ? ? sofia profile. I don't use the transfer application to complete the >> ? ? call. >> >> >> >> ? ? On 6/1/11 4:36 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: >> ? ? > routing loop, its transferring more that 73 times inside the dialplan >> ? ? > >> ? ? > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Bill W. > ? ? > wrote: >> ? ? >> Hey All, >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> About once or twice a day, I'm getting an EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR >> ? ? failure. >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> I've enabled debugging, including logging SIP messages, and can't >> ? ? seem >> ? ? >> to find the cause of the error. >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> Freeswitch goes from setting variables to exchange routing error: >> ? ? >> switch_channel.c:935 EXPORTING[export_vars] >> ? ? >> to >> ? ? >> switch_ivr_originate.c:2447 Cannot create outgoing channel of type >> ? ? >> [sofia] cause: [EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR] >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> Whenever that happens, "switch_channel.c:816 New Channel" is never >> ? ? >> called and I don't see any outbound SIP messages to the IP in >> ? ? question. >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> So if no new channel is created, how can there be a routing error? >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> Any insight or advice on how to debug this would be greatly >> ? ? appreciated. >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> Thanks! >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> >> ? ? >> _______________________________________________ >> ? ? >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> ? ? >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> ? ? >> ? ? >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> ? ? >> >> ? ? UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> ? ? >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> ? ? >> >> ? ? > >> ? ? > >> ? ? > >> >> ? ? _______________________________________________ >> ? ? FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> ? ? FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> ? ? >> ? ? http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> ? ? UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> ? ? http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From yungwei at resolvity.com Thu Jun 2 18:34:56 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Unable to get events from freeswitch using java ESL client Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F9@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> I missed the following: client.setEventSubscriptions("plain", "ALL"); From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 6:28 PM To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Unable to get events from freeswitch using java ESL client Hi, I am using org.freeswitch.esl.client-0.9.2 to ask freeswitch to make an outbound call in the following java class. I want to be able to get notified when a call is not answered for whatever reason. However, I don't get any events from freeswitch. What am I missing here? Thanks. public class esl implements IEslEventListener { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { esl e = new esl(); Client client = new Client(); EslMessage response = null; try { client.connect("192.168.6.18", 8021, "ClueCon", 10); client.addEventListener(e); response = client.sendSyncApiCommand("originate", "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/1112223333 9886"); CommandResponse cr = client.close(); System.out.println("Done."); } catch (InboundConnectionFailure ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); } } @Override public void backgroundJobResultReceived(EslEvent arg0) { System.out.println("backgroundJobResultReceived"); } @Override public void eventReceived(EslEvent arg0) { System.out.println(String.format("eventReceived, event name=%s", arg0.getEventName())); } } From Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com Thu Jun 2 18:39:02 2011 From: Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com (mazilo) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use mod_mp4 In-Reply-To: References: <1306486049569-6410226.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306841276439-6422324.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306858803865-6423457.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306927048156-6426476.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1307025542904-6431457.post@n2.nabble.com> Steven Ayre wrote: > > Should do, it's the same library. :) I would think so. However, upon a closer look on both http://mp4v2.googlecode.com/files/mp4v2-1.9.1.tar.bz2 MP4v2 and http://libmp4.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libmp4/trunk/libmp4/ libmp4 source, it appears MP4v2 uses some different header file names to produce libmp4v2.so library while libmp4 produces libmp4_static.a library. Perhaps, those who compiled mod_mp4 on a Linux machine already has libmp4 patched to produce libmp4v2.so library. ----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/how-to-use-mod-mp4-tp6410226p6431457.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From brian at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 2 18:56:55 2011 From: brian at freeswitch.org (Brian West) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_msn In-Reply-To: <931F80EC287F4BBEA4174FFBE344D831@e1705> References: <931F80EC287F4BBEA4174FFBE344D831@e1705> Message-ID: Isn't one already in contrib? /b On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:23 AM, Madovsky wrote: > Do you think it's technically feasible to > make a module that connect to MSN network ?_______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From brian at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 2 18:58:12 2011 From: brian at freeswitch.org (Brian West) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Forcing SRTP/TLS connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: What was so wrong with adding ;transport=tls to the URI :P /b On May 30, 2011, at 1:05 PM, Mitch Capper wrote: > You may want to check out my tls patch at: > > it features the option for tls_only forcing only the encrypted port to > be open: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3071 in your dialplan > for calls you can set sip_secure_media to true to force it to SRTP. > > ~Mitch -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/c08e63c9/attachment.html From mitch.capper at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 19:39:34 2011 From: mitch.capper at gmail.com (Mitch Capper) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:39:34 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Forcing SRTP/TLS connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This just prevents any unencrypted registration attempts, useful for also stopping brute force attacks and ensuring clients are properly configured and not attempting to connect over an insecure channel. ~mitch On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Brian West wrote: > What was so wrong with adding ;transport=tls to the URI :P > /b > On May 30, 2011, at 1:05 PM, Mitch Capper wrote: > > You may want to check out my tls patch at: > > it features the option for tls_only forcing only the encrypted port to > be open:?http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3071??in your dialplan > for calls you can set sip_secure_media to true to force it to SRTP. > > ~Mitch > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From freeswitch at aastral.net Thu Jun 2 20:07:00 2011 From: freeswitch at aastral.net (Bill W.) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR In-Reply-To: References: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> <1QRt7M-0002Zm-GE@mail.aastral.net> <1QS7yM-0005cW-8h@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: <1QSAQM-0003GJ-6U@mail.aastral.net> Hey Anthony, All the bridge commands are of the form: sofia/profile/18005551212 at 1.2.3.4 Also, if it was looping, would I see that in the logs? It would parse the dialplan 73 times, correct? Because I don't see that. From u2nsam at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 20:16:45 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:46:45 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] manipulate CID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Is it possible to add prefix to caller id on FS ? Regds Sam On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Sam wrote: > Hello, > > > How do i manipulate callerid number ... i have the below statement > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > here i want to prefix caller id with 66 so the effective caller id becomes > 66 + original callerid . > > using above statement the caller id passed was just 66 to the far end. > > below is the dialplan i used. > > > continue="false"> > > > data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx"/> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This is from header i get . > > From: "" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action info() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action ring_ready() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 [BREAK] > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 > CHANNEL EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 set(call_timeout=20) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 SET > [call_timeout]=[20] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 info() > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: > Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] > Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] > Channel-State-Number: [4] > Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Call-Direction: [inbound] > Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] > Channel-Call-UUID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Answer-State: [ringing] > Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Caller-Direction: [inbound] > Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] > Caller-Dialplan: [XML] > Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] > Caller-ANI: [8097328707] > Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] > Caller-Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] > Caller-RDNIS: [7001] > Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Caller-Profile-Index: [2] > Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1306997028110372] > Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1306997028103773] > Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] > Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] > variable_direction: [inbound] > variable_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_read_codec: [PCMA] > variable_read_rate: [8000] > variable_write_codec: [PCMA] > variable_write_rate: [8000] > variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] > variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] > variable_freetdm_chan_number: [29] > variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] > variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] > variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] > variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] > variable_dialed_extension: [7001] > variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] > variable_#: [true] > variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] > variable_bind_meta_key: [#] > variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] > variable_continue_on_fail: [true] > variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] > variable_dialed_user: [7001] > variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] > variable_call_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] > variable_max_forwards: [70] > variable_call_timeout: [20] > variable_current_application: [info] > > > > Regards > Sam > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/0ec7c4dd/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 20:19:06 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:19:06 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use mod_mp4 In-Reply-To: <1307025542904-6431457.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1306486049569-6410226.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306841276439-6422324.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306858803865-6423457.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306927048156-6426476.post@n2.nabble.com> <1307025542904-6431457.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Uh, where did you get that 2nd link from? That looks like it might be an older version of the library, libmp4 rather than libmp4v2. libmp4v2 is the dependancy for mod_mp4, not libmp4 -Steve On 2 June 2011 15:39, mazilo wrote: > > Steven Ayre wrote: > > > > Should do, it's the same library. :) > I would think so. However, upon a closer look on both > http://mp4v2.googlecode.com/files/mp4v2-1.9.1.tar.bz2 MP4v2 and > http://libmp4.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libmp4/trunk/libmp4/ libmp4 > source, it appears MP4v2 uses some different header file names to produce > libmp4v2.so library while libmp4 produces libmp4_static.a library. Perhaps, > those who compiled mod_mp4 on a Linux machine already has libmp4 patched to > produce libmp4v2.so library. > > ----- > FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 > Watts of electricity. > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/how-to-use-mod-mp4-tp6410226p6431457.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/f2857892/attachment.html From boris at tagnet.ru Thu Jun 2 20:41:17 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:41:17 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] manipulate CID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DE7BD2D.5070302@tagnet.ru> Hello! Yes, and You're right to set effective_caller_id_number. But have You set outbound_caller_id_number before? I see not. And if You need just prepend original caller id may be it is better to use ? > Is it possible to add prefix to caller id on FS ? > > Regds > Sam > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Sam > wrote: > > Hello, > > > How do i manipulate callerid number ... i have the below statement > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > here i want to prefix caller id with 66 so the effective caller id > becomes 66 + original callerid . > > using above statement the caller id passed was just 66 to the far end. > > below is the dialplan i used. > > > continue="false"> > > > data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx"/> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This is from header i get . > > From: "" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action info() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action ring_ready() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send > signal FreeTDM/1:29/7001 [BREAK] > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 CHANNEL EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 set(call_timeout=20) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 SET [call_timeout]=[20] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 info() > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: > Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] > Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] > Channel-State-Number: [4] > Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Call-Direction: [inbound] > Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] > Channel-Call-UUID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Answer-State: [ringing] > Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Caller-Direction: [inbound] > Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] > Caller-Dialplan: [XML] > Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] > Caller-ANI: [8097328707] > Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] > Caller-Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] > Caller-RDNIS: [7001] > Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Caller-Profile-Index: [2] > Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1306997028110372] > Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1306997028103773] > Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] > Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] > variable_direction: [inbound] > variable_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_read_codec: [PCMA] > variable_read_rate: [8000] > variable_write_codec: [PCMA] > variable_write_rate: [8000] > variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] > variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] > variable_freetdm_chan_number: [29] > variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] > variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] > variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] > variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] > variable_dialed_extension: [7001] > variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] > variable_#: [true] > variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] > variable_bind_meta_key: [#] > variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] > variable_continue_on_fail: [true] > variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] > variable_dialed_user: [7001] > variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] > variable_call_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] > variable_max_forwards: [70] > variable_call_timeout: [20] > variable_current_application: [info] > > > > Regards > Sam > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/a5989f78/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 21:13:47 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR In-Reply-To: <1QSAQM-0003GJ-6U@mail.aastral.net> References: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> <1QRt7M-0002Zm-GE@mail.aastral.net> <1QS7yM-0005cW-8h@mail.aastral.net> <1QSAQM-0003GJ-6U@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: then look for a low max-forwards header in the sip traffic On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Bill W. wrote: > > Hey Anthony, > > All the bridge commands are of the form: > sofia/profile/18005551212 at 1.2.3.4 > > Also, if it was looping, would I see that in the logs? ?It would parse > the dialplan 73 times, correct? ?Because I don't see that. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From rmorin at blie-ent.com Thu Jun 2 21:38:54 2011 From: rmorin at blie-ent.com (Rob Morin) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 In-Reply-To: <067601cc1afc$b210ada0$163208e0$@blie-ent.com> References: <1caa01cc197a$5c9ab8d0$15d02a70$@blie-ent.com> <02e001cc19ad$d3d26780$7b773680$@blie-ent.com> <59ACD9D4-19EE-40D2-8D03-3F798EF08A51@ipeva.fr> <04b201cc1a21$e8825400$b986fc00$@blie-ent.com> <060401cc1acd$82adae20$88090a60$@blie-ent.com> <067601cc1afc$b210ada0$163208e0$@blie-ent.com> Message-ID: <013c01cc214b$f25bad60$d7130820$@blie-ent.com> Should I open a JIRA case? Two? Thank you, Rob From: Rob Morin [mailto:rmorin at blie-ent.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 12:56 PM To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 Thank you. So, I believe that there are two potential problems, fixing either of which will allow me to send faxes. 1. When T.38 is enabled in passthrough mode and the B leg offers T.38, Freeswitch needs to forward the invite and the responses. Currently it isn?t forwarding the response back to the B leg. 2. When T.38 is not enabled and the B leg offers T.38, Freeswitch needs to respond with a 488 indicating T.38 is not acceptable. Currently it doesn?t respond at all. How would I go about making or requesting these fixes? Thank you, Rob From: David Ponzone [mailto:david.ponzone at ipeva.fr] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:11 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 Rob, On my test box, I run a GIT from 05-02, and I don't have any issue. But I just did the test, and the call flow is different from yours. When I send a fax with my endpoint (Zoiper Softphone), I got the remote fax tone, and then my Zoiper sends the T38-REINVITE, not the remote gateway. So I guess there are 2 possible call flows, because I remember in some circumstances, the remote sends the RE-INVITE. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 25/05/2011 ? 13:18, Rob Morin a ?crit : Is the fact that I was previously running the snapshot from 25 March adequate to meet this test? From: Rob Morin [mailto:rmorin at blie-ent.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:50 AM To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 I can, if someone can tell me where to get the snapshot. I looked at files.freeswitch.org and didn?t see one. Prior to updating to the 5-17 snapshot, I was having the same problems with the 3-25 snapshot that I was using. Thank you, Rob From: David Ponzone [mailto:david.ponzone at ipeva.fr] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 1:47 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 Rob, following Yehavi's comment, could you downgrade your GIT version to a previous version, like one month old ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 24/05/2011 ? 02:59, Rob Morin a ?crit : David, It isn?t the ATA. I?ve tried both the Grandstream HandyTone 502 and Cisco/Linksys SPA 2102. Same story in both cases. I had my carrier help me troubleshoot and we can see the SIP request from the carrier come in. When T.38 is enabled, it is forwarded to the A leg, but the response from the A leg isn?t forwarded back to the B leg. I can produce traces that show this. When T.38 isn?t enabled, the B leg is sending a T.38 reinvite. FS doesn?t respond or forward it. So the connection dies. I have every reason to believe that I?d be able to send the fax if FS would respond with a 488 indicating T.38 is not acceptable. But instead, all I get is silence. Again, I can produce traces that demonstrate this. There?s another similar email trail out there, http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/T-38-via-UPDATE-request-td3821 994.html, but I?m not certain that they?re related. Thank you for your help! Rob From: David Ponzone [mailto:david.ponzone at ipeva.fr] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 6:11 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 Rob, perhaps you should not consider T38 is 100% interoperable. You may tell us what ATA is that, because some of them are nice piece of junk. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/05/2011 ? 20:51, Rob Morin a ?crit : I?m having problems faxing if the B leg offers T.38. Several scenarios, but always the same result. First, the architecture FAX ? ATA (T.38 optional) ? FS ? Carrier ? Destination (Possibly another carrier (PSTN) and the fax machine) On my ATA, T.38 is enabled (Auto Detect). If the destination supports T.38, the Carrier will offer it to Freeswitch. If the Destination doesn?t support T.38, the B leg doesn?t offer it and the faxes go through. I?ve set Freeswitch as: When that?s the case, and the B leg offers T.38, Freeswitch passes through the offer and the ATA responds, 3 times. But the response never gets sent to the B leg, so it terminates the call after about 30 seconds. When I set Freeswitch as: The B leg still offers T.38 if its other side is capable. Freeswitch doesn?t pass the offer through and the B leg terminates the call after about 30 seconds. I?m running on a recent git ( FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-86d757d 2011-05-17 22-51-47 -0500) ). I?ve had no success attempting to configure FS as a gateway. Frankly, T.38 ?passthrough? has had the most success, mostly when the other ends aren?t T.38 capable and it stays in G711u. Is there something else I need to do to enable T.38 in passthrough mode? Thank you, Rob Morin PS ? I can provide tcpdumps of this, or whatever else is necessary. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/2e994547/attachment-0001.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 21:57:33 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 In-Reply-To: <067601cc1afc$b210ada0$163208e0$@blie-ent.com> References: <1caa01cc197a$5c9ab8d0$15d02a70$@blie-ent.com> <02e001cc19ad$d3d26780$7b773680$@blie-ent.com> <59ACD9D4-19EE-40D2-8D03-3F798EF08A51@ipeva.fr> <04b201cc1a21$e8825400$b986fc00$@blie-ent.com> <060401cc1acd$82adae20$88090a60$@blie-ent.com> <067601cc1afc$b210ada0$163208e0$@blie-ent.com> Message-ID: start by proving them and post them in a jira with full console traces with sofia global siptrace on and pcaps etc then wait for us to get to them or email consulting at freeswitch.org for expedition On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Rob Morin wrote: > Thank you. > > > > So, I believe that there are two potential problems, fixing either of which > will allow me to send faxes. > > > > 1.?????? When T.38 is enabled in passthrough mode and the B leg offers T.38, > Freeswitch needs to forward the invite and the responses. Currently it isn?t > forwarding the response back to the B leg. > > 2.?????? When T.38 is not enabled and the B leg offers T.38, Freeswitch > needs to respond with a 488 indicating T.38 is not acceptable.? Currently it > doesn?t respond at all. > > > > How would I go about making or requesting these fixes? > > Thank you, > Rob > > > > From: David Ponzone [mailto:david.ponzone at ipeva.fr] > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:11 AM > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 > > > > Rob, > > > > On my test box, I run a GIT from 05-02, and I don't have any issue. > > But I just did the test, and the call flow is different from yours. > > > > When I send a fax with my endpoint (Zoiper Softphone), I got the remote fax > tone, and then my Zoiper sends the T38-REINVITE, not the remote gateway. > > So I guess there are 2 possible call flows, because I remember in some > circumstances, the remote sends the RE-INVITE. > > > > David Ponzone ?Direction Technique > > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > > tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 > > gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 > > > > Service Client?IPeva > > tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 > > www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com > > > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il > a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce > message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > > Le 25/05/2011 ? 13:18, Rob Morin a ?crit : > > Is the fact that I was previously running the snapshot from 25 March > adequate to meet this test? > > > > From:?Rob Morin [mailto:rmorin at blie-ent.com] > Sent:?Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:50 AM > To:?'FreeSWITCH Users Help' > Subject:?Re: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 > > > > I can, if someone can tell me where to get the snapshot.? I looked > at?files.freeswitch.org?and didn?t see one. > > > > Prior to updating to the 5-17 snapshot, I was having the same problems with > the 3-25 snapshot that I was using. > > > > Thank you, > > Rob > > > > From:?David Ponzone [mailto:david.ponzone at ipeva.fr] > Sent:?Tuesday, May 24, 2011 1:47 AM > To:?FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject:?Re: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 > > > > Rob, > > > > following Yehavi's comment, could you downgrade your GIT version to a > previous version, like one month old ? > > > > David Ponzone ?Direction Technique > > email:?david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > > tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 > > gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 > > > > Service Client?IPeva > > tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 > > www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com > > > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il > a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce > message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > > > > Le 24/05/2011 ? 02:59, Rob Morin a ?crit : > > > > David, > > > > It isn?t the ATA. I?ve tried both the Grandstream HandyTone 502 and > Cisco/Linksys SPA 2102. Same story in both cases. > > > > I had my carrier help me troubleshoot and we can see the SIP request from > the carrier come in. When T.38 is enabled, it is forwarded to the A leg, but > the response from the A leg isn?t forwarded back to the B leg. I can produce > traces that show this. > > > > When T.38 isn?t enabled, the B leg is sending a T.38 reinvite. FS doesn?t > respond or forward it. So the connection dies.? I have every reason to > believe that I?d be able to send the fax if FS would respond with a 488 > indicating T.38 is not acceptable. But instead, all I get is silence. Again, > I can produce traces that demonstrate this. > > > > There?s another similar email? trail out > there,?http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/T-38-via-UPDATE-request-td3821994.html, > but I?m not certain that they?re related. > > > > Thank you for your help! > Rob > > > > From:?David Ponzone [mailto:david.ponzone at ipeva.fr] > Sent:?Monday, May 23, 2011 6:11 PM > To:?FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject:?Re: [Freeswitch-users] Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38 > > > > Rob, > > > > perhaps you should not consider T38 is 100% interoperable. > > You may tell us what ATA is that, because some of them are nice piece of > junk. > > > > David Ponzone ?Direction Technique > > email:?david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > > tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 > > gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 > > > > Service Client?IPeva > > tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 > > www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com > > > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il > a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce > message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > > > Le 23/05/2011 ? 20:51, Rob Morin a ?crit : > > > I?m having problems faxing if the B leg offers T.38.? Several scenarios, but > always the same result. > > > > First, the architecture > > > > FAX???ATA (T.38 optional)???FS???Carrier????Destination (Possibly another > carrier (PSTN) and the fax machine) > > > > On my ATA, T.38 is enabled (Auto Detect). > > > > If the destination supports T.38, the Carrier will offer it to Freeswitch. > If the Destination doesn?t support T.38, the B leg doesn?t offer it and the > faxes go through. > > > > I?ve set Freeswitch as: > > ?????? > > ????? > > When that?s the case, and the B leg offers T.38, Freeswitch passes through > the offer and the ATA responds, 3 times. But the response never gets sent to > the B leg, so it terminates the call after about 30 seconds. > > > > When I set Freeswitch as: > > ?????? > > The B leg still offers T.38 if its other side is capable. Freeswitch doesn?t > pass the offer through and the B leg terminates the call after about 30 > seconds. > > > > I?m running on a recent git ( FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-86d757d > 2011-05-17 22-51-47 -0500) ). > > > > I?ve had no success attempting to configure FS as a gateway. Frankly, T.38 > ?passthrough? has had the most success, mostly when the other ends aren?t > T.38 capable and it stays in G711u. > > > > Is there something else I need to do to enable T.38 in passthrough mode? > > > > Thank you, > Rob Morin > > > > PS ? I can provide tcpdumps of this, or whatever else is necessary. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com Thu Jun 2 22:40:20 2011 From: Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com (mazilo) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:40:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use mod_mp4 In-Reply-To: References: <1306486049569-6410226.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306841276439-6422324.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306858803865-6423457.post@n2.nabble.com> <1306927048156-6426476.post@n2.nabble.com> <1307025542904-6431457.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1307040020381-6432408.post@n2.nabble.com> Steven Ayre wrote: > > Uh, where did you get that 2nd link from? >From a Google search for libmp4. That looks like it might be an older version of the library, libmp4 rather > than libmp4v2. Indeed. Thanks for clarifying this. ----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/how-to-use-mod-mp4-tp6410226p6432408.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br Thu Jun 2 23:33:30 2011 From: leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br (Leonardo P. Bidinoto) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:33:30 -0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Hanged up callers doubt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, About this issue, could be a way to destroy the conference from FS, in a attempt to remove the stucked channels from the "show channels " and "conference list"? 2011/5/17 Leonardo P. Bidinoto > Sure. Im sending a pcap file made by tcpdump and one that i made by ngrep. > In both files, it was registering whats happening when i stuck the channel > by hanging up while using a ESL connection inside a conference(app socket > 8085 sync full). I did a "conference kick" command in this channel while its > was waiting to close the ESL connection. > > > > 2011/5/16 Michael Collins > >> Can you tcpdump or otherwise capture the traffic on port 8085? I am >> curious what is happening with that. >> -MC >> >> >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto < >> leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br> wrote: >> >>> hehe, ok michael. >>> >>> here is the pastebin link: >>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16303 >>> >>> >>> 2011/5/13 Michael Collins >>> >>>> Pastebin this info and select "FreeSWITCH Log" as the syntax >>>> highlighting. I need the colorized output to read logs. (I'm getting older >>>> and it's hard for me to ready black and white in an email.) >>>> >>>> -MC >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto < >>>> leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>> >>>>> Just succeeded to reproduce the problem. >>>>> >>>>> The condition is: when a channel inside a conference is using a ESL >>>>> connection(lets call it "A") through socket application and another ESL >>>>> connection(lets call it "B") executes a command with this channel, the "B" >>>>> ESL connection will wait the "A" ESL connection close to execute its >>>>> command. >>>>> If the channel hangs up before the "A" ESL connection is closed, then >>>>> "B" ESL command will never be executed and the stucked channel will still be >>>>> there, into sofia and the conference too. >>>>> To verify that, just do "show channels" and "conference list". with >>>>> "uuid_exists" command, return "false". >>>>> >>>>> Here are the actions done by the channel before get stucked: >>>>> >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.187321 >>>>> [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:816 New Channel sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 entering >>>>> state [received][100] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia.c:4772 Remote SDP: >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare >>>>> [BV32:107:16000:20:0]/[PCMU:0:8000:20:64000] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare >>>>> [BV32:107:16000:20:0]/[PCMA:8:8000:20:64000] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare >>>>> [PCMU:0:8000:20:64000]/[PCMU:0:8000:20:64000] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia_glue.c:2788 Set Codec sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 samples 64000 bits >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia_glue.c:4770 Set 2833 dtmf send/recv payload to 101 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia.c:4943 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change >>>>> CS_NEW -> CS_INIT >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_INIT >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State INIT >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA INIT >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change >>>>> CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State INIT going to sleep >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_channel.c:1665 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) >>>>> Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Standard ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [INFO] >>>>> mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing Phone1 <1000123402>->1234567890 in context >>>>> public >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [public->unloop] continue=false >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [unloop] ${unroll_loops}(true) >>>>> =~ /^true$/ break=on-false >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (FAIL) [unloop] ${sip_looped_call}() =~ >>>>> /^true$/ break=on-false >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [public->public_extensions] >>>>> continue=false >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [public_extensions] >>>>> destination_number(1234567890) =~ /^(\d*)$/ break=on-false >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action transfer(1234567890 XML default) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING going to sleep >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 transfer(1234567890 XML default) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:1597 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State >>>>> Change CS_EXECUTE -> CS_ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>> [NOTICE] switch_ivr.c:1603 Transfer sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 to XML[1234567890 at default] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE going to sleep >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Standard ROUTING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [INFO] >>>>> mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing Phone1 <1000123402>->1234567890 in context >>>>> default >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [default->flex] continue=false >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [flex] >>>>> destination_number(1234567890) =~ /^(\d+)$/ break=on-false >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action log(INFO VOICE received >>>>> dest=1234567890) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action set(playback_terminators=#) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action log(INFO Let's do some ivrd, shall >>>>> we?) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action >>>>> set(ivr_path=/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action socket(localhost:8084 full) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING going to sleep >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard EXECUTE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 log(INFO VOICE received dest=1234567890) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [INFO] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1184 VOICE received dest=1234567890 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(playback_terminators=#) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET >>>>> [playback_terminators]=[#] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 log(INFO Let's do some ivrd, shall we?) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [INFO] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1184 Let's do some ivrd, shall we? >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154set(ivr_path=/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET >>>>> [ivr_path]=[/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8084 full) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute answer() >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 answer() >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia_glue.c:3022 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154] >>>>> 192.168.0.154 port 24232 -> 192.168.0.111 port 4046 codec: 0 ms: 20 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_rtp.c:1623 Starting timer [soft] 160 bytes per 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia_glue.c:3284 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia_glue.c:3289 Set 2833 dtmf receive payload to 101 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_sofia.c:681 Local SDP sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154: >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_channel.c:2827 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) >>>>> Callstate Change RINGING -> ACTIVE >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 >>>>> [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:930 Channel [sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154] has been answered >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.933312 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 entering >>>>> state [completed][200] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.040285 [DEBUG] >>>>> sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 entering >>>>> state [ready][200] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.082294 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute >>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/WelcomeToTheConferenceSystem.wav) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/WelcomeToTheConferenceSystem.wav) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.082294 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.114277 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.155281 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Mainmenu.wav >>>>> flex_digits 5000 ) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 >>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Mainmenu.wav flex_digits 5000 >>>>> ) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.155281 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.893670 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:1120 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.893670 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.897674 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.897674 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET >>>>> [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.940673 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute read(1 1 >>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/PleaseEnterYourPassCodeNow.wav >>>>> flex_digits 5000 ) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 >>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/PleaseEnterYourPassCodeNow.wav >>>>> flex_digits 5000 ) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.940673 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.113662 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 8:640 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.113662 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.116663 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.116663 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET >>>>> [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.117663 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute read(1 11 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav >>>>> flex_digits 5000 #,*) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 11 >>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 5000 >>>>> #,*) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.117663 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.153658 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.053615 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF #:960 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.055618 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.055618 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET >>>>> [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.146613 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute >>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/InternalHelp.wav) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/InternalHelp.wav) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.146613 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF #:800 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1664 Digit # >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.350617 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute >>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/YouAreTheOnlyPersonOnThisConference.wav) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/YouAreTheOnlyPersonOnThisConference.wav) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.350617 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.253520 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.322510 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute conference(15646 at teste+flags{waste}) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 conference(15646 at teste+flags{waste}) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_conference.c:5582 Raw Codec Activation Success L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>> channel 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_conference.c:5627 Raw Codec Activation Success L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>> channel 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push >>>>> codec L16:70 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:05.280469 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:05.280469 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_conference.c:2557 Setup timer soft success interval: 20 samples: 160 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.573928 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF *:960 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.593929 >>>>> [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2021 Execute app: socket, localhost:8085 sync full >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.593929 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_codec.c:141 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Restore previous codec PCMU:0. >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8085 sync full) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.097927 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav >>>>> flex_digits 2000 ) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 >>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.097927 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.133923 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.373913 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:1120 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.375912 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.375912 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET >>>>> [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.490911 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute >>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/SelfMuteOn.wav) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/SelfMuteOn.wav) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.490911 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.233824 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.235828 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_cpp.cpp:988 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154destroy/unlink session from object >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.235828 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push >>>>> codec L16:70 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.433668 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF *:800 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.453667 >>>>> [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2021 Execute app: socket, localhost:8085 sync full >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.453667 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_codec.c:141 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Restore previous codec PCMU:0. >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8085 sync full) >>>>> >>>>> ==================================================================================================================================================== >>>>> While Inside this connection, a "conference 15646 kick [member_id of >>>>> this channels]" command is executed by a fs_cli console and get stuck while >>>>> waiting response. >>>>> >>>>> ==================================================================================================================================================== >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.000850 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav >>>>> flex_digits 2000 ) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 >>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.000850 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.033846 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.553821 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:960 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.555825 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command >>>>> Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.555825 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET >>>>> [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_channel.c:2560 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) >>>>> Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 >>>>> [NOTICE] sofia.c:538 Hangup sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154[CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_channel.c:2576 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [KILL] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:2057 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_cpp.cpp:988 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154destroy/unlink session from object >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_session.c:2057 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] >>>>> switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push >>>>> codec L16:70 >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_conference.c:2815 Channel leaving conference, cause: NORMAL_CLEARING >>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.757239 [DEBUG] >>>>> mod_conference.c:6104 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 skip >>>>> receive message [UNBRIDGE] (channel is hungup already) >>>>> >>>>> I hope this info helps. >>>>> >>>>> 2011/5/12 Michael Collins >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto < >>>>>> leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Im not using to any cdr module. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I would recommend that you do several things: >>>>>> >>>>>> #1 - update to latest git >>>>>> #2 - rotate logs >>>>>> #3 - enable uuid logging (see logfile.conf.xml - param name "uuid") >>>>>> #4 - reproduce the symptom with a single call (if possible) >>>>>> #5 - pastebin the log for the uuid in question and link to it in this >>>>>> thread >>>>>> >>>>>> From there hopefully we'll get a clue as to what is happening. >>>>>> -MC >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Leonardo Pires Bidinoto >>>>> Voice Technology >>>>> www.voicetechnology.com.br >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Leonardo Pires Bidinoto >>> Voice Technology >>> www.voicetechnology.com.br >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > -- > Leonardo Pires Bidinoto > Voice Technology > www.voicetechnology.com.br > -- Leonardo Pires Bidinoto Voice Technology www.voicetechnology.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/79aae46b/attachment-0001.html From mgende at gendesign.com Thu Jun 2 23:49:18 2011 From: mgende at gendesign.com (Michael Gende) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ptime mismatch confusion Message-ID: Hello, If you are a codec/ptime person, great. I've been "round and round" with the vendor on this and and not making much headway. We've an FS switch that has two numbers registered with our provider. That provider is, in turn, getting service from another gateway provider of their own. On our FS, one DID works with no issues and has for more than a year. They other recently started having ptime mismatch issues making it unusable. Tried Scrooge setting to no avail. For the daring (and merciful), here's FS output for a "bad" call and then a "good" one (just a little output from the start): 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:397 (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060) Running State Change CS_NEW 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3210 Channel sofia/external/ 8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 entering state [received][100] 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3217 Remote SDP: v=0 o=Acme_UAS 0 1 IN IP4 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx s=SIP Media Capabilities c=IN IP4 yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy t=0 0 m=audio 52024 RTP/AVP 0 18 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 *a=maxptime:30 * 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:403 (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060) State NEW 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3081 *Audio Codec Compare [PCMU:0:8000:30]/[PCMU:0:8000:**20]* 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3092 Bah HUMBUG! Sticking with PCMU at 8000h@20i 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2039 Set Codec sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 samples 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3041 Set 2833 dtmf payload to 101 Note that whilst it says its sticking with ptime of 20 (bolded above),* our vendor in-the-middle sees us as still using ptime=30*. Weird. But, on the same switch with different DID, we get the following "good" result: 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:397 (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060) Running State Change CS_NEW 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3210 Channel sofia/external/8151231234@ xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 entering state [received][100] 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3217 Remote SDP: v=0 o=Acme_UAS 0 1 IN IP4 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx s=SIP Media Capabilities c=IN IP4 yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy t=0 0 m=audio 52052 RTP/AVP 0 18 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 *a=maxptime:20* 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:403 (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.10:5060) State NEW 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3081 *Audio Codec Compare [PCMU:0:8000:20]/[PCMU:0:8000:**20]* 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3092 Bah HUMBUG! Sticking with PCMU at 8000h@20i 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2039 Set Codec sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 samples 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3041 Set 2833 dtmf payload to 101 Naturally, the "far end" vendor says they think its a "FreeSwitch problem". Huh? For my part, I'd just like to FORCE a ptime of 20 in all cases, no matter the codec, for incoming calls, either DID. Tried, but so far, no go. A packet capture showed "bad" call coming in with ptime max of 30, we respond that 30 is OK but them re-invite with ptime set to 20, but it doesn't seem to "catch". On the good DID, they proffer ptime max of 30, we respond with ptime of 20 and life is good. Sorry to post again on this. I have put in some hours but still same results so far. Any suggestions much appreciated. Regards, Mike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/7eca4ba2/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 23:55:14 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:55:14 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ptime mismatch confusion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thats not really enough info you should have a full pcap of a single call also you should not be using that codec negotiation scrooge unless its a very specific case. get a trace without the scrooge mode and consider reporting it to consulting at freeswitch.org for expedited commercial assistance. On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Michael Gende wrote: > Hello, > > If you are a codec/ptime person, great. I've been "round and round" with the > vendor on this and and not making much headway. > > We've an FS switch that has two numbers registered with our provider. That > provider is, in turn, getting service from another gateway provider of their > own. > > On our FS, one DID works with no issues and has for more than a year. They > other recently started having ptime mismatch issues making it unusable. > Tried Scrooge setting to no avail. > > For the daring (and merciful), here's FS output for a "bad" call and then a > "good" one (just a little output from the start): > > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:397 > (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060) Running State Change CS_NEW > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3210 Channel > sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 entering state > [received][100] > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3217 Remote SDP: > > > v=0 > > > o=Acme_UAS 0 1 IN IP4 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > > s=SIP Media Capabilities > > > c=IN IP4 yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy > > > t=0 0 > > > m=audio 52024 RTP/AVP 0 18 101 > > > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > > > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > > > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > > a=maxptime:30 > > > > > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:403 > (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060) State NEW > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3081 Audio Codec Compare > [PCMU:0:8000:30]/[PCMU:0:8000:20] > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3092 Bah HUMBUG! Sticking > with PCMU at 8000h@20i > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2039 Set Codec > sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 samples > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3041 Set 2833 dtmf payload > to 101 > > > > Note that whilst it says its sticking with ptime of 20 (bolded above), our > vendor in-the-middle sees us as still using ptime=30. Weird. But, on the > same switch with different DID, we get the following "good" result: > > > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:397 > (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060) Running State Change CS_NEW > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3210 Channel > sofia/external/8151231234@ xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 entering state > [received][100] > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3217 Remote SDP: > > > v=0 > > > o=Acme_UAS 0 1 IN IP4 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > > s=SIP Media Capabilities > > > c=IN IP4 yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy > > > t=0 0 > > > m=audio 52052 RTP/AVP 0 18 101 > > > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > > > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > > > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > > a=maxptime:20 > > > > > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:403 > (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.10:5060) State NEW > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3081 Audio Codec Compare > [PCMU:0:8000:20]/[PCMU:0:8000:20] > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3092 Bah HUMBUG! Sticking > with PCMU at 8000h@20i > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2039 Set Codec > sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 samples > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3041 Set 2833 dtmf payload > to 101 > > > Naturally, the "far end" vendor says they think its a "FreeSwitch problem". > Huh? For my part, I'd just like to FORCE a ptime of 20 in all cases, no > matter the codec, for incoming calls, either DID. Tried, but so far, no go. > > A packet capture showed "bad" call coming in with ptime max of 30, we > respond that 30 is OK but them re-invite with ptime set to 20, but it > doesn't seem to "catch". On the good DID, they proffer ptime max of 30, we > respond with ptime of 20 and life is good. > > Sorry to post again on this. I have put in some hours but still same results > so far. Any suggestions much appreciated. > > Regards, > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From mgende at gendesign.com Thu Jun 2 23:57:47 2011 From: mgende at gendesign.com (Michael Gende) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ptime mismatch confusion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: That's what I'll try. Thanks. On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > Thats not really enough info > you should have a full pcap of a single call > > also you should not be using that codec negotiation scrooge unless its > a very specific case. > > get a trace without the scrooge mode and consider reporting it to > consulting at freeswitch.org for expedited commercial assistance. > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Michael Gende > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > If you are a codec/ptime person, great. I've been "round and round" with > the > > vendor on this and and not making much headway. > > > > We've an FS switch that has two numbers registered with our provider. > That > > provider is, in turn, getting service from another gateway provider of > their > > own. > > > > On our FS, one DID works with no issues and has for more than a year. > They > > other recently started having ptime mismatch issues making it unusable. > > Tried Scrooge setting to no avail. > > > > For the daring (and merciful), here's FS output for a "bad" call and then > a > > "good" one (just a little output from the start): > > > > > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:397 > > (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060) Running State Change > CS_NEW > > > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3210 Channel > > sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 entering state > > [received][100] > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3217 Remote SDP: > > > > > > v=0 > > > > > > o=Acme_UAS 0 1 IN IP4 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > > > > > s=SIP Media Capabilities > > > > > > c=IN IP4 yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy > > > > > > t=0 0 > > > > > > m=audio 52024 RTP/AVP 0 18 101 > > > > > > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > > > > > > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > > > > > > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > > > > > a=maxptime:30 > > > > > > > > > > > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:403 > > (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060) State NEW > > > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3081 Audio Codec Compare > > [PCMU:0:8000:30]/[PCMU:0:8000:20] > > > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3092 Bah HUMBUG! Sticking > > with PCMU at 8000h@20i > > > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2039 Set Codec > > sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 > samples > > > > 2011-06-02 14:12:06.756170 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3041 Set 2833 dtmf > payload > > to 101 > > > > > > > > Note that whilst it says its sticking with ptime of 20 (bolded above), > our > > vendor in-the-middle sees us as still using ptime=30. Weird. But, on the > > same switch with different DID, we get the following "good" result: > > > > > > > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:397 > > (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060) Running State Change > CS_NEW > > > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3210 Channel > > sofia/external/8151231234@ xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 entering state > > [received][100] > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3217 Remote SDP: > > > > > > v=0 > > > > > > o=Acme_UAS 0 1 IN IP4 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > > > > > s=SIP Media Capabilities > > > > > > c=IN IP4 yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy > > > > > > t=0 0 > > > > > > m=audio 52052 RTP/AVP 0 18 101 > > > > > > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > > > > > > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > > > > > > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > > > > > a=maxptime:20 > > > > > > > > > > > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:403 > > (sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.10:5060) State NEW > > > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3081 Audio Codec Compare > > [PCMU:0:8000:20]/[PCMU:0:8000:20] > > > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3092 Bah HUMBUG! Sticking > > with PCMU at 8000h@20i > > > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2039 Set Codec > > sofia/external/8151231234 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 > samples > > > > 2011-06-02 14:15:15.135193 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3041 Set 2833 dtmf > payload > > to 101 > > > > > > Naturally, the "far end" vendor says they think its a "FreeSwitch > problem". > > Huh? For my part, I'd just like to FORCE a ptime of 20 in all cases, no > > matter the codec, for incoming calls, either DID. Tried, but so far, no > go. > > > > A packet capture showed "bad" call coming in with ptime max of 30, we > > respond that 30 is OK but them re-invite with ptime set to 20, but it > > doesn't seem to "catch". On the good DID, they proffer ptime max of 30, > we > > respond with ptime of 20 and life is good. > > > > Sorry to post again on this. I have put in some hours but still same > results > > so far. Any suggestions much appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > > > Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/14850e18/attachment-0001.html From mgende at gendesign.com Fri Jun 3 00:30:16 2011 From: mgende at gendesign.com (Michael Gende) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ptime mismatch confusion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Tried one last thing and it appears to have worked! Hallelujah! Left "scrooge" on, and updated, in the vars.xml, the global codec prefs settings and added @20i to ones we are using. Still got the "mismatch" message that showed in the "bad" output (prior post) but the call worked fine! Just did a few to satisfy myself. Thanks to Michael and Anthony who read my prior posts and had constructive suggestions. Regards, Mike On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Michael Gende wrote: > That's what I'll try. Thanks. > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Anthony Minessale < > anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thats not really enough info >> you should have a full pcap of a single call >> >> also you should not be using that codec negotiation scrooge unless its >> a very specific case. >> >> get a trace without the scrooge mode and consider reporting it to >> consulting at freeswitch.org for expedited commercial assistance. >> >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/be29b84d/attachment.html From rgelfand2 at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 00:33:43 2011 From: rgelfand2 at gmail.com (Roman Gelfand) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Troubleshooting FreeSwitch Configuration Message-ID: I am running into trouble trying to register to ITSP. The log file shows ... 2011-06-01 21:58:10.950068 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:401 Timeout Registering 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com 2011-06-01 21:58:11.957417 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:425 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com Failed Registration [0], setting retry to 30 seconds. 2011-06-01 21:58:42.046331 [NOTICE] sofia_reg.c:367 Registering 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com When challenged by 407 message from ITSP, I get 05:03:12.857: Missing contact header in REGISTER response. Does anyone know what is happening here? or pointers how to troubleshoot this? Thanks in advance From maciej.aniserowicz at gmail.com Thu Jun 2 22:28:25 2011 From: maciej.aniserowicz at gmail.com (Maciej Aniserowicz) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Eavesdrop between 2 FS instaces Message-ID: <1307039305975-6432366.post@n2.nabble.com> Hello, Is it possible to eavesdrop between 2 FS instaces? I have CallA parked on FS1 and want to eavesdrop on CallB that is on FS2. I have both channel ids. I tried transfering CallA to FS2, intercept CallB in FS2 dialplan and then eavesdrop in inline dialplan, but this does not work (however it works with bridging). Can I make it work somehow? Best regards, Maciej Aniserowicz -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Eavesdrop-between-2-FS-instaces-tp6432366p6432366.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From joaocarlosleme at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 01:02:35 2011 From: joaocarlosleme at gmail.com (Joao Leme) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:02:35 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FIFO suddenly stopped working properly Message-ID: Hi there, No change nor updates have been made in months. Everything was working great but now FIFO is not ringing the extensions while the first call is not HUNG UP...meaning, first call to go to FIFO rings the agents, and one person answer...when the second call comes in, it goes to fifo queue (caller listens the music) but no one is aware of the call, nor even the agents that are available. Only after the first call hangs up the 2nd goes in. I tried troubleshooting but no help. What I also noticed is that before, to display the caller ID on my sip client I had to use: but now, while testing, the caller id was showing when calling fifo without setting those parameters, but before it would just show the fifo queue name. All I can say is that I can't figure out why and how to fix these behavior if I have done no change to FreeSWITCH nor the config files. I also tried downloading the latest GIT and got the same response. THANKS, John -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/233e4b4e/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Fri Jun 3 01:21:14 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:21:14 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Hanged up callers doubt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2C18EE80-BB65-4A93-9A44-627B6154DD5F@ipeva.fr> Sure, that one is easy: from fs_cli: conference kick all David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 02/06/2011 ? 21:33, Leonardo P. Bidinoto a ?crit : > Hi, > > About this issue, could be a way to destroy the conference from FS, in a attempt to remove the stucked channels from the "show channels " and "conference list"? > > 2011/5/17 Leonardo P. Bidinoto > Sure. Im sending a pcap file made by tcpdump and one that i made by ngrep. In both files, it was registering whats happening when i stuck the channel by hanging up while using a ESL connection inside a conference(app socket 8085 sync full). I did a "conference kick" command in this channel while its was waiting to close the ESL connection. > > > > 2011/5/16 Michael Collins > Can you tcpdump or otherwise capture the traffic on port 8085? I am curious what is happening with that. > -MC > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto wrote: > hehe, ok michael. > > here is the pastebin link: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16303 > > > 2011/5/13 Michael Collins > Pastebin this info and select "FreeSWITCH Log" as the syntax highlighting. I need the colorized output to read logs. (I'm getting older and it's hard for me to ready black and white in an email.) > > -MC > > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Just succeeded to reproduce the problem. > > The condition is: when a channel inside a conference is using a ESL connection(lets call it "A") through socket application and another ESL connection(lets call it "B") executes a command with this channel, the "B" ESL connection will wait the "A" ESL connection close to execute its command. > If the channel hangs up before the "A" ESL connection is closed, then "B" ESL command will never be executed and the stucked channel will still be there, into sofia and the conference too. > To verify that, just do "show channels" and "conference list". with "uuid_exists" command, return "false". > > Here are the actions done by the channel before get stucked: > > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.187321 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:816 New Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 entering state [received][100] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4772 Remote SDP: > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare [BV32:107:16000:20:0]/[PCMU:0:8000:20:64000] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare [BV32:107:16000:20:0]/[PCMA:8:8000:20:64000] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare [PCMU:0:8000:20:64000]/[PCMU:0:8000:20:64000] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2788 Set Codec sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 samples 64000 bits > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4770 Set 2833 dtmf send/recv payload to 101 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4943 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_INIT > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State INIT > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA INIT > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State INIT going to sleep > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1665 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing Phone1 <1000123402>->1234567890 in context public > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [public->unloop] continue=false > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [unloop] ${unroll_loops}(true) =~ /^true$/ break=on-false > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (FAIL) [unloop] ${sip_looped_call}() =~ /^true$/ break=on-false > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [public->public_extensions] continue=false > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [public_extensions] destination_number(1234567890) =~ /^(\d*)$/ break=on-false > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action transfer(1234567890 XML default) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING going to sleep > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 transfer(1234567890 XML default) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:1597 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> CS_ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [NOTICE] switch_ivr.c:1603 Transfer sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 to XML[1234567890 at default] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE going to sleep > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard ROUTING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing Phone1 <1000123402>->1234567890 in context default > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [default->flex] continue=false > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [flex] destination_number(1234567890) =~ /^(\d+)$/ break=on-false > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action log(INFO VOICE received dest=1234567890) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action set(playback_terminators=#) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action log(INFO Let's do some ivrd, shall we?) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action set(ivr_path=/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action socket(localhost:8084 full) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING going to sleep > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard EXECUTE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 log(INFO VOICE received dest=1234567890) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1184 VOICE received dest=1234567890 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(playback_terminators=#) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [playback_terminators]=[#] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 log(INFO Let's do some ivrd, shall we?) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1184 Let's do some ivrd, shall we? > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(ivr_path=/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [ivr_path]=[/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8084 full) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute answer() > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 answer() > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3022 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154] 192.168.0.154 port 24232 -> 192.168.0.111 port 4046 codec: 0 ms: 20 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1623 Starting timer [soft] 160 bytes per 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3284 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3289 Set 2833 dtmf receive payload to 101 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:681 Local SDP sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154: > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2827 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Callstate Change RINGING -> ACTIVE > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:930 Channel [sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154] has been answered > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.933312 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 entering state [completed][200] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.040285 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 entering state [ready][200] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.082294 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/WelcomeToTheConferenceSystem.wav) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/WelcomeToTheConferenceSystem.wav) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.082294 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.114277 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.155281 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Mainmenu.wav flex_digits 5000 ) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Mainmenu.wav flex_digits 5000 ) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.155281 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.893670 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:1120 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.893670 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.897674 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.897674 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.940673 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/PleaseEnterYourPassCodeNow.wav flex_digits 5000 ) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/PleaseEnterYourPassCodeNow.wav flex_digits 5000 ) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.940673 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.113662 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 8:640 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.113662 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.116663 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.116663 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.117663 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 11 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 5000 #,*) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 11 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 5000 #,*) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.117663 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.153658 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.053615 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF #:960 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.055618 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.055618 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.146613 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/InternalHelp.wav) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/InternalHelp.wav) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.146613 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF #:800 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1664 Digit # > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.350617 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/YouAreTheOnlyPersonOnThisConference.wav) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/YouAreTheOnlyPersonOnThisConference.wav) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.350617 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.253520 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.322510 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute conference(15646 at teste+flags{waste}) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 conference(15646 at teste+flags{waste}) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:5582 Raw Codec Activation Success L16 at 8000hz 1 channel 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:5627 Raw Codec Activation Success L16 at 8000hz 1 channel 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push codec L16:70 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:05.280469 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:05.280469 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2557 Setup timer soft success interval: 20 samples: 160 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.573928 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF *:960 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.593929 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2021 Execute app: socket, localhost:8085 sync full > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.593929 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:141 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Restore previous codec PCMU:0. > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8085 sync full) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.097927 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.097927 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.133923 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.373913 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:1120 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.375912 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.375912 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.490911 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/SelfMuteOn.wav) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/SelfMuteOn.wav) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.490911 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.233824 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.235828 [DEBUG] switch_cpp.cpp:988 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 destroy/unlink session from object > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.235828 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push codec L16:70 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.433668 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF *:800 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.453667 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2021 Execute app: socket, localhost:8085 sync full > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.453667 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:141 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Restore previous codec PCMU:0. > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8085 sync full) > ==================================================================================================================================================== > While Inside this connection, a "conference 15646 kick [member_id of this channels]" command is executed by a fs_cli console and get stuck while waiting response. > ==================================================================================================================================================== > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.000850 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.000850 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.033846 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.553821 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:960 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.555825 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.555825 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2560 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [NOTICE] sofia.c:538 Hangup sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2576 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [KILL] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2057 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] switch_cpp.cpp:988 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 destroy/unlink session from object > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2057 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push codec L16:70 > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2815 Channel leaving conference, cause: NORMAL_CLEARING > 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.757239 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:6104 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 skip receive message [UNBRIDGE] (channel is hungup already) > > I hope this info helps. > > 2011/5/12 Michael Collins > > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Im not using to any cdr module. > > I would recommend that you do several things: > > #1 - update to latest git > #2 - rotate logs > #3 - enable uuid logging (see logfile.conf.xml - param name "uuid") > #4 - reproduce the symptom with a single call (if possible) > #5 - pastebin the log for the uuid in question and link to it in this thread > > From there hopefully we'll get a clue as to what is happening. > -MC > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > -- > Leonardo Pires Bidinoto > Voice Technology > www.voicetechnology.com.br > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > -- > Leonardo Pires Bidinoto > Voice Technology > www.voicetechnology.com.br > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > -- > Leonardo Pires Bidinoto > Voice Technology > www.voicetechnology.com.br > > > > -- > Leonardo Pires Bidinoto > Voice Technology > www.voicetechnology.com.br > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/a2fbd689/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 01:54:31 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:54:31 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Eavesdrop between 2 FS instaces In-Reply-To: <1307039305975-6432366.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1307039305975-6432366.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: You can't eavesdrop on a call that's going through another server, because you're not in the media path. As a possible workaround, it would be possible to dial into FS2 from FS1 into a special context (which can be done either by using a different profile for this, or setting the context in the user directory for a special fs-to-fs user) and do the eavesdrop on FS2 that way. You could use the sip-X_* variables to send the UUID to eavesdrop on to FS2 in the INVITE from FS1. -Steve On 2 June 2011 19:28, Maciej Aniserowicz wrote: > Hello, > Is it possible to eavesdrop between 2 FS instaces? I have CallA parked on > FS1 and want to eavesdrop on CallB that is on FS2. I have both channel ids. > > I tried transfering CallA to FS2, intercept CallB in FS2 dialplan and then > eavesdrop in inline dialplan, but this does not work (however it works with > bridging). Can I make it work somehow? > > Best regards, > Maciej Aniserowicz > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Eavesdrop-between-2-FS-instaces-tp6432366p6432366.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/d8c4d2aa/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 01:57:12 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:57:12 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Troubleshooting FreeSwitch Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sounds like they're not sending back a valid response. It would be useful to see what's beeing sent back and forth. Change the logging level to debug and do 'sofia global siptrace on' to log all sip packets so we can see what's in them. It could be a problem with their server not sending the correct reply or it could be that your configuration isn't quite right to interop with their server and needs tweaking. -Steve On 2 June 2011 21:33, Roman Gelfand wrote: > I am running into trouble trying to register to ITSP. The log file shows > ... > > 2011-06-01 21:58:10.950068 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:401 Timeout > Registering 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com > 2011-06-01 21:58:11.957417 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:425 > 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com Failed Registration [0], setting retry to > 30 seconds. > 2011-06-01 21:58:42.046331 [NOTICE] sofia_reg.c:367 Registering > 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com > > When challenged by 407 message from ITSP, I get > > 05:03:12.857: Missing contact header in REGISTER response. > > Does anyone know what is happening here? or pointers how to troubleshoot > this? > > Thanks in advance > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/d0484ac3/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Fri Jun 3 04:07:03 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 02:07:03 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks, It "kind of" does the job.It's nice to be able to specify URL or file as grammar, but I need to pass SRGS or SSML directly. If you attempt to send SRGS it screws up in mod_unimrcp and attempt to load a file from what I can see - it seems to lack a test to see if it gets passed srgs or ssml from the app directly. Need to test tomorrow. Jan _____ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steven Ayre Sent: 2. juni 2011 13:44 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_unimrcp :) On 2 June 2011 11:25, Jan Berger wrote: Hi, I would like to communicate with MRCP to control TTS and ASR from a C module - how can I do that easiest? Jan _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/f0409766/attachment.html From rgelfand2 at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 04:33:36 2011 From: rgelfand2 at gmail.com (Roman Gelfand) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Troubleshooting FreeSwitch Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for your help. The actual application I am using is Karoo Bridge SBC which is built on FreeSwitch. I found freeswitch.xml.fsxml configuration file. I suppose this the final resolved configuraiton. I am not sure where I set debug option. Anyway, I thought the following could be useful for you to see. 09:03:38.274: [CID=29f64488] B2B Transaction CREATED - register13166648z9hG4bKr84Dr2gK3ccHm 09:03:38.274: [CID=29f64488] JS: Setting transaction property respond-to-packet-source=1 09:03:38.274: [CID=29f64488] JS: Setting transaction property auth-method=access-list 09:03:38.274: [CID=29f64488] JS: Setting transaction property auth-method=none 09:03:38.310: [CID=29f64488] >>> REGISTER sip:callcentric.com;transport=udp SIP/2.0 LEN: 843 SRC: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 DST: 204.11.192.37:5060 ENC: 0 PROT: udp 09:03:38.310: ^M {^M [CID=29f64488] REGISTER sip:callcentric.com;transport=udp SIP/2.0^M [CID=29f64488] From: ;tag=v0r8KQHmF054m^M [CID=29f64488] To: ^M [CID=29f64488] Call-ID: 99b2a5a7-1e7c-4e65-b9ac-6fadbf4ca1c3^M [CID=29f64488] CSeq: 13166648 REGISTER^M [CID=29f64488] Expires: 1800^M [CID=29f64488] User-Agent: OSS Karoo FS^M [CID=29f64488] Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY^M [CID=29f64488] Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces^M [CID=29f64488] Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="1##########", realm="callcentric.com", nonce="a0667bbc4a83b98f36b9619405daa1f5", opaque="", algorithm=MD5, uri="sip:XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060", response="d4ee3820ca6f33ac8d40afc319b82006"^M [CID=29f64488] Content-Length: 0^M [CID=29f64488] Max-Forwards: 69^M [CID=29f64488] Contact: ^M [CID=29f64488] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK34487872-8cf7-11e0-a33e-0800274986dc;rport^M }; 09:03:38.279: [CID=29f64488] B2B Transaction DESTROYED - register13166647z9hG4bKQZBNp7ZF63Nyr 09:03:38.348: [CID=29f64488] Found Transaction register13166648z9hG4bK34487872-8cf7-11e0-a33e-0800274986dc 09:03:38.348: [CID=29f64488] <<< SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required LEN: 498 SRC: 204.11.192.37:5060 DST: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 EXT: [XX.XX.XXX.XXX] ENC: 0 PROT: udp 09:03:38.348: ^M {^M [CID=29f64488] SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required^M [CID=29f64488] v: SIP/2.0/UDP XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK34487872-8cf7-11e0-a33e-0800274986dc;rport=5060^M [CID=29f64488] f: ;tag=v0r8KQHmF054m^M [CID=29f64488] t: ^M [CID=29f64488] i: 99b2a5a7-1e7c-4e65-b9ac-6fadbf4ca1c3^M [CID=29f64488] CSeq: 13166648 REGISTER^M [CID=29f64488] Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="callcentric.com", domain="sip:callcentric.com", nonce="edbfefbbc2ab6d684bae2b1de3fec2ea", opaque="", stale=TRUE, algorithm=MD5^M [CID=29f64488] l: 0^M }; 09:03:38.349: Missing contact header in REGISTER response. 09:03:38.350: [CID=29f64488] >>> SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required LEN: 526 SRC: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 DST: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 ENC: 0 PROT: udp 09:03:38.351: ^M {^M [CID=29f64488] SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required^M [CID=29f64488] f: ;tag=v0r8KQHmF054m^M [CID=29f64488] t: ^M [CID=29f64488] i: 99b2a5a7-1e7c-4e65-b9ac-6fadbf4ca1c3^M [CID=29f64488] CSeq: 13166648 REGISTER^M [CID=29f64488] Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="callcentric.com", domain="sip:callcentric.com", nonce="edbfefbbc2ab6d684bae2b1de3fec2ea", opaque="", stale=TRUE, algorithm=MD5^M [CID=29f64488] l: 0^M On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > Sounds like they're not sending back a valid response. > > It would be useful to see what's beeing sent back and forth. Change the > logging level to debug and do 'sofia global siptrace on' to log all sip > packets so we can see what's in them. It could be a problem with their > server not sending the correct reply or it could be that your configuration > isn't quite right to interop with their server and needs tweaking. > > -Steve > > > On 2 June 2011 21:33, Roman Gelfand wrote: >> >> I am running into trouble trying to register to ITSP. ?The log file shows >> ... >> >> 2011-06-01 21:58:10.950068 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:401 Timeout >> Registering 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com >> 2011-06-01 21:58:11.957417 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:425 >> 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com Failed Registration [0], setting retry to >> 30 seconds. >> 2011-06-01 21:58:42.046331 [NOTICE] sofia_reg.c:367 Registering >> 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com >> >> When challenged by 407 message from ITSP, I get >> >> 05:03:12.857: Missing contact header in REGISTER response. >> >> Does anyone know what is happening here? or pointers how to troubleshoot >> this? >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From cmcureau at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 05:39:22 2011 From: cmcureau at gmail.com (Chris Cureau) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call For Help: FreeSWITCH Cookbook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <332535808673479297@unknownmsgid> -- Chris Cureau Director of Information Services R&R Home Care, Inc. (985) 624-3800 On May 31, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Hello FreeSWITCHers! > > We have a need for some assistance with a few of our recipes for the cookbook. If you are able to write technical documentation in English and have first-hand knowledge of these topics then you might be in a position to help: > > CDRs: > Parsing XML CDRs > Handling A and B leg CDRs > Using a web server to handle XML CDRs > > Event Socket: > Inbound ESL connections (basic how-to) > Outbound ESL connections (basic how-to) > Launch an outbound call with inbound event socket & ESL > Handle inbound call with socket app & ESL > Reacting to events (events for "my call" vs. system-wide events, etc.) > > Misc: > Presence for BLF and SLA > Presence for FIFO agent status > > If you think you've got the chops to write one or more recipes for the cookbook then email me off list and we'll discuss the specifics. I will get you all the information you need to get started. > > Thanks! > > -Michael > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From cmrienzo at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 06:28:27 2011 From: cmrienzo at gmail.com (Christopher Rienzo) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: To send SRGS directly, use the "inline:" prefix. For TTS, you can send SSML if your server supports it. This is the APP to control speech recognition: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_detect_speech I need to update the wiki... it got out of sync last year when luke-jr added support for multiple grammars per session. Chris On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Jan Berger wrote: > Thanks, > > > > It ?kind of? does the job.It?s nice to be able to specify URL or file as > grammar, but I need to pass SRGS or SSML directly. > > > > If you attempt to send SRGS it screws up in mod_unimrcp and attempt to > load a file from what I can see ? it seems to lack a test to see if it gets > passed srgs or ssml from the app directly. Need to test tomorrow. > > > > Jan > ------------------------------ > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Steven Ayre > *Sent:* 2. juni 2011 13:44 > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_unimrcp > > :) > > > On 2 June 2011 11:25, Jan Berger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to communicate with MRCP to control TTS and ASR from a C > module - how can I do that easiest? > > > > Jan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110602/daa19b39/attachment.html From u2nsam at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 08:39:04 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:09:04 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] manipulate CID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I still cannot get desired caller id through prefixing, i get from header as :- From: "" Logs: ----------------------- Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action set(effective_caller_id_number=91${Caller-Caller-ID-Number}) Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action ring_ready() Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/novanet/1646xxxxxxx) 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal FreeTDM/1:13/7001 [BREAK] 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) State EXECUTE 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 CHANNEL EXECUTE 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Standard EXECUTE EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 set(call_timeout=20) 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 SET [call_timeout]=[20] EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 info() 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] Channel-State-Number: [4] Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:13/7001] Unique-ID: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] Call-Direction: [inbound] Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] Channel-Call-UUID: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] Answer-State: [ringing] Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] Caller-Direction: [inbound] Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] Caller-Dialplan: [XML] Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] Caller-ANI: [8097328707] Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] Caller-Unique-ID: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] Caller-Context: [novanet] Caller-RDNIS: [7001] Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:13/7001] Caller-Profile-Index: [2] Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1307073154764686] Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1307073154758018] Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] variable_direction: [inbound] variable_uuid: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] variable_read_codec: [PCMA] variable_read_rate: [8000] variable_write_codec: [PCMA] variable_write_rate: [8000] variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:13/7001] variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] variable_freetdm_chan_number: [13] variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] variable_dialed_extension: [7001] variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] variable_#: [true] variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] variable_bind_meta_key: [#] variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] variable_continue_on_fail: [true] variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] variable_dialed_user: [7001] variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] variable_call_uuid: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] variable_max_forwards: [70] variable_call_timeout: [20] variable_current_application: [info] EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 SET [continue_on_fail]=[NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED] EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 set(effective_caller_id_number=91) 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 SET [effective_caller_id_number]=[91] EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 ring_ready() 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:861 [s1c13][1:13] Indicating RINGING in state PROCEED 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:861 [s1c13][1:13] Changed state from PROCEED to RINGING 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] ftdm_state.c:508 [s1c13][1:13] Executing state processor for RINGING 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:614 [s1c13][1:13] Completed state change from PROCEED to RINGING in 0ms 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:625 [s1c13][1:13] processing state change to RINGING ----------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Sam wrote: > Hello, > > > How do i manipulate callerid number ... i have the below statement > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > here i want to prefix caller id with 66 so the effective caller id becomes > 66 + original callerid . > > using above statement the caller id passed was just 66 to the far end. > > below is the dialplan i used. > > > continue="false"> > > > data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx"/> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This is from header i get . > > From: "" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action info() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action ring_ready() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 [BREAK] > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 > CHANNEL EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 set(call_timeout=20) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 SET > [call_timeout]=[20] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 info() > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: > Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] > Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] > Channel-State-Number: [4] > Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Call-Direction: [inbound] > Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] > Channel-Call-UUID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Answer-State: [ringing] > Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Caller-Direction: [inbound] > Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] > Caller-Dialplan: [XML] > Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] > Caller-ANI: [8097328707] > Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] > Caller-Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] > Caller-RDNIS: [7001] > Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Caller-Profile-Index: [2] > Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1306997028110372] > Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1306997028103773] > Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] > Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] > variable_direction: [inbound] > variable_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_read_codec: [PCMA] > variable_read_rate: [8000] > variable_write_codec: [PCMA] > variable_write_rate: [8000] > variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] > variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] > variable_freetdm_chan_number: [29] > variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] > variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] > variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] > variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] > variable_dialed_extension: [7001] > variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] > variable_#: [true] > variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] > variable_bind_meta_key: [#] > variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] > variable_continue_on_fail: [true] > variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] > variable_dialed_user: [7001] > variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] > variable_call_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] > variable_max_forwards: [70] > variable_call_timeout: [20] > variable_current_application: [info] > > > > Regards > Sam > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/a7eb215c/attachment-0001.html From jan.berger at video24.no Fri Jun 3 09:21:18 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 07:21:18 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3B804BE828BD4B6FBC55F6FE6EBE3507@dell9400> Thanks - i did not see that option. Is it possible to do this through ESL as well? Jan _____ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Rienzo Sent: 3. juni 2011 04:28 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp To send SRGS directly, use the "inline:" prefix. For TTS, you can send SSML if your server supports it. This is the APP to control speech recognition: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_detect_speech I need to update the wiki... it got out of sync last year when luke-jr added support for multiple grammars per session. Chris On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Jan Berger wrote: Thanks, It "kind of" does the job.It's nice to be able to specify URL or file as grammar, but I need to pass SRGS or SSML directly. If you attempt to send SRGS it screws up in mod_unimrcp and attempt to load a file from what I can see - it seems to lack a test to see if it gets passed srgs or ssml from the app directly. Need to test tomorrow. Jan _____ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steven Ayre Sent: 2. juni 2011 13:44 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_unimrcp :) On 2 June 2011 11:25, Jan Berger wrote: Hi, I would like to communicate with MRCP to control TTS and ASR from a C module - how can I do that easiest? Jan _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/c8fe18bc/attachment.html From u2nsam at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 10:53:37 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:23:37 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] domain Message-ID: Hello, I have a user registered by domain (1001 at xyz.com) and when the invite comes to my FS server it should recognize the domain and route the calls accordingly to the group ... . The call would be entering via the acl to public.xml. Here i want to route the call according to domain names, how will i do that. Any suggestions... Regards Sam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/5e91e752/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 11:27:12 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:27:12 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp In-Reply-To: <3B804BE828BD4B6FBC55F6FE6EBE3507@dell9400> References: <3B804BE828BD4B6FBC55F6FE6EBE3507@dell9400> Message-ID: You can execute an app on a channel through ESL using the uuid_broadcast API. http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_commands#uuid_broadcast -Steve On 3 June 2011 06:21, Jan Berger wrote: > Thanks ? i did not see that option. > > > > Is it possible to do this through ESL as well? > > > > Jan > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Christopher > Rienzo > *Sent:* 3. juni 2011 04:28 > > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp > > > > To send SRGS directly, use the "inline:" prefix. For TTS, you can send > SSML if your server supports it. > > This is the APP to control speech recognition: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_detect_speech > > I need to update the wiki... it got out of sync last year when luke-jr > added support for multiple grammars per session. > > Chris > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Jan Berger wrote: > > Thanks, > > > > It ?kind of? does the job.It?s nice to be able to specify URL or file as > grammar, but I need to pass SRGS or SSML directly. > > > > If you attempt to send SRGS it screws up in mod_unimrcp and attempt to > load a file from what I can see ? it seems to lack a test to see if it gets > passed srgs or ssml from the app directly. Need to test tomorrow. > > > > Jan > ------------------------------ > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Steven Ayre > *Sent:* 2. juni 2011 13:44 > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mrcp > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_unimrcp > > :) > > On 2 June 2011 11:25, Jan Berger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to communicate with MRCP to control TTS and ASR from a C > module - how can I do that easiest? > > > > Jan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/e344f10c/attachment-0001.html From boris at tagnet.ru Fri Jun 3 12:14:31 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:14:31 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] manipulate CID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DE897E7.1050705@tagnet.ru> Hello! There is no variable ${Caller-Caller-ID-Number}, but ${caller_id_number}. Please look at http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables > I still cannot get desired caller id through prefixing, > > i get from header as :- From: "" > > > > continue="false"> > > > data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> > > data="effective_caller_id_number=91${Caller-Caller-ID-Number}"/> > > data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/novanet/1646xxxxxxxx"/> > > > > > Logs: > ----------------------- > > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action > set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action > set(effective_caller_id_number=91${Caller-Caller-ID-Number}) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action ring_ready() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action > bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/novanet/1646xxxxxxx) > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 > (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send > signal FreeTDM/1:13/7001 [BREAK] > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 > CHANNEL EXECUTE > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 set(call_timeout=20) > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 > FreeTDM/1:13/7001 SET [call_timeout]=[20] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 info() > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: > Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] > Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] > Channel-State-Number: [4] > Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:13/7001] > Unique-ID: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > Call-Direction: [inbound] > Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] > Channel-Call-UUID: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > Answer-State: [ringing] > Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Caller-Direction: [inbound] > Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] > Caller-Dialplan: [XML] > Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] > Caller-ANI: [8097328707] > Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] > Caller-Unique-ID: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] > Caller-Context: [novanet] > Caller-RDNIS: [7001] > Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:13/7001] > Caller-Profile-Index: [2] > Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1307073154764686] > Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1307073154758018] > Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] > Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] > variable_direction: [inbound] > variable_uuid: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > variable_read_codec: [PCMA] > variable_read_rate: [8000] > variable_write_codec: [PCMA] > variable_write_rate: [8000] > variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:13/7001] > variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] > variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] > variable_freetdm_chan_number: [13] > variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] > variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] > variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] > variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] > variable_dialed_extension: [7001] > variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] > variable_#: [true] > variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] > variable_bind_meta_key: [#] > variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] > variable_continue_on_fail: [true] > variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] > variable_dialed_user: [7001] > variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] > variable_call_uuid: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] > variable_max_forwards: [70] > variable_call_timeout: [20] > variable_current_application: [info] > > > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 > set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 > FreeTDM/1:13/7001 SET > [continue_on_fail]=[NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 set(effective_caller_id_number=91) > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 > FreeTDM/1:13/7001 SET [effective_caller_id_number]=[91] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 ring_ready() > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:861 [s1c13][1:13] > Indicating RINGING in state PROCEED > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:861 [s1c13][1:13] > Changed state from PROCEED to RINGING > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] ftdm_state.c:508 [s1c13][1:13] > Executing state processor for RINGING > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:614 > [s1c13][1:13] Completed state change from PROCEED to RINGING in 0ms > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:625 > [s1c13][1:13] processing state change to RINGING > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Sam > wrote: > > Hello, > > > How do i manipulate callerid number ... i have the below statement > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > here i want to prefix caller id with 66 so the effective caller id > becomes 66 + original callerid . > > using above statement the caller id passed was just 66 to the far end. > > below is the dialplan i used. > > > continue="false"> > > > data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> > > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > > data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx"/> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This is from header i get . > > From: "" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action info() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > set(effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action ring_ready() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action > bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send > signal FreeTDM/1:29/7001 [BREAK] > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 CHANNEL EXECUTE > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 set(call_timeout=20) > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 > FreeTDM/1:29/7001 SET [call_timeout]=[20] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 info() > 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: > Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] > Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] > Channel-State-Number: [4] > Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Call-Direction: [inbound] > Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] > Channel-Call-UUID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Answer-State: [ringing] > Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Caller-Direction: [inbound] > Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] > Caller-Dialplan: [XML] > Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] > Caller-ANI: [8097328707] > Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] > Caller-Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] > Caller-RDNIS: [7001] > Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > Caller-Profile-Index: [2] > Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1306997028110372] > Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1306997028103773] > Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] > Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] > variable_direction: [inbound] > variable_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_read_codec: [PCMA] > variable_read_rate: [8000] > variable_write_codec: [PCMA] > variable_write_rate: [8000] > variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] > variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] > variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] > variable_freetdm_chan_number: [29] > variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] > variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] > variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] > variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] > variable_dialed_extension: [7001] > variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] > variable_#: [true] > variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] > variable_bind_meta_key: [#] > variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] > variable_continue_on_fail: [true] > variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] > variable_dialed_user: [7001] > variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] > variable_call_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] > variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] > variable_max_forwards: [70] > variable_call_timeout: [20] > variable_current_application: [info] > > > > Regards > Sam > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/9f0a7c48/attachment-0001.html From boris at tagnet.ru Fri Jun 3 12:21:05 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:21:05 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] domain In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DE89971.9010205@tagnet.ru> Hello! What do You mean? You may (for example) set the domain variable for a user and test it inside condition. > Hello, > > I have a user registered by domain (1001 at xyz.com > ) and when the invite comes to my FS server it > should recognize the domain and route > the calls accordingly to the group ... . > The call would be entering via the acl to public.xml. Here i want to > route the call according to domain names, how will i do that. > > Any suggestions... > > > Regards > Sam > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/f7689445/attachment.html From u2nsam at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 13:03:33 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:33:33 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] domain In-Reply-To: <4DE89971.9010205@tagnet.ru> References: <4DE89971.9010205@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: The call would be coming from outside to FS and not within , so the call would be routed from public to different domains , and after that following the doc http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Multi-tenant Here how can we recognized from the header on which domain is it ? like if we get an from header as 1001 at xyz.com how can we recognized the domain and route the call accordingly ... when an outside system sends a call via acl . regards Sam On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Hello! > > What do You mean? You may (for example) set the domain variable for a > user and test it inside condition. > > Hello, > > I have a user registered by domain (1001 at xyz.com) and when the invite > comes to my FS server it should recognize the domain and route > the calls accordingly to the group ... > . > The call would be entering via the acl to public.xml. Here i want to route > the call according to domain names, how will i do that. > > Any suggestions... > > > Regards > Sam > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/b59a205e/attachment.html From u2nsam at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 13:04:44 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:34:44 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] manipulate CID In-Reply-To: <4DE897E7.1050705@tagnet.ru> References: <4DE897E7.1050705@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Thanks it works On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Hello! > > There is no variable ${Caller-Caller-ID-Number}, but > ${caller_id_number}. Please look at > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables > > I still cannot get desired caller id through prefixing, > > i get from header as :- From: "" > > > > continue="false"> > > > data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> > > data="effective_caller_id_number=91${Caller-Caller-ID-Number}"/> > > data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/novanet/1646xxxxxxxx"/> > > > > > Logs: > ----------------------- > > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action > set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action > set(effective_caller_id_number=91${Caller-Caller-ID-Number}) > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action ring_ready() > Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Action > bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/novanet/1646xxxxxxx) > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 > (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > FreeTDM/1:13/7001 [BREAK] > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (FreeTDM/1:13/7001) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 > CHANNEL EXECUTE > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > FreeTDM/1:13/7001 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 set(call_timeout=20) > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 SET > [call_timeout]=[20] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 info() > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.765627 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: > Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] > Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] > Channel-State-Number: [4] > Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:13/7001] > Unique-ID: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > Call-Direction: [inbound] > Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] > Channel-Call-UUID: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > Answer-State: [ringing] > Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] > Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] > Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] > Caller-Direction: [inbound] > Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] > Caller-Dialplan: [XML] > Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] > Caller-ANI: [8097328707] > Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] > Caller-Unique-ID: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] > Caller-Context: [novanet] > Caller-RDNIS: [7001] > Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:13/7001] > Caller-Profile-Index: [2] > Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1307073154764686] > Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1307073154758018] > Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] > Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] > Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] > Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] > variable_direction: [inbound] > variable_uuid: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > variable_read_codec: [PCMA] > variable_read_rate: [8000] > variable_write_codec: [PCMA] > variable_write_rate: [8000] > variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:13/7001] > variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] > variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] > variable_freetdm_chan_number: [13] > variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] > variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] > variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] > variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] > variable_dialed_extension: [7001] > variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] > variable_#: [true] > variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] > variable_bind_meta_key: [#] > variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] > variable_continue_on_fail: [true] > variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] > variable_dialed_user: [7001] > variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] > variable_call_uuid: [8949f10a-ad91-4705-95a7-eb42dfcfe40f] > variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] > variable_max_forwards: [70] > variable_call_timeout: [20] > variable_current_application: [info] > > > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 > set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 SET > [continue_on_fail]=[NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 set(effective_caller_id_number=91) > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:13/7001 SET > [effective_caller_id_number]=[91] > EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:13/7001 ring_ready() > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:861 [s1c13][1:13] > Indicating RINGING in state PROCEED > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:861 [s1c13][1:13] Changed > state from PROCEED to RINGING > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] ftdm_state.c:508 [s1c13][1:13] Executing > state processor for RINGING > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:614 [s1c13][1:13] > Completed state change from PROCEED to RINGING in 0ms > 2011-06-03 03:52:34.766572 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:625 [s1c13][1:13] > processing state change to RINGING > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Sam wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> How do i manipulate callerid number ... i have the below statement >> >> > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> >> >> here i want to prefix caller id with 66 so the effective caller id becomes >> 66 + original callerid . >> >> using above statement the caller id passed was just 66 to the far end. >> >> below is the dialplan i used. >> >> >> > continue="false"> >> >> >> > data="continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED"/> >> >> > data="effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> >> >> > data="{sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> This is from header i get . >> >> From: "" >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action info() >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action >> set(continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,USER_BUSY,NO_ANSWER,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,USER_NOT_REGISTERED) >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action >> set(effective_caller_id_number=66${outbound_caller_id_number}) >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action ring_ready() >> Dialplan: FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Action >> bridge({sip_cid_type=rpid}sofia/gateway/outbound/1646xxxxxxx) >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 >> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> FreeTDM/1:29/7001 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State ROUTING going to sleep >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >> (FreeTDM/1:29/7001) State EXECUTE >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:451 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 >> CHANNEL EXECUTE >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >> FreeTDM/1:29/7001 Standard EXECUTE >> EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 set(call_timeout=20) >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1059 FreeTDM/1:29/7001 >> SET [call_timeout]=[20] >> EXECUTE FreeTDM/1:29/7001 info() >> 2011-06-02 06:43:48.111347 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: >> Channel-State: [CS_EXECUTE] >> Channel-Call-State: [RINGING] >> Channel-State-Number: [4] >> Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] >> Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> Call-Direction: [inbound] >> Presence-Call-Direction: [inbound] >> Channel-Call-UUID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> Answer-State: [ringing] >> Channel-Read-Codec-Name: [PCMA] >> Channel-Read-Codec-Rate: [8000] >> Channel-Read-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] >> Channel-Write-Codec-Name: [PCMA] >> Channel-Write-Codec-Rate: [8000] >> Channel-Write-Codec-Bit-Rate: [64000] >> Caller-Direction: [inbound] >> Caller-Username: [FreeTDM] >> Caller-Dialplan: [XML] >> Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [8097328707] >> Caller-ANI: [8097328707] >> Caller-Destination-Number: [7001] >> Caller-Unique-ID: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> Caller-Source: [mod_freetdm] >> Caller-RDNIS: [7001] >> Caller-Channel-Name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] >> Caller-Profile-Index: [2] >> Caller-Profile-Created-Time: [1306997028110372] >> Caller-Channel-Created-Time: [1306997028103773] >> Caller-Channel-Answered-Time: [0] >> Caller-Channel-Progress-Time: [0] >> Caller-Channel-Progress-Media-Time: [0] >> Caller-Channel-Hangup-Time: [0] >> Caller-Channel-Transfer-Time: [0] >> Caller-Screen-Bit: [true] >> Caller-Privacy-Hide-Name: [false] >> Caller-Privacy-Hide-Number: [false] >> variable_direction: [inbound] >> variable_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> variable_read_codec: [PCMA] >> variable_read_rate: [8000] >> variable_write_codec: [PCMA] >> variable_write_rate: [8000] >> variable_channel_name: [FreeTDM/1:29/7001] >> variable_freetdm_span_name: [wp1] >> variable_freetdm_span_number: [1] >> variable_freetdm_chan_number: [29] >> variable_freetdm_bearer_capability: [0] >> variable_freetdm_bearer_layer1: [3] >> variable_freetdm_screening_ind: [network-provided] >> variable_freetdm_presentation_ind: [presentation-allowed] >> variable_dialed_extension: [7001] >> variable_transfer_ringback: [local_stream://moh] >> variable_#: [true] >> variable_export_vars: [#,*,#] >> variable_bind_meta_key: [#] >> variable_hangup_after_bridge: [true] >> variable_continue_on_fail: [true] >> variable_called_party_callgroup: [1] >> variable_dialed_user: [7001] >> variable_dialed_domain: [192.168.2.190] >> variable_call_uuid: [e5b47553-3b9c-4692-beaa-513a3a3356c2] >> variable_originate_disposition: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] >> variable_max_forwards: [70] >> variable_call_timeout: [20] >> variable_current_application: [info] >> >> >> >> Regards >> Sam >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/301c3e7f/attachment-0001.html From sharad at coraltele.com Fri Jun 3 13:16:58 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:46:58 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] core.db location References: Message-ID: <3396F43C6C34416BAD6E25D2702995B2@sharad> Dear All Is there any way to host only core.db in some other predefined directory ? Let all other db remain in the folder db. Plz advise. Regards Ankur ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 2:35 PM Subject: FreeSWITCH-users Digest, Vol 60, Issue 21 > Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to > freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freeswitch-users-request at lists.freeswitch.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freeswitch-users-owner at lists.freeswitch.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..." > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: domain (Boris Kovalenko) > 2. Re: domain (Sam) > 3. Re: manipulate CID (Sam) > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From boris at tagnet.ru Fri Jun 3 13:16:48 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:16:48 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] domain In-Reply-To: References: <4DE89971.9010205@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: <4DE8A680.1080102@tagnet.ru> Hello! There is a variable named ${sip_from_user}. You may do something like > The call would be coming from outside to FS and not within , so the > call would be routed from public to different domains , > > and after that following the doc > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Multi-tenant > > Here how can we recognized from the header on which domain is it ? > like if we get an from header as 1001 at xyz.com > how can we recognized the domain and route the call accordingly ... > when an outside system sends a call via acl . > > regards > Sam > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Boris Kovalenko > wrote: > > Hello! > > What do You mean? You may (for example) set the domain > variable for a user and test it inside condition. > >> Hello, >> >> I have a user registered by domain (1001 at xyz.com >> ) and when the invite comes to my FS server >> it should recognize the domain and route >> the calls accordingly to the group ... . >> The call would be entering via the acl to public.xml. Here i want >> to route the call according to domain names, how will i do that. >> >> Any suggestions... >> >> >> Regards >> Sam >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/b5649c66/attachment.html From fdelawarde at wirelessmundi.com Fri Jun 3 13:20:39 2011 From: fdelawarde at wirelessmundi.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Delawarde) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:20:39 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered Message-ID: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> Maybe it could be used to improve mod_skypopen?? http://skype-open-source.blogspot.com/2011/06/skype-protocol-reverse-engineered.html Fran?ois. From thomas at chaschperli.ch Fri Jun 3 13:32:48 2011 From: thomas at chaschperli.ch (Thomas Mueller) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:32:48 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] core.db location In-Reply-To: <3396F43C6C34416BAD6E25D2702995B2@sharad> References: <3396F43C6C34416BAD6E25D2702995B2@sharad> Message-ID: <4DE8AA40.40608@chaschperli.ch> On 03.06.2011 11:16, sharad wrote: > Dear All > > Is there any way to host only core.db in some other predefined directory ? > > Let all other db remain in the folder db. > on Linux you could symlink the core.db file to where you want it. - Thomas From thomas at chaschperli.ch Fri Jun 3 14:15:01 2011 From: thomas at chaschperli.ch (Thomas Mueller) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:15:01 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] core.db location In-Reply-To: <655CA25849B34C998B7A1F14B2514DF3@sharad> References: <655CA25849B34C998B7A1F14B2514DF3@sharad> Message-ID: <4DE8B425.7000002@chaschperli.ch> > Just tried it. Symlink is created but the issue is when freeswitch > starts, it removes the symlink. So how to handle this ? cannot confirm this: * stopped freeswitch * moved core.db to core.db.symlinked * ln -s core.db.symlinked core.db * start freeswitch * file-list: root root 17 Jun 3 12:11 core.db -> core.db.symlinked freeswitch daemon 144384 Jun 3 12:11 core.db.symlinked core.db still symlinked to core.db.symlinked - Thomas From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 14:19:10 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:19:10 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered In-Reply-To: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> References: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> Message-ID: Since it'd allow native support while skypopen requires the official client, it'd be a big enough rewrite to probably be more of a separate module. It remains to see what the M$ reaction will be to that project. It sounds fairly easy for them to break support for it too. Even if they don't go the legal route, it's an older version of the protocol and they could just choose to block those older versions and force users to upgrade. -Steve On 3 June 2011 10:20, Fran?ois Delawarde wrote: > Maybe it could be used to improve mod_skypopen?? > > > http://skype-open-source.blogspot.com/2011/06/skype-protocol-reverse-engineered.html > > > Fran?ois. > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/6919affb/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 14:25:22 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:25:22 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered In-Reply-To: References: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> Message-ID: However interestingly it appears to be 1.x, 3.x and 4.x have reverse engineered. 5.x is the latest windows version. The latest Linux version (used by mod_skypopen) is 2.2.0.25. Not sure why that's not reverse engineered but if they were to block anything pre-5.x it'd break both skyopen and skype-open-source. On the more optimistic note I have seen a good argument that there are enough hardware Skype phones with Skype that they can't easily block older versions without breaking a lot of devices. -Steve On 3 June 2011 11:19, Steven Ayre wrote: > Since it'd allow native support while skypopen requires the official > client, it'd be a big enough rewrite to probably be more of a separate > module. > > It remains to see what the M$ reaction will be to that project. It sounds > fairly easy for them to break support for it too. Even if they don't go the > legal route, it's an older version of the protocol and they could just > choose to block those older versions and force users to upgrade. > > -Steve > > > > > On 3 June 2011 10:20, Fran?ois Delawarde wrote: > >> Maybe it could be used to improve mod_skypopen?? >> >> >> http://skype-open-source.blogspot.com/2011/06/skype-protocol-reverse-engineered.html >> >> >> Fran?ois. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/0b061ba1/attachment-0001.html From sharad at coraltele.com Fri Jun 3 14:59:16 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:29:16 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] core.db location References: <655CA25849B34C998B7A1F14B2514DF3@sharad> <4DE8B425.7000002@chaschperli.ch> Message-ID: Sorry Mr. Thomas I made a mistake in testing. Its working. Thanks a lot for your kind advise. Best Regards Sharad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: "sharad" Cc: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 3:45 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] core.db location > >> Just tried it. Symlink is created but the issue is when freeswitch >> starts, it removes the symlink. So how to handle this ? > > cannot confirm this: > > * stopped freeswitch > * moved core.db to core.db.symlinked > * ln -s core.db.symlinked core.db > * start freeswitch > * file-list: > root root 17 Jun 3 12:11 core.db -> core.db.symlinked > freeswitch daemon 144384 Jun 3 12:11 core.db.symlinked > > core.db still symlinked to core.db.symlinked > > - Thomas > > > > From freeswitch at peely.com Fri Jun 3 16:03:48 2011 From: freeswitch at peely.com (peely) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 05:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ptime mismatch confusion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1307102628006-6434987.post@n2.nabble.com> You should really be able to set a channel variable in the dialplan just before you handle the call with which will set the a-leg codecs and ptimes, then in the bridge add absolute_codec_string=${global_codec_prefs} to set the codecs to use on the b-leg. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/ptime-mismatch-confusion-tp6432622p6434987.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com Fri Jun 3 16:28:52 2011 From: Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com (mazilo) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 05:28:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered In-Reply-To: References: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> Message-ID: <1307104132721-6435062.post@n2.nabble.com> Steven Ayre wrote: > On the more optimistic note I have seen a good argument that there are > enough hardware Skype phones with Skype that they can't easily block older > versions without breaking a lot of devices. If Skype decides to block older version of software, then all it needs is to furnish Skype Phone hardware manufacturers with a new code to come up with a new firmware to support new Skype version. Then, hackers will start to reversed engineer on the new version. And, the cat/mouse chase begins. OTOH, it looks like the source was released to https://github.com/skypeopensource/skypeopensource/downloads GitHUB on 6/2/11. let's see how fast it will become a Linux compilable package/plugin/module. I won't be surprised to see a working mod_skype_re(versed engineered) soon if Anthony and/or FS developers will decide to port the source into an FS module. ----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/skype-reverse-engineered-tp6434578p6435062.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br Fri Jun 3 16:31:44 2011 From: leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br (Leonardo P. Bidinoto) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:31:44 -0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Hanged up callers doubt In-Reply-To: <2C18EE80-BB65-4A93-9A44-627B6154DD5F@ipeva.fr> References: <2C18EE80-BB65-4A93-9A44-627B6154DD5F@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: Hi David, Yes, indeed that should work, BUT it doesn't if an user inside is stucked(i get a "false" from "uuid_exists"). With "conference kick", all users inside will be dropped, but the stucked ones will remain, and with that the conference isnt destroyed. 2011/6/2 David Ponzone > Sure, that one is easy: > > from fs_cli: > > conference kick all > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 02/06/2011 ? 21:33, Leonardo P. Bidinoto a ?crit : > > Hi, > > About this issue, could be a way to destroy the conference from FS, in a > attempt to remove the stucked channels from the "show channels " and > "conference list"? > > 2011/5/17 Leonardo P. Bidinoto > >> Sure. Im sending a pcap file made by tcpdump and one that i made by ngrep. >> In both files, it was registering whats happening when i stuck the channel >> by hanging up while using a ESL connection inside a conference(app socket >> 8085 sync full). I did a "conference kick" command in this channel while its >> was waiting to close the ESL connection. >> >> >> >> 2011/5/16 Michael Collins >> >>> Can you tcpdump or otherwise capture the traffic on port 8085? I am >>> curious what is happening with that. >>> -MC >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto < >>> leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br> wrote: >>> >>>> hehe, ok michael. >>>> >>>> here is the pastebin link: >>>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16303 >>>> >>>> >>>> 2011/5/13 Michael Collins >>>> >>>>> Pastebin this info and select "FreeSWITCH Log" as the syntax >>>>> highlighting. I need the colorized output to read logs. (I'm getting older >>>>> and it's hard for me to ready black and white in an email.) >>>>> >>>>> -MC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto < >>>>> leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>>> >>>>>> Just succeeded to reproduce the problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> The condition is: when a channel inside a conference is using a ESL >>>>>> connection(lets call it "A") through socket application and another ESL >>>>>> connection(lets call it "B") executes a command with this channel, the "B" >>>>>> ESL connection will wait the "A" ESL connection close to execute its >>>>>> command. >>>>>> If the channel hangs up before the "A" ESL connection is closed, then >>>>>> "B" ESL command will never be executed and the stucked channel will still be >>>>>> there, into sofia and the conference too. >>>>>> To verify that, just do "show channels" and "conference list". with >>>>>> "uuid_exists" command, return "false". >>>>>> >>>>>> Here are the actions done by the channel before get stucked: >>>>>> >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.187321 >>>>>> [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:816 New Channel sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154entering state [received][100] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia.c:4772 Remote SDP: >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare >>>>>> [BV32:107:16000:20:0]/[PCMU:0:8000:20:64000] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare >>>>>> [BV32:107:16000:20:0]/[PCMA:8:8000:20:64000] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare >>>>>> [PCMU:0:8000:20:64000]/[PCMU:0:8000:20:64000] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2788 Set Codec sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 samples 64000 bits >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4770 Set 2833 dtmf send/recv payload to 101 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia.c:4943 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State >>>>>> Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_INIT >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State INIT >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA >>>>>> INIT >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) >>>>>> State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State INIT going to sleep >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1665 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA >>>>>> ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [INFO] >>>>>> mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing Phone1 <1000123402>->1234567890 in context >>>>>> public >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [public->unloop] continue=false >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [unloop] ${unroll_loops}(true) >>>>>> =~ /^true$/ break=on-false >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (FAIL) [unloop] ${sip_looped_call}() >>>>>> =~ /^true$/ break=on-false >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [public->public_extensions] >>>>>> continue=false >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [public_extensions] >>>>>> destination_number(1234567890) =~ /^(\d*)$/ break=on-false >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action transfer(1234567890 XML default) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING going to sleep >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA >>>>>> EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 transfer(1234567890 XML default) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:1597 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) >>>>>> State Change CS_EXECUTE -> CS_ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [NOTICE] switch_ivr.c:1603 Transfer sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 to XML[1234567890 at default] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE going to sleep >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA >>>>>> ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard ROUTING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [INFO] >>>>>> mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing Phone1 <1000123402>->1234567890 in context >>>>>> default >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [default->flex] continue=false >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [flex] >>>>>> destination_number(1234567890) =~ /^(\d+)$/ break=on-false >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action log(INFO VOICE received >>>>>> dest=1234567890) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action set(playback_terminators=#) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action log(INFO Let's do some ivrd, shall >>>>>> we?) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action >>>>>> set(ivr_path=/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action socket(localhost:8084 full) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING going to sleep >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA >>>>>> EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard EXECUTE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 log(INFO VOICE received dest=1234567890) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [INFO] >>>>>> mod_dptools.c:1184 VOICE received dest=1234567890 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(playback_terminators=#) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154SET [playback_terminators]=[#] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 log(INFO Let's do some ivrd, shall we?) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [INFO] >>>>>> mod_dptools.c:1184 Let's do some ivrd, shall we? >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154set(ivr_path=/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154SET [ivr_path]=[/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8084 full) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute answer() >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 answer() >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3022 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154] 192.168.0.154 port 24232 -> 192.168.0.111 >>>>>> port 4046 codec: 0 ms: 20 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1623 Starting timer [soft] 160 bytes per 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3284 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3289 Set 2833 dtmf receive payload to 101 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:681 Local SDP sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154: >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2827 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Callstate Change RINGING -> ACTIVE >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 >>>>>> [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:930 Channel [sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154] has been answered >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.933312 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154entering state [completed][200] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.040285 >>>>>> [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154entering state [ready][200] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.082294 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute >>>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/WelcomeToTheConferenceSystem.wav) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/WelcomeToTheConferenceSystem.wav) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.082294 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>>> channels 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.114277 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.155281 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute read(1 1 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Mainmenu.wav flex_digits 5000 >>>>>> ) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Mainmenu.wav flex_digits 5000 >>>>>> ) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.155281 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>>> channels 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.893670 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:1120 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.893670 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.897674 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.897674 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.940673 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute read(1 1 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/PleaseEnterYourPassCodeNow.wav >>>>>> flex_digits 5000 ) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/PleaseEnterYourPassCodeNow.wav >>>>>> flex_digits 5000 ) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.940673 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>>> channels 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.113662 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 8:640 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.113662 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.116663 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.116663 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.117663 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute read(1 11 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 5000 >>>>>> #,*) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 11 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 5000 >>>>>> #,*) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.117663 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>>> channels 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.153658 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.053615 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF #:960 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.055618 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.055618 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.146613 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute >>>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/InternalHelp.wav) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/InternalHelp.wav) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.146613 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>>> channels 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF #:800 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1664 Digit # >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.350617 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute >>>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/YouAreTheOnlyPersonOnThisConference.wav) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/YouAreTheOnlyPersonOnThisConference.wav) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.350617 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>>> channels 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.253520 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.322510 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute conference(15646 at teste >>>>>> +flags{waste}) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 conference(15646 at teste+flags{waste}) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:5582 Raw Codec Activation Success L16 at 8000hz1 channel 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:5627 Raw Codec Activation Success L16 at 8000hz1 channel 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push codec L16:70 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:05.280469 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:05.280469 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2557 Setup timer soft success interval: 20 >>>>>> samples: 160 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.573928 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF *:960 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.593929 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2021 Execute app: socket, localhost:8085 sync full >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.593929 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:141 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Restore previous codec PCMU:0. >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8085 sync full) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.097927 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute read(1 1 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.097927 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>>> channels 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.133923 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.373913 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:1120 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.375912 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.375912 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.490911 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute >>>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/SelfMuteOn.wav) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/SelfMuteOn.wav) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.490911 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>>> channels 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.233824 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.235828 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_cpp.cpp:988 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154destroy/unlink session from object >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.235828 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push codec L16:70 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.433668 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF *:800 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.453667 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2021 Execute app: socket, localhost:8085 sync full >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.453667 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:141 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Restore previous codec PCMU:0. >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8085 sync full) >>>>>> >>>>>> ==================================================================================================================================================== >>>>>> While Inside this connection, a "conference 15646 kick [member_id of >>>>>> this channels]" command is executed by a fs_cli console and get stuck while >>>>>> waiting response. >>>>>> >>>>>> ==================================================================================================================================================== >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.000850 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute read(1 1 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.000850 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 >>>>>> channels 20ms >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.033846 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.553821 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:960 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.555825 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154Command Execute set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.555825 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2560 (sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 >>>>>> [NOTICE] sofia.c:538 Hangup sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154[CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2576 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [KILL] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2057 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 skip receive message >>>>>> [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_cpp.cpp:988 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154destroy/unlink session from object >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2057 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 skip receive message >>>>>> [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 >>>>>> [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/ >>>>>> 1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push codec L16:70 >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2815 Channel leaving conference, cause: >>>>>> NORMAL_CLEARING >>>>>> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.757239 >>>>>> [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:6104 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154skip receive message [UNBRIDGE] (channel is hungup already) >>>>>> >>>>>> I hope this info helps. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011/5/12 Michael Collins >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto < >>>>>>> leonardo.bidinoto at voicetechnology.com.br> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Im not using to any cdr module. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would recommend that you do several things: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> #1 - update to latest git >>>>>>> #2 - rotate logs >>>>>>> #3 - enable uuid logging (see logfile.conf.xml - param name "uuid") >>>>>>> #4 - reproduce the symptom with a single call (if possible) >>>>>>> #5 - pastebin the log for the uuid in question and link to it in this >>>>>>> thread >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From there hopefully we'll get a clue as to what is happening. >>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Leonardo Pires Bidinoto >>>>>> Voice Technology >>>>>> www.voicetechnology.com.br >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Leonardo Pires Bidinoto >>>> Voice Technology >>>> www.voicetechnology.com.br >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Leonardo Pires Bidinoto >> Voice Technology >> www.voicetechnology.com.br >> > > > > -- > Leonardo Pires Bidinoto > Voice Technology > www.voicetechnology.com.br > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Leonardo Pires Bidinoto Voice Technology www.voicetechnology.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/0d7eb47b/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Fri Jun 3 16:41:34 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:41:34 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Hanged up callers doubt In-Reply-To: References: <2C18EE80-BB65-4A93-9A44-627B6154DD5F@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <793379B8-D1FC-47F4-8387-4E2789A69C72@ipeva.fr> I guess there is no way to drop stuck calls. That's why they are stuck. I think you should find a way to solve the root cause. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 03/06/2011 ? 14:31, Leonardo P. Bidinoto a ?crit : > Hi David, > > Yes, indeed that should work, BUT it doesn't if an user inside is stucked(i get a "false" from "uuid_exists"). > With "conference kick", all users inside will be dropped, but the stucked ones will remain, and with that the conference isnt destroyed. > > > > 2011/6/2 David Ponzone > Sure, that one is easy: > > from fs_cli: > > conference kick all > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > Le 02/06/2011 ? 21:33, Leonardo P. Bidinoto a ?crit : > >> Hi, >> >> About this issue, could be a way to destroy the conference from FS, in a attempt to remove the stucked channels from the "show channels " and "conference list"? >> >> 2011/5/17 Leonardo P. Bidinoto >> Sure. Im sending a pcap file made by tcpdump and one that i made by ngrep. In both files, it was registering whats happening when i stuck the channel by hanging up while using a ESL connection inside a conference(app socket 8085 sync full). I did a "conference kick" command in this channel while its was waiting to close the ESL connection. >> >> >> >> 2011/5/16 Michael Collins >> Can you tcpdump or otherwise capture the traffic on port 8085? I am curious what is happening with that. >> -MC >> >> >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto wrote: >> hehe, ok michael. >> >> here is the pastebin link: >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16303 >> >> >> 2011/5/13 Michael Collins >> Pastebin this info and select "FreeSWITCH Log" as the syntax highlighting. I need the colorized output to read logs. (I'm getting older and it's hard for me to ready black and white in an email.) >> >> -MC >> >> >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> Just succeeded to reproduce the problem. >> >> The condition is: when a channel inside a conference is using a ESL connection(lets call it "A") through socket application and another ESL connection(lets call it "B") executes a command with this channel, the "B" ESL connection will wait the "A" ESL connection close to execute its command. >> If the channel hangs up before the "A" ESL connection is closed, then "B" ESL command will never be executed and the stucked channel will still be there, into sofia and the conference too. >> To verify that, just do "show channels" and "conference list". with "uuid_exists" command, return "false". >> >> Here are the actions done by the channel before get stucked: >> >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.187321 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:816 New Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 entering state [received][100] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4772 Remote SDP: >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare [BV32:107:16000:20:0]/[PCMU:0:8000:20:64000] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare [BV32:107:16000:20:0]/[PCMA:8:8000:20:64000] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4656 Audio Codec Compare [PCMU:0:8000:20:64000]/[PCMU:0:8000:20:64000] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2788 Set Codec sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 PCMU/8000 20 ms 160 samples 64000 bits >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4770 Set 2833 dtmf send/recv payload to 101 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4943 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_INIT >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State INIT >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA INIT >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State INIT going to sleep >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1665 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.188323 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing Phone1 <1000123402>->1234567890 in context public >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [public->unloop] continue=false >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [unloop] ${unroll_loops}(true) =~ /^true$/ break=on-false >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (FAIL) [unloop] ${sip_looped_call}() =~ /^true$/ break=on-false >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [public->public_extensions] continue=false >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [public_extensions] destination_number(1234567890) =~ /^(\d*)$/ break=on-false >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action transfer(1234567890 XML default) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING going to sleep >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.190328 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 transfer(1234567890 XML default) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:1597 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> CS_ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [NOTICE] switch_ivr.c:1603 Transfer sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 to XML[1234567890 at default] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE going to sleep >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard ROUTING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.191327 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing Phone1 <1000123402>->1234567890 in context default >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 parsing [default->flex] continue=false >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Regex (PASS) [flex] destination_number(1234567890) =~ /^(\d+)$/ break=on-false >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action log(INFO VOICE received dest=1234567890) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action set(playback_terminators=#) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action log(INFO Let's do some ivrd, shall we?) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action set(ivr_path=/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f Dialplan: sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Action socket(localhost:8084 full) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State ROUTING going to sleep >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) State EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SOFIA EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Standard EXECUTE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 log(INFO VOICE received dest=1234567890) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.193325 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1184 VOICE received dest=1234567890 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(playback_terminators=#) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [playback_terminators]=[#] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 log(INFO Let's do some ivrd, shall we?) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1184 Let's do some ivrd, shall we? >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(ivr_path=/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.194331 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [ivr_path]=[/usr/local/ipconf/fs/daemon/ivr.rb] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8084 full) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute answer() >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 answer() >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3022 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154] 192.168.0.154 port 24232 -> 192.168.0.111 port 4046 codec: 0 ms: 20 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.930309 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1623 Starting timer [soft] 160 bytes per 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3284 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3289 Set 2833 dtmf receive payload to 101 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:681 Local SDP sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154: >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2827 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Callstate Change RINGING -> ACTIVE >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.932313 [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:930 Channel [sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154] has been answered >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:47.933312 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 entering state [completed][200] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.040285 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 entering state [ready][200] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.082294 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/WelcomeToTheConferenceSystem.wav) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/WelcomeToTheConferenceSystem.wav) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.082294 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.114277 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.155281 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Mainmenu.wav flex_digits 5000 ) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Mainmenu.wav flex_digits 5000 ) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:51:48.155281 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.893670 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:1120 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.893670 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.897674 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.897674 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.940673 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/PleaseEnterYourPassCodeNow.wav flex_digits 5000 ) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/PleaseEnterYourPassCodeNow.wav flex_digits 5000 ) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:00.940673 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.113662 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 8:640 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.113662 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.116663 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.116663 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.117663 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 11 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 5000 #,*) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 11 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 5000 #,*) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.117663 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:01.153658 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.053615 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF #:960 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.055618 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.055618 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.146613 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/InternalHelp.wav) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/InternalHelp.wav) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.146613 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF #:800 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1664 Digit # >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.333603 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.350617 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/YouAreTheOnlyPersonOnThisConference.wav) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/YouAreTheOnlyPersonOnThisConference.wav) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:02.350617 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.253520 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.322510 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute conference(15646 at teste+flags{waste}) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 conference(15646 at teste+flags{waste}) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:5582 Raw Codec Activation Success L16 at 8000hz 1 channel 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:5627 Raw Codec Activation Success L16 at 8000hz 1 channel 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:04.813492 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push codec L16:70 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:05.280469 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:05.280469 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2557 Setup timer soft success interval: 20 samples: 160 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.573928 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF *:960 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.593929 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2021 Execute app: socket, localhost:8085 sync full >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:16.593929 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:141 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Restore previous codec PCMU:0. >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8085 sync full) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.097927 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.097927 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.133923 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.373913 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:1120 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.375912 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.375912 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.490911 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/SelfMuteOn.wav) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/SelfMuteOn.wav) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:17.490911 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.233824 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.235828 [DEBUG] switch_cpp.cpp:988 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 destroy/unlink session from object >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:19.235828 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push codec L16:70 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.433668 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF *:800 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.453667 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2021 Execute app: socket, localhost:8085 sync full >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:43.453667 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:141 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Restore previous codec PCMU:0. >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 socket(localhost:8085 sync full) >> ==================================================================================================================================================== >> While Inside this connection, a "conference 15646 kick [member_id of this channels]" command is executed by a fs_cli console and get stuck while waiting response. >> ==================================================================================================================================================== >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.000850 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 read(1 1 /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/flex/app32/teste/Silence.wav flex_digits 2000 ) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.000850 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.033846 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.553821 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3280 RTP RECV DTMF 1:960 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.555825 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:561 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Command Execute set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f EXECUTE sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 set(flex_digits) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:44.555825 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 SET [flex_digits]=[UNDEF] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2560 (sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [NOTICE] sofia.c:538 Hangup sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2576 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [KILL] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.674244 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 [BREAK] >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2057 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] switch_cpp.cpp:988 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 destroy/unlink session from object >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2057 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] switch_core_codec.c:116 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 Push codec L16:70 >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.675246 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:2815 Channel leaving conference, cause: NORMAL_CLEARING >> 16e09413-9cb0-4011-a635-f91933a35c0f 2011-05-13 10:52:56.757239 [DEBUG] mod_conference.c:6104 sofia/external/1000123402 at 192.168.0.154 skip receive message [UNBRIDGE] (channel is hungup already) >> >> I hope this info helps. >> >> 2011/5/12 Michael Collins >> >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Leonardo P. Bidinoto wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> Im not using to any cdr module. >> >> I would recommend that you do several things: >> >> #1 - update to latest git >> #2 - rotate logs >> #3 - enable uuid logging (see logfile.conf.xml - param name "uuid") >> #4 - reproduce the symptom with a single call (if possible) >> #5 - pastebin the log for the uuid in question and link to it in this thread >> >> From there hopefully we'll get a clue as to what is happening. >> -MC >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Leonardo Pires Bidinoto >> Voice Technology >> www.voicetechnology.com.br >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Leonardo Pires Bidinoto >> Voice Technology >> www.voicetechnology.com.br >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Leonardo Pires Bidinoto >> Voice Technology >> www.voicetechnology.com.br >> >> >> >> -- >> Leonardo Pires Bidinoto >> Voice Technology >> www.voicetechnology.com.br >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > -- > Leonardo Pires Bidinoto > Voice Technology > www.voicetechnology.com.br > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/cc21c3f4/attachment-0001.html From maciej.aniserowicz at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 17:01:43 2011 From: maciej.aniserowicz at gmail.com (Maciej Aniserowicz) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Eavesdrop between 2 FS instaces In-Reply-To: References: <1307039305975-6432366.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1307106103579-6435172.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi Steve, Thanks for interest. Yes, i figured out that i cannot eavesdrop any 'easy' way. I tried the approach you described (dialing into FS2 to a special context and passing sip-h_X header). In fact i use this to bridge calls on different FSes. But while i managed to get it working with bridging, i cannot find a way to do eavesdropping. With bridging I send: uuid_transfer [CallA channel] bridge:{sip_h_X-target_channel_id=[CallB channel]}sofia/bridging/123456 at ip:port,park inline Then FS2 in dialplan for 123456 extracts target channel id from sip header and intercepts it: What actions should i define in FS2 dialplan for eavesdropping? What inline dialplan should i send in dial string? I'm stuck here. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Eavesdrop-between-2-FS-instaces-tp6432366p6435172.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From infos at madovsky.org Fri Jun 3 17:54:22 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered References: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> <1307104132721-6435062.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: I'm curious how MSSkype will manage the open source code and community year after year.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "mazilo" To: Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 8:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered > > Steven Ayre wrote: >> On the more optimistic note I have seen a good argument that there are >> enough hardware Skype phones with Skype that they can't easily block >> older >> versions without breaking a lot of devices. > If Skype decides to block older version of software, then all it needs is > to > furnish Skype Phone hardware manufacturers with a new code to come up with > a > new firmware to support new Skype version. Then, hackers will start to > reversed engineer on the new version. And, the cat/mouse chase begins. > > OTOH, it looks like the source was released to > https://github.com/skypeopensource/skypeopensource/downloads GitHUB on > 6/2/11. let's see how fast it will become a Linux compilable > package/plugin/module. I won't be surprised to see a working > mod_skype_re(versed engineered) soon if Anthony and/or FS developers will > decide to port the source into an FS module. > > ----- > FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 > Watts of electricity. > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/skype-reverse-engineered-tp6434578p6435062.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From kahn at vestec.com Fri Jun 3 05:48:01 2011 From: kahn at vestec.com (Kashif Kahn) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Vestec ASR: 3 New Language Models Message-ID: <4DE83D51.8020909@vestec.com> Dear All, We have launched three new acoustic models for use with Vestec ASR: (1) Australian English, (2) Chinese Mandarin, and (3) Indian English. Vestec offers the best deal around for enabling sophisticated speech recognition with command-and-control type IVR applications. Our ASR supports SRGS grammar format, can be integrated using MRCP (v1 & v2) interface, offers high recognition accuracy, and costs a fraction of conventional speech engines. We offer the ASR in two versions according to vocabulary size: 500 items vocabulary and 2,500 items vocabulary, per recognition. A starter kit is available for $25 from Vestec webstore: http://www.vestec.com/products Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. We are looking forward to being of service. Regards, -Kashif -- Kashif Kahn VP Business Development Vestec Inc Waterloo, ON Canada phone: +1 519 885-7615 From gopalakrishnan.an at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 17:54:22 2011 From: gopalakrishnan.an at gmail.com (Gopal krishnan) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 19:24:22 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered In-Reply-To: <1307104132721-6435062.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> <1307104132721-6435062.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/intellectual-property/2011/06/03/skype-denounces-nefarious-reverse-engineering-40092982/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:58 PM, mazilo wrote: > > Steven Ayre wrote: > > On the more optimistic note I have seen a good argument that there are > > enough hardware Skype phones with Skype that they can't easily block > older > > versions without breaking a lot of devices. > If Skype decides to block older version of software, then all it needs is > to > furnish Skype Phone hardware manufacturers with a new code to come up with > a > new firmware to support new Skype version. Then, hackers will start to > reversed engineer on the new version. And, the cat/mouse chase begins. > > OTOH, it looks like the source was released to > https://github.com/skypeopensource/skypeopensource/downloads GitHUB on > 6/2/11. let's see how fast it will become a Linux compilable > package/plugin/module. I won't be surprised to see a working > mod_skype_re(versed engineered) soon if Anthony and/or FS developers will > decide to port the source into an FS module. > > ----- > FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 > Watts of electricity. > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/skype-reverse-engineered-tp6434578p6435062.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/ee39f3d7/attachment.html From andre.rosowski at omigos.de Fri Jun 3 13:11:29 2011 From: andre.rosowski at omigos.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Rosowski?=) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:11:29 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Any way to limit the ability to create conference rooms on demand? In-Reply-To: References: <4DE3532A.9000004@omigos.de> Message-ID: <4DE8A541.6050807@omigos.de> Hi Michael, thank you for your answer. Could you be more specific how exactly I have to hard-code the conference rooms into the dialplan. Would you be so kind and give me an example? Much appreciated... Regards Realdoe On 31.05.2011 22:58, Michael Collins wrote: > There are only two practical ways to do this: hard-code your > conference rooms in the dialplan or use a database-backed solution > like mod_xml_curl. How are you currently managing the list of > available conferences? > > -MC > > 2011/5/30 Andr? Rosowski > > > Hi there, > > I'm using Bigbluebutton (online conferencing) with Freeswitch so that > users can call a number and then have to enter the "voicebridge" > number > to be put into a voice conference. The problem, however, is that if a > user dialed the wrong "voicebridge" number he will be put into a new > conference thus creating one on demand as stated in the describtion of > "mod_conference". Is there any way to manually create conference rooms > and make them static...not allowing for new conference "rooms" to be > created on demand. > > default.xml in dialplan: > > > expression="^(SEND_TO_CONFERENCE)$"> > > > > > Thanks for your help : ) > > Regards, > > Realdoe > > -- > Omigos Labs UG (haftungsbeschr?nkt) - Meisenstra?e 96 - 33607 > Bielefeld > Fon: +49 521 2997 200 - Fax: +49 521 2997 101 > info at omigos.de - www.omigos.de > > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: BSc Andr? Rosowski, Benjamin Bittner, Julian Klima > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bielefeld - Registernummer: HRB 40255 > USt-IdNr.: 305/5860/1585 > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Omigos Labs UG (haftungsbeschr?nkt) - Meisenstra?e 96 - 33607 Bielefeld Fon: +49 521 2997 200 - Fax: +49 521 2997 101 info at omigos.de - www.omigos.de Gesch?ftsf?hrer: BSc Andr? Rosowski, Benjamin Bittner, Julian Klima Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bielefeld - Registernummer: HRB 40255 USt-IdNr.: 305/5860/1585 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/d1ee8e6a/attachment.html From nasir at ictinnovations.com Fri Jun 3 18:12:04 2011 From: nasir at ictinnovations.com (Nasir Iqbal) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 19:12:04 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Conference choppy voice Message-ID: Hi, I have configured a conference on new installation of freeswitch, every thing works fine voice quality is good when lady says that "You are the only one in this conference" and music but as soon as other party get connected and started to talk voice get choppy/noisy nothing can be understood, like if someone says "HELLO" other party listen jerking noisy voice like "---$H^----#E at ----%LL^----*O&" I am new to Freeswitch please guide me that how I can fix / troubleshoot this issue or let me know if need some debugging etc... currently my setup is following CentOs-5 32bit Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.66GHz [root at localhost conf]# freeswitch -version FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-66d16d1 2011-05-20 12-49-16 -0500) [root at localhost conf]# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:44:23 EST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root at localhost conf]# free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 1001664 959668 41996 0 196484 540676 -/+ buffers/cache: 222508 779156 Swap: 2031608 60 2031548 Thanks in advance Nasir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/05192d58/attachment-0001.html From infos at madovsky.org Fri Jun 3 19:02:01 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered References: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com><1307104132721-6435062.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: some logical I don't understand. why is it need reverse engineering if Skype had an open source community until today ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Gopal krishnan To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 9:54 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/intellectual-property/2011/06/03/skype-denounces-nefarious-reverse-engineering-40092982/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:58 PM, mazilo wrote: Steven Ayre wrote: > On the more optimistic note I have seen a good argument that there are > enough hardware Skype phones with Skype that they can't easily block older > versions without breaking a lot of devices. If Skype decides to block older version of software, then all it needs is to furnish Skype Phone hardware manufacturers with a new code to come up with a new firmware to support new Skype version. Then, hackers will start to reversed engineer on the new version. And, the cat/mouse chase begins. OTOH, it looks like the source was released to https://github.com/skypeopensource/skypeopensource/downloads GitHUB on 6/2/11. let's see how fast it will become a Linux compilable package/plugin/module. I won't be surprised to see a working mod_skype_re(versed engineered) soon if Anthony and/or FS developers will decide to port the source into an FS module. ----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/skype-reverse-engineered-tp6434578p6435062.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/0d9f7698/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 19:08:03 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:08:03 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered In-Reply-To: References: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> <1307104132721-6435062.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: There's nothing open about about Skype. The protocol is entirely closed and proprietary. They offer an API to talk to the Skype client from another program running on the same machine, but that's about it. mod_skypopen works by running one or more copies of the official Skype client, creating a virtual sound card and communicating with that from FreeSWITCH. -Steve On 3 June 2011 16:02, Madovsky wrote: > some logical I don't understand. > why is it need reverse engineering if Skype had an open source community > until today ? > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Gopal krishnan > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Sent:* Friday, June 03, 2011 9:54 AMS > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered > > > http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/intellectual-property/2011/06/03/skype-denounces-nefarious-reverse-engineering-40092982/ > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:58 PM, mazilo wrote: > >> >> Steven Ayre wrote: >> > On the more optimistic note I have seen a good argument that there are >> > enough hardware Skype phones with Skype that they can't easily block >> older >> > versions without breaking a lot of devices. >> If Skype decides to block older version of software, then all it needs is >> to >> furnish Skype Phone hardware manufacturers with a new code to come up with >> a >> new firmware to support new Skype version. Then, hackers will start to >> reversed engineer on the new version. And, the cat/mouse chase begins. >> >> OTOH, it looks like the source was released to >> https://github.com/skypeopensource/skypeopensource/downloads GitHUB on >> 6/2/11. let's see how fast it will become a Linux compilable >> package/plugin/module. I won't be surprised to see a working >> mod_skype_re(versed engineered) soon if Anthony and/or FS developers will >> decide to port the source into an FS module. >> >> ----- >> FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 >> Watts of electricity. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/skype-reverse-engineered-tp6434578p6435062.html >> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/5fa7530e/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 19:11:53 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:11:53 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Eavesdrop between 2 FS instaces In-Reply-To: <1307106103579-6435172.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1307039305975-6432366.post@n2.nabble.com> <1307106103579-6435172.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: I think you want the eavesdrop app: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_eavesdrop Intercept takes over the call. Eavesdrop just silently listens in. -Steve On 3 June 2011 14:01, Maciej Aniserowicz wrote: > Hi Steve, > Thanks for interest. > > Yes, i figured out that i cannot eavesdrop any 'easy' way. I tried the > approach you described (dialing into FS2 to a special context and passing > sip-h_X header). In fact i use this to bridge calls on different FSes. But > while i managed to get it working with bridging, i cannot find a way to do > eavesdropping. > > With bridging I send: > uuid_transfer [CallA channel] bridge:{sip_h_X-target_channel_id=[CallB > channel]}sofia/bridging/123456 at ip:port,park inline > > Then FS2 in dialplan for 123456 extracts target channel id from sip header > and intercepts it: > > > > > What actions should i define in FS2 dialplan for eavesdropping? What inline > dialplan should i send in dial string? I'm stuck here. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Eavesdrop-between-2-FS-instaces-tp6432366p6435172.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/af25c257/attachment.html From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Fri Jun 3 19:13:59 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:13:59 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Conference choppy voice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DE2B6327@cooper> First check the comfort-noise value - default is 1400, try that. And also (if the above doesn't help) - do a timer_test in the FS console and get back with the results. /Peter ________________________________________ Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Nasir Iqbal [nasir at ictinnovations.com] Skickat: den 3 juni 2011 16:12 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] Conference choppy voice Hi, I have configured a conference on new installation of freeswitch, every thing works fine voice quality is good when lady says that "You are the only one in this conference" and music but as soon as other party get connected and started to talk voice get choppy/noisy nothing can be understood, like if someone says "HELLO" other party listen jerking noisy voice like "---$H^----#E at ----%LL^----*O&" I am new to Freeswitch please guide me that how I can fix / troubleshoot this issue or let me know if need some debugging etc... currently my setup is following CentOs-5 32bit Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.66GHz [root at localhost conf]# freeswitch -version FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-66d16d1 2011-05-20 12-49-16 -0500) [root at localhost conf]# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:44:23 EST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root at localhost conf]# free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 1001664 959668 41996 0 196484 540676 -/+ buffers/cache: 222508 779156 Swap: 2031608 60 2031548 Thanks in advance Nasir !DSPAM:4de8ec6d32764556817595! From infos at madovsky.org Fri Jun 3 19:20:12 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered References: <1307092839.6781.599.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com><1307104132721-6435062.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <30241955FD5E4862A155DDD8E8BE8179@e1705> tha'ts clear, not sure it will be a good future for them so.... ----- Original Message ----- From: Steven Ayre To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 11:08 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered There's nothing open about about Skype. The protocol is entirely closed and proprietary. They offer an API to talk to the Skype client from another program running on the same machine, but that's about it. mod_skypopen works by running one or more copies of the official Skype client, creating a virtual sound card and communicating with that from FreeSWITCH. -Steve On 3 June 2011 16:02, Madovsky wrote: some logical I don't understand. why is it need reverse engineering if Skype had an open source community until today ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Gopal krishnan To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 9:54 AMS Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] skype reverse engineered http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/intellectual-property/2011/06/03/skype-denounces-nefarious-reverse-engineering-40092982/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:58 PM, mazilo wrote: Steven Ayre wrote: > On the more optimistic note I have seen a good argument that there are > enough hardware Skype phones with Skype that they can't easily block older > versions without breaking a lot of devices. If Skype decides to block older version of software, then all it needs is to furnish Skype Phone hardware manufacturers with a new code to come up with a new firmware to support new Skype version. Then, hackers will start to reversed engineer on the new version. And, the cat/mouse chase begins. OTOH, it looks like the source was released to https://github.com/skypeopensource/skypeopensource/downloads GitHUB on 6/2/11. let's see how fast it will become a Linux compilable package/plugin/module. I won't be surprised to see a working mod_skype_re(versed engineered) soon if Anthony and/or FS developers will decide to port the source into an FS module. ----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/skype-reverse-engineered-tp6434578p6435062.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/08065190/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Fri Jun 3 19:22:23 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:22:23 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Conference choppy voice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Check the timer precision in your kernel. It should be 1000Hz. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 03/06/2011 ? 16:12, Nasir Iqbal a ?crit : > Hi, > > I have configured a conference on new installation of freeswitch, every thing works fine voice quality is good when lady says that "You are the only one in this conference" and music but as soon as other party get connected and started to talk voice get choppy/noisy nothing can be understood, like if someone says "HELLO" other party listen jerking noisy voice like "---$H^----#E at ----%LL^----*O&" > > I am new to Freeswitch please guide me that how I can fix / troubleshoot this issue or let me know if need some debugging etc... currently my setup is following > > CentOs-5 32bit > Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.66GHz > > [root at localhost conf]# freeswitch -version > FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-66d16d1 2011-05-20 12-49-16 -0500) > > [root at localhost conf]# uname -a > Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:44:23 EST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > [root at localhost conf]# free > total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 1001664 959668 41996 0 196484 540676 > -/+ buffers/cache: 222508 779156 > Swap: 2031608 60 2031548 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > Nasir > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/64d5cce4/attachment-0001.html From john_platts at hotmail.com Fri Jun 3 19:33:33 2011 From: john_platts at hotmail.com (John Platts) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:33:33 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Click-to-call from Outlook Message-ID: Is there already an application that allows calls to be initiated from FreeSWITCH via Microsoft Outlook? We really want to initiate calls from FreeSWITCH through Microsoft Outlook? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/1f624cb6/attachment.html From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 19:45:23 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:45:23 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Click-to-call from Outlook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: If outlook does support the sip: uri, then it should be able to automatically have a function similar to what you are looking for. Clicking on a SIP URI should launch a softphone where you should be able to dial out to it. On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:33 AM, John Platts wrote: > Is there already an application that allows calls to be initiated from > FreeSWITCH via Microsoft Outlook? We really want to initiate calls from > FreeSWITCH through Microsoft Outlook? > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From avi at avimarcus.net Fri Jun 3 20:01:03 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 19:01:03 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Click-to-call from Outlook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Or, if you want to click a button outlook to ring your deskphone and call the contact, you can set up a web url that use the api calls to run "originates". -Avi On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:45 PM, curriegrad2004 wrote: > If outlook does support the sip: uri, then it should be able to > automatically have a function similar to what you are looking for. > Clicking on a SIP URI should launch a softphone where you should be > able to dial out to it. > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:33 AM, John Platts > wrote: > > Is there already an application that allows calls to be initiated from > > FreeSWITCH via Microsoft Outlook? We really want to initiate calls from > > FreeSWITCH through Microsoft Outlook? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/0be0b160/attachment.html From b_ball_henry at hotmail.com Fri Jun 3 20:19:53 2011 From: b_ball_henry at hotmail.com (Henry Huang) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 00:19:53 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference Message-ID: Hi: The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of cake. Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after the installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr from skyTpe client. 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't respond to dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is connected to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I tried push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of the key press works. If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please do share your methods. Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. Thanks, Henry Huang US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 Contact Me [image: LinkedIn] [image: Facebook] [image: Twitter] IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: Skype] unicsolution [image: MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110604/8e7c0921/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 3 20:35:46 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:35:46 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been looking for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I really like. Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been issues with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself so I will defer to those who have. -MC On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang wrote: > Hi: > > The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of cake. Made > live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after the > installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr from > skyTpe client. > > 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. > 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't respond to > dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is connected > to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I tried > push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of the key > press works. > > If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please do > share your methods. > > Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. > > Thanks, > > Henry Huang > US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 > Contact Me [image: LinkedIn] [image: > Facebook] [image: > Twitter] > IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: Skype]unicsolution [image: > MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/c5b45a75/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 20:37:55 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Any way to limit the ability to create conference rooms on demand? In-Reply-To: <4DE8A541.6050807@omigos.de> References: <4DE3532A.9000004@omigos.de> <4DE8A541.6050807@omigos.de> Message-ID: would limit you to pins that were 5xxx 2011/6/3 Andr? Rosowski : > Hi Michael, > > thank you for your answer. Could you be more specific how exactly I have to > hard-code the conference rooms into the dialplan. Would you be so kind and > give me an example? Much appreciated... > > > Regards > > Realdoe > > On 31.05.2011 22:58, Michael Collins wrote: > > There are only two practical ways to do this: hard-code your conference > rooms in the dialplan or use a database-backed solution like mod_xml_curl. > How are you currently managing the list of available conferences? > -MC > > 2011/5/30 Andr? Rosowski >> >> Hi there, >> >> I'm using Bigbluebutton (online conferencing) with Freeswitch so that >> users can call a number and then have to enter the "voicebridge" number >> to be put into a voice conference. The problem, however, is that if a >> user dialed the wrong "voicebridge" number he will be put into a new >> conference thus creating one on demand as stated in the describtion of >> "mod_conference". Is there any way to manually create conference rooms >> and make them static...not allowing for new conference "rooms" to be >> created on demand. >> >> default.xml in dialplan: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for your help : ) >> >> Regards, >> >> Realdoe >> >> -- >> Omigos Labs UG (haftungsbeschr?nkt) - Meisenstra?e 96 - 33607 Bielefeld >> Fon: +49 521 2997 200 - Fax: +49 521 2997 101 >> info at omigos.de - www.omigos.de >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: BSc Andr? Rosowski, Benjamin Bittner, Julian Klima >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bielefeld - Registernummer: HRB 40255 >> USt-IdNr.: 305/5860/1585 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- > Omigos Labs UG (haftungsbeschr?nkt) - Meisenstra?e 96 - 33607 Bielefeld > Fon: +49 521 2997 200 - Fax: +49 521 2997 101 > info at omigos.de - www.omigos.de > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: BSc Andr? Rosowski, Benjamin Bittner, Julian Klima > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bielefeld - Registernummer: HRB 40255 > USt-IdNr.: 305/5860/1585 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 3 20:44:35 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:44:35 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F8@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC74C@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <0454EB31-E9EA-4594-9FDD-29D69F5B6126@ipeva.fr> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC7E2@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <1306499299750-6410887.post@n2.nabble.com> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC8B0@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3AC938@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC3ACA1B@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F3@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC4FB5F8@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: Why are you using js to begin with? You don't really gain anything by performing the transfer from within a js script. In fact, when you do it this way the js instance stays active for the entire call. A happy medium might be to session.execute("transfer","2223334444 XML custom"); and then have a custom dp context handle the bridge. That way you could do whatever it is you need to do inside of js and still let the dialplan do its thing. -MC On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > Using bridge in the dialplan directly works. > > I tried putting only the following line in transfer.js, but it doesn't > work. > session.execute("bridge", "sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); > > Putting the following instead doesn't work either. > session.execute("bridge", > "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); > > Using the following instead doesn't work either. > session.answer(); > session.execute("bridge", > "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); > > Still don't understand why. > > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [ > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Collins [msc at freeswitch.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 4:32 PM > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone > > > I'm not really sure what's happening here. The first BYE message that I see > comes in at line #548 from the provider side of what I assume is the A leg. > > > For now I would try using a very simple bridge app right in the public > context and avoid all the javascript so that you can get the simplest > scenario. SImply route the A leg to the bridge app and bridge it to the > broadvoice gateway: > > expression="^(INCOMING_DID_NUMBER)$"> > data="sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"/> > > > > > > A call coming in from one SIP endpoint and being bridged to another SIP > endpoint is pretty much the core and fundamental functionality of > FreeSWITCH, so I'm thinking that the javascript is doing something > unintended. > > > -MC > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Yungwei Chen > wrote: > > Here's the log with siptrace. > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16424 > > Here's the content of transfer.js: > session.answer(); > if (session.ready()) > { > session.execute("bridge", > "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/broadvoice/2223334444"); > } > > > > > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [ > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Collins [msc at freeswitch.org] > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:21 PM > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone > > > > Something is not right with the outbound leg of the call. It looks like > there is an immediate hangup after the b leg answers. Get a siptrace of that > traffic and look to see what is causing the hangup. > > > -MC > > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Yungwei Chen > wrote: > > The whole picture looks like the following: > A land-line<-->SIP provider A<-->FS<-->SIP provider A<-->a cell phone > > Is there any configuration setting that needs to be enabled or set > differently so that those 2 endpoints can talk to each other? > Btw, the same scenario works with Asterisk so my SIP provider shouldn't be > the problem. > > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Yungwei Chen > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:34 AM > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone > > Here's the debug log, http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16398 > > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Collins > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 10:08 AM > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone > > You need to put a debug log on pastebin.freeswitch.org. Be sure to use > "FreeSWITCH Log" for the syntax highlighting. > -MC > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Yungwei Chen > wrote: > No. > > I just verified that making an outbound call to my cell phone still works. > I even recorded the session just to make sure, and in the recording I hear > things both ways. > I first dial 9911 from my SIP client (behind freeswitch), and this leads to > the javascript program below. > session.answer(); > var new_session = new > Session("{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/sip_provider/1231231234"); > session.hangup(16); // disconnects the session between the SIP client and > freeswitch > new_session.execute("record_session", "/tmp/call-from-js-to-cell.wav"); > while (new_session.ready()) > { > new_session.streamFile("/path/to/local/wav/file"); > } > > Now back to the case I'm having problem with. > In this case, I first make a call from a landline to freeswitch through my > sip provider, and then a javascript program takes over. > I want to transfer the call to a cell phone so that the landline and the > cell phone can communicate with each other. > Here's the javascript program: > session.answer(); > > if (session.ready()) > { > session.execute("bridge", > "{ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/sip_provider/1231231234"); > } > > So what am I missing here? > > -----Original Message----- > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of mazilo > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:28 AM > To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transferring to a cell phone > > > Yungwei Chen wrote: > > > > Thanks for your reply. Using bridge fixed the problem. But I cannot hear > > anything both ways. Any idea? > After switching to using bridge function, does this also happen when you > make an outbound call to your cell phone using your javascript? > > ----- > FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 > Watts of electricity. > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Transferring-to-a-cell-phone-tp6408246p6410887.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/1efaef0b/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 3 20:57:05 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:57:05 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch Server getting down In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think Moises from Sangoma will want to check this out. First, though, be sure that you do a "make current" and get on the latest code, then re-test. Be prepared to collect logs, PRI traces, and/or backtrace info should the devs ask for it. -MC On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:33 AM, ovvenkat wrote: > Hi to all, > > I dont know whether this problem related to PRI line (OR) wanpipe driver ( > OR ) PRI Card > > I use Linux fedora 13 and Sangoma A101 PRI card to handle incoming calls > from E1 lines. > > Everything works fine for some time. > > After that, I could see cli debug output saying, > > all the channels are disconnected and then immediately > it says that "signaling status changed to UP". > > After some time, freeswitch getting shutdown saying > ftmod_wanpipe.c:967 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from sangoma device: No > buffer space available (-65) > > > I pastebin debug logs for the same. > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16432 > > I am failed to identify the problem. > Can you anyone guide me what is going wrong? > > > > Regards > Venkatesan OV. > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/b71687fd/attachment.html From freeswitch at simpot.com Fri Jun 3 21:49:19 2011 From: freeswitch at simpot.com (Dmitry Saratsky) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:49:19 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec enforcment from dialplan? Message-ID: <000401cc2216$90f08b10$b2d1a130$@com> Hi All, I have some codec-prefs in my FS configured globally for all profiles (In my case: "global_codec_prefs=G729,PCMU,PCMA,GSM"/>) In addition, I need to provide for some specific incoming channels other codec order (PCMU,PCMA) that destined to FS itself. I can identify those channels by destination number of incoming call (fax service) in my dialplan. I can enforce needed codec from dialplan successfully for my outgoing channels by using (absolute_codec_string='PCMU,PCMA'), but I'm failing to do the same for incoming channels. So now I'm enforcing all incoming calls from my provider to different from global order (), instead of doing this for fax calls only. Any ideas? Relevant part of profile config: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/694282cb/attachment-0001.html From b_ball_henry at hotmail.com Fri Jun 3 22:10:15 2011 From: b_ball_henry at hotmail.com (Henry Huang) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 02:10:15 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, even when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. It didn't work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. Henry On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been looking for > an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I really like. > > Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been issues > with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself so I > will defer to those who have. > > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of cake. Made >> live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after the >> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr from >> skyTpe client. >> >> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. >> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't respond to >> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is connected >> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I tried >> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of the key >> press works. >> >> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please do >> share your methods. >> >> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Henry Huang >> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 >> Contact Me [image: LinkedIn] [image: >> Facebook] [image: >> Twitter] >> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: Skype]unicsolution [image: >> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110604/58f2eeb1/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 3 22:32:58 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:32:58 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Try transferring to a local conference on your machine and see what happens. Watch the fs_cli and see if the DTMFs show up or not. From there we can see what's up... -MC On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Henry Huang wrote: > But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, even > when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. It didn't > work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. > > Henry > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been looking >> for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I really >> like. >> >> Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been issues >> with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself so I >> will defer to those who have. >> >> -MC >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang wrote: >> >>> Hi: >>> >>> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of cake. >>> Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after the >>> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr from >>> skyTpe client. >>> >>> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. >>> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't respond to >>> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is connected >>> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I tried >>> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of the key >>> press works. >>> >>> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please do >>> share your methods. >>> >>> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Henry Huang >>> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 >>> Contact Me [image: LinkedIn] [image: >>> Facebook] [image: >>> Twitter] >>> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: Skype]unicsolution [image: >>> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/2c9de610/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Fri Jun 3 22:47:40 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:47:40 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Vestec ASR: 3 New Language Models In-Reply-To: <4DE83D51.8020909@vestec.com> References: <4DE83D51.8020909@vestec.com> Message-ID: Kashif, Do you provide British English? Jan -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Kashif Kahn Sent: 3. juni 2011 03:48 To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Vestec ASR: 3 New Language Models Dear All, We have launched three new acoustic models for use with Vestec ASR: (1) Australian English, (2) Chinese Mandarin, and (3) Indian English. Vestec offers the best deal around for enabling sophisticated speech recognition with command-and-control type IVR applications. Our ASR supports SRGS grammar format, can be integrated using MRCP (v1 & v2) interface, offers high recognition accuracy, and costs a fraction of conventional speech engines. We offer the ASR in two versions according to vocabulary size: 500 items vocabulary and 2,500 items vocabulary, per recognition. A starter kit is available for $25 from Vestec webstore: http://www.vestec.com/products Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. We are looking forward to being of service. Regards, -Kashif -- Kashif Kahn VP Business Development Vestec Inc Waterloo, ON Canada phone: +1 519 885-7615 _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 23:09:07 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:09:07 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec enforcment from dialplan? In-Reply-To: <000401cc2216$90f08b10$b2d1a130$@com> References: <000401cc2216$90f08b10$b2d1a130$@com> Message-ID: The default behaviour is to select the codec for an incoming call *before* it hits the dialplan. To work around that you should enable late-negotiation on the sofia profile taking the incoming call. That'll delay selecting a codec until media starts for a bridge. The codec will then match the bleg if possible, and otherwise will pick the preferred codec from your lists. The alternative would be to have multiple profiles with different codec preferences on each. -Steve On 3 June 2011 18:49, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I have some codec-prefs in my FS configured globally for all profiles (In > my case: "global_codec_prefs=G729,PCMU,PCMA,GSM"/>) > > In addition, I need to provide for some specific incoming channels other > codec order (PCMU,PCMA) that destined to FS itself. I can identify those > channels by destination number of incoming call (fax service) in my > dialplan. > > I can enforce needed codec from dialplan successfully for my outgoing > channels by using (absolute_codec_string='PCMU,PCMA'), but I?m failing to do > the same for incoming channels? > > So now I?m enforcing all incoming calls from my provider to different from > global order (), > instead of doing this for fax calls only? > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > Relevant part of profile config: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/9c3b16f8/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 3 23:18:17 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:18:17 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec enforcment from dialplan? In-Reply-To: <000401cc2216$90f08b10$b2d1a130$@com> References: <000401cc2216$90f08b10$b2d1a130$@com> Message-ID: FYI, I wrote some nice, gentle words about codec negotiation on the wiki: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Codec_negotiation#Introduction Start there - it will help you understand codec negotiation in general, which will give you the foundation you need to do what you're trying to do. -MC On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I have some codec-prefs in my FS configured globally for all profiles (In > my case: "global_codec_prefs=G729,PCMU,PCMA,GSM"/>) > > In addition, I need to provide for some specific incoming channels other > codec order (PCMU,PCMA) that destined to FS itself. I can identify those > channels by destination number of incoming call (fax service) in my > dialplan. > > I can enforce needed codec from dialplan successfully for my outgoing > channels by using (absolute_codec_string='PCMU,PCMA'), but I?m failing to do > the same for incoming channels? > > So now I?m enforcing all incoming calls from my provider to different from > global order (), > instead of doing this for fax calls only? > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > Relevant part of profile config: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/fe5c488e/attachment.html From joaocarlosleme at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 23:22:23 2011 From: joaocarlosleme at gmail.com (Joao Leme) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:22:23 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FIFO not working properly Message-ID: FIFO is not ringing any extension while first call out is not hang up. Even with five different agents to answer the queue only one (the first to answer) get to take the calls, one at a time. Why? It used to work just fine before. What may be causing this behavior? Thanks, John -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/dd1ab339/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 3 23:38:12 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:38:12 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FIFO not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Malfunction! Need input! Collect up all the relevant info and put it on pastebin. See http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs for hints on how to gather data and drop it into pastebin. -MC On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Joao Leme wrote: > FIFO is not ringing any extension while first call out is not hang up. Even > with five different agents to answer the queue only one (the first to > answer) get to take the calls, one at a time. Why? It used to work just fine > before. What may be causing this behavior? > Thanks, > John > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/2786c5ae/attachment.html From freeswitch at simpot.com Fri Jun 3 23:41:45 2011 From: freeswitch at simpot.com (Dmitry Saratsky) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:41:45 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec enforcment from dialplan? In-Reply-To: References: <000401cc2216$90f08b10$b2d1a130$@com> Message-ID: <000901cc2226$455ee3d0$d01cab70$@com> Hi Steven, Thanks for your input, in that case you are right - I need to do late-negotiation. I have already tried to work with late-negotiation, but I was failed probably because I still not understand enough about configuring this in right way. As far as I do understand, I should: 1. Configure () on my external profile. This is clear for me. 2. Is there any limitation for ("inbound-codec-negotiation" value) in that case? 3. Configure () in dialplan. This is not clear. Where in dialpan? On A leg (before "transfer" DID) or on B leg (in general part before "bridge")? 4. Is this enough, or I should use also additional settings in dialplan (Maybe: )? Where? Thanks, Dmitry. From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steven Ayre Sent: 03 Jun 2011 22:09 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Codec enforcment from dialplan? The default behaviour is to select the codec for an incoming call *before* it hits the dialplan. To work around that you should enable late-negotiation on the sofia profile taking the incoming call. That'll delay selecting a codec until media starts for a bridge. The codec will then match the bleg if possible, and otherwise will pick the preferred codec from your lists. The alternative would be to have multiple profiles with different codec preferences on each. -Steve On 3 June 2011 18:49, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: Hi All, I have some codec-prefs in my FS configured globally for all profiles (In my case: "global_codec_prefs=G729,PCMU,PCMA,GSM"/>) In addition, I need to provide for some specific incoming channels other codec order (PCMU,PCMA) that destined to FS itself. I can identify those channels by destination number of incoming call (fax service) in my dialplan. I can enforce needed codec from dialplan successfully for my outgoing channels by using (absolute_codec_string='PCMU,PCMA'), but I'm failing to do the same for incoming channels. So now I'm enforcing all incoming calls from my provider to different from global order (), instead of doing this for fax calls only. Any ideas? Relevant part of profile config: _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/3ded8fdf/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 3 23:43:33 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:43:33 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Troubleshooting FreeSwitch Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Interesting... I had never heard of "Karoo Bridge" - I'll have to contact them and see if they will sponsor ClueCon. :P If you don't have access to the fs_cli then just use tcpdump and grab the port 5060 traffic (or whatever port your SIP traffic is on) and check for clues. Once you know where the problem is then you can work on fixing it. -MC On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote: > Thanks for your help. > > The actual application I am using is Karoo Bridge SBC which is built > on FreeSwitch. I found freeswitch.xml.fsxml configuration file. I > suppose this the final resolved configuraiton. I am not sure where I > set debug option. > > Anyway, I thought the following could be useful for you to see. > > > 09:03:38.274: [CID=29f64488] B2B Transaction CREATED - > register13166648z9hG4bKr84Dr2gK3ccHm > 09:03:38.274: [CID=29f64488] JS: Setting transaction property > respond-to-packet-source=1 > 09:03:38.274: [CID=29f64488] JS: Setting transaction property > auth-method=access-list > 09:03:38.274: [CID=29f64488] JS: Setting transaction property > auth-method=none > 09:03:38.310: [CID=29f64488] >>> REGISTER > sip:callcentric.com;transport=udp SIP/2.0 LEN: 843 SRC: > XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 DST: 204.11.192.37:5060 ENC: 0 PROT: udp > 09:03:38.310: ^M > {^M > [CID=29f64488] REGISTER > sip:callcentric.com;transport=udp SIP/2.0^M > [CID=29f64488] From: > ;tag=v0r8KQHmF054m^M > [CID=29f64488] To: > ^M > [CID=29f64488] Call-ID: > 99b2a5a7-1e7c-4e65-b9ac-6fadbf4ca1c3^M > [CID=29f64488] CSeq: 13166648 REGISTER^M > [CID=29f64488] Expires: 1800^M > [CID=29f64488] User-Agent: OSS Karoo FS^M > [CID=29f64488] Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, > OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY^M > [CID=29f64488] Supported: timer, precondition, path, > replaces^M > [CID=29f64488] Proxy-Authorization: Digest > username="1##########", realm="callcentric.com", > nonce="a0667bbc4a83b98f36b9619405daa1f5", opaque="", algorithm=MD5, > uri="sip:XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060", > response="d4ee3820ca6f33ac8d40afc319b82006"^M > [CID=29f64488] Content-Length: 0^M > [CID=29f64488] Max-Forwards: 69^M > [CID=29f64488] Contact: > ^M > [CID=29f64488] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > > XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK34487872-8cf7-11e0-a33e-0800274986dc;rport^M > }; > 09:03:38.279: [CID=29f64488] B2B Transaction DESTROYED - > register13166647z9hG4bKQZBNp7ZF63Nyr > 09:03:38.348: [CID=29f64488] Found Transaction > register13166648z9hG4bK34487872-8cf7-11e0-a33e-0800274986dc > 09:03:38.348: [CID=29f64488] <<< SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication > Required LEN: 498 SRC: 204.11.192.37:5060 DST: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 EXT: > [XX.XX.XXX.XXX] ENC: 0 PROT: udp > 09:03:38.348: ^M > {^M > [CID=29f64488] SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required^M > [CID=29f64488] v: SIP/2.0/UDP > > XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK34487872-8cf7-11e0-a33e-0800274986dc;rport=5060^M > [CID=29f64488] f: > ;tag=v0r8KQHmF054m^M > [CID=29f64488] t: > ^M > [CID=29f64488] i: 99b2a5a7-1e7c-4e65-b9ac-6fadbf4ca1c3^M > [CID=29f64488] CSeq: 13166648 REGISTER^M > [CID=29f64488] Proxy-Authenticate: Digest > realm="callcentric.com", domain="sip:callcentric.com", > nonce="edbfefbbc2ab6d684bae2b1de3fec2ea", opaque="", stale=TRUE, > algorithm=MD5^M > [CID=29f64488] l: 0^M > }; > 09:03:38.349: Missing contact header in REGISTER response. > 09:03:38.350: [CID=29f64488] >>> SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication > Required LEN: 526 SRC: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 DST: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 ENC: > 0 PROT: udp > 09:03:38.351: ^M > {^M > [CID=29f64488] SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required^M > [CID=29f64488] f: > ;tag=v0r8KQHmF054m^M > [CID=29f64488] t: > ^M > [CID=29f64488] i: 99b2a5a7-1e7c-4e65-b9ac-6fadbf4ca1c3^M > [CID=29f64488] CSeq: 13166648 REGISTER^M > [CID=29f64488] Proxy-Authenticate: Digest > realm="callcentric.com", domain="sip:callcentric.com", > nonce="edbfefbbc2ab6d684bae2b1de3fec2ea", opaque="", stale=TRUE, > algorithm=MD5^M > [CID=29f64488] l: 0^M > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > > Sounds like they're not sending back a valid response. > > > > It would be useful to see what's beeing sent back and forth. Change the > > logging level to debug and do 'sofia global siptrace on' to log all sip > > packets so we can see what's in them. It could be a problem with their > > server not sending the correct reply or it could be that your > configuration > > isn't quite right to interop with their server and needs tweaking. > > > > -Steve > > > > > > On 2 June 2011 21:33, Roman Gelfand wrote: > >> > >> I am running into trouble trying to register to ITSP. The log file > shows > >> ... > >> > >> 2011-06-01 21:58:10.950068 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:401 Timeout > >> Registering 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com > >> 2011-06-01 21:58:11.957417 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:425 > >> 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com Failed Registration [0], setting retry to > >> 30 seconds. > >> 2011-06-01 21:58:42.046331 [NOTICE] sofia_reg.c:367 Registering > >> 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com > >> > >> When challenged by 407 message from ITSP, I get > >> > >> 05:03:12.857: Missing contact header in REGISTER response. > >> > >> Does anyone know what is happening here? or pointers how to troubleshoot > >> this? > >> > >> Thanks in advance > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/cc6c7496/attachment.html From freeswitch at simpot.com Fri Jun 3 23:44:29 2011 From: freeswitch at simpot.com (Dmitry Saratsky) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:44:29 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec enforcment from dialplan? In-Reply-To: References: <000401cc2216$90f08b10$b2d1a130$@com> Message-ID: <000e01cc2226$a70d7380$f5285a80$@com> Hi Michael, Thanks you, but I have already read this several time. Probably I still not understand how do I configure late-negotiation. Please see: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2011-June/073246.html From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins Sent: 03 Jun 2011 22:18 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Codec enforcment from dialplan? FYI, I wrote some nice, gentle words about codec negotiation on the wiki: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Codec_negotiation#Introduction Start there - it will help you understand codec negotiation in general, which will give you the foundation you need to do what you're trying to do. -MC On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: Hi All, I have some codec-prefs in my FS configured globally for all profiles (In my case: "global_codec_prefs=G729,PCMU,PCMA,GSM"/>) In addition, I need to provide for some specific incoming channels other codec order (PCMU,PCMA) that destined to FS itself. I can identify those channels by destination number of incoming call (fax service) in my dialplan. I can enforce needed codec from dialplan successfully for my outgoing channels by using (absolute_codec_string='PCMU,PCMA'), but I'm failing to do the same for incoming channels. So now I'm enforcing all incoming calls from my provider to different from global order (), instead of doing this for fax calls only. Any ideas? Relevant part of profile config: _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/55295d9d/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 3 23:48:56 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:48:56 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec enforcment from dialplan? In-Reply-To: <000901cc2226$455ee3d0$d01cab70$@com> References: <000401cc2216$90f08b10$b2d1a130$@com> <000901cc2226$455ee3d0$d01cab70$@com> Message-ID: You may have replied here before you saw my last email, but definitely go read the codec negotiation page on the wiki. There you will find out whether or not you need "inherit_codec" or something else. It all depends on exactly what you are trying to accomplish. -MC On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > Hi Steven, > > > > Thanks for your input, in that case you are right ? I need to do > late-negotiation. > > I have already tried to work with late-negotiation, but I was failed > probably because I still not understand enough about configuring this in > right way? > > As far as I do understand, I should: > > 1. Configure () > on my external profile. This is clear for me. > > 2. Is there any limitation for ("inbound-codec-negotiation" value) > in that case? > > 3. Configure () > in dialplan. This is not clear? Where in dialpan? On A leg (before > ?transfer? DID) or on B leg (in general part before ?bridge?)? > > 4. Is this enough, or I should use also additional settings in > dialplan (Maybe: data="codec_string=${ep_codec_string}"/>)? Where? > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitry. > > > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Steven Ayre > *Sent:* 03 Jun 2011 22:09 > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Codec enforcment from dialplan? > > > > The default behaviour is to select the codec for an incoming call *before* > it hits the dialplan. > > To work around that you should enable late-negotiation on the sofia profile > taking the incoming call. That'll delay selecting a codec until media starts > for a bridge. The codec will then match the bleg if possible, and otherwise > will pick the preferred codec from your lists. The alternative would be to > have multiple profiles with different codec preferences on each. > > -Steve > > > On 3 June 2011 18:49, Dmitry Saratsky wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I have some codec-prefs in my FS configured globally for all profiles (In > my case: "global_codec_prefs=G729,PCMU,PCMA,GSM"/>) > > In addition, I need to provide for some specific incoming channels other > codec order (PCMU,PCMA) that destined to FS itself. I can identify those > channels by destination number of incoming call (fax service) in my > dialplan. > > I can enforce needed codec from dialplan successfully for my outgoing > channels by using (absolute_codec_string='PCMU,PCMA'), but I?m failing to do > the same for incoming channels? > > So now I?m enforcing all incoming calls from my provider to different from > global order (), > instead of doing this for fax calls only? > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > Relevant part of profile config: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/8b679154/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 3 23:53:29 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:53:29 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FIFO suddenly stopped working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Also, check out this thread, particularly the comments from Anthony: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2011-March/070588.html If you had a really old version of FIFO and updated then you may have crossed over from when caller ID was not the default to the current state where it is the default. -MC On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Joao Leme wrote: > Hi there, > No change nor updates have been made in months. Everything was working > great but now FIFO is not ringing the extensions while the first call is not > HUNG UP...meaning, first call to go to FIFO rings the agents, and one > person answer...when the second call comes in, it goes to fifo queue (caller > listens the music) but no one is aware of the call, nor even the agents that > are available. Only after the first call hangs up the 2nd goes in. I tried > troubleshooting but no help. > > What I also noticed is that before, to display the caller ID on my sip > client I had to use: > > data="origination_caller_id_number=${caller_id_number}"/> > data="origination_caller_id_name=${caller_id_name}"/> > > but now, while testing, the caller id was showing when calling > fifo without setting those parameters, but before it would just show the > fifo queue name. > > All I can say is that I can't figure out why and how to fix these behavior > if I have done no change to FreeSWITCH nor the config files. I also tried > downloading the latest GIT and got the same response. > > THANKS, > John > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/327e7540/attachment.html From gmaruzz at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 01:08:51 2011 From: gmaruzz at gmail.com (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:08:51 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: As per the wiki page, and as is clearly written in the console and the logfile, if an incomong skype call is bridged to an outbound call, the dtmf is by default passed only in band (eg: as audio). If you want to have it working with the fs developer conference, create an extension that goes there and add to it the variable that's in the wiki page (can't remember the name, is something like "dtmf-outband-also-when-bridged=true"). Please check the wiki page for the variable name. Reason for this is that the in band dtmf cannot be shut up, and often is detected by the remote party. But in this particular case of the fs developer conference, the remote party is setup to not detect inband in sip (or anyway, it does not detect it). Long story short: create an extension that sets that variable and goes to the fs conference and you'll be all set. Tomorrow I'll post here an example from my dialplan. -giovanni On 6/3/11, Michael Collins wrote: > Try transferring to a local conference on your machine and see what happens. > Watch the fs_cli and see if the DTMFs show up or not. From there we can see > what's up... > > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Henry Huang > wrote: > >> But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, even >> when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. It >> didn't >> work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. >> >> Henry >> >> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins >> wrote: >> >>> The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been looking >>> for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I >>> really >>> like. >>> >>> Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been >>> issues >>> with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself so I >>> will defer to those who have. >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi: >>>> >>>> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of cake. >>>> Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after the >>>> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr >>>> from >>>> skyTpe client. >>>> >>>> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. >>>> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't respond to >>>> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is >>>> connected >>>> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I tried >>>> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of the >>>> key >>>> press works. >>>> >>>> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please do >>>> share your methods. >>>> >>>> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Henry Huang >>>> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 >>>> Contact Me [image: >>>> LinkedIn] [image: >>>> Facebook] [image: >>>> Twitter] >>>> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: >>>> Skype]unicsolution [image: >>>> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > -- Sent from my mobile device Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 From rgelfand2 at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 01:42:27 2011 From: rgelfand2 at gmail.com (Roman Gelfand) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Troubleshooting FreeSwitch Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: As it turns out, I do have access to fs_cli. In fact when I left it, it gave me this message [INFO] libs/esl/fs_cli.c:676 process_command() Goodbye! See you at ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ I am looking into it right now. Thanks for the help. On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Interesting... I had never heard of "Karoo Bridge" - I'll have to contact > them and see if they will sponsor ClueCon. :P > If you don't have access to the fs_cli then just use tcpdump and grab the > port 5060 traffic (or whatever port your SIP traffic is on) and check for > clues. Once you know where the problem is then you can work on fixing it. > -MC > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote: >> >> Thanks for your help. >> >> The actual application I am using is Karoo Bridge SBC which is built >> on FreeSwitch. ?I found freeswitch.xml.fsxml configuration file. ?I >> suppose this the final resolved configuraiton. ?I am not sure where I >> set debug option. >> >> Anyway, I thought the following could be useful for you to see. >> >> >> 09:03:38.274: ? [CID=29f64488] B2B Transaction CREATED - >> register13166648z9hG4bKr84Dr2gK3ccHm >> 09:03:38.274: ? [CID=29f64488] JS: Setting transaction property >> respond-to-packet-source=1 >> 09:03:38.274: ? [CID=29f64488] JS: Setting transaction property >> auth-method=access-list >> 09:03:38.274: ? [CID=29f64488] JS: Setting transaction property >> auth-method=none >> 09:03:38.310: ? [CID=29f64488] >>> REGISTER >> sip:callcentric.com;transport=udp SIP/2.0 LEN: 843 SRC: >> XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 DST: 204.11.192.37:5060 ENC: 0 PROT: udp >> 09:03:38.310: ^M >> {^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] REGISTER >> sip:callcentric.com;transport=udp SIP/2.0^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] From: >> ;tag=v0r8KQHmF054m^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] To: >> ^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Call-ID: >> 99b2a5a7-1e7c-4e65-b9ac-6fadbf4ca1c3^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] CSeq: 13166648 REGISTER^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Expires: 1800^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] User-Agent: OSS Karoo FS^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, >> OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Supported: timer, precondition, path, >> replaces^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Proxy-Authorization: Digest >> username="1##########", realm="callcentric.com", >> nonce="a0667bbc4a83b98f36b9619405daa1f5", opaque="", algorithm=MD5, >> uri="sip:XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060", >> response="d4ee3820ca6f33ac8d40afc319b82006"^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Content-Length: 0^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Max-Forwards: 69^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Contact: >> ^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> >> XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK34487872-8cf7-11e0-a33e-0800274986dc;rport^M >> }; >> 09:03:38.279: ? [CID=29f64488] B2B Transaction DESTROYED - >> register13166647z9hG4bKQZBNp7ZF63Nyr >> 09:03:38.348: ? [CID=29f64488] Found Transaction >> register13166648z9hG4bK34487872-8cf7-11e0-a33e-0800274986dc >> 09:03:38.348: ? [CID=29f64488] <<< SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication >> Required LEN: 498 SRC: 204.11.192.37:5060 DST: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 EXT: >> [XX.XX.XXX.XXX] ENC: 0 PROT: udp >> 09:03:38.348: ^M >> {^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] v: SIP/2.0/UDP >> >> XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK34487872-8cf7-11e0-a33e-0800274986dc;rport=5060^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] f: >> ;tag=v0r8KQHmF054m^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] t: >> ^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] i: 99b2a5a7-1e7c-4e65-b9ac-6fadbf4ca1c3^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] CSeq: 13166648 REGISTER^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Proxy-Authenticate: Digest >> realm="callcentric.com", domain="sip:callcentric.com", >> nonce="edbfefbbc2ab6d684bae2b1de3fec2ea", opaque="", stale=TRUE, >> algorithm=MD5^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] l: 0^M >> }; >> 09:03:38.349: Missing contact header in REGISTER response. >> 09:03:38.350: ? [CID=29f64488] >>> SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication >> Required LEN: 526 SRC: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 DST: XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 ENC: >> 0 PROT: udp >> 09:03:38.351: ^M >> {^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] f: >> ;tag=v0r8KQHmF054m^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] t: >> ^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] i: 99b2a5a7-1e7c-4e65-b9ac-6fadbf4ca1c3^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] CSeq: 13166648 REGISTER^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] Proxy-Authenticate: Digest >> realm="callcentric.com", domain="sip:callcentric.com", >> nonce="edbfefbbc2ab6d684bae2b1de3fec2ea", opaque="", stale=TRUE, >> algorithm=MD5^M >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[CID=29f64488] l: 0^M >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: >> > Sounds like they're not sending back a valid response. >> > >> > It would be useful to see what's beeing sent back and forth. Change the >> > logging level to debug and do 'sofia global siptrace on' to log all sip >> > packets so we can see what's in them. It could be a problem with their >> > server not sending the correct reply or it could be that your >> > configuration >> > isn't quite right to interop with their server and needs tweaking. >> > >> > -Steve >> > >> > >> > On 2 June 2011 21:33, Roman Gelfand wrote: >> >> >> >> I am running into trouble trying to register to ITSP. ?The log file >> >> shows >> >> ... >> >> >> >> 2011-06-01 21:58:10.950068 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:401 Timeout >> >> Registering 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com >> >> 2011-06-01 21:58:11.957417 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:425 >> >> 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com Failed Registration [0], setting retry to >> >> 30 seconds. >> >> 2011-06-01 21:58:42.046331 [NOTICE] sofia_reg.c:367 Registering >> >> 1XXXXXXXXXX-callcentric.com >> >> >> >> When challenged by 407 message from ITSP, I get >> >> >> >> 05:03:12.857: Missing contact header in REGISTER response. >> >> >> >> Does anyone know what is happening here? or pointers how to >> >> troubleshoot >> >> this? >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From rgelfand2 at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 02:04:47 2011 From: rgelfand2 at gmail.com (Roman Gelfand) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Need help interpreting fs_cli debug messages Message-ID: I was wondering if somebody could help interpret the registration issue. +OK log level [7] freeswitch at internal> nua: nh_create_handle: entering nua: nua_handle_bind: entering 2011-06-02 13:35:18.401497 [NOTICE] sofia_reg.c:367 Registering ###########-callcentric.com nua: nua_register: entering nua(0x873dc88): sent signal r_register nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering soa_clone(static::0x86d2e30, 0x86fba08, 0x873dc88) called soa_set_params(static::0x8dd11008, ...) called soa_set_params(static::0x8dd11008, ...) called nua(0x873dc88): adding register usage nta_leg_tcreate(0x8dd16398) nta: selecting scheme sip tport_tsend(0x86afae0) tpn = */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_resolve addrinfo = XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_by_addrinfo(0x86afae0): not found by name */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_vsend returned 639 nta: sent REGISTER (13181995) to */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_pend(0x86afae0): pending 0x8dd0a588 for udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 (already 0) nta: timer set to 32000 ms nta: timer shortened to 1000 ms tport_wakeup_pri(0x86afae0): events IN tport_recv_event(0x86afae0) tport_recv_iovec(0x86afae0) msg 0x8dd08cf8 from (udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080) has 526 bytes, veclen = 1 tport_deliver(0x86afae0): msg 0x8dd08cf8 (526 bytes) from udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080/sip next=(nil) nta: received 407 Proxy Authentication Required for REGISTER (13181995) nta: 407 Proxy Authentication Required is going to a transaction nta_outgoing: RTT is 135.683 ms tport_release(0x86afae0): 0x8dd0a588 by 0x8dd009d8 with 0x8dd08cf8 auth_digest_challenge_get(): got 7 nta: outgoing_free(0x8dd009d8) nua: nua_application_event: entering nua: nua_authenticate: entering nua(0x873dc88): sent signal r_authenticate nua: nua_handle_magic: entering auth_digest_a1() has A1 = MD5(###########:callcentric.com:passwd) = 8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b A2 = MD5(REGISTER:sip:XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060) auth_response: 9f45cc31d0328fdf18a7e4d3b547e3ea = MD5(8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b:dbcc6c9095c35c4be730ec1110f970e5:db5f9cddc4d0d297aa85cc660f20595a) (qop=NONE) nta: selecting scheme sip tport_tsend(0x86afae0) tpn = */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_resolve addrinfo = XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_by_addrinfo(0x86afae0): not found by name */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_vsend returned 859 nta: sent REGISTER (13181996) to */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_pend(0x86afae0): pending 0x8dd08cf8 for udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 (already 0) tport_wakeup_pri(0x86afae0): events IN tport_recv_event(0x86afae0) tport_recv_iovec(0x86afae0) msg 0x8dd1ae88 from (udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080) has 526 bytes, veclen = 1 tport_deliver(0x86afae0): msg 0x8dd1ae88 (526 bytes) from udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080/sip next=(nil) nta: received 407 Proxy Authentication Required for REGISTER (13181996) nta: 407 Proxy Authentication Required is going to a transaction nta_outgoing: RTT is 127.055 ms tport_release(0x86afae0): 0x8dd08cf8 by 0x8dd08a98 with 0x8dd1ae88 auth_digest_challenge_get(): got 7 auth_digest_a1() has A1 = MD5(###########:callcentric.com:passwd) = 8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b A2 = MD5(REGISTER:sip:XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060) auth_response: c0b3965ec27e2e3386277645ae14f324 = MD5(8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b:c76385015930949803ca8b0946f81d0e:db5f9cddc4d0d297aa85cc660f20595a) (qop=NONE) nta: selecting scheme sip tport_tsend(0x86afae0) tpn = */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_resolve addrinfo = XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_by_addrinfo(0x86afae0): not found by name */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_vsend returned 859 nta: sent REGISTER (13181997) to */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_pend(0x86afae0): pending 0x8dd19ea8 for udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 (already 0) nta: outgoing_free(0x8dd08a98) nua: nua_application_event: entering nua: nua_handle_magic: entering tport_wakeup_pri(0x86afae0): events IN tport_recv_event(0x86afae0) tport_recv_iovec(0x86afae0) msg 0x8dd1ae88 from (udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080) has 526 bytes, veclen = 1 tport_deliver(0x86afae0): msg 0x8dd1ae88 (526 bytes) from udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080/sip next=(nil) nta: received 407 Proxy Authentication Required for REGISTER (13181997) nta: 407 Proxy Authentication Required is going to a transaction nta_outgoing: RTT is 139.175 ms tport_release(0x86afae0): 0x8dd19ea8 by 0x8dd18790 with 0x8dd1ae88 auth_digest_challenge_get(): got 7 auth_digest_a1() has A1 = MD5(###########:callcentric.com:passwd) = 8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b A2 = MD5(REGISTER:sip:XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060) auth_response: f014cc64fa858ec3615b2b1caab196a6 = MD5(8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b:274bba14cbca0384c30f227da6c42c35:db5f9cddc4d0d297aa85cc660f20595a) (qop=NONE) nta: selecting scheme sip tport_tsend(0x86afae0) tpn = */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_resolve addrinfo = XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_by_addrinfo(0x86afae0): not found by name */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_vsend returned 859 nta: sent REGISTER (13181998) to */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 tport_pend(0x86afae0): pending 0x8dd18f80 for udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 (already 0) nta: outgoing_free(0x8dd18790) nua: nua_application_event: entering nua: nua_handle_magic: entering tport_wakeup_pri(0x86afae0): events IN tport_recv_event(0x86afae0) tport_recv_iovec(0x86afae0) msg 0x8dd1ae88 from (udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080) has 526 bytes, veclen = 1 tport_deliver(0x86afae0): msg 0x8dd1ae88 (526 bytes) from udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080/sip next=(nil) nta: received 407 Proxy Authentication Required for REGISTER (13181998) nta: 407 Proxy Authentication Required is going to a transaction nta_outgoing: RTT is 114.044 ms tport_release(0x86afae0): 0x8dd18f80 by 0x8dd16e10 with 0x8dd1ae88 nta: outgoing_free(0x8dd16e10) nua(0x873dc88): removing register usage nta_leg_destroy(0x8dd16398) nua: nua_application_event: entering nua: nua_authenticate: entering nua(0x873dc88): sent signal r_authenticate nua: nua_handle_magic: entering nua: nua_application_event: entering nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering nua(0x873dc88): sent signal r_destroy nua: nua_handle_magic: entering nua: nua_handle_bind: entering nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering nta_leg_destroy((nil)) soa_destroy(static::0x8dd11008) called nta: timer not set 2011-06-02 13:36:19.875422 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:401 Timeout Registering ###########-callcentric.com nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering 2011-06-02 13:36:20.881513 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:425 ###########-callcentric.com Failed Registration [0], setting retry to 30 seconds. Thanks in advance From joaocarlosleme at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 02:31:27 2011 From: joaocarlosleme at gmail.com (Joao Leme) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:31:27 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FIFO suddenly stopped working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Michael, but I don't know what I have to do to get it fixed. Is there a configuration change? I'm not good at debugging and probably I should change the subject to "How to configure FIFO properly" (hoping to be a configuration problem). Below is my simple configuration for FIFO: fifo.conf.xml: {fifo_member_wait=nowait}group/attendants@$${domain} {fifo_member_wait=nowait}group/sales@$${domain} directory/default.xml: dialplan/default/mydialplan.xml: putting call on fifo It used to work but nows it only sends one call at a time, even with the other users available. I also tried replacing the groups for users but no luck. Thanks On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Also, check out this thread, particularly the comments from Anthony: > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2011-March/070588.html > > If you had a really old version of FIFO and updated then you may have > crossed over from when caller ID was not the default to the current state > where it is the default. > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Joao Leme wrote: > >> Hi there, >> No change nor updates have been made in months. Everything was working >> great but now FIFO is not ringing the extensions while the first call is not >> HUNG UP...meaning, first call to go to FIFO rings the agents, and one >> person answer...when the second call comes in, it goes to fifo queue (caller >> listens the music) but no one is aware of the call, nor even the agents that >> are available. Only after the first call hangs up the 2nd goes in. I tried >> troubleshooting but no help. >> >> What I also noticed is that before, to display the caller ID on my sip >> client I had to use: >> >> > data="origination_caller_id_number=${caller_id_number}"/> >> > data="origination_caller_id_name=${caller_id_name}"/> >> >> but now, while testing, the caller id was showing when calling >> fifo without setting those parameters, but before it would just show the >> fifo queue name. >> >> All I can say is that I can't figure out why and how to fix these behavior >> if I have done no change to FreeSWITCH nor the config files. I also tried >> downloading the latest GIT and got the same response. >> >> THANKS, >> John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/6ef0c174/attachment-0001.html From yungwei at resolvity.com Sat Jun 4 02:35:48 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585DEE@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Hi, When testing the following javascript program, I notice a problem that it takes longer and longer for freeswitch to respond to DTMF input for some reason. Please refer to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16435 for debug logs. Notice that the difference in time between any adjacent pairs of the following is increasing as time goes by. Am I missing something here? switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 2:960 Thanks. Here's the javascript program: var dtmf_digits = ""; function on_dtmf_28(session, type, digits, arg) { if (type == "dtmf") { dtmf_digits = digits.digit; console_log("dtmf_digits=" + dtmf_digits + "\n"); return false; // barge-in / done } return true; } while (true) { dtmf_digits = ""; session.flushDigits(); session.streamFile("/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/long-prompt.wav", on_dtmf_28, false); if(dtmf_digits.length == 0) { /* no input */ console_log("no input\n"); session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'no input!', null); } else if(dtmf_digits == "1" || dtmf_digits == "2") { console_log("match "+dtmf_digits+"\n"); session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'you pressed ' + dtmf_digits+ '!', null); } else { /* no match */ console_log("no match\n"); session.speak('flite', 'kal', "no match!", null); } } From steveayre at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 02:46:20 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:46:20 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585DEE@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585DEE@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: You should be checking session.ready() in that loop, as it is I think you'll find the scripts are never ending when the channel is hung up. streamFile/flushDigits probably return instantly, but then get called again on the next loop iteration. The problem would get slightly worse after each test call since there would be an extra copy of the script running. Try replacing: while(true) { with: while(session.ready()) { -Steve On 3 June 2011 23:35, Yungwei Chen wrote: > Hi, > > When testing the following javascript program, I notice a problem that it > takes longer and longer for freeswitch to respond to DTMF input for some > reason. > Please refer to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16435 for debug logs. > Notice that the difference in time between any adjacent pairs of the > following is increasing as time goes by. Am I missing something here? > switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels > 20ms > switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 2:960 > Thanks. > > Here's the javascript program: > var dtmf_digits = ""; > > > function on_dtmf_28(session, type, digits, arg) > { > if (type == "dtmf") > { > > dtmf_digits = digits.digit; > > console_log("dtmf_digits=" + dtmf_digits + "\n"); > > return false; // barge-in / done > } > return true; > } > > while (true) > { > dtmf_digits = ""; > session.flushDigits(); > session.streamFile("/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/long-prompt.wav", > on_dtmf_28, false); > > if(dtmf_digits.length == 0) > { > /* no input */ > console_log("no input\n"); > session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'no input!', null); > } > else if(dtmf_digits == "1" || dtmf_digits == "2") > { > console_log("match "+dtmf_digits+"\n"); > session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'you pressed ' + dtmf_digits+ > '!', null); > } > else > { > /* no match */ > console_log("no match\n"); > session.speak('flite', 'kal', "no match!", null); > } > > } > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/a00aa5a8/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 02:48:30 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:48:30 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Need help interpreting fs_cli debug messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The debug log and siptrace would be more useful than the sofia stack debugging... Looks like it's failing to authenticate, which is likely bad credentials or the configuration not quite matching what the provider needs. -Steve On 3 June 2011 23:04, Roman Gelfand wrote: > I was wondering if somebody could help interpret the registration issue. > > +OK log level [7] > freeswitch at internal> nua: nh_create_handle: entering > nua: nua_handle_bind: entering > 2011-06-02 13:35:18.401497 [NOTICE] sofia_reg.c:367 Registering > ###########-callcentric.com > nua: nua_register: entering > nua(0x873dc88): sent signal r_register > nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering > soa_clone(static::0x86d2e30, 0x86fba08, 0x873dc88) called > soa_set_params(static::0x8dd11008, ...) called > soa_set_params(static::0x8dd11008, ...) called > nua(0x873dc88): adding register usage > nta_leg_tcreate(0x8dd16398) > nta: selecting scheme sip > tport_tsend(0x86afae0) tpn = */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_resolve addrinfo = XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_by_addrinfo(0x86afae0): not found by name */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_vsend returned 639 > nta: sent REGISTER (13181995) to */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_pend(0x86afae0): pending 0x8dd0a588 for udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 > (already 0) > nta: timer set to 32000 ms > nta: timer shortened to 1000 ms > tport_wakeup_pri(0x86afae0): events IN > tport_recv_event(0x86afae0) > tport_recv_iovec(0x86afae0) msg 0x8dd08cf8 from > (udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080) has 526 bytes, veclen = 1 > tport_deliver(0x86afae0): msg 0x8dd08cf8 (526 bytes) from > udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080/sip next=(nil) > nta: received 407 Proxy Authentication Required for REGISTER (13181995) > nta: 407 Proxy Authentication Required is going to a transaction > nta_outgoing: RTT is 135.683 ms > tport_release(0x86afae0): 0x8dd0a588 by 0x8dd009d8 with 0x8dd08cf8 > auth_digest_challenge_get(): got 7 > nta: outgoing_free(0x8dd009d8) > nua: nua_application_event: entering > nua: nua_authenticate: entering > nua(0x873dc88): sent signal r_authenticate > nua: nua_handle_magic: entering > auth_digest_a1() has A1 = MD5(###########:callcentric.com:passwd) = > 8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b > A2 = MD5(REGISTER:sip:XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060) > auth_response: 9f45cc31d0328fdf18a7e4d3b547e3ea = > > MD5(8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b:dbcc6c9095c35c4be730ec1110f970e5:db5f9cddc4d0d297aa85cc660f20595a) > (qop=NONE) > nta: selecting scheme sip > tport_tsend(0x86afae0) tpn = */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_resolve addrinfo = XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_by_addrinfo(0x86afae0): not found by name */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_vsend returned 859 > nta: sent REGISTER (13181996) to */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_pend(0x86afae0): pending 0x8dd08cf8 for udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 > (already 0) > tport_wakeup_pri(0x86afae0): events IN > tport_recv_event(0x86afae0) > tport_recv_iovec(0x86afae0) msg 0x8dd1ae88 from > (udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080) has 526 bytes, veclen = 1 > tport_deliver(0x86afae0): msg 0x8dd1ae88 (526 bytes) from > udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080/sip next=(nil) > nta: received 407 Proxy Authentication Required for REGISTER (13181996) > nta: 407 Proxy Authentication Required is going to a transaction > nta_outgoing: RTT is 127.055 ms > tport_release(0x86afae0): 0x8dd08cf8 by 0x8dd08a98 with 0x8dd1ae88 > auth_digest_challenge_get(): got 7 > auth_digest_a1() has A1 = MD5(###########:callcentric.com:passwd) = > 8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b > A2 = MD5(REGISTER:sip:XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060) > auth_response: c0b3965ec27e2e3386277645ae14f324 = > > MD5(8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b:c76385015930949803ca8b0946f81d0e:db5f9cddc4d0d297aa85cc660f20595a) > (qop=NONE) > nta: selecting scheme sip > tport_tsend(0x86afae0) tpn = */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_resolve addrinfo = XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_by_addrinfo(0x86afae0): not found by name */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_vsend returned 859 > nta: sent REGISTER (13181997) to */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_pend(0x86afae0): pending 0x8dd19ea8 for udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 > (already 0) > nta: outgoing_free(0x8dd08a98) > nua: nua_application_event: entering > nua: nua_handle_magic: entering > tport_wakeup_pri(0x86afae0): events IN > tport_recv_event(0x86afae0) > tport_recv_iovec(0x86afae0) msg 0x8dd1ae88 from > (udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080) has 526 bytes, veclen = 1 > tport_deliver(0x86afae0): msg 0x8dd1ae88 (526 bytes) from > udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080/sip next=(nil) > nta: received 407 Proxy Authentication Required for REGISTER (13181997) > nta: 407 Proxy Authentication Required is going to a transaction > nta_outgoing: RTT is 139.175 ms > tport_release(0x86afae0): 0x8dd19ea8 by 0x8dd18790 with 0x8dd1ae88 > auth_digest_challenge_get(): got 7 > auth_digest_a1() has A1 = MD5(###########:callcentric.com:passwd) = > 8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b > A2 = MD5(REGISTER:sip:XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060) > auth_response: f014cc64fa858ec3615b2b1caab196a6 = > > MD5(8dddd49339918097d09e22dd7b15c38b:274bba14cbca0384c30f227da6c42c35:db5f9cddc4d0d297aa85cc660f20595a) > (qop=NONE) > nta: selecting scheme sip > tport_tsend(0x86afae0) tpn = */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_resolve addrinfo = XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_by_addrinfo(0x86afae0): not found by name */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_vsend returned 859 > nta: sent REGISTER (13181998) to */XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5060 > tport_pend(0x86afae0): pending 0x8dd18f80 for udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080 > (already 0) > nta: outgoing_free(0x8dd18790) > nua: nua_application_event: entering > nua: nua_handle_magic: entering > tport_wakeup_pri(0x86afae0): events IN > tport_recv_event(0x86afae0) > tport_recv_iovec(0x86afae0) msg 0x8dd1ae88 from > (udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080) has 526 bytes, veclen = 1 > tport_deliver(0x86afae0): msg 0x8dd1ae88 (526 bytes) from > udp/XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5080/sip next=(nil) > nta: received 407 Proxy Authentication Required for REGISTER (13181998) > nta: 407 Proxy Authentication Required is going to a transaction > nta_outgoing: RTT is 114.044 ms > tport_release(0x86afae0): 0x8dd18f80 by 0x8dd16e10 with 0x8dd1ae88 > nta: outgoing_free(0x8dd16e10) > nua(0x873dc88): removing register usage > nta_leg_destroy(0x8dd16398) > nua: nua_application_event: entering > nua: nua_authenticate: entering > nua(0x873dc88): sent signal r_authenticate > nua: nua_handle_magic: entering > nua: nua_application_event: entering > nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering > nua(0x873dc88): sent signal r_destroy > nua: nua_handle_magic: entering > nua: nua_handle_bind: entering > nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering > nta_leg_destroy((nil)) > soa_destroy(static::0x8dd11008) called > nta: timer not set > 2011-06-02 13:36:19.875422 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:401 Timeout > Registering ###########-callcentric.com > nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering > 2011-06-02 13:36:20.881513 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:425 > ###########-callcentric.com Failed Registration [0], setting retry to > 30 seconds. > > > Thanks in advance > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110603/b6188dae/attachment.html From sireeps at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 07:14:38 2011 From: sireeps at gmail.com (Kamen) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] collectInput does not call callback function In-Reply-To: <4de2ae9b.0b610e0a.3fd0.1fe0@mx.google.com> References: <1306601304658-6414679.post@n2.nabble.com> <4de166bd.81320e0a.7135.7e06@mx.google.com> <1306683515927-6416704.post@n2.nabble.com> <4de2ae9b.0b610e0a.3fd0.1fe0@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <1307157278537-6438355.post@n2.nabble.com> I have exhausted all possible combinations for the javascript function collectInput paramaters. Function is not called. Although the timeout works and it waits before continues. Could it be that DTMF is not getting through? And accordingly the function is not called. What could be the possible cause? Thanks Sergei Kamen -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/collectInput-does-not-call-callback-function-tp6414679p6438355.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From gmaruzz at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 09:39:07 2011 From: gmaruzz at gmail.com (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 07:39:07 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: You need to set the variable 'skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged' to true before bridging. This is my /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/default/02_conf_via_skype.xml : You can copy and paste it in the same file. You then will edit the file /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ivr_menus/demo_ivr.xml and substitute the line: with the line: and it will work as you expect, both with inbound skype and with inbound sip. -giovanni On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote: > As per the wiki page, and as is clearly written in the console and the > logfile, if an incomong skype call is bridged to an outbound call, the > dtmf is by default passed only in band (eg: as audio). > If you want to have it working with the fs developer conference, > create an extension that goes there and add to it the variable that's > in the wiki page (can't remember the name, is something like > "dtmf-outband-also-when-bridged=true"). > Please check the wiki page for the variable name. > Reason for this is that the in band dtmf cannot be shut up, and often > is detected by the remote party. But in this particular case of the fs > developer conference, the remote party is setup to not detect inband > in sip (or anyway, it does not detect it). > Long story short: create an extension that sets that variable and goes > to the fs conference and you'll be all set. > Tomorrow I'll post here an example from my dialplan. > -giovanni > > On 6/3/11, Michael Collins wrote: >> Try transferring to a local conference on your machine and see what happens. >> Watch the fs_cli and see if the DTMFs show up or not. From there we can see >> what's up... >> >> -MC >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Henry Huang >> wrote: >> >>> But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, even >>> when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. It >>> didn't >>> work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. >>> >>> Henry >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been looking >>>> for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I >>>> really >>>> like. >>>> >>>> Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been >>>> issues >>>> with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself so I >>>> will defer to those who have. >>>> >>>> -MC >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi: >>>>> >>>>> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of cake. >>>>> Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after the >>>>> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr >>>>> from >>>>> skyTpe client. >>>>> >>>>> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. >>>>> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't respond to >>>>> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is >>>>> connected >>>>> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I tried >>>>> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of the >>>>> key >>>>> press works. >>>>> >>>>> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please do >>>>> share your methods. >>>>> >>>>> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Henry Huang >>>>> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 >>>>> Contact Me [image: >>>>> LinkedIn] [image: >>>>> Facebook] [image: >>>>> Twitter] >>>>> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: >>>>> Skype]unicsolution [image: >>>>> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > Sincerely, > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > -- Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 From u2nsam at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 10:06:39 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:36:39 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] domain In-Reply-To: <4DE8A680.1080102@tagnet.ru> References: <4DE89971.9010205@tagnet.ru> <4DE8A680.1080102@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Hello, After doing this , i get domain name = xyz.com Now how can i use the fundas of identified domain and using below to execute . Is that possible. Regards Sam On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Hello! > > There is a variable named ${sip_from_user}. You may do something like > > "from_domain=${regex(${sip_from_user}|^.*@(.*)$|%1)}"inline="true"/> > > > > The call would be coming from outside to FS and not within , so the call > would be routed from public to different domains , > > and after that following the doc > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Multi-tenant > > Here how can we recognized from the header on which domain is it ? like if > we get an from header as 1001 at xyz.com > how can we recognized the domain and route the call accordingly ... when an > outside system sends a call via acl . > > regards > Sam > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> What do You mean? You may (for example) set the domain variable for a >> user and test it inside condition. >> >> Hello, >> >> I have a user registered by domain (1001 at xyz.com) and when the invite >> comes to my FS server it should recognize the domain and route >> the calls accordingly to the group ... >> . >> The call would be entering via the acl to public.xml. Here i want to route >> the call according to domain names, how will i do that. >> >> Any suggestions... >> >> >> Regards >> Sam >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110604/54df7474/attachment.html From boris at tagnet.ru Sat Jun 4 10:51:19 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:51:19 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] domain In-Reply-To: References: <4DE89971.9010205@tagnet.ru> <4DE8A680.1080102@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: <4DE9D5E7.7030800@tagnet.ru> Hello! No, You can't use it this way. There are 2 possibilites: 1. You have one context (dialplan) and use something like 2. I prefer the way to have separate contexts (dialplans) for each domain. So in the main context You do something like: And after that You know that is context_${domain_name} (context_xyz.com as in your example) You have o > Hello, > > After doing this , > > > > i get domain name = xyz.com > > Now how can i use the fundas of identified domain and using below to > execute . > > > > > > > > > Is that possible. > > > Regards > Sam > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Boris Kovalenko > wrote: > > Hello! > > There is a variable named ${sip_from_user}. You may do > something like > > data="from_domain=${regex(${sip_from_user}|^.*@(.*)$|%1)}" > > inline="true"/> > > > >> The call would be coming from outside to FS and not within , so >> the call would be routed from public to different domains , >> >> and after that following the doc >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Multi-tenant >> >> Here how can we recognized from the header on which domain is it >> ? like if we get an from header as 1001 at xyz.com >> >> how can we recognized the domain and route the call accordingly >> ... when an outside system sends a call via acl . >> >> regards >> Sam >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Boris Kovalenko > > wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> What do You mean? You may (for example) set the domain >> variable for a user and test it inside condition. >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have a user registered by domain (1001 at xyz.com >>> ) and when the invite comes to my FS >>> server it should recognize the domain and route >>> the calls accordingly to the group ... . >>> The call would be entering via the acl to public.xml. Here i >>> want to route the call according to domain names, how will i >>> do that. >>> >>> Any suggestions... >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Sam >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110604/4b9146a0/attachment-0001.html From b_ball_henry at hotmail.com Sat Jun 4 19:48:43 2011 From: b_ball_henry at hotmail.com (Henry Huang) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:48:43 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Giovanni: Yeh, I saw the section regarding sending dtmf after bridge later. ?got too excited once the installation was done and not finish reading the whole thing. Thanks for making things more clear here. I will put your example to the wiki if it's not already there. By the way, is there a place where DTMF is explained in more detail of what are the differences between rfc2833, inband, and info? For my understanding, I think both inband and rfc2833 are transmitted via the RTP correct? and sip info is by the SIP signal? Thanks, Henry Huang US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 Contact Me [image: LinkedIn] [image: Facebook] [image: Twitter] IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: Skype] unicsolution [image: MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote: > You need to set the variable > 'skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged' to true before bridging. > > This is my > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/default/02_conf_via_skype.xml : > > > > > data="skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged=true"/> > > > data="sofia/${use_profile}/888 at conference.freeswitch.org"/> > > > > > You can copy and paste it in the same file. > > You then will edit the file > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ivr_menus/demo_ivr.xml and substitute the > line: > > > > with the line: > > > > and it will work as you expect, both with inbound skype and with inbound > sip. > > -giovanni > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli > wrote: > > As per the wiki page, and as is clearly written in the console and the > > logfile, if an incomong skype call is bridged to an outbound call, the > > dtmf is by default passed only in band (eg: as audio). > > If you want to have it working with the fs developer conference, > > create an extension that goes there and add to it the variable that's > > in the wiki page (can't remember the name, is something like > > "dtmf-outband-also-when-bridged=true"). > > Please check the wiki page for the variable name. > > Reason for this is that the in band dtmf cannot be shut up, and often > > is detected by the remote party. But in this particular case of the fs > > developer conference, the remote party is setup to not detect inband > > in sip (or anyway, it does not detect it). > > Long story short: create an extension that sets that variable and goes > > to the fs conference and you'll be all set. > > Tomorrow I'll post here an example from my dialplan. > > -giovanni > > > > On 6/3/11, Michael Collins wrote: > >> Try transferring to a local conference on your machine and see what > happens. > >> Watch the fs_cli and see if the DTMFs show up or not. From there we can > see > >> what's up... > >> > >> -MC > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Henry Huang > >> wrote: > >> > >>> But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, > even > >>> when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. It > >>> didn't > >>> work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. > >>> > >>> Henry > >>> > >>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been > looking > >>>> for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I > >>>> really > >>>> like. > >>>> > >>>> Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been > >>>> issues > >>>> with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself so > I > >>>> will defer to those who have. > >>>> > >>>> -MC > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi: > >>>>> > >>>>> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of cake. > >>>>> Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after > the > >>>>> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr > >>>>> from > >>>>> skyTpe client. > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. > >>>>> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't > respond to > >>>>> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is > >>>>> connected > >>>>> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I > tried > >>>>> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of > the > >>>>> key > >>>>> press works. > >>>>> > >>>>> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please > do > >>>>> share your methods. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Henry Huang > >>>>> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 > >>>>> Contact Me [image: > >>>>> LinkedIn] [image: > >>>>> Facebook] [image: > >>>>> Twitter] > >>>>> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: > >>>>> Skype]unicsolution [image: > >>>>> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > -- > > Sent from my mobile device > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > > > > > > -- > Sincerely, > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110604/d9782f8e/attachment.html From boris at tagnet.ru Sat Jun 4 20:05:45 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:05:45 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Strage E1 PCI card Message-ID: <4DEA57D9.1030103@tagnet.ru> Hello! I found strange PCI E1 card marked as DIALOGIC DM/IP0821A-E1-120. No drivers, no manuals. It is possible to get it working with FreeSwitch? -- Regards, Boris From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 20:09:24 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 09:09:24 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Strage E1 PCI card In-Reply-To: <4DEA57D9.1030103@tagnet.ru> References: <4DEA57D9.1030103@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Haven't found any drivers out there that might support this. You're on your own if you do go ahead. On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Hello! > > ? ? I found strange PCI E1 card marked as DIALOGIC DM/IP0821A-E1-120. > No drivers, no manuals. It is possible to get it working with FreeSwitch? > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From kahn at vestec.com Sat Jun 4 18:57:43 2011 From: kahn at vestec.com (Kashif Kahn) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Speech Recognition: Australian English Message-ID: <4DEA47E7.8010306@vestec.com> Hello Everyone, Vestec ASR engine now supports speech recognition in Australian English. (We also support American English, Indian English, and Chinese Mandarin). A starter kit is available for $25: http://www.vestec.com/products Please note that Vestec offers the best deal around for enabling sophisticated speech recognition with command-and-control type IVR applications by offering a high accuracy, standards based speech engine at a fraction of the cost of conventional ASR vendors. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Regards, -Kashif From educs13 at yahoo.com.br Sat Jun 4 19:45:50 2011 From: educs13 at yahoo.com.br (educs13) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 08:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Lua ASR TTS Message-ID: <1307202350274-6439449.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi, I was trying to run the 'Examples directory lua asr tts' (http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Examples_directory_lua_asr_tts) in Ubuntu 10.04/32 bits, but I had some problems with the 'session:streamFile()'. If I say something when the prompt is still playing, the audio stucks indefinitely. It seems that the 'break' command isn't doing all its job. I guess that maybe the 'break' is just stop feeding the audio player with new samples, but it is not stopping the player. So, this player keeps reading and playing the same samples continuously ... I really don't know if my guess makes sense and as I don't know C very well, I don't know where to look for a solution in the source code. I Hope you could help me. Thanks, Eduardo -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Lua-ASR-TTS-tp6439449p6439449.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From dujinfang at gmail.com Sun Jun 5 03:24:36 2011 From: dujinfang at gmail.com (Seven Du) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:24:36 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Speech Recognition: Australian English In-Reply-To: <4DEA47E7.8010306@vestec.com> References: <4DEA47E7.8010306@vestec.com> Message-ID: <5391553A31334E0587B99203F8E78C96@gmail.com> Interested in dose it offer trial version? -- Seven Du About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn Sent with Sparrow On Saturday, June 4, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Kashif Kahn wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Vestec ASR engine now supports speech recognition in Australian English. > (We also support American English, Indian English, and Chinese > Mandarin). A starter kit is available for $25: > http://www.vestec.com/products > > Please note that Vestec offers the best deal around for enabling > sophisticated speech recognition with command-and-control type IVR > applications by offering a high accuracy, standards based speech engine > at a fraction of the cost of conventional ASR vendors. Feel free to > contact me with any questions or concerns. > > Regards, > -Kashif > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110605/6b721a8f/attachment.html From b_ball_henry at hotmail.com Sun Jun 5 06:28:34 2011 From: b_ball_henry at hotmail.com (Henry Huang) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 10:28:34 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: One thing I didn't see it covered in the wiki. Is the skype client we use for the mod_skypopen having the risk of being used as a "supernode"? If so, is there ways to disable it? Thanks, Henry On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote: > You need to set the variable > 'skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged' to true before bridging. > > This is my > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/default/02_conf_via_skype.xml : > > > > > data="skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged=true"/> > > > data="sofia/${use_profile}/888 at conference.freeswitch.org"/> > > > > > You can copy and paste it in the same file. > > You then will edit the file > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ivr_menus/demo_ivr.xml and substitute the > line: > > > > with the line: > > > > and it will work as you expect, both with inbound skype and with inbound > sip. > > -giovanni > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli > wrote: > > As per the wiki page, and as is clearly written in the console and the > > logfile, if an incomong skype call is bridged to an outbound call, the > > dtmf is by default passed only in band (eg: as audio). > > If you want to have it working with the fs developer conference, > > create an extension that goes there and add to it the variable that's > > in the wiki page (can't remember the name, is something like > > "dtmf-outband-also-when-bridged=true"). > > Please check the wiki page for the variable name. > > Reason for this is that the in band dtmf cannot be shut up, and often > > is detected by the remote party. But in this particular case of the fs > > developer conference, the remote party is setup to not detect inband > > in sip (or anyway, it does not detect it). > > Long story short: create an extension that sets that variable and goes > > to the fs conference and you'll be all set. > > Tomorrow I'll post here an example from my dialplan. > > -giovanni > > > > On 6/3/11, Michael Collins wrote: > >> Try transferring to a local conference on your machine and see what > happens. > >> Watch the fs_cli and see if the DTMFs show up or not. From there we can > see > >> what's up... > >> > >> -MC > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Henry Huang > >> wrote: > >> > >>> But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, > even > >>> when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. It > >>> didn't > >>> work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. > >>> > >>> Henry > >>> > >>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been > looking > >>>> for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I > >>>> really > >>>> like. > >>>> > >>>> Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been > >>>> issues > >>>> with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself so > I > >>>> will defer to those who have. > >>>> > >>>> -MC > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi: > >>>>> > >>>>> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of cake. > >>>>> Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after > the > >>>>> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr > >>>>> from > >>>>> skyTpe client. > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. > >>>>> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't > respond to > >>>>> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is > >>>>> connected > >>>>> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I > tried > >>>>> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of > the > >>>>> key > >>>>> press works. > >>>>> > >>>>> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please > do > >>>>> share your methods. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Henry Huang > >>>>> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 > >>>>> Contact Me [image: > >>>>> LinkedIn] [image: > >>>>> Facebook] [image: > >>>>> Twitter] > >>>>> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: > >>>>> Skype]unicsolution [image: > >>>>> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > -- > > Sent from my mobile device > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > > > > > > -- > Sincerely, > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110605/bfd4bad7/attachment.html From gmaruzz at celliax.org Sun Jun 5 10:21:32 2011 From: gmaruzz at celliax.org (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 08:21:32 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: If you're behind a nat or a firewall you can't be supernode. If you're directly on the internet (eg: you have a real routable IP number) on the machine, and you are not behind a firewall (eg: you have all incoming ports open) then you *may* become a supernode. Btw: google is your friend, those are informations easily available with a search for "skype supernode". -giovanni On 6/5/11, Henry Huang wrote: > One thing I didn't see it covered in the wiki. Is the skype client we use > for the mod_skypopen having the risk of being used as a "supernode"? If so, > is there ways to disable it? > > Thanks, > > Henry > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli > wrote: > >> You need to set the variable >> 'skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged' to true before bridging. >> >> This is my >> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/default/02_conf_via_skype.xml : >> >> >> >> >> > data="skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged=true"/> >> >> >> > data="sofia/${use_profile}/888 at conference.freeswitch.org"/> >> >> >> >> >> You can copy and paste it in the same file. >> >> You then will edit the file >> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ivr_menus/demo_ivr.xml and substitute the >> line: >> >> >> >> with the line: >> >> >> >> and it will work as you expect, both with inbound skype and with inbound >> sip. >> >> -giovanni >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli >> wrote: >> > As per the wiki page, and as is clearly written in the console and the >> > logfile, if an incomong skype call is bridged to an outbound call, the >> > dtmf is by default passed only in band (eg: as audio). >> > If you want to have it working with the fs developer conference, >> > create an extension that goes there and add to it the variable that's >> > in the wiki page (can't remember the name, is something like >> > "dtmf-outband-also-when-bridged=true"). >> > Please check the wiki page for the variable name. >> > Reason for this is that the in band dtmf cannot be shut up, and often >> > is detected by the remote party. But in this particular case of the fs >> > developer conference, the remote party is setup to not detect inband >> > in sip (or anyway, it does not detect it). >> > Long story short: create an extension that sets that variable and goes >> > to the fs conference and you'll be all set. >> > Tomorrow I'll post here an example from my dialplan. >> > -giovanni >> > >> > On 6/3/11, Michael Collins wrote: >> >> Try transferring to a local conference on your machine and see what >> happens. >> >> Watch the fs_cli and see if the DTMFs show up or not. From there we can >> see >> >> what's up... >> >> >> >> -MC >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Henry Huang >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, >> even >> >>> when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. It >> >>> didn't >> >>> work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. >> >>> >> >>> Henry >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been >> looking >> >>>> for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I >> >>>> really >> >>>> like. >> >>>> >> >>>> Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been >> >>>> issues >> >>>> with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself >> >>>> so >> I >> >>>> will defer to those who have. >> >>>> >> >>>> -MC >> >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of >> >>>>> cake. >> >>>>> Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after >> the >> >>>>> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr >> >>>>> from >> >>>>> skyTpe client. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. >> >>>>> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't >> respond to >> >>>>> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is >> >>>>> connected >> >>>>> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I >> tried >> >>>>> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of >> the >> >>>>> key >> >>>>> press works. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please >> do >> >>>>> share your methods. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Henry Huang >> >>>>> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 >> >>>>> Contact Me [image: >> >>>>> LinkedIn] [image: >> >>>>> Facebook] [image: >> >>>>> Twitter] >> >>>>> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: >> >>>>> Skype]unicsolution [image: >> >>>>> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > Sent from my mobile device >> > >> > Sincerely, >> > >> > Giovanni Maruzzelli >> > Cell : +39-347-2665618 >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely, >> >> Giovanni Maruzzelli >> Cell : +39-347-2665618 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > -- Sent from my mobile device Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 From steveayre at gmail.com Sun Jun 5 11:17:00 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 08:17:00 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <00D2C8FA-7A2E-4066-B428-CE1A4B915744@gmail.com> I think you might still be able to be a supernode behind nat if your router uses upnp... Not sure though. Afaik the option to disable being a supernode was added on Windows in v3... No such option on Linux yet (v2). Steve on iPhone On 5 Jun 2011, at 07:21, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote: > If you're behind a nat or a firewall you can't be supernode. > If you're directly on the internet (eg: you have a real routable IP > number) on the machine, and you are not behind a firewall (eg: you > have all incoming ports open) then you *may* become a supernode. > Btw: google is your friend, those are informations easily available > with a search for "skype supernode". > -giovanni > > On 6/5/11, Henry Huang wrote: >> One thing I didn't see it covered in the wiki. Is the skype client we use >> for the mod_skypopen having the risk of being used as a "supernode"? If so, >> is there ways to disable it? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Henry >> >> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli >> wrote: >> >>> You need to set the variable >>> 'skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged' to true before bridging. >>> >>> This is my >>> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/default/02_conf_via_skype.xml : >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> data="skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged=true"/> >>> >>> >>> >> data="sofia/${use_profile}/888 at conference.freeswitch.org"/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> You can copy and paste it in the same file. >>> >>> You then will edit the file >>> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ivr_menus/demo_ivr.xml and substitute the >>> line: >>> >>> >>> >>> with the line: >>> >>> >>> >>> and it will work as you expect, both with inbound skype and with inbound >>> sip. >>> >>> -giovanni >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli >>> wrote: >>>> As per the wiki page, and as is clearly written in the console and the >>>> logfile, if an incomong skype call is bridged to an outbound call, the >>>> dtmf is by default passed only in band (eg: as audio). >>>> If you want to have it working with the fs developer conference, >>>> create an extension that goes there and add to it the variable that's >>>> in the wiki page (can't remember the name, is something like >>>> "dtmf-outband-also-when-bridged=true"). >>>> Please check the wiki page for the variable name. >>>> Reason for this is that the in band dtmf cannot be shut up, and often >>>> is detected by the remote party. But in this particular case of the fs >>>> developer conference, the remote party is setup to not detect inband >>>> in sip (or anyway, it does not detect it). >>>> Long story short: create an extension that sets that variable and goes >>>> to the fs conference and you'll be all set. >>>> Tomorrow I'll post here an example from my dialplan. >>>> -giovanni >>>> >>>> On 6/3/11, Michael Collins wrote: >>>>> Try transferring to a local conference on your machine and see what >>> happens. >>>>> Watch the fs_cli and see if the DTMFs show up or not. From there we can >>> see >>>>> what's up... >>>>> >>>>> -MC >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Henry Huang >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, >>> even >>>>>> when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. It >>>>>> didn't >>>>>> work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. >>>>>> >>>>>> Henry >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been >>> looking >>>>>>> for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I >>>>>>> really >>>>>>> like. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been >>>>>>> issues >>>>>>> with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself >>>>>>> so >>> I >>>>>>> will defer to those who have. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of >>>>>>>> cake. >>>>>>>> Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right after >>> the >>>>>>>> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the demo-ivr >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> skyTpe client. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. >>>>>>>> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't >>> respond to >>>>>>>> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is >>>>>>>> connected >>>>>>>> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I >>> tried >>>>>>>> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of >>> the >>>>>>>> key >>>>>>>> press works. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, please >>> do >>>>>>>> share your methods. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Henry Huang >>>>>>>> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 >>>>>>>> Contact Me [image: >>>>>>>> LinkedIn] [image: >>>>>>>> Facebook] [image: >>>>>>>> Twitter] >>>>>>>> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: >>>>>>>> Skype]unicsolution [image: >>>>>>>> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from my mobile device >>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> >>>> Giovanni Maruzzelli >>>> Cell : +39-347-2665618 >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Giovanni Maruzzelli >>> Cell : +39-347-2665618 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > Sincerely, > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From b_ball_henry at hotmail.com Sun Jun 5 17:39:33 2011 From: b_ball_henry at hotmail.com (Henry Huang) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:39:33 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sorry, I didn't make it clear. I did search google and found "general" information of skype being behind NAT or firewall. But I was looking for something that is capable of turning that feature off. So I tossed the questions here hoping people having done integration with Skype would know better. I also thought of some feature that I am not sure if I should posted here or open a new thread. I was thinking of integrating the mod_skypopen with mod_digaling or some other sort so that when the skype client receive messages, we can transfer it to a designated XMPP client with a 2 way text design in mind. Thanks, Henry On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote: > If you're behind a nat or a firewall you can't be supernode. > If you're directly on the internet (eg: you have a real routable IP > number) on the machine, and you are not behind a firewall (eg: you > have all incoming ports open) then you *may* become a supernode. > Btw: google is your friend, those are informations easily available > with a search for "skype supernode". > -giovanni > > On 6/5/11, Henry Huang wrote: > > One thing I didn't see it covered in the wiki. Is the skype client we use > > for the mod_skypopen having the risk of being used as a "supernode"? If > so, > > is there ways to disable it? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Henry > > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli > > wrote: > > > >> You need to set the variable > >> 'skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged' to true before bridging. > >> > >> This is my > >> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/default/02_conf_via_skype.xml : > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> data="skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged=true"/> > >> > >> > >> >> data="sofia/${use_profile}/888 at conference.freeswitch.org"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> You can copy and paste it in the same file. > >> > >> You then will edit the file > >> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ivr_menus/demo_ivr.xml and substitute the > >> line: > >> > >> > >> > >> with the line: > >> > >> > >> > >> and it will work as you expect, both with inbound skype and with inbound > >> sip. > >> > >> -giovanni > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli > > >> wrote: > >> > As per the wiki page, and as is clearly written in the console and the > >> > logfile, if an incomong skype call is bridged to an outbound call, the > >> > dtmf is by default passed only in band (eg: as audio). > >> > If you want to have it working with the fs developer conference, > >> > create an extension that goes there and add to it the variable that's > >> > in the wiki page (can't remember the name, is something like > >> > "dtmf-outband-also-when-bridged=true"). > >> > Please check the wiki page for the variable name. > >> > Reason for this is that the in band dtmf cannot be shut up, and often > >> > is detected by the remote party. But in this particular case of the fs > >> > developer conference, the remote party is setup to not detect inband > >> > in sip (or anyway, it does not detect it). > >> > Long story short: create an extension that sets that variable and goes > >> > to the fs conference and you'll be all set. > >> > Tomorrow I'll post here an example from my dialplan. > >> > -giovanni > >> > > >> > On 6/3/11, Michael Collins wrote: > >> >> Try transferring to a local conference on your machine and see what > >> happens. > >> >> Watch the fs_cli and see if the DTMFs show up or not. From there we > can > >> see > >> >> what's up... > >> >> > >> >> -MC > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Henry Huang > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, > >> even > >> >>> when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. > It > >> >>> didn't > >> >>> work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. > >> >>> > >> >>> Henry > >> >>> > >> >>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been > >> looking > >> >>>> for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything I > >> >>>> really > >> >>>> like. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have been > >> >>>> issues > >> >>>> with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it myself > >> >>>> so > >> I > >> >>>> will defer to those who have. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> -MC > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Hi: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of > >> >>>>> cake. > >> >>>>> Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right > after > >> the > >> >>>>> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the > demo-ivr > >> >>>>> from > >> >>>>> skyTpe client. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. > >> >>>>> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't > >> respond to > >> >>>>> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is > >> >>>>> connected > >> >>>>> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So I > >> tried > >> >>>>> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non of > >> the > >> >>>>> key > >> >>>>> press works. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, > please > >> do > >> >>>>> share your methods. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Henry Huang > >> >>>>> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 > >> >>>>> Contact Me [image: > >> >>>>> LinkedIn] > [image: > >> >>>>> Facebook] > [image: > >> >>>>> Twitter] > >> >>>>> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: > >> >>>>> Skype]unicsolution [image: > >> >>>>> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Sent from my mobile device > >> > > >> > Sincerely, > >> > > >> > Giovanni Maruzzelli > >> > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sincerely, > >> > >> Giovanni Maruzzelli > >> Cell : +39-347-2665618 > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > Sincerely, > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110605/12ca486c/attachment-0001.html From gmaruzz at celliax.org Sun Jun 5 18:38:31 2011 From: gmaruzz at celliax.org (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 16:38:31 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_skypopen is awesome issue with demo-ivr conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: :) again, read the wiki page. Messages use the CHAT standard freeswitch interface, same used by dingaling ans sofia. So, you can simply make an application that routes messages between skype, google and sip, eg, using the ESL. -giovanni On 6/5/11, Henry Huang wrote: > Sorry, I didn't make it clear. I did search google and found "general" > information of skype being behind NAT or firewall. But I was looking for > something that is capable of turning that feature off. So I tossed the > questions here hoping people having done integration with Skype would know > better. > > I also thought of some feature that I am not sure if I should posted here or > open a new thread. I was thinking of integrating the mod_skypopen with > mod_digaling or some other sort so that when the skype client receive > messages, we can transfer it to a designated XMPP client with a 2 way text > design in mind. > > > Thanks, > > Henry > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli > wrote: > >> If you're behind a nat or a firewall you can't be supernode. >> If you're directly on the internet (eg: you have a real routable IP >> number) on the machine, and you are not behind a firewall (eg: you >> have all incoming ports open) then you *may* become a supernode. >> Btw: google is your friend, those are informations easily available >> with a search for "skype supernode". >> -giovanni >> >> On 6/5/11, Henry Huang wrote: >> > One thing I didn't see it covered in the wiki. Is the skype client we >> > use >> > for the mod_skypopen having the risk of being used as a "supernode"? If >> so, >> > is there ways to disable it? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Henry >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli >> > wrote: >> > >> >> You need to set the variable >> >> 'skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged' to true before bridging. >> >> >> >> This is my >> >> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/default/02_conf_via_skype.xml : >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> data="skype_add_outband_dtmf_also_when_bridged=true"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> data="sofia/${use_profile}/888 at conference.freeswitch.org"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You can copy and paste it in the same file. >> >> >> >> You then will edit the file >> >> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ivr_menus/demo_ivr.xml and substitute the >> >> line: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> with the line: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> and it will work as you expect, both with inbound skype and with >> >> inbound >> >> sip. >> >> >> >> -giovanni >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli > > >> >> wrote: >> >> > As per the wiki page, and as is clearly written in the console and >> >> > the >> >> > logfile, if an incomong skype call is bridged to an outbound call, >> >> > the >> >> > dtmf is by default passed only in band (eg: as audio). >> >> > If you want to have it working with the fs developer conference, >> >> > create an extension that goes there and add to it the variable that's >> >> > in the wiki page (can't remember the name, is something like >> >> > "dtmf-outband-also-when-bridged=true"). >> >> > Please check the wiki page for the variable name. >> >> > Reason for this is that the in band dtmf cannot be shut up, and often >> >> > is detected by the remote party. But in this particular case of the >> >> > fs >> >> > developer conference, the remote party is setup to not detect inband >> >> > in sip (or anyway, it does not detect it). >> >> > Long story short: create an extension that sets that variable and >> >> > goes >> >> > to the fs conference and you'll be all set. >> >> > Tomorrow I'll post here an example from my dialplan. >> >> > -giovanni >> >> > >> >> > On 6/3/11, Michael Collins wrote: >> >> >> Try transferring to a local conference on your machine and see what >> >> happens. >> >> >> Watch the fs_cli and see if the DTMFs show up or not. From there we >> can >> >> see >> >> >> what's up... >> >> >> >> >> >> -MC >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Henry Huang >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> But the DTMF press worked very well while I was under the Demo IVR, >> >> even >> >> >>> when I press "1001" I was able to get connected to extension 1001. >> It >> >> >>> didn't >> >> >>> work only after I was transferred to the conference selection. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Henry >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> The monkeys have stopped screaming for everyone. :( I have been >> >> looking >> >> >>>> for an alternative sound file for this but haven't found anything >> >> >>>> I >> >> >>>> really >> >> >>>> like. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Not sure about the DTMF, but from what I understand there have >> >> >>>> been >> >> >>>> issues >> >> >>>> with sending DTMFs from the Skype client. I haven't tried it >> >> >>>> myself >> >> >>>> so >> >> I >> >> >>>> will defer to those who have. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -MC >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Henry Huang >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>> Hi: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> The new interactive installation for mod_skypopen is a piece of >> >> >>>>> cake. >> >> >>>>> Made live much easier. I was so excited and tried it out right >> after >> >> the >> >> >>>>> installation was done. But I found a few issues calling the >> demo-ivr >> >> >>>>> from >> >> >>>>> skyTpe client. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> 1. The screaming monkey does not scream anymore. >> >> >>>>> 2. The conference that connects to the freeswitch.org doesn't >> >> respond to >> >> >>>>> dtmf pressed on the skype client. Ever since the second client is >> >> >>>>> connected >> >> >>>>> to the conference, the conference tell the client it's muted. So >> >> >>>>> I >> >> tried >> >> >>>>> push 0 and any other key to see if I get to unmute. But no, non >> >> >>>>> of >> >> the >> >> >>>>> key >> >> >>>>> press works. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> If anyone have previous experiences on these and fixed them, >> please >> >> do >> >> >>>>> share your methods. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Sound quality with the new virtual sound drive is very good. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Henry Huang >> >> >>>>> US: +1(818)6885508 | ??(Taiwan): +886 933847619 >> >> >>>>> Contact Me [image: >> >> >>>>> LinkedIn] >> [image: >> >> >>>>> Facebook] >> [image: >> >> >>>>> Twitter] >> >> >>>>> IM [image: Google Talk] red_rain_seven at gmail.com [image: >> >> >>>>> Skype]unicsolution [image: >> >> >>>>> MSN] b_ball_henry at hotmail.com >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Sent from my mobile device >> >> > >> >> > Sincerely, >> >> > >> >> > Giovanni Maruzzelli >> >> > Cell : +39-347-2665618 >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sincerely, >> >> >> >> Giovanni Maruzzelli >> >> Cell : +39-347-2665618 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> > >> >> -- >> Sent from my mobile device >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Giovanni Maruzzelli >> Cell : +39-347-2665618 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > -- Sent from my mobile device Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 From gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com Sun Jun 5 18:40:41 2011 From: gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com (Gustavo Espeche) Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:40:41 -0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sangoma Transcoding Message-ID: <1307284841.2616.4.camel@gustavo-laptop> Hi some one can do work sangoma d100 transcoding, i installed the card, load the sangoma codec into freeswitch, but i can't do that the freeswitch do a transcoding using sangoma card. I configure my profile if some one configure with success this card i appreciate a lot any advice. Best Regards. -- Gustavo Espeche EasyIpCall S.R.L. www.easyipcall.com Bv Mitre 517 24? E Cordoba - Argentina Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 From steveayre at gmail.com Sun Jun 5 20:04:47 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:04:47 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sangoma Transcoding In-Reply-To: <1307284841.2616.4.camel@gustavo-laptop> References: <1307284841.2616.4.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: Do you have mod_sangoma_codec loaded? If so, it'll automatically use the card instead of CPU for transcoding for the supported codecs. You should also avoid having the modules loaded that provide any of the codecs that mod_sangoma_codec provides. i.e. do not load mod_g729, mod_com_g729, mod_g7231, mod_amr, mod_ilbc. The parameters you mentioned only affect how codec negotiation is performed, they don't control transcoding and any settings for those parameter will work with the Sandoma card. Rather importantly disable-transcoding is a bit of a misnomer, it doesn't actually disable transcoding, just attempts to force it not to be needed by forcing the aleg and bleg codecs to match. -Steve On 5 June 2011 15:40, Gustavo Espeche wrote: > Hi some one can do work sangoma d100 transcoding, i installed the card, > load the sangoma codec into freeswitch, but i can't do that the > freeswitch do a transcoding using sangoma card. > I configure my profile > > > if some one configure with success this card i appreciate a lot any > advice. > Best Regards. > > > -- > > Gustavo Espechese > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > www.easyipcall.com > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > Cordoba - Argentina > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110605/3f30d4a6/attachment.html From moises.silva at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 02:40:17 2011 From: moises.silva at gmail.com (Moises Silva) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 18:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sangoma Transcoding In-Reply-To: References: <1307284841.2616.4.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > Do you have mod_sangoma_codec loaded? If so, it'll automatically use the > card instead of CPU for transcoding for the supported codecs. > > You should also avoid having the modules loaded that provide any of the > codecs that mod_sangoma_codec provides. i.e. do not load mod_g729, > mod_com_g729, mod_g7231, mod_amr, mod_ilbc. > > Also, be aware, by default only G729 codec is registered when loading mod_sangoma_codec. If you want other codecs you must enable them in autload_configs/sangoma_codec.conf.xml Something like that would register all supported codecs by the card. As stated by Steve you should not load conflicting modules, for example loading mod_voipcodecs and registering G722 codec in sangoma_codec.conf.xml would cause a conflict. Moises Silva Senior Software Engineer, Software Development Manager Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 100 Renfrew Drive, Suite 100, Markham ON L3R 9R6 Canada t. 1 905 474 1990 x128 | e. moy at sangoma.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110605/cd2db0c1/attachment.html From juanito1982 at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 11:01:04 2011 From: juanito1982 at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Juan_Antonio_Iba=F1ez_Santorum?=) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:01:04 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Fwd: Major deployment of outbound FAX on latest version of Freeswitch question In-Reply-To: <4DCBE7D4.1070100@coppice.org> References: <4DC40C86.9000503@coppice.org> <4DC67898.2090106@coppice.org> <4DC732BC.9070206@coppice.org> <4DCBE7D4.1070100@coppice.org> Message-ID: Having FS plus a Sangoma Card with echo cancel, is necessary to disable echo cancel in order to sending/receiving faxes? How can it be done? Regards 2011/5/12 Steve Underwood > On 05/12/2011 05:21 PM, Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum wrote: > > Hello Steve! > > > > I would like to ask you one question about fax system. You told > > that using FS+mod_spandsp could be gotten successful faxing rates over > > 99%. Looking at your experience, is 99% nearer to 100% or to 99%? > > Which errors do you find usually on that 1%? > > > You can run tests all day in a lab without failure. The real test is how > well things work against a wide diversity of machines in the real world. > This http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp-soft-fax-performance.html says > something about our testing, and what is achievable. Its quite a lot of > work to get real reliability numbers. You get a lot of call failures on > a typical public FAX server due to things like wrong numbers, voice > calls into a FAX port, people purposefully dropping half completed FAX > calls, and buggy FAX machines doing weird things. Don't ignore the last > one. There are famous make machines with serious bugs. You need to > manually check the failed calls one by one to get real reliability > figures. In the end there are always a few calls where you are never > sure who's fault the failure is. All I can say with hand on heart is the > number of unexplainable failures is well below 1% > > Regards, > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/72b22f8f/attachment-0001.html From david.villasmil.work at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 16:15:39 2011 From: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com (David Villasmil) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:15:39 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] XML_CURL and configuration missing Message-ID: Hello all, I have xml_curl to load sofia and distributor, it's working fine... but after some calls (don't know how many) FS starts giving: 2011-06-06 13:33:10.913489 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4036 Invalid Gateway And calls are not going through. When this happens I do: sofia status and I get: (???) sofia status Name Type Data State ================================================================================================= gold my_profile sip:mod_sofia at MY_LOCAL_IP:5060 RUNNING (0) ================================================================================================= then i RESTART the profile: sofia profile restart all and again: sofia status and i get: Name Type Data State ================================================================================================= my_profile profile sip:mod_sofia at MY_LOCAL_IP:5060 RUNNING (0) my_profile::GW1 gateway sip:1234 at GW1_IP:5060 NOREG my_profile::GW2 gateway sip:1234 at GW2_IP:5066 NOREG my_profile::GW3 gateway sip:1111111 at GW3_IP:5060 NOREG my_profile::GW4 gateway sip:1234 at GW4_IP:5060 NOREG ================================================================================================= 1 profile 0 aliases the obvious question is: Why is this happening??? thanks all for your help! David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/c3daa48e/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 17:39:08 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:39:08 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] XML_CURL and configuration missing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Does this happen on the latest git? Are there any other messages prior to the ERR that might indicate when/why the gateways disappear? -Steve On 6 June 2011 13:15, David Villasmil wrote: > Hello all, > > I have xml_curl to load sofia and distributor, it's working fine... but > after some calls (don't know how many) FS starts giving: > > 2011-06-06 13:33:10.913489 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4036 Invalid Gateway > > And calls are not going through. > > When this happens I do: > > sofia status > > and I get: (???) > > sofia status > Name Type > Data State > > ================================================================================================= > gold my_profile > sip:mod_sofia at MY_LOCAL_IP:5060 RUNNING (0) > > ================================================================================================= > > then i RESTART the profile: > > sofia profile restart all > > and again: > > sofia status > > and i get: > > Name Type > Data State > > ================================================================================================= > my_profile profile > sip:mod_sofia at MY_LOCAL_IP:5060 RUNNING (0) > my_profile::GW1 gateway sip:1234 at GW1_IP:5060 > NOREG > my_profile::GW2 gateway sip:1234 at GW2_IP:5066 > NOREG > my_profile::GW3 gateway sip:1111111 at GW3_IP:5060 > NOREG > my_profile::GW4 gateway > sip:1234 at GW4_IP:5060 NOREG > > ================================================================================================= > 1 profile 0 aliases > > > > the obvious question is: Why is this happening??? > > thanks all for your help! > > David > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/b259276d/attachment.html From david.villasmil.work at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 17:50:46 2011 From: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com (David Villasmil) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:50:46 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] XML_CURL and configuration missing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for answering Steve. No, i don't see any errors anywhere... I haven't tried the latest git, and i'm reluctant to update as I have an app running on this server... don't want any backward-compatibility issues... if this is a known problem, then i will have to update, else I would rather try and find what the problem is before updating. my version is: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-7e52acf 2011-03-28 22-18-47 -0500) Thanks! On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > Does this happen on the latest git? > > Are there any other messages prior to the ERR that might indicate when/why > the gateways disappear? > > -Steve > > > > On 6 June 2011 13:15, David Villasmil wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I have xml_curl to load sofia and distributor, it's working fine... but >> after some calls (don't know how many) FS starts giving: >> >> 2011-06-06 13:33:10.913489 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4036 Invalid Gateway >> >> And calls are not going through. >> >> When this happens I do: >> >> sofia status >> >> and I get: (???) >> >> sofia status >> Name Type >> Data State >> >> ================================================================================================= >> gold my_profile >> sip:mod_sofia at MY_LOCAL_IP:5060 RUNNING (0) >> >> ================================================================================================= >> >> then i RESTART the profile: >> >> sofia profile restart all >> >> and again: >> >> sofia status >> >> and i get: >> >> Name Type >> Data State >> >> ================================================================================================= >> my_profile profile >> sip:mod_sofia at MY_LOCAL_IP:5060 RUNNING (0) >> my_profile::GW1 gateway sip:1234 at GW1_IP:5060 >> NOREG >> my_profile::GW2 gateway sip:1234 at GW2_IP:5066 >> NOREG >> my_profile::GW3 gateway sip:1111111 at GW3_IP:5060 >> NOREG >> my_profile::GW4 gateway >> sip:1234 at GW4_IP:5060 NOREG >> >> ================================================================================================= >> 1 profile 0 aliases >> >> >> >> the obvious question is: Why is this happening??? >> >> thanks all for your help! >> >> David >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/46ab6879/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 18:13:33 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:13:33 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] XML_CURL and configuration missing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think I do remember seeing this reported once before, which might mean that it was looked into and fixed. I can't say for sure though. It might be worth looking at the commit log on fisheye and bug reports on jira to see if there's anything that sounds like this mentioned. -Steve On 6 June 2011 14:50, David Villasmil wrote: > Thanks for answering Steve. > > No, i don't see any errors anywhere... > I haven't tried the latest git, and i'm reluctant to update as I have an > app running on this server... don't want any backward-compatibility > issues... if this is a known problem, then i will have to update, else I > would rather try and find what the problem is before updating. > > > my version is: > > FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-7e52acf 2011-03-28 22-18-47 -0500) > > Thanks! > > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > >> Does this happen on the latest git? >> >> Are there any other messages prior to the ERR that might indicate when/why >> the gateways disappear? >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> On 6 June 2011 13:15, David Villasmil wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I have xml_curl to load sofia and distributor, it's working fine... but >>> after some calls (don't know how many) FS starts giving: >>> >>> 2011-06-06 13:33:10.913489 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4036 Invalid Gateway >>> >>> And calls are not going through. >>> >>> When this happens I do: >>> >>> sofia status >>> >>> and I get: (???) >>> >>> sofia status >>> Name Type >>> Data State >>> >>> ================================================================================================= >>> gold my_profile >>> sip:mod_sofia at MY_LOCAL_IP:5060 RUNNING (0) >>> >>> ================================================================================================= >>> >>> then i RESTART the profile: >>> >>> sofia profile restart all >>> >>> and again: >>> >>> sofia status >>> >>> and i get: >>> >>> Name Type >>> Data State >>> >>> ================================================================================================= >>> my_profile profile >>> sip:mod_sofia at MY_LOCAL_IP:5060 RUNNING (0) >>> my_profile::GW1 gateway sip:1234 at GW1_IP:5060 >>> NOREG >>> my_profile::GW2 gateway sip:1234 at GW2_IP:5066 >>> NOREG >>> my_profile::GW3 gateway sip:1111111 at GW3_IP:5060 >>> NOREG >>> my_profile::GW4 gateway >>> sip:1234 at GW4_IP:5060 NOREG >>> >>> ================================================================================================= >>> 1 profile 0 aliases >>> >>> >>> >>> the obvious question is: Why is this happening??? >>> >>> thanks all for your help! >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/d717e3df/attachment-0001.html From adam.kelloway at newpace.ca Mon Jun 6 18:25:19 2011 From: adam.kelloway at newpace.ca (Adam Kelloway) Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:25:19 -0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] proposed patch to org.freeswitch.esl.client Message-ID: <4DECE34F.2090909@newpace.ca> Hi there, This message is to the author of org.freeswitch.esl.client: I have attached a git diff of some small changes I was hoping could be made to the org.freeswitch.esl.client library. To summarize: 1. Added EslMessage parameter to handleDisconnectionNotice 2. Added some more headers to EslHeaders My motivation for this is that I wanted be able to read the headers in a disconnection EslMessage. The first problem was that handleDisconnectionNotice didn't pass in the EslMessage. The second problem was that the Name object didn't define the headers I wanted, resulting in them being set in the headers map with a key of null. Do you think this is a reasonable change to your code? If so, can it be included in the next release? On that note, when do you think the next release will be made? Thanks and keep up the great work, Adam -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: gitdiff.txt Url: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/4972f834/attachment.txt From jeff at jefflenk.com Mon Jun 6 18:25:41 2011 From: jeff at jefflenk.com (Jeff Lenk) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Click-to-call from Outlook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1307370341109-6445362.post@n2.nabble.com> checkout siptapi the last time i tried it it worked well for fs -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Click-to-call-from-Outlook-tp6435767p6445362.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From mail.mthakkar at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 14:32:59 2011 From: mail.mthakkar at gmail.com (Mitesh Thakkar) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:02:59 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] cancel a non answered bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello all, I am facing the similar kind of issue. My flow is as below. 1. doing bridge to route 1. 2. on fail i need some work to be done. 3. doing bridge to route 2. So, in above (1.) is being timeout with progress_timeout., and process further and does bridge to route 2. It sends INVITE to route 2 but it is not CANCELing to route 1 and keeps sending INVITEs. Basically, it should not send INVITE once skipped. Kindly guide me how can I achieve it. Regards, Mitesh Thakkar > the situation : > > Aleg call external gateway > in dialplan I set on the fly the nibble_rate (nibble_account is already set) > and just after make a bridge to the gateway. > so nibblebill tries to ask DB if cahs is ok (so it takes a little time) but in the mean > time the bridge is created and Bleg is ringing. > nibblebill realize that cash is below the amount allowed and redirect to nofunds extension. > > I'd like to avoid the Bleg ringing by kill the bridge (but not hanup Aleg) once the nofunds extension is reached. > > Thanks > ----- Original Message ----- > From: David Ponzone > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:27 PM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] cancel a non answered bridge > > > Sorry, I fail to get the question... > Perhaps we need more details like: where do you want to do that ? from XML dialplan ? from script ? > From API, you can uuid_kill. > From XML, I am not sure I see what that would mean...perhaps you need to define a timeout, so that the bridge attempt ends after X seconds ? > > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > > > > Le 28/01/2011 ? 18:14, Madovsky a ?crit : > > > Sorry I forgot > > without to hangup ? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Madovsky > To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:13 PM > Subject: cancel a non answered bridge > > > How to cancel ok kil a non answered bridge ? > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/1eb38930/attachment.html From matzemuc86 at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 17:40:49 2011 From: matzemuc86 at gmail.com (Matthias Kaufmann) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:40:49 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Compile FreeSWITCH on WinXP, VS2008 pro Message-ID: Hello, I try to compile FreeSWITCh with VS2008 pro Version on my WinXP (32bit) OS but I get 4 errors. Where can I find the log to get more information? Starting freewitch works but e.g. mod_sofia is not working :-(. Thanks MatzeMuc86 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/de0e656f/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 18:58:52 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:58:52 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Compile FreeSWITCH on WinXP, VS2008 pro In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Can you tell us what the errors are? Are they compile errors, or runtime errors? -Steve On 6 June 2011 14:40, Matthias Kaufmann wrote: > Hello, > > I try to compile FreeSWITCh with VS2008 pro Version on my WinXP (32bit) OS > but I get 4 errors. Where can I find the log to get more information? > Starting freewitch works but e.g. mod_sofia is not working :-(. > > Thanks > MatzeMuc86 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/6b33da48/attachment.html From matzemuc86 at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 19:02:01 2011 From: matzemuc86 at gmail.com (Matthias Kaufmann) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:02:01 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Compile FreeSWITCH on WinXP, VS2008 pro In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: compile errors in VS2008. Viele Gr??e Matthias Kaufmann 2011/6/6 Steven Ayre > Can you tell us what the errors are? Are they compile errors, or runtime > errors? > > -Steve > > > On 6 June 2011 14:40, Matthias Kaufmann wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I try to compile FreeSWITCh with VS2008 pro Version on my WinXP (32bit) OS >> but I get 4 errors. Where can I find the log to get more information? >> Starting freewitch works but e.g. mod_sofia is not working :-(. >> >> Thanks >> MatzeMuc86 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/e8ea6e42/attachment-0001.html From jeff at jefflenk.com Mon Jun 6 19:35:04 2011 From: jeff at jefflenk.com (Jeff Lenk) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:35:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Compile FreeSWITCH on WinXP, VS2008 pro In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1307374504805-6445607.post@n2.nabble.com> Just grab the output window in visual studio it has the full build log and attach a pastebin here -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Compile-FreeSWITCH-on-WinXP-VS2008-pro-tp6445427p6445607.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From steveayre at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 19:56:37 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:56:37 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Compile FreeSWITCH on WinXP, VS2008 pro In-Reply-To: <1307374504805-6445607.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1307374504805-6445607.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Indeed. Also check you're using Freeswitch.2008.sln, and that you're using the latest version of FS from Git. -Steve On 6 June 2011 16:35, Jeff Lenk wrote: > Just grab the output window in visual studio it has the full build log and > attach a pastebin here > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Compile-FreeSWITCH-on-WinXP-VS2008-pro-tp6445427p6445607.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/f882fc44/attachment.html From a.afzali2003 at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 20:18:34 2011 From: a.afzali2003 at gmail.com (afshin afzali) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:48:34 +0430 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Binding meta apps on mod_fifo dispatched calls Message-ID: Hi Guys, It seems mod_fifo enables *dx* feature extension ( * 1 ) on all calls which bridge to agents by default. I want to be able to add *cf* feature extension as well. Is there a way except that to use mod_loopback? BEST, -- afshin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/349e0cd8/attachment.html From yungwei at resolvity.com Mon Jun 6 21:51:01 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Does FreeSwitch support something like "preserve bandwidth during silent periods"? Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585FF9@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Hi, I'm just wondering if FreeSwitch allows us to control whether to preserve bandwidth during silent periods in config files. Thanks. From steveayre at gmail.com Mon Jun 6 22:04:00 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:04:00 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Does FreeSwitch support something like "preserve bandwidth during silent periods"? In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585FF9@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585FF9@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: Yes: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/VAD_and_CNG -Steve On 6 June 2011 18:51, Yungwei Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just wondering if FreeSwitch allows us to control whether to preserve > bandwidth during silent periods in config files. Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/606f0dd6/attachment.html From freeswitch at aastral.net Mon Jun 6 22:24:18 2011 From: freeswitch at aastral.net (Bill W.) Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR In-Reply-To: References: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> <1QRt7M-0002Zm-GE@mail.aastral.net> <1QS7yM-0005cW-8h@mail.aastral.net> <1QSAQM-0003GJ-6U@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: <1QTeTP-0003ff-Om@mail.aastral.net> Hey Anthony/Michael, After a lot of digging, it turns out the problem was the Max-Forwards on the incoming SIP traffic was too low for FreeSWITCH to complete the call. Thanks so much for all your help! On 6/2/11 1:13 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > then look for a low max-forwards header in the sip traffic > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Bill W. wrote: >> >> Hey Anthony, >> >> All the bridge commands are of the form: >> sofia/profile/18005551212 at 1.2.3.4 >> >> Also, if it was looping, would I see that in the logs? It would parse >> the dialplan 73 times, correct? Because I don't see that. >> From fborot at hotmail.com Mon Jun 6 23:16:25 2011 From: fborot at hotmail.com (Fabian Borot) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Questions Message-ID: Hello We are giving Freeswitch a try in our organization to provide H323 <-> SIP functionality. We have 2 main questions/requests before starting installing/configuring: 1- What would be the most recommended module for H323? I see there are two [opal and mod_h323] both both say that are in development stages. 2- Does FS fully supports virtual interfaces [eth0:1]? I mean: 2- 1 listening on several virtual interfaces, 2-2 replying from the virtual interface that the request came in instead of replying from the primary interface 2-3 and also we need to specify the interface to send the call out instead of using the primary interface Thank you Fabian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/725790a4/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 7 01:07:01 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:07:01 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] intermittent EXCHANGE_ROUTING_ERROR In-Reply-To: <1QTeTP-0003ff-Om@mail.aastral.net> References: <1QRrkF-0007cj-IK@mail.aastral.net> <1QRt7M-0002Zm-GE@mail.aastral.net> <1QS7yM-0005cW-8h@mail.aastral.net> <1QSAQM-0003GJ-6U@mail.aastral.net> <1QTeTP-0003ff-Om@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: Thanks for the followup email. It's always nice to know how these problems eventually get solved... -MC On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Bill W. wrote: > Hey Anthony/Michael, > > After a lot of digging, it turns out the problem was the Max-Forwards on > the incoming SIP traffic was too low for FreeSWITCH to complete the call. > > Thanks so much for all your help! > > > > > On 6/2/11 1:13 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > > then look for a low max-forwards header in the sip traffic > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Bill W. wrote: > >> > >> Hey Anthony, > >> > >> All the bridge commands are of the form: > >> sofia/profile/18005551212 at 1.2.3.4 > >> > >> Also, if it was looping, would I see that in the logs? It would parse > >> the dialplan 73 times, correct? Because I don't see that. > >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/dd1c1080/attachment.html From kahn at vestec.com Tue Jun 7 01:08:23 2011 From: kahn at vestec.com (Kashif Kahn) Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Speech Recognition: Indian English Message-ID: <4DED41C7.4050009@vestec.com> Hello Everyone, Vestec ASR engine now supports speech recognition in Indian English. (We also support American English, Australian English, and Chinese Mandarin). A starter kit is available for $25: http://www.vestec.com/products Please note that Vestec offers the best deal around for enabling sophisticated speech recognition with command-and-control type IVR applications by offering a high accuracy, standards based speech engine at a fraction of the cost of conventional ASR vendors. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Regards, -Kashif From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 7 01:10:32 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:10:32 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] cancel a non answered bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Can you supply a debug log w/ siptrace? Also include the dialplan that you are using. -MC On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Mitesh Thakkar wrote: > Hello all, > > I am facing the similar kind of issue. My flow is as below. > 1. doing bridge to route 1. > 2. on fail i need some work to be done. > 3. doing bridge to route 2. > > So, in above (1.) is being timeout with progress_timeout., and process > further and does bridge to route 2. It sends INVITE to route 2 but it is not > CANCELing to route 1 and keeps sending INVITEs. > > Basically, it should not send INVITE once skipped. Kindly guide me how can > I achieve it. > > Regards, > Mitesh Thakkar > > >> the situation : >> >> Aleg call external gateway >> in dialplan I set on the fly the nibble_rate (nibble_account is already set) >> and just after make a bridge to the gateway. >> so nibblebill tries to ask DB if cahs is ok (so it takes a little time) but in the mean >> time the bridge is created and Bleg is ringing. >> nibblebill realize that cash is below the amount allowed and redirect to nofunds extension. >> >> I'd like to avoid the Bleg ringing by kill the bridge (but not hanup Aleg) once the nofunds extension is reached. >> >> Thanks >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Ponzone >> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:27 PM >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] cancel a non answered bridge >> >> >> Sorry, I fail to get the question... >> Perhaps we need more details like: where do you want to do that ? from XML dialplan ? from script ? >> From API, you can uuid_kill. >> From XML, I am not sure I see what that would mean...perhaps you need to define a timeout, so that the bridge attempt ends after X seconds ? >> >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> >> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Le 28/01/2011 ? 18:14, Madovsky a ?crit : >> >> >> Sorry I forgot >> >> without to hangup ? >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Madovsky >> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:13 PM >> Subject: cancel a non answered bridge >> >> >> How to cancel ok kil a non answered bridge ? >> >> Thanks >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/79e2b831/attachment.html From chat2jesse at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 03:10:20 2011 From: chat2jesse at gmail.com (jesse) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:10:20 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch 1.0.6 doesn't have mod_hash.c? Message-ID: but my fs running time complains : switch_core_session.c:1731 Invalid Application hash. I couldn't find mod_hash.c in src package... any idea? thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/23d0a39c/attachment.html From michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de Tue Jun 7 03:13:05 2011 From: michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de (Michal Bielicki) Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:13:05 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Does FreeSwitch support something like "preserve bandwidth during silent periods"? In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585FF9@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585FF9@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: <4DED5F01.3000600@seventhsignal.de> Am 06.06.2011 19:51, schrieb Yungwei Chen: > Hi, > > I'm just wondering if FreeSwitch allows us to control whether to preserve bandwidth during silent periods in config files. Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org yes From frankie.k.yiu at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 03:29:35 2011 From: frankie.k.yiu at gmail.com (Frankie Yiu) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:29:35 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to stop a Recording when the user presses "#" on C# project? Message-ID: Hi there, I am working on a C# project and would like to record a message when the user is ready to record. Here is the API for C#: * public int RecordFile(string file_name, int time_limit, int silence_threshold, int silence_hits); *This API will stop the call only on timeout or when there is seconds of silence. What I want to do is to let the user decide when to end the recording by pressing a "#" key. So how can I do that? Do I have to use C code to do that? (by sending event to C code side?) Thanks, Frankie * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/ced9bc2c/attachment.html From bobc at devassert.com Tue Jun 7 05:31:10 2011 From: bobc at devassert.com (Bob Coleman) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:31:10 +1200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to stop a Recording when the user presses "#" on C# project? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, You just set the playback_terminators to a # before you issue the record Cheers Bob On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Frankie Yiu wrote: > Hi there, > > I am working on a C# project and would like to record a message when the > user is ready to record.? Here is the API for C#: > ?public int RecordFile(string file_name, int time_limit, int > silence_threshold, int silence_hits); > > This API will stop the call only on timeout or when there is seconds of > silence.? What I want to do is to let the user decide when to end the > recording by pressing a "#" key.? So how can I do that?? Do I have to use C > code to do that? (by sending event to C code side?) > > Thanks, > Frankie > From boris at tagnet.ru Tue Jun 7 07:47:28 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:47:28 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch 1.0.6 doesn't have mod_hash.c? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DED9F50.50109@tagnet.ru> Hello! It is in source tree now. Please read Changelog > but my fs running time complains : switch_core_session.c:1731 Invalid > Application hash. I couldn't find mod_hash.c in src package... > > any idea? > > thanks! > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/54a610b1/attachment.html From adminjew at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 07:55:51 2011 From: adminjew at gmail.com (Yitzchok) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to stop a Recording when the user presses "#" on C# project? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: session.SetVariable("playback_terminators", "#"); session.RecordFile(fileName, 7000, 1000, 5); This should also work if you need something more advanced. var receivedFunction = (c, t) => (c == '#') ? "break" : ""; session.DtmfReceivedFunction += receivedFunction; session.RecordFile(fileName, 7000, 1000, 5); session.DtmfReceivedFunction -= receivedFunction; Yitzchok On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Bob Coleman wrote: > Hi, > > You just set the playback_terminators to a # before you issue the record > > Cheers > > Bob > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Frankie Yiu > wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I am working on a C# project and would like to record a message when the > > user is ready to record. Here is the API for C#: > > public int RecordFile(string file_name, int time_limit, int > > silence_threshold, int silence_hits); > > > > This API will stop the call only on timeout or when there is seconds of > > silence. What I want to do is to let the user decide when to end the > > recording by pressing a "#" key. So how can I do that? Do I have to use > C > > code to do that? (by sending event to C code side?) > > > > Thanks, > > Frankie > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/2f411707/attachment-0001.html From freeswitch at earthspike.net Tue Jun 7 01:36:20 2011 From: freeswitch at earthspike.net (John) Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:36:20 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK Message-ID: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> Hello, I have just set up a FreeSWITCH box with a Sangoma B700 connected to 2 x ISDN2e lines (each 2B+D, so 4 voice channels) in UK, so supplied by BT Openreach. There are a number of anomalies that I am trying to solve. [One of these is that 1 line is dead, but that is for BT Openreach to resolve rather than anyone on this list.] I have a few questions, but as they are all related, I hope you don't mind them in one post. Some basics first. The box is an Atom dual-core with 2GB of memory and a Sangoma B700 card. It's built with Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS server 64-bit, patched and up to date, and also runs dhcpd, lighttpd and sshd. I built the Sangoma ISDN libraries and FreeSWITCH using the latest git versions I could ('make current' about 2 weeks ago). We have incoming and outgoing calls working, but some incoming calls ring in the caller's ear, but nothing appears on the FreeSWITCH console, and others fail. Rebooting the server cures this. We have had problems with lines being disconnected and then reconnected, and it seems that FreeTDM/wanrouter/whatever doesn't recognise previously disconnected lines coming back into use, because a reboot finds lines that were previously reported disconnected ('wanrouter status' or 'ftdm list'). We have ongoing problems with one line that is 'disconnected' (wanpipe2/wp2) but the queries I am describing below apply equally when both lines are connected and working. 1. There seems to be a lot of ISDN 'chatter' with channels going up and down all the time even when the switch is completely idle. Is this normal? Here is my /log 7 showing two of the cycles (which appear to be about 50s apart): 2011-06-06 22:01:54.992467 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect initiated(263) 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:748 [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: Down(261): Dchan(285) 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to DOWN 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to DOWN 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to DOWN 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling changed to :DOWN 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling changed to :DOWN 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling changed to :DOWN 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:1) 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with F-bit = 1(258) 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling changed to :UP 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling changed to :UP 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling changed to :UP 2011-06-06 22:03:19.912462 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect initiated(263) 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with F-bit = 1(258) 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling changed to :UP 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling changed to :UP 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling changed to :UP freeswitch at internal> ftdm list +OK span: 1 (wp1) type: Sangoma (ISDN) physical_status: ok signaling_status: UP chan_count: 3 dialplan: XML context: public dial_regex: fail_dial_regex: hold_music: analog_options: none +OK span: 2 (wp2) type: Sangoma (ISDN) physical_status: alarmed signaling_status: DOWN chan_count: 3 dialplan: XML context: public dial_regex: fail_dial_regex: hold_music: analog_options: none +OK span: 3 (FXS) type: analog physical_status: ok signaling_status: UP chan_count: 2 dialplan: XML context: default dial_regex: fail_dial_regex: hold_music: analog_options: none # wanrouter status Devices currently active: wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 Wanpipe Config: Device name | Protocol Map | Adapter | IRQ | Slot/IO | If's | CLK | Baud rate | wanpipe1 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | 0 | wanpipe2 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | 0 | wanpipe3 | N/A | A200/A400/B600/B700/B800| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | 0 | Wanrouter Status: Device name | Protocol | Station | Status | wanpipe1 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Connected | wanpipe2 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Disconnected | wanpipe3 | A-ANALOG | N/A | Connected | # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanrouter.rc #!/bin/sh # .. comments snipped ... ROUTER_BOOT=YES WAN_CONF_DIR=/etc/wanpipe WAN_INTR_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/interfaces WAN_BIN_DIR=/usr/sbin WAN_LOG=/var/log/wanrouter WAN_LOCK=/var/lock/wanrouter WAN_LOCK_DIR=/var/lock WAN_IP_FORWARD=NO NEW_IF_TYPE=NO WAN_LIB_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/lib WAN_ADSL_LIST=/etc/wanpipe/wan_adsl.list WAN_ANNEXG_LOAD=NO WAN_SCTP_LOAD=NO WAN_LIP_LOAD=NO WAN_DYN_WANCONFIG=NO WAN_SCRIPTS_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/scripts WAN_FIRMWARE_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/firmware WAN_DEVICES_REV_STOP_ORDER=YES WAN_DEVICES="wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 " # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanpipe1.conf #================================================ # WANPIPE1 Configuration File #================================================ # # Note: This file was generated automatically # by /usr/local/sbin/setup-sangoma program. # # If you want to edit this file, it is # recommended that you use wancfg program # to do so. #================================================ # Sangoma Technologies Inc. #================================================ [devices] wanpipe1 = WAN_AFT_ISDN_BRI, Comment [interfaces] w1g1 = wanpipe1, , TDM_VOICE_API, Comment [wanpipe1] CARD_TYPE = AFT S514CPU = A CommPort = PRI AUTO_PCISLOT = NO PCISLOT = 0 PCIBUS = 5 FE_MEDIA = BRI FE_LINE = 1 TDMV_LAW = ALAW RM_BRI_CLOCK_MASTER = NO MTU = 1500 UDPPORT = 9000 TTL = 255 IGNORE_FRONT_END = NO TDMV_SPAN = 1 TE_AIS_MAINTENANCE = NO #NO: defualt YES: Start port in AIS Blue Alarm and keep line down #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_off to disable AIS maintenance mode #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_on to enable AIS maintenance mode TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES # YES: receive dtmf events from hardware TDMV_HW_FAX_DETECT = YES # YES: receive fax 1100hz events from hardware HWEC_OPERATION_MODE = OCT_NORMAL # OCT_NORMAL: echo cancelation enabled with nlp (default) # OCT_SPEECH: improves software tone detection by disabling NLP (echo possible) # OCT_NO_ECHO:disables echo cancelation but allows VQE/tone functions. HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = NO # NO: default YES: remove dtmf out of incoming media (must have hwdtmf enabled) HWEC_NOISE_REDUCTION = NO # NO: default YES: reduces noise on the line - could break fax HWEC_ACUSTIC_ECHO = NO # NO: default YES: enables acustic echo cancelation HWEC_NLP_DISABLE = NO # NO: default YES: guarantees software tone detection (possible echo) HWEC_TX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio level to be maintained (-20 default) HWEC_RX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio level to be maintained (-20 default) HWEC_TX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be applied to tx signal HWEC_RX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be applied to tx signal [w1g1] ACTIVE_CH = ALL TDMV_HWEC = YES MTU = 80 ... and wanpipe2 was also automatically generated so just has '2' for FE_LINE and TDMV_SPAN instead of '1'. # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/freetdm.conf [span wanpipe wp1] trunk_type => bri group=1 b-channel => 1:1-2 d-channel => 1:3 [span wanpipe wp2] trunk_type => bri group=1 b-channel => 2:1-2 d-channel => 2:3 [span wanpipe FXS] name => freetdm trunk_type => fxs group => grp2 fxs-channel => 3:1 trunk_type => fxs group => grp2 fxs-channel => 3:2 # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/autoload_configs/freetdm.conf.xml What other config files do I need to supply? I don't want to deluge the list any more in my first post! 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. Has anyone got this working in UK, and what is the format for the outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? I note that the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. 3. I have built FreeSWITCH from git and installed at /usr/local/... and then followed the steps on the Ubuntu page in the Wiki to set up the run control scripts, etc, and run FS non-root as freeswitch:daemon. With FreeTDM, I have discovered that the /dev/wan* devices are owned by root:root, and so are inaccessible to FS running as non-root. So for now I have added a line in /etc/init.d/freeswitch to 'chgrp freeswitch /dev/wan*'. This is not the most elegant solution, because 'wanrouter restart' (which seems to be my best friend at the moment) resets the ownership to root:root. I have tried grepping to see where the mknods are for these devices, but have been unsuccessful. Is there a better place to 'permanently' change the device ownership? Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! John From fredyg1965 at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 02:01:35 2011 From: fredyg1965 at gmail.com (Fredy Gonzales) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:01:35 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Speech Recognition: Australian English References: <4DEA47E7.8010306@vestec.com> <5391553A31334E0587B99203F8E78C96@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87244E7710894AF1B59375BBE784A890@gcg.com.pe> Plans to add Spanish language? ----- Original Message ----- From: Seven Du To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 6:24 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Speech Recognition: Australian English Interested in dose it offer trial version? -- Seven Du About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn Sent with Sparrow On Saturday, June 4, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Kashif Kahn wrote: Hello Everyone, Vestec ASR engine now supports speech recognition in Australian English. (We also support American English, Indian English, and Chinese Mandarin). A starter kit is available for $25: http://www.vestec.com/products Please note that Vestec offers the best deal around for enabling sophisticated speech recognition with command-and-control type IVR applications by offering a high accuracy, standards based speech engine at a fraction of the cost of conventional ASR vendors. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Regards, -Kashif _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/ea762278/attachment.html From krice at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 7 09:27:07 2011 From: krice at freeswitch.org (Ken Rice) Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:27:07 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch 1.0.6 doesn't have mod_hash.c? In-Reply-To: <4DED9F50.50109@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: How about quit using 1.0.6 and update to current... On 6/6/11 10:47 PM, "Boris Kovalenko" wrote: > Hello! > > It is in source tree now. Please read Changelog > > >> but my fs running time complains : switch_core_session.c:1731 Invalid >> Application hash. I couldn't find mod_hash.c in src package... >> >> >> >> any idea? >> >> >> >> >> thanks! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/a70e50ed/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 10:35:56 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:35:56 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch 1.0.6 doesn't have mod_hash.c? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It's supplied by mod_limit. That module has been removed from the latest versions due to a large reimplementation of the Limit system (it's now in the core with a new API so that you can have pluggable modules providing custom backends for Limit). You could load mod_limit for now, but you'll have to switch to loading mod_hash when you upgrade. You're best off developing with the latest version to save you some extra work when you do eventually upgrade. Plenty of bugs have been fixed in git head since 1.0.6 too. -Steve On 7 June 2011 00:10, jesse wrote: > but my fs running time complains : switch_core_session.c:1731 Invalid > Application hash. I couldn't find mod_hash.c in src package... > > any idea? > > thanks! > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/6235c445/attachment.html From sunwood360 at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 10:37:15 2011 From: sunwood360 at gmail.com (envelopes envelopes) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:37:15 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch 1.0.6 doesn't have mod_hash.c? In-Reply-To: References: <4DED9F50.50109@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Sure, I am just curious about this error message since there is no mod_hash.c in 1.0.6. On Jun 6, 2011 10:29 PM, "Ken Rice" wrote: > How about quit using 1.0.6 and update to current... > > > On 6/6/11 10:47 PM, "Boris Kovalenko" wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> It is in source tree now. Please read Changelog >> >> >>> but my fs running time complains : switch_core_session.c:1731 Invalid >>> Application hash. I couldn't find mod_hash.c in src package... >>> >>> >>> >>> any idea? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110606/77580e57/attachment.html From p.devarahalli at alcatel-lucent.com Tue Jun 7 09:16:51 2011 From: p.devarahalli at alcatel-lucent.com (DEVARAHALLI, PRAKASH (PRAKASH)) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:46:51 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS does not uses the IP/PORT resolved using STUN. Message-ID: <7E79416ABDDDFC4E8C85571D0B5CAB3F138AE81452@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> I configured FS to use the STUN server to find the public IP address used by the NAT. FS sends the request to STUN and receives the reply from the STUN Server , But it does not uses this info ( IP and port obtained from STUN) neither while negotiation ( in SDP) nor in the RTP. My testbed: ----------- < FreeSwitch > ---- < NAT > ---+------- < SIP Phone Client > | | [ STUN Server] File conf/sip_profiles/internal.xml has below configuration. ; This is the local STUN server. Thanks Prakash -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/b3d4e6ea/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 11:51:47 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:51:47 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch 1.0.6 doesn't have mod_hash.c? In-Reply-To: References: <4DED9F50.50109@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: <570EC7DE-9D4A-48A4-8B8B-9F13FD51C033@gmail.com> Well more specifically, any module can register an application with any name it likes. In this case you're trying to call an application named hash which hasn't been loaded. In 1.0.6 that is registered by mod_limit, in more recent versions it's provided by the newer mod_hash which isn't in the older versions. Steve on iPhone On 7 Jun 2011, at 07:37, envelopes envelopes wrote: > Sure, I am just curious about this error message since there is no mod_hash.c in 1.0.6. > > On Jun 6, 2011 10:29 PM, "Ken Rice" wrote: > > How about quit using 1.0.6 and update to current... > > > > > > On 6/6/11 10:47 PM, "Boris Kovalenko" wrote: > > > >> Hello! > >> > >> It is in source tree now. Please read Changelog > >> > >> > >>> but my fs running time complains : switch_core_session.c:1731 Invalid > >>> Application hash. I couldn't find mod_hash.c in src package... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> any idea? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> thanks! > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/d16aba3c/attachment.html From p.devarahalli at alcatel-lucent.com Tue Jun 7 11:53:32 2011 From: p.devarahalli at alcatel-lucent.com (DEVARAHALLI, PRAKASH (PRAKASH)) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:23:32 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS does not uses the IP/PORT resolved using STUN. Message-ID: <7E79416ABDDDFC4E8C85571D0B5CAB3F138AE814F1@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> I configured FS to use the STUN server to find the public IP address used by the NAT. FS sends the request to STUN and receives the reply from the STUN Server , But it does not uses this info ( IP and port obtained from STUN) neither while negotiation ( in SDP) nor in the RTP. My testbed: ----------- < FreeSwitch > ---- < NAT > ---+------- < SIP Phone Client > | | [ STUN Server] File conf/sip_profiles/internal.xml has below configuration. ; This is the local STUN server. Thanks Prakash -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/5edeb2df/attachment-0001.html From grsingh750 at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 13:14:24 2011 From: grsingh750 at gmail.com (guru singh) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:44:24 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS does not uses the IP/PORT resolved using STUN. In-Reply-To: <7E79416ABDDDFC4E8C85571D0B5CAB3F138AE814F1@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <7E79416ABDDDFC4E8C85571D0B5CAB3F138AE814F1@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> Message-ID: Hi, I've never used STUN but if you have a router that supports UPnP/PMP, you could try configuring your sofia profile to use auto-nat , it usually does the job. Regards, guru On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, DEVARAHALLI, PRAKASH (PRAKASH) wrote: > I configured FS to use the STUN server to find the public IP address used by > the NAT. > FS sends the request to STUN and receives the reply from the STUN Server , > But it does > not uses this info ( IP and port obtained from STUN)? neither while > negotiation ( in SDP) > nor in the RTP. > > > My testbed: > ----------- > > < FreeSwitch > ---- < NAT > ---+------- < SIP Phone Client > > ???????????????????????????????????????????? | > ???????????????????????????????????????????? | > ??????????????????????????????? [ STUN Server] > > > File conf/sip_profiles/internal.xml has below configuration. > > ?? ; This is the > local STUN server. > ?? > ?? > ?? > > Thanks > Prakash > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Tue Jun 7 16:11:00 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:11:00 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <176BC431-D84F-4E75-8CAA-7015AB3AFCB2@ipeva.fr> Fabian, I would really recommend staying away from H323 on FS. As far as I know, both modules are far from perfect, and you would have to be closely in touch with the devs to get them working as you need. I know people who went for Yate, just to convert H323 into SIP, and then FS. About the virtual interfaces, FS does not have to deal with that. It's the network layer of the Linux kernel which decides which interface to use. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 06/06/2011 ? 21:16, Fabian Borot a ?crit : > Hello > > We are giving Freeswitch a try in our organization to provide H323 <-> SIP functionality. We have 2 main questions/requests before starting installing/configuring: > > 1- What would be the most recommended module for H323? I see there are two [opal and mod_h323] both both say that are in development stages. > > 2- Does FS fully supports virtual interfaces [eth0:1]? I mean: > 2- 1 listening on several virtual interfaces, > 2-2 replying from the virtual interface that the request came in instead of replying from the primary interface > 2-3 and also we need to specify the interface to send the call out instead of using the primary interface > > Thank you > > Fabian > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/9db799c9/attachment.html From fborot at hotmail.com Tue Jun 7 16:37:39 2011 From: fborot at hotmail.com (Fabian Borot) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you David for your reply. I guess I'll do that. From: fborot at hotmail.com To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Questions Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:16:25 -0400 Hello We are giving Freeswitch a try in our organization to provide H323 <-> SIP functionality. We have 2 main questions/requests before starting installing/configuring: 1- What would be the most recommended module for H323? I see there are two [opal and mod_h323] both both say that are in development stages. 2- Does FS fully supports virtual interfaces [eth0:1]? I mean: 2- 1 listening on several virtual interfaces, 2-2 replying from the virtual interface that the request came in instead of replying from the primary interface 2-3 and also we need to specify the interface to send the call out instead of using the primary interface Thank you Fabian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/200ad845/attachment.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 16:39:10 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:39:10 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > 2- Does FS fully supports virtual interfaces [eth0:1]? I mean: > ??????? 2- 1 listening on several virtual interfaces, > ? ? ??? 2-2 replying from the virtual interface that the request came in > instead of replying from the primary interface > ? ? ? ? 2-3 and also we need to specify the interface to send the call out > instead of using the primary interface You don't define interfaces but the ip-adresses where freeswitch listens on(take a look at external_sip_ip, external_rtp_ip, domain and local_ip_v4 and sip_profiles). So yes, virtual interfaces can be served, several ip's are possible too, but you have to define each of them in separate sip-profiles. From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 18:02:50 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:02:50 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Questions In-Reply-To: <176BC431-D84F-4E75-8CAA-7015AB3AFCB2@ipeva.fr> References: <176BC431-D84F-4E75-8CAA-7015AB3AFCB2@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: I couldn't get mod_opal to compile (probably because I was on debian lenny at the time). mod_h323 worked better, but did have stability issues. We've actually moved to being 100% SIP now though and it's some time since I tried using either. We used to use Yate as a H323->SIP proxy, the configuration details are here: http://yate.null.ro/pmwiki/index.php?n=Main.H323ToSIPSignallingProxy -Steve On 7 June 2011 13:11, David Ponzone wrote: > Fabian, > > I would really recommend staying away from H323 on FS. > As far as I know, both modules are far from perfect, and you would have to > be closely in touch with the devs to get them working as you need. > I know people who went for Yate, just to convert H323 into SIP, and then > FS. > > About the virtual interfaces, FS does not have to deal with that. > It's the network layer of the Linux kernel which decides which interface to > use. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 06/06/2011 ? 21:16, Fabian Borot a ?crit : > > Hello > > We are giving Freeswitch a try in our organization to provide H323 <-> SIP > functionality. We have 2 main questions/requests before starting > installing/configuring: > > 1- What would be the most recommended module for H323? I see there are two > [opal and mod_h323] both both say that are in development stages. > > 2- Does FS fully supports virtual interfaces [eth0:1]? I mean: > 2- 1 listening on several virtual interfaces, > 2-2 replying from the virtual interface that the request came in > instead of replying from the primary interface > 2-3 and also we need to specify the interface to send the call out > instead of using the primary interface > > Thank you > > Fabian > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/96f88082/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 18:04:11 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:04:11 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > > 2- Does FS fully supports virtual interfaces [eth0:1]? I mean: > 2- 1 listening on several virtual interfaces, > 2-2 replying from the virtual interface that the request came in > instead of replying from the primary interface > 2-3 and also we need to specify the interface to send the call out > instead of using the primary interface FS will bind to the IP rather than the device. That does mean it'll always send/receive using the IP you set - is that what you're asking? -Steve On 6 June 2011 20:16, Fabian Borot wrote: > Hello > > We are giving Freeswitch a try in our organization to provide H323 <-> SIP > functionality. We have 2 main questions/requests before starting > installing/configuring: > > 1- What would be the most recommended module for H323? I see there are two > [opal and mod_h323] both both say that are in development stages. > > 2- Does FS fully supports virtual interfaces [eth0:1]? I mean: > 2- 1 listening on several virtual interfaces, > 2-2 replying from the virtual interface that the request came in > instead of replying from the primary interface > 2-3 and also we need to specify the interface to send the call out > instead of using the primary interface > > Thank you > > Fabian > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/5f1dc446/attachment.html From rajesh.npnr at yahoo.com Tue Jun 7 18:09:57 2011 From: rajesh.npnr at yahoo.com (rex.alex) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_com_g729 version for freeswitch 1.0.6 Message-ID: <1307455797128-6449771.post@n2.nabble.com> Hello, I just purchased a g729 license for testing purpose and based on http://files.freeswitch.org/g729/INSTALL.txt file, installed fsg729-194-installer. My freeswitch version is 1.0.6. I have unloaded the mod_g729 and when I am trying to load mod_com_g729, it shows the following error. Please assist. freeswitch at internal> load mod_com_g729 -ERR [module load file routine returned an error] freeswitch at internal> 2011-06-07 03:03:08.294418 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:882 Error Loading module /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_com_g729.so **Trying to load an out of date module, please rebuild the module.** Thanks, Rex. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/mod-com-g729-version-for-freeswitch-1-0-6-tp6449771p6449771.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 18:46:48 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:46:48 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_com_g729 version for freeswitch 1.0.6 In-Reply-To: <1307455797128-6449771.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1307455797128-6449771.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <42319CAF-2786-40A4-895F-BEC9C273A22E@gmail.com> It won't work with 1.0.6, you'll need a newer version of FS. Please upgrade to git head. Steve on iPhone On 7 Jun 2011, at 15:09, "rex.alex" wrote: > Hello, > > I just purchased a g729 license for testing purpose and based on > http://files.freeswitch.org/g729/INSTALL.txt file, installed > fsg729-194-installer. My freeswitch version is 1.0.6. I have unloaded the > mod_g729 and when I am trying to load mod_com_g729, it shows the following > error. Please assist. > > freeswitch at internal> load mod_com_g729 > -ERR [module load file routine returned an error] > freeswitch at internal> 2011-06-07 03:03:08.294418 [CRIT] > switch_loadable_module.c:882 Error Loading module > /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_com_g729.so > **Trying to load an out of date module, please rebuild the module.** > > Thanks, > Rex. > > -- > View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/mod-com-g729-version-for-freeswitch-1-0-6-tp6449771p6449771.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From yungwei at resolvity.com Tue Jun 7 19:05:50 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585DEE@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5861DC@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> That's how it's supposed to work and no workaround? From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steven Ayre Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 5:46 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue You should be checking session.ready() in that loop, as it is I think you'll find the scripts are never ending when the channel is hung up. streamFile/flushDigits probably return instantly, but then get called again on the next loop iteration. The problem would get slightly worse after each test call since there would be an extra copy of the script running. Try replacing: while(true) { with: while(session.ready()) { -Steve On 3 June 2011 23:35, Yungwei Chen wrote: Hi, When testing the following javascript program, I notice a problem that it takes longer and longer for freeswitch to respond to DTMF input for some reason. Please refer to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16435 for debug logs. Notice that the difference in time between any adjacent pairs of the following is increasing as time goes by. Am I missing something here? switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 2:960 Thanks. Here's the javascript program: var dtmf_digits = ""; function on_dtmf_28(session, type, digits, arg) { if (type == "dtmf") { dtmf_digits = digits.digit; console_log("dtmf_digits=" + dtmf_digits + "\n"); return false; // barge-in / done } return true; } while (true) { dtmf_digits = ""; session.flushDigits(); session.streamFile("/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/long-prompt.wav", on_dtmf_28, false); if(dtmf_digits.length == 0) { /* no input */ console_log("no input\n"); session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'no input!', null); } else if(dtmf_digits == "1" || dtmf_digits == "2") { console_log("match "+dtmf_digits+"\n"); session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'you pressed ' + dtmf_digits+ '!', null); } else { /* no match */ console_log("no match\n"); session.speak('flite', 'kal', "no match!", null); } } -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/2ba290f1/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 19:54:26 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:54:26 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5861DC@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585DEE@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5861DC@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: It's a simple fix. Always check session.ready when you loop. Yes, that's how it's designed to work. -Steve On 7 June 2011 16:05, Yungwei Chen wrote: > That's how it's supposed to work and no workaround? > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Steven Ayre > *Sent:* Friday, June 03, 2011 5:46 PM > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue > > > > You should be checking session.ready() in that loop, as it is I think > you'll find the scripts are never ending when the channel is hung up. > > streamFile/flushDigits probably return instantly, but then get called again > on the next loop iteration. The problem would get slightly worse after each > test call since there would be an extra copy of the script running. > > Try replacing: > while(true) { > with: > while(session.ready()) { > > -Steve > > On 3 June 2011 23:35, Yungwei Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > When testing the following javascript program, I notice a problem that it > takes longer and longer for freeswitch to respond to DTMF input for some > reason. > Please refer to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16435 for debug logs. > Notice that the difference in time between any adjacent pairs of the > following is increasing as time goes by. Am I missing something here? > switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels > 20ms > switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 2:960 > Thanks. > > Here's the javascript program: > var dtmf_digits = ""; > > > function on_dtmf_28(session, type, digits, arg) > { > if (type == "dtmf") > { > > dtmf_digits = digits.digit; > > console_log("dtmf_digits=" + dtmf_digits + "\n"); > > return false; // barge-in / done > } > return true; > } > > while (true) > { > dtmf_digits = ""; > session.flushDigits(); > session.streamFile("/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/long-prompt.wav", > on_dtmf_28, false); > > if(dtmf_digits.length == 0) > { > /* no input */ > console_log("no input\n"); > session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'no input!', null); > } > else if(dtmf_digits == "1" || dtmf_digits == "2") > { > console_log("match "+dtmf_digits+"\n"); > session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'you pressed ' + dtmf_digits+ > '!', null); > } > else > { > /* no match */ > console_log("no match\n"); > session.speak('flite', 'kal', "no match!", null); > } > > } > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/6e5a42ee/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 7 19:55:20 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:55:20 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5861DC@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585DEE@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5861DC@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: Yes, this is by design. I think you might be trying to use the wrong tool for the task at hand. What is the problem that you are trying to solve? What function/feature are you trying to implement? -MC On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > That's how it's supposed to work and no workaround? > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Steven Ayre > *Sent:* Friday, June 03, 2011 5:46 PM > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue > > > > You should be checking session.ready() in that loop, as it is I think > you'll find the scripts are never ending when the channel is hung up. > > streamFile/flushDigits probably return instantly, but then get called again > on the next loop iteration. The problem would get slightly worse after each > test call since there would be an extra copy of the script running. > > Try replacing: > while(true) { > with: > while(session.ready()) { > > -Steve > > On 3 June 2011 23:35, Yungwei Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > When testing the following javascript program, I notice a problem that it > takes longer and longer for freeswitch to respond to DTMF input for some > reason. > Please refer to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16435 for debug logs. > Notice that the difference in time between any adjacent pairs of the > following is increasing as time goes by. Am I missing something here? > switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels > 20ms > switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 2:960 > Thanks. > > Here's the javascript program: > var dtmf_digits = ""; > > > function on_dtmf_28(session, type, digits, arg) > { > if (type == "dtmf") > { > > dtmf_digits = digits.digit; > > console_log("dtmf_digits=" + dtmf_digits + "\n"); > > return false; // barge-in / done > } > return true; > } > > while (true) > { > dtmf_digits = ""; > session.flushDigits(); > session.streamFile("/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/long-prompt.wav", > on_dtmf_28, false); > > if(dtmf_digits.length == 0) > { > /* no input */ > console_log("no input\n"); > session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'no input!', null); > } > else if(dtmf_digits == "1" || dtmf_digits == "2") > { > console_log("match "+dtmf_digits+"\n"); > session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'you pressed ' + dtmf_digits+ > '!', null); > } > else > { > /* no match */ > console_log("no match\n"); > session.speak('flite', 'kal', "no match!", null); > } > > } > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/1345782d/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 7 19:56:31 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:56:31 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC585DEE@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5861DC@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: - checks whether the session is still active (true anytime between call starts and hangup) - also session:ready will return false if the call is being transferred. *Bottom line is you should always be checking session:ready on any loops and periodicly throughout your script and exit asap if it returns false.* [http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_lua#session:ready] On 7 June 2011 16:54, Steven Ayre wrote: > It's a simple fix. Always check session.ready when you loop. Yes, that's > how it's designed to work. > > -Steve > > > > On 7 June 2011 16:05, Yungwei Chen wrote: > >> That's how it's supposed to work and no workaround? >> >> >> >> *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: >> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Steven Ayre >> *Sent:* Friday, June 03, 2011 5:46 PM >> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help >> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] A DTMF issue >> >> >> >> You should be checking session.ready() in that loop, as it is I think >> you'll find the scripts are never ending when the channel is hung up. >> >> streamFile/flushDigits probably return instantly, but then get called >> again on the next loop iteration. The problem would get slightly worse after >> each test call since there would be an extra copy of the script running. >> >> Try replacing: >> while(true) { >> with: >> while(session.ready()) { >> >> -Steve >> >> On 3 June 2011 23:35, Yungwei Chen wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> When testing the following javascript program, I notice a problem that it >> takes longer and longer for freeswitch to respond to DTMF input for some >> reason. >> Please refer to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16435 for debug logs. >> Notice that the difference in time between any adjacent pairs of the >> following is increasing as time goes by. Am I missing something here? >> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1279 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels >> 20ms >> switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF 2:960 >> Thanks. >> >> Here's the javascript program: >> var dtmf_digits = ""; >> >> >> function on_dtmf_28(session, type, digits, arg) >> { >> if (type == "dtmf") >> { >> >> dtmf_digits = digits.digit; >> >> console_log("dtmf_digits=" + dtmf_digits + "\n"); >> >> return false; // barge-in / done >> } >> return true; >> } >> >> while (true) >> { >> dtmf_digits = ""; >> session.flushDigits(); >> session.streamFile("/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/long-prompt.wav", >> on_dtmf_28, false); >> >> if(dtmf_digits.length == 0) >> { >> /* no input */ >> console_log("no input\n"); >> session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'no input!', null); >> } >> else if(dtmf_digits == "1" || dtmf_digits == "2") >> { >> console_log("match "+dtmf_digits+"\n"); >> session.speak('flite', 'kal', 'you pressed ' + dtmf_digits+ >> '!', null); >> } >> else >> { >> /* no match */ >> console_log("no match\n"); >> session.speak('flite', 'kal', "no match!", null); >> } >> >> } >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110607/c686a178/attachment.html From awais-nazeer at hotmail.com Tue Jun 7 20:05:28 2011 From: awais-nazeer at hotmail.com (awais nazir) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:05:28 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch dialplan help Message-ID: Hi I want to achieve a simple scenario , after attempting a bridge in my dialplan if I get cause code 480, it should be converted to 503 to originator.
When I start FS, I can't see my IP 195.225.XXX.XXX in freeswitch.log - only this: [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1088 Created ip list rfc1918.auto default (deny) [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 (allow) [] to list rfc1918.auto [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 (allow) [] to list rfc1918.auto [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 (allow) [] to list rfc1918.auto [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1096 Created ip list wan.auto default (allow) [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 (deny) [] to list wan.auto [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 (deny) [] to list wan.auto [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 (deny) [] to list wan.auto [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1104 Created ip list nat.auto default (deny) [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1106 Adding 88.198.XXX.XXX/255.255.255.255 (deny) to list nat.auto [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 (allow) [] to list nat.auto [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 (allow) [] to list nat.auto [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 (allow) [] to list nat.auto [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1115 Created ip list loopback.auto default (deny) [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 127.0.0.0/8 (allow) [] to list loopback.auto [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1121 Created ip list localnet.auto default (deny) [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1124 Adding 88.198.XXX.XXX/255.255.255.255 (allow) to list localnet.auto With my current configuration FS allow to register from any IP. Where is my error? From mtaylor at employees.org Wed Jun 8 05:46:21 2011 From: mtaylor at employees.org (Mike Taylor) Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:46:21 +1200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Conceptual/design question - per gateway/DTMF & PSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi, I hope that I've taught myself enough over the last few weeks that this isn't a blindingly stupid question? I am providing services to multiple customers on FS 1.0.6 I have a basic setup; (which I have inherited, hence the basic questions); AS5350------------- FS-----------customer GW(s) (No Registration) (No Registration) All of the GW info is pulled from a PSWL database. Carriers, carrier_id, lcr table etc. The bit I am missing is; If all of my GW config is in the PSQL database, and that's all accessed by mod_lcr before routing the call, how do I allow for different DTMF types, codecs etc, PER CUSTOMER GW ? Am I stuck with actually defining the gateways statically under /etc/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/ (or I see I can doit in the dialplan, but that won't achieve what I need) I was hoping to be able to pull the DTMF (and other misc info) from the database, but the more I look into it, the less likely it is that this will work I think. (mod_lcr is already at the routing stage, can't modify DTMF at that point AFAIK) Like I said, hope the question isn't so obvious that it's crazy? Regards, Mike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/f940dc63/attachment.html From p.devarahalli at alcatel-lucent.com Wed Jun 8 08:03:32 2011 From: p.devarahalli at alcatel-lucent.com (DEVARAHALLI, PRAKASH (PRAKASH)) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:33:32 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS does not uses the IP/PORT resolved using STUN. In-Reply-To: References: <7E79416ABDDDFC4E8C85571D0B5CAB3F138AE814F1@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> Message-ID: <7E79416ABDDDFC4E8C85571D0B5CAB3F138AE815F5@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> Hi, Thanks for the response. I agree that the solution proposed by you works perfectly. But purpose of my test is to specifically use the STUN for NAT traversing. Thanks Prakash -----Original Message----- From: guru singh [mailto:grsingh750 at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 2:44 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS does not uses the IP/PORT resolved using STUN. Hi, I've never used STUN but if you have a router that supports UPnP/PMP, you could try configuring your sofia profile to use auto-nat , it usually does the job. Regards, guru On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, DEVARAHALLI, PRAKASH (PRAKASH) wrote: > I configured FS to use the STUN server to find the public IP address used by > the NAT. > FS sends the request to STUN and receives the reply from the STUN Server , > But it does > not uses this info ( IP and port obtained from STUN)? neither while > negotiation ( in SDP) > nor in the RTP. > > > My testbed: > ----------- > > < FreeSwitch > ---- < NAT > ---+------- < SIP Phone Client > > ???????????????????????????????????????????? | > ???????????????????????????????????????????? | > ??????????????????????????????? [ STUN Server] > > > File conf/sip_profiles/internal.xml has below configuration. > > ?? ; This is the > local STUN server. > ?? > ?? > ?? > > Thanks > Prakash > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Wed Jun 8 10:04:41 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:04:41 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch dialplan help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5990920F-0369-4EC3-84A0-7023FE9EEC99@ipeva.fr> Personally, I used to do it this way: Of course, you would have to change continue_on_fail=19 to whatever you want, as there are several possibilities for 480. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 08/06/2011 ? 01:46, Michael Collins a ?crit : > Thanks for the tip Steve! > -MC > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > Try also setting this before the bridge: > > > Without that you'll get a 34 reason but 480 sip code, with it you'll get a 34+503. > > -Steve > > > > > On 7 June 2011 21:51, Eric Beard wrote: > I tried this and it does not modify the SIP response code. It seems to only affect this response header: > > > Reason: Q.850;cause=34;text="NORMAL_CIRCUIT_CONGESTION" > > > ----------------------- > > Eric Z. Beard, CTO > > Loop LLC > > w (877) 850-2010 x9249 > > m (727) 776-2768 > > eric at loopfx.com > > > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Wilde > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 12:53 PM > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch dialplan help > > > I think that something like this can work (not tested by me): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stephen > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:05 PM, awais nazir wrote: > > Hi > > I want to achieve a simple scenario , after attempting a bridge in my dialplan if I get cause code 480, it should be converted to 503 to originator. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > data="effective_caller_id_number=$${sipnet_login}"/> > data="{sip_invite_domain=$${sipnet_proxy}}sofia/sipnet/$1@ > $${sipnet_proxy}"/> > > > >
> >
> > > value="{presence_id=${dialed_user}@ > ${dialed_domain}}${sofia_contact(${dialed_user}@${dialed_domain})}"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > When I start FS, I can't see my IP 195.225.XXX.XXX in freeswitch.log - only > this: > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1088 Created ip list rfc1918.auto default (deny) > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 (allow) [] to list > rfc1918.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 (allow) [] to list > rfc1918.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 (allow) [] to list > rfc1918.auto > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1096 Created ip list wan.auto default (allow) > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 (deny) [] to list wan.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 (deny) [] to list > wan.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 (deny) [] to list > wan.auto > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1104 Created ip list nat.auto default (deny) > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1106 Adding 88.198.XXX.XXX/255.255.255.255 (deny) > to list nat.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 (allow) [] to list nat.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 (allow) [] to list > nat.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 (allow) [] to list > nat.auto > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1115 Created ip list loopback.auto default (deny) > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 127.0.0.0/8 (allow) [] to list > loopback.auto > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1121 Created ip list localnet.auto default (deny) > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1124 Adding 88.198.XXX.XXX/255.255.255.255 (allow) > to list localnet.auto > > With my current configuration FS allow to register from any IP. > Where is my error? > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/b3f5883d/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 11:59:35 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:59:35 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Conceptual/design question - per gateway/DTMF & PSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The dtmf_type channel variable can be used to override the profile's dtmf setting. Valid settings are rf2833, info and none. Inband would be more complex, as you'd need to call the start_dtmf_generate application, not sure how you could easily integrate that with mod_lcr. Possibly using the execute_on_x family of channel variables. mod_lcr would need to use custom sql to get the additional dtmf variable. As David pointed out, mod_lcr already lets you set the codec list for a gateway. late-negotiation isn't *required*, but could be useful. Without it the aleg will pick a codec, then you'll dial out with the codec list to the gateway and transcode if needed. With it, the aleg doesn't pick the codec until the bleg has picked one - which may make transcoding less likely. You could also setup the gateways as sofia gateways, set the codec/dtmf variables on the gateway and have mod_lcr return the sofia/gateway/gwname/ prefix. A lot of the behaviour in terms of mod_lcr, execute_on_x etc has changed since 1.0.6 so you might find you have to upgrade to get some of the newer features. -Steve On 8 June 2011 02:46, Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi, > > I hope that I've taught myself enough over the last few weeks that this > isn't a blindingly stupid question? > > I am providing services to multiple customers on FS 1.0.6 > > I have a basic setup; (which I have inherited, hence the basic questions); > > AS5350------------- FS-----------customer GW(s) > (No Registration) (No Registration) > > All of the GW info is pulled from a PSWL database. Carriers, carrier_id, > lcr table etc. > > The bit I am missing is; > > If all of my GW config is in the PSQL database, and that's all accessed by > mod_lcr before routing the call, how do I allow for different DTMF types, > codecs etc, PER CUSTOMER GW ? > > Am I stuck with actually defining the gateways statically under > /etc/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/ (or I see I can doit in the dialplan, but > that won't achieve what I need) > > I was hoping to be able to pull the DTMF (and other misc info) from the > database, but the more I look into it, the less likely it is that this will > work I think. (mod_lcr is already at the routing stage, can't modify DTMF at > that point AFAIK) > > Like I said, hope the question isn't so obvious that it's crazy? > > Regards, > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/14331959/attachment-0001.html From u2nsam at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 13:01:37 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:31:37 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] domain In-Reply-To: <4DE9D5E7.7030800@tagnet.ru> References: <4DE89971.9010205@tagnet.ru> <4DE8A680.1080102@tagnet.ru> <4DE9D5E7.7030800@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Thankyou. Regds Sam On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Hello! > > No, You can't use it this way. There are 2 possibilites: > 1. You have one context (dialplan) and use something like > > > > > > > > > > 2. I prefer the way to have separate contexts (dialplans) for each domain. > So in the main context You do something like: > > And after that You know that is context_${domain_name} (context_xyz.com as > in your example) You have o > > Hello, > > After doing this , > > > > i get domain name = xyz.com > > Now how can i use the fundas of identified domain and using below to > execute . > > > > > > > > > Is that possible. > > > Regards > Sam > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> There is a variable named ${sip_from_user}. You may do something like >> >> > "from_domain=${regex(${sip_from_user}|^.*@(.*)$|%1)}"inline="true"/> >> >> >> >> The call would be coming from outside to FS and not within , so the call >> would be routed from public to different domains , >> >> and after that following the doc >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Multi-tenant >> >> Here how can we recognized from the header on which domain is it ? like >> if we get an from header as 1001 at xyz.com >> how can we recognized the domain and route the call accordingly ... when >> an outside system sends a call via acl . >> >> regards >> Sam >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> What do You mean? You may (for example) set the domain variable for a >>> user and test it inside condition. >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have a user registered by domain (1001 at xyz.com) and when the invite >>> comes to my FS server it should recognize the domain and route >>> the calls accordingly to the group ... >>> . >>> The call would be entering via the acl to public.xml. Here i want to >>> route the call according to domain names, how will i do that. >>> >>> Any suggestions... >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Sam >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Boris >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/a2503112/attachment.html From u2nsam at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 13:21:50 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:51:50 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] domain In-Reply-To: <4DE9D5E7.7030800@tagnet.ru> References: <4DE89971.9010205@tagnet.ru> <4DE8A680.1080102@tagnet.ru> <4DE9D5E7.7030800@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Had it been FS identifying the call to be of some domain and using the dial-plan with ... , that would had been great . Regds Sam On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Hello! > > No, You can't use it this way. There are 2 possibilites: > 1. You have one context (dialplan) and use something like > > > > > > > > > > 2. I prefer the way to have separate contexts (dialplans) for each domain. > So in the main context You do something like: > > And after that You know that is context_${domain_name} (context_xyz.com as > in your example) You have o > > Hello, > > After doing this , > > > > i get domain name = xyz.com > > Now how can i use the fundas of identified domain and using below to > execute . > > > > > > > > > Is that possible. > > > Regards > Sam > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> There is a variable named ${sip_from_user}. You may do something like >> >> > "from_domain=${regex(${sip_from_user}|^.*@(.*)$|%1)}"inline="true"/> >> >> >> >> The call would be coming from outside to FS and not within , so the call >> would be routed from public to different domains , >> >> and after that following the doc >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Multi-tenant >> >> Here how can we recognized from the header on which domain is it ? like >> if we get an from header as 1001 at xyz.com >> how can we recognized the domain and route the call accordingly ... when >> an outside system sends a call via acl . >> >> regards >> Sam >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> What do You mean? You may (for example) set the domain variable for a >>> user and test it inside condition. >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have a user registered by domain (1001 at xyz.com) and when the invite >>> comes to my FS server it should recognize the domain and route >>> the calls accordingly to the group ... >>> . >>> The call would be entering via the acl to public.xml. Here i want to >>> route the call according to domain names, how will i do that. >>> >>> Any suggestions... >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Sam >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Boris >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/998b15c0/attachment-0001.html From boris at tagnet.ru Wed Jun 8 13:42:55 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:42:55 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] domain In-Reply-To: References: <4DE89971.9010205@tagnet.ru> <4DE8A680.1080102@tagnet.ru> <4DE9D5E7.7030800@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: <4DEF441F.3070904@tagnet.ru> Hello! Hmmm... I think this is useless feature. You already have an user_context and separate sip profiles. > Had it been FS identifying the call to be of some domain and using the > dial-plan with ... , > that would had been great . > > Regds > Sam > > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Boris Kovalenko > wrote: > > Hello! > > No, You can't use it this way. There are 2 possibilites: > 1. You have one context (dialplan) and use something like > > > > > > > > > > 2. I prefer the way to have separate contexts (dialplans) for each > domain. So in the main context You do something like: > > And after that You know that is context_${domain_name} > (context_xyz.com as in your example) You > have o > >> Hello, >> >> After doing this , >> >> >> >> i get domain name = xyz.com >> >> Now how can i use the fundas of identified domain and using below >> to execute . >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Is that possible. >> >> >> Regards >> Sam >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Boris Kovalenko > > wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> There is a variable named ${sip_from_user}. You may do >> something like >> >> > data="from_domain=${regex(${sip_from_user}|^.*@(.*)$|%1)}" >> >> inline="true"/> >> >> >> >>> The call would be coming from outside to FS and not within , >>> so the call would be routed from public to different domains , >>> >>> and after that following the doc >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Multi-tenant >>> >>> Here how can we recognized from the header on which domain >>> is it ? like if we get an from header as 1001 at xyz.com >>> >>> how can we recognized the domain and route the call >>> accordingly ... when an outside system sends a call via acl . >>> >>> regards >>> Sam >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Boris Kovalenko >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hello! >>> >>> What do You mean? You may (for example) set the >>> domain variable for a user and test it inside condition. >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have a user registered by domain (1001 at xyz.com >>>> ) and when the invite comes to my >>>> FS server it should recognize the domain and route >>>> the calls accordingly to the group >>> name="xyz.com "> ... . >>>> The call would be entering via the acl to public.xml. >>>> Here i want to route the call according to domain >>>> names, how will i do that. >>>> >>>> Any suggestions... >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Sam >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Boris >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/025b052e/attachment.html From sharad at coraltele.com Wed Jun 8 16:06:47 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:36:47 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how many are read & how many are unread in Inbox References: Message-ID: Dear All, Just wondering whether there is any way to know how many voice messages are read or unread in New & SAVED box. A help will be highly appriciated. Regards Sharad From valery.kalinin at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 16:18:29 2011 From: valery.kalinin at gmail.com (Valery Kalinin) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:18:29 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM does not work Message-ID: Hi all! FreeTDM does not work with Digium equipment. Equipment: Digium TE121 OS: CentOS 5.6 DAHDI: 2.4.1.2 # ./dahdi_scan [1] active=yes alarms=OK description=Wildcard TE121 Card 0 name=WCT1/0 manufacturer=Digium devicetype=Wildcard TE121 (VPMADT032) location=PCI Bus 04 Slot 09 basechan=1 totchans=31 irq=5 type=digital-E1 syncsrc=1 lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) coding_opts=AMI,HDB3 framing_opts=CCS,CRC4 coding=HDB3 framing=CCS LIBPRI: 1.4.11.5 zt.conf [defaults] codec_ms => 20 wink_ms => 150 flash_ms => 750 echo_cancel_level => 64 rxgain => 0.0 txgain => 0.0 freetdm.conf [span zt pri] name => pri trunk_type => E1 group => e1group b-channel => 1-15 b-channel => 17-31 d-channel => 16 part of freetdm.conf.xml: and log result (important parts): start freetdm: 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591482 [DEBUG] ftdm_config.c:52 New mod directory: /usr/local/freeswitch/mod 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591492 [DEBUG] ftdm_config.c:58 New config directory: /usr/local/freeswitch/conf 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591539 [DEBUG] ftdm_sched.c:154 Initializing scheduling API 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591545 [DEBUG] ftdm_sched.c:251 Created schedule freetdm-master 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591551 [NOTICE] ftdm_sched.c:178 Launching main schedule thread 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591581 [DEBUG] ftdm_sched.c:187 Running schedule freetdm-master in the main schedule thread 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591592 [DEBUG] ftdm_config.c:80 Configuration file is /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/modules.conf. 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591639 [NOTICE] ftdm_io.c:5656 Modules configured: 1 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591645 [DEBUG] ftdm_config.c:80 Configuration file is /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/freetdm.conf. 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591659 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4595 Reading FreeTDM configuration file 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591679 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4611 found config for span 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591783 [NOTICE] ftmod_zt.c:1300 Using DAHDI control device 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591794 [INFO] ftdm_io.c:4898 Loading IO from /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/ftmod_zt.so [zt] 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591814 [DEBUG] ftdm_config.c:80 Configuration file is /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/zt.conf. 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591840 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:577 Setting rxgain val to 0.000000 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591846 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:585 Setting txgain val to 0.000000 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591860 [INFO] ftdm_io.c:790 Auto-loaded I/O module 'zt' 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591885 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4625 created span 1 (pri) of type zt 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591890 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4641 span 1 [name]=[pri] 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591896 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4641 span 1 [trunk_type]=[E1] 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591902 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4646 setting trunk type to 'E1' 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591907 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4641 span 1 [group]=[e1group] 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591912 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4641 span 1 [b-channel]=[1-15] 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591940 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 1 as FreeTDM device 1:1 fd:25 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591963 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 2 as FreeTDM device 1:2 fd:26 2011-06-09 02:07:00.591984 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 3 as FreeTDM device 1:3 fd:27 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592006 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 4 as FreeTDM device 1:4 fd:28 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592029 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 5 as FreeTDM device 1:5 fd:29 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592049 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 6 as FreeTDM device 1:6 fd:30 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592069 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 7 as FreeTDM device 1:7 fd:31 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592090 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 8 as FreeTDM device 1:8 fd:32 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592110 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 9 as FreeTDM device 1:9 fd:33 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592131 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 10 as FreeTDM device 1:10 fd:34 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592151 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 11 as FreeTDM device 1:11 fd:35 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592171 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 12 as FreeTDM device 1:12 fd:36 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592192 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 13 as FreeTDM device 1:13 fd:37 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592212 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 14 as FreeTDM device 1:14 fd:38 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592231 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 15 as FreeTDM device 1:15 fd:39 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592239 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:5200 Creating new group:e1group 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592275 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4641 span 1 [b-channel]=[17-31] 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592299 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 17 as FreeTDM device 1:16 fd:40 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592323 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 18 as FreeTDM device 1:17 fd:41 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592348 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 19 as FreeTDM device 1:18 fd:42 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592369 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 20 as FreeTDM device 1:19 fd:43 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592390 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 21 as FreeTDM device 1:20 fd:44 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592422 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 22 as FreeTDM device 1:21 fd:45 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592442 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 23 as FreeTDM device 1:22 fd:46 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592462 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 24 as FreeTDM device 1:23 fd:47 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592486 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 25 as FreeTDM device 1:24 fd:48 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592510 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 26 as FreeTDM device 1:25 fd:49 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592531 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 27 as FreeTDM device 1:26 fd:50 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592558 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 28 as FreeTDM device 1:27 fd:51 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592584 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 29 as FreeTDM device 1:28 fd:52 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592609 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 30 as FreeTDM device 1:29 fd:53 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592628 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 31 as FreeTDM device 1:30 fd:54 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592654 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4641 span 1 [d-channel]=[16] 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592692 [INFO] ftmod_zt.c:396 configuring device /dev/dahdi/channel channel 16 as FreeTDM device 1:31 fd:55 2011-06-09 02:07:00.592712 [INFO] ftdm_io.c:4823 Configured 31 channel(s) 2011-06-09 02:07:00.593269 [INFO] ftdm_io.c:4898 Loading IO from /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/ftmod_libpri.so [libpri] 2011-06-09 02:07:00.593283 [DEBUG] ftdm_io.c:4839 Module libpri does not support configuration. 2011-06-09 02:07:00.593287 [INFO] ftdm_io.c:4910 Loading SIG from /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/ftmod_libpri.so 2011-06-09 02:07:00.593292 [INFO] ftdm_io.c:5133 auto-loaded 'libpri' 2011-06-09 02:07:00.593302 [NOTICE] ftmod_libpri.c:1981 Setting default Layer 1 to ALAW since this is an E1/BRI/BRI PTMP trunk 2011-06-09 02:07:00.593566 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1629 opening D-Channel #0 1:31 2011-06-09 02:07:00.596450 [NOTICE] switch_loadable_module.c:145 Adding Endpoint 'freetdm' 2011-06-09 02:07:00.596481 [NOTICE] switch_loadable_module.c:252 Adding Application 'disable_ec' 2011-06-09 02:07:00.596510 [NOTICE] switch_loadable_module.c:252 Adding Application 'disable_dtmf' 2011-06-09 02:07:00.596530 [NOTICE] switch_loadable_module.c:252 Adding Application 'enable_dtmf' 2011-06-09 02:07:00.596552 [NOTICE] switch_loadable_module.c:274 Adding API Function 'ftdm' 2011-06-09 02:07:00.618807 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) 2011-06-09 02:07:00.622776 [NOTICE] switch_loadable_module.c:274 Adding API Function 'acl' ...later: 2011-06-09 02:07:01.693551 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) 2011-06-09 02:07:02.773590 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) 2011-06-09 02:07:03.833629 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) 2011-06-09 02:07:04.893667 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:146 TEI=0 DL event: Q931_DL_EVENT_DL_RELEASE_IND(3) 2011-06-09 02:07:05.962709 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) 2011-06-09 02:07:07.982780 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) 2011-06-09 02:07:10.002854 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) ... making a call: ... Dialplan: sofia/internal/1000 at 192.168.200.11 Action bridge(freetdm/e1group/1/12345) Dialplan: sofia/internal/1000 at 192.168.200.11 Action answer() 2011-06-09 02:10:27.343089 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1063 sofia/internal/ 1000 at 192.168.200.11 SET [RFC2822_DATE]=[Thu, 09 Jun 2011 02:10:27 +0600] EXECUTE sofia/internal/1000 at 192.168.200.11 bridge(freetdm/e1group/1/12345) 2011-06-09 02:10:27.343089 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1869 Parsing global variables 2011-06-09 02:10:27.343089 [NOTICE] mod_freetdm.c:1551 Close Channel N/A [CS_NEW] 2011-06-09 02:10:27.343089 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 () Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-09 02:10:27.343089 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (N/A) State DESTROY 2011-06-09 02:10:27.343089 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (N/A) State DESTROY going to sleep 2011-06-09 02:10:27.343089 [ERR] switch_ivr_originate.c:2443 Cannot create outgoing channel of type [freetdm] cause: [NORMAL_CIRCUIT_CONGESTION] 2011-06-09 02:10:27.343089 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3296 Originate Resulted in Error Cause: 34 [NORMAL_CIRCUIT_CONGESTION] Why? Which means error: Caught Event span 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) Which config??? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/adb2e934/attachment-0001.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 18:34:31 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:34:31 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - destination_number empty on inbound call Message-ID: Hi! My FS is connected to a plain BRI-line via a HFC-S PCI-card. On inbound calls i don't receive a dialed number. Please see the debug at http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16456 for details. Do i have to fetch the DID from a variable before i can handle the call or is there some other problem, which i assume? Outbound calls work just fine btw. Best regards, Christian From mint.office.nick at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 04:04:25 2011 From: mint.office.nick at gmail.com (Mint.Nick) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] LuaSQL, Curl, mod_skypopen, mod_dingaling....Can't get 'em to work! Message-ID: <31778696.post@talk.nabble.com> Hi all, I've noticed there isn't much traffic on this forum anymore. I'm having issues with the things listed in the subj. Is there anyone out there who might be willing to help a guy figure one or more of these out? Thanks -Nick -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/LuaSQL%2C-Curl%2C-mod_skypopen%2C-mod_dingaling....Can%27t-get-%27em-to-work%21-tp31778696p31778696.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From alessandro865 at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 13:52:42 2011 From: alessandro865 at gmail.com (Alessandro Luppi) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:52:42 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS response Message-ID: Hi, I have the following scenario: If the softphone2 respond with 486 freeswitch is working in this way: softphone1 FS softphone2 INVITE ----------> INVITE ---------------> <------------------- 486 <-------------- 200 ACK ------------------> ACK ------------> <-------------- BYE i want this behaviour: softphone1 FS softphone2 INVITE ----------> INVITE ---------------> <------------------- 486 <-------------- 486 ACK ------------------> ACK ------------> Any suggestion? Regards Alessandro -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/dee438aa/attachment.html From gmaruzz at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 19:26:52 2011 From: gmaruzz at gmail.com (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:26:52 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] LuaSQL, Curl, mod_skypopen, mod_dingaling....Can't get 'em to work! In-Reply-To: <31778696.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <31778696.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: First read all the related docs in the wiki: http://wiki.freeswitch.org Then, search the mailing list archive: lists.freeswitch.org After that, if you have not found the answers to your doubts, please write here what is your specific problem, with all the details that can give us the precise idea of why you are in a situation that is not documented. -giovanni On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Mint.Nick wrote: > > Hi all, > I've noticed there isn't much traffic on this forum anymore. I'm having > issues with the things listed in the subj. Is there anyone out there who > might be willing to help a guy figure one or more of these out? > > Thanks > -Nick > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/LuaSQL%2C-Curl%2C-mod_skypopen%2C-mod_dingaling....Can%27t-get-%27em-to-work%21-tp31778696p31778696.html > Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 From yungwei at resolvity.com Wed Jun 8 19:30:20 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] An extension with a javascript action can handle multiple concurrent calls? Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5864D7@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Hi, I'm wondering if the following extension can handle multiple concurrent calls. Thanks. From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 8 19:32:32 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:32:32 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] An extension with a javascript action can handle multiple concurrent calls? In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5864D7@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5864D7@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: Yes, you'll have one js instance for each call. JS does not scale very well, but if you want the ability to scale a lot then you should use Lua. -MC On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if the following extension can handle multiple concurrent > calls. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/7ff7aa47/attachment.html From sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org Wed Jun 8 19:40:45 2011 From: sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org (Sergey Okhapkin) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] An extension with a javascript action can handle multiple concurrent calls? In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5864D7@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: <201106081140.45399.sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> To me lua frequently crashes when multiple channels call lua interpreter at the same time. Even with trivial lua script which calls single select statement using dbh. On Wednesday 08 June 2011, Michael Collins wrote: > Yes, you'll have one js instance for each call. JS does not scale very > well, but if you want the ability to scale a lot then you should use Lua. > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm wondering if the following extension can handle multiple concurrent > > calls. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 8 20:03:39 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:03:39 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] An extension with a javascript action can handle multiple concurrent calls? In-Reply-To: <201106081140.45399.sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC5864D7@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <201106081140.45399.sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> Message-ID: I've never ever had a Lua script crash, but I don't use LuaSQL or even the dbh. However, Chad Phillips (IRC: hunmonk) uses Lua and dbh for the JesterMail. -MC On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: > To me lua frequently crashes when multiple channels call lua interpreter at > the same time. Even with trivial lua script which calls single select > statement using dbh. > > On Wednesday 08 June 2011, Michael Collins wrote: > > Yes, you'll have one js instance for each call. JS does not scale very > > well, but if you want the ability to scale a lot then you should use Lua. > > > > -MC > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Yungwei Chen > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm wondering if the following extension can handle multiple concurrent > > > calls. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/a348095b/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 8 20:10:36 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:10:36 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Conference Call Today Message-ID: Hello gang! Today's agenda is here: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FS_weekly_2011_06_08 We have a special guest from George Washington University today: Robert Daniel. We are looking forward to hearing from him about how FreeSWITCH is being used in his telecommunications classes. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/1dd510d4/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Wed Jun 8 20:44:26 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:44:26 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - destination_number empty on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8A8F0584-3226-48F1-989F-83CDBE80AA4D@ipeva.fr> Christian, well you should first tell us what kinda of ISDN you ordered from your local telco. And also, check if the card/drivers are configured with the right ISDN type. That could explain why you don't get the DID. I suppose there are other possible reasons: How many DID do you have ? If only one, I suppose some telcos may send you the call without anything, as you dont need the info anyway. That would be ugly, but some telcos do ugly things in some places. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 08/06/2011 ? 16:34, Christian Benke a ?crit : > Hi! > > My FS is connected to a plain BRI-line via a HFC-S PCI-card. On > inbound calls i don't receive a dialed number. Please see the debug at > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16456 for details. > Do i have to fetch the DID from a variable before i can handle the > call or is there some other problem, which i assume? > > Outbound calls work just fine btw. > > Best regards, > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/051833fb/attachment.html From yungwei at resolvity.com Wed Jun 8 21:43:50 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Passing a map to session.setVariable() Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586567@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Hi, In javascript, is passing a map or array to session.setVariable() supported? Thanks. From benkokakao at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 21:44:44 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:44:44 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - destination_number empty on inbound call In-Reply-To: <8A8F0584-3226-48F1-989F-83CDBE80AA4D@ipeva.fr> References: <8A8F0584-3226-48F1-989F-83CDBE80AA4D@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: On 8 June 2011 18:44, David Ponzone wrote: > Christian, > well you should first tell us what kinda of ISDN you ordered from your local > telco. > And also, check if the card/drivers are configured with the right ISDN type. > That could explain why you don't get the DID. > I suppose there are other possible reasons: > How many DID do you have ? > If only one, I suppose some telcos may send you the call without anything, > as you dont need the info anyway. That would be ugly, but some telcos do > ugly things in some places. Well the line is in our lab since ages, so i can't really tell you what "exactly" has been ordered back then :-) It's an EuroISDN-BRI without a MSN but an unbounded number of DIDs(Fixed 7-digit Headnumber plus up to 5 digit extensions - which is basically a standard BRI-line in Austria). As the outbound calls work fine(headnumber+extensions are delivered) i assume it's not exactly an configuration issue. According to my colleagues the DID has always been sent(With proprietary PBX). A few harder facts - my configuration: http://pastebin.com/Kc4BPL9E This in old paste of a previous problem, but the configuration is still the same. If i can provide you with more precise information, please let me know what you need, a ISDN-trace is in the paste in my previous mail. I'll run a test on a different box with a Sangoma card tomorrow, i just hoped someone could give me a jump-start with the information i posted earlier. Best, Christian From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 22:01:08 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:01:08 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Passing a map to session.setVariable() In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586567@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586567@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: Variables can only store strings. You'd want to serialise the map/array to a string and storing that. What do you need to store? -Steve On 8 June 2011 18:43, Yungwei Chen wrote: > Hi, > > In javascript, is passing a map or array to session.setVariable() > supported? Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/1bc6a54b/attachment.html From anton.vazir at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 22:09:27 2011 From: anton.vazir at gmail.com (Anton VG) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 23:09:27 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] LuaSQL, Curl, mod_skypopen, mod_dingaling....Can't get 'em to work! In-Reply-To: References: <31778696.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: all works for me. 2011/6/8 Giovanni Maruzzelli : > First read all the related docs in the wiki: http://wiki.freeswitch.org > Then, search the mailing list archive: lists.freeswitch.org > > After that, if you have not found the answers to your doubts, please > write here what is your specific problem, with all the details that > can give us the precise idea of why you are in a situation that is not > documented. > > -giovanni > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Mint.Nick wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> I've noticed there isn't much traffic on this forum anymore. I'm having >> issues with the things listed in the subj. Is there anyone out there who >> might be willing to help a guy figure one or more of these out? >> >> Thanks >> -Nick >> -- >> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/LuaSQL%2C-Curl%2C-mod_skypopen%2C-mod_dingaling....Can%27t-get-%27em-to-work%21-tp31778696p31778696.html >> Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Sincerely, > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From yungwei at resolvity.com Wed Jun 8 22:18:13 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Enumerate variables in a session Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586589@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Hi, I'm wondering if there's way to enumerate the list of variable names in a session in javascript. Thanks. From stkn at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 8 22:43:49 2011 From: stkn at freeswitch.org (Stefan Knoblich) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:43:49 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - destination_number empty on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201106082043.54622.stkn@freeswitch.org> Am Wednesday 08 June 2011 schrieb Christian Benke: > My FS is connected to a plain BRI-line via a HFC-S PCI-card. On > inbound calls i don't receive a dialed number. Please see the debug at > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16456 for details. > Do i have to fetch the DID from a variable before i can handle the > call or is there some other problem, which i assume? That SETUP message at the top isn't valid, AFAIK. There are two 'Calling Number' IEs (0x6c) and the second one should have been a 'Called Number' IE (0x70) instead ('190341' is the number you dialed, right?). -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stefan Knoblich | Web: http://www.axsentis.de/ axsentis GmbH | http://oss.axsentis.de/ Eupener Str. 74, 50933 Koeln, Germany | Amtsgericht Koeln: HR B 56238 | Email: s.knoblich at axsentis.de UST-ID: DE244977565 | JID: s.knoblich at jabber.axsentis.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Web: http://stkn.techmage.de/ Email: stkn at freeswitch.org IRC: #freeswitch-de @ irc.freenode.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/bce83194/attachment-0001.bin From eric at loopfx.com Wed Jun 8 23:11:34 2011 From: eric at loopfx.com (Eric Beard) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] IP Whitelist Message-ID: It seems I misunderstand the purpose of the acl.conf.xml file. What I want to do is create an IP whitelist, so only the IPs I designate get a response from FreeSwitch. I'd like to do this with FreeSwitch rather than a firewall. I have this in acl.conf.xml: I was assuming that this would only allow traffic from my local network, 10.1.0.0, and from the single IP 209.249.3.74 But while watching sip traffic, I saw an OPTIONS request from a different IP (sipvicious scan). Freeswitch happily responded to the OPTIONS with an OK. How can I configure it so that it ignores requests that are not on my whitelist? Thanks! ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/9d168a75/attachment.html From kris at livecall.com Wed Jun 8 23:12:06 2011 From: kris at livecall.com (Kris) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:12:06 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Passing a map to session.setVariable() References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586567@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: Why not pass the file name? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Ayre" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:01 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Passing a map to session.setVariable() > Variables can only store strings. You'd want to serialise the map/array to > a > string and storing that. What do you need to store? > > -Steve > > > On 8 June 2011 18:43, Yungwei Chen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In javascript, is passing a map or array to session.setVariable() >> supported? Thanks. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > From a.luppi at seletech.com Wed Jun 8 23:14:23 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:14:23 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Response status from client Message-ID: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> Hi, I have two questions about FS: Question 1: i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive a call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that freeswitch filter this status. This is an example of desired behaviour: 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) 1001 at localnet_ip INVITE ----------> INVITE ---------------> <-------------- trying<--------------------trying <-------------- 603<------------------ 603 ACK ------------> ACK------------------> The current behaviour of FS is: 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) 1001 at localnet_ip INVITE ----------> INVITE ---------------> <-------------- trying<--------------------trying <------------------ 603 <-------------- 200 ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE I'd like to avoid the current behaviour. It's possible a kind of message status path trough? If the called party terminate the call before answering, FS send always to the calling partner 200 and BYE. First thought was related to the voice-mail. Now voice-mail is disabled but the behaviour is the same. Question:2 It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? Thanks Good Evening Alessandro -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/91837391/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 23:44:22 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:44:22 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] IP Whitelist In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ACLs control registrations and calls, not options requests. You'd be best off blocking sipvicious with this iptables entry: iptables -I INPUT -j DROP -p udp --dport 5060 -m string --string "friendly-scanner" --algo bm -Steve On 8 June 2011 20:11, Eric Beard wrote: > It seems I misunderstand the purpose of the acl.conf.xml file. > > > > What I want to do is create an IP whitelist, so only the IPs I designate > get a response from FreeSwitch. I?d like to do this with FreeSwitch rather > than a firewall. > > > > I have this in acl.conf.xml: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was assuming that this would only allow traffic from my local network, > 10.1.0.0, and from the single IP 209.249.3.74 > > > > But while watching sip traffic, I saw an OPTIONS request from a different > IP (sipvicious scan). Freeswitch happily responded to the OPTIONS with an > OK. > > > > How can I configure it so that it ignores requests that are not on my > whitelist? > > > > Thanks! > > > > ----------------------- > > *Eric Z. Beard, CTO* > > Loop LLC > > w (877) 850-2010 x9249 > > m (727) 776-2768 > > eric at loopfx.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/5c180e3b/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 23:47:52 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:47:52 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] LuaSQL, Curl, mod_skypopen, mod_dingaling....Can't get 'em to work! In-Reply-To: <31778696.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <31778696.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: Rather than using LuaSQL you might find you have more success with the freeswitch.Dbh class that gives you access to FreeSWITCH's ODBC support from within lua: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Lua_freeswitch_dbh If you still need help after reading the documentation, there are almost always people on the IRC channel that can help you figure things out (#freeswitch on freenode). This mailing list does see plenty of traffic though too, although you might not get as fast an answer. -Steve On 8 June 2011 01:04, Mint.Nick wrote: > > Hi all, > I've noticed there isn't much traffic on this forum anymore. I'm having > issues with the things listed in the subj. Is there anyone out there who > might be willing to help a guy figure one or more of these out? > > Thanks > -Nick > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/LuaSQL%2C-Curl%2C-mod_skypopen%2C-mod_dingaling....Can%27t-get-%27em-to-work%21-tp31778696p31778696.html > Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/77f9bab6/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 23:55:20 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:55:20 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Response status from client In-Reply-To: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> References: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> Message-ID: > > Question 1: > i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive a > call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that freeswitch > filter this status. > 603 gets treated fine for me. I think we need to see more information - can you put a debug level log of the call with siptrace enabled (sofia global siptrace on) on pastebin (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/) and then post the url here? Chances are you're doing something in the dialplan that's answering the call, either before or after the failed bleg. You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the client and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call. > Question:2 > It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or > session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to > invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? > Yes, you can for 180/183, with the sip_ph_X- prefix. That puts the header on any provisional response. http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia#Adding_Response_Headers For example: AFAIK you won't be able to do the same for a 100 Trying since Sofia doesn't let FS do any handling at the required point. But have a try anyway just to be sure. -Steve On 8 June 2011 20:14, Alessandro wrote: > Hi, > > I have two questions about FS: > > Question 1: > i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive a > call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that freeswitch > filter this status. > This is an example of desired behaviour: > 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) > 1001 at localnet_ip > > INVITE ----------> > INVITE ---------------> > <-------------- trying <--------------------trying > <-------------- 603 <------------------ 603 > ACK ------------> ACK------------------> > > > > The current behaviour of FS is: > > 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) > 1001 at localnet_ip > > INVITE ----------> > INVITE ---------------> > <-------------- trying <--------------------trying > <------------------ 603 > > <-------------- 200 > > ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE I'd like to avoid the > current behaviour. It's possible a kind of message status path trough? If > the called party terminate the call before answering, FS send always to the > calling partner 200 and BYE. First thought was related to the voice-mail. > Now voice-mail is disabled but the behaviour is the same. Question:2 It's > possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or > session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to > invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? Thanks Good > Evening > > Alessandro > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/52afca34/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 23:56:10 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:56:10 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Passing a map to session.setVariable() In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586567@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: Well you can, but he never said he had a filename to pass... On 8 June 2011 20:12, Kris wrote: > Why not pass the file name? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Ayre" > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:01 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Passing a map to session.setVariable() > > > > Variables can only store strings. You'd want to serialise the map/array > to > > a > > string and storing that. What do you need to store? > > > > -Steve > > > > > > On 8 June 2011 18:43, Yungwei Chen wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> In javascript, is passing a map or array to session.setVariable() > >> supported? Thanks. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/af030356/attachment.html From eric at loopfx.com Thu Jun 9 00:08:00 2011 From: eric at loopfx.com (Eric Beard) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] IP Whitelist In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Is it actually supposed to prevent calls from any IP's not in acl.conf.xml? With the settings I listed below, I can still make calls from different IP's to any number, which effectively makes my server an open relay. Do those settings only work if you are authenticating callers? It seems like I'm going to have to set up IP-specific firewall rules for each SIP port, to allow only traffic from my gateways. ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steven Ayre Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:44 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] IP Whitelist ACLs control registrations and calls, not options requests. You'd be best off blocking sipvicious with this iptables entry: iptables -I INPUT -j DROP -p udp --dport 5060 -m string --string "friendly-scanner" --algo bm -Steve On 8 June 2011 20:11, Eric Beard > wrote: It seems I misunderstand the purpose of the acl.conf.xml file. What I want to do is create an IP whitelist, so only the IPs I designate get a response from FreeSwitch. I'd like to do this with FreeSwitch rather than a firewall. I have this in acl.conf.xml: I was assuming that this would only allow traffic from my local network, 10.1.0.0, and from the single IP 209.249.3.74 But while watching sip traffic, I saw an OPTIONS request from a different IP (sipvicious scan). Freeswitch happily responded to the OPTIONS with an OK. How can I configure it so that it ignores requests that are not on my whitelist? Thanks! ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/32ac5ce2/attachment-0001.html From eric at loopfx.com Thu Jun 9 00:24:46 2011 From: eric at loopfx.com (Eric Beard) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] IP Whitelist In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I found what I was missing. Since I don't authenticate callers, I use the external profile for everything, even calls from my LAN. I had never copied this setting from internal.xml: I put that in sip_profiles/external.xml. Now FreeSwitch sends 403 to any IPs not in acl.conf.xml. ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Eric Beard Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:08 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] IP Whitelist Is it actually supposed to prevent calls from any IP's not in acl.conf.xml? With the settings I listed below, I can still make calls from different IP's to any number, which effectively makes my server an open relay. Do those settings only work if you are authenticating callers? It seems like I'm going to have to set up IP-specific firewall rules for each SIP port, to allow only traffic from my gateways. ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steven Ayre Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:44 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] IP Whitelist ACLs control registrations and calls, not options requests. You'd be best off blocking sipvicious with this iptables entry: iptables -I INPUT -j DROP -p udp --dport 5060 -m string --string "friendly-scanner" --algo bm -Steve On 8 June 2011 20:11, Eric Beard > wrote: It seems I misunderstand the purpose of the acl.conf.xml file. What I want to do is create an IP whitelist, so only the IPs I designate get a response from FreeSwitch. I'd like to do this with FreeSwitch rather than a firewall. I have this in acl.conf.xml: I was assuming that this would only allow traffic from my local network, 10.1.0.0, and from the single IP 209.249.3.74 But while watching sip traffic, I saw an OPTIONS request from a different IP (sipvicious scan). Freeswitch happily responded to the OPTIONS with an OK. How can I configure it so that it ignores requests that are not on my whitelist? Thanks! ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/a70b43e2/attachment.html From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Thu Jun 9 01:32:17 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:32:17 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues Message-ID: Hello Freeswitch-users! I'm currently writing a SIP middlebox that intercepts sip messages and changes their username. The reasons for this are complicated and somewhat outside of the scope of this discussion. However, I've come upon a very strange issue: when making a phone-to-phone call across freeswitch; it is connecting the wrong user. I'm fairly well convinced this is a bug, but I thought I'd send the issue here and see if it's anything I'm obviously doing wrong. Basically, FS sees a SIP message from a registered UA (call it A) inviting another registered user to a call (B). This is acked correctly (a TRYING message). FS then responds by inviting B into a call with some OTHER user C. C is not mentioned at any point in the initial SIP messages (as verified by wireshark). Even more strangely, if I remove user C from FS (by removing their config file) FS responds to the invite by inviting B into a call with itself. In each case, the appropriate from header in the invite should be the original caller A. It's worth noting that I am not monkeying with the RTP packets at all, but my understanding is that SIP signalling shouldn't be affected by that. My general guess is that I'm messing up the naming somehow, and FS is running an algorithm to guess at who the call originator is. However, the naming must be roughly correct; Asterisk is able to handle this call just fine. I've included a sip trace of the second situation (A calls B, FS invites B to a call with itself) For the record A:1300 B:1301 C:IMSI641104878332498 REGISTER MESSAGE (Which works fine) REGISTER sip:192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui To: 1300 Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 CSeq: 91 REGISTER Contact: ;expires=7200 Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui To: 1300 ;tag=jU64NXypQc57F Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 CSeq: 91 REGISTER Contact: ;expires=7200 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:02:04 GMT User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Content-Length: 0 SIP TRACE (A -> B, B -> B response) INITIAL INVITE INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx To: Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 CSeq: 485 INVITE Contact: ;expires=3600 Content-Type: application/sdp Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 143 INVITE ACK SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx To: Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 CSeq: 485 INVITE User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 Content-Length: 0 FS INVITE (Note the from address being wrong) INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144:5063 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144;rport;branch=z9hG4bKeeQvcyZ70SDUg Max-Forwards: 69 From: "1301" ;tag=rHyS0Z3B61arN To: Call-ID: 84df47f9-0cb7-122f-13b5-5cff350d9de5 CSeq: 13447852 INVITE Contact: User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 315 X-FS-Support: update_display Remote-Party-ID: "1301" ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off USER CONFIGURATIONS 1300.xml 1301.xml IMSI641104878332498.xml DIALPLAN From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 9 01:51:21 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:51:21 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Passing a map to session.setVariable() In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586567@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: FYI, in the latest and greatest version of FreeSWITCH we *do* have arrays! I haven't had a chance to document it yet, but you can check it out: http://fisheye.freeswitch.org/changelog/freeswitch.git/?cs=c1c759526d1ccf7cca8afcd139751133d382d34e and http://fisheye.freeswitch.org/changelog/freeswitch.git/?cs=860d2a6c12cb5dc1c4e63ecc92b7610bcacf5902 In fact, if anyone knows about these and would like to help me get them wikified then please let me know. -MC On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > Well you can, but he never said he had a filename to pass... > > > > On 8 June 2011 20:12, Kris wrote: > >> Why not pass the file name? >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Steven Ayre" >> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" >> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:01 AM >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Passing a map to session.setVariable() >> >> >> > Variables can only store strings. You'd want to serialise the map/array >> to >> > a >> > string and storing that. What do you need to store? >> > >> > -Steve >> > >> > >> > On 8 June 2011 18:43, Yungwei Chen wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> In javascript, is passing a map or array to session.setVariable() >> >> supported? Thanks. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/6a4a78a9/attachment.html From potxoka at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 02:13:14 2011 From: potxoka at gmail.com (Antonio) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:13:14 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proxy traffic security Message-ID: <4DEFF3FA.5050500@gmail.com> Hello I have a FreeSwitch configured as a gateway, the proxy makes the user authentication and other functions. All servers have public ip's, and I have doubts to security. I had thought to put the proxy ip's in acl. Is it safe this scenario? Can it be improved? Should we also put the sip providers? Thanks. Greetings From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 07:21:03 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:51:03 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK In-Reply-To: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> Message-ID: Dear John, Appreciate the long time you took in putting down your queries. I'd like to help but unfortunately don't have domain expertise in the areas you're having problems. Your mail is more likely to be read if it was shorter. May I suggest you use http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/ to paste all your debug messages and configurations. Please ignore this message if you don't agree with the strategy. Thanks, Sidharth On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:06 AM, John wrote: > Hello, > > I have just set up a FreeSWITCH box with a Sangoma B700 connected to 2 x > ISDN2e lines (each 2B+D, so 4 voice channels) in UK, so supplied by BT > Openreach. There are a number of anomalies that I am trying to solve. > [One of these is that 1 line is dead, but that is for BT Openreach to > resolve rather than anyone on this list.] > > I have a few questions, but as they are all related, I hope you don't > mind them in one post. Some basics first. The box is an Atom dual-core > with 2GB of memory and a Sangoma B700 card. It's built with Ubuntu > 10.04.2 LTS server 64-bit, patched and up to date, and also runs dhcpd, > lighttpd and sshd. I built the Sangoma ISDN libraries and FreeSWITCH > using the latest git versions I could ('make current' about 2 weeks > ago). We have incoming and outgoing calls working, but some incoming > calls ring in the caller's ear, but nothing appears on the FreeSWITCH > console, and others fail. Rebooting the server cures this. We have had > problems with lines being disconnected and then reconnected, and it > seems that FreeTDM/wanrouter/whatever doesn't recognise previously > disconnected lines coming back into use, because a reboot finds lines > that were previously reported disconnected ('wanrouter status' or 'ftdm > list'). We have ongoing problems with one line that is 'disconnected' > (wanpipe2/wp2) but the queries I am describing below apply equally when > both lines are connected and working. > > 1. There seems to be a lot of ISDN 'chatter' with channels going up and > down all the time even when the switch is completely idle. Is this > normal? Here is my /log 7 showing two of the cycles (which appear to be > about 50s apart): > > 2011-06-06 22:01:54.992467 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 > [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect > initiated(263) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:748 > [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: Down(261): Dchan(285) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling > changed to :DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling > changed to :DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling > changed to :DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 > Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:1) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 > Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 > [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with > F-bit = 1(258) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 > Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 > [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 > Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.912462 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 > [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect > initiated(263) > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 > [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with > F-bit = 1(258) > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 > Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 > Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 > [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling > changed to :UP > freeswitch at internal> ftdm list > +OK > span: 1 (wp1) > type: Sangoma (ISDN) > physical_status: ok > signaling_status: UP > chan_count: 3 > dialplan: XML > context: public > dial_regex: > fail_dial_regex: > hold_music: > analog_options: none > +OK > span: 2 (wp2) > type: Sangoma (ISDN) > physical_status: alarmed > signaling_status: DOWN > chan_count: 3 > dialplan: XML > context: public > dial_regex: > fail_dial_regex: > hold_music: > analog_options: none > +OK > span: 3 (FXS) > type: analog > physical_status: ok > signaling_status: UP > chan_count: 2 > dialplan: XML > context: default > dial_regex: > fail_dial_regex: > hold_music: > analog_options: none > > > # wanrouter status > > Devices currently active: > wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 > > > Wanpipe Config: > > Device name | Protocol Map | Adapter | IRQ | Slot/IO | If's | CLK | > Baud rate | > wanpipe1 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | > 0 | > wanpipe2 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | > 0 | > wanpipe3 | N/A | A200/A400/B600/B700/B800| 20 | 0 | > 1 | N/A | 0 | > > Wanrouter Status: > > Device name | Protocol | Station | Status | > wanpipe1 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Connected | > wanpipe2 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Disconnected | > wanpipe3 | A-ANALOG | N/A | Connected | > > > # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanrouter.rc > #!/bin/sh > # .. comments snipped ... > ROUTER_BOOT=YES > WAN_CONF_DIR=/etc/wanpipe > WAN_INTR_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/interfaces > WAN_BIN_DIR=/usr/sbin > WAN_LOG=/var/log/wanrouter > WAN_LOCK=/var/lock/wanrouter > WAN_LOCK_DIR=/var/lock > WAN_IP_FORWARD=NO > NEW_IF_TYPE=NO > WAN_LIB_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/lib > WAN_ADSL_LIST=/etc/wanpipe/wan_adsl.list > WAN_ANNEXG_LOAD=NO > WAN_SCTP_LOAD=NO > WAN_LIP_LOAD=NO > WAN_DYN_WANCONFIG=NO > WAN_SCRIPTS_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/scripts > WAN_FIRMWARE_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/firmware > WAN_DEVICES_REV_STOP_ORDER=YES > WAN_DEVICES="wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 " > > # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanpipe1.conf > #================================================ > # WANPIPE1 Configuration File > #================================================ > # > # Note: This file was generated automatically > # by /usr/local/sbin/setup-sangoma program. > # > # If you want to edit this file, it is > # recommended that you use wancfg program > # to do so. > #================================================ > # Sangoma Technologies Inc. > #================================================ > > > > > [devices] > wanpipe1 = WAN_AFT_ISDN_BRI, Comment > > [interfaces] > w1g1 = wanpipe1, , TDM_VOICE_API, Comment > > [wanpipe1] > CARD_TYPE = AFT > S514CPU = A > CommPort = PRI > AUTO_PCISLOT = NO > PCISLOT = 0 > PCIBUS = 5 > FE_MEDIA = BRI > FE_LINE = 1 > TDMV_LAW = ALAW > RM_BRI_CLOCK_MASTER = NO > MTU = 1500 > UDPPORT = 9000 > TTL = 255 > IGNORE_FRONT_END = NO > TDMV_SPAN = 1 > TE_AIS_MAINTENANCE = NO #NO: defualt YES: Start port in AIS > Blue Alarm and keep line down > #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_off to > disable AIS maintenance mode > #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_on to > enable AIS maintenance mode > TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES # YES: receive dtmf events from hardware > TDMV_HW_FAX_DETECT = YES # YES: receive fax 1100hz events from > hardware > HWEC_OPERATION_MODE = OCT_NORMAL # OCT_NORMAL: echo cancelation > enabled with nlp (default) > # OCT_SPEECH: improves software > tone detection by disabling NLP (echo possible) > # OCT_NO_ECHO:disables echo > cancelation but allows VQE/tone functions. > HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = NO # NO: default YES: remove dtmf out of > incoming media (must have hwdtmf enabled) > HWEC_NOISE_REDUCTION = NO # NO: default YES: reduces noise on the > line - could break fax > HWEC_ACUSTIC_ECHO = NO # NO: default YES: enables acustic echo > cancelation > HWEC_NLP_DISABLE = NO # NO: default YES: guarantees software > tone detection (possible echo) > HWEC_TX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio > level to be maintained (-20 default) > HWEC_RX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio > level to be maintained (-20 default) > HWEC_TX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be > applied to tx signal > HWEC_RX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be > applied to tx signal > > [w1g1] > ACTIVE_CH = ALL > TDMV_HWEC = YES > MTU = 80 > > ... and wanpipe2 was also automatically generated so just has '2' for > FE_LINE and TDMV_SPAN instead of '1'. > > # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/freetdm.conf > [span wanpipe wp1] > trunk_type => bri > group=1 > b-channel => 1:1-2 > d-channel => 1:3 > > [span wanpipe wp2] > trunk_type => bri > group=1 > b-channel => 2:1-2 > d-channel => 2:3 > > [span wanpipe FXS] > name => freetdm > trunk_type => fxs > group => grp2 > fxs-channel => 3:1 > > trunk_type => fxs > group => grp2 > fxs-channel => 3:2 > > # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/autoload_configs/freetdm.conf.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What other config files do I need to supply? I don't want to deluge the > list any more in my first post! > > 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. > I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from > either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be > overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. Has anyone > got this working in UK, and what is the format for the > outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? I note that > the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. > > 3. I have built FreeSWITCH from git and installed at /usr/local/... and > then followed the steps on the Ubuntu page in the Wiki to set up the run > control scripts, etc, and run FS non-root as freeswitch:daemon. With > FreeTDM, I have discovered that the /dev/wan* devices are owned by > root:root, and so are inaccessible to FS running as non-root. So for > now I have added a line in /etc/init.d/freeswitch to 'chgrp freeswitch > /dev/wan*'. This is not the most elegant solution, because 'wanrouter > restart' (which seems to be my best friend at the moment) resets the > ownership to root:root. I have tried grepping to see where the mknods > are for these devices, but have been unsuccessful. Is there a better > place to 'permanently' change the device ownership? > > Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my > Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! > > John > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/b2537a36/attachment-0001.html From revmichael at bethelightchapel.com Thu Jun 9 11:00:48 2011 From: revmichael at bethelightchapel.com (RevMichael) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 00:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setup help Conference, 3 way call, FIFO, MOH, record to Shoutcast In-Reply-To: References: <20110520081825.150834ml8unxokqo@psychicawakeningschool.com> <1305903105560-6386372.post@n2.nabble.com> <20110520110517.1159452g1qi9dyyo@psychicawakeningschool.com> <25a801cc1701$6740d510$35c27f30$@com> <20110520183037.83314gw215dgz5og@psychicawakeningschool.com> Message-ID: <1307602848678-6456754.post@n2.nabble.com> Conference works great BUT! I have it setup in the dialplan: < action application="record" data="shout://source:PASSWORD at 74.208.297.***:****/stream.mp3"/ > It's not doing anything do I have to already have stream.mp3 file created on the icecast server or will it be created by itself I have the server set for mountpoint as /stream I have it setup to record locally when host hits "record" now to get it to the stream so that people using the website player can hear the conference call from the icecast server at the same time. "conference foo-10.10.10.1 record shout://foo.bar.com:8000/foobar.mp3" -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Setup-help-Conference-3-way-call-FIFO-MOH-record-to-Shoutcast-tp6386123p6456754.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Thu Jun 9 11:18:55 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:18:55 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58301@cooper> Please pastebin a complete debug log, with "sofia global siptrace on", to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org. I'm pretty sure this is not a bug in FS, if it was, we would have lots of people complaining... /Peter -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r Kurtis Heimerl Skickat: den 8 juni 2011 23:32 Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues Hello Freeswitch-users! I'm currently writing a SIP middlebox that intercepts sip messages and changes their username. The reasons for this are complicated and somewhat outside of the scope of this discussion. However, I've come upon a very strange issue: when making a phone-to-phone call across freeswitch; it is connecting the wrong user. I'm fairly well convinced this is a bug, but I thought I'd send the issue here and see if it's anything I'm obviously doing wrong. Basically, FS sees a SIP message from a registered UA (call it A) inviting another registered user to a call (B). This is acked correctly (a TRYING message). FS then responds by inviting B into a call with some OTHER user C. C is not mentioned at any point in the initial SIP messages (as verified by wireshark). Even more strangely, if I remove user C from FS (by removing their config file) FS responds to the invite by inviting B into a call with itself. In each case, the appropriate from header in the invite should be the original caller A. It's worth noting that I am not monkeying with the RTP packets at all, but my understanding is that SIP signalling shouldn't be affected by that. My general guess is that I'm messing up the naming somehow, and FS is running an algorithm to guess at who the call originator is. However, the naming must be roughly correct; Asterisk is able to handle this call just fine. I've included a sip trace of the second situation (A calls B, FS invites B to a call with itself) For the record A:1300 B:1301 C:IMSI641104878332498 REGISTER MESSAGE (Which works fine) REGISTER sip:192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui To: 1300 Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 CSeq: 91 REGISTER Contact: ;expires=7200 Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui To: 1300 ;tag=jU64NXypQc57F Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 CSeq: 91 REGISTER Contact: ;expires=7200 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:02:04 GMT User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Content-Length: 0 SIP TRACE (A -> B, B -> B response) INITIAL INVITE INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx To: Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 CSeq: 485 INVITE Contact: ;expires=3600 Content-Type: application/sdp Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 143 INVITE ACK SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx To: Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 CSeq: 485 INVITE User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 Content-Length: 0 FS INVITE (Note the from address being wrong) INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144:5063 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144;rport;branch=z9hG4bKeeQvcyZ70SDUg Max-Forwards: 69 From: "1301" ;tag=rHyS0Z3B61arN To: Call-ID: 84df47f9-0cb7-122f-13b5-5cff350d9de5 CSeq: 13447852 INVITE Contact: User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 315 X-FS-Support: update_display Remote-Party-ID: "1301" ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off USER CONFIGURATIONS 1300.xml 1301.xml IMSI641104878332498.xml DIALPLAN _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4defeb7432764293448790! From freeswitch at earthspike.net Thu Jun 9 11:22:43 2011 From: freeswitch at earthspike.net (John) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:22:43 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK In-Reply-To: References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> Message-ID: <4DF074C3.9080707@earthspike.net> Sidharth, You are right. I'm new to the list and have since found pastebin. Thank you. John On 09/06/11 04:21, Sidharth Kshatriya wrote: > Dear John, > > Appreciate the long time you took in putting down your queries. I'd > like to help but unfortunately don't have domain expertise in the > areas you're having problems. > > Your mail is more likely to be read if it was shorter. May I suggest > you use http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/ to paste all your debug > messages and configurations. > > Please ignore this message if you don't agree with the strategy. > > Thanks, > > Sidharth > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:06 AM, John > wrote: > > Hello, > [ ... ] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/4bae8bab/attachment.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Thu Jun 9 11:35:53 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:35:53 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Response status from client In-Reply-To: References: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4DF077D9.2090208@seletech.com> Hi, the url is: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16463 i made a call from phone1 to phone2, the called party refused the call with code 603. FS received the status 603 form the called (softphone 2) party. Than FS sent to the calling party (softphone 1) the message 200 and bye. This is the resume of the log: 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) 1001 at localnet_ip INVITE ----------> INVITE ---------------> <-------------- trying<--------------------trying <------------------ 603 <-------------- 200 ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE /You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the client and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call./ When the called party terminates the call before answering, the calling party receive e registered message like "The phone called is not available, leave a message ...". Than i found the registered message in freeswitch. (I'm using fusion-pbx) Thanks Regards Alessandro Il 08/06/2011 21:55, Steven Ayre ha scritto: > > Question 1: > i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when > receive a call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I > think that freeswitch filter this status. > > > 603 gets treated fine for me. I think we need to see more information > - can you put a debug level log of the call with siptrace enabled > (sofia global siptrace on) on pastebin > (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/) and then post the url here? > > Chances are you're doing something in the dialplan that's answering > the call, either before or after the failed bleg. > > You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the > client and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call. > > Question:2 > > It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like > trying or session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only > on invite adding to invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any > suggestion? > > > Yes, you can for 180/183, with the sip_ph_X- prefix. That puts the > header on any provisional response. > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia#Adding_Response_Headers > > For example: > > > AFAIK you won't be able to do the same for a 100 Trying since Sofia > doesn't let FS do any handling at the required point. But have a try > anyway just to be sure. > > -Steve > > > On 8 June 2011 20:14, Alessandro > wrote: > > Hi, > > I have two questions about FS: > > Question 1: > i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when > receive a call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I > think that freeswitch filter this status. > This is an example of desired behaviour: > 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) > 1001 at localnet_ip > > INVITE ----------> > INVITE ---------------> > <-------------- trying<--------------------trying > <-------------- 603<------------------ 603 > ACK ------------> ACK------------------> > > The current behaviour of FS is: > > 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) > 1001 at localnet_ip > > INVITE ----------> > INVITE ---------------> > <-------------- trying<--------------------trying > <------------------ 603 > > <-------------- 200 > > ACK------------------> > <--------------------BYE > > I'd like to avoid the current behaviour. It's possible a kind of message status path trough? > If the called party terminate the call before answering, FS send always to the calling partner 200 and BYE. > First thought was related to the voice-mail. Now voice-mail is disabled but the behaviour is the same. > > Question:2 > It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or session in progress? > I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to invite a header with name like X-myheader. > Any suggestion? > > Thanks > Good Evening > > Alessandro > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/767da27d/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 12:11:53 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:11:53 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Response status from client In-Reply-To: <4DF077D9.2090208@seletech.com> References: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> <4DF077D9.2090208@seletech.com> Message-ID: I don't see the siptrace in that log? -Steve On 9 June 2011 08:35, Alessandro wrote: > Hi, > > the url is: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16463 > i made a call from phone1 to phone2, the called party refused the call with > code 603. FS received the status 603 form the called (softphone 2) party. > Than FS sent to the calling party (softphone 1) the message 200 and bye. > > This is the resume of the log: > > > 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) > 1001 at localnet_ip > > INVITE ----------> > INVITE ---------------> > <-------------- trying <--------------------trying > <------------------ 603 > > <-------------- 200 > > ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE > > > > *You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the > client and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call.* > > When the called party terminates the call before answering, the calling > party receive e registered message like "The phone called is not available, > leave a message ...". Than i found the registered message in freeswitch. > (I'm using fusion-pbx) > > > Thanks > > Regards > > Alessandro > > > Il 08/06/2011 21:55, Steven Ayre ha scritto: > > Question 1: >> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive a >> call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that freeswitch >> filter this status. >> > > 603 gets treated fine for me. I think we need to see more information - can > you put a debug level log of the call with siptrace enabled (sofia global > siptrace on) on pastebin (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/) and then post > the url here? > > Chances are you're doing something in the dialplan that's answering the > call, either before or after the failed bleg. > > You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the client > and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call. > > >> Question:2 >> > It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or >> session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to >> invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? >> > > Yes, you can for 180/183, with the sip_ph_X- prefix. That puts the header > on any provisional response. > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia#Adding_Response_Headers > > For example: > > > AFAIK you won't be able to do the same for a 100 Trying since Sofia doesn't > let FS do any handling at the required point. But have a try anyway just to > be sure. > > -Steve > > > On 8 June 2011 20:14, Alessandro wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have two questions about FS: >> >> Question 1: >> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive a >> call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that freeswitch >> filter this status. >> This is an example of desired behaviour: >> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >> 1001 at localnet_ip >> >> INVITE ----------> >> INVITE ---------------> >> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >> <-------------- 603 <------------------ 603 >> ACK ------------> ACK------------------> >> >> >> >> The current behaviour of FS is: >> >> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >> 1001 at localnet_ip >> >> INVITE ----------> >> INVITE ---------------> >> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >> <------------------ 603 >> >> <-------------- 200 >> >> ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE I'd like to avoid the >> current behaviour. It's possible a kind of message status path trough? If >> the called party terminate the call before answering, FS send always to the >> calling partner 200 and BYE. First thought was related to the voice-mail. >> Now voice-mail is disabled but the behaviour is the same. Question:2 It's >> possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or >> session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to >> invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? Thanks Good >> Evening >> >> Alessandro >> >> -- >> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >> Software development >> Seletech srl >> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/f6e9155b/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 12:16:05 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:16:05 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Response status from client In-Reply-To: References: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> <4DF077D9.2090208@seletech.com> Message-ID: It's a mistake in your dialplan. See lines 342-343: 1. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action bridge(user/${ dialed_extension}@${domain_name}) 2. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action answer() 3. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action sleep(1000) 4. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action voicemail(default $ {domain_name} ${dialed_extension}) You're answering the call after the bridge before it goes to voicemail. That answer is what is generating the 200. See lines 507-508 to see it happening: 1. 2011-06-09 09:15:15.627871 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2393 Originate Failed. Cause: CALL_REJECTED 2. EXECUTE sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 answer() -Steve On 9 June 2011 09:11, Steven Ayre wrote: > I don't see the siptrace in that log? > > -Steve > > > On 9 June 2011 08:35, Alessandro wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the url is: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16463 >> i made a call from phone1 to phone2, the called party refused the call >> with code 603. FS received the status 603 form the called (softphone 2) >> party. Than FS sent to the calling party (softphone 1) the message 200 and >> bye. >> >> This is the resume of the log: >> >> >> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >> 1001 at localnet_ip >> >> INVITE ----------> >> INVITE ---------------> >> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >> <------------------ 603 >> >> <-------------- 200 >> >> ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE >> >> >> >> *You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the >> client and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call.* >> >> When the called party terminates the call before answering, the calling >> party receive e registered message like "The phone called is not available, >> leave a message ...". Than i found the registered message in freeswitch. >> (I'm using fusion-pbx) >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Regards >> >> Alessandro >> >> >> Il 08/06/2011 21:55, Steven Ayre ha scritto: >> >> Question 1: >>> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive a >>> call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that freeswitch >>> filter this status. >>> >> >> 603 gets treated fine for me. I think we need to see more information - >> can you put a debug level log of the call with siptrace enabled (sofia >> global siptrace on) on pastebin (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/) and >> then post the url here? >> >> Chances are you're doing something in the dialplan that's answering the >> call, either before or after the failed bleg. >> >> You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the client >> and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call. >> >> >>> Question:2 >>> >> It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying >>> or session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding >>> to invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? >>> >> >> Yes, you can for 180/183, with the sip_ph_X- prefix. That puts the header >> on any provisional response. >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia#Adding_Response_Headers >> >> For example: >> >> >> AFAIK you won't be able to do the same for a 100 Trying since Sofia >> doesn't let FS do any handling at the required point. But have a try anyway >> just to be sure. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 8 June 2011 20:14, Alessandro wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have two questions about FS: >>> >>> Question 1: >>> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive a >>> call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that freeswitch >>> filter this status. >>> This is an example of desired behaviour: >>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>> >>> INVITE ----------> >>> INVITE ---------------> >>> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >>> <-------------- 603 <------------------ 603 >>> ACK ------------> ACK------------------> >>> >>> >>> >>> The current behaviour of FS is: >>> >>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>> >>> INVITE ----------> >>> INVITE ---------------> >>> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >>> <------------------ 603 >>> >>> <-------------- 200 >>> >>> ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE I'd like to avoid the >>> current behaviour. It's possible a kind of message status path trough? If >>> the called party terminate the call before answering, FS send always to the >>> calling partner 200 and BYE. First thought was related to the voice-mail. >>> Now voice-mail is disabled but the behaviour is the same. Question:2 It's >>> possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or >>> session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to >>> invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? Thanks Good >>> Evening >>> >>> Alessandro >>> >>> -- >>> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >>> Software development >>> Seletech srl >>> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >>> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >>> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >> Software development >> Seletech srl >> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/caa0e02c/attachment-0001.html From mtaylor at employees.org Thu Jun 9 12:42:58 2011 From: mtaylor at employees.org (Mike Taylor) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:42:58 +1200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Conceptual/design question - per gateway/DTMF & PSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DF08792.8090801@employees.org> Thanks both for the pointers, I've got close to 60 gateways under my internal profile, so tweaking the database is definitely preferable to editing xml files (for me) I've found some excellent documentation on lcr.conf.xml, custom SQL queries, and exporting extra variables. I tested, then modified my default mod_lcr query, just to simplify things, extended my carrier.gateway schema, and successfully (according to debugs, set several dtmf related variables. So it looks like it might be working in the lab, on Git (about a week old), so I'll see what happens with more testing (which options work etc). I'm not clear on dtmf and dtmf_relay interaction, so that'll be the next thing to nail I think. Hopefully, once this works, I can offer all sorts of options. Thanks again, excellent help, your replies let me search for what I needed. Regards, Mike On 8/06/2011 7:59 p.m., Steven Ayre wrote: > The dtmf_type channel variable can be used to override the profile's > dtmf setting. Valid settings are rf2833, info and none. Inband would > be more complex, as you'd need to call the > start_dtmf_generate application, not sure how you could easily > integrate that with mod_lcr. Possibly using the execute_on_x family of > channel variables. mod_lcr would need to use custom sql to get the > additional dtmf variable. > > As David pointed out, mod_lcr already lets you set the codec list for > a gateway. late-negotiation isn't *required*, but could be useful. > Without it the aleg will pick a codec, then you'll dial out with the > codec list to the gateway and transcode if needed. With it, the aleg > doesn't pick the codec until the bleg has picked one - which may make > transcoding less likely. > > You could also setup the gateways as sofia gateways, set the > codec/dtmf variables on the gateway and have mod_lcr return the > sofia/gateway/gwname/ prefix. > > A lot of the behaviour in terms of mod_lcr, execute_on_x etc has > changed since 1.0.6 so you might find you have to upgrade to get some > of the newer features. > > -Steve > > > On 8 June 2011 02:46, Mike Taylor > wrote: > > Hi, > > I hope that I've taught myself enough over the last few weeks that > this isn't a blindingly stupid question? > > I am providing services to multiple customers on FS 1.0.6 > > I have a basic setup; (which I have inherited, hence the basic > questions); > > AS5350------------- FS-----------customer GW(s) > (No Registration)(No Registration) > > All of the GW info is pulled from a PSWL database. Carriers, > carrier_id, lcr table etc. > > The bit I am missing is; > > If all of my GW config is in the PSQL database, and that's all > accessed by mod_lcr before routing the call, how do I allow for > different DTMF types, codecs etc, PER CUSTOMER GW ? > > Am I stuck with actually defining the gateways statically under > /etc/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/ (or I see I can doit in the > dialplan, but that won't achieve what I need) > > I was hoping to be able to pull the DTMF (and other misc info) > from the database, but the more I look into it, the less likely > it is that this will work I think. (mod_lcr is already at the > routing stage, can't modify DTMF at that point AFAIK) > > Like I said, hope the question isn't so obvious that it's crazy? > > Regards, > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/a108afd4/attachment.html From kawarod at laposte.net Thu Jun 9 13:23:57 2011 From: kawarod at laposte.net (kawarod) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:23:57 +0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Problem with Cancel Message-ID: <9406EB1A-D3A4-416C-AF39-A8555D3D329B@laposte.net> Hi List, I have an issue with FS connected to a SIP gateway. When I receive a call from the SIP Gateway and try to hangup the call before he call is answered, so that a Cancel is emitted by the SIP GW, I have a SIP 481 Call Transaction does not exist. I understand that FS is unable to match this Cancel with the correct Invite, so that FS can not process the Cancel. Below is the SIP trace. It seems to me that the issue is because the Invite and the Cancel (generated by the same SIP GW) have different branch in the Via field. But I have no way to update the SIP GW and I absolutely need it for connection to the core network. May you please help to check if the issue could be related to the Via branch. It seems that they should be the same based on RFC. Do you have any idea to bypass this issue (any SIP profile magic trick :p). I made a "make current" this morning to check if this could help. U 10.69.208.204:5060 -> 10.69.208.200:5063 INVITE sip:770056 at 10.69.208.200:5063;user=phone SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.69.208.204:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-600-8524. To: . From: ;tag=s24df07240-600-9408. Call-ID: 10.69.208.204:5060-4df07240-600-4680. Max-Forwards: 70. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Content-Length: 679. Remote-Party-Id: ;privacy=off;screen=yes. X-Fmc-Signaling-Info: location-pdu=83178679040000;location-pdu=689740000. Contact: . Allow: INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,REFER,PRACK,INFO,MESSAGE,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,UPDATE. Content-Type: application/sdp. U 10.69.208.204:5060 -> 10.69.208.200:5063 CANCEL sip:770056 at 10.69.208.200:5063 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.69.208.204:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-5800-392. To: ;tag=6XN6KF2N267cp. From: ;tag=s24df07240-600-9408. Call-ID: 10.69.208.204:5060-4df07240-600-4680. Max-Forwards: 70. CSeq: 1 CANCEL. Content-Length: 0. Reason: Q.850;cause=16;text="Normal call clearing". . U 10.69.208.200:5063 -> 10.69.208.204:5060 SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.69.208.204:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-5800-392. From: ;tag=s24df07240-600-9408. To: ;tag=6XN6KF2N267cp. Call-ID: 10.69.208.204:5060-4df07240-600-4680. CSeq: 1 CANCEL. Content-Length: 0. regards, rod From eagle.antonio at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 13:51:51 2011 From: eagle.antonio at gmail.com (Antonio Teixeira) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:51:51 +0000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UUID_Bridge Fails But Reports +OK In-Reply-To: References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DE2B62F9@cooper> Message-ID: Ok So here i Come with more news regarding this problem : Based on current GIT HEAD. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-e2ed8c0 2011-06-08 19-32-18 -0500) Using valet_park together with ESL INBOUND + G711. I'm almost capable of obtaining 100% ( above 95%) success. With uuid_bridge + Park() Even on non-esl generated call just a plain dialplan with Answer() , Park() , then uuid_bridge on FS console. Some calls will connect correctly arround 80% while others will freeze in the following log line SOFT_EXECUTE in mod_sofia There is no audio between the two phones. And even reissuing the uuid_bridge command does nothing. Besides that i'm a happy DEV :D If you need some more testing drop me an e-mail :) A/T 2011/5/30 Antonio Teixeira > Hello Anton. > > Still no i? setting a tottaly different enviroment to test other variables > like network our Voice Provider and also pressure on FS. > Will keep you guys updated. > > > Regards > A/T > > > 2011/5/29 Anton VG > >> Have you resolved the issue? >> >> 2011/5/25 Anton VG : >> > Anthony, I do use the same scheme, and did not experienced the >> > problem. But I do use park everywhere instead of ValetPark - can it be >> > the reason? >> > >> > 2011/5/25 Peter Olsson : >> >> You need to provide the entire debug trace from this, nor just only >> after calling uuid_bridge. >> >> >> >> /Peter >> >> ________________________________________ >> >> Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [ >> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Antonio Teixeira >> [eagle.antonio at gmail.com] >> >> Skickat: den 25 maj 2011 10:32 >> >> Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> >> ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] UUID_Bridge Fails But Reports +OK >> >> >> >> Good Morning List As Promised. >> >> >> >> I Have tested with G711 the problem remains and appears not be affected >> by the codec change. >> >> >> >> Here i have my debug log : >> >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16369 >> >> >> >> Just a short explanation : >> >> >> >> the call XXXX1010 is Leg A and is currently valet_park() >> >> >> >> call XXXX371 is Leg B and is currently on park() >> >> >> >> Strangely FS says LEG A is out of order but i can hear MOH and >> sometimes with this exact software it connects fine. >> >> >> >> Hope you can help me out i will keep testing during the day. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> A/T >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011/5/24 Antonio Teixeira > eagle.antonio at gmail.com>> >> >> Ok Anthony. >> >> >> >> I will provide you with data regarding the use of G711 and full debug >> logs. >> >> Will keep an eye on the logs. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> A/T >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011/5/24 Anthony Minessale > anthony.minessale at gmail.com>> >> >> The +OK only means the attempt to bridge was successful, if something >> >> else goes wrong after that, you will not know because it happens >> >> later. >> >> >> >> As suggested, look at the cause of the hangup on the failed bridge. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Antonio Teixeira >> >> > wrote: >> >>> Hello List , Good Morning. >> >>> >> >>> In my fight to get ESL & Python & Freeswitch all to behave properly i >> >>> noticed a possible BUG ( need the veterans to confirm). >> >>> >> >>> Scenario : >> >>> >> >>> Originate & ValetPark () + MOH OR Just Park() , Both show the same >> problem. >> >>> Codec G729 >> >>> >> >>> I Make another call: >> >>> originate & park() >> >>> codec G729 >> >>> >> >>> Now Python ESL Inbound Or FS Console : >> >>> >> >>> uuid_bridge uuid1 uuid2 >> >>> >> >>> +OK uuid >> >>> >> >>> Now one of the two things happen : >> >>> >> >>> 1) One the call gets connected hurray :) , Audio Perfect , etc. >> >>> >> >>> 2) The call gets dropped :( >> >>> >> >>> In both cases uuid_bridge reports +OK even in the case the call is >> dropped. >> >>> Even if i Park() Both Calls using the dialplan XML ( NO ESL with those >> >>> SYN/ASYNC Problems) I still get sometimes ( not always) a dropped >> call >> >>> could this be related to the use of G729 ? >> >>> >> >>> I have lots of available licenses. >> >>> >> >>> Regards >> >>> Ant?nio Teixeira >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org> >> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Anthony Minessale II >> >> >> >> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >> >> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire >> >> >> >> AIM: anthm >> >> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com> MSN%3Aanthony_minessale at hotmail.com> >> >> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com> PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale at gmail.com> >> >> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >> >> >> >> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >> >> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org> sip%3A888 at conference.freeswitch.org> >> >> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org> googletalk%3Aconf%2B888 at conference.freeswitch.org> >> >> pstn:+19193869900 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org> >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> >> !DSPAM:4ddcbfed32761527616399! >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/35c83cb7/attachment-0001.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Thu Jun 9 14:03:13 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:03:13 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Response status from client In-Reply-To: References: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> <4DF077D9.2090208@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4DF09A61.9070801@seletech.com> Hi, This is de default diaplan: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16464 but I think that sofia read public dial plan, ths is the public dial plan: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16465 I don't see the point where the FS read operation reported at lines 342-343. Thanks Regards Alessandro Il 09/06/2011 10:16, Steven Ayre ha scritto: > It's a mistake in your dialplan. See lines 342-343: > > 1. > Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action > bridge(user/${dialed_extension}@${domain_name}) > 2. > Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action answer() > 3. > Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action sleep(1000) > 4. > Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action > voicemail(default ${domain_name} ${dialed_extension}) > > > You're answering the call after the bridge before it goes to > voicemail. That answer is what is generating the 200. > > See lines 507-508 to see it happening: > > 1. > 2011-06-09 09:15:15.627871 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2393 Originate > Failed. Cause: CALL_REJECTED > 2. > EXECUTE sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 answer() > > -Steve > > > > On 9 June 2011 09:11, Steven Ayre > wrote: > > I don't see the siptrace in that log? > > -Steve > > > On 9 June 2011 08:35, Alessandro > wrote: > > Hi, > > the url is: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16463 > i made a call from phone1 to phone2, the called party refused > the call with code 603. FS received the status 603 form the > called (softphone 2) party. Than FS sent to the calling party > (softphone 1) the message 200 and bye. > > This is the resume of the log: > > > 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) > 1001 at localnet_ip > > INVITE ----------> > INVITE ---------------> > <-------------- trying<--------------------trying > <------------------ 603 > > <-------------- 200 > > ACK------------------> > <--------------------BYE > > > > /You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back > to the client and continue to voicemail because the 603 > terminates the call./ > > When the called party terminates the call before answering, > the calling party receive e registered message like "The phone > called is not available, leave a message ...". Than i found > the registered message in freeswitch. (I'm using fusion-pbx) > > > Thanks > > Regards > > Alessandro > > > Il 08/06/2011 21:55, Steven Ayre ha scritto: >> >> Question 1: >> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This >> client when receive a call that can't be accepted respond >> with status 603. I think that freeswitch filter this status. >> >> >> 603 gets treated fine for me. I think we need to see more >> information - can you put a debug level log of the call with >> siptrace enabled (sofia global siptrace on) on pastebin >> (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/) and then post the url here? >> >> Chances are you're doing something in the dialplan that's >> answering the call, either before or after the failed bleg. >> >> You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back >> to the client and continue to voicemail because the 603 >> terminates the call. >> >> Question:2 >> >> It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status >> response like trying or session in progress? I'm able to >> use custom header only on invite adding to invite a >> header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? >> >> >> Yes, you can for 180/183, with the sip_ph_X- prefix. That >> puts the header on any provisional response. >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia#Adding_Response_Headers >> >> For example: >> >> >> AFAIK you won't be able to do the same for a 100 Trying since >> Sofia doesn't let FS do any handling at the required point. >> But have a try anyway just to be sure. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 8 June 2011 20:14, Alessandro > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have two questions about FS: >> >> Question 1: >> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This >> client when receive a call that can't be accepted respond >> with status 603. I think that freeswitch filter this status. >> This is an example of desired behaviour: >> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >> 1001 at localnet_ip >> >> INVITE ----------> >> INVITE ---------------> >> <-------------- trying<--------------------trying >> <-------------- 603<------------------ 603 >> ACK ------------> ACK------------------> >> >> The current behaviour of FS is: >> >> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >> 1001 at localnet_ip >> >> INVITE ----------> >> INVITE ---------------> >> <-------------- trying<--------------------trying >> <------------------ 603 >> >> <-------------- 200 >> >> ACK------------------> >> <--------------------BYE >> >> I'd like to avoid the current behaviour. It's possible a kind of message status path trough? >> If the called party terminate the call before answering, FS send always to the calling partner 200 and BYE. >> First thought was related to the voice-mail. Now voice-mail is disabled but the behaviour is the same. >> >> Question:2 >> It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or session in progress? >> I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to invite a header with name like X-myheader. >> Any suggestion? >> >> Thanks >> Good Evening >> >> Alessandro >> >> -- >> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >> Software development >> Seletech srl >> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >> email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/5fd4bff6/attachment-0001.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Thu Jun 9 14:48:38 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:48:38 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Response status from client In-Reply-To: <4DF09A61.9070801@seletech.com> References: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> <4DF077D9.2090208@seletech.com> <4DF09A61.9070801@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4DF0A506.9040206@seletech.com> hi, i found the problem, was in the default.xml dialplan. Thanks for help Regards Alessandro Il 09/06/2011 12:03, Alessandro ha scritto: > Hi, > > This is de default diaplan: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16464 > > but I think that sofia read public dial plan, ths is the public dial plan: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16465 > > > I don't see the point where the FS read operation reported at lines > 342-343. > > Thanks > > Regards > > Alessandro > > > > Il 09/06/2011 10:16, Steven Ayre ha scritto: >> It's a mistake in your dialplan. See lines 342-343: >> >> 1. >> Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action >> bridge(user/${dialed_extension}@${domain_name}) >> 2. >> Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action answer() >> 3. >> Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action sleep(1000) >> 4. >> Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action >> voicemail(default ${domain_name} ${dialed_extension}) >> >> >> You're answering the call after the bridge before it goes to >> voicemail. That answer is what is generating the 200. >> >> See lines 507-508 to see it happening: >> >> 1. >> 2011-06-09 09:15:15.627871 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2393 Originate >> Failed. Cause: CALL_REJECTED >> 2. >> EXECUTE sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 answer() >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> On 9 June 2011 09:11, Steven Ayre > > wrote: >> >> I don't see the siptrace in that log? >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 9 June 2011 08:35, Alessandro > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> the url is: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16463 >> i made a call from phone1 to phone2, the called party refused >> the call with code 603. FS received the status 603 form the >> called (softphone 2) party. Than FS sent to the calling party >> (softphone 1) the message 200 and bye. >> >> This is the resume of the log: >> >> >> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >> 1001 at localnet_ip >> >> INVITE ----------> >> INVITE ---------------> >> <-------------- trying<--------------------trying >> <------------------ 603 >> >> <-------------- 200 >> >> ACK------------------> >> <--------------------BYE >> >> >> >> /You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back >> to the client and continue to voicemail because the 603 >> terminates the call./ >> >> When the called party terminates the call before answering, >> the calling party receive e registered message like "The >> phone called is not available, leave a message ...". Than i >> found the registered message in freeswitch. (I'm using >> fusion-pbx) >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Regards >> >> Alessandro >> >> >> Il 08/06/2011 21:55, Steven Ayre ha scritto: >>> >>> Question 1: >>> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This >>> client when receive a call that can't be accepted >>> respond with status 603. I think that freeswitch filter >>> this status. >>> >>> >>> 603 gets treated fine for me. I think we need to see more >>> information - can you put a debug level log of the call with >>> siptrace enabled (sofia global siptrace on) on pastebin >>> (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/) and then post the url here? >>> >>> Chances are you're doing something in the dialplan that's >>> answering the call, either before or after the failed bleg. >>> >>> You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back >>> to the client and continue to voicemail because the 603 >>> terminates the call. >>> >>> Question:2 >>> >>> It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status >>> response like trying or session in progress? I'm able to >>> use custom header only on invite adding to invite a >>> header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? >>> >>> >>> Yes, you can for 180/183, with the sip_ph_X- prefix. That >>> puts the header on any provisional response. >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia#Adding_Response_Headers >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> >>> AFAIK you won't be able to do the same for a 100 Trying >>> since Sofia doesn't let FS do any handling at the required >>> point. But have a try anyway just to be sure. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> On 8 June 2011 20:14, Alessandro >> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have two questions about FS: >>> >>> Question 1: >>> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This >>> client when receive a call that can't be accepted >>> respond with status 603. I think that freeswitch filter >>> this status. >>> This is an example of desired behaviour: >>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>> >>> INVITE ----------> >>> INVITE ---------------> >>> <-------------- trying<--------------------trying >>> <-------------- 603<------------------ 603 >>> ACK ------------> ACK------------------> >>> >>> The current behaviour of FS is: >>> >>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>> >>> INVITE ----------> >>> INVITE ---------------> >>> <-------------- trying<--------------------trying >>> <------------------ 603 >>> >>> <-------------- 200 >>> >>> ACK------------------> >>> <--------------------BYE >>> >>> I'd like to avoid the current behaviour. It's possible a kind of message status path trough? >>> If the called party terminate the call before answering, FS send always to the calling partner 200 and BYE. >>> First thought was related to the voice-mail. Now voice-mail is disabled but the behaviour is the same. >>> >>> Question:2 >>> It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or session in progress? >>> I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to invite a header with name like X-myheader. >>> Any suggestion? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Good Evening >>> >>> Alessandro >>> >>> -- >>> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >>> Software development >>> Seletech srl >>> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >>> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >>> email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> -- >> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >> Software development >> Seletech srl >> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >> email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/a4211f60/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 14:52:09 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:52:09 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Response status from client In-Reply-To: <4DF09A61.9070801@seletech.com> References: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> <4DF077D9.2090208@seletech.com> <4DF09A61.9070801@seletech.com> Message-ID: It's when it's executing the Local_Extension extension on http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16464 lines 741-772: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16463 line 327 shows it's this extension -Steve On 9 June 2011 11:03, Alessandro wrote: > Hi, > > This is de default diaplan: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16464 > > but I think that sofia read public dial plan, ths is the public dial plan: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16465 > > > I don't see the point where the FS read operation reported at lines > 342-343. > > Thanks > > Regards > > Alessandro > > > > Il 09/06/2011 10:16, Steven Ayre ha scritto: > > It's a mistake in your dialplan. See lines 342-343: > > 1. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action bridge(user/${ > dialed_extension}@${domain_name}) > 2. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action answer() > 3. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action sleep(1000) > 4. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action voicemail(default > ${domain_name} ${dialed_extension}) > > > You're answering the call after the bridge before it goes to voicemail. > That answer is what is generating the 200. > > See lines 507-508 to see it happening: > > 1. 2011-06-09 09:15:15.627871 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2393 Originate > Failed. Cause: CALL_REJECTED > 2. EXECUTE sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 answer() > > -Steve > > > > On 9 June 2011 09:11, Steven Ayre wrote: > >> I don't see the siptrace in that log? >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 9 June 2011 08:35, Alessandro wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> the url is: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16463 >>> i made a call from phone1 to phone2, the called party refused the call >>> with code 603. FS received the status 603 form the called (softphone 2) >>> party. Than FS sent to the calling party (softphone 1) the message 200 and >>> bye. >>> >>> This is the resume of the log: >>> >>> >>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>> >>> INVITE ----------> >>> INVITE ---------------> >>> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >>> <------------------ 603 >>> >>> <-------------- 200 >>> >>> ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE >>> >>> >>> >>> *You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the >>> client and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call.* >>> >>> When the called party terminates the call before answering, the calling >>> party receive e registered message like "The phone called is not available, >>> leave a message ...". Than i found the registered message in freeswitch. >>> (I'm using fusion-pbx) >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Alessandro >>> >>> >>> Il 08/06/2011 21:55, Steven Ayre ha scritto: >>> >>> Question 1: >>>> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive >>>> a call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that >>>> freeswitch filter this status. >>>> >>> >>> 603 gets treated fine for me. I think we need to see more information - >>> can you put a debug level log of the call with siptrace enabled (sofia >>> global siptrace on) on pastebin (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/) and >>> then post the url here? >>> >>> Chances are you're doing something in the dialplan that's answering the >>> call, either before or after the failed bleg. >>> >>> You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the >>> client and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call. >>> >>> >>>> Question:2 >>>> >>> It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying >>>> or session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding >>>> to invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, you can for 180/183, with the sip_ph_X- prefix. That puts the header >>> on any provisional response. >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia#Adding_Response_Headers >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> >>> AFAIK you won't be able to do the same for a 100 Trying since Sofia >>> doesn't let FS do any handling at the required point. But have a try anyway >>> just to be sure. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> On 8 June 2011 20:14, Alessandro wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have two questions about FS: >>>> >>>> Question 1: >>>> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive >>>> a call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that >>>> freeswitch filter this status. >>>> This is an example of desired behaviour: >>>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>>> >>>> INVITE ----------> >>>> INVITE ---------------> >>>> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >>>> <-------------- 603 <------------------ 603 >>>> ACK ------------> ACK------------------> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The current behaviour of FS is: >>>> >>>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>>> >>>> INVITE ----------> >>>> INVITE ---------------> >>>> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >>>> <------------------ 603 >>>> >>>> <-------------- 200 >>>> >>>> ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE I'd like to avoid the >>>> current behaviour. It's possible a kind of message status path trough? If >>>> the called party terminate the call before answering, FS send always to the >>>> calling partner 200 and BYE. First thought was related to the voice-mail. >>>> Now voice-mail is disabled but the behaviour is the same. Question:2 It's >>>> possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or >>>> session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to >>>> invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? Thanks Good >>>> Evening >>>> >>>> Alessandro >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >>>> Software development >>>> Seletech srl >>>> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >>>> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >>>> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >>> Software development >>> Seletech srl >>> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >>> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >>> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/e0eaebce/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 14:52:59 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:52:59 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Response status from client In-Reply-To: <4DF0A506.9040206@seletech.com> References: <4DEFCA0F.7090808@seletech.com> <4DF077D9.2090208@seletech.com> <4DF09A61.9070801@seletech.com> <4DF0A506.9040206@seletech.com> Message-ID: Great. :) No problem. -Steve On 9 June 2011 11:48, Alessandro wrote: > hi, > > i found the problem, was in the default.xml dialplan. > > Thanks for help > > Regards > > Alessandro > > Il 09/06/2011 12:03, Alessandro ha scritto: > > Hi, > > This is de default diaplan: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16464 > > but I think that sofia read public dial plan, ths is the public dial plan: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16465 > > > I don't see the point where the FS read operation reported at lines > 342-343. > > Thanks > > Regards > > Alessandro > > > > Il 09/06/2011 10:16, Steven Ayre ha scritto: > > It's a mistake in your dialplan. See lines 342-343: > > 1. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action bridge(user/${ > dialed_extension}@${domain_name}) > 2. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action answer() > 3. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action sleep(1000) > 4. Dialplan: sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 Action voicemail(default > ${domain_name} ${dialed_extension}) > > > You're answering the call after the bridge before it goes to voicemail. > That answer is what is generating the 200. > > See lines 507-508 to see it happening: > > 1. 2011-06-09 09:15:15.627871 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2393 Originate > Failed. Cause: CALL_REJECTED > 2. EXECUTE sofia/internal/1009 at 192.168.2.101 answer() > > -Steve > > > > On 9 June 2011 09:11, Steven Ayre wrote: > >> I don't see the siptrace in that log? >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 9 June 2011 08:35, Alessandro wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> the url is: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16463 >>> i made a call from phone1 to phone2, the called party refused the call >>> with code 603. FS received the status 603 form the called (softphone 2) >>> party. Than FS sent to the calling party (softphone 1) the message 200 and >>> bye. >>> >>> This is the resume of the log: >>> >>> >>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>> >>> INVITE ----------> >>> INVITE ---------------> >>> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >>> <------------------ 603 >>> >>> <-------------- 200 >>> >>> ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE >>> >>> >>> >>> *You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the >>> client and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call.* >>> >>> When the called party terminates the call before answering, the calling >>> party receive e registered message like "The phone called is not available, >>> leave a message ...". Than i found the registered message in freeswitch. >>> (I'm using fusion-pbx) >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Alessandro >>> >>> >>> Il 08/06/2011 21:55, Steven Ayre ha scritto: >>> >>> Question 1: >>>> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive >>>> a call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that >>>> freeswitch filter this status. >>>> >>> >>> 603 gets treated fine for me. I think we need to see more information - >>> can you put a debug level log of the call with siptrace enabled (sofia >>> global siptrace on) on pastebin (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/) and >>> then post the url here? >>> >>> Chances are you're doing something in the dialplan that's answering the >>> call, either before or after the failed bleg. >>> >>> You said you had voicemail before... you can't send 603 back to the >>> client and continue to voicemail because the 603 terminates the call. >>> >>> >>>> Question:2 >>>> >>> It's possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying >>>> or session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding >>>> to invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, you can for 180/183, with the sip_ph_X- prefix. That puts the header >>> on any provisional response. >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia#Adding_Response_Headers >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> >>> AFAIK you won't be able to do the same for a 100 Trying since Sofia >>> doesn't let FS do any handling at the required point. But have a try anyway >>> just to be sure. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> On 8 June 2011 20:14, Alessandro wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have two questions about FS: >>>> >>>> Question 1: >>>> i'm developing a custom client sip with pjsip. This client when receive >>>> a call that can't be accepted respond with status 603. I think that >>>> freeswitch filter this status. >>>> This is an example of desired behaviour: >>>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>>> >>>> INVITE ----------> >>>> INVITE ---------------> >>>> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >>>> <-------------- 603 <------------------ 603 >>>> ACK ------------> ACK------------------> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The current behaviour of FS is: >>>> >>>> 1000 at localnet_ip FS(ip:localnet_ip) >>>> 1001 at localnet_ip >>>> >>>> INVITE ----------> >>>> INVITE ---------------> >>>> <-------------- trying <--------------------trying >>>> <------------------ 603 >>>> >>>> <-------------- 200 >>>> >>>> ACK------------------> <--------------------BYE I'd like to avoid the >>>> current behaviour. It's possible a kind of message status path trough? If >>>> the called party terminate the call before answering, FS send always to the >>>> calling partner 200 and BYE. First thought was related to the voice-mail. >>>> Now voice-mail is disabled but the behaviour is the same. Question:2 It's >>>> possible a custom Header pass trough in status response like trying or >>>> session in progress? I'm able to use custom header only on invite adding to >>>> invite a header with name like X-myheader. Any suggestion? Thanks Good >>>> Evening >>>> >>>> Alessandro >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >>>> Software development >>>> Seletech srl >>>> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >>>> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >>>> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >>> Software development >>> Seletech srl >>> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >>> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >>> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/2f6d7ca0/attachment-0001.html From Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com Thu Jun 9 15:30:02 2011 From: Nabble at slickdeals.endjunk.com (mazilo) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 04:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] IP Whitelist In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1307619002073-6457393.post@n2.nabble.com> Steven Ayre wrote: > > ACLs control registrations and calls, not options requests. > > You'd be best off blocking sipvicious with this iptables entry: > > iptables -I INPUT -j DROP -p udp --dport 5060 -m string --string > "friendly-scanner" --algo bm Will the above IPTABLES work with old versions of sipvicious scan? ----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/IP-Whitelist-tp6455077p6457393.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 15:37:10 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:37:10 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] IP Whitelist In-Reply-To: <1307619002073-6457393.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1307619002073-6457393.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: As far as I know all (official) versions of sipvicious use the friendly-scanner useragent, so will be spotted. -Steve On 9 June 2011 12:30, mazilo wrote: > > Steven Ayre wrote: > > > > ACLs control registrations and calls, not options requests. > > > > You'd be best off blocking sipvicious with this iptables entry: > > > > iptables -I INPUT -j DROP -p udp --dport 5060 -m string --string > > "friendly-scanner" --algo bm > Will the above IPTABLES work with old versions of sipvicious scan? > > ----- > FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 > Watts of electricity. > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/IP-Whitelist-tp6455077p6457393.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/e700ce7b/attachment.html From michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de Thu Jun 9 16:49:50 2011 From: michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de (Michal Bielicki) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:49:50 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] test Message-ID: test Michal Bielicki Gesch?ftsf?hrer / CEO Seventh Signal Ltd. & Co. KG Weigandufer 45, B?ro 115, D-12059 Berlin Voice: +49 30 60988730 Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRA 44413 B Ust.-ID: DE266981999 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Michal Bielicki Pers?nlich Haftende Gesellschafterin: Seventh Signal Ltd, 69 Great Hampton St. Birmingham, B18 6EW, GB, Company Nr.: 06889439 WWW.: http://www.seventhsignal.de -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/cfe7a697/attachment.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 17:50:56 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:50:56 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - destination_number empty on inbound call In-Reply-To: <201106082043.54622.stkn@freeswitch.org> References: <201106082043.54622.stkn@freeswitch.org> Message-ID: On 8 June 2011 20:43, Stefan Knoblich wrote: > Am Wednesday 08 June 2011 schrieb Christian Benke: >> My FS is connected to a plain BRI-line via a HFC-S PCI-card. On >> inbound calls i don't receive a dialed number. Please see the debug at >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16456 for details. >> Do i have to fetch the DID from a variable before i can handle the >> call or is there some other problem, which i assume? > > That SETUP message at the top isn't valid, AFAIK. > There are two 'Calling Number' IEs (0x6c) and the second > one should have been a 'Called Number' IE (0x70) instead > ('190341' is the number you dialed, right?). No, that's actually fine - the first number is user-provided("user number not screened") as it is a "location independent corporate number", the second one is the "network provided" regional number(Which i missed to obfuscate). After talking with a colleague who is very proficient with ISDN and testing the line with a ISDN testing device today, we came to the conclusion that ftdm sends "CALL PROCEEDING" immediately, instead of sending an "SETUP ACK" and waiting for additional digits. What it comes down to, i simply didn't allow overlap-dialing. This was easy to fix for the Sangoma card by setting the "overlap"-parameter to "yes", as documented in http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeTDM#FreeSWITCH_FreeTDM_configuration. However, on my second device, which has a HFC-S based card(OpenVOX B100P) installed, ftmod_libpri based, overlap-dialing doesn't seem to work. The debug-logs posted above are from this card. Googling for overlap-dialing with libpri brought up this thread from Dec 2010, where Michael Collins says it's not supported yet: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2010-December/066695.html I assume this status has not changed? Best regards, Christian From benkokakao at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 18:01:31 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:01:31 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proxy traffic security In-Reply-To: <4DEFF3FA.5050500@gmail.com> References: <4DEFF3FA.5050500@gmail.com> Message-ID: On 9 June 2011 00:13, Antonio wrote: > Hello > > I have a FreeSwitch configured as a gateway, the proxy makes the user > authentication and other functions. All servers have public ip's, and I > have doubts to security. I had thought to put the proxy ip's in acl. Is > it safe this scenario? Can it be improved? Should we also put the sip > providers? Thanks. ACLs definitely would not hurt. Also think about setting up a simple firewall(e.g. Shorewall or just plain IPTables) to limit the access to the ip's which MUST have access(e.g. SIP-Provider IPs), you can never be sure if a software(like FreeSWITCH) doesn't have a bug that could be exploited. Cheers, Christian From benkokakao at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 18:03:06 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:03:06 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Enumerate variables in a session In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586589@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586589@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: On 8 June 2011 20:18, Yungwei Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if there's way to enumerate the list of variable names in a session in javascript. Thanks. This is not a FreeSWITCH specific question - a javascript-focused community or a more general programming website like stackoverflow.com would be suited better. Best regards, Christian From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 18:17:04 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:17:04 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proxy traffic security In-Reply-To: <4DEFF3FA.5050500@gmail.com> References: <4DEFF3FA.5050500@gmail.com> Message-ID: You can create an ACL listing proxy IPs then set the proxy-acl parameter on the SIP profile.call If your proxy can add a X-AUTH-IP header to the INVITE containing the caller's IP then FS will use that IP to check against ACLs instead of the IP received from, if the IP received from is on the proxy ACL. That way you can still authenticate callers with ACLs behind a proxy, although you're trusting your proxy to set that header correctly. The proxy-acl setting means only your proxy can set the X-AUTH-IP header, it'll be ignored on calls from any other IP. -Steve On 8 June 2011 23:13, Antonio wrote: > Hello > > I have a FreeSwitch configured as a gateway, the proxy makes the user > authentication and other functions. All servers have public ip's, and I > have doubts to security. I had thought to put the proxy ip's in acl. Is > it safe this scenario? Can it be improved? Should we also put the sip > providers? Thanks. > > Greetings > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/e18103ed/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 18:20:03 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:20:03 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Enumerate variables in a session In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586589@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: Actually Christian, it is since you have a session object in javascript and have to access the variables via the Session api. The simple answer is not directly AFAIK, although I think there is an undocumented Session.getXMLCDR() function. The XML CDR contains all variables on the session, so if you parse that XML I think you'll get the full list. -Steve On 9 June 2011 15:03, Christian Benke wrote: > On 8 June 2011 20:18, Yungwei Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm wondering if there's way to enumerate the list of variable names in a > session in javascript. Thanks. > > This is not a FreeSWITCH specific question - a javascript-focused > community or a more general programming website like stackoverflow.com > would be suited better. > > Best regards, > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/a80152b1/attachment-0001.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 18:24:38 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:24:38 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hmm, i don't believe FS really behaves like the transaction you posted. Can you provide us with an "original" trace? (Either "sofia global siptrace on" in fs_cli or install ngrep and do "ngrep -d ethX -W byline port 5060" on the shell of your freeswitch-host. Regards Christian From benkokakao at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 18:33:20 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:33:20 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how many are read & how many are unread in Inbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > Just wondering whether there is any way to know how many voice messages are > read or unread in New & SAVED box. Not sure in "which" way you want to know this. From fs_cli you can try: > vm_list user at domain xml This gives you an xml-output of all messages of this user - saved/read mails have an read_epoch-value, unread messages have a read_epoch-value of 0, e.g.: freeswitch at internal> vm_list 200 at 192.168.0.4 xml 1307630009 0 200 192.168.0.4 inbox /usr/local/freeswitch/storage/voicemail/default/192.168.0.4/200/msg_60c27a70-92a5-11e0-8b2f-fd7505ade349.wav 60c27a70-92a5-11e0-8b2f-fd7505ade349 Jim Doe 300 1307348316 1307629941 200 192.168.0.4 inbox /usr/local/freeswitch/storage/voicemail/default/192.168.0.4/200/msg_775fa510-9015-11e0-88e7-fd7505ade349.wav 775fa510-9015-11e0-88e7-fd7505ade349 John Doe 100 freeswitch at internal> hth Christian From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 18:50:14 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:50:14 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: He asked a similar question about a 603 that was returning 200 in another thread, which has already been solved. I expect it's the same problem, that his dialplan was doing an answer after the bridge before going to voicemail. -Steve On 9 June 2011 15:24, Christian Benke wrote: > Hmm, i don't believe FS really behaves like the transaction you posted. > > Can you provide us with an "original" trace? (Either "sofia global > siptrace on" in fs_cli or install ngrep and do "ngrep -d ethX -W > byline port 5060" on the shell of your freeswitch-host. > > Regards > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/2884d673/attachment.html From moises.silva at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 19:19:03 2011 From: moises.silva at gmail.com (Moises Silva) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM does not work In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2011/6/8 Valery Kalinin > Hi all! > > FreeTDM does not work with Digium equipment. > > That's not true. You just did not configure things correctly. 2011-06-09 02:07:01.693551 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span > 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) > 2011-06-09 02:07:02.773590 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span > 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) > 2011-06-09 02:07:03.833629 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span > 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) > 2011-06-09 02:07:04.893667 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:146 TEI=0 DL event: > Q931_DL_EVENT_DL_RELEASE_IND(3) > 2011-06-09 02:07:05.962709 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span > 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) > 2011-06-09 02:07:07.982780 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span > 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) > 2011-06-09 02:07:10.002854 [DEBUG] ftmod_libpri.c:1586 -- Caught Event span > 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) > ... > > Why? > Which means error: Caught Event span 1 4 (CONFIG_ERR) > Which config??? > > That means libpri does not like the configuration. I just updated the code to print the error string coming from lbipri. Update to latest GIT and you will see a more meaningful error. My guess is you configured for network when you are really the cpe or viceversa. Moises Silva Senior Software Engineer, Software Development Manager Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 100 Renfrew Drive, Suite 100, Markham ON L3R 9R6 Canada t. 1 905 474 1990 x128 | e. moy at sangoma.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/67df10d3/attachment.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Thu Jun 9 19:33:31 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:33:31 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DF0E7CB.5010005@seletech.com> Hi, yes problem already solved, sorry for the double mail... my mistake... regards Alessandro Il 09/06/2011 16:50, Steven Ayre ha scritto: > He asked a similar question about a 603 that was returning 200 in > another thread, which has already been solved. > > I expect it's the same problem, that his dialplan was doing an answer > after the bridge before going to voicemail. > > -Steve > > > On 9 June 2011 15:24, Christian Benke > wrote: > > Hmm, i don't believe FS really behaves like the transaction you > posted. > > Can you provide us with an "original" trace? (Either "sofia global > siptrace on" in fs_cli or install ngrep and do "ngrep -d ethX -W > byline port 5060" on the shell of your freeswitch-host. > > Regards > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/cbfe0c69/attachment.html From Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net Thu Jun 9 02:14:30 2011 From: Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net (Hector Geraldino) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app Message-ID: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Hi all, I've been playing with FS around weeks, with some level of success. Right now I'm stuck trying to dial an extension, or to bridge a call to an external extension. Briefly, the scenario is the following: - Cisco CCM forwarding SIP calls to FS - FS in outbound mode, forwarding calls to a Java application using freeswitch-esl jar The java application answers the call, says a dialogue using TTS and receives input using DTFM or speech commands; all this is working pretty well. Now I'm trying to put this call in hold, originate a call to another extension and, depending on the result (call answered, not answered, destination user presses an specific number generating an expected DTMF), I need to bridge both calls and finish the session. I try several ways to get this done with no luck yet: using api originate to make the call with different arguments ({ignore_early_media, etc). I even tried to skip this step and just do the bridge between the inbound call and the external extension, but this didn't work either. I can't see any errors thrown by FS, and the result of the command is +OK, but nothing happens, the external phone never rings. The FS log only says: [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/5655 at 192.168.8.1 [BREAK] <= this ext/IP address is from the inbound caller, not the one I'm trying to connect to. My first impression was that I might have something wrong with the originate/bridge parameters. I changed the dialplan XML file to just do the bridge, and it worked like a charm. I don't know what path to follow here. I was unable to find relevant examples on google that guides me to solve this little issue. Any advices? Thanks all, Hector -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110608/9e958c22/attachment-0001.html From freeswitch at mralston.com Thu Jun 9 02:44:43 2011 From: freeswitch at mralston.com (Matthew Ralston) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 23:44:43 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Logical OR in conditions Message-ID: <43439B44-F6EE-448F-9CB4-58D15ACAE9F6@mralston.com> Hi, What is the correct condition->break value to use in order to create a logical OR with conditions? I have two extensions which I'd like to merge into one. I'd like the actions to be run if either of the conditions matches: So the result would be something like: I can't seem to get it to work and my brain is melting trying to wrap my head around the different break values. Cheers, Matt From Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net Thu Jun 9 17:12:49 2011 From: Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net (Hector Geraldino) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EA9E@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EA9E@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EACF@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Hi all, I've been playing with FS around weeks, with some level of success. Right now I'm stuck trying to dial an extension, or to bridge a call to an external extension. Briefly, the scenario is the following: - Cisco CCM forwarding SIP calls to FS - FS in outbound mode, forwarding calls to a Java application using freeswitch-esl jar The java application answers the call, says a dialogue using TTS and receives input using DTFM or speech commands; all this is working pretty well. Now I'm trying to put this call in hold, originate a call to another extension and, depending on the result (call answered, not answered, destination user presses an specific number generating an expected DTMF), I need to bridge both calls and finish the session. I try several ways to get this done with no luck yet: using api originate to make the call with different arguments ({ignore_early_media, etc). I even tried to skip this step and just do the bridge between the inbound call and the external extension, but this didn't work either. I can't see any errors thrown by FS, and the result of the command is +OK, but nothing happens, the external phone never rings. The FS log only says: [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/5655 at 192.168.8.1 [BREAK] <= this ext/IP address is from the inbound caller, not the one I'm trying to connect to. My first impression was that I might have something wrong with the originate/bridge parameters. I changed the dialplan XML file to just do the bridge, and it worked like a charm. I don't know what path to follow here. I was unable to find relevant examples on google that guides me to solve this little issue. Can somebody please give me some advice? Thanks all, Hector -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/14890ae5/attachment.html From freeswitch at mralston.com Thu Jun 9 19:20:44 2011 From: freeswitch at mralston.com (Matthew Ralston) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:20:44 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Logical OR in conditions Message-ID: <19EE2626-06B6-4971-BFCA-0370EF77A8AC@mralston.com> Hi, What is the correct condition->break value to use in order to create a logical OR with conditions? I have two extensions which I'd like to merge into one. I'd like the actions to be run if either of the conditions matches: So the result would be something like: I can't seem to get it to work and my brain is melting trying to wrap my head around the different break values. Cheers, Matt From shouldbeq931 at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 11:27:13 2011 From: shouldbeq931 at gmail.com (shouldbe q931) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:27:13 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK In-Reply-To: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:36 PM, John wrote: > Hello, > > 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. > I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from > either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be > overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. Has anyone > got this working in UK, and what is the format for the > outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? I note that > the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. > > > Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my > Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! > > John > I can only comment on the BT part. If they are two individual lines, you're out of luck with BT, as they do not allow CLI spoofing, which this would be. I would suggest sending BT the same number of digits that they send you, if that doesn't work try 10 digits. If you are not sending the "correct" number of digits for a valid DDI on the trunk, then they will send the lead number for the trunk. Cheers From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 19:53:17 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Logical OR in conditions In-Reply-To: <19EE2626-06B6-4971-BFCA-0370EF77A8AC@mralston.com> References: <19EE2626-06B6-4971-BFCA-0370EF77A8AC@mralston.com> Message-ID: the easy way would be to put the OR in the REGEX sep with | ^1234$|^5678$ On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Matthew Ralston wrote: > Hi, > > What is the correct condition->break value to use in order to create a logical OR with conditions? > > I have two extensions which I'd like to merge into one. I'd like the actions to be run if either of the conditions matches: > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > > So the result would be something like: > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > > I can't seem to get it to work and my brain is melting trying to wrap my head around the different break values. > > Cheers, > > Matt > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From freeswitch at mralston.com Thu Jun 9 20:10:08 2011 From: freeswitch at mralston.com (Matthew Ralston) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:10:08 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Logical OR in conditions In-Reply-To: References: <19EE2626-06B6-4971-BFCA-0370EF77A8AC@mralston.com> Message-ID: <31096DDC-7826-4038-8A27-D3B465AA4486@mralston.com> Hi, Ah ok, that'll do me. Thank you. Kind regards, Matthew Ralston Web Developer & IT Consultant matt at mralston.co.uk www.mralston.com On 9 Jun 2011, at 16:53, Anthony Minessale wrote: > the easy way would be to put the OR in the REGEX sep with | > ^1234$|^5678$ > > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Matthew Ralston > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> What is the correct condition->break value to use in order to create a logical OR with conditions? >> >> I have two extensions which I'd like to merge into one. I'd like the actions to be run if either of the conditions matches: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So the result would be something like: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I can't seem to get it to work and my brain is melting trying to wrap my head around the different break values. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matt >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 9 20:37:41 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:37:41 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Enumerate variables in a session In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586589@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: You can also create an API object and issue a uuid_dump command and parse the results. -MC On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: > Actually Christian, it is since you have a session object in javascript and > have to access the variables via the Session api. > > The simple answer is not directly AFAIK, although I think there is an > undocumented Session.getXMLCDR() function. The XML CDR contains all > variables on the session, so if you parse that XML I think you'll get the > full list. > > -Steve > > > > On 9 June 2011 15:03, Christian Benke wrote: > >> On 8 June 2011 20:18, Yungwei Chen wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm wondering if there's way to enumerate the list of variable names in >> a session in javascript. Thanks. >> >> This is not a FreeSWITCH specific question - a javascript-focused >> community or a more general programming website like stackoverflow.com >> would be suited better. >> >> Best regards, >> Christian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/2306520b/attachment.html From joland at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 02:27:46 2011 From: joland at gmail.com (Jeppe Oland) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Problem receiving calls from E1 to TE122p References: <20110527195856.GA3362@jgalaz-desktop> Message-ID: Javier Galaz Jeria writes: > I'm using FS git, on Ubuntu 11.04, with Digium TE122p card (from now on > srv1), and FS git, on Ubuntu Server 11.04 with Sangoma A101 card (from now > on srv2), both currently configured by vendor's scripts. I was trying to get a Sangoma A200 working on Ubuntu 11.04 last week, but as far as I can tell, WANPIPE won't compile with the new kernels. What did you do to get it working in the first place? Regards, -Jeppe From kahn at vestec.com Thu Jun 9 20:15:01 2011 From: kahn at vestec.com (Kashif Kahn) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Speech Recognition: Chinese Mandarin Message-ID: <4DF0F185.8010500@vestec.com> Hello Everyone, Vestec ASR engine now supports speech recognition in Chinese Mandarin. (We also support American English, Australian English, and Indian English). A starter kit is available for $25: http://www.vestec.com/products Please note that Vestec offers the best deal around for enabling sophisticated speech recognition with command-and-control type IVR applications by offering a high accuracy, standards based speech engine at a fraction of the cost of conventional ASR vendors. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Regards, -Kashif From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 9 20:47:28 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:47:28 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: I would say that you want to bridge the inbound leg to the outbound leg and use the answer confirmation variables. I recommend you pastebin a simple java app that answers the call and attempts to bridge it and also pastebin the console log. The community will take a look and see if we can help you figure out what is happening. -MC On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Hector Geraldino < Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I?ve been playing with FS around weeks, with some level of success. Right > now I?m stuck trying to dial an extension, or to bridge a call to an > external extension. Briefly, the scenario is the following: > > > > - Cisco CCM forwarding SIP calls to FS > > - FS in outbound mode, forwarding calls to a Java application > using freeswitch-esl jar > > > > The java application answers the call, says a dialogue using TTS and > receives input using DTFM or speech commands; all this is working pretty > well. Now I?m trying to put this call in hold, originate a call to another > extension and, depending on the result (call answered, not answered, > destination user presses an specific number generating an expected DTMF), I > need to bridge both calls and finish the session. > > > > I try several ways to get this done with no luck yet: using api originate > to make the call with different arguments ({ignore_early_media, etc). I > even tried to skip this step and just do the bridge between the inbound call > and the external extension, but this didn?t work either. I can?t see any > errors thrown by FS, and the result of the command is +OK, but nothing > happens, the external phone never rings. The FS log only says: > > > > [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/ > 5655 at 192.168.8.1 [BREAK] <= this ext/IP address is from the inbound > caller, not the one I?m trying to connect to. > > > > My first impression was that I might have something wrong with the > originate/bridge parameters. I changed the dialplan XML file to just do the > bridge, and it worked like a charm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don?t know what path to follow here. I was unable to find relevant > examples on google that guides me to solve this little issue. Any advices? > > > > Thanks all, > > Hector > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/c50d236d/attachment.html From robert.hadley at teotech.com Thu Jun 9 21:43:01 2011 From: robert.hadley at teotech.com (Robert Hadley) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:43:01 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how many are read & how many are unread in Inbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: vm_boxcount user at domain|[new|saved|new-urgent|saved-urgent|all]] freeswitch at internal> vm_boxcount 2002 at 192.168.xx.xx|all 5:0:0:0 -Robert -----Original Message----- From: Christian Benke [mailto:benkokakao at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 7:33 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how many are read & how many are unread in Inbox > Just wondering whether there is any way to know how many voice > messages are read or unread in New & SAVED box. Not sure in "which" way you want to know this. From fs_cli you can try: > vm_list user at domain xml This gives you an xml-output of all messages of this user - saved/read mails have an read_epoch-value, unread messages have a read_epoch-value of 0, e.g.: freeswitch at internal> vm_list 200 at 192.168.0.4 xml 1307630009 0 200 192.168.0.4 inbox /usr/local/freeswitch/storage/voicemail/default/192.168.0.4/200/msg_60c27a70-92a5-11e0-8b2f-fd7505ade349.wav 60c27a70-92a5-11e0-8b2f-fd7505ade349 Jim Doe 300 1307348316 1307629941 200 192.168.0.4 inbox /usr/local/freeswitch/storage/voicemail/default/192.168.0.4/200/msg_775fa510-9015-11e0-88e7-fd7505ade349.wav 775fa510-9015-11e0-88e7-fd7505ade349 John Doe 100 freeswitch at internal> hth Christian From freeswitch at earthspike.net Thu Jun 9 22:10:11 2011 From: freeswitch at earthspike.net (John) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:10:11 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UK ISDN outgoing CLI (was Re: FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK) In-Reply-To: References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> Message-ID: <4DF10C83.6020803@earthspike.net> [I've forked this thread as it really should have been 3 separate threads to start with.] Thanks, I have tried every combination I can think of, except 10 digits which I will give a go. That makes sense as in the general case it would permit non-geographical numbers to be presented. The lines are provided as 2 x ISDN2e with a lead number covering all 4 channels. The NTE8s are labelled 1-2 and 3-4, so not separate individual lines, I thnk. We currently have a Single Number DDI in addition, and hope to increase that to 2 very soon; the 3 numbers between them will serve 3 separate business units, so we want to be able to present the correct outbound CLI from each business unit. We also have a remote call forward from another number to the lead number, but presenting that really would be CLI spoofing, so I am not expecting that to be permissible. But I would expect those that are directly allocated to the 2 lines/4 channels to be allowed to be presented. John On 09/06/11 08:27, shouldbe q931 wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:36 PM, John wrote: >> Hello, >> > >> 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. >> I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from >> either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be >> overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. Has anyone >> got this working in UK, and what is the format for the >> outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? I note that >> the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. >> > >> Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my >> Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! >> >> John >> > I can only comment on the BT part. > > If they are two individual lines, you're out of luck with BT, as they > do not allow CLI spoofing, which this would be. > > I would suggest sending BT the same number of digits that they send > you, if that doesn't work try 10 digits. If you are not sending the > "correct" number of digits for a valid DDI on the trunk, then they > will send the lead number for the trunk. > > Cheers > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net Fri Jun 10 00:22:25 2011 From: Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net (Hector Geraldino) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Hi Michael, Thanks for replying back. I've pasted a sample application on pastebin, the URL is: http://pastebin.com/MYusWe3V What I'm trying to do (and have partially accomplished) is: -Answer the call - Play a message - wait for a command (dtmf or voice, this is out of the sample app for the sake of keeping it short & simple) - originate a new call, wait for it to be answered and depending on an event (dtmf)... - ...do the bridge or dial another extension. The extension number is external (managed by a Cisco CCM). If I try to do the bridge from the XML dialplan it works perfect. When I try to do it from an outbound socket java application, anything happens, and almost no information is logged on FS log that I can use to decide what might be happening. Thanks again for your help. I truly appreciate it. Hector From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:47 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app I would say that you want to bridge the inbound leg to the outbound leg and use the answer confirmation variables. I recommend you pastebin a simple java app that answers the call and attempts to bridge it and also pastebin the console log. The community will take a look and see if we can help you figure out what is happening. -MC On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Hector Geraldino > wrote: Hi all, I've been playing with FS around weeks, with some level of success. Right now I'm stuck trying to dial an extension, or to bridge a call to an external extension. Briefly, the scenario is the following: - Cisco CCM forwarding SIP calls to FS - FS in outbound mode, forwarding calls to a Java application using freeswitch-esl jar The java application answers the call, says a dialogue using TTS and receives input using DTFM or speech commands; all this is working pretty well. Now I'm trying to put this call in hold, originate a call to another extension and, depending on the result (call answered, not answered, destination user presses an specific number generating an expected DTMF), I need to bridge both calls and finish the session. I try several ways to get this done with no luck yet: using api originate to make the call with different arguments ({ignore_early_media, etc). I even tried to skip this step and just do the bridge between the inbound call and the external extension, but this didn't work either. I can't see any errors thrown by FS, and the result of the command is +OK, but nothing happens, the external phone never rings. The FS log only says: [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/5655 at 192.168.8.1 [BREAK] <= this ext/IP address is from the inbound caller, not the one I'm trying to connect to. My first impression was that I might have something wrong with the originate/bridge parameters. I changed the dialplan XML file to just do the bridge, and it worked like a charm. I don't know what path to follow here. I was unable to find relevant examples on google that guides me to solve this little issue. Any advices? Thanks all, Hector _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/eb4fdca7/attachment.html From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Fri Jun 10 00:21:59 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:21:59 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues In-Reply-To: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58301@cooper> References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58301@cooper> Message-ID: Here you go: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16468 For this packet trace I decided to have profile "C" in the UA directory. This causes FS to send the second invite (which should be A->B) as C->B, rather than B->B, as it does if that UA is not present. Neither is correct, this just makes it a little easier to grep. User 1302 first appears in that invite, I don't see any other log items talking about 1302 at all. It's worth noting that 1302's user name (IMSI641104878332498) DOES appear in the SDP packet loaded in the first (A->B) invite, but I'm pretty certain FS should not be using that information for SIP addressing. Again, if I remove user IMSI641104878332498 from the directory, FS just switched to returning with user 1301, it doesn't fix the issue. It's very likely I'm massaging some code that's not commonly used, as I may be making a small mistake here or there in the original SIP invite. These two lines: 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6674 IP 192.168.1.144 Approved by acl "domains[IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144]". Access Granted. 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6803 Authenticating user IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144 Are particularly curious. I'm not sure if those are a response to the incoming invite (which would be incorrect) or not. It should be approving user 1300 at 192.168.1.144, if anyone. Thanks! On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Peter Olsson wrote: > Please pastebin a complete debug log, with "sofia global siptrace on", to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org. > > I'm pretty sure this is not a bug in FS, if it was, we would have lots of people complaining... > > /Peter > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r Kurtis Heimerl > Skickat: den 8 juni 2011 23:32 > Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues > > Hello Freeswitch-users! > > I'm currently writing a SIP middlebox that intercepts sip messages and > changes their username. The reasons for this are complicated and > somewhat outside of the scope of this discussion. However, I've come > upon a very strange issue: when making a phone-to-phone call across > freeswitch; it is connecting the wrong user. I'm fairly well convinced > this is a bug, but I thought I'd send the issue here and see if it's > anything I'm obviously doing wrong. > > Basically, FS sees a SIP message from a registered UA (call it A) > inviting another registered user to a call (B). This is acked > correctly (a TRYING message). FS then responds by inviting B into a > call with some OTHER user C. C is not mentioned at any point in the > initial SIP messages (as verified by wireshark). Even more strangely, > if I remove user C from FS (by removing their config file) FS responds > to the invite by inviting B into a call with itself. In each case, the > appropriate from header in the invite should be the original caller A. > ?It's worth noting that I am not monkeying with the RTP packets at > all, but my understanding is that SIP signalling shouldn't be affected > by that. > > My general guess is that I'm messing up the naming somehow, and FS is > running an algorithm to guess at who the call originator is. However, > the naming must be roughly correct; Asterisk is able to handle this > call just fine. I've included a sip trace of the second situation (A > calls B, FS invites B to a call with itself) > > For the record A:1300 > B:1301 > C:IMSI641104878332498 > > REGISTER MESSAGE (Which works fine) > > REGISTER sip:192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 > From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui > To: 1300 > Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 > CSeq: 91 REGISTER > Contact: ;expires=7200 > Max-Forwards: 70 > Content-Length: 0 > > SIP/2.0 200 OK > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 > From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui > To: 1300 ;tag=jU64NXypQc57F > Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 > CSeq: 91 REGISTER > Contact: ;expires=7200 > Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:02:04 GMT > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE > Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces > Content-Length: 0 > > SIP TRACE (A -> B, B -> B response) > > INITIAL INVITE > INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 > From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx > To: > Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 > CSeq: 485 INVITE > Contact: ;expires=3600 > Content-Type: application/sdp > Max-Forwards: 70 > Content-Length: 143 > > INVITE ACK > SIP/2.0 100 Trying > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 > From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx > To: > Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 > CSeq: 485 INVITE > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 > Content-Length: 0 > > FS INVITE (Note the from address being wrong) > INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144:5063 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144;rport;branch=z9hG4bKeeQvcyZ70SDUg > Max-Forwards: 69 > From: "1301" ;tag=rHyS0Z3B61arN > To: > Call-ID: 84df47f9-0cb7-122f-13b5-5cff350d9de5 > CSeq: 13447852 INVITE > Contact: > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE > Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces > Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, > sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, > refer > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Disposition: session > Content-Length: 315 > X-FS-Support: update_display > Remote-Party-ID: "1301" > ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off > > USER CONFIGURATIONS > > 1300.xml > > ? > ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? > > > 1301.xml > > ? > ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? > > > IMSI641104878332498.xml > > ? number-alias="1302"> > ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? > > > DIALPLAN > > ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > !DSPAM:4defeb7432764293448790! > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Fri Jun 10 00:55:22 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:55:22 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues In-Reply-To: References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58301@cooper>, Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56421@cooper> I'm guessing your problem might be related to the fact that you use the cidr attribute on the user's - with the same IP's for all of them. If I understand these correctly (never used it this way myself) they're supposed to be used to authenticate a user for a specific IP, instead of challenge auth, and since the same IP is provided for all of them they might overwrite eachother, and the last one will be the one it matches. Also, read more on http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Acl#Users. Try removing the cidr attribute, and let the agents auth instead, or use different IP's for the users. /Peter ________________________________________ Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Kurtis Heimerl [kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu] Skickat: den 9 juni 2011 22:21 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues Here you go: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16468 For this packet trace I decided to have profile "C" in the UA directory. This causes FS to send the second invite (which should be A->B) as C->B, rather than B->B, as it does if that UA is not present. Neither is correct, this just makes it a little easier to grep. User 1302 first appears in that invite, I don't see any other log items talking about 1302 at all. It's worth noting that 1302's user name (IMSI641104878332498) DOES appear in the SDP packet loaded in the first (A->B) invite, but I'm pretty certain FS should not be using that information for SIP addressing. Again, if I remove user IMSI641104878332498 from the directory, FS just switched to returning with user 1301, it doesn't fix the issue. It's very likely I'm massaging some code that's not commonly used, as I may be making a small mistake here or there in the original SIP invite. These two lines: 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6674 IP 192.168.1.144 Approved by acl "domains[IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144]". Access Granted. 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6803 Authenticating user IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144 Are particularly curious. I'm not sure if those are a response to the incoming invite (which would be incorrect) or not. It should be approving user 1300 at 192.168.1.144, if anyone. Thanks! On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Peter Olsson wrote: > Please pastebin a complete debug log, with "sofia global siptrace on", to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org. > > I'm pretty sure this is not a bug in FS, if it was, we would have lots of people complaining... > > /Peter > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r Kurtis Heimerl > Skickat: den 8 juni 2011 23:32 > Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues > > Hello Freeswitch-users! > > I'm currently writing a SIP middlebox that intercepts sip messages and > changes their username. The reasons for this are complicated and > somewhat outside of the scope of this discussion. However, I've come > upon a very strange issue: when making a phone-to-phone call across > freeswitch; it is connecting the wrong user. I'm fairly well convinced > this is a bug, but I thought I'd send the issue here and see if it's > anything I'm obviously doing wrong. > > Basically, FS sees a SIP message from a registered UA (call it A) > inviting another registered user to a call (B). This is acked > correctly (a TRYING message). FS then responds by inviting B into a > call with some OTHER user C. C is not mentioned at any point in the > initial SIP messages (as verified by wireshark). Even more strangely, > if I remove user C from FS (by removing their config file) FS responds > to the invite by inviting B into a call with itself. In each case, the > appropriate from header in the invite should be the original caller A. > It's worth noting that I am not monkeying with the RTP packets at > all, but my understanding is that SIP signalling shouldn't be affected > by that. > > My general guess is that I'm messing up the naming somehow, and FS is > running an algorithm to guess at who the call originator is. However, > the naming must be roughly correct; Asterisk is able to handle this > call just fine. I've included a sip trace of the second situation (A > calls B, FS invites B to a call with itself) > > For the record A:1300 > B:1301 > C:IMSI641104878332498 > > REGISTER MESSAGE (Which works fine) > > REGISTER sip:192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 > From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui > To: 1300 > Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 > CSeq: 91 REGISTER > Contact: ;expires=7200 > Max-Forwards: 70 > Content-Length: 0 > > SIP/2.0 200 OK > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 > From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui > To: 1300 ;tag=jU64NXypQc57F > Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 > CSeq: 91 REGISTER > Contact: ;expires=7200 > Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:02:04 GMT > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE > Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces > Content-Length: 0 > > SIP TRACE (A -> B, B -> B response) > > INITIAL INVITE > INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 > From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx > To: > Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 > CSeq: 485 INVITE > Contact: ;expires=3600 > Content-Type: application/sdp > Max-Forwards: 70 > Content-Length: 143 > > INVITE ACK > SIP/2.0 100 Trying > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 > From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx > To: > Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 > CSeq: 485 INVITE > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 > Content-Length: 0 > > FS INVITE (Note the from address being wrong) > INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144:5063 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144;rport;branch=z9hG4bKeeQvcyZ70SDUg > Max-Forwards: 69 > From: "1301" ;tag=rHyS0Z3B61arN > To: > Call-ID: 84df47f9-0cb7-122f-13b5-5cff350d9de5 > CSeq: 13447852 INVITE > Contact: > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE > Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces > Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, > sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, > refer > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Disposition: session > Content-Length: 315 > X-FS-Support: update_display > Remote-Party-ID: "1301" > ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off > > USER CONFIGURATIONS > > 1300.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1301.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IMSI641104878332498.xml > > number-alias="1302"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DIALPLAN > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4df12cbe32761899399581! From chat2jesse at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 01:30:38 2011 From: chat2jesse at gmail.com (jesse) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:30:38 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to redirect $${sounds_dir} ? Message-ID: I would like to pint sounds_dir to a different location, but it seems freeswitch doesn't support --sounds_dir as command line arguments. please let me know how to re-define sounds_dir? thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/4994300b/attachment.html From mehmasarja at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 21:10:07 2011 From: mehmasarja at gmail.com (Mehma Sarja) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:10:07 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Default Install Extensions NEWBIE Question Message-ID: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> The default install on ubuntu renders a working system servicing 19 extensions. Can I use this as-is in a production environment which only requires within-LAN, inter-departmental voice connectivity? Mehma From ivank at rogers.com Fri Jun 10 00:38:22 2011 From: ivank at rogers.com (Ivan Kovacevic) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] continue_on_fail failover with mod_lcr Message-ID: <027301cc26e5$2d224a50$8766def0$@rogers.com> Hi Everyone, I would like to implement fail-over for my outbound gateway, but I would like to be able to pick certain cause codes which qualify to stop trying next gateway (specifically when I have bad number and I am getting sip:404 NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION, UNALLOCATED_NUMBER). I was using 1.0.6, but I moved to the newest git about month ago. After searching through lists and spending several hours playing with continue_to_fail, failure_causes and fail_on_single_reject I was able to make it work by specifying cause codes for which I want to fail-over and omitting ones that qualify to stop trying next gateway in variable continue_to_fail: So this setup is working for me and in the case I have bad number and x.x.x.x returns sip:404 (NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION or UNALLOCATED_NUMBER) it is not trying y.y.y.y gateway. However if I want to use "|" between my gateways - and the example below is not working. And no matter what x.x.x.x returns - it will try y.y.y.y and eventually z.z.z.z. Unfortunately, we have to use pipe for fail-over since we are using mod_lcr to choose between outbound gateways. Any suggestions? Thanks, Ivan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/7f89d158/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 10 02:05:21 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:05:21 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: What is the socket app syntax that you are using? Do you have "async full" turned on? -MC On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Hector Geraldino < Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > > Thanks for replying back. I?ve pasted a sample application on pastebin, the > URL is: > > > > http://pastebin.com/MYusWe3V > > > > What I?m trying to do (and have partially accomplished) is: > > > > -Answer the call > > - Play a message > > - wait for a command (dtmf or voice, this is out of the sample app for the > sake of keeping it short & simple) > > - originate a new call, wait for it to be answered and depending on an > event (dtmf)? > > - ?do the bridge or dial another extension. > > > > The extension number is external (managed by a Cisco CCM). If I try to do > the bridge from the XML dialplan it works perfect. When I try to do it from > an outbound socket java application, anything happens, and almost no > information is logged on FS log that I can use to decide what might be > happening. > > > > Thanks again for your help. I truly appreciate it. > > > > Hector > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael > Collins > *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:47 PM > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound > socket app > > > > I would say that you want to bridge the inbound leg to the outbound leg and > use the answer confirmation variables. I recommend you pastebin a simple > java app that answers the call and attempts to bridge it and also pastebin > the console log. The community will take a look and see if we can help you > figure out what is happening. > > > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Hector Geraldino < > Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I?ve been playing with FS around weeks, with some level of success. Right > now I?m stuck trying to dial an extension, or to bridge a call to an > external extension. Briefly, the scenario is the following: > > > > - Cisco CCM forwarding SIP calls to FS > > - FS in outbound mode, forwarding calls to a Java application > using freeswitch-esl jar > > > > The java application answers the call, says a dialogue using TTS and > receives input using DTFM or speech commands; all this is working pretty > well. Now I?m trying to put this call in hold, originate a call to another > extension and, depending on the result (call answered, not answered, > destination user presses an specific number generating an expected DTMF), I > need to bridge both calls and finish the session. > > > > I try several ways to get this done with no luck yet: using api originate > to make the call with different arguments ({ignore_early_media, etc). I > even tried to skip this step and just do the bridge between the inbound call > and the external extension, but this didn?t work either. I can?t see any > errors thrown by FS, and the result of the command is +OK, but nothing > happens, the external phone never rings. The FS log only says: > > > > [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/ > 5655 at 192.168.8.1 [BREAK] <= this ext/IP address is from the inbound > caller, not the one I?m trying to connect to. > > > > My first impression was that I might have something wrong with the > originate/bridge parameters. I changed the dialplan XML file to just do the > bridge, and it worked like a charm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don?t know what path to follow here. I was unable to find relevant > examples on google that guides me to solve this little issue. Any advices? > > > > Thanks all, > > Hector > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/96f44e3d/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 10 02:12:36 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:12:36 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: Also, I don't think this is helping you: EslMessage response = sendSyncSingleLineCommand(channel, "myevents"); Look here to see what "myevents" does: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_event_socket#Special_Case_-_.27myevents.27 -MC On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Hector Geraldino < Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > > Thanks for replying back. I?ve pasted a sample application on pastebin, the > URL is: > > > > http://pastebin.com/MYusWe3V > > > > What I?m trying to do (and have partially accomplished) is: > > > > -Answer the call > > - Play a message > > - wait for a command (dtmf or voice, this is out of the sample app for the > sake of keeping it short & simple) > > - originate a new call, wait for it to be answered and depending on an > event (dtmf)? > > - ?do the bridge or dial another extension. > > > > The extension number is external (managed by a Cisco CCM). If I try to do > the bridge from the XML dialplan it works perfect. When I try to do it from > an outbound socket java application, anything happens, and almost no > information is logged on FS log that I can use to decide what might be > happening. > > > > Thanks again for your help. I truly appreciate it. > > > > Hector > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael > Collins > *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:47 PM > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound > socket app > > > > I would say that you want to bridge the inbound leg to the outbound leg and > use the answer confirmation variables. I recommend you pastebin a simple > java app that answers the call and attempts to bridge it and also pastebin > the console log. The community will take a look and see if we can help you > figure out what is happening. > > > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Hector Geraldino < > Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I?ve been playing with FS around weeks, with some level of success. Right > now I?m stuck trying to dial an extension, or to bridge a call to an > external extension. Briefly, the scenario is the following: > > > > - Cisco CCM forwarding SIP calls to FS > > - FS in outbound mode, forwarding calls to a Java application > using freeswitch-esl jar > > > > The java application answers the call, says a dialogue using TTS and > receives input using DTFM or speech commands; all this is working pretty > well. Now I?m trying to put this call in hold, originate a call to another > extension and, depending on the result (call answered, not answered, > destination user presses an specific number generating an expected DTMF), I > need to bridge both calls and finish the session. > > > > I try several ways to get this done with no luck yet: using api originate > to make the call with different arguments ({ignore_early_media, etc). I > even tried to skip this step and just do the bridge between the inbound call > and the external extension, but this didn?t work either. I can?t see any > errors thrown by FS, and the result of the command is +OK, but nothing > happens, the external phone never rings. The FS log only says: > > > > [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/ > 5655 at 192.168.8.1 [BREAK] <= this ext/IP address is from the inbound > caller, not the one I?m trying to connect to. > > > > My first impression was that I might have something wrong with the > originate/bridge parameters. I changed the dialplan XML file to just do the > bridge, and it worked like a charm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don?t know what path to follow here. I was unable to find relevant > examples on google that guides me to solve this little issue. Any advices? > > > > Thanks all, > > Hector > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110609/54ada4e8/attachment.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 02:52:07 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:52:07 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how many are read & how many are unread in Inbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 9 June 2011 19:43, Robert Hadley wrote: > > vm_boxcount user at domain|[new|saved|new-urgent|saved-urgent|all]] > > freeswitch at internal> vm_boxcount 2002 at 192.168.xx.xx|all > 5:0:0:0 Hmm, i thought vm_boxcount is broken resp. means something different - only displays 0 on the mailbox above(While there is 1 new and 1 saved msg, as displayed by vm_list) :-/ From benkokakao at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 02:55:26 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:55:26 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Enumerate variables in a session In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC586589@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: On 9 June 2011 16:20, Steven Ayre wrote: > Actually Christian, it is since you have a session object in javascript and > have to access the variables via the Session api. Oh, sorry for that hasty reply then! From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Fri Jun 10 07:29:21 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:29:21 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues In-Reply-To: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56421@cooper> References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58301@cooper> <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56421@cooper> Message-ID: I think you're right. Thanks! Removing IMSI641104278340883 from that domain caused FS to fall back to the previous user, 1301. Unfortunately, I can't lets the agents auth, or use different IPs, all are coming from the same application that doesn't support auth. I'm going to try adding each to their own unique domain, hopefully that'll help. It might not though, considering they're all coming from the same IP. Do you have any other idea how to fix this? On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Peter Olsson wrote: > I'm guessing your problem might be related to the fact that you use the cidr attribute on the user's - with the same IP's for all of them. If I understand these correctly (never used it this way myself) they're supposed to be used to authenticate a user for a specific IP, instead of challenge auth, and since the same IP is provided for all of them they might overwrite eachother, and the last one will be the one it matches. > > Also, read more on http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Acl#Users. > > Try removing the cidr attribute, and let the agents auth instead, or use different IP's for the users. > > /Peter > ________________________________________ > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Kurtis Heimerl [kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu] > Skickat: den 9 juni 2011 22:21 > Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help > ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues > > Here you go: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16468 > > For this packet trace I decided to have profile "C" in the UA > directory. This causes FS to send the second invite (which should be > A->B) as C->B, rather than B->B, as it does if that UA is not present. > ?Neither is correct, this just makes it a little easier to grep. > > User 1302 first appears in that invite, I don't see any other log > items talking about 1302 at all. It's worth noting that 1302's user > name (IMSI641104878332498) DOES appear in the SDP packet loaded in the > first (A->B) invite, but I'm pretty certain FS should not be using > that information for SIP addressing. Again, if I remove user > IMSI641104878332498 from the directory, FS just switched to returning > with user 1301, it doesn't fix the issue. > > It's very likely I'm massaging some code that's not commonly used, as > I may be making a small mistake here or there in the original SIP > invite. These two lines: > 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6674 IP 192.168.1.144 > Approved by acl "domains[IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144]". Access > Granted. > 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6803 Authenticating user > IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144 > Are particularly curious. I'm not sure if those are a response to the > incoming invite (which would be incorrect) or not. It should be > approving user 1300 at 192.168.1.144, if anyone. > > Thanks! > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Peter Olsson > wrote: >> Please pastebin a complete debug log, with "sofia global siptrace on", to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org. >> >> I'm pretty sure this is not a bug in FS, if it was, we would have lots of people complaining... >> >> /Peter >> >> >> -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >> Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r Kurtis Heimerl >> Skickat: den 8 juni 2011 23:32 >> Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues >> >> Hello Freeswitch-users! >> >> I'm currently writing a SIP middlebox that intercepts sip messages and >> changes their username. The reasons for this are complicated and >> somewhat outside of the scope of this discussion. However, I've come >> upon a very strange issue: when making a phone-to-phone call across >> freeswitch; it is connecting the wrong user. I'm fairly well convinced >> this is a bug, but I thought I'd send the issue here and see if it's >> anything I'm obviously doing wrong. >> >> Basically, FS sees a SIP message from a registered UA (call it A) >> inviting another registered user to a call (B). This is acked >> correctly (a TRYING message). FS then responds by inviting B into a >> call with some OTHER user C. C is not mentioned at any point in the >> initial SIP messages (as verified by wireshark). Even more strangely, >> if I remove user C from FS (by removing their config file) FS responds >> to the invite by inviting B into a call with itself. In each case, the >> appropriate from header in the invite should be the original caller A. >> ?It's worth noting that I am not monkeying with the RTP packets at >> all, but my understanding is that SIP signalling shouldn't be affected >> by that. >> >> My general guess is that I'm messing up the naming somehow, and FS is >> running an algorithm to guess at who the call originator is. However, >> the naming must be roughly correct; Asterisk is able to handle this >> call just fine. I've included a sip trace of the second situation (A >> calls B, FS invites B to a call with itself) >> >> For the record A:1300 >> B:1301 >> C:IMSI641104878332498 >> >> REGISTER MESSAGE (Which works fine) >> >> REGISTER sip:192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >> From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui >> To: 1300 >> Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 >> CSeq: 91 REGISTER >> Contact: ;expires=7200 >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> SIP/2.0 200 OK >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >> From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui >> To: 1300 ;tag=jU64NXypQc57F >> Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 >> CSeq: 91 REGISTER >> Contact: ;expires=7200 >> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:02:04 GMT >> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE >> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> SIP TRACE (A -> B, B -> B response) >> >> INITIAL INVITE >> INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 >> From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx >> To: >> Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 >> CSeq: 485 INVITE >> Contact: ;expires=3600 >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> Content-Length: 143 >> >> INVITE ACK >> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 >> From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx >> To: >> Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 >> CSeq: 485 INVITE >> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> FS INVITE (Note the from address being wrong) >> INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144:5063 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144;rport;branch=z9hG4bKeeQvcyZ70SDUg >> Max-Forwards: 69 >> From: "1301" ;tag=rHyS0Z3B61arN >> To: >> Call-ID: 84df47f9-0cb7-122f-13b5-5cff350d9de5 >> CSeq: 13447852 INVITE >> Contact: >> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE >> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >> Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, >> sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, >> refer >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Disposition: session >> Content-Length: 315 >> X-FS-Support: update_display >> Remote-Party-ID: "1301" >> ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off >> >> USER CONFIGURATIONS >> >> 1300.xml >> >> ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? >> >> >> 1301.xml >> >> ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? >> >> >> IMSI641104878332498.xml >> >> ?> number-alias="1302"> >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? >> >> >> DIALPLAN >> >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > !DSPAM:4df12cbe32761899399581! > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From OSchenk at wnr.com.au Fri Jun 10 08:19:57 2011 From: OSchenk at wnr.com.au (Schenk, Oliver) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:19:57 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] CISCO 2811 - FreeSwitch - IVR Message-ID: Hey all, I have successfully managed the following setup ... at least to a certain extent. Phone line -> CISCO VIC2-4FXO -> CISCO 2811 -> Sip -> Windows Server 2008 -> FreeSwitch -> Managed IVR (IAppPlugin) When I dial say the phone line's number (49794) it connects me to extension 1024 which has the managed C#.NET IVR sitting behind it. That works fine while everything is happy. However, when I hang up my phone. My IVR is still happily talking to no one until the relevant timeouts expire. Is this the normal way to implement it? Just wait for timeout? Or do I have some CISCO configuration issues? Shouldn't the CISCO tell FreeSwitch that "Hey ... the guy on the line has put down his phone receiver so you can end your session now."? Any comments? voice-port 0/3/0 input gain 10 output attenuation 10 no comfort-noise cptone AU connection plar opx 1024 impedance complex1 ! voice-port 0/3/1 ! voice-port 0/3/2 ! voice-port 0/3/3 ! ! ! ! ! dial-peer voice 2 voip destination-pattern .T session protocol sipv2 session target sip-server session transport udp dtmf-relay rtp-nte codec g711ulaw no vad ! ! sip-ua credentials username 1000 password * ******* realm default authentication username 1000 password * ******** retry invite 2 retry register 10 timers connect 100 registrar ipv4:192.168.255.**:5060 expires 3600 sip-server ipv4:192.168.255.**:5060 ! Regards, Oliver Schenk Control Systems Engineer WestNet Rail NOTICE - This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only for the use of the person to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then you have received this e-mail in error; please advise us immediately if this is the case. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of WestNet Rail. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/cfe612d9/attachment.html From sharad at coraltele.com Fri Jun 10 09:17:35 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:47:35 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how many areread & how many are unread in Inbox References: Message-ID: <26DE8A8116AB4F5BB31F0675DDBFD1BF@sharad> Thanks for your reply.. vm_boxcount is not helping me. I think I did not explain my query correctly. Let me explain again - There are some messages in INBOX of a user. Some of them are read & some of them are new which are not read. As of now, FS marks a message as SAVED message when user dials 2 while listening or does not dial anything. But in my case, neither user dialed 2 to save the msg, nor he waited for auto save. rather waiting, user pressed the corresponding DTMF for next listening message. means user has read but this mesaage is not saved. So my query is - Is there any way to differentiate between READ / UNREAD messages while messages are INBOX only. Hope it is clear now. Thanks & regards Sharad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Benke" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 4:22 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how many areread & how many are unread in Inbox > On 9 June 2011 19:43, Robert Hadley wrote: >> >> vm_boxcount user at domain|[new|saved|new-urgent|saved-urgent|all]] >> >> freeswitch at internal> vm_boxcount 2002 at 192.168.xx.xx|all >> 5:0:0:0 > > Hmm, i thought vm_boxcount is broken resp. means something different - > only displays 0 on the mailbox above(While there is 1 new and 1 saved > msg, as displayed by vm_list) :-/ > > > From u2nsam at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 09:59:52 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:29:52 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] fetch password Message-ID: hello, If i want to store the vm pasword in database , how should i go ahead with the dialplan to fetch the pasword. Regards San -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/3bbd55c9/attachment.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 10:03:54 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:03:54 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how many areread & how many are unread in Inbox In-Reply-To: <26DE8A8116AB4F5BB31F0675DDBFD1BF@sharad> References: <26DE8A8116AB4F5BB31F0675DDBFD1BF@sharad> Message-ID: > So my query is - Is there any way to differentiate between READ / UNREAD > messages while messages are INBOX only. Have you checked if the "read_epoch"-parameter in the voicemail_msgs-table in voicemail_default.db or your odbc-db is set to a "real" value when this happens(Also displayed above with vm_list)? You could then simply query the db (e.g. "select count(*) from voicemail_msgs where read_epoch>0;") instead of using the commands above. From benkokakao at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 10:06:39 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:06:39 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] fetch password In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > If i want to store the vm pasword in database , how should i go ahead with > the dialplan to fetch the pasword. I'm not sure if i correctly understand your request. If you want to save the voicemail-settings in a db rather than a directory-file, there's a schema for that(http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_voicemail#Database_Schema), the voicemail-app then fetches the password directly from the db via odbc. Does that help you? Regards, Christian From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Fri Jun 10 10:32:54 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:32:54 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Default Install Extensions NEWBIE Question In-Reply-To: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> References: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> Message-ID: Pretty much, but wouldn't it be better to give it a try ? Requirements vary... David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 09/06/2011 ? 19:10, Mehma Sarja a ?crit : > The default install on ubuntu renders a working system servicing 19 > extensions. Can I use this as-is in a production environment which only > requires within-LAN, inter-departmental voice connectivity? > > Mehma > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/41884384/attachment-0001.html From sharad at coraltele.com Fri Jun 10 10:38:52 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:08:52 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how manyareread & how many are unread in Inbox References: <26DE8A8116AB4F5BB31F0675DDBFD1BF@sharad> Message-ID: Thanks for reply, Yes, I have checked this. The value of read_epoch is changed only if message is saved. If message is not saved (only listen), than it remain 0 only. Plz advice further.. Regards Sharad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Benke" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 11:33 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how manyareread & how many are unread in Inbox >> So my query is - Is there any way to differentiate between READ / UNREAD >> messages while messages are INBOX only. > > Have you checked if the "read_epoch"-parameter in the > voicemail_msgs-table in voicemail_default.db or your odbc-db is set to > a "real" value when this happens(Also displayed above with vm_list)? > You could then simply query the db (e.g. "select count(*) from > voicemail_msgs where read_epoch>0;") instead of using the commands > above. > > > From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Fri Jun 10 10:54:55 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:54:55 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues In-Reply-To: References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58301@cooper> <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56421@cooper> Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58661@cooper> In that case, just add the cidr stuff to the global acl "domain" (acl.conf.xml under autoload_configs), this is used by default by the sofia internal profile, or create a new acl the the profile uses. Something like; This will make all calls from these IP's just to pass in. They won't be detected as any user, so the original From will be used when bridging the outgoing call. /Peter -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r Kurtis Heimerl Skickat: den 10 juni 2011 05:29 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues I think you're right. Thanks! Removing IMSI641104278340883 from that domain caused FS to fall back to the previous user, 1301. Unfortunately, I can't lets the agents auth, or use different IPs, all are coming from the same application that doesn't support auth. I'm going to try adding each to their own unique domain, hopefully that'll help. It might not though, considering they're all coming from the same IP. Do you have any other idea how to fix this? On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Peter Olsson wrote: > I'm guessing your problem might be related to the fact that you use the cidr attribute on the user's - with the same IP's for all of them. If I understand these correctly (never used it this way myself) they're supposed to be used to authenticate a user for a specific IP, instead of challenge auth, and since the same IP is provided for all of them they might overwrite eachother, and the last one will be the one it matches. > > Also, read more on http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Acl#Users. > > Try removing the cidr attribute, and let the agents auth instead, or use different IP's for the users. > > /Peter > ________________________________________ > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Kurtis Heimerl [kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu] > Skickat: den 9 juni 2011 22:21 > Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help > ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues > > Here you go: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16468 > > For this packet trace I decided to have profile "C" in the UA > directory. This causes FS to send the second invite (which should be > A->B) as C->B, rather than B->B, as it does if that UA is not present. > ?Neither is correct, this just makes it a little easier to grep. > > User 1302 first appears in that invite, I don't see any other log > items talking about 1302 at all. It's worth noting that 1302's user > name (IMSI641104878332498) DOES appear in the SDP packet loaded in the > first (A->B) invite, but I'm pretty certain FS should not be using > that information for SIP addressing. Again, if I remove user > IMSI641104878332498 from the directory, FS just switched to returning > with user 1301, it doesn't fix the issue. > > It's very likely I'm massaging some code that's not commonly used, as > I may be making a small mistake here or there in the original SIP > invite. These two lines: > 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6674 IP 192.168.1.144 > Approved by acl "domains[IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144]". Access > Granted. > 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6803 Authenticating user > IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144 > Are particularly curious. I'm not sure if those are a response to the > incoming invite (which would be incorrect) or not. It should be > approving user 1300 at 192.168.1.144, if anyone. > > Thanks! > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Peter Olsson > wrote: >> Please pastebin a complete debug log, with "sofia global siptrace on", to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org. >> >> I'm pretty sure this is not a bug in FS, if it was, we would have lots of people complaining... >> >> /Peter >> >> >> -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >> Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r Kurtis Heimerl >> Skickat: den 8 juni 2011 23:32 >> Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues >> >> Hello Freeswitch-users! >> >> I'm currently writing a SIP middlebox that intercepts sip messages and >> changes their username. The reasons for this are complicated and >> somewhat outside of the scope of this discussion. However, I've come >> upon a very strange issue: when making a phone-to-phone call across >> freeswitch; it is connecting the wrong user. I'm fairly well convinced >> this is a bug, but I thought I'd send the issue here and see if it's >> anything I'm obviously doing wrong. >> >> Basically, FS sees a SIP message from a registered UA (call it A) >> inviting another registered user to a call (B). This is acked >> correctly (a TRYING message). FS then responds by inviting B into a >> call with some OTHER user C. C is not mentioned at any point in the >> initial SIP messages (as verified by wireshark). Even more strangely, >> if I remove user C from FS (by removing their config file) FS responds >> to the invite by inviting B into a call with itself. In each case, the >> appropriate from header in the invite should be the original caller A. >> ?It's worth noting that I am not monkeying with the RTP packets at >> all, but my understanding is that SIP signalling shouldn't be affected >> by that. >> >> My general guess is that I'm messing up the naming somehow, and FS is >> running an algorithm to guess at who the call originator is. However, >> the naming must be roughly correct; Asterisk is able to handle this >> call just fine. I've included a sip trace of the second situation (A >> calls B, FS invites B to a call with itself) >> >> For the record A:1300 >> B:1301 >> C:IMSI641104878332498 >> >> REGISTER MESSAGE (Which works fine) >> >> REGISTER sip:192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >> From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui >> To: 1300 >> Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 >> CSeq: 91 REGISTER >> Contact: ;expires=7200 >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> SIP/2.0 200 OK >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >> From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui >> To: 1300 ;tag=jU64NXypQc57F >> Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 >> CSeq: 91 REGISTER >> Contact: ;expires=7200 >> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:02:04 GMT >> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE >> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> SIP TRACE (A -> B, B -> B response) >> >> INITIAL INVITE >> INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 >> From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx >> To: >> Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 >> CSeq: 485 INVITE >> Contact: ;expires=3600 >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> Content-Length: 143 >> >> INVITE ACK >> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 >> From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx >> To: >> Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 >> CSeq: 485 INVITE >> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> FS INVITE (Note the from address being wrong) >> INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144:5063 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144;rport;branch=z9hG4bKeeQvcyZ70SDUg >> Max-Forwards: 69 >> From: "1301" ;tag=rHyS0Z3B61arN >> To: >> Call-ID: 84df47f9-0cb7-122f-13b5-5cff350d9de5 >> CSeq: 13447852 INVITE >> Contact: >> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE >> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >> Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, >> sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, >> refer >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Disposition: session >> Content-Length: 315 >> X-FS-Support: update_display >> Remote-Party-ID: "1301" >> ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off >> >> USER CONFIGURATIONS >> >> 1300.xml >> >> ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? >> >> >> 1301.xml >> >> ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? >> >> >> IMSI641104878332498.xml >> >> ?> number-alias="1302"> >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> ? >> >> >> DIALPLAN >> >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4df1916532761203114732! From u2nsam at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 11:38:16 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:08:16 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] fetch password In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: How Does it access database , does we need to write some syntax somewhere, so that FS fetches it out from DB. Regds Sam On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Christian Benke wrote: > > If i want to store the vm pasword in database , how should i go ahead > with > > the dialplan to fetch the pasword. > > > I'm not sure if i correctly understand your request. If you want to > save the voicemail-settings in a db rather than a directory-file, > there's a schema for > that(http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_voicemail#Database_Schema), > the voicemail-app then fetches the password directly from the db via > odbc. Does that help you? > > Regards, > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/e08ab3f4/attachment.html From nazim.aghabayov at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 11:41:44 2011 From: nazim.aghabayov at gmail.com (Nazim Aghabayov) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:41:44 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK In-Reply-To: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> Message-ID: <4DF1CAB8.3070706@gmail.com> Hello John, I'm not an ISDN expert, but have some experience with PRI. Have you checked the line? Sometimes bad physical interconnects makes line noisy. Channels going up and down may indicate a physical line problem or inadequate grounding (or mixed signal / common grounds). I would disable hardware echo-canellation and hw. dtmf during the troubleshooting. On PRI it's possible to trace the D channel with "wanpipemon -i w1g1 -pcap -pcap_file isdn.pcap -prot ISDN -full -systime -c trd". It should be supported on BRI too, look through wanpipemon manual. Best Regards, Nazim On 06/07/2011 02:36 AM, John wrote: > Hello, > > I have just set up a FreeSWITCH box with a Sangoma B700 connected to 2 x > ISDN2e lines (each 2B+D, so 4 voice channels) in UK, so supplied by BT > Openreach. There are a number of anomalies that I am trying to solve. > [One of these is that 1 line is dead, but that is for BT Openreach to > resolve rather than anyone on this list.] > > I have a few questions, but as they are all related, I hope you don't > mind them in one post. Some basics first. The box is an Atom dual-core > with 2GB of memory and a Sangoma B700 card. It's built with Ubuntu > 10.04.2 LTS server 64-bit, patched and up to date, and also runs dhcpd, > lighttpd and sshd. I built the Sangoma ISDN libraries and FreeSWITCH > using the latest git versions I could ('make current' about 2 weeks > ago). We have incoming and outgoing calls working, but some incoming > calls ring in the caller's ear, but nothing appears on the FreeSWITCH > console, and others fail. Rebooting the server cures this. We have had > problems with lines being disconnected and then reconnected, and it > seems that FreeTDM/wanrouter/whatever doesn't recognise previously > disconnected lines coming back into use, because a reboot finds lines > that were previously reported disconnected ('wanrouter status' or 'ftdm > list'). We have ongoing problems with one line that is 'disconnected' > (wanpipe2/wp2) but the queries I am describing below apply equally when > both lines are connected and working. > > 1. There seems to be a lot of ISDN 'chatter' with channels going up and > down all the time even when the switch is completely idle. Is this > normal? Here is my /log 7 showing two of the cycles (which appear to be > about 50s apart): > > 2011-06-06 22:01:54.992467 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 > [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect > initiated(263) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:748 > [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: Down(261): Dchan(285) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling > changed to :DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling > changed to :DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling > changed to :DOWN > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 > Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:1) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 > Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 > [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with > F-bit = 1(258) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 > Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 > [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 > Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.912462 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 > [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect > initiated(263) > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 > [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with > F-bit = 1(258) > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 > Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 > Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 > [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 > [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 > [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling > changed to :UP > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel > sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] > 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling > changed to :UP > freeswitch at internal> ftdm list > +OK > span: 1 (wp1) > type: Sangoma (ISDN) > physical_status: ok > signaling_status: UP > chan_count: 3 > dialplan: XML > context: public > dial_regex: > fail_dial_regex: > hold_music: > analog_options: none > +OK > span: 2 (wp2) > type: Sangoma (ISDN) > physical_status: alarmed > signaling_status: DOWN > chan_count: 3 > dialplan: XML > context: public > dial_regex: > fail_dial_regex: > hold_music: > analog_options: none > +OK > span: 3 (FXS) > type: analog > physical_status: ok > signaling_status: UP > chan_count: 2 > dialplan: XML > context: default > dial_regex: > fail_dial_regex: > hold_music: > analog_options: none > > > # wanrouter status > > Devices currently active: > wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 > > > Wanpipe Config: > > Device name | Protocol Map | Adapter | IRQ | Slot/IO | If's | CLK | > Baud rate | > wanpipe1 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | > 0 | > wanpipe2 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | > 0 | > wanpipe3 | N/A | A200/A400/B600/B700/B800| 20 | 0 | > 1 | N/A | 0 | > > Wanrouter Status: > > Device name | Protocol | Station | Status | > wanpipe1 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Connected | > wanpipe2 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Disconnected | > wanpipe3 | A-ANALOG | N/A | Connected | > > > # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanrouter.rc > #!/bin/sh > # .. comments snipped ... > ROUTER_BOOT=YES > WAN_CONF_DIR=/etc/wanpipe > WAN_INTR_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/interfaces > WAN_BIN_DIR=/usr/sbin > WAN_LOG=/var/log/wanrouter > WAN_LOCK=/var/lock/wanrouter > WAN_LOCK_DIR=/var/lock > WAN_IP_FORWARD=NO > NEW_IF_TYPE=NO > WAN_LIB_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/lib > WAN_ADSL_LIST=/etc/wanpipe/wan_adsl.list > WAN_ANNEXG_LOAD=NO > WAN_SCTP_LOAD=NO > WAN_LIP_LOAD=NO > WAN_DYN_WANCONFIG=NO > WAN_SCRIPTS_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/scripts > WAN_FIRMWARE_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/firmware > WAN_DEVICES_REV_STOP_ORDER=YES > WAN_DEVICES="wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 " > > # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanpipe1.conf > #================================================ > # WANPIPE1 Configuration File > #================================================ > # > # Note: This file was generated automatically > # by /usr/local/sbin/setup-sangoma program. > # > # If you want to edit this file, it is > # recommended that you use wancfg program > # to do so. > #================================================ > # Sangoma Technologies Inc. > #================================================ > > > > > [devices] > wanpipe1 = WAN_AFT_ISDN_BRI, Comment > > [interfaces] > w1g1 = wanpipe1, , TDM_VOICE_API, Comment > > [wanpipe1] > CARD_TYPE = AFT > S514CPU = A > CommPort = PRI > AUTO_PCISLOT = NO > PCISLOT = 0 > PCIBUS = 5 > FE_MEDIA = BRI > FE_LINE = 1 > TDMV_LAW = ALAW > RM_BRI_CLOCK_MASTER = NO > MTU = 1500 > UDPPORT = 9000 > TTL = 255 > IGNORE_FRONT_END = NO > TDMV_SPAN = 1 > TE_AIS_MAINTENANCE = NO #NO: defualt YES: Start port in AIS > Blue Alarm and keep line down > #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_off to > disable AIS maintenance mode > #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_on to > enable AIS maintenance mode > TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES # YES: receive dtmf events from hardware > TDMV_HW_FAX_DETECT = YES # YES: receive fax 1100hz events from > hardware > HWEC_OPERATION_MODE = OCT_NORMAL # OCT_NORMAL: echo cancelation > enabled with nlp (default) > # OCT_SPEECH: improves software > tone detection by disabling NLP (echo possible) > # OCT_NO_ECHO:disables echo > cancelation but allows VQE/tone functions. > HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = NO # NO: default YES: remove dtmf out of > incoming media (must have hwdtmf enabled) > HWEC_NOISE_REDUCTION = NO # NO: default YES: reduces noise on the > line - could break fax > HWEC_ACUSTIC_ECHO = NO # NO: default YES: enables acustic echo > cancelation > HWEC_NLP_DISABLE = NO # NO: default YES: guarantees software > tone detection (possible echo) > HWEC_TX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio > level to be maintained (-20 default) > HWEC_RX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio > level to be maintained (-20 default) > HWEC_TX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be > applied to tx signal > HWEC_RX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be > applied to tx signal > > [w1g1] > ACTIVE_CH = ALL > TDMV_HWEC = YES > MTU = 80 > > ... and wanpipe2 was also automatically generated so just has '2' for > FE_LINE and TDMV_SPAN instead of '1'. > > # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/freetdm.conf > [span wanpipe wp1] > trunk_type => bri > group=1 > b-channel => 1:1-2 > d-channel => 1:3 > > [span wanpipe wp2] > trunk_type => bri > group=1 > b-channel => 2:1-2 > d-channel => 2:3 > > [span wanpipe FXS] > name => freetdm > trunk_type => fxs > group => grp2 > fxs-channel => 3:1 > > trunk_type => fxs > group => grp2 > fxs-channel => 3:2 > > # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/autoload_configs/freetdm.conf.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What other config files do I need to supply? I don't want to deluge the > list any more in my first post! > > 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. > I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from > either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be > overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. Has anyone > got this working in UK, and what is the format for the > outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? I note that > the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. > > 3. I have built FreeSWITCH from git and installed at /usr/local/... and > then followed the steps on the Ubuntu page in the Wiki to set up the run > control scripts, etc, and run FS non-root as freeswitch:daemon. With > FreeTDM, I have discovered that the /dev/wan* devices are owned by > root:root, and so are inaccessible to FS running as non-root. So for > now I have added a line in /etc/init.d/freeswitch to 'chgrp freeswitch > /dev/wan*'. This is not the most elegant solution, because 'wanrouter > restart' (which seems to be my best friend at the moment) resets the > ownership to root:root. I have tried grepping to see where the mknods > are for these devices, but have been unsuccessful. Is there a better > place to 'permanently' change the device ownership? > > Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my > Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! > > John > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From freeswitch at earthspike.net Fri Jun 10 12:01:42 2011 From: freeswitch at earthspike.net (John) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:01:42 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK In-Reply-To: <4DF1CAB8.3070706@gmail.com> References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF1CAB8.3070706@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4DF1CF66.4050700@earthspike.net> Nazim, Late last night this got resolved; sorry I didn't post then. We have had problems with the second line, and when these were fixed last night, the problem disappeared. So now I have a nice stable FreeSWITCH with the only outputs on /log 7 being SIP re-registrations. So, you are probably correct, and it was a line quality issue. I've also resolved the device permissions issue with help from Sangoma support, and will post on that/update the Ubuntu Wiki page when I get a moment, probably after the weekend. Thanks, John On 10/06/11 08:41, Nazim Aghabayov wrote: > Hello John, > > I'm not an ISDN expert, but have some experience with PRI. > Have you checked the line? Sometimes bad physical interconnects makes > line noisy. > Channels going up and down may indicate a physical line problem or > inadequate grounding (or mixed signal / common grounds). I would disable > hardware echo-canellation and hw. dtmf during the troubleshooting. > On PRI it's possible to trace the D channel with "wanpipemon -i w1g1 > -pcap -pcap_file isdn.pcap -prot ISDN -full -systime -c trd". It should > be supported on BRI too, look through wanpipemon manual. > > Best Regards, > Nazim > > > On 06/07/2011 02:36 AM, John wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have just set up a FreeSWITCH box with a Sangoma B700 connected to 2 x >> ISDN2e lines (each 2B+D, so 4 voice channels) in UK, so supplied by BT >> Openreach. There are a number of anomalies that I am trying to solve. >> [One of these is that 1 line is dead, but that is for BT Openreach to >> resolve rather than anyone on this list.] >> >> I have a few questions, but as they are all related, I hope you don't >> mind them in one post. Some basics first. The box is an Atom dual-core >> with 2GB of memory and a Sangoma B700 card. It's built with Ubuntu >> 10.04.2 LTS server 64-bit, patched and up to date, and also runs dhcpd, >> lighttpd and sshd. I built the Sangoma ISDN libraries and FreeSWITCH >> using the latest git versions I could ('make current' about 2 weeks >> ago). We have incoming and outgoing calls working, but some incoming >> calls ring in the caller's ear, but nothing appears on the FreeSWITCH >> console, and others fail. Rebooting the server cures this. We have had >> problems with lines being disconnected and then reconnected, and it >> seems that FreeTDM/wanrouter/whatever doesn't recognise previously >> disconnected lines coming back into use, because a reboot finds lines >> that were previously reported disconnected ('wanrouter status' or 'ftdm >> list'). We have ongoing problems with one line that is 'disconnected' >> (wanpipe2/wp2) but the queries I am describing below apply equally when >> both lines are connected and working. >> >> 1. There seems to be a lot of ISDN 'chatter' with channels going up and >> down all the time even when the switch is completely idle. Is this >> normal? Here is my /log 7 showing two of the cycles (which appear to be >> about 50s apart): >> >> 2011-06-06 22:01:54.992467 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect >> initiated(263) >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:748 >> [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: Down(261): Dchan(285) >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >> [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to DOWN >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >> [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to DOWN >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >> [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to DOWN >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling >> changed to :DOWN >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling >> changed to :DOWN >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling >> changed to :DOWN >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 >> Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:1) >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 >> Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with >> F-bit = 1(258) >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 >> Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 >> [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >> [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >> [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >> [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 >> Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling >> changed to :UP >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling >> changed to :UP >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling >> changed to :UP >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.912462 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect >> initiated(263) >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with >> F-bit = 1(258) >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 >> Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 >> Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 >> [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >> [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >> [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >> [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling >> changed to :UP >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling >> changed to :UP >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling >> changed to :UP >> freeswitch at internal> ftdm list >> +OK >> span: 1 (wp1) >> type: Sangoma (ISDN) >> physical_status: ok >> signaling_status: UP >> chan_count: 3 >> dialplan: XML >> context: public >> dial_regex: >> fail_dial_regex: >> hold_music: >> analog_options: none >> +OK >> span: 2 (wp2) >> type: Sangoma (ISDN) >> physical_status: alarmed >> signaling_status: DOWN >> chan_count: 3 >> dialplan: XML >> context: public >> dial_regex: >> fail_dial_regex: >> hold_music: >> analog_options: none >> +OK >> span: 3 (FXS) >> type: analog >> physical_status: ok >> signaling_status: UP >> chan_count: 2 >> dialplan: XML >> context: default >> dial_regex: >> fail_dial_regex: >> hold_music: >> analog_options: none >> >> >> # wanrouter status >> >> Devices currently active: >> wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 >> >> >> Wanpipe Config: >> >> Device name | Protocol Map | Adapter | IRQ | Slot/IO | If's | CLK | >> Baud rate | >> wanpipe1 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | >> 0 | >> wanpipe2 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | >> 0 | >> wanpipe3 | N/A | A200/A400/B600/B700/B800| 20 | 0 | >> 1 | N/A | 0 | >> >> Wanrouter Status: >> >> Device name | Protocol | Station | Status | >> wanpipe1 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Connected | >> wanpipe2 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Disconnected | >> wanpipe3 | A-ANALOG | N/A | Connected | >> >> >> # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanrouter.rc >> #!/bin/sh >> # .. comments snipped ... >> ROUTER_BOOT=YES >> WAN_CONF_DIR=/etc/wanpipe >> WAN_INTR_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/interfaces >> WAN_BIN_DIR=/usr/sbin >> WAN_LOG=/var/log/wanrouter >> WAN_LOCK=/var/lock/wanrouter >> WAN_LOCK_DIR=/var/lock >> WAN_IP_FORWARD=NO >> NEW_IF_TYPE=NO >> WAN_LIB_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/lib >> WAN_ADSL_LIST=/etc/wanpipe/wan_adsl.list >> WAN_ANNEXG_LOAD=NO >> WAN_SCTP_LOAD=NO >> WAN_LIP_LOAD=NO >> WAN_DYN_WANCONFIG=NO >> WAN_SCRIPTS_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/scripts >> WAN_FIRMWARE_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/firmware >> WAN_DEVICES_REV_STOP_ORDER=YES >> WAN_DEVICES="wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 " >> >> # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanpipe1.conf >> #================================================ >> # WANPIPE1 Configuration File >> #================================================ >> # >> # Note: This file was generated automatically >> # by /usr/local/sbin/setup-sangoma program. >> # >> # If you want to edit this file, it is >> # recommended that you use wancfg program >> # to do so. >> #================================================ >> # Sangoma Technologies Inc. >> #================================================ >> >> >> >> >> [devices] >> wanpipe1 = WAN_AFT_ISDN_BRI, Comment >> >> [interfaces] >> w1g1 = wanpipe1, , TDM_VOICE_API, Comment >> >> [wanpipe1] >> CARD_TYPE = AFT >> S514CPU = A >> CommPort = PRI >> AUTO_PCISLOT = NO >> PCISLOT = 0 >> PCIBUS = 5 >> FE_MEDIA = BRI >> FE_LINE = 1 >> TDMV_LAW = ALAW >> RM_BRI_CLOCK_MASTER = NO >> MTU = 1500 >> UDPPORT = 9000 >> TTL = 255 >> IGNORE_FRONT_END = NO >> TDMV_SPAN = 1 >> TE_AIS_MAINTENANCE = NO #NO: defualt YES: Start port in AIS >> Blue Alarm and keep line down >> #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_off to >> disable AIS maintenance mode >> #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_on to >> enable AIS maintenance mode >> TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES # YES: receive dtmf events from hardware >> TDMV_HW_FAX_DETECT = YES # YES: receive fax 1100hz events from >> hardware >> HWEC_OPERATION_MODE = OCT_NORMAL # OCT_NORMAL: echo cancelation >> enabled with nlp (default) >> # OCT_SPEECH: improves software >> tone detection by disabling NLP (echo possible) >> # OCT_NO_ECHO:disables echo >> cancelation but allows VQE/tone functions. >> HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = NO # NO: default YES: remove dtmf out of >> incoming media (must have hwdtmf enabled) >> HWEC_NOISE_REDUCTION = NO # NO: default YES: reduces noise on the >> line - could break fax >> HWEC_ACUSTIC_ECHO = NO # NO: default YES: enables acustic echo >> cancelation >> HWEC_NLP_DISABLE = NO # NO: default YES: guarantees software >> tone detection (possible echo) >> HWEC_TX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio >> level to be maintained (-20 default) >> HWEC_RX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio >> level to be maintained (-20 default) >> HWEC_TX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be >> applied to tx signal >> HWEC_RX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be >> applied to tx signal >> >> [w1g1] >> ACTIVE_CH = ALL >> TDMV_HWEC = YES >> MTU = 80 >> >> ... and wanpipe2 was also automatically generated so just has '2' for >> FE_LINE and TDMV_SPAN instead of '1'. >> >> # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/freetdm.conf >> [span wanpipe wp1] >> trunk_type => bri >> group=1 >> b-channel => 1:1-2 >> d-channel => 1:3 >> >> [span wanpipe wp2] >> trunk_type => bri >> group=1 >> b-channel => 2:1-2 >> d-channel => 2:3 >> >> [span wanpipe FXS] >> name => freetdm >> trunk_type => fxs >> group => grp2 >> fxs-channel => 3:1 >> >> trunk_type => fxs >> group => grp2 >> fxs-channel => 3:2 >> >> # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/autoload_configs/freetdm.conf.xml >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What other config files do I need to supply? I don't want to deluge the >> list any more in my first post! >> >> 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. >> I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from >> either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be >> overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. Has anyone >> got this working in UK, and what is the format for the >> outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? I note that >> the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. >> >> 3. I have built FreeSWITCH from git and installed at /usr/local/... and >> then followed the steps on the Ubuntu page in the Wiki to set up the run >> control scripts, etc, and run FS non-root as freeswitch:daemon. With >> FreeTDM, I have discovered that the /dev/wan* devices are owned by >> root:root, and so are inaccessible to FS running as non-root. So for >> now I have added a line in /etc/init.d/freeswitch to 'chgrp freeswitch >> /dev/wan*'. This is not the most elegant solution, because 'wanrouter >> restart' (which seems to be my best friend at the moment) resets the >> ownership to root:root. I have tried grepping to see where the mknods >> are for these devices, but have been unsuccessful. Is there a better >> place to 'permanently' change the device ownership? >> >> Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my >> Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! >> >> John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From benkokakao at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 12:29:47 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:29:47 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] fetch password In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 10 June 2011 09:38, Sam wrote: > How Does it access database , does we need to write some syntax somewhere, > so that FS fetches it out from DB. Hi! I'm still not sure if i understand your question. The default configuration uses a sqlite-DB which is saved in /usr/local/freeswitch/db/voicemail_default.db. The voicemail-application accesses this db without additional configuration. If you however want to save the voicemail-preferences in a non-embedded DB like PostgreSQL or MySQL, you have to configure odbc on your host to access them plus activate odbc in voicemail.conf.xml. Please read the following pages if that is what you want to do: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_voicemail#odbc-dsn http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Using_ODBC_in_the_core hth, Christian From benkokakao at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 12:44:28 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:44:28 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know how manyareread & how many are unread in Inbox In-Reply-To: References: <26DE8A8116AB4F5BB31F0675DDBFD1BF@sharad> Message-ID: > Plz advice further.. Sorry, no idea then. But i assume, if a user just listens to a message but doesn't archive it right away, he want's to listen to it again at a later time, so the message should remain "new" - therefore the behaviour you report is not wrong imho(not updating "read_epoch" is not beautiful though). From mariusz_kolo at wp.pl Fri Jun 10 13:02:20 2011 From: mariusz_kolo at wp.pl (=?UTF-8?B?TWFyaXVzeiBLb8WCb2R6aWVqY3p5aw==?=) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:02:20 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Logical OR in conditions In-Reply-To: <43439B44-F6EE-448F-9CB4-58D15ACAE9F6@mralston.com> References: <43439B44-F6EE-448F-9CB4-58D15ACAE9F6@mralston.com> Message-ID: <4DF1DD9C.4080907@wp.pl> Hi maybe only one condition something like ^[\*7]21[\*7]([0-9]+)[#9]$ - this allows to use combination of *#79 or ^\*21\*([0-9]+)#$|^7217([0-9]+)9$ - this is more restrict, because u can use *# or 79 but not 7# or *9 this is solution for OR in your code. W dniu 2011-06-09 00:44, Matthew Ralston pisze: > Hi, > > What is the correct condition->break value to use in order to create a logical OR with conditions? > > I have two extensions which I'd like to merge into one. I'd like the actions to be run if either of the conditions matches: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the result would be something like: > > > > > > > > > > I can't seem to get it to work and my brain is melting trying to wrap my head around the different break values. > > Cheers, > > Matt > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From shouldbeq931 at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 13:08:25 2011 From: shouldbeq931 at gmail.com (shouldbe q931) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:08:25 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UK ISDN outgoing CLI (was Re: FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK) In-Reply-To: <4DF10C83.6020803@earthspike.net> References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF10C83.6020803@earthspike.net> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:10 PM, John wrote: > [I've forked this thread as it really should have been 3 separate > threads to start with.] > > Thanks, > > I have tried every combination I can think of, except 10 digits which I > will give a go. ?That makes sense as in the general case it would permit > non-geographical numbers to be presented. > > The lines are provided as 2 x ISDN2e with a lead number covering all 4 > channels. ?The NTE8s are labelled 1-2 and 3-4, so not separate > individual lines, I thnk. > > We currently have a Single Number DDI in addition, and hope to increase > that to 2 very soon; the 3 numbers between them will serve 3 separate > business units, so we want to be able to present the correct outbound > CLI from each business unit. ?We also have a remote call forward from > another number to the lead number, but presenting that really would be > CLI spoofing, so I am not expecting that to be permissible. But I would > expect those that are directly allocated to the 2 lines/4 channels to be > allowed to be presented. > > John > > On 09/06/11 08:27, shouldbe q931 wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:36 PM, John ?wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >> >>> 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. >>> I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from >>> either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be >>> overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. ?Has anyone >>> got this working in UK, and what is the format for the >>> outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? ?I note that >>> the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. >>> >> >>> Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my >>> Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! >>> >>> John >>> >> I can only comment on the BT part. >> >> If they are two individual lines, you're out of luck with BT, as they >> do not allow CLI spoofing, which this would be. >> >> I would suggest sending BT the same number of digits that they send >> you, if that doesn't work try 10 digits. If ?you are not sending the >> "correct" number of digits for a valid DDI on the trunk, then they >> will send the lead number for the trunk. >> >> Cheers >> >> _______________________________________________ I know that this might sound like heresy :-) but have you checked spoken to BT and asked them if CLIP and CLOP on the lines ? I think CLOP is outbound and CLIP is inbound, but I might have it the wrong way round... From potxoka at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 13:31:02 2011 From: potxoka at gmail.com (Antonio) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:31:02 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proxy traffic security In-Reply-To: References: <4DEFF3FA.5050500@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4DF1E456.1030607@gmail.com> Hi, If I had thought also use iptables, but it was to know if exists something better to put the ip's (to prevent IP spoofing). Thanks. Greetings Anto El 09/06/11 16:01, Christian Benke escribi?: > ACLs definitely would not hurt. Also think about setting up a simple > firewall(e.g. Shorewall or just plain IPTables) to limit the access to > the ip's which MUST have access(e.g. SIP-Provider IPs), you can never > be sure if a software(like FreeSWITCH) doesn't have a bug that could > be exploited. > > Cheers, > Christian From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 13:46:00 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:46:00 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proxy traffic security In-Reply-To: <4DF1E456.1030607@gmail.com> References: <4DEFF3FA.5050500@gmail.com> <4DF1E456.1030607@gmail.com> Message-ID: Iptables will allow you to block all but your proxies from sending. It should work (slightly) faster than the FS ACL because it'll block it earlier in the packet processing. -Steve On 10 June 2011 10:31, Antonio wrote: > Hi, > > If I had thought also use iptables, but it was to know if exists > something better to put the ip's (to prevent IP spoofing). Thanks. > > Greetings > Anto > > El 09/06/11 16:01, Christian Benke escribi?: > > ACLs definitely would not hurt. Also think about setting up a simple > > firewall(e.g. Shorewall or just plain IPTables) to limit the access to > > the ip's which MUST have access(e.g. SIP-Provider IPs), you can never > > be sure if a software(like FreeSWITCH) doesn't have a bug that could > > be exploited. > > > > Cheers, > > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/fc932b36/attachment.html From potxoka at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 13:37:49 2011 From: potxoka at gmail.com (Antonio) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:37:49 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proxy traffic security In-Reply-To: References: <4DEFF3FA.5050500@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4DF1E5ED.2080509@gmail.com> Hi, Thank you very much for the reply, I will look at this solution. Best regards Anto El 09/06/11 16:17, Steven Ayre escribi?: > You can create an ACL listing proxy IPs then set the proxy-acl > parameter on the SIP profile.call > > If your proxy can add a X-AUTH-IP header to the INVITE containing the > caller's IP then FS will use that IP to check against ACLs instead of > the IP received from, if the IP received from is on the proxy ACL. > That way you can still authenticate callers with ACLs behind a proxy, > although you're trusting your proxy to set that header correctly. The > proxy-acl setting means only your proxy can set the X-AUTH-IP header, > it'll be ignored on calls from any other IP. > > -Steve From freeswitch at earthspike.net Fri Jun 10 14:22:50 2011 From: freeswitch at earthspike.net (John) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:22:50 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UK ISDN outgoing CLI (was Re: FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK) In-Reply-To: References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF10C83.6020803@earthspike.net> Message-ID: <4DF1F07A.5000200@earthspike.net> Shouldbe, You won't be burned at the stake for heresy and are probably right that this is the problem, as we have had delays in getting CLIP implemented. From your comment I assume that COLP is not automatically enabled (even though I am paying for additional SNDDIs) but has to be ordered specifically. Our service provider is on to it, and I am waiting till CLIP/COLP is applied before doing any more testing. I'll post here with the results. John On 10/06/11 10:08, shouldbe q931 wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:10 PM, John wrote: >> [I've forked this thread as it really should have been 3 separate >> threads to start with.] >> >> Thanks, >> >> I have tried every combination I can think of, except 10 digits which I >> will give a go. That makes sense as in the general case it would permit >> non-geographical numbers to be presented. >> >> The lines are provided as 2 x ISDN2e with a lead number covering all 4 >> channels. The NTE8s are labelled 1-2 and 3-4, so not separate >> individual lines, I thnk. >> >> We currently have a Single Number DDI in addition, and hope to increase >> that to 2 very soon; the 3 numbers between them will serve 3 separate >> business units, so we want to be able to present the correct outbound >> CLI from each business unit. We also have a remote call forward from >> another number to the lead number, but presenting that really would be >> CLI spoofing, so I am not expecting that to be permissible. But I would >> expect those that are directly allocated to the 2 lines/4 channels to be >> allowed to be presented. >> >> John >> >> On 09/06/11 08:27, shouldbe q931 wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:36 PM, John wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>> >>>> 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. >>>> I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from >>>> either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be >>>> overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. Has anyone >>>> got this working in UK, and what is the format for the >>>> outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? I note that >>>> the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. >>>> >>> >>>> Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my >>>> Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>> I can only comment on the BT part. >>> >>> If they are two individual lines, you're out of luck with BT, as they >>> do not allow CLI spoofing, which this would be. >>> >>> I would suggest sending BT the same number of digits that they send >>> you, if that doesn't work try 10 digits. If you are not sending the >>> "correct" number of digits for a valid DDI on the trunk, then they >>> will send the lead number for the trunk. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > I know that this might sound like heresy :-) but have you checked > spoken to BT and asked them if CLIP and CLOP on the lines ? > > I think CLOP is outbound and CLIP is inbound, but I might have it the > wrong way round... > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Fri Jun 10 14:44:40 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:44:40 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to redirect $${sounds_dir} ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE587AA@cooper> This is defined in vars.xml in the conf folder. /Peter Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r jesse Skickat: den 9 juni 2011 23:31 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] how to redirect $${sounds_dir} ? I would like to pint sounds_dir to a different location, but it seems freeswitch doesn't support --sounds_dir as command line arguments. please let me know how to re-define sounds_dir? thanks! !DSPAM:4df13db632761312720727! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/fe3c4ead/attachment.html From kris at kriskinc.com Fri Jun 10 17:40:31 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] CISCO 2811 - FreeSwitch - IVR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Oliver, This is relatively common with POTS interfaces. Here's an old Cisco article but it should still be relevant: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653/technologies_tech_note09186a00800ae2d1.shtml On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Schenk, Oliver wrote: > Hey all, > > > > I have successfully managed the following setup ? at least to a certain > extent. > > > > Phone line -> CISCO VIC2-4FXO -> CISCO 2811 -> Sip -> Windows Server 2008 -> > FreeSwitch -> Managed IVR (IAppPlugin) > > > > When I dial say the phone line?s number (49794) it connects me to extension > 1024 which has the managed C#.NET IVR sitting behind it. That works fine > while everything is happy. However, when I hang up my phone. My IVR is still > happily talking to no one until the relevant timeouts expire. Is this the > normal way to implement it? Just wait for timeout? Or do I have some CISCO > configuration issues? > > > > Shouldn?t the CISCO tell FreeSwitch that ?Hey ? the guy on the line has put > down his phone receiver so you can end your session now.?? > > > > > > Any comments? > > > > voice-port 0/3/0 > > ?input gain 10 > > ?output attenuation 10 > > ?no comfort-noise > > ?cptone AU > > ?connection plar opx 1024 > > ?impedance complex1 > > ! > > voice-port 0/3/1 > > ! > > voice-port 0/3/2 > > ! > > voice-port 0/3/3 > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > dial-peer voice 2 voip > > ?destination-pattern .T > > ?session protocol sipv2 > > ?session target sip-server > > ?session transport udp > > ?dtmf-relay rtp-nte > > ?codec g711ulaw > > ?no vad > > ! > > ! > > sip-ua > > ?credentials username 1000 password * ******* realm default > > ?authentication username 1000 password * ******** > > ?retry invite 2 > > ?retry register 10 > > ?timers connect 100 > > ?registrar ipv4:192.168.255.**:5060 expires 3600 > > ?sip-server ipv4:192.168.255.**:5060 > > ! > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Oliver Schenk > > > > Control Systems Engineer > > > > WestNet Rail > > > > NOTICE - This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > are only for the use of the person to whom they are addressed. > If you are not the intended recipient then you have received this e-mail in > error; please advise us immediately if this is the case. > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, > except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of WestNet > Rail. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Kristian Kielhofner From Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net Fri Jun 10 18:00:02 2011 From: Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net (Hector Geraldino) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EBBC@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Thanks for your response Michael. Finally I found the way of dialing to an external extension. What I did was just open a shell, listen in a port using nc and tried to originate a call. It worked using the syntax: originate sofia/internal/5562 at 192.168.23.104 &park As this is an outbound call (not managed by the socket application) I had to use a new inbound socket connection to connect to FS, make the call, query for the uuid and receive some events (like DTMF among others). Everything was going great, until I found two issues: - The CHANNEL_ANSWER event is always triggered, no matter if the call is actually picked up or not on my phone. I thought that maybe I can use some other event to determine if the call have been answered or not (like CHANNEL_CALLSTATE or CALL_UPDATE), but the additional information on the event headers is the same no matter if it's answered or not. - When the call is answered, and the user presses a key to accept the call, the function returns the UUID of this session to the main method. Then I tried to make the bridge between the two calls (the legA call handled by the socket application, and the legB outbound call generated in the application using an inbound connection). I using the command api uuid_bridge but this didn't work. Am I missing something here? Thanks again, Hector From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 6:13 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app Also, I don't think this is helping you: EslMessage response = sendSyncSingleLineCommand(channel, "myevents"); Look here to see what "myevents" does: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_event_socket#Special_Case_-_.27myevents.27 -MC On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Hector Geraldino > wrote: Hi Michael, Thanks for replying back. I've pasted a sample application on pastebin, the URL is: http://pastebin.com/MYusWe3V What I'm trying to do (and have partially accomplished) is: -Answer the call - Play a message - wait for a command (dtmf or voice, this is out of the sample app for the sake of keeping it short & simple) - originate a new call, wait for it to be answered and depending on an event (dtmf)... - ...do the bridge or dial another extension. The extension number is external (managed by a Cisco CCM). If I try to do the bridge from the XML dialplan it works perfect. When I try to do it from an outbound socket java application, anything happens, and almost no information is logged on FS log that I can use to decide what might be happening. Thanks again for your help. I truly appreciate it. Hector From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:47 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app I would say that you want to bridge the inbound leg to the outbound leg and use the answer confirmation variables. I recommend you pastebin a simple java app that answers the call and attempts to bridge it and also pastebin the console log. The community will take a look and see if we can help you figure out what is happening. -MC On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Hector Geraldino > wrote: Hi all, I've been playing with FS around weeks, with some level of success. Right now I'm stuck trying to dial an extension, or to bridge a call to an external extension. Briefly, the scenario is the following: - Cisco CCM forwarding SIP calls to FS - FS in outbound mode, forwarding calls to a Java application using freeswitch-esl jar The java application answers the call, says a dialogue using TTS and receives input using DTFM or speech commands; all this is working pretty well. Now I'm trying to put this call in hold, originate a call to another extension and, depending on the result (call answered, not answered, destination user presses an specific number generating an expected DTMF), I need to bridge both calls and finish the session. I try several ways to get this done with no luck yet: using api originate to make the call with different arguments ({ignore_early_media, etc). I even tried to skip this step and just do the bridge between the inbound call and the external extension, but this didn't work either. I can't see any errors thrown by FS, and the result of the command is +OK, but nothing happens, the external phone never rings. The FS log only says: [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/5655 at 192.168.8.1 [BREAK] <= this ext/IP address is from the inbound caller, not the one I'm trying to connect to. My first impression was that I might have something wrong with the originate/bridge parameters. I changed the dialplan XML file to just do the bridge, and it worked like a charm. I don't know what path to follow here. I was unable to find relevant examples on google that guides me to solve this little issue. Any advices? Thanks all, Hector _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/49202ca0/attachment-0001.html From freeswitch-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl Fri Jun 10 20:38:44 2011 From: freeswitch-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl (Patrick Lists) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:38:44 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK In-Reply-To: <4DF1CF66.4050700@earthspike.net> References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF1CAB8.3070706@gmail.com> <4DF1CF66.4050700@earthspike.net> Message-ID: <4DF24894.4090609@puzzled.xs4all.nl> On 06/10/2011 10:01 AM, John wrote: [snip] > I've also resolved the device permissions issue with help from Sangoma > support, and will post on that/update the Ubuntu Wiki page when I get a > moment, probably after the weekend. Can you please post here also what those permission issues were and how you solved them so people like me who don't use Ubuntu and have no idea which Ubuntu Wiki you refer too can learn from this too? Or possibly add it to the appropriate section on the FreeSWITCH Wiki at http://wiki.freeswitch.org Thanks and regards, Patrick From chat2jesse at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 21:40:18 2011 From: chat2jesse at gmail.com (jesse) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:40:18 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to redirect $${sounds_dir} ? In-Reply-To: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE587AA@cooper> References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE587AA@cooper> Message-ID: vars.xml only sets sound_prefix : $${sounds_dir} is like $${local_ip_v4}, automatically fetched by the application. not sure whether i can set sounds_dir in vars.xml... On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Peter Olsson < peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se> wrote: > This is defined in vars.xml in the conf folder. > > > > /Peter > > > > *Fr?n:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *F?r *jesse > *Skickat:* den 9 juni 2011 23:31 > *Till:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *?mne:* [Freeswitch-users] how to redirect $${sounds_dir} ? > > > > I would like to pint sounds_dir to a different location, but it seems > freeswitch doesn't support --sounds_dir as command line arguments. > > please let me know how to re-define sounds_dir? > > > > thanks! > > > > !DSPAM:4df13db632761312720727! > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/2b63576d/attachment.html From joaocarlosleme at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 00:26:05 2011 From: joaocarlosleme at gmail.com (Joao Leme) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:26:05 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FIFO suddenly stopped working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Anyone? Anyone else having the same issue? On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Joao Leme wrote: > Thanks Michael, but I don't know what I have to do to get it fixed. Is > there a configuration change? I'm not good at debugging and probably I > should change the subject to "How to configure FIFO properly" (hoping to be > a configuration problem). > > Below is my simple configuration for FIFO: > > fifo.conf.xml: > > lag="3">{fifo_member_wait=nowait}group/attendants@$${domain} > lag="3">{fifo_member_wait=nowait}group/sales@$${domain} > > > directory/default.xml: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dialplan/default/mydialplan.xml: putting call on fifo > > > > > > > > > data="fifo_music=$${base_dir}/sounds/music/8000/partita-no-3-in-e-major-bwv-1006-1-preludio.wav"/> > > > > It used to work but nows it only sends one call at a time, even with the > other users available. I also tried replacing the groups for users but no > luck. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> Also, check out this thread, particularly the comments from Anthony: >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2011-March/070588.html >> >> If you had a really old version of FIFO and updated then you may have >> crossed over from when caller ID was not the default to the current state >> where it is the default. >> >> -MC >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Joao Leme wrote: >> >>> Hi there, >>> No change nor updates have been made in months. Everything was working >>> great but now FIFO is not ringing the extensions while the first call is not >>> HUNG UP...meaning, first call to go to FIFO rings the agents, and one >>> person answer...when the second call comes in, it goes to fifo queue (caller >>> listens the music) but no one is aware of the call, nor even the agents that >>> are available. Only after the first call hangs up the 2nd goes in. I tried >>> troubleshooting but no help. >>> >>> What I also noticed is that before, to display the caller ID on my sip >>> client I had to use: >>> >>> >> data="origination_caller_id_number=${caller_id_number}"/> >>> >> data="origination_caller_id_name=${caller_id_name}"/> >>> >>> but now, while testing, the caller id was showing when calling >>> fifo without setting those parameters, but before it would just show the >>> fifo queue name. >>> >>> All I can say is that I can't figure out why and how to fix these >>> behavior if I have done no change to FreeSWITCH nor the config files. I also >>> tried downloading the latest GIT and got the same response. >>> >>> THANKS, >>> John >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/e2aaf5f9/attachment.html From lrobot.qq at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 13:06:35 2011 From: lrobot.qq at gmail.com (lrobot) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:06:35 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Require help for 2833 dtmf problem( application: bridge, bypass_media=true) Message-ID: Hi Freeswitch gay, I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone number. I use bypass_media mode. So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, By I notice that When LegB receive 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to caller. That make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf What wrong with that? How can fix it? Any information or help is welcome. Thanks Lrobot -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/25a935db/attachment-0001.html From stephenl at yourgolftravel.com Fri Jun 10 21:27:23 2011 From: stephenl at yourgolftravel.com (Stephen Lewis) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:27:23 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK In-Reply-To: <4DF1CF66.4050700@earthspike.net> References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF1CAB8.3070706@gmail.com> <4DF1CF66.4050700@earthspike.net> Message-ID: Hi John Would be interesting to hear whether you did something along these lines - creating /etc/udev/rules.d/80-wanpipe.rules containing SUBSYSTEM=="wanpipe", OWNER="freeswitch", GROUP="daemon" SUBSYSTEM=="wp_ec", OWNER="freeswitch", GROUP="daemon" That's what we're doing on Ubuntu 10.04.2, and it seems to work. I assume the solution currently described in the wiki[0] doesn't survive a reboot? Thanks Stephen [0] http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Quick_Start#Using_FreeTDM_with_the_.27direct_from_git.27_method_above On 10 June 2011 09:01, John wrote: > Nazim, > > Late last night this got resolved; sorry I didn't post then. ?We have > had problems with the second line, and when these were fixed last night, > the problem disappeared. ?So now I have a nice stable FreeSWITCH with > the only outputs on /log 7 being SIP re-registrations. ?So, you are > probably correct, and it was a line quality issue. > > I've also resolved the device permissions issue with help from Sangoma > support, and will post on that/update the Ubuntu Wiki page when I get a > moment, probably after the weekend. > > Thanks, > > John > > On 10/06/11 08:41, Nazim Aghabayov wrote: >> Hello John, >> >> I'm not an ISDN expert, but have some experience with PRI. >> Have you checked the line? Sometimes bad physical interconnects makes >> line noisy. >> Channels going up and down may indicate a physical line problem or >> inadequate grounding (or mixed signal / common grounds). I would disable >> hardware echo-canellation and hw. dtmf during the troubleshooting. >> On PRI it's possible to trace the D channel with "wanpipemon -i w1g1 >> -pcap -pcap_file isdn.pcap -prot ISDN -full -systime -c trd". It should >> be supported on BRI too, look through wanpipemon manual. >> >> Best Regards, >> Nazim >> >> >> On 06/07/2011 02:36 AM, John wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have just set up a FreeSWITCH box with a Sangoma B700 connected to 2 x >>> ISDN2e lines (each 2B+D, so 4 voice channels) in UK, so supplied by BT >>> Openreach. ?There are a number of anomalies that I am trying to solve. >>> [One of these is that 1 line is dead, but that is for BT Openreach to >>> resolve rather than anyone on this list.] >>> >>> I have a few questions, but as they are all related, I hope you don't >>> mind them in one post. ?Some basics first. ?The box is an Atom dual-core >>> with 2GB of memory and a Sangoma B700 card. ?It's built with Ubuntu >>> 10.04.2 LTS server 64-bit, patched and up to date, and also runs dhcpd, >>> lighttpd and sshd. ?I built the Sangoma ISDN libraries and FreeSWITCH >>> using the latest git versions I could ('make current' about 2 weeks >>> ago). ?We have incoming and outgoing calls working, but some incoming >>> calls ring in the caller's ear, but nothing appears on the FreeSWITCH >>> console, and others fail. ?Rebooting the server cures this. ?We have had >>> problems with lines being disconnected and then reconnected, and it >>> seems that FreeTDM/wanrouter/whatever doesn't recognise previously >>> disconnected lines coming back into use, because a reboot finds lines >>> that were previously reported disconnected ('wanrouter status' or 'ftdm >>> list'). ?We have ongoing problems with one line that is 'disconnected' >>> (wanpipe2/wp2) but the queries I am describing below apply equally when >>> both lines are connected and working. >>> >>> 1. There seems to be a lot of ISDN 'chatter' with channels going up and >>> down all the time even when the switch is completely idle. ?Is this >>> normal? ?Here is my /log 7 showing two of the cycles (which appear to be >>> about 50s apart): >>> >>> 2011-06-06 22:01:54.992467 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >>> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect >>> initiated(263) >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:748 >>> [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: Down(261): Dchan(285) >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>> [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to DOWN >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>> [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to DOWN >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>> [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to DOWN >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling >>> changed to :DOWN >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling >>> changed to :DOWN >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling >>> changed to :DOWN >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 >>> Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:1) >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 >>> Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >>> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with >>> F-bit = 1(258) >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 >>> Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 >>> [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>> [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>> [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>> [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 >>> Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling >>> changed to :UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling >>> changed to :UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling >>> changed to :UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.912462 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >>> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect >>> initiated(263) >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >>> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with >>> F-bit = 1(258) >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 >>> Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 >>> Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 >>> [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>> [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>> [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>> [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling >>> changed to :UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling >>> changed to :UP >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling >>> changed to :UP >>> freeswitch at internal> ? ftdm list >>> +OK >>> span: 1 (wp1) >>> type: Sangoma (ISDN) >>> physical_status: ok >>> signaling_status: UP >>> chan_count: 3 >>> dialplan: XML >>> context: public >>> dial_regex: >>> fail_dial_regex: >>> hold_music: >>> analog_options: none >>> +OK >>> span: 2 (wp2) >>> type: Sangoma (ISDN) >>> physical_status: alarmed >>> signaling_status: DOWN >>> chan_count: 3 >>> dialplan: XML >>> context: public >>> dial_regex: >>> fail_dial_regex: >>> hold_music: >>> analog_options: none >>> +OK >>> span: 3 (FXS) >>> type: analog >>> physical_status: ok >>> signaling_status: UP >>> chan_count: 2 >>> dialplan: XML >>> context: default >>> dial_regex: >>> fail_dial_regex: >>> hold_music: >>> analog_options: none >>> >>> >>> # wanrouter status >>> >>> Devices currently active: >>> ? ? ? ?wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 >>> >>> >>> Wanpipe Config: >>> >>> Device name | Protocol Map | Adapter ?| IRQ | Slot/IO | If's | CLK | >>> Baud rate | >>> wanpipe1 ? ?| N/A ? ? ? ? ?| A500/B700| 20 ?| 0 ? ? ? | 1 ? ?| N/A | >>> 0 ? ? ? ? | >>> wanpipe2 ? ?| N/A ? ? ? ? ?| A500/B700| 20 ?| 0 ? ? ? | 1 ? ?| N/A | >>> 0 ? ? ? ? | >>> wanpipe3 ? ?| N/A ? ? ? ? ?| A200/A400/B600/B700/B800| 20 ?| 0 ? ? ? | >>> 1 ? ?| N/A | 0 ? ? ? ? | >>> >>> Wanrouter Status: >>> >>> Device name | Protocol | Station | Status ? ? ? ?| >>> wanpipe1 ? ?| AFT ISDN | N/A ? ? | Connected ? ? | >>> wanpipe2 ? ?| AFT ISDN | N/A ? ? | Disconnected ?| >>> wanpipe3 ? ?| A-ANALOG | N/A ? ? | Connected ? ? | >>> >>> >>> # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanrouter.rc >>> #!/bin/sh >>> # .. comments snipped ... >>> ROUTER_BOOT=YES >>> WAN_CONF_DIR=/etc/wanpipe >>> WAN_INTR_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/interfaces >>> WAN_BIN_DIR=/usr/sbin >>> WAN_LOG=/var/log/wanrouter >>> WAN_LOCK=/var/lock/wanrouter >>> WAN_LOCK_DIR=/var/lock >>> WAN_IP_FORWARD=NO >>> NEW_IF_TYPE=NO >>> WAN_LIB_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/lib >>> WAN_ADSL_LIST=/etc/wanpipe/wan_adsl.list >>> WAN_ANNEXG_LOAD=NO >>> WAN_SCTP_LOAD=NO >>> WAN_LIP_LOAD=NO >>> WAN_DYN_WANCONFIG=NO >>> WAN_SCRIPTS_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/scripts >>> WAN_FIRMWARE_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/firmware >>> WAN_DEVICES_REV_STOP_ORDER=YES >>> WAN_DEVICES="wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 " >>> >>> # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanpipe1.conf >>> #================================================ >>> # WANPIPE1 Configuration File >>> #================================================ >>> # >>> # Note: This file was generated automatically >>> # ? ? ? by /usr/local/sbin/setup-sangoma program. >>> # >>> # ? ? ? If you want to edit this file, it is >>> # ? ? ? recommended that you use wancfg program >>> # ? ? ? to do so. >>> #================================================ >>> # Sangoma Technologies Inc. >>> #================================================ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [devices] >>> wanpipe1 = WAN_AFT_ISDN_BRI, Comment >>> >>> [interfaces] >>> w1g1 = wanpipe1, , TDM_VOICE_API, Comment >>> >>> [wanpipe1] >>> CARD_TYPE ? ? = AFT >>> S514CPU ? ? = A >>> CommPort ? ? = PRI >>> AUTO_PCISLOT ? ? = NO >>> PCISLOT ? ? = 0 >>> PCIBUS ? ? ?= 5 >>> FE_MEDIA ? ?= BRI >>> FE_LINE ? ? ? ?= 1 >>> TDMV_LAW ? ?= ALAW >>> RM_BRI_CLOCK_MASTER ? ?= NO >>> MTU ? ? ? ? = 1500 >>> UDPPORT ? ? = 9000 >>> TTL ? ? ? ?= 255 >>> IGNORE_FRONT_END = NO >>> TDMV_SPAN ? ?= 1 >>> TE_AIS_MAINTENANCE = NO ? ? ? ? ? ?#NO: defualt ?YES: Start port in AIS >>> Blue Alarm and keep line down >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?#wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_off to >>> disable AIS maintenance mode >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?#wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_on to >>> enable AIS maintenance mode >>> TDMV_HW_DTMF ? ? ? ?= YES ? ? ? ?# YES: receive dtmf events from hardware >>> TDMV_HW_FAX_DETECT ? ? ?= YES ? ? # YES: receive fax 1100hz events from >>> hardware >>> HWEC_OPERATION_MODE ? ? = OCT_NORMAL ? ?# OCT_NORMAL: echo cancelation >>> enabled with nlp (default) >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?# OCT_SPEECH: improves software >>> tone detection by disabling NLP (echo possible) >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?# OCT_NO_ECHO:disables echo >>> cancelation but allows VQE/tone functions. >>> HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL ? ? ? = NO ? ?# NO: default ?YES: remove dtmf out of >>> incoming media (must have hwdtmf enabled) >>> HWEC_NOISE_REDUCTION ? ?= NO ? ?# NO: default ?YES: reduces noise on the >>> line - could break fax >>> HWEC_ACUSTIC_ECHO ? ? ? = NO ? ?# NO: default ?YES: enables acustic echo >>> cancelation >>> HWEC_NLP_DISABLE ? ? ? ?= NO ? ?# NO: default ?YES: guarantees software >>> tone detection (possible echo) >>> HWEC_TX_AUTO_GAIN ? ? ? = 0 ? ? # 0: disable ? -40-0: default tx audio >>> level to be maintained (-20 default) >>> HWEC_RX_AUTO_GAIN ? ? ? = 0 ? ? # 0: disable ? -40-0: default tx audio >>> level to be maintained (-20 default) >>> HWEC_TX_GAIN ? ? ? ? ? ?= 0 ? ? # 0: disable ? -24-24: db values to be >>> applied to tx signal >>> HWEC_RX_GAIN ? ? ? ? ? ?= 0 ? ? # 0: disable ? -24-24: db values to be >>> applied to tx signal >>> >>> [w1g1] >>> ACTIVE_CH ? ?= ALL >>> TDMV_HWEC ? ?= YES >>> MTU ? ? ? ? = 80 >>> >>> ? ? ... and wanpipe2 was also automatically generated so just has '2' for >>> FE_LINE and TDMV_SPAN instead of '1'. >>> >>> # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/freetdm.conf >>> [span wanpipe wp1] >>> trunk_type => ? bri >>> group=1 >>> b-channel => ? 1:1-2 >>> d-channel => ? 1:3 >>> >>> [span wanpipe wp2] >>> trunk_type => ? bri >>> group=1 >>> b-channel => ? 2:1-2 >>> d-channel => ? 2:3 >>> >>> [span wanpipe FXS] >>> name => ? freetdm >>> trunk_type => ? fxs >>> group => ? grp2 >>> fxs-channel => ? 3:1 >>> >>> trunk_type => ? fxs >>> group => ? grp2 >>> fxs-channel => ? 3:2 >>> >>> # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/autoload_configs/freetdm.conf.xml >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> What other config files do I need to supply? I don't want to deluge the >>> list any more in my first post! >>> >>> 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. >>> I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from >>> either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be >>> overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. ?Has anyone >>> got this working in UK, and what is the format for the >>> outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? ?I note that >>> the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. >>> >>> 3. I have built FreeSWITCH from git and installed at /usr/local/... and >>> then followed the steps on the Ubuntu page in the Wiki to set up the run >>> control scripts, etc, and run FS non-root as freeswitch:daemon. ?With >>> FreeTDM, I have discovered that the /dev/wan* devices are owned by >>> root:root, and so are inaccessible to FS running as non-root. ?So for >>> now I have added a line in /etc/init.d/freeswitch to 'chgrp freeswitch >>> /dev/wan*'. ?This is not the most elegant solution, because 'wanrouter >>> restart' (which seems to be my best friend at the moment) resets the >>> ownership to root:root. ?I have tried grepping to see where the mknods >>> are for these devices, but have been unsuccessful. ?Is there a better >>> place to 'permanently' change the device ownership? >>> >>> Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my >>> Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! >>> >>> John >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From fischetti at digiunit.it Fri Jun 10 23:08:00 2011 From: fischetti at digiunit.it (Carmelo Fischetti - Digi Unit) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:08:00 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Strange and annoying problem. Message-ID: Hello to everybody, I'm new to this list but I've been experimenting with FreeSWITCH for 3 months. My environment consists of a FreeSWITCH server and some (4-5) SIP softphones. We are noting a strange and annoying problem. When in call, after exactly 15 minutes, FreeSWITCH CLI logs the following lines: 2011-06-10 20:10:51.689289 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4769 Channel sofia/internal/1010 at fscch00.dyndns-server.com entering state [calling][0] 2011-06-10 20:10:51.789283 [INFO] sofia.c:748 sofia/internal/1010 at fscch00.dyndns-server.com Update Callee ID to "Outbound Call" <1010> 2011-06-10 20:10:51.789283 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4769 Channel sofia/internal/1010 at fscch00.dyndns-server.com entering state [ready][200] 2011-06-10 20:10:51.789283 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4780 Remote SDP: v=0 o=amsip 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.1.100 s=talk c=IN IP4 192.168.1.100 t=0 0 m=audio 12100 RTP/AVP 3 101 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=setup:both a=ptime:20 2011-06-10 20:10:51.789283 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4658 Audio Codec Compare [GSM:3:8000:20:13200]/[GSM:3:8000:20:13200] 2011-06-10 20:10:51.789283 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2724 Already using GSM 2011-06-10 20:10:51.789283 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4772 Set 2833 dtmf send/recv payload to 101 2011-06-10 20:10:51.789283 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5238 Processing updated SDP 2011-06-10 20:10:51.789283 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3009 Audio params are unchanged for sofia/internal/1010 at fscch00.dyndns-server.com. My first question is: what does this mean? Is there some configuration parameter (where?) that triggers some event after 15 minutes? Actually, for unencrypted calls, nothing happens but when using SRTP, the log changes to: 2011-06-10 20:32:32.825843 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4769 Channel sofia/internal/1010 at fscch00.dyndns-server.com entering state [calling][0] 2011-06-10 20:32:32.965833 [INFO] sofia.c:748 sofia/internal/1010 at fscch00.dyndns-server.com Update Callee ID to "Outbound Call" <1010> 2011-06-10 20:32:32.965833 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4769 Channel sofia/internal/1010 at fscch00.dyndns-server.com entering state [ready][200] 2011-06-10 20:32:32.965833 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4780 Remote SDP: v=0 o=amsip 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.1.100 s=talk c=IN IP4 192.168.1.100 t=0 0 m=audio 12665 RTP/SAVP 3 101 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=setup:both a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:YjUwMzQyNWU4YmY2ZjhiOGYyYTQ1MmZiOGNhMWEy a=encryption:optional a=ptime:20 2011-06-10 20:32:32.965833 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4463 Existing key is still valid. 2011-06-10 20:32:32.965833 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4658 Audio Codec Compare [GSM:3:8000:20:13200]/[GSM:3:8000:20:13200] 2011-06-10 20:32:32.965833 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2724 Already using GSM 2011-06-10 20:32:32.965833 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4772 Set 2833 dtmf send/recv payload to 101 2011-06-10 20:32:32.965833 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5238 Processing updated SDP 2011-06-10 20:32:32.965833 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3009 Audio params are unchanged for sofia/internal/1010 at fscch00.dyndns-server.com. 2011-06-10 20:32:33.485800 [ERR] switch_rtp.c:2560 Error: SRTP unprotect failed with code 7 (auth check failed) (the last line repeated indefinitely)... and one leg of the call is dropped (one of the phones cannot hear the other). Since this happens with various softphones, it's a server issue, I suppose. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Carmelo From wes-fs at 499x.com Sat Jun 11 00:05:13 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (wes-fs at 499x.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using fs api to originate a call and record it Message-ID: <4DF278F9.6000201@499x.com> I'm extremely new to freeswitch, and anything like it, so please forgive me! I'd like to be able to use the API to originate a call and record it. So far, I have the following figured out: originate sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) And it dials out to an external number and successfully records the conversation. But, it also records the ringing. When I was trying this through a dialplan, I found an option: which delayed the recording until the call was answered. Is there a way to do the same thing through the API? Thanks! Wes From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 11 02:18:49 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:18:49 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Default Install Extensions NEWBIE Question In-Reply-To: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> References: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> Message-ID: What kind of hardware, RAM, HDDs, etc? Most likely this will be a piece of cake for FS unless you are trying to run it on a 486 with 4MB of RAM... -MC On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mehma Sarja wrote: > The default install on ubuntu renders a working system servicing 19 > extensions. Can I use this as-is in a production environment which only > requires within-LAN, inter-departmental voice connectivity? > > Mehma > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/fe2f62eb/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 11 02:27:23 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:27:23 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EBBC@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EBBC@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Hector Geraldino < Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > Thanks for your response Michael. > > > > Finally I found the way of dialing to an external extension. What I did was > just open a shell, listen in a port using nc and tried to originate a call. > It worked using the syntax: > > > > originate sofia/internal/5562 at 192.168.23.104 &park > > > > As this is an outbound call (not managed by the socket application) I had > to use a new inbound socket connection to connect to FS, make the call, > query for the uuid and receive some events (like DTMF among others). > Everything was going great, until I found two issues: > > > > - The CHANNEL_ANSWER event is always triggered, no matter if the > call is actually picked up or not on my phone. I thought that maybe I can > use some other event to determine if the call have been answered or not > (like CHANNEL_CALLSTATE or CALL_UPDATE), but the additional information on > the event headers is the same no matter if it?s answered or not. > > - When the call is answered, and the user presses a key to accept > the call, the function returns the UUID of this session to the main method. > Then I tried to make the bridge between the two calls (the legA call handled > by the socket application, and the legB outbound call generated in the > application using an inbound connection). I using the command > > > > api uuid_bridge > > > > but this didn?t work. Am I missing something here? > You're missing the debug log on the pastebin. ;) Yeah, let's take a look at the debug log of this happening. Capture from the beginning of the a leg all the way through to trying the uuid_bridge. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/525f6c3a/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 11 02:30:19 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:30:19 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using fs api to originate a call and record it In-Reply-To: <4DF278F9.6000201@499x.com> References: <4DF278F9.6000201@499x.com> Message-ID: Try this: originate {media_bug_answer_req=true}sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) Let us know if it works. -MC On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:05 PM, wrote: > I'm extremely new to freeswitch, and anything like it, so please forgive > me! > > I'd like to be able to use the API to originate a call and record it. > So far, I have the following figured out: > > originate sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx > &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) > And it dials out to an external number and successfully records the > conversation. > > But, it also records the ringing. When I was trying this through a > dialplan, I found an option: > > which delayed the recording until the call was answered. > > Is there a way to do the same thing through the API? > > Thanks! > Wes > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/e411ac33/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 11 02:46:35 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:46:35 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to redirect $${sounds_dir} ? In-Reply-To: References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE587AA@cooper> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:40 AM, jesse wrote: > vars.xml only sets sound_prefix : > > > > $${sounds_dir} is like $${local_ip_v4}, automatically fetched by the > application. > > not sure whether i can set sounds_dir in vars.xml... > the sounds_dir variable you cannot - it is like the base_dir, htdocs_dir, etc. variables. What are you doing that requires you to change ${sounds_dir}? Perhaps we can help you with an alternate solution. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/5ada2744/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 11 02:50:11 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:50:11 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] fetch password In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: If I understand you correctly you want your VM users to have their individual passwords stored in a database. The solution is to use mod_xml_curl instead of static XML for your directory. See mod_xml_curl on the wiki, specifically look for the section on "bindings" for directory. -MC On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Christian Benke wrote: > On 10 June 2011 09:38, Sam wrote: > > How Does it access database , does we need to write some syntax > somewhere, > > so that FS fetches it out from DB. > > Hi! > > I'm still not sure if i understand your question. > > The default configuration uses a sqlite-DB which is saved in > /usr/local/freeswitch/db/voicemail_default.db. The > voicemail-application accesses this db without additional > configuration. > > If you however want to save the voicemail-preferences in a > non-embedded DB like PostgreSQL or MySQL, you have to configure odbc > on your host to access them plus activate odbc in voicemail.conf.xml. > > Please read the following pages if that is what you want to do: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_voicemail#odbc-dsn > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Using_ODBC_in_the_core > > hth, > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/5a1c225a/attachment-0001.html From mehmasarja at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 03:54:06 2011 From: mehmasarja at gmail.com (Mehma Sarja) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:54:06 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Default Install Extensions NEWBIE Question In-Reply-To: References: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4DF2AE9E.5040108@gmail.com> SuperMicro Atom D510 with 4 GB RAM on Ubuntu 64 bit server OS and SSD drive. Need about 62 extensions. Any idea what the call quality is going to be like on a 100 MB client to switch and 1 GB switch to server link and with say, 10 concurrent conversations? Mehma === On 6/10/11 3:18 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > What kind of hardware, RAM, HDDs, etc? Most likely this will be a > piece of cake for FS unless you are trying to run it on a 486 with 4MB > of RAM... > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mehma Sarja > wrote: > > The default install on ubuntu renders a working system servicing 19 > extensions. Can I use this as-is in a production environment which > only > requires within-LAN, inter-departmental voice connectivity? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110610/5cc9c24f/attachment.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 10:47:11 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 08:47:11 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Default Install Extensions NEWBIE Question In-Reply-To: <4DF2AE9E.5040108@gmail.com> References: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> <4DF2AE9E.5040108@gmail.com> Message-ID: On 11 June 2011 01:54, Mehma Sarja wrote: > SuperMicro Atom D510 with 4 GB RAM on Ubuntu 64 bit server OS and SSD drive. > Need about 62 extensions. Any idea what the call quality is going to be like > on a 100 MB client to switch and 1 GB switch to server link and with say, 10 > concurrent conversations? I've been testing FS on an Atom N270 and started to get little audio blemishes at around 30 concurrent conversations - so i'm pretty sure you'll be fine(Unless all 62 extensions talk at the same time). Your bandwith will also be sufficient - see e.g. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/meet-voip-bandwidth-requirements-without-crippling-your-network-performance/6159446 for bandwith used by different codecs(G711 would be the most common, G722/G722.1 "HD"-audio with better quality, if your clients support it - see http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Codecs too). Best regards, Christian From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Sat Jun 11 16:06:07 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 14:06:07 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] session:read() not timeouting Message-ID: <9911DF4D-FC78-4F88-AB15-2FAB939F3A59@ipeva.fr> All, When using session:read() in a LUA script called from dialplan, the interdigit timeout works fine on my test box (with GIT from end of May, and a 1000hz timer). On my prod box, the timeout does not trigger the end of the read app. The terminating character is the only way to end the read() normally. The prod box is using a GIT from December 2010, and a bad timer (250Hz). Should I suppose the issue comes from the timer or from the old version on the prod box (I am upgrading ASAP) ? Thanks David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110611/d6c82009/attachment.html From roger.castaldo at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 16:57:23 2011 From: roger.castaldo at gmail.com (Roger Castaldo) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 08:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Default Install Extensions NEWBIE Question In-Reply-To: References: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> <4DF2AE9E.5040108@gmail.com> Message-ID: Also factor in the D510 is a dual core whereas the N270 is a single core. On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Christian Benke wrote: > On 11 June 2011 01:54, Mehma Sarja wrote: > > SuperMicro Atom D510 with 4 GB RAM on Ubuntu 64 bit server OS and SSD > drive. > > Need about 62 extensions. Any idea what the call quality is going to be > like > > on a 100 MB client to switch and 1 GB switch to server link and with say, > 10 > > concurrent conversations? > > I've been testing FS on an Atom N270 and started to get little audio > blemishes at around 30 concurrent conversations - so i'm pretty sure > you'll be fine(Unless all 62 extensions talk at the same time). > > Your bandwith will also be sufficient - see e.g. > > http://www.techrepublic.com/article/meet-voip-bandwidth-requirements-without-crippling-your-network-performance/6159446 > for bandwith used by different codecs(G711 would be the most common, > G722/G722.1 "HD"-audio with better quality, if your clients support it > - see http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Codecs too). > > Best regards, > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110611/b75d2edd/attachment.html From yungwei at resolvity.com Sat Jun 11 19:22:04 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Listen to the conversation between a user and an IVR Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC643016@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Hi, I'm wondering if there's a way to listen to the conversation between a user and an IVR (javascript programs). Here's the background info. I have a javascript that first makes an outbound call to someone. And When the call is answered, the call is then connected another extension, which runs an IVR application written in javascript. I want to be able to listen to the live conversation between the person and the IVR. Is this supported? If so, how can I do that in javascript? Thanks. From anton.vazir at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 19:40:41 2011 From: anton.vazir at gmail.com (Anton VG) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:40:41 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? Message-ID: Hi! Switched from outbound ESL to an INBOUND mode, for controlling the incoming CALL flow: so when call comes, Inbound ESL app catches corresponding event and executes the necessary command on the caller UUID. My question is: In XML dialplan, when call comes, if do not PARK it or do PAUSE, the ESL controlling application is too late to execute park before XML dialplan ends, and disconnect the call. PARK shows itself as not a good solution, since if call did not handled by ESL - it stales. PAUSE - i would not like to add extra delays to call handling. I suppose there should be a known good way to handle in XML dialplan if anything else executed on the given channel/uuid? Regards, Anton. From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Sat Jun 11 19:55:57 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:55:57 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56437@cooper> PARK is the only way to handle this in a good way. If you can't separate the calls directly in the dial plan, you could probably do a transfer of the call (that you don't want to handle) inside your app, to another extension in the dial plan. /Peter ________________________________________ Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Anton VG [anton.vazir at gmail.com] Skickat: den 11 juni 2011 17:40 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? Hi! Switched from outbound ESL to an INBOUND mode, for controlling the incoming CALL flow: so when call comes, Inbound ESL app catches corresponding event and executes the necessary command on the caller UUID. My question is: In XML dialplan, when call comes, if do not PARK it or do PAUSE, the ESL controlling application is too late to execute park before XML dialplan ends, and disconnect the call. PARK shows itself as not a good solution, since if call did not handled by ESL - it stales. PAUSE - i would not like to add extra delays to call handling. I suppose there should be a known good way to handle in XML dialplan if anything else executed on the given channel/uuid? Regards, Anton. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4df38d5032765714154118! From u2nsam at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 20:04:52 2011 From: u2nsam at gmail.com (Sam) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:34:52 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] fetch password In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thankyou. On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > If I understand you correctly you want your VM users to have their > individual passwords stored in a database. The solution is to use > mod_xml_curl instead of static XML for your directory. See mod_xml_curl on > the wiki, specifically look for the section on "bindings" for directory. > > -MC > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Christian Benke wrote: > >> On 10 June 2011 09:38, Sam wrote: >> > How Does it access database , does we need to write some syntax >> somewhere, >> > so that FS fetches it out from DB. >> >> Hi! >> >> I'm still not sure if i understand your question. >> >> The default configuration uses a sqlite-DB which is saved in >> /usr/local/freeswitch/db/voicemail_default.db. The >> voicemail-application accesses this db without additional >> configuration. >> >> If you however want to save the voicemail-preferences in a >> non-embedded DB like PostgreSQL or MySQL, you have to configure odbc >> on your host to access them plus activate odbc in voicemail.conf.xml. >> >> Please read the following pages if that is what you want to do: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_voicemail#odbc-dsn >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Using_ODBC_in_the_core >> >> hth, >> Christian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110611/c29e7c44/attachment.html From anton.vazir at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 20:07:29 2011 From: anton.vazir at gmail.com (Anton VG) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:07:29 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? In-Reply-To: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56437@cooper> References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56437@cooper> Message-ID: now actually I do park over ESL, as soon as I get channel_create message, and there is only a single command in the XML dialplan: pause 1000. I was hoping there is a better approach to this. PS. Outbound ESL showed itself as a terribly bad scaling solution if implemented in python... 2011/6/11 Peter Olsson : > PARK is the only way to handle this in a good way. If you can't separate the calls directly in the dial plan, you could probably do a transfer of the call (that you don't want to handle) inside your app, to another extension in the dial plan. > > /Peter > ________________________________________ > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Anton VG [anton.vazir at gmail.com] > Skickat: den 11 juni 2011 17:40 > Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help > ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? > > Hi! > > Switched from outbound ESL to an INBOUND mode, for controlling the > incoming CALL flow: so when call comes, Inbound ESL app catches > corresponding event and executes the necessary command on the caller > UUID. > > My question is: In XML dialplan, when call comes, if do not PARK it or > do PAUSE, the ESL controlling application is too late to execute park > before XML dialplan ends, and disconnect the call. > > PARK shows itself as not a good solution, since if call did not > handled by ESL - it stales. > PAUSE - i would not like to add extra delays to call handling. > > I suppose there should be a known good way to handle in XML dialplan > if anything else executed on the given channel/uuid? > > Regards, > Anton. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > !DSPAM:4df38d5032765714154118! > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Sat Jun 11 20:16:59 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:16:59 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? In-Reply-To: References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56437@cooper>, Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56438@cooper> I do it like this; First I separate calls in the dialplan, those calls with a destination to my "IVR" i will first set a variable, for instance "ivr=true", I then park the call in the dialplan. In my ESL app I wait for the CALL_PARKED event, I then check if the var is set on the call - if it is I start handling it. /Peter ________________________________________ Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Anton VG [anton.vazir at gmail.com] Skickat: den 11 juni 2011 18:07 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? now actually I do park over ESL, as soon as I get channel_create message, and there is only a single command in the XML dialplan: pause 1000. I was hoping there is a better approach to this. PS. Outbound ESL showed itself as a terribly bad scaling solution if implemented in python... 2011/6/11 Peter Olsson : > PARK is the only way to handle this in a good way. If you can't separate the calls directly in the dial plan, you could probably do a transfer of the call (that you don't want to handle) inside your app, to another extension in the dial plan. > > /Peter > ________________________________________ > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Anton VG [anton.vazir at gmail.com] > Skickat: den 11 juni 2011 17:40 > Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help > ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? > > Hi! > > Switched from outbound ESL to an INBOUND mode, for controlling the > incoming CALL flow: so when call comes, Inbound ESL app catches > corresponding event and executes the necessary command on the caller > UUID. > > My question is: In XML dialplan, when call comes, if do not PARK it or > do PAUSE, the ESL controlling application is too late to execute park > before XML dialplan ends, and disconnect the call. > > PARK shows itself as not a good solution, since if call did not > handled by ESL - it stales. > PAUSE - i would not like to add extra delays to call handling. > > I suppose there should be a known good way to handle in XML dialplan > if anything else executed on the given channel/uuid? > > Regards, > Anton. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4df392d332762225017462! From anton.vazir at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 20:53:32 2011 From: anton.vazir at gmail.com (Anton VG) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:53:32 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? In-Reply-To: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56438@cooper> References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56437@cooper> <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56438@cooper> Message-ID: very similar... 2011/6/11 Peter Olsson : > I do it like this; > > First I separate calls in the dialplan, those calls with a destination to my "IVR" i will first set a variable, for instance "ivr=true", I then park the call in the dialplan. In my ESL app I wait for the CALL_PARKED event, I then check if the var is set on the call - if it is I start handling it. > > /Peter > ________________________________________ > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Anton VG [anton.vazir at gmail.com] > Skickat: den 11 juni 2011 18:07 > Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help > ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? > > now actually I do park over ESL, as soon as I get channel_create > message, and there is only a single command in the XML dialplan: pause > 1000. I was hoping there is a better approach to this. > > PS. Outbound ESL showed itself as a terribly bad scaling solution if > implemented in python... > > 2011/6/11 Peter Olsson : >> PARK is the only way to handle this in a good way. If you can't separate the calls directly in the dial plan, you could probably do a transfer of the call (that you don't want to handle) inside your app, to another extension in the dial plan. >> >> /Peter >> ________________________________________ >> Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Anton VG [anton.vazir at gmail.com] >> Skickat: den 11 juni 2011 17:40 >> Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? >> >> Hi! >> >> Switched from outbound ESL to an INBOUND mode, for controlling the >> incoming CALL flow: so when call comes, Inbound ESL app catches >> corresponding event and executes the necessary command on the caller >> UUID. >> >> My question is: In XML dialplan, when call comes, if do not PARK it or >> do PAUSE, the ESL controlling application is too late to execute park >> before XML dialplan ends, and disconnect the call. >> >> PARK shows itself as not a good solution, since if call did not >> handled by ESL - it stales. >> PAUSE - i would not like to add extra delays to call handling. >> >> I suppose there should be a known good way to handle in XML dialplan >> if anything else executed on the given channel/uuid? >> >> Regards, >> Anton. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > !DSPAM:4df392d332762225017462! > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From anton.vazir at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 20:55:02 2011 From: anton.vazir at gmail.com (Anton VG) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:55:02 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? In-Reply-To: References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56437@cooper> <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56438@cooper> Message-ID: BTW, what language do you use for your ESL app? Any info on performance? How many CPS? 2011/6/11 Anton VG : > very similar... > > 2011/6/11 Peter Olsson : >> I do it like this; >> >> First I separate calls in the dialplan, those calls with a destination to my "IVR" i will first set a variable, for instance "ivr=true", I then park the call in the dialplan. In my ESL app I wait for the CALL_PARKED event, I then check if the var is set on the call - if it is I start handling it. >> >> /Peter >> ________________________________________ >> Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Anton VG [anton.vazir at gmail.com] >> Skickat: den 11 juni 2011 18:07 >> Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? >> >> now actually I do park over ESL, as soon as I get channel_create >> message, and there is only a single command in the XML dialplan: pause >> 1000. I was hoping there is a better approach to this. >> >> PS. Outbound ESL showed itself as a terribly bad scaling solution if >> implemented in python... >> >> 2011/6/11 Peter Olsson : >>> PARK is the only way to handle this in a good way. If you can't separate the calls directly in the dial plan, you could probably do a transfer of the call (that you don't want to handle) inside your app, to another extension in the dial plan. >>> >>> /Peter >>> ________________________________________ >>> Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Anton VG [anton.vazir at gmail.com] >>> Skickat: den 11 juni 2011 17:40 >>> Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help >>> ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Inbound - what would be the best known way to wait in XML dialplan for any command execution via ESL? >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Switched from outbound ESL to an INBOUND mode, for controlling the >>> incoming CALL flow: so when call comes, Inbound ESL app catches >>> corresponding event and executes the necessary command on the caller >>> UUID. >>> >>> My question is: In XML dialplan, when call comes, if do not PARK it or >>> do PAUSE, the ESL controlling application is too late to execute park >>> before XML dialplan ends, and disconnect the call. >>> >>> PARK shows itself as not a good solution, since if call did not >>> handled by ESL - it stales. >>> PAUSE - i would not like to add extra delays to call handling. >>> >>> I suppose there should be a known good way to handle in XML dialplan >>> if anything else executed on the given channel/uuid? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Anton. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> !DSPAM:4df392d332762225017462! >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > From mehmasarja at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 22:18:24 2011 From: mehmasarja at gmail.com (mehma sarja) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:18:24 +0000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Default Install Extensions NEWBIE Question In-Reply-To: References: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> <4DF2AE9E.5040108@gmail.com> Message-ID: Would a single core be better for this application? On 6/11/11, Roger Castaldo wrote: > Also factor in the D510 is a dual core whereas the N270 is a single core. > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Christian Benke > wrote: > >> On 11 June 2011 01:54, Mehma Sarja wrote: >> > SuperMicro Atom D510 with 4 GB RAM on Ubuntu 64 bit server OS and SSD >> drive. >> > Need about 62 extensions. Any idea what the call quality is going to be >> like >> > on a 100 MB client to switch and 1 GB switch to server link and with >> > say, >> 10 >> > concurrent conversations? >> >> I've been testing FS on an Atom N270 and started to get little audio >> blemishes at around 30 concurrent conversations - so i'm pretty sure >> you'll be fine(Unless all 62 extensions talk at the same time). >> >> Your bandwith will also be sufficient - see e.g. >> >> http://www.techrepublic.com/article/meet-voip-bandwidth-requirements-without-crippling-your-network-performance/6159446 >> for bandwith used by different codecs(G711 would be the most common, >> G722/G722.1 "HD"-audio with better quality, if your clients support it >> - see http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Codecs too). >> >> Best regards, >> Christian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > From roger.castaldo at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 22:50:19 2011 From: roger.castaldo at gmail.com (Roger Castaldo) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 14:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Default Install Extensions NEWBIE Question In-Reply-To: References: <4DF0FE6F.2020806@gmail.com> <4DF2AE9E.5040108@gmail.com> Message-ID: thats a six of one half a dozen of the other, that being said, since freeswitch operates with a threaded design as long as the OS configures itself properly for threading, the threads can be ran in each core allowing for more concurrent operations and performance is gained because of the second core. On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, mehma sarja wrote: > Would a single core be better for this application? > > On 6/11/11, Roger Castaldo wrote: > > Also factor in the D510 is a dual core whereas the N270 is a single core. > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Christian Benke > > wrote: > > > >> On 11 June 2011 01:54, Mehma Sarja wrote: > >> > SuperMicro Atom D510 with 4 GB RAM on Ubuntu 64 bit server OS and SSD > >> drive. > >> > Need about 62 extensions. Any idea what the call quality is going to > be > >> like > >> > on a 100 MB client to switch and 1 GB switch to server link and with > >> > say, > >> 10 > >> > concurrent conversations? > >> > >> I've been testing FS on an Atom N270 and started to get little audio > >> blemishes at around 30 concurrent conversations - so i'm pretty sure > >> you'll be fine(Unless all 62 extensions talk at the same time). > >> > >> Your bandwith will also be sufficient - see e.g. > >> > >> > http://www.techrepublic.com/article/meet-voip-bandwidth-requirements-without-crippling-your-network-performance/6159446 > >> for bandwith used by different codecs(G711 would be the most common, > >> G722/G722.1 "HD"-audio with better quality, if your clients support it > >> - see http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Codecs too). > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Christian > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110611/3a5333bf/attachment.html From jcasale at activenetwerx.com Sat Jun 11 23:12:36 2011 From: jcasale at activenetwerx.com (Joseph L. Casale) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 19:12:36 +0000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] regex groups Message-ID: I wrote up a quick dialplan and intended on using $0 for the whole number, so my regex was: but $0 was empty until I rewrote it: Is this expected, I assumed not and I was not looking for $1 etc I figured $0 to always get populated. Thanks, jlc From michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de Sun Jun 12 00:35:33 2011 From: michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de (Michal Bielicki) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:35:33 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK In-Reply-To: References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF1CAB8.3070706@gmail.com> <4DF1CF66.4050700@earthspike.net> Message-ID: <4B655CBA-9ADD-498E-8B0A-C5594F5E634B@seventhsignal.de> That works on centos as well Am 10.06.2011 um 19:27 schrieb Stephen Lewis: > Hi John > > Would be interesting to hear whether you did something along these > lines - creating /etc/udev/rules.d/80-wanpipe.rules containing > > SUBSYSTEM=="wanpipe", OWNER="freeswitch", GROUP="daemon" > SUBSYSTEM=="wp_ec", OWNER="freeswitch", GROUP="daemon" > > That's what we're doing on Ubuntu 10.04.2, and it seems to work. > > I assume the solution currently described in the wiki[0] doesn't > survive a reboot? > > Thanks > > Stephen > > [0] http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Quick_Start#Using_FreeTDM_with_the_.27direct_from_git.27_method_above > > On 10 June 2011 09:01, John wrote: >> Nazim, >> >> Late last night this got resolved; sorry I didn't post then. We have >> had problems with the second line, and when these were fixed last night, >> the problem disappeared. So now I have a nice stable FreeSWITCH with >> the only outputs on /log 7 being SIP re-registrations. So, you are >> probably correct, and it was a line quality issue. >> >> I've also resolved the device permissions issue with help from Sangoma >> support, and will post on that/update the Ubuntu Wiki page when I get a >> moment, probably after the weekend. >> >> Thanks, >> >> John >> >> On 10/06/11 08:41, Nazim Aghabayov wrote: >>> Hello John, >>> >>> I'm not an ISDN expert, but have some experience with PRI. >>> Have you checked the line? Sometimes bad physical interconnects makes >>> line noisy. >>> Channels going up and down may indicate a physical line problem or >>> inadequate grounding (or mixed signal / common grounds). I would disable >>> hardware echo-canellation and hw. dtmf during the troubleshooting. >>> On PRI it's possible to trace the D channel with "wanpipemon -i w1g1 >>> -pcap -pcap_file isdn.pcap -prot ISDN -full -systime -c trd". It should >>> be supported on BRI too, look through wanpipemon manual. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Nazim >>> >>> >>> On 06/07/2011 02:36 AM, John wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have just set up a FreeSWITCH box with a Sangoma B700 connected to 2 x >>>> ISDN2e lines (each 2B+D, so 4 voice channels) in UK, so supplied by BT >>>> Openreach. There are a number of anomalies that I am trying to solve. >>>> [One of these is that 1 line is dead, but that is for BT Openreach to >>>> resolve rather than anyone on this list.] >>>> >>>> I have a few questions, but as they are all related, I hope you don't >>>> mind them in one post. Some basics first. The box is an Atom dual-core >>>> with 2GB of memory and a Sangoma B700 card. It's built with Ubuntu >>>> 10.04.2 LTS server 64-bit, patched and up to date, and also runs dhcpd, >>>> lighttpd and sshd. I built the Sangoma ISDN libraries and FreeSWITCH >>>> using the latest git versions I could ('make current' about 2 weeks >>>> ago). We have incoming and outgoing calls working, but some incoming >>>> calls ring in the caller's ear, but nothing appears on the FreeSWITCH >>>> console, and others fail. Rebooting the server cures this. We have had >>>> problems with lines being disconnected and then reconnected, and it >>>> seems that FreeTDM/wanrouter/whatever doesn't recognise previously >>>> disconnected lines coming back into use, because a reboot finds lines >>>> that were previously reported disconnected ('wanrouter status' or 'ftdm >>>> list'). We have ongoing problems with one line that is 'disconnected' >>>> (wanpipe2/wp2) but the queries I am describing below apply equally when >>>> both lines are connected and working. >>>> >>>> 1. There seems to be a lot of ISDN 'chatter' with channels going up and >>>> down all the time even when the switch is completely idle. Is this >>>> normal? Here is my /log 7 showing two of the cycles (which appear to be >>>> about 50s apart): >>>> >>>> 2011-06-06 22:01:54.992467 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >>>> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect >>>> initiated(263) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:748 >>>> [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: Down(261): Dchan(285) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>>> [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to DOWN >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>>> [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to DOWN >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>>> [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to DOWN >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:5 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling >>>> changed to :DOWN >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:5 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling >>>> changed to :DOWN >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:5 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling >>>> changed to :DOWN >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 >>>> Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:1) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.952464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 >>>> Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >>>> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with >>>> F-bit = 1(258) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 >>>> Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 >>>> [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>>> [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>>> [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>>> [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 >>>> Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling >>>> changed to :UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling >>>> changed to :UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>>> 2011-06-06 22:02:29.972464 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling >>>> changed to :UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.912462 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >>>> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect >>>> initiated(263) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:681 >>>> [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection UP(3): UA frame with >>>> F-bit = 1(258) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:631 >>>> Received RESTART CFM (dChan:1 ces:0 type:0) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:1179 >>>> Receved RESTART, but Restart Indicator IE not present >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:729 >>>> [SNGISDN Q931] s1: Interface: UP(260): Dchan(285) >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>>> [s1c1][1:1] Signalling link status changed to UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>>> [s1c2][1:2] Signalling link status changed to UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_cntrl.c:43 >>>> [s1c3][1:3] Signalling link status changed to UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>>> [s1c1][1:1] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>>> [s1c2][1:2] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:200 >>>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_support.c:186 >>>> [s1c3][1:3] Setting availability rate to:10 >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:1 signalling >>>> changed to :UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:2 signalling >>>> changed to :UP >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [DEBUG] mod_freetdm.c:2268 got clear channel >>>> sig [SIGSTATUS_CHANGED] >>>> 2011-06-06 22:03:19.932483 [INFO] mod_freetdm.c:2345 1:3 signalling >>>> changed to :UP >>>> freeswitch at internal> ftdm list >>>> +OK >>>> span: 1 (wp1) >>>> type: Sangoma (ISDN) >>>> physical_status: ok >>>> signaling_status: UP >>>> chan_count: 3 >>>> dialplan: XML >>>> context: public >>>> dial_regex: >>>> fail_dial_regex: >>>> hold_music: >>>> analog_options: none >>>> +OK >>>> span: 2 (wp2) >>>> type: Sangoma (ISDN) >>>> physical_status: alarmed >>>> signaling_status: DOWN >>>> chan_count: 3 >>>> dialplan: XML >>>> context: public >>>> dial_regex: >>>> fail_dial_regex: >>>> hold_music: >>>> analog_options: none >>>> +OK >>>> span: 3 (FXS) >>>> type: analog >>>> physical_status: ok >>>> signaling_status: UP >>>> chan_count: 2 >>>> dialplan: XML >>>> context: default >>>> dial_regex: >>>> fail_dial_regex: >>>> hold_music: >>>> analog_options: none >>>> >>>> >>>> # wanrouter status >>>> >>>> Devices currently active: >>>> wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 >>>> >>>> >>>> Wanpipe Config: >>>> >>>> Device name | Protocol Map | Adapter | IRQ | Slot/IO | If's | CLK | >>>> Baud rate | >>>> wanpipe1 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | >>>> 0 | >>>> wanpipe2 | N/A | A500/B700| 20 | 0 | 1 | N/A | >>>> 0 | >>>> wanpipe3 | N/A | A200/A400/B600/B700/B800| 20 | 0 | >>>> 1 | N/A | 0 | >>>> >>>> Wanrouter Status: >>>> >>>> Device name | Protocol | Station | Status | >>>> wanpipe1 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Connected | >>>> wanpipe2 | AFT ISDN | N/A | Disconnected | >>>> wanpipe3 | A-ANALOG | N/A | Connected | >>>> >>>> >>>> # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanrouter.rc >>>> #!/bin/sh >>>> # .. comments snipped ... >>>> ROUTER_BOOT=YES >>>> WAN_CONF_DIR=/etc/wanpipe >>>> WAN_INTR_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/interfaces >>>> WAN_BIN_DIR=/usr/sbin >>>> WAN_LOG=/var/log/wanrouter >>>> WAN_LOCK=/var/lock/wanrouter >>>> WAN_LOCK_DIR=/var/lock >>>> WAN_IP_FORWARD=NO >>>> NEW_IF_TYPE=NO >>>> WAN_LIB_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/lib >>>> WAN_ADSL_LIST=/etc/wanpipe/wan_adsl.list >>>> WAN_ANNEXG_LOAD=NO >>>> WAN_SCTP_LOAD=NO >>>> WAN_LIP_LOAD=NO >>>> WAN_DYN_WANCONFIG=NO >>>> WAN_SCRIPTS_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/scripts >>>> WAN_FIRMWARE_DIR=/etc/wanpipe/firmware >>>> WAN_DEVICES_REV_STOP_ORDER=YES >>>> WAN_DEVICES="wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 " >>>> >>>> # cat /etc/wanpipe/wanpipe1.conf >>>> #================================================ >>>> # WANPIPE1 Configuration File >>>> #================================================ >>>> # >>>> # Note: This file was generated automatically >>>> # by /usr/local/sbin/setup-sangoma program. >>>> # >>>> # If you want to edit this file, it is >>>> # recommended that you use wancfg program >>>> # to do so. >>>> #================================================ >>>> # Sangoma Technologies Inc. >>>> #================================================ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [devices] >>>> wanpipe1 = WAN_AFT_ISDN_BRI, Comment >>>> >>>> [interfaces] >>>> w1g1 = wanpipe1, , TDM_VOICE_API, Comment >>>> >>>> [wanpipe1] >>>> CARD_TYPE = AFT >>>> S514CPU = A >>>> CommPort = PRI >>>> AUTO_PCISLOT = NO >>>> PCISLOT = 0 >>>> PCIBUS = 5 >>>> FE_MEDIA = BRI >>>> FE_LINE = 1 >>>> TDMV_LAW = ALAW >>>> RM_BRI_CLOCK_MASTER = NO >>>> MTU = 1500 >>>> UDPPORT = 9000 >>>> TTL = 255 >>>> IGNORE_FRONT_END = NO >>>> TDMV_SPAN = 1 >>>> TE_AIS_MAINTENANCE = NO #NO: defualt YES: Start port in AIS >>>> Blue Alarm and keep line down >>>> #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_off to >>>> disable AIS maintenance mode >>>> #wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ttx_ais_on to >>>> enable AIS maintenance mode >>>> TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES # YES: receive dtmf events from hardware >>>> TDMV_HW_FAX_DETECT = YES # YES: receive fax 1100hz events from >>>> hardware >>>> HWEC_OPERATION_MODE = OCT_NORMAL # OCT_NORMAL: echo cancelation >>>> enabled with nlp (default) >>>> # OCT_SPEECH: improves software >>>> tone detection by disabling NLP (echo possible) >>>> # OCT_NO_ECHO:disables echo >>>> cancelation but allows VQE/tone functions. >>>> HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = NO # NO: default YES: remove dtmf out of >>>> incoming media (must have hwdtmf enabled) >>>> HWEC_NOISE_REDUCTION = NO # NO: default YES: reduces noise on the >>>> line - could break fax >>>> HWEC_ACUSTIC_ECHO = NO # NO: default YES: enables acustic echo >>>> cancelation >>>> HWEC_NLP_DISABLE = NO # NO: default YES: guarantees software >>>> tone detection (possible echo) >>>> HWEC_TX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio >>>> level to be maintained (-20 default) >>>> HWEC_RX_AUTO_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -40-0: default tx audio >>>> level to be maintained (-20 default) >>>> HWEC_TX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be >>>> applied to tx signal >>>> HWEC_RX_GAIN = 0 # 0: disable -24-24: db values to be >>>> applied to tx signal >>>> >>>> [w1g1] >>>> ACTIVE_CH = ALL >>>> TDMV_HWEC = YES >>>> MTU = 80 >>>> >>>> ... and wanpipe2 was also automatically generated so just has '2' for >>>> FE_LINE and TDMV_SPAN instead of '1'. >>>> >>>> # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/freetdm.conf >>>> [span wanpipe wp1] >>>> trunk_type => bri >>>> group=1 >>>> b-channel => 1:1-2 >>>> d-channel => 1:3 >>>> >>>> [span wanpipe wp2] >>>> trunk_type => bri >>>> group=1 >>>> b-channel => 2:1-2 >>>> d-channel => 2:3 >>>> >>>> [span wanpipe FXS] >>>> name => freetdm >>>> trunk_type => fxs >>>> group => grp2 >>>> fxs-channel => 3:1 >>>> >>>> trunk_type => fxs >>>> group => grp2 >>>> fxs-channel => 3:2 >>>> >>>> # cat /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/autoload_configs/freetdm.conf.xml >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What other config files do I need to supply? I don't want to deluge the >>>> list any more in my first post! >>>> >>>> 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. >>>> I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from >>>> either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to be >>>> overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. Has anyone >>>> got this working in UK, and what is the format for the >>>> outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? I note that >>>> the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. >>>> >>>> 3. I have built FreeSWITCH from git and installed at /usr/local/... and >>>> then followed the steps on the Ubuntu page in the Wiki to set up the run >>>> control scripts, etc, and run FS non-root as freeswitch:daemon. With >>>> FreeTDM, I have discovered that the /dev/wan* devices are owned by >>>> root:root, and so are inaccessible to FS running as non-root. So for >>>> now I have added a line in /etc/init.d/freeswitch to 'chgrp freeswitch >>>> /dev/wan*'. This is not the most elegant solution, because 'wanrouter >>>> restart' (which seems to be my best friend at the moment) resets the >>>> ownership to root:root. I have tried grepping to see where the mknods >>>> are for these devices, but have been unsuccessful. Is there a better >>>> place to 'permanently' change the device ownership? >>>> >>>> Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing my >>>> Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org Michal Bielicki Gesch?ftsf?hrer / CEO Seventh Signal Ltd. & Co. KG Weigandufer 45, B?ro 115, D-12059 Berlin Voice: +49 30 60988730 Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRA 44413 B Ust.-ID: DE266981999 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Michal Bielicki Pers?nlich Haftende Gesellschafterin: Seventh Signal Ltd, 69 Great Hampton St. Birmingham, B18 6EW, GB, Company Nr.: 06889439 WWW.: http://www.seventhsignal.de -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110611/438f84fc/attachment-0001.html From avi at avimarcus.net Sun Jun 12 01:20:45 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 00:20:45 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] IVR -> Phrase with a parameter Message-ID: I'm kinda new to IVRs and Phrases, but I see this: Meaning I can pass a parameter to the phrase, and then set different matching input configurations. Now, I see phrases are being used in the IVR: I'd like to have an announcement of a balance at the beginning, but start listening for the digits already. But, I'd like to have two different types of announcement in the beginning. I can either duplicate and create two different IVRs and two different sets of phrases, or I can take advantage of that parameter passing. But when I try: greet-long="phrase:cc_ivr_main_menu,${cash}" I get: 2011-06-12 00:05:24.788910 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:142 Can't find macro cc_ivr_main_menu,33.09. Am I missing something? Do I need to make a lua IVR to start capturing digits while I play other audio (how??) or create split the IVR into two nearly duplicate ones? Thanks, Avi From georuse at gmx.com Sat Jun 11 21:08:58 2011 From: georuse at gmx.com (george russell) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:08:58 +0000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] CHANNEL_BRIDGE event missing Message-ID: <20110611170858.278240@gmx.com> Freeswitch has connected my call. The call has gone through the gateway and connected to the phone on the other end. Because the call has connected I thought CHANNEL_BRIDGE should of occured. This is the list of events captured. Why would CHANNEL_BRIDGE event be missing even though the call has been bridged? I have done a "events plain all" and filtered for aleg uuid and bleg uuid "filter Unique-ID (aleg uuid)" "filter Unique-ID (bleg uuid)" CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export CHANNEL_EXECUTE / bridge CHANNEL_PROGRESS / CALL_UPDATE / CALL_UPDATE / CALL_UPDATE / CALL_UPDATE / CHANNEL_ANSWER / SESSION_HEARTBEAT / CHANNEL_HANGUP / -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110611/9bf173e6/attachment.html From snabb at epipe.com Sat Jun 11 13:02:12 2011 From: snabb at epipe.com (Janne Snabb) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:02:12 +0000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Free ZRTP implementation? Message-ID: Hi, I wanted to compile FreeSWITCH with ZRTP support, but it looks like Zimmermann's commercial libzrtp has not been available for "evaluation" download since the beginning of this year. I found a couple of older messages asking about it in the mailing list archives, but no real solution. Does anyone have patches or is anyone working on a module which would use a free ZRTP implementation such as ZORG or GNU ZRTP? If not, I might be able to have a look at it at some point... no promises though. -- Janne Snabb / EPIPE Communications snabb at epipe.com - http://epipe.com/ From msc at freeswitch.org Sun Jun 12 02:07:03 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:07:03 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Need: Fax Examples Message-ID: Hey all, I am working on the FSCB and I could use some of your real-world fax examples. I'm looking for anything like these: Inbound fax to email/PDF Outbound fax examples (scripts, etc. - whatever you do to make it easier for your users to send faxes thru FS) T.38 config examples and reports on symptoms/issues you had to overcome to make it work I will gladly accept any information you have, even if it's just raw dumps of scripts, XML configs, etc. Shoot them to me off-list. Thanks! -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110611/5a1b9314/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sun Jun 12 02:14:33 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:14:33 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] IVR -> Phrase with a parameter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: If you had read chapter 6 of the bridge book you'd know the answer. ;) If you want to pass arguments then do something like this: greet-long="phrase:cc_ivr_main_menu:${cash}:${arg2}:${arg3}" and Now you can use $1, $2, $3, etc. in your phrase macro. If you want to see macros in action then I suggest you look at the voicemail macros - they do all sorts of stuff. Of course, if you'd read chapter 6 of the FS book you'd know that, too. ;) -MC P.S. - Did I mention chapter 6 of the book? :D The reason I'm so familiar with it is because I wrote the stuff on phrase macros in chapter 6 and chapter 7... On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: > I'm kinda new to IVRs and Phrases, but I see this: > > > > > > Meaning I can pass a parameter to the phrase, and then set different > matching input configurations. > > Now, I see phrases are being used in the IVR: > I'd like to have an announcement of a balance at the beginning, but > start listening for the digits already. > But, I'd like to have two different types of announcement in the beginning. > I can either duplicate and create two different IVRs and two different > sets of phrases, or I can take advantage of that parameter passing. > > But when I try: greet-long="phrase:cc_ivr_main_menu,${cash}" I get: > 2011-06-12 00:05:24.788910 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:142 Can't find > macro cc_ivr_main_menu,33.09. > > Am I missing something? > Do I need to make a lua IVR to start capturing digits while I play > other audio (how??) or create split the IVR into two nearly duplicate > ones? > > Thanks, > Avi > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110611/8ff503d4/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Sun Jun 12 03:35:28 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:35:28 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] g729 licenses are not valid anymore after upgrade Message-ID: <9335B0A6-5190-4B14-86FE-EE515AF0B97A@ipeva.fr> I just upgraded from a 6 months GIT version to current, and the latest mod_com_g729 does not seem to accept my G729 licenses anymore. The error message is: Unrecognized resource G729A/0 If I revert back to the previous version (with mod_com_g729 158), it works fine. Is there something that was changed in the licenses ? Thanks David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110612/3085a5b9/attachment-0001.html From woodydickson at gmail.com Sun Jun 12 14:13:08 2011 From: woodydickson at gmail.com (Woody Dickson) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn Message-ID: <1517215760.4106057.1307873588760.JavaMail.app@ela4-bed78.prod> LinkedIn ------------ FreeSWITCH, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Woody Woody Dickson Managing Director at Power Telecom San Francisco Bay Area Confirm that you know Woody Dickson https://www.linkedin.com/e/xbphn8-gotu5zpw-6s/isd/3186430560/QOqMJZue/ -- (c) 2011, LinkedIn Corporation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110612/6f4afd44/attachment.html From devel at omninet.eu Sun Jun 12 16:18:38 2011 From: devel at omninet.eu (Anestis Mavro) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:18:38 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] g729 licenses are not valid anymore after upgrade In-Reply-To: <9335B0A6-5190-4B14-86FE-EE515AF0B97A@ipeva.fr> References: <9335B0A6-5190-4B14-86FE-EE515AF0B97A@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <37601782DCD4427186EF316CA19FD65A@omni1.local> Just activate the license again. I?ve had the same problem a few weeks ago Regards Anestis _____ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of David Ponzone Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 2:35 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: [Freeswitch-users] g729 licenses are not valid anymore after upgrade I just upgraded from a 6 months GIT version to current, and the latest mod_com_g729 does not seem to accept my G729 licenses anymore. The error message is: Unrecognized resource G729A/0 If I revert back to the previous version (with mod_com_g729 158), it works fine. Is there something that was changed in the licenses ? Thanks David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5054 (20100423) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110612/244b1000/attachment.html From gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com Sun Jun 12 19:01:06 2011 From: gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com (Gustavo Espeche) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:01:06 -0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec/CDR Error Message-ID: <1307890866.2056.31.camel@gustavo-laptop> Hi we found an error in freeswitch 2011-06-12 10:45:35.662591 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 o=Argentina-2 1307890456 1307890458 IN IP4 200.49.30.68 s=sip call c=IN IP4 200.49.30.69 t=0 0 m=audio 42410 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 -------------------------------------------- 2011-06-12 10:48:28.322557 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 o=Sonus_UAC 19969 23951 IN IP4 38.105.229.116 s=SIP Media Capabilities c=IN IP4 38.105.229.114 t=0 0 m=audio 14578 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 -------------------------------------------- 2011-06-12 10:50:14.686620 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 o=ATSI-B2 188 2 IN IP4 208.37.200.235 s=sip call c=IN IP4 208.37.200.245 t=0 0 m=audio 35538 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 -------------------------------------------------------- 2011-06-12 10:47:52.362623 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 o=VoipSwitch 10828 10828 IN IP4 50.30.35.13 s=VoipSIP i=Audio Session c=IN IP4 50.30.35.13 t=0 0 m=audio 9828 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-1 the problem is that when this error happens FS send the cdr immediately but the call still connected, and the provider still with all billing, because of the we see a billing difference with our provider. The error happens with different provider or customer equipment. Some one know if we can configure of freeswitch in some way that the call hangup. The problem isn't fix the codec error, for us the real problem is that the FS do a cdr but the call still connected. Thank a lot in advice. -- Gustavo Espeche EasyIpCall S.R.L. www.easyipcall.com Bv Mitre 517 24? E Cordoba - Argentina Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 From nsirugudi at gmail.com Sun Jun 12 19:32:53 2011 From: nsirugudi at gmail.com (Narendra Sirugudi) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:02:53 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Originating a call from a confeence is not working ? Message-ID: Hi, I am trying to use the dial-out feature of the conference application of freeswitch. I am using freeswtich version 1.0.6. As i understand the conference gets created when the first user joins. Hence i made one user with number 1004 join the conference. freeswitch at internal> conference list Conference 3001-10.10.10.16 (1 member rate: 8000) 6;sofia/internal/1004 at 10.10.10.16 ;08178796-a06e-4ee8-81fb-1f0cc53f8fb5;1004;1004;hear|speak|floor;0;0;300 Now i dail out another user 1005 using the command : freeswitch at internal> conference 3001-10.10.10.16 dial {originate_timeout=30}sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16<%7Boriginate_timeout=30%7Dsofia/internal/1005 at 135.254.210.166>1234567890 FreeSWITCH_Conference This does not work. I observe the following errors in the fs_cli logs: *2011-06-12 10:57:57.621014 [ERR] sofia.c:5366 Cannot Blind Transfer 1 Legged calls* can anyone tell what could be going wrong ? thanks --naren The complete logs are given below: ############################################################# freeswitch at internal> conference 3001-10.10.10.16 dial {originate_timeout=30}sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 1234567890 FreeSWITCH_Conference Call Requested: result: [NO_USER_RESPONSE] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1885 variable string 0 = [ignore_early_media=true] freeswitch at internal> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1885 variable string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:669 New Channel sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [a77137ad-ad1a-45e9-ac27-88a996cd865d] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:3384 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:83 sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA INIT 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:117 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:140 sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA ROUTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:360 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:360 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.608051 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 entering state [calling][0] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.608051 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5847 IP 10.10.10.16 Rejected by acl "domains". Falling back to Digest auth. 2011-06-12 10:57:57.608051 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:669 New Channel sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [86e5b4a9-8c63-4d22-b087-94c4b95d1abb] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.609139 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_NEW 2011-06-12 10:57:57.609139 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State NEW 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 entering state [received][100] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4164 Remote SDP: v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1307870225 1307870226 IN IP4 10.10.10.16 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 10.10.10.16 t=0 0 m=audio 20452 RTP/AVP 115 107 9 0 8 3 101 13 a=rtpmap:115 G7221/32000 a=fmtp:115 bitrate=48000 a=rtpmap:107 G7221/16000 a=fmtp:107 bitrate=32000 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 a=ptime:20 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3585 Audio Codec Compare [G7221:115:32000:20]/[G7221:115:32000:20] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2354 Set Codec sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 G7221/32000 20 ms 640 samples 2011-06-12 10:57:57.617820 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3524 Set 2833 dtmf send/recv payload to 101 2011-06-12 10:57:57.617820 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4310 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-12 10:57:57.617820 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:83 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA INIT 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:117 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:140 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA ROUTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard ROUTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:418 Processing FreeSWITCH_Conference->1005 in context public Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 parsing [public->unloop] continue=false Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Regex (PASS) [unloop] ${unroll_loops}(true) =~ /^true$/ break=on-false Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Regex (PASS) [unloop] ${sip_looped_call}(true) =~ /^true$/ break=on-false Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Action deflect(${destination_number}) 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:348 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State EXECUTE 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:226 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA EXECUTE 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard EXECUTE EXECUTE sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 deflect(1005) 2011-06-12 10:57:57.621014 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5004 Process REFER to [ 1005 at 10.10.10.16] *2011-06-12 10:57:57.621014 [ERR] sofia.c:5366 Cannot Blind Transfer 1 Legged calls* 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 entering state [terminated][480] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [NOTICE] sofia.c:4789 Hangup sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_CONSUME_MEDIA] [NO_USER_RESPONSE] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2102 Send signal sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [KILL] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:408 sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Overriding SIP cause 408 with 480 from the other leg 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:414 Channel sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 hanging up, cause: NO_USER_RESPONSE 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3228 Originate Resulted in Error Cause: 18 [NO_USER_RESPONSE] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Standard HANGUP, cause: NO_USER_RESPONSE 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:333 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Standard REPORTING, cause: NO_USER_RESPONSE 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:327 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1164 Session 24 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1182 Session 24 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Ended 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1184 Close Channel sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:428 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:341 sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Standard DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.720295 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:641 Send signal sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.721283 [NOTICE] switch_core_state_machine.c:185 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 has executed the last dialplan instruction, hanging up. 2011-06-12 10:57:57.721283 [NOTICE] switch_core_state_machine.c:187 Hangup sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.721283 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2102 Send signal sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [KILL] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:348 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:414 Channel sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 hanging up, cause: NORMAL_CLEARING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:476 Responding to INVITE with: 480 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard HANGUP, cause: NORMAL_CLEARING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:333 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard REPORTING, cause: NORMAL_CLEARING 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING going to sleep 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:327 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1164 Session 25 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1182 Session 25 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Ended 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1184 Close Channel sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:428 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:341 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard DESTROY 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY going to sleep ################################################################################## -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110612/938b9650/attachment-0001.html From michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de Sun Jun 12 21:30:35 2011 From: michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de (Michal Bielicki) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:30:35 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn In-Reply-To: <1517215760.4106057.1307873588760.JavaMail.app@ela4-bed78.prod> References: <1517215760.4106057.1307873588760.JavaMail.app@ela4-bed78.prod> Message-ID: <92787CF9-ED2A-4CBE-9431-C5A9CB593B07@seventhsignal.de> Would you now .... Am 12.06.2011 um 12:13 schrieb Woody Dickson: > LinkedIn > FreeSWITCH, > > I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. > > - Woody > > Woody Dickson > Managing Director at Power Telecom > San Francisco Bay Area > Confirm that you know Woody > > ? 2011, LinkedIn Corporation > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org Michal Bielicki Gesch?ftsf?hrer / CEO Seventh Signal Ltd. & Co. KG Weigandufer 45, B?ro 115, D-12059 Berlin Voice: +49 30 60988730 Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRA 44413 B Ust.-ID: DE266981999 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Michal Bielicki Pers?nlich Haftende Gesellschafterin: Seventh Signal Ltd, 69 Great Hampton St. Birmingham, B18 6EW, GB, Company Nr.: 06889439 WWW.: http://www.seventhsignal.de -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110612/e1c60220/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Sun Jun 12 22:22:27 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:22:27 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec/CDR Error In-Reply-To: <1307890866.2056.31.camel@gustavo-laptop> References: <1307890866.2056.31.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: <8BDCFAF1-7BF5-4691-AECB-A22DE5E813B4@ipeva.fr> which FS version do you use ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 12/06/2011 ? 17:01, Gustavo Espeche a ?crit : > Hi we found an error in freeswitch > > 2011-06-12 10:45:35.662591 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > o=Argentina-2 1307890456 1307890458 IN IP4 200.49.30.68 > s=sip call > c=IN IP4 200.49.30.69 > t=0 0 > m=audio 42410 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > -------------------------------------------- > 2011-06-12 10:48:28.322557 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > o=Sonus_UAC 19969 23951 IN IP4 38.105.229.116 > s=SIP Media Capabilities > c=IN IP4 38.105.229.114 > t=0 0 > m=audio 14578 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-15 > a=ptime:20 > -------------------------------------------- > 2011-06-12 10:50:14.686620 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > o=ATSI-B2 188 2 IN IP4 208.37.200.235 > s=sip call > c=IN IP4 208.37.200.245 > t=0 0 > m=audio 35538 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-15 > -------------------------------------------------------- > 2011-06-12 10:47:52.362623 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > o=VoipSwitch 10828 10828 IN IP4 50.30.35.13 > s=VoipSIP > i=Audio Session > c=IN IP4 50.30.35.13 > t=0 0 > m=audio 9828 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-1 > > the problem is that when this error happens FS send the cdr immediately > but the call still connected, and the provider still with all billing, > because of the we see a billing difference with our provider. > The error happens with different provider or customer equipment. > Some one know if we can configure of freeswitch in some way that the > call hangup. > The problem isn't fix the codec error, for us the real problem is that > the FS do a cdr but the call still connected. > Thank a lot in advice. > > > -- > > Gustavo Espeche > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > www.easyipcall.com > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > Cordoba - Argentina > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110612/920c1953/attachment.html From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Sun Jun 12 23:55:27 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:55:27 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues In-Reply-To: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58661@cooper> References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58301@cooper> <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEF56421@cooper> <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59DEE58661@cooper> Message-ID: Just so the robots catch this, Peter was exactly right, and this resolved the issue. Thanks! On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Peter Olsson wrote: > In that case, just add the cidr stuff to the global acl "domain" (acl.conf.xml under autoload_configs), this is used by default by the sofia internal profile, or create a new acl the the profile uses. > > Something like; > ? ? ? > ? ? ? > > This will make all calls from these IP's just to pass in. They won't be detected as any user, so the original From will be used when bridging the outgoing call. > > /Peter > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r Kurtis Heimerl > Skickat: den 10 juni 2011 05:29 > Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help > ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues > > I think you're right. Thanks! Removing IMSI641104278340883 from that > domain caused FS to fall back to the previous user, 1301. > > Unfortunately, I can't lets the agents auth, or use different IPs, all > are coming from the same application that doesn't support auth. > > I'm going to try adding each to their own unique domain, hopefully > that'll help. It might not though, considering they're all coming from > the same IP. > > Do you have any other idea how to fix this? > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Peter Olsson > wrote: >> I'm guessing your problem might be related to the fact that you use the cidr attribute on the user's - with the same IP's for all of them. If I understand these correctly (never used it this way myself) they're supposed to be used to authenticate a user for a specific IP, instead of challenge auth, and since the same IP is provided for all of them they might overwrite eachother, and the last one will be the one it matches. >> >> Also, read more on http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Acl#Users. >> >> Try removing the cidr attribute, and let the agents auth instead, or use different IP's for the users. >> >> /Peter >> ________________________________________ >> Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Kurtis Heimerl [kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu] >> Skickat: den 9 juni 2011 22:21 >> Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> ?mne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues >> >> Here you go: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16468 >> >> For this packet trace I decided to have profile "C" in the UA >> directory. This causes FS to send the second invite (which should be >> A->B) as C->B, rather than B->B, as it does if that UA is not present. >> ?Neither is correct, this just makes it a little easier to grep. >> >> User 1302 first appears in that invite, I don't see any other log >> items talking about 1302 at all. It's worth noting that 1302's user >> name (IMSI641104878332498) DOES appear in the SDP packet loaded in the >> first (A->B) invite, but I'm pretty certain FS should not be using >> that information for SIP addressing. Again, if I remove user >> IMSI641104878332498 from the directory, FS just switched to returning >> with user 1301, it doesn't fix the issue. >> >> It's very likely I'm massaging some code that's not commonly used, as >> I may be making a small mistake here or there in the original SIP >> invite. These two lines: >> 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6674 IP 192.168.1.144 >> Approved by acl "domains[IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144]". Access >> Granted. >> 2011-06-09 13:11:32.947157 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6803 Authenticating user >> IMSI641104878332498 at 192.168.1.144 >> Are particularly curious. I'm not sure if those are a response to the >> incoming invite (which would be incorrect) or not. It should be >> approving user 1300 at 192.168.1.144, if anyone. >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Peter Olsson >> wrote: >>> Please pastebin a complete debug log, with "sofia global siptrace on", to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org. >>> >>> I'm pretty sure this is not a bug in FS, if it was, we would have lots of people complaining... >>> >>> /Peter >>> >>> >>> -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >>> Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r Kurtis Heimerl >>> Skickat: den 8 juni 2011 23:32 >>> Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia invite issues >>> >>> Hello Freeswitch-users! >>> >>> I'm currently writing a SIP middlebox that intercepts sip messages and >>> changes their username. The reasons for this are complicated and >>> somewhat outside of the scope of this discussion. However, I've come >>> upon a very strange issue: when making a phone-to-phone call across >>> freeswitch; it is connecting the wrong user. I'm fairly well convinced >>> this is a bug, but I thought I'd send the issue here and see if it's >>> anything I'm obviously doing wrong. >>> >>> Basically, FS sees a SIP message from a registered UA (call it A) >>> inviting another registered user to a call (B). This is acked >>> correctly (a TRYING message). FS then responds by inviting B into a >>> call with some OTHER user C. C is not mentioned at any point in the >>> initial SIP messages (as verified by wireshark). Even more strangely, >>> if I remove user C from FS (by removing their config file) FS responds >>> to the invite by inviting B into a call with itself. In each case, the >>> appropriate from header in the invite should be the original caller A. >>> ?It's worth noting that I am not monkeying with the RTP packets at >>> all, but my understanding is that SIP signalling shouldn't be affected >>> by that. >>> >>> My general guess is that I'm messing up the naming somehow, and FS is >>> running an algorithm to guess at who the call originator is. However, >>> the naming must be roughly correct; Asterisk is able to handle this >>> call just fine. I've included a sip trace of the second situation (A >>> calls B, FS invites B to a call with itself) >>> >>> For the record A:1300 >>> B:1301 >>> C:IMSI641104878332498 >>> >>> REGISTER MESSAGE (Which works fine) >>> >>> REGISTER sip:192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >>> From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui >>> To: 1300 >>> Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 >>> CSeq: 91 REGISTER >>> Contact: ;expires=7200 >>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> SIP/2.0 200 OK >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK13347 >>> From: 1300 ;tag=ftoui >>> To: 1300 ;tag=jU64NXypQc57F >>> Call-ID: 1032827938 at 192.168.1.144 >>> CSeq: 91 REGISTER >>> Contact: ;expires=7200 >>> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:02:04 GMT >>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE >>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> SIP TRACE (A -> B, B -> B response) >>> >>> INITIAL INVITE >>> INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144 SIP/2.0 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 >>> From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx >>> To: >>> Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 >>> CSeq: 485 INVITE >>> Contact: ;expires=3600 >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>> Content-Length: 143 >>> >>> INVITE ACK >>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144:5063;branch=z9hG4bK77974 >>> From: 1300 ;tag=bgdqx >>> To: >>> Call-ID: 1817795092 at 192.168.1.144 >>> CSeq: 485 INVITE >>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> FS INVITE (Note the from address being wrong) >>> INVITE sip:1301 at 192.168.1.144:5063 SIP/2.0 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.144;rport;branch=z9hG4bKeeQvcyZ70SDUg >>> Max-Forwards: 69 >>> From: "1301" ;tag=rHyS0Z3B61arN >>> To: >>> Call-ID: 84df47f9-0cb7-122f-13b5-5cff350d9de5 >>> CSeq: 13447852 INVITE >>> Contact: >>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-71d64e6 2011-06-07 22-30-16 -0700 >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE >>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, >>> sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, >>> refer >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Content-Disposition: session >>> Content-Length: 315 >>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>> Remote-Party-ID: "1301" >>> ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off >>> >>> USER CONFIGURATIONS >>> >>> 1300.xml >>> >>> ? >>> ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? >>> ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? >>> ? >>> >>> >>> 1301.xml >>> >>> ? >>> ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? >>> ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? >>> ? >>> >>> >>> IMSI641104878332498.xml >>> >>> ?>> number-alias="1302"> >>> ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? >>> ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? >>> ? >>> >>> >>> DIALPLAN >>> >>> ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? ? >>> ? ? ? >>> ? ? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > !DSPAM:4df1916532761203114732! > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From freeswitch at aastral.net Mon Jun 13 00:48:19 2011 From: freeswitch at aastral.net (Bill W.) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] start_dtmf_generate during early media? Message-ID: <1QVra4-0008Vr-8x@mail.aastral.net> Hey everyone, I'm trying to terminate a call over a voip carrier to an AT&T conference bridge. AT&T (who, of all people, should know better) are playing the prompts for the conference bridge over early media. And of course, you can't connect to the conf. bridge because no DTMF is transferred (because the call isn't answered yet). So the question is, is there a way to force FreeSWITCH to transcode 2833 DTMF from the A-leg and send inband DTMF on the B-leg while the B-leg is in early-media state? I see there is the start_dtmf_generate application, but will this work if the b-leg is still in the early-media state? Thanks! From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Mon Jun 13 03:52:36 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:52:36 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] g729 licenses are not valid anymore after upgrade In-Reply-To: <37601782DCD4427186EF316CA19FD65A@omni1.local> References: <9335B0A6-5190-4B14-86FE-EE515AF0B97A@ipeva.fr> <37601782DCD4427186EF316CA19FD65A@omni1.local> Message-ID: Anestis, absolutely. I tried that yesterday but it failed. I supposed I screwed up somewhere because I just did it again, and it's ok now. Thanks David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 12/06/2011 ? 14:18, Anestis Mavro a ?crit : > Just activate the license again. I?ve had the same problem a few weeks ago? > > Regards > Anestis > > > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of David Ponzone > Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 2:35 AM > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] g729 licenses are not valid anymore after upgrade > > I just upgraded from a 6 months GIT version to current, and the latest mod_com_g729 does not seem to accept my G729 licenses anymore. > > The error message is: > Unrecognized resource G729A/0 > > If I revert back to the previous version (with mod_com_g729 158), it works fine. > > Is there something that was changed in the licenses ? > > Thanks > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5054 (20100423) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5054 (20100423) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/8367d895/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Mon Jun 13 03:54:45 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:54:45 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] session:read() not timeouting In-Reply-To: <9911DF4D-FC78-4F88-AB15-2FAB939F3A59@ipeva.fr> References: <9911DF4D-FC78-4F88-AB15-2FAB939F3A59@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <37948572-D5DC-446D-B6E5-B2AC48523B09@ipeva.fr> I upgraded to latest GIT, so I can now answer to myself: it's fixed. Something was wrong in Dec 1st 2010 version with application read, and is fixed now. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 11/06/2011 ? 14:06, David Ponzone a ?crit : > All, > > When using session:read() in a LUA script called from dialplan, the interdigit timeout works fine on my test box (with GIT from end of May, and a 1000hz timer). > On my prod box, the timeout does not trigger the end of the read app. The terminating character is the only way to end the read() normally. > The prod box is using a GIT from December 2010, and a bad timer (250Hz). > > Should I suppose the issue comes from the timer or from the old version on the prod box (I am upgrading ASAP) ? > > Thanks > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/75b8e150/attachment-0001.html From qingquan at globalroam.com Mon Jun 13 06:31:24 2011 From: qingquan at globalroam.com (qingquan luo) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:31:24 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! Message-ID: Hi All, I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone number. I use bypass_media mode. So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, By I notice that When LegB reply 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to caller. This make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf What wrong with that? How can fix it? Any information or help is welcome. Thanks Best Regards Qingquan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/b36074b1/attachment.html From michael.raistrick at googlemail.com Mon Jun 13 10:55:10 2011 From: michael.raistrick at googlemail.com (Mike Raistrick) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:55:10 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UK ISDN outgoing CLI (was Re: FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK) In-Reply-To: <4DF1F07A.5000200@earthspike.net> References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF10C83.6020803@earthspike.net> <4DF1F07A.5000200@earthspike.net> Message-ID: I've no direct experience with BT BRA ISDN (plenty with other providers) - but I don't think that CLIP / COLP will be the issue. CLIP is an inbound service - and determines whether your equipment is presented with the number of the person calling you (and if they allow it). Although COLP is an outbound service, it is used to display the number of the line that you are connected through to (which might not be the same as the number you dialled - e.g. 0800 numbers). Whilst we're on supplementary services, CLIR is also an outbound service and allows you to specify whether the CLI that you send (or the one that BT uses) can be shown to the person you call. Some terminogy: ISDN Basic Rate differentiates Direct Dial In (DDI's) and Multiple Subscriber Numbers (MSNs) for incoming services. DDIs are designed for PBXs and are associated with a range of numbers in a block. The service provider sends you a called party number that can range either from the last 'X' digits through to the whole number - this is normally specified when the service is ordered and then all calls are delivered the same way. With DDIs - when you send an outgoing call you should be able to send the extension or the whole number - in either case you should mark the Type Of Number field accordingly (and if in national format - not include the '0' for the number itself). In case that you send the extension digits - the service provider adds this to the DDI 'stem' to get the full number. With the full number (either derived from the extension, or as you sent it) - the provider should then check that the number is in the allocated DDI range - if it is it will allow it through, if not it will usually send the root DDI number. MSNs are unique to BRA - they are completely separate telephone numbers and were originally designed to allow multiple BRA phones to be off the same ISDN bus and have their own phone numbers. This means that the full number will always be sent to you, and be expected from you for called and calling numbers (still with the right Type Of Number set..). Summary - with either DDI or MSNs - you should be OK to send the whole number to BT as the calling party - minus the '0' and with TON set to 'national'. Finally - if you do have the CLIR supplementary service, make sure that you set the presentation indicator to 'allowed' - default should normally be to assume allowed unless set differently - but to be on the safe side. Mike On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, John wrote: > Shouldbe, > > You won't be burned at the stake for heresy and are probably right that > this is the problem, as we have had delays in getting CLIP implemented. > From your comment I assume that COLP is not automatically enabled (even > though I am paying for additional SNDDIs) but has to be ordered > specifically. Our service provider is on to it, and I am waiting till > CLIP/COLP is applied before doing any more testing. I'll post here with > the results. > > John > > On 10/06/11 10:08, shouldbe q931 wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:10 PM, John wrote: > >> [I've forked this thread as it really should have been 3 separate > >> threads to start with.] > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> I have tried every combination I can think of, except 10 digits which I > >> will give a go. That makes sense as in the general case it would permit > >> non-geographical numbers to be presented. > >> > >> The lines are provided as 2 x ISDN2e with a lead number covering all 4 > >> channels. The NTE8s are labelled 1-2 and 3-4, so not separate > >> individual lines, I thnk. > >> > >> We currently have a Single Number DDI in addition, and hope to increase > >> that to 2 very soon; the 3 numbers between them will serve 3 separate > >> business units, so we want to be able to present the correct outbound > >> CLI from each business unit. We also have a remote call forward from > >> another number to the lead number, but presenting that really would be > >> CLI spoofing, so I am not expecting that to be permissible. But I would > >> expect those that are directly allocated to the 2 lines/4 channels to be > >> allowed to be presented. > >> > >> John > >> > >> On 09/06/11 08:27, shouldbe q931 wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:36 PM, John > wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>> > >>>> 2. We have 2 Single Number DDI numbers configured over the 4 channels. > >>>> I want to set up outgoing calls so that they can appear to come from > >>>> either of the two numbers, but at present the outgoing CLI appears to > be > >>>> overridden by the telco (BT) to only use one of the numbers. Has > anyone > >>>> got this working in UK, and what is the format for the > >>>> outbound_caller_id_number: last 6 digits or full 11 digits? I note > that > >>>> the inbound called number is only the last 6 digits. > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Thanks for all the great support I have already got just from editing > my > >>>> Wiki User page; this is a friendly group! > >>>> > >>>> John > >>>> > >>> I can only comment on the BT part. > >>> > >>> If they are two individual lines, you're out of luck with BT, as they > >>> do not allow CLI spoofing, which this would be. > >>> > >>> I would suggest sending BT the same number of digits that they send > >>> you, if that doesn't work try 10 digits. If you are not sending the > >>> "correct" number of digits for a valid DDI on the trunk, then they > >>> will send the lead number for the trunk. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > > I know that this might sound like heresy :-) but have you checked > > spoken to BT and asked them if CLIP and CLOP on the lines ? > > > > I think CLOP is outbound and CLIP is inbound, but I might have it the > > wrong way round... > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/58e1c5c9/attachment.html From gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com Mon Jun 13 14:54:51 2011 From: gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com (Gustavo Espeche) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:54:51 -0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec/CDR Error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1307962491.2216.4.camel@gustavo-laptop> the freeswitch version is FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-c4a2faf 2011-06-10 14-36-35 -0400), and in this version we can put the FS in debug too. -- Gustavo Espeche EasyIpCall S.R.L. www.easyipcall.com Bv Mitre 517 24? E Cordoba - Argentina Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 which FS version do you use ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 12/06/2011 ? 17:01, Gustavo Espeche a ?crit : > Hi we found an error in freeswitch > > 2011-06-12 10:45:35.662591 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > o=Argentina-2 1307890456 1307890458 IN IP4 200.49.30.68 > s=sip call > c=IN IP4 200.49.30.69 > t=0 0 > m=audio 42410 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > -------------------------------------------- > 2011-06-12 10:48:28.322557 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > o=Sonus_UAC 19969 23951 IN IP4 38.105.229.116 > s=SIP Media Capabilities > c=IN IP4 38.105.229.114 > t=0 0 > m=audio 14578 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-15 > a=ptime:20 > -------------------------------------------- > 2011-06-12 10:50:14.686620 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > o=ATSI-B2 188 2 IN IP4 208.37.200.235 > s=sip call > c=IN IP4 208.37.200.245 > t=0 0 > m=audio 35538 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-15 > -------------------------------------------------------- > 2011-06-12 10:47:52.362623 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > o=VoipSwitch 10828 10828 IN IP4 50.30.35.13 > s=VoipSIP > i=Audio Session > c=IN IP4 50.30.35.13 > t=0 0 > m=audio 9828 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-1 > > the problem is that when this error happens FS send the cdr > immediately > but the call still connected, and the provider still with all billing, > because of the we see a billing difference with our provider. > The error happens with different provider or customer equipment. > Some one know if we can configure of freeswitch in some way that the > call hangup. > The problem isn't fix the codec error, for us the real problem is that > the FS do a cdr but the call still connected. > Thank a lot in advice. > > > -- > > Gustavo Espeche > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > www.easyipcall.com > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > Cordoba - Argentina > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com Mon Jun 13 14:59:34 2011 From: gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com (Gustavo Espeche) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:59:34 -0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sangoma Card D100 Message-ID: <1307962774.2216.6.camel@gustavo-laptop> Hi Some one can do this card work, we was buy it 2 week ago and nor Sangoma support can't it work, the card don't do transcoding, if someone can do it work please let us know. -- Gustavo Espeche EasyIpCall S.R.L. www.easyipcall.com Bv Mitre 517 24? E Cordoba - Argentina Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Mon Jun 13 15:30:15 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:30:15 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sangoma Card D100 In-Reply-To: <1307962774.2216.6.camel@gustavo-laptop> References: <1307962774.2216.6.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: May you explain exactly what makes you think it does not work and what are the steps you followed to install it ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 13/06/2011 ? 12:59, Gustavo Espeche a ?crit : > Hi Some one can do this card work, we was buy it 2 week ago and nor > Sangoma support can't it work, the card don't do transcoding, if someone > can do it work please let us know. > > -- > > Gustavo Espeche > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > www.easyipcall.com > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > Cordoba - Argentina > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/9a1ead14/attachment-0001.html From andy at fabulous4.co.uk Mon Jun 13 17:48:02 2011 From: andy at fabulous4.co.uk (Andy Ayers) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:48:02 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Option Method Message-ID: <00cc01cc29d0$855d4380$9017ca80$@fabulous4.co.uk> Hi folks, I've been asked by my telecoms provider if my switch supports the SIP OPTION METHOD. I'm running freeswitch 1.0.6 on a debian linux server. Can you confirm if this is supported or not? Many thanks Andy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/3be00830/attachment.html From rhuddleston at gmail.com Mon Jun 13 17:51:49 2011 From: rhuddleston at gmail.com (Robert Huddleston) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Option Method In-Reply-To: <00cc01cc29d0$855d4380$9017ca80$@fabulous4.co.uk> References: <00cc01cc29d0$855d4380$9017ca80$@fabulous4.co.uk> Message-ID: <1c4b01cc29d1$0b848680$228d9380$@com> RTFM / JFGI http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia_Configuration_Files From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Andy Ayers Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 9:48 AM To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Option Method Hi folks, I've been asked by my telecoms provider if my switch supports the SIP OPTION METHOD. I'm running freeswitch 1.0.6 on a debian linux server. Can you confirm if this is supported or not? Many thanks Andy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/335997af/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Mon Jun 13 18:24:14 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:24:14 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Option Method In-Reply-To: <00cc01cc29d0$855d4380$9017ca80$@fabulous4.co.uk> References: <00cc01cc29d0$855d4380$9017ca80$@fabulous4.co.uk> Message-ID: Yes On 13 June 2011 14:48, Andy Ayers wrote: > Hi folks, > > > > I?ve been asked by my telecoms provider if my switch supports the SIP > OPTION METHOD. I?m running freeswitch 1.0.6 on a debian linux server. Can > you confirm if this is supported or not? > > > > Many thanks > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/de071566/attachment.html From wstephen80 at gmail.com Mon Jun 13 18:28:51 2011 From: wstephen80 at gmail.com (Stephen Wilde) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:28:51 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sangoma Card D100 In-Reply-To: <1307962774.2216.6.camel@gustavo-laptop> References: <1307962774.2216.6.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: Hi, I'm using a Sangoma D500 transcoding card. No problem to install and configure the board: is zero config board, you have only to load the sangoma codec freeswitch module. As David Ponzone say, you have to do a detailed explanation of your trouble. Stephen On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Gustavo Espeche < gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com> wrote: > Hi Some one can do this card work, we was buy it 2 week ago and nor > Sangoma support can't it work, the card don't do transcoding, if someone > can do it work please let us know. > > -- > > Gustavo Espeche > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > www.easyipcall.com > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > Cordoba - Argentina > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/90ac35d8/attachment.html From kris at kriskinc.com Mon Jun 13 18:46:36 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Please provide a full console log with sip trace enabled and upload it to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org sofia global siptrace on On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:31 PM, qingquan luo wrote: > Hi All, > > I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone number. > I use bypass_media mode. > So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, > By I notice that When LegB reply 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch > change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to > caller. This make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf > > What wrong with that? How can fix it? > Any information or help is welcome. > > > Thanks > > Best Regards > > > Qingquan > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Kristian Kielhofner From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Mon Jun 13 15:08:19 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:38:19 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] X-Lite giving error while connecting to FreeSwitch Server Message-ID: Hello all, I am very new to FreeSwitch and VOIP Technology. I installed the FreeSwitch and X-Lite on my Window 7 OS. I am using default FreeSwitch configuration. Nothing changed except adding Text to Speech module. When I am trying connecting to FreeSwitch Sever on localhost from X-Lite Softphone. I am getting the error on X-lite Account failed to enable. Account 1001 could not be enabled. Problem at server(SIP error 503). Try Again Later I have given the account setting at X-Lite as below: Account Name: 1001 Protocol: SIP UserID: 1001 Domain: localhost Password: 1234 Display Name: Test User Authorization Name: 1001 Domain Proxy: Register with Domain and receive calls: Checked Send Outbound via: DOmain I dont know what wrong I am doing and How I should debug this issue. Please help. Thanks Ankit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/0d1f4e8e/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 13 19:11:08 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:11:08 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Codec/CDR Error In-Reply-To: <1307962491.2216.4.camel@gustavo-laptop> References: <1307962491.2216.4.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: get a full debug trace w/ sip trace and put it on pastebin.freeswitch.org. -MC On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Gustavo Espeche < gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com> wrote: > the freeswitch version is FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-c4a2faf > 2011-06-10 14-36-35 -0400), and in this version we can put the FS in > debug too. > > -- > Gustavo Espeche > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > www.easyipcall.com > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > Cordoba - Argentina > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > which FS version do you use ? > David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: > 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - > www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de > ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et > d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > Le 12/06/2011 ? 17:01, Gustavo Espeche a ?crit : > > Hi we found an error in freeswitch > > > > 2011-06-12 10:45:35.662591 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > > o=Argentina-2 1307890456 1307890458 IN IP4 200.49.30.68 > > s=sip call > > c=IN IP4 200.49.30.69 > > t=0 0 > > m=audio 42410 RTP/AVP 18 101 > > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > -------------------------------------------- > > 2011-06-12 10:48:28.322557 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > > o=Sonus_UAC 19969 23951 IN IP4 38.105.229.116 > > s=SIP Media Capabilities > > c=IN IP4 38.105.229.114 > > t=0 0 > > m=audio 14578 RTP/AVP 18 101 > > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > a=fmtp:101 0-15 > > a=ptime:20 > > -------------------------------------------- > > 2011-06-12 10:50:14.686620 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > > o=ATSI-B2 188 2 IN IP4 208.37.200.235 > > s=sip call > > c=IN IP4 208.37.200.245 > > t=0 0 > > m=audio 35538 RTP/AVP 18 101 > > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > a=fmtp:101 0-15 > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > 2011-06-12 10:47:52.362623 [ERR] sofia.c:5323 Codec Error! v=0 > > o=VoipSwitch 10828 10828 IN IP4 50.30.35.13 > > s=VoipSIP > > i=Audio Session > > c=IN IP4 50.30.35.13 > > t=0 0 > > m=audio 9828 RTP/AVP 18 101 > > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1 > > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > a=fmtp:101 0-1 > > > > the problem is that when this error happens FS send the cdr > > immediately > > but the call still connected, and the provider still with all billing, > > because of the we see a billing difference with our provider. > > The error happens with different provider or customer equipment. > > Some one know if we can configure of freeswitch in some way that the > > call hangup. > > The problem isn't fix the codec error, for us the real problem is that > > the FS do a cdr but the call still connected. > > Thank a lot in advice. > > > > > > -- > > > > Gustavo Espeche > > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > > www.easyipcall.com > > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > > Cordoba - Argentina > > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/704e9e6e/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 13 19:20:01 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:20:01 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Listen to the conversation between a user and an IVR In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC643016@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC643016@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: Whom do you wish to have listening to that call? You can use the eavesdrop function if you wish. You can also use the telecast feature of mod_xml_rpc to listen to live calls via a browser... -MC On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if there's a way to listen to the conversation between a user > and an IVR (javascript programs). > > Here's the background info. > I have a javascript that first makes an outbound call to someone. And When > the call is answered, the call is then connected another extension, which > runs an IVR application written in javascript. > I want to be able to listen to the live conversation between the person and > the IVR. > > Is this supported? If so, how can I do that in javascript? Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/81be5997/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 13 19:27:25 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:27:25 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Originating a call from a confeence is not working ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Just curious - Try this and let us know if it behaves differently: conference 3001-10.10.10.16 dial {originate_timeout=30}<%7Boriginate_timeout=30%7Dsofia/internal/1005 at 135.254.210.166>user/1005 1234567890 FreeSWITCH_Conference -MC On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Narendra Sirugudi wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use the dial-out feature of the conference application of > freeswitch. > I am using freeswtich version 1.0.6. > > As i understand the conference gets created when the first user joins. > Hence i made one user with number 1004 join the conference. > > freeswitch at internal> conference list > Conference 3001-10.10.10.16 (1 member rate: 8000) > 6;sofia/internal/1004 at 10.10.10.16 > ;08178796-a06e-4ee8-81fb-1f0cc53f8fb5;1004;1004;hear|speak|floor;0;0;300 > > Now i dail out another user 1005 using the command : > freeswitch at internal> conference 3001-10.10.10.16 dial > {originate_timeout=30}sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16<%7Boriginate_timeout=30%7Dsofia/internal/1005 at 135.254.210.166>1234567890 FreeSWITCH_Conference > This does not work. I observe the following errors in the fs_cli logs: > > *2011-06-12 10:57:57.621014 [ERR] sofia.c:5366 Cannot Blind Transfer 1 > Legged calls* > can anyone tell what could be going wrong ? > > thanks > --naren > > The complete logs are given below: > > ############################################################# > freeswitch at internal> conference 3001-10.10.10.16 dial > {originate_timeout=30}sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 1234567890 > FreeSWITCH_Conference > Call Requested: result: [NO_USER_RESPONSE] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1885 variable > string 0 = [ignore_early_media=true] > freeswitch at internal> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] > switch_ivr_originate.c:1885 variable string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:669 New Channel > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [a77137ad-ad1a-45e9-ac27-88a996cd865d] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:3384 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_INIT > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:83 > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA INIT > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:117 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:140 > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA ROUTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_ROUTING -> > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:360 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:360 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.608051 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 entering state [calling][0] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.608051 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5847 IP 10.10.10.16 Rejected by > acl "domains". Falling back to Digest auth. > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.608051 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:669 New Channel > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16[86e5b4a9-8c63-4d22-b087-94c4b95d1abb] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.609139 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_NEW > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.609139 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State NEW > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 entering state [received][100] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4164 Remote SDP: > v=0 > o=FreeSWITCH 1307870225 1307870226 IN IP4 10.10.10.16 > s=FreeSWITCH > c=IN IP4 10.10.10.16 > t=0 0 > m=audio 20452 RTP/AVP 115 107 9 0 8 3 101 13 > a=rtpmap:115 G7221/32000 > a=fmtp:115 bitrate=48000 > a=rtpmap:107 G7221/16000 > a=fmtp:107 bitrate=32000 > a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 > a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-16 > a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 > a=ptime:20 > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3585 Audio Codec Compare > [G7221:115:32000:20]/[G7221:115:32000:20] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2354 Set Codec > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 G7221/32000 20 ms 640 samples > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.617820 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3524 Set 2833 dtmf > send/recv payload to 101 > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.617820 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4310 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.617820 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_INIT > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:83 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA INIT > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:117 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:140 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA ROUTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard ROUTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:418 Processing > FreeSWITCH_Conference->1005 in context public > Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 parsing [public->unloop] > continue=false > Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Regex (PASS) [unloop] > ${unroll_loops}(true) =~ /^true$/ break=on-false > Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Regex (PASS) [unloop] > ${sip_looped_call}(true) =~ /^true$/ break=on-false > Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Action > deflect(${destination_number}) > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_ROUTING -> > CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:348 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:226 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA EXECUTE > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 deflect(1005) > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.621014 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5004 Process REFER to [ > 1005 at 10.10.10.16] > *2011-06-12 10:57:57.621014 [ERR] sofia.c:5366 Cannot Blind Transfer 1 > Legged calls* > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 entering state [terminated][480] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [NOTICE] sofia.c:4789 Hangup > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_CONSUME_MEDIA] [NO_USER_RESPONSE] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2102 Send signal > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [KILL] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:408 > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Overriding SIP cause 408 with 480 from the > other leg > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:414 Channel > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 hanging up, cause: NO_USER_RESPONSE > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3228 Originate > Resulted in Error Cause: 18 [NO_USER_RESPONSE] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Standard HANGUP, cause: NO_USER_RESPONSE > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:333 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Standard REPORTING, cause: > NO_USER_RESPONSE > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:327 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1164 Session 24 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Locked, Waiting on external entities > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1182 Session 24 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Ended > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1184 Close > Channel sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_DESTROY] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:428 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:341 > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( > sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.720295 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:641 Send signal > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.721283 [NOTICE] switch_core_state_machine.c:185 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 has executed the last dialplan > instruction, hanging up. > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.721283 [NOTICE] switch_core_state_machine.c:187 Hangup > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.721283 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2102 Send signal > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [KILL] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:348 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State EXECUTE going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:414 Channel > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 hanging up, cause: NORMAL_CLEARING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:476 Responding to INVITE > with: 480 > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard HANGUP, cause: > NORMAL_CLEARING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:333 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_HANGUP -> > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard REPORTING, cause: > NORMAL_CLEARING > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING going to sleep > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:327 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_REPORTING -> > CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1164 Session 25 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Locked, Waiting on external > entities > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1182 Session 25 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Ended > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1184 Close > Channel sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_DESTROY] > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:428 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:341 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( > sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY going to sleep > > ################################################################################## > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/4724d50d/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 13 19:30:26 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:30:26 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] X-Lite giving error while connecting to FreeSwitch Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Are you running FreeSWITCH on the same server where you have X-Lite running? If so, change the host from "localhost" to the actual IP address and try again. -MC On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:08 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Hello all, > > I am very new to FreeSwitch and VOIP Technology. > > I installed the FreeSwitch and X-Lite on my Window 7 OS. > > I am using default FreeSwitch configuration. Nothing changed except adding > Text to Speech module. > > When I am trying connecting to FreeSwitch Sever on localhost from X-Lite > Softphone. I am getting the error on X-lite > Account failed to enable. > Account 1001 could not be enabled. > Problem at server(SIP error 503). Try Again Later > > I have given the account setting at X-Lite as below: > Account Name: 1001 > Protocol: SIP > UserID: 1001 > Domain: localhost > Password: 1234 > Display Name: Test User > Authorization Name: 1001 > > Domain Proxy: > Register with Domain and receive calls: Checked > Send Outbound via: DOmain > > I dont know what wrong I am doing and How I should debug this issue. > > Please help. > > Thanks > Ankit > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/da42c903/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 13 19:34:25 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:34:25 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] start_dtmf_generate during early media? In-Reply-To: <1QVra4-0008Vr-8x@mail.aastral.net> References: <1QVra4-0008Vr-8x@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: AFAIK the start_dtmf will work as long as media is established - even early media. -MC On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Bill W. wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I'm trying to terminate a call over a voip carrier to an AT&T conference > bridge. > > AT&T (who, of all people, should know better) are playing the prompts > for the conference bridge over early media. And of course, you can't > connect to the conf. bridge because no DTMF is transferred (because the > call isn't answered yet). > > So the question is, is there a way to force FreeSWITCH to transcode 2833 > DTMF from the A-leg and send inband DTMF on the B-leg while the B-leg is > in early-media state? > > I see there is the start_dtmf_generate application, but will this work > if the b-leg is still in the early-media state? > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/259fbf57/attachment.html From revmichael at bethelightchapel.com Mon Jun 13 19:34:58 2011 From: revmichael at bethelightchapel.com (Rev Michael Carbone) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Timer Config Off Message-ID: <20110613113458.19515fiw9kw6axgc@psychicawakeningschool.com> Not sure what happened but recording a conference was working, now I get this error when I try to record a conference: 2011-06-13 15:33:16.337400 [ERR] mod_conference.c:2897 Error Opening File [recordings/conference_CallInLineRadio-localhost-2011-06-13-06_3.wav] 2011-06-13 15:33:16.337400 [ERR] switch_core_timer.c:117 Timer is not properly configured. any ideas? From Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net Mon Jun 13 20:37:33 2011 From: Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net (Hector Geraldino) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EBBC@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EC87@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Hi Michael, I finally figure out how to connect both calls using the command 'intercept'. From the inbound call (handled by the OB socket) I just do an execute intercept legB uuid, and both calls are bridged perfectly. Thanks very much. So the only thing that stills concerns me is why the event CHANNEL_ANSWER is always generated on the outbound call (legb), even if the user doesn't pick up the call. Also I can't find any differences on the CHANNEL_CALLSTATE or CALL_UPDATE events that allows me to determine when an outbound call generated from FS is actually answered or not. BTW, I bought the FS 1.0.6 book on Amazon last week and I want to congratulate you and Anthony/Darren for the excellent work you've done, it has been really helpful. My only complaint is that it doesn't have an eBook format so I can read it on my Kindle. Besides that, great work. From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 6:27 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Hector Geraldino > wrote: Thanks for your response Michael. Finally I found the way of dialing to an external extension. What I did was just open a shell, listen in a port using nc and tried to originate a call. It worked using the syntax: originate sofia/internal/5562 at 192.168.23.104 &park As this is an outbound call (not managed by the socket application) I had to use a new inbound socket connection to connect to FS, make the call, query for the uuid and receive some events (like DTMF among others). Everything was going great, until I found two issues: - The CHANNEL_ANSWER event is always triggered, no matter if the call is actually picked up or not on my phone. I thought that maybe I can use some other event to determine if the call have been answered or not (like CHANNEL_CALLSTATE or CALL_UPDATE), but the additional information on the event headers is the same no matter if it's answered or not. - When the call is answered, and the user presses a key to accept the call, the function returns the UUID of this session to the main method. Then I tried to make the bridge between the two calls (the legA call handled by the socket application, and the legB outbound call generated in the application using an inbound connection). I using the command api uuid_bridge but this didn't work. Am I missing something here? You're missing the debug log on the pastebin. ;) Yeah, let's take a look at the debug log of this happening. Capture from the beginning of the a leg all the way through to trying the uuid_bridge. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/06ef5be8/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Mon Jun 13 21:45:33 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:15:33 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] X-Lite giving error while connecting to FreeSwitch Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I tried your suggestion and it is working now, Thank you very much. On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Are you running FreeSWITCH on the same server where you have X-Lite > running? If so, change the host from "localhost" to the actual IP address > and try again. > > -MC > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:08 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I am very new to FreeSwitch and VOIP Technology. >> >> I installed the FreeSwitch and X-Lite on my Window 7 OS. >> >> I am using default FreeSwitch configuration. Nothing changed except adding >> Text to Speech module. >> >> When I am trying connecting to FreeSwitch Sever on localhost from X-Lite >> Softphone. I am getting the error on X-lite >> Account failed to enable. >> Account 1001 could not be enabled. >> Problem at server(SIP error 503). Try Again Later >> >> I have given the account setting at X-Lite as below: >> Account Name: 1001 >> Protocol: SIP >> UserID: 1001 >> Domain: localhost >> Password: 1234 >> Display Name: Test User >> Authorization Name: 1001 >> >> Domain Proxy: >> Register with Domain and receive calls: Checked >> Send Outbound via: DOmain >> >> I dont know what wrong I am doing and How I should debug this issue. >> >> Please help. >> >> Thanks >> Ankit >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/de758c4a/attachment-0001.html From cbanta at gmail.com Mon Jun 13 20:31:47 2011 From: cbanta at gmail.com (Cameron Banta) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] conference high cpu and audio delay Message-ID: <4DF63B73.3090902@gmail.com> Hello, I'm running FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.7 (hacked-20110606T040042Z) on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit with kernel 2.6.35-22-server. I am running about 300 simultaneous calls spread out over about 50 conferences. I'm getting a cpu load of 20 to 30, and cpu utilization about 75% on each core. There's about a 2 second audio delay in the conference when it gets this loaded. Is this high load and audio delay just the limit of my cpu (dual core E5200)? I ask because I was able to get the same number of calls on this server with asterisk 1.6 with app_konference with a much lower cpu load - about 4 or 5 - and no audio delay. Thanks, Cameron From yungwei at resolvity.com Mon Jun 13 21:49:16 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originate a call to an extension and then connect to another extension Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC643195@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Hi, I am wondering if it's possible to originate a call to an extension and then connect to another extension. If so, how does the the dialstring look like? Thanks. From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 13 21:52:57 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:52:57 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EC87@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EBBC@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EC87@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Hector Geraldino < Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > > I finally figure out how to connect both calls using the command > ?intercept?. From the inbound call (handled by the OB socket) I just do an > execute intercept legB uuid, and both calls are bridged perfectly. Thanks > very much. > > > > So the only thing that stills concerns me is why the event CHANNEL_ANSWER > is always generated on the outbound call (legb), even if the user doesn?t > pick up the call. Also I can?t find any differences on the CHANNEL_CALLSTATE > or CALL_UPDATE events that allows me to determine when an outbound call > generated from FS is actually answered or not. > Did you ever post the full call debug log with a siptrace? I don't recall seeing that... > > > BTW, I bought the FS 1.0.6 book on Amazon last week and I want to > congratulate you and Anthony/Darren for the excellent work you?ve done, it > has been really helpful. My only complaint is that it doesn?t have an eBook > format so I can read it on my Kindle. Besides that, great work. > Yes, that complaint has been levied on more than one occasion. We've been imploring Packt to rectify the situation. We'll keep you posted on the status. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/6fcc06c6/attachment.html From freeswitch at aastral.net Mon Jun 13 22:00:37 2011 From: freeswitch at aastral.net (Bill W.) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] start_dtmf_generate during early media? In-Reply-To: References: <1QVra4-0008Vr-8x@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: <1QWBRK-0007Rl-Qf@mail.aastral.net> Hey Michael, Thanks for the reply! If that is the case, what is the best way to trigger that? I've tried setting this on the A-leg, but it didn't appear to work. Thanks, Bill On 6/13/11 11:34 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > AFAIK the start_dtmf will work as long as media is established - even > early media. > -MC From errotan at elder.hu Mon Jun 13 22:27:36 2011 From: errotan at elder.hu (=?iso-8859-1?q?Pusk=E1s_Zsolt?=) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:27:36 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] conference high cpu and audio delay In-Reply-To: <4DF63B73.3090902@gmail.com> References: <4DF63B73.3090902@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201106132027.36630.errotan@elder.hu> Hi. You should try to compile an 1000 Hz kernel for your box. I helps alot. 2011. j?nius 13. 18:31:47 d?tummal Cameron Banta az al?bbiakat ?rta: > Hello, > > I'm running FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.7 (hacked-20110606T040042Z) on Ubuntu > 10.04 64 bit with kernel 2.6.35-22-server. > > I am running about 300 simultaneous calls spread out over about 50 > conferences. I'm getting a cpu load of 20 to 30, and cpu utilization > about 75% on each core. There's about a 2 second audio delay in the > conference when it gets this loaded. > > Is this high load and audio delay just the limit of my cpu (dual core > E5200)? > > I ask because I was able to get the same number of calls on this server > with asterisk 1.6 with app_konference with a much lower cpu load - about > 4 or 5 - and no audio delay. > > Thanks, > Cameron > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 13 22:32:53 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:32:53 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] start_dtmf_generate during early media? In-Reply-To: <1QWBRK-0007Rl-Qf@mail.aastral.net> References: <1QVra4-0008Vr-8x@mail.aastral.net> <1QWBRK-0007Rl-Qf@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: Can you pb the debug output of this call? You might also record the call and listen to the audio, just to confirm what's happening. -MC On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Bill W. wrote: > Hey Michael, > > Thanks for the reply! If that is the case, what is the best way to > trigger that? > > I've tried setting this on the A-leg, but it didn't appear to work. > > data="nolocal:execute_on_media=start_dtmf_generate true"/> > > Thanks, > Bill > > > On 6/13/11 11:34 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > > AFAIK the start_dtmf will work as long as media is established - even > > early media. > > -MC > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/2f573518/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 13 22:36:53 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:36:53 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originate a call to an extension and then connect to another extension In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC643195@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC643195@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: If you mean you want to call x1000 and then when it answers, immediately dial x1001? If so it's just this, assuming these are registered users: originate user/1000 1001 If you want to call 1001 first then do this: originate user/1001 1000 -MC On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I am wondering if it's possible to originate a call to an extension and > then connect to another extension. If so, how does the the dialstring look > like? Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/16763fd9/attachment.html From Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net Mon Jun 13 22:47:55 2011 From: Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net (Hector Geraldino) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EBBC@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EC87@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45ECAA@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Right, the call log is on: http://pastebin.com/kAEZsFe6 I found the issue which is really silly (don't know how I couldn't figure it out before): the call has been picked up by the voicemail, that's why the CHANNEL_ANSWER event is shown up. What's the most common pattern to deal with this situation, when you want to know if the call has been answered by a human being and not by a machine? I'm thinking about requesting a confirmation (DTMF) and timeout the operation after a few secs, but as this seems to be a very common task, I was wondering if there's a better way of doing it. From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:53 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Hector Geraldino > wrote: Hi Michael, I finally figure out how to connect both calls using the command 'intercept'. From the inbound call (handled by the OB socket) I just do an execute intercept legB uuid, and both calls are bridged perfectly. Thanks very much. So the only thing that stills concerns me is why the event CHANNEL_ANSWER is always generated on the outbound call (legb), even if the user doesn't pick up the call. Also I can't find any differences on the CHANNEL_CALLSTATE or CALL_UPDATE events that allows me to determine when an outbound call generated from FS is actually answered or not. Did you ever post the full call debug log with a siptrace? I don't recall seeing that... BTW, I bought the FS 1.0.6 book on Amazon last week and I want to congratulate you and Anthony/Darren for the excellent work you've done, it has been really helpful. My only complaint is that it doesn't have an eBook format so I can read it on my Kindle. Besides that, great work. Yes, that complaint has been levied on more than one occasion. We've been imploring Packt to rectify the situation. We'll keep you posted on the status. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/bbbb4965/attachment-0001.html From yungwei at resolvity.com Mon Jun 13 23:08:04 2011 From: yungwei at resolvity.com (Yungwei Chen) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originate a call to an extension and then connect to another extension In-Reply-To: References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC643195@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC6431DC@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> I don't mean registered users. I mean extensions defined in conf/dialplan/default/my_exten.xml as shown below. In this case, I can do: originate sofia/internal/answer question? From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:37 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] originate a call to an extension and then connect to another extension If you mean you want to call x1000 and then when it answers, immediately dial x1001? If so it's just this, assuming these are registered users: originate user/1000 1001 If you want to call 1001 first then do this: originate user/1001 1000 -MC On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: Hi, I am wondering if it's possible to originate a call to an extension and then connect to another extension. If so, how does the the dialstring look like? Thanks. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/7ee8d008/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 14 00:59:21 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:59:21 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originate a call to an extension and then connect to another extension In-Reply-To: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC6431DC@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> References: <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC643195@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> <33095823FD21DF429B481B5163264B7950AC6431DC@VMBX102.ihostexchange.net> Message-ID: originate loopback/question answer On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > I don't mean registered users. I mean extensions defined in > conf/dialplan/default/my_exten.xml as shown below. > > In this case, I can do: originate sofia/internal/answer question? > > > > > > > > > > data="/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/question.wav" /> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > data="/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/answer.wav" /> > > > > > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael > Collins > *Sent:* Monday, June 13, 2011 1:37 PM > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] originate a call to an extension and > then connect to another extension > > > > If you mean you want to call x1000 and then when it answers, immediately > dial x1001? If so it's just this, assuming these are registered users: > > > > originate user/1000 1001 > > > > If you want to call 1001 first then do this: > > > > originate user/1001 1000 > > > > -MC > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > I am wondering if it's possible to originate a call to an extension and > then connect to another extension. If so, how does the the dialstring look > like? Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/56950c58/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 14 01:02:16 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:02:16 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound socket app In-Reply-To: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45ECAA@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EAA0@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EB71@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EBBC@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45EC87@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F45ECAA@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: Well, you can use the answer confirmation variables... http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#Answer_confirmation_variables or you can contact consulting at freeswitch.org and see about getting the answering machine detection module. (Not a free item, BTW.) -MC On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Hector Geraldino < Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > Right, the call log is on: > > > > http://pastebin.com/kAEZsFe6 > > > > I found the issue which is really silly (don?t know how I couldn?t figure > it out before): the call has been picked up by the voicemail, that?s why the > CHANNEL_ANSWER event is shown up. > > > > What?s the most common pattern to deal with this situation, when you want > to know if the call has been answered by a human being and not by a machine? > I?m thinking about requesting a confirmation (DTMF) and timeout the > operation after a few secs, but as this seems to be a very common task, I > was wondering if there?s a better way of doing it. > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael > Collins > *Sent:* Monday, June 13, 2011 1:53 PM > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] originating a call from an outbound > socket app > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Hector Geraldino < > Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > I finally figure out how to connect both calls using the command > ?intercept?. From the inbound call (handled by the OB socket) I just do an > execute intercept legB uuid, and both calls are bridged perfectly. Thanks > very much. > > > > So the only thing that stills concerns me is why the event CHANNEL_ANSWER > is always generated on the outbound call (legb), even if the user doesn?t > pick up the call. Also I can?t find any differences on the CHANNEL_CALLSTATE > or CALL_UPDATE events that allows me to determine when an outbound call > generated from FS is actually answered or not. > > Did you ever post the full call debug log with a siptrace? I don't recall > seeing that... > > > > > > BTW, I bought the FS 1.0.6 book on Amazon last week and I want to > congratulate you and Anthony/Darren for the excellent work you?ve done, it > has been really helpful. My only complaint is that it doesn?t have an eBook > format so I can read it on my Kindle. Besides that, great work. > > Yes, that complaint has been levied on more than one occasion. We've been > imploring Packt to rectify the situation. We'll keep you posted on the > status. > > > > -MC > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/131dbb7a/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 14 01:04:29 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:04:29 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] regex groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: What's in $0 on something like this? expresion="^0(\d+)$" Just curious. This is probably a minor bug, so open a jira w/ low priority. -MC On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Joseph L. Casale < jcasale at activenetwerx.com> wrote: > I wrote up a quick dialplan and intended on using $0 for the whole number, > so my regex was: > > but $0 was empty until I rewrote it: > > > Is this expected, I assumed not and I was not looking for $1 etc I figured > $0 to > always get populated. > > Thanks, > jlc > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/ee34137c/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 14 01:08:09 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:08:09 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] CHANNEL_BRIDGE event missing In-Reply-To: <20110611170858.278240@gmx.com> References: <20110611170858.278240@gmx.com> Message-ID: Can you do a few tests? First, filter for just the CHANNEL_BRIDGE events (so you see them for all channels) and then make your test call. Confirm that they are coming through before you bang your head any further... -MC On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:08 AM, george russell wrote: > Freeswitch has connected my call. The call has gone through the gateway and > connected to the phone on the other end. > Because the call has connected I thought CHANNEL_BRIDGE should of occured. > > This is the list of events captured. Why would CHANNEL_BRIDGE event be > missing even though the call has been bridged? > > > I have done a "events plain all" and filtered for aleg uuid and bleg uuid > > "filter Unique-ID (aleg uuid)" > "filter Unique-ID (bleg uuid)" > > > > CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE / export > CHANNEL_EXECUTE / bridge > CHANNEL_PROGRESS / > CALL_UPDATE / > CALL_UPDATE / > CALL_UPDATE / > CALL_UPDATE / > CHANNEL_ANSWER / > SESSION_HEARTBEAT / > CHANNEL_HANGUP / > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/1ebc9a52/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 14 01:11:11 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:11:11 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Lua ASR TTS In-Reply-To: <1307202350274-6439449.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1307202350274-6439449.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Sorry for the late reply - I missed this one. Are you using the break app or the uuid_break API? Also, are you using the "all" argument? -MC On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:45 AM, educs13 wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to run the 'Examples directory lua asr tts' > (http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Examples_directory_lua_asr_tts) in Ubuntu > 10.04/32 bits, but I had some problems with the 'session:streamFile()'. > > If I say something when the prompt is still playing, the audio stucks > indefinitely. It seems that the 'break' command isn't doing all its job. I > guess that maybe the 'break' is just stop feeding the audio player with new > samples, but it is not stopping the player. So, this player keeps reading > and playing the same samples continuously ... > > I really don't know if my guess makes sense and as I don't know C very > well, > I don't know where to look for a solution in the source code. I Hope you > could help me. > > Thanks, > Eduardo > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Lua-ASR-TTS-tp6439449p6439449.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/12c051f0/attachment.html From david.villasmil.work at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 02:59:14 2011 From: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com (David Villasmil) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:59:14 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bypass_media problem Message-ID: Hello Guys, I have a set where i'm receiving a call from a gw and sending to another gw. Both un-natted. If I set in my (lua) script bypass_media=false, call goes just fine, if i set it to true, FS sends "Temporary unavailable" to the B-side and CANCELs the A-side... Codec is fine as you will see in the pastebin.. here's the trace: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16480 and here's the console log: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16481 I'm bridging with a lua script, this is the pertinent part: gw_sip_username and gw_sip_pwd are just bogus "1234","1234", no registration is needed.... session:execute("set","continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,UNALLOCATED_NUMBER,407") session:execute("set","inbound-late-negotiation=true") session:execute("set","inbound-bypass-media=false") session:execute("set","proxy_media=false") session:execute("set","bypass_media=false") --session:execute("bridge","{sip_auth_username=" .. gw_sip_username .. ",sip_auth_password=" .. gw_sip_pwd .. "}sofia/external/".. out_number .."@".. gw_sip_ip .."") fsLog("BRIDGE EXECUTE:", "{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. route_name .. ")}" .. out_number .. "") session:execute("bridge","{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. route_name .. ")}".. out_number .."") -- hangup session:hangup(); Thanks guys for your help! David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/644c225b/attachment.html From david.villasmil.work at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 03:01:29 2011 From: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com (David Villasmil) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:01:29 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bypass_media problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Forgot to mention, calls gets disconnected whe 183 is received from B-side Thanks! On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:59 AM, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I have a set where i'm receiving a call from a gw and sending to another > gw. Both un-natted. If I set in my (lua) script bypass_media=false, call > goes just fine, if i set it to true, FS sends "Temporary unavailable" to the > B-side and CANCELs the A-side... > > Codec is fine as you will see in the pastebin.. > > > here's the trace: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16480 > > and here's the console log: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16481 > > I'm bridging with a lua script, this is the pertinent part: > > gw_sip_username and gw_sip_pwd are just bogus "1234","1234", no > registration is needed.... > > > > > > session:execute("set","continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,UNALLOCATED_NUMBER,407") > > session:execute("set","inbound-late-negotiation=true") > session:execute("set","inbound-bypass-media=false") > > session:execute("set","proxy_media=false") > session:execute("set","bypass_media=false") > > > --session:execute("bridge","{sip_auth_username=" .. gw_sip_username .. > ",sip_auth_password=" .. gw_sip_pwd .. "}sofia/external/".. out_number > .."@".. gw_sip_ip .."") > > > fsLog("BRIDGE EXECUTE:", "{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. > route_name .. ")}" .. out_number .. "") > session:execute("bridge","{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. > route_name .. ")}".. out_number .."") > > -- hangup > session:hangup(); > > > > Thanks guys for your help! > > > David > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/760cd042/attachment.html From gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com Tue Jun 14 03:20:14 2011 From: gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com (Gustavo Espeche) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:20:14 -0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] unload pcmu and pcma Message-ID: <1308007214.2014.1.camel@gustavo-laptop> Hi we buy a sangoma d100 and we are having trouble because sangoma support inform to us that we can't do a trascoding g711-->g729 because we can unload the codec g711 from freeswitch. Some one know how we can fix this issue? Best Regards. -- Gustavo Espeche EasyIpCall S.R.L. www.easyipcall.com Bv Mitre 517 24? E Cordoba - Argentina Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 03:24:40 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:24:40 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] unload pcmu and pcma In-Reply-To: <1308007214.2014.1.camel@gustavo-laptop> References: <1308007214.2014.1.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: G711 is built into the core, you can't just unload it. That specific Sangoma's support personnel might be confused with how FreeSwitch works. Try pulling the latest git again, I saw some fixes for the Sangoma cards that somebody put up a few days ago. On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Gustavo Espeche wrote: > Hi we buy a sangoma d100 and we are having trouble because sangoma > support inform to us that we can't do a trascoding g711-->g729 because > we can unload the codec g711 from freeswitch. > Some one know how we can fix this issue? > Best Regards. > > -- > > Gustavo Espeche > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > www.easyipcall.com > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > Cordoba - Argentina > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From ivank at rogers.com Tue Jun 14 04:23:13 2011 From: ivank at rogers.com (Ivan Kovacevic) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] continue_on_fail failover with mod_lcr Message-ID: <041201cc2a29$3ffe2df0$bffa89d0$@rogers.com> Anyone? I am still wondering if there is a documented/undocumented reason why continue_on_fail does not work with piped failover? From: Ivan Kovacevic [mailto:ivank at rogers.com] Sent: June-09-11 4:38 PM To: 'freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org' Subject: continue_on_fail failover with mod_lcr Hi Everyone, I would like to implement fail-over for my outbound gateway, but I would like to be able to pick certain cause codes which qualify to stop trying next gateway (specifically when I have bad number and I am getting sip:404 NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION, UNALLOCATED_NUMBER). I was using 1.0.6, but I moved to the newest git about month ago. After searching through lists and spending several hours playing with continue_to_fail, failure_causes and fail_on_single_reject I was able to make it work by specifying cause codes for which I want to fail-over and omitting ones that qualify to stop trying next gateway in variable continue_to_fail: So this setup is working for me and in the case I have bad number and x.x.x.x returns sip:404 (NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION or UNALLOCATED_NUMBER) it is not trying y.y.y.y gateway. However if I want to use "|" between my gateways - and the example below is not working. And no matter what x.x.x.x returns - it will try y.y.y.y and eventually z.z.z.z. Unfortunately, we have to use pipe for fail-over since we are using mod_lcr to choose between outbound gateways. Any suggestions? Thanks, Ivan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/c1facedc/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 14 05:38:02 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:38:02 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Question: Pocketsphinx Message-ID: Hello all! I am looking for examples of mod_pocketsphinx being used in a real-world application. If you are using pocketsphinx ASR for something useful and can share some configs I would appreciate it. I'm soliciting ideas on how to make the pocketsphinx recipe in the cookbook be as truly useful as possible. I don't personally use it for anything and I've only seen the pizza demo in action, so I'm asking our intrepid community members for some thoughts. Email me off list, please. Thanks! -Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110613/9c73d2bb/attachment.html From lrobot.qq at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 06:40:10 2011 From: lrobot.qq at gmail.com (Qingquan Luo) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:40:10 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! Message-ID: Hi All, I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone number. I use bypass_media mode. So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, By I notice that When LegB reply 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to caller. This make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf What wrong with that? How can fix it? Any information or help is welcome. Thanks Best Regards Qingquan -- Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/83e3003f/attachment.html From kris at kriskinc.com Tue Jun 14 06:44:29 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Perhaps you didn't get my earlier reply: 1) Turn on siptrace with "sofia global siptrace on" from fs_cli. 2) Provide a full SIP trace and console debug on http://pastebin.freeswitch.org On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Qingquan Luo wrote: > Hi All, > ? I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone number. > ? I use bypass_media mode. > ? So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, > ? By I notice that When LegB reply 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch > change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to > caller. This make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf > ? What wrong with that? ?How can fix it? > ? Any information or help is welcome. > > Thanks > > Best Regards > > Qingquan > > > -- > Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: > http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Kristian Kielhofner From freeswitch at aastral.net Tue Jun 14 07:48:58 2011 From: freeswitch at aastral.net (Bill W.) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] start_dtmf_generate during early media? In-Reply-To: References: <1QVra4-0008Vr-8x@mail.aastral.net> <1QWBRK-0007Rl-Qf@mail.aastral.net> Message-ID: <1QWKci-0005DQ-Fw@mail.aastral.net> Hey Micheal, Okay, I believe I've tracked it down to this: If I set Then inband dtmf is NOT generated on the B-leg. If I remove the bridge_early_media=true, then inband DTMF IS generated on the b-leg. Is this a bug or a feature? ;-) Thanks! Bill On 6/13/11 2:32 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Can you pb the debug output of this call? You might also record the call > and listen to the audio, just to confirm what's happening. > > -MC > From sharad at coraltele.com Tue Jun 14 08:54:33 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:24:33 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know howmanyareread & how many are unread in Inbox References: <26DE8A8116AB4F5BB31F0675DDBFD1BF@sharad> Message-ID: Ok Thanks for all your efforts.. Best Regards Sharad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Benke" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 2:14 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Voicemail Message - How t know howmanyareread & how many are unread in Inbox >> Plz advice further.. > > Sorry, no idea then. > But i assume, if a user just listens to a message but doesn't archive > it right away, he want's to listen to it again at a later time, so the > message should remain "new" - therefore the behaviour you report is > not wrong imho(not updating "read_epoch" is not beautiful though). > > > From wstephen80 at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 11:00:49 2011 From: wstephen80 at gmail.com (Stephen Wilde) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:00:49 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] unload pcmu and pcma In-Reply-To: <1308007214.2014.1.camel@gustavo-laptop> References: <1308007214.2014.1.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: Hi, I use Sangoma transcoding card only to handle G711-G729 calls! Probably, what the Sangoma people say is that the codec G711 is embedded in Freeswitch and you cannot move it to Sangoma hardware. This means that Sangoma card do the G729-L16 transcoding (high cpu consuming) and Freeswitch do the L16-G711 transcoding (is only a mapping, not algorithm = very low cpu consuming). For this reason, for example, in all G711-G711 calls the Sangoma card is not involved. For these calls, to have the G711 in Freeswitch is more efficient then to have the G711 in Sangoma card! Stephen On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Gustavo Espeche < gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com> wrote: > Hi we buy a sangoma d100 and we are having trouble because sangoma > support inform to us that we can't do a trascoding g711-->g729 because > we can unload the codec g711 from freeswitch. > Some one know how we can fix this issue? > Best Regards. > > -- > > Gustavo Espeche > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > www.easyipcall.com > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > Cordoba - Argentina > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/d4a6e779/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 11:02:08 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:02:08 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bypass_media problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: session:execute("set","inbound-late-negotiation=true") session:execute("set","inbound-bypass-media=false") This will have no effect. Once the channel is created drop the inbound- part, that is only used on the SIP profile. -Steve On 13 June 2011 23:59, David Villasmil wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I have a set where i'm receiving a call from a gw and sending to another > gw. Both un-natted. If I set in my (lua) script bypass_media=false, call > goes just fine, if i set it to true, FS sends "Temporary unavailable" to the > B-side and CANCELs the A-side... > > Codec is fine as you will see in the pastebin.. > > > here's the trace: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16480 > > and here's the console log: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16481 > > I'm bridging with a lua script, this is the pertinent part: > > gw_sip_username and gw_sip_pwd are just bogus "1234","1234", no > registration is needed.... > > > > > > session:execute("set","continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,UNALLOCATED_NUMBER,407") > > session:execute("set","inbound-late-negotiation=true") > session:execute("set","inbound-bypass-media=false") > > session:execute("set","proxy_media=false") > session:execute("set","bypass_media=false") > > > --session:execute("bridge","{sip_auth_username=" .. gw_sip_username .. > ",sip_auth_password=" .. gw_sip_pwd .. "}sofia/external/".. out_number > .."@".. gw_sip_ip .."") > > > fsLog("BRIDGE EXECUTE:", "{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. > route_name .. ")}" .. out_number .. "") > session:execute("bridge","{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. > route_name .. ")}".. out_number .."") > > -- hangup > session:hangup(); > > > > Thanks guys for your help! > > > David > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/b058f43f/attachment.html From maciej.aniserowicz at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 11:40:00 2011 From: maciej.aniserowicz at gmail.com (Maciej Aniserowicz) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Eavesdrop between 2 FS instaces In-Reply-To: References: <1307039305975-6432366.post@n2.nabble.com> <1307106103579-6435172.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1308037200643-6473071.post@n2.nabble.com> Yes, I tried this also... 3 applications are needed here: (command sent to FS1) [app1] [CallA channel] [app2]:{sip_h_X-target_channel_id=[CallB channel]}sofia/bridging/123456 at ip:port,park inline (dialplan in FS2) <action application="<b>app3" data="${sip_h_X-target_channel_id}" /> app1 is uuid_transfer app3 is eavesdrop app2...? I cannot find anything that fits in here. MA Steven Ayre wrote: > > I think you want the eavesdrop app: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_eavesdrop > > Intercept takes over the call. Eavesdrop just silently listens in. > > -Steve > > > > On 3 June 2011 14:01, Maciej Aniserowicz > <maciej.aniserowicz at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Steve, >> Thanks for interest. >> >> Yes, i figured out that i cannot eavesdrop any 'easy' way. I tried the >> approach you described (dialing into FS2 to a special context and passing >> sip-h_X header). In fact i use this to bridge calls on different FSes. >> But >> while i managed to get it working with bridging, i cannot find a way to >> do >> eavesdropping. >> >> With bridging I send: >> uuid_transfer [CallA channel] bridge:{sip_h_X-target_channel_id=[CallB >> channel]}sofia/bridging/123456 at ip:port,park inline >> >> Then FS2 in dialplan for 123456 extracts target channel id from sip >> header >> and intercepts it: >> >> >> >> >> What actions should i define in FS2 dialplan for eavesdropping? What >> inline >> dialplan should i send in dial string? I'm stuck here. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Eavesdrop-between-2-FS-instaces-tp6432366p6435172.html >> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Eavesdrop-between-2-FS-instaces-tp6432366p6473071.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From valery.kalinin at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 11:57:35 2011 From: valery.kalinin at gmail.com (Valery Kalinin) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:57:35 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Cannot configure ftmod_libpri Message-ID: Hi all! Cannot setup FreeTDM with libpri. I have configured mode network on channel E1, the provider also set this mode. But log write: 2011-06-14 13:42:01.930818 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. 2011-06-14 13:42:02.934635 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. 2011-06-14 13:42:03.965449 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. 2011-06-14 13:42:04.965269 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. 2011-06-14 13:42:05.905336 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. 2011-06-14 13:42:06.925361 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. 2011-06-14 13:42:07.945387 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. 2011-06-14 13:42:08.565403 [CRIT] lpwrap_pri.c:321 Error = -1 [Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character] 2011-06-14 13:43:07.975737 [ERR] Span:0 Received UA frame in invalid state How to properly set up FreeTDM? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/c8a3230e/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 12:14:08 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:14:08 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bypass_media problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Can't see the reason immediately... the channel appears to be hanging up because it thinks the bridge is finished. Can you repeat the debug log, but this time enabling FreeSWITCH's siptrace option? (sofia global siptrace on). Also, I this isn't doing what I think you expect: session:execute("bridge","{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. route_name .. ")}".. out_number .."") The distributor API is called just once to generate the string to give to the bridge app, not on each loop. So you'll be dialing through the same gateway 3 times not rerouting to another gateway. Also, what FS version is this? -Steve On 13 June 2011 23:59, David Villasmil wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I have a set where i'm receiving a call from a gw and sending to another > gw. Both un-natted. If I set in my (lua) script bypass_media=false, call > goes just fine, if i set it to true, FS sends "Temporary unavailable" to the > B-side and CANCELs the A-side... > > Codec is fine as you will see in the pastebin.. > > rou > here's the trace: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16480 > > and here's the console log: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16481 > > I'm bridging with a lua script, this is the pertinent part: > > gw_sip_username and gw_sip_pwd are just bogus "1234","1234", no > registration is needed.... > > > > > > session:execute("set","continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,UNALLOCATED_NUMBER,407") > > session:execute("set","inbound-late-negotiation=true") > session:execute("set","inbound-bypass-media=false") > > session:execute("set","proxy_media=false") > session:execute("set","bypass_media=false") > > > --session:execute("bridge","{sip_auth_username=" .. gw_sip_username .. > ",sip_auth_password=" .. gw_sip_pwd .. "}sofia/external/".. out_number > .."@".. gw_sip_ip .."") > > > fsLog("BRIDGE EXECUTE:", "{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. > route_name .. ")}" .. out_number .. "") > session:execute("bridge","{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. > route_name .. ")}".. out_number .."") > > -- hangup > session:hangup(); > > > > Thanks guys for your help! > > > David > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/bfcd5961/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 12:21:50 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:21:50 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Cannot configure ftmod_libpri In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Try changing that to: One side has to be network, the other has to be cpe (like master-slave). That error makes it look like you're both trying to be the network end. -Steve On 14 June 2011 08:57, Valery Kalinin wrote: > Hi all! > > Cannot setup FreeTDM with libpri. > I have configured mode network on channel E1, the provider also set this > mode. > But log write: > 2011-06-14 13:42:01.930818 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error > event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. > 2011-06-14 13:42:02.934635 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error > event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. > 2011-06-14 13:42:03.965449 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error > event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. > 2011-06-14 13:42:04.965269 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error > event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. > 2011-06-14 13:42:05.905336 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error > event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. > 2011-06-14 13:42:06.925361 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error > event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. > 2011-06-14 13:42:07.945387 [WARNING] ftmod_libpri.c:1590 -- PRI error > event: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. > 2011-06-14 13:42:08.565403 [CRIT] lpwrap_pri.c:321 Error = -1 [Invalid or > incomplete multibyte or wide character] > 2011-06-14 13:43:07.975737 [ERR] Span:0 Received UA frame in invalid state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How to properly set up FreeTDM? > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/4c96f02c/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 12:38:28 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:08:28 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Adding a New User Message-ID: Dear all, I am new to FreeSwitch. I added a new user ext 1100 by below two steps. 1. Create a new XML file for the user, usually by copying an existing file 2. Modify the Local_Extension Dialplan entry Now, I tried to connect to the FS Server using SIP protocol and Soft Phone X-lite. On X-lite, it is giving error "Account cant be enable" At FS CLI, it is giving the error freeswitch at ankit-PC> 2011-06-14 13:37:45.695430 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1872 Can't find user [1100 at 192.168.1.5] You must define a domain called '192.168.1.5' in your directory and add a user w ith the id="1100" attribute and you must configure your device to use the proper domain in it's authenticati on credentials. 2011-06-14 13:37:45.703430 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1030 SIP auth failure (REGISTER ) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1100 at 192.168.1.5] from ip 192.168.1.5 I reloaded the XML also. My SIP soft phone and my Freeswitch server is at the same machine having same IP address. I did some hit and trial and also tried to find on mailing list. I could not find what could be the problem. Please help. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/013a9972/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 12:41:53 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:41:53 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Eavesdrop between 2 FS instaces In-Reply-To: <1308037200643-6473071.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1307039305975-6432366.post@n2.nabble.com> <1307106103579-6435172.post@n2.nabble.com> <1308037200643-6473071.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Try something like this: FS1: uuid_broadcast bridge:{sip_h_X-target_ channel_id=}sofia/bridging/123456 at ip:port aleg FS2: -Steve On 14 June 2011 08:40, Maciej Aniserowicz wrote: > Yes, I tried this also... > 3 applications are needed here: > > (command sent to FS1) > [app1] [CallA channel] [app2]:{sip_h_X-target_channel_id=[CallB > channel]}sofia/bridging/123456 at ip:port,park inline > > (dialplan in FS2) > > <action application="<b>app3" > data="${sip_h_X-target_channel_id}" /> > > > app1 is uuid_transfer > app3 is eavesdrop > app2...? I cannot find anything that fits in here. > > MA > > > > Steven Ayre wrote: > > > > I think you want the eavesdrop app: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_eavesdrop > > > > Intercept takes over the call. Eavesdrop just silently listens in. > > > > -Steve > > > > > > > > On 3 June 2011 14:01, Maciej Aniserowicz > > <maciej.aniserowicz at gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> Hi Steve, > >> Thanks for interest. > >> > >> Yes, i figured out that i cannot eavesdrop any 'easy' way. I tried the > >> approach you described (dialing into FS2 to a special context and > passing > >> sip-h_X header). In fact i use this to bridge calls on different FSes. > >> But > >> while i managed to get it working with bridging, i cannot find a way to > >> do > >> eavesdropping. > >> > >> With bridging I send: > >> uuid_transfer [CallA channel] bridge:{sip_h_X-target_channel_id=[CallB > >> channel]}sofia/bridging/123456 at ip:port,park inline > >> > >> Then FS2 in dialplan for 123456 extracts target channel id from sip > >> header > >> and intercepts it: > >> > >> /> > >> > >> > >> What actions should i define in FS2 dialplan for eavesdropping? What > >> inline > >> dialplan should i send in dial string? I'm stuck here. > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Eavesdrop-between-2-FS-instaces-tp6432366p6435172.html > >> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Eavesdrop-between-2-FS-instaces-tp6432366p6473071.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/595e1d9e/attachment.html From valery.kalinin at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 15:00:33 2011 From: valery.kalinin at gmail.com (Valery Kalinin) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:00:33 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Cannot configure ftmod_libpri Message-ID: Now other errors: 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c19][1:20] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c20][1:21] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c21][1:22] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c22][1:23] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c23][1:24] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c24][1:25] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c25][1:26] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c26][1:27] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c27][1:28] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c28][1:29] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c29][1:30] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:31.958295 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2753 [s1c30][1:31] Channel not opened, proceeding anyway 2011-06-14 16:51:32.058312 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:33.588339 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1087 [s1c31][1:16] HDLC abort frame received (ZT_EVENT_ABORT) 2011-06-14 16:51:33.598348 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:33.608355 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.158405 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.178402 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.188409 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.208410 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.258408 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.358406 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.388410 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1087 [s1c31][1:16] HDLC abort frame received (ZT_EVENT_ABORT) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.438412 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.498413 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:36.868433 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [2002 at 192.168.205.1] from ip 192.168.20 2011-06-14 16:51:36.928427 [WARNING] sofia_glue.c:213 Codec G723 payload 4 added to sdp wanting ptime 30 but it's already 20 (PCMA:8:20), disabling ptime 2011-06-14 16:51:41.031529 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:43.078575 [ERR] ftmod_zt.c:1075 [s1c31][1:16] Bad frame checksum (ZT_EVENT_BADFCS) 2011-06-14 16:51:44.961433 [CRIT] lpwrap_pri.c:321 Error = -1 [Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character] 2011-06-14 16:52:12.490765 [CRIT] sofia.c:841 No more sessions allowed at this time. 2011-06-14 16:52:12.649384 [ERR] Span:0 Received UA frame in invalid state 2011-06-14 16:52:15.057934 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 8 for 1:16 2011-06-14 16:52:15.157916 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 8 for 1:16 2011-06-14 16:52:15.257898 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 8 for 1:16 2011-06-14 16:52:15.357880 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 8 for 1:16 2011-06-14 16:52:15.457862 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 6 for 1:16 2011-06-14 16:52:15.557844 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 6 for 1:16 2011-06-14 16:52:15.657826 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 6 for 1:16 2011-06-14 16:52:15.757808 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 6 for 1:16 2011-06-14 16:52:15.857790 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 6 for 1:16 2011-06-14 16:52:16.057754 [WARNING] ozmod_zt.c:1072 Unhandled event 6 for 1:16 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/6bf29c01/attachment-0001.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 15:51:28 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:21:28 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invalid Profile [external] Message-ID: Dear all, I am new to FreeSwitch. I am trying to use an external SIP profile for connecting ouside my LAN I create a SIP account on iptel.org. To add a new gateway, I created a file and saved into the External folder I have given the username and password which I got after creating an account at iptel.org. Now, after launching FS CLI, I run a "sofia profile external restart reloadxml" which is giving me message "Invalid Profile [external]" I am not able to make up what is the problem. I have some understanding of Networking. When i tried to find this issue on internet I found that this could be related to: 1. Is this a problem because of NAT? or Port Forwarding which I need to do? Please give me some clue to debug the issue. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/c884d752/attachment.html From gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com Tue Jun 14 16:35:26 2011 From: gustavo.espeche at easyipcall.com (Gustavo Espeche) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:35:26 -0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch transcoding Message-ID: <1308054926.3665.6.camel@gustavo-laptop> Hi we are trying to do transcoding with freeswitch g711a-->g711u or g711-->speex but we can't do that FS do a trascoding, follow is a dialplan that we use with mod_curl
we relay can't understand what are we doing wrong. are we need configure someone special in FS? we are using sip_external_profile with port 5060. Regards. -- Gustavo Espeche EasyIpCall S.R.L. www.easyipcall.com Bv Mitre 517 24? E Cordoba - Argentina Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 From benkokakao at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 16:42:32 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:42:32 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Adding a New User In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > freeswitch at ankit-PC> 2011-06-14 13:37:45.695430 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1872 > Can't > ?find user [1100 at 192.168.1.5] > You must define a domain called '192.168.1.5' in your directory and add a > user w > ith the id="1100" attribute > and you must configure your device to use the proper domain in it's > authenticati > on credentials. > 2011-06-14 13:37:45.703430 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1030 SIP auth failure > (REGISTER > ) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1100 at 192.168.1.5] from ip 192.168.1.5 > I reloaded the XML also. Hi Ankit! Ignore the X-Lite message - this is a (minor) configuration error in FreeSWITCH. Is there more than one network-device configured on the machine? If yes, open /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/vars.xml and verify that you have the following settings somewhere: Best regards Christian From benkokakao at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 16:51:09 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:51:09 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invalid Profile [external] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > Now, after launching FS CLI, I run a "sofia profile external restart > reloadxml" which is giving me message "Invalid Profile [external]" Please give me the full output of the command above, i believe it says more than just "Invalid Profile". Best regards, Christian From educs13 at yahoo.com.br Tue Jun 14 16:59:59 2011 From: educs13 at yahoo.com.br (educs13) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Lua ASR TTS In-Reply-To: References: <1307202350274-6439449.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <597923.84033.qm@web161919.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Hi MC, thank you very much! I tried all the following combinations: i) break; ii) break all; iii) uuid_break; iv) uuid_break all; but I always had the same problem... As a "workaround", I changed my script this way: 1) I play the prompt: session:streamFile("/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/en/us/pizza/GP-DeliveryorTakeout.wav"); 2) I play a short sample of silence. session:streamFile("/home/ubuntu/audio/silence.wav");??? With this strategy, if I say something when the prompt is being played, it is stopped and a short sample (duration: ~20 ms) without audio is played. It's not the ideal solution, but, at least, it doesn't stuck. If you have another idea, please tell me. I would like to solve it without "workarounds". Eduardo --- Em seg, 13/6/11, mercutioviz [via freeswitch-users] escreveu: De: mercutioviz [via freeswitch-users] Assunto: Re: Lua ASR TTS Para: "educs13" Data: Segunda-feira, 13 de Junho de 2011, 18:14 Sorry for the late reply - I missed this one. Are you using the break app or the uuid_break API? Also, are you using the "all" argument?-MC On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:45 AM, educs13 <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, I was trying to run the 'Examples directory lua asr tts' (http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Examples_directory_lua_asr_tts) in Ubuntu 10.04/32 bits, but I had some problems with the 'session:streamFile()'. If I say something when the prompt is still playing, the audio stucks indefinitely. It seems that the 'break' command isn't doing all its job. I guess that maybe the 'break' is just stop feeding the audio player with new samples, but it is not stopping the player. So, this player keeps reading and playing the same samples continuously ... I really don't know if my guess makes sense and as I don't know C very well, I don't know where to look for a solution in the source code. I Hope you could help me. Thanks, Eduardo -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Lua-ASR-TTS-tp6439449p6439449.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Lua-ASR-TTS-tp6439449p6471843.html To unsubscribe from Lua ASR TTS, click here. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Lua-ASR-TTS-tp6439449p6473905.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/84ff171b/attachment.html From dujinfang at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 17:09:53 2011 From: dujinfang at gmail.com (Seven Du) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:09:53 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] interesting mod_erlang_event performance problem Message-ID: Hi, First, i'm running on Mac 10.6.7 with FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-765908f 2011-05-22 19-10-52 -0500) I found erlang receives events really slow so I did some tests. I use two custom erl to receive events, the file is on github: https://gist.github.com/1024808 The only difference of fse.erl and fse2.erl is that the following line in fse.erl was commented (line 16). {blah, 'freeswitch at localhost'} ! {blah}, % comment this line will be slow I run the scripts at about the same time, so they should can get the same events. The problem is that fse2.erl runs fast ( 1000 events in 6s ) while fse.erl is slow (1000 events in 2 min). (s2 at localhost)1> fse2:start(). start {{2011,6,14},{20,21,41}} end {{2011,6,14},{20,21,47}} ok (s at localhost)1> fse:start(). start {{2011,6,14},{20,21,36}} end {{2011,6,14},{20,23,24}} ok It's like fse.erl can only get 10 events per sec, so I guess there's some sleep(100) things in code, but sending a message(what ever) to FS breaks the sleep. the {blah} message can be anything, while a valid msg can get ok, an invalid one gets {error, undef} etc. I use the simple shell script to generate many events: #!/bin/bash IP=192.168.7.7 for f in `seq 1 8`; do for f in `seq 1 20`; do fs_cli -x "bgapi originate sofia/internal/load_test@$IP:5080 9664" done sleep 2 done -- Seven Du About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn Sent with Sparrow -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/c1603552/attachment-0001.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 17:10:16 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:10:16 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invalid Profile [external] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 14 June 2011 14:51, Christian Benke wrote: >> Now, after launching FS CLI, I run a "sofia profile external restart >> reloadxml" which is giving me message "Invalid Profile [external]" > > Please give me the full output of the command above, i believe it says > more than just "Invalid Profile". Oh! It's indeed just one line saying "2011-06-14 13:07:47.335914 [WARNING] sofia.c:4044 No Such Profile 'external'" You probably have a typo in your sip-profile-configuration, in case you didn't change it intentionally. The default configuration for the external sip-profile is /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path according to your Win7-installation). Please verify you have a section in your configuration that says: ...lots of other stuff in default-config... Then you add the iptel-configuration you've posted above in /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external/iptel.xml(If this didn't happen already) Best regards, Christian From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 17:14:08 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:14:08 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch transcoding In-Reply-To: <1308054926.3665.6.camel@gustavo-laptop> References: <1308054926.3665.6.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: At a guess, it's this line: Unless the media is going through FS it can't trancode. The SDP (codec list) will be forwarded from the aleg to the bleg so absolute_codec_string would be ignored. Also this has no effect, unless have proxy_media set to true on the sip profile. You don't need to set them to false, they'll already be false. You're correct to have this disabled though, as that would also prevent transcoding. This won't do as you think: It chooses the codec before you get to the dialplan. absolute_codec_string will only apply to the bleg. The incoming codec will either be picked from the inbound-codec-prefs param on the sip profile that receives the a-leg, or if you're using late-negotiation it'll pick that after the bridge so that it'll try to use the same codec as the bleg if possible and pick one of the other choices and transcode if that's not possible. absolute_codec_string overrides the outbound-codec-prefs sip profile param on the bleg. Try these on your sip profile: Then this will transcode: If you want to offer other codecs you can add them to the codec-pref params. They'll be listed in the preference order. FS will handle the transcoding automatically. You might also find it useful to read the Codec Negotiation page on the Wiki, if you haven't already done so: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Codec_Negotiation -Steve On 14 June 2011 13:35, Gustavo Espeche wrote: > Hi we are trying to do transcoding with freeswitch g711a-->g711u or > g711-->speex but we can't do that FS do a trascoding, follow is a > dialplan that we use with mod_curl > > > >
> > > > > > > data="export_vars=et_routing_number,et_routing_host,et_routed_number,et_routed_host,et_random_key"/> > > > > > > > > > > data="sofia/external/555554351428063 at 10.0.0.14"/> > > > >
>
> > we relay can't understand what are we doing wrong. > are we need configure someone special in FS? we are using > sip_external_profile with port 5060. > > > Regards. > > -- > > Gustavo Espeche > EasyIpCall S.R.L. > www.easyipcall.com > Bv Mitre 517 24? E > Cordoba - Argentina > Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/e2084ba7/attachment.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 17:48:22 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:18:22 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch transcoding In-Reply-To: References: <1308054926.3665.6.camel@gustavo-laptop> Message-ID: Nice answer! On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > At a guess, it's this line: > > > Unless the media is going through FS it can't trancode. The SDP (codec > list) will be forwarded from the aleg to the bleg so absolute_codec_string > would be ignored. > > Also this has no effect, unless have proxy_media set to true on the sip > profile. You don't need to set them to false, they'll already be false. > You're correct to have this disabled though, as that would also prevent > transcoding. > > > > This won't do as you think: > > > It chooses the codec before you get to the dialplan. absolute_codec_string > will only apply to the bleg. The incoming codec will either be picked from > the inbound-codec-prefs param on the sip profile that receives the a-leg, or > if you're using late-negotiation it'll pick that after the bridge so that > it'll try to use the same codec as the bleg if possible and pick one of the > other choices and transcode if that's not possible. absolute_codec_string > overrides the outbound-codec-prefs sip profile param on the bleg. > > Try these on your sip profile: > > > > Then this will transcode: > > > > > > data="export_vars=et_routing_number,et_routing_host,et_routed_number,et_routed_host,et_random_key"/> > data="et_routing_number=666654351428063"/> > > data="et_random_key=029645322327599477"/> > data="et_routed_number=555554351428063"/> > > > > > > If you want to offer other codecs you can add them to the codec-pref > params. They'll be listed in the preference order. FS will handle the > transcoding automatically. > > You might also find it useful to read the Codec Negotiation page on the > Wiki, if you haven't already done so: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Codec_Negotiation > > -Steve > > > > > > On 14 June 2011 13:35, Gustavo Espeche wrote: > >> Hi we are trying to do transcoding with freeswitch g711a-->g711u or >> g711-->speex but we can't do that FS do a trascoding, follow is a >> dialplan that we use with mod_curl >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> data="export_vars=et_routing_number,et_routing_host,et_routed_number,et_routed_host,et_random_key"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > data="sofia/external/555554351428063 at 10.0.0.14"/> >> >> >> >>
>>
>> >> we relay can't understand what are we doing wrong. >> are we need configure someone special in FS? we are using >> sip_external_profile with port 5060. >> >> >> Regards. >> >> -- >> >> Gustavo Espeche >> EasyIpCall S.R.L. >> www.easyipcall.com >> Bv Mitre 517 24? E >> Cordoba - Argentina >> Te: +54 - 351 - 4280633 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/173fe7b6/attachment-0001.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 18:06:01 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:36:01 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Adding a New User In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for responding Christian!!! I am only having one network device. Just to try my luck, I even tried setting the local_ip_v4 after your suggestion. Still, the same issue :-( Thanks Ankit On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Christian Benke wrote: > > freeswitch at ankit-PC> 2011-06-14 13:37:45.695430 [WARNING] > sofia_reg.c:1872 > > Can't > > find user [1100 at 192.168.1.5] > > You must define a domain called '192.168.1.5' in your directory and add a > > user w > > ith the id="1100" attribute > > and you must configure your device to use the proper domain in it's > > authenticati > > on credentials. > > 2011-06-14 13:37:45.703430 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1030 SIP auth failure > > (REGISTER > > ) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1100 at 192.168.1.5] from ip 192.168.1.5 > > I reloaded the XML also. > > Hi Ankit! > > Ignore the X-Lite message - this is a (minor) configuration error in > FreeSWITCH. > > Is there more than one network-device configured on the machine? > > If yes, open /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/vars.xml and verify that you > have the following settings somewhere: > > > > > > > > > > Best regards > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/51b5b3b1/attachment.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 18:21:19 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:21:19 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Adding a New User In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 14 June 2011 16:06, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Thanks for responding Christian!!! > > I am only having one network device. > > Just to try my luck, I even tried setting the local_ip_v4 after your > suggestion. Still, the same issue :-( Add a cidr-parameter to the user-configuration in conf/directory/default/ like that: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Acl#Users Background: conf/sip_profiles/internal.xml is the sip-profile authenticating the directory-users, there you have a setting The "domains"-acl is set in conf/autoload_configs/acl.conf.xml: Best regards, Christian From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 18:56:31 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:26:31 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invalid Profile [external] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Christian, I tried commenting out some code one after another, if there is any typo. I got the error Invalid profile every time. I even tried removing iptel.xml and add the content in external.xml, still issue persist. Even for default configuration, this error seems to be coming. Thanks Ankit On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Christian Benke wrote: > On 14 June 2011 14:51, Christian Benke wrote: > >> Now, after launching FS CLI, I run a "sofia profile external restart > >> reloadxml" which is giving me message "Invalid Profile [external]" > > > > Please give me the full output of the command above, i believe it says > > more than just "Invalid Profile". > > Oh! It's indeed just one line saying "2011-06-14 13:07:47.335914 > [WARNING] sofia.c:4044 No Such Profile 'external'" > > You probably have a typo in your sip-profile-configuration, in case > you didn't change it intentionally. > > The default configuration for the external sip-profile is > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path > according to your Win7-installation). > > Please verify you have a section in your configuration that says: > > > > > > > ...lots of other stuff in default-config... > > > > > Then you add the iptel-configuration you've posted above in > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external/iptel.xml(If this > didn't happen already) > > Best regards, > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/745739c8/attachment.html From henk at oegema.com Tue Jun 14 14:50:31 2011 From: henk at oegema.com (Henk Oegema) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:50:31 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] One way audio with Localphone .com Message-ID: <1308048631.2133.76.camel@DELL> I'm in the process of changing from Asterisk to Freeswitch (Version 1.0.head (git-0675b59 2011-06-06 21-28-14 -0500)). I have a problem with one way audio, when using Localphone.com with FS. (Audio is OK both way with localphone.com in Asterisk). (Audio is also OK bothway in FS with powervoip.com and jumblo.com) Problem: mobile -> Localphone.com -> FS audio is OK FS -> Localphone.com -> mobile audio NOK My setup is a little bit specific : internet -> internetmodem -> (ip:62.195.45.192) router1 -> switch ->(ip:192.1.68.1.144) router2 -> (ip:10.0.0.101) FS server Explanation of above line; router1 has external-ip:62.195.45.192 router1 gives router2 external-ip:192.1.68.1.144 router2 gives FS server internal-ip:10.0.0.101 When I connect to localphone.com with Asterisk, I see: Device name: Asterisk PBX 1.6.2.7 Status: Online Received IP address: 62.195.45.192 Contact IP address: 62.195.45.192 <----------!! When I connect to localphone.com with FS, I see: Device name: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-0675b59..... Received IP address: 62.195.45.192 Contact IP address: 192.168.1.144 <-----------?? It looks to me that the one way audio has to do with the Contact IP address:192.168.1.144 (???) Is it possible to change a setting in FS so that Localphone.com will get Contact IP address: 62.195.45.192 ? (may be this solves the problem) (I don't think (?) it has to do with port-forwarding, since all audio is ok with Asterisk) Rgds. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/6278033e/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 19:05:11 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:35:11 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invalid Profile [external] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Where I can modify the path for the default configuration for the external sip-profile is /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path according to your Win7-installation). I have seen, everywhere there is a relative path. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:26 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Christian, > > I tried commenting out some code one after another, if there is any typo. > I got the error Invalid profile every time. I even tried removing iptel.xml > and add the content in external.xml, still issue persist. > > Even for default configuration, this error seems to be coming. > > Thanks > Ankit > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Christian Benke wrote: > >> On 14 June 2011 14:51, Christian Benke wrote: >> >> Now, after launching FS CLI, I run a "sofia profile external restart >> >> reloadxml" which is giving me message "Invalid Profile [external]" >> > >> > Please give me the full output of the command above, i believe it says >> > more than just "Invalid Profile". >> >> Oh! It's indeed just one line saying "2011-06-14 13:07:47.335914 >> [WARNING] sofia.c:4044 No Such Profile 'external'" >> >> You probably have a typo in your sip-profile-configuration, in case >> you didn't change it intentionally. >> >> The default configuration for the external sip-profile is >> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path >> according to your Win7-installation). >> >> Please verify you have a section in your configuration that says: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ...lots of other stuff in default-config... >> >> >> >> >> Then you add the iptel-configuration you've posted above in >> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external/iptel.xml(If this >> didn't happen already) >> >> Best regards, >> Christian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/df3cb61c/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Tue Jun 14 19:06:05 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (wes-fs at 499x.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using fs api to originate a call and record it In-Reply-To: References: <4DF278F9.6000201@499x.com> Message-ID: <4DF778DD.7060805@499x.com> This did not work, I still heard the ringing. On 6/10/2011 5:30 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Try this: > > originate > {media_bug_answer_req=true}sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx > &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) > > Let us know if it works. > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:05 PM, > wrote: > > I'm extremely new to freeswitch, and anything like it, so please > forgive me! > > I'd like to be able to use the API to originate a call and record it. > So far, I have the following figured out: > > originate sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx > &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) > And it dials out to an external number and successfully records the > conversation. > > But, it also records the ringing. When I was trying this through a > dialplan, I found an option: > > which delayed the recording until the call was answered. > > Is there a way to do the same thing through the API? > > Thanks! > Wes > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/a9c3eaeb/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 14 19:18:53 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:18:53 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invalid Profile [external] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Be sure that the external profile is actually coming up. Watch the log when you start FS - if the external profile's port is already in use then the profile will not start. -MC On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:05 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Where I can modify the path for the default configuration for the external > sip-profile is > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ > sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path > according to your Win7-installation). > > I have seen, everywhere there is a relative path. > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:26 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > >> Christian, >> >> I tried commenting out some code one after another, if there is any typo. >> I got the error Invalid profile every time. I even tried removing >> iptel.xml and add the content in external.xml, still issue persist. >> >> Even for default configuration, this error seems to be coming. >> >> Thanks >> Ankit >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Christian Benke wrote: >> >>> On 14 June 2011 14:51, Christian Benke wrote: >>> >> Now, after launching FS CLI, I run a "sofia profile external restart >>> >> reloadxml" which is giving me message "Invalid Profile [external]" >>> > >>> > Please give me the full output of the command above, i believe it says >>> > more than just "Invalid Profile". >>> >>> Oh! It's indeed just one line saying "2011-06-14 13:07:47.335914 >>> [WARNING] sofia.c:4044 No Such Profile 'external'" >>> >>> You probably have a typo in your sip-profile-configuration, in case >>> you didn't change it intentionally. >>> >>> The default configuration for the external sip-profile is >>> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path >>> according to your Win7-installation). >>> >>> Please verify you have a section in your configuration that says: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ...lots of other stuff in default-config... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Then you add the iptel-configuration you've posted above in >>> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external/iptel.xml(If this >>> didn't happen already) >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Christian >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >> > > > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/c0051280/attachment.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 19:21:53 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:51:53 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua Message-ID: I am implementing an IVR using Lua in Freeswitch. In my Lua script I use curl to a web service. Sometimes the response takes a long time to come back. During that time period I would like to play music on hold. I have searched the freeswitch discussion archives a lot. There seem to be many suggested ways to implement music on hold from a Lua script but the answers are not very clear / not really applicable to my use case. I don't know what method I should use and which one is recommended. *Method 1:* Transfer the call to 9664 (music on hold extension). However the implementation for this solution for this does not seem to be available in Lua. For example: How would I transfer the call back? *Method 2:* Using bgapi uuid_park park the call and using uuid_broadcast play an audio file. Again what do I do to unpark the call..? Thanks, Sidharth -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/08c54991/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Tue Jun 14 19:30:34 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (wes-fs at 499x.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:30:34 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using fs api to originate a call and record it In-Reply-To: <4DF778DD.7060805@499x.com> References: <4DF278F9.6000201@499x.com> <4DF778DD.7060805@499x.com> Message-ID: <4DF77E9A.6010701@499x.com> based on the documentation here, it looks like I might be able to execute a script, instead of directly doing the record command. Then the script could maybe set the parameters I need? http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_commands#originate On 6/14/2011 10:06 AM, wes-fs at 499x.com wrote: > This did not work, I still heard the ringing. > > On 6/10/2011 5:30 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> Try this: >> >> originate >> {media_bug_answer_req=true}sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx >> &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) >> >> Let us know if it works. >> -MC >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:05 PM, > > wrote: >> >> I'm extremely new to freeswitch, and anything like it, so please >> forgive me! >> >> I'd like to be able to use the API to originate a call and record it. >> So far, I have the following figured out: >> >> originate sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx >> &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) >> And it dials out to an external number and successfully records the >> conversation. >> >> But, it also records the ringing. When I was trying this through a >> dialplan, I found an option: >> >> which delayed the recording until the call was answered. >> >> Is there a way to do the same thing through the API? >> >> Thanks! >> Wes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/e3c4754d/attachment.html From brad at tech21.com Tue Jun 14 21:14:32 2011 From: brad at tech21.com (Brad Mina) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:14:32 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] One way audio with Localphone .com In-Reply-To: <1308048631.2133.76.camel@DELL> References: <1308048631.2133.76.camel@DELL> Message-ID: A double NAT has always been very tricky for me, I ended up merging my doubled subnet into the primary. As for your contact address, try using STUN to check your external IP in your vars.xml and external.xml http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/NAT On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: > I'm in the process of changing from Asterisk to Freeswitch (Version > 1.0.head (git-0675b59 2011-06-06 21-28-14 -0500)). > I have a problem with one way audio, when using Localphone.com with FS. > (Audio is OK both way with localphone.com in Asterisk). (Audio is also OK > bothway in FS with powervoip.com and jumblo.com) > > Problem: > mobile -> Localphone.com -> FS audio is OK > FS -> Localphone.com -> mobile audio NOK > > My setup is a little bit specific : internet -> internetmodem -> > (ip:62.195.45.192) router1 -> switch ->(ip:192.1.68.1.144) router2 -> > (ip:10.0.0.101) FS server > Explanation of above line; > router1 has external-ip:62.195.45.192 > router1 gives router2 external-ip:192.1.68.1.144 > router2 gives FS server internal-ip:10.0.0.101 > > When I connect to localphone.com with Asterisk, I see: > Device name: Asterisk PBX 1.6.2.7 > Status: Online > Received IP address: 62.195.45.192 > Contact IP address: 62.195.45.192 <----------!! > > When I connect to localphone.com with FS, I see: > Device name: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-0675b59..... > Received IP address: 62.195.45.192 > Contact IP address: 192.168.1.144 <-----------?? > > It looks to me that the one way audio has to do with the Contact IP > address:192.168.1.144 (???) > Is it possible to change a setting in FS so that Localphone.com will get > Contact IP address: 62.195.45.192 ? (may be this solves the problem) > > (I don't think (?) it has to do with port-forwarding, since all audio is ok > with Asterisk) > > Rgds. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/5d3819c1/attachment-0001.html From frankie.k.yiu at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 21:54:32 2011 From: frankie.k.yiu at gmail.com (Frankie Yiu) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:54:32 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to record incoming audio only (not both direction)? Message-ID: Hi, I would like to record the incoming audio during a call when making a call to a callee, so that we can optimize the voice mail detection algorithm when debugging. I know there is a function: "switch_ivr_record_session" to record the whole session in both direction (incoming & outgoing) but I can not find a function to record only the incoming audio. Could someone please help me on how I can record only the incoming direction audio? Thanks, Frankie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/48600fe8/attachment.html From avi at avimarcus.net Tue Jun 14 22:00:44 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:00:44 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to record incoming audio only (not both direction)? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_record Check the channel variable that you can set.. e.g. RECORD_WRITE_ONLY -Avi Marcus On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Frankie Yiu wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to record the incoming audio during a call when making a call > to a callee, so that we can optimize the voice mail detection algorithm when > debugging. > > I know there is a function: "switch_ivr_record_session" to record the whole > session in both direction (incoming & outgoing) but I can not find a > function to record only the incoming audio. Could someone please help me on > how I can record only the incoming direction audio? > > Thanks, > Frankie > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/882dfe0d/attachment.html From justlikeef at gmail.com Tue Jun 14 22:01:20 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trying to get TLS/SRTP working Message-ID: Trying to get TLS working. When sofia loads, I see that it seems to accept the parameters: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16487 But sofia status shows nothing running on the TLS ports: Name Type Data State ================================================================================================= sipinterface_3 profile sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5080 RUNNING (0) sipinterface_2 profile sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5070 RUNNING (0) 192.168.2.25 alias sipinterface_1 ALIASED sipinterface_1 profile sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5060 RUNNING (0) voicemail_1 alias sipinterface_1 ALIASED ================================================================================================= 3 profiles 2 aliases /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ssl looks like: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3627 Jun 14 12:55 agent.pem -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1996 Jun 14 13:04 cafile.pem Freeswitch is compiled with SSL support: ldd freeswitch linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff415ff000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fab636b8000) libfreeswitch.so.1 => /usr/local/freeswitch/lib/libfreeswitch.so.1 (0x00007fab632c1000) libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007fab630bc000) librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007fab62eb3000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00007fab62c78000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fab62a5b000) libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fab627ff000) libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fab6244e000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fab6224a000) libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fab62032000) libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007fab61ddd000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fab61a70000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fab61767000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fab61551000) libodbc.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libodbc.so.1 (0x00007fab612e5000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fab6390f000) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/dd49825d/attachment.html From gerrit308 at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 00:05:24 2011 From: gerrit308 at gmail.com (humbr) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch.dbh and affected_rows() question Message-ID: <1308081924858-6475723.post@n2.nabble.com> Basically, does this function do anything if I am using core:db? In my test code it consistently returns 0 even though the just completed query did return 1 or more rows. I couldn't find this function in switch_core_db.c Gerrit -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Freeswitch-dbh-and-affected-rows-question-tp6475723p6475723.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From wes-fs at 499x.com Wed Jun 15 01:48:11 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:48:11 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] invalid application lua Message-ID: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> I'm getting "invalid application lua" however, in modules.conf, the line for is active and not commented out. Any help is appreciated. Thanks. From sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org Wed Jun 15 01:55:49 2011 From: sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org (Sergey Okhapkin) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] invalid application lua In-Reply-To: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> References: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> Message-ID: <201106141755.49546.sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> Is mod_lua compiled and installed? On Tuesday 14 June 2011, Wes wrote: > I'm getting "invalid application lua" however, in modules.conf, the line > for is active and not commented out. > > Any help is appreciated. Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From avi at avimarcus.net Wed Jun 15 01:55:51 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:55:51 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] invalid application lua In-Reply-To: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> References: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> Message-ID: What happens when you run "reload mod_lua" from the CLI? -Avi Marcus On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Wes wrote: > I'm getting "invalid application lua" however, in modules.conf, the line > for is active and not commented out. > > Any help is appreciated. Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/edbfd656/attachment.html From henk at oegema.com Wed Jun 15 02:00:11 2011 From: henk at oegema.com (Henk Oegema) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:11 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] One way audio with Localphone .com In-Reply-To: <1308048631.2133.76.camel@DELL> References: <1308048631.2133.76.camel@DELL> Message-ID: <1308088811.2247.8.camel@DELL> Surprisingly it suddenly started to work. I'm sorry that I can't explain why! I tried so many things, that I lost control of what I did. The logon settings are still the same: Device name: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-0675b59..... Received IP address: 62.195.45.192 Contact IP address: 192.168.1.144 <-----------Now it works !! On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:50 +0200, Henk Oegema wrote: > I'm in the process of changing from Asterisk to Freeswitch (Version > 1.0.head (git-0675b59 2011-06-06 21-28-14 -0500)). > I have a problem with one way audio, when using Localphone.com with > FS. (Audio is OK both way with localphone.com in Asterisk). (Audio is > also OK bothway in FS with powervoip.com and jumblo.com) > > Problem: > mobile -> Localphone.com -> FS audio is OK > FS -> Localphone.com -> mobile audio NOK > > My setup is a little bit specific : internet -> internetmodem -> > (ip:62.195.45.192) router1 -> switch ->(ip:192.1.68.1.144) router2 -> > (ip:10.0.0.101) FS server > Explanation of above line; > router1 has external-ip:62.195.45.192 > router1 gives router2 external-ip:192.1.68.1.144 > router2 gives FS server internal-ip:10.0.0.101 > > When I connect to localphone.com with Asterisk, I see: > Device name: Asterisk PBX 1.6.2.7 > Status: Online > Received IP address: 62.195.45.192 > Contact IP address: 62.195.45.192 <----------!! > > When I connect to localphone.com with FS, I see: > Device name: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-0675b59..... > Received IP address: 62.195.45.192 > Contact IP address: 192.168.1.144 <-----------?? > > It looks to me that the one way audio has to do with the Contact IP > address:192.168.1.144 (???) > Is it possible to change a setting in FS so that Localphone.com will > get Contact IP address: 62.195.45.192 ? (may be this solves the > problem) > > (I don't think (?) it has to do with port-forwarding, since all audio > is ok with Asterisk) > > Rgds. > > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/155052bd/attachment-0001.html From paul at iamfine.com Wed Jun 15 00:41:35 2011 From: paul at iamfine.com (paul at iamfine.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:41:35 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] failure to start a session from within lua for outbound call Message-ID: Having problems getting a session created from a lua script - its the latest build on a centos system this is the lua code ----------------------- freeswitch.console_log("info", "Lua in da house!!!\n"); local session = freeswitch.Session("sofia/00.00.127.61/1000"); session:execute("playback", "/sr8k.wav"); session:hangup(); ----------------------- ***** please note i changed the ip address to protect its identity ***** ********** please help - i am tearing my hair out on this one Paul +OK freeswitch at internal> 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [INFO] switch_cpp.cpp:1197 Lua in da house!!! 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1869 Parsing global variables 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:833 New Channel sofia/internal/1000 [c9c5d8ec-af7f-4153-a844-5000983170d5] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4392 (sofia/internal/1000) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/internal/1000) State INIT 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:85 sofia/internal/1000 SOFIA INIT 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:125 (sofia/internal/1000) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/internal/1000) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1736 (sofia/internal/1000) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/internal/1000) State ROUTING 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:148 sofia/internal/1000 SOFIA ROUTING 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 (sofia/internal/1000) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/internal/1000) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:383 (sofia/internal/1000) State CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:383 (sofia/internal/1000) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4800 Channel sofia/internal/1000 entering state [calling][0] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4800 Channel sofia/internal/1000 entering state [terminated][503] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 (sofia/internal/1000) Callstate Change RINGING -> HANGUP 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5522 Hangup sofia/internal/1000 [CS_CONSUME_MEDIA] [NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3308 Originate Resulted in Error Cause: 41 [NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [ERR] switch_cpp.cpp:655 session is not initalized 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [ERR] switch_cpp.cpp:617 session is not initalized 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal sofia/internal/1000 [KILL] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/internal/1000) State HANGUP 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:452 sofia/internal/1000 Overriding SIP cause 503 with 503 from the other leg 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel sofia/internal/1000 hanging up, cause: NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/internal/1000 Standard HANGUP, cause: NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/internal/1000) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/internal/1000) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/internal/1000) State REPORTING 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/internal/1000 Standard REPORTING, cause: NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/internal/1000) State REPORTING going to sleep 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 (sofia/internal/1000) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 8 (sofia/internal/1000) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 8 (sofia/internal/1000) Ended 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close Channel sofia/internal/1000 [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 (sofia/internal/1000) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/internal/1000) State DESTROY 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 sofia/internal/1000 SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/internal/1000 Standard DESTROY 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/internal/1000) State DESTROY going to sleep From marketing at cluecon.com Wed Jun 15 02:21:46 2011 From: marketing at cluecon.com (marketing at cluecon.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:21:46 +0000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 is Almost Here! Message-ID: <00000130903f02de-584b4a90-af91-4575-a025-cd0787a6c37a-000000@email.amazonses.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/484bc74e/attachment.html From henk at oegema.com Wed Jun 15 02:33:33 2011 From: henk at oegema.com (Henk Oegema) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:33:33 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge Message-ID: <1308090813.2247.14.camel@DELL> What is the meaning of getting (regular) this message: .....[WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1001 at 10.0.0.101] from ip 10.0.0.12 ?? Extension 1001 is a Portech GSM gateway MV370. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/57e94f3f/attachment.html From avi at avimarcus.net Wed Jun 15 02:38:29 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:38:29 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge In-Reply-To: <1308090813.2247.14.camel@DELL> References: <1308090813.2247.14.camel@DELL> Message-ID: It's just a notice that there's a register attempt. If it's every 30 or 60 minutes from a known extension, it's fine. It's there for fail2ban to notice excessive register attempts so it can block abuse from clients that try to register but don't submit a password to avoid setting off the warning bells. -Avi On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: > What is the meaning of getting (regular) this message: > .....[WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia > profile 'internal' for [1001 at 10.0.0.101] from ip 10.0.0.12 ?? > > Extension 1001 is a Portech GSM gateway MV370. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/ce59579c/attachment.html From henk at oegema.com Wed Jun 15 02:48:06 2011 From: henk at oegema.com (Henk Oegema) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:48:06 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] Message-ID: <1308091686.2247.16.camel@DELL> But the message is every 4 minutes. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Avi Marcus Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:38:29 +0300 It's just a notice that there's a register attempt. If it's every 30 or 60 minutes from a known extension, it's fine. It's there for fail2ban to notice excessive register attempts so it can block abuse from clients that try to register but don't submit a password to avoid setting off the warning bells. -Avi On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: What is the meaning of getting (regular) this message: .....[WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1001 at 10.0.0.101] from ip 10.0.0.12 ?? Extension 1001 is a Portech GSM gateway MV370. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/671f867a/attachment.html From mitch.capper at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 02:55:19 2011 From: mitch.capper at gmail.com (Mitch Capper) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:55:19 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trying to get TLS/SRTP working In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Are you using latest trunk or what version of freeswitch? Can you post the rest of the startup log so we can see if it possibly failed later? ~Mitch On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: > Trying to get TLS working.? When sofia loads, I see that it seems to accept > the parameters: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16487 > > But sofia status shows nothing running on the TLS ports: > ???????????????????? Name > Type?????????????????????????????????????? Data????? State > ================================================================================================= > ?????????? sipinterface_3?????? profile > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5080????? RUNNING (0) > ?????????? sipinterface_2?????? profile > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5070????? RUNNING (0) > ???????????? 192.168.2.25???????? alias > sipinterface_1????? ALIASED > ?????????? sipinterface_1?????? profile > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5060????? RUNNING (0) > ????????????? voicemail_1???????? alias > sipinterface_1????? ALIASED > ================================================================================================= > 3 profiles 2 aliases > > > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ssl looks like: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3627 Jun 14 12:55 agent.pem > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1996 Jun 14 13:04 cafile.pem > > > Freeswitch is compiled with SSL support: > > ldd freeswitch > ??????? linux-vdso.so.1 =>? (0x00007fff415ff000) > ??????? libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fab636b8000) > ??????? libfreeswitch.so.1 => /usr/local/freeswitch/lib/libfreeswitch.so.1 > (0x00007fab632c1000) > ??????? libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007fab630bc000) > ??????? librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007fab62eb3000) > ??????? libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00007fab62c78000) > ??????? libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fab62a5b000) > ??????? libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fab627ff000) > ??????? libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fab6244e000) > ??????? libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fab6224a000) > ??????? libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fab62032000) > ??????? libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007fab61ddd000) > ??????? libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fab61a70000) > ??????? libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fab61767000) > ??????? libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fab61551000) > ??????? libodbc.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libodbc.so.1 (0x00007fab612e5000) > ??????? /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fab6390f000) > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From brokendash at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 02:56:50 2011 From: brokendash at gmail.com (broken dash) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_pocketsphinx In-Reply-To: References: <4C1997A0.1080909@gmail.com> <4C1ACD2A.70906@gmail.com> <4C1AE301.30405@gmail.com> <4C3D48A5.6030508@todandlorna.com> Message-ID: Has this been fixed? Perhaps a workaround or something... It will build on Debian Squeeze, but it damn sure doesn't work. :-) freeswitch at 127.0.0.1@internal> version FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-36f812d 2011-06-14 00-35-18 -0400) freeswitch at 127.0.0.1@internal> load mod_pocketsphinx +OK Reloading XML -ERR [module load file routine returned an error] 2011-06-14 17:46:31.721075 [INFO] switch_time.c:1020 Timezone reloaded 530 definitions freeswitch at 127.0.0.1@internal> 2011-06-14 17:46:31.721075 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:928 Error Loading module /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so **/usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so: undefined symbol: ngram_model_get_counts** On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Brian West wrote: > Compiles fine on CentOS not sure what your issue is but someone that cares > about Ubuntu should probably figure it out and post patches if possible. > /b > On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Jan Kubr wrote: > > Were you able to reproduce the problem? Not sure where to look to get rid of > this :( > Jan > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Brian West??wrote: >> >> No clue I'll try to compile it again today. >> /b > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From spencer at 5ninesolutions.com Wed Jun 15 02:58:30 2011 From: spencer at 5ninesolutions.com (Spencer Thomason) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:58:30 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_cidlookup crashing Message-ID: <0E43D250-4B7E-453F-91F2-E4253DCC1068@5ninesolutions.com> Hello all, When I enable caching in mod_cidlookup, a query causes a crash. Is there some configuration error or any way I can troubleshoot this? There isn't any output other than an immediate crash and a core dump. memcache status verbose Lib version: 0.32 Servers: 1 localhost (11211) pid: 9598 uptime: 5126 time: 1308091953 version: 1.4.5 pointer_size: 64 rusage_user: 0.71989 rusage_system: 0.15997 curr_items: 0 total_items: 0 bytes: 0 curr_connections: 10 total_connections: 32 connection_structures: 11 cmd_get: 18 cmd_set: 0 get_hits: 0 get_misses: 18 evictions: 0 bytes_read: 0 bytes_written: 0 limit_maxbytes: 67108864 threads: 4 freeswitch at internal> cidlookup status +OK url: http://cnam.bulkcnam.com/?id=XXXX&did=${caller_id_number} cache: true cache-expire: 86400 curl-timeout: 2000 curl-warn-duration: 1000 odbc-dsn: clidlookup_odbc sql: (null) citystate-sql: SELECT CONCAT(ratecenter, ' ', state) as name FROM npa_nxx_company_ocn WHERE npa = ${caller_id_number:1:3} AND nxx = ${caller_id_number:4:3} LIMIT 1 ODBC Compiled: true Thanks, Spencer From cyril.zlachevsky at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 02:13:27 2011 From: cyril.zlachevsky at gmail.com (Cyril Zlachevsky) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:13:27 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ACL In-Reply-To: References: <4DEEBF6D.7050608@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4DF7DD07.7080504@gmail.com> Yes, you are right - I'm prefer flat file because customizing the default config is nightmare for me. I changed "allow" to "deny" in my freeswitch.xml with absolutely no effect - anyone still register on my FS from any IP! I read http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Acl but can't stand how enable ACL for my SIP UA's. 08.06.2011 10:51, Steven Ayre ?????: > > > > > You want a default of 'deny'. The default is what to do with any IP not on the list, what you've set > allows every IP. > > I would suggest you build your config off the default config by the way, customising them to suit > you and removing what you don't need. The directory structure is there to help you manage things > (what you've posted makes it look like you might be using a flat file?). There's a lot of parameters > you've missed out setting. > > For example: > > > > These will have absolutely no effect. They set a global variable that you can use elsewhere in your > configuration, but you're not actually using them. You should be setting the inbound & outbound > codec preferences on the sofia profile in a param, either using the global variable e.g. > $${outbound_codec_prefs} or by setting them explicitly there. > > -Steve > > > On 8 June 2011 01:16, Cyril Zlachevsky > wrote: > > Hi, > Can't stand what should I do for ACL working. > > I'm forwarding a call from a particular static IP to number at voipprovider. > I refused of using FS default configs because they are complicated and redundant for me. > > This is my configuration: > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > data="{sip_invite_domain=$${sipnet_proxy}}sofia/sipnet/$1@$${sipnet_proxy}"/> > > > >
> >
> > > value="{presence_id=${dialed_user}@${dialed_domain}}${sofia_contact(${dialed_user}@${dialed_domain})}"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > When I start FS, I can't see my IP 195.225.XXX.XXX in freeswitch.log - only this: > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1088 Created ip list rfc1918.auto default (deny) > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 (allow) [] to list rfc1918.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 (allow) [] to list > rfc1918.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 (allow) [] to list > rfc1918.auto > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1096 Created ip list wan.auto default (allow) > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 (deny) [] to list wan.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 (deny) [] to list wan.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 (deny) [] to list wan.auto > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1104 Created ip list nat.auto default (deny) > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1106 Adding 88.198.XXX.XXX/255.255.255.255 > (deny) to list nat.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 (allow) [] to list nat.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 (allow) [] to list nat.auto > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 (allow) [] to list > nat.auto > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1115 Created ip list loopback.auto default (deny) > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 127.0.0.0/8 (allow) [] to list loopback.auto > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1121 Created ip list localnet.auto default (deny) > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1124 Adding 88.198.XXX.XXX/255.255.255.255 > (allow) to list localnet.auto > > With my current configuration FS allow to register from any IP. > Where is my error? > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From justlikeef at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 03:52:50 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trying to get TLS/SRTP working In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201106141952.50449.justlikeef@gmail.com> This is running a git version from mid day yesterday. That is the complete (non-debug) log of a mod_sofia reload. I can capture a log from a full load or turn logging up, but there isn't anything later from mod_sofia than this. On Tuesday 14 June 2011 18:55:19 Mitch Capper wrote: > Are you using latest trunk or what version of freeswitch? Can you > post the rest of the startup log so we can see if it possibly failed > later? > > ~Mitch > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: > > Trying to get TLS working. When sofia loads, I see that it seems to > > accept the parameters: > > > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16487 > > > > But sofia status shows nothing running on the TLS ports: > > Name > > Type Data State > > ========================================================================= > > ======================== sipinterface_3 profile > > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5080 RUNNING (0) > > sipinterface_2 profile > > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5070 RUNNING (0) > > 192.168.2.25 alias > > sipinterface_1 ALIASED > > sipinterface_1 profile > > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5060 RUNNING (0) > > voicemail_1 alias > > sipinterface_1 ALIASED > > ========================================================================= > > ======================== 3 profiles 2 aliases > > > > > > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ssl looks like: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3627 Jun 14 12:55 agent.pem > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1996 Jun 14 13:04 cafile.pem > > > > > > Freeswitch is compiled with SSL support: > > > > ldd freeswitch > > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff415ff000) > > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fab636b8000) > > libfreeswitch.so.1 => > > /usr/local/freeswitch/lib/libfreeswitch.so.1 (0x00007fab632c1000) > > libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007fab630bc000) > > librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007fab62eb3000) > > libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00007fab62c78000) > > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fab62a5b000) > > libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fab627ff000) > > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 > > (0x00007fab6244e000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 > > (0x00007fab6224a000) > > libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fab62032000) > > libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007fab61ddd000) > > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fab61a70000) > > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fab61767000) > > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fab61551000) > > libodbc.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libodbc.so.1 (0x00007fab612e5000) > > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fab6390f000) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From justlikeef at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 04:07:04 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trying to get TLS/SRTP working In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Full startup log: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16494 Here's the config file: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16495 FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-d52a254 2011-06-13 18-27-28 -0400) On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Mitch Capper wrote: > Are you using latest trunk or what version of freeswitch? Can you > post the rest of the startup log so we can see if it possibly failed > later? > > ~Mitch > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: > > Trying to get TLS working. When sofia loads, I see that it seems to > accept > > the parameters: > > > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16487 > > > > But sofia status shows nothing running on the TLS ports: > > Name > > Type Data State > > > ================================================================================================= > > sipinterface_3 profile > > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5080 RUNNING (0) > > sipinterface_2 profile > > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5070 RUNNING (0) > > 192.168.2.25 alias > > sipinterface_1 ALIASED > > sipinterface_1 profile > > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5060 RUNNING (0) > > voicemail_1 alias > > sipinterface_1 ALIASED > > > ================================================================================================= > > 3 profiles 2 aliases > > > > > > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ssl looks like: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3627 Jun 14 12:55 agent.pem > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1996 Jun 14 13:04 cafile.pem > > > > > > Freeswitch is compiled with SSL support: > > > > ldd freeswitch > > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff415ff000) > > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fab636b8000) > > libfreeswitch.so.1 => > /usr/local/freeswitch/lib/libfreeswitch.so.1 > > (0x00007fab632c1000) > > libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007fab630bc000) > > librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007fab62eb3000) > > libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00007fab62c78000) > > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fab62a5b000) > > libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fab627ff000) > > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 > (0x00007fab6244e000) > > libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fab6224a000) > > libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fab62032000) > > libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007fab61ddd000) > > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fab61a70000) > > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fab61767000) > > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fab61551000) > > libodbc.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libodbc.so.1 (0x00007fab612e5000) > > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fab6390f000) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/33a31fd1/attachment-0001.html From qingquan at globalroam.com Wed Jun 15 05:55:35 2011 From: qingquan at globalroam.com (qingquan luo) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:55:35 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! Message-ID: Hi All, I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone number. I use bypass_media mode. So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, By I notice that When LegB reply 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to caller. This make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf What wrong with that? How can fix it? Any information or help is welcome. information with "sofia global siptrace on" http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16496 Thanks Best Regards Qingquan -- Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/54953da7/attachment.html From brad at tech21.com Wed Jun 15 07:30:46 2011 From: brad at tech21.com (Brad Mina) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:30:46 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trying to get TLS/SRTP working In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Line 89 and 90 of your startup log clearly show TLS starting on port 5061 on your internal profile. 2011-06-14 19:58:19.325605 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3100 tls-port [5061] > > 2011-06-14 19:58:19.325610 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3100 tls-version [tlsv1] > > My 'sofia status' returns about the same thing as you: > freeswitch at internal> sofia status > > Name Type Data >> State > > >> ================================================================================================= > > internal profile sip:mod_sofia at pbx.ip.add.ress >> :5060 RUNNING (0) > > internal-ipv6 profile sip:mod_sofia@ >> [::1]:5060 RUNNING (0) > > external profile sip:mod_sofia at pbx.ip.add.ress >> :5080 RUNNING (0) > > external::bw-secondary gateway >> sip:1831xxxxxxx at 216.82.225.202 NOREG > > external::bw-main gateway >> sip:1831xxxxxxx at 216.82.224.202 NOREG > > pbx.ip.add.ress alias >> internal ALIASED > > >> ================================================================================================= > > 3 profiles 1 alias > > > Have you tried configuring a phone for use with TLS? If so what problems are you having with it? On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Rob Hutton wrote: > Full startup log: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16494 > > Here's the config file: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16495 > > FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-d52a254 2011-06-13 18-27-28 -0400) > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Mitch Capper wrote: > >> Are you using latest trunk or what version of freeswitch? Can you >> post the rest of the startup log so we can see if it possibly failed >> later? >> >> ~Mitch >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rob Hutton >> wrote: >> > Trying to get TLS working. When sofia loads, I see that it seems to >> accept >> > the parameters: >> > >> > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16487 >> > >> > But sofia status shows nothing running on the TLS ports: >> > Name >> > Type Data State >> > >> ================================================================================================= >> > sipinterface_3 profile >> > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5080 RUNNING (0) >> > sipinterface_2 profile >> > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5070 RUNNING (0) >> > 192.168.2.25 alias >> > sipinterface_1 ALIASED >> > sipinterface_1 profile >> > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5060 RUNNING (0) >> > voicemail_1 alias >> > sipinterface_1 ALIASED >> > >> ================================================================================================= >> > 3 profiles 2 aliases >> > >> > >> > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ssl looks like: >> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3627 Jun 14 12:55 agent.pem >> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1996 Jun 14 13:04 cafile.pem >> > >> > >> > Freeswitch is compiled with SSL support: >> > >> > ldd freeswitch >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff415ff000) >> > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fab636b8000) >> > libfreeswitch.so.1 => >> /usr/local/freeswitch/lib/libfreeswitch.so.1 >> > (0x00007fab632c1000) >> > libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007fab630bc000) >> > librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007fab62eb3000) >> > libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00007fab62c78000) >> > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fab62a5b000) >> > libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fab627ff000) >> > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 >> (0x00007fab6244e000) >> > libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fab6224a000) >> > libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fab62032000) >> > libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007fab61ddd000) >> > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fab61a70000) >> > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fab61767000) >> > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fab61551000) >> > libodbc.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libodbc.so.1 (0x00007fab612e5000) >> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fab6390f000) >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110614/e3b534a5/attachment.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 09:43:37 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:13:37 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ACL In-Reply-To: <4DF7DD07.7080504@gmail.com> References: <4DEEBF6D.7050608@gmail.com> <4DF7DD07.7080504@gmail.com> Message-ID: Have you tried typing reloadacl reloadxml from the freeswitch command line? On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Cyril Zlachevsky < cyril.zlachevsky at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, you are right - I'm prefer flat file because customizing the default > config is nightmare for me. > I changed "allow" to "deny" in my freeswitch.xml with absolutely no effect > - anyone still register > on my FS from any IP! > I read http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Acl but can't stand how enable ACL > for my SIP UA's. > > > 08.06.2011 10:51, Steven Ayre ?????: > > > > > > > > > > You want a default of 'deny'. The default is what to do with any IP not > on the list, what you've set > > allows every IP. > > > > I would suggest you build your config off the default config by the way, > customising them to suit > > you and removing what you don't need. The directory structure is there to > help you manage things > > (what you've posted makes it look like you might be using a flat file?). > There's a lot of parameters > > you've missed out setting. > > > > For example: > > > > > > > > These will have absolutely no effect. They set a global variable that you > can use elsewhere in your > > configuration, but you're not actually using them. You should be setting > the inbound & outbound > > codec preferences on the sofia profile in a param, either using the > global variable e.g. > > $${outbound_codec_prefs} or by setting them explicitly there. > > > > -Steve > > > > > > On 8 June 2011 01:16, Cyril Zlachevsky > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > Can't stand what should I do for ACL working. > > > > I'm forwarding a call from a particular static IP to > number at voipprovider. > > I refused of using FS default configs because they are complicated > and redundant for me. > > > > This is my configuration: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > data="sound_prefix=$${sounds_dir}/en/us/callie"/> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value="console,debug,info,notice,warning,err,crit,alert"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > data="effective_caller_id_number=$${sipnet_login}"/> > > > data="{sip_invite_domain=$${sipnet_proxy}}sofia/sipnet/$1@ > $${sipnet_proxy}"/> > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > value="{presence_id=${dialed_user}@ > ${dialed_domain}}${sofia_contact(${dialed_user}@${dialed_domain})}"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > When I start FS, I can't see my IP 195.225.XXX.XXX in freeswitch.log > - only this: > > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1088 Created ip list rfc1918.auto default > (deny) > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 > (allow) [] to list rfc1918.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 < > http://172.16.0.0/12> (allow) [] to list > > rfc1918.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 < > http://192.168.0.0/16> (allow) [] to list > > rfc1918.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1096 Created ip list wan.auto default (allow) > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 > (deny) [] to list wan.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 < > http://172.16.0.0/12> (deny) [] to list wan.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 < > http://192.168.0.0/16> (deny) [] to list wan.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1104 Created ip list nat.auto default (deny) > > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1106 Adding 88.198.XXX.XXX/255.255.255.255 < > http://255.255.255.255> > > (deny) to list nat.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 10.0.0.0/8 > (allow) [] to list nat.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 172.16.0.0/12 < > http://172.16.0.0/12> (allow) [] to list nat.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 192.168.0.0/16 < > http://192.168.0.0/16> (allow) [] to list > > nat.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1115 Created ip list loopback.auto default > (deny) > > [NOTICE] switch_utils.c:248 Adding 127.0.0.0/8 > (allow) [] to list loopback.auto > > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1121 Created ip list localnet.auto default > (deny) > > [NOTICE] switch_core.c:1124 Adding 88.198.XXX.XXX/255.255.255.255 < > http://255.255.255.255> > > (allow) to list localnet.auto > > > > With my current configuration FS allow to register from any IP. > > Where is my error? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org> > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/b0ef6cf2/attachment-0001.html From avi at avimarcus.net Wed Jun 15 10:26:46 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:26:46 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] In-Reply-To: <1308091686.2247.16.camel@DELL> References: <1308091686.2247.16.camel@DELL> Message-ID: If it's from the same extension and the same device, then it's set to register every 4 minutes. If you don't want that, you can change the register time on the phone or forces the subscription expire time: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia_Configuration_Files#force-subscription-expires -Avi Marcus On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: > But the message is every 4 minutes. > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > *From*: Avi Marcus > > > *Reply-to*: FreeSWITCH Users Help > *To*: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > > *Subject*: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge > *Date*: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:38:29 +0300 > > > It's just a notice that there's a register attempt. If it's every 30 or 60 > minutes from a known extension, it's fine. > > It's there for fail2ban to notice excessive register attempts so it can > block abuse from clients that try to register but don't submit a password to > avoid setting off the warning bells. > > -Avi > > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: > > What is the meaning of getting (regular) this message: > .....[WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia > profile 'internal' for [1001 at 10.0.0.101] from ip 10.0.0.12 ?? > > Extension 1001 is a Portech GSM gateway MV370. > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/6e4519ee/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Wed Jun 15 11:15:09 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:15:09 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> You have a mail issue. Check your spam... David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 15/06/2011 ? 03:55, qingquan luo a ?crit : > Hi All, > > I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone number. > I use bypass_media mode. > So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, > By I notice that When LegB reply 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch > change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to > caller. This make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf > > What wrong with that? How can fix it? > Any information or help is welcome. > > information with "sofia global siptrace on" > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16496 > > Thanks > > > Best Regards > > > Qingquan > > -- > Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/b6c44792/attachment.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 11:48:11 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:18:11 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Any help guys ? On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Sidharth Kshatriya wrote: > I am implementing an IVR using Lua in Freeswitch. In my Lua script I use > curl to a web service. Sometimes the response takes a long time to come > back. During that time period I would like to play music on hold. > > I have searched the freeswitch discussion archives a lot. There seem to be > many suggested ways to implement music on hold from a Lua script but the > answers are not very clear / not really applicable to my use case. I don't > know what method I should use and which one is recommended. > > *Method 1:* Transfer the call to 9664 (music on hold extension). However > the implementation for this solution for this does not seem to be available > in Lua. For example: How would I transfer the call back? > *Method 2:* Using bgapi uuid_park park the call and using uuid_broadcast > play an audio file. Again what do I do to unpark the call..? > > Thanks, > > Sidharth > -- > Sidharth Kshatriya > www.sidk.info > > -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/1d8a70e1/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 12:34:36 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:04:36 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invalid Profile [external] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks MC and Christian. I was doing a silly thing, I did not realize. I made FreeSwitch as Windows Service, so I was starting FS as service and as well as from Debug->FS. I checked in the logs and then I find that same logs created two times. it triggered my mind that there could be problem because of it. Then, I started FS from Debug->FS. Now the profile is loaded and GW is also registered. I thinkthe problem is when i started FS as Win Service. It used my port 5080. Now, when I am starting it next time with Debug->FS application. it could not get the port free and failed to load. Am I right? But, I have one question: 1. In real scenario, Do we need to use FS as Windows Service or to start the FS as exe. What if we start FS as Service and we would like to do some test using commands as FS CLI? If, the above question/explanation sounding weird to you, sorry for that. I am very new to FreeSwitch. Regards, Ankit On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Be sure that the external profile is actually coming up. Watch the log when > you start FS - if the external profile's port is already in use then the > profile will not start. > -MC > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:05 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > >> Where I can modify the path for the default configuration for the external >> sip-profile is >> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ >> sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path >> according to your Win7-installation). >> >> I have seen, everywhere there is a relative path. >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:26 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: >> >>> Christian, >>> >>> I tried commenting out some code one after another, if there is any typo. >>> I got the error Invalid profile every time. I even tried removing >>> iptel.xml and add the content in external.xml, still issue persist. >>> >>> Even for default configuration, this error seems to be coming. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Ankit >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Christian Benke wrote: >>> >>>> On 14 June 2011 14:51, Christian Benke wrote: >>>> >> Now, after launching FS CLI, I run a "sofia profile external restart >>>> >> reloadxml" which is giving me message "Invalid Profile [external]" >>>> > >>>> > Please give me the full output of the command above, i believe it says >>>> > more than just "Invalid Profile". >>>> >>>> Oh! It's indeed just one line saying "2011-06-14 13:07:47.335914 >>>> [WARNING] sofia.c:4044 No Such Profile 'external'" >>>> >>>> You probably have a typo in your sip-profile-configuration, in case >>>> you didn't change it intentionally. >>>> >>>> The default configuration for the external sip-profile is >>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path >>>> according to your Win7-installation). >>>> >>>> Please verify you have a section in your configuration that says: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ...lots of other stuff in default-config... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Then you add the iptel-configuration you've posted above in >>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external/iptel.xml(If this >>>> didn't happen already) >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/f340c8e2/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 13:12:42 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:12:42 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Invalid Profile [external] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > > 1. In real scenario, Do we need to use FS as Windows Service or to start > the FS as exe. What if we start FS as Service and we would like to do some > test using commands as FS CLI? > There are 2 different consoles. Starting FS with the -c option gives you a console provided by FS itself. I don't use FS on Windows but I assume that's what Debug->FS was doing. There's also the ESL protocol (provided by mod_event_socket) which allows you to connect over the network, either from on the same server or from another. That provides remote console access, and fs_cli will let you connect to that. -Steve On 15 June 2011 09:34, ankIT WALiA wrote: > > Thanks MC and Christian. I was doing a silly thing, I did not realize. I made FreeSwitch as Windows Service, so I was starting FS as service and as well as from Debug->FS. I checked in the logs and then I find that same logs created two times. it triggered my mind that there could be problem because of it. Then, I started FS from Debug->FS. Now the profile is loaded and GW is also registered. > I thinkthe problem is when i started FS as Win Service. It used my port 5080. Now, when I am starting it next time with Debug->FS application. it could not get the port free and failed to load. Am I right? > > But, I have one question: > 1. In real scenario, Do we need to use FS as Windows Service or to start the FS as exe. What if we start FS as Service and we would like to do some test using commands as FS CLI? > If, the above question/explanation sounding weird to you, sorry for that. I am very new to FreeSwitch. > Regards, > Ankit > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >> Be sure that the external profile is actually coming up. Watch the log when you start FS - if the external profile's port is already in use then the profile will not start. >> -MC >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:05 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: >>> >>> Where I can modify the path for the default configuration for the external sip-profile is >>> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ >>> sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path >>> according to your Win7-installation). >>> >>> I have seen, everywhere there is a relative path. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:26 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: >>>> >>>> Christian, >>>> >>>> I tried commenting out some code one after another, if there is any typo. >>>> I got the error Invalid profile every time. I even tried removing iptel.xml and add the content in external.xml, still issue persist. >>>> >>>> Even for default configuration, this error seems to be coming. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Ankit >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Christian Benke wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 14 June 2011 14:51, Christian Benke wrote: >>>>> >> Now, after launching FS CLI, I run a "sofia profile external restart >>>>> >> reloadxml" which is giving me message "Invalid Profile [external]" >>>>> > >>>>> > Please give me the full output of the command above, i believe it says >>>>> > more than just "Invalid Profile". >>>>> >>>>> Oh! It's indeed just one line saying "2011-06-14 13:07:47.335914 >>>>> [WARNING] sofia.c:4044 No Such Profile 'external'" >>>>> >>>>> You probably have a typo in your sip-profile-configuration, in case >>>>> you didn't change it intentionally. >>>>> >>>>> The default configuration for the external sip-profile is >>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external.xml(Modify the path >>>>> according to your Win7-installation). >>>>> >>>>> Please verify you have a section in your configuration that says: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ...lots of other stuff in default-config... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Then you add the iptel-configuration you've posted above in >>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/external/iptel.xml(If this >>>>> didn't happen already) >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/7701d2d7/attachment.html From william at xofap.com Wed Jun 15 13:18:24 2011 From: william at xofap.com (William Alianto) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:18:24 +0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk as gateway for FS Message-ID: <4DF878E0.80601@xofap.com> Hi, I'm trying to setup a system using Asterisk and FreeSwitch, where Asterisk will perform as gateway for FreeSwitch. Is this setup possible? If yes, where can I find an example setup to look on to? -- Regards, William From benkokakao at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 13:31:36 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:31:36 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk as gateway for FS In-Reply-To: <4DF878E0.80601@xofap.com> References: <4DF878E0.80601@xofap.com> Message-ID: On 15 June 2011 11:18, William Alianto wrote: > I'm trying to setup a system using Asterisk and FreeSwitch, where > Asterisk will perform as gateway for FreeSwitch. Is this setup possible? > If yes, where can I find an example setup to look on to? http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Connecting_Freeswitch_And_Asterisk Regards, Christian From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 14:15:11 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:15:11 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] In-Reply-To: References: <1308091686.2247.16.camel@DELL> Message-ID: I think the log-auth-failures option will also disable logging of that message, useful if you're not using fail2ban: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia_Configuration_Files#log-auth-failures The only reason that it's a warning level message is so that you can run FS on warning level and fail2ban can still see those messages. -Steve On 15 June 2011 07:26, Avi Marcus wrote: > If it's from the same extension and the same device, then it's set to > register every 4 minutes. If you don't want that, you can change the > register time on the phone or forces the subscription expire time: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia_Configuration_Files#force-subscription-expires > > -Avi Marcus > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: > >> But the message is every 4 minutes. >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> *From*: Avi Marcus >> > >> *Reply-to*: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> *To*: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> > >> *Subject*: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge >> *Date*: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:38:29 +0300 >> >> >> It's just a notice that there's a register attempt. If it's every 30 or 60 >> minutes from a known extension, it's fine. >> >> It's there for fail2ban to notice excessive register attempts so it can >> block abuse from clients that try to register but don't submit a password to >> avoid setting off the warning bells. >> >> -Avi >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: >> >> What is the meaning of getting (regular) this message: >> .....[WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia >> profile 'internal' for [1001 at 10.0.0.101] from ip 10.0.0.12 ?? >> >> Extension 1001 is a Portech GSM gateway MV370. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/1f70cbb9/attachment-0001.html From henk at oegema.com Wed Jun 15 14:37:45 2011 From: henk at oegema.com (Henk Oegema) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:37:45 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Asterisk as gateway for FS] Message-ID: <1308134265.2150.1.camel@DELL> Just to be curios: What is the purpose of Asterisk being a gateway for FS ? Rgds. Henk -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: William Alianto Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk as gateway for FS Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:18:24 +0700 Hi, I'm trying to setup a system using Asterisk and FreeSwitch, where Asterisk will perform as gateway for FreeSwitch. Is this setup possible? If yes, where can I find an example setup to look on to? -- Regards, William _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/a5a0cb87/attachment.html From fdelawarde at wirelessmundi.com Wed Jun 15 16:09:45 2011 From: fdelawarde at wirelessmundi.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Delawarde) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:09:45 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] custom ODBC timeouts Message-ID: <1308139785.16213.140.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> Hello everyone, I would like to manually set the timeouts for ODBC (login, query and connections), to use with DBH in lua, in order to quickly fallback to another action if something goes wrong. Those timeouts look like they are hard-coded in FS, but is there any way to force them externally (odbc.ini or similar)? Thanks, Fran?ois. From fdelawarde at wirelessmundi.com Wed Jun 15 16:41:19 2011 From: fdelawarde at wirelessmundi.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Delawarde) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:41:19 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Asterisk as gateway for FS] In-Reply-To: <1308134265.2150.1.camel@DELL> References: <1308134265.2150.1.camel@DELL> Message-ID: <1308141679.16213.159.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> It is possible and works very well, just connect some SIP trunk between the two. Here we use it for TDM, IAX, and chan_mobile call termination. Regards, Fran?ois. On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 12:37 +0200, Henk Oegema wrote: > Just to be curios: What is the purpose of Asterisk being a gateway for > FS ? > > Rgds. > Henk > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: William Alianto > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk as gateway for FS > Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:18:24 +0700 > > Hi, > > I'm trying to setup a system using Asterisk and FreeSwitch, where > Asterisk will perform as gateway for FreeSwitch. Is this setup possible? > If yes, where can I find an example setup to look on to? > > -- > Regards, > > William > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From justlikeef at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 16:59:21 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trying to get TLS/SRTP working In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201106150859.22504.justlikeef@gmail.com> If I force TLS on the phone, it will not register. A netstat shows nothing listening on the ports. On Tuesday 14 June 2011 23:30:46 Brad Mina wrote: > Line 89 and 90 of your startup log clearly show TLS starting on port 5061 > on your internal profile. > > 2011-06-14 19:58:19.325605 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3100 tls-port [5061] > > > 2011-06-14 19:58:19.325610 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3100 tls-version [tlsv1] > > My 'sofia status' returns about the same thing as you: > > freeswitch at internal> sofia status > > > > Name Type > > Data > >> > >> State > >> > >> > >> ======================================================================== > >> ========================= > >> > > internal profile sip:mod_sofia at pbx.ip.add.ress > >> : > >> :5060 RUNNING (0) > >> : > > internal-ipv6 profile sip:mod_sofia@ > >> > >> [::1]:5060 RUNNING (0) > >> > > external profile sip:mod_sofia at pbx.ip.add.ress > >> : > >> :5080 RUNNING (0) > >> : > > external::bw-secondary gateway > >> > >> sip:1831xxxxxxx at 216.82.225.202 NOREG > >> > > external::bw-main gateway > >> > >> sip:1831xxxxxxx at 216.82.224.202 NOREG > >> > > pbx.ip.add.ress alias > >> > >> internal ALIASED > >> > >> ======================================================================== > >> ========================= > > > > 3 profiles 1 alias > > Have you tried configuring a phone for use with TLS? If so what problems > are you having with it? > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Rob Hutton wrote: > > Full startup log: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16494 > > > > Here's the config file: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16495 > > > > FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-d52a254 2011-06-13 18-27-28 -0400) > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Mitch Capper wrote: > >> Are you using latest trunk or what version of freeswitch? Can you > >> post the rest of the startup log so we can see if it possibly failed > >> later? > >> > >> ~Mitch > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rob Hutton > >> > >> wrote: > >> > Trying to get TLS working. When sofia loads, I see that it seems to > >> > >> accept > >> > >> > the parameters: > >> > > >> > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16487 > >> > > >> > But sofia status shows nothing running on the TLS ports: > >> > Name > >> > > >> > Type Data State > >> > >> ======================================================================== > >> ========================= > >> > >> > sipinterface_3 profile > >> > > >> > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5080 RUNNING (0) > >> > > >> > sipinterface_2 profile > >> > > >> > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5070 RUNNING (0) > >> > > >> > 192.168.2.25 alias > >> > > >> > sipinterface_1 ALIASED > >> > > >> > sipinterface_1 profile > >> > > >> > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5060 RUNNING (0) > >> > > >> > voicemail_1 alias > >> > > >> > sipinterface_1 ALIASED > >> > >> ======================================================================== > >> ========================= > >> > >> > 3 profiles 2 aliases > >> > > >> > > >> > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ssl looks like: > >> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3627 Jun 14 12:55 agent.pem > >> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1996 Jun 14 13:04 cafile.pem > >> > > >> > > >> > Freeswitch is compiled with SSL support: > >> > > >> > ldd freeswitch > >> > > >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff415ff000) > >> > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fab636b8000) > >> > libfreeswitch.so.1 => > >> > >> /usr/local/freeswitch/lib/libfreeswitch.so.1 > >> > >> > (0x00007fab632c1000) > >> > > >> > libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007fab630bc000) > >> > librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007fab62eb3000) > >> > libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00007fab62c78000) > >> > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fab62a5b000) > >> > libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fab627ff000) > >> > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 > >> > >> (0x00007fab6244e000) > >> > >> > libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fab6224a000) > >> > libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fab62032000) > >> > libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007fab61ddd000) > >> > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fab61a70000) > >> > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 > >> > (0x00007fab61767000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 > >> > (0x00007fab61551000) libodbc.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libodbc.so.1 > >> > (0x00007fab612e5000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 > >> > (0x00007fab6390f000) > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> > >> > UNSUBSCRIBE: > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> > >> > http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org From potxoka at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 17:38:14 2011 From: potxoka at gmail.com (Antonio) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:38:14 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proxy traffic security In-Reply-To: References: <4DEFF3FA.5050500@gmail.com> <4DF1E456.1030607@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4DF8B5C6.2080104@gmail.com> Thanks ! ;-) El 10/06/11 11:46, Steven Ayre escribi?: > Iptables will allow you to block all but your proxies from sending. It > should work (slightly) faster than the FS ACL because it'll block it > earlier in the packet processing. > > -Steve > > > On 10 June 2011 10:31, Antonio > wrote: > > Hi, > > If I had thought also use iptables, but it was to know if exists > something better to put the ip's (to prevent IP spoofing). Thanks. > > Greetings > Anto > > El 09/06/11 16:01, Christian Benke escribi?: > > ACLs definitely would not hurt. Also think about setting up a simple > > firewall(e.g. Shorewall or just plain IPTables) to limit the > access to > > the ip's which MUST have access(e.g. SIP-Provider IPs), you can > never > > be sure if a software(like FreeSWITCH) doesn't have a bug that could > > be exploited. > > > > Cheers, > > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/f3345355/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Wed Jun 15 18:00:30 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] invalid application lua In-Reply-To: References: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> Message-ID: <4DF8BAFE.1000704@499x.com> freeswitch at transcription-desktop> reload mod_lua Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file or directory) 2011-06-15 09:00:17.969278 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file or directory) Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file or directory) 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file or directory) Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file or directory) 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file or directory) 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] mod_enum.c:808 ENUM Reloaded 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] switch_time.c:950 Timezone reloaded 530 definitions 2011-06-15 09:00:18.022839 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:926 Error Loading module /opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so **/opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory** -ERR unloading module [No such module!] +OK Reloading XML -ERR loading module [module load file routine returned an error] On 6/14/2011 4:55 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: > What happens when you run "reload mod_lua" from the CLI? > > -Avi Marcus > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Wes > wrote: > > I'm getting "invalid application lua" however, in modules.conf, > the line > for is active and not commented out. > > Any help is appreciated. Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/e0d7a0ac/attachment-0001.html From infos at madovsky.org Wed Jun 15 18:21:12 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] References: <1308091686.2247.16.camel@DELL> Message-ID: <26DA9D570679447EBFF6F49A2657976C@e1705> useful if you use fail2ban.... ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: Steven Ayre To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 6:15 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] I think the log-auth-failures option will also disable logging of that message, useful if you're not using fail2ban: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia_Configuration_Files#log-auth-failures The only reason that it's a warning level message is so that you can run FS on warning level and fail2ban can still see those messages. -Steve On 15 June 2011 07:26, Avi Marcus wrote: If it's from the same extension and the same device, then it's set to register every 4 minutes. If you don't want that, you can change the register time on the phone or forces the subscription expire time: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia_Configuration_Files#force-subscription-expires -Avi Marcus On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: But the message is every 4 minutes. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Avi Marcus Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:38:29 +0300 It's just a notice that there's a register attempt. If it's every 30 or 60 minutes from a known extension, it's fine. It's there for fail2ban to notice excessive register attempts so it can block abuse from clients that try to register but don't submit a password to avoid setting off the warning bells. -Avi On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: What is the meaning of getting (regular) this message: .....[WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1001 at 10.0.0.101] from ip 10.0.0.12 ?? Extension 1001 is a Portech GSM gateway MV370. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/61339b4b/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Wed Jun 15 18:24:33 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:24:33 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] invalid application lua In-Reply-To: <4DF8BAFE.1000704@499x.com> References: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> <4DF8BAFE.1000704@499x.com> Message-ID: <876A820B-B0A3-4FDA-9F02-C55E8A261AAA@ipeva.fr> Wes, in FS source tree, edit modules.conf and enable mod_lua. Then recompile. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 15/06/2011 ? 16:00, Wes a ?crit : > freeswitch at transcription-desktop> reload mod_lua > Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file or directory) > 2011-06-15 09:00:17.969278 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file or directory) > Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file or directory) > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file or directory) > Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file or directory) > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file or directory) > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] mod_enum.c:808 ENUM Reloaded > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] switch_time.c:950 Timezone reloaded 530 definitions > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.022839 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:926 Error Loading module /opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so > **/opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory** > > -ERR unloading module [No such module!] > +OK Reloading XML > -ERR loading module [module load file routine returned an error] > > On 6/14/2011 4:55 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: >> >> What happens when you run "reload mod_lua" from the CLI? >> >> -Avi Marcus >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Wes wrote: >> I'm getting "invalid application lua" however, in modules.conf, the line >> for is active and not commented out. >> >> Any help is appreciated. Thanks. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/db92ff0d/attachment-0001.html From jaybinks at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 18:29:36 2011 From: jaybinks at gmail.com (jay binks) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:29:36 +1000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] In-Reply-To: <26DA9D570679447EBFF6F49A2657976C@e1705> References: <1308091686.2247.16.camel@DELL> <26DA9D570679447EBFF6F49A2657976C@e1705> Message-ID: and everyone SHOULD use fail2ban ... or your asking for trouble.. not many good reasons to avoid it . J On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Madovsky wrote: > useful if you use fail2ban.... ;) > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Steven Ayre > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 15, 2011 6:15 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] > > I think the log-auth-failures option will also disable logging of that > message, useful if you're not using fail2ban: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia_Configuration_Files#log-auth-failures > > The only reason that it's a warning level message is so that you can run FS > on warning level and fail2ban can still see those messages. > > -Steve > > > On 15 June 2011 07:26, Avi Marcus wrote: > >> If it's from the same extension and the same device, then it's set to >> register every 4 minutes. If you don't want that, you can change the >> register time on the phone or forces the subscription expire time: >> >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia_Configuration_Files#force-subscription-expires >> >> -Avi Marcus >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: >> >>> But the message is every 4 minutes. >>> >>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>> *From*: Avi Marcus >>> > >>> *Reply-to*: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> > >>> *To*: FreeSWITCH Users Help >>> > >>> *Subject*: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge >>> *Date*: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:38:29 +0300 >>> >>> >>> It's just a notice that there's a register attempt. If it's every 30 or >>> 60 minutes from a known extension, it's fine. >>> >>> It's there for fail2ban to notice excessive register attempts so it can >>> block abuse from clients that try to register but don't submit a password to >>> avoid setting off the warning bells. >>> >>> -Avi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: >>> >>> What is the meaning of getting (regular) this message: >>> .....[WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia >>> profile 'internal' for [1001 at 10.0.0.101] from ip 10.0.0.12 ?? >>> >>> Extension 1001 is a Portech GSM gateway MV370. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Sincerely Jay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/c1e8945d/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Wed Jun 15 19:14:09 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] invalid application lua In-Reply-To: <876A820B-B0A3-4FDA-9F02-C55E8A261AAA@ipeva.fr> References: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> <4DF8BAFE.1000704@499x.com> <876A820B-B0A3-4FDA-9F02-C55E8A261AAA@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <4DF8CC41.4080102@499x.com> I'm using the ubuntu packages, so I can't do exactly that, but I did find that: sudo apt-get install freeswitch-lua did the trick! I'm sure I'll have more questions now when I start to try the lua scripting, but for now, I've got an extension hitting the hello.lua example script and it works fine...thanks for the help! On 6/15/2011 9:24 AM, David Ponzone wrote: > Wes, > > in FS source tree, edit modules.conf and enable mod_lua. > Then recompile. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > / > / > > > > Le 15/06/2011 ? 16:00, Wes a ?crit : > >> freeswitch at transcription-desktop> reload mod_lua >> Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file or >> directory) >> 2011-06-15 09:00:17.969278 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open >> /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file or directory) >> Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file or >> directory) >> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open >> /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file or directory) >> Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file or >> directory) >> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open >> /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file or directory) >> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] mod_enum.c:808 ENUM Reloaded >> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] switch_time.c:950 Timezone reloaded >> 530 definitions >> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.022839 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:926 Error >> Loading module /opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so >> **/opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so: cannot open shared object file: No >> such file or directory** >> >> -ERR unloading module [No such module!] >> +OK Reloading XML >> -ERR loading module [module load file routine returned an error] >> >> On 6/14/2011 4:55 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: >>> What happens when you run "reload mod_lua" from the CLI? >>> >>> -Avi Marcus >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Wes >> > wrote: >>> >>> I'm getting "invalid application lua" however, in modules.conf, >>> the line >>> for is active and not commented out. >>> >>> Any help is appreciated. Thanks. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/05c3e175/attachment-0001.html From kris at kriskinc.com Wed Jun 15 19:18:00 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Certainly looks like a bug. Make sure you're running latest and open an issue on JIRA. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:55 PM, qingquan luo wrote: > Hi All, > ? I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone number. > ? I use bypass_media mode. > ? So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, > ? By I notice that When LegB reply 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch > change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to > caller. This make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf > ? What wrong with that? ?How can fix it? > ? Any information or help is welcome. > information with "sofia global siptrace on" > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16496 > Thanks > > Best Regards > > Qingquan > -- > Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: > http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Kristian Kielhofner From avi at avimarcus.net Wed Jun 15 19:21:11 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:21:11 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] invalid application lua In-Reply-To: <4DF8CC41.4080102@499x.com> References: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> <4DF8BAFE.1000704@499x.com> <876A820B-B0A3-4FDA-9F02-C55E8A261AAA@ipeva.fr> <4DF8CC41.4080102@499x.com> Message-ID: Compile from git, compile from git, compile from git! http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide The one in the main ubuntu 10.04 repo is Version: 1.0.head~git.master.20101015.1-1 - that's 8 months old... -Avi Marcus On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Wes wrote: > I'm using the ubuntu packages, so I can't do exactly that, but I did find > that: > > sudo apt-get install freeswitch-lua > > did the trick! > > I'm sure I'll have more questions now when I start to try the lua > scripting, but for now, I've got an extension hitting the hello.lua example > script and it works fine...thanks for the help! > > On 6/15/2011 9:24 AM, David Ponzone wrote: > > Wes, > > in FS source tree, edit modules.conf and enable mod_lua. > Then recompile. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 15/06/2011 ? 16:00, Wes a ?crit : > > freeswitch at transcription-desktop> reload mod_lua > Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file or > directory) > 2011-06-15 09:00:17.969278 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open > /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file or directory) > Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file or > directory) > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open > /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file or directory) > Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file or > directory) > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open > /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file or directory) > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] mod_enum.c:808 ENUM Reloaded > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] switch_time.c:950 Timezone reloaded 530 > definitions > 2011-06-15 09:00:18.022839 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:926 Error > Loading module /opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so > **/opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so: cannot open shared object file: No such > file or directory** > > -ERR unloading module [No such module!] > +OK Reloading XML > -ERR loading module [module load file routine returned an error] > > On 6/14/2011 4:55 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: > > What happens when you run "reload mod_lua" from the CLI? > > -Avi Marcus > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Wes wrote: > >> I'm getting "invalid application lua" however, in modules.conf, the line >> for is active and not commented out. >> >> Any help is appreciated. Thanks. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/beedea75/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 15 20:25:00 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:25:00 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Conference Call Today Message-ID: Hello all! Today's agenda is here: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FS_weekly_2011_06_15 We have a light agenda but we do want to talk about a few things, in particular the FreeSWITCH Cookbook and the new mod_rtmp that was released on Monday. Talk to you soon, Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/e6cf5b4c/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Wed Jun 15 20:31:37 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] invalid application lua In-Reply-To: References: <4DF7D71B.3020103@499x.com> <4DF8BAFE.1000704@499x.com> <876A820B-B0A3-4FDA-9F02-C55E8A261AAA@ipeva.fr> <4DF8CC41.4080102@499x.com> Message-ID: <4DF8DE69.4000306@499x.com> ok, I'll give it a try. A coworker who's an Ubuntu-head set me up this way! Can I just do this in a separate directory without messing with the current installation just to try it out? On 6/15/2011 10:21 AM, Avi Marcus wrote: > Compile from git, compile from git, compile from git! > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide > The one in the main ubuntu 10.04 repo is Version: > 1.0.head~git.master.20101015.1-1 - that's 8 months old... > > > -Avi Marcus > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Wes > wrote: > > I'm using the ubuntu packages, so I can't do exactly that, but I > did find that: > > sudo apt-get install freeswitch-lua > > did the trick! > > I'm sure I'll have more questions now when I start to try the lua > scripting, but for now, I've got an extension hitting the > hello.lua example script and it works fine...thanks for the help! > > On 6/15/2011 9:24 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >> Wes, >> >> in FS source tree, edit modules.conf and enable mod_lua. >> Then recompile. >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service ClientIPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout >> message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message >> s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et >> d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >> / >> / >> >> >> >> Le 15/06/2011 ? 16:00, Wes a ?crit : >> >>> freeswitch at transcription-desktop> reload mod_lua >>> Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file >>> or directory) >>> 2011-06-15 09:00:17.969278 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open >>> /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/de/*.xml (No such file or directory) >>> Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file >>> or directory) >>> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open >>> /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/fr/*.xml (No such file or directory) >>> Error including /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file >>> or directory) >>> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.008426 [ERR] switch_xml.c:1329 Couldnt open >>> /opt/freeswitch/conf/lang/ru/*.xml (No such file or directory) >>> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] mod_enum.c:808 ENUM Reloaded >>> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.021491 [INFO] switch_time.c:950 Timezone >>> reloaded 530 definitions >>> 2011-06-15 09:00:18.022839 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:926 >>> Error Loading module /opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so >>> **/opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_lua.so: cannot open shared object >>> file: No such file or directory** >>> >>> -ERR unloading module [No such module!] >>> +OK Reloading XML >>> -ERR loading module [module load file routine returned an error] >>> >>> On 6/14/2011 4:55 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: >>>> What happens when you run "reload mod_lua" from the CLI? >>>> >>>> -Avi Marcus >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Wes >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm getting "invalid application lua" however, in >>>> modules.conf, the line >>>> for is active and not commented out. >>>> >>>> Any help is appreciated. Thanks. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/dbba76c5/attachment-0001.html From daldworth at teliax.com Wed Jun 15 08:24:23 2011 From: daldworth at teliax.com (David Aldworth) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:24:23 -0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 183 after 180 Message-ID: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> I am trying to find the best solution to generate ring on 180 but bypass on 183. We are in the middle, customer -> FS -> pstn. We bypass_media=true for all calls. However, sometimes we get a 180 from the PSTN and FS relays that to the customer, but the customer is not generating ring so the calling party hears dead air. So, the solution would be to anchor media and generate ring when we get a 180, but once the 183 or 200 hits, bypass starts. I suppose we could do an expression match on the 180, ignore early media, generate ring, and bypass media after bridge. Just wondering if there was a better alternative solution. From qingquan at globalroam.com Wed Jun 15 11:23:37 2011 From: qingquan at globalroam.com (qingquan luo) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:23:37 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> References: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: Hi David, Thank you for reminder, I resend this mail in mail list, Because I can not reply preview mail( I make a mistake to subscribe this mail list in Daily Digest mode.) So I need resend this mail for require help. For this issue, I has paste sip debug output in: information with "sofia global siptrace on" http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16496 Thanks On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > You have a mail issue. Check your spam... > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 15/06/2011 ? 03:55, qingquan luo a ?crit : > > Hi All, > > I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone > number. > I use bypass_media mode. > So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, > By I notice that When LegB reply 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch > change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to > caller. This make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf > > What wrong with that? How can fix it? > Any information or help is welcome. > > information with "sofia global siptrace on" > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16496 > > Thanks > > > Best Regards > > > Qingquan > > -- > Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: > http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/507e122e/attachment-0001.html From doreme202002 at yahoo.com Wed Jun 15 13:36:39 2011 From: doreme202002 at yahoo.com (hala alramli) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:36:39 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Fw: caller phone hangup call after callee answer Message-ID: <34394.27154.qm@web24604.mail.ird.yahoo.com> i have kamailio server with freeswitch ?but i face this problem .any help to explain the reason. i have a problem here ?that when callee answer caller phone send bye and terminate the call i will attach the track. ? freeswitch listen to?sip_server:5068 U 2011/06/13 13:23:41.764946 caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 -> sip_server:5060 INVITE sip:callee at sip..XXXX.XXXSIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-a9c2d8ca. From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: . Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 101 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 70. Contact: . Expires: 240. User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2T-3.1.15(LS). Content-Length: 444. Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER. Supported: x-sipura. Content-Type: application/sdp. . v=0. o=- 785603 785603 IN IP4 192.168.1.130. s=-. c=IN IP4 192.168.1.130. t=0 0. m=audio 16416 RTP/AVP 18 0 2 4 8 96 97 98 100 101. a=rtpmap:18 G729a/8000. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. a=rtpmap:2 G726-32/8000. a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:96 G726-40/8000. a=rtpmap:97 G726-24/8000. a=rtpmap:98 G726-16/8000. a=rtpmap:100 NSE/8000. a=fmtp:100 192-193. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:30. a=sendrecv. ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:41.765588 sip_server:5060 -> caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-a9c2d8ca;rport=1024;received=caller_ip_XXXXX. From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: ;tag=4471d251144740103ef2d5e5631bdc66.e595. Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 101 INVITE. Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="sip.XXXX.XXX", nonce="4df5f4690000f03a53f01a12380d236e373437474bf441ef". Server: Kamailio (1.4.4-notls (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. . ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:41.822266 caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 -> sip_server:5060 ACK sip:callee at sip..XXXX.XXXSIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-a9c2d8ca. From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: ;tag=4471d251144740103ef2d5e5631bdc66.e595. Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 101 ACK. Max-Forwards: 70. Contact: . User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2T-3.1.15(LS). Content-Length: 0. . ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:41.834779 caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 -> sip_server:5060 INVITE sip:callee at sip..XXXX.XXXSIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-9f4eddee. From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: . Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 102 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 70. Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="909999999",realm="sip.XXXX.XXX",nonce="4df5f4690000f03a53f01a12380d236e373437474bf441 ef",uri="sip:callee at sip.XXXX.XXX",algorithm=MD5,response="82a5c2648544cf1abd616f7816a61a5f". Contact: . Expires: 240. User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2T-3.1.15(LS). Content-Length: 444. Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER. Supported: x-sipura. Content-Type: application/sdp. . v=0. o=- 785603 785603 IN IP4 192.168.1.130. s=-. c=IN IP4 192.168.1.130. t=0 0. m=audio 16416 RTP/AVP 18 0 2 4 8 96 97 98 100 101. a=rtpmap:18 G729a/8000. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. a=rtpmap:2 G726-32/8000. a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:96 G726-40/8000. a=rtpmap:97 G726-24/8000. a=rtpmap:98 G726-16/8000. a=rtpmap:100 NSE/8000. a=fmtp:100 192-193. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:30. a=sendrecv. ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:41.838496 sip_server:5060 -> caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 SIP/2.0 100 Giving a try. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-9f4eddee;rport=1024;received=caller_ip_XXXXX. From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: . Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 102 INVITE. Server: Kamailio (1.4.4-notls (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. . ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:41.843647 sip_server:5068 -> gateway_XXXX:5060 INVITE sip:122callee at gateway_XXXX SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip_server:5068;rport;branch=z9hG4bKcZmy3ypB0jm1B. Max-Forwards: 14. From: "909999999" ;tag=5SNSNaj6XQ8Kr. To: . Call-ID: 6f179185-1052-122f-49bf-00221988c79d. CSeq: 13646046 INVITE. Contact: . User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.trunk-11078. Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO, PUBLISH. Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces. Allow-Events: talk, presence, dialog, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer. Min-SE: 120. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Disposition: session. Content-Length: 478. P-PInfo: 0. Remote-Party-ID: "909999999" ;screen=yes;privacy=off. . v=0. o=- 4131904911551689921 6268338771912655224 IN IP4 sip_server. s=-. c=IN IP4 sip_server. t=0 0. m=audio 19594 RTP/AVP 18 0 2 4 8 96 97 98 100 101. a=rtpmap:18 G729a/8000. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. a=rtpmap:2 G726-32/8000. a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:96 G726-40/8000. a=rtpmap:97 G726-24/8000. a=rtpmap:98 G726-16/8000. a=rtpmap:100 NSE/8000. a=fmtp:100 192-193. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:30. a=direction:active. ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:41.847833 gateway_XXXX:5060 -> sip_server:5068 SIP/2.0 100 Trying. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip_server:5068;received=sip_server;rport=5068;branch=z9hG4bKcZmy3ypB0jm1B. From: "909999999" ;tag=5SNSNaj6XQ8Kr. To: . Call-ID: 6f179185-1052-122f-49bf-00221988c79d. CSeq: 13646046 INVITE. Content-Length: 0. . ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:47.038040 gateway_XXXX:5060 -> sip_server:5068 SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip_server:5068;received=sip_server;rport=5068;branch=z9hG4bKcZmy3ypB0jm1B. From: "909999999" ;tag=5SNSNaj6XQ8Kr. To: ;tag=SDlfkl999-e4e6842982432011613141134. Call-ID: 6f179185-1052-122f-49bf-00221988c79d. CSeq: 13646046 INVITE. Server: CS2000_NGSS/8.0. Supported: 100rel. Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INVITE,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE,REFER,NOTIFY,PRACK. Contact: . Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 246. . v=0. o=PVG 1307966093710 1307966093710 IN IP4 gateway_XXXX. s=-. p=+1 6135555555. c=IN IP4 gateway_XXXX. t=0 0. m=audio 36568 RTP/AVP 18 101. a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:30. ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:47.049924 sip_server:5060 -> caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;rport=1024;received=caller_ip_XXXXX;branch=z9hG4bK-9f4eddee. Record-Route: . From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: ;tag=4gv0KF120ej1c. Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 102 INVITE. Contact: . User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.trunk-11078. Accept: application/sdp. Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO, PUBLISH. Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces. Allow-Events: talk, presence, dialog, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Disposition: session. Content-Length: 248. . v=0. o=PVG 2756959439342557186 2159116678429256306 IN IP4 sip_server. s=-. p=+1 6135555555. c=IN IP4 sip_server. t=0 0. m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 99 101. a=rtpmap:99 G729/8000. a=fmtp:99 annexb=no. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:49.770967 gateway_XXXX:5060 -> sip_server:5068 SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip_server:5068;received=sip_server;rport=5068;branch=z9hG4bKcZmy3ypB0jm1B. From: "909999999" ;tag=5SNSNaj6XQ8Kr. To: ;tag=SDlfkl999-e4e6842982432011613141134. Call-ID: 6f179185-1052-122f-49bf-00221988c79d. CSeq: 13646046 INVITE. Server: CS2000_NGSS/8.0. Supported: 100rel. Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INVITE,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE,REFER,NOTIFY,PRACK. Contact: . Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 246. . v=0. o=PVG 1307966093710 1307966093710 IN IP4 gateway_XXXX. s=-. p=+1 6135555555. c=IN IP4 gateway_XXXX. t=0 0. m=audio 36568 RTP/AVP 18 101. a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:30. ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:49.771167 sip_server:5068 -> gateway_XXXX:5060 ACK sip:gateway_XXXX:5060;transport=UDP SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip_server:5068;rport;branch=z9hG4bKD8DQ5S7eXUamQ. Max-Forwards: 70. From: "909999999" ;tag=5SNSNaj6XQ8Kr. To: ;tag=SDlfkl999-e4e6842982432011613141134. Call-ID: 6f179185-1052-122f-49bf-00221988c79d. CSeq: 13646046 ACK. Contact: . Content-Length: 0. . ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:49.774216 sip_server:5060 -> caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;rport=1024;received=caller_ip_XXXXX;branch=z9hG4bK-9f4eddee. Record-Route: . From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: ;tag=4gv0KF120ej1c. Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 102 INVITE. Contact: . User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.trunk-11078. Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO, PUBLISH. Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces. Allow-Events: talk, presence, dialog, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer. Min-SE: 120. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Disposition: session. Content-Length: 248. . v=0. o=PVG 2756959439342557186 2159116678429256306 IN IP4 sip_server. s=-. p=+1 6135555555. c=IN IP4 sip_server. t=0 0. m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 99 101. a=rtpmap:99 G729/8000. a=fmtp:99 annexb=no. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:49.836231 caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 -> sip_server:5060 ACK sip:mod_sofia at sip_server:5068;transport=udp SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-d84f3d54. From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: ;tag=4gv0KF120ej1c. Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 102 ACK. Max-Forwards: 70. Route: . Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="909999999",realm="sip.XXXX.XXX",nonce="4df5f4690000f03a53f01a12380d236e373437474bf441 ef",uri="sip:mod_sofia at sip_server:5068",algorithm=MD5,response="1dc1c1666a5d210779ab1daf84b6eb10". Contact: . User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2T-3.1.15(LS). Content-Length: 0. . ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:49.843388 caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 -> sip_server:5060 BYE sip:mod_sofia at sip_server:5068;transport=udp SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-1710f527. From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: ;tag=4gv0KF120ej1c. Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 103 BYE. Max-Forwards: 70. Route: . Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="909999999",realm="sip.XXXX.XXX",nonce="4df5f4690000f03a53f01a12380d236e373437474bf441 ef",uri="sip:mod_sofia at sip_server:5068",algorithm=MD5,response="ff113ffd721bbaef656458c39840e450". User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2T-3.1.15(LS). Content-Length: 0. . ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:49.845476 sip_server:5060 -> caller_ip_XXXXX:1024 SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.130:5060;rport=1024;received=caller_ip_XXXXX;branch=z9hG4bK-1710f527. From: ;tag=4fde77c876fbda1ao0. To: ;tag=4gv0KF120ej1c. Call-ID: 850573e0-95b74ce2 at 192.168.1.130. CSeq: 103 BYE. User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.trunk-11078. Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO, PUBLISH. Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces. Content-Length: 0. . ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:49.848748 sip_server:5068 -> gateway_XXXX:5060 BYE sip:gateway_XXXX:5060;transport=UDP SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip_server:5068;rport;branch=z9hG4bKeH7F7mrjt406j. Max-Forwards: 70. From: "909999999" ;tag=5SNSNaj6XQ8Kr. To: ;tag=SDlfkl999-e4e6842982432011613141134. Call-ID: 6f179185-1052-122f-49bf-00221988c79d. CSeq: 13646047 BYE. Contact: . User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.trunk-11078. Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO, PUBLISH. Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces. Reason: Q.850;cause=16;text="NORMAL_CLEARING". Content-Length: 0. . ? ? U 2011/06/13 13:23:49.858691 gateway_XXXX:5060 -> sip_server:5068 SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip_server:5068;received=sip_server;rport=5068;branch=z9hG4bKeH7F7mrjt406j. From: "909999999" ;tag=5SNSNaj6XQ8Kr. To: ;tag=SDlfkl999-e4e6842982432011613141134. Call-ID: 6f179185-1052-122f-49bf-00221988c79d. CSeq: 13646047 BYE. Server: CS2000_NGSS/8.0. Supported: 100rel. Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INVITE,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE,REFER,NOTIFY,PRACK. Content-Length: 0. . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/d67a0a79/attachment-0001.html From Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com Wed Jun 15 19:14:08 2011 From: Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com (Weigel, Stefan) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:14:08 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] unixODBC MySQL mysqld-5.0.77 - error messages with mod_callcenter Message-ID: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C29@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7m Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime Size: 10057 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/cff595b0/attachment.bin From nsirugudi at gmail.com Wed Jun 15 07:20:40 2011 From: nsirugudi at gmail.com (Narendra Sirugudi) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:50:40 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Originating a call from a confeence is not working ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Thanks for your reply. But your suggestion did not work. What worked is: freeswitch at internal> conference 3001-135.254.210.166 dial {originate_timeout=30}sofia/internal/1005%135.254.210.166 1234567890 FreeSWITCH_Conference The change is instead of 1005 at 135.254.210.166, i now have 1005%135.254.210.166 i.e. "@" replaced with "%". this works fine. thanks again, --naren On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Just curious - Try this and let us know if it behaves differently: > > conference 3001-10.10.10.16 dial {originate_timeout=30}<%7Boriginate_timeout=30%7Dsofia/internal/1005 at 135.254.210.166>user/1005 1234567890 > FreeSWITCH_Conference > > -MC > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Narendra Sirugudi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to use the dial-out feature of the conference application of >> freeswitch. >> I am using freeswtich version 1.0.6. >> >> As i understand the conference gets created when the first user joins. >> Hence i made one user with number 1004 join the conference. >> >> freeswitch at internal> conference list >> Conference 3001-10.10.10.16 (1 member rate: 8000) >> 6;sofia/internal/1004 at 10.10.10.16 >> ;08178796-a06e-4ee8-81fb-1f0cc53f8fb5;1004;1004;hear|speak|floor;0;0;300 >> >> Now i dail out another user 1005 using the command : >> freeswitch at internal> conference 3001-10.10.10.16 dial >> {originate_timeout=30}sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16<%7Boriginate_timeout=30%7Dsofia/internal/1005 at 135.254.210.166>1234567890 FreeSWITCH_Conference >> This does not work. I observe the following errors in the fs_cli logs: >> >> *2011-06-12 10:57:57.621014 [ERR] sofia.c:5366 Cannot Blind Transfer 1 >> Legged calls* >> can anyone tell what could be going wrong ? >> >> thanks >> --naren >> >> The complete logs are given below: >> >> ############################################################# >> freeswitch at internal> conference 3001-10.10.10.16 dial >> {originate_timeout=30}sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 1234567890 >> FreeSWITCH_Conference >> Call Requested: result: [NO_USER_RESPONSE] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1885 variable >> string 0 = [ignore_early_media=true] >> freeswitch at internal> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] >> switch_ivr_originate.c:1885 variable string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:669 New Channel >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [a77137ad-ad1a-45e9-ac27-88a996cd865d] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:3384 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.606002 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_INIT >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:83 >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA INIT >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:117 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_ROUTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:140 >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA ROUTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_ROUTING -> >> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:360 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State CONSUME_MEDIA >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.607036 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:360 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.608051 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 entering state [calling][0] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.608051 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5847 IP 10.10.10.16 Rejected by >> acl "domains". Falling back to Digest auth. >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.608051 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:669 New Channel >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16[86e5b4a9-8c63-4d22-b087-94c4b95d1abb] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.609139 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_NEW >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.609139 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State NEW >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 entering state [received][100] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4164 Remote SDP: >> v=0 >> o=FreeSWITCH 1307870225 1307870226 IN IP4 10.10.10.16 >> s=FreeSWITCH >> c=IN IP4 10.10.10.16 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 20452 RTP/AVP 115 107 9 0 8 3 101 13 >> a=rtpmap:115 G7221/32000 >> a=fmtp:115 bitrate=48000 >> a=rtpmap:107 G7221/16000 >> a=fmtp:107 bitrate=32000 >> a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 >> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 >> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 >> a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >> a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 >> a=ptime:20 >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3585 Audio Codec Compare >> [G7221:115:32000:20]/[G7221:115:32000:20] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.616761 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2354 Set Codec >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 G7221/32000 20 ms 640 samples >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.617820 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3524 Set 2833 dtmf >> send/recv payload to 101 >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.617820 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4310 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.617820 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_INIT >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:83 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA INIT >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:117 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:338 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State INIT going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_ROUTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:140 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA ROUTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard ROUTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.618925 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:418 Processing >> FreeSWITCH_Conference->1005 in context public >> Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 parsing [public->unloop] >> continue=false >> Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Regex (PASS) [unloop] >> ${unroll_loops}(true) =~ /^true$/ break=on-false >> Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Regex (PASS) [unloop] >> ${sip_looped_call}(true) =~ /^true$/ break=on-false >> Dialplan: sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Action >> deflect(${destination_number}) >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_ROUTING -> >> CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:341 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State ROUTING going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:348 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State EXECUTE >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:226 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA EXECUTE >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.620002 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard EXECUTE >> EXECUTE sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 deflect(1005) >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.621014 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5004 Process REFER to [ >> 1005 at 10.10.10.16] >> *2011-06-12 10:57:57.621014 [ERR] sofia.c:5366 Cannot Blind Transfer 1 >> Legged calls* >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 entering state [terminated][480] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [NOTICE] sofia.c:4789 Hangup >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_CONSUME_MEDIA] [NO_USER_RESPONSE] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2102 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [KILL] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.622041 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_HANGUP >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:408 >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Overriding SIP cause 408 with 480 from >> the other leg >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:414 Channel >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 hanging up, cause: NO_USER_RESPONSE >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.623126 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3228 Originate >> Resulted in Error Cause: 18 [NO_USER_RESPONSE] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Standard HANGUP, cause: NO_USER_RESPONSE >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:333 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.636515 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Standard REPORTING, cause: >> NO_USER_RESPONSE >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:327 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1164 Session 24 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Locked, Waiting on external entities >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1182 Session 24 >> (sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Ended >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1184 Close >> Channel sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_DESTROY] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:428 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:341 >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16 Standard DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.637437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( >> sofia/internal/1005 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.720295 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:641 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.721283 [NOTICE] switch_core_state_machine.c:185 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 has executed the last dialplan >> instruction, hanging up. >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.721283 [NOTICE] switch_core_state_machine.c:187 Hangup >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.721283 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2102 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [KILL] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:348 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State EXECUTE going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_HANGUP >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:414 Channel >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 hanging up, cause: NORMAL_CLEARING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.722210 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:476 Responding to INVITE >> with: 480 >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard HANGUP, cause: >> NORMAL_CLEARING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State HANGUP going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:333 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_HANGUP -> >> CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard REPORTING, cause: >> NORMAL_CLEARING >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State REPORTING going to sleep >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:327 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State Change CS_REPORTING -> >> CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1164 Session 25 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Locked, Waiting on external >> entities >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1182 Session 25 >> (sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Ended >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1184 Close >> Channel sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 [CS_DESTROY] >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:428 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) Running State Change CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:341 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 SOFIA DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16 Standard DESTROY >> 2011-06-12 10:57:57.723321 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439 ( >> sofia/internal/1234567890 at 10.10.10.16) State DESTROY going to sleep >> >> ################################################################################## >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/c05d1d52/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 00:03:02 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:03:02 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using fs api to originate a call and record it In-Reply-To: <4DF77E9A.6010701@499x.com> References: <4DF278F9.6000201@499x.com> <4DF778DD.7060805@499x.com> <4DF77E9A.6010701@499x.com> Message-ID: You can use ignore_early_media=true if your scenario allows it. -MC On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:30 AM, wrote: > based on the documentation here, it looks like I might be able to execute > a script, instead of directly doing the record command. Then the script > could maybe set the parameters I need? > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_commands#originate > > > > > On 6/14/2011 10:06 AM, wes-fs at 499x.com wrote: > > This did not work, I still heard the ringing. > > On 6/10/2011 5:30 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > Try this: > > originate { > media_bug_answer_req=true}sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx > &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) > > Let us know if it works. > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:05 PM, wrote: > >> I'm extremely new to freeswitch, and anything like it, so please forgive >> me! >> >> I'd like to be able to use the API to originate a call and record it. >> So far, I have the following figured out: >> >> originate sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx >> &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) >> And it dials out to an external number and successfully records the >> conversation. >> >> But, it also records the ringing. When I was trying this through a >> dialplan, I found an option: >> >> which delayed the recording until the call was answered. >> >> Is there a way to do the same thing through the API? >> >> Thanks! >> Wes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/a38a764b/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 00:08:31 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:08:31 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] failure to start a session from within lua for outbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Your dialstring is invalid. You need to format it properly: sofia/gateway/my_gw/1000 sofia/internal/1000 at host user/1000 It all depends on exactly what you're doing. Use this wiki page for lots of cool examples: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Dialplan_XML#SIP-Specific_Dialstrings -MC On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:41 PM, paul at iamfine.com wrote: > Having problems getting a session created from a lua script - its the > latest build on a centos system > > this is the lua code > > ----------------------- > freeswitch.console_log("info", "Lua in da house!!!\n"); > > local session = freeswitch.Session("sofia/00.00.127.61/1000"); > session:execute("playback", "/sr8k.wav"); > session:hangup(); > ----------------------- > > ***** please note i changed the ip address to protect its identity ***** > ********** > > > > > please help - i am tearing my hair out on this one > > Paul > > > +OK > > freeswitch at internal> 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [INFO] switch_cpp.cpp:1197 > Lua in da house!!! > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1869 Parsing > global variables > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:833 New Channel > sofia/internal/1000 [c9c5d8ec-af7f-4153-a844-5000983170d5] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4392 (sofia/internal/1000) > State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 > (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_INIT > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 > (sofia/internal/1000) State INIT > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:85 sofia/internal/1000 SOFIA > INIT > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:125 (sofia/internal/1000) > State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 > (sofia/internal/1000) State INIT going to sleep > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 > (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1736 > (sofia/internal/1000) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 > (sofia/internal/1000) State ROUTING > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:148 sofia/internal/1000 > SOFIA ROUTING > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 > (sofia/internal/1000) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 > (sofia/internal/1000) State ROUTING going to sleep > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 > (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:383 > (sofia/internal/1000) State CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:383 > (sofia/internal/1000) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.476406 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4800 Channel sofia/internal/1000 > entering state [calling][0] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4800 Channel sofia/internal/1000 > entering state [terminated][503] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 > (sofia/internal/1000) Callstate Change RINGING -> HANGUP > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5522 Hangup sofia/internal/1000 > [CS_CONSUME_MEDIA] [NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3308 Originate > Resulted in Error Cause: 41 [NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [ERR] switch_cpp.cpp:655 session is not > initalized > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [ERR] switch_cpp.cpp:617 session is not > initalized > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal > sofia/internal/1000 [KILL] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 > (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 > (sofia/internal/1000) State HANGUP > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:452 sofia/internal/1000 > Overriding SIP cause 503 with 503 from the other leg > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel > sofia/internal/1000 hanging up, cause: NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 > sofia/internal/1000 Standard HANGUP, cause: NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 > (sofia/internal/1000) State HANGUP going to sleep > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/internal/1000) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 > (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-14 20:31:01.638509 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 > (sofia/internal/1000) State REPORTING > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 > sofia/internal/1000 Standard REPORTING, cause: NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 > (sofia/internal/1000) State REPORTING going to sleep > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 > (sofia/internal/1000) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1000 [BREAK] > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 8 > (sofia/internal/1000) Locked, Waiting on external entities > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 8 > (sofia/internal/1000) Ended > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close > Channel sofia/internal/1000 [CS_DESTROY] > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 > (sofia/internal/1000) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 > (sofia/internal/1000) Running State Change CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 > (sofia/internal/1000) State DESTROY > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 sofia/internal/1000 > SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 > sofia/internal/1000 Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-14 20:31:02.631557 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 > (sofia/internal/1000) State DESTROY going to sleep > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/4dcc012b/attachment.html From gmaruzz at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 00:21:46 2011 From: gmaruzz at gmail.com (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:21:46 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] unixODBC MySQL mysqld-5.0.77 - error messages with mod_callcenter In-Reply-To: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C29@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C29@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: Stefan, your mail is unreadable. Send plain old pure ASCII, not fancy cryptostuff :) -giovanni On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Weigel, Stefan < Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com> wrote: > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/f7af8fea/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 01:09:37 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:09:37 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: QQ, I don't see that FreeSWITCH is doing anything incorrect here. According to RFC3264, the offerer (FreeSWITCH) sends an SDP and in the case of RTP, the answerer (GRSIP Gateway) must use the payload type offered, even if the answerer uses a different payload type when it sends a telephone-event. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3264#section-6.1 Specifically near the end: "In the case of RTP, it MUST use the payload type numbers from the offer, even if they differ from those in the answer." Technically, FreeSWITCH isn't "changing" anything anyway. The originator of the call (Vox Callcontrol) is the one who chose PT 101 in the INVITE that it sent to FreeSWITCH. FS is just passing that along without modifying it. I think you need to contact the people running the gateway and make sure that they understand that they are not following RFC3264 if they're rejecting telephone-events in PT 101 simply because they prefer to send in PT 110. Also, if your Vox Callcontrol client has any configuration options then maybe you can tell it to use PT 110 for RFC2833 DTMFs. It is a bit of a workaround but this is SIP, so no one is expecting perfection. :) -MC On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:23 AM, qingquan luo wrote: > Hi David, > Thank you for reminder, I resend this mail in mail list, Because I > can not reply preview mail( I make a mistake to subscribe this mail list in > Daily Digest mode.) > So I need resend this mail for require help. > > For this issue, I has paste sip debug output in: > > information with "sofia global siptrace on" > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16496 > > > Thanks > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > >> You have a mail issue. Check your spam... >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >> l'exp?diteur.* >> * >> * >> >> >> >> Le 15/06/2011 ? 03:55, qingquan luo a ?crit : >> >> Hi All, >> >> I use freeswitch to bridge one incoming call to other target phone >> number. >> I use bypass_media mode. >> So the rtp is not go through the freeswitch, >> By I notice that When LegB reply 183 or 200 SDP message. Freeswitch >> change it 2833 telephone-event payload type. and forwarding the message to >> caller. This make the caller use wrong dtmf payload type to send dtmf >> >> What wrong with that? How can fix it? >> Any information or help is welcome. >> >> information with "sofia global siptrace on" >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16496 >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Best Regards >> >> >> Qingquan >> >> -- >> Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: >> http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > -- > Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: > http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/d73187cf/attachment.html From kris at kriskinc.com Thu Jun 16 01:58:47 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: Michael, This isn't an SDP offer/answer issue with FreeSWITCH. Even if there were underlying offer/answer issues between the endpoints FreeSWITCH is in bypass_media mode and it shouldn't care about the SDP because by definition (bypass_media) the SDP is "pass through" between the two remote endpoints. The specific issue lies in the 183 w/ SDP at line 207. It has rfc2833 payload type 110. When FreeSWITCH forwards this to the other end (line 276) the SDP is untouched (expected with bypass_media) EXCEPT the rfc2833 payload type has been changed to 101 (unexpected with bypass_media). It does this again with the 200 OK. All other SDP params are passed through - media address, port, codec, goofy session name, and even the SER rtpproxy attributes. I'll admit the remote end/proxy is doing some strange stuff - 100, 101, 183, then 180, etc but this does look like a strange bypass_media bug in FreeSWITCH. The RFC2833 payload type should be forwarded between the two remote endpoints without being modified by FreeSWITCH - just like all of the other SDP parameters (or any part of the SIP body, for that matter). On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > QQ, > I don't see that FreeSWITCH is doing anything incorrect here. According to > RFC3264, the offerer (FreeSWITCH) sends an SDP and in the case of RTP, the > answerer (GRSIP Gateway) must use the payload type offered, even if the > answerer uses a different payload type when it sends a telephone-event. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3264#section-6.1 > Specifically near the end: > "In the case of RTP, it MUST use the payload type numbers > > from the offer, even if they differ from those in the answer." > > Technically, FreeSWITCH isn't "changing" anything anyway. The originator of > the call (Vox Callcontrol) is the one who chose PT 101 in the INVITE that it > sent to FreeSWITCH. FS is just passing that along without modifying it. > I think you need to contact the people running the gateway and make sure > that they understand that they are not following RFC3264 if they're > rejecting telephone-events in PT 101 simply because they prefer to send in > PT 110. Also, if your Vox Callcontrol client has any configuration options > then maybe you can tell it to use PT 110 for RFC2833 DTMFs. It is a bit of a > workaround but this is SIP, so no one is expecting perfection. :) > -MC -- Kristian Kielhofner From wes-fs at 499x.com Thu Jun 16 02:04:36 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using fs api to originate a call and record it In-Reply-To: References: <4DF278F9.6000201@499x.com> <4DF778DD.7060805@499x.com> <4DF77E9A.6010701@499x.com> Message-ID: <4DF92C74.6010607@499x.com> I've successfully transitioned to using a lua script instead of using the &record command directly: something like this: in the api: originate sofia/sipinterface_1/8839 at 1xxx.xx.xx &lua(hello.lua) and in the hello.lua script: session:answer(); session:recordFile("/tmp/myrecording.wav"); session:hangup(); this is much more flexible than doing: originate sofia/sipinterface_1/8839 at 141.106.29.6 &record('/tmp/myrecording.wav') On 6/15/2011 3:03 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > You can use ignore_early_media=true if your scenario allows it. > -MC > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:30 AM, > wrote: > > based on the documentation here, it looks like I might be able to > execute a script, instead of directly doing the record command. > Then the script could maybe set the parameters I need? > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_commands#originate > > > > > On 6/14/2011 10:06 AM, wes-fs at 499x.com > wrote: >> This did not work, I still heard the ringing. >> >> On 6/10/2011 5:30 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>> Try this: >>> >>> originate >>> {media_bug_answer_req=true}sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx >>> >>> &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) >>> >>> Let us know if it works. >>> -MC >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:05 PM, >> > wrote: >>> >>> I'm extremely new to freeswitch, and anything like it, so >>> please forgive me! >>> >>> I'd like to be able to use the API to originate a call and >>> record it. >>> So far, I have the following figured out: >>> >>> originate sofia/sipinterface_1/912625551212 at 141.xxx.xxx.xxx >>> >>> &record(/tmp/myrecording.wav) >>> And it dials out to an external number and successfully >>> records the >>> conversation. >>> >>> But, it also records the ringing. When I was trying this >>> through a >>> dialplan, I found an option: >>> >>> which delayed the recording until the call was answered. >>> >>> Is there a way to do the same thing through the API? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Wes >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/431bf971/attachment-0001.html From kris at kriskinc.com Thu Jun 16 02:06:13 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 183 after 180 In-Reply-To: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> References: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> Message-ID: David, While the solution you've proposed below is the best in terms of media handling I'm not sure how well it will work in practice. If you intercept the 180 and provide 183 w/ media the calling endpoint will get media (ringback) from the IP address of your FS machine (no problem). However, when the 183/200 w/ media comes from the remote end it is going to contain a different IP address and port if you (somehow) re-enable bypass_media. Even if FreeSWITCH could be coerced into doing this I'm not sure that all endpoints will react well to this change in connection information from your 183 to the remote 183/200. Technically speaking (RFC) there's nothing wrong with it but we all know that doesn't mean there won't be issues doing this with the various endpoints in the field. You /may/ get stuck anchoring the media for the entire call in these cases where your upstream returns a 180. Other than that I'd be interested to see how you get along with this... On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, David Aldworth wrote: > I am trying to find the best solution to generate ring on 180 but bypass on 183. We are in the middle, customer -> FS -> pstn. We bypass_media=true for all calls. However, sometimes we get a 180 from the PSTN and FS relays that to the customer, but the customer is not generating ring so the calling party hears dead air. So, the solution would be to anchor media and generate ring when we get a 180, but once the 183 or 200 hits, bypass starts. I suppose we could do an expression match on the 180, ignore early media, generate ring, and bypass media after bridge. Just wondering if there was a better alternative solution. > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Kristian Kielhofner From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 02:11:05 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:11:05 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: Ah, quite right. I'd file this in Jira. Hopefully it's not buried deep in the Sofia stack... -MC On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > Michael, > > This isn't an SDP offer/answer issue with FreeSWITCH. Even if there > were underlying offer/answer issues between the endpoints FreeSWITCH > is in bypass_media mode and it shouldn't care about the SDP because by > definition (bypass_media) the SDP is "pass through" between the two > remote endpoints. > > The specific issue lies in the 183 w/ SDP at line 207. It has > rfc2833 payload type 110. When FreeSWITCH forwards this to the other > end (line 276) the SDP is untouched (expected with bypass_media) > EXCEPT the rfc2833 payload type has been changed to 101 (unexpected > with bypass_media). It does this again with the 200 OK. All other > SDP params are passed through - media address, port, codec, goofy > session name, and even the SER rtpproxy attributes. I'll admit the > remote end/proxy is doing some strange stuff - 100, 101, 183, then > 180, etc but this does look like a strange bypass_media bug in > FreeSWITCH. The RFC2833 payload type should be forwarded between the > two remote endpoints without being modified by FreeSWITCH - just like > all of the other SDP parameters (or any part of the SIP body, for that > matter). > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Michael Collins > wrote: > > QQ, > > I don't see that FreeSWITCH is doing anything incorrect here. According > to > > RFC3264, the offerer (FreeSWITCH) sends an SDP and in the case of RTP, > the > > answerer (GRSIP Gateway) must use the payload type offered, even if the > > answerer uses a different payload type when it sends a telephone-event. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3264#section-6.1 > > Specifically near the end: > > "In the case of RTP, it MUST use the payload type numbers > > > > from the offer, even if they differ from those in the answer." > > > > Technically, FreeSWITCH isn't "changing" anything anyway. The originator > of > > the call (Vox Callcontrol) is the one who chose PT 101 in the INVITE that > it > > sent to FreeSWITCH. FS is just passing that along without modifying it. > > I think you need to contact the people running the gateway and make sure > > that they understand that they are not following RFC3264 if they're > > rejecting telephone-events in PT 101 simply because they prefer to send > in > > PT 110. Also, if your Vox Callcontrol client has any configuration > options > > then maybe you can tell it to use PT 110 for RFC2833 DTMFs. It is a bit > of a > > workaround but this is SIP, so no one is expecting perfection. :) > > -MC > > -- > Kristian Kielhofner > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/5ed74975/attachment.html From daldworth at teliax.com Thu Jun 16 02:35:03 2011 From: daldworth at teliax.com (David Aldworth) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 183 after 180 In-Reply-To: References: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> Message-ID: Your comments about different endpoints reacting different is my concern exactly. That said, we came up with a fairly simple solution (below) that, thus far, seems alright. However, not all scenarios have been fully test, such as what happens if we get an early media operator intercept with the 183, what happens if the endpoint rejects the re-invite, etc. On Jun 15, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > David, > > While the solution you've proposed below is the best in terms of > media handling I'm not sure how well it will work in practice. > > If you intercept the 180 and provide 183 w/ media the calling > endpoint will get media (ringback) from the IP address of your FS > machine (no problem). However, when the 183/200 w/ media comes from > the remote end it is going to contain a different IP address and port > if you (somehow) re-enable bypass_media. Even if FreeSWITCH could be > coerced into doing this I'm not sure that all endpoints will react > well to this change in connection information from your 183 to the > remote 183/200. Technically speaking (RFC) there's nothing wrong with > it but we all know that doesn't mean there won't be issues doing this > with the various endpoints in the field. > > You /may/ get stuck anchoring the media for the entire call in these > cases where your upstream returns a 180. Other than that I'd be > interested to see how you get along with this... > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, David Aldworth wrote: >> I am trying to find the best solution to generate ring on 180 but bypass on 183. We are in the middle, customer -> FS -> pstn. We bypass_media=true for all calls. However, sometimes we get a 180 from the PSTN and FS relays that to the customer, but the customer is not generating ring so the calling party hears dead air. So, the solution would be to anchor media and generate ring when we get a 180, but once the 183 or 200 hits, bypass starts. I suppose we could do an expression match on the 180, ignore early media, generate ring, and bypass media after bridge. Just wondering if there was a better alternative solution. >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Kristian Kielhofner > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From avi at avimarcus.net Thu Jun 16 02:44:36 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:44:36 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Presence SQL Error Message-ID: This is a pretty fresh install of FS on centos, using sqlite for the DB. I do have multiple domains set up. There's an SQL error for the presence requests, but FS isn't telling me much info. What can I do about this? The only times I've used presence, it basically just worked. http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16518 -Avi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/fe213c10/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 02:47:03 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: However, there is not really any rule anywhere that states that bypass media will not touch the packets. All of the packets/sdp are still subject to SIP SOA model so if you pass a remote sdp into the lib, sofia will parse and modify it. The idea of bypass media is to bypass the media by advertising the proper codecs/addrs to arrange point to point media and there is no assurance that the packets will not be modified. However, There is a sofia param called "enable-soa" and a variable sip_enable_soa for per call basis which can be set to false to disable SIP SOA from sofia and most likely result in untouched exchange of SDP. try this in your dialplan On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Ah, quite right. I'd file this in Jira. Hopefully it's not buried deep in > the Sofia stack... > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Kristian Kielhofner > wrote: >> >> Michael, >> >> ?This isn't an SDP offer/answer issue with FreeSWITCH. ?Even if there >> were underlying offer/answer issues between the endpoints FreeSWITCH >> is in bypass_media mode and it shouldn't care about the SDP because by >> definition (bypass_media) the SDP is "pass through" between the two >> remote endpoints. >> >> ?The specific issue lies in the 183 w/ SDP at line 207. ?It has >> rfc2833 payload type 110. ?When FreeSWITCH forwards this to the other >> end (line 276) the SDP is untouched (expected with bypass_media) >> EXCEPT the rfc2833 payload type has been changed to 101 (unexpected >> with bypass_media). ?It does this again with the 200 OK. ?All other >> SDP params are passed through - media address, port, codec, goofy >> session name, and even the SER rtpproxy attributes. ?I'll admit the >> remote end/proxy is doing some strange stuff - 100, 101, 183, then >> 180, etc but this does look like a strange bypass_media bug in >> FreeSWITCH. ?The RFC2833 payload type should be forwarded between the >> two remote endpoints without being modified by FreeSWITCH - just like >> all of the other SDP parameters (or any part of the SIP body, for that >> matter). >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Michael Collins >> wrote: >> > QQ, >> > I don't see that FreeSWITCH is doing anything incorrect here. According >> > to >> > RFC3264, the offerer (FreeSWITCH) sends an SDP and in the case of RTP, >> > the >> > answerer (GRSIP Gateway) must use the payload type offered, even if the >> > answerer uses a different payload type when it sends a telephone-event. >> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3264#section-6.1 >> > Specifically near the end: >> > "In the case of RTP, it MUST use the payload type numbers >> > >> > ? ?from the offer, even if they differ from those in the answer." >> > >> > Technically, FreeSWITCH isn't "changing" anything anyway. The originator >> > of >> > the call (Vox Callcontrol) is the one who chose PT 101 in the INVITE >> > that it >> > sent to FreeSWITCH. FS is just passing that along without modifying it. >> > I think you need to contact the people running the gateway and make sure >> > that they understand that they are not following RFC3264 if they're >> > rejecting telephone-events in PT 101 simply because they prefer to send >> > in >> > PT 110. Also, if your Vox Callcontrol client has any configuration >> > options >> > then maybe you can tell it to use PT 110 for RFC2833 DTMFs. It is a bit >> > of a >> > workaround but this is SIP, so no one is expecting perfection. :) >> > -MC >> >> -- >> Kristian Kielhofner >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From avi at avimarcus.net Thu Jun 16 02:49:00 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:49:00 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Funky Gateway Confusion? Message-ID: When making a call out on a gateway named "xconnect" they ping to see if my machine is still active. It uses 1111 in there, which happens to be the highest numbered SIP username on my system. Oh, and gw=Spikko001 gets in there too which is a completely unrelated gateway on my system. What in the world is going on? http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16519 It doesn't seem to be causing any problems.. but it's so weird. kinda old: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-0911ed7 2011-03-05 12-49-19 -0500) -Avi Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/647826cf/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 03:29:13 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:29:13 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: And FTR, this *is* on the wiki - I just didn't know about it. :) http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#SDP_Manipulation (Last item) -MC On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > However, there is not really any rule anywhere that states that bypass > media will not touch the packets. > All of the packets/sdp are still subject to SIP SOA model so if you > pass a remote sdp into the lib, sofia will parse and modify it. > The idea of bypass media is to bypass the media by advertising the > proper codecs/addrs to arrange point to point media and there is no > assurance that the packets will not be modified. > > However, > > There is a sofia param called "enable-soa" and a variable > sip_enable_soa for per call basis which can be set to false to disable > SIP SOA from sofia and most likely result in untouched exchange of > SDP. > > try this in your dialplan > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Michael Collins > wrote: > > Ah, quite right. I'd file this in Jira. Hopefully it's not buried deep in > > the Sofia stack... > > -MC > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Kristian Kielhofner > > wrote: > >> > >> Michael, > >> > >> This isn't an SDP offer/answer issue with FreeSWITCH. Even if there > >> were underlying offer/answer issues between the endpoints FreeSWITCH > >> is in bypass_media mode and it shouldn't care about the SDP because by > >> definition (bypass_media) the SDP is "pass through" between the two > >> remote endpoints. > >> > >> The specific issue lies in the 183 w/ SDP at line 207. It has > >> rfc2833 payload type 110. When FreeSWITCH forwards this to the other > >> end (line 276) the SDP is untouched (expected with bypass_media) > >> EXCEPT the rfc2833 payload type has been changed to 101 (unexpected > >> with bypass_media). It does this again with the 200 OK. All other > >> SDP params are passed through - media address, port, codec, goofy > >> session name, and even the SER rtpproxy attributes. I'll admit the > >> remote end/proxy is doing some strange stuff - 100, 101, 183, then > >> 180, etc but this does look like a strange bypass_media bug in > >> FreeSWITCH. The RFC2833 payload type should be forwarded between the > >> two remote endpoints without being modified by FreeSWITCH - just like > >> all of the other SDP parameters (or any part of the SIP body, for that > >> matter). > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Michael Collins > >> wrote: > >> > QQ, > >> > I don't see that FreeSWITCH is doing anything incorrect here. > According > >> > to > >> > RFC3264, the offerer (FreeSWITCH) sends an SDP and in the case of RTP, > >> > the > >> > answerer (GRSIP Gateway) must use the payload type offered, even if > the > >> > answerer uses a different payload type when it sends a > telephone-event. > >> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3264#section-6.1 > >> > Specifically near the end: > >> > "In the case of RTP, it MUST use the payload type numbers > >> > > >> > from the offer, even if they differ from those in the answer." > >> > > >> > Technically, FreeSWITCH isn't "changing" anything anyway. The > originator > >> > of > >> > the call (Vox Callcontrol) is the one who chose PT 101 in the INVITE > >> > that it > >> > sent to FreeSWITCH. FS is just passing that along without modifying > it. > >> > I think you need to contact the people running the gateway and make > sure > >> > that they understand that they are not following RFC3264 if they're > >> > rejecting telephone-events in PT 101 simply because they prefer to > send > >> > in > >> > PT 110. Also, if your Vox Callcontrol client has any configuration > >> > options > >> > then maybe you can tell it to use PT 110 for RFC2833 DTMFs. It is a > bit > >> > of a > >> > workaround but this is SIP, so no one is expecting perfection. :) > >> > -MC > >> > >> -- > >> Kristian Kielhofner > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110615/de15dabc/attachment.html From justlikeef at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 05:55:41 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trying to get TLS/SRTP working In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201106152155.42232.justlikeef@gmail.com> What I have been able to figure out is that if I try to enable encryption on all of the interfaces defined on an IP, then freeswitch does not listen on the TLS port. But if I enable it on only one of the interfaces, then it works. On Tuesday 14 June 2011 14:01:20 Rob Hutton wrote: > Trying to get TLS working. When sofia loads, I see that it seems to accept > the parameters: > > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16487 > > But sofia status shows nothing running on the TLS ports: > Name > Type Data State > =========================================================================== > ====================== sipinterface_3 profile > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5080 RUNNING (0) > sipinterface_2 profile > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5070 RUNNING (0) > 192.168.2.25 alias > sipinterface_1 ALIASED > sipinterface_1 profile > sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.25:5060 RUNNING (0) > voicemail_1 alias > sipinterface_1 ALIASED > =========================================================================== > ====================== 3 profiles 2 aliases > > > /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/ssl looks like: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3627 Jun 14 12:55 agent.pem > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1996 Jun 14 13:04 cafile.pem > > > Freeswitch is compiled with SSL support: > > ldd freeswitch > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff415ff000) > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fab636b8000) > libfreeswitch.so.1 => /usr/local/freeswitch/lib/libfreeswitch.so.1 > (0x00007fab632c1000) > libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007fab630bc000) > librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007fab62eb3000) > libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00007fab62c78000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fab62a5b000) > libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fab627ff000) > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 > (0x00007fab6244e000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fab6224a000) > libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fab62032000) > libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007fab61ddd000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fab61a70000) > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fab61767000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fab61551000) > libodbc.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libodbc.so.1 (0x00007fab612e5000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fab6390f000) From justlikeef at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 06:10:40 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SRTP Message-ID: <201106152210.41334.justlikeef@gmail.com> I think I have TLS and SRTP working at this point, but in the docs it says to use the following template for the dialplan: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Secure_RTP: at the end of the close extension tag. 2) There is either a missing / at the end of the internal condition line, or a missing condition close tag somewhere 3) When I fix the interal condition, I get an error: {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed All this, but a packet capture shows that SRTP is working based on what I did on: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SIP_TLS Can someone give me some guidance on the Secure_RTP page and I will update whatever? From william at xofap.com Thu Jun 16 07:14:20 2011 From: william at xofap.com (William Alianto) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:14:20 +0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Asterisk as gateway for FS] In-Reply-To: <1308141679.16213.159.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> References: <1308134265.2150.1.camel@DELL> <1308141679.16213.159.camel@luna.madrid.commsmundi.com> Message-ID: <4DF9750C.5080107@xofap.com> Do I need to do some change in the dialplan on both system? On 2:59, Fran?ois Delawarde wrote: > It is possible and works very well, just connect some SIP trunk between > the two. > > Here we use it for TDM, IAX, and chan_mobile call termination. > > Regards, > Fran?ois. > > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 12:37 +0200, Henk Oegema wrote: >> Just to be curios: What is the purpose of Asterisk being a gateway for >> FS ? >> >> Rgds. >> Henk >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> From: William Alianto >> Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> >> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk as gateway for FS >> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:18:24 +0700 >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to setup a system using Asterisk and FreeSwitch, where >> Asterisk will perform as gateway for FreeSwitch. Is this setup possible? >> If yes, where can I find an example setup to look on to? >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> William >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- Regards, William From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 08:53:14 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:23:14 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua Message-ID: I am implementing an IVR using Lua in Freeswitch. In my Lua script I use curl to a web service. Sometimes the response takes a long time to come back. During that time period I would like to play music on hold. I have searched the freeswitch discussion archives a lot. There seem to be many suggested ways to implement music on hold from a Lua script but the answers are not very clear / not really applicable to my use case. I don't know what method I should use and which one is recommended. *Method 1:* Transfer the call to 9664 (music on hold extension). However the implementation for this solution for this does not seem to be available in Lua. For example: How would I transfer the call back? *Method 2:* Using bgapi uuid_park park the call and using uuid_broadcast play an audio file. Again what do I do to unpark the call..? Thanks, Sidharth [P.S. This is a repost, I apologize but I never got any responses on my previous email. Need help! :-) ] -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/98f165d2/attachment-0001.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 09:03:24 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:33:24 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SRTP In-Reply-To: <201106152210.41334.justlikeef@gmail.com> References: <201106152210.41334.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Rob, I have adding the missing ">" The wiki is freely editable. You could have made a new login account and signed in and corrected it yourself. Regarding your points 2, 3 -- I think no more edits are required apart from just point 1. Thanks, Sidharth On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: > I think I have TLS and SRTP working at this point, but in the docs it says > to use the following template for the dialplan: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Secure_RTP: > > > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" > break="never"> > > > > > 1) There is a missing > at the end of the close extension tag. > 2) There is either a missing / at the end of the internal condition line, > or a missing condition close tag somewhere > 3) When I fix the interal condition, I get an error: > > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed > > All this, but a packet capture shows that SRTP is working based on what I > did on: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SIP_TLS > > Can someone give me some guidance on the Secure_RTP page and I will update > whatever? > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/fb3c23aa/attachment.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 09:41:06 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (sidharth_k) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Music On Hold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1308202866242-6481837.post@n2.nabble.com> I too have this requirement. Lets say I have a script abc.lua In it, I session:transfer("9664", "XML", "default") session:setAutoHangup(false) -- prevent the script from ending lets say I even have the uuid saved in a local variable uuid_value After I do this, how do I bring the call back to the "context" of the script abc.lua. In other words, how do I "untransfer" mercutioviz wrote: > > Just x-fer the call to dp ext 9664. When you are done with the Lua tasks > use > uuid_transfer (or uuid_bridge) to grab the call out of 9664 and send it > wherever you need it to go. > > -MC > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Chia-Yen Wu <teddywu72 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am using freeswitch as an IVR server. >> I would like to be able to put the call on hold and play music while >> performing some other tasks in the lua. >> when the task is complete , the music stop and the IVR continue >> >> but i cant find a way to do that, is there any function can do "music on >> hold" in dialplan ? >> >> Thank you >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Music-On-Hold-tp5662660p6481837.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 11:15:33 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:15:33 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SRTP In-Reply-To: <201106152210.41334.justlikeef@gmail.com> References: <201106152210.41334.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed That's because it shouldn't be nested. It's not missing a /, and the 1st Should have the /. The extra indendation shouldn't be there on the 2nd. It should look like this: The two conditions function as an AND, even though it's not nested. FS stops checking the extension as soon as it sees a condition that's false (at least by default and in the above case), so if the destination is not 202 it'll never get to the 2nd condition. -Steve On 16 June 2011 03:10, Rob Hutton wrote: > I think I have TLS and SRTP working at this point, but in the docs it says > to use the following template for the dialplan: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Secure_RTP: > > > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" > break="never"> > > > > > 1) There is a missing > at the end of the close extension tag. > 2) There is either a missing / at the end of the internal condition line, > or a missing condition close tag somewhere > 3) When I fix the interal condition, I get an error: > > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed > > All this, but a packet capture shows that SRTP is working based on what I > did on: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SIP_TLS > > Can someone give me some guidance on the Secure_RTP page and I will update > whatever? > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/dd25faee/attachment.html From helmut.kuper at ewetel.de Thu Jun 16 11:40:47 2011 From: helmut.kuper at ewetel.de (Helmut Kuper) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:40:47 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Cleaning libs subdir for recompiling Message-ID: <4DF9B37F.8080709@ewetel.de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello FS folks, yesterday I copied a compiled FS git directory from 64Bit CentOS 5.5 to a 64Bit CentOS 5.4 machine. This is, because I did some modifications in serveral FS modules (e.g. openzap, freetdm, sofia, ...) and I was too lazy to apply the modifications again to a fresh git clone, hehe. I did a "make distclean" in the main directory. Then a bootstrap, configure and make. I found that it seems that in the libs subdir were still some information about the other sever's paths, which led to compile errors. So I removed them as good as I could found the data. My question is: Is there something like "make libsdistclean" or so which resets the complete libs subdir of FS? best regards Helmut -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk35s38ACgkQ4tZeNddg3dxeZACdF9+5UMmXwPBbIHzYhNjqaYen 1AMAn3JVy6UlLdEKFwUb9ljbaA83tIYU =mIOI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com Thu Jun 16 12:01:40 2011 From: Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com (Weigel, Stefan) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:01:40 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] unixODBC MySQL mysqld-5.0.77 - error messages with mod_callcenter In-Reply-To: References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C29@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2A@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Hi, sorry, I signed the message. Again: I recently changed from local DB to a ODBC connection with a MySQL backend. After testing around I'm now getting the following errors: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16503 When executing the statements for example with phpMyAdmin I'm not getting any error. Any hints on this topic ? Thanks and best regards Stefan I also found some related topics on the list, so I fixed this issue with setting the options parameter in odbc.ini to allow multiple statements. Thanks and best regards Stefan Stefan Weigel Advanced IT-Professional Tel.: +49 89 2000 48 975 Fax: +49 89 2000 48 566 eMail: Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com Allianz Automotive Services GmbH Einsteinring 28 85609 Aschheim Germany http://www.allianz-warranty.com Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Andreas R?sing, Horst Ziegler Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRB 175682 F?r Umsatzsteuerzwecke: Ust-ID-Nr.: DE 262 617 720 Von: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] Im Auftrag von Giovanni Maruzzelli Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011 22:22 An: FreeSWITCH Users Help Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] unixODBC MySQL mysqld-5.0.77 - error messages with mod_callcenter Stefan, your mail is unreadable. Send plain old pure ASCII, not fancy cryptostuff :) -giovanni On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Weigel, Stefan > wrote: _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/1ea69e0f/attachment-0001.html From Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com Thu Jun 16 12:30:08 2011 From: Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com (Weigel, Stefan) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:30:08 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing Message-ID: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Hi list, yesterday I had a ODBC related problem. Therefore I used the latest snapshot. Now my scripts are not working properly (I'm doing an ESL connection and listening for spandsp::rxfaxresults events). With an older release (mid of may) I was getting lot's more info's (for example variable_current_application_data), now I'm only getting the information documented on the wiki page: fax-document-transferred-pages fax-document-total-pages fax-image-resolution fax-image-size fax-bad-rows fax-transfer-rate fax-result-code fax-result-text fax-ecm-used fax-local-station-id fax-remote-station-id What changed and how can I get back the needed information ? Thanks and best regards Stefan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/8cd51481/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 13:46:53 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:46:53 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing In-Reply-To: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: Do you know the version number of the older working release? http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3004 Looks like Flavio's patch wasn't applied entirely on May 3rd - it's missing the "switch_channel_event_set_data(channel, event);" line. Not sure if that's what's causing it, but it seems likely. The event generation hasn't been modified since then. -Steve On 16 June 2011 09:30, Weigel, Stefan wrote: > Hi list, > > > > yesterday I had a ODBC related problem. Therefore I used the latest > snapshot. Now my scripts are not working properly (I?m doing an ESL > connection and listening for spandsp::rxfaxresults events). > > With an older release (mid of may) I was getting lot?s more info?s (for > example variable_current_application_data), now I?m only getting the > information documented on the wiki page: > > > > fax-document-transferred-pages > > fax-document-total-pages > > fax-image-resolution > > fax-image-size > > fax-bad-rows > > fax-transfer-rate > > fax-result-code > > fax-result-text > > fax-ecm-used > > fax-local-station-id > > fax-remote-station-id > > > > > > What changed and how can I get back the needed information ? > > > > > > > > Thanks and best regards > > > > Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/4c7303cb/attachment.html From Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com Thu Jun 16 14:24:45 2011 From: Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com (Weigel, Stefan) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:24:45 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing In-Reply-To: References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2E@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7m Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime Size: 22942 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/3110100d/attachment-0001.bin From Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com Thu Jun 16 14:25:18 2011 From: Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com (Weigel, Stefan) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:25:18 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing In-Reply-To: References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2F@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Hi Steve, version shows me only 'git-. I'm pretty sure that it was the snapshot downloaded on the 2nd of May. But I can remember also applied the patches. I checked and the line switch_channel_event_set_data(channel, event); is missing. I will rebuild the module and test again and tell you more. Thanks and best regards Stefan Von: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] Im Auftrag von Steven Ayre Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011 11:47 An: FreeSWITCH Users Help Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing Do you know the version number of the older working release? http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3004 Looks like Flavio's patch wasn't applied entirely on May 3rd - it's missing the "switch_channel_event_set_data(channel, event);" line. Not sure if that's what's causing it, but it seems likely. The event generation hasn't been modified since then. -Steve On 16 June 2011 09:30, Weigel, Stefan > wrote: Hi list, yesterday I had a ODBC related problem. Therefore I used the latest snapshot. Now my scripts are not working properly (I'm doing an ESL connection and listening for spandsp::rxfaxresults events). With an older release (mid of may) I was getting lot's more info's (for example variable_current_application_data), now I'm only getting the information documented on the wiki page: fax-document-transferred-pages fax-document-total-pages fax-image-resolution fax-image-size fax-bad-rows fax-transfer-rate fax-result-code fax-result-text fax-ecm-used fax-local-station-id fax-remote-station-id What changed and how can I get back the needed information ? Thanks and best regards Stefan _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/5944b54c/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Thu Jun 16 14:41:00 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:41:00 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <30FA9F9A-6489-4954-9DAA-39152DC021A4@ipeva.fr> Sidharth, Generally, if noone answers, it means noone has an interesting answer or noone had the time yet to answer. It's quite like when you ask a girl out. If she doesn't answer, it's unlikely harassing her will improve the situation ... most of the times :) You can also try to go on irc #freeswitch. And also, you can read the wiki. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 16/06/2011 ? 06:53, Sidharth Kshatriya a ?crit : > I am implementing an IVR using Lua in Freeswitch. In my Lua script I use curl to a web service. Sometimes the response takes a long time to come back. During that time period I would like to play music on hold. > > I have searched the freeswitch discussion archives a lot. There seem to be many suggested ways to implement music on hold from a Lua script but the answers are not very clear / not really applicable to my use case. I don't know what method I should use and which one is recommended. > > Method 1: Transfer the call to 9664 (music on hold extension). However the implementation for this solution for this does not seem to be available in Lua. For example: How would I transfer the call back? > Method 2: Using bgapi uuid_park park the call and using uuid_broadcast play an audio file. Again what do I do to unpark the call..? > > Thanks, > > Sidharth > [P.S. This is a repost, I apologize but I never got any responses on my previous email. Need help! :-) ] > > -- > Sidharth Kshatriya > www.sidk.info > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/e3987b59/attachment.html From sascha.daniels at amooma.de Thu Jun 16 14:56:44 2011 From: sascha.daniels at amooma.de (Sascha Daniels) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:56:44 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_fifo shared lag Message-ID: <4DF9E16C.4090608@amooma.de> Hi together. Is there a possibility to have a shared lag over several fifos? In a callcenter with agents in several Queues the lag is 10sec. After a call from fifo A the agent should not get a call from fifo B within those 10sec. Basically like shared_lastcall=yes in Asterisk 1.6 Regards Sascha -- AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 124 - 56566 Neuwied --> http://www.amooma.de Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister Montabaur B14998 B?cher: http://das-asterisk-buch.de - http://ruby-auf-schienen.de From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 15:01:56 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:01:56 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing In-Reply-To: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2F@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2F@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: Ok. If they're still missing after you rebuild you could reopen the Jira. -Steve On 16 June 2011 11:25, Weigel, Stefan wrote: > Hi Steve, > > > > version shows me only ?git-. > > I?m pretty sure that it was the snapshot downloaded on the 2nd of May. But > I can remember also applied the patches. > > I checked and the line > > > > switch_channel_event_set_data(channel, > event); > > > > is missing. I will rebuild the module and test again and tell you more. > > > > > > Thanks and best regards > > > > Stefan > > > > > > *Von:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *Im Auftrag von *Steven > Ayre > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011 11:47 > *An:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Betreff:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult > variables missing > > > > Do you know the version number of the older working release? > > > > http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3004 > > Looks like Flavio's patch wasn't applied entirely on May 3rd - it's missing > the "switch_channel_event_set_data(channel, event);" line. Not sure if > that's what's causing it, but it seems likely. The event generation hasn't > been modified since then. > > > > -Steve > > > > > > > > > > On 16 June 2011 09:30, Weigel, Stefan > wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > yesterday I had a ODBC related problem. Therefore I used the latest > snapshot. Now my scripts are not working properly (I?m doing an ESL > connection and listening for spandsp::rxfaxresults events). > > With an older release (mid of may) I was getting lot?s more info?s (for > example variable_current_application_data), now I?m only getting the > information documented on the wiki page: > > > > fax-document-transferred-pages > > fax-document-total-pages > > fax-image-resolution > > fax-image-size > > fax-bad-rows > > fax-transfer-rate > > fax-result-code > > fax-result-text > > fax-ecm-used > > fax-local-station-id > > fax-remote-station-id > > > > > > What changed and how can I get back the needed information ? > > > > > > > > Thanks and best regards > > > > Stefan > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/1382633f/attachment.html From sharad at coraltele.com Thu Jun 16 15:54:54 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:24:54 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Originate API - Context remain default till the call is answered References: Message-ID: <57087ED9B5CB4F35AC110A4415C4A6B9@sharad> Hi All When we make an API originate with desired context say `abcd', `show channels' shows the context `default' before answer. But as soon as call is answered, context also gets changed to `abcd'. Is there any way to make the context `abcd' before call answer also. Thanks Regards Sharad From kris at kriskinc.com Thu Jun 16 17:32:16 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 183 after 180 In-Reply-To: References: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> Message-ID: David, I was going to suggest bypass_media_after_bridge (re-INVITE) but I've never used it so I wasn't sure how well it worked. This is still a very interesting situation... One question: How do you detect the remote end has responded with a 180/183 w/o SDP in order to execute these commands conditionally? On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:35 PM, David Aldworth wrote: > Your comments about different endpoints reacting different is my concern exactly. That said, we came up with a fairly simple solution (below) that, thus far, seems alright. However, not all scenarios have been fully test, such as what happens if we get an early media operator intercept with the 183, what happens if the endpoint rejects the re-invite, etc. > > > > -- Kristian Kielhofner From kris at kriskinc.com Thu Jun 16 17:42:30 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Funky Gateway Confusion? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Avi, Based on the SDP from the 200 OK I'd say your provider is using a proxy in the SER family. The SER proxies allow the proxy admin to configure the nathelper "pinger" address: http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.6.x/nathelper.html#id292784 They probably just couldn't think of anything better than "1111". As far as "Spikko001", I have no idea... On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: > When making a call out on a gateway named "xconnect" they ping to see if my > machine is still active. > It uses 1111 in there, which happens to be the highest numbered SIP username > on my system. > Oh, and?gw=Spikko001?gets in there too which is a completely unrelated > gateway on my system. > What in the world is going on? > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16519 > It doesn't seem to be causing any problems.. but it's so weird. > kinda old: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-0911ed7 2011-03-05 12-49-19 > -0500) > > -Avi Marcus > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Kristian Kielhofner From kris at kriskinc.com Thu Jun 16 17:51:59 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: I didn't know about this parameter either. Is it new? I'd argue that it should be enabled by default when bypass_media is in enabled. If not, it leaves open cases such as this one where you can't win - some parameters of the SDP will be changed but not others? If FreeSWITCH is completely rewriting the SDP and handling the media to account for differences in the RTP streams that's fine (normal media mode). If FreeSWITCH is rewriting some SDP params without handling the media it leaves the endpoints in a broken state that no one would ever want. In this case FreeSWITCH changed the SDP to say 2833 is payload type 101 when the RTP stream from the remote end would clearly have it at payload type 110! The endpoints would end up completely confused... I think this parameter has some purpose and I always enjoy having extra knobs to turn. However, it should be enabled by default when bypass_media is in use (to be disabled selectively by users in cases where they need to, for some reason). What about proxy_media? As far as I can tell the same thing would happen there (or worse). The SDP would (probably) get changed and the media would be proxied through FreeSWITCH but the RTP and SDP would not agree on payload type (same as now). From what it sounds like this soa parameter is not compatible with proxy_media (hands off SDP) so what would happen there? On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > And FTR, this *is* on the wiki - I just didn't know about it. :) > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#SDP_Manipulation > (Last item) > -MC -- Kristian Kielhofner From mehmasarja at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 17:57:36 2011 From: mehmasarja at gmail.com (Mehma Sarja) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:57:36 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua In-Reply-To: <30FA9F9A-6489-4954-9DAA-39152DC021A4@ipeva.fr> References: <30FA9F9A-6489-4954-9DAA-39152DC021A4@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <4DFA0BD0.7010104@gmail.com> This is true. Although I've never formally asked a girl out, I have posted a lame question and waited for days until someone responded. Then we have a few messages back and forth. Maybe Sidharth has a point because now I'm married and have lost the interest to ask anyone out, if I had it in the first place. Mehma === On 6/16/11 3:41 AM, David Ponzone wrote: > > Generally, if noone answers, it means noone has an interesting answer > or noone had the time yet to answer. > It's quite like when you ask a girl out. If she doesn't answer, it's > unlikely harassing her will improve the situation ... most of the times :) > > > > Le 16/06/2011 ? 06:53, Sidharth Kshatriya a ?crit : > >> [P.S. This is a repost, I apologize but I never got any responses on >> my previous email. Need help! :-) ] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/5f3b04e7/attachment-0001.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 19:10:32 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Presence SQL Error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: this is the result of debug-presence enabled on your profile. It puts all the sql etc into error level so it stands out. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Avi Marcus wrote: > This is a pretty fresh install of FS on centos, using sqlite for the DB. > I do have multiple domains set up. > There's an SQL error for the presence requests, but FS isn't telling me much > info. What can I do about this? > The only times I've used presence, it basically just worked. > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16518 > -Avi > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From jeff at jefflenk.com Thu Jun 16 20:17:00 2011 From: jeff at jefflenk.com (Jeff Lenk) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing In-Reply-To: References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2F@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: <1308241020809-6483715.post@n2.nabble.com> Check git head for recent changes to the fax event headers -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/mod-spandsp-event-spandsp-rxfaxresult-variables-missing-tp6482195p6483715.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 21:04:12 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:34:12 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Making a external call to Mobile number Message-ID: Dear all, I am trying to make an external call to a mobile number of India using the default ext number 1005. For doing this, I did the following things. First, I created a user at IPTEL.org, I added a SIP profile. I registered with IPTEL. I also added a dial plan regex for 91 - (10 digit number). But, because of some issue, I was not able to connect to IPTEL SIP. I was getting error on X-LITE about some server issue. then, I tried my VOIP account with ActionVoip which is a paid account and has SIP service. I could connect to my action voip account through X-LITE SIP. I made a SIP profile for Action Voip and registered the username with action voip in FS. On reload, it got registered using action voip SIP profile. I changed the dialplan to use actionvoip gateway. But still, when I am trying to call to my mobile number in India. The call is not able to connect. I think there is gap in my knowledge. Please help me I am new to FreeSwitch. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/5b36018e/attachment.html From justlikeef at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 21:22:53 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SRTP In-Reply-To: References: <201106152210.41334.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201106161322.53638.justlikeef@gmail.com> Steven - Thanks for the help here... So there would have to be two dialplan entries for this number to work with either RTP or SRTP? (Maybe two devices registering to the same user?) Would it make more since to do this in a more global manner higher up in the dialplan in its own condition block? On Thursday 16 June 2011 03:15:33 Steven Ayre wrote: > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed > > That's because it shouldn't be nested. It's not missing a /, and the 1st > Should have the /. The extra indendation shouldn't be there on the 2nd. > > It should look like this: > > > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" > break="never"> > > > > > > The two conditions function as an AND, even though it's not nested. FS > stops checking the extension as soon as it sees a condition that's false > (at least by default and in the above case), so if the destination is not > 202 it'll never get to the 2nd condition. > > -Steve > > On 16 June 2011 03:10, Rob Hutton wrote: > > I think I have TLS and SRTP working at this point, but in the docs it > > says to use the following template for the dialplan: > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Secure_RTP: > > > > > > > > > > > > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" > > break="never"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) There is a missing > at the end of the close extension tag. > > 2) There is either a missing / at the end of the internal condition line, > > or a missing condition close tag somewhere > > 3) When I fix the interal condition, I get an error: > > > > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed > > > > All this, but a packet capture shows that SRTP is working based on what I > > did on: > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SIP_TLS > > > > Can someone give me some guidance on the Secure_RTP page and I will > > update whatever? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org From brian at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 21:23:42 2011 From: brian at freeswitch.org (Brian West) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 183 after 180 In-Reply-To: References: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> Message-ID: <38D35468-79AF-42AA-9A1D-DBFAD3600200@freeswitch.org> You could use execute_on_media to set a variable ;) /b On Jun 16, 2011, at 8:32 AM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > One question: How do you detect the remote end has responded with a > 180/183 w/o SDP in order to execute these commands conditionally? From kris at kriskinc.com Thu Jun 16 21:28:04 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 183 after 180 In-Reply-To: <38D35468-79AF-42AA-9A1D-DBFAD3600200@freeswitch.org> References: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> <38D35468-79AF-42AA-9A1D-DBFAD3600200@freeswitch.org> Message-ID: According to the wiki both execute_on_media and execute_on_preanswer don't distinguish between the various 180/183 with or without SDP scenarios. I guess I just may have to try it :). On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Brian West wrote: > You could use execute_on_media to set a variable ;) > > /b -- Kristian Kielhofner From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 21:37:05 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:37:05 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 183 after 180 In-Reply-To: References: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> <38D35468-79AF-42AA-9A1D-DBFAD3600200@freeswitch.org> Message-ID: if you set ringback variable on A and bypass_media_after_bridge=true and don't set ignore_early_media you should get what you want. The generate will only happen on 180 and the 183 would bridge. and in both cases once it's answered it goes to no media mode. On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > According to the wiki both execute_on_media and execute_on_preanswer > don't distinguish between the various 180/183 with or without SDP > scenarios. > > I guess I just may have to try it :). > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Brian West wrote: >> You could use execute_on_media to set a variable ;) >> >> /b > > -- > Kristian Kielhofner > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From daldworth at teliax.com Thu Jun 16 21:42:32 2011 From: daldworth at teliax.com (David Aldworth) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:42:32 -0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 183 after 180 In-Reply-To: References: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> <38D35468-79AF-42AA-9A1D-DBFAD3600200@freeswitch.org> Message-ID: <930F2905-EDD4-43C5-AB0D-BE132977FE0E@teliax.com> Thank you. That is indeed the scenario I was trying to confirm. So far I've had no problem with the dp settings of anchoring, then setting US ring, then bypassing after bridge. Thanks to Math for help in the forum too! He suggested I add the US ring and that without it FS would just relay the 180. The execute_on_media/preanswer has interesting implications too... David On Jun 16, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > if you set ringback variable on A and bypass_media_after_bridge=true > and don't set ignore_early_media > you should get what you want. > The generate will only happen on 180 and the 183 would bridge. > > and in both cases once it's answered it goes to no media mode. > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: >> According to the wiki both execute_on_media and execute_on_preanswer >> don't distinguish between the various 180/183 with or without SDP >> scenarios. >> >> I guess I just may have to try it :). >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Brian West wrote: >>> You could use execute_on_media to set a variable ;) >>> >>> /b >> >> -- >> Kristian Kielhofner >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From brian at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 21:44:41 2011 From: brian at freeswitch.org (Brian West) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 183 after 180 In-Reply-To: References: <9AD5D885-6663-4C1D-B3FA-7CFC1C49F68F@teliax.com> <38D35468-79AF-42AA-9A1D-DBFAD3600200@freeswitch.org> Message-ID: Hrm.. that is true you can get a 180 with an SDP which we treat like a 183 but hrm I think you're correct. /b On Jun 16, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > According to the wiki both execute_on_media and execute_on_preanswer > don't distinguish between the various 180/183 with or without SDP > scenarios. > > I guess I just may have to try it :). > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Brian West wrote: >> You could use execute_on_media to set a variable ;) >> >> /b > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/3e83e09b/attachment-0001.html From qingquan at globalroam.com Thu Jun 16 05:46:37 2011 From: qingquan at globalroam.com (qingquan luo) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:46:37 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] in bypass_media mode, 2833 payload type modified by freeswitch! In-Reply-To: References: <4A5154F6-90DE-4B40-9F24-E3E0D0824D02@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: Hi All, Thank you all for spend time on this question. I has try use export sip_enable_soa=false, And It work perfectly. Thanks a lot. Respect for your work and your production. -Qingquan On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > And FTR, this *is* on the wiki - I just didn't know about it. :) > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#SDP_Manipulation > (Last item) > > -MC > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Anthony Minessale < > anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > >> However, there is not really any rule anywhere that states that bypass >> media will not touch the packets. >> All of the packets/sdp are still subject to SIP SOA model so if you >> pass a remote sdp into the lib, sofia will parse and modify it. >> The idea of bypass media is to bypass the media by advertising the >> proper codecs/addrs to arrange point to point media and there is no >> assurance that the packets will not be modified. >> >> However, >> >> There is a sofia param called "enable-soa" and a variable >> sip_enable_soa for per call basis which can be set to false to disable >> SIP SOA from sofia and most likely result in untouched exchange of >> SDP. >> >> try this in your dialplan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Michael Collins >> wrote: >> > Ah, quite right. I'd file this in Jira. Hopefully it's not buried deep >> in >> > the Sofia stack... >> > -MC >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Kristian Kielhofner > > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael, >> >> >> >> This isn't an SDP offer/answer issue with FreeSWITCH. Even if there >> >> were underlying offer/answer issues between the endpoints FreeSWITCH >> >> is in bypass_media mode and it shouldn't care about the SDP because by >> >> definition (bypass_media) the SDP is "pass through" between the two >> >> remote endpoints. >> >> >> >> The specific issue lies in the 183 w/ SDP at line 207. It has >> >> rfc2833 payload type 110. When FreeSWITCH forwards this to the other >> >> end (line 276) the SDP is untouched (expected with bypass_media) >> >> EXCEPT the rfc2833 payload type has been changed to 101 (unexpected >> >> with bypass_media). It does this again with the 200 OK. All other >> >> SDP params are passed through - media address, port, codec, goofy >> >> session name, and even the SER rtpproxy attributes. I'll admit the >> >> remote end/proxy is doing some strange stuff - 100, 101, 183, then >> >> 180, etc but this does look like a strange bypass_media bug in >> >> FreeSWITCH. The RFC2833 payload type should be forwarded between the >> >> two remote endpoints without being modified by FreeSWITCH - just like >> >> all of the other SDP parameters (or any part of the SIP body, for that >> >> matter). >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Michael Collins >> >> wrote: >> >> > QQ, >> >> > I don't see that FreeSWITCH is doing anything incorrect here. >> According >> >> > to >> >> > RFC3264, the offerer (FreeSWITCH) sends an SDP and in the case of >> RTP, >> >> > the >> >> > answerer (GRSIP Gateway) must use the payload type offered, even if >> the >> >> > answerer uses a different payload type when it sends a >> telephone-event. >> >> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3264#section-6.1 >> >> > Specifically near the end: >> >> > "In the case of RTP, it MUST use the payload type numbers >> >> > >> >> > from the offer, even if they differ from those in the answer." >> >> > >> >> > Technically, FreeSWITCH isn't "changing" anything anyway. The >> originator >> >> > of >> >> > the call (Vox Callcontrol) is the one who chose PT 101 in the INVITE >> >> > that it >> >> > sent to FreeSWITCH. FS is just passing that along without modifying >> it. >> >> > I think you need to contact the people running the gateway and make >> sure >> >> > that they understand that they are not following RFC3264 if they're >> >> > rejecting telephone-events in PT 101 simply because they prefer to >> send >> >> > in >> >> > PT 110. Also, if your Vox Callcontrol client has any configuration >> >> > options >> >> > then maybe you can tell it to use PT 110 for RFC2833 DTMFs. It is a >> bit >> >> > of a >> >> > workaround but this is SIP, so no one is expecting perfection. :) >> >> > -MC >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Kristian Kielhofner >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Anthony Minessale II >> >> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire >> >> AIM: anthm >> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com >> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com >> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >> >> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> pstn:+19193869900 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Using Gmail? Please read this important notice: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/jstrap/gmail?40922. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/b5ad0be7/attachment-0001.html From mays.david at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 12:32:31 2011 From: mays.david at gmail.com (dma) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure Message-ID: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> I am creating a call-back solution. After leg-A answers, I originate leg-B call. After receiving SIP 183 from Leg-B, I bridge the 2 legs. However, in some cases, leg-A is automatically disconnected by FreeSwitch on leg-B failure, for example, DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER. The application is not given a chance to handle leg-B failure event. This should not be a correct scenario because I never set "hangup-after-bridge", which is false by default. The right way should be, FreeSwitch doesn't hang up leg-A automatically, but give a chance for the application to decide what to do. Please see the logs below: ================================================= 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750914] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 4 = [privacy=yes] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.477997: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501633 INVITE Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer Privacy: none Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 204 X-FS-Support: update_display P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46> v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1307645395 1307645396 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 t=0 0 m=audio 30000 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.485130: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501633 INVITE Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:56.677788: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501633 INVITE Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 189 v=0 o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 t=0 0 m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=sendrecv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "Outbound Call" <03996590031055> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [proceeding][183] 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: v=0 o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 t=0 0 m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples 8000 bits 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30000 -> 203.208.207.196 port 30792 codec: 18 ms: 20 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] 160 bytes per 20ms 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive payload to 101 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212! 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING -> EARLY 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 park() 2011-06-10 11:09:56.618770 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port confirmed. recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.562021: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501633 INVITE Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 189 v=0 o=- 421265648 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 t=0 0 m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=sendrecv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "03996590031055" <03996590031055> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state [proceeding][183] recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.563178: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501633 INVITE Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 189 v=0 o=- 421265648 3 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 t=0 0 m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=sendrecv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:01.457169 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state [proceeding][183] recv 749 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.365284: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501633 INVITE Contact: Allow-Events: refer Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Content-Type: application/sdp Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces Content-Length: 189 v=0 o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 t=0 0 m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=sendrecv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [completing][200] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: v=0 o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 t=0 0 m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.366562: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKyUg0ga7pUZmrS Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501633 ACK Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [ready][200] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> ACTIVE 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered 2011-06-10 11:10:27.264178 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task 23 switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79) to run at 1307676927 2011-06-10 11:10:27.265202 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996590031055] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 3 = [privacy=yes] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [30228d2b-756a-4a98-871d-db63a2955b52] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.373220: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501649 INVITE Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer Privacy: none Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 204 X-FS-Support: update_display P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46> v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1307646863 1307646864 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 t=0 0 m=audio 28564 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.378710: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501649 INVITE Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample rate 11025 doesn't match requested rate 8000 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has 2 channels, muxing to mono will occur. 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms 2011-06-10 11:10:27.298764 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:28.618472: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501649 INVITE Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 186 v=0 o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 t=0 0 m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=sendrecv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "Outbound Call" <03996563750914> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [proceeding][183] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: v=0 o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 t=0 0 m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples 8000 bits 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 28564 -> 203.208.207.195 port 45002 codec: 18 ms: 20 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] 160 bytes per 20ms 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive payload to 101 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212! 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING -> EARLY 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 park() 2011-06-10 11:10:28.516887 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> CS_HIBERNATE 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> CS_HIBERNATE 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done playing file 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_HIBERNATE 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE -> CS_RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.540814: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501649 INVITE Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 186 v=0 o=- 131082 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 t=0 0 m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=sendrecv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "03996563750914" <03996563750914> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state [proceeding][183] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [WARNING] switch_core_session.c:1940 Cannot execute app 'playback' media required on an outbound channel that does not have media established 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_HIBERNATE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE -> CS_RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> HANGUP 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.818391: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CANCEL sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 40 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 40 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Ended 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close Channel sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: ORIGINATOR_CANCEL 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: ORIGINATOR_CANCEL 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: ORIGINATOR_CANCEL 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to sleep 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 39 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 39 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Ended 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close Channel sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaab00310c0 (nil) send 662 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.820530: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501634 BYE Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to sleep recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.823302: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u00000001QXU3LU Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL Contact: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824765: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501649 INVITE Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824891: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACK sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501649 ACK Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.826375: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212>;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 13501634 BYE -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Leg-A-is-automatically-disconnected-on-Leg-B-orginate-failure-tp6482192p6482192.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From dave at clancysystems.com Thu Jun 16 19:54:36 2011 From: dave at clancysystems.com (Dave) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:54:36 -0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication Message-ID: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com> Hi, I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP address. I put in the default.xml under Dialplan When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it to the Lua IVR script above. I Appreciate any help you may offer. Dave Goodwin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/40431c15/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 22:01:41 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:01:41 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SRTP In-Reply-To: <201106161322.53638.justlikeef@gmail.com> References: <201106152210.41334.justlikeef@gmail.com> <201106161322.53638.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: Are you working off of the default.xml dialplan file? If so, it has an example condition already: What exactly are you checking on in your scenario? Most likely there is an elegant way to do it. Give us the plain language description of the problem you're addressing and the community will no doubt have good suggestions for you. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: > Steven - > > Thanks for the help here... > > So there would have to be two dialplan entries for this number to work with > either RTP or SRTP? (Maybe two devices registering to the same user?) > > Would it make more since to do this in a more global manner higher up in > the > dialplan in its own condition block? > > > On Thursday 16 June 2011 03:15:33 Steven Ayre wrote: > > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed > > > > That's because it shouldn't be nested. It's not missing a /, and the 1st > > Should have the /. The extra indendation shouldn't be there on the 2nd. > > > > It should look like this: > > > > > > > > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" > > break="never"> > > > > > > > > > > > > The two conditions function as an AND, even though it's not nested. FS > > stops checking the extension as soon as it sees a condition that's false > > (at least by default and in the above case), so if the destination is not > > 202 it'll never get to the 2nd condition. > > > > -Steve > > > > On 16 June 2011 03:10, Rob Hutton wrote: > > > I think I have TLS and SRTP working at this point, but in the docs it > > > says to use the following template for the dialplan: > > > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Secure_RTP: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" > > > break="never"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) There is a missing > at the end of the close extension tag. > > > 2) There is either a missing / at the end of the internal condition > line, > > > or a missing condition close tag somewhere > > > 3) When I fix the interal condition, I get an error: > > > > > > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed > > > > > > All this, but a packet capture shows that SRTP is working based on what > I > > > did on: > > > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SIP_TLS > > > > > > Can someone give me some guidance on the Secure_RTP page and I will > > > update whatever? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/acb50424/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 22:15:30 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:15:30 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication In-Reply-To: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com> References: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com> Message-ID: Dave, If you are simply handling incoming calls then you will need to do two things: Add Velocity's IP addr to the domains section of acl.conf.xml Add an extension to the public context (conf/dialplan/public.xml) Allowing a call into FS via an ACL will send it into the "public" context; from there you need to transfer it to the default context or just send it straight to your Lua script. Also, I don't believe you need to use a "bridge" app based on the description you gave. Bridge is used to create a new outbound call leg (B leg) and connect it to the inbound call leg (A leg). If you just are handling a call with an IVR then there is no B leg needed, thus no need to bridge. Welcome to FreeSWITCH, btw! :) I can highly recommend the FS book (the "bridge" book, ironically) as it discusses some of these basic concepts that will make your FS experience a whole lot more pleasant. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls > through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate > with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP > address. > > I put > > > > > > > > > in the default.xml under Dialplan > > When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH > server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' > for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. > > What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it to > the Lua IVR script above. > > I Appreciate any help you may offer. > > Dave Goodwin > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/913a2591/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 22:17:45 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:17:45 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing In-Reply-To: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2F@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2F@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Weigel, Stefan < Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > > > version shows me only ?git-. > This usually means that you have a git version older than 1.7.x and should probably get a new one. I think we're at least at git 1.7.4... -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/7b5ecda3/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 16 22:21:14 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:21:14 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Actually, I am looking into ways to accomplish these. They are somewhat related to some recipes I am doing for the FS Cookbook. Please stand by. FYI, I am looking at an ESL-based solution, not a dialplan script. Thus far I have not found a viable way to do async stuff like this from a dp script and I'm thinking ESL is the way to go. I will report back in a bit. -MC On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Sidharth Kshatriya wrote: > I am implementing an IVR using Lua in Freeswitch. In my Lua script I use > curl to a web service. Sometimes the response takes a long time to come > back. During that time period I would like to play music on hold. > > I have searched the freeswitch discussion archives a lot. There seem to be > many suggested ways to implement music on hold from a Lua script but the > answers are not very clear / not really applicable to my use case. I don't > know what method I should use and which one is recommended. > > *Method 1:* Transfer the call to 9664 (music on hold extension). However > the implementation for this solution for this does not seem to be available > in Lua. For example: How would I transfer the call back? > *Method 2:* Using bgapi uuid_park park the call and using uuid_broadcast > play an audio file. Again what do I do to unpark the call..? > > Thanks, > > Sidharth > [P.S. This is a repost, I apologize but I never got any responses on my > previous email. Need help! :-) ] > > -- > Sidharth Kshatriya > www.sidk.info > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/0f55750f/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Thu Jun 16 22:54:52 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using keypress to stop a recording. Message-ID: <4DFA517C.6010109@499x.com> I'm using the following script to record, and I"m hoping to take a user keypress to trigger the end of the recording and then play it back: (the problem is that it stops on ANY keypress, while it seems like it should only break on a "#" keypress) I found this example at: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_lua#session:recordFile local numberToCall = 1234 local session = freeswitch.Session("sofia/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/"..numberToCall); session:set_tts_parms("flite", "kal"); session:speak("Thank you for using my recording service, press the pound key to stop the recording." ); function onInput(s, type, obj) if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then return "break"; end end session:setInputCallback("onInput", ""); session:recordFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "recording stopped by user keypress \n"); session:speak("your voicehas been recorded, i will play it for you now"); session:streamFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); session:speak("that's it, goodbye."); freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "hanging up... \n"); session:hangup(); From david.villasmil.work at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 23:43:53 2011 From: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com (David Villasmil) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:43:53 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bypass_media problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Steve, my version is: freeswitch at 192.168.168.3@internal> version FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-7e52acf 2011-03-28 22-18-47 -0500) On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: > Can't see the reason immediately... the channel appears to be hanging up > because it thinks the bridge is finished. > > Can you repeat the debug log, but this time enabling FreeSWITCH's siptrace > option? (sofia global siptrace on). > > Also, I this isn't doing what I think you expect: > > session:execute("bridge","{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. > route_name .. ")}".. out_number .."") > The distributor API is called just once to generate the string to give to > the bridge app, not on each loop. So you'll be dialing through the same > gateway 3 times not rerouting to another gateway. > > Also, what FS version is this? > > -Steve > > > On 13 June 2011 23:59, David Villasmil wrote: > >> Hello Guys, >> >> I have a set where i'm receiving a call from a gw and sending to another >> gw. Both un-natted. If I set in my (lua) script bypass_media=false, call >> goes just fine, if i set it to true, FS sends "Temporary unavailable" to the >> B-side and CANCELs the A-side... >> >> Codec is fine as you will see in the pastebin.. >> >> rou >> here's the trace: >> >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16480 >> >> and here's the console log: >> >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16481 >> >> I'm bridging with a lua script, this is the pertinent part: >> >> gw_sip_username and gw_sip_pwd are just bogus "1234","1234", no >> registration is needed.... >> >> >> >> >> >> session:execute("set","continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,UNALLOCATED_NUMBER,407") >> >> session:execute("set","inbound-late-negotiation=true") >> session:execute("set","inbound-bypass-media=false") >> >> session:execute("set","proxy_media=false") >> session:execute("set","bypass_media=false") >> >> >> --session:execute("bridge","{sip_auth_username=" .. gw_sip_username >> .. ",sip_auth_password=" .. gw_sip_pwd .. "}sofia/external/".. out_number >> .."@".. gw_sip_ip .."") >> >> >> fsLog("BRIDGE EXECUTE:", "{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. >> route_name .. ")}" .. out_number .. "") >> session:execute("bridge","{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. >> route_name .. ")}".. out_number .."") >> >> -- hangup >> session:hangup(); >> >> >> >> Thanks guys for your help! >> >> >> David >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/de37d360/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 23:49:53 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:49:53 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bypass_media problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ok. Have you tried reproducing it on the latest Git? -Steve On 16 June 2011 20:43, David Villasmil wrote: > Hello Steve, > > my version is: > > freeswitch at 192.168.168.3@internal> version > FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-7e52acf 2011-03-28 22-18-47 -0500) > > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: > >> Can't see the reason immediately... the channel appears to be hanging up >> because it thinks the bridge is finished. >> >> Can you repeat the debug log, but this time enabling FreeSWITCH's siptrace >> option? (sofia global siptrace on). >> >> Also, I this isn't doing what I think you expect: >> >> session:execute("bridge","{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. >> route_name .. ")}".. out_number .."") >> The distributor API is called just once to generate the string to give to >> the bridge app, not on each loop. So you'll be dialing through the same >> gateway 3 times not rerouting to another gateway. >> >> Also, what FS version is this? >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 13 June 2011 23:59, David Villasmil wrote: >> >>> Hello Guys, >>> >>> I have a set where i'm receiving a call from a gw and sending to another >>> gw. Both un-natted. If I set in my (lua) script bypass_media=false, call >>> goes just fine, if i set it to true, FS sends "Temporary unavailable" to the >>> B-side and CANCELs the A-side... >>> >>> Codec is fine as you will see in the pastebin.. >>> >>> rou >>> here's the trace: >>> >>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16480 >>> >>> and here's the console log: >>> >>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16481 >>> >>> I'm bridging with a lua script, this is the pertinent part: >>> >>> gw_sip_username and gw_sip_pwd are just bogus "1234","1234", no >>> registration is needed.... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> session:execute("set","continue_on_fail=NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE,TIMEOUT,NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION,UNALLOCATED_NUMBER,407") >>> >>> session:execute("set","inbound-late-negotiation=true") >>> session:execute("set","inbound-bypass-media=false") >>> >>> session:execute("set","proxy_media=false") >>> session:execute("set","bypass_media=false") >>> >>> >>> --session:execute("bridge","{sip_auth_username=" .. gw_sip_username >>> .. ",sip_auth_password=" .. gw_sip_pwd .. "}sofia/external/".. out_number >>> .."@".. gw_sip_ip .."") >>> >>> >>> fsLog("BRIDGE EXECUTE:", "{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. >>> route_name .. ")}" .. out_number .. "") >>> session:execute("bridge","{loop=3}sofia/gateway/${distributor(" .. >>> route_name .. ")}".. out_number .."") >>> >>> -- hangup >>> session:hangup(); >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks guys for your help! >>> >>> >>> David >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/e0b33aaa/attachment-0001.html From dave at clancysystems.com Fri Jun 17 00:02:14 2011 From: dave at clancysystems.com (Dave) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:02:14 -0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication References: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com> Message-ID: <5A9A76E6D31143F1B2C971E2A7508D22@clancysystems.com> Under "domains" in acl.conf.xml I added x's are the IP address it's just a single address not a CIDR. And I created the file velocity_did.xml with the following code.. I still just get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. Do I need to change the line .. to the IP address? If so what syntax? They have no Domain Name. Thanks again for your help. Dave Goodwin ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:15 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication Dave, If you are simply handling incoming calls then you will need to do two things: Add Velocity's IP addr to the domains section of acl.conf.xml Add an extension to the public context (conf/dialplan/public.xml) Allowing a call into FS via an ACL will send it into the "public" context; from there you need to transfer it to the default context or just send it straight to your Lua script. Also, I don't believe you need to use a "bridge" app based on the description you gave. Bridge is used to create a new outbound call leg (B leg) and connect it to the inbound call leg (A leg). If you just are handling a call with an IVR then there is no B leg needed, thus no need to bridge. Welcome to FreeSWITCH, btw! :) I can highly recommend the FS book (the "bridge" book, ironically) as it discusses some of these basic concepts that will make your FS experience a whole lot more pleasant. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave wrote: Hi, I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP address. I put in the default.xml under Dialplan When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it to the Lua IVR script above. I Appreciate any help you may offer. Dave Goodwin _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/d8f165f1/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 00:02:03 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:02:03 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Test message - Please ignore Message-ID: I <3 FS -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/90b6e796/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 00:11:04 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:11:04 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication In-Reply-To: <5A9A76E6D31143F1B2C971E2A7508D22@clancysystems.com> References: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com> <5A9A76E6D31143F1B2C971E2A7508D22@clancysystems.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dave wrote: > > Under "domains" in acl.conf.xml I added > > > > The correct syntax is: > x's are the IP address it's just a single address not a CIDR. > > > And I created the file velocity_did.xml with the following code.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I still just get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile > 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. > > Wait - can you explain *exactly* what you're doing for testing? Are you trying to dial out via Velocity and back in to your DID? If so then you have 2 completely different things you need to set up. The instructions I gave were only for inbound DID, so use a cell phone or something to test that. For outbound it seems like they are sending you an auth challenge, which means they need to give you a username and password as well as a host/ip. You need to create a gateway, preferably in your external profile. Just be sure to set the "register" param to false since they are not expecting you to register with them. -MC Do I need to change the line .. > > > to the IP address? If so what syntax? > > They have no Domain Name. > > Thanks again for your help. > > Dave Goodwin > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Michael Collins > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:15 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without > Authentication > > Dave, > > If you are simply handling incoming calls then you will need to do two > things: > > Add Velocity's IP addr to the domains section of acl.conf.xml > Add an extension to the public context (conf/dialplan/public.xml) > > Allowing a call into FS via an ACL will send it into the "public" context; > from there you need to transfer it to the default context or just send it > straight to your Lua script. > > Also, I don't believe you need to use a "bridge" app based on the > description you gave. Bridge is used to create a new outbound call leg (B > leg) and connect it to the inbound call leg (A leg). If you just are > handling a call with an IVR then there is no B leg needed, thus no need to > bridge. > > Welcome to FreeSWITCH, btw! :) I can highly recommend the FS book (the > "bridge" book, ironically) as it discusses some of these basic concepts that > will make your FS experience a whole lot more pleasant. > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls >> through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate >> with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP >> address. >> >> I put >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in the default.xml under Dialplan >> >> When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH >> server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' >> for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. >> >> What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it >> to the Lua IVR script above. >> >> I Appreciate any help you may offer. >> >> Dave Goodwin >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/5ec4e27f/attachment-0001.html From dave at clancysystems.com Fri Jun 17 00:27:32 2011 From: dave at clancysystems.com (Dave) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:27:32 -0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication References: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com><5A9A76E6D31143F1B2C971E2A7508D22@clancysystems.com> Message-ID: Yes, I am only testing inbound. When I call from our office phone (not connected to FreeSWITCH, it's on a trunk from broadvox) I Get a busy signal and at that moment FreeSWITCH shows... "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. If I call from my cell phone I get the Operator Message "your call did not go through" and at that moment the same thing shows in FreeSWITCH "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:11 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dave wrote: Under "domains" in acl.conf.xml I added The correct syntax is: x's are the IP address it's just a single address not a CIDR. And I created the file velocity_did.xml with the following code.. I still just get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. Wait - can you explain *exactly* what you're doing for testing? Are you trying to dial out via Velocity and back in to your DID? If so then you have 2 completely different things you need to set up. The instructions I gave were only for inbound DID, so use a cell phone or something to test that. For outbound it seems like they are sending you an auth challenge, which means they need to give you a username and password as well as a host/ip. You need to create a gateway, preferably in your external profile. Just be sure to set the "register" param to false since they are not expecting you to register with them. -MC Do I need to change the line .. to the IP address? If so what syntax? They have no Domain Name. Thanks again for your help. Dave Goodwin ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:15 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication Dave, If you are simply handling incoming calls then you will need to do two things: Add Velocity's IP addr to the domains section of acl.conf.xml Add an extension to the public context (conf/dialplan/public.xml) Allowing a call into FS via an ACL will send it into the "public" context; from there you need to transfer it to the default context or just send it straight to your Lua script. Also, I don't believe you need to use a "bridge" app based on the description you gave. Bridge is used to create a new outbound call leg (B leg) and connect it to the inbound call leg (A leg). If you just are handling a call with an IVR then there is no B leg needed, thus no need to bridge. Welcome to FreeSWITCH, btw! :) I can highly recommend the FS book (the "bridge" book, ironically) as it discusses some of these basic concepts that will make your FS experience a whole lot more pleasant. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave wrote: Hi, I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP address. I put in the default.xml under Dialplan When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it to the Lua IVR script above. I Appreciate any help you may offer. Dave Goodwin _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/9307e607/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 00:46:58 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:46:58 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication In-Reply-To: References: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com> <5A9A76E6D31143F1B2C971E2A7508D22@clancysystems.com> Message-ID: Did you reloadxml and restart the sofia profile after the changes? Also, you need to "reloadacl" after doing a change to acl.conf.xml. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Dave wrote: > Yes, I am only testing inbound. When I call from our office phone (not > connected to FreeSWITCH, it's on a trunk from broadvox) I Get a busy signal > and at that moment FreeSWITCH shows... > "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for > [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. > > If I call from my cell phone I get the Operator Message "your call did not > go through" and at that moment the same thing shows in FreeSWITCH > "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for > [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Michael Collins > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:11 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without > Authentication > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dave wrote: > >> >> Under "domains" in acl.conf.xml I added >> >> >> >> > The correct syntax is: > > > >> x's are the IP address it's just a single address not a CIDR. >> >> >> And I created the file velocity_did.xml with the following code.. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I still just get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile >> 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. >> >> > Wait - can you explain *exactly* what you're doing for testing? Are you > trying to dial out via Velocity and back in to your DID? If so then you have > 2 completely different things you need to set up. The instructions I gave > were only for inbound DID, so use a cell phone or something to test that. > > For outbound it seems like they are sending you an auth challenge, which > means they need to give you a username and password as well as a host/ip. > You need to create a gateway, preferably in your external profile. Just be > sure to set the "register" param to false since they are not expecting you > to register with them. > > -MC > > Do I need to change the line .. >> >> >> to the IP address? If so what syntax? >> >> They have no Domain Name. >> >> Thanks again for your help. >> >> Dave Goodwin >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Michael Collins >> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:15 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without >> Authentication >> >> Dave, >> >> If you are simply handling incoming calls then you will need to do two >> things: >> >> Add Velocity's IP addr to the domains section of acl.conf.xml >> Add an extension to the public context (conf/dialplan/public.xml) >> >> Allowing a call into FS via an ACL will send it into the "public" context; >> from there you need to transfer it to the default context or just send it >> straight to your Lua script. >> >> Also, I don't believe you need to use a "bridge" app based on the >> description you gave. Bridge is used to create a new outbound call leg (B >> leg) and connect it to the inbound call leg (A leg). If you just are >> handling a call with an IVR then there is no B leg needed, thus no need to >> bridge. >> >> Welcome to FreeSWITCH, btw! :) I can highly recommend the FS book (the >> "bridge" book, ironically) as it discusses some of these basic concepts that >> will make your FS experience a whole lot more pleasant. >> >> -MC >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls >>> through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate >>> with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP >>> address. >>> >>> I put >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> in the default.xml under Dialplan >>> >>> When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH >>> server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' >>> for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. >>> >>> What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it >>> to the Lua IVR script above. >>> >>> I Appreciate any help you may offer. >>> >>> Dave Goodwin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/1cc57a22/attachment-0001.html From grsingh750 at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 00:50:57 2011 From: grsingh750 at gmail.com (guru singh) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:20:57 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Making a external call to Mobile number In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Ankit, Look at the debug level logs in fs_cli and let us know what they say. It'll be more relevant than "this call is not connecting". It should tell you exactly why its failing, also if things dont work always look here first instead of what x-lite is telling you. Regards guru On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:34 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Dear all, > > I am trying to make an external call to a mobile number of India using the > default ext number 1005. For doing this, I did the following things. > > First, I created a user at IPTEL.org, I added a SIP profile. I registered > with IPTEL. I also added a dial plan regex for 91 - (10 digit number). But, > because of some issue, I was not able to connect to IPTEL SIP. I was getting > error on X-LITE about some server issue. > > then, I tried my VOIP account with ActionVoip which is a paid account and > has SIP service. I could connect to my action voip account through X-LITE > SIP. > > I made a SIP profile for Action Voip and registered the username with action > voip in FS. On reload, it got registered using action voip SIP profile. I > changed the dialplan to use actionvoip gateway. > > But still, when I am trying to call to my mobile number in India. The call > is not able to connect. > > I think there is gap in my knowledge. Please help me I am new to FreeSwitch. > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 00:51:22 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:51:22 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: How about setting this? http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#continue_on_fail -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:32 AM, dma wrote: > I am creating a call-back solution. After leg-A answers, I originate leg-B > call. After receiving SIP 183 from Leg-B, I bridge the 2 legs. However, in > some cases, leg-A is automatically disconnected by FreeSwitch on leg-B > failure, for example, DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER. The application is not > given > a chance to handle leg-B failure event. This should not be a correct > scenario because I never set "hangup-after-bridge", which is false by > default. > > The right way should be, FreeSwitch doesn't hang up leg-A automatically, > but > give a chance for the application to decide what to do. > > Please see the logs below: > > ================================================= > > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750914] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 4 = [privacy=yes] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > [ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> > CS_INIT > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_INIT > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT > send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.477997: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > INVITE sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc > To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> > Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501633 INVITE > Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY > Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces > Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer > Privacy: none > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Disposition: session > Content-Length: 204 > X-FS-Support: update_display > P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46> > > v=0 > o=FreeSWITCH 1307645395 1307645396 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > s=FreeSWITCH > c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > t=0 0 > m=audio 30000 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-16 > a=ptime:20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> > CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> > RINGING > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING -> > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going > to > sleep > recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.485130: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 100 Trying > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc > To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> > Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501633 INVITE > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:56.677788: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc > To: > <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW > Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501633 INVITE > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Length: 189 > > v=0 > o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 > t=0 0 > m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=sendrecv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [INFO] sofia.c:729 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to > "Outbound > Call" <03996590031055> > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state > [proceeding][183] > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: > v=0 > o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 > t=0 0 > m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare > [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples > 8000 bits > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send > payload to 101 > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP > [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30000 -> > 203.208.207.196 port 30792 codec: 18 ms: 20 > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] > 160 bytes per 20ms > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send > payload to 101 > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive > payload to 101 > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212! > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING > -> > EARLY > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate > Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 park() > 2011-06-10 11:09:56.618770 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port > confirmed. > recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.562021: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc > To: > <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW > Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501633 INVITE > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Length: 189 > > v=0 > o=- 421265648 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 > t=0 0 > m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=sendrecv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [INFO] sofia.c:729 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to > "03996590031055" <03996590031055> > 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state > [proceeding][183] > recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.563178: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc > To: > <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW > Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501633 INVITE > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Length: 189 > > v=0 > o=- 421265648 3 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 > t=0 0 > m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=sendrecv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:01.457169 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state > [proceeding][183] > recv 749 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.365284: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 Ok > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc > To: > <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW > Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501633 INVITE > Contact: > Allow-Events: refer > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Content-Type: application/sdp > Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces > Content-Length: 189 > > v=0 > o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 > t=0 0 > m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=sendrecv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state > [completing][200] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: > v=0 > o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 > t=0 0 > m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.366562: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKyUg0ga7pUZmrS > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc > To: > <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW > Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501633 ACK > Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [ready][200] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> > ACTIVE > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel > [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.264178 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task 23 > switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79) to run at > 1307676927 > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.265202 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996590031055] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 3 = [privacy=yes] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 > [30228d2b-756a-4a98-871d-db63a2955b52] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> > CS_INIT > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_INIT > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> > CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> > RINGING > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING > send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.373220: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > INVITE sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN2011-06-10 > 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING > > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar > To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> > Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501649 INVITE > Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY > Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces > Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer > Privacy: none > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Disposition: session > Content-Length: 204 > X-FS-Support: update_display > P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46> > > v=0 > o=FreeSWITCH 1307646863 1307646864 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > s=FreeSWITCH > c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > t=0 0 > m=audio 28564 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-16 > a=ptime:20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING -> > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going > to > sleep > recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.378710: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 100 Trying > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar > To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> > Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501649 INVITE > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute > playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) > EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File > /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample rate > 11025 > doesn't match requested rate 8000 > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has 2 > channels, muxing to mono will occur. > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec > Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms > 2011-06-10 11:10:27.298764 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - > 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 > recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:28.618472: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar > To: > <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F > Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501649 INVITE > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Length: 186 > > v=0 > o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 > t=0 0 > m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=sendrecv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [INFO] sofia.c:729 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to > "Outbound > Call" <03996563750914> > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state > [proceeding][183] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: > v=0 > o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 > t=0 0 > m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare > [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples > 8000 bits > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send > payload to 101 > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP > [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 28564 -> > 203.208.207.195 port 45002 codec: 18 ms: 20 > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] > 160 bytes per 20ms > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send > payload to 101 > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive > payload to 101 > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212! > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING > -> > EARLY > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate > Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 park() > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.516887 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> > CS_HIBERNATE > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> > CS_HIBERNATE > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done playing > file > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute > playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_HIBERNATE > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE > -> > CS_RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.540814: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar > To: > <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F > Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501649 INVITE > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Length: 186 > > v=0 > o=- 131082 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 > t=0 0 > m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=sendrecv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [INFO] sofia.c:729 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to > "03996563750914" <03996563750914> > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state > [proceeding][183] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [WARNING] switch_core_session.c:1940 Cannot > execute app 'playback' media required on an outbound channel that does not > have media established > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_HIBERNATE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE > -> > CS_RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> > CS_SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> > CS_SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going > to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> > HANGUP > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] > [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> > HANGUP > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: > DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 > send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.818391: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CANCEL sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar > To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> > Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL > Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] > [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: > DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: > DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going > to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING > -> > CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 40 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on > external > entities > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 40 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Ended > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close > Channel > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP -> > DOWN > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 > sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 > (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: > ORIGINATOR_CANCEL > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: > ORIGINATOR_CANCEL > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: > ORIGINATOR_CANCEL > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to > sleep > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING > -> > CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 39 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on > external > entities > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 39 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Ended > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close > Channel > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP -> > DOWN > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaab00310c0 (nil) > send 662 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.820530: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc > To: > <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW > Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501634 BYE > Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY > Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces > Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - > 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 > sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 > (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to > sleep > recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.823302: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 Ok > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar > To: > <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u00000001QXU3LU > Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL > Contact: > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824765: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar > To: > <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F > Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501649 INVITE > Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824891: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ACK sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar > To: > <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F > Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501649 ACK > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.826375: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 Ok > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc > To: > <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 > >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW > Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 13501634 BYE > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Leg-A-is-automatically-disconnected-on-Leg-B-orginate-failure-tp6482192p6482192.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/7a19c94e/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 00:55:46 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:55:46 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using keypress to stop a recording. In-Reply-To: <4DFA517C.6010109@499x.com> References: <4DFA517C.6010109@499x.com> Message-ID: How about setting this only to #? http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#playback_terminators -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Wes wrote: > I'm using the following script to record, and I"m hoping to take a user > keypress to trigger the end of the recording and then play it back: > > (the problem is that it stops on ANY keypress, while it seems like it > should only break on a "#" keypress) > > I found this example at: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_lua#session:recordFile > > local numberToCall = 1234 > local session = freeswitch.Session("sofia/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/"..numberToCall); > session:set_tts_parms("flite", "kal"); > session:speak("Thank you for using my recording service, press the pound > key to stop the recording." ); > > function onInput(s, type, obj) > if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then > return "break"; > end > end > > session:setInputCallback("onInput", ""); > session:recordFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); > freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "recording stopped by user keypress \n"); > session:speak("your voicehas been recorded, i will play it for you now"); > session:streamFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); > session:speak("that's it, goodbye."); > freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "hanging up... \n"); > session:hangup(); > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/f5484502/attachment.html From dave at clancysystems.com Fri Jun 17 01:18:06 2011 From: dave at clancysystems.com (Dave) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:18:06 -0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication References: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com><5A9A76E6D31143F1B2C971E2A7508D22@clancysystems.com> Message-ID: <0580E32182F04516A074B86F364EDB5E@clancysystems.com> I did both, and even restarted the service. same results. Velocity did a call capture on thier end and sent it to me. They say that FreeSWITCH is requiring proxy authentication and that that is the issue. SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication Did you reloadxml and restart the sofia profile after the changes? Also, you need to "reloadacl" after doing a change to acl.conf.xml. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Dave wrote: Yes, I am only testing inbound. When I call from our office phone (not connected to FreeSWITCH, it's on a trunk from broadvox) I Get a busy signal and at that moment FreeSWITCH shows... "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. If I call from my cell phone I get the Operator Message "your call did not go through" and at that moment the same thing shows in FreeSWITCH "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:11 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dave wrote: Under "domains" in acl.conf.xml I added The correct syntax is: x's are the IP address it's just a single address not a CIDR. And I created the file velocity_did.xml with the following code.. I still just get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. Wait - can you explain *exactly* what you're doing for testing? Are you trying to dial out via Velocity and back in to your DID? If so then you have 2 completely different things you need to set up. The instructions I gave were only for inbound DID, so use a cell phone or something to test that. For outbound it seems like they are sending you an auth challenge, which means they need to give you a username and password as well as a host/ip. You need to create a gateway, preferably in your external profile. Just be sure to set the "register" param to false since they are not expecting you to register with them. -MC Do I need to change the line .. to the IP address? If so what syntax? They have no Domain Name. Thanks again for your help. Dave Goodwin ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:15 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication Dave, If you are simply handling incoming calls then you will need to do two things: Add Velocity's IP addr to the domains section of acl.conf.xml Add an extension to the public context (conf/dialplan/public.xml) Allowing a call into FS via an ACL will send it into the "public" context; from there you need to transfer it to the default context or just send it straight to your Lua script. Also, I don't believe you need to use a "bridge" app based on the description you gave. Bridge is used to create a new outbound call leg (B leg) and connect it to the inbound call leg (A leg). If you just are handling a call with an IVR then there is no B leg needed, thus no need to bridge. Welcome to FreeSWITCH, btw! :) I can highly recommend the FS book (the "bridge" book, ironically) as it discusses some of these basic concepts that will make your FS experience a whole lot more pleasant. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave wrote: Hi, I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP address. I put in the default.xml under Dialplan When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it to the Lua IVR script above. I Appreciate any help you may offer. Dave Goodwin _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/ae086870/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 01:22:50 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:22:50 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication In-Reply-To: <0580E32182F04516A074B86F364EDB5E@clancysystems.com> References: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com> <5A9A76E6D31143F1B2C971E2A7508D22@clancysystems.com> <0580E32182F04516A074B86F364EDB5E@clancysystems.com> Message-ID: Okay, I want you to go read up on gather data and dropping it on pastebin. The skills you hone there will server you well. :) http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs Need a debug log and a sip trace. Drop it on pastebin. Hint: use "sofia global siptrace on" to get all sip traffic logged to the console. Put the pb link in this email thread. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dave wrote: > I did both, and even restarted the service. same results. Velocity did a > call capture on thier end and sent it to me. They say that FreeSWITCH is > requiring proxy authentication and that that is the issue. > SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Michael Collins > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:46 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without > Authentication > > Did you reloadxml and restart the sofia profile after the changes? Also, > you need to "reloadacl" after doing a change to acl.conf.xml. > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Dave wrote: > >> Yes, I am only testing inbound. When I call from our office phone (not >> connected to FreeSWITCH, it's on a trunk from broadvox) I Get a busy signal >> and at that moment FreeSWITCH shows... >> "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for >> [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. >> >> If I call from my cell phone I get the Operator Message "your call did not >> go through" and at that moment the same thing shows in FreeSWITCH >> "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for >> [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Michael Collins >> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:11 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without >> Authentication >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dave wrote: >> >>> >>> Under "domains" in acl.conf.xml I added >>> >>> >>> >>> >> The correct syntax is: >> >> >> >>> x's are the IP address it's just a single address not a CIDR. >>> >>> >>> And I created the file velocity_did.xml with the following code.. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I still just get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile >>> 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. >>> >>> >> Wait - can you explain *exactly* what you're doing for testing? Are you >> trying to dial out via Velocity and back in to your DID? If so then you have >> 2 completely different things you need to set up. The instructions I gave >> were only for inbound DID, so use a cell phone or something to test that. >> >> For outbound it seems like they are sending you an auth challenge, which >> means they need to give you a username and password as well as a host/ip. >> You need to create a gateway, preferably in your external profile. Just be >> sure to set the "register" param to false since they are not expecting you >> to register with them. >> >> -MC >> >> Do I need to change the line .. >>> >>> >>> to the IP address? If so what syntax? >>> >>> They have no Domain Name. >>> >>> Thanks again for your help. >>> >>> Dave Goodwin >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Michael Collins >>> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help >>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:15 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without >>> Authentication >>> >>> Dave, >>> >>> If you are simply handling incoming calls then you will need to do two >>> things: >>> >>> Add Velocity's IP addr to the domains section of acl.conf.xml >>> Add an extension to the public context (conf/dialplan/public.xml) >>> >>> Allowing a call into FS via an ACL will send it into the "public" >>> context; from there you need to transfer it to the default context or just >>> send it straight to your Lua script. >>> >>> Also, I don't believe you need to use a "bridge" app based on the >>> description you gave. Bridge is used to create a new outbound call leg (B >>> leg) and connect it to the inbound call leg (A leg). If you just are >>> handling a call with an IVR then there is no B leg needed, thus no need to >>> bridge. >>> >>> Welcome to FreeSWITCH, btw! :) I can highly recommend the FS book (the >>> "bridge" book, ironically) as it discusses some of these basic concepts that >>> will make your FS experience a whole lot more pleasant. >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls >>>> through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate >>>> with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP >>>> address. >>>> >>>> I put >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> in the default.xml under Dialplan >>>> >>>> When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH >>>> server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' >>>> for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. >>>> >>>> What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it >>>> to the Lua IVR script above. >>>> >>>> I Appreciate any help you may offer. >>>> >>>> Dave Goodwin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/e06ffaed/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Fri Jun 17 01:29:37 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:29:37 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using keypress to stop a recording. In-Reply-To: References: <4DFA517C.6010109@499x.com> Message-ID: <4DFA75C1.3050008@499x.com> I'm writing a lua script, that link you mention doesn't seem like something I can do in LUA... the problem is in this function: function onInput(s, type, obj) if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then return "break"; end end which seems to break on any keypress, so the check for # doesn't work as expected. is there a different way to do this with a lua script? Ideally, I'd like to do more than just break, I'd like the user to be able to review the message more than once, and then finally hit another key to submit it for real. Like a voicemail system, actually. On 6/16/2011 3:55 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > How about setting this only to #? > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#playback_terminators > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Wes > wrote: > > I'm using the following script to record, and I"m hoping to take a > user > keypress to trigger the end of the recording and then play it back: > > (the problem is that it stops on ANY keypress, while it seems like it > should only break on a "#" keypress) > > I found this example at: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_lua#session:recordFile > > local numberToCall = 1234 > local session = > freeswitch.Session("sofia/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/"..numberToCall); > session:set_tts_parms("flite", "kal"); > session:speak("Thank you for using my recording service, press the > pound > key to stop the recording." ); > > function onInput(s, type, obj) > if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then > return "break"; > end > end > > session:setInputCallback("onInput", ""); > session:recordFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); > freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "recording stopped by user keypress > \n"); > session:speak("your voicehas been recorded, i will play it for you > now"); > session:streamFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); > session:speak("that's it, goodbye."); > freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "hanging up... \n"); > session:hangup(); > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/d915f35a/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 01:32:24 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:32:24 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using keypress to stop a recording. In-Reply-To: <4DFA75C1.3050008@499x.com> References: <4DFA517C.6010109@499x.com> <4DFA75C1.3050008@499x.com> Message-ID: It's just a channel variable. Set it prior to calling the Lua script or use session:setVariable("playback_terminators","#") -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Wes wrote: > I'm writing a lua script, that link you mention doesn't seem like > something I can do in LUA... > > the problem is in this function: > > > function onInput(s, type, obj) > if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then > return "break"; > end > end > > which seems to break on any keypress, so the check for # doesn't work as > expected. > > is there a different way to do this with a lua script? Ideally, I'd like > to do more than just break, I'd like the user to be able to review the > message more than once, and then finally hit another key to submit it for > real. Like a voicemail system, actually. > > > On 6/16/2011 3:55 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > How about setting this only to #? > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#playback_terminators > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Wes wrote: > >> I'm using the following script to record, and I"m hoping to take a user >> keypress to trigger the end of the recording and then play it back: >> >> (the problem is that it stops on ANY keypress, while it seems like it >> should only break on a "#" keypress) >> >> I found this example at: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_lua#session:recordFile >> >> local numberToCall = 1234 >> local session = >> freeswitch.Session("sofia/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/"..numberToCall); >> session:set_tts_parms("flite", "kal"); >> session:speak("Thank you for using my recording service, press the pound >> key to stop the recording." ); >> >> function onInput(s, type, obj) >> if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then >> return "break"; >> end >> end >> >> session:setInputCallback("onInput", ""); >> session:recordFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); >> freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "recording stopped by user keypress \n"); >> session:speak("your voicehas been recorded, i will play it for you now"); >> session:streamFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); >> session:speak("that's it, goodbye."); >> freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "hanging up... \n"); >> session:hangup(); >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/33cf329d/attachment.html From justlikeef at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 01:40:17 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SRTP In-Reply-To: References: <201106152210.41334.justlikeef@gmail.com> <201106161322.53638.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201106161740.18059.justlikeef@gmail.com> I am trying to get encryption working from within Bluebox, in the most "reasonably flexible" way possible. (So no, not the default dialpan, but I missed the example so I will go back and look at it) So, one scenario I am thinking needs to be supported is where you have two devices that are registered to the same user, one encrypted and one not. For instance, a phone and a remote ringer. What I am looking for is the best way to stay as flexible as possible. It may be a situation where you end up turning on encryption system wide if the devices support it, but that is overkill in a situation where there is a seperate voice and data VLAN unless there is a need for that level of security.. It may be a situation where I need to offer both options and write two dialplan enries in the situation where the admin wants to enable it device by device. BTW, I am also using my head to beat through getting TLS working on the front end. I would REALLY appreciate another set of eyes if you have time. http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- tabpanel&focusedCommentId=24719#action_24719 Thanks, Rob On Thursday 16 June 2011 14:01:41 Michael Collins wrote: > Are you working off of the default.xml dialplan file? If so, it has an > example condition already: > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" > break="never"> > > > > > > What exactly are you checking on in your scenario? Most likely there is an > elegant way to do it. Give us the plain language description of the problem > you're addressing and the community will no doubt have good suggestions for > you. > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: > > Steven - > > > > Thanks for the help here... > > > > So there would have to be two dialplan entries for this number to work > > with either RTP or SRTP? (Maybe two devices registering to the same > > user?) > > > > Would it make more since to do this in a more global manner higher up in > > the > > dialplan in its own condition block? > > > > On Thursday 16 June 2011 03:15:33 Steven Ayre wrote: > > > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed > > > > > > That's because it shouldn't be nested. It's not missing a /, and the > > > 1st Should have the /. The extra indendation shouldn't be there on the > > > 2nd. > > > > > > It should look like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" > > > break="never"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The two conditions function as an AND, even though it's not nested. FS > > > stops checking the extension as soon as it sees a condition that's > > > false (at least by default and in the above case), so if the > > > destination is not 202 it'll never get to the 2nd condition. > > > > > > -Steve > > > > > > On 16 June 2011 03:10, Rob Hutton wrote: > > > > I think I have TLS and SRTP working at this point, but in the docs it > > > > says to use the following template for the dialplan: > > > > > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Secure_RTP: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" > > > > break="never"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) There is a missing > at the end of the close extension tag. > > > > 2) There is either a missing / at the end of the internal condition > > > > line, > > > > > > or a missing condition close tag somewhere > > > > 3) When I fix the interal condition, I get an error: > > > > > > > > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed > > > > > > > > All this, but a packet capture shows that SRTP is working based on > > > > what > > > > I > > > > > > did on: > > > > > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SIP_TLS > > > > > > > > Can someone give me some guidance on the Secure_RTP page and I will > > > > update whatever? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org From dave at clancysystems.com Fri Jun 17 01:46:23 2011 From: dave at clancysystems.com (Dave) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:46:23 -0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication References: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com><5A9A76E6D31143F1B2C971E2A7508D22@clancysystems.com><0580E32182F04516A074B86F364EDB5E@clancysystems.com> Message-ID: <271B8C7B3AE54D7CA9229E49D3AB652D@clancysystems.com> Will Do. Thanks very much for your help. I bought the book:) Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 3:22 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication Okay, I want you to go read up on gather data and dropping it on pastebin. The skills you hone there will server you well. :) http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs Need a debug log and a sip trace. Drop it on pastebin. Hint: use "sofia global siptrace on" to get all sip traffic logged to the console. Put the pb link in this email thread. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dave wrote: I did both, and even restarted the service. same results. Velocity did a call capture on thier end and sent it to me. They say that FreeSWITCH is requiring proxy authentication and that that is the issue. SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication Did you reloadxml and restart the sofia profile after the changes? Also, you need to "reloadacl" after doing a change to acl.conf.xml. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Dave wrote: Yes, I am only testing inbound. When I call from our office phone (not connected to FreeSWITCH, it's on a trunk from broadvox) I Get a busy signal and at that moment FreeSWITCH shows... "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. If I call from my cell phone I get the Operator Message "your call did not go through" and at that moment the same thing shows in FreeSWITCH "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:11 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dave wrote: Under "domains" in acl.conf.xml I added The correct syntax is: x's are the IP address it's just a single address not a CIDR. And I created the file velocity_did.xml with the following code.. I still just get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. Wait - can you explain *exactly* what you're doing for testing? Are you trying to dial out via Velocity and back in to your DID? If so then you have 2 completely different things you need to set up. The instructions I gave were only for inbound DID, so use a cell phone or something to test that. For outbound it seems like they are sending you an auth challenge, which means they need to give you a username and password as well as a host/ip. You need to create a gateway, preferably in your external profile. Just be sure to set the "register" param to false since they are not expecting you to register with them. -MC Do I need to change the line .. to the IP address? If so what syntax? They have no Domain Name. Thanks again for your help. Dave Goodwin ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:15 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication Dave, If you are simply handling incoming calls then you will need to do two things: Add Velocity's IP addr to the domains section of acl.conf.xml Add an extension to the public context (conf/dialplan/public.xml) Allowing a call into FS via an ACL will send it into the "public" context; from there you need to transfer it to the default context or just send it straight to your Lua script. Also, I don't believe you need to use a "bridge" app based on the description you gave. Bridge is used to create a new outbound call leg (B leg) and connect it to the inbound call leg (A leg). If you just are handling a call with an IVR then there is no B leg needed, thus no need to bridge. Welcome to FreeSWITCH, btw! :) I can highly recommend the FS book (the "bridge" book, ironically) as it discusses some of these basic concepts that will make your FS experience a whole lot more pleasant. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave wrote: Hi, I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP address. I put in the default.xml under Dialplan When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it to the Lua IVR script above. I Appreciate any help you may offer. Dave Goodwin _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/3c047a8e/attachment-0001.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Fri Jun 17 01:52:45 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using keypress to stop a recording. In-Reply-To: References: <4DFA517C.6010109@499x.com> <4DFA75C1.3050008@499x.com> Message-ID: <4DFA7B2D.5040005@499x.com> ok, tried that, but it didn't change the behavior In fact, I removed both the onInput function, and the call to session:setVariable, and the recording is still halted by *any* keypress on the keypad. So this must be the default behavior of how to stop the recording... Can anyone confirm this? Thanks. On 6/16/2011 4:32 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > It's just a channel variable. Set it prior to calling the Lua script > or use session:setVariable("playback_terminators","#") > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Wes > wrote: > > I'm writing a lua script, that link you mention doesn't seem like > something I can do in LUA... > > the problem is in this function: > > > function onInput(s, type, obj) > if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then > return "break"; > end > end > > which seems to break on any keypress, so the check for # doesn't > work as expected. > > is there a different way to do this with a lua script? Ideally, > I'd like to do more than just break, I'd like the user to be able > to review the message more than once, and then finally hit another > key to submit it for real. Like a voicemail system, actually. > > > On 6/16/2011 3:55 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> How about setting this only to #? >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#playback_terminators >> >> -MC >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Wes > > wrote: >> >> I'm using the following script to record, and I"m hoping to >> take a user >> keypress to trigger the end of the recording and then play it >> back: >> >> (the problem is that it stops on ANY keypress, while it seems >> like it >> should only break on a "#" keypress) >> >> I found this example at: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_lua#session:recordFile >> >> local numberToCall = 1234 >> local session = >> freeswitch.Session("sofia/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/"..numberToCall); >> session:set_tts_parms("flite", "kal"); >> session:speak("Thank you for using my recording service, >> press the pound >> key to stop the recording." ); >> >> function onInput(s, type, obj) >> if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then >> return "break"; >> end >> end >> >> session:setInputCallback("onInput", ""); >> session:recordFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); >> freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "recording stopped by user >> keypress \n"); >> session:speak("your voicehas been recorded, i will play it >> for you now"); >> session:streamFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); >> session:speak("that's it, goodbye."); >> freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "hanging up... \n"); >> session:hangup(); >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/c99b64f5/attachment.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 01:56:44 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:26:44 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Michael. This is quite a mainstream requirement :-) ! Not everyone uses ESL. Is there no way we can "hack" this in Lua? Will await your research, Sidharth On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Actually, I am looking into ways to accomplish these. They are somewhat > related to some recipes I am doing for the FS Cookbook. Please stand by. > FYI, I am looking at an ESL-based solution, not a dialplan script. Thus far > I have not found a viable way to do async stuff like this from a dp script > and I'm thinking ESL is the way to go. I will report back in a bit. > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Sidharth Kshatriya < > sid.kshatriya at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am implementing an IVR using Lua in Freeswitch. In my Lua script I use >> curl to a web service. Sometimes the response takes a long time to come >> back. During that time period I would like to play music on hold. >> >> I have searched the freeswitch discussion archives a lot. There seem to be >> many suggested ways to implement music on hold from a Lua script but the >> answers are not very clear / not really applicable to my use case. I don't >> know what method I should use and which one is recommended. >> >> *Method 1:* Transfer the call to 9664 (music on hold extension). However >> the implementation for this solution for this does not seem to be available >> in Lua. For example: How would I transfer the call back? >> *Method 2:* Using bgapi uuid_park park the call and using uuid_broadcast >> play an audio file. Again what do I do to unpark the call..? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Sidharth >> [P.S. This is a repost, I apologize but I never got any responses on my >> previous email. Need help! :-) ] >> >> -- >> Sidharth Kshatriya >> www.sidk.info >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/dbe64d43/attachment.html From gcd at i.ph Fri Jun 17 02:38:30 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:38:30 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Making a external call to Mobile number In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: in fs_cli, execute *sofia status* to check if the account is REGED. the account should be in sip_profiles/external/. show us a sample of the account entry and the dialplan. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:04 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Dear all, > > I am trying to make an external call to a mobile number of India using the > default ext number 1005. For doing this, I did the following things. > > First, I created a user at IPTEL.org, I added a SIP profile. I registered > with IPTEL. I also added a dial plan regex for 91 - (10 digit number). But, > because of some issue, I was not able to connect to IPTEL SIP. I was getting > error on X-LITE about some server issue. > > then, I tried my VOIP account with ActionVoip which is a paid account and > has SIP service. I could connect to my action voip account through X-LITE > SIP. > > I made a SIP profile for Action Voip and registered the username with > action voip in FS. On reload, it got registered using action voip SIP > profile. I changed the dialplan to use actionvoip gateway. > > But still, when I am trying to call to my mobile number in India. The call > is not able to connect. > > I think there is gap in my knowledge. Please help me I am new to > FreeSwitch. > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/b1a2cf2c/attachment-0001.html From rentmycoder at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 02:56:59 2011 From: rentmycoder at gmail.com (rentmycoder rentmycoder) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:56:59 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to show unregistered users Message-ID: Hi, It may be an easy question, but I'm unable to find the answer on wiki or google... sofia status profie internal show only registered internal extensions... how to list all users (both reged and unreged)? like: sip show peers in Asterisk... Thanks,,, From gcd at i.ph Fri Jun 17 03:03:50 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:03:50 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs Message-ID: hello everybody, i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects directly to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do we still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? i appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. tks, nandy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/d2ac09be/attachment.html From sascha.daniels at amooma.de Fri Jun 17 03:59:32 2011 From: sascha.daniels at amooma.de (Sascha Daniels) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:59:32 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Hooks for own call logs Message-ID: Hi together. My dialplan is generated by a java script. I am writing call logs (not cdr) in the application that feeds the js. Everething is fine except canceled calls. I think I need a hook in the dialplan. How can I make a system call (or what ever) when a call is canceled? Any hints? Regards Sascga -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/64a8d6d1/attachment.html From justlikeef at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 05:31:04 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. So normally, you have |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports for the CPE end. If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp handle much besides the traffic. On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: > hello everybody, > > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects directly > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do we > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? i > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. > > tks, > nandy From justlikeef at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 05:32:46 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_fifo shared lag In-Reply-To: <4DF9E16C.4090608@amooma.de> References: <4DF9E16C.4090608@amooma.de> Message-ID: <201106162132.47164.justlikeef@gmail.com> The callcenter app has a "recovery" time for each queue you are a member of, but I'm not sure about fifo. On Thursday 16 June 2011 06:56:44 Sascha Daniels wrote: > Hi together. > > Is there a possibility to have a shared lag over several fifos? > > In a callcenter with agents in several Queues the lag is 10sec. After a > call from fifo A the agent should not get a call from fifo B within > those 10sec. > > Basically like shared_lastcall=yes in Asterisk 1.6 > > Regards > > Sascha From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 05:43:21 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:43:21 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Hooks for own call logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It depends on what you mean by "canceled" - can you pastebin a call log of a canceled call and give us an idea what should be happening? Thanks, MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Sascha Daniels wrote: > Hi together. > > My dialplan is generated by a java script. > > I am writing call logs (not cdr) in the application that feeds the js. > > Everething is fine except canceled calls. > > I think I need a hook in the dialplan. > > How can I make a system call (or what ever) when a call is canceled? > > Any hints? > > Regards Sascga > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/fd11a573/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 05:46:16 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:46:16 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_fifo shared lag In-Reply-To: <201106162132.47164.justlikeef@gmail.com> References: <4DF9E16C.4090608@amooma.de> <201106162132.47164.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_fifo#Configure_for_Agent_Callback There's a lag= option mentioned there and I believe that it honors multiple queues. Can you try it out and let us know? Set a really high lag time so that the test is completely obvious. -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Rob Hutton wrote: > The callcenter app has a "recovery" time for each queue you are a member > of, > but I'm not sure about fifo. > > On Thursday 16 June 2011 06:56:44 Sascha Daniels wrote: > > Hi together. > > > > Is there a possibility to have a shared lag over several fifos? > > > > In a callcenter with agents in several Queues the lag is 10sec. After a > > call from fifo A the agent should not get a call from fifo B within > > those 10sec. > > > > Basically like shared_lastcall=yes in Asterisk 1.6 > > > > Regards > > > > Sascha > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/21eb4c0f/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 05:53:01 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:53:01 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to show unregistered users In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Well, if you have access to the XML config files then you have the complete list of users. You can also parse that list out with "xml_locate directory". Nothing that I'm aware of to tell you who isn't registered. I'm assuming most of us will infer who is not registered by look at who is registered. Curious - what problem are you solving by listing unregistered users? -MC On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:56 PM, rentmycoder rentmycoder < rentmycoder at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It may be an easy question, but I'm unable to find the answer on wiki > or google... > > sofia status profie internal show only registered internal extensions... > > how to list all users (both reged and unreged)? > > like: sip show peers in Asterisk... > > Thanks,,, > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110616/e2ac482b/attachment.html From jaybinks at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 06:45:37 2011 From: jaybinks at gmail.com (jay binks) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:45:37 +1000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: this is MY take on what Nandy is after. A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to provide the voice, but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see if there are such devices.. sorry I dont know of any :( Jay On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: > Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device > that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. > So normally, you have > > |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or > modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] > > What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could be a > VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and others > make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports for the > CPE end. > > If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you > could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp > handle much besides the traffic. > > On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: > > hello everybody, > > > > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects > directly > > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do we > > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? i > > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. > > > > tks, > > nandy > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Sincerely Jay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/49d88c1c/attachment-0001.html From mays.david at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 06:52:22 2011 From: mays.david at gmail.com (David Ma) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:52:22 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Hi Michael, Thanks very much for your prompt response! I appreciate the information provided. I was actually searching the the existence of such a variable. I was not so luck to find it out and thereby resort to the support forum. I've modified my code to build this parameter into my application. Will feedback to you after verification. Thanks again, D.Ma On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > How about setting this? > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#continue_on_fail > > -MC > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:32 AM, dma wrote: > >> I am creating a call-back solution. After leg-A answers, I originate leg-B >> call. After receiving SIP 183 from Leg-B, I bridge the 2 legs. However, in >> some cases, leg-A is automatically disconnected by FreeSwitch on leg-B >> failure, for example, DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER. The application is not >> given >> a chance to handle leg-B failure event. This should not be a correct >> scenario because I never set "hangup-after-bridge", which is false by >> default. >> >> The right way should be, FreeSwitch doesn't hang up leg-A automatically, >> but >> give a chance for the application to decide what to do. >> >> Please see the logs below: >> >> ================================================= >> >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750914] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 4 = [privacy=yes] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> [ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> >> CS_INIT >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_INIT >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.477997: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> INVITE sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >> Privacy: none >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Disposition: session >> Content-Length: 204 >> X-FS-Support: update_display >> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46> >> >> v=0 >> o=FreeSWITCH 1307645395 1307645396 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >> s=FreeSWITCH >> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 30000 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >> a=ptime:20 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> >> CS_ROUTING >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_ROUTING >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> >> RINGING >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING >> -> >> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going >> to >> sleep >> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.485130: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:56.677788: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >> To: >> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Length: 189 >> >> v=0 >> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> a=sendrecv >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >> "Outbound >> Call" <03996590031055> >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >> [proceeding][183] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >> v=0 >> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare >> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples >> 8000 bits >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send >> payload to 101 >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30000 -> >> 203.208.207.196 port 30792 codec: 18 ms: 20 >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] >> 160 bytes per 20ms >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send >> payload to 101 >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive >> payload to 101 >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212! >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING >> -> >> EARLY >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate >> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 park() >> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.618770 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port >> confirmed. >> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.562021: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >> To: >> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Length: 189 >> >> v=0 >> o=- 421265648 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> a=sendrecv >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >> "03996590031055" <03996590031055> >> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >> [proceeding][183] >> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.563178: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >> To: >> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Length: 189 >> >> v=0 >> o=- 421265648 3 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> a=sendrecv >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.457169 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >> [proceeding][183] >> recv 749 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.365284: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >> To: >> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >> Contact: >> Allow-Events: refer >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces >> Content-Length: 189 >> >> v=0 >> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> a=sendrecv >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >> [completing][200] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >> v=0 >> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> >> send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.366562: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKyUg0ga7pUZmrS >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >> To: >> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501633 ACK >> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [ready][200] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> >> ACTIVE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel >> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.264178 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task 23 >> switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79) to run >> at >> 1307676927 >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.265202 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996590031055] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 3 = [privacy=yes] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >> [30228d2b-756a-4a98-871d-db63a2955b52] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> >> CS_INIT >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_INIT >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> >> CS_ROUTING >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_ROUTING >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> >> RINGING >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.373220: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> INVITE sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN2011-06-10 >> 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >> >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >> Privacy: none >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Disposition: session >> Content-Length: 204 >> X-FS-Support: update_display >> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46> >> >> v=0 >> o=FreeSWITCH 1307646863 1307646864 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >> s=FreeSWITCH >> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 28564 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >> a=ptime:20 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING >> -> >> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going >> to >> sleep >> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.378710: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File >> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample rate >> 11025 >> doesn't match requested rate 8000 >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has 2 >> channels, muxing to mono will occur. >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec >> Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms >> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.298764 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - >> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:28.618472: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >> To: >> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Length: 186 >> >> v=0 >> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> a=sendrecv >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >> "Outbound >> Call" <03996563750914> >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >> [proceeding][183] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >> v=0 >> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare >> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples >> 8000 bits >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send >> payload to 101 >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >> [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 28564 -> >> 203.208.207.195 port 45002 codec: 18 ms: 20 >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] >> 160 bytes per 20ms >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send >> payload to 101 >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive >> payload to 101 >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212! >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING >> -> >> EARLY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate >> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 park() >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.516887 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE >> -> >> CS_HIBERNATE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE >> -> >> CS_HIBERNATE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done playing >> file >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >> playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_HIBERNATE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE >> -> >> CS_RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.540814: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >> To: >> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Length: 186 >> >> v=0 >> o=- 131082 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> a=sendrecv >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >> "03996563750914" <03996563750914> >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >> [proceeding][183] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [WARNING] switch_core_session.c:1940 Cannot >> execute app 'playback' media required on an outbound channel that does not >> have media established >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_HIBERNATE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE >> -> >> CS_RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> >> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> >> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going >> to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> >> HANGUP >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >> [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_HANGUP >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE >> -> >> HANGUP >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >> send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.818391: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> CANCEL sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >> Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >> [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> >> CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: >> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going >> to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_HANGUP >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING >> -> >> CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 40 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >> external >> entities >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 40 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >> Channel >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP >> -> >> DOWN >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> >> CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: >> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to >> sleep >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING >> -> >> CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 39 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >> external >> entities >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 39 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >> Channel >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP >> -> >> DOWN >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >> 0x2aaab00310c0 (nil) >> send 662 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.820530: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >> To: >> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >> Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - >> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to >> sleep >> recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.823302: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >> To: >> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u00000001QXU3LU >> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >> Contact: >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824765: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >> To: >> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >> Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824891: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> ACK sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >> To: >> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501649 ACK >> Content-Length: 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.826375: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg;received=10.1.1.46 >> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >> To: >> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Leg-A-is-automatically-disconnected-on-Leg-B-orginate-failure-tp6482192p6482192.html >> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/40cca436/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Fri Jun 17 09:57:35 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:57:35 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication In-Reply-To: <271B8C7B3AE54D7CA9229E49D3AB652D@clancysystems.com> References: <75EE58D2AC7E4BFE9A53B699375DD699@clancysystems.com><5A9A76E6D31143F1B2C971E2A7508D22@clancysystems.com><0580E32182F04516A074B86F364EDB5E@clancysystems.com> <271B8C7B3AE54D7CA9229E49D3AB652D@clancysystems.com> Message-ID: <3FC1A4D1-87F2-45AB-9AC8-F9C767F267B5@ipeva.fr> Dave, if you use the default config, I would recommend you configure Vitelity to send you the packets to your port 5080 (profile external). Auth is disabled on external, so I think this port is more adapted to be used for unauth trunks. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 16/06/2011 ? 23:46, Dave a ?crit : > Will Do. Thanks very much for your help. I bought the book:) > > Dave > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Collins > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 3:22 PM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication > > Okay, I want you to go read up on gather data and dropping it on pastebin. The skills you hone there will server you well. :) > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs > > Need a debug log and a sip trace. Drop it on pastebin. Hint: use "sofia global siptrace on" to get all sip traffic logged to the console. > > Put the pb link in this email thread. > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dave wrote: > I did both, and even restarted the service. same results. Velocity did a call capture on thier end and sent it to me. They say that FreeSWITCH is requiring proxy authentication and that that is the issue. > SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Collins > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:46 PM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication > > Did you reloadxml and restart the sofia profile after the changes? Also, you need to "reloadacl" after doing a change to acl.conf.xml. > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Dave wrote: > Yes, I am only testing inbound. When I call from our office phone (not connected to FreeSWITCH, it's on a trunk from broadvox) I Get a busy signal and at that moment FreeSWITCH shows... > "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. > > If I call from my cell phone I get the Operator Message "your call did not go through" and at that moment the same thing shows in FreeSWITCH > "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Collins > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:11 PM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dave wrote: > > Under "domains" in acl.conf.xml I added > > > > The correct syntax is: > > > x's are the IP address it's just a single address not a CIDR. > > > And I created the file velocity_did.xml with the following code.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I still just get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. > > Wait - can you explain *exactly* what you're doing for testing? Are you trying to dial out via Velocity and back in to your DID? If so then you have 2 completely different things you need to set up. The instructions I gave were only for inbound DID, so use a cell phone or something to test that. > > For outbound it seems like they are sending you an auth challenge, which means they need to give you a username and password as well as a host/ip. You need to create a gateway, preferably in your external profile. Just be sure to set the "register" param to false since they are not expecting you to register with them. > > -MC > > Do I need to change the line .. > > > to the IP address? If so what syntax? > > They have no Domain Name. > > Thanks again for your help. > > Dave Goodwin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Collins > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:15 PM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting Up an Sip Trunk without Authentication > > Dave, > > If you are simply handling incoming calls then you will need to do two things: > > Add Velocity's IP addr to the domains section of acl.conf.xml > Add an extension to the public context (conf/dialplan/public.xml) > > Allowing a call into FS via an ACL will send it into the "public" context; from there you need to transfer it to the default context or just send it straight to your Lua script. > > Also, I don't believe you need to use a "bridge" app based on the description you gave. Bridge is used to create a new outbound call leg (B leg) and connect it to the inbound call leg (A leg). If you just are handling a call with an IVR then there is no B leg needed, thus no need to bridge. > > Welcome to FreeSWITCH, btw! :) I can highly recommend the FS book (the "bridge" book, ironically) as it discusses some of these basic concepts that will make your FS experience a whole lot more pleasant. > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to FreeSWITCH and need to set up FreeSWITCH to receive calls through a Velocity Networks SIP trunk. They say I should not authenticate with Username and Password. Rather, I connect directly to the their IP address. > > I put > > > > > > > > > in the default.xml under Dialplan > > When I Dial the DID from a Phone (not one connected to the FreeSWITCH server) I get the "SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [myphone at theirIP] from their IP, but nothing more. > > What I hope to do is take the incoming call from 2064001950 and route it to the Lua IVR script above. > > I Appreciate any help you may offer. > > Dave Goodwin > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/dfed860a/attachment-0001.html From gcd at i.ph Fri Jun 17 10:07:54 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:07:54 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: hello guys! i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on newer IP DSLAMs. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: > this is MY take on what Nandy is after. > > A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. > ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. > > my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to > provide the voice, > but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the > voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) > > I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see if > there are such devices.. > sorry I dont know of any :( > > Jay > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: > >> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device >> that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. >> So normally, you have >> >> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or >> modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >> >> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could be >> a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and >> others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports >> for the CPE end. >> >> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you >> could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp >> handle much besides the traffic. >> >> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >> > hello everybody, >> > >> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects >> directly >> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do we >> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? i >> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >> > >> > tks, >> > nandy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Sincerely > > Jay > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/07dd74dd/attachment.html From oseslija at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 10:08:25 2011 From: oseslija at gmail.com (Ognjen Seslija) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:08:25 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: I think he wants the newer DSLAMs without ATM layer. On Jun 17, 2011 3:35 AM, "Rob Hutton" wrote: > Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. So normally, you have > > |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] > > What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports for the CPE end. > > If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp handle much besides the traffic. > > On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >> hello everybody, >> >> i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects directly >> to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do we >> still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? i >> appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >> >> tks, >> nandy > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/812f1a02/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Fri Jun 17 10:19:12 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:19:12 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: Which density are you looking for ? Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > hello guys! > > i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). > > i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on newer IP DSLAMs. > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: > this is MY take on what Nandy is after. > > A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. > ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. > > my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to provide the voice, > but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) > > I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see if there are such devices.. > sorry I dont know of any :( > > Jay > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: > Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. So normally, you have > > |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] > > What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports for the CPE end. > > If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp handle much besides the traffic. > > On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: > > hello everybody, > > > > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects directly > > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do we > > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? i > > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. > > > > tks, > > nandy > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Sincerely > > Jay > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/fc7912ba/attachment-0001.html From gcd at i.ph Fri Jun 17 10:28:54 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:28:54 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > Which density are you looking for ? > Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > > hello guys! > > i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, using > FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and that > would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). > > i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's > FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on > newer IP DSLAMs. > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: > >> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. >> >> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. >> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. >> >> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to >> provide the voice, >> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the >> voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) >> >> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see >> if there are such devices.. >> sorry I dont know of any :( >> >> Jay >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: >> >>> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device >>> that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. >>> So normally, you have >>> >>> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or >>> modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >>> >>> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could be >>> a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and >>> others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports >>> for the CPE end. >>> >>> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you >>> could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp >>> handle much besides the traffic. >>> >>> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >>> > hello everybody, >>> > >>> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects >>> directly >>> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do >>> we >>> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? i >>> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >>> > >>> > tks, >>> > nandy >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely >> >> Jay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/ea6977f3/attachment.html From gcd at i.ph Fri Jun 17 10:30:06 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:30:06 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: density - 24 or 48 lines only On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Nandy Dagondon wrote: > yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > >> Which density are you looking for ? >> Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >> l'exp?diteur.* >> * >> * >> >> >> >> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >> >> hello guys! >> >> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, >> using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and >> that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). >> >> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's >> FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on >> newer IP DSLAMs. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: >> >>> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. >>> >>> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. >>> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. >>> >>> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to >>> provide the voice, >>> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the >>> voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) >>> >>> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see >>> if there are such devices.. >>> sorry I dont know of any :( >>> >>> Jay >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: >>> >>>> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device >>>> that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. >>>> So normally, you have >>>> >>>> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or >>>> modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >>>> >>>> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could >>>> be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and >>>> others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports >>>> for the CPE end. >>>> >>>> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you >>>> could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp >>>> handle much besides the traffic. >>>> >>>> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >>>> > hello everybody, >>>> > >>>> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects >>>> directly >>>> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do >>>> we >>>> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? >>>> i >>>> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >>>> > >>>> > tks, >>>> > nandy >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely >>> >>> Jay >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/e40ec7c1/attachment-0001.html From Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com Fri Jun 17 11:10:49 2011 From: Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com (Weigel, Stefan) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:10:49 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing In-Reply-To: References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2F@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C30@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Hi Michael, I'm lazy and so I'm using the freeswitch-snapshot.tar.gz from files.freeswitch.org. Should I always do a 'make current' to get the latest version ? Best regards Stefan Von: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] Im Auftrag von Michael Collins Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011 20:18 An: FreeSWITCH Users Help Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Weigel, Stefan > wrote: Hi Steve, version shows me only 'git-. This usually means that you have a git version older than 1.7.x and should probably get a new one. I think we're at least at git 1.7.4... -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/f91c01b7/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 11:25:32 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:55:32 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Making a external call to Mobile number In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes, the sofia status is REGED. I am adding my Dial Plan and SIP Profile SIP Profile ----------------------------------------------------------- DialPlan ----------------------------------------------------------- In the logs, I found Errors. Full logs at Pastebin http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16541 2011-06-17 12:45:14.794565 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:3183 Invalid Gateway 2011-06-17 12:45:14.794565 [ERR] switch_ivr_originate.c:2430 Cannot create outgoing channel of type [sofia] cause: [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] I am stuck now. I did try most of the permutations and combinations. Thanks Ankit On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Nandy Dagondon wrote: > in fs_cli, execute *sofia status* to check if the account is REGED. the > account should be in sip_profiles/external/. show us a sample of the > account entry and the dialplan. > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:04 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I am trying to make an external call to a mobile number of India using the >> default ext number 1005. For doing this, I did the following things. >> >> First, I created a user at IPTEL.org, I added a SIP profile. I registered >> with IPTEL. I also added a dial plan regex for 91 - (10 digit number). But, >> because of some issue, I was not able to connect to IPTEL SIP. I was getting >> error on X-LITE about some server issue. >> >> then, I tried my VOIP account with ActionVoip which is a paid account and >> has SIP service. I could connect to my action voip account through X-LITE >> SIP. >> >> I made a SIP profile for Action Voip and registered the username with >> action voip in FS. On reload, it got registered using action voip SIP >> profile. I changed the dialplan to use actionvoip gateway. >> >> But still, when I am trying to call to my mobile number in India. The call >> is not able to connect. >> >> I think there is gap in my knowledge. Please help me I am new to >> FreeSwitch. >> >> Thanks >> Ankit >> >> -- >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/184890cd/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 11:31:15 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:31:15 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Making a external call to Mobile number In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It's complaining the gateway you're trying to use doesn't exist. It looks like a simple typo in the gateway name attribute: -Steve On 17 June 2011 08:25, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Yes, the sofia status is REGED. > > I am adding my Dial Plan and SIP Profile > > SIP Profile > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > DialPlan > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > In the logs, I found Errors. Full logs at Pastebin > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16541 > > 2011-06-17 12:45:14.794565 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:3183 Invalid Gateway > > 2011-06-17 12:45:14.794565 [ERR] switch_ivr_originate.c:2430 Cannot create > outgoing channel of type [sofia] cause: [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] > > I am stuck now. I did try most of the permutations and combinations. > > Thanks > > Ankit > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Nandy Dagondon wrote: > >> in fs_cli, execute *sofia status* to check if the account is REGED. the >> account should be in sip_profiles/external/. show us a sample of the >> account entry and the dialplan. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:04 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I am trying to make an external call to a mobile number of India using >>> the default ext number 1005. For doing this, I did the following things. >>> >>> First, I created a user at IPTEL.org, I added a SIP profile. I registered >>> with IPTEL. I also added a dial plan regex for 91 - (10 digit number). But, >>> because of some issue, I was not able to connect to IPTEL SIP. I was getting >>> error on X-LITE about some server issue. >>> >>> then, I tried my VOIP account with ActionVoip which is a paid account and >>> has SIP service. I could connect to my action voip account through X-LITE >>> SIP. >>> >>> I made a SIP profile for Action Voip and registered the username with >>> action voip in FS. On reload, it got registered using action voip SIP >>> profile. I changed the dialplan to use actionvoip gateway. >>> >>> But still, when I am trying to call to my mobile number in India. The >>> call is not able to connect. >>> >>> I think there is gap in my knowledge. Please help me I am new to >>> FreeSwitch. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Ankit >>> >>> -- >>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/f5a10527/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 11:32:54 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:32:54 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing In-Reply-To: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C30@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2F@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C30@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: Check it out using Git: 'git clone git://git.freeswitch.org/freeswitch.git' -Steve On 17 June 2011 08:10, Weigel, Stefan wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > > I?m lazy and so I?m using the freeswitch-snapshot.tar.gz from > files.freeswitch.org. > > Should I always do a ?make current? to get the latest version ? > > > > > > Best regards > > > > Stefan > > > > > > *Von:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *Im Auftrag von *Michael > Collins > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011 20:18 > > *An:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Betreff:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult > variables missing > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Weigel, Stefan < > Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com> wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > version shows me only ?git-. > > > > This usually means that you have a git version older than 1.7.x and should > probably get a new one. I think we're at least at git 1.7.4... > > > > -MC > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/1c6c43bc/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Fri Jun 17 11:37:34 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:37:34 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> Nandy, something does not add up. When you deploy DSLAMs for public lines, it's not for 24/48 ports, but rather for 20 000 to 30 000 ports. Perhaps there is a confusion about what is a public line. A public line is the 200 meters-8km pair of copper going from the local (legacy) telco facility to your house. You don't install your own DSLAMs for 24/48 ports, or perhaps you are in a very specific situation. I really doubt you will find a cost effective DSLAM for so few ports. Plus, you realize you will need to install on DSLAM in all the telco facilities required to get the coverage you need There are small DSLAMs on the market, but they are targeted for private lines (hospitality, health care, ...) and I really don't know if they can work on public lines. In case you actually need a small DSLAM just to run ADSL over a private pair of copper, you should have a look at: http://www.phybridge.com/uniphyer-ip-phones.aspx This thing does not call itself a DSLAM but it is one. They market that as a "switch" that enables LAN on your copper wires. It's a small lie for data usage as you only get 25Mbps/1.4Mbps (ATM), but for voice, that's enough. Basically, you put the "switch"-DSLAM in the network cabinet where the copper wires go, you connect the wires to it, you connect the ethernet port to your LAN (so your FS). In each room/office, you plug an adapter (provided also by Phybridge) which is basically a small ADSL modem (powered from the switch through the wire), from which you get an ethernet port, with POE on it! I like the solution on the paper, but never used. Because of the cost: a 24 ports switch is 3500$ one adapter is 122$ so a full 24 ports solution would be 6500$, which is not very competitive compared to recabling the place. But your mileage may vary. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:28, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > Which density are you looking for ? > Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > >> hello guys! >> >> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). >> >> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on newer IP DSLAMs. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: >> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. >> >> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. >> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. >> >> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to provide the voice, >> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) >> >> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see if there are such devices.. >> sorry I dont know of any :( >> >> Jay >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: >> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. So normally, you have >> >> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >> >> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports for the CPE end. >> >> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp handle much besides the traffic. >> >> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >> > hello everybody, >> > >> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects directly >> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do we >> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? i >> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >> > >> > tks, >> > nandy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely >> >> Jay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/0a3ceb44/attachment-0001.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 11:51:31 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:21:31 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Making a external call to Mobile number In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ahhh! I wasted a half day in figuring out what's the issue? Thanks a lot Steve. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > It's complaining the gateway you're trying to use doesn't exist. It looks > like a simple typo in the gateway name attribute: > > > > > > -Steve > > > > > On 17 June 2011 08:25, ankIT WALiA wrote: > >> Yes, the sofia status is REGED. >> >> I am adding my Dial Plan and SIP Profile >> >> SIP Profile >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> DialPlan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >> In the logs, I found Errors. Full logs at Pastebin >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16541 >> >> 2011-06-17 12:45:14.794565 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:3183 Invalid Gateway >> >> 2011-06-17 12:45:14.794565 [ERR] switch_ivr_originate.c:2430 Cannot create >> outgoing channel of type [sofia] cause: [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] >> >> I am stuck now. I did try most of the permutations and combinations. >> >> Thanks >> >> Ankit >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Nandy Dagondon wrote: >> >>> in fs_cli, execute *sofia status* to check if the account is REGED. the >>> account should be in sip_profiles/external/. show us a sample of the >>> account entry and the dialplan. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:04 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> I am trying to make an external call to a mobile number of India using >>>> the default ext number 1005. For doing this, I did the following things. >>>> >>>> First, I created a user at IPTEL.org, I added a SIP profile. I >>>> registered with IPTEL. I also added a dial plan regex for 91 - (10 digit >>>> number). But, because of some issue, I was not able to connect to IPTEL SIP. >>>> I was getting error on X-LITE about some server issue. >>>> >>>> then, I tried my VOIP account with ActionVoip which is a paid account >>>> and has SIP service. I could connect to my action voip account through >>>> X-LITE SIP. >>>> >>>> I made a SIP profile for Action Voip and registered the username with >>>> action voip in FS. On reload, it got registered using action voip SIP >>>> profile. I changed the dialplan to use actionvoip gateway. >>>> >>>> But still, when I am trying to call to my mobile number in India. The >>>> call is not able to connect. >>>> >>>> I think there is gap in my knowledge. Please help me I am new to >>>> FreeSwitch. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Ankit >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/b656c3ba/attachment.html From brent at overthewire.com.au Fri Jun 17 12:10:29 2011 From: brent at overthewire.com.au (Brent Paddon) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:10:29 +1000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: I presume you are actually after an MSAN : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-service_access_node An MSAN allows the single copper pair to be used for voice and data. The voice component appears to the subscriber as a standard POTS and the MSAN then uses SIP to connect back to a softswitch such as FS. Perhaps something like this: http://www.zhone.com/products/msan/MALC-XP/ Brent On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Nandy Dagondon wrote: > yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > >> Which density are you looking for ? >> Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >> l'exp?diteur.* >> * >> * >> >> >> >> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >> >> hello guys! >> >> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, >> using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and >> that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). >> >> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's >> FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on >> newer IP DSLAMs. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: >> >>> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. >>> >>> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. >>> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. >>> >>> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to >>> provide the voice, >>> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the >>> voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) >>> >>> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see >>> if there are such devices.. >>> sorry I dont know of any :( >>> >>> Jay >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: >>> >>>> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device >>>> that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. >>>> So normally, you have >>>> >>>> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or >>>> modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >>>> >>>> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could >>>> be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and >>>> others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports >>>> for the CPE end. >>>> >>>> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you >>>> could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp >>>> handle much besides the traffic. >>>> >>>> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >>>> > hello everybody, >>>> > >>>> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects >>>> directly >>>> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do >>>> we >>>> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? >>>> i >>>> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >>>> > >>>> > tks, >>>> > nandy >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely >>> >>> Jay >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- -- Brent Paddon Director | Over the Wire Pty Ltd brent.paddon at overthewire.com.au | www.overthewire.com.au Phone: 07 3847 9292 | Fax: 07 3847 9696 | Mobile: 0400 2400 54 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/c859d0d5/attachment-0001.html From gcd at i.ph Fri Jun 17 12:25:59 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:25:59 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: yes, it doesn't add up because the application is in a rural area. the Phybridge is a good solution except for the price. thanks David. however, the MSAN, perfectly describes what i'm looking - hopefully the investment is lower. thanks to all who contributed. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > Nandy, > > something does not add up. > When you deploy DSLAMs for public lines, it's not for 24/48 ports, but > rather for 20 000 to 30 000 ports. > Perhaps there is a confusion about what is a public line. > A public line is the 200 meters-8km pair of copper going from the local > (legacy) telco facility to your house. > You don't install your own DSLAMs for 24/48 ports, or perhaps you are in a > very specific situation. > I really doubt you will find a cost effective DSLAM for so few ports. > Plus, you realize you will need to install on DSLAM in all the telco > facilities required to get the coverage you need > > There are small DSLAMs on the market, but they are targeted for private > lines (hospitality, health care, ...) and I really don't know if they can > work on public lines. > > In case you actually need a small DSLAM just to run ADSL over a private > pair of copper, you should have a look at: > > http://www.phybridge.com/uniphyer-ip-phones.aspx > > This thing does not call itself a DSLAM but it is one. > They market that as a "switch" that enables LAN on your copper wires. > It's a small lie for data usage as you only get 25Mbps/1.4Mbps (ATM), but > for voice, that's enough. > Basically, you put the "switch"-DSLAM in the network cabinet where the > copper wires go, you connect the wires to it, you connect the ethernet port > to your LAN (so your FS). In each room/office, you plug an adapter (provided > also by Phybridge) which is basically a small ADSL modem (powered from the > switch through the wire), from which you get an ethernet port, with POE on > it! > > I like the solution on the paper, but never used. Because of the cost: > a 24 ports switch is 3500$ > one adapter is 122$ > > so a full 24 ports solution would be 6500$, which is not very competitive > compared to recabling the place. > > But your mileage may vary. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:28, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > > yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > >> Which density are you looking for ? >> Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >> l'exp?diteur.* >> * >> * >> >> >> >> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >> >> hello guys! >> >> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, >> using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and >> that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). >> >> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's >> FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on >> newer IP DSLAMs. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: >> >>> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. >>> >>> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. >>> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. >>> >>> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to >>> provide the voice, >>> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the >>> voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) >>> >>> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see >>> if there are such devices.. >>> sorry I dont know of any :( >>> >>> Jay >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: >>> >>>> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device >>>> that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. >>>> So normally, you have >>>> >>>> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or >>>> modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >>>> >>>> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could >>>> be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and >>>> others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports >>>> for the CPE end. >>>> >>>> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you >>>> could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp >>>> handle much besides the traffic. >>>> >>>> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >>>> > hello everybody, >>>> > >>>> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects >>>> directly >>>> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do >>>> we >>>> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? >>>> i >>>> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >>>> > >>>> > tks, >>>> > nandy >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely >>> >>> Jay >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/9f0f3f21/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Fri Jun 17 13:29:48 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:29:48 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> Hmmm unlikely I think. The Zhone box for instance seems to be around 11,000$. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 17/06/2011 ? 10:25, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > yes, it doesn't add up because the application is in a rural area. the Phybridge is a good solution except for the price. thanks David. however, the MSAN, perfectly describes what i'm looking - hopefully the investment is lower. > > thanks to all who contributed. > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > Nandy, > > something does not add up. > When you deploy DSLAMs for public lines, it's not for 24/48 ports, but rather for 20 000 to 30 000 ports. > Perhaps there is a confusion about what is a public line. > A public line is the 200 meters-8km pair of copper going from the local (legacy) telco facility to your house. > You don't install your own DSLAMs for 24/48 ports, or perhaps you are in a very specific situation. > I really doubt you will find a cost effective DSLAM for so few ports. > Plus, you realize you will need to install on DSLAM in all the telco facilities required to get the coverage you need > > There are small DSLAMs on the market, but they are targeted for private lines (hospitality, health care, ...) and I really don't know if they can work on public lines. > > In case you actually need a small DSLAM just to run ADSL over a private pair of copper, you should have a look at: > > http://www.phybridge.com/uniphyer-ip-phones.aspx > > This thing does not call itself a DSLAM but it is one. > They market that as a "switch" that enables LAN on your copper wires. > It's a small lie for data usage as you only get 25Mbps/1.4Mbps (ATM), but for voice, that's enough. > Basically, you put the "switch"-DSLAM in the network cabinet where the copper wires go, you connect the wires to it, you connect the ethernet port to your LAN (so your FS). In each room/office, you plug an adapter (provided also by Phybridge) which is basically a small ADSL modem (powered from the switch through the wire), from which you get an ethernet port, with POE on it! > > I like the solution on the paper, but never used. Because of the cost: > a 24 ports switch is 3500$ > one adapter is 122$ > > so a full 24 ports solution would be 6500$, which is not very competitive compared to recabling the place. > > But your mileage may vary. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:28, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > >> yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >> Which density are you looking for ? >> Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >> >> >> >> >> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >> >>> hello guys! >>> >>> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). >>> >>> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on newer IP DSLAMs. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: >>> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. >>> >>> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. >>> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. >>> >>> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to provide the voice, >>> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) >>> >>> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see if there are such devices.. >>> sorry I dont know of any :( >>> >>> Jay >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: >>> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. So normally, you have >>> >>> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >>> >>> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports for the CPE end. >>> >>> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp handle much besides the traffic. >>> >>> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >>> > hello everybody, >>> > >>> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects directly >>> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do we >>> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? i >>> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >>> > >>> > tks, >>> > nandy >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely >>> >>> Jay >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/d383d1f3/attachment-0001.html From gcd at i.ph Fri Jun 17 14:57:44 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:57:44 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: huh ... that's quiet pricey. perhaps an IP DSLAM + FXS would be a cheaper setup. in rural areas, many are still dinosaurs. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:29 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > Hmmm unlikely I think. > The Zhone box for instance seems to be around 11,000$. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 17/06/2011 ? 10:25, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > > yes, it doesn't add up because the application is in a rural area. the > Phybridge is a good solution except for the price. thanks David. however, > the MSAN, perfectly describes what i'm looking - hopefully the investment is > lower. > > thanks to all who contributed. > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > >> Nandy, >> >> something does not add up. >> When you deploy DSLAMs for public lines, it's not for 24/48 ports, but >> rather for 20 000 to 30 000 ports. >> Perhaps there is a confusion about what is a public line. >> A public line is the 200 meters-8km pair of copper going from the local >> (legacy) telco facility to your house. >> You don't install your own DSLAMs for 24/48 ports, or perhaps you are in a >> very specific situation. >> I really doubt you will find a cost effective DSLAM for so few ports. >> Plus, you realize you will need to install on DSLAM in all the telco >> facilities required to get the coverage you need >> >> There are small DSLAMs on the market, but they are targeted for private >> lines (hospitality, health care, ...) and I really don't know if they can >> work on public lines. >> >> In case you actually need a small DSLAM just to run ADSL over a private >> pair of copper, you should have a look at: >> >> http://www.phybridge.com/uniphyer-ip-phones.aspx >> >> This thing does not call itself a DSLAM but it is one. >> They market that as a "switch" that enables LAN on your copper wires. >> It's a small lie for data usage as you only get 25Mbps/1.4Mbps (ATM), but >> for voice, that's enough. >> Basically, you put the "switch"-DSLAM in the network cabinet where the >> copper wires go, you connect the wires to it, you connect the ethernet port >> to your LAN (so your FS). In each room/office, you plug an adapter (provided >> also by Phybridge) which is basically a small ADSL modem (powered from the >> switch through the wire), from which you get an ethernet port, with POE on >> it! >> >> I like the solution on the paper, but never used. Because of the cost: >> a 24 ports switch is 3500$ >> one adapter is 122$ >> >> so a full 24 ports solution would be 6500$, which is not very competitive >> compared to recabling the place. >> >> But your mileage may vary. >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >> l'exp?diteur.* >> * >> * >> >> >> >> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:28, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >> >> yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >> >>> Which density are you looking for ? >>> Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service Client IPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >>> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >>> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >>> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >>> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >>> l'exp?diteur.* >>> * >>> * >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >>> >>> hello guys! >>> >>> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, >>> using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and >>> that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). >>> >>> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's >>> FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on >>> newer IP DSLAMs. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: >>> >>>> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. >>>> >>>> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. >>>> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. >>>> >>>> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device >>>> to provide the voice, >>>> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND >>>> the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) >>>> >>>> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see >>>> if there are such devices.. >>>> sorry I dont know of any :( >>>> >>>> Jay >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: >>>> >>>>> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a device >>>>> that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. >>>>> So normally, you have >>>>> >>>>> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or >>>>> modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >>>>> >>>>> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could >>>>> be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and >>>>> others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports >>>>> for the CPE end. >>>>> >>>>> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, >>>>> you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU >>>>> tp handle much besides the traffic. >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >>>>> > hello everybody, >>>>> > >>>>> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects >>>>> directly >>>>> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do >>>>> we >>>>> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? >>>>> i >>>>> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >>>>> > >>>>> > tks, >>>>> > nandy >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sincerely >>>> >>>> Jay >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/0ac94f61/attachment-0001.html From justlikeef at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 14:57:58 2011 From: justlikeef at gmail.com (Rob Hutton) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Unable to get TLS working Message-ID: <201106170657.58978.justlikeef@gmail.com> I have been unable to get TLS working for several days despite beating my head against it, so I am sure I am doing something simple and stupid. Brian and Jeff have tried to help, but I haven't gotten anywhere. I would appreciate any help that I can get.... http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3346 Thanks, Rob From mbrancaleoni at voismart.it Fri Jun 17 15:14:30 2011 From: mbrancaleoni at voismart.it (Matteo) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:14:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Generating ringback if 180 arrives after 183 Message-ID: <1f3159c1-33ac-42f1-8277-fcb0b79829c7@mx.voismart.com> Hi all, I've the following scenario from my upstream provider : FS calls provider Provider sends easrly media with 183 announcing that the call is going to be trasferred Provider sends 180 without sdp In my dialplan I'm using ringback variable to let FS generate ringback to internal network, and if I receive 180 without 183 is working ok. What I'm trying to achieve is to let ringback work even if we've already received the 183 with sdp. I've tryed a lot of dialplan magic without luck. Maybe we need to add this support into FS itself ? What I see seems that we need to break the bridge or at least "inject" the tone stream into the internal leg of the call. To be fair, the exact sequence is: FS calls provider provider sends 183/sdp annoucing the call trasnfer provider sends update which stops the media (media=inactive) provider sends 180 ringing (we must generate here) maybe the correct way is to handle the update, put fs back into ringing state and proceed from there? Is feasible or we can get the same result with some dialplan magic? any hint is appreciated :) regards, matteo From spencer at 5ninesolutions.com Fri Jun 17 15:26:29 2011 From: spencer at 5ninesolutions.com (Spencer Thomason) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:26:29 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Kamailio Interop Message-ID: Hello all, I've been working on upgrading our SBC setup which consists of FreeSWITCH instances between Kamailio 3.1 instances. In initial testing FreeSWITCH would fail on an ACK timeout. After looking at the traces, Kamailio was responding to the 200 with an ACK that has a branch=0 parameter. It is possible to disable this behavior by setting syn_branch=0 in kamailio.cfg which causes an MD5 hash to be used as the branch parameter. In researching this it seems that this has been around in SER for some time as the ACK following the 200 is sent statelessly regardless of a t_relay() function. See: http://www.mail-archive.com/users at openser.org/msg00697.html The question I have is there any way to get Freeswitch to work with an ACK with a branch=0? and if so should it? Gotta love SIP. :-) Spencer From spencer at 5ninesolutions.com Fri Jun 17 15:39:47 2011 From: spencer at 5ninesolutions.com (Spencer Thomason) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:39:47 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Kamailio Interop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: And since this a Kamailio issue, I don't want to dwell on it but, here's the fix if anyone else runs into this problem... http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=commitdiff;h=ebb3b085c15b398192cd8e242d46914252278448 On Jun 17, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Spencer Thomason wrote: > Hello all, > I've been working on upgrading our SBC setup which consists of FreeSWITCH instances between Kamailio 3.1 instances. In initial testing FreeSWITCH would fail on an ACK timeout. After looking at the traces, Kamailio was responding to the 200 with an ACK that has a branch=0 parameter. It is possible to disable this behavior by setting syn_branch=0 in kamailio.cfg which causes an MD5 hash to be used as the branch parameter. In researching this it seems that this has been around in SER for some time as the ACK following the 200 is sent statelessly regardless of a t_relay() function. > > > See: > http://www.mail-archive.com/users at openser.org/msg00697.html > > The question I have is there any way to get Freeswitch to work with an ACK with a branch=0? and if so should it? > > Gotta love SIP. :-) > > Spencer > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From brent at overthewire.com.au Fri Jun 17 15:54:37 2011 From: brent at overthewire.com.au (Brent Paddon) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:54:37 +1000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: Probably just check what distance your FXS solution will support. I've heard a number of them do not support long distances commonly found on outdoor style plant (they're more intended for in-building). Brent On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Nandy Dagondon wrote: > huh ... that's quiet pricey. perhaps an IP DSLAM + FXS would be a cheaper > setup. in rural areas, many are still dinosaurs. > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:29 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > >> Hmmm unlikely I think. >> The Zhone box for instance seems to be around 11,000$. >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >> l'exp?diteur.* >> * >> * >> >> >> >> Le 17/06/2011 ? 10:25, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >> >> yes, it doesn't add up because the application is in a rural area. the >> Phybridge is a good solution except for the price. thanks David. however, >> the MSAN, perfectly describes what i'm looking - hopefully the investment is >> lower. >> >> thanks to all who contributed. >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >> >>> Nandy, >>> >>> something does not add up. >>> When you deploy DSLAMs for public lines, it's not for 24/48 ports, but >>> rather for 20 000 to 30 000 ports. >>> Perhaps there is a confusion about what is a public line. >>> A public line is the 200 meters-8km pair of copper going from the local >>> (legacy) telco facility to your house. >>> You don't install your own DSLAMs for 24/48 ports, or perhaps you are in >>> a very specific situation. >>> I really doubt you will find a cost effective DSLAM for so few ports. >>> Plus, you realize you will need to install on DSLAM in all the telco >>> facilities required to get the coverage you need >>> >>> There are small DSLAMs on the market, but they are targeted for private >>> lines (hospitality, health care, ...) and I really don't know if they can >>> work on public lines. >>> >>> In case you actually need a small DSLAM just to run ADSL over a private >>> pair of copper, you should have a look at: >>> >>> http://www.phybridge.com/uniphyer-ip-phones.aspx >>> >>> This thing does not call itself a DSLAM but it is one. >>> They market that as a "switch" that enables LAN on your copper wires. >>> It's a small lie for data usage as you only get 25Mbps/1.4Mbps (ATM), but >>> for voice, that's enough. >>> Basically, you put the "switch"-DSLAM in the network cabinet where the >>> copper wires go, you connect the wires to it, you connect the ethernet port >>> to your LAN (so your FS). In each room/office, you plug an adapter (provided >>> also by Phybridge) which is basically a small ADSL modem (powered from the >>> switch through the wire), from which you get an ethernet port, with POE on >>> it! >>> >>> I like the solution on the paper, but never used. Because of the cost: >>> a 24 ports switch is 3500$ >>> one adapter is 122$ >>> >>> so a full 24 ports solution would be 6500$, which is not very competitive >>> compared to recabling the place. >>> >>> But your mileage may vary. >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service Client IPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >>> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >>> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >>> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >>> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >>> l'exp?diteur.* >>> * >>> * >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:28, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >>> >>> yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>> >>>> Which density are you looking for ? >>>> Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? >>>> >>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>> >>>> Service Client IPeva >>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>> >>>> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis >>>> ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >>>> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >>>> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >>>> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >>>> l'exp?diteur.* >>>> * >>>> * >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >>>> >>>> hello guys! >>>> >>>> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, >>>> using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and >>>> that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). >>>> >>>> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's >>>> FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on >>>> newer IP DSLAMs. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: >>>> >>>>> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. >>>>> >>>>> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. >>>>> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. >>>>> >>>>> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device >>>>> to provide the voice, >>>>> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND >>>>> the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) >>>>> >>>>> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to >>>>> see if there are such devices.. >>>>> sorry I dont know of any :( >>>>> >>>>> Jay >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a >>>>>> device that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run >>>>>> across it. So normally, you have >>>>>> >>>>>> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or >>>>>> modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >>>>>> >>>>>> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could >>>>>> be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and >>>>>> others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports >>>>>> for the CPE end. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, >>>>>> you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU >>>>>> tp handle much besides the traffic. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >>>>>> > hello everybody, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects >>>>>> directly >>>>>> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or >>>>>> do we >>>>>> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS >>>>>> gateways? i >>>>>> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > tks, >>>>>> > nandy >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sincerely >>>>> >>>>> Jay >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- -- Brent Paddon Director | Over the Wire Pty Ltd brent.paddon at overthewire.com.au | www.overthewire.com.au Phone: 07 3847 9292 | Fax: 07 3847 9696 | Mobile: 0400 2400 54 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/a28c8619/attachment-0001.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 16:13:04 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:43:04 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No Voice for default IVR ext 5000 Message-ID: Dear all, I have configured an gateway for external profile to receive and make calls. I have added a file in public directory. Now, while I am calling to my voip account, I am transferring the call. It is getting transferred to the extension also. But, If I use normal ext number, I am able to talk both ways. But when I use default ext number 5000 for IVR menu. I could not listen to IVR menu. Though, I can see in my logs that the audio file are being played one by one, but I cant listen. Do I need some extra configuration to listen to IVR? There may be a gap in my knowledge. Please enlighten. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/d44c24af/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 16:13:43 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:43:43 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No Voice for default IVR ext 5000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I am able to listen to Ext 5000 IVR menu, if I call from internal ext. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:43 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Dear all, > > I have configured an gateway for external profile to receive and make > calls. > > I have added a file in public directory. > > > expression="^(MY_IPTEL_USERNAME)$"> > > > > > > > Now, while I am calling to my voip account, I am transferring the call. It > is getting transferred to the extension also. > But, If I use normal ext number, I am able to talk both ways. But when I > use default ext number 5000 for IVR menu. I could not listen to IVR menu. > Though, I can see in my logs that the audio file are being played one by > one, but I cant listen. > > Do I need some extra configuration to listen to IVR? > There may be a gap in my knowledge. Please enlighten. > > Thanks > Ankit > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/97683173/attachment.html From mitch.johnson7 at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 16:52:51 2011 From: mitch.johnson7 at gmail.com (mitch Johnson) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Message Numbers Message-ID: Can we have the messages seperated by their respective message numbers. I subscribe to quite a few lists and the FreeSWITCH list is the only one that doesn't transpose the message number down into the messages. It would make searching for specific messages much easier. Thanks, Mitch -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/030219e9/attachment.html From fs-list at communicatefreely.net Fri Jun 17 17:27:49 2011 From: fs-list at communicatefreely.net (Tim St. Pierre) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DFB5655.5010204@communicatefreely.net> Take a look at Zhone technologies. The MXK is a really nice DSLAM for medium to high densities. They have line cards for ADSL2+, ADSL2+ w/ POTS (exactly what you are after), G.SHDSL, ADSL2+ with splitters, POTS only, and GPON. That pretty much covers everything. The POTS line cards are essentially FXS gateways. The combo cards give you ADSL2+ and a SIP ATA essentially on the same board. This all terminates out to Gigabit Ethernet, so you can connect it up to your IP network and use FreeSwitch to handle the voice side of things. I think they even make a T1 card for that frame. If you want something small, take a look at their Raptor DSLAMs. These are 1U models that are environmentally hardened and can be used in outdoor cabinets. I'm pretty sure they make a model that has 24 ports of ADSL2+ and POTS. Good luck! -Tim Nandy Dagondon wrote: > hello everybody, > > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects > directly to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the > market? or do we still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters > and FXS gateways? i appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. > > tks, > nandy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From steveayre at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 17:35:52 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:35:52 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No Voice for default IVR ext 5000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Is there any NAT involved? Usually lack of audio means that a NAT router or firewall is screwing up the RTP media which is sent in a separate UDP stream. Either it's not being forwarded, or it's being told to go to the wrong place. -Steve On 17 June 2011 13:13, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Dear all, > > I have configured an gateway for external profile to receive and make > calls. > > I have added a file in public directory. > > > expression="^(MY_IPTEL_USERNAME)$"> > > > > > > > Now, while I am calling to my voip account, I am transferring the call. It > is getting transferred to the extension also. > But, If I use normal ext number, I am able to talk both ways. But when I > use default ext number 5000 for IVR menu. I could not listen to IVR menu. > Though, I can see in my logs that the audio file are being played one by > one, but I cant listen. > > Do I need some extra configuration to listen to IVR? > There may be a gap in my knowledge. Please enlighten. > > Thanks > Ankit > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/c4b3bf0b/attachment.html From Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com Fri Jun 17 17:40:52 2011 From: Stefan.Weigel at allianz-warranty.com (Weigel, Stefan) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:40:52 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing In-Reply-To: References: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2B@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C2F@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Message-ID: <5003D7D3E06F514E8C682F18D223265C04D3B36C39@AZWSMS03.azwarranty.int> Hi Steve, list, I did a fresh 'git clone git://git.freeswitch.org/freeswitch.git' and now I can find the line 'switch_channel_event_set_data(channel, event);' in mod_spandsp_fax.c Thanks and best regards Stefan Von: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] Im Auftrag von Steven Ayre Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011 13:02 An: FreeSWITCH Users Help Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing Ok. If they're still missing after you rebuild you could reopen the Jira. -Steve On 16 June 2011 11:25, Weigel, Stefan > wrote: Hi Steve, version shows me only 'git-. I'm pretty sure that it was the snapshot downloaded on the 2nd of May. But I can remember also applied the patches. I checked and the line switch_channel_event_set_data(channel, event); is missing. I will rebuild the module and test again and tell you more. Thanks and best regards Stefan Von: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] Im Auftrag von Steven Ayre Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011 11:47 An: FreeSWITCH Users Help Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_spandsp event spandsp::rxfaxresult variables missing Do you know the version number of the older working release? http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3004 Looks like Flavio's patch wasn't applied entirely on May 3rd - it's missing the "switch_channel_event_set_data(channel, event);" line. Not sure if that's what's causing it, but it seems likely. The event generation hasn't been modified since then. -Steve On 16 June 2011 09:30, Weigel, Stefan > wrote: Hi list, yesterday I had a ODBC related problem. Therefore I used the latest snapshot. Now my scripts are not working properly (I'm doing an ESL connection and listening for spandsp::rxfaxresults events). With an older release (mid of may) I was getting lot's more info's (for example variable_current_application_data), now I'm only getting the information documented on the wiki page: fax-document-transferred-pages fax-document-total-pages fax-image-resolution fax-image-size fax-bad-rows fax-transfer-rate fax-result-code fax-result-text fax-ecm-used fax-local-station-id fax-remote-station-id What changed and how can I get back the needed information ? Thanks and best regards Stefan _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/a4f998f8/attachment-0001.html From linux4michelle at tamay-dogan.net Fri Jun 17 18:57:14 2011 From: linux4michelle at tamay-dogan.net (Michelle Konzack) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:57:14 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20110617145714.GX4017@michelle1> Hello Nandy Dagondon, Am 2011-06-17 14:07:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > hello guys! > > i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, using > FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and that > would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). > > i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's > FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on > newer IP DSLAMs. WHY not give your customers a ADSL/VoIP Gateway where they connect the telephone tothe router? And then they can connect directly to Asterisk. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack -- ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux itsystems at tdnet France itsystems at tdnet Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 (homeoffice) Gewerbe Stra?e 3 50, rue de Soultz 77694 Kehl/Germany 67100 Strasbourg/France Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-176-86004575 office Jabber linux4michelle at jabber.ccc.de ICQ #328449886 Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/9ad506f4/attachment.bin From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 20:07:53 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:37:53 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No Voice for default IVR ext 5000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes, I am under NAT through my Broadband router. But, if NAT is the issue, then is it possible for both sides able to listen each other voices when I am transferring my call to another ext. which is not IVR Could someone please suggest what I can do to work with NAT or under firewall? Secondly, do you know any other reason for this issue if its not NAT? Thanks Ankit On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > Is there any NAT involved? Usually lack of audio means that a NAT router or > firewall is screwing up the RTP media which is sent in a separate UDP > stream. Either it's not being forwarded, or it's being told to go to the > wrong place. > > -Steve > > > On 17 June 2011 13:13, ankIT WALiA wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I have configured an gateway for external profile to receive and make >> calls. >> >> I have added a file in public directory. >> >> >> > expression="^(MY_IPTEL_USERNAME)$"> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Now, while I am calling to my voip account, I am transferring the call. It >> is getting transferred to the extension also. >> But, If I use normal ext number, I am able to talk both ways. But when I >> use default ext number 5000 for IVR menu. I could not listen to IVR menu. >> Though, I can see in my logs that the audio file are being played one by >> one, but I cant listen. >> >> Do I need some extra configuration to listen to IVR? >> There may be a gap in my knowledge. Please enlighten. >> >> Thanks >> Ankit >> -- >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/e9231fe6/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 21:30:42 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: In this case, it turns out you are asking the girl to defy physics for you. The session is executing the script code in the same thread that needs to play the audio. You cannot magically do 2 things at once in the same thread so.... using ASYNC (esl) is your only choice apart from using C and threads or launching the lua script in another thread with luarun with the channel uuid as an arg so it can feed it to the constructor and send commands to it remotely which is a pretty big mess..... On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Sidharth Kshatriya wrote: > Thanks Michael. This is quite a mainstream requirement :-) ! Not everyone > uses ESL. Is there no way we can "hack" this in Lua? > > Will await your research, > > Sidharth > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Michael Collins > wrote: >> >> Actually, I am looking into ways to accomplish these. They are somewhat >> related to some recipes I am doing for the FS Cookbook. Please stand by. >> FYI, I am looking at an ESL-based solution, not a dialplan script. Thus far >> I have not found a viable way to do async stuff like this from a dp script >> and I'm thinking ESL is the way to go. I will report back in a bit. >> -MC >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Sidharth Kshatriya >> wrote: >>> >>> I am implementing an IVR using Lua in Freeswitch. In my Lua script I use >>> curl to a web service. Sometimes the response takes a long time to come >>> back. During that time period I would like to play music on hold. >>> >>> I have searched the freeswitch discussion archives a lot. There seem to >>> be many suggested ways to implement music on hold from a Lua script but the >>> answers are not very clear / not really applicable to my use case. I don't >>> know what method I should use and which one is recommended. >>> >>> Method 1: Transfer the call to 9664 (music on hold extension). However >>> the implementation for this solution for this does not seem to be available >>> in Lua. For example: How would I transfer the call back? >>> Method 2: Using bgapi uuid_park park the call and using uuid_broadcast >>> play an audio file. Again what do I do to unpark the call..? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Sidharth >>> [P.S. This is a repost, I apologize but I never got any responses on my >>> previous email. Need help! :-) ] >>> >>> -- >>> Sidharth Kshatriya >>> www.sidk.info >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Sidharth Kshatriya > www.sidk.info > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From shouldbeq931 at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 21:33:59 2011 From: shouldbeq931 at gmail.com (shouldbe q931) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:33:59 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UK ISDN outgoing CLI (was Re: FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK) In-Reply-To: References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF10C83.6020803@earthspike.net> <4DF1F07A.5000200@earthspike.net> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Mike Raistrick wrote: > I've no direct experience with BT BRA ISDN (plenty with other providers) - > but I don't think that CLIP / COLP will be the issue. > CLIP is an inbound service - and determines whether your equipment is > presented with the number of the person calling you (and if they allow it). > Although COLP is an outbound service, it is used to display the number of > the line that you are connected through to (which might not be the same as > the number you dialled - e.g. 0800 numbers). > Whilst we're on supplementary services, CLIR is also an outbound service and > allows you to specify whether the CLI that you send (or the one that BT > uses) can be shown to the person you call. > Some terminogy: ISDN Basic Rate differentiates Direct Dial In (DDI's) and > Multiple Subscriber Numbers (MSNs) for incoming services. > DDIs are designed for PBXs and are associated with a range of numbers in a > block. The service provider sends you a called party number that can range > either from the last 'X' digits through to the whole number - this is > normally specified when the service is ordered and then all calls are > delivered the same way. > With DDIs - when you send an outgoing call you should be able to send the > extension or the whole number - in either case you should mark the Type Of > Number field accordingly (and if in national format - not include the '0' > for the number itself). In case that you send the extension digits - the > service provider adds this to the DDI 'stem' to get the full number. With > the full number (either derived from the extension, or as you sent it) - the > provider should then check that the number is in the allocated DDI range - > if it is it will allow it through, if not it will usually send the root DDI > number. > MSNs are unique to BRA - they are completely separate telephone numbers and > were originally designed to allow multiple BRA phones to be off the same > ISDN bus and have their own phone numbers. This means that the full number > will always be sent to you, and be expected from you for called and calling > numbers (still with the right Type Of Number set..). > Summary - with either DDI or MSNs - you should be OK to send the whole > number to BT as the calling party - minus the '0' and with TON set to > 'national'. > Finally - if you do have the CLIR supplementary service, make sure that you > set the presentation indicator to 'allowed' - default should normally be to > assume allowed unless set differently - but to be on the safe side. > Mike > > >From my experience with BT, unless you have COLP, you will only send the lead number of the trunk, you only need CLIR if you want to be able to restrict From infos at madovsky.org Fri Jun 17 21:36:40 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua References: Message-ID: <4040DFAD059445368E79FE23CC08474C@e1705> nice metaphore Anth ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Minessale" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:30 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua > In this case, it turns out you are asking the girl to defy physics for > you. > > The session is executing the script code in the same thread that needs > to play the audio. > You cannot magically do 2 things at once in the same thread so.... > using ASYNC (esl) is your only choice apart from using C and threads > or launching the lua script in another thread with luarun with the > channel uuid as an arg so it can feed it to the constructor and send > commands to it remotely which is a pretty big mess..... > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Sidharth Kshatriya > wrote: >> Thanks Michael. This is quite a mainstream requirement :-) ! Not everyone >> uses ESL. Is there no way we can "hack" this in Lua? >> >> Will await your research, >> >> Sidharth >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Michael Collins >> wrote: >>> >>> Actually, I am looking into ways to accomplish these. They are somewhat >>> related to some recipes I am doing for the FS Cookbook. Please stand by. >>> FYI, I am looking at an ESL-based solution, not a dialplan script. Thus >>> far >>> I have not found a viable way to do async stuff like this from a dp >>> script >>> and I'm thinking ESL is the way to go. I will report back in a bit. >>> -MC >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Sidharth Kshatriya >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am implementing an IVR using Lua in Freeswitch. In my Lua script I >>>> use >>>> curl to a web service. Sometimes the response takes a long time to come >>>> back. During that time period I would like to play music on hold. >>>> >>>> I have searched the freeswitch discussion archives a lot. There seem to >>>> be many suggested ways to implement music on hold from a Lua script but >>>> the >>>> answers are not very clear / not really applicable to my use case. I >>>> don't >>>> know what method I should use and which one is recommended. >>>> >>>> Method 1: Transfer the call to 9664 (music on hold extension). However >>>> the implementation for this solution for this does not seem to be >>>> available >>>> in Lua. For example: How would I transfer the call back? >>>> Method 2: Using bgapi uuid_park park the call and using uuid_broadcast >>>> play an audio file. Again what do I do to unpark the call..? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Sidharth >>>> [P.S. This is a repost, I apologize but I never got any responses on my >>>> previous email. Need help! :-) ] >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sidharth Kshatriya >>>> www.sidk.info >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sidharth Kshatriya >> www.sidk.info >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 21:44:04 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:44:04 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Want to play music on hold while executing a time consuming operation in Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Tony, Thanks for the explanation. This was indeed my concern with trying to do it from a dp script. Sid, I'm afraid you'll need to use ESL or find a girl who is not bound by the laws of physics... :) -MC On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > In this case, it turns out you are asking the girl to defy physics for you. > > The session is executing the script code in the same thread that needs > to play the audio. > You cannot magically do 2 things at once in the same thread so.... > using ASYNC (esl) is your only choice apart from using C and threads > or launching the lua script in another thread with luarun with the > channel uuid as an arg so it can feed it to the constructor and send > commands to it remotely which is a pretty big mess..... > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Sidharth Kshatriya > wrote: > > Thanks Michael. This is quite a mainstream requirement :-) ! Not everyone > > uses ESL. Is there no way we can "hack" this in Lua? > > > > Will await your research, > > > > Sidharth > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Michael Collins > > wrote: > >> > >> Actually, I am looking into ways to accomplish these. They are somewhat > >> related to some recipes I am doing for the FS Cookbook. Please stand by. > >> FYI, I am looking at an ESL-based solution, not a dialplan script. Thus > far > >> I have not found a viable way to do async stuff like this from a dp > script > >> and I'm thinking ESL is the way to go. I will report back in a bit. > >> -MC > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Sidharth Kshatriya > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> I am implementing an IVR using Lua in Freeswitch. In my Lua script I > use > >>> curl to a web service. Sometimes the response takes a long time to come > >>> back. During that time period I would like to play music on hold. > >>> > >>> I have searched the freeswitch discussion archives a lot. There seem to > >>> be many suggested ways to implement music on hold from a Lua script but > the > >>> answers are not very clear / not really applicable to my use case. I > don't > >>> know what method I should use and which one is recommended. > >>> > >>> Method 1: Transfer the call to 9664 (music on hold extension). However > >>> the implementation for this solution for this does not seem to be > available > >>> in Lua. For example: How would I transfer the call back? > >>> Method 2: Using bgapi uuid_park park the call and using uuid_broadcast > >>> play an audio file. Again what do I do to unpark the call..? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Sidharth > >>> [P.S. This is a repost, I apologize but I never got any responses on my > >>> previous email. Need help! :-) ] > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sidharth Kshatriya > >>> www.sidk.info > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Sidharth Kshatriya > > www.sidk.info > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/33503f13/attachment.html From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 21:46:06 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:46:06 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <20110617145714.GX4017@michelle1> References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <20110617145714.GX4017@michelle1> Message-ID: Actually, most of his customers are still in the dark ages... That's the problem here ;) On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Nandy Dagondon, > > Am 2011-06-17 14:07:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: >> hello guys! >> >> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, using >> FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and that >> would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). >> >> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's >> FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. ?i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on >> newer IP DSLAMs. > > WHY not give your customers a ADSL/VoIP Gateway where they ?connect ?the > telephone tothe router? ?And then they can connect directly to Asterisk. > > Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening > ? ?Michelle Konzack > > -- > ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### > ? Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux > > itsystems at tdnet France ? ? ? ? ? ?itsystems at tdnet > Owner Michelle Konzack ? ? ? ? ? ?Owner Michelle Konzack > > Apt. 917 (homeoffice) ? ? ? ? ? ? Gewerbe Stra?e 3 > 50, rue de Soultz ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 77694 Kehl/Germany > 67100 Strasbourg/France ? ? ? ? ? Tel: +49-177-9351947 ?mobil > Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil ? ? ? ? Tel: +49-176-86004575 office > > ? > ? ? ? ? > > Jabber linux4michelle at jabber.ccc.de > ICQ ? ?#328449886 > > Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From freeswitch at earthspike.net Fri Jun 17 22:08:49 2011 From: freeswitch at earthspike.net (John) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:08:49 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UK ISDN outgoing CLI (was Re: FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK) In-Reply-To: References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF10C83.6020803@earthspike.net> <4DF1F07A.5000200@earthspike.net> Message-ID: <4DFB9831.4040709@earthspike.net> Mike, Shouldbe, We now have CLIP on the line for sure, and I ordered COLP at the same time and am assured that that has been turned on as well, but I still cannot get outgoing CLI to work properly. Mike, you mention setting the TON to 'national'; where is that setting? At the moment, my dialplan looks like http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16548 with . An outgoing call gives the log 7 at http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16549 (numbers have been changed to protect the innocent!) but the number that 01234 567890 sees on their Caller ID is not 876543 but the main number of the line (876540, say). I have tried setting the outgoing_caller_id_number to 6, 10 and 11 digits, restarting FS after each change, but with no success. The service provider has only one clue to offer: "With regards to the configuration at the exchange, the line is set to 6 digits to switch." which makes eminent sense, and suggests that I should be presenting 6 digits. Incoming calls have a 6 digit called number and 10 digit calling number. Thanks for the help so far. Any other ideas? John On 17/06/11 18:33, shouldbe q931 wrote: > From my experience with BT, unless you have COLP, you will only send the lead number of the trunk, you only need CLIR if you want to be able to restrict > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Mike Raistrick > wrote: >> I've no direct experience with BT BRA ISDN (plenty with other providers) - >> but I don't think that CLIP / COLP will be the issue. >> CLIP is an inbound service - and determines whether your equipment is >> presented with the number of the person calling you (and if they allow it). >> Although COLP is an outbound service, it is used to display the number of >> the line that you are connected through to (which might not be the same as >> the number you dialled - e.g. 0800 numbers). >> Whilst we're on supplementary services, CLIR is also an outbound service and >> allows you to specify whether the CLI that you send (or the one that BT >> uses) can be shown to the person you call. >> Some terminogy: ISDN Basic Rate differentiates Direct Dial In (DDI's) and >> Multiple Subscriber Numbers (MSNs) for incoming services. >> DDIs are designed for PBXs and are associated with a range of numbers in a >> block. The service provider sends you a called party number that can range >> either from the last 'X' digits through to the whole number - this is >> normally specified when the service is ordered and then all calls are >> delivered the same way. >> With DDIs - when you send an outgoing call you should be able to send the >> extension or the whole number - in either case you should mark the Type Of >> Number field accordingly (and if in national format - not include the '0' >> for the number itself). In case that you send the extension digits - the >> service provider adds this to the DDI 'stem' to get the full number. With >> the full number (either derived from the extension, or as you sent it) - the >> provider should then check that the number is in the allocated DDI range - >> if it is it will allow it through, if not it will usually send the root DDI >> number. >> MSNs are unique to BRA - they are completely separate telephone numbers and >> were originally designed to allow multiple BRA phones to be off the same >> ISDN bus and have their own phone numbers. This means that the full number >> will always be sent to you, and be expected from you for called and calling >> numbers (still with the right Type Of Number set..). >> Summary - with either DDI or MSNs - you should be OK to send the whole >> number to BT as the calling party - minus the '0' and with TON set to >> 'national'. >> Finally - if you do have the CLIR supplementary service, make sure that you >> set the presentation indicator to 'allowed' - default should normally be to >> assume allowed unless set differently - but to be on the safe side. >> Mike >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/d7da3e09/attachment-0001.html From freeswitch at peely.com Fri Jun 17 22:12:23 2011 From: freeswitch at peely.com (peely) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can't make mod_rtmp Message-ID: <1308334343913-6488229.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi, I'm having trouble building FreeSWITCH with the latest mod_rtmp goodness. On Ubuntu X64 compiling with gcc I get: cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_rtmp/mod_rtmp.c: In function ?rtmp_function?: /usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_rtmp/mod_rtmp.c:1612:114: error: comparison between ?switch_call_cause_t? and ?enum ? I'm not sure if I need to do anything else, I just naively added endpoints/mod_rtmp to modules.conf and did a make clean install? Thanks, Neil. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Can-t-make-mod-rtmp-tp6488229p6488229.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From shouldbeq931 at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 22:12:34 2011 From: shouldbeq931 at gmail.com (shouldbe q931) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:12:34 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Nandy Dagondon wrote: > huh ... that's quiet pricey. perhaps an IP DSLAM + FXS would be a cheaper > setup. in rural areas, many are still dinosaurs. > > Not a clue about price, but Zyxel and Draytek make some "small" DSLAM/MSAN units, Draytek also make some DSL routers with integrated FXS ports, note sure if they would interop with Freswitch... From shouldbeq931 at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 22:43:35 2011 From: shouldbeq931 at gmail.com (shouldbe q931) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:43:35 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UK ISDN outgoing CLI (was Re: FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK) In-Reply-To: <4DFB9831.4040709@earthspike.net> References: <4DED4854.6010203@earthspike.net> <4DF10C83.6020803@earthspike.net> <4DF1F07A.5000200@earthspike.net> <4DFB9831.4040709@earthspike.net> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:08 PM, John wrote: > Mike, Shouldbe, > > We now have CLIP on the line for sure, and I ordered COLP at the same time > and am assured that that has been turned on as well, but I still cannot get > outgoing CLI to work properly.? Mike, you mention setting the TON to > 'national'; where is that setting? > > At the moment, my dialplan looks like http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16548 > with .? An outgoing call gives the log 7 at > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16549 (numbers have been changed to protect > the innocent!) but the number that 01234 567890 sees on their Caller ID is > not 876543 but the main number of the line (876540, say).? I have tried > setting the outgoing_caller_id_number to 6, 10 and 11 digits, restarting FS > after each change, but with no success. > > The service provider has only one clue to offer: "With regards to the > configuration at the exchange, the line is set to 6 digits to switch." which > makes eminent sense, and suggests that I should be presenting 6 digits. > Incoming calls have a 6 digit called number and 10 digit calling number. > > Thanks for the help so far.? Any other ideas? > > John > > I don't have any experience with FS connecting over ISDN so can't help you much further on the FS configuration:-( However on the lines, I would be very tempted to see if you can borrow a BRI tester, or what I've frequently used in the past is an Eicon/Dialogic card as the test functions (under windows) are nearly as good, that might help you see if it _is_ a BT problem, or a FS configuration issue. It would need a 2k/XP machine, but something like http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/EICON-DIVA-2-01-PCI-GRAPHICS-CARD-/270761571564 is what I have used in the past. I think I might have one of the PCMCIA ones somewhere, but I'd need to test it still works I'm fairly sure that the "6 digits to switch" is what they are sending to you, not what they are expecting from you. I can't access out remaining BRI (Avaya) PBX from here, but on our PRI (again Avaya) switches, we are sending 10 digits. Cheers From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 23:05:55 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:05:55 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No Voice for default IVR ext 5000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I would get a pcap of both the signaling and the RTP and analyze w/ wireshark. Find out if the RTP is actually leaving FreeSWITCH or not. Of course, you might start with a console debug log and siptrace on pastebin.freeswitch.org so that we can have a looksee at what is happening on the call. -MC On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Yes, I am under NAT through my Broadband router. > > But, if NAT is the issue, then is it possible for both sides able to listen > each other voices when I am transferring my call to another ext. which is > not IVR > > Could someone please suggest what I can do to work with NAT or under > firewall? > > Secondly, do you know any other reason for this issue if its not NAT? > > Thanks > Ankit > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > >> Is there any NAT involved? Usually lack of audio means that a NAT router >> or firewall is screwing up the RTP media which is sent in a separate UDP >> stream. Either it's not being forwarded, or it's being told to go to the >> wrong place. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 17 June 2011 13:13, ankIT WALiA wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I have configured an gateway for external profile to receive and make >>> calls. >>> >>> I have added a file in public directory. >>> >>> >>> >> expression="^(MY_IPTEL_USERNAME)$"> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Now, while I am calling to my voip account, I am transferring the call. >>> It is getting transferred to the extension also. >>> But, If I use normal ext number, I am able to talk both ways. But when I >>> use default ext number 5000 for IVR menu. I could not listen to IVR menu. >>> Though, I can see in my logs that the audio file are being played one by >>> one, but I cant listen. >>> >>> Do I need some extra configuration to listen to IVR? >>> There may be a gap in my knowledge. Please enlighten. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Ankit >>> -- >>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/0e677deb/attachment.html From abdmeziane at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 22:34:55 2011 From: abdmeziane at gmail.com (abderrahmane abdmeziane) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:34:55 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Registration problem with default extension Message-ID: hey,after installing freeswitch from deb package,and using default extension 1000 with default password 1234 in xlite softphone,i can't call another extension just don't ring but in xlite screen i get my user name with my number;a check the output of F9 from fs_cli command,but there is no register extension: ############################################## freeswitch at internal> sofia status profile internal ================================================================================================= Name internal Domain Name N/A Auto-NAT true DBName sofia_reg_internal Pres Hosts 192.168.2.2,192.168.2.2 Dialplan XML Context public Challenge Realm auto_from RTP-IP 192.168.2.2 Ext-RTP-IP 41.104.52.52 SIP-IP 192.168.2.2 Ext-SIP-IP 41.104.52.52 URL sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.2:5060 BIND-URL sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.2:5060 HOLD-MUSIC local_stream://moh OUTBOUND-PROXY N/A CODECS IN G7221 at 32000h,G7221 at 16000h,G722,PCMU,PCMA,GSM CODECS OUT G7221 at 32000h,G7221 at 16000h,G722,PCMU,PCMA,GSM TEL-EVENT 101 DTMF-MODE rfc2833 CNG 13 SESSION-TO 0 MAX-DIALOG 0 NOMEDIA false LATE-NEG false PROXY-MEDIA false AGGRESSIVENAT false STUN-ENABLED true STUN-AUTO-DISABLE false CALLS-IN 0 FAILED-CALLS-IN 0 CALLS-OUT 0 FAILED-CALLS-OUT 0 Registrations: ================================================================================================= Total items returned: 0 ================================================================================================= freeswitch at internal> ################################# any help please? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/d0f433b8/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 23:20:25 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Barracuda Networks Donates mod_rtmp for FreeSWITCH (Flash Audio Endpoint) Message-ID: check it out http://slashdot.org/submission/1657690/Barracuda-Networks-Connects-FLASH-To-SIP-for-FREE mark it worthy and rate it http://digg.com/news/entertainment/barracuda_networks_connects_flash_to_sip_for_free_2 digg it -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 17 23:34:19 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:34:19 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Generating ringback if 180 arrives after 183 In-Reply-To: <1f3159c1-33ac-42f1-8277-fcb0b79829c7@mx.voismart.com> References: <1f3159c1-33ac-42f1-8277-fcb0b79829c7@mx.voismart.com> Message-ID: Any chance you can find the person who designed their SIP stack and hit him with a ClueBat? -MC On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Matteo wrote: > Hi all, > > I've the following scenario from my upstream provider : > > FS calls provider > Provider sends easrly media with 183 announcing that the call is going to > be trasferred > Provider sends 180 without sdp > > In my dialplan I'm using ringback variable to let FS generate ringback > to internal network, and if I receive 180 without 183 is working ok. > > What I'm trying to achieve is to let ringback work even if we've already > received > the 183 with sdp. > > I've tryed a lot of dialplan magic without luck. > Maybe we need to add this support into FS itself ? > > What I see seems that we need to break the bridge or at least > "inject" the tone stream into the internal leg of the call. > > To be fair, the exact sequence is: > > FS calls provider > provider sends 183/sdp annoucing the call trasnfer > provider sends update which stops the media (media=inactive) > provider sends 180 ringing (we must generate here) > > maybe the correct way is to handle the update, put fs back > into ringing state and proceed from there? > Is feasible or we can get the same result with some dialplan magic? > > any hint is appreciated :) > > regards, > matteo > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/79014a93/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Sat Jun 18 00:05:45 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can't make mod_rtmp In-Reply-To: <1308334343913-6488229.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1308334343913-6488229.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: update and try again On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:12 PM, peely wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having trouble building FreeSWITCH with the latest mod_rtmp goodness. On > Ubuntu X64 compiling with gcc I get: > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_rtmp/mod_rtmp.c: In function > ?rtmp_function?: > /usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_rtmp/mod_rtmp.c:1612:114: error: > comparison between ?switch_call_cause_t? and ?enum ? > > > I'm not sure if I need to do anything else, I just naively added > endpoints/mod_rtmp to modules.conf and did a make clean install? > > > Thanks, > > > > Neil. > > -- > View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Can-t-make-mod-rtmp-tp6488229p6488229.html > Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Sat Jun 18 00:16:06 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:16:06 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> Draytek gear is crap like hell. Stay away from that. The support is crap too. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 17/06/2011 ? 20:12, shouldbe q931 a ?crit : > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Nandy Dagondon wrote: >> huh ... that's quiet pricey. perhaps an IP DSLAM + FXS would be a cheaper >> setup. in rural areas, many are still dinosaurs. >> >> > Not a clue about price, but Zyxel and Draytek make some "small" > DSLAM/MSAN units, Draytek also make some DSL routers with integrated > FXS ports, note sure if they would interop with Freswitch... > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/b2460e00/attachment.html From grsingh750 at gmail.com Sat Jun 18 00:28:44 2011 From: grsingh750 at gmail.com (guru singh) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:58:44 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No Voice for default IVR ext 5000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Ankit, You could also see if there are SIP ALG settings on the router. If by broadband router you mean the DSL modem that providers give, then you're in a sticky situation. From my experience they are very unreliable, something that works would break without any apparent reason or even worse at times things would only work intermittently. So you just end up racking your brains trying to reproduce and diagnose, what I'd call "a false problem". Replacing that would reduce some of your troubles. Regards, guru On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > I would get a pcap of both the signaling and the RTP and analyze w/ > wireshark. Find out if the RTP is actually leaving FreeSWITCH or not. Of > course, you might start with a console debug log and siptrace on > pastebin.freeswitch.org so that we can have a looksee at what is happening > on the call. > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: >> >> Yes, I am under NAT through my Broadband router. >> But, if NAT is the issue, then is it possible for?both sides able to >> listen each other voices?when I am?transferring?my call to another ext. >> which is not IVR >> Could someone please suggest what I can do to work with NAT or under >> firewall? >> Secondly, do you know any other reason for this issue if its not NAT? >> Thanks >> Ankit >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: >>> >>> Is there any NAT involved? Usually lack of audio means that a NAT router >>> or firewall is screwing up the RTP media which is sent in a separate UDP >>> stream. Either it's not being forwarded, or it's being told to go to the >>> wrong place. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> On 17 June 2011 13:13, ankIT WALiA wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> I have configured an gateway for external profile to receive and make >>>> calls. >>>> I have added a file in public directory. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> expression="^(MY_IPTEL_USERNAME)$"> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Now, while I am calling to my voip account, I am?transferring?the call. >>>> It is getting transferred to the extension also. >>>> But, If I use normal ext number, I am able to talk both ways. But when I >>>> use default ext number 5000 for IVR menu. I could not listen to IVR menu. >>>> Though, I can see in my logs that the audio file are being played one by >>>> one, but I cant listen. >>>> Do I need some extra configuration to listen to IVR? >>>> There may be a gap in my knowledge. Please enlighten. >>>> Thanks >>>> Ankit >>>> -- >>>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From mbrancaleoni at voismart.it Sat Jun 18 00:43:23 2011 From: mbrancaleoni at voismart.it (Matteo) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:43:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Generating ringback if 180 arrives after 183 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <7d1e7eba-6248-44e5-bfee-3723369e1784@mx.voismart.com> Hi, ----- Messaggio originale ----- > > Any chance you can find the person who designed their SIP stack and > hit him with a ClueBat? why? I think that can be correct, even on sip implementors someone expresses that if we receive 180 after 183 local ringing must be generated. And this is "more right" if before the 180 an update which tells us to stop the media is sent, like in this case. or I'm missing something? mat From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 18 00:42:33 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:42:33 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Registration problem with default extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Most likely there is a setting wrong in the x-lite config. If you watch the freeswitch console you will see any registration attempts. If you want to see what's REALLY happening then enable SIP trace: sofia profile internal siptrace on Then watch to see what traffic passes between x-lite and freeswitch. Look for messages like "403 Forbidden" which means the password is wrong. If you see no registration attempts from the phone then that means there's some network issue or the IP address is not set correctly in the x-lite config. -MC On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:34 AM, abderrahmane abdmeziane < abdmeziane at gmail.com> wrote: > hey,after installing freeswitch from deb package,and using default > extension 1000 with default password 1234 in xlite softphone,i can't call > another extension just don't ring but in xlite screen i get my user name > with my number;a check the output of F9 from fs_cli command,but there is no > register extension: > ############################################## > freeswitch at internal> sofia status profile internal > > > ================================================================================================= > Name internal > Domain Name N/A > Auto-NAT true > DBName sofia_reg_internal > Pres Hosts 192.168.2.2,192.168.2.2 > Dialplan XML > Context public > Challenge Realm auto_from > RTP-IP 192.168.2.2 > Ext-RTP-IP 41.104.52.52 > SIP-IP 192.168.2.2 > Ext-SIP-IP 41.104.52.52 > URL sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.2:5060 > BIND-URL sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.2.2:5060 > HOLD-MUSIC local_stream://moh > OUTBOUND-PROXY N/A > CODECS IN G7221 at 32000h,G7221 at 16000h,G722,PCMU,PCMA,GSM > CODECS OUT G7221 at 32000h,G7221 at 16000h,G722,PCMU,PCMA,GSM > TEL-EVENT 101 > DTMF-MODE rfc2833 > CNG 13 > SESSION-TO 0 > MAX-DIALOG 0 > NOMEDIA false > LATE-NEG false > PROXY-MEDIA false > AGGRESSIVENAT false > STUN-ENABLED true > STUN-AUTO-DISABLE false > CALLS-IN 0 > FAILED-CALLS-IN 0 > CALLS-OUT 0 > FAILED-CALLS-OUT 0 > > Registrations: > > ================================================================================================= > Total items returned: 0 > > ================================================================================================= > > freeswitch at internal> > ################################# > any help please? > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/dd715887/attachment.html From gcd at i.ph Sat Jun 18 01:54:23 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 05:54:23 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <20110617145714.GX4017@michelle1> References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <20110617145714.GX4017@michelle1> Message-ID: actually this is what we need if the subscriber needs Internet connection. any suggested brand/model of ADSL/VoIP gateway? that would be great. but i'll stick to FreeSwitch not Asterisk. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Michelle Konzack < linux4michelle at tamay-dogan.net> wrote: > Hello Nandy Dagondon, > > Am 2011-06-17 14:07:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > > hello guys! > > > > i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, > using > > FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and that > > would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). > > > > i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's > > FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on > > newer IP DSLAMs. > > WHY not give your customers a ADSL/VoIP Gateway where they connect the > telephone tothe router? And then they can connect directly to Asterisk. > > Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening > Michelle Konzack > > -- > ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### > Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux > > itsystems at tdnet France itsystems at tdnet > Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack > > Apt. 917 (homeoffice) Gewerbe Stra?e 3 > 50, rue de Soultz 77694 Kehl/Germany > 67100 Strasbourg/France Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil > Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-176-86004575 office > > > > > Jabber linux4michelle at jabber.ccc.de > ICQ #328449886 > > Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110618/f095fde9/attachment.html From linux4michelle at tamay-dogan.net Sat Jun 18 02:49:13 2011 From: linux4michelle at tamay-dogan.net (Michelle Konzack) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:49:13 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <20110617145714.GX4017@michelle1> Message-ID: <20110617224913.GC4017@michelle1> Hello Nandy Dagondon, Am 2011-06-18 05:54:23, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > actually this is what we need if the subscriber needs Internet connection. > any suggested brand/model of ADSL/VoIP gateway? that would be great. but > i'll stick to FreeSwitch not Asterisk. There are MANY DSL/VoIP Router. We in Germany use mainly AVM but I have also products from Matrix (India) and some chinese manufacturers. Price is in the range between 40 and 300 US$ depending on the requested features. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack -- ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux itsystems at tdnet France itsystems at tdnet Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 (homeoffice) Gewerbe Stra?e 3 50, rue de Soultz 77694 Kehl/Germany 67100 Strasbourg/France Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-176-86004575 office Jabber linux4michelle at jabber.ccc.de ICQ #328449886 Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110618/2aa4c3ae/attachment.bin From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 18 03:07:17 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:07:17 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Generating ringback if 180 arrives after 183 In-Reply-To: <7d1e7eba-6248-44e5-bfee-3723369e1784@mx.voismart.com> References: <7d1e7eba-6248-44e5-bfee-3723369e1784@mx.voismart.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Matteo wrote: > Hi, > > ----- Messaggio originale ----- > > > > Any chance you can find the person who designed their SIP stack and > > hit him with a ClueBat? > > why? I think that can be correct, even on sip implementors someone > expresses > that if we receive 180 after 183 local ringing must be generated. > And this is "more right" if before the 180 an update which tells us > to stop the media is sent, like in this case. > > or I'm missing something? > I was just being glib. The simple fact of the matter is that if they are going to send a 183/sdp and then a 180 w/o sdp then you're simply going to have to figure out how to dance around it, or you're going to need to ignore that early media and just provide your own ringback to the calling party. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/d39cba1f/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 18 04:11:07 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:11:07 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Help With ClueCon 2011 Message-ID: Hey gang! I am looking to get a few notable names to ClueCon this year and am looking for businesses who are willing to sponsor by purchasing plane tickets or hotel rooms. If your business is in a position to assist then please contact me off list and I will give you the details. Also, if you haven't already signed up for ClueCon then maybe you'd like to call in via our new RTMP phone ! Brian would love to hear from you. :) Thanks, Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/1477ab2a/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 18 07:14:33 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:14:33 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List Message-ID: Hello all! Some have inquired recently about what's needed to complete the FS cookbook. I've uploaded the most recent list of recipes that we have identified. Some are already written but many are yet to be done. Check out this page: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Cookbook#Information_for_prospective_authors Contact me if you have any questions about helping with any of these recipes. Thanks, Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/0164a0e5/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 18 08:01:11 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:01:11 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] using keypress to stop a recording. In-Reply-To: <4DFA7B2D.5040005@499x.com> References: <4DFA517C.6010109@499x.com> <4DFA75C1.3050008@499x.com> <4DFA7B2D.5040005@499x.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Wes wrote: > ** > ok, tried that, but it didn't change the behavior In fact, I removed both > the onInput function, and the call to session:setVariable, and the recording > is still halted by *any* keypress on the keypad. So this must be the > default behavior of how to stop the recording... > > Can anyone confirm this? > > I can. It does indeed always stop the recording. Not sure why. However, there is a simple workaround. Instead of using setInputCallback just do this: session:setVariable('playback_terminators','#'); session:execute('record','/tmp/foo.wav'); You would, though, need to setInputCallback while you are playing the followup message to the caller. BTW, if you have the FS book I did an example of this, in Lua, where the caller records something then he can listen, accept, or re-record. Check out chapter 7. FYI, download the code samples because there's a bug in the text. (Missing the session:ready() check on one or more while loops, IIRC.) -MC > Thanks. > > > > On 6/16/2011 4:32 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > It's just a channel variable. Set it prior to calling the Lua script or use > session:setVariable("playback_terminators","#") > > -MC > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Wes wrote: > >> I'm writing a lua script, that link you mention doesn't seem like >> something I can do in LUA... >> >> the problem is in this function: >> >> >> function onInput(s, type, obj) >> if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then >> return "break"; >> end >> end >> >> which seems to break on any keypress, so the check for # doesn't work as >> expected. >> >> is there a different way to do this with a lua script? Ideally, I'd like >> to do more than just break, I'd like the user to be able to review the >> message more than once, and then finally hit another key to submit it for >> real. Like a voicemail system, actually. >> >> >> On 6/16/2011 3:55 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >> How about setting this only to #? >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#playback_terminators >> >> -MC >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Wes wrote: >> >>> I'm using the following script to record, and I"m hoping to take a user >>> keypress to trigger the end of the recording and then play it back: >>> >>> (the problem is that it stops on ANY keypress, while it seems like it >>> should only break on a "#" keypress) >>> >>> I found this example at: >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_lua#session:recordFile >>> >>> local numberToCall = 1234 >>> local session = >>> freeswitch.Session("sofia/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/"..numberToCall); >>> session:set_tts_parms("flite", "kal"); >>> session:speak("Thank you for using my recording service, press the pound >>> key to stop the recording." ); >>> >>> function onInput(s, type, obj) >>> if (type == "dtmf" and obj['digit'] == '#') then >>> return "break"; >>> end >>> end >>> >>> session:setInputCallback("onInput", ""); >>> session:recordFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); >>> freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "recording stopped by user keypress \n"); >>> session:speak("your voicehas been recorded, i will play it for you now"); >>> session:streamFile("/tmp/luatest.wav"); >>> session:speak("that's it, goodbye."); >>> freeswitch.consoleLog("info", "hanging up... \n"); >>> session:hangup(); >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110617/1723692f/attachment.html From yehavi.bourvine at gmail.com Sat Jun 18 09:22:39 2011 From: yehavi.bourvine at gmail.com (Yehavi Bourvine) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:22:39 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Need: Fax Examples In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Mike, We can aid with receiving faxes (although our working example is quite similar to the one on the WIKI) and T.38 configs. In about a month we'll be able to provide also email2fax examples (did not start working on it yet). Regards, __Yehavi: 2011/6/12 Michael Collins > Hey all, > > I am working on the FSCB and I could use some of your real-world fax > examples. I'm looking for anything like these: > > Inbound fax to email/PDF > Outbound fax examples (scripts, etc. - whatever you do to make it easier > for your users to send faxes thru FS) > T.38 config examples and reports on symptoms/issues you had to overcome to > make it work > > I will gladly accept any information you have, even if it's just raw dumps > of scripts, XML configs, etc. Shoot them to me off-list. > > Thanks! > -MC > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110618/2f3680c5/attachment.html From mbrancaleoni at voismart.it Sat Jun 18 11:50:03 2011 From: mbrancaleoni at voismart.it (Matteo) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:50:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Generating ringback if 180 arrives after 183 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <0503e1d1-37d5-4087-b198-880cf316702e@mx.voismart.com> > ----- Messaggio originale ----- > I was just being glib. The simple fact of the matter is that if they > are going to send a 183/sdp and then a 180 w/o sdp then you're > simply going to have to figure out how to dance around it, or you're > going to need to ignore that early media and just provide your own > ringback to the calling party. Unfortunately I cannot ignore early media since contains the announcement about the call being transferred. But I can use the trigger on the update method which stops the media to do something. the question is, there's some point into the code to look at in order to understand how to stop the audio bridge without killing the channels in order to start the ringback. I may try coding something... just need some pointers :) regards, mat From freeswitch at peely.com Sat Jun 18 13:22:39 2011 From: freeswitch at peely.com (peely) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 02:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can't make mod_rtmp In-Reply-To: References: <1308334343913-6488229.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1308388959641-6490318.post@n2.nabble.com> That worked, thanks! -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Can-t-make-mod-rtmp-tp6488229p6490318.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From sascha.daniels at amooma.de Sat Jun 18 16:14:50 2011 From: sascha.daniels at amooma.de (Sascha Daniels) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:14:50 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Hooks for own call logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DFC96BA.1080306@amooma.de> Hi. Am 17.06.2011 03:43, schrieb Michael Collins: > It depends on what you mean by "canceled" - can you pastebin a call > log of a canceled call and give us an idea what should be happening? > I would like to make an http call to my application after the originator canceled the call. Here ist the cli output. http://pastebin.com/fCadQTMQ Somewhere after line 96 the script (or what ever) should be called. Thanks a lot. Regards Sascha -- AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 124 - 56566 Neuwied --> http://www.amooma.de Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister Montabaur B14998 B?cher: http://das-asterisk-buch.de - http://ruby-auf-schienen.de From shouldbeq931 at gmail.com Sat Jun 18 19:27:22 2011 From: shouldbeq931 at gmail.com (shouldbe q931) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:27:22 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:16 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > Draytek gear is crap like hell. > Stay away from that. > The support is crap too. > David Ponzone ?Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 > Service Client?IPeva > tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il > a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce > message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > granted I have no experience with their "telco" side equipment, but I've not had any problems with their DSL and Ethernet routers, I've used them for several commercial deployments where the client didn't want the expense of Cisco... the other side of the coin being that I've not needed much in the way of support, but when I have it's been from their main UK reseller which has been fine. From tculjaga at gmail.com Sat Jun 18 20:00:49 2011 From: tculjaga at gmail.com (Tihomir Culjaga) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:00:49 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: well, my guess is that he wants a SIP based MSAN with additional FXS ports on ADSL/VDSL CPEs. something like this: ---voice---- FS -----SIP---- MSAN ---DSL line---SPL -----low band---------POTS line (FXS) | | ---data-----------------------+ +-------high band--------ADSL/VDSL2 Modem W FXS ports (SIP) anyhow, here everything registers to a FS (MSAN POTS line, FXS ports on the ADSL modem). FS is in charge to do voice routing, while the data traffic goes via VLANs to a data network in order to achieve service separation and an decent level of QoS. Port density is not an issue here as small density is mainly used for shopping centers, not residential. anyhow, i've been working with Huawei MSANs, ZTE MSANs, Zyxel, Siemens. All of them support H.248 by default... even the micro ones (16 ports from Zyxel). For the SIP protocol you need to ask a different firmware but its feasible... they do have it. in terms of density: Huawei UA5000 - 660 ports (combo xDSL + POTS), it spoortst ISDN BRI/PRI , G.SHDSL ... all sort of things but we are using it for ADSL/VDSL + POTS Huawei MA500 - 48 ports (same as above) ZTE ZXDSL 9806H - 64 ports (best buy) ... supports AC or DC power supply in the same time. Zyxel - 48 ports ( don't try this at home :P ) Siemens - 48 ( T.30 fax not working well) T. On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:27 PM, shouldbe q931 wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:16 PM, David Ponzone > wrote: > > Draytek gear is crap like hell. > > Stay away from that. > > The support is crap too. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion > > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > > d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message > s'il > > a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce > > message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > granted I have no experience with their "telco" side equipment, but > I've not had any problems with their DSL and Ethernet routers, I've > used them for several commercial deployments where the client didn't > want the expense of Cisco... > > the other side of the coin being that I've not needed much in the way > of support, but when I have it's been from their main UK reseller > which has been fine. > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110618/a0e68e8c/attachment.html From tculjaga at gmail.com Sat Jun 18 20:09:01 2011 From: tculjaga at gmail.com (Tihomir Culjaga) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:09:01 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: As for ADSL/VDSL CPE with FXS ports ... as someone said ... $40 - $300 depending of what is your setup. Whether you need VLAN tagging on the LAN side, multiple PVCs, VLAN rewriting, IGMP, multiple bridges .. etc All sort of additional features brings you 1 step towards that $300 mark :=) my advice to you is to make it simple ... don't complicate things, don't ask too much from vendor... Initially you need to present him/them with your network topology and the services you need to run on that CPE. They will come back to you with the information whether they can or cannot do it ... once they accept it ... make them work on the setup... just provide them the lines. good luck. T. On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Tihomir Culjaga wrote: > well, my guess is that he wants a SIP based MSAN with additional FXS ports > on ADSL/VDSL CPEs. > > something like this: > > ---voice---- FS -----SIP---- MSAN ---DSL line---SPL -----low > band---------POTS line (FXS) > | | > ---data-----------------------+ +-------high > band--------ADSL/VDSL2 Modem W FXS ports (SIP) > > > anyhow, here everything registers to a FS (MSAN POTS line, FXS ports on the > ADSL modem). FS is in charge to do voice routing, while the data traffic > goes via VLANs to a data network in order to achieve service separation and > an decent level of QoS. > Port density is not an issue here as small density is mainly used for > shopping centers, not residential. > > > anyhow, i've been working with Huawei MSANs, ZTE MSANs, Zyxel, Siemens. All > of them support H.248 by default... even the micro ones (16 ports from > Zyxel). For the SIP protocol you need to ask a different firmware but its > feasible... they do have it. > > in terms of density: > > Huawei UA5000 - 660 ports (combo xDSL + POTS), it spoortst ISDN BRI/PRI , > G.SHDSL ... all sort of things but we are using it for ADSL/VDSL + POTS > Huawei MA500 - 48 ports (same as above) > ZTE ZXDSL 9806H - 64 ports (best buy) ... supports AC or DC power supply in > the same time. > Zyxel - 48 ports ( don't try this at home :P ) > Siemens - 48 ( T.30 fax not working well) > > T. > > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:27 PM, shouldbe q931 wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:16 PM, David Ponzone >> wrote: >> > Draytek gear is crap like hell. >> > Stay away from that. >> > The support is crap too. >> > David Ponzone Direction Technique >> > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> > Service Client IPeva >> > tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou >> diffusion >> > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> > d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message >> s'il >> > a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >> > message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >> > >> > >> granted I have no experience with their "telco" side equipment, but >> I've not had any problems with their DSL and Ethernet routers, I've >> used them for several commercial deployments where the client didn't >> want the expense of Cisco... >> >> the other side of the coin being that I've not needed much in the way >> of support, but when I have it's been from their main UK reseller >> which has been fine. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110618/4cd0702c/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Sat Jun 18 20:14:24 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:14:24 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: I found bugs in the NAT layer of the Vigor 2820 that I prefer not to tell you about.... David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 18/06/2011 ? 17:27, shouldbe q931 a ?crit : > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:16 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >> Draytek gear is crap like hell. >> Stay away from that. >> The support is crap too. >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il >> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >> >> > granted I have no experience with their "telco" side equipment, but > I've not had any problems with their DSL and Ethernet routers, I've > used them for several commercial deployments where the client didn't > want the expense of Cisco... > > the other side of the coin being that I've not needed much in the way > of support, but when I have it's been from their main UK reseller > which has been fine. > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110618/1b04695a/attachment-0001.html From shouldbeq931 at gmail.com Sat Jun 18 20:31:12 2011 From: shouldbeq931 at gmail.com (shouldbe q931) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:31:12 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: 2011/6/18 David Ponzone : > I found bugs in the NAT layer of the Vigor 2820 that I prefer not to tell > you about.... Is this a security issue, or a breaks protocol x issue ? From henk at oegema.com Sat Jun 18 21:27:33 2011 From: henk at oegema.com (Henk Oegema) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:27:33 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No more sessions allowed at this time. Message-ID: <1308418053.2246.4.camel@DELL> My FS server was working fine until (suddenly) now. When I want to call a mobile phone (via a gateway) I get busy (?) or unavailable (?) and get this message: freeswitch at internal> 2011-06-18 19:23:00.379259 [CRIT] sofia.c:841 No more sessions allowed at this time. There is only one user on my system. (myself) Rgds. Henk. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110618/22a5097f/attachment.html From linux4michelle at tamay-dogan.net Sun Jun 19 00:31:59 2011 From: linux4michelle at tamay-dogan.net (Michelle Konzack) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:31:59 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <20110618203159.GD4017@michelle1> Hello shouldbe q931, Am 2011-06-18 18:31:12, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > 2011/6/18 David Ponzone : > > I found bugs in the NAT layer of the Vigor 2820 that I prefer not to tell > > you about.... > > Is this a security issue, or a breaks protocol x issue ? The Vigors can be transformed into a BOTs and Zombies. Hijacking Vigors from the Internet is easy! The problem is known since last years and nothing has changed. Not a singel firmware upgrade which solv this problem, even if they claim, they are working on it. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack -- ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux itsystems at tdnet France itsystems at tdnet Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 (homeoffice) Gewerbe Stra?e 3 50, rue de Soultz 77694 Kehl/Germany 67100 Strasbourg/France Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-176-86004575 office Jabber linux4michelle at jabber.ccc.de ICQ #328449886 Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110618/4dafe8d0/attachment.bin From shouldbeq931 at gmail.com Sun Jun 19 01:11:14 2011 From: shouldbeq931 at gmail.com (shouldbe q931) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:11:14 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <20110618203159.GD4017@michelle1> References: <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> <20110618203159.GD4017@michelle1> Message-ID: On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello shouldbe q931, > > Am 2011-06-18 18:31:12, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: >> 2011/6/18 David Ponzone : >> > I found bugs in the NAT layer of the Vigor 2820 that I prefer not to tell >> > you about.... >> >> Is this a security issue, or a breaks protocol x issue ? > > The Vigors can be transformed into a BOTs and Zombies. > Hijacking Vigors from the Internet is easy! > > The problem is known since last years and nothing ?has ?changed. ?Not ?a > singel firmware upgrade which solv this problem, ?even ?if ?they ?claim, > they are working on it. > > Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening > ? ?Michelle Konzack Got a link to something/anything that discusses this ? Cheers From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Sun Jun 19 11:33:25 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:33:25 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <201106162131.04859.justlikeef@gmail.com> <45FF3438-C239-48D9-A57B-F0A49166900E@ipeva.fr> <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <54DA215E-D28E-4CCB-9B86-A8DAF1E6BCBA@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: Let's say a weird way to do NAT. To make it short, the algorithm to compute the external source port of a connection was statically computed from source IP and source port (no randomization of any kind). So basically, if you had a packet coming from internal IP:port and one coming from internal IP+1:port-1, both were using the same outside port.... You can imagine the result of that with RTP and its systematic RTCP flow using the same port+1. We had no to number the IP Phones using consecutive IP addresses... The issue is I had trouble to convince the support that was very wrong. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 18/06/2011 ? 18:31, shouldbe q931 a ?crit : > 2011/6/18 David Ponzone : >> I found bugs in the NAT layer of the Vigor 2820 that I prefer not to tell >> you about.... > > Is this a security issue, or a breaks protocol x issue ? > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110619/0805c830/attachment.html From brokendash at gmail.com Sun Jun 19 21:41:49 2011 From: brokendash at gmail.com (broken dash) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_pocketsphinx In-Reply-To: References: <4C1997A0.1080909@gmail.com> <4C1ACD2A.70906@gmail.com> <4C1AE301.30405@gmail.com> <4C3D48A5.6030508@todandlorna.com> Message-ID: Does anyone think this issue is related to this? http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, broken dash wrote: > Has this been fixed? Perhaps a workaround or something... It will > build on Debian Squeeze, but it damn sure doesn't work. :-) > > > freeswitch at 127.0.0.1@internal> version > FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-36f812d 2011-06-14 00-35-18 -0400) > > freeswitch at 127.0.0.1@internal> load mod_pocketsphinx > +OK Reloading XML > -ERR [module load file routine returned an error] > > 2011-06-14 17:46:31.721075 [INFO] switch_time.c:1020 Timezone reloaded > 530 definitions > freeswitch at 127.0.0.1@internal> 2011-06-14 17:46:31.721075 [CRIT] > switch_loadable_module.c:928 Error Loading module > /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so > **/usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so: undefined symbol: > ngram_model_get_counts** > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Brian West wrote: >> Compiles fine on CentOS not sure what your issue is but someone that cares >> about Ubuntu should probably figure it out and post patches if possible. >> /b >> On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Jan Kubr wrote: >> >> Were you able to reproduce the problem? Not sure where to look to get rid of >> this :( >> Jan >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Brian West??wrote: >>> >>> No clue I'll try to compile it again today. >>> /b >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > From a.luppi at seletech.com Mon Jun 20 11:55:12 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:55:12 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call Hangup Message-ID: <4DFEFCE0.9040809@seletech.com> Hi, I have an active call from the extension A to the extension B. If one of the two extension is disconnected from the network without deregistration the call isn't hung up by the server. The call should be hangup when FS realizes that the extension isn't in the network? Is there a time out to be set somewhere? thanks Regards Alessandro Luppi -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Mon Jun 20 12:43:01 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:43:01 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call Hangup In-Reply-To: <4DFEFCE0.9040809@seletech.com> References: <4DFEFCE0.9040809@seletech.com> Message-ID: Alessandro, there are 2 ways to do that: Session timers: with this, FS will send a RE-INVITE to phones every X minutes, and if the phone does not answer, it's considerer dead, so it is unregistered and the current calls will be hung up or RTP Timeout: this will detect that media is missing, and will hang up the call Session timers has to be enabled on the SIP Profile with: RTP timeout has to be enabled in the SIP Profile with: (use the value you wish. Also, be careful with this, it can lead to issues with some phones when you put a call on hold/mute or if you use VAD) David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 20/06/2011 ? 09:55, Alessandro a ?crit : > Hi, > > I have an active call from the extension A to the extension B. > If one of the two extension is disconnected from the network without > deregistration the call isn't hung up by the server. The call should be > hangup when FS realizes that the extension isn't in the network? > Is there a time out to be set somewhere? > > thanks > > Regards > > Alessandro Luppi > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/0aea1f44/attachment.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Mon Jun 20 13:28:24 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:28:24 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call Hangup In-Reply-To: References: <4DFEFCE0.9040809@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4DFF12B8.5090008@seletech.com> Hi, i set on sip profile, but doesn't change. FS doesn't hang up the call after one of the two extension disappear from the network. With wireshark i don't see re-invite during the call. Regards Alessandro Il 20/06/2011 10:43, David Ponzone ha scritto: > Alessandro, > > there are 2 ways to do that: > Session timers: with this, FS will send a RE-INVITE to phones every X > minutes, and if the phone does not answer, it's considerer dead, so it > is unregistered and the current calls will be hung up > or > RTP Timeout: this will detect that media is missing, and will hang up > the call > > Session timers has to be enabled on the SIP Profile with: > > > > RTP timeout has to be enabled in the SIP Profile with: > > (use the value you wish. Also, be careful with this, it can lead to > issues with some phones when you put a call on hold/mute or if you use > VAD) > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > / > / > > > > Le 20/06/2011 ? 09:55, Alessandro a ?crit : > >> Hi, >> >> I have an active call from the extension A to the extension B. >> If one of the two extension is disconnected from the network without >> deregistration the call isn't hung up by the server. The call should be >> hangup when FS realizes that the extension isn't in the network? >> Is there a time out to be set somewhere? >> >> thanks >> >> Regards >> >> Alessandro Luppi >> >> -- >> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >> Software development >> Seletech srl >> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: >> www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/c775016e/attachment-0001.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 13:36:00 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:06:00 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No Voice for default IVR ext 5000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Guru, MC and friends, Sorry for the delayed reply, I did some changes in my broadband modem, reset the conf On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:58 AM, guru singh wrote: > Hi Ankit, > > You could also see if there are SIP ALG settings on the router. > > If by broadband router you mean the DSL modem that providers give, > then you're in a sticky situation. From my experience they are very > unreliable, something that works would break without any apparent > reason or even worse at times things would only work intermittently. > So you just end up racking your brains trying to reproduce and > diagnose, what I'd call "a false problem". Replacing that would reduce > some of your troubles. > > Regards, > guru > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins > wrote: > > I would get a pcap of both the signaling and the RTP and analyze w/ > > wireshark. Find out if the RTP is actually leaving FreeSWITCH or not. Of > > course, you might start with a console debug log and siptrace on > > pastebin.freeswitch.org so that we can have a looksee at what is > happening > > on the call. > > -MC > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM, ankIT WALiA > wrote: > >> > >> Yes, I am under NAT through my Broadband router. > >> But, if NAT is the issue, then is it possible for both sides able to > >> listen each other voices when I am transferring my call to another ext. > >> which is not IVR > >> Could someone please suggest what I can do to work with NAT or under > >> firewall? > >> Secondly, do you know any other reason for this issue if its not NAT? > >> Thanks > >> Ankit > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Steven Ayre > wrote: > >>> > >>> Is there any NAT involved? Usually lack of audio means that a NAT > router > >>> or firewall is screwing up the RTP media which is sent in a separate > UDP > >>> stream. Either it's not being forwarded, or it's being told to go to > the > >>> wrong place. > >>> > >>> -Steve > >>> > >>> > >>> On 17 June 2011 13:13, ankIT WALiA wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Dear all, > >>>> I have configured an gateway for external profile to receive and make > >>>> calls. > >>>> I have added a file in public directory. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> expression="^(MY_IPTEL_USERNAME)$"> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Now, while I am calling to my voip account, I am transferring the > call. > >>>> It is getting transferred to the extension also. > >>>> But, If I use normal ext number, I am able to talk both ways. But when > I > >>>> use default ext number 5000 for IVR menu. I could not listen to IVR > menu. > >>>> Though, I can see in my logs that the audio file are being played one > by > >>>> one, but I cant listen. > >>>> Do I need some extra configuration to listen to IVR? > >>>> There may be a gap in my knowledge. Please enlighten. > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Ankit > >>>> -- > >>>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >>>> > >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >>> > >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/9bd58353/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 13:45:37 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:15:37 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No Voice for default IVR ext 5000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Guru, MC, Steve and friends, I have pasted my logs on http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16555 I observed the logs and saw the below line: 2011-06-20 14:57:27.282184 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2594 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/waliaankit1 at sip.actionvoip.com:5060] 192.168.1.2 port 23520 -> 77.72.168.99 port 11994 codec: 8 ms: 20 I think it is telling me that the request is from IP address 192.168.1.2 port 23520 to 77.72.168.99 port 11994.Though, I am using NAT at my broadband modem but my public IP address is also not 77.72.168.99. I think as told by Steve, the response is going to wrong place. Guru, I also saw the SIP ALG setting, SIP is enabled. Please suggest what I can do in this case. I can try wireshark or pcap, but isnt it evident from the above log that the response is going to the wrong place. Can it be a problem that my FS server, my call request system and my receiving system is one system only having one network device with IP address 192.168.1.2 ? Thanks, Ankit On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:06 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Hello Guru, MC and friends, > > Sorry for the delayed reply, I did some changes in my broadband modem, > reset the conf > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:58 AM, guru singh wrote: > >> Hi Ankit, >> >> You could also see if there are SIP ALG settings on the router. >> >> If by broadband router you mean the DSL modem that providers give, >> then you're in a sticky situation. From my experience they are very >> unreliable, something that works would break without any apparent >> reason or even worse at times things would only work intermittently. >> So you just end up racking your brains trying to reproduce and >> diagnose, what I'd call "a false problem". Replacing that would reduce >> some of your troubles. >> >> Regards, >> guru >> >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins >> wrote: >> > I would get a pcap of both the signaling and the RTP and analyze w/ >> > wireshark. Find out if the RTP is actually leaving FreeSWITCH or not. Of >> > course, you might start with a console debug log and siptrace on >> > pastebin.freeswitch.org so that we can have a looksee at what is >> happening >> > on the call. >> > -MC >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM, ankIT WALiA >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Yes, I am under NAT through my Broadband router. >> >> But, if NAT is the issue, then is it possible for both sides able to >> >> listen each other voices when I am transferring my call to another ext. >> >> which is not IVR >> >> Could someone please suggest what I can do to work with NAT or under >> >> firewall? >> >> Secondly, do you know any other reason for this issue if its not NAT? >> >> Thanks >> >> Ankit >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Steven Ayre >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Is there any NAT involved? Usually lack of audio means that a NAT >> router >> >>> or firewall is screwing up the RTP media which is sent in a separate >> UDP >> >>> stream. Either it's not being forwarded, or it's being told to go to >> the >> >>> wrong place. >> >>> >> >>> -Steve >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 17 June 2011 13:13, ankIT WALiA wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Dear all, >> >>>> I have configured an gateway for external profile to receive and make >> >>>> calls. >> >>>> I have added a file in public directory. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> expression="^(MY_IPTEL_USERNAME)$"> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Now, while I am calling to my voip account, I am transferring the >> call. >> >>>> It is getting transferred to the extension also. >> >>>> But, If I use normal ext number, I am able to talk both ways. But >> when I >> >>>> use default ext number 5000 for IVR menu. I could not listen to IVR >> menu. >> >>>> Though, I can see in my logs that the audio file are being played one >> by >> >>>> one, but I cant listen. >> >>>> Do I need some extra configuration to listen to IVR? >> >>>> There may be a gap in my knowledge. Please enlighten. >> >>>> Thanks >> >>>> Ankit >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >>>> >> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >>> >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> > >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/ce85c43d/attachment-0001.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 14:03:50 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:33:50 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] No Voice for default IVR ext 5000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: When I tried with FS Server and my receivig system as same system with one IP address. Call Requesting System from other system with second IP address. It worked as expected, I can listen the IVR menu. But the logs says 2011-06-20 15:27:53.054612 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2594 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/w aliaankit1 at sip.actionvoip.com:5060] 192.168.1.2 port 24484 -> 194.120.0.106 port 11772 codec: 0 ms: 20 My Requesting system IP address is correct but my receiving system IP address is 192.168.1.3. Is it something related to NAT? Is it something which I dont know about Networking? Is this a random behavior? Thanks Ankit On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:15 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Hello Guru, MC, Steve and friends, > > I have pasted my logs on http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16555 > > I observed the logs and saw the below line: > 2011-06-20 14:57:27.282184 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2594 AUDIO RTP > [sofia/external/waliaankit1 at sip.actionvoip.com:5060] 192.168.1.2 port > 23520 -> 77.72.168.99 port 11994 codec: 8 ms: 20 > > I think it is telling me that the request is from IP address 192.168.1.2 > port 23520 to 77.72.168.99 port 11994.Though, I am using NAT at my broadband > modem but my public IP address is also not 77.72.168.99. > > I think as told by Steve, the response is going to wrong place. > > Guru, > I also saw the SIP ALG setting, SIP is enabled. > > Please suggest what I can do in this case. I can try wireshark or pcap, but > isnt it evident from the above log that the response is going to the wrong > place. > > Can it be a problem that my FS server, my call request system and my > receiving system is one system only having one network device with IP > address 192.168.1.2 ? > > Thanks, > Ankit > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:06 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > >> Hello Guru, MC and friends, >> >> Sorry for the delayed reply, I did some changes in my broadband modem, >> reset the conf >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:58 AM, guru singh wrote: >> >>> Hi Ankit, >>> >>> You could also see if there are SIP ALG settings on the router. >>> >>> If by broadband router you mean the DSL modem that providers give, >>> then you're in a sticky situation. From my experience they are very >>> unreliable, something that works would break without any apparent >>> reason or even worse at times things would only work intermittently. >>> So you just end up racking your brains trying to reproduce and >>> diagnose, what I'd call "a false problem". Replacing that would reduce >>> some of your troubles. >>> >>> Regards, >>> guru >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Collins >>> wrote: >>> > I would get a pcap of both the signaling and the RTP and analyze w/ >>> > wireshark. Find out if the RTP is actually leaving FreeSWITCH or not. >>> Of >>> > course, you might start with a console debug log and siptrace on >>> > pastebin.freeswitch.org so that we can have a looksee at what is >>> happening >>> > on the call. >>> > -MC >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM, ankIT WALiA >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Yes, I am under NAT through my Broadband router. >>> >> But, if NAT is the issue, then is it possible for both sides able to >>> >> listen each other voices when I am transferring my call to another >>> ext. >>> >> which is not IVR >>> >> Could someone please suggest what I can do to work with NAT or under >>> >> firewall? >>> >> Secondly, do you know any other reason for this issue if its not NAT? >>> >> Thanks >>> >> Ankit >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Steven Ayre >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there any NAT involved? Usually lack of audio means that a NAT >>> router >>> >>> or firewall is screwing up the RTP media which is sent in a separate >>> UDP >>> >>> stream. Either it's not being forwarded, or it's being told to go to >>> the >>> >>> wrong place. >>> >>> >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 17 June 2011 13:13, ankIT WALiA wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Dear all, >>> >>>> I have configured an gateway for external profile to receive and >>> make >>> >>>> calls. >>> >>>> I have added a file in public directory. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> expression="^(MY_IPTEL_USERNAME)$"> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Now, while I am calling to my voip account, I am transferring the >>> call. >>> >>>> It is getting transferred to the extension also. >>> >>>> But, If I use normal ext number, I am able to talk both ways. But >>> when I >>> >>>> use default ext number 5000 for IVR menu. I could not listen to IVR >>> menu. >>> >>>> Though, I can see in my logs that the audio file are being played >>> one by >>> >>>> one, but I cant listen. >>> >>>> Do I need some extra configuration to listen to IVR? >>> >>>> There may be a gap in my knowledge. Please enlighten. >>> >>>> Thanks >>> >>>> Ankit >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>>> >>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >> >>> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> > >>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> > UNSUBSCRIBE: >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> > http://www.freeswitch.org >>> > >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns >> > > > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/c4ef1b31/attachment.html From fieldpeak at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 15:11:07 2011 From: fieldpeak at gmail.com (fieldpeak) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:11:07 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can FS use external user database Message-ID: Gurus, Can we configure FS to have it to read registeration users information (e.g. account and pwd) for authentication from external database replacing default xml files(under conf\directory\default)? e.g. we have a database which contains user's account and password and was used by other application, we would like to have FS to read this exsiting databse for authentication as well... Thanks. Regards, Charles -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/229874e1/attachment.html From jgallartm at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 15:37:12 2011 From: jgallartm at gmail.com (Javier Gallart) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:37:12 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bind_digit_action delay Message-ID: Hello list, I'm using to bind_digit_action application to launch an event when a particular sequence of keys (##) is pressed. It works fine, the only problem is that the application is launched 5 seconds after the last key is pressed. I've tried with a simple playback application and it's just the same: 2011-06-20 07:22:55.641019 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF #:1560 2011-06-20 07:22:56.121025 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF #:1480 2011-06-20 07:22:56.121025 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:151 sofia/internal/ 34917019888 at 79.170.64.151 Digit match binding [exec:playback][/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time] (...) 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:567 sofia/internal/ 34661574758 at 79.170.68.169:5060 Command Execute playback(local_stream://moh) EXECUTE sofia/internal/34661574758 at 79.170.68.169:5060playback(local_stream://moh) 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [WARNING] mod_local_stream.c:393 Unknown source moh, trying 'default' 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [ERR] mod_local_stream.c:402 Unknown source default (...) 2011-06-20 07:23:01.281067 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:567 sofia/internal/ 34917019888 at 79.170.64.151 Command Execute playback(/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time) EXECUTE sofia/internal/34917019888 at 79.170.64.151playback(/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time) My first question is why does fs tries to play moh? And the second one is if there is a way to shorten the lapse between the last key and the execution of the application. I've played a bit with the bind_digit_input_timeout variable that I've seen in the code, with no success. Does anyone have faces the same issue? I'm using version FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-7768808 2011-06-18 11-52-37 -0500) Thanks in advance Javi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/921a338a/attachment-0001.html From peder at networkoblivion.com Mon Jun 20 15:49:49 2011 From: peder at networkoblivion.com (Peder) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can FS use external user database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <05fb01cc2f40$297556f0$7c6004d0$@com> Not directly, but you can use xml_curl to query a web server which queries a database: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_xml_curl http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_xml_curl#bindings.3D.22directory.22 From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of fieldpeak Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 6:11 AM To: FreeSWITCH-users Cc: 442962866 at 139.com Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can FS use external user database Gurus, Can we configure FS to have it to read registeration users information (e.g. account and pwd) for authentication from external database replacing default xml files(under conf\directory\default)? e.g. we have a database which contains user's account and password and was used by other application, we would like to have FS to read this exsiting databse for authentication as well... Thanks. Regards, Charles -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/67aa3826/attachment.html From nazim.aghabayov at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 15:51:05 2011 From: nazim.aghabayov at gmail.com (Nazim Aghabayov) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:51:05 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can FS use external user database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DFF3429.5020905@gmail.com> Hello Charles, Mod xml curl with bindings="directory" does that. Please have a look at http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_xml_curl Best Regards, Nazim On 06/20/2011 04:11 PM, fieldpeak wrote: > Gurus, > > Can we configure FS to have it to read registeration users information (e.g. > account and pwd) for authentication from external database replacing default > xml files(under conf\directory\default)? > > e.g. we have a database which contains user's account and password and was > used by other application, we would like to have FS to read this exsiting > databse for authentication as well... > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Charles > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From fieldpeak at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 16:21:01 2011 From: fieldpeak at gmail.com (fieldpeak) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:21:01 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can FS use external user database In-Reply-To: <4DFF3429.5020905@gmail.com> References: <4DFF3429.5020905@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hello Peder and Nazim, Thanks for your valuable information, i will have a try... Regards, Charles 2011/6/20 Nazim Aghabayov > Hello Charles, > > Mod xml curl with bindings="directory" does that. > Please have a look at http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_xml_curl > > Best Regards, > Nazim > > On 06/20/2011 04:11 PM, fieldpeak wrote: > > Gurus, > > > > Can we configure FS to have it to read registeration users information > (e.g. > > account and pwd) for authentication from external database replacing > default > > xml files(under conf\directory\default)? > > > > e.g. we have a database which contains user's account and password and > was > > used by other application, we would like to have FS to read this exsiting > > databse for authentication as well... > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > Charles > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/10910b61/attachment.html From mitch.johnson7 at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 17:24:48 2011 From: mitch.johnson7 at gmail.com (mitch Johnson) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:24:48 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List Message-ID: It seems as if you have already identified what's going into the Cookbook. Is it too late to add a few sections on TLS/SRTP with examples on using different phone vendors and softphones on smartphones? I think FreeSWITCH is a powerful solution in the TLS/SRTP area yet to be realized or tapped into. Having recipes on how to implement and a great discussion on how FreeSWITCH can use channels on a single box to do encrypted calls on the Internet side and unencrypted calls on the LAN side would be incredible. Thanks, Mitch Johnson > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Collins > To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org, > freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:14:33 -0700 > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List > Hello all! > > Some have inquired recently about what's needed to complete the FS > cookbook. I've uploaded the most recent list of recipes that we have > identified. Some are already written but many are yet to be done. Check out > this page: > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Cookbook#Information_for_prospective_authors > > Contact me if you have any questions about helping with any of these > recipes. > > Thanks, > Michael > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/a9a89ea5/attachment.html From matthew at corp.crocker.com Mon Jun 20 18:25:01 2011 From: matthew at corp.crocker.com (Matthew S. Crocker) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:25:01 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <09c0a579-6210-4db5-a669-5d9e2ca6beac@zimbra1.crocker.com> I use Zhone MALCs for ADSL2+/POTS to the customer. It handles MGCP or SIP back to the softswitch. I'm using Broadsoft not Freeswitch but should still work just as well. http://www.zhone.com/products/MALC-XP/ -Matt ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nandy Dagondon" > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:03:50 PM > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs > hello everybody, > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects > directly to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the > market? or do we still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters > and FXS gateways? i appreciate if you can mention some > brands/models. > tks, > nandy > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/150f9598/attachment.html From matthew at corp.crocker.com Mon Jun 20 18:26:58 2011 From: matthew at corp.crocker.com (Matthew S. Crocker) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:26:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <84b3f6b0-9cff-40cc-8a32-f1a2da1458ab@zimbra1.crocker.com> Zhone MALC-XP are nowhere near $11k. They are < $100/port ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Ponzone" > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 5:29:48 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs > Hmmm unlikely I think. > The Zhone box for instance seems to be around 11,000$. > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > Service Client IP eva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > Le 17/06/2011 ? 10:25, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > > yes, it doesn't add up because the application is in a rural area. > > the Phybridge is a good solution except for the price. thanks > > David. > > however, the MSAN, perfectly describes what i'm looking - hopefully > > the investment is lower. > > > thanks to all who contributed. > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, David Ponzone < > > david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > wrote: > > > > Nandy, > > > > > > something does not add up. > > > > > > When you deploy DSLAMs for public lines, it's not for 24/48 > > > ports, > > > but rather for 20 000 to 30 000 ports. > > > > > > Perhaps there is a confusion about what is a public line. > > > > > > A public line is the 200 meters-8km pair of copper going from the > > > local (legacy) telco facility to your house. > > > > > > You don't install your own DSLAMs for 24/48 ports, or perhaps you > > > are > > > in a very specific situation. > > > > > > I really doubt you will find a cost effective DSLAM for so few > > > ports. > > > > > > Plus, you realize you will need to install on DSLAM in all the > > > telco > > > facilities required to get the coverage you need > > > > > > There are small DSLAMs on the market, but they are targeted for > > > private lines (hospitality, health care, ...) and I really don't > > > know if they can work on public lines. > > > > > > In case you actually need a small DSLAM just to run ADSL over a > > > private pair of copper, you should have a look at: > > > > > > http://www.phybridge.com/uniphyer-ip-phones.aspx > > > > > > This thing does not call itself a DSLAM but it is one. > > > > > > They market that as a "switch" that enables LAN on your copper > > > wires. > > > > > > It's a small lie for data usage as you only get 25Mbps/1.4Mbps > > > (ATM), > > > but for voice, that's enough. > > > > > > Basically, you put the "switch"-DSLAM in the network cabinet > > > where > > > the copper wires go, you connect the wires to it, you connect the > > > ethernet port to your LAN (so your FS). In each room/office, you > > > plug an adapter (provided also by Phybridge) which is basically a > > > small ADSL modem (powered from the switch through the wire), from > > > which you get an ethernet port, with POE on it! > > > > > > I like the solution on the paper, but never used. Because of the > > > cost: > > > > > > a 24 ports switch is 3500$ > > > > > > one adapter is 122$ > > > > > > so a full 24 ports solution would be 6500$, which is not very > > > competitive compared to recabling the place. > > > > > > But your mileage may vary. > > > > > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > > > > > > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > > > > > > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > > > > > > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > > > > > Service Client IP eva > > > > > > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > > > > > > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > > > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et > > > ?tablis > > > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation > > > ou > > > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique > > > est > > > susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au > > > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si > > > vous > > > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > > > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > > Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:28, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > > > > > > > yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone < > > > > david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Which density are you looking for ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Service Client IP eva > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et > > > > > ?tablis > > > > > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute > > > > > utilisation > > > > > ou > > > > > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message > > > > > ?lectronique > > > > > est > > > > > susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? > > > > > au > > > > > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. > > > > > Si > > > > > vous > > > > > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > > > > > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hello guys! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - > > > > > > of > > > > > > course, > > > > > > using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire > > > > > > splitters and that would require using FXS gateway (as what > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > mentioned). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS > > > > > > - > > > > > > so > > > > > > it's > > > > > > FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is > > > > > > now > > > > > > possible on newer IP DSLAMs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks < > > > > > > jaybinks at gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is MY take on what Nandy is after. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > device to provide the voice, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the > > > > > > > DSL > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > AND > > > > > > > the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / > > > > > > > RTP > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess this is a logical question and would be quite > > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > see if there are such devices.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sorry I dont know of any :( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton < > > > > > > > justlikeef at gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A > > > > > > > > DSLAM > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > device that provides DSL transport, which is > > > > > > > > independent > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > run across it. So normally, you have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] > > > > > > > > |-------[modem > > > > > > > > |or modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the > > > > > > > > Client > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > (could be a VOIP phone) are independent of the > > > > > > > > transport??? > > > > > > > > Onewire, > > > > > > > > Cisco, and others make some DSL Modem/Router combos > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > integrated > > > > > > > > Voip to FXS ports for the CPE end. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that > > > > > > > > Freeswitch > > > > > > > > supports, > > > > > > > > you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > enough CPU tp handle much besides the traffic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hello everybody, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that > > > > > > > > > inter-connects > > > > > > > > > directly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > market? > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > do we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > FXS > > > > > > > > > gateways? i > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nandy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > > > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > > > > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/c7da5f7b/attachment-0001.html From avi at avimarcus.net Mon Jun 20 18:33:17 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:33:17 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call Hangup In-Reply-To: <4DFF12B8.5090008@seletech.com> References: <4DFEFCE0.9040809@seletech.com> <4DFF12B8.5090008@seletech.com> Message-ID: You need to do a "sofia profile internal restart" to load your new settings. -Avi Marcus On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Alessandro wrote: > ** > Hi, > > i set > > > > on sip profile, but doesn't change. FS doesn't hang up the call after one > of the two extension disappear from the network. > With wireshark i don't see re-invite during the call. > > Regards > > Alessandro > Il 20/06/2011 10:43, David Ponzone ha scritto: > > Alessandro, > > there are 2 ways to do that: > Session timers: with this, FS will send a RE-INVITE to phones every X > minutes, and if the phone does not answer, it's considerer dead, so it is > unregistered and the current calls will be hung up > or > RTP Timeout: this will detect that media is missing, and will hang up the > call > > Session timers has to be enabled on the SIP Profile with: > > > > RTP timeout has to be enabled in the SIP Profile with: > > (use the value you wish. Also, be careful with this, it can lead to > issues with some phones when you put a call on hold/mute or if you use VAD) > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 20/06/2011 ? 09:55, Alessandro a ?crit : > > Hi, > > I have an active call from the extension A to the extension B. > If one of the two extension is disconnected from the network without > deregistration the call isn't hung up by the server. The call should be > hangup when FS realizes that the extension isn't in the network? > Is there a time out to be set somewhere? > > thanks > > Regards > > Alessandro Luppi > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/e65e0ece/attachment.html From mario_fs at mgtech.com Mon Jun 20 18:55:00 2011 From: mario_fs at mgtech.com (Mario G) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:55:00 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7EAFE942-322C-4EC0-941A-F1226B8DDAD1@mgtech.com> I see there is a need for install on OS X Server. I thought the OS X install I did for the wiki was quite comprehensive. What is missing? It should be the same for OS X server. Also, I will do a clean install on OS X 10.7 next month to update the wiki. On Jun 17, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Hello all! > > Some have inquired recently about what's needed to complete the FS cookbook. I've uploaded the most recent list of recipes that we have identified. Some are already written but many are yet to be done. Check out this page: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Cookbook#Information_for_prospective_authors > > Contact me if you have any questions about helping with any of these recipes. > > Thanks, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/b00500b6/attachment.html From skyptester at gmail.com Sun Jun 19 15:34:17 2011 From: skyptester at gmail.com (Skyp Tester) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:34:17 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Skypopen, Skype 2.2.0.35 Beta for Linux and Skype Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi There is problem with Skype Linux client 2.0.0.72 , I cant call to Skype Connect client, error ?FAILUREREASON 2? = ?User or phone number does not exist?. http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/business/skype-connect/ Installed skypopen with Skype client 2.0.0.72 . Upgraded to 2.2.0.35: 1) install libstdc++-4.3.2-7.i386.rpm 2) copy over /usr/bin/skype and /usr/share/skype/lang with new version Now I can call to Skype Connect client but there are some problems 1) audio is one way, Skype->FS 2) after first call there is error ?NO SPACE WRITE: 640? and no more Skype calls, ?ERROR 68? & ?If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again)? Can we hope support to Skype Linux 2.2.0.35 or there is some big technical obstacle? Centos 5.6 x86_64 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-fccbba5 2011-05-18 19-00-42 -0400) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110619/5ff3f755/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- EXECUTE sofia/internal/1001 at fsserver bridge(skypopen/skype101/echo123) 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1264 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1264 ][none ][N/A,N/A] 1 SESSION_REQUEST 3cc797ba-7552-459c-9a86-9daa8745821c 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1299 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1299 ][none ][N/A,N/A] globals.SKYPOPEN_INTERFACES[1].name=|||skype101|||? 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:244 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 244 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] codecs UP 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:273 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 273 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] skypopen_tech_init SUCCESS 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:816 New Channel skypopen/skype101/echo123 [3cc797ba-7552-459c-9a86-9daa8745821c] 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1371 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [BREAK] 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:728 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 728 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_BREAK 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1143 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1143 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] Calling Skype, rdest is: echo123 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||CALL echo123|||| 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State INIT 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||CALL 112 STATUS UNPLACED||| 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:714 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 714 ][skype101 ][DIALING,UNPLACD] skype_call: 112 is now UNPLACED 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:463 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [BREAK] 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:728 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 728 ][skype101 ][DIALING,UNPLACD] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_BREAK 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:464 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 464 ][skype101 ][DIALING,UNPLACD] skype101 CHANNEL INIT 3cc797ba-7552-459c-9a86-9daa8745821c 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1687 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State ROUTING 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:665 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 665 ][skype101 ][DIALING,UNPLACD] skype101 CHANNEL ROUTING 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [BREAK] 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:728 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 728 ][skype101 ][DIALING,UNPLACD] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_BREAK 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:383 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:748 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 748 ][skype101 ][DIALING,UNPLACD] skype101 CHANNEL CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-19 12:53:47.517153 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:383 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep 2011-06-19 12:53:47.565225 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][DIALING,UNPLACD] READING: |||CALL 112 STATUS ROUTING||| 2011-06-19 12:53:47.565225 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:709 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 709 ][skype101 ][DIALING,ROUTING] skype_call: 112 is now ROUTING 2011-06-19 12:53:47.565225 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][DIALING,ROUTING] READING: |||CALL 112 STATUS ROUTING||| 2011-06-19 12:53:47.565225 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:709 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 709 ][skype101 ][DIALING,ROUTING] skype_call: 112 is now ROUTING 2011-06-19 12:53:47.626189 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][DIALING,ROUTING] READING: |||CALL 112 STATUS RINGING||| 2011-06-19 12:53:47.626189 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:612 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 612 ][skype101 ][RINGING,RINGING] Our remote party in skype_call 112 is RINGING 2011-06-19 12:53:47.626189 [NOTICE] mod_skypopen.c:2309 Ring-Ready skypopen/skype101/echo123! 2011-06-19 12:53:47.626189 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:2310 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 2310 ][skype101 ][RINGING,RINGING] skype_call: REMOTE PARTY RINGING 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][RINGING,RINGING] READING: |||CALL 112 STATUS INPROGRESS||| 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:725 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 725 ][skype101 ][RINGING,RINGING] skype_call: 112 is now active 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:732 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 732 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] START start_audio_threads 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:2208 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 2208 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] started tcp_srv_thread thread. 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:2225 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 2225 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] started tcp_cli_thread thread. 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:89 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 89 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] Binded! *which_port=32775, tech_pvt->tcp_cli_port=32774, tech_pvt->tcp_srv_port=32775 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:94 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 94 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 1 SO_RCVBUF is 87380, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:98 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 98 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 1 SO_SNDBUF is 16384, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:115 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 115 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 2 SO_RCVBUF is 5120, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:130 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 130 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 2 SO_SNDBUF is 5120, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:134 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 134 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] TCP_NODELAY is 0 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:141 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 141 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] TCP_NODELAY is 1 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:833 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 833 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] started tcp_srv_thread thread. 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:89 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 89 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] Binded! *which_port=32776, tech_pvt->tcp_cli_port=32776, tech_pvt->tcp_srv_port=32775 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:94 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 94 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 1 SO_RCVBUF is 87380, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:98 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 98 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 1 SO_SNDBUF is 16384, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:115 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 115 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 2 SO_RCVBUF is 5120, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:130 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 130 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 2 SO_SNDBUF is 5120, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:134 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 134 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] TCP_NODELAY is 0 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:141 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 141 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] TCP_NODELAY is 1 2011-06-19 12:53:49.326423 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:997 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 997 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] started tcp_cli_thread thread. 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] SENDING: |||ALTER CALL 112 SET_INPUT PORT="32776"|||| 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] SENDING: |||#output ALTER CALL 112 SET_OUTPUT PORT="32775"|||| 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:2019 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 2019 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] Outbound Channel Answered! session_uuid_str=3cc797ba-7552-459c-9a86-9daa8745821c 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2859 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Callstate Change RINGING -> ACTIVE 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [NOTICE] mod_skypopen.c:2369 Channel [skypopen/skype101/echo123] has been answered 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1149 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1149 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_MESSAGE_INDICATE_AUDIO_SYNC 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1171 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1171 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] Synching audio 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:2377 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 2377 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] outbound_channel_answered! 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 0||| 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:564 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 564 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] Synching audio on skype_call: 112. 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:862 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 862 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] ACCEPTED here I send you 32775 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:867 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 867 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 3 SO_RCVBUF is 5120, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:871 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 871 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 3 SO_SNDBUF is 5120, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||ALTER CALL 112 SET_INPUT PORT="32776"||| 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||#output ALTER CALL 112 SET_OUTPUT PORT="32775"||| 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1026 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1026 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] ACCEPTED here you send me 32776 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1031 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1031 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 4 SO_RCVBUF is 5120, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1035 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1035 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] 4 SO_SNDBUF is 5120, size is 4 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3206 Originate Resulted in Success: [skypopen/skype101/echo123] 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1149 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1149 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_MESSAGE_INDICATE_AUDIO_SYNC 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1171 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1171 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] Synching audio 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1174 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1174 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_MESSAGE_INDICATE_BRIDGE 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1196 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1196 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] Synching audio 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:707 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [BREAK] 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:728 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 728 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_BREAK 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1239 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXCHANGE_MEDIA 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [BREAK] 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:728 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 728 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_BREAK 2011-06-19 12:53:49.426437 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Running State Change CS_EXCHANGE_MEDIA 2011-06-19 12:53:49.446447 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:374 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State EXCHANGE_MEDIA 2011-06-19 12:53:49.446447 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:757 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 757 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] skype101 CHANNEL EXCHANGE_MEDIA 2011-06-19 12:53:49.466445 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:899 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 899 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] CHANNEL READ FRAME goto CNG 2011-06-19 12:53:49.546455 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1202 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1202 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] MSG_ID=19 2011-06-19 12:53:49.606499 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:769 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [BREAK] 2011-06-19 12:53:49.606499 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:728 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 728 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_BREAK 2011-06-19 12:53:49.626465 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:899 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 899 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] CHANNEL READ FRAME goto CNG 2011-06-19 12:53:49.626465 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1202 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1202 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] MSG_ID=18 2011-06-19 12:53:50.326567 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 1||| 2011-06-19 12:53:51.332778 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 2||| 2011-06-19 12:53:52.328865 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 3||| 2011-06-19 12:53:53.329050 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 4||| 2011-06-19 12:53:54.230149 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 5||| 2011-06-19 12:53:55.330298 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 6||| 2011-06-19 12:53:56.330469 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 7||| 2011-06-19 12:53:57.330619 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 8||| 2011-06-19 12:53:58.333749 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 9||| 2011-06-19 12:53:59.333919 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 10||| 2011-06-19 12:54:00.334051 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 11||| 2011-06-19 12:54:01.334213 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 12||| 2011-06-19 12:54:02.334356 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 13||| 2011-06-19 12:54:03.336467 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 14||| 2011-06-19 12:54:04.323615 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 15||| 2011-06-19 12:54:05.237748 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 16||| 2011-06-19 12:54:06.317892 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 17||| 2011-06-19 12:54:07.219050 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 18||| 2011-06-19 12:54:08.319186 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 19||| 2011-06-19 12:54:09.219400 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 20||| 2011-06-19 12:54:09.219400 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:564 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 564 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] Synching audio on skype_call: 112. 2011-06-19 12:54:10.319478 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 21||| 2011-06-19 12:54:11.323629 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 22||| 2011-06-19 12:54:12.324783 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 23||| 2011-06-19 12:54:13.324950 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 24||| 2011-06-19 12:54:14.225078 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 25||| 2011-06-19 12:54:15.325218 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 26||| 2011-06-19 12:54:16.325388 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 27||| 2011-06-19 12:54:17.234497 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 28||| 2011-06-19 12:54:18.329677 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 29||| 2011-06-19 12:54:19.329836 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 30||| 2011-06-19 12:54:20.229955 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 31||| 2011-06-19 12:54:21.230081 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 32||| 2011-06-19 12:54:22.230227 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 33||| 2011-06-19 12:54:23.230396 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 34||| 2011-06-19 12:54:24.317565 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] READING: |||CALL 112 DURATION 35||| 2011-06-19 12:54:31.547588 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1093 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1093 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] len=-1, error: Connection reset by peer 2011-06-19 12:54:31.547588 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1103 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1103 ][skype101 ][UP,INPROGRS] Skype outbound audio GONE 2011-06-19 12:54:31.547588 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1112 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1112 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] outbound audio server (I am it) EXITING 2011-06-19 12:54:31.567590 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:951 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 951 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] Skype incoming audio GONE 2011-06-19 12:54:31.567590 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:960 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 960 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] incoming audio (read) server (I am it) EXITING 2011-06-19 12:54:31.607588 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:31.667597 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:31.727606 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:31.787614 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:31.847657 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:31.907632 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:31.967640 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.027650 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.087658 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.147697 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.207676 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.267696 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.327694 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.387703 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.447724 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.507728 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.567737 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.627745 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.687755 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.747803 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.807772 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.867781 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.927790 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:32.987798 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.047851 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.107816 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.167825 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.227835 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.287842 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.347891 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.407860 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.467868 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.527878 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.587886 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.647936 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.707903 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.767995 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.827921 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.887930 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:33.947985 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.007947 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.067956 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.127965 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.187973 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.248014 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.307991 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.368073 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.428009 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.488018 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.548057 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.608035 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.668044 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.728052 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.788062 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.848105 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.908078 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:34.968088 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.028097 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.088105 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.148144 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.208121 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.268131 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.328140 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.388148 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.448195 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.508167 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.568175 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.628183 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.688192 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.748231 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.808210 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.868219 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.928228 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:35.988236 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.048277 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.109254 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.169263 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.229271 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.289281 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.350300 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.411298 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.472307 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.554320 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.615328 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.676338 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.737346 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.798356 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.859364 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.920373 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:36.981382 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.044390 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.106406 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.166408 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.226420 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.286427 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.346435 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.406444 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.466452 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.526465 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.586469 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.646479 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.706487 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.766497 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.826508 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.886514 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:37.946523 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.006531 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.066541 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.126606 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.186557 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.246567 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.306575 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.366584 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.426652 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.486601 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.546610 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.606619 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.666628 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.726641 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.786645 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.846654 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.906662 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:38.966672 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.026686 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.086689 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.146697 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.206707 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.266715 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.326729 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.386732 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.446743 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.506751 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.566759 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.626772 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.686777 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.746785 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.806794 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.866804 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.926837 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:39.986821 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.046829 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.106838 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.166847 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.226859 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.286864 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.346873 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.406882 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.466918 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.526903 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.586908 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.646917 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.706926 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.766935 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.826949 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.886952 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:40.946962 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.006970 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.066978 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.126991 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.186995 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.247004 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.307014 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.367022 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.427035 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.487040 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.607058 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.667066 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.727078 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.787083 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.847146 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.907101 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:41.967110 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.027123 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.087128 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.147136 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.207146 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.267154 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.327166 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.387172 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.447181 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.507189 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.567198 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.627209 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.687215 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.748256 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.809233 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.870243 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.931251 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:42.992260 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.033283 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.094283 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.155284 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.216292 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.277301 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.338311 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.399320 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.462319 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.524328 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.587345 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.649358 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.709354 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.769363 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.829372 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.889381 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:43.949393 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.009398 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.069407 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.129416 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.189425 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.249434 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.309442 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.369674 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.429459 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.489471 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.549478 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.609486 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.669495 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.729504 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.789512 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.849521 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.909530 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:44.969539 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.029548 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.089556 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.149566 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.209576 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.269582 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.329591 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.389600 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.449610 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.509619 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.569627 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.629635 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.689645 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.749655 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.809662 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.869671 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.929680 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:45.989687 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.049698 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.109707 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.169715 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.229724 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.289733 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.349742 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.409750 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.469758 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.529768 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.589778 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.649785 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.709794 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.769803 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.829811 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.889820 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:46.949828 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:47.009837 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:47.069845 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:47.129855 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:47.189863 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:47.249872 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:1018 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1018 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] NO SPACE WRITE: 640 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:604 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [BREAK] 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:728 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 728 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_BREAK 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:899 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 899 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] CHANNEL READ FRAME goto CNG 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:584 BRIDGE THREAD DONE [skypopen/skype101/echo123] 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2592 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:656 Hangup skypopen/skype101/echo123 [CS_EXCHANGE_MEDIA] [NORMAL_CLEARING] 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2608 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [KILL] 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:701 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 701 ][skype101 ][UP,INC_HNG] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_KILL 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [BREAK] 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:728 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 728 ][skype101 ][HANG_RQ,INC_HNG] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_BREAK 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:374 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State EXCHANGE_MEDIA going to sleep 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State HANGUP 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:624 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 624 ][skype101 ][HANG_RQ,INC_HNG] hanging up skype call: 112 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][HANG_RQ,INC_HNG] SENDING: |||ALTER CALL 112 END HANGUP|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][HANG_RQ,INC_HNG] SENDING: |||ALTER CALL 112 HANGUP|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:630 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 630 ][skype101 ][HANG_RQ,INC_HNG] skype101 CHANNEL HANGUP 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:649 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1114 Send signal skypopen/skype101/echo123 [BREAK] 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:728 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 728 ][skype101 ][DOWN,INC_HNG] skypopen/skype101/echo123 CHANNEL got SWITCH_SIG_BREAK 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1286 Session 8 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1304 Session 8 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Ended 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Close Channel skypopen/skype101/echo123 [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State DESTROY 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:480 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 480 ][skype101 ][DOWN,INC_HNG] skype101 CHANNEL DESTROY 3cc797ba-7552-459c-9a86-9daa8745821c 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:494 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 494 ][skype101 ][DOWN,INC_HNG] audio tcp threads to DIE 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:504 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 504 ][skype101 ][DOWN,INC_HNG] audio tcp srv thread DEAD 0 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:514 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 514 ][skype101 ][DOWN,INC_HNG] audio tcp cli thread DEAD 0 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:525 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 525 ][skype101 ][DOWN,INC_HNG] codecs DOWN 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] mod_skypopen.c:580 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 580 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] CHANNEL DESTROYED 3cc797ba-7552-459c-9a86-9daa8745821c 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 skypopen/skype101/echo123 Standard DESTROY 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (skypopen/skype101/echo123) State DESTROY going to sleep 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:47.329895 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:48.330039 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:48.330039 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:48.330039 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:49.335187 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:49.355190 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:49.355190 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:50.350535 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:50.350535 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:50.350535 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:51.350481 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:51.370489 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:51.370489 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:52.370630 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:52.370630 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:52.370630 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:53.370777 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:53.390783 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:53.390783 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:54.390928 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:54.390928 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:54.390928 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:55.392072 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:55.412076 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:55.412076 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:56.407220 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:56.428426 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:56.428426 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:57.430371 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:57.430371 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:57.430371 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:58.430517 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:58.450520 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:58.450520 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:54:59.450666 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:54:59.450666 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:54:59.450666 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:55:00.450812 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:55:00.470814 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:55:00.470814 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:55:01.451959 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:55:01.471961 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:55:01.471961 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:55:02.479109 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:55:02.479109 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:55:02.479109 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:55:03.492257 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:55:03.492257 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:55:03.492257 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) 2011-06-19 12:55:04.495411 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:1619 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 1619 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] SENDING: |||PROTOCOL 7|||| 2011-06-19 12:55:04.515407 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:173 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 173 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] READING: |||ERROR 68||| 2011-06-19 12:55:04.515407 [DEBUG] skypopen_protocol.c:186 [ac7ca63|9350fb9] [DEBUG_SKYPE 186 ][skype101 ][IDLE,IDLE] If I don't connect immediately, please give the Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask you again) From bryan.lemon.iccle at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 00:47:20 2011 From: bryan.lemon.iccle at gmail.com (Bryan Lemon) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Loading Pocketsphinx Message-ID: Whenever I try to load the pocketsphinx module, either on startup, or with the load mod_pocketsphinx command, I get the following error: freeswitch at bryanlemon-laptop> load mod_pocketsphinx 2011-06-19 15:17:04.471275 [INFO] mod_enum.c:775 ENUM Reloaded 2011-06-19 15:17:04.471275 [INFO] switch_time.c:1020 Timezone reloaded 530 definitions +OK Reloading XML -ERR [module load file routine returned an error] 2011-06-19 15:17:04.471275 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:928 Error Loading module /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so **/usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so: undefined symbol: feat_init** I am running Ubuntu 10.04, and installed freeswitch using the git method. I tried a git pull && make current, and it runs through with no problem. Any Ideas? Thank you, Bryan Lemon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110619/7cdf54f9/attachment.html From endlesspixel at hotmail.com Mon Jun 20 06:24:49 2011 From: endlesspixel at hotmail.com (J.B. BERLIN) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:24:49 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Have someone zrtp with correct sas ? Message-ID: Dear users, I try run FS last git build from today 19. June 2011 with ZRTP. Zfone show me green but the sas are everytime different! Tested with 2x Notebooks on Fedora 14 Twinkle(via yum) & with two desktops with Win7 x64 / Zfone 0.92.build.219 and X-Lite on both sides. FS is build with libzrtp-0.81.514 zrtp.lua is enabled ! global_setvar zrtp_secure_media=true" is set Or have someone a real good step by step guide ? Many thanks and best regards Jacek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/74123396/attachment.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Mon Jun 20 19:04:03 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:04:03 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call Hangup In-Reply-To: References: <4DFEFCE0.9040809@seletech.com> <4DFF12B8.5090008@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4DFF6163.7010901@seletech.com> Yes, i have done only reload xml with fusionpbx. Thanks Alessandro Il 20/06/2011 16:33, Avi Marcus ha scritto: > You need to do a "sofia profile internal restart" to load your new > settings. > > -Avi Marcus > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Alessandro > wrote: > > Hi, > > i set > > > > on sip profile, but doesn't change. FS doesn't hang up the call > after one of the two extension disappear from the network. > With wireshark i don't see re-invite during the call. > > Regards > > Alessandro > Il 20/06/2011 10:43, David Ponzone ha scritto: >> Alessandro, >> >> there are 2 ways to do that: >> Session timers: with this, FS will send a RE-INVITE to phones >> every X minutes, and if the phone does not answer, it's >> considerer dead, so it is unregistered and the current calls will >> be hung up >> or >> RTP Timeout: this will detect that media is missing, and will >> hang up the call >> >> Session timers has to be enabled on the SIP Profile with: >> >> >> >> RTP timeout has to be enabled in the SIP Profile with: >> >> (use the value you wish. Also, be careful with this, it can lead >> to issues with some phones when you put a call on hold/mute or if >> you use VAD) >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service ClientIPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout >> message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message >> s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et >> d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >> / >> / >> >> >> >> Le 20/06/2011 ? 09:55, Alessandro a ?crit : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have an active call from the extension A to the extension B. >>> If one of the two extension is disconnected from the network >>> without >>> deregistration the call isn't hung up by the server. The call >>> should be >>> hangup when FS realizes that the extension isn't in the network? >>> Is there a time out to be set somewhere? >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Alessandro Luppi >>> >>> -- >>> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >>> Software development >>> Seletech srl >>> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >>> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >>> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: >>> www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/51529fa0/attachment-0001.html From avi at avimarcus.net Mon Jun 20 19:12:14 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:12:14 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call Hangup In-Reply-To: <4DFF6163.7010901@seletech.com> References: <4DFEFCE0.9040809@seletech.com> <4DFF12B8.5090008@seletech.com> <4DFF6163.7010901@seletech.com> Message-ID: BTW, fusionpbx on the Status -> SIP Status page has buttons to start/stop/restart the profiles. -Avi Marcus On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Alessandro wrote: > ** > Yes, i have done only reload xml with fusionpbx. > > Thanks > > Alessandro > > Il 20/06/2011 16:33, Avi Marcus ha scritto: > > You need to do a "sofia profile internal restart" to load your new > settings. > > -Avi Marcus > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Alessandro wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i set >> >> >> >> on sip profile, but doesn't change. FS doesn't hang up the call after one >> of the two extension disappear from the network. >> With wireshark i don't see re-invite during the call. >> >> Regards >> >> Alessandro >> Il 20/06/2011 10:43, David Ponzone ha scritto: >> >> Alessandro, >> >> there are 2 ways to do that: >> Session timers: with this, FS will send a RE-INVITE to phones every X >> minutes, and if the phone does not answer, it's considerer dead, so it is >> unregistered and the current calls will be hung up >> or >> RTP Timeout: this will detect that media is missing, and will hang up the >> call >> >> Session timers has to be enabled on the SIP Profile with: >> >> >> >> RTP timeout has to be enabled in the SIP Profile with: >> >> (use the value you wish. Also, be careful with this, it can lead to >> issues with some phones when you put a call on hold/mute or if you use VAD) >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >> l'exp?diteur.* >> * >> * >> >> >> >> Le 20/06/2011 ? 09:55, Alessandro a ?crit : >> >> Hi, >> >> I have an active call from the extension A to the extension B. >> If one of the two extension is disconnected from the network without >> deregistration the call isn't hung up by the server. The call should be >> hangup when FS realizes that the extension isn't in the network? >> Is there a time out to be set somewhere? >> >> thanks >> >> Regards >> >> Alessandro Luppi >> >> -- >> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >> Software development >> Seletech srl >> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or >> www.seletech.eu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >> Software development >> Seletech srl >> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/97d12cf8/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Mon Jun 20 19:22:21 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:22:21 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Loading Pocketsphinx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3277E95E06DC465F885DD89B0FFB7355@dell9400> You can also use pocketsphinx through uniMRCP according to their website. I have not tried it myself yet but I will a bit later. Jan _____ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Lemon Sent: 19. juni 2011 22:47 To: freeswitch-users Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Loading Pocketsphinx Whenever I try to load the pocketsphinx module, either on startup, or with the load mod_pocketsphinx command, I get the following error: freeswitch at bryanlemon-laptop> load mod_pocketsphinx 2011-06-19 15:17:04.471275 [INFO] mod_enum.c:775 ENUM Reloaded 2011-06-19 15:17:04.471275 [INFO] switch_time.c:1020 Timezone reloaded 530 definitions +OK Reloading XML -ERR [module load file routine returned an error] 2011-06-19 15:17:04.471275 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:928 Error Loading module /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so **/usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so: undefined symbol: feat_init** I am running Ubuntu 10.04, and installed freeswitch using the git method. I tried a git pull && make current, and it runs through with no problem. Any Ideas? Thank you, Bryan Lemon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/add65493/attachment-0001.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Mon Jun 20 19:26:08 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:26:08 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call Hangup In-Reply-To: References: <4DFEFCE0.9040809@seletech.com> <4DFF12B8.5090008@seletech.com> <4DFF6163.7010901@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4DFF6690.3020804@seletech.com> yes, done.. My mistake I thought that was enough reload xml Thanks for help Alessandro Il 20/06/2011 17:12, Avi Marcus ha scritto: > IP Status page has buttons to start/stop/restart the profiles. > -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 20 19:26:47 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:26:47 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List In-Reply-To: <7EAFE942-322C-4EC0-941A-F1226B8DDAD1@mgtech.com> References: <7EAFE942-322C-4EC0-941A-F1226B8DDAD1@mgtech.com> Message-ID: I believe we decided to forego the "how-to install fs" recipes since we have lots and lots of information on that subject on the wiki. We want to keep the recipes focused on interesting ways to use FreeSWITCH. -MC On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Mario G wrote: > I see there is a need for install on OS X Server. I thought the OS X > install I did for the wiki was quite comprehensive. What is missing? It > should be the same for OS X server. Also, I will do a clean install on OS X > 10.7 next month to update the wiki. > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > Hello all! > > Some have inquired recently about what's needed to complete the FS > cookbook. I've uploaded the most recent list of recipes that we have > identified. Some are already written but many are yet to be done. Check out > this page: > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Cookbook#Information_for_prospective_authors > > Contact me if you have any questions about helping with any of these > recipes. > > Thanks, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/c2b60e80/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 20 19:31:25 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:31:25 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Mitch, if you can supply how-to's/examples/screen shots for SRTP/TLS and various phones then those can make it into the chapter on security. We do mention setting up TLS and SRTP but like you said, each phone is different. A few examples will help. -MC On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:24 AM, mitch Johnson wrote: > It seems as if you have already identified what's going into the Cookbook. > Is it too late to add a few sections on TLS/SRTP with examples on using > different phone vendors and softphones on smartphones? > > I think FreeSWITCH is a powerful solution in the TLS/SRTP area yet to be > realized or tapped into. Having recipes on how to implement and a great > discussion on how FreeSWITCH can use channels on a single box to do > encrypted calls on the Internet side and unencrypted calls on the LAN side > would be incredible. > > Thanks, > > Mitch Johnson > >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Michael Collins >> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org, >> freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org >> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:14:33 -0700 >> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List >> Hello all! >> >> Some have inquired recently about what's needed to complete the FS >> cookbook. I've uploaded the most recent list of recipes that we have >> identified. Some are already written but many are yet to be done. Check out >> this page: >> >> >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Cookbook#Information_for_prospective_authors >> >> Contact me if you have any questions about helping with any of these >> recipes. >> >> Thanks, >> Michael >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/ba3d4a13/attachment.html From brian at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 20 19:39:21 2011 From: brian at freeswitch.org (Brian West) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <69DAAD6A-4597-4CFF-8D57-08CB6DA5A147@freeswitch.org> This is documented really well on the Wiki and is tested a lot by myself and I think Mitch Capper? /b On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > Mitch, > > if you can supply how-to's/examples/screen shots for SRTP/TLS and various > phones then those can make it into the chapter on security. We do mention > setting up TLS and SRTP but like you said, each phone is different. A few > examples will help. > > -MC From anton.vazir at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 20:21:40 2011 From: anton.vazir at gmail.com (Anton VG) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:21:40 +0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: <84b3f6b0-9cff-40cc-8a32-f1a2da1458ab@zimbra1.crocker.com> References: <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <84b3f6b0-9cff-40cc-8a32-f1a2da1458ab@zimbra1.crocker.com> Message-ID: zyxel have what you ask. Huawei have better pricing (~20$ per port) but huawei wants to sell huge amounts and quality is somehow bad. Zyxel is quite good (did not try ZyXEL Voip features, only ADSL) but ADSL is good and reliable, but more expensive per port. There are options for 12/24/48 and modular 300+ ports 2011/6/20 Matthew S. Crocker : > > Zhone MALC-XP are nowhere near $11k.??? They are < $100/port > > ________________________________ > > From: "David Ponzone" > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 5:29:48 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs > > Hmmm unlikely I think. > The Zhone box for instance seems to be around 11,000$. > David Ponzone ?Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 > Service Client?IPeva > tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il > a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce > message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > Le 17/06/2011 ? 10:25, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > > yes, it doesn't add up because the application is in a rural area. the > Phybridge is a good solution except for the price. thanks David. however, > the MSAN, perfectly describes what i'm looking - hopefully the investment is > lower. > thanks to all who contributed. > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, David Ponzone > wrote: >> >> Nandy, >> something does not add up. >> When you deploy DSLAMs for public lines, it's not for 24/48 ports, but >> rather for 20 000 to 30 000 ports. >> Perhaps there is a confusion about what is a public line. >> A public line is the 200 meters-8km pair of copper going from the local >> (legacy) telco facility to your house. >> You don't install your own DSLAMs for 24/48 ports, or perhaps you are in a >> very specific situation. >> I really doubt you will find a cost effective DSLAM for so few ports. >> Plus, you realize you will need to install on DSLAM in all the telco >> facilities required to get the coverage you need >> There are small DSLAMs on the market, but they are targeted for private >> lines (hospitality, health care, ...) and I really don't know if they can >> work on public lines. >> In case you actually need a small DSLAM just to run ADSL over a private >> pair of copper, you should have a look at: >> http://www.phybridge.com/uniphyer-ip-phones.aspx >> This thing does not call itself a DSLAM but it is one. >> They market that as a "switch" that enables LAN on your copper wires. >> It's a small lie for data usage as you only get 25Mbps/1.4Mbps (ATM), but >> for voice, that's enough. >> Basically, you put the "switch"-DSLAM in the network cabinet where the >> copper wires go, you connect the wires to it, you connect the ethernet port >> to your LAN (so your FS). In each room/office, you plug an adapter (provided >> also by Phybridge) which is basically a small ADSL modem (powered from the >> switch through the wire), from which you get an ethernet port, with POE on >> it! >> I like the solution on the paper, but never used. Because of the cost: >> a 24 ports switch is 3500$ >> one adapter is 122$ >> so a full 24 ports solution would be 6500$, which is not very competitive >> compared to recabling the place. >> But your mileage may vary. >> David Ponzone ?Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 >> Service Client?IPeva >> tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com >> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il >> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >> >> >> >> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:28, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >> >> yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone >> wrote: >>> >>> Which density are you looking for ? >>> Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? >>> David Ponzone ?Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 >>> Service Client?IPeva >>> tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com >>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >>> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >>> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >>> d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il >>> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : >>> >>> hello guys! >>> >>> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, >>> using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and >>> that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). >>> >>> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's >>> FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP.? i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on >>> newer IP DSLAMs. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks wrote: >>>> >>>> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. >>>> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. >>>> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. >>>> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device >>>> to provide the voice, >>>> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND >>>> the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) >>>> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to see >>>> if there are such devices.. >>>> sorry I dont know of any :( >>>> Jay >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? ?A DSLAM is a device >>>>> that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. >>>>> ?So normally, you have >>>>> >>>>> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or >>>>> modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] >>>>> >>>>> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could >>>>> be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? ?Onewire, Cisco, and >>>>> others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports >>>>> for the CPE end. >>>>> >>>>> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, >>>>> you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU >>>>> tp handle much besides the traffic. >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: >>>>> > hello everybody, >>>>> > >>>>> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) ?IP DSLAMs that inter-connects >>>>> > directly >>>>> > to FreeSwitch via IP. ?is this already available on the market? or do >>>>> > we >>>>> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? >>>>> > i >>>>> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. >>>>> > >>>>> > tks, >>>>> > nandy >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sincerely >>>> >>>> Jay >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From steveayre at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 20:44:47 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:44:47 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Skypopen, Skype 2.2.0.35 Beta for Linux and Skype Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I don't think that version's supported... http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_skypopen*: "Don't* use the *beta* Skype client or more recent "stable" (2.0.0.72 static for OSS is the one you want to use)." Giovanni is the module maintainer so can probably chip in to clarify if that's still the case or whether that's or information. -Steve On 19 June 2011 12:34, Skyp Tester wrote: > Hi > > > > There is problem with Skype Linux client 2.0.0.72 , I cant call to Skype > Connect client, error ?FAILUREREASON 2? = ?User or phone number does not > exist?. > > http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/business/skype-connect/ > > > > Installed skypopen with Skype client 2.0.0.72 . > > Upgraded to 2.2.0.35: > > 1) install libstdc++-4.3.2-7.i386.rpm > > 2) copy over /usr/bin/skype and /usr/share/skype/lang with new > version > > > > Now I can call to Skype Connect client but there are some problems > > 1) audio is one way, Skype->FS > > 2) after first call there is error ?NO SPACE WRITE: 640? and no more > Skype calls, ?ERROR 68? & ?If I don't connect immediately, please give the > Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask > you again)? > > > > Can we hope support to Skype Linux 2.2.0.35 or there is some big technical > obstacle? > > > > > > Centos 5.6 x86_64 > > 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP > > FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-fccbba5 2011-05-18 19-00-42 -0400) > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/687efd53/attachment.html From gmaruzz at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 20:51:21 2011 From: gmaruzz at gmail.com (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:51:21 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Skypopen, Skype 2.2.0.35 Beta for Linux and Skype Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: All relevant info are in the wiki page ;). Particularly, I would counseil to use the interactive installer, that does it all automatically for you. Included downloading, configuring and installing the correct skype client. -giovanni On 6/20/11, Steven Ayre wrote: > I don't think that version's supported... > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_skypopen*: > "Don't* use the *beta* Skype client or more recent "stable" (2.0.0.72 static > for OSS is the one you want to use)." > > Giovanni is the module maintainer so can probably chip in to clarify if > that's still the case or whether that's or information. > > -Steve > > > > On 19 June 2011 12:34, Skyp Tester wrote: > >> Hi >> >> >> >> There is problem with Skype Linux client 2.0.0.72 , I cant call to Skype >> Connect client, error ?FAILUREREASON 2? = ?User or phone number does not >> exist?. >> >> http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/business/skype-connect/ >> >> >> >> Installed skypopen with Skype client 2.0.0.72 . >> >> Upgraded to 2.2.0.35: >> >> 1) install libstdc++-4.3.2-7.i386.rpm >> >> 2) copy over /usr/bin/skype and /usr/share/skype/lang with new >> version >> >> >> >> Now I can call to Skype Connect client but there are some problems >> >> 1) audio is one way, Skype->FS >> >> 2) after first call there is error ?NO SPACE WRITE: 640? and no more >> Skype calls, ?ERROR 68? & ?If I don't connect immediately, please give the >> Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask >> you again)? >> >> >> >> Can we hope support to Skype Linux 2.2.0.35 or there is some big technical >> obstacle? >> >> >> >> >> >> Centos 5.6 x86_64 >> >> 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP >> >> FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-fccbba5 2011-05-18 19-00-42 -0400) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > -- Sent from my mobile device Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 From nyamul at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 21:14:20 2011 From: nyamul at gmail.com (Nyamul Hassan) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:14:20 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs In-Reply-To: References: <0013F8A2-8D82-470C-B8D8-45C22BDB3A00@ipeva.fr> <84b3f6b0-9cff-40cc-8a32-f1a2da1458ab@zimbra1.crocker.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 22:21, Anton VG wrote: > zyxel have what you ask. Huawei have better pricing (~20$ per port) > but huawei wants to sell huge amounts and quality is somehow bad. > > Zyxel is quite good (did not try ZyXEL Voip features, only ADSL) but > ADSL is good and reliable, but more expensive per port. There are > options for 12/24/48 and modular 300+ ports > > 2011/6/20 Matthew S. Crocker : > > > > Zhone MALC-XP are nowhere near $11k. They are < $100/port > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: "David Ponzone" > > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 5:29:48 AM > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs > > > > Hmmm unlikely I think. > > The Zhone box for instance seems to be around 11,000$. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion > > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > > d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message > s'il > > a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce > > message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > > > > Le 17/06/2011 ? 10:25, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > > > > yes, it doesn't add up because the application is in a rural area. the > > Phybridge is a good solution except for the price. thanks David. however, > > the MSAN, perfectly describes what i'm looking - hopefully the investment > is > > lower. > > thanks to all who contributed. > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, David Ponzone > > wrote: > >> > >> Nandy, > >> something does not add up. > >> When you deploy DSLAMs for public lines, it's not for 24/48 ports, but > >> rather for 20 000 to 30 000 ports. > >> Perhaps there is a confusion about what is a public line. > >> A public line is the 200 meters-8km pair of copper going from the local > >> (legacy) telco facility to your house. > >> You don't install your own DSLAMs for 24/48 ports, or perhaps you are in > a > >> very specific situation. > >> I really doubt you will find a cost effective DSLAM for so few ports. > >> Plus, you realize you will need to install on DSLAM in all the telco > >> facilities required to get the coverage you need > >> There are small DSLAMs on the market, but they are targeted for private > >> lines (hospitality, health care, ...) and I really don't know if they > can > >> work on public lines. > >> In case you actually need a small DSLAM just to run ADSL over a private > >> pair of copper, you should have a look at: > >> http://www.phybridge.com/uniphyer-ip-phones.aspx > >> This thing does not call itself a DSLAM but it is one. > >> They market that as a "switch" that enables LAN on your copper wires. > >> It's a small lie for data usage as you only get 25Mbps/1.4Mbps (ATM), > but > >> for voice, that's enough. > >> Basically, you put the "switch"-DSLAM in the network cabinet where the > >> copper wires go, you connect the wires to it, you connect the ethernet > port > >> to your LAN (so your FS). In each room/office, you plug an adapter > (provided > >> also by Phybridge) which is basically a small ADSL modem (powered from > the > >> switch through the wire), from which you get an ethernet port, with POE > on > >> it! > >> I like the solution on the paper, but never used. Because of the cost: > >> a 24 ports switch is 3500$ > >> one adapter is 122$ > >> so a full 24 ports solution would be 6500$, which is not very > competitive > >> compared to recabling the place. > >> But your mileage may vary. > >> David Ponzone Direction Technique > >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > >> Service Client IPeva > >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 > >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > >> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion > >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > >> d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message > s'il > >> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce > >> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > >> > >> > >> > >> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:28, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > >> > >> yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Which density are you looking for ? > >>> Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? > >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique > >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > >>> Service Client IPeva > >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 > >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > >>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > >>> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion > >>> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > >>> d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message > s'il > >>> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de > ce > >>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Le 17/06/2011 ? 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a ?crit : > >>> > >>> hello guys! > >>> > >>> i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, > >>> using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters > and > >>> that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned). > >>> > >>> i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's > >>> FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible > on > >>> newer IP DSLAMs. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> this is MY take on what Nandy is after. > >>>> A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. > >>>> ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. > >>>> my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device > >>>> to provide the voice, > >>>> but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND > >>>> the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) > >>>> I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to > see > >>>> if there are such devices.. > >>>> sorry I dont know of any :( > >>>> Jay > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a > device > >>>>> that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run > across it. > >>>>> So normally, you have > >>>>> > >>>>> |Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem > or > >>>>> modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client] > >>>>> > >>>>> What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is > (could > >>>>> be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, > and > >>>>> others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS > ports > >>>>> for the CPE end. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, > >>>>> you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with > enough CPU > >>>>> tp handle much besides the traffic. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: > >>>>> > hello everybody, > >>>>> > > >>>>> > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects > >>>>> > directly > >>>>> > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or > do > >>>>> > we > >>>>> > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS > gateways? > >>>>> > i > >>>>> > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > tks, > >>>>> > nandy > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Sincerely > >>>> > >>>> Jay > Very informative discussion. :) Can someone also share their experience on Fibre Optic based vendors / solutions? Regards HASSAN -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/3d9c7d6b/attachment-0001.html From gmaruzz at gmail.com Mon Jun 20 21:31:08 2011 From: gmaruzz at gmail.com (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:31:08 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Skypopen, Skype 2.2.0.35 Beta for Linux and Skype Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Skypopen#SHORT_BLUEPRINT:_STEPS_NEEDED_TO_USE_SKYPOPEN http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Skypopen#Build_procedure_.28all_Linuxes.29_for_FS_and_mod_skypopen http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Skypopen#How_to_build_skypopen.ko_OSS_sound_driver_.28required.29 http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Skypopen#Interactive_INSTALLER_and_CONFIGURATOR http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Skypopen#How_to_start_the_Skype_clients.2C_then_start_FreeSWITCH_and_load_mod_skypopen_on_Linux On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote: > All relevant info are in the wiki page ;). > > Particularly, I would counseil to use the interactive installer, that > does it all automatically for you. Included downloading, configuring > and installing the correct skype client. > > -giovanni > > > On 6/20/11, Steven Ayre wrote: > > I don't think that version's supported... > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_skypopen*: > > "Don't* use the *beta* Skype client or more recent "stable" (2.0.0.72 > static > > for OSS is the one you want to use)." > > > > Giovanni is the module maintainer so can probably chip in to clarify if > > that's still the case or whether that's or information. > > > > -Steve > > > > > > > > On 19 June 2011 12:34, Skyp Tester wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> > >> > >> There is problem with Skype Linux client 2.0.0.72 , I cant call to Skype > >> Connect client, error ?FAILUREREASON 2? = ?User or phone number does not > >> exist?. > >> > >> http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/business/skype-connect/ > >> > >> > >> > >> Installed skypopen with Skype client 2.0.0.72 . > >> > >> Upgraded to 2.2.0.35: > >> > >> 1) install libstdc++-4.3.2-7.i386.rpm > >> > >> 2) copy over /usr/bin/skype and /usr/share/skype/lang with new > >> version > >> > >> > >> > >> Now I can call to Skype Connect client but there are some problems > >> > >> 1) audio is one way, Skype->FS > >> > >> 2) after first call there is error ?NO SPACE WRITE: 640? and no > more > >> Skype calls, ?ERROR 68? & ?If I don't connect immediately, please give > the > >> Skype client authorization to be connected by Skypopen (and to not ask > >> you again)? > >> > >> > >> > >> Can we hope support to Skype Linux 2.2.0.35 or there is some big > technical > >> obstacle? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Centos 5.6 x86_64 > >> > >> 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP > >> > >> FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-fccbba5 2011-05-18 19-00-42 -0400) > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > >> > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > Sincerely, > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > -- Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/1b8f035e/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 20 21:32:42 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:32:42 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bind_digit_action delay In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Could you please pastebin your dialplan where you set the target actions for these digits? -MC On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Javier Gallart wrote: > Hello list, > > I'm using to bind_digit_action application to launch an event when a > particular sequence of keys (##) is pressed. It works fine, the only problem > is that the application is launched 5 seconds after the last key is pressed. > I've tried with a simple playback application and it's just the same: > 2011-06-20 07:22:55.641019 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF #:1560 > 2011-06-20 07:22:56.121025 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF #:1480 > 2011-06-20 07:22:56.121025 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:151 sofia/internal/ > 34917019888 at 79.170.64.151 Digit match binding > [exec:playback][/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time] > (...) > 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:567 sofia/internal/ > 34661574758 at 79.170.68.169:5060 Command Execute > playback(local_stream://moh) > EXECUTE sofia/internal/34661574758 at 79.170.68.169:5060playback(local_stream://moh) > 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [WARNING] mod_local_stream.c:393 Unknown source > moh, trying 'default' > 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [ERR] mod_local_stream.c:402 Unknown source > default > (...) > 2011-06-20 07:23:01.281067 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:567 sofia/internal/ > 34917019888 at 79.170.64.151 Command Execute > playback(/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time) > EXECUTE sofia/internal/34917019888 at 79.170.64.151playback(/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time) > > My first question is why does fs tries to play moh? And the second one is > if there is a way to shorten the lapse between the last key and the > execution of the application. I've played a bit with the > bind_digit_input_timeout variable that I've seen in the code, with no > success. Does anyone have faces the same issue? > I'm using version FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-7768808 2011-06-18 > 11-52-37 -0500) > > Thanks in advance > > Javi > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/429368db/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 20 23:50:55 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:50:55 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Have someone zrtp with correct sas ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Is media flowing through FreeSWITCH? If so I think that FS needs to be configured as a "trusted man in the middle." The other option would be to bypass media and see if that works. I would start with the bypass media since that is the low-hanging fruit. -MC On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:24 PM, J.B. BERLIN wrote: > Dear users, > > I try run FS last git build from today 19. June 2011 with ZRTP. > > Zfone show me green but the sas are everytime different! > > Tested with 2x Notebooks on Fedora 14 Twinkle(via yum) & with two desktops > with Win7 x64 / Zfone 0.92.build.219 and X-Lite on both sides. > > FS is build with libzrtp-0.81.514 > > zrtp.lua is enabled ! > > global_setvar zrtp_secure_media=true" is set > > Or have someone a real good step by step guide ? > > Many thanks and best regards > Jacek > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/4a3dd9c5/attachment.html From endlesspixel at hotmail.com Tue Jun 21 00:36:18 2011 From: endlesspixel at hotmail.com (J.B. BERLIN) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:36:18 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Have someone zrtp with correct sas ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Michael, thanks for reply where the difference in the configuration ? How is the right configuration for bypass and what for MiTM ? I build FS like so: sudo git clone git://git.freeswitch.org/freeswitch.git cd /usr/src/freeswitch sh build/buildzrtp.sh sudo ./bootstrap.sh sudo ./configure -C --prefix=/opt/freeswitch --enable-zrtp --enable-64 sudo make all install sounds-install moh-install Than put : global_setvar zrtp_secure_media=true in the conf and following in my dailplan: I can call 9787 and it?s say me that the call is secure but if I callanother user i become different SAS...?Kind regardsJacek From: Michael Collins Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 9:50 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Have someone zrtp with correct sas ? Is media flowing through FreeSWITCH? If so I think that FS needs to be configured as a "trusted man in the middle." The other option would be to bypass media and see if that works. I would start with the bypass media since that is the low-hanging fruit. -MC On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:24 PM, J.B. BERLIN wrote: Dear users, I try run FS last git build from today 19. June 2011 with ZRTP. Zfone show me green but the sas are everytime different! Tested with 2x Notebooks on Fedora 14 Twinkle(via yum) & with two desktops with Win7 x64 / Zfone 0.92.build.219 and X-Lite on both sides. FS is build with libzrtp-0.81.514 zrtp.lua is enabled ! global_setvar zrtp_secure_media=true" is set Or have someone a real good step by step guide ? Many thanks and best regards Jacek _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/60f93f0a/attachment-0001.html From brian at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 21 00:40:54 2011 From: brian at freeswitch.org (Brian West) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Have someone zrtp with correct sas ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <45A8C155-CAC4-4C87-BA8D-768559BCB9F6@freeswitch.org> Its called MiTM... and it will switch in some cases depending on who wins. :P /b On Jun 20, 2011, at 3:36 PM, J.B. BERLIN wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for reply where the difference in the configuration ? > > How is the right configuration for bypass and what for MiTM ? > > I build FS like so: From mitch.johnson7 at gmail.com Tue Jun 21 05:07:12 2011 From: mitch.johnson7 at gmail.com (Mitch Johnson) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <16591747-C9A1-4B88-AC4D-8C986EE5A961@gmail.com> I would love to supply examples and screenshots, but to be honest it would feel like stealing from the work of others such as Brian and the other Mitch (Capper). They have both helped me to be successful in this area. Brian was a huge help on the Cudatel side and Mitch was incredible on the Freeswitch side. I did read Brian's response and he is right, there are examples available, but having a complete explanation on using one channel for encrypted and the other as unencrypted. Or having both channels encrypted. An explanation on the process of how to build a cert server and then import certificates into a mobile device. Once again, I have done these things, but I am hardly the right person to be able to explain the process in an effective manner. The other Mitch (Capper) explained it brilliantly to me and Brian West had to reiterate everything that Mitch explained. If there is anything I can do to make FreeSWITCH the premier TLS/SRTP solution I would love to help. I think all I could offer is the way I eventually connected FreeSWITCH to the Cisco CallManager platform. That part I think I can provide screenshots. Thanks for everyone's help, especially Mitch and Brian. Mitch (Not Capper) From bcxml at hotmail.com Tue Jun 21 06:29:43 2011 From: bcxml at hotmail.com (Brian Campbell) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls Message-ID: I have run into a very strange issue with periodically losing Audio on Incomming calls I am receiving incomming calls to FreeSwitch via a DID from an ITSP. Once FreeSwitch receives the call, I am adding a header to pass the UUID (which I use later to inject some custom values into CDRs) and then bridge to an IVR application running on Microsoft Speech Server 2007 which is on a separate box, using the following dial plan Some calls are performing properly, but in some of the calls (about 30%) the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying I have eliminated any Firewalls for testing, so I go straight from the ITSP to FreeSwitch and then to Speech Server. Thee is no NAT in play. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to when a call is going to work, or when it isn't. I have also seen exactly the same behavior in a completely different environment with a different ITSP and a completely different IVR application. So I figure that the problem is somewhere between FreeSwitch and Speech Server, but I don't see anything wrong. Using WireShark I can see the SIP signalling creating/tearing down the call and I see RTP traffic flowing both ways between FreeSwitch and Speech Server The version of FreeSwitch that I am running is 'FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-38f06a3 2011-05-19 15-39-43 -0500)' I have pasted 2 FreeSwitch traces into pastebin. The first one is of a working call, the second one is of a call where the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying Can anyone advise on what the issue might be. I am completely out of ideas. Thanks Brian Campbell -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110620/46eb7168/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Tue Jun 21 10:43:44 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:43:44 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Brian, twice you say "the IVR doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying". I suppose that means it is an assumption because it does not react to DTMFs ? Do you have the possibility in this IVR to record the call ? This way, you would be sure. Also you say that Wireshark tells you the RTP traffic is fine. Even when the call is not working ? Do you notice anything different in this RTP ? You may also take a RTP trace between FS and IVR of a non-working call, analyse the RTP flows and save the payload as raw to a file. You should be able to listen to the audio with the right tool. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 21/06/2011 ? 04:29, Brian Campbell a ?crit : > I have run into a very strange issue with periodically losing Audio on Incomming calls > > I am receiving incomming calls to FreeSwitch via a DID from an ITSP. Once FreeSwitch receives the call, I am adding a header to pass the UUID (which I use later to inject some custom values into CDRs) and then bridge to an IVR application running on Microsoft Speech Server 2007 which is on a separate box, using the following dial plan > > > > > > > > > Some calls are performing properly, but in some of the calls (about 30%) the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying > > I have eliminated any Firewalls for testing, so I go straight from the ITSP to FreeSwitch and then to Speech Server. Thee is no NAT in play. > > There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to when a call is going to work, or when it isn't. I have also seen exactly the same behavior in a completely different environment with a different ITSP and a completely different IVR application. > > So I figure that the problem is somewhere between FreeSwitch and Speech Server, but I don't see anything wrong. > > Using WireShark I can see the SIP signalling creating/tearing down the call and I see RTP traffic flowing both ways between FreeSwitch and Speech Server > > The version of FreeSwitch that I am running is 'FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-38f06a3 2011-05-19 15-39-43 -0500)' > > I have pasted 2 FreeSwitch traces into pastebin. The first one is of a working call, the second one is of a call where the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying > > Can anyone advise on what the issue might be. I am completely out of ideas. > > Thanks > > Brian Campbell > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/86044f6f/attachment.html From jgallartm at gmail.com Tue Jun 21 14:18:29 2011 From: jgallartm at gmail.com (Javier Gallart) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:18:29 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bind_digit_action delay Message-ID: Thanks Michael the session has been answered by a lua script and transferred back to the dialplan to be bridged. Once in the dialplan this is the extension executed. The CUSTOM schedule event is sent 5 seconds after the ## is pressed. (...here we assign some custom variables...) Regards Javi ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Collins > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:32:42 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] bind_digit_action delay > Could you please pastebin your dialplan where you set the target actions > for these digits? > -MC > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Javier Gallart wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> I'm using to bind_digit_action application to launch an event when a >> particular sequence of keys (##) is pressed. It works fine, the only problem >> is that the application is launched 5 seconds after the last key is pressed. >> I've tried with a simple playback application and it's just the same: >> 2011-06-20 07:22:55.641019 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF #:1560 >> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.121025 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF #:1480 >> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.121025 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:151 sofia/internal/ >> 34917019888 at 79.170.64.151 Digit match binding >> [exec:playback][/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time] >> (...) >> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:567 sofia/internal/ >> 34661574758 at 79.170.68.169:5060 Command Execute >> playback(local_stream://moh) >> EXECUTE sofia/internal/34661574758 at 79.170.68.169:5060playback(local_stream://moh) >> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [WARNING] mod_local_stream.c:393 Unknown source >> moh, trying 'default' >> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [ERR] mod_local_stream.c:402 Unknown source >> default >> (...) >> 2011-06-20 07:23:01.281067 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:567 sofia/internal/ >> 34917019888 at 79.170.64.151 Command Execute >> playback(/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time) >> EXECUTE sofia/internal/34917019888 at 79.170.64.151playback(/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time) >> >> My first question is why does fs tries to play moh? And the second one is >> if there is a way to shorten the lapse between the last key and the >> execution of the application. I've played a bit with the >> bind_digit_input_timeout variable that I've seen in the code, with no >> success. Does anyone have faces the same issue? >> I'm using version FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-7768808 2011-06-18 >> 11-52-37 -0500) >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Javi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/f6b5952d/attachment-0001.html From marketing at cluecon.com Tue Jun 21 16:39:42 2011 From: marketing at cluecon.com (marketing at cluecon.com) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:42 +0000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon 2011 Special Guest: PGP Inventor Philip Zimmermann Message-ID: <00000130b236a04b-f80474f5-f26e-4ddb-820c-ddadbecd3c08-000000@email.amazonses.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/7ac65fa3/attachment.html From bcxml at hotmail.com Tue Jun 21 17:13:19 2011 From: bcxml at hotmail.com (Brian Campbell) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: Thanks David The Speech Server application reacts to speech from the caller validated by a grammar. There is a facility in Speech Server to log the calls, including the audio. On calls that work, I can hear the prompts from the application as well as my responses in the session audio. On calls that don't work, I hear the prompts from the application but none of my responses. After a small period of waiting the Speech Recognizer times out and tells me that it did not hear me say anything. I have tried increasing the timeout interval but the problem remains. So I am not sure where the problem lies, is it something breaking down in Speech Server, or is the audio not making it from FreeSwitch to Speech Server. One thing for sure is that it doesnt stop working half way through the call. It either recognizes utterances from the caller or it doesn't, which would lead me to think that sometimes the call is not properly setup between Speech Server and FreeSwitch, but as I said I have run out of ideas. As I mentioned I do see RTP traffic, but I am afraid that I do not posses indepth knowledge about the protocol, so I am not sure how to properly analyse it. Thanks again for your input Brian Campbell From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:43:44 +0200 To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls Brian, twice you say "the IVR doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying". I suppose that means it is an assumption because it does not react to DTMFs ? Do you have the possibility in this IVR to record the call ? This way, you would be sure. Also you say that Wireshark tells you the RTP traffic is fine. Even when the call is not working ? Do you notice anything different in this RTP ? You may also take a RTP trace between FS and IVR of a non-working call, analyse the RTP flows and save the payload as raw to a file. You should be able to listen to the audio with the right tool. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 21/06/2011 ? 04:29, Brian Campbell a ?crit : I have run into a very strange issue with periodically losing Audio on Incomming calls I am receiving incomming calls to FreeSwitch via a DID from an ITSP. Once FreeSwitch receives the call, I am adding a header to pass the UUID (which I use later to inject some custom values into CDRs) and then bridge to an IVR application running on Microsoft Speech Server 2007 which is on a separate box, using the following dial plan Some calls are performing properly, but in some of the calls (about 30%) the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying I have eliminated any Firewalls for testing, so I go straight from the ITSP to FreeSwitch and then to Speech Server. Thee is no NAT in play. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to when a call is going to work, or when it isn't. I have also seen exactly the same behavior in a completely different environment with a different ITSP and a completely different IVR application. So I figure that the problem is somewhere between FreeSwitch and Speech Server, but I don't see anything wrong. Using WireShark I can see the SIP signalling creating/tearing down the call and I see RTP traffic flowing both ways between FreeSwitch and Speech Server The version of FreeSwitch that I am running is 'FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-38f06a3 2011-05-19 15-39-43 -0500)' I have pasted 2 FreeSwitch traces into pastebin. The first one is of a working call, the second one is of a call where the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying Can anyone advise on what the issue might be. I am completely out of ideas. Thanks Brian Campbell _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/c9852fa5/attachment.html From henk at oegema.com Tue Jun 21 17:48:08 2011 From: henk at oegema.com (Henk Oegema) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:48:08 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working Message-ID: <1308664088.9892.86.camel@DELL> I want to achieve the following: When a call comes in, it should ring 30 seconds on extension 1000. If there's no answer the call should go to my mobile. ............... ............. However, when I answer the incoming call at 1000 and hangup, the call will still go to my mobile, in stead of hanging up. What am I doing wrong? Rgds. Henk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/fad61407/attachment.html From monemran at gmail.com Tue Jun 21 17:56:48 2011 From: monemran at gmail.com (Mohammad Emran) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:56:48 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working In-Reply-To: <1308664088.9892.86.camel@DELL> References: <1308664088.9892.86.camel@DELL> Message-ID: <6F677925-0E82-4A82-9477-7347C8AF25FA@gmail.com> You can try to set hangup_after_bridge true before bridge. Sent from my iPad On 21 Jun 2011, at 19:48, Henk Oegema wrote: > I want to achieve the following: > When a call comes in, it should ring 30 seconds on extension 1000. > If there's no answer the call should go to my mobile. > > > ............... > > > > > > ............. > > > However, when I answer the incoming call at 1000 and hangup, the call will still go to my mobile, in stead of hanging up. > What am I doing wrong? > > Rgds. > Henk > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From avi at avimarcus.net Tue Jun 21 18:06:20 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:06:20 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working In-Reply-To: <6F677925-0E82-4A82-9477-7347C8AF25FA@gmail.com> References: <1308664088.9892.86.camel@DELL> <6F677925-0E82-4A82-9477-7347C8AF25FA@gmail.com> Message-ID: Not just "try" :) You want it to hangup_after_bridge, so you need to tell it that before the first bridge. -Avi Marcus On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Mohammad Emran wrote: > You can try to set hangup_after_bridge true before bridge. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21 Jun 2011, at 19:48, Henk Oegema wrote: > > > I want to achieve the following: > > When a call comes in, it should ring 30 seconds on extension 1000. > > If there's no answer the call should go to my mobile. > > > > > > ............... > > > > data="{originate_timeout=30}sofia/internal/1000%$${domain}"/> > > > > data="sofia/gateway/powervoip/003163086xxxx"/> > > > > ............. > > > > > > However, when I answer the incoming call at 1000 and hangup, the call > will still go to my mobile, in stead of hanging up. > > What am I doing wrong? > > > > Rgds. > > Henk > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/0c978a01/attachment.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Tue Jun 21 18:09:32 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:09:32 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Modified Follow me Message-ID: <4E00A61C.1060503@seletech.com> Hi, i'd like to implement this particular behaviour. If I call an extension that isn't registered to FS, FS re-route the call to another destination. If also the second destination in unreachable the call end. I first used the follow me (created with fusionpbx) to implement this feature, but I have the following problem: if the first extension is reachable and the user hangup before answering (hangup in ringing), the follow me procedure starts to contact the second extension in the list. I want that FS start to contact the second phone only if the first extension isn't registered to FS. The second problem is that with follow-me FS answer with 200 OK at the invite of the caller bypassing the ringing status, than the procedure of follow-me is transparent to the caller. I'd like that the caller stay in ringing status until one of the destination extension answer at the call or the call is closed by FS. Any suggestion? Regards Alessandro Luppi -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu From henk at oegema.com Tue Jun 21 18:25:07 2011 From: henk at oegema.com (Henk Oegema) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:25:07 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working In-Reply-To: References: <1308664088.9892.86.camel@DELL> <6F677925-0E82-4A82-9477-7347C8AF25FA@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1308666307.10396.1.camel@DELL> You are right of course. On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 17:06 +0300, Avi Marcus wrote: > Not just "try" :) > > You want it to hangup_after_bridge, so you need to tell it that before > the first bridge. > > > -Avi Marcus > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Mohammad Emran > wrote: > > You can try to set hangup_after_bridge true before bridge. > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On 21 Jun 2011, at 19:48, Henk Oegema wrote: > > > I want to achieve the following: > > When a call comes in, it should ring 30 seconds on extension > 1000. > > If there's no answer the call should go to my mobile. > > > > > > ............... > > > > data="{originate_timeout=30}sofia/internal/1000%$${domain}"/> > > > > data="sofia/gateway/powervoip/003163086xxxx"/> > > > > ............. > > > > > > However, when I answer the incoming call at 1000 and > hangup, the call will still go to my mobile, in stead of > hanging up. > > What am I doing wrong? > > > > Rgds. > > Henk > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/fdf56910/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Tue Jun 21 18:41:14 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:41:14 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: Wireshark is your friend :) Open your RTP flow, click on Telephony/RTP/Show All Streams In the next window, select the stream you want (the one from FS to IVR) and click on Analyse. And in the final window, click on Save Payload. Then select the forward stream, and save as raw. You should be able to import the raw file in any decent audio software (Audacity, etc...) as U-Law (I suppose you use PCMU), 8Khz. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 21/06/2011 ? 15:13, Brian Campbell a ?crit : > Thanks David > > The Speech Server application reacts to speech from the caller validated by a grammar. There is a facility in Speech Server to log the calls, including the audio. On calls that work, I can hear the prompts from the application as well as my responses in the session audio. On calls that don't work, I hear the prompts from the application but none of my responses. After a small period of waiting the Speech Recognizer times out and tells me that it did not hear me say anything. I have tried increasing the timeout interval but the problem remains. > > So I am not sure where the problem lies, is it something breaking down in Speech Server, or is the audio not making it from FreeSwitch to Speech Server. > > One thing for sure is that it doesnt stop working half way through the call. It either recognizes utterances from the caller or it doesn't, which would lead me to think that sometimes the call is not properly setup between Speech Server and FreeSwitch, but as I said I have run out of ideas. > > As I mentioned I do see RTP traffic, but I am afraid that I do not posses indepth knowledge about the protocol, so I am not sure how to properly analyse it. > > Thanks again for your input > > > Brian Campbell > > From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:43:44 +0200 > To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls > > Brian, > > twice you say "the IVR doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying". > I suppose that means it is an assumption because it does not react to DTMFs ? > Do you have the possibility in this IVR to record the call ? > This way, you would be sure. > > Also you say that Wireshark tells you the RTP traffic is fine. > Even when the call is not working ? > Do you notice anything different in this RTP ? > You may also take a RTP trace between FS and IVR of a non-working call, analyse the RTP flows and save the payload as raw to a file. > You should be able to listen to the audio with the right tool. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > Le 21/06/2011 ? 04:29, Brian Campbell a ?crit : > > I have run into a very strange issue with periodically losing Audio on Incomming calls > > I am receiving incomming calls to FreeSwitch via a DID from an ITSP. Once FreeSwitch receives the call, I am adding a header to pass the UUID (which I use later to inject some custom values into CDRs) and then bridge to an IVR application running on Microsoft Speech Server 2007 which is on a separate box, using the following dial plan > > > > > > > > > Some calls are performing properly, but in some of the calls (about 30%) the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying > > I have eliminated any Firewalls for testing, so I go straight from the ITSP to FreeSwitch and then to Speech Server. Thee is no NAT in play. > > There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to when a call is going to work, or when it isn't. I have also seen exactly the same behavior in a completely different environment with a different ITSP and a completely different IVR application. > > So I figure that the problem is somewhere between FreeSwitch and Speech Server, but I don't see anything wrong. > > Using WireShark I can see the SIP signalling creating/tearing down the call and I see RTP traffic flowing both ways between FreeSwitch and Speech Server > > The version of FreeSwitch that I am running is 'FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-38f06a3 2011-05-19 15-39-43 -0500)' > > I have pasted 2 FreeSwitch traces into pastebin. The first one is of a working call, the second one is of a call where the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying > > Can anyone advise on what the issue might be. I am completely out of ideas. > > Thanks > > Brian Campbell > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-usersUNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/dcc6d214/attachment-0001.html From jgallartm at gmail.com Tue Jun 21 19:40:43 2011 From: jgallartm at gmail.com (Javier Gallart) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:40:43 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bind_digit_action delay Message-ID: Hi you can ignore this issue, it was a stupid fault in my config. The /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds dir was empty (we have our custom sounds in a different path), but at vars.xml the following directives were still present: Thanks anyway Javi > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Javier Gallart > To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:18:29 +0200 > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] bind_digit_action delay > Thanks Michael > > the session has been answered by a lua script and transferred back to the > dialplan to be bridged. Once in the dialplan this is the extension executed. > The CUSTOM schedule event is sent 5 seconds after the ## is pressed. > > > > > > (...here we assign some custom variables...) > data="bridge_pre_execute_aleg_app=bind_digit_action"/> > data="bridge_pre_execute_aleg_data=test1,##,exec:event,Event-Subclass=reoriginate,Event-Name=CUSTOM"/> > > data="sofia/internal/${dest_number}@${gateway}"/> > > > > Regards > > Javi > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Michael Collins >> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:32:42 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] bind_digit_action delay >> Could you please pastebin your dialplan where you set the target actions >> for these digits? >> -MC >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Javier Gallart wrote: >> >>> Hello list, >>> >>> I'm using to bind_digit_action application to launch an event when a >>> particular sequence of keys (##) is pressed. It works fine, the only problem >>> is that the application is launched 5 seconds after the last key is pressed. >>> I've tried with a simple playback application and it's just the same: >>> 2011-06-20 07:22:55.641019 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF #:1560 >>> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.121025 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:3302 RTP RECV DTMF #:1480 >>> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.121025 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:151 sofia/internal/ >>> 34917019888 at 79.170.64.151 Digit match binding >>> [exec:playback][/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time] >>> (...) >>> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:567 sofia/internal/ >>> 34661574758 at 79.170.68.169:5060 Command Execute >>> playback(local_stream://moh) >>> EXECUTE sofia/internal/34661574758 at 79.170.68.169:5060playback(local_stream://moh) >>> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [WARNING] mod_local_stream.c:393 Unknown >>> source moh, trying 'default' >>> 2011-06-20 07:22:56.441011 [ERR] mod_local_stream.c:402 Unknown source >>> default >>> (...) >>> 2011-06-20 07:23:01.281067 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:567 sofia/internal/ >>> 34917019888 at 79.170.64.151 Command Execute >>> playback(/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time) >>> EXECUTE sofia/internal/34917019888 at 79.170.64.151playback(/var/local/sounds/common/en/last_time) >>> >>> My first question is why does fs tries to play moh? And the second one is >>> if there is a way to shorten the lapse between the last key and the >>> execution of the application. I've played a bit with the >>> bind_digit_input_timeout variable that I've seen in the code, with no >>> success. Does anyone have faces the same issue? >>> I'm using version FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-7768808 2011-06-18 >>> 11-52-37 -0500) >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> Javi >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/41d77cc7/attachment.html From avi at avimarcus.net Tue Jun 21 19:50:23 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:50:23 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Fax API Message-ID: I've seen Faxing issues over and over in the channel, so since I don't need it so much I'd like to outsource it. I've had a recommendation to use metrofax - they seem to have a nice website, great pricing, and an API that I may be able to get access to. Are there any other suggestions for a faxing both inbound and outbound that I can plug into my GUI for customers? Thanks! -Avi Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/84368ef2/attachment.html From rhuddleston at gmail.com Tue Jun 21 20:09:30 2011 From: rhuddleston at gmail.com (Robert Huddleston) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Fax API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0cdb01cc302d$9aeb8690$d0c293b0$@com> Tried hylafax? From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Avi Marcus Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 11:50 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Fax API I've seen Faxing issues over and over in the channel, so since I don't need it so much I'd like to outsource it. I've had a recommendation to use metrofax - they seem to have a nice website, great pricing, and an API that I may be able to get access to. Are there any other suggestions for a faxing both inbound and outbound that I can plug into my GUI for customers? Thanks! -Avi Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/57c62837/attachment.html From avi at avimarcus.net Tue Jun 21 20:26:21 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:26:21 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Fax API In-Reply-To: <0cdb01cc302d$9aeb8690$d0c293b0$@com> References: <0cdb01cc302d$9aeb8690$d0c293b0$@com> Message-ID: That's interesting, dedicated faxing software. Actually though I'm looking for a hosted kind of solution.. just POST the pdf file and I don't need to worry about any sort of debugging beyond that. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Robert Huddleston wrote: > Tried hylafax?**** > > ** ** > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Avi Marcus > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 21, 2011 11:50 AM > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Fax API**** > > ** ** > > I've seen Faxing issues over and over in the channel, so since I don't need > it so much I'd like to outsource it.**** > > I've had a recommendation to use metrofax - they seem to have a nice > website, great pricing, and an API that I may be able to get access to.*** > * > > Are there any other suggestions for a faxing both inbound and outbound that > I can plug into my GUI for customers?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks!**** > > > **** > > -Avi Marcus**** > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/80875d2c/attachment-0001.html From cmcureau at gmail.com Tue Jun 21 20:36:59 2011 From: cmcureau at gmail.com (Chris Cureau) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:36:59 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Fax API In-Reply-To: References: <0cdb01cc302d$9aeb8690$d0c293b0$@com> Message-ID: <-7597423912234016994@unknownmsgid> Avi, I am sure that I can provide a solution for you. My company is still in start-up mode, but I can provide you DIDs for inbound fax and accept PDFs for delivery. My current architecture does T.38 from the switch to the customer, so we can work with ATAs as well Want to discuss? Drop me a line! -- Chris Cureau President eTech Data Solutions, Inc. (985) 707-6510 On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Avi Marcus wrote: That's interesting, dedicated faxing software. Actually though I'm looking for a hosted kind of solution.. just POST the pdf file and I don't need to worry about any sort of debugging beyond that. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Robert Huddleston wrote: > Tried hylafax?**** > > ** ** > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Avi Marcus > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 21, 2011 11:50 AM > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Fax API**** > > ** ** > > I've seen Faxing issues over and over in the channel, so since I don't need > it so much I'd like to outsource it.**** > > I've had a recommendation to use metrofax - they seem to have a nice > website, great pricing, and an API that I may be able to get access to.*** > * > > Are there any other suggestions for a faxing both inbound and outbound that > I can plug into my GUI for customers?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks!**** > > > **** > > -Avi Marcus**** > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/d5b5a570/attachment.html From bcxml at hotmail.com Tue Jun 21 22:09:56 2011 From: bcxml at hotmail.com (Brian Campbell) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls In-Reply-To: References: , , , , Message-ID: Thanks David I have followed your instructions and I find that the audio is definately flowing between FreeSwitch and Speech Server on calls that seem to be broken. So that points me to a Speech Server issue Thanks so much for the advice, you have been a big help Brian Campbell From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:41:14 +0200 To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls Wireshark is your friend :) Open your RTP flow, click on Telephony/RTP/Show All Streams In the next window, select the stream you want (the one from FS to IVR) and click on Analyse. And in the final window, click on Save Payload. Then select the forward stream, and save as raw. You should be able to import the raw file in any decent audio software (Audacity, etc...) as U-Law (I suppose you use PCMU), 8Khz. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 21/06/2011 ? 15:13, Brian Campbell a ?crit : Thanks David The Speech Server application reacts to speech from the caller validated by a grammar. There is a facility in Speech Server to log the calls, including the audio. On calls that work, I can hear the prompts from the application as well as my responses in the session audio. On calls that don't work, I hear the prompts from the application but none of my responses. After a small period of waiting the Speech Recognizer times out and tells me that it did not hear me say anything. I have tried increasing the timeout interval but the problem remains. So I am not sure where the problem lies, is it something breaking down in Speech Server, or is the audio not making it from FreeSwitch to Speech Server. One thing for sure is that it doesnt stop working half way through the call. It either recognizes utterances from the caller or it doesn't, which would lead me to think that sometimes the call is not properly setup between Speech Server and FreeSwitch, but as I said I have run out of ideas. As I mentioned I do see RTP traffic, but I am afraid that I do not posses indepth knowledge about the protocol, so I am not sure how to properly analyse it. Thanks again for your input Brian Campbell From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:43:44 +0200 To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls Brian, twice you say "the IVR doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying". I suppose that means it is an assumption because it does not react to DTMFs ? Do you have the possibility in this IVR to record the call ? This way, you would be sure. Also you say that Wireshark tells you the RTP traffic is fine. Even when the call is not working ? Do you notice anything different in this RTP ? You may also take a RTP trace between FS and IVR of a non-working call, analyse the RTP flows and save the payload as raw to a file. You should be able to listen to the audio with the right tool. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 21/06/2011 ? 04:29, Brian Campbell a ?crit : I have run into a very strange issue with periodically losing Audio on Incomming calls I am receiving incomming calls to FreeSwitch via a DID from an ITSP. Once FreeSwitch receives the call, I am adding a header to pass the UUID (which I use later to inject some custom values into CDRs) and then bridge to an IVR application running on Microsoft Speech Server 2007 which is on a separate box, using the following dial plan Some calls are performing properly, but in some of the calls (about 30%) the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying I have eliminated any Firewalls for testing, so I go straight from the ITSP to FreeSwitch and then to Speech Server. Thee is no NAT in play. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to when a call is going to work, or when it isn't. I have also seen exactly the same behavior in a completely different environment with a different ITSP and a completely different IVR application. So I figure that the problem is somewhere between FreeSwitch and Speech Server, but I don't see anything wrong. Using WireShark I can see the SIP signalling creating/tearing down the call and I see RTP traffic flowing both ways between FreeSwitch and Speech Server The version of FreeSwitch that I am running is 'FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-38f06a3 2011-05-19 15-39-43 -0500)' I have pasted 2 FreeSwitch traces into pastebin. The first one is of a working call, the second one is of a call where the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying Can anyone advise on what the issue might be. I am completely out of ideas. Thanks Brian Campbell _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-usersUNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org_______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/6ffb5f62/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Tue Jun 21 23:21:27 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:21:27 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls In-Reply-To: References: , , , , Message-ID: <54472BC3-EBC3-4BBF-8CFF-3C49F98C609C@ipeva.fr> How surprising :) David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 21/06/2011 ? 20:09, Brian Campbell a ?crit : > > Thanks David > > I have followed your instructions and I find that the audio is definately flowing between FreeSwitch and Speech Server on calls that seem to be broken. So that points me to a Speech Server issue > > Thanks so much for the advice, you have been a big help > > > Brian Campbell > > > From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:41:14 +0200 > To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls > > Wireshark is your friend :) > Open your RTP flow, click on Telephony/RTP/Show All Streams > In the next window, select the stream you want (the one from FS to IVR) and click on Analyse. > And in the final window, click on Save Payload. > Then select the forward stream, and save as raw. > > You should be able to import the raw file in any decent audio software (Audacity, etc...) as U-Law (I suppose you use PCMU), 8Khz. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > Le 21/06/2011 ? 15:13, Brian Campbell a ?crit : > > Thanks David > > The Speech Server application reacts to speech from the caller validated by a grammar. There is a facility in Speech Server to log the calls, including the audio. On calls that work, I can hear the prompts from the application as well as my responses in the session audio. On calls that don't work, I hear the prompts from the application but none of my responses. After a small period of waiting the Speech Recognizer times out and tells me that it did not hear me say anything. I have tried increasing the timeout interval but the problem remains. > > So I am not sure where the problem lies, is it something breaking down in Speech Server, or is the audio not making it from FreeSwitch to Speech Server. > > One thing for sure is that it doesnt stop working half way through the call. It either recognizes utterances from the caller or it doesn't, which would lead me to think that sometimes the call is not properly setup between Speech Server and FreeSwitch, but as I said I have run out of ideas. > > As I mentioned I do see RTP traffic, but I am afraid that I do not posses indepth knowledge about the protocol, so I am not sure how to properly analyse it. > > Thanks again for your input > > > Brian Campbell > > From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:43:44 +0200 > To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Intermittent Audio Problem - Incomming Calls > > Brian, > > twice you say "the IVR doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying". > I suppose that means it is an assumption because it does not react to DTMFs ? > Do you have the possibility in this IVR to record the call ? > This way, you would be sure. > > Also you say that Wireshark tells you the RTP traffic is fine. > Even when the call is not working ? > Do you notice anything different in this RTP ? > You may also take a RTP trace between FS and IVR of a non-working call, analyse the RTP flows and save the payload as raw to a file. > You should be able to listen to the audio with the right tool. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > Le 21/06/2011 ? 04:29, Brian Campbell a ?crit : > > I have run into a very strange issue with periodically losing Audio on Incomming calls > > I am receiving incomming calls to FreeSwitch via a DID from an ITSP. Once FreeSwitch receives the call, I am adding a header to pass the UUID (which I use later to inject some custom values into CDRs) and then bridge to an IVR application running on Microsoft Speech Server 2007 which is on a separate box, using the following dial plan > > > > > > > > > Some calls are performing properly, but in some of the calls (about 30%) the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying > > I have eliminated any Firewalls for testing, so I go straight from the ITSP to FreeSwitch and then to Speech Server. Thee is no NAT in play. > > There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to when a call is going to work, or when it isn't. I have also seen exactly the same behavior in a completely different environment with a different ITSP and a completely different IVR application. > > So I figure that the problem is somewhere between FreeSwitch and Speech Server, but I don't see anything wrong. > > Using WireShark I can see the SIP signalling creating/tearing down the call and I see RTP traffic flowing both ways between FreeSwitch and Speech Server > > The version of FreeSwitch that I am running is 'FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-38f06a3 2011-05-19 15-39-43 -0500)' > > I have pasted 2 FreeSwitch traces into pastebin. The first one is of a working call, the second one is of a call where the IVR application doesn't seem to hear anything the caller is saying > > Can anyone advise on what the issue might be. I am completely out of ideas. > > Thanks > > Brian Campbell > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-usersUNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-usersUNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/2a6329d9/attachment-0001.html From mario_fs at mgtech.com Wed Jun 22 03:28:50 2011 From: mario_fs at mgtech.com (Mario G) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:28:50 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook Recipe List In-Reply-To: References: <7EAFE942-322C-4EC0-941A-F1226B8DDAD1@mgtech.com> Message-ID: I get it, but beyond the install is how to control logging, setup emailing from FS, and a couple of other things that might be useful. On Jun 20, 2011, at 8:26 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > I believe we decided to forego the "how-to install fs" recipes since we have lots and lots of information on that subject on the wiki. We want to keep the recipes focused on interesting ways to use FreeSWITCH. > > -MC > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Mario G wrote: > I see there is a need for install on OS X Server. I thought the OS X install I did for the wiki was quite comprehensive. What is missing? It should be the same for OS X server. Also, I will do a clean install on OS X 10.7 next month to update the wiki. > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> Hello all! >> >> Some have inquired recently about what's needed to complete the FS cookbook. I've uploaded the most recent list of recipes that we have identified. Some are already written but many are yet to be done. Check out this page: >> >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Cookbook#Information_for_prospective_authors >> >> Contact me if you have any questions about helping with any of these recipes. >> >> Thanks, >> Michael >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/780aa425/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Wed Jun 22 03:36:00 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:36:00 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server Message-ID: <8C4E260F53CB47079D913881B45F6587@dell9400> Hi, Have anyone connected to Microsoft Speech Server from FreeSWITCH? I have briefly tested it on an Athlon II X2 215 2.7 Ghz. Windows 7 Home (not with FS). It works, but the CPU bounce quite high on a single channel - so I am guessing 5 simultaneous voice streams before the CPU's are 100%. I am not a big fan of running speech on Windows, but I wanted to try it to see if I can get it working. Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/cfc6f29d/attachment.html From eric at loopfx.com Wed Jun 22 03:59:51 2011 From: eric at loopfx.com (Eric Beard) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server In-Reply-To: <8C4E260F53CB47079D913881B45F6587@dell9400> References: <8C4E260F53CB47079D913881B45F6587@dell9400> Message-ID: Yes, I am running it in production. On a new Dell R610 (1U server) I can run 80 calls with CPU at maybe 5%, and I point several Speech Servers at a single Freeswitch box on a separate (Linux) server, also a 1U DELL. That box can do more than 200 calls at around 10-20% CPU. My calls are a mix of recorded messages and IVR. Audio and reco quality are fine. You could run Freeswitch on the same machine as Speech Server if you wanted. ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jan Berger Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 7:36 PM To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server Hi, Have anyone connected to Microsoft Speech Server from FreeSWITCH? I have briefly tested it on an Athlon II X2 215 2.7 Ghz. Windows 7 Home (not with FS). It works, but the CPU bounce quite high on a single channel - so I am guessing 5 simultaneous voice streams before the CPU's are 100%. I am not a big fan of running speech on Windows, but I wanted to try it to see if I can get it working. Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/a87bc4e3/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Wed Jun 22 04:20:05 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:20:05 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server In-Reply-To: References: <8C4E260F53CB47079D913881B45F6587@dell9400> Message-ID: <3851CB8FD5804BF9A30B87576460E4FE@dell9400> How do you connect FreeSWITCH and SAPI? I can't find anything on that topic either on FreeSWITCH or uniMRCP (I kind of hoped uniMRCP would gateway into SAPI). Jan _____ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Eric Beard Sent: 22. juni 2011 02:00 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server Yes, I am running it in production. On a new Dell R610 (1U server) I can run 80 calls with CPU at maybe 5%, and I point several Speech Servers at a single Freeswitch box on a separate (Linux) server, also a 1U DELL. That box can do more than 200 calls at around 10-20% CPU. My calls are a mix of recorded messages and IVR. Audio and reco quality are fine. You could run Freeswitch on the same machine as Speech Server if you wanted. ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jan Berger Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 7:36 PM To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server Hi, Have anyone connected to Microsoft Speech Server from FreeSWITCH? I have briefly tested it on an Athlon II X2 215 2.7 Ghz. Windows 7 Home (not with FS). It works, but the CPU bounce quite high on a single channel - so I am guessing 5 simultaneous voice streams before the CPU's are 100%. I am not a big fan of running speech on Windows, but I wanted to try it to see if I can get it working. Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/fe3747c2/attachment-0001.html From elijah at crankenstein.com Wed Jun 22 04:44:48 2011 From: elijah at crankenstein.com (elijah) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:44:48 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 'make current' fails to complete Message-ID: My attempts to 'make current' against the Git repository are failing today. Can you recommend a method by which I can update my FreeSwitch installation? Here's the the last bit of console logging: ... make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/ruby' make -C java clean make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/java' rm -f *.o *.so *~ *.jar make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/java' make -C managed clean make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/managed' rm -f *.o *.so *~ make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/managed' make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl' make update make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch' Pulling updates... Updating 5923f71..4bb7683 src/mod/applications/mod_dptools/mod_dptools.c: needs update fatal: Entry 'src/mod/applications/mod_dptools/mod_dptools.c' not uptodate. Cannot merge. make[1]: *** [update] Error 128 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch' make: *** [current] Error 2 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110621/c639c78c/attachment.html From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 05:11:58 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:11:58 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 'make current' fails to complete In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: did you make any changes to the code tree? If you did, you'd probably want to perform a git stash to save all the changes you made then run git stash apply to merge your changes after the pull. Otherwise, it would be wise to run git reset --hard to 'fix' the source tree if you are sure you made no changes to the code at all On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:44 PM, elijah wrote: > My attempts to 'make current' against the Git repository are failing today. > Can you?recommend?a method by which I can update my FreeSwitch installation? > Here's the the last bit of console logging: > ... > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/ruby' > make -C java clean > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/java' > rm -f *.o *.so *~ *.jar > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/java' > make -C managed clean > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/managed' > rm -f *.o *.so *~ > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/managed' > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl' > make update > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch' > Pulling updates... > Updating 5923f71..4bb7683 > src/mod/applications/mod_dptools/mod_dptools.c: needs update > fatal: Entry 'src/mod/applications/mod_dptools/mod_dptools.c' not uptodate. > Cannot merge. > make[1]: *** [update] Error 128 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch' > make: *** [current] Error 2 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 09:16:33 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:46:33 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution for Concurrent Calls Message-ID: Dear all, I am working to develop an IVR solution for an NGO in Tamil Nadu, India using Freeswitch open source telephony interface. I am looking for any cost effective solution for hardware where concurrent inbound/outbound calls can be made by the IVR system. Some research, I did but I am skeptical, need some more guidance from experts. Number of concurrent calls for initial stage inbound 5-10 but based on response from the community, we will plan for scaling up. Outbound Scheduled calls are of lesser importance right now. I checked online that PRI line provides me 30 lines for voice which can be used concurrently. But, the rent for the line is very high which cant be feasible for the NGO. Min PRI line cost is Rs 4.5 K per month. Please suggest alternative solutions which I can use for the same. 1. What about VOIP and using their local access number? 2. What about SIP based IP phone with extensions? 3. What about trunk lines, DID etc? 4. What about GSM Modems, GSMOpen? I am very new telecom technology. Please help. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/9d9ab59a/attachment.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 09:59:47 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:29:47 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution for Concurrent Calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Any decent off the shelf desktop computer purchased today should be ok for the kind of call volumes you're talking abnout. You will need to buy a PRI data card which will cost Rs. 20-35 thousand rupees. Look at Sangoma or Digium cards. I personally would recommend Sangoma as seems to be better supported in freeswitch. *Also look at kookoo.in -- you might be able to achieve what you want.* I think the first thing you should do is understand the technology. After you do that, you will be in a better position to ask questions and see answers. Why do you look at reading a good book on freeswitch? See more answers inline below.... On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:46 AM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Dear all, > > I am working to develop an IVR solution for an NGO in Tamil Nadu, India > using Freeswitch open source telephony interface. > > I am looking for any cost effective solution for hardware where concurrent > inbound/outbound calls can be made by the IVR system. Some research, I did > but I am skeptical, need some more guidance from experts. Number of > concurrent calls for initial stage inbound 5-10 but based on response from > the community, we will plan for scaling up. Outbound Scheduled calls are of > lesser importance right now. > > I checked online that PRI line provides me 30 lines for voice which can be > used concurrently. But, the rent for the line is very high which cant be > feasible for the NGO. > Min PRI line cost is Rs 4.5 K per month. > > Please suggest alternative solutions which I can use for the same. > > 1. What about VOIP and using their local access number? > VOIP is somewhat difficult to do in India. I don't know any services in India that will give you a SIP connection. > 2. What about SIP based IP phone with extensions? > You need to get a SIP connection or use a PRI. > > 3. What about trunk lines, DID etc? > You need to get a SIP connection or use a PRI > 4. What about GSM Modems, GSMOpen? > > May be an interesting option. But don't know much about it. > I am very new telecom technology. Please help. > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/0cae7619/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Wed Jun 22 12:40:42 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:40:42 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Minor issue with INVITE domain Message-ID: <4BC0A7AA-CBC9-4A52-8C63-9C368F8D04EC@ipeva.fr> Hello all, I work with a provider which I need to send calls using their IP (I want to avoid any DNS issues), but I need the FQDN to be in the INVITE domain. So basically, I have a gateway defined with but I need the INVITE to be: sip:called at whatever.foo.com and not: sip:called at X.X.X.X I played with everything I could think of: outbound-proxy in gateway params (which seems to do nothing) {sip_invite_domain=whatever.foo.com}bridge/gateway/gw/called also does nothing. I am missing something ? Thanks David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/a184ab6f/attachment-0001.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 12:42:36 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:42:36 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Modified Follow me In-Reply-To: <4E00A61C.1060503@seletech.com> References: <4E00A61C.1060503@seletech.com> Message-ID: On 21 June 2011 16:09, Alessandro wrote: > Any suggestion? While i can't give you a concrete solution, take a look at the files that are created by fusionpbx, mainly /usr/local/freeswitch/scripts/v_huntgroup_localhost_$EXTENSION.lua - if you dig a bit you might be able to find and fix the problem yourself(And eventually file a bugreport with fusionpbx). hth Christian From sharad at coraltele.com Wed Jun 22 13:17:53 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:47:53 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution forConcurrent Calls References: Message-ID: <7091CBE8A30F42978D9F082C267C22DA@sharad> Hi Ankit I differ with you on the PRI pricing. Now a days, in north India, BSNL, Reliance, Airtel, etc, are providing PRI connectivity somewhere arround 10-12 K per month. More over this, they will permit you to make the free calls of the same value. Means if you opt for 10K / month plan, you will be able to make the out calls of wrth Rs 10K approx. Yes, if you want only inbound, you will have to pay at least 10K. So you can check with the local service provider in Tamilnadu & nagotiate with the service provider for minimum rent. Regarding your rest queries, I am not sure what do you want to ask..plz explore your queries. Regards Sharad, Noida 9891499202 ----- Original Message ----- From: ankIT WALiA To: FreeSWITCH Users Help ; The Linux-Delhi mailing list ; ilugc at ae.iitm.ac.in Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:46 AM Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution forConcurrent Calls Dear all, I am working to develop an IVR solution for an NGO in Tamil Nadu, India using Freeswitch open source telephony interface. I am looking for any cost effective solution for hardware where concurrent inbound/outbound calls can be made by the IVR system. Some research, I did but I am skeptical, need some more guidance from experts. Number of concurrent calls for initial stage inbound 5-10 but based on response from the community, we will plan for scaling up. Outbound Scheduled calls are of lesser importance right now. I checked online that PRI line provides me 30 lines for voice which can be used concurrently. But, the rent for the line is very high which cant be feasible for the NGO. Min PRI line cost is Rs 4.5 K per month. Please suggest alternative solutions which I can use for the same. 1. What about VOIP and using their local access number? 2. What about SIP based IP phone with extensions? 3. What about trunk lines, DID etc? 4. What about GSM Modems, GSMOpen? I am very new telecom technology. Please help. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/98004e70/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 13:48:20 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution forConcurrent Calls In-Reply-To: <7091CBE8A30F42978D9F082C267C22DA@sharad> References: <7091CBE8A30F42978D9F082C267C22DA@sharad> Message-ID: I want to know If there is any other way to receive concurrent incomings calls apart from using PRI. I think Reliance is giving in 4.5K. I saw herehttp://mobile.ebest.in/pri-tariff-plans/reliance-pri/3.html On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:17 AM, sharad wrote: > ** > Hi Ankit > > I differ with you on the PRI pricing. Now a days, in north India, BSNL, > Reliance, Airtel, etc, are providing PRI connectivity somewhere arround > 10-12 K per month. More over this, they will permit you to make the free > calls of the same value. Means if you opt for 10K / month plan, you will be > able to make the out calls of wrth Rs 10K approx. Yes, if you want only > inbound, you will have to pay at least 10K. So you can check with the local > service provider in Tamilnadu & nagotiate with the service provider for > minimum rent. > > Regarding your rest queries, I am not sure what do you want to ask..plz > explore your queries. > > Regards > Sharad, Noida > 9891499202 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* ankIT WALiA > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help ; The > Linux-Delhi mailing list ; > ilugc at ae.iitm.ac.in > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:46 AM > *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution > forConcurrent Calls > > Dear all, > > I am working to develop an IVR solution for an NGO in Tamil Nadu, India > using Freeswitch open source telephony interface. > > I am looking for any cost effective solution for hardware where concurrent > inbound/outbound calls can be made by the IVR system. Some research, I did > but I am skeptical, need some more guidance from experts. Number of > concurrent calls for initial stage inbound 5-10 but based on response from > the community, we will plan for scaling up. Outbound Scheduled calls are of > lesser importance right now. > > I checked online that PRI line provides me 30 lines for voice which can be > used concurrently. But, the rent for the line is very high which cant be > feasible for the NGO. > Min PRI line cost is Rs 4.5 K per month. > > Please suggest alternative solutions which I can use for the same. > > 1. What about VOIP and using their local access number? > 2. What about SIP based IP phone with extensions? > 3. What about trunk lines, DID etc? > 4. What about GSM Modems, GSMOpen? > > I am very new telecom technology. Please help. > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/229c87f7/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Wed Jun 22 14:45:58 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:45:58 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution forConcurrent Calls In-Reply-To: References: <7091CBE8A30F42978D9F082C267C22DA@sharad> Message-ID: You could try to setup a SIP trunk with a foreign provider able to give you DIDs for India. That's a long shot, and the quality could be at loss. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 22/06/2011 ? 11:48, ankIT WALiA a ?crit : > I want to know If there is any other way to receive concurrent incomings calls apart from using PRI. > > I think Reliance is giving in 4.5K. I saw here http://mobile.ebest.in/pri-tariff-plans/reliance-pri/3.html > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:17 AM, sharad wrote: > Hi Ankit > > I differ with you on the PRI pricing. Now a days, in north India, BSNL, Reliance, Airtel, etc, are providing PRI connectivity somewhere arround 10-12 K per month. More over this, they will permit you to make the free calls of the same value. Means if you opt for 10K / month plan, you will be able to make the out calls of wrth Rs 10K approx. Yes, if you want only inbound, you will have to pay at least 10K. So you can check with the local service provider in Tamilnadu & nagotiate with the service provider for minimum rent. > > Regarding your rest queries, I am not sure what do you want to ask..plz explore your queries. > > Regards > Sharad, Noida > 9891499202 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: ankIT WALiA > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help ; The Linux-Delhi mailing list ; ilugc at ae.iitm.ac.in > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:46 AM > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution forConcurrent Calls > > Dear all, > > I am working to develop an IVR solution for an NGO in Tamil Nadu, India using Freeswitch open source telephony interface. > > I am looking for any cost effective solution for hardware where concurrent inbound/outbound calls can be made by the IVR system. Some research, I did but I am skeptical, need some more guidance from experts. Number of concurrent calls for initial stage inbound 5-10 but based on response from the community, we will plan for scaling up. Outbound Scheduled calls are of lesser importance right now. > > I checked online that PRI line provides me 30 lines for voice which can be used concurrently. But, the rent for the line is very high which cant be feasible for the NGO. > Min PRI line cost is Rs 4.5 K per month. > > Please suggest alternative solutions which I can use for the same. > > 1. What about VOIP and using their local access number? > 2. What about SIP based IP phone with extensions? > 3. What about trunk lines, DID etc? > 4. What about GSM Modems, GSMOpen? > > I am very new telecom technology. Please help. > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/e46709b7/attachment-0001.html From sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org Wed Jun 22 15:51:25 2011 From: sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org (Sergey Okhapkin) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Minor issue with INVITE domain In-Reply-To: <4BC0A7AA-CBC9-4A52-8C63-9C368F8D04EC@ipeva.fr> References: <4BC0A7AA-CBC9-4A52-8C63-9C368F8D04EC@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <201106220751.25728.sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> Put IP address of whatever.foo.com to /etc/hosts and use domain name. you will not get any DNS issues. On Wednesday 22 June 2011, David Ponzone wrote: > Hello all, > > I work with a provider which I need to send calls using their IP (I want to > avoid any DNS issues), but I need the FQDN to be in the INVITE domain. So > basically, I have a gateway defined with > > but I need the INVITE to be: > sip:called at whatever.foo.com > and not: > sip:called at X.X.X.X > > I played with everything I could think of: > outbound-proxy in gateway params (which seems to do nothing) > > {sip_invite_domain=whatever.foo.com}bridge/gateway/gw/called > also does nothing. > > I am missing something ? > > Thanks > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message > s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de > ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. From sharad at coraltele.com Wed Jun 22 16:01:14 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:31:14 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR SolutionforConcurrent Calls References: <7091CBE8A30F42978D9F082C267C22DA@sharad> Message-ID: <35A852F7A200457DA761EBAEDC836F23@sharad> Yes, there are following ways - 1. Analog trunk line (FXO) - taken from BSNL. Connect those lines to FXO GW / PBX & route the calls to freeswitch. If you are expecting your incoming calls within India, this may be cheaper. 2. PRI - You already know. 3. Through VoIP - If you are expecting international calls, this medium may be cheaper. But you need to discuss this with your VoIP provider in advance that you r expecting incoming calls also. Regards Sharad ----- Original Message ----- From: ankIT WALiA To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR SolutionforConcurrent Calls I want to know If there is any other way to receive concurrent incomings calls apart from using PRI. I think Reliance is giving in 4.5K. I saw here http://mobile.ebest.in/pri-tariff-plans/reliance-pri/3.html On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:17 AM, sharad wrote: Hi Ankit I differ with you on the PRI pricing. Now a days, in north India, BSNL, Reliance, Airtel, etc, are providing PRI connectivity somewhere arround 10-12 K per month. More over this, they will permit you to make the free calls of the same value. Means if you opt for 10K / month plan, you will be able to make the out calls of wrth Rs 10K approx. Yes, if you want only inbound, you will have to pay at least 10K. So you can check with the local service provider in Tamilnadu & nagotiate with the service provider for minimum rent. Regarding your rest queries, I am not sure what do you want to ask..plz explore your queries. Regards Sharad, Noida 9891499202 ----- Original Message ----- From: ankIT WALiA To: FreeSWITCH Users Help ; The Linux-Delhi mailing list ; ilugc at ae.iitm.ac.in Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:46 AM Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution forConcurrent Calls Dear all, I am working to develop an IVR solution for an NGO in Tamil Nadu, India using Freeswitch open source telephony interface. I am looking for any cost effective solution for hardware where concurrent inbound/outbound calls can be made by the IVR system. Some research, I did but I am skeptical, need some more guidance from experts. Number of concurrent calls for initial stage inbound 5-10 but based on response from the community, we will plan for scaling up. Outbound Scheduled calls are of lesser importance right now. I checked online that PRI line provides me 30 lines for voice which can be used concurrently. But, the rent for the line is very high which cant be feasible for the NGO. Min PRI line cost is Rs 4.5 K per month. Please suggest alternative solutions which I can use for the same. 1. What about VOIP and using their local access number? 2. What about SIP based IP phone with extensions? 3. What about trunk lines, DID etc? 4. What about GSM Modems, GSMOpen? I am very new telecom technology. Please help. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/2f4d9763/attachment.html From freeswitch at mralston.com Wed Jun 22 16:38:32 2011 From: freeswitch at mralston.com (Matthew Ralston) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:38:32 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call drops after 30 seconds Message-ID: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> Hi, I'm having a problem at the moment with calls being successfully set up, with two-way audio, being terminated by FreeSWITCH after 30 seconds. Internal calls (i.e. between SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the FreeSWITCH box) work flawlessly. The problem arises when at least one of the handsets is located elsewhere on the Internet. This behaviour is exhibited under the following circumstances: - A-leg only call, e.g. to voicemail when the handset is at another location on the Internet - A-leg-B-leg call if one or both of the handsets are at another location on the Internet - Inbound calls from our external SIP provider - Outbound calls to our external SIP provider So it is obvious that the problem is related to the SIP going via the Internet, but I'm having trouble understanding why. Whilst debugging this problem I have placed the FreeSWITCH box is in the DMZ on our router, so there should not be any ports blocked. The FreeSWITCH box itself is not running a software firewall. The calls themselves are absolutely fine for the first 30 seconds - each party can hear the other talking fine. The fact that the call is consistently dropped after 30 seconds (give or take a second or two for PDD) suggests that some timeout is being triggered. When FreeSWITCH terminates the call, the following is logged to the console: 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4787 Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed entering state [terminating][0] 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5508 Hangup sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED] 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [KILL] 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:33:50.534966 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file 2011-06-22 13:33:50.625988 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:244 Handle play-file:[voicemail/vm-press.wav] (en:en) 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2063 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed hanging up, cause: NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard HANGUP, cause: NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard REPORTING, cause: NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 5 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 5 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Ended 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:33:50.780056 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port 31484 protocol UDP to localport 31484 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port 31485 protocol UDP to localport 31485 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY going to sleep The above example was from an externally situated SIP phone ringing voicemail (4000) on FreeSWITCH. I have experimented changing various timers and timeouts in the config of FreeSWITCH (one at a time, being careful to put them back afterwards!) but been unable to resolve the issue. Incidentally, we have no long term intention of running off-site SIP phones with the PBX and I'm hoping not to have to leave it in the DMZ either, it's just like that for debugging. What is a real issue is the calls to our external SIP provider (i.e. outbound calls) being dropped. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Matthew Ralston Web Developer & IT Consultant matt at mralston.co.uk www.mralston.com From mattzerah+freeswitch at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 16:44:15 2011 From: mattzerah+freeswitch at gmail.com (Matt Paine) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:44:15 +1000 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call drops after 30 seconds In-Reply-To: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> References: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> Message-ID: My two cents worth... I have fixed this in the past by setting up a STUND server to help with the SIP data. I had the same problem as you, 30 seconds on the dot the call would drop. After pointing my sip devices to a stun server everything is solved. (for me anyway :) HTH Matt On 22 June 2011 22:38, Matthew Ralston wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem at the moment with calls being successfully set up, > with two-way audio, being terminated by FreeSWITCH after 30 seconds. > > Internal calls (i.e. between SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the > FreeSWITCH box) work flawlessly. > > The problem arises when at least one of the handsets is located elsewhere > on the Internet. This behaviour is exhibited under the following > circumstances: > > - A-leg only call, e.g. to voicemail when the handset is at another > location on the Internet > - A-leg-B-leg call if one or both of the handsets are at another location > on the Internet > - Inbound calls from our external SIP provider > - Outbound calls to our external SIP provider > > So it is obvious that the problem is related to the SIP going via the > Internet, but I'm having trouble understanding why. > > Whilst debugging this problem I have placed the FreeSWITCH box is in the > DMZ on our router, so there should not be any ports blocked. The FreeSWITCH > box itself is not running a software firewall. > > The calls themselves are absolutely fine for the first 30 seconds - each > party can hear the other talking fine. > > The fact that the call is consistently dropped after 30 seconds (give or > take a second or two for PDD) suggests that some timeout is being triggered. > > When FreeSWITCH terminates the call, the following is logged to the > console: > > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4787 Channel > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed entering state [terminating][0] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5508 Hangup > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [KILL] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.534966 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing > file > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.625988 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:244 Handle > play-file:[voicemail/vm-press.wav] (en:en) > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2063 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed skip receive message > [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State EXECUTE going to sleep > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed hanging up, cause: > NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard HANGUP, cause: > NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP going to sleep > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_HANGUP -> > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard REPORTING, cause: > NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING going to sleep > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_REPORTING -> > CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 5 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Locked, Waiting on external > entities > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 5 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Ended > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close > Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_DESTROY] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.780056 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port > 31484 protocol UDP to localport 31484 > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port > 31485 protocol UDP to localport 31485 > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY going to sleep > > The above example was from an externally situated SIP phone ringing > voicemail (4000) on FreeSWITCH. > > I have experimented changing various timers and timeouts in the config of > FreeSWITCH (one at a time, being careful to put them back afterwards!) but > been unable to resolve the issue. > > Incidentally, we have no long term intention of running off-site SIP phones > with the PBX and I'm hoping not to have to leave it in the DMZ either, it's > just like that for debugging. What is a real issue is the calls to our > external SIP provider (i.e. outbound calls) being dropped. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Matthew Ralston > Web Developer & IT Consultant > > matt at mralston.co.uk > www.mralston.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/7e05dce5/attachment-0001.html From hemant.taan at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 16:54:39 2011 From: hemant.taan at gmail.com (hemant kumar) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:24:39 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution for Concurrent Calls Message-ID: You should be able to get pri with min rent of 1750rs from BSNL as i had got one installed myself, after the whatever is the usage. On Wednesday, June 22, 2011, sharad wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, there are following?ways > - > > 1.??? Analog trunk line > (FXO) - taken from BSNL. Connect those lines to FXO GW / PBX & route the > calls to freeswitch. If you are expecting your incoming calls within India, this > may be cheaper. > > 2.??? PRI - You already > know. > > 3.??? Through VoIP - If > you are expecting international calls, this medium may be cheaper. But you need > to discuss this with your VoIP provider in advance that you r expecting incoming > calls also. > > Regards > Sharad > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > ankIT > WALiA? > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help? > > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:18 > PM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Looking > for Cost Effective IVR SolutionforConcurrent Calls > > I want to know If there is any other way to receive concurrent > incomings calls apart from using PRI. > > I think Reliance is giving in > 4.5K. I saw here > http://mobile.ebest.in/pri-tariff-plans/reliance-pri/3.html > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:17 AM, sharad > wrote: > > > Hi Ankit > > I differ with you on the PRI pricing. > Now a days, in north India, BSNL, Reliance,?Airtel, etc, are providing > PRI connectivity somewhere arround 10-12 K per month. More over this, they > will permit you to make the free calls of the same value. Means if you opt > for 10K / month plan, you will be able to make the out calls of wrth Rs 10K > approx. Yes, if you want only inbound, you will have to pay at least > 10K.? So you can check with the local service provider in Tamilnadu > & nagotiate with the service provider for minimum rent. > > Regarding your?rest queries, I > am not sure what do you want to ask..plz explore your queries. > > Regards > Sharad, Noida > 9891499202 > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: ankIT WALiA > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help ; The Linux-Delhi > mailing list ; ilugc at ae.iitm.ac.in > > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:46 > AM > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking > for Cost Effective IVR Solution forConcurrent Calls > > Dear all, > > > I am working to develop an IVR solution for an NGO in Tamil Nadu, > India using Freeswitch open source telephony interface. > > > I am looking for any cost effective solution for hardware where > concurrent inbound/outbound calls can be made by the IVR system.?Some > research, I did but I am skeptical, need some more guidance from experts. > Number of concurrent calls for initial stage inbound 5-10 but based on > response from the community, we will plan for scaling up. Outbound > Scheduled calls are of lesser?importance right now. > > > I checked online that PRI line provides me 30 lines for voice which > can be used concurrently. But, the rent for the line is very high which > cant be feasible for the NGO. > Min PRI line cost is Rs 4.5 K per month. > > > Please suggest alternative solutions which I can use for the > same. > > > 1. What about VOIP ?and using their local access number? > 2. What about SIP based IP phone with extensions? > 3. What about trunk lines, DID etc? > 4. What about GSM Modems, GSMOpen? > > > I am very new telecom technology. Please help. > > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is > From eric at loopfx.com Wed Jun 22 17:00:29 2011 From: eric at loopfx.com (Eric Beard) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server In-Reply-To: <3851CB8FD5804BF9A30B87576460E4FE@dell9400> References: <8C4E260F53CB47079D913881B45F6587@dell9400> <3851CB8FD5804BF9A30B87576460E4FE@dell9400> Message-ID: Not sure about SAPI. I just set the trusted sip peer to point to Freeswitch. There's a forum here that might help: http://gotspeech.net/forums/thread/10657.aspx and a series of blog posts here: http://gotspeech.net/blogs/verbalinput/archive/2010/11/12/speech-server-2007-marries-freeswitch-part-6-upgrading-to-1-0-6.aspx ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jan Berger Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 8:20 PM To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server How do you connect FreeSWITCH and SAPI? I can't find anything on that topic either on FreeSWITCH or uniMRCP (I kind of hoped uniMRCP would gateway into SAPI). Jan ________________________________ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Eric Beard Sent: 22. juni 2011 02:00 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server Yes, I am running it in production. On a new Dell R610 (1U server) I can run 80 calls with CPU at maybe 5%, and I point several Speech Servers at a single Freeswitch box on a separate (Linux) server, also a 1U DELL. That box can do more than 200 calls at around 10-20% CPU. My calls are a mix of recorded messages and IVR. Audio and reco quality are fine. You could run Freeswitch on the same machine as Speech Server if you wanted. ----------------------- Eric Z. Beard, CTO Loop LLC w (877) 850-2010 x9249 m (727) 776-2768 eric at loopfx.com From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jan Berger Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 7:36 PM To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Microsoft Speech Server Hi, Have anyone connected to Microsoft Speech Server from FreeSWITCH? I have briefly tested it on an Athlon II X2 215 2.7 Ghz. Windows 7 Home (not with FS). It works, but the CPU bounce quite high on a single channel - so I am guessing 5 simultaneous voice streams before the CPU's are 100%. I am not a big fan of running speech on Windows, but I wanted to try it to see if I can get it working. Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/6ea94ed4/attachment.html From chris.chen2004 at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 17:21:37 2011 From: chris.chen2004 at gmail.com (Chris Chen) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call drops after 30 seconds In-Reply-To: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> References: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> Message-ID: Hi Matthew, this is typical behavior for the setup of SIP behind NAT. 1) Please provide the exact setup of remote SIP phones, what's the router model, does it have SIP ALG enabled, what kind of SIP phones 2) On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Matthew Ralston wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem at the moment with calls being successfully set up, > with two-way audio, being terminated by FreeSWITCH after 30 seconds. > > Internal calls (i.e. between SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the > FreeSWITCH box) work flawlessly. > > The problem arises when at least one of the handsets is located elsewhere > on the Internet. This behaviour is exhibited under the following > circumstances: > > - A-leg only call, e.g. to voicemail when the handset is at another > location on the Internet > - A-leg-B-leg call if one or both of the handsets are at another location > on the Internet > - Inbound calls from our external SIP provider > - Outbound calls to our external SIP provider > > So it is obvious that the problem is related to the SIP going via the > Internet, but I'm having trouble understanding why. > > Whilst debugging this problem I have placed the FreeSWITCH box is in the > DMZ on our router, so there should not be any ports blocked. The FreeSWITCH > box itself is not running a software firewall. > > The calls themselves are absolutely fine for the first 30 seconds - each > party can hear the other talking fine. > > The fact that the call is consistently dropped after 30 seconds (give or > take a second or two for PDD) suggests that some timeout is being triggered. > > When FreeSWITCH terminates the call, the following is logged to the > console: > > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4787 Channel > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed entering state [terminating][0] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5508 Hangup > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [KILL] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.534966 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing > file > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.625988 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:244 Handle > play-file:[voicemail/vm-press.wav] (en:en) > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2063 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed skip receive message > [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State EXECUTE going to sleep > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed hanging up, cause: > NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard HANGUP, cause: > NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP going to sleep > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_HANGUP -> > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard REPORTING, cause: > NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING going to sleep > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_REPORTING -> > CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 5 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Locked, Waiting on external > entities > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 5 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Ended > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close > Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_DESTROY] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.780056 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port > 31484 protocol UDP to localport 31484 > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port > 31485 protocol UDP to localport 31485 > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 > sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 > (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY going to sleep > > The above example was from an externally situated SIP phone ringing > voicemail (4000) on FreeSWITCH. > > I have experimented changing various timers and timeouts in the config of > FreeSWITCH (one at a time, being careful to put them back afterwards!) but > been unable to resolve the issue. > > Incidentally, we have no long term intention of running off-site SIP phones > with the PBX and I'm hoping not to have to leave it in the DMZ either, it's > just like that for debugging. What is a real issue is the calls to our > external SIP provider (i.e. outbound calls) being dropped. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Matthew Ralston > Web Developer & IT Consultant > > matt at mralston.co.uk > www.mralston.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/2134ba30/attachment-0001.html From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 17:39:09 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:09:09 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution forConcurrent Calls In-Reply-To: <7091CBE8A30F42978D9F082C267C22DA@sharad> References: <7091CBE8A30F42978D9F082C267C22DA@sharad> Message-ID: PRI pricing is about 4,500/- rupees a month. You can purchase a toll free plan from a provider -- how much you use (or don't use) the toll free number is upto you. I know this because I am in the process of purchasing a PRI. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:47 PM, sharad wrote: > ** > Hi Ankit > > I differ with you on the PRI pricing. Now a days, in north India, BSNL, > Reliance, Airtel, etc, are providing PRI connectivity somewhere arround > 10-12 K per month. More over this, they will permit you to make the free > calls of the same value. Means if you opt for 10K / month plan, you will be > able to make the out calls of wrth Rs 10K approx. Yes, if you want only > inbound, you will have to pay at least 10K. So you can check with the local > service provider in Tamilnadu & nagotiate with the service provider for > minimum rent. > > Regarding your rest queries, I am not sure what do you want to ask..plz > explore your queries. > > Regards > Sharad, Noida > 9891499202 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* ankIT WALiA > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help ; The > Linux-Delhi mailing list ; > ilugc at ae.iitm.ac.in > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:46 AM > *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Looking for Cost Effective IVR Solution > forConcurrent Calls > > Dear all, > > I am working to develop an IVR solution for an NGO in Tamil Nadu, India > using Freeswitch open source telephony interface. > > I am looking for any cost effective solution for hardware where concurrent > inbound/outbound calls can be made by the IVR system. Some research, I did > but I am skeptical, need some more guidance from experts. Number of > concurrent calls for initial stage inbound 5-10 but based on response from > the community, we will plan for scaling up. Outbound Scheduled calls are of > lesser importance right now. > > I checked online that PRI line provides me 30 lines for voice which can be > used concurrently. But, the rent for the line is very high which cant be > feasible for the NGO. > Min PRI line cost is Rs 4.5 K per month. > > Please suggest alternative solutions which I can use for the same. > > 1. What about VOIP and using their local access number? > 2. What about SIP based IP phone with extensions? > 3. What about trunk lines, DID etc? > 4. What about GSM Modems, GSMOpen? > > I am very new telecom technology. Please help. > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/880825ae/attachment.html From henk at oegema.com Wed Jun 22 18:03:38 2011 From: henk at oegema.com (Henk Oegema) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:03:38 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org Message-ID: <1308751418.2780.11.camel@DELL> How come I don't see my mails in the FreeSWITCH-Users Archives? Rgds. Henk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/efcc511a/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Wed Jun 22 18:47:39 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Need help detecting when phone call is answered in lua script (it is starting before the call is picked up) Message-ID: <4E02008B.7080908@499x.com> Hello, I'm having trouble detecting when a phone call (originated from freeswitch) is answered by the called party using a lua script. I have freeswitch connected to a corporate phone system at my office via SIP. When I call my deskphone at work (914145551212), the script waits until I answer to start playing the welcome message, and other actions. But when I call my cellphone (912625551212), the script starts before I pick up the cellphone, as can be seen in the logs I've pasted below. Even though the lua script isn't properly detecting when the cell phone has been answered, freeswitch *does* seem to know, as shown by the line: 2011-06-22 09:21:28.334618 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5594 Channel [sofia/external/912625551212] has been answered which gets logged when I answer the cell, even though the script is already running. This fact gives me hope that there will be a way to fix this script. Any suggestions are appreciated! thanks. using: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-8decee3 2011-06-20 13-21-20 -0500) Script http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16564 logs: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16563 From freeswitch at mralston.com Wed Jun 22 18:49:51 2011 From: freeswitch at mralston.com (Matthew Ralston) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:49:51 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call drops after 30 seconds In-Reply-To: References: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> Message-ID: Hi Chris, Thanks for the quick reply! The FreeSWITCH box is in the DMZ of a Cisco Linksys WAG160N. Best I can tell, the DMZ is doing its job and allowing all ports through, inbound and outbound, TCP & UDP. The external SIP phones are a Cisco SPA504G and Bria on the iPhone. These are behind behind a Cisco ASA5505, which has policy inspection for SIP switched on, i.e. ALG. I have also tested with Bria going over 3G (so it's not behind the Cisco ASA) and had the same problem. The other scenario we have is some Yealink T20P SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the FreeSWITCH box. These can make A-leg only calls into FreeSWITCH (like calling voicemail) and also calls to other internal SIP phones fine. However when they make an outbound call the problem happens again. In this case the b-leg of the calls are sent to an external SIP provider and get cut after 30 seconds. Incidentally, we also use the same SIP provider from an Asterisk box in our data centre and that doesn't have a problem, so I believe the SIP provider is fine. Kind regards, Matthew Ralston Web Developer & IT Consultant matt at mralston.co.uk www.mralston.com On 22 Jun 2011, at 14:21, Chris Chen wrote: > Hi Matthew, this is typical behavior for the setup of SIP behind NAT. > > 1) Please provide the exact setup of remote SIP phones, what's the router model, does it have SIP ALG enabled, what kind of SIP phones > 2) > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Matthew Ralston wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem at the moment with calls being successfully set up, with two-way audio, being terminated by FreeSWITCH after 30 seconds. > > Internal calls (i.e. between SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the FreeSWITCH box) work flawlessly. > > The problem arises when at least one of the handsets is located elsewhere on the Internet. This behaviour is exhibited under the following circumstances: > > - A-leg only call, e.g. to voicemail when the handset is at another location on the Internet > - A-leg-B-leg call if one or both of the handsets are at another location on the Internet > - Inbound calls from our external SIP provider > - Outbound calls to our external SIP provider > > So it is obvious that the problem is related to the SIP going via the Internet, but I'm having trouble understanding why. > > Whilst debugging this problem I have placed the FreeSWITCH box is in the DMZ on our router, so there should not be any ports blocked. The FreeSWITCH box itself is not running a software firewall. > > The calls themselves are absolutely fine for the first 30 seconds - each party can hear the other talking fine. > > The fact that the call is consistently dropped after 30 seconds (give or take a second or two for PDD) suggests that some timeout is being triggered. > > When FreeSWITCH terminates the call, the following is logged to the console: > > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4787 Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed entering state [terminating][0] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5508 Hangup sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [KILL] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.534966 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.625988 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:244 Handle play-file:[voicemail/vm-press.wav] (en:en) > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2063 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State EXECUTE going to sleep > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed hanging up, cause: NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard HANGUP, cause: NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP going to sleep > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard REPORTING, cause: NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING going to sleep > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 5 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Locked, Waiting on external entities > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 5 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Ended > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_DESTROY] > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.780056 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port 31484 protocol UDP to localport 31484 > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port 31485 protocol UDP to localport 31485 > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY going to sleep > > The above example was from an externally situated SIP phone ringing voicemail (4000) on FreeSWITCH. > > I have experimented changing various timers and timeouts in the config of FreeSWITCH (one at a time, being careful to put them back afterwards!) but been unable to resolve the issue. > > Incidentally, we have no long term intention of running off-site SIP phones with the PBX and I'm hoping not to have to leave it in the DMZ either, it's just like that for debugging. What is a real issue is the calls to our external SIP provider (i.e. outbound calls) being dropped. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Matthew Ralston > Web Developer & IT Consultant > > matt at mralston.co.uk > www.mralston.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/9eb41020/attachment-0001.html From infos at madovsky.org Wed Jun 22 18:52:12 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API Message-ID: Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/2f35bac2/attachment.html From max.asterisk at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 14:23:35 2011 From: max.asterisk at gmail.com (Max Alex) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:53:35 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Answer issue on inbound call Message-ID: Hi, I have installed freeswitch latest version with sangoma card A200 as well, I have installed and configured freetdm module with wanpipe drivers for freeswitch, We are properly receiving the inbound calls in public context and then we are routing that call to 1001 extension, it is properly routing to 1001 as well, but we have one issue while routing on 1001. Here is the issue description. I am calling from my cell phone to that DID number of pri line, and then it will start ringing on 1001 extension, When 1001 extension start ringing the call is answered on my cell phone, it is something like freeswitch preanswer or autoanswer the call, how can i stop this answer call when it is ringing on 1001 extension, Waiting for good reply. Thanks, Max Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/696b5575/attachment.html From Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net Wed Jun 22 18:54:41 2011 From: Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net (Hector Geraldino) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS and ASR engine Message-ID: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F939AE4@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Hi everyone, I want to check with you guys to see if anyone has experience integrating FreeSwitch with an ASR engine, and using the engine as a merely transcriber of the conversation. I've been playing for the past two weeks or so with Nuance Speech Server/recognizer and pocketsphinx. Nuance is by far a better solution, but due to the lack of freely available documentation and my short expertise in this subject, I haven't been to achieve my goal. The communication between FS and the ASR engine works great using MCRP, my concern is with the ASR engine itself. I want to allow the user to speak freely, and get a transcription of what the user said. I don't want or need to understand what the meaning of the utterances are (definitely the engine doesn't need to do that), also I don't need/want to write any complex grammar or SLM to get an interpretation of the spoken phrases, I just want the plain text of what has been said. No decisions will be taken based on what the user said, this information will just be passed to a 3rd application. I don't know if this can be achieved or not without developing grammars (not suitable for open-ended dialogs) or training statistical language models. What I do recall is using Dragon Speak in MS word for dictation, without the need of doing some trtraining or developing grammars. That's exactly what I'm pursuing: a simple plain text transcription of the spoken words. Have anyone of you deal with something like this by any chance? Thanks for your help. I apologize if this is not the right place to ask this type of questions. Thanks again, Hector -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/99666b89/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 22 19:11:14 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:11:14 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. :D Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start building your own. -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky wrote: > ** > Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/aad99713/attachment.html From chris.chen2004 at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 19:11:13 2011 From: chris.chen2004 at gmail.com (Chris Chen) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call drops after 30 seconds In-Reply-To: References: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> Message-ID: Hi Matthew, continue my last reply here 2) Is your FS server using private IP address? you have to setup your FS external SIP/RTP IP address to the proper public IP address, by either using UPNP enabled router, STUN, or hardcoded public IP address in sofia profiles. Please check that. Thanks, Chris On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Matthew Ralston wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Thanks for the quick reply! > > The FreeSWITCH box is in the DMZ of a Cisco Linksys WAG160N. Best I can > tell, the DMZ is doing its job and allowing all ports through, inbound and > outbound, TCP & UDP. > > The external SIP phones are a Cisco SPA504G and Bria on the iPhone. These > are behind behind a Cisco ASA5505, which has policy inspection for SIP > switched on, i.e. ALG. I have also tested with Bria going over 3G (so it's > not behind the Cisco ASA) and had the same problem. > > The other scenario we have is some Yealink T20P SIP phones on the same LAN > segment as the FreeSWITCH box. These can make A-leg only calls into > FreeSWITCH (like calling voicemail) and also calls to other internal SIP > phones fine. However when they make an outbound call the problem happens > again. In this case the b-leg of the calls are sent to an external SIP > provider and get cut after 30 seconds. Incidentally, we also use the same > SIP provider from an Asterisk box in our data centre and that doesn't have a > problem, so I believe the SIP provider is fine. > > Kind regards, > > > Matthew Ralston > Web Developer & IT Consultant > > matt at mralston.co.uk > www.mralston.com > > On 22 Jun 2011, at 14:21, Chris Chen wrote: > > Hi Matthew, this is typical behavior for the setup of SIP behind NAT. > > 1) Please provide the exact setup of remote SIP phones, what's the > router model, does it have SIP ALG enabled, what kind of SIP phones > 2) > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Matthew Ralston wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm having a problem at the moment with calls being successfully set up, >> with two-way audio, being terminated by FreeSWITCH after 30 seconds. >> >> Internal calls (i.e. between SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the >> FreeSWITCH box) work flawlessly. >> >> The problem arises when at least one of the handsets is located elsewhere >> on the Internet. This behaviour is exhibited under the following >> circumstances: >> >> - A-leg only call, e.g. to voicemail when the handset is at another >> location on the Internet >> - A-leg-B-leg call if one or both of the handsets are at another location >> on the Internet >> - Inbound calls from our external SIP provider >> - Outbound calls to our external SIP provider >> >> So it is obvious that the problem is related to the SIP going via the >> Internet, but I'm having trouble understanding why. >> >> Whilst debugging this problem I have placed the FreeSWITCH box is in the >> DMZ on our router, so there should not be any ports blocked. The FreeSWITCH >> box itself is not running a software firewall. >> >> The calls themselves are absolutely fine for the first 30 seconds - each >> party can hear the other talking fine. >> >> The fact that the call is consistently dropped after 30 seconds (give or >> take a second or two for PDD) suggests that some timeout is being triggered. >> >> When FreeSWITCH terminates the call, the following is logged to the >> console: >> >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4787 Channel >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed entering state [terminating][0] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5508 Hangup >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [KILL] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.534966 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing >> file >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.625988 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:244 Handle >> play-file:[voicemail/vm-press.wav] (en:en) >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2063 >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed skip receive message >> [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State EXECUTE going to sleep >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_HANGUP >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed hanging up, cause: >> NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard HANGUP, cause: >> NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP going to sleep >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_HANGUP -> >> CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard REPORTING, cause: >> NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING going to sleep >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_REPORTING -> >> CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 5 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Locked, Waiting on external >> entities >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 5 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Ended >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close >> Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_DESTROY] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed SOFIA DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.780056 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port >> 31484 protocol UDP to localport 31484 >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port >> 31485 protocol UDP to localport 31485 >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 ( >> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY going to sleep >> >> The above example was from an externally situated SIP phone ringing >> voicemail (4000) on FreeSWITCH. >> >> I have experimented changing various timers and timeouts in the config of >> FreeSWITCH (one at a time, being careful to put them back afterwards!) but >> been unable to resolve the issue. >> >> Incidentally, we have no long term intention of running off-site SIP >> phones with the PBX and I'm hoping not to have to leave it in the DMZ >> either, it's just like that for debugging. What is a real issue is the calls >> to our external SIP provider (i.e. outbound calls) being dropped. >> >> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matthew Ralston >> Web Developer & IT Consultant >> >> matt at mralston.co.uk >> www.mralston.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/0d49139c/attachment-0001.html From infos at madovsky.org Wed Jun 22 19:20:24 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API References: Message-ID: Mike, I didn't ask tools, but to know at least which function it needs to call to the server to make it work ! :) ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:11 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. :D Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start building your own. -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky wrote: Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? Thanks _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/1b7387da/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 22 19:21:22 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:21:22 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Answer issue on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I thought the A200 was an analog card? Maybe I have my numbers mixed up... Go ahead and collect a debug log of this call. It might help to have your configs posted as well. Use pastebin.freeswitch.org. See this wiki article for tips on how to collect information: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Max Alex wrote: > Hi, > I have installed freeswitch latest version with sangoma card A200 as well, > I have installed and configured freetdm module with wanpipe drivers for > freeswitch, > We are properly receiving the inbound calls in public context and then we > are routing that call to 1001 extension, > it is properly routing to 1001 as well, but we have one issue while routing > on 1001. > > Here is the issue description. > I am calling from my cell phone to that DID number of pri line, and then it > will start ringing on 1001 extension, > When 1001 extension start ringing the call is answered on my cell phone, > it is something like freeswitch preanswer or autoanswer the call, how can i > stop this answer call when it is ringing on 1001 extension, > Waiting for good reply. > > Thanks, > Max Alex > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/c822f63a/attachment.html From freeswitch at mralston.com Wed Jun 22 19:26:43 2011 From: freeswitch at mralston.com (Matthew Ralston) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:26:43 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call drops after 30 seconds In-Reply-To: References: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> Message-ID: <28830F22-9654-45D2-B00A-1E69E32A42F9@mralston.com> Hi Chris, The FreeSWITCH box does indeed have a private IP address. The Cisco Linksys WAG160N router in front of it has UPnP enabled, not that I particularly trust it. So maybe it's worth hard coding the public IP into the Sofia config. Where is the best place to put the public IP? The internal.xml and external.xml files both refer to $${local_ip_v4} although I don't see where this comes from. Does FreeSWITCH figure this out itself in some way? As I have internal SIP phones, an external SIP provider and (whilst debugging) some external SIP phones (which use the internal profile!!). I'm concerned that if I hard code the public IP address in to the wrong place it will cause problems for the internal SIP phones. Kind regards, Matthew Ralston Web Developer & IT Consultant matt at mralston.co.uk www.mralston.com On 22 Jun 2011, at 16:11, Chris Chen wrote: > Hi Matthew, continue my last reply here > > 2) Is your FS server using private IP address? you have to setup your FS external SIP/RTP IP address to the proper public IP address, by either using UPNP enabled router, STUN, or hardcoded public IP address in sofia profiles. > > Please check that. > > Thanks, > Chris > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Matthew Ralston wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Thanks for the quick reply! > > The FreeSWITCH box is in the DMZ of a Cisco Linksys WAG160N. Best I can tell, the DMZ is doing its job and allowing all ports through, inbound and outbound, TCP & UDP. > > The external SIP phones are a Cisco SPA504G and Bria on the iPhone. These are behind behind a Cisco ASA5505, which has policy inspection for SIP switched on, i.e. ALG. I have also tested with Bria going over 3G (so it's not behind the Cisco ASA) and had the same problem. > > The other scenario we have is some Yealink T20P SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the FreeSWITCH box. These can make A-leg only calls into FreeSWITCH (like calling voicemail) and also calls to other internal SIP phones fine. However when they make an outbound call the problem happens again. In this case the b-leg of the calls are sent to an external SIP provider and get cut after 30 seconds. Incidentally, we also use the same SIP provider from an Asterisk box in our data centre and that doesn't have a problem, so I believe the SIP provider is fine. > > Kind regards, > > > Matthew Ralston > Web Developer & IT Consultant > > matt at mralston.co.uk > www.mralston.com > > On 22 Jun 2011, at 14:21, Chris Chen wrote: > >> Hi Matthew, this is typical behavior for the setup of SIP behind NAT. >> >> 1) Please provide the exact setup of remote SIP phones, what's the router model, does it have SIP ALG enabled, what kind of SIP phones >> 2) >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Matthew Ralston wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm having a problem at the moment with calls being successfully set up, with two-way audio, being terminated by FreeSWITCH after 30 seconds. >> >> Internal calls (i.e. between SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the FreeSWITCH box) work flawlessly. >> >> The problem arises when at least one of the handsets is located elsewhere on the Internet. This behaviour is exhibited under the following circumstances: >> >> - A-leg only call, e.g. to voicemail when the handset is at another location on the Internet >> - A-leg-B-leg call if one or both of the handsets are at another location on the Internet >> - Inbound calls from our external SIP provider >> - Outbound calls to our external SIP provider >> >> So it is obvious that the problem is related to the SIP going via the Internet, but I'm having trouble understanding why. >> >> Whilst debugging this problem I have placed the FreeSWITCH box is in the DMZ on our router, so there should not be any ports blocked. The FreeSWITCH box itself is not running a software firewall. >> >> The calls themselves are absolutely fine for the first 30 seconds - each party can hear the other talking fine. >> >> The fact that the call is consistently dropped after 30 seconds (give or take a second or two for PDD) suggests that some timeout is being triggered. >> >> When FreeSWITCH terminates the call, the following is logged to the console: >> >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4787 Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed entering state [terminating][0] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5508 Hangup sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [KILL] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.534966 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done playing file >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.625988 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:244 Handle play-file:[voicemail/vm-press.wav] (en:en) >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2063 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State EXECUTE going to sleep >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_HANGUP >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed hanging up, cause: NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard HANGUP, cause: NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP going to sleep >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_REPORTING >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard REPORTING, cause: NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING going to sleep >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 5 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Locked, Waiting on external entities >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 5 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Ended >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_DESTROY] >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed SOFIA DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.780056 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port 31484 protocol UDP to localport 31484 >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port 31485 protocol UDP to localport 31485 >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard DESTROY >> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY going to sleep >> >> The above example was from an externally situated SIP phone ringing voicemail (4000) on FreeSWITCH. >> >> I have experimented changing various timers and timeouts in the config of FreeSWITCH (one at a time, being careful to put them back afterwards!) but been unable to resolve the issue. >> >> Incidentally, we have no long term intention of running off-site SIP phones with the PBX and I'm hoping not to have to leave it in the DMZ either, it's just like that for debugging. What is a real issue is the calls to our external SIP provider (i.e. outbound calls) being dropped. >> >> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matthew Ralston >> Web Developer & IT Consultant >> >> matt at mralston.co.uk >> www.mralston.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/6843e9c8/attachment-0001.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Wed Jun 22 19:28:17 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:28:17 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Modified Follow me In-Reply-To: References: <4E00A61C.1060503@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4E020A11.4080706@seletech.com> Hi, this is the v_huntgroup_localhost_$EXTENSION.lua http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16565 if the second line is deleted one problem is solved, FS doesn't answer with 200 ok, but answer with ringing. But I'm not able to solve the other problem... / if the first extension is reachable and the user hangup before answering (hangup in ringing), the follow me procedure starts to contact the second extension in the list. I want that FS start to contact the second phone only if the first extension isn't registered to FS. / I think is related with the line 47. Some one can help me? Thanks Alessandro Luppi Il 22/06/2011 10:42, Christian Benke ha scritto: > On 21 June 2011 16:09, Alessandro wrote: >> Any suggestion? > While i can't give you a concrete solution, take a look at the files > that are created by fusionpbx, mainly > /usr/local/freeswitch/scripts/v_huntgroup_localhost_$EXTENSION.lua - > if you dig a bit you might be able to find and fix the problem > yourself(And eventually file a bugreport with fusionpbx). > > hth > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > FIRST MAIL: /Hi, i'd like to implement this particular behaviour. If I call an extension that isn't registered to FS, FS re-route the call to another destination. If also the second destination in unreachable the call end. I first used the follow me (created with fusionpbx) to implement this feature, but I have the following problem: if the first extension is reachable and the user hangup before answering (hangup in ringing), the follow me procedure starts to contact the second extension in the list. I want that FS start to contact the second phone only if the first extension isn't registered to FS. The second problem is that with follow-me FS answer with 200 OK at the invite of the caller bypassing the ringing status, than the procedure of follow-me is transparent to the caller. I'd like that the caller stay in ringing status until one of the destination extension answer at the call or the call is closed by FS. Any suggestion? Regards Alessandro Luppi / -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/864ee10e/attachment.html From infos at madovsky.org Wed Jun 22 19:53:05 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API Message-ID: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> if I type "actionscript mod_rtmp freeswitch" on google nothing that helps a common developer to work on mod_rtmp .... ----- Original Message ----- From: Madovsky To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API Mike, I didn't ask tools, but to know at least which function it needs to call to the server to make it work ! :) ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Collins To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:11 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. :D Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start building your own. -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky wrote: Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? Thanks _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/653e112d/attachment.html From pehr at harqen.com Wed Jun 22 20:16:47 2011 From: pehr at harqen.com (Pehr Anderson) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS and ASR engine In-Reply-To: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F939AE4@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F939AE4@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: You might check out http://Nexiwave.com They have been active at Cluecon and have a web API that does fully hosted ASR on WAV's or MP3's. They are doing innovation around running their ASR in GPU clusters, which means their internal cost of operation is likely to be the lowest in the industry. Good ASR is always going to be computationally intensive, so it is helpful to have somebody managing that for you. It's going to be a lot easier that trying to juggle your own sphinx training sets. http://nexiwave.com/index.php/pricing --pehr On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Hector Geraldino < Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net> wrote: > Hi everyone,**** > > ** ** > > I want to check with you guys to see if anyone has experience integrating > FreeSwitch with an ASR engine, and using the engine as a merely transcriber > of the conversation. **** > > ** ** > > I?ve been playing for the past two weeks or so with Nuance Speech > Server/recognizer and pocketsphinx. Nuance is by far a better solution, but > due to the lack of freely available documentation and my short expertise in > this subject, I haven?t been to achieve my goal.**** > > ** ** > > The communication between FS and the ASR engine works great using MCRP, my > concern is with the ASR engine itself. I want to allow the user to speak > freely, and get a transcription of what the user said. I don?t want or need > to understand what the meaning of the utterances are (definitely the engine > doesn?t need to do that), also I don?t need/want to write any complex > grammar or SLM to get an interpretation of the spoken phrases, I just want > the plain text of what has been said. No decisions will be taken based on > what the user said, this information will just be passed to a 3rdapplication. > **** > > ** ** > > I don?t know if this can be achieved or not without developing grammars > (not suitable for open-ended dialogs) or training statistical language > models. What I do recall is using Dragon Speak in MS word for dictation, > without the need of doing some trtraining or developing grammars. That?s > exactly what I?m pursuing: a simple plain text transcription of the spoken > words.**** > > ** ** > > Have anyone of you deal with something like this by any chance?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks for your help. I apologize if this is not the right place to ask > this type of questions.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks again,**** > > Hector**** > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Pehr Anderson, VP Platform Technology HarQen - http://HarQen.com 414-755-1962 x114 pehr at harqen.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/ac179a6a/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 20:19:20 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> Message-ID: Actually...... We have something we are working on that we are considering releasing if we can build a community base effort around it. When I get a sign of enough interest we'll go from there. It would be nice to do some presentations at ClueCon about it. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Madovsky wrote: > if I type "actionscript mod_rtmp freeswitch" on google > nothing that helps a common developer to work on mod_rtmp > .... > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Madovsky > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:20 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API > Mike, > > I didn't ask tools, but to know at least which function it needs to call to > the server > to make it work ! :) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Collins > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:11 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API > No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. :D > Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start building > your own. > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky wrote: >> >> Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? >> >> Thanks >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > ________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 22 20:23:34 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:23:34 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > Actually...... > > We have something we are working on that we are considering releasing > if we can build a community base effort around it. > When I get a sign of enough interest we'll go from there. > > It would be nice to do some presentations at ClueCon about it. > I stand corrected. Thanks for the update, Anthony. - Hey folks, Our conf call agenda is here: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FS_weekly_2011_06_22 Please add your items. It turns out our speaker for today had to reschedule at the last minute so we're going to do a community scrum. Bring your topics for conversation! Thanks, MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/e7d32e9b/attachment.html From infos at madovsky.org Wed Jun 22 20:33:34 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> Message-ID: Ok Anth, adobe is actually going into the voip market very quickly, they started some voip services already. so if FS want a chance to create a community for mod_rtmp it needs at least a minimum information to use it, if not, I can't see the interest of mod_rtmp Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Minessale" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API > Actually...... > > We have something we are working on that we are considering releasing > if we can build a community base effort around it. > When I get a sign of enough interest we'll go from there. > > It would be nice to do some presentations at ClueCon about it. > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Madovsky wrote: >> if I type "actionscript mod_rtmp freeswitch" on google >> nothing that helps a common developer to work on mod_rtmp >> .... >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Madovsky >> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:20 AM >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >> Mike, >> >> I didn't ask tools, but to know at least which function it needs to call >> to >> the server >> to make it work ! :) >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Michael Collins >> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:11 AM >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >> No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. >> :D >> Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start >> building >> your own. >> -MC >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky wrote: >>> >>> Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? >>> >>> Thanks >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net Wed Jun 22 20:43:53 2011 From: Hector.Geraldino at ip-soft.net (Hector Geraldino) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS and ASR engine In-Reply-To: References: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F939AE4@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F939AFD@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Yeah, well, the thing is that it needs to be interactive (like an IVR system), so recording the voice and using a 3rd party service to translate a file is not an option for me right now. That's why I'm using MCRP to communicate FreeSwitch with the ASR engine. All I need is to figure out how to get the recognized text from a given ASR, without constraining the user to talk in an specific way (by a grammar) and, if possible, without training SLMs. My guess is that it's not possible, as I can't find any resources on the web showing this feature, but I'm still optimistic hoping to find an 'easy' way of doing the transcription. From: Pehr Anderson [mailto:pehr at harqen.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:17 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help; Hector Geraldino Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS and ASR engine You might check out http://Nexiwave.com They have been active at Cluecon and have a web API that does fully hosted ASR on WAV's or MP3's. They are doing innovation around running their ASR in GPU clusters, which means their internal cost of operation is likely to be the lowest in the industry. Good ASR is always going to be computationally intensive, so it is helpful to have somebody managing that for you. It's going to be a lot easier that trying to juggle your own sphinx training sets. http://nexiwave.com/index.php/pricing --pehr On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Hector Geraldino > wrote: Hi everyone, I want to check with you guys to see if anyone has experience integrating FreeSwitch with an ASR engine, and using the engine as a merely transcriber of the conversation. I've been playing for the past two weeks or so with Nuance Speech Server/recognizer and pocketsphinx. Nuance is by far a better solution, but due to the lack of freely available documentation and my short expertise in this subject, I haven't been to achieve my goal. The communication between FS and the ASR engine works great using MCRP, my concern is with the ASR engine itself. I want to allow the user to speak freely, and get a transcription of what the user said. I don't want or need to understand what the meaning of the utterances are (definitely the engine doesn't need to do that), also I don't need/want to write any complex grammar or SLM to get an interpretation of the spoken phrases, I just want the plain text of what has been said. No decisions will be taken based on what the user said, this information will just be passed to a 3rd application. I don't know if this can be achieved or not without developing grammars (not suitable for open-ended dialogs) or training statistical language models. What I do recall is using Dragon Speak in MS word for dictation, without the need of doing some trtraining or developing grammars. That's exactly what I'm pursuing: a simple plain text transcription of the spoken words. Have anyone of you deal with something like this by any chance? Thanks for your help. I apologize if this is not the right place to ask this type of questions. Thanks again, Hector _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Pehr Anderson, VP Platform Technology HarQen - http://HarQen.com 414-755-1962 x114 pehr at harqen.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/66cd356b/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 22 20:51:17 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:51:17 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Need help detecting when phone call is answered in lua script (it is starting before the call is picked up) In-Reply-To: <4E02008B.7080908@499x.com> References: <4E02008B.7080908@499x.com> Message-ID: Wes, The "originate" API is very similar to the "bridge" dp command - when the far end sends *any* media then the originate (or bridge) is considered "successful" and processing continues. You have a few choices, but I would start by trying this on your originate: originate {ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/mcw/914145551212 &lua( hello.lua) This will tell the originate not to be "successful" until the far end actually answers, as opposed to when the far end simply sends media. The drawback here, of course, is that if call progress is sent in band, e.g. a busy signal, you are explicitly ignoring that information. An alternative is found in the "execute_on_xxx" family of channel variables. Check it out: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#The_execute_on_family It requires a little more thought, but you end up with more fine-tuned control over everything. Look in particular at the originate & dialplan example under "execute_on_answer" which I believe contains the most complete solution to your problem. -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Wes wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having trouble detecting when a phone call (originated from > freeswitch) is answered by the called party using a lua script. I have > freeswitch connected to a corporate phone system at my office via SIP. > When I call my deskphone at work (914145551212), the script waits until > I answer to start playing the welcome message, and other actions. But > when I call my cellphone (912625551212), the script starts before I pick > up the cellphone, as can be seen in the logs I've pasted below. > > Even though the lua script isn't properly detecting when the cell phone > has been answered, freeswitch *does* seem to know, as shown by the line: > 2011-06-22 09:21:28.334618 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5594 Channel > [sofia/external/912625551212] has been answered > which gets logged when I answer the cell, even though the script is > already running. > > This fact gives me hope that there will be a way to fix this script. > > Any suggestions are appreciated! > thanks. > > using: > FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-8decee3 2011-06-20 13-21-20 -0500) > > Script > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16564 > > logs: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16563 > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/facabd64/attachment-0001.html From educs13 at yahoo.com.br Wed Jun 22 20:52:29 2011 From: educs13 at yahoo.com.br (=?utf-8?B?Sm9zw6kgRWR1YXJkbyBkZSBDLiBTaWx2YQ==?=) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FS and ASR engine In-Reply-To: <6A6B4C284AD15042B429EB9D904544AD021F939AE4@NY1-EXMB-01.ip-soft.net> Message-ID: <608380.9320.qm@web161902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Hi Hector, the point with Dragon Speak is that it already has a language model buil-in (and an acoustic model as well). It's not just an ASR engine. To solve your problem, you must have an ASR engine + statistical language model (LM) + acoustic model (AM). These three parts together can be called ASR system and it can be built directly from entreprises like Nuance and Loquendo. But if you want to use a free ASR system you'll have to combine a free engine + a free statistical LM + a free AM. Two known free engines are Sphinx and Julius. I think that you can find some free english LMs and english AMs supported by these engines at http://www.voxforge.org/ and http://www.keithv.com/software/. One problem that you'll face with these free engines is the lack of MRCP support. But it can be easily solved just by writing a simple module in FS (for example, see mod_pocketsphinx.c that comes with the source code of FS). I hope it helps ... Eduardo --- Em qua, 22/6/11, Hector Geraldino escreveu: De: Hector Geraldino Assunto: [Freeswitch-users] FS and ASR engine Para: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Data: Quarta-feira, 22 de Junho de 2011, 11:54 Hi everyone, ?I want to check with you guys to see if anyone has experience integrating FreeSwitch with an ASR engine, and using the engine as a merely transcriber of the conversation. ?I?ve been playing for the past two weeks or so with Nuance Speech Server/recognizer and pocketsphinx. Nuance is by far a better solution, but due to the lack of freely available documentation and my short expertise in this subject, I haven?t been to achieve my goal. ?The communication between FS and the ASR engine works great using MCRP, my concern is with the ASR engine itself. I want to allow the user to speak freely, and get a transcription of what the user said. I don?t want or need to understand what the meaning of the utterances are (definitely the engine doesn?t need to do that), also I don?t need/want to write any complex grammar or SLM to get an interpretation of the spoken phrases, I just want the plain text of what has been said. No decisions will be taken based on what the user said, this information will just be passed to a 3rd application. ?I don?t know if this can be achieved or not without developing grammars (not suitable for open-ended dialogs) or training statistical language models. What I do recall is using Dragon Speak in MS word for dictation, without the need of doing some trtraining or developing grammars. That?s exactly what I?m pursuing: a simple plain text transcription of the spoken words. ?Have anyone of you deal with something like this by any chance? ?Thanks for your help. I apologize if this is not the right place to ask this type of questions. ?Thanks again,Hector -----Anexo incorporado----- _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/77bd307d/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 20:56:25 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Madovsky wrote: > Ok Anth, > > adobe is actually going into the voip market very quickly, > they started some voip services already. > so if FS want a chance to create a community for mod_rtmp > it needs at least a minimum information to use it, if not, I can't see > the interest of mod_rtmp > > Regards I don't really feel any urgency to speed up the free work we do because you and adobe are impatient but thanks for the suggestion. Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From bmoore at statirasystems.com Wed Jun 22 20:34:58 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue Message-ID: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> I can't get any incoming nor outgoing calls. The trunk is through Junction Networks and registers fine. I though I had the dial plan correct but there is obviously something I am missing. I am running Blue.Box GUI with FreeSwitch. It is in CentOS 5.5. I am using Verizon FiOS internet and the firewall is properly configured. This is a test environment so I would be happy to let someone in to take a look. I have SSH setup and web access via phone.statirasystems.com. Other wise it is a lot of configuration info to post. I have checked with Junction Networks and everything is fine on there end. My server is not responding to the requests. I am fairly green with freeswitch and would appreciate any help. Please note: I have sought assistance via the 2600hz community to no avail. Thank you, -- William J. Moore Owner Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA 22401 540.693.0579 www.statirasystems.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bmoore.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 245 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/2cd6d9ec/attachment.vcf From bmoore at statirasystems.com Wed Jun 22 21:35:04 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> Some details /opt/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/bluebox_sipinterfaces.xml /opt/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/bluebox_dialplan.xml /opt/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/bluebox_routes.xml William J. Moore Owner Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA 22401 540.693.0579 www.statirasystems.com On 6/22/2011 12:34 PM, William Moore wrote: > I can't get any incoming nor outgoing calls. The trunk is through > Junction Networks and registers fine. I though I had the dial plan > correct but there is obviously something I am missing. > > I am running Blue.Box GUI with FreeSwitch. It is in CentOS 5.5. I am > using Verizon FiOS internet and the firewall is properly configured. > This is a test environment so I would be happy to let someone in to > take a look. I have SSH setup and web access via > phone.statirasystems.com. Other wise it is a lot of configuration info > to post. > > I have checked with Junction Networks and everything is fine on there > end. My server is not responding to the requests. > > I am fairly green with freeswitch and would appreciate any help. > > Please note: I have sought assistance via the 2600hz community to no > avail. > > Thank you, > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/f5c7b79f/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bmoore.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 245 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/f5c7b79f/attachment-0001.vcf From infos at madovsky.org Wed Jun 22 22:16:38 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> Message-ID: <1F6D6705ED694D4C8BEA7D99CA3FF100@e1705> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Minessale" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:56 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Madovsky wrote: >> Ok Anth, >> >> adobe is actually going into the voip market very quickly, >> they started some voip services already. >> so if FS want a chance to create a community for mod_rtmp >> it needs at least a minimum information to use it, if not, I can't see >> the interest of mod_rtmp >> >> Regards > > I don't really feel any urgency to speed up the free work we do > because you and adobe are impatient but thanks for the suggestion. personaly I use my own flash phone since one year now. my developer knowledger doesn't make me any wage since 2 years. I personaly not (yet) make money with FS...... but thanks for your answer.... From wes-fs at 499x.com Wed Jun 22 22:17:35 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Need help detecting when phone call is answered in lua script (it is starting before the call is picked up) In-Reply-To: References: <4E02008B.7080908@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E0231BF.5020704@499x.com> Thank you! that worked just fine. On 6/22/2011 11:51 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > Wes, > > The "originate" API is very similar to the "bridge" dp command - when > the far end sends *any* media then the originate (or bridge) is > considered "successful" and processing continues. You have a few > choices, but I would start by trying this on your originate: > > originate {ignore_early_media=true}sofia/gateway/mcw/914145551212 > &lua(hello.lua) > > This will tell the originate not to be "successful" until the far end > actually answers, as opposed to when the far end simply sends media. > The drawback here, of course, is that if call progress is sent in > band, e.g. a busy signal, you are explicitly ignoring that > information. An alternative is found in the "execute_on_xxx" family of > channel variables. Check it out: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#The_execute_on_family > > It requires a little more thought, but you end up with more fine-tuned > control over everything. Look in particular at the originate & > dialplan example under "execute_on_answer" which I believe contains > the most complete solution to your problem. > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Wes > wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm having trouble detecting when a phone call (originated from > freeswitch) is answered by the called party using a lua script. I > have > freeswitch connected to a corporate phone system at my office via SIP. > When I call my deskphone at work (914145551212), the script waits > until > I answer to start playing the welcome message, and other actions. But > when I call my cellphone (912625551212), the script starts before > I pick > up the cellphone, as can be seen in the logs I've pasted below. > > Even though the lua script isn't properly detecting when the cell > phone > has been answered, freeswitch *does* seem to know, as shown by the > line: > 2011-06-22 09:21:28.334618 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5594 Channel > [sofia/external/912625551212] has been answered > which gets logged when I answer the cell, even though the script is > already running. > > This fact gives me hope that there will be a way to fix this script. > > Any suggestions are appreciated! > thanks. > > using: > FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-8decee3 2011-06-20 13-21-20 -0500) > > Script > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16564 > > logs: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16563 > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/9286b7d0/attachment.html From bmoore at statirasystems.com Wed Jun 22 22:27:25 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> And what sophiatrace reports from my soft phone device 502 calling number 7032203446. When I call from outside in nothing is shown on the trace, so I am not sure what that means. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= PuTTY log 2011.06.22 14:22:40 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= send 695 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:07.684442: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OPTIONS sip:502 at 192.168.1.11:42615;ob SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;rport;branch=z9hG4bK4Hyp1U0Djc12F Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=trm8SvQyg57ga To: Call-ID: fb2b0eb4-17b0-122f-85bc-0002a5ed0817 CSeq: 14049563 OPTIONS Contact: User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 1188 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:07.755356: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;rport=5060;received=192.168.1.254;branch=z9hG4bK4Hyp1U0Djc12F Call-ID: fb2b0eb4-17b0-122f-85bc-0002a5ed0817 From: ;tag=trm8SvQyg57ga To: ;tag=z9hG4bK4Hyp1U0Djc12F CSeq: 14049563 OPTIONS Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Accept: application/sdp, application/pidf+xml, application/xpidf+xml, application/simple-message-summary, message/sipfrag;version=2.0, application/im-iscomposing+xml, text/plain Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Allow-Events: presence, message-summary, refer User-Agent: CSipSimple r944 / inc-8 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 427 v=0 o=- 3517756265 3517756265 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 m=audio 49493 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtcp:40021 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:15.458709 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5060 protocol UDP to localport 5060 2011-06-22 13:28:15.574709 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5060 protocol TCP to localport 5060 2011-06-22 13:28:15.691704 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5070 protocol UDP to localport 5070 2011-06-22 13:28:15.808694 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5070 protocol TCP to localport 5070 2011-06-22 13:28:15.925687 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5080 protocol UDP to localport 5080 2011-06-22 13:28:16.040679 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5080 protocol TCP to localport 5080 recv 1346 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.536924: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjYU1YgUOgEnTrbjl09SB0FLBTUw3q.4kD Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: Contact: ;+sip.ice Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23484 INVITE Route: Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 User-Agent: CSipSimple r944 / inc-8 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 616 v=0 o=- 3517756289 3517756289 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 33616 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtcp:38327 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ice-ufrag:7adc4b5a a=ice-pwd:15961ee1 a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 1 UDP 2130706431 192.168.1.11 33616 typ host a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 2 UDP 2130706430 192.168.1.11 38327 typ host ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 363 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.537870: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjYU1YgUOgEnTrbjl09SB0FLBTUw3q.4kD From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23484 INVITE User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:31.539663 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6551 IP 192.168.1.11 Rejected by acl "net_list_5". Falling back to Digest auth. 2011-06-22 13:28:31.539663 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1246 SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'sipinterface_1' for [7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com] from ip 192.168.1.11 send 855 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.541775: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjYU1YgUOgEnTrbjl09SB0FLBTUw3q.4kD From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: ;tag=U1D1UQ81Dey3N Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23484 INVITE User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="phone.statirasystems.com", nonce="430ea594-c447-42e5-a795-1c5ac884b996", algorithm=MD5, qop="auth" Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 445 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.544036: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACK sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjYU1YgUOgEnTrbjl09SB0FLBTUw3q.4kD Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: ;tag=U1D1UQ81Dey3N Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23484 ACK Route: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 1643 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.545117: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: Contact: ;+sip.ice Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23485 INVITE Route: Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 User-Agent: CSipSimple r944 / inc-8 Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="502", realm="phone.statirasystems.com", nonce="430ea594-c447-42e5-a795-1c5ac884b996", uri="sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com", response="95d75cc4f1478333731f960e0e686399", algorithm=MD5, cnonce="VIYZuITTZROoTJla3ithxFWRKkW15K3H", qop=auth, nc=00000001 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 616 v=0 o=- 3517756289 3517756289 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 33616 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtcp:38327 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ice-ufrag:7adc4b5a a=ice-pwd:15961ee1 a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 1 UDP 2130706431 192.168.1.11 33616 typ host a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 2 UDP 2130706430 192.168.1.11 38327 typ host ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 363 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.545859: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23485 INVITE User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6551 IP 192.168.1.11 Rejected by acl "net_list_5". Falling back to Digest auth. 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:816 New Channel sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [ae454abd-dc4a-42c9-90cc-6b0b332c44f4] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com entering state [received][100] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4772 Remote SDP: v=0 o=- 3517756289 3517756289 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 33616 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=rtcp:38327 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=ice-ufrag:7adc4b5a a=ice-pwd:15961ee1 a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 1 UDP 2130706431 192.168.1.11 33616 typ host a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 2 UDP 2130706430 192.168.1.11 38327 typ host 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4669 Audio Codec Compare [G722:9:8000:20:64000]/[G7221:115:32000:20:48000] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4669 Audio Codec Compare [G722:9:8000:20:64000]/[G7221:107:16000:20:32000] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4669 Audio Codec Compare [G722:9:8000:20:64000]/[G722:9:8000:20:64000] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2792 Set Codec sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com G722/8000 20 ms 160 samples 64000 bits 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4783 Set 2833 dtmf send/recv payload to 101 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4943 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State INIT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SOFIA INIT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1672 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.555041 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.555041 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SOFIA ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.555041 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.555041 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing 502 <502>->7032203446 in context context_1 Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->conditioning_callerid] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (PASS) [conditioning_callerid] ${internal_caller_id_number}(7036526678) =~ /^.+$/ break=on-false Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_name=${internal_caller_id_name}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_number=${internal_caller_id_number}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->postroute_global] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Absolute Condition [postroute_global] Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action hash(insert/${domain_name}-spymap/${caller_id_number}/${uuid}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action hash(insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/${caller_id_number}/${destination_number}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action hash(insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/global/${uuid}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(RFC2822_DATE=${strftime(%a, %d %b %Y %T %z)}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->main_number_1] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (FAIL) [main_number_1] destination_number(7032203446) =~ /^2001$/ break=on-false Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->main_number_3] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (FAIL) [main_number_3] destination_number(7032203446) =~ /^502$/ break=on-false Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->main_trunk_1_pattern_1] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (PASS) [main_trunk_1_pattern_1] destination_number(7032203446) =~ /^1{0,1}([2-9][0-8][0-9][2-9][0-9]{6})$/ break=never Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(prepend=) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_name=Statira Systems) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_number=7036526678) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (PASS) [main_trunk_1_pattern_1] ${outbound_caller_id_number}(7036526678) =~ /^.+$/ break=never Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_name=${outbound_caller_id_name}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_number=${outbound_caller_id_number}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action export(sip_cid_type=rpid) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (PASS) [main_trunk_1_pattern_1] destination_number(7032203446) =~ /^1{0,1}([2-9][0-8][0-9][2-9][0-9]{6})$/ break=never Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action bridge(sofia/gateway/trunk_1/${prepend}7032203446) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State EXECUTE 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SOFIA EXECUTE 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard EXECUTE EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_name=Monkey) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.559681 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_name]=[Monkey] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_number=7036526678) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.559681 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_number]=[7036526678] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com hash(insert/phone.statirasystems.com-spymap/502/ae454abd-dc4a-42c9-90cc-6b0b332c44f4) EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com hash(insert/phone.statirasystems.com-last_dial/502/7032203446) EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com hash(insert/phone.statirasystems.com-last_dial/global/ae454abd-dc4a-42c9-90cc-6b0b332c44f4) EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(RFC2822_DATE=Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:28:31 -0700) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.562678 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [RFC2822_DATE]=[Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:28:31 -0700] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(prepend=) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.563814 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [prepend]=[UNDEF] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_name=Statira Systems) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.564681 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_name]=[Statira Systems] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_number=7036526678) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.565679 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_number]=[7036526678] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_name=Monkey) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.565679 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_name]=[Monkey] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_number=7036526678) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.566804 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_number]=[7036526678] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com export(sip_cid_type=rpid) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.567678 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:965 EXPORT (export_vars) [sip_cid_type]=[rpid] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com bridge(sofia/gateway/trunk_1/7032203446) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:922 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com EXPORTING[export_vars] [sip_cid_type]=[rpid] to event 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1873 Parsing global variables 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4045 Invalid Gateway 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [NOTICE] mod_sofia.c:4402 Close Channel N/A [CS_NEW] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 () Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (N/A) State DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 N/A SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (N/A) State DESTROY going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [ERR] switch_ivr_originate.c:2447 Cannot create outgoing channel of type [sofia] cause: [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3299 Originate Resulted in Error Cause: 28 [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2647 Originate Failed. Cause: INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2567 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Callstate Change RINGING -> HANGUP 2011-06-22 13:28:31.570693 [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:2761 Hangup sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [CS_EXECUTE] [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.570693 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2583 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [KILL] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.570693 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.571679 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.571679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.571679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-22 13:28:31.572811 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State HANGUP 2011-06-22 13:28:31.572811 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com hanging up, cause: INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.573682 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:519 Responding to INVITE with: 484 send 861 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.574787: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: ;tag=va7SXjS5aQmpH Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23485 INVITE User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Reason: Q.850;cause=28;text="INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT" Content-Length: 0 Remote-Party-ID: "7032203446" ;party=calling;privacy=off;screen=no ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard HANGUP, cause: INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575845 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State REPORTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575845 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard REPORTING, cause: INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT recv 445 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.583298: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACK sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: ;tag=va7SXjS5aQmpH Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23485 ACK Route: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:31.584480 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State REPORTING going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 8 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 8 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Ended 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close Channel sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State DESTROY going to sleep send 695 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:37.744017: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OPTIONS sip:502 at 192.168.1.11:42615;ob SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;rport;branch=z9hG4bK5tQF3pHHFNQNB Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=XK0jZDa97Za9c To: Call-ID: 0d15c90c-17b1-122f-85bc-0002a5ed0817 CSeq: 14049564 OPTIONS Contact: User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 1188 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:37.860253: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;rport=5060;received=192.168.1.254;branch=z9hG4bK5tQF3pHHFNQNB Call-ID: 0d15c90c-17b1-122f-85bc-0002a5ed0817 From: ;tag=XK0jZDa97Za9c To: ;tag=z9hG4bK5tQF3pHHFNQNB CSeq: 14049564 OPTIONS Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Accept: application/sdp, application/pidf+xml, application/xpidf+xml, application/simple-message-summary, message/sipfrag;version=2.0, application/im-iscomposing+xml, text/plain Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Allow-Events: presence, message-summary, refer User-Agent: CSipSimple r944 / inc-8 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 427 v=0 o=- 3517756295 3517756295 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 m=audio 49493 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtcp:40021 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ William J. Moore Owner Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA 22401 540.693.0579 www.statirasystems.com On 6/22/2011 1:35 PM, William Moore wrote: > Some details > > /opt/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/bluebox_sipinterfaces.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /opt/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/bluebox_dialplan.xml > > > > > > > data="effective_caller_id_name=${internal_caller_id_name}"/> > data="effective_caller_id_number=${internal_caller_id_number}"/> > > > > > data="insert/${domain_name}-spymap/${caller_id_number}/${uuid}"/> > data="insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/${caller_id_number}/${destination_number}"/> > data="insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/global/${uuid}"/> > > > > > > data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/> > data="continue_on_fail=true"/> > data="vm_auto_play=false"/> > data="call_timeout=20"/> > data="ringback=${us-ring}"/> > data="transfer_ringback=${us-ring}"/> > data="sip_callee_id_name=Account Admin"/> > data="sip_callee_id_number=2001"/> > data="user/account_admin@$${location_1}"/> > > > > > > > > data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/> > data="continue_on_fail=true"/> > data="vm_auto_play=false"/> > data="call_timeout=30"/> > data="ringback=${us-ring}"/> > data="transfer_ringback=${us-ring}"/> > data="sip_callee_id_name=Monkey"/> > data="sip_callee_id_number=502"/> > > > > > > > > expression="^1{0,1}([2-9][0-8][0-9][2-9][0-9]{6})$" > bluebox="pattern_1_part_1"> > > data="effective_caller_id_name=Statira Systems"/> > data="effective_caller_id_number=7036526678"/> > > expression="^.+$" break="never" bluebox="caller_id"> > data="effective_caller_id_name=${outbound_caller_id_name}"/> > data="effective_caller_id_number=${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > data="sip_cid_type=rpid"/> > > expression="^1{0,1}([2-9][0-8][0-9][2-9][0-9]{6})$" > bluebox="pattern_1_part_1_out"> > data="sofia/gateway/trunk_1/${prepend}$1"/> > > > > > > > data="effective_caller_id_name=${internal_caller_id_name}"/> > data="effective_caller_id_number=${internal_caller_id_number}"/> > > > > > data="insert/${domain_name}-spymap/${caller_id_number}/${uuid}"/> > data="insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/${caller_id_number}/${destination_number}"/> > data="insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/global/${uuid}"/> > > > > > > data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/> > data="continue_on_fail=true"/> > data="vm_auto_play=false"/> > data="call_timeout=30"/> > data="ringback=${us-ring}"/> > data="transfer_ringback=${us-ring}"/> > data="sip_callee_id_name=Monkey"/> > data="sip_callee_id_number=502"/> > > > > > > > > > data="call_timeout=30"/> > data="ringback=${us-ring}"/> > data="transfer_ringback=${us-ring}"/> > data="sip_callee_id_name=Account Admin"/> > data="sip_callee_id_number=17036526678"/> > data="user/account_admin@$${location_1}"/> > > > > > expression="^1{0,1}([2-9][0-8][0-9][2-9][0-9]{6})$" > bluebox="pattern_1_part_1"> > > data="effective_caller_id_name=Statira Systems"/> > data="effective_caller_id_number=7036526678"/> > > expression="^.+$" break="never" bluebox="caller_id"> > data="effective_caller_id_name=${outbound_caller_id_name}"/> > data="effective_caller_id_number=${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> > data="sip_cid_type=rpid"/> > > expression="^1{0,1}([2-9][0-8][0-9][2-9][0-9]{6})$" > bluebox="pattern_1_part_1_out"> > data="sofia/gateway/trunk_1/${prepend}$1"/> > > > > > > /opt/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/bluebox_routes.xml > > > > > > > data="vm-operator-extension=17036526678"/> > data="force_transfer_context=context_2"/> > > > > > > > William J. Moore > Owner > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA 22401 > 540.693.0579 > www.statirasystems.com > > On 6/22/2011 12:34 PM, William Moore wrote: >> I can't get any incoming nor outgoing calls. The trunk is through >> Junction Networks and registers fine. I though I had the dial plan >> correct but there is obviously something I am missing. >> >> I am running Blue.Box GUI with FreeSwitch. It is in CentOS 5.5. I am >> using Verizon FiOS internet and the firewall is properly configured. >> This is a test environment so I would be happy to let someone in to >> take a look. I have SSH setup and web access via >> phone.statirasystems.com. Other wise it is a lot of configuration >> info to post. >> >> I have checked with Junction Networks and everything is fine on there >> end. My server is not responding to the requests. >> >> I am fairly green with freeswitch and would appreciate any help. >> >> Please note: I have sought assistance via the 2600hz community to no >> avail. >> >> Thank you, >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/ae253f2d/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bmoore.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 245 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/ae253f2d/attachment-0001.vcf From a.luppi at seletech.com Wed Jun 22 23:28:41 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:28:41 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Modified Follow me In-Reply-To: <4E020A11.4080706@seletech.com> References: <4E00A61C.1060503@seletech.com> <4E020A11.4080706@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4E024269.8060503@seletech.com> Solved, Thanks Alessandro Il 22/06/2011 17:28, Alessandro ha scritto: > Hi, > > this is the v_huntgroup_localhost_$EXTENSION.lua > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16565 > > if the second line is deleted one problem is solved, FS doesn't answer > with 200 ok, but answer with ringing. > But I'm not able to solve the other problem... > / if the first extension is reachable and the user hangup before > answering (hangup in ringing), the follow me procedure starts to > contact the second extension in the list. I want that FS > start to contact the second phone only if the first extension isn't > registered to FS. / > > I think is related with the line 47. > > Some one can help me? > > Thanks > > Alessandro Luppi > > > > Il 22/06/2011 10:42, Christian Benke ha scritto: >> On 21 June 2011 16:09, Alessandro wrote: >>> Any suggestion? >> While i can't give you a concrete solution, take a look at the files >> that are created by fusionpbx, mainly >> /usr/local/freeswitch/scripts/v_huntgroup_localhost_$EXTENSION.lua - >> if you dig a bit you might be able to find and fix the problem >> yourself(And eventually file a bugreport with fusionpbx). >> >> hth >> Christian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > FIRST MAIL: > /Hi, > > i'd like to implement this particular behaviour. If I call an > extension that isn't registered to FS, FS re-route the call to another > destination. If also the second destination in unreachable the call > end. I first used the follow me (created with fusionpbx) to implement > this feature, but I have the following problem: if the first extension > is reachable and the user hangup before answering (hangup in ringing), > the follow me procedure starts to contact the second extension in the > list. I want that FS start to contact the second phone only if the > first extension isn't registered to FS. > The second problem is that with follow-me FS answer with 200 OK at the > invite of the caller bypassing the ringing status, than the procedure > of follow-me is transparent to the caller. > I'd like that the caller stay in ringing status until one of the > destination extension answer at the call or the call is closed by FS. > Any suggestion? > > Regards > > Alessandro Luppi / > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/ae934a36/attachment.html From elijah at crankenstein.com Wed Jun 22 23:48:06 2011 From: elijah at crankenstein.com (elijah) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:48:06 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 'make current' fails to complete In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I did make changes. 'git reset --hard' worked. Thanks. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:11 PM, curriegrad2004 wrote: > did you make any changes to the code tree? If you did, you'd probably > want to perform a git stash to save all the changes you made then run > git stash apply to merge your changes after the pull. > > Otherwise, it would be wise to run git reset --hard to 'fix' the > source tree if you are sure you made no changes to the code at all > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:44 PM, elijah wrote: > > My attempts to 'make current' against the Git repository are failing > today. > > Can you recommend a method by which I can update my FreeSwitch > installation? > > Here's the the last bit of console logging: > > ... > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/ruby' > > make -C java clean > > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/java' > > rm -f *.o *.so *~ *.jar > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/java' > > make -C managed clean > > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/managed' > > rm -f *.o *.so *~ > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/managed' > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl' > > make update > > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch' > > Pulling updates... > > Updating 5923f71..4bb7683 > > src/mod/applications/mod_dptools/mod_dptools.c: needs update > > fatal: Entry 'src/mod/applications/mod_dptools/mod_dptools.c' not > uptodate. > > Cannot merge. > > make[1]: *** [update] Error 128 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch' > > make: *** [current] Error 2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/1ad936cc/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Wed Jun 22 23:53:51 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use session:playAndGetDigits with the "say" command in lua script? Message-ID: <4E02484F.90907@499x.com> I'm trying to convert an example from a dialplan: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits#Examples into a lua statement like this: digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 1, 3000, "#", "say:'press one for technicial support' ", "say:'invalid entry'", "\\d+") but I'm having trouble with the quoting. The log says: 2011-06-22 14:40:52.614654 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1144 Invalid Args I can't find any lua examples that use both playAndGetDigits and "say" any suggestions? From elijah at crankenstein.com Wed Jun 22 23:57:28 2011 From: elijah at crankenstein.com (elijah) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:57:28 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bind_meta_app no longer works on a-leg of outbound call Message-ID: My dialplan scheme to bind #2 no longer works on the a-leg of outbound calls after updating against git yesterday. Nothing is logged when a user presses #2. However, pressing un-mapped keys, such as #3 produces: 2011-06-22 12:46:04.598820 [WARNING] switch_ivr_async.c:2938 sofia/internal/ 11 at live001.voice.telifi.com Ignoring meta digit '3' not mapped here's the relevant dialplan items: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/28dde1e3/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 00:47:57 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bind_meta_app no longer works on a-leg of outbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I just loaded that config on my box and it works ok. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, elijah wrote: > My dialplan scheme to bind #2 no longer works on the a-leg of outbound calls > after updating against git yesterday. Nothing is logged when a user presses > #2. However, pressing un-mapped keys, such as #3 produces: > 2011-06-22 12:46:04.598820 [WARNING] switch_ivr_async.c:2938 > sofia/internal/11 at live001.voice.telifi.com Ignoring meta digit '3' not > mapped > here's the?relevant?dialplan items: > ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? ? > ? ? ? expression="^dynamic_conference"/> > ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? data="moderator,*1,exec:execute_extension,ASK_FOR_NUMBER__${telifi_call_id} > XML callsdirect"/> > ? ? ? ? data="moderator,*2,exec:execute_extension,CANCEL_LAST_CALL__${telifi_call_id} > XML callsdirect"/> > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> > ? ? ? > ? ? > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 00:51:17 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:51:17 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use session:playAndGetDigits with the "say" command in lua script? In-Reply-To: <4E02484F.90907@499x.com> References: <4E02484F.90907@499x.com> Message-ID: Can you confirm: are you trying to use TTS or the say engine? These are two completely different subjects. If you want to use TTS then you need the "speak" app, not the "say" app: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_speak -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Wes wrote: > I'm trying to convert an example from a dialplan: > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits#Examples > > > > > > > > into a lua statement like this: > > digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 1, 3000, "#", "say:'press one for > technicial support' > ", "say:'invalid entry'", "\\d+") > > but I'm having trouble with the quoting. The log says: > > 2011-06-22 14:40:52.614654 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1144 Invalid Args > > I can't find any lua examples that use both playAndGetDigits and "say" > > any suggestions? > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/cf915f64/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Thu Jun 23 01:13:55 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use session:playAndGetDigits with the "say" command in lua script? In-Reply-To: References: <4E02484F.90907@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E025B13.90701@499x.com> Sorry, I was thrown off by the dialplan example... I'm trying to use speak... I changed my example to try the speak command and I still have the same issue with the quotes. Is it possible to send in a "speak" phrase as the phrase to use in the PAGD command? Or do I have to record a wav file and pass the name of the wave file in for that parameter? On 6/22/2011 3:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Can you confirm: are you trying to use TTS or the say engine? These > are two completely different subjects. If you want to use TTS then you > need the "speak" app, not the "say" app: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_speak > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Wes > wrote: > > I'm trying to convert an example from a dialplan: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits#Examples > > > > > > > > into a lua statement like this: > > digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 1, 3000, "#", "say:'press > one for technicial support' > ", "say:'invalid entry'", "\\d+") > > but I'm having trouble with the quoting. The log says: > > 2011-06-22 14:40:52.614654 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1144 > Invalid Args > > I can't find any lua examples that use both playAndGetDigits and "say" > > any suggestions? > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/b24d969d/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Thu Jun 23 02:09:30 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use session:playAndGetDigits with the "say" command in lua script? In-Reply-To: <4E025B13.90701@499x.com> References: <4E02484F.90907@499x.com> <4E025B13.90701@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E02681A.2070703@499x.com> or maybe we just need a new version of this method called "speakAndGetDigits" that specifically takes a couple of string parameters for the words to speak, instead of taking the location of the wav files... On 6/22/2011 4:13 PM, Wes wrote: > Sorry, I was thrown off by the dialplan example... I'm trying to use > speak... I changed my example to try the speak command and I still > have the same issue with the quotes. > > Is it possible to send in a "speak" phrase as the phrase to use in the > PAGD command? Or do I have to record a wav file and pass the name of > the wave file in for that parameter? > > On 6/22/2011 3:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> Can you confirm: are you trying to use TTS or the say engine? These >> are two completely different subjects. If you want to use TTS then >> you need the "speak" app, not the "say" app: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_speak >> >> -MC >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Wes > > wrote: >> >> I'm trying to convert an example from a dialplan: >> >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits#Examples >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> into a lua statement like this: >> >> digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 1, 3000, "#", >> "say:'press one for technicial support' >> ", "say:'invalid entry'", "\\d+") >> >> but I'm having trouble with the quoting. The log says: >> >> 2011-06-22 14:40:52.614654 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1144 >> Invalid Args >> >> I can't find any lua examples that use both playAndGetDigits and >> "say" >> >> any suggestions? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/c3f54f9f/attachment.html From elijah at crankenstein.com Thu Jun 23 02:13:58 2011 From: elijah at crankenstein.com (elijah) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:13:58 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bind_meta_app no longer works on a-leg of outbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hmmm. This went from working to spontaneously not working for me yesterday. However, this same command works on the b-leg of inbound calls. There's no action from standard logging. What's the best logging setup to catch these bind commands? On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > I just loaded that config on my box and it works ok. > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, elijah wrote: > > My dialplan scheme to bind #2 no longer works on the a-leg of outbound > calls > > after updating against git yesterday. Nothing is logged when a user > presses > > #2. However, pressing un-mapped keys, such as #3 produces: > > 2011-06-22 12:46:04.598820 [WARNING] switch_ivr_async.c:2938 > > sofia/internal/11 at live001.voice.telifi.com Ignoring meta digit '3' not > > mapped > > here's the relevant dialplan items: > > > > > > data="transfer_ringback=$${hold_music}"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expression="^dynamic_conference"/> > > > > > > > > data="moderator,*1,exec:execute_extension,ASK_FOR_NUMBER__${telifi_call_id} > > XML callsdirect"/> > > > > data="moderator,*2,exec:execute_extension,CANCEL_LAST_CALL__${telifi_call_id} > > XML callsdirect"/> > > > > > > > > > > > data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/29896c3b/attachment-0001.html From elijah at crankenstein.com Thu Jun 23 02:53:46 2011 From: elijah at crankenstein.com (elijah) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:53:46 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] second member to dynamic conference hears only hold music Message-ID: This setup was working for me until updating against git yesterday. Via a bind statement on the b-leg of inbound calls, a user is able to pull both legs into a conference bridge. The problem now is that the a-leg hears only hold music. I'm having this and another problem with my dialplan after updating, w/o changing my own configuration - could there be updates to source that would be affecting me? Here's the setup: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/173310f1/attachment.html From elijah at crankenstein.com Thu Jun 23 03:00:33 2011 From: elijah at crankenstein.com (elijah) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:00:33 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bind_meta_app no longer works on a-leg of outbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Oddly, this same command does work on the b-leg of outbound calls, like this: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:13 PM, elijah wrote: > Hmmm. This went from working to spontaneously not working for me yesterday. > However, this same command works on the b-leg of inbound calls. There's no > action from standard logging. What's the best logging setup to catch these > bind commands? > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Anthony Minessale < > anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just loaded that config on my box and it works ok. >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, elijah wrote: >> > My dialplan scheme to bind #2 no longer works on the a-leg of outbound >> calls >> > after updating against git yesterday. Nothing is logged when a user >> presses >> > #2. However, pressing un-mapped keys, such as #3 produces: >> > 2011-06-22 12:46:04.598820 [WARNING] switch_ivr_async.c:2938 >> > sofia/internal/11 at live001.voice.telifi.com Ignoring meta digit '3' not >> > mapped >> > here's the relevant dialplan items: >> > >> > >> > > data="transfer_ringback=$${hold_music}"/> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > expression="^dynamic_conference"/> >> > >> > >> > > > >> data="moderator,*1,exec:execute_extension,ASK_FOR_NUMBER__${telifi_call_id} >> > XML callsdirect"/> >> > > > >> data="moderator,*2,exec:execute_extension,CANCEL_LAST_CALL__${telifi_call_id} >> > XML callsdirect"/> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> > >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Anthony Minessale II >> >> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire >> >> AIM: anthm >> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com >> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com >> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >> >> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> pstn:+19193869900 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/5aaae48a/attachment.html From benkokakao at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 03:23:08 2011 From: benkokakao at gmail.com (Christian Benke) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:23:08 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Modified Follow me In-Reply-To: <4E024269.8060503@seletech.com> References: <4E00A61C.1060503@seletech.com> <4E020A11.4080706@seletech.com> <4E024269.8060503@seletech.com> Message-ID: On 22 June 2011 21:28, Alessandro wrote: > Solved, Could you post the solution to complete this thread please? Respectively file a bug-report/feature-improvement-proposal with fusionpbx? Thanks, Christian From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 03:42:02 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:42:02 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use session:playAndGetDigits with the "say" command in lua script? In-Reply-To: <4E02681A.2070703@499x.com> References: <4E02484F.90907@499x.com> <4E025B13.90701@499x.com> <4E02681A.2070703@499x.com> Message-ID: Have you researched the subject of "phrase macros"? That may be your golden ticket. If you have the FS book then look at the latter half of ch 6. Otherwise check out these resources: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_phrase conf/lang/en/vm/sounds.xml conf/lang/en/vm/tts.xml The voicemail system uses phrase macros a ton, and effectively, I might add. In short, phrase macros let you piece together sound prompts, calls to the say app, calls to the speak app, calls to the sleep app, etc. I think you would be most interested in the "speak-text" action. -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Wes wrote: > ** > or maybe we just need a new version of this method called > "speakAndGetDigits" that specifically takes a couple of string parameters > for the words to speak, instead of taking the location of the wav files... > > > On 6/22/2011 4:13 PM, Wes wrote: > > Sorry, I was thrown off by the dialplan example... I'm trying to use > speak... I changed my example to try the speak command and I still have the > same issue with the quotes. > > Is it possible to send in a "speak" phrase as the phrase to use in the PAGD > command? Or do I have to record a wav file and pass the name of the wave > file in for that parameter? > > On 6/22/2011 3:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > Can you confirm: are you trying to use TTS or the say engine? These are two > completely different subjects. If you want to use TTS then you need the > "speak" app, not the "say" app: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_speak > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Wes wrote: > >> I'm trying to convert an example from a dialplan: >> >> >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits#Examples >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> into a lua statement like this: >> >> digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 1, 3000, "#", "say:'press one for >> technicial support' >> ", "say:'invalid entry'", "\\d+") >> >> but I'm having trouble with the quoting. The log says: >> >> 2011-06-22 14:40:52.614654 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1144 Invalid Args >> >> I can't find any lua examples that use both playAndGetDigits and "say" >> >> any suggestions? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/98997b7e/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 03:45:45 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:45:45 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] bind_meta_app no longer works on a-leg of outbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Have you looked at a pcap of the call for clues? What about DTMF type? -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:00 PM, elijah wrote: > Oddly, this same command does work on the b-leg of outbound calls, like > this: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:13 PM, elijah wrote: > >> Hmmm. This went from working to spontaneously not working for me >> yesterday. However, this same command works on the b-leg of inbound calls. >> There's no action from standard logging. What's the best logging setup to >> catch these bind commands? >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Anthony Minessale < >> anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I just loaded that config on my box and it works ok. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, elijah wrote: >>> > My dialplan scheme to bind #2 no longer works on the a-leg of outbound >>> calls >>> > after updating against git yesterday. Nothing is logged when a user >>> presses >>> > #2. However, pressing un-mapped keys, such as #3 produces: >>> > 2011-06-22 12:46:04.598820 [WARNING] switch_ivr_async.c:2938 >>> > sofia/internal/11 at live001.voice.telifi.com Ignoring meta digit '3' not >>> > mapped >>> > here's the relevant dialplan items: >>> > >>> > >>> > >> data="transfer_ringback=$${hold_music}"/> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> data="sofia/gateway/onesource/$1"/> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > expression="^dynamic_conference"/> >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >>> data="moderator,*1,exec:execute_extension,ASK_FOR_NUMBER__${telifi_call_id} >>> > XML callsdirect"/> >>> > >> > >>> data="moderator,*2,exec:execute_extension,CANCEL_LAST_CALL__${telifi_call_id} >>> > XML callsdirect"/> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> > >>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> > UNSUBSCRIBE: >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> > http://www.freeswitch.org >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Anthony Minessale II >>> >>> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >>> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire >>> >>> AIM: anthm >>> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com >>> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com >>> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >>> >>> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >>> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org >>> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org >>> pstn:+19193869900 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/cdbb9256/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 03:47:38 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:47:38 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] second member to dynamic conference hears only hold music In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This is the second feature that "broke" for you when updating to latest git. You may need to clean things out and start over to make sure that you haven't introduced cruft into the build system. What was your previous version of FS? What kinds of phones are you using? On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:53 PM, elijah wrote: > This setup was working for me until updating against git yesterday. Via a > bind statement on the b-leg of inbound calls, a user is able to pull both > legs into a conference bridge. The problem now is that the a-leg hears only > hold music. I'm having this and another problem with my dialplan after > updating, w/o changing my own configuration - could there be updates to > source that would be affecting me? Here's the setup: > > > expression="^telifi_sales_queue$"> > data="telifi_call_id=${telifi_call_id}"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expression="^dynamic_conference"/> > > > data="moderator,*1,exec:execute_extension,ASK_FOR_NUMBER__${telifi_call_id} > XML callsdirect"/> > data="moderator,*2,exec:execute_extension,CANCEL_LAST_CALL__${telifi_call_id} > XML callsdirect"/> > > > > data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/cd1cf3df/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 03:52:07 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:52:07 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:27 AM, William Moore wrote: > ** > And what sophiatrace reports from my soft phone device 502 calling number > 7032203446. When I call from outside in nothing is shown on the trace, so I > am not sure what that means. > I'm thinking this might be a problem: 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4045 Invalid Gateway Do a "sofia status" and see what shows up for that gateway. Make sure that gateway is up and reachable. If you have the "options" param enabled in your gw config then that gw must respond or mod_sofia will assume the gw is down. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/9934df59/attachment.html From brad at tech21.com Thu Jun 23 04:19:25 2011 From: brad at tech21.com (Brad Mina) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:19:25 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: Also, I'm seeing this being a problem: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete* Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615 ;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: ;tag=va7SXjS5aQmpH Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23485 INVITE User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer * Reason: Q.850;cause=28;text="INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT"* Content-Length: 0 Remote-Party-ID: "7032203446" ;party=calling;privacy=off;screen=no On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:27 AM, William Moore > wrote: > >> ** >> And what sophiatrace reports from my soft phone device 502 calling number >> 7032203446. When I call from outside in nothing is shown on the trace, so >> I am not sure what that means. >> > > I'm thinking this might be a problem: > 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4045 Invalid Gateway > > Do a "sofia status" and see what shows up for that gateway. Make sure that > gateway is up and reachable. If you have the "options" param enabled in your > gw config then that gw must respond or mod_sofia will assume the gw is > down. > > -MC > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/cac7dd5f/attachment-0001.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 04:30:56 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] second member to dynamic conference hears only hold music In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: could you comment line 1696 of switch_channel.c and make install_core then restart and retest? That is the only one I can think of. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:53 PM, elijah wrote: > This setup was working for me until updating against git yesterday. Via a > bind statement on the b-leg of inbound calls, a user is able to pull both > legs into a conference bridge. The problem now is that the a-leg hears only > hold music. I'm having this and another problem with my dialplan after > updating, w/o changing my own configuration - could there be updates to > source that would be affecting me? Here's the setup: > ? ? > ? ? ? expression="^telifi_sales_queue$"> > ? ? ? ? data="telifi_call_id=${telifi_call_id}"/> > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? data="${telifi_queue_name}@live001.voice.telifi.com"/> > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? ? > ? ? ? expression="^dynamic_conference"/> > ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? data="moderator,*1,exec:execute_extension,ASK_FOR_NUMBER__${telifi_call_id} > XML callsdirect"/> > ? ? ? ? data="moderator,*2,exec:execute_extension,CANCEL_LAST_CALL__${telifi_call_id} > XML callsdirect"/> > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> > ? ? ? > ? ? > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 04:31:16 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:31:16 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Brad Mina wrote: > Also, I'm seeing this being a problem: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete* > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615 > ;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf > From: > ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. > To: > ;tag=va7SXjS5aQmpH > Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl > CSeq: 23485 INVITE > User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! > Accept: application/sdp > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE > Supported: precondition, path, replaces > Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, > include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer > * Reason: Q.850;cause=28;text="INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT"* > Content-Length: 0 > Remote-Party-ID: "7032203446" > ;party=calling;privacy=off;screen=no > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:27 AM, William Moore < >> bmoore at statirasystems.com> wrote: >> >>> ** >>> And what sophiatrace reports from my soft phone device 502 calling number >>> 7032203446. When I call from outside in nothing is shown on the trace, >>> so I am not sure what that means. >>> >> >> I'm thinking this might be a problem: >> 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4045 Invalid Gateway >> >> Do a "sofia status" and see what shows up for that gateway. Make sure that >> gateway is up and reachable. If you have the "options" param enabled in your >> gw config then that gw must respond or mod_sofia will assume the gw is >> down. >> >> -MC >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/284de8c8/attachment.html From brad at tech21.com Thu Jun 23 04:34:46 2011 From: brad at tech21.com (Brad Mina) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:34:46 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue can cause this. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs > to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... > > -MC > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Brad Mina wrote: > >> Also, I'm seeing this being a problem: >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete* >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615 >> ;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf >> From: >> ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. >> To: >> ;tag=va7SXjS5aQmpH >> Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl >> CSeq: 23485 INVITE >> User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! >> Accept: application/sdp >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE >> Supported: precondition, path, replaces >> Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, >> include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer >> * Reason: Q.850;cause=28;text="INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT"* >> Content-Length: 0 >> Remote-Party-ID: "7032203446" >> ;party=calling;privacy=off;screen=no >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:27 AM, William Moore < >>> bmoore at statirasystems.com> wrote: >>> >>>> ** >>>> And what sophiatrace reports from my soft phone device 502 calling >>>> number 7032203446. When I call from outside in nothing is shown on the >>>> trace, so I am not sure what that means. >>>> >>> >>> I'm thinking this might be a problem: >>> 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4045 Invalid Gateway >>> >>> Do a "sofia status" and see what shows up for that gateway. Make sure >>> that gateway is up and reachable. If you have the "options" param enabled in >>> your gw config then that gw must respond or mod_sofia will assume the gw is >>> down. >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/2bae5c7d/attachment.html From brian at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 04:37:59 2011 From: brian at freeswitch.org (Brian West) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. /b On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: > Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue > can cause this. > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs >> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... >> >> -MC > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/ab1e3d42/attachment-0001.html From elijah at crankenstein.com Thu Jun 23 05:00:48 2011 From: elijah at crankenstein.com (elijah) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:00:48 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] second member to dynamic conference hears only hold music In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: That didn't help. Maybe I've screwed this up by running 'git reset --hard'? I've confirmed this version works for me: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-5923f71 2011-06-01 22-36-19 -0500) and this does not: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-288455c 2011-06-22 17-05-53 -0400) On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > could you comment line 1696 of switch_channel.c and > make install_core > then restart and retest? > > That is the only one I can think of. > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:53 PM, elijah wrote: > > This setup was working for me until updating against git yesterday. Via a > > bind statement on the b-leg of inbound calls, a user is able to pull both > > legs into a conference bridge. The problem now is that the a-leg hears > only > > hold music. I'm having this and another problem with my dialplan after > > updating, w/o changing my own configuration - could there be updates to > > source that would be affecting me? Here's the setup: > > > > > expression="^telifi_sales_queue$"> > > > data="telifi_call_id=${telifi_call_id}"/> > > > > > > > > > data="${telifi_queue_name}@live001.voice.telifi.com"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expression="^dynamic_conference"/> > > > > > > > > data="moderator,*1,exec:execute_extension,ASK_FOR_NUMBER__${telifi_call_id} > > XML callsdirect"/> > > > > data="moderator,*2,exec:execute_extension,CANCEL_LAST_CALL__${telifi_call_id} > > XML callsdirect"/> > > > > > > > > > data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/ebec9b41/attachment.html From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 06:02:47 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:02:47 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] 'make current' fails to complete In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yeah, the next time you make changes to the git tree, you would want to first stash all your changes by running git stash and then do the git pull. After that, run git stash apply to restore the changes you made to the code on the git tree. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:48 PM, elijah wrote: > I did make changes. 'git reset --hard' worked. Thanks. > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:11 PM, curriegrad2004 > wrote: >> >> did you make any changes to the code tree? If you did, you'd probably >> want to perform a git stash to save all the changes you made then run >> git stash apply to merge your changes after the pull. >> >> Otherwise, it would be wise to run git reset --hard to 'fix' the >> source tree if you are sure you made no changes to the code at all >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:44 PM, elijah wrote: >> > My attempts to 'make current' against the Git repository are failing >> > today. >> > Can you?recommend?a method by which I can update my FreeSwitch >> > installation? >> > Here's the the last bit of console logging: >> > ... >> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/ruby' >> > make -C java clean >> > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/java' >> > rm -f *.o *.so *~ *.jar >> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/java' >> > make -C managed clean >> > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/managed' >> > rm -f *.o *.so *~ >> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl/managed' >> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch/libs/esl' >> > make update >> > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/freeswitch' >> > Pulling updates... >> > Updating 5923f71..4bb7683 >> > src/mod/applications/mod_dptools/mod_dptools.c: needs update >> > fatal: Entry 'src/mod/applications/mod_dptools/mod_dptools.c' not >> > uptodate. >> > Cannot merge. >> > make[1]: *** [update] Error 128 >> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/freeswitch' >> > make: *** [current] Error 2 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> > >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From spencer at 5ninesolutions.com Thu Jun 23 08:53:11 2011 From: spencer at 5ninesolutions.com (Spencer Thomason) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:53:11 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Linksys SPA509 MWI Subscribe Message-ID: Hello all, I'm trying to set up a shared VM box with a few Cisco/Linksys SPA509G phones. Does anyone know if it is possible to make these phones subscribe to a mailbox number? I've done it in the past with Polycoms without any issue but I can't seem to get these to work... Thanks for any help! Spencer From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 10:19:40 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:19:40 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West wrote: > 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the > gateway usually. > > /b > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: > > Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway > issue > can cause this. > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins > wrote: > > The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs > > to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... > > > -MC > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110622/169121be/attachment.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Thu Jun 23 12:05:43 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:05:43 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Modified Follow me In-Reply-To: References: <4E00A61C.1060503@seletech.com> <4E020A11.4080706@seletech.com> <4E024269.8060503@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4E02F3D7.4070108@seletech.com> Hi, this is the original script created by fusionpbx when enabling follow me on an extension: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16565 to solve the problem I have modified the script, removing the answer and voice-mail. I also delete the time-out on bridge because i want that the second destination is bridged only if the first isn't in the network.. This is the modified script: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16570 best regards Alessandro Il 23/06/2011 01:23, Christian Benke ha scritto: > On 22 June 2011 21:28, Alessandro wrote: >> Solved, > Could you post the solution to complete this thread please? > Respectively file a bug-report/feature-improvement-proposal with > fusionpbx? > > Thanks, > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Thu Jun 23 12:21:05 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:21:05 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: William, If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164:
But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: Numbering The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". I think they are confused about what is E164.... You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : > Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West wrote: > 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. > > /b > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: > >> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue >> can cause this. >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs >>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... >>> >>> -MC >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/024b7301/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Thu Jun 23 12:22:49 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:22:49 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Minor issue with INVITE domain In-Reply-To: <201106220751.25728.sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> References: <4BC0A7AA-CBC9-4A52-8C63-9C368F8D04EC@ipeva.fr> <201106220751.25728.sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <2EB0D62C-A1A9-4ECF-B74E-446F950E1FFE@ipeva.fr> Sergey, that does not answer to my theoretical question but that indeed solves my issue :) I was so pissed not to be able to find a way to do that in FS that I disregarded any other possibilities... Thanks! David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 22/06/2011 ? 13:51, Sergey Okhapkin a ?crit : > Put IP address of whatever.foo.com to /etc/hosts and use domain name. you will > not get any DNS issues. > > On Wednesday 22 June 2011, David Ponzone wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I work with a provider which I need to send calls using their IP (I want to >> avoid any DNS issues), but I need the FQDN to be in the INVITE domain. So >> basically, I have a gateway defined with >> >> but I need the INVITE to be: >> sip:called at whatever.foo.com >> and not: >> sip:called at X.X.X.X >> >> I played with everything I could think of: >> outbound-proxy in gateway params (which seems to do nothing) >> >> {sip_invite_domain=whatever.foo.com}bridge/gateway/gw/called >> also does nothing. >> >> I am missing something ? >> >> Thanks >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message >> s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de >> ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/1f777c48/attachment.html From kees at mroffice.org Thu Jun 23 13:33:01 2011 From: kees at mroffice.org (Kees Varekamp) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:33:01 +1200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> Message-ID: I'm interested! Can I play around with it? Kees On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 04:19, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > Actually...... > > We have something we are working on that we are considering releasing > if we can build a community base effort around it. > When I get a sign of enough interest we'll go from there. > > It would be nice to do some presentations at ClueCon about it. > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Madovsky wrote: > > if I type "actionscript mod_rtmp freeswitch" on google > > nothing that helps a common developer to work on mod_rtmp > > .... > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Madovsky > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:20 AM > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API > > Mike, > > > > I didn't ask tools, but to know at least which function it needs to call > to > > the server > > to make it work ! :) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Michael Collins > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:11 AM > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API > > No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. > :D > > Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start > building > > your own. > > -MC > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky wrote: > >> > >> Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? > >> > >> Thanks > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > ________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/a281ea58/attachment.html From max.asterisk at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 14:31:15 2011 From: max.asterisk at gmail.com (Max Alex) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:01:15 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Answer issue on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Thanks for your reply. Here is my configuration and log http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16571 I am using A200 analog sangoma device with freeswitch, it is working fine but when it is routing call to 1001 then it is answered. Please provider your suggestions. Thanks, Max Alex Voip Developer On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > I thought the A200 was an analog card? Maybe I have my numbers mixed up... > > Go ahead and collect a debug log of this call. It might help to have your > configs posted as well. Use pastebin.freeswitch.org. See this wiki article > for tips on how to collect information: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Max Alex wrote: > >> Hi, >> I have installed freeswitch latest version with sangoma card A200 as well, >> I have installed and configured freetdm module with wanpipe drivers for >> freeswitch, >> We are properly receiving the inbound calls in public context and then we >> are routing that call to 1001 extension, >> it is properly routing to 1001 as well, but we have one issue while >> routing on 1001. >> >> Here is the issue description. >> I am calling from my cell phone to that DID number of pri line, and then >> it will start ringing on 1001 extension, >> When 1001 extension start ringing the call is answered on my cell phone, >> it is something like freeswitch preanswer or autoanswer the call, how can >> i stop this answer call when it is ringing on 1001 extension, >> Waiting for good reply. >> >> Thanks, >> Max Alex >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/47cae4a3/attachment-0001.html From jaasmailing at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 16:27:37 2011 From: jaasmailing at gmail.com (Carlo Dimaggio) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:27:37 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] RTMP/SIP solution - scalability Message-ID: <4E033139.1040709@gmail.com> Hi all, first of all thank you for the mod_rtmp contribution. It is a very interesting solution that could be used to create UC platform. I would like to know if such a this module is suitable in an hosted environment (with web portal and flash client) and what could be the scalability in this case. I know it is a new/beta module but I'm wondering if somebody have done load test or has thought about this application. Just another question: when we could have documentation about configuration and sip integration? Best Regards, Carlo Dimaggio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/75e9e9df/attachment.html From soapee01.fs at stubbornroses.com Thu Jun 23 18:52:08 2011 From: soapee01.fs at stubbornroses.com (soapee01) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeTDM - Sangoma B700 - ISDN connection questions - UK Message-ID: <4E035318.4070807@stubbornroses.com> On 6/6/2011 4:36 PM, John wrote: > Hello, > > > 3. I have built FreeSWITCH from git and installed at /usr/local/... and > then followed the steps on the Ubuntu page in the Wiki to set up the run > control scripts, etc, and run FS non-root as freeswitch:daemon. With > FreeTDM, I have discovered that the /dev/wan* devices are owned by > root:root, and so are inaccessible to FS running as non-root. So for > now I have added a line in /etc/init.d/freeswitch to 'chgrp freeswitch > /dev/wan*'. This is not the most elegant solution, because 'wanrouter > restart' (which seems to be my best friend at the moment) resets the > ownership to root:root. I have tried grepping to see where the mknods > are for these devices, but have been unsuccessful. Is there a better > place to 'permanently' change the device ownership? > John, Have a look at /etc/udev/rules.d You can write a rule there and set the ownership permanently that way. Sorry about the delay on this John. I'd sent it earlier but managed to use the wrong identity and the list didn't bounce my reply (or I didn't notice). You've probably figured this out on your own by now... James From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 19:42:28 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] second member to dynamic conference hears only hold music In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: this really should be in jira. please open one http://jira.freeswitch.org and post the url here do the following 1) update right now to the latest GIT as of the time you read this. 2) turn on debugging and sip trace with these commands: >console loglevel debug >sofia global siptrace on 3) reproduce your issue and capture the console log 4) attach it to your jira report Then: try version 9df8169d1f3458e0b565a64922a1390ebf324703 On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:00 PM, elijah wrote: > That didn't help. Maybe I've screwed this up by running 'git reset --hard'? > I've confirmed this version works for me:?FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head > (git-5923f71 2011-06-01 22-36-19 -0500) > and this does not:?FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-288455c 2011-06-22 > 17-05-53 -0400) > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Anthony Minessale > wrote: >> >> could you comment line 1696 of switch_channel.c and >> make install_core >> then restart and retest? >> >> That is the only one I can think of. >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:53 PM, elijah wrote: >> > This setup was working for me until updating against git yesterday. Via >> > a >> > bind statement on the b-leg of inbound calls, a user is able to pull >> > both >> > legs into a conference bridge. The problem now is that the a-leg hears >> > only >> > hold music. I'm having this and another problem with my dialplan after >> > updating, w/o changing my own configuration - could there be updates to >> > source that would be affecting me? Here's the setup: >> > ? ? >> > ? ? ? > > expression="^telifi_sales_queue$"> >> > ? ? ? ? > > data="telifi_call_id=${telifi_call_id}"/> >> > ? ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? ? > > data="${telifi_queue_name}@live001.voice.telifi.com"/> >> > ? ? ? >> > ? ? >> > ? ? >> > ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? >> > ? ? >> > ? ? >> > ? ? ? > > expression="^dynamic_conference"/> >> > ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? ? > > >> > data="moderator,*1,exec:execute_extension,ASK_FOR_NUMBER__${telifi_call_id} >> > XML callsdirect"/> >> > ? ? ? ? > > >> > data="moderator,*2,exec:execute_extension,CANCEL_LAST_CALL__${telifi_call_id} >> > XML callsdirect"/> >> > ? ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? ? > > data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> >> > ? ? ? ? >> > ? ? ? ? > > data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> >> > ? ? ? >> > ? ? >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> > >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Anthony Minessale II >> >> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire >> >> AIM: anthm >> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com >> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com >> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >> >> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> pstn:+19193869900 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From zahid.maqbool at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 19:49:16 2011 From: zahid.maqbool at gmail.com (Zahid Maqbool) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:49:16 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Off Hook Agents in Mod_Fifo Message-ID: Hi, I've been trying out Freeswitch and so far it seems great, however I wanted to test out call center features. So I had a look at Mod_FIFO. I'd like to understand how to configure off hook agents and if its possible to login an off hook agent via an external application? Looking at the mod FIFO most of the examples are for on hook agents, does anyone know how to configure off hook agents? What exactly I want to do is let's say, there is an agent application on the desktop and I want the agent to put his phone off hook, enter the agent id and extension through this application and click on login. Any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks. Zahid Maqbool -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/ca8af3c9/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 20:02:30 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Off Hook Agents in Mod_Fifo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: if you enter the fifo app as an agent and supply the wait keyword in place of nowait, the agent remains off hook until a call is received. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Zahid Maqbool wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying out Freeswitch and so far it seems great, however I wanted > to test out call center features. So I had a look at Mod_FIFO. I'd like to > understand how to configure off hook agents and if its possible to login an > off hook agent via an external application? Looking at the mod FIFO most of > the examples are for on hook agents, does anyone know how to configure off > hook agents? > > What exactly I want to do is let's say, there is an agent application on the > desktop and I want the agent to put his phone off hook, enter the agent id > and extension through this application and click on login. > > Any pointers would be appreciated. > > Thanks. > > > Zahid Maqbool > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From bmoore at statirasystems.com Thu Jun 23 20:15:24 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: > William, > > If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't > expect E164: > > > > >
> > But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: > > *Numbering* > The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU ) is used. > North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. > International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". > > > I think they are confused about what is E164.... > > You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > / > / > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : > >> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >> -MC >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West > > wrote: >> >> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to >> the gateway usually. >> >> /b >> >> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >> >>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid >>> gateway issue >>> can cause this. >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, >>>> the OP needs >>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... >>>> >>>> -MC >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/2e62be17/attachment-0001.html From jack at livecall.com Thu Jun 23 19:48:11 2011 From: jack at livecall.com (Jack) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:48:11 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> Message-ID: <4E03603B.6020405@livecall.com> I am interested.... It looks like a clean, simple way to connect to Freeswitch. Nice Job! Jack On 6/22/2011 9:19 AM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > Actually...... > > We have something we are working on that we are considering releasing > if we can build a community base effort around it. > When I get a sign of enough interest we'll go from there. > > It would be nice to do some presentations at ClueCon about it. > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Madovsky wrote: >> if I type "actionscript mod_rtmp freeswitch" on google >> nothing that helps a common developer to work on mod_rtmp >> .... >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Madovsky >> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:20 AM >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >> Mike, >> >> I didn't ask tools, but to know at least which function it needs to call to >> the server >> to make it work ! :) >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Michael Collins >> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:11 AM >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >> No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. :D >> Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start building >> your own. >> -MC >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky wrote: >>> Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? >>> >>> Thanks >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> ________________________________ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > From mik3weider at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 20:20:48 2011 From: mik3weider at gmail.com (=?KOI8-R?B?88zA08HSxdcg7cnIwcnM?=) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:20:48 +0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCHer: issue with ObjectSpace Message-ID: Hey, guys My question is about FreeSWITCHer the Ruby framework handle events from FreeSWITCH. I know that this is not exactly what you are discuss here, but I really don't know whith whom to comunicate about this problem. So, if you have experience in FreeSWITCHer and Ruby and would like to help, please read futher. Otherwise, sorry for spam. FreeSWITCHer doesn't sent subscribing messages during of usage of examples/inbound_socket_events.rb. As I can see in the source, that happens because subscribe_to_event function is never trigered. So, the question is why this snippet of code doesn't work as expected? def self.add_event_hook(event, sub_events = [], &block) ObjectSpace.each_object { |e| e.subscribe_to_event(event, sub_events) if e.class.ancestors.include?(FSR::Listener::Inbound) } HOOKS[event] = block end And this is my environment: # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.6 (Final) # ruby -v ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i386-linux] # gem -v 1.3.5 # gem list *** LOCAL GEMS *** eventmachine (0.12.10) freeswitcher (0.6.12) log4r (1.1.9) Since it's looks like Ruby configuration issue I don't describe other installation steps. From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Thu Jun 23 20:25:14 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:25:14 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: tshark port 5080 You will then see if you receive it. In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: unregister the gateway register it again make an inbound call right away David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : > It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. > > I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >> >> William, >> >> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >> >> Numbering >> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >> >> >> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >> >> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >> >> >> >> >> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >> >>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>> -MC >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West wrote: >>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. >>> >>> /b >>> >>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>> >>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue >>>> can cause this. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>> >>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs >>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... >>>>> >>>>> -MC >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/5e93aef5/attachment-0001.html From zahid.maqbool at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 20:25:30 2011 From: zahid.maqbool at gmail.com (Zahid Maqbool) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:25:30 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Off Hook Agents in Mod_Fifo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks a lot Anthony. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > if you enter the fifo app as an agent and supply the wait keyword in > place of nowait, the agent remains off hook until a call is received. > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Zahid Maqbool > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been trying out Freeswitch and so far it seems great, however I > wanted > > to test out call center features. So I had a look at Mod_FIFO. I'd like > to > > understand how to configure off hook agents and if its possible to login > an > > off hook agent via an external application? Looking at the mod FIFO most > of > > the examples are for on hook agents, does anyone know how to configure > off > > hook agents? > > > > What exactly I want to do is let's say, there is an agent application on > the > > desktop and I want the agent to put his phone off hook, enter the agent > id > > and extension through this application and click on login. > > > > Any pointers would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Zahid Maqbool > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Kind Regards, Zahid Maqbool -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/bf4b3757/attachment.html From bmoore at statirasystems.com Thu Jun 23 20:50:45 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> I get this with wireshark 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 I am looking for the expiration now.. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: > tshark port 5080 > > You will then see if you receive it. > > In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register > expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a > ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. > > If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: > unregister the gateway > register it again > make an inbound call right away > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > / > / > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : > >> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it >> a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could >> have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the >> purpose of the GUI. >> >> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in >> sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not >> responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. >> William J. Moore >> Statira Systems >> 611 Caroline St >> Fredericksburg, VA >> http://www.statirasystems.com >> >> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>> William, >>> >>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't >>> expect E164: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>> >>> *Numbering* >>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU ) is >>> used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. >>> International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>> >>> >>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>> >>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service ClientIPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> >>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >>> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >>> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >>> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>> / >>> / >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>> >>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>>> -MC >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits >>>> to the gateway usually. >>>> >>>> /b >>>> >>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid >>>>> gateway issue >>>>> can cause this. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any >>>>>> case, the OP needs >>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going >>>>>> out... >>>>>> >>>>>> -MC >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/b987de48/attachment-0001.html From bmoore at statirasystems.com Thu Jun 23 20:52:11 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> correction: missed a line. 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: > I get this with wireshark > > 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying > 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy > Authentication Required > 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK > sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 > > I am looking for the expiration now.. > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >> tshark port 5080 >> >> You will then see if you receive it. >> >> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register >> expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a >> ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >> >> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >> unregister the gateway >> register it again >> make an inbound call right away >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service ClientIPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> >> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >> / >> / >> >> >> >> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >> >>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it >>> a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could >>> have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the >>> purpose of the GUI. >>> >>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in >>> sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not >>> responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. >>> William J. Moore >>> Statira Systems >>> 611 Caroline St >>> Fredericksburg, VA >>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>> >>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>> William, >>>> >>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they >>>> don't expect E164: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>> >>>> *Numbering* >>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU ) is >>>> used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a >>>> '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>>> >>>> >>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>> >>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>> >>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>> >>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>> >>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline >>>> toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, >>>> d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, >>>> merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>> / >>>> / >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>>>> -MC >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West >>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits >>>>> to the gateway usually. >>>>> >>>>> /b >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an >>>>>> invalid gateway issue >>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any >>>>>>> case, the OP needs >>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going >>>>>>> out... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -MC >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/16759b89/attachment-0001.html From bmoore at statirasystems.com Thu Jun 23 20:58:01 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <4E037099.9090107@statirasystems.com> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: > correction: missed a line. > > 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE > sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with > session description > 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying > 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy > Authentication Required > 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK > sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 > > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >> I get this with wireshark >> >> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >> Authentication Required >> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >> >> I am looking for the expiration now.. >> William J. Moore >> Statira Systems >> 611 Caroline St >> Fredericksburg, VA >> http://www.statirasystems.com >> >> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>> tshark port 5080 >>> >>> You will then see if you receive it. >>> >>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register >>> expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a >>> ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>> >>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>> unregister the gateway >>> register it again >>> make an inbound call right away >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service ClientIPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> >>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >>> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >>> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >>> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>> / >>> / >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>> >>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes >>>> it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I >>>> could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats >>>> the purpose of the GUI. >>>> >>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in >>>> sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not >>>> responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. >>>> William J. Moore >>>> Statira Systems >>>> 611 Caroline St >>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>> >>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>> William, >>>>> >>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they >>>>> don't expect E164: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>> >>>>> *Numbering* >>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU ) is >>>>> used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a >>>>> '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>> >>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>> >>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>> >>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>> >>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>>>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline >>>>> toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, >>>>> d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >>>>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >>>>> l'exp?diteur./ >>>>> / >>>>> / >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>>>>> -MC >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West >>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits >>>>>> to the gateway usually. >>>>>> >>>>>> /b >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an >>>>>>> invalid gateway issue >>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any >>>>>>>> case, the OP needs >>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be >>>>>>>> going out... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/71688d1e/attachment-0001.html From bmoore at statirasystems.com Thu Jun 23 21:15:35 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E037099.9090107@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> <4E037099.9090107@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <4E0374B7.8030709@statirasystems.com> Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: > When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference > the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in > that one? > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >> correction: missed a line. >> >> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE >> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with >> session description >> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >> Authentication Required >> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >> >> William J. Moore >> Statira Systems >> 611 Caroline St >> Fredericksburg, VA >> http://www.statirasystems.com >> >> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>> I get this with wireshark >>> >>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >>> Authentication Required >>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>> >>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>> William J. Moore >>> Statira Systems >>> 611 Caroline St >>> Fredericksburg, VA >>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>> >>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>>> tshark port 5080 >>>> >>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>> >>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register >>>> expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a >>>> ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>> >>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>> unregister the gateway >>>> register it again >>>> make an inbound call right away >>>> >>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>> >>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>> >>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline >>>> toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, >>>> d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, >>>> merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>> / >>>> / >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes >>>>> it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I >>>>> could have set it up as a separate config file however that >>>>> defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>> >>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in >>>>> sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is >>>>> not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming >>>>> correct. >>>>> William J. Moore >>>>> Statira Systems >>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>> >>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>> William, >>>>>> >>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they >>>>>> don't expect E164: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>> >>>>>> *Numbering* >>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU ) is >>>>>> used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a >>>>>> '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>> >>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>> >>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>> >>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>> >>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout >>>>>> message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message >>>>>> s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >>>>>> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et >>>>>> d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>> / >>>>>> / >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough >>>>>>> digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /b >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an >>>>>>>> invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any >>>>>>>>> case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be >>>>>>>>> going out... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/005075f1/attachment-0001.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 21:25:47 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:25:47 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: <4E03603B.6020405@livecall.com> References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> <4E03603B.6020405@livecall.com> Message-ID: lets open a new feature JIRA on it and assemble a list of participants and we'll discuss it at next Wednesday public meeting, this thread and IRC. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jack wrote: > I am interested.... ?It looks like a clean, simple way to connect to > Freeswitch. > Nice Job! > Jack > > On 6/22/2011 9:19 AM, Anthony Minessale wrote: >> Actually...... >> >> We have something we are working on that we are considering releasing >> if we can build a community base effort around it. >> When I get a sign of enough interest we'll go from there. >> >> It would be nice to do some presentations at ClueCon about it. >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Madovsky ?wrote: >>> if I type "actionscript mod_rtmp freeswitch" on google >>> nothing that helps a common developer to work on mod_rtmp >>> .... >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Madovsky >>> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:20 AM >>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >>> Mike, >>> >>> I didn't ask tools, but to know at least which function it needs to call to >>> the server >>> to make it work ! :) >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Michael Collins >>> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:11 AM >>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >>> No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. :D >>> Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start building >>> your own. >>> -MC >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky ?wrote: >>>> Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Thu Jun 23 21:31:28 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:31:28 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E0374B7.8030709@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> <4E037099.9090107@statirasystems.com> <4E0374B7.8030709@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : > Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: > 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description > 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying > 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required > 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 > 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp > 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) > > The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: >> >> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? >> William J. Moore >> Statira Systems >> 611 Caroline St >> Fredericksburg, VA >> http://www.statirasystems.com >> >> On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >>> >>> correction: missed a line. >>> >>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>> >>> William J. Moore >>> Statira Systems >>> 611 Caroline St >>> Fredericksburg, VA >>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>> >>> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>> >>>> I get this with wireshark >>>> >>>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>> >>>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>>> William J. Moore >>>> Statira Systems >>>> 611 Caroline St >>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>> >>>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>>>> tshark port 5080 >>>>> >>>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>>> >>>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>>> >>>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>>> unregister the gateway >>>>> register it again >>>>> make an inbound call right away >>>>> >>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>> >>>>> Service Client IPeva >>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>> >>>>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>>> >>>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. >>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> William, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Numbering >>>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Service Client IPeva >>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West wrote: >>>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /b >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/d6895b14/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Thu Jun 23 21:34:22 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:34:22 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> <4E037099.9090107@statirasystems.com> <4E0374B7.8030709@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : > The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : > >> Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: >> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >> 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >> 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >> 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >> 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp >> 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) >> >> The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. >> William J. Moore >> Statira Systems >> 611 Caroline St >> Fredericksburg, VA >> http://www.statirasystems.com >> >> On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: >>> >>> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? >>> William J. Moore >>> Statira Systems >>> 611 Caroline St >>> Fredericksburg, VA >>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>> >>> On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>> >>>> correction: missed a line. >>>> >>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>>> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>> >>>> William J. Moore >>>> Statira Systems >>>> 611 Caroline St >>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>> >>>> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I get this with wireshark >>>>> >>>>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>> >>>>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>>>> William J. Moore >>>>> Statira Systems >>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>> >>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>>>>> tshark port 5080 >>>>>> >>>>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>>>> >>>>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>>>> >>>>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>>>> unregister the gateway >>>>>> register it again >>>>>> make an inbound call right away >>>>>> >>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>> >>>>>> Service Client IPeva >>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. >>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> William, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Numbering >>>>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Service Client IPeva >>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West wrote: >>>>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /b >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/cd0e1a23/attachment-0001.html From philippe.sultan at gmail.com Thu Jun 23 21:41:13 2011 From: philippe.sultan at gmail.com (Philippe Sultan) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:41:13 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> <4E03603B.6020405@livecall.com> Message-ID: I'm very interested too. We have a Red5 server here and some AS3 audio apps we'd love to test with mod_rtmp. Thanks, Philippe On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > lets open a new feature JIRA on it and assemble a list of participants > and we'll discuss it at next Wednesday public meeting, this thread and > IRC. > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jack wrote: >> I am interested.... ?It looks like a clean, simple way to connect to >> Freeswitch. >> Nice Job! >> Jack >> >> On 6/22/2011 9:19 AM, Anthony Minessale wrote: >>> Actually...... >>> >>> We have something we are working on that we are considering releasing >>> if we can build a community base effort around it. >>> When I get a sign of enough interest we'll go from there. >>> >>> It would be nice to do some presentations at ClueCon about it. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Madovsky ?wrote: >>>> if I type "actionscript mod_rtmp freeswitch" on google >>>> nothing that helps a common developer to work on mod_rtmp >>>> .... >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Madovsky >>>> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:20 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >>>> Mike, >>>> >>>> I didn't ask tools, but to know at least which function it needs to call to >>>> the server >>>> to make it work ! :) >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Michael Collins >>>> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:11 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >>>> No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. :D >>>> Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start building >>>> your own. >>>> -MC >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky ?wrote: >>>>> Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Philippe Sultan From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 21:45:25 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:45:25 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> <4E03603B.6020405@livecall.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > lets open a new feature JIRA on it and assemble a list of participants > and we'll discuss it at next Wednesday public meeting, this thread and > IRC. > http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3368 All those who have a specific interest in working on the mod_rtmp client-side features please go to that Jira and add your comments, experience, etc. If you don't have any specific development experience with Flash/RTMP but have the ability to do QC and testing then please add your name to the hat - we can never have too many people doing tests. Thanks for supporting the project! -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/d8d098da/attachment.html From bmoore at statirasystems.com Thu Jun 23 21:55:15 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> <4E037099.9090107@statirasystems.com> <4E0374B7.8030709@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <4E037E03.2070408@statirasystems.com> I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: > > > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > / > / > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : > >> The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they >> won't. >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service ClientIPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> >> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >> / >> / >> >> >> >> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : >> >>> Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: >>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITEsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>> 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>> 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>> 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACKsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>> 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTERsip:jnctn.net;transport=udp >>> 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) >>> >>> The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. >>> William J. Moore >>> Statira Systems >>> 611 Caroline St >>> Fredericksburg, VA >>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>> >>> On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I >>>> reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have >>>> to be in that one? >>>> William J. Moore >>>> Statira Systems >>>> 611 Caroline St >>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>> >>>> On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>> correction: missed a line. >>>>> >>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE >>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with >>>>> session description >>>>> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >>>>> Authentication Required >>>>> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>> >>>>> William J. Moore >>>>> Statira Systems >>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>> >>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>> I get this with wireshark >>>>>> >>>>>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >>>>>> Authentication Required >>>>>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>> >>>>>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>>>>>> tshark port 5080 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register >>>>>>> expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you >>>>>>> add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>>>>> unregister the gateway >>>>>>> register it again >>>>>>> make an inbound call right away >>>>>>> >>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>>>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>>>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout >>>>>>> message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message >>>>>>> s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >>>>>>> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement >>>>>>> et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>> / >>>>>>> / >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box >>>>>>>> makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the >>>>>>>> xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however >>>>>>>> that defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in >>>>>>>> sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is >>>>>>>> not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for >>>>>>>> incoming correct. >>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>> William, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they >>>>>>>>> don't expect E164: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Numbering* >>>>>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU ) >>>>>>>>> is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed >>>>>>>>> with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>>>>>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>>>>>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout >>>>>>>>> message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>>>>>>>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes >>>>>>>>> pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire >>>>>>>>> imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West >>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough >>>>>>>>>> digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> /b >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an >>>>>>>>>>> invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In >>>>>>>>>>>> any case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be >>>>>>>>>>>> going out... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/d5a579c9/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 23 22:32:56 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:32:56 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call drops after 30 seconds In-Reply-To: <28830F22-9654-45D2-B00A-1E69E32A42F9@mralston.com> References: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> <28830F22-9654-45D2-B00A-1E69E32A42F9@mralston.com> Message-ID: Matthew, Did you get resolution on this one? I think you can go to the sip profile and work with these lines: You can put an IP address in those and try it out. Let us know what happens. -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Matthew Ralston wrote: > Hi Chris, > > The FreeSWITCH box does indeed have a private IP address. The Cisco Linksys > WAG160N router in front of it has UPnP enabled, not that I particularly > trust it. > > So maybe it's worth hard coding the public IP into the Sofia config. > > Where is the best place to put the public IP? The internal.xml and > external.xml files both refer to $${local_ip_v4} although I don't see where > this comes from. Does FreeSWITCH figure this out itself in some way? > > As I have internal SIP phones, an external SIP provider and (whilst > debugging) some external SIP phones (which use the internal profile!!). I'm > concerned that if I hard code the public IP address in to the wrong place it > will cause problems for the internal SIP phones. > > > Kind regards, > > Matthew Ralston > Web Developer & IT Consultant > > matt at mralston.co.uk > www.mralston.com > > On 22 Jun 2011, at 16:11, Chris Chen wrote: > > Hi Matthew, continue my last reply here > > 2) Is your FS server using private IP address? you have to setup your FS > external SIP/RTP IP address to the proper public IP address, by either using > UPNP enabled router, STUN, or hardcoded public IP address in sofia profiles. > > Please check that. > > Thanks, > Chris > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Matthew Ralston > wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thanks for the quick reply! >> >> The FreeSWITCH box is in the DMZ of a Cisco Linksys WAG160N. Best I can >> tell, the DMZ is doing its job and allowing all ports through, inbound and >> outbound, TCP & UDP. >> >> The external SIP phones are a Cisco SPA504G and Bria on the iPhone. These >> are behind behind a Cisco ASA5505, which has policy inspection for SIP >> switched on, i.e. ALG. I have also tested with Bria going over 3G (so it's >> not behind the Cisco ASA) and had the same problem. >> >> The other scenario we have is some Yealink T20P SIP phones on the same LAN >> segment as the FreeSWITCH box. These can make A-leg only calls into >> FreeSWITCH (like calling voicemail) and also calls to other internal SIP >> phones fine. However when they make an outbound call the problem happens >> again. In this case the b-leg of the calls are sent to an external SIP >> provider and get cut after 30 seconds. Incidentally, we also use the same >> SIP provider from an Asterisk box in our data centre and that doesn't have a >> problem, so I believe the SIP provider is fine. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> Matthew Ralston >> Web Developer & IT Consultant >> >> matt at mralston.co.uk >> www.mralston.com >> >> On 22 Jun 2011, at 14:21, Chris Chen wrote: >> >> Hi Matthew, this is typical behavior for the setup of SIP behind NAT. >> >> 1) Please provide the exact setup of remote SIP phones, what's the >> router model, does it have SIP ALG enabled, what kind of SIP phones >> 2) >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Matthew Ralston > > wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm having a problem at the moment with calls being successfully set up, >>> with two-way audio, being terminated by FreeSWITCH after 30 seconds. >>> >>> Internal calls (i.e. between SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the >>> FreeSWITCH box) work flawlessly. >>> >>> The problem arises when at least one of the handsets is located elsewhere >>> on the Internet. This behaviour is exhibited under the following >>> circumstances: >>> >>> - A-leg only call, e.g. to voicemail when the handset is at another >>> location on the Internet >>> - A-leg-B-leg call if one or both of the handsets are at another location >>> on the Internet >>> - Inbound calls from our external SIP provider >>> - Outbound calls to our external SIP provider >>> >>> So it is obvious that the problem is related to the SIP going via the >>> Internet, but I'm having trouble understanding why. >>> >>> Whilst debugging this problem I have placed the FreeSWITCH box is in the >>> DMZ on our router, so there should not be any ports blocked. The FreeSWITCH >>> box itself is not running a software firewall. >>> >>> The calls themselves are absolutely fine for the first 30 seconds - each >>> party can hear the other talking fine. >>> >>> The fact that the call is consistently dropped after 30 seconds (give or >>> take a second or two for PDD) suggests that some timeout is being triggered. >>> >>> When FreeSWITCH terminates the call, the following is logged to the >>> console: >>> >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4787 Channel >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed entering state [terminating][0] >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5508 Hangup >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED] >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [KILL] >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.534966 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done >>> playing file >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.625988 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:244 Handle >>> play-file:[voicemail/vm-press.wav] (en:en) >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2063 >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed skip receive message >>> [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State EXECUTE going to sleep >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_HANGUP >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed hanging up, cause: >>> NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard HANGUP, cause: >>> NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP going to sleep >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_HANGUP -> >>> CS_REPORTING >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_REPORTING >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard REPORTING, cause: >>> NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING going to sleep >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_REPORTING -> >>> CS_DESTROY >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send signal >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 5 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Locked, Waiting on external >>> entities >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 5 >>> (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Ended >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close >>> Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_DESTROY] >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_DESTROY >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed SOFIA DESTROY >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.780056 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port >>> 31484 protocol UDP to localport 31484 >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port >>> 31485 protocol UDP to localport 31485 >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard DESTROY >>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 ( >>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY going to sleep >>> >>> The above example was from an externally situated SIP phone ringing >>> voicemail (4000) on FreeSWITCH. >>> >>> I have experimented changing various timers and timeouts in the config of >>> FreeSWITCH (one at a time, being careful to put them back afterwards!) but >>> been unable to resolve the issue. >>> >>> Incidentally, we have no long term intention of running off-site SIP >>> phones with the PBX and I'm hoping not to have to leave it in the DMZ >>> either, it's just like that for debugging. What is a real issue is the calls >>> to our external SIP provider (i.e. outbound calls) being dropped. >>> >>> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Matthew Ralston >>> Web Developer & IT Consultant >>> >>> matt at mralston.co.uk >>> www.mralston.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/2929cbf7/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Thu Jun 23 23:59:16 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:59:16 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E037E03.2070408@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> <4E037099.9090107@statirasystems.com> <4E0374B7.8030709@statirasystems.com> <4E037E03.2070408@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <183C4D22-20BB-4695-AC7F-82AFE0D4D385@ipeva.fr> I had the same feeling about blue.box. I think there are more interesting GUIs out there, like FreePBX V3. The weird thing is that none of them seems very active. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:55, William Moore a ?crit : > I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >> >> In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: >> >> >> >> >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service Client IPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >> >> >> >> >> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : >> >>> The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service Client IPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>> >>>> Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: >>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>>> 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>> 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>> 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>> 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp >>>> 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) >>>> >>>> The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. >>>> William J. Moore >>>> Statira Systems >>>> 611 Caroline St >>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>> >>>> On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>> >>>>> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? >>>>> William J. Moore >>>>> Statira Systems >>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>> >>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> correction: missed a line. >>>>>> >>>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>>>>> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>>>> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>> >>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I get this with wireshark >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>>>>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>>>>>>> tshark port 5080 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>>>>>> unregister the gateway >>>>>>>> register it again >>>>>>>> make an inbound call right away >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Service Client IPeva >>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. >>>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> William, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Numbering >>>>>>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Service Client IPeva >>>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> /b >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/71881c59/attachment-0001.html From bmoore at statirasystems.com Fri Jun 24 01:10:00 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <183C4D22-20BB-4695-AC7F-82AFE0D4D385@ipeva.fr> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> <4E037099.9090107@statirasystems.com> <4E0374B7.8030709@statirasystems.com> <4E037E03.2070408@statirasystems.com> <183C4D22-20BB-4695-AC7F-82AFE0D4D385@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <4E03ABA8.4030204@statirasystems.com> I noticed that also. I have been pondering doing my own. I can program but am fairly new to the freeswitch and sip in general. Don't want anything all that fancy. Just working would be good. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 03:59 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > I had the same feeling about blue.box. > I think there are more interesting GUIs out there, like FreePBX V3. > The weird thing is that none of them seems very active. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > / > / > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:55, William Moore a ?crit : > >> I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. >> Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human >> by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. >> William J. Moore >> Statira Systems >> 611 Caroline St >> Fredericksburg, VA >> http://www.statirasystems.com >> >> On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>> In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service ClientIPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> >>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >>> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >>> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >>> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>> / >>> / >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : >>> >>>> The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they >>>> won't. >>>> >>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>> >>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>> >>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline >>>> toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, >>>> d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, >>>> merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>> / >>>> / >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: >>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITEsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>>>> 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>> 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>>> 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACKsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>> 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTERsip:jnctn.net;transport=udp >>>>> 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) >>>>> >>>>> The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. >>>>> William J. Moore >>>>> Statira Systems >>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>> >>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I >>>>>> reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it >>>>>> have to be in that one? >>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>> correction: missed a line. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: >>>>>>> INVITE >>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, >>>>>>> with session description >>>>>>> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >>>>>>> Authentication Required >>>>>>> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>>> I get this with wireshark >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >>>>>>>> Authentication Required >>>>>>>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>>>>>>>> tshark port 5080 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register >>>>>>>>> expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you >>>>>>>>> add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>>>>>>> unregister the gateway >>>>>>>>> register it again >>>>>>>>> make an inbound call right away >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>>>>>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>>>>>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout >>>>>>>>> message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>>>>>>>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes >>>>>>>>> pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire >>>>>>>>> imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box >>>>>>>>>> makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the >>>>>>>>>> xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file >>>>>>>>>> however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up >>>>>>>>>> in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my >>>>>>>>>> server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings >>>>>>>>>> for incoming correct. >>>>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> William, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, >>>>>>>>>>> they don't expect E164: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Numbering* >>>>>>>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU >>>>>>>>>>> ) is used. North American numbers are >>>>>>>>>>> required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers >>>>>>>>>>> need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels >>>>>>>>>>> et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. >>>>>>>>>>> Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. >>>>>>>>>>> Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>>>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>>>>>>>>>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous >>>>>>>>>>> n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire >>>>>>>>>>> imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 >>>>>>>>>>>> format? >>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West >>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough >>>>>>>>>>>> digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> /b >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an >>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be going out... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com >>>>>>>>>>>> 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/f41c0b43/attachment-0001.html From gcd at i.ph Fri Jun 24 02:38:55 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:38:55 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call drops after 30 seconds In-Reply-To: References: <71F1700A-7641-43E5-A7C6-F25A0DC2EBC5@mralston.com> <28830F22-9654-45D2-B00A-1E69E32A42F9@mralston.com> Message-ID: matt, i also encountered the same problem, even bridging internal endpoints. i traced some RTCP packets using wireshark. i tried to enable the "rtcp-audio-interval-msec=5000" in the internal sip profile. it solved the problem momentarily. -nandy On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > Matthew, > > Did you get resolution on this one? I think you can go to the sip profile > and work with these lines: > > > > You can put an IP address in those and try it out. Let us know what > happens. > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Matthew Ralston wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> The FreeSWITCH box does indeed have a private IP address. The Cisco >> Linksys WAG160N router in front of it has UPnP enabled, not that I >> particularly trust it. >> >> So maybe it's worth hard coding the public IP into the Sofia config. >> >> Where is the best place to put the public IP? The internal.xml and >> external.xml files both refer to $${local_ip_v4} although I don't see where >> this comes from. Does FreeSWITCH figure this out itself in some way? >> >> As I have internal SIP phones, an external SIP provider and (whilst >> debugging) some external SIP phones (which use the internal profile!!). I'm >> concerned that if I hard code the public IP address in to the wrong place it >> will cause problems for the internal SIP phones. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Matthew Ralston >> Web Developer & IT Consultant >> >> matt at mralston.co.uk >> www.mralston.com >> >> On 22 Jun 2011, at 16:11, Chris Chen wrote: >> >> Hi Matthew, continue my last reply here >> >> 2) Is your FS server using private IP address? you have to setup your FS >> external SIP/RTP IP address to the proper public IP address, by either using >> UPNP enabled router, STUN, or hardcoded public IP address in sofia profiles. >> >> Please check that. >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Matthew Ralston < >> freeswitch at mralston.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> Thanks for the quick reply! >>> >>> The FreeSWITCH box is in the DMZ of a Cisco Linksys WAG160N. Best I can >>> tell, the DMZ is doing its job and allowing all ports through, inbound and >>> outbound, TCP & UDP. >>> >>> The external SIP phones are a Cisco SPA504G and Bria on the iPhone. These >>> are behind behind a Cisco ASA5505, which has policy inspection for SIP >>> switched on, i.e. ALG. I have also tested with Bria going over 3G (so it's >>> not behind the Cisco ASA) and had the same problem. >>> >>> The other scenario we have is some Yealink T20P SIP phones on the same >>> LAN segment as the FreeSWITCH box. These can make A-leg only calls into >>> FreeSWITCH (like calling voicemail) and also calls to other internal SIP >>> phones fine. However when they make an outbound call the problem happens >>> again. In this case the b-leg of the calls are sent to an external SIP >>> provider and get cut after 30 seconds. Incidentally, we also use the same >>> SIP provider from an Asterisk box in our data centre and that doesn't have a >>> problem, so I believe the SIP provider is fine. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> >>> Matthew Ralston >>> Web Developer & IT Consultant >>> >>> matt at mralston.co.uk >>> www.mralston.com >>> >>> On 22 Jun 2011, at 14:21, Chris Chen wrote: >>> >>> Hi Matthew, this is typical behavior for the setup of SIP behind NAT. >>> >>> 1) Please provide the exact setup of remote SIP phones, what's the >>> router model, does it have SIP ALG enabled, what kind of SIP phones >>> 2) >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Matthew Ralston < >>> freeswitch at mralston.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm having a problem at the moment with calls being successfully set up, >>>> with two-way audio, being terminated by FreeSWITCH after 30 seconds. >>>> >>>> Internal calls (i.e. between SIP phones on the same LAN segment as the >>>> FreeSWITCH box) work flawlessly. >>>> >>>> The problem arises when at least one of the handsets is located >>>> elsewhere on the Internet. This behaviour is exhibited under the following >>>> circumstances: >>>> >>>> - A-leg only call, e.g. to voicemail when the handset is at another >>>> location on the Internet >>>> - A-leg-B-leg call if one or both of the handsets are at another >>>> location on the Internet >>>> - Inbound calls from our external SIP provider >>>> - Outbound calls to our external SIP provider >>>> >>>> So it is obvious that the problem is related to the SIP going via the >>>> Internet, but I'm having trouble understanding why. >>>> >>>> Whilst debugging this problem I have placed the FreeSWITCH box is in the >>>> DMZ on our router, so there should not be any ports blocked. The FreeSWITCH >>>> box itself is not running a software firewall. >>>> >>>> The calls themselves are absolutely fine for the first 30 seconds - each >>>> party can hear the other talking fine. >>>> >>>> The fact that the call is consistently dropped after 30 seconds (give or >>>> take a second or two for PDD) suggests that some timeout is being triggered. >>>> >>>> When FreeSWITCH terminates the call, the following is logged to the >>>> console: >>>> >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4787 Channel >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed entering state [terminating][0] >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2641 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> >>>> HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5508 Hangup >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED] >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2657 Send signal >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [KILL] >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.514941 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send >>>> signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.534966 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1649 done >>>> playing file >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.625988 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:244 Handle >>>> play-file:[voicemail/vm-press.wav] (en:en) >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2063 >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed skip receive message >>>> [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State EXECUTE going to sleep >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:458 Channel >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed hanging up, cause: >>>> NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard HANGUP, cause: >>>> NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State HANGUP going to sleep >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_HANGUP -> >>>> CS_REPORTING >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send >>>> signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change >>>> CS_REPORTING >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.727027 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard REPORTING, cause: >>>> NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State REPORTING going to sleep >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State Change CS_REPORTING -> >>>> CS_DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1118 Send >>>> signal sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1290 Session 5 >>>> (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Locked, Waiting on external >>>> entities >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 5 >>>> (sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Ended >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close >>>> Channel sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed [CS_DESTROY] >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) Running State Change CS_DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.740064 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:363 >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed SOFIA DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.780056 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port >>>> 31484 protocol UDP to localport 31484 >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:570 unmapped public port >>>> 31485 protocol UDP to localport 31485 >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed Standard DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-22 13:33:50.840070 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 ( >>>> sofia/internal/1006 at public.ip.removed) State DESTROY going to sleep >>>> >>>> The above example was from an externally situated SIP phone ringing >>>> voicemail (4000) on FreeSWITCH. >>>> >>>> I have experimented changing various timers and timeouts in the config >>>> of FreeSWITCH (one at a time, being careful to put them back afterwards!) >>>> but been unable to resolve the issue. >>>> >>>> Incidentally, we have no long term intention of running off-site SIP >>>> phones with the PBX and I'm hoping not to have to leave it in the DMZ >>>> either, it's just like that for debugging. What is a real issue is the calls >>>> to our external SIP provider (i.e. outbound calls) being dropped. >>>> >>>> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Matthew Ralston >>>> Web Developer & IT Consultant >>>> >>>> matt at mralston.co.uk >>>> www.mralston.com >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/dca7d6c3/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 03:07:38 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:07:38 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E03ABA8.4030204@statirasystems.com> References: <4E0219B2.9070808@statirasystems.com> <4E0227C8.9080304@statirasystems.com> <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> <4E03669C.2030603@statirasystems.com> <963C184F-7466-4874-80F1-0CC13FEC8581@ipeva.fr> <4E036EE5.60208@statirasystems.com> <4E036F3B.8090303@statirasystems.com> <4E037099.9090107@statirasystems.com> <4E0374B7.8030709@statirasystems.com> <4E037E03.2070408@statirasystems.com> <183C4D22-20BB-4695-AC7F-82AFE0D4D385@ipeva.fr> <4E03ABA8.4030204@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:10 PM, William Moore wrote: > ** > I noticed that also. I have been pondering doing my own. I can program but > am fairly new to the freeswitch and sip in general. > > Don't want anything all that fancy. Just working would be good. > If you want "just working, not fancy" then check out FusionPBX. It is a GUI that is closer to the default FS XML configs than is blue.box. There are a lot of people using it and it has a fair amount of traction, plus Mark Crane (IRC: mcrane) is frequently in the #fusionpbx channel. Whatever you do, please consider helping the existing projects before you start a new one. Many have tried, few have succeeded... :) -MC > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VAhttp://www.statirasystems.com > > > On 06/23/2011 03:59 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > > I had the same feeling about blue.box. > I think there are more interesting GUIs out there, like FreePBX V3. > The weird thing is that none of them seems very active. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:55, William Moore a ?crit : > > I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. > Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human by > their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. > > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VAhttp://www.statirasystems.com > > > On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > > In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: > > > > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : > > The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. > > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : > > Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: > > 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description > 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying > 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required > 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 > 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp > 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) > > The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. > > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VAhttp://www.statirasystems.com > > > On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: > > When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the > gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? > > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VAhttp://www.statirasystems.com > > > On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: > > correction: missed a line. > > 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE > sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session > description > 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying > 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy > Authentication Required > 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK > sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 > > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VAhttp://www.statirasystems.com > > > On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: > > I get this with wireshark > > 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying > 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy > Authentication Required > 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK > sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 > > I am looking for the expiration now.. > > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VAhttp://www.statirasystems.com > > > On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > > Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: > tshark port 5080 > > You will then see if you receive it. > > In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, > or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 > seconds to your gateway config. > > If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: > unregister the gateway > register it again > make an inbound call right away > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : > > It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a > little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it > up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. > > I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. > Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm > not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. > > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VAhttp://www.statirasystems.com > > > On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: > > William, > > If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't > expect E164: > > > > > > > > But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: > > *Numbering* > The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU ) is used. > North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International > numbers need to be prefixed with "011". > > I think they are confused about what is E164.... > > You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : > > Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West wrote: > >> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the >> gateway usually. >> >> /b >> >> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >> >> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway >> issue >> can cause this. >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >> wrote: >> >> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP >> needs >> >> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... >> >> >> -MC >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/4f363521/attachment-0001.html From clive at lansink.co.nz Fri Jun 24 03:21:05 2011 From: clive at lansink.co.nz (Clive Lansink) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:21:05 +1200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Recovering from database fault Message-ID: <20110623232119.D65B5E8035@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/b341e966/attachment.pl From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 03:39:01 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:39:01 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Recovering from database fault In-Reply-To: <20110623232119.D65B5E8035@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> References: <20110623232119.D65B5E8035@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> Message-ID: Which files in the db/ directory did you actually delete? There are several files in there and generally it is "safe" to delete them all. Note that if you delete the voicemail_xxx.db for your domain then you will lose user voicemail information, like new vs. saved msgs. Of course, the recordings themselves reside in storage/voicemail/xxx/. (xxx = the name of your domain, so if it's the default configs then your domain is "default") -MC On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Clive Lansink wrote: > Hello list > > After a computer crash yesterday I noticed FreeSwitch reporting that the > database disk image was malformed. After googling on this it seemed that the > thing to do was to either delete or rename the db folder and get FreeSwitch > to recreate it. After I did that and restarted Freeswitch, I found that all > my phones seemed to register ok in that their web interfaces reported they > were registered and I could make calls on them, but none of them could ring. > When I rang another extension, it seemed from the log that the > sofia/internal calling phone would get to the point where it would bridge to > the sofia/internal for the extension, and then there would be an error > something like could not create the channel, cause, user not registered. So > all the phones could make calls but not receive them. > > I needed to get things working quickly and fortunately I achieved this by > brute force - simply uninstalling Freeswitch, getting rid of its folder, > installing again, and copying a saved copy of the conf directory back. Our > installation is simple and we don't rely on the internal voicemail etc, so > that was a quick way to get going again. > > But does anyone know what was going on here? Are there other data files > apart from the db folder we should be aware of? > > > Clive Lansink > Email: Clive at Lansink.Co.NZ > Phone: +64 9 520-4242 > Mobile: +64 21 663-999 > Fax: +64 21 789-150 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/f88d3fbc/attachment.html From cmcureau at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 03:59:00 2011 From: cmcureau at gmail.com (Chris Cureau) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:59:00 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) Message-ID: <3491149370155049607@unknownmsgid> I'm guessing this is just a pipe dream, but I'll throw it out anyway... Is there any database available that can determine the carrier for an outbound number? It would be really nice to be able to route cellular calls via a cell phone automatically instead of setting up specific numbers in the profile. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/3af06deb/attachment.html From krice at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 04:02:36 2011 From: krice at freeswitch.org (Ken Rice) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <3491149370155049607@unknownmsgid> Message-ID: That?s called the LRN database and its not free... There are services that will offer you access to it on a per query basis out there tho K On 6/23/11 6:59 PM, "Chris Cureau" wrote: > I'm guessing this is just a pipe dream, but I'll throw it out anyway... > > Is there any database available that can determine the carrier for an outbound > number? It would be really nice to be able to route cellular calls via a cell > phone automatically instead of setting up specific numbers in the profile. > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/a82c858b/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 04:18:02 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:18:02 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Answer issue on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm not sure I understand the problem. What is happening vs. what you believe should be happening? -MC On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Max Alex wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for your reply. > Here is my configuration and log > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16571 > > I am using A200 analog sangoma device with freeswitch, it is working fine > but when it is routing call to 1001 then it is answered. > Please provider your suggestions. > > Thanks, > Max Alex > Voip Developer > > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> I thought the A200 was an analog card? Maybe I have my numbers mixed up... >> >> Go ahead and collect a debug log of this call. It might help to have your >> configs posted as well. Use pastebin.freeswitch.org. See this wiki >> article for tips on how to collect information: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs >> >> -MC >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Max Alex wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I have installed freeswitch latest version with sangoma card A200 as >>> well, >>> I have installed and configured freetdm module with wanpipe drivers for >>> freeswitch, >>> We are properly receiving the inbound calls in public context and then we >>> are routing that call to 1001 extension, >>> it is properly routing to 1001 as well, but we have one issue while >>> routing on 1001. >>> >>> Here is the issue description. >>> I am calling from my cell phone to that DID number of pri line, and then >>> it will start ringing on 1001 extension, >>> When 1001 extension start ringing the call is answered on my cell phone, >>> it is something like freeswitch preanswer or autoanswer the call, how can >>> i stop this answer call when it is ringing on 1001 extension, >>> Waiting for good reply. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Max Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/87646246/attachment-0001.html From d at d-man.org Fri Jun 24 05:13:25 2011 From: d at d-man.org (Darren Schreiber) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:13:25 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E037E03.2070408@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: Hi William, Sorry to hear that ? what exactly makes you think this? We're very active on the blue.box front. There have been 3 new features and over 20 bug fixes in just the past four weeks. Can you email me off-list to get whatever issue you're having sorted out? Also, for authentication, bluebox "replaces" your changes because you're supposed to use the GUI to change that option. Go into Connectivity / SIP Interfaces and edit the SIP port you're trying to change. Uncheck the mark named "Require Authentication". It's not very difficult? - Darren -- From: William Moore > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:55:15 -0700 To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. William J. MooreStatira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: correction: missed a line. 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: I get this with wireshark 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 I am looking for the expiration now.. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: tshark port 5080 You will then see if you receive it. In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: unregister the gateway register it again make an inbound call right away David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: William, If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: Numbering The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". I think they are confused about what is E164.... You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West > wrote: 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. /b On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue can cause this. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins > wrote: The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... -MC _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/89eae582/attachment-0001.html From d at d-man.org Fri Jun 24 05:14:23 2011 From: d at d-man.org (Darren Schreiber) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:14:23 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <183C4D22-20BB-4695-AC7F-82AFE0D4D385@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: David, FreePBX v3 is now called blue.box. You're not making any sense? Is this an attempt at creating FUD? - Darren -- From: David Ponzone > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:59:16 -0700 To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue I had the same feeling about blue.box. I think there are more interesting GUIs out there, like FreePBX V3. The weird thing is that none of them seems very active. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:55, William Moore a ?crit : I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. William J. MooreStatira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: correction: missed a line. 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: I get this with wireshark 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 I am looking for the expiration now.. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: tshark port 5080 You will then see if you receive it. In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: unregister the gateway register it again make an inbound call right away David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: William, If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: Numbering The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". I think they are confused about what is E164.... You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West > wrote: 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. /b On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue can cause this. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins > wrote: The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... -MC _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/08beb298/attachment-0001.html From d at d-man.org Fri Jun 24 05:15:12 2011 From: d at d-man.org (Darren Schreiber) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:15:12 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SRTP In-Reply-To: <201106161740.18059.justlikeef@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Rob, Sorry for responding late on this. I'd be happy to help with this - seems like a really good use of time. Want to give a trial run at this over the weekend? - Darren -- On 6/16/11 2:40 PM, "Rob Hutton" wrote: >I am trying to get encryption working from within Bluebox, in the most >"reasonably flexible" way possible. (So no, not the default dialpan, but >I >missed the example so I will go back and look at it) > >So, one scenario I am thinking needs to be supported is where you have >two >devices that are registered to the same user, one encrypted and one not. >For >instance, a phone and a remote ringer. > >What I am looking for is the best way to stay as flexible as possible. >It may >be a situation where you end up turning on encryption system wide if the >devices support it, but that is overkill in a situation where there is a >seperate voice and data VLAN unless there is a need for that level of >security.. > >It may be a situation where I need to offer both options and write two >dialplan enries in the situation where the admin wants to enable it >device by >device. > >BTW, I am also using my head to beat through getting TLS working on the >front >end. I would REALLY appreciate another set of eyes if you have time. > >http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s >ystem.issuetabpanels:comment- >tabpanel&focusedCommentId=24719#action_24719 > >Thanks, >Rob > >On Thursday 16 June 2011 14:01:41 Michael Collins wrote: >> Are you working off of the default.xml dialplan file? If so, it has an >> example condition already: >> >> > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" >> break="never"> >> >> >> >> >> >> What exactly are you checking on in your scenario? Most likely there is >>an >> elegant way to do it. Give us the plain language description of the >>problem >> you're addressing and the community will no doubt have good suggestions >>for >> you. >> >> -MC >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Rob Hutton >>wrote: >> > Steven - >> > >> > Thanks for the help here... >> > >> > So there would have to be two dialplan entries for this number to work >> > with either RTP or SRTP? (Maybe two devices registering to the same >> > user?) >> > >> > Would it make more since to do this in a more global manner higher up >>in >> > the >> > dialplan in its own condition block? >> > >> > On Thursday 16 June 2011 03:15:33 Steven Ayre wrote: >> > > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed >> > > >> > > That's because it shouldn't be nested. It's not missing a /, and the >> > > 1st Should have the /. The extra indendation shouldn't be there on >>the >> > > 2nd. >> > > >> > > It should look like this: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" >> > > break="never"> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > The two conditions function as an AND, even though it's not nested. >>FS >> > > stops checking the extension as soon as it sees a condition that's >> > > false (at least by default and in the above case), so if the >> > > destination is not 202 it'll never get to the 2nd condition. >> > > >> > > -Steve >> > > >> > > On 16 June 2011 03:10, Rob Hutton wrote: >> > > > I think I have TLS and SRTP working at this point, but in the >>docs it >> > > > says to use the following template for the dialplan: >> > > > >> > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Secure_RTP: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > expression="^(AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32|AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80)$" >> > > > break="never"> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > 1) There is a missing > at the end of the close extension tag. >> > > > 2) There is either a missing / at the end of the internal >>condition >> > >> > line, >> > >> > > > or a missing condition close tag somewhere >> > > > 3) When I fix the interal condition, I get an error: >> > > > >> > > > {ERR} mod_dialplan_xml.c:110 Nexted conditions are not allowed >> > > > >> > > > All this, but a packet capture shows that SRTP is working based on >> > > > what >> > >> > I >> > >> > > > did on: >> > > > >> > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SIP_TLS >> > > > >> > > > Can someone give me some guidance on the Secure_RTP page and I >>will >> > > > update whatever? >> > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> > > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > >> > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > >> > > > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > >>UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > http://www.freeswitch.org > >_______________________________________________ >Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >http://www.freeswitch.org From d at d-man.org Fri Jun 24 05:16:22 2011 From: d at d-man.org (Darren Schreiber) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:16:22 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E02340D.2050708@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: You've created a loop ? it means you've setup auth or the numbering incorrectly. Again, can we take a look at your box? This is pretty easy to solve? -- From: William Moore > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:27:25 -0700 To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue And what sophiatrace reports from my soft phone device 502 calling number 7032203446. When I call from outside in nothing is shown on the trace, so I am not sure what that means. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= PuTTY log 2011.06.22 14:22:40 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= send 695 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:07.684442: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OPTIONS sip:502 at 192.168.1.11:42615;ob SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;rport;branch=z9hG4bK4Hyp1U0Djc12F Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=trm8SvQyg57ga To: Call-ID: fb2b0eb4-17b0-122f-85bc-0002a5ed0817 CSeq: 14049563 OPTIONS Contact: User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 1188 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:07.755356: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;rport=5060;received=192.168.1.254;branch=z9hG4bK4Hyp1U0Djc12F Call-ID: fb2b0eb4-17b0-122f-85bc-0002a5ed0817 From: ;tag=trm8SvQyg57ga To: ;tag=z9hG4bK4Hyp1U0Djc12F CSeq: 14049563 OPTIONS Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Accept: application/sdp, application/pidf+xml, application/xpidf+xml, application/simple-message-summary, message/sipfrag;version=2.0, application/im-iscomposing+xml, text/plain Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Allow-Events: presence, message-summary, refer User-Agent: CSipSimple r944 / inc-8 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 427 v=0 o=- 3517756265 3517756265 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 m=audio 49493 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtcp:40021 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:15.458709 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5060 protocol UDP to localport 5060 2011-06-22 13:28:15.574709 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5060 protocol TCP to localport 5060 2011-06-22 13:28:15.691704 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5070 protocol UDP to localport 5070 2011-06-22 13:28:15.808694 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5070 protocol TCP to localport 5070 2011-06-22 13:28:15.925687 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5080 protocol UDP to localport 5080 2011-06-22 13:28:16.040679 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:510 mapped public port 5080 protocol TCP to localport 5080 recv 1346 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.536924: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjYU1YgUOgEnTrbjl09SB0FLBTUw3q.4kD Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: Contact: ;+sip.ice Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23484 INVITE Route: Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 User-Agent: CSipSimple r944 / inc-8 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 616 v=0 o=- 3517756289 3517756289 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 33616 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtcp:38327 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ice-ufrag:7adc4b5a a=ice-pwd:15961ee1 a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 1 UDP 2130706431 192.168.1.11 33616 typ host a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 2 UDP 2130706430 192.168.1.11 38327 typ host ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 363 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.537870: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjYU1YgUOgEnTrbjl09SB0FLBTUw3q.4kD From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23484 INVITE User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:31.539663 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6551 IP 192.168.1.11 Rejected by acl "net_list_5". Falling back to Digest auth. 2011-06-22 13:28:31.539663 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1246 SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'sipinterface_1' for [7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com] from ip 192.168.1.11 send 855 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.541775: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjYU1YgUOgEnTrbjl09SB0FLBTUw3q.4kD From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: ;tag=U1D1UQ81Dey3N Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23484 INVITE User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="phone.statirasystems.com", nonce="430ea594-c447-42e5-a795-1c5ac884b996", algorithm=MD5, qop="auth" Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 445 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.544036: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACK sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjYU1YgUOgEnTrbjl09SB0FLBTUw3q.4kD Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: ;tag=U1D1UQ81Dey3N Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23484 ACK Route: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 1643 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.545117: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: Contact: ;+sip.ice Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23485 INVITE Route: Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 User-Agent: CSipSimple r944 / inc-8 Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="502", realm="phone.statirasystems.com", nonce="430ea594-c447-42e5-a795-1c5ac884b996", uri="sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com", response="95d75cc4f1478333731f960e0e686399", algorithm=MD5, cnonce="VIYZuITTZROoTJla3ithxFWRKkW15K3H", qop=auth, nc=00000001 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 616 v=0 o=- 3517756289 3517756289 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 33616 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtcp:38327 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ice-ufrag:7adc4b5a a=ice-pwd:15961ee1 a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 1 UDP 2130706431 192.168.1.11 33616 typ host a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 2 UDP 2130706430 192.168.1.11 38327 typ host ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 363 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.545859: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23485 INVITE User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia.c:6551 IP 192.168.1.11 Rejected by acl "net_list_5". Falling back to Digest auth. 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:816 New Channel sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [ae454abd-dc4a-42c9-90cc-6b0b332c44f4] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4761 Channel sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com entering state [received][100] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4772 Remote SDP: v=0 o=- 3517756289 3517756289 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 33616 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=rtcp:38327 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=ice-ufrag:7adc4b5a a=ice-pwd:15961ee1 a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 1 UDP 2130706431 192.168.1.11 33616 typ host a=candidate:Hc0a8010b 2 UDP 2130706430 192.168.1.11 38327 typ host 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4669 Audio Codec Compare [G722:9:8000:20:64000]/[G7221:115:32000:20:48000] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4669 Audio Codec Compare [G722:9:8000:20:64000]/[G7221:107:16000:20:32000] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4669 Audio Codec Compare [G722:9:8000:20:64000]/[G722:9:8000:20:64000] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2792 Set Codec sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com G722/8000 20 ms 160 samples 64000 bits 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4783 Set 2833 dtmf send/recv payload to 101 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4943 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.547460 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State INIT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SOFIA INIT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:361 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.553607 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1672 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.555041 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.555041 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SOFIA ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.555041 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:77 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard ROUTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.555041 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:331 Processing 502 <502>->7032203446 in context context_1 Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->conditioning_callerid] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (PASS) [conditioning_callerid] ${internal_caller_id_number}(7036526678) =~ /^.+$/ break=on-false Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_name=${internal_caller_id_name}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_number=${internal_caller_id_number}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->postroute_global] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Absolute Condition [postroute_global] Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action hash(insert/${domain_name}-spymap/${caller_id_number}/${uuid}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action hash(insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/${caller_id_number}/${destination_number}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action hash(insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/global/${uuid}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(RFC2822_DATE=${strftime(%a, %d %b %Y %T %z)}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->main_number_1] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (FAIL) [main_number_1] destination_number(7032203446) =~ /^2001$/ break=on-false Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->main_number_3] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (FAIL) [main_number_3] destination_number(7032203446) =~ /^502$/ break=on-false Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com parsing [context_1->main_trunk_1_pattern_1] continue=true Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (PASS) [main_trunk_1_pattern_1] destination_number(7032203446) =~ /^1{0,1}([2-9][0-8][0-9][2-9][0-9]{6})$/ break=never Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(prepend=) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_name=Statira Systems) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_number=7036526678) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (PASS) [main_trunk_1_pattern_1] ${outbound_caller_id_number}(7036526678) =~ /^.+$/ break=never Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_name=${outbound_caller_id_name}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action set(effective_caller_id_number=${outbound_caller_id_number}) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action export(sip_cid_type=rpid) Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Regex (PASS) [main_trunk_1_pattern_1] destination_number(7032203446) =~ /^1{0,1}([2-9][0-8][0-9][2-9][0-9]{6})$/ break=never Dialplan: sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Action bridge(sofia/gateway/trunk_1/${prepend}7032203446) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:119 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:364 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State EXECUTE 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SOFIA EXECUTE 2011-06-22 13:28:31.558679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard EXECUTE EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_name=Monkey) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.559681 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_name]=[Monkey] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_number=7036526678) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.559681 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_number]=[7036526678] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com hash(insert/phone.statirasystems.com-spymap/502/ae454abd-dc4a-42c9-90cc-6b0b332c44f4) EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com hash(insert/phone.statirasystems.com-last_dial/502/7032203446) EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com hash(insert/phone.statirasystems.com-last_dial/global/ae454abd-dc4a-42c9-90cc-6b0b332c44f4) EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(RFC2822_DATE=Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:28:31 -0700) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.562678 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [RFC2822_DATE]=[Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:28:31 -0700] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(prepend=) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.563814 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [prepend]=[UNDEF] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_name=Statira Systems) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.564681 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_name]=[Statira Systems] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_number=7036526678) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.565679 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_number]=[7036526678] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_name=Monkey) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.565679 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_name]=[Monkey] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com set(effective_caller_id_number=7036526678) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.566804 [DEBUG] mod_dptools.c:1060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SET [effective_caller_id_number]=[7036526678] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com export(sip_cid_type=rpid) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.567678 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:965 EXPORT (export_vars) [sip_cid_type]=[rpid] EXECUTE sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com bridge(sofia/gateway/trunk_1/7032203446) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:922 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com EXPORTING[export_vars] [sip_cid_type]=[rpid] to event 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1873 Parsing global variables 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4045 Invalid Gateway 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [NOTICE] mod_sofia.c:4402 Close Channel N/A [CS_NEW] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.568678 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 () Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (N/A) State DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 N/A SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (N/A) State DESTROY going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [ERR] switch_ivr_originate.c:2447 Cannot create outgoing channel of type [sofia] cause: [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3299 Originate Resulted in Error Cause: 28 [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2647 Originate Failed. Cause: INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.569833 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2567 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Callstate Change RINGING -> HANGUP 2011-06-22 13:28:31.570693 [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:2761 Hangup sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [CS_EXECUTE] [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.570693 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2583 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [KILL] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.570693 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.571679 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2060 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) 2011-06-22 13:28:31.571679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:371 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.571679 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-22 13:28:31.572811 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State HANGUP 2011-06-22 13:28:31.572811 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com hanging up, cause: INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.573682 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:519 Responding to INVITE with: 484 send 861 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.574787: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport=42615;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: ;tag=va7SXjS5aQmpH Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23485 INVITE User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Reason: Q.850;cause=28;text="INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT" Content-Length: 0 Remote-Party-ID: "7032203446" ;party=calling;privacy=off;screen=no ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard HANGUP, cause: INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:565 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575063 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:325 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575845 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State REPORTING 2011-06-22 13:28:31.575845 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard REPORTING, cause: INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT recv 445 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:31.583298: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACK sip:7032203446 at phone.statirasystems.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:42615;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjRaqtNZWIkhvyivUL2g2vkoVMTmdtxGlf Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=llr4Rj-HnTn9EQhAB8mLWxBLOUkqnap. To: ;tag=va7SXjS5aQmpH Call-ID: hiSXYJajRDw17Q9BBhV8MiVL6FHepRwl CSeq: 23485 ACK Route: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-22 13:28:31.584480 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:625 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State REPORTING going to sleep 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:350 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [BREAK] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 8 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 8 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Ended 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close Channel sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-22 13:28:31.585691 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:454 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:457 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com Standard DESTROY 2011-06-22 13:28:31.586867 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:467 (sofia/sipinterface_1/502 at phone.statirasystems.com) State DESTROY going to sleep send 695 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:37.744017: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OPTIONS sip:502 at 192.168.1.11:42615;ob SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;rport;branch=z9hG4bK5tQF3pHHFNQNB Max-Forwards: 70 From: ;tag=XK0jZDa97Za9c To: Call-ID: 0d15c90c-17b1-122f-85bc-0002a5ed0817 CSeq: 14049564 OPTIONS Contact: User-Agent: Configured by 2600hz! Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 1188 bytes from udp/[192.168.1.11]:42615 at 20:28:37.860253: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;rport=5060;received=192.168.1.254;branch=z9hG4bK5tQF3pHHFNQNB Call-ID: 0d15c90c-17b1-122f-85bc-0002a5ed0817 From: ;tag=XK0jZDa97Za9c To: ;tag=z9hG4bK5tQF3pHHFNQNB CSeq: 14049564 OPTIONS Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Accept: application/sdp, application/pidf+xml, application/xpidf+xml, application/simple-message-summary, message/sipfrag;version=2.0, application/im-iscomposing+xml, text/plain Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Allow-Events: presence, message-summary, refer User-Agent: CSipSimple r944 / inc-8 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 427 v=0 o=- 3517756295 3517756295 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 s=pjmedia c=IN IP4 192.168.1.11 t=0 0 m=audio 49493 RTP/AVP 9 104 103 105 102 0 8 101 a=rtcp:40021 IN IP4 192.168.1.11 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:104 speex/32000 a=rtpmap:103 speex/16000 a=rtpmap:105 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:105 mode=30 a=rtpmap:102 speex/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ William J. Moore Owner Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA 22401 540.693.0579 www.statirasystems.com On 6/22/2011 1:35 PM, William Moore wrote: Some details /opt/freeswitch/conf/sip_profiles/bluebox_sipinterfaces.xml /opt/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/bluebox_dialplan.xml /opt/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/bluebox_routes.xml William J. Moore Owner Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA 22401 540.693.0579 www.statirasystems.com On 6/22/2011 12:34 PM, William Moore wrote: I can't get any incoming nor outgoing calls. The trunk is through Junction Networks and registers fine. I though I had the dial plan correct but there is obviously something I am missing. I am running Blue.Box GUI with FreeSwitch. It is in CentOS 5.5. I am using Verizon FiOS internet and the firewall is properly configured. This is a test environment so I would be happy to let someone in to take a look. I have SSH setup and web access via phone.statirasystems.com. Other wise it is a lot of configuration info to post. I have checked with Junction Networks and everything is fine on there end. My server is not responding to the requests. I am fairly green with freeswitch and would appreciate any help. Please note: I have sought assistance via the 2600hz community to no avail. Thank you, _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/afd69d3e/attachment-0001.html From rhuddleston at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 05:53:37 2011 From: rhuddleston at gmail.com (Robert-iPhone) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> isnt voip great - nobody learns telecom 101. LERG LRN LNP OCN B8ZS / SF just the good ole days 5ESS / DMS RCV Sent from my iPhone On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:02 PM, Ken Rice wrote: > That?s called the LRN database and its not free... There are services that will offer you access to it on a per query basis out there tho > > K > > > On 6/23/11 6:59 PM, "Chris Cureau" wrote: > > I'm guessing this is just a pipe dream, but I'll throw it out anyway... > > Is there any database available that can determine the carrier for an outbound number? It would be really nice to be able to route cellular calls via a cell phone automatically instead of setting up specific numbers in the profile. > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/5cde1861/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Fri Jun 24 05:56:04 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:56:04 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <73317B9D-B8B3-4F1B-AD2A-7F9B3DF1DDDC@ipeva.fr> No Darren, sorry, I confused FreePBX and FusionPBX. My bad. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 24/06/2011 ? 03:14, Darren Schreiber a ?crit : > David, > FreePBX v3 is now called blue.box. You're not making any sense? Is this an attempt at creating FUD? > > - Darren > > -- > > > From: David Ponzone > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:59:16 -0700 > To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue > > I had the same feeling about blue.box. > I think there are more interesting GUIs out there, like FreePBX V3. > The weird thing is that none of them seems very active. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:55, William Moore a ?crit : > >> I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. >> William J. Moore >> Statira Systems >> 611 Caroline St >> Fredericksburg, VA >> http://www.statirasystems.com >> >> On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>> >>> In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service Client IPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : >>> >>>> The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. >>>> >>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>> >>>> Service Client IPeva >>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>> >>>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: >>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>>>> 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>> 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>>> 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>> 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp >>>>> 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) >>>>> >>>>> The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. >>>>> William J. MooreStatira Systems >>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>> >>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? >>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> correction: missed a line. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>>>>>> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>>>>> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I get this with wireshark >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>>>>>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>>>>>>>> tshark port 5080 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>>>>>>> unregister the gateway >>>>>>>>> register it again >>>>>>>>> make an inbound call right away >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Service Client IPeva >>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. >>>>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> William, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Numbering >>>>>>>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Service Client IPeva >>>>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? >>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> /b >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/a2baa946/attachment-0001.html From d at d-man.org Fri Jun 24 06:05:45 2011 From: d at d-man.org (Darren Schreiber) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:05:45 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <73317B9D-B8B3-4F1B-AD2A-7F9B3DF1DDDC@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: OK, well again, I'm happy to help, as is my team and as are the open-source folks. Sometimes we do get busy, so please just ping me, but the logs pasted by William indicate he doesn't know how to setup the authentication for his carriers/phones and since there's 82 different ways to do that, I'd need to know more info. Hence the request to email off list, unless he wants to post his auth strategy and IPs publicly :) -- From: David Ponzone > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:56:04 -0700 To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue No Darren, sorry, I confused FreePBX and FusionPBX. My bad. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 24/06/2011 ? 03:14, Darren Schreiber a ?crit : David, FreePBX v3 is now called blue.box. You're not making any sense? Is this an attempt at creating FUD? - Darren -- From: David Ponzone > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:59:16 -0700 To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue I had the same feeling about blue.box. I think there are more interesting GUIs out there, like FreePBX V3. The weird thing is that none of them seems very active. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:55, William Moore a ?crit : I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. William J. MooreStatira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: correction: missed a line. 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: I get this with wireshark 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 I am looking for the expiration now.. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: tshark port 5080 You will then see if you receive it. In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: unregister the gateway register it again make an inbound call right away David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: William, If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: Numbering The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". I think they are confused about what is E164.... You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West > wrote: 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. /b On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue can cause this. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins > wrote: The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... -MC _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/afba4f58/attachment-0001.html From cmcureau at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 06:12:15 2011 From: cmcureau at gmail.com (Chris Cureau) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> References: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1769702213133480228@unknownmsgid> Consider this my telephony 101 experience. The past 15 years have been filled with tech support, coding, and project management. I guess I was looking for a change. If one can't ask even newbie questions without this type of disdain, how does one get the knowledge? On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Robert-iPhone wrote: isnt voip great - nobody learns telecom 101. LERG LRN LNP OCN B8ZS / SF just the good ole days 5ESS / DMS RCV Sent from my iPhone On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:02 PM, Ken Rice wrote: That?s called the LRN database and its not free... There are services that will offer you access to it on a per query basis out there tho K On 6/23/11 6:59 PM, "Chris Cureau" < cmcureau at gmail.com> wrote: I'm guessing this is just a pipe dream, but I'll throw it out anyway... Is there any database available that can determine the carrier for an outbound number? It would be really nice to be able to route cellular calls via a cell phone automatically instead of setting up specific numbers in the profile. ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/95f606f2/attachment.html From rhuddleston at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 06:27:34 2011 From: rhuddleston at gmail.com (Robert-iPhone) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <1769702213133480228@unknownmsgid> References: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> <1769702213133480228@unknownmsgid> Message-ID: <3DF51B5A-A97F-42AE-9C31-90D132B4F066@gmail.com> it wasnt intended as insult - just humorous how voip requires less knowledge Sent from my iPhone On Jun 23, 2011, at 10:12 PM, Chris Cureau wrote: > Consider this my telephony 101 experience. The past 15 years have been filled with tech support, coding, and project management. I guess I was looking for a change. > > If one can't ask even newbie questions without this type of disdain, how does one get the knowledge? > > On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Robert-iPhone wrote: > >> isnt voip great - nobody learns telecom 101. >> LERG >> LRN >> LNP >> OCN >> B8ZS / SF >> >> just the good ole days 5ESS / DMS RCV >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:02 PM, Ken Rice wrote: >> >>> That?s called the LRN database and its not free... There are services that will offer you access to it on a per query basis out there tho >>> >>> K >>> >>> >>> On 6/23/11 6:59 PM, "Chris Cureau" wrote: >>> >>> I'm guessing this is just a pipe dream, but I'll throw it out anyway... >>> >>> Is there any database available that can determine the carrier for an outbound number? It would be really nice to be able to route cellular calls via a cell phone automatically instead of setting up specific numbers in the profile. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/55f2cbe5/attachment.html From cmcureau at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 06:30:10 2011 From: cmcureau at gmail.com (Chris Cureau) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:30:10 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <3DF51B5A-A97F-42AE-9C31-90D132B4F066@gmail.com> References: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> <1769702213133480228@unknownmsgid> <3DF51B5A-A97F-42AE-9C31-90D132B4F066@gmail.com> Message-ID: My apologies, then :) On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Robert-iPhone wrote: > it wasnt intended as insult - just humorous how voip requires less > knowledge > > Sent from my iPhone > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/f59e6ec2/attachment.html From frankie.k.yiu at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 06:35:18 2011 From: frankie.k.yiu at gmail.com (Frankie Yiu) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:35:18 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Any RECORD_STOP event sample available? Message-ID: Hi there, Could someone please point me where I can find a sample of the RECORD_STOP event look like? I look at this page but it does not have any information about it. ( http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Event_list#RECORD_STOP) Thanks, Frankie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/3515d8e0/attachment.html From max.asterisk at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 08:32:56 2011 From: max.asterisk at gmail.com (Max Alex) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:02:56 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Answer issue on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Thanks for reply. Current scenario is below. PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to 1001 -> ringing (Answered on cellphone) Here when it is routed to 1001 the call it is started ringing, but on phone that call is answered and hearding sound of ringing. Required flow: PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to 1001 -> ringing (Ringing on cellphone) I hope it is understable, the call should not be answered until 1001 answer it, right not when it is started ring it is answered on cell phone. that should not be happen as it is not answered yet. Waiting for your reply. Thanks, Max Alex Voip Developer On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > I'm not sure I understand the problem. What is happening vs. what you > believe should be happening? > -MC > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Max Alex wrote: > >> Hi, >> Thanks for your reply. >> Here is my configuration and log >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16571 >> >> I am using A200 analog sangoma device with freeswitch, it is working fine >> but when it is routing call to 1001 then it is answered. >> Please provider your suggestions. >> >> Thanks, >> Max Alex >> Voip Developer >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >>> I thought the A200 was an analog card? Maybe I have my numbers mixed >>> up... >>> >>> Go ahead and collect a debug log of this call. It might help to have your >>> configs posted as well. Use pastebin.freeswitch.org. See this wiki >>> article for tips on how to collect information: >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Max Alex wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I have installed freeswitch latest version with sangoma card A200 as >>>> well, >>>> I have installed and configured freetdm module with wanpipe drivers for >>>> freeswitch, >>>> We are properly receiving the inbound calls in public context and then >>>> we are routing that call to 1001 extension, >>>> it is properly routing to 1001 as well, but we have one issue while >>>> routing on 1001. >>>> >>>> Here is the issue description. >>>> I am calling from my cell phone to that DID number of pri line, and then >>>> it will start ringing on 1001 extension, >>>> When 1001 extension start ringing the call is answered on my cell phone, >>>> it is something like freeswitch preanswer or autoanswer the call, how >>>> can i stop this answer call when it is ringing on 1001 extension, >>>> Waiting for good reply. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Max Alex >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/a14066ad/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 10:08:45 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:08:45 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Answer issue on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Are you using the default dialplan? I think you might just need to ignore early media on your bridge app. If you are using the default.xml file then locate "Local_Extension" and the bridge line: Change it to this, then try again: If I understand correctly, the "symptom" you are experiencing is the normal operation of the bridge app (and it's cousin, the originate API command). When the b-leg sends back media, including ringing, the bridge (or the originate) will be considered "successful," and in the case of bridge, the b-leg's audio (the early media) will be connected to the a-leg. If you set ignore_early_media=true then you are explicitly telling the bridge app that you only want to connect the b-leg to the a-leg if the b-leg actually answers. I hope that made sense... -MC On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Max Alex wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for reply. > Current scenario is below. > > PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to > 1001 -> ringing (Answered on cellphone) > Here when it is routed to 1001 the call it is started ringing, but on phone > that call is answered and hearding sound of ringing. > > Required flow: > PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to > 1001 -> ringing (Ringing on cellphone) > > I hope it is understable, the call should not be answered until 1001 answer > it, right not when it is started ring it is answered on cell phone. > that should not be happen as it is not answered yet. > > Waiting for your reply. > > > Thanks, > Max Alex > Voip Developer > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> I'm not sure I understand the problem. What is happening vs. what you >> believe should be happening? >> -MC >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Max Alex wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Thanks for your reply. >>> Here is my configuration and log >>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16571 >>> >>> I am using A200 analog sangoma device with freeswitch, it is working fine >>> but when it is routing call to 1001 then it is answered. >>> Please provider your suggestions. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Max Alex >>> Voip Developer >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>> >>>> I thought the A200 was an analog card? Maybe I have my numbers mixed >>>> up... >>>> >>>> Go ahead and collect a debug log of this call. It might help to have >>>> your configs posted as well. Use pastebin.freeswitch.org. See this wiki >>>> article for tips on how to collect information: >>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs >>>> >>>> -MC >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Max Alex wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I have installed freeswitch latest version with sangoma card A200 as >>>>> well, >>>>> I have installed and configured freetdm module with wanpipe drivers for >>>>> freeswitch, >>>>> We are properly receiving the inbound calls in public context and then >>>>> we are routing that call to 1001 extension, >>>>> it is properly routing to 1001 as well, but we have one issue while >>>>> routing on 1001. >>>>> >>>>> Here is the issue description. >>>>> I am calling from my cell phone to that DID number of pri line, and >>>>> then it will start ringing on 1001 extension, >>>>> When 1001 extension start ringing the call is answered on my cell >>>>> phone, >>>>> it is something like freeswitch preanswer or autoanswer the call, how >>>>> can i stop this answer call when it is ringing on 1001 extension, >>>>> Waiting for good reply. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Max Alex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/84272dc9/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 10:11:31 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:11:31 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) In-Reply-To: References: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> <1769702213133480228@unknownmsgid> <3DF51B5A-A97F-42AE-9C31-90D132B4F066@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Chris Cureau wrote: > My apologies, then :) > > No worries. Besides, you didn't miss anything interesting. :D -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/2b8da2d9/attachment.html From mays.david at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 10:26:44 2011 From: mays.david at gmail.com (David Ma) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:26:44 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Hi Michael, Unfortunately this problem still happens. I enabled "continue_on_fail" for leg-A when I originated the call. Leg-A call went well. Then I originated leg-B call ("continue_on_fail" is NOT set for leg-B), which failed for [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER]. As the consequence, leg-A was hung up by FS automatically for [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL]. The log excerpt follows. Do you think "continue_on_fail" should be also enabled for leg-B call? Thanks, D.Ma 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 5 = [continue_on_fail=true] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212[c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8] [...] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:52 AM, David Ma wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks very much for your prompt response! I appreciate the information > provided. > > I was actually searching the the existence of such a variable. I was not so > luck to find it out and thereby resort to the support forum. > > I've modified my code to build this parameter into my application. Will > feedback to you after verification. > > Thanks again, > D.Ma > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> How about setting this? >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#continue_on_fail >> >> -MC >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:32 AM, dma wrote: >> >>> I am creating a call-back solution. After leg-A answers, I originate >>> leg-B >>> call. After receiving SIP 183 from Leg-B, I bridge the 2 legs. However, >>> in >>> some cases, leg-A is automatically disconnected by FreeSwitch on leg-B >>> failure, for example, DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER. The application is not >>> given >>> a chance to handle leg-B failure event. This should not be a correct >>> scenario because I never set "hangup-after-bridge", which is false by >>> default. >>> >>> The right way should be, FreeSwitch doesn't hang up leg-A automatically, >>> but >>> give a chance for the application to decide what to do. >>> >>> Please see the logs below: >>> >>> ================================================= >>> >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750914] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 4 = [privacy=yes] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> [ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> >>> CS_INIT >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_INIT >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.477997: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> INVITE sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D >>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>> Privacy: none >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Content-Disposition: session >>> Content-Length: 204 >>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46> >>> >>> v=0 >>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307645395 1307645396 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>> s=FreeSWITCH >>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 30000 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>> a=ptime:20 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> >>> CS_ROUTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>> [calling][0] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_ROUTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> >>> RINGING >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING >>> -> >>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>> going to >>> sleep >>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.485130: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:56.677788: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>> To: >>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Content-Length: 189 >>> >>> v=0 >>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> a=sendrecv >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>> "Outbound >>> Call" <03996590031055> >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>> [proceeding][183] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>> v=0 >>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare >>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>> samples >>> 8000 bits >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send >>> payload to 101 >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30000 -> >>> 203.208.207.196 port 30792 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>> [soft] >>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send >>> payload to 101 >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>> receive >>> payload to 101 >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212! >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING >>> -> >>> EARLY >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate >>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.618770 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port >>> confirmed. >>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.562021: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>> To: >>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Content-Length: 189 >>> >>> v=0 >>> o=- 421265648 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> a=sendrecv >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>> "03996590031055" <03996590031055> >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>> [proceeding][183] >>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.563178: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>> To: >>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Content-Length: 189 >>> >>> v=0 >>> o=- 421265648 3 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> a=sendrecv >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.457169 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>> [proceeding][183] >>> recv 749 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.365284: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>> To: >>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>> Contact: >>> Allow-Events: refer >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces >>> Content-Length: 189 >>> >>> v=0 >>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> a=sendrecv >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>> [completing][200] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>> v=0 >>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> >>> send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.366562: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKyUg0ga7pUZmrS >>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>> To: >>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501633 ACK >>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>> [ready][200] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY >>> -> >>> ACTIVE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel >>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.264178 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task 23 >>> switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79) to run >>> at >>> 1307676927 >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.265202 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996590031055] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 3 = [privacy=yes] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>> [30228d2b-756a-4a98-871d-db63a2955b52] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> >>> CS_INIT >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_INIT >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> >>> CS_ROUTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_ROUTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> >>> RINGING >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.373220: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> INVITE sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN2011-06-10 >>> 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>> >>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>> Privacy: none >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Content-Disposition: session >>> Content-Length: 204 >>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46> >>> >>> v=0 >>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307646863 1307646864 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>> s=FreeSWITCH >>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 28564 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>> a=ptime:20 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>> [calling][0] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING >>> -> >>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>> going to >>> sleep >>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.378710: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File >>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample rate >>> 11025 >>> doesn't match requested rate 8000 >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has 2 >>> channels, muxing to mono will occur. >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec >>> Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.298764 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - >>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:28.618472: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>> To: >>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Content-Length: 186 >>> >>> v=0 >>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> a=sendrecv >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>> "Outbound >>> Call" <03996563750914> >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>> [proceeding][183] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>> v=0 >>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare >>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>> samples >>> 8000 bits >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send >>> payload to 101 >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>> [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 28564 -> >>> 203.208.207.195 port 45002 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>> [soft] >>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send >>> payload to 101 >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>> receive >>> payload to 101 >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212! >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING >>> -> >>> EARLY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate >>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.516887 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE >>> -> >>> CS_HIBERNATE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE >>> -> >>> CS_HIBERNATE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done >>> playing >>> file >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>> playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_HIBERNATE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>> CS_RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.540814: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>> To: >>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Content-Length: 186 >>> >>> v=0 >>> o=- 131082 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>> t=0 0 >>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>> a=sendrecv >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>> "03996563750914" <03996563750914> >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>> [proceeding][183] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [WARNING] switch_core_session.c:1940 Cannot >>> execute app 'playback' media required on an outbound channel that does >>> not >>> have media established >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_HIBERNATE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>> CS_RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> >>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> >>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going >>> to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY >>> -> >>> HANGUP >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>> [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_HANGUP >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE >>> -> >>> HANGUP >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>> send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.818391: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> CANCEL sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>> Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>> [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP >>> -> >>> CS_REPORTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_REPORTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: >>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going >>> to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_HANGUP >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>> CS_REPORTING -> >>> CS_DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 40 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>> external >>> entities >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 40 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>> Channel >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP >>> -> >>> DOWN >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP >>> -> >>> CS_REPORTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_REPORTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: >>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to >>> sleep >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>> CS_REPORTING -> >>> CS_DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 39 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>> external >>> entities >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 39 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>> Channel >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP >>> -> >>> DOWN >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>> 0x2aaab00310c0 (nil) >>> send 662 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.820530: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg >>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>> To: >>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>> Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - >>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to >>> sleep >>> recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.823302: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>> To: >>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u00000001QXU3LU >>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>> Contact: >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824765: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>> To: >>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>> Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824891: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ACK sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>> To: >>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501649 ACK >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.826375: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.1.1.46:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg;received=10.1.1.46 >>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>> To: >>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Leg-A-is-automatically-disconnected-on-Leg-B-orginate-failure-tp6482192p6482192.html >>> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/201b6658/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 10:39:00 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:39:00 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Any RECORD_STOP event sample available? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It would be better for you to experience an actual record stop event: open fs_cli and enter: /log 0 /event plain event_stop Then make a call to 9664 (or some other valid extension on your system) Back at fs_cli: uuid_record xxx start /tmp/rec.wav uuid_record xxx stop /tmp/wec.wav As soon as you issue the stop command your screen will be filled with all the wonderful stuff in the RECORD_STOP event. I think you'll find the event headers to be pretty self-explanatory, but if you have any questions just ask here if you don't see anything on the wiki. Thanks, MC On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Frankie Yiu wrote: > Hi there, > > Could someone please point me where I can find a sample of the RECORD_STOP > event look like? > I look at this page but it does not have any information about it. ( > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Event_list#RECORD_STOP) > > Thanks, > Frankie > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/f52c5ffb/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 10:41:26 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:41:26 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Pastebin the entire debug log, including the siptrace. Also include the originate line and any other dialplan config that might be used. -MC On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:26 PM, David Ma wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Unfortunately this problem still happens. > > I enabled "continue_on_fail" for leg-A when I originated the call. Leg-A > call went well. Then I originated leg-B call ("continue_on_fail" is NOT set > for leg-B), which failed for [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER]. As the consequence, > leg-A was hung up by FS automatically for [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL]. > > The log excerpt follows. > > Do you think "continue_on_fail" should be also enabled for leg-B call? > > Thanks, > D.Ma > > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 5 = [continue_on_fail=true] > > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212[c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8] > [...] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going > to sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] > [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] > [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:52 AM, David Ma wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> Thanks very much for your prompt response! I appreciate the information >> provided. >> >> I was actually searching the the existence of such a variable. I was not >> so luck to find it out and thereby resort to the support forum. >> >> I've modified my code to build this parameter into my application. Will >> feedback to you after verification. >> >> Thanks again, >> D.Ma >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >>> How about setting this? >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#continue_on_fail >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:32 AM, dma wrote: >>> >>>> I am creating a call-back solution. After leg-A answers, I originate >>>> leg-B >>>> call. After receiving SIP 183 from Leg-B, I bridge the 2 legs. However, >>>> in >>>> some cases, leg-A is automatically disconnected by FreeSwitch on leg-B >>>> failure, for example, DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER. The application is not >>>> given >>>> a chance to handle leg-B failure event. This should not be a correct >>>> scenario because I never set "hangup-after-bridge", which is false by >>>> default. >>>> >>>> The right way should be, FreeSwitch doesn't hang up leg-A automatically, >>>> but >>>> give a chance for the application to decide what to do. >>>> >>>> Please see the logs below: >>>> >>>> ================================================= >>>> >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750914] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 4 = [privacy=yes] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> [ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> >>>> CS_INIT >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_INIT >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.477997: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> INVITE sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D >>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>>> Privacy: none >>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>> Content-Disposition: session >>>> Content-Length: 204 >>>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46> >>>> >>>> v=0 >>>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307645395 1307645396 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>> s=FreeSWITCH >>>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 30000 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>>> a=ptime:20 >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> >>>> CS_ROUTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>> [calling][0] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_ROUTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN >>>> -> >>>> RINGING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING >>>> -> >>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>> going to >>>> sleep >>>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.485130: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:56.677788: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>> >>>> v=0 >>>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>> s=session >>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> a=sendrecv >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>> "Outbound >>>> Call" <03996590031055> >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>> [proceeding][183] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>> v=0 >>>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>> s=session >>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare >>>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>>> samples >>>> 8000 bits >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send >>>> payload to 101 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30000 -> >>>> 203.208.207.196 port 30792 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>>> [soft] >>>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send >>>> payload to 101 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>>> receive >>>> payload to 101 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212! >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>> RINGING -> >>>> EARLY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate >>>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.618770 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port >>>> confirmed. >>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.562021: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>> >>>> v=0 >>>> o=- 421265648 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>> s=session >>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> a=sendrecv >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>> "03996590031055" <03996590031055> >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>> [proceeding][183] >>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.563178: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>> >>>> v=0 >>>> o=- 421265648 3 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>> s=session >>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> a=sendrecv >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.457169 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>> [proceeding][183] >>>> recv 749 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.365284: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>> Contact: >>>> Allow-Events: refer >>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>> Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces >>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>> >>>> v=0 >>>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>> s=session >>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> a=sendrecv >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>> [completing][200] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>> v=0 >>>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>> s=session >>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> >>>> send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.366562: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKyUg0ga7pUZmrS >>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501633 ACK >>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>> [ready][200] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY >>>> -> >>>> ACTIVE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel >>>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.264178 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task 23 >>>> switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79) to run >>>> at >>>> 1307676927 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.265202 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996590031055] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 3 = [privacy=yes] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> [30228d2b-756a-4a98-871d-db63a2955b52] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> >>>> CS_INIT >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_INIT >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> >>>> CS_ROUTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_ROUTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN >>>> -> >>>> RINGING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.373220: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> INVITE sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN2011-06-10 >>>> 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>>> >>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>>> Privacy: none >>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>> Content-Disposition: session >>>> Content-Length: 204 >>>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46> >>>> >>>> v=0 >>>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307646863 1307646864 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>> s=FreeSWITCH >>>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 28564 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>>> a=ptime:20 >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>> [calling][0] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING >>>> -> >>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>> going to >>>> sleep >>>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.378710: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File >>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample rate >>>> 11025 >>>> doesn't match requested rate 8000 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has 2 >>>> channels, muxing to mono will occur. >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec >>>> Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.298764 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - >>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:28.618472: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>> Content-Length: 186 >>>> >>>> v=0 >>>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>> s=session >>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> a=sendrecv >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>> "Outbound >>>> Call" <03996563750914> >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>> [proceeding][183] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>> v=0 >>>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>> s=session >>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare >>>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>>> samples >>>> 8000 bits >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send >>>> payload to 101 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>>> [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 28564 -> >>>> 203.208.207.195 port 45002 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>>> [soft] >>>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send >>>> payload to 101 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>>> receive >>>> payload to 101 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212! >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>> RINGING -> >>>> EARLY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate >>>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.516887 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE >>>> -> >>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE >>>> -> >>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done >>>> playing >>>> file >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>>> playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>>> CS_RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going >>>> to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.540814: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>> Content-Length: 186 >>>> >>>> v=0 >>>> o=- 131082 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>> s=session >>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>> t=0 0 >>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>> a=sendrecv >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>> "03996563750914" <03996563750914> >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>> [proceeding][183] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [WARNING] switch_core_session.c:1940 Cannot >>>> execute app 'playback' media required on an outbound channel that does >>>> not >>>> have media established >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>>> CS_RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going >>>> to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET >>>> -> >>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET >>>> -> >>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY >>>> -> >>>> HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>> [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE >>>> -> >>>> HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.818391: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> CANCEL sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>>> Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>> [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP >>>> -> >>>> CS_REPORTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_REPORTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, >>>> cause: >>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going >>>> to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>> CS_REPORTING -> >>>> CS_DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 40 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>>> external >>>> entities >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session >>>> 40 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>>> Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP >>>> -> >>>> DOWN >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP >>>> -> >>>> CS_REPORTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_REPORTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, >>>> cause: >>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going >>>> to >>>> sleep >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>> CS_REPORTING -> >>>> CS_DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 39 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>>> external >>>> entities >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session >>>> 39 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>>> Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP >>>> -> >>>> DOWN >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 (nil) >>>> send 662 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.820530: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg >>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>> Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - >>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to >>>> sleep >>>> recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.823302: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u00000001QXU3LU >>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>>> Contact: >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824765: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>> Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824891: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> ACK sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501649 ACK >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.826375: >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg;received=10.1.1.46 >>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>> To: >>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Leg-A-is-automatically-disconnected-on-Leg-B-orginate-failure-tp6482192p6482192.html >>>> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/f3e17b7f/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 10:48:48 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:48:48 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org In-Reply-To: <1308751418.2780.11.camel@DELL> References: <1308751418.2780.11.camel@DELL> Message-ID: I'm seeing quite a few: - [Freeswitch-users] One way audio with Localphone .com *Henk Oegema * - [Freeswitch-users] One way audio with Localphone .com *Henk Oegema * - [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge *Henk Oegema * - [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] *Henk Oegema * - [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Asterisk as gateway for FS] *Henk Oegema * - [Freeswitch-users] No more sessions allowed at this time. *Henk Oegema * - [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working *Henk Oegema * - [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working *Henk Oegema * - [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org *Henk Oegema * -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: > ** > How come I don't see my mails in the FreeSWITCH-Users Archives? > > > Rgds. > Henk > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/4db1b0f7/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 10:52:43 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:52:43 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Hooks for own call logs In-Reply-To: <4DFC96BA.1080306@amooma.de> References: <4DFC96BA.1080306@amooma.de> Message-ID: Sorry for the late reply... Have you tried setting the api_hangup_hook variable? http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#api_hangup_hook -MC On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Sascha Daniels wrote: > Hi. > > Am 17.06.2011 03:43, schrieb Michael Collins: > > It depends on what you mean by "canceled" - can you pastebin a call > > log of a canceled call and give us an idea what should be happening? > > > > I would like to make an http call to my application after the originator > canceled the call. > > Here ist the cli output. > > http://pastebin.com/fCadQTMQ > > Somewhere after line 96 the script (or what ever) should be called. > > Thanks a lot. > > Regards > > Sascha > > > -- > AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 124 - 56566 Neuwied --> http://www.amooma.de > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister Montabaur B14998 > > B?cher: http://das-asterisk-buch.de - http://ruby-auf-schienen.de > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110623/13aec3d2/attachment.html From freeswitch-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl Fri Jun 24 11:05:37 2011 From: freeswitch-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl (Patrick Lists) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:05:37 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> References: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4E043741.8090204@puzzled.xs4all.nl> On 06/24/2011 03:53 AM, Robert-iPhone wrote: > isnt voip great - nobody learns telecom 101. > LERG > LRN > LNP > OCN > B8ZS / SF At the risk of being wrong (it's been more than a decade since I worked at Lucent), iirc LERG, LRN and OCN are US centric. Since I'm on the other side of the Big Blue Pond I don't need to know them :) It probably helps if one knows LNP if one offers or uses VoIP services. B8ZS line encoding. Iirc a funky version of AMI because the US suffered from not-invented-here syndrom so they came up with a tweaked version of AMI called Bipolar-8-0-substition. Nuf said :) Brings back memories of long nights troubleshooting international circuits with BERT testers and hopping on planes to follow the nodes so we could finally pinpoint which carrier was lying about nothing being wrong with their stretch. > just the good ole days 5ESS / DMS RCV 5ESS wasn't my thing. They were just really big and did not do very exciting things so best left alone with the ancient bearded tribe that ran those monsters. All I can remember about the Nortel stuff was that it was really loud, particularly their X.25 nodes. I do have fond memories of all the Ascend gear (the TNT, CBS-500 and GX-550) and all the Lucent experimental DWDM and SDH gear that we got to play with. "If we build it they will come" - wonder if we will ever see those days again. Regards, Patrick From kris at livecall.com Fri Jun 24 11:25:01 2011 From: kris at livecall.com (Kris) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:25:01 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Any RECORD_STOP event sample available? References: Message-ID: Here are the start and stop events. Hope it helps. Kris 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:15:47.921875, [INFO], Thread Run 2,END 'E:\LiveMatch\Sounds\en\us\female\SEND_MSG_TO_THIS_PERSON.wav' Digits:1 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:15:48.437500, [INFO], Thread Run 2,vAddFile play_info[0] File: E:\LiveMatch\Sounds\en\us\female\LEAVE_A_MESSAGE_FOR.wav. 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:15:48.437500, [INFO], Thread Run 2,vAddFile play_info[1] File: E:\Tele\A\222\202\6\9\2222026917.2222026917.11.96.vox. 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:15:48.468750, [INFO], Thread Run 2,BEG read(min_d 0 max_d 1 StartIndx:0 LastIndx:1 max_t0 term none intd_t 0) 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:15:51.828125, [INFO], Thread Run 2,END 'E:\LiveMatch\Sounds\en\us\female\LEAVE_A_MESSAGE_FOR.wav&E:\Tele\A\222\202\6\9\2222026917.2222026917.11.96.vox' Digits: 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:15:52.921875, [INFO], Thread Run 2,BEG RecordFile(\\DINGO\E_Drive\tele\M\222\202\6\9\2222026917.2222014124.114.vox,tmoout 900000,sil_thrsh 1000,sil_hits 10) 0, NO UUID, 2011/06/24 00:15:53.000000, [FSEVENT], Thread LiveMatchMaintenanceEvents, RECORD_START fdcec719-e099-4919-a33e-71b75d0f5133 dingo dingo 192.168.1.14 %3A%3A1 2011-06-24%2000%3A15%3A52 Fri,%2024%20Jun%202011%2007%3A15%3A52%20GMT 1308899752937500 switch_ivr_play_say.c switch_ivr_record_file 615 CS_EXECUTE ACTIVE 4 sofia/internal/2014124%40192.168.1.14 bd16c590-d3e5-4cc8-b551-5e6a7242c38f inbound inbound 2014124%40192.168.1.14 answered L16 8000 128000 PCMU 8000 64000 inbound 2014124 XML LaptopXL 2014124 192.168.1.9 2014124 livematch bd16c590-d3e5-4cc8-b551-5e6a7242c38f mod_sofia default sofia/internal/2014124%40192.168.1.14 1 1308899717078125 1308899717078125 1308899717125000 0 0 0 0 true false false inbound bd16c590-d3e5-4cc8-b551-5e6a7242c38f 192.168.1.14 192.168.1.9 59765 192.168.1.9 59765 udp true 2014124 2014124 192.168.1.14 2014124 2014124 192.168.1.14 default 2014124 local 2014124 2014124 FreeSWITCH 0000000000 2014124 2014124%40192.168.1.14 192.168.1.14 2014124 internal SIP/2.0/UDP%20192.168.1.9%3A59765%3Bbranch%3Dz9hG4bK-d8754z-4bde784ddbe2a67b-1---d8754z-%3Brport%3D59765 livematch livematch%40192.168.1.14 192.168.1.14 livematch livematch%40192.168.1.14 192.168.1.14 2014124 59765 2014124%40192.168.1.9%3A59765 192.168.1.9 sofia/internal/2014124%40192.168.1.14 X-Lite%204%20release%204.0%20stamp%2058832 192.168.1.9 59765 59765 70 2014124%40192.168.1.14 v%3D0%0D%0Ao%3D-%2012953373323111530%201%20IN%20IP4%20192.168.1.9%0D%0As%3DCounterPath%20X-Lite%204.0%0D%0Ac%3DIN%20IP4%20192.168.1.9%0D%0At%3D0%200%0D%0Am%3Daudio%2064060%20RTP/AVP%20107%200%208%203%20101%0D%0Aa%3Drtpmap%3A107%20BV32/16000%0D%0Aa%3Drtpmap%3A101%20telephone-event/8000%0D%0Aa%3Dfmtp%3A101%200-15%0D%0A 0 PCMU 8000 20 PCMU 8000 flite kal LiveMatchApp%20web_conference_menu managed 2 v%3D0%0Ao%3DFreeSWITCH%201308874795%201308874796%20IN%20IP4%20192.168.1.14%0As%3DFreeSWITCH%0Ac%3DIN%20IP4%20192.168.1.14%0At%3D0%200%0Am%3Daudio%2024922%20RTP/AVP%200%20101%0Aa%3Drtpmap%3A0%20PCMU/8000%0Aa%3Drtpmap%3A101%20telephone-event/8000%0Aa%3Dfmtp%3A101%200-16%0Aa%3DsilenceSupp%3Aoff%20-%20-%20-%20-%0Aa%3Dptime%3A20%0Aa%3Dsendrecv%0A 192.168.1.14 24922 0 1294177623 192.168.1.9 64060 ANSWER 918XvDZ82QZFK bf5785fd 3 MmM0OWIzNWNkYmY4MWZhMTk4NTQ1Zjg0NTU5NGIzMTU. LaptopXL %22LaptopXL%22%20%3Csip%3A2014124%40192.168.1.14%3E%3Btag%3Dbf5785fd livematch %22livematch%22%20%3Csip%3Alivematch%40192.168.1.14%3E%3Btag%3D918XvDZ82QZFK 06/24/2011%2007%3A15%3A17.843 2222014124 %5C%5CDINGO%5CE_Drive%5Ctele%5CCDR%5C222%5C201%5C4%5C1%5C %26 250 failure 8000 0 900 7200 L16 8000 %5C%5CDINGO%5CE_Drive%5Ctele%5CM%5C222%5C202%5C6%5C9%5C2222026917.2222014124.114.vox 2,bd16c590-d3e5-4cc8-b551-5e6a7242c38f, 2011/06/24 00:15:53.031250, [INFO], Thread LiveMatchMaintenanceEvents,Started Record . 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:16:02.921875, [INFO], Thread Run 2,END RecordFile(\\DINGO\E_Drive\tele\M\222\202\6\9\2222026917.2222014124.114.vox)result:0 Digits: 0, NO UUID, 2011/06/24 00:16:03.000000, [FSEVENT], Thread LiveMatchMaintenanceEvents, RECORD_STOP fdcec719-e099-4919-a33e-71b75d0f5133 dingo dingo 192.168.1.14 %3A%3A1 2011-06-24%2000%3A16%3A02 Fri,%2024%20Jun%202011%2007%3A16%3A02%20GMT 1308899762921875 switch_ivr_play_say.c switch_ivr_record_file 767 CS_EXECUTE ACTIVE 4 sofia/internal/2014124%40192.168.1.14 bd16c590-d3e5-4cc8-b551-5e6a7242c38f inbound inbound 2014124%40192.168.1.14 answered L16 8000 128000 PCMU 8000 64000 inbound 2014124 XML LaptopXL 2014124 192.168.1.9 2014124 livematch bd16c590-d3e5-4cc8-b551-5e6a7242c38f mod_sofia default sofia/internal/2014124%40192.168.1.14 1 1308899717078125 1308899717078125 1308899717125000 0 0 0 0 true false false inbound bd16c590-d3e5-4cc8-b551-5e6a7242c38f 192.168.1.14 192.168.1.9 59765 192.168.1.9 59765 udp true 2014124 2014124 192.168.1.14 2014124 2014124 192.168.1.14 default 2014124 local 2014124 2014124 FreeSWITCH 0000000000 2014124 2014124%40192.168.1.14 192.168.1.14 2014124 internal SIP/2.0/UDP%20192.168.1.9%3A59765%3Bbranch%3Dz9hG4bK-d8754z-4bde784ddbe2a67b-1---d8754z-%3Brport%3D59765 livematch livematch%40192.168.1.14 192.168.1.14 livematch livematch%40192.168.1.14 192.168.1.14 2014124 59765 2014124%40192.168.1.9%3A59765 192.168.1.9 sofia/internal/2014124%40192.168.1.14 X-Lite%204%20release%204.0%20stamp%2058832 192.168.1.9 59765 59765 70 2014124%40192.168.1.14 v%3D0%0D%0Ao%3D-%2012953373323111530%201%20IN%20IP4%20192.168.1.9%0D%0As%3DCounterPath%20X-Lite%204.0%0D%0Ac%3DIN%20IP4%20192.168.1.9%0D%0At%3D0%200%0D%0Am%3Daudio%2064060%20RTP/AVP%20107%200%208%203%20101%0D%0Aa%3Drtpmap%3A107%20BV32/16000%0D%0Aa%3Drtpmap%3A101%20telephone-event/8000%0D%0Aa%3Dfmtp%3A101%200-15%0D%0A 0 PCMU 8000 20 PCMU 8000 flite kal LiveMatchApp%20web_conference_menu managed 2 v%3D0%0Ao%3DFreeSWITCH%201308874795%201308874796%20IN%20IP4%20192.168.1.14%0As%3DFreeSWITCH%0Ac%3DIN%20IP4%20192.168.1.14%0At%3D0%200%0Am%3Daudio%2024922%20RTP/AVP%200%20101%0Aa%3Drtpmap%3A0%20PCMU/8000%0Aa%3Drtpmap%3A101%20telephone-event/8000%0Aa%3Dfmtp%3A101%200-16%0Aa%3DsilenceSupp%3Aoff%20-%20-%20-%20-%0Aa%3Dptime%3A20%0Aa%3Dsendrecv%0A 192.168.1.14 24922 0 1294177623 192.168.1.9 64060 ANSWER 918XvDZ82QZFK bf5785fd 3 MmM0OWIzNWNkYmY4MWZhMTk4NTQ1Zjg0NTU5NGIzMTU. LaptopXL %22LaptopXL%22%20%3Csip%3A2014124%40192.168.1.14%3E%3Btag%3Dbf5785fd livematch %22livematch%22%20%3Csip%3Alivematch%40192.168.1.14%3E%3Btag%3D918XvDZ82QZFK 06/24/2011%2007%3A15%3A17.843 2222014124 %5C%5CDINGO%5CE_Drive%5Ctele%5CCDR%5C222%5C201%5C4%5C1%5C %26 250 failure 8000 0 900 7200 L16 8000 11 11448 91584 %5C%5CDINGO%5CE_Drive%5Ctele%5CM%5C222%5C202%5C6%5C9%5C2222026917.2222014124.114.vox 2,bd16c590-d3e5-4cc8-b551-5e6a7242c38f, 2011/06/24 00:16:03.000000, [INFO], Thread LiveMatchMaintenanceEvents,Stopped Record . 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:16:03.468750, [INFO], Thread Run 2,ttsAddText play_info[0] "To send press 1, to re-play press 2, to re-record, press 3, To cancel press 7..". 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:16:03.500000, [INFO], Thread Run 2,BEG read(min_d 0 max_d 1 StartIndx:0 LastIndx:0 max_t5000 term none intd_t 5000) 0, NO UUID, 2011/06/24 00:16:06.218750, [FSEVENT], Thread LiveMatchMaintenanceEvents, HEARTBEAT fdcec719-e099-4919-a33e-71b75d0f5133 dingo dingo 192.168.1.14 %3A%3A1 2011-06-24%2000%3A16%3A06 Fri,%2024%20Jun%202011%2007%3A16%3A06%20GMT 1308899766218750 switch_core.c send_heartbeat 65 System%20Ready 0%20years,%200%20days,%200%20hours,%204%20minutes,%2040%20seconds,%20640%20milliseconds,%20625%20microseconds 2 30 3 100.000000 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:16:16.140625, [INFO], Thread Run 2,END 'say:flite:kal:To send press 1, to re-play press 2, to re-record, press 3, To cancel press 7..' Digits: 2,BD16C590-D3E5-4CC8-B551-5E6A7242C38F, 2011/06/24 00:16:16.265625, [INFO], Thread Run 2,New message added. Receiver:2222026917 CallerExt: 2222014124 CallerANI: //capturing the events and doing something case "RECORD_START": if (LoadingNewDLL) break; BaseLog.WriteLine(BaseLogLevel.Info, CallID, SessionUUID, Actions.RECORDING, TerminationReasons.NONE, "Started Record ."); break; case "RECORD_STOP": if (LoadingNewDLL) //allow anything to be processed in the just loaded DLL to avoid conflicts break; BaseLog.WriteLine(BaseLogLevel.Info, CallID, SessionUUID, Actions.RECORDING, TerminationReasons.END_OF_RECORD, "Stopped Record ."); break; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frankie Yiu" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 7:35 PM Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Any RECORD_STOP event sample available? > Hi there, > > Could someone please point me where I can find a sample of the RECORD_STOP > event look like? > I look at this page but it does not have any information about it. ( > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Event_list#RECORD_STOP) > > Thanks, > Frankie > From mail at jankubr.com Fri Jun 24 13:55:53 2011 From: mail at jankubr.com (Jan Kubr) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:55:53 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Loading Pocketsphinx In-Reply-To: <3277E95E06DC465F885DD89B0FFB7355@dell9400> References: <3277E95E06DC465F885DD89B0FFB7355@dell9400> Message-ID: This is how I got pocketsphinx working on an Ubuntu box: Downloaded latest SVN snapshots of sphinxbase and pocketsphinx from http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/wiki/download/ to the libs directory of the FreeSWITCH source. Unpacked the files and named the directories pocketsphinx-0.7 and sphinxbase-0.7. Run ./autogen.sh in sphinxbase-0.7 Run make mod_pocketsphinx in the root directory of the source Run ./authogen.sh in pocketsphinx-0.7 Run make mod_pocketsphinx in the root directory of the source cp libs/sphinxbase-0.7/src/libsphinxad/.libs/libsphinxad.so* /usr/local/freeswitch/lib/ cp libs/sphinxbase-0.7/src/libsphinxbase/.libs/libsphinxbase.so* /usr/local/freeswitch/lib/ Run make mod_pocketsphinx-install in the root directory of the source Hope this helps. Jan Kubr On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Jan Berger wrote: > You can also use pocketsphinx through uniMRCP according to their website. > I have not tried it myself yet but I will a bit later.**** > > ** ** > > Jan**** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Bryan Lemon > *Sent:* 19. juni 2011 22:47 > *To:* freeswitch-users > *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Loading Pocketsphinx**** > > ** ** > > Whenever I try to load the pocketsphinx module, either on startup, or with > the load mod_pocketsphinx command, I get the following error:**** > > freeswitch at bryanlemon-laptop> load mod_pocketsphinx**** > > 2011-06-19 15:17:04.471275 [INFO] mod_enum.c:775 ENUM Reloaded**** > > 2011-06-19 15:17:04.471275 [INFO] switch_time.c:1020 Timezone reloaded 530 > definitions**** > > ** ** > > +OK Reloading XML**** > > -ERR [module load file routine returned an error]**** > > ** ** > > 2011-06-19 15:17:04.471275 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:928 Error > Loading module /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so**** > > **/usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_pocketsphinx.so: undefined symbol: > feat_init****** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > I am running Ubuntu 10.04, and installed freeswitch using the git method. I > tried a git pull && make current, and it runs through with no problem. *** > * > > ** ** > > Any Ideas? > > Thank you, > Bryan Lemon**** > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/fae1639e/attachment.html From Suneel.Papineni at mettoni.com Fri Jun 24 15:46:09 2011 From: Suneel.Papineni at mettoni.com (Suneel Papineni) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:46:09 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Issue with format value 19 in SDP Message-ID: <3181A30B8C35AB4AA8577B78DDF461380831F32F@nickel.mettonigroup.com> Hi, I am facing an issue with SDP. FS is getting an INVITE with media parameters in SDP as "m=image 23456 udptl t38". For this FS is responding with "m=image 0 udptl 19" in its 183 response. This is correct as per RFC's. Unfortunately my ITSP is expecting the same format what it is sent (i.e. t38 instead of 19). Is there any way in Freeswitch I can specify to the send same format values in response. I tried to look into the code, it is mentioned that 19 is used as it is not used by anybody it is used. (sdp_print.c in libsofia_sip_ua_static project). Could someone please help me how to send all format values that were send in INVITE. Of course according to SDP standards it is enough to send one value. I want to know how to send at least one value which is same as sent in INVITE. Thanks & Regards Suneel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/c4d2d563/attachment.html From kris at kriskinc.com Fri Jun 24 17:57:43 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <3DF51B5A-A97F-42AE-9C31-90D132B4F066@gmail.com> References: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> <1769702213133480228@unknownmsgid> <3DF51B5A-A97F-42AE-9C31-90D132B4F066@gmail.com> Message-ID: "voip requires less knowledge" These kinds of statements only serve to fracture telephony/communications communities even more (at a time when "unified communications" have been the buzzword for a decade). I take it you've never spent time developing high scale, high availability "voip" systems. Built SS7/SIP internetworking gateways? SIP-I? SIP-T? Debugged ridiculous SIP/SDP/RTP interop issues between the thousands of endpoints, networks, and configurations available in the field? TLS? SRTP? IPV6? Complex codecs operating at multiple sample rates and ptimes, complete with adaptive jitter buffers and forward error correction? I could go on, and on, and on and of course most of us also have to deal with the 8k TDM PSTN (including SS7, IMTs, various DBs, regulatory stuff, etc, etc). Saying "voip requires less knowledge" does nothing more than show how little you know about it. Voip does not require less knowledge - it requires /different/ knowledge. At this point I couldn't patch a 25 pair cable if my life depended on it, that requires expertise different from my own. If you want to talk about any of the technologies above I'd probably be able to contribute quite a bit to the conversation :). On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Robert-iPhone wrote: > it wasnt intended as insult - just humorous how voip requires less knowledge > > Sent from my iPhone -- Kristian Kielhofner From bmoore at statirasystems.com Fri Jun 24 19:24:24 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E04AC28.5050402@statirasystems.com> LOL I know it is not difficult. The change I had an issue storing was the expire seconds. It actually stayed on the fifth try. Not sure why it would not but it is there. Actually authentication was not the issue after all. Junction sends the number with a one so I had to add it to the Number setting. Also I had the context setting on the number wrong. It kept trying to send it out the second it came in. My concerns about the project were not about the activity of the project. It was about it's attention to the users. I tried the documentation, which is better then a lot of projects I have looked at, and it failed me. It is only about each specific thing and yet it is not that specific. To someone well versed in freeswitch, they could connect the dots, my green self could not. Also that comments I made were because I had attempted assistance via 2600hz IRC and forum. As you can see I ended up here. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 09:13 PM, Darren Schreiber wrote: > Hi William, > Sorry to hear that ? what exactly makes you think this? We're very > active on the blue.box front. There have been 3 new features and over > 20 bug fixes in just the past four weeks. Can you email me off-list to > get whatever issue you're having sorted out? > > Also, for authentication, bluebox "replaces" your changes because > you're supposed to use the GUI to change that option. Go into > Connectivity / SIP Interfaces and edit the SIP port you're trying to > change. Uncheck the mark named "Require Authentication". It's not very > difficult? > > - Darren > > -- > > > From: William Moore > > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > " > > > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:55:15 -0700 > To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > " > > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue > > I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. > Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human > by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >> In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: >> >> >> >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service ClientIPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> >> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >> / >> / >> >> >> >> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : >> >>> The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they >>> won't. >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service ClientIPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> >>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >>> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >>> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >>> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>> / >>> / >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>> >>>> Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: >>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITEsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>>> 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>> 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>> 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACKsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>> 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTERsip:jnctn.net;transport=udp >>>> 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) >>>> >>>> The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. >>>> William J. MooreStatira Systems >>>> 611 Caroline St >>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>> >>>> On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I >>>>> reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it >>>>> have to be in that one? >>>>> William J. Moore >>>>> Statira Systems >>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>> >>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>> correction: missed a line. >>>>>> >>>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE >>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with >>>>>> session description >>>>>> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >>>>>> Authentication Required >>>>>> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>> >>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>> I get this with wireshark >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >>>>>>> Authentication Required >>>>>>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>>>>>>> tshark port 5080 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register >>>>>>>> expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you >>>>>>>> add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>>>>>> unregister the gateway >>>>>>>> register it again >>>>>>>> make an inbound call right away >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>>>>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>>>>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout >>>>>>>> message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message >>>>>>>> s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >>>>>>>> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement >>>>>>>> et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box >>>>>>>>> makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the >>>>>>>>> xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however >>>>>>>>> that defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up >>>>>>>>> in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my >>>>>>>>> server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings >>>>>>>>> for incoming correct. >>>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>>> William, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, >>>>>>>>>> they don't expect E164: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Numbering* >>>>>>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU ) >>>>>>>>>> is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed >>>>>>>>>> with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels >>>>>>>>>> et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. >>>>>>>>>> Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. >>>>>>>>>> Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>>>>>>>>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous >>>>>>>>>> n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire >>>>>>>>>> imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 >>>>>>>>>>> format? >>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West >>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough >>>>>>>>>>> digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> /b >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an >>>>>>>>>>>> invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In >>>>>>>>>>>>> any case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be >>>>>>>>>>>>> going out... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com >>>>>>>>>>> 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/4c990796/attachment-0001.html From mehmasarja at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 19:41:07 2011 From: mehmasarja at gmail.com (Mehma Sarja) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:41:07 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <4E043741.8090204@puzzled.xs4all.nl> References: <32B9468B-3402-4056-A18D-D4A01626A87A@gmail.com> <4E043741.8090204@puzzled.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <4E04B013.4010608@gmail.com> On 6/24/11 12:05 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: > > B8ZS line encoding. Iirc a funky version of AMI because the US suffered > from not-invented-here syndrom so they came up with a tweaked version of > AMI called Bipolar-8-0-substition. Nuf said :) Brings back memories of > long nights troubleshooting international circuits with BERT testers and > hopping on planes to follow the nodes so we could finally pinpoint which > carrier was lying about nothing being wrong with their stretch. > erimental DWDM and SDH gear that we got to play with. > > "If we build it they will come" - wonder if we will ever see those days > again. Very interesting window into history. Mehma From bmoore at statirasystems.com Fri Jun 24 19:41:45 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E04B039.6020706@statirasystems.com> Thanks for responding. I just stayed up all night learning all I could about both freeswitch and blue.box. I had a client pushing me so I was a little frustrated with it. I usually troll and learn it on my own via the code, documentation, bug lists, and so on. I was looking for a more immediate response than normal. I do appreciate the project and all the work put forward by you and your team. The only other software I had as much trouble learning was when I switched to Gentoo and found out how little I knew about linux. You will hear from me again. Hopefully via contributions. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 10:05 PM, Darren Schreiber wrote: > OK, well again, I'm happy to help, as is my team and as are the > open-source folks. Sometimes we do get busy, so please just ping me, > but the logs pasted by William indicate he doesn't know how to setup > the authentication for his carriers/phones and since there's 82 > different ways to do that, I'd need to know more info. > > Hence the request to email off list, unless he wants to post his auth > strategy and IPs publicly :) > > -- > > > From: David Ponzone > > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > " > > > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:56:04 -0700 > To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > " > > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue > > No Darren, sorry, I confused FreePBX and FusionPBX. > > My bad. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > / > / > > > > Le 24/06/2011 ? 03:14, Darren Schreiber a ?crit : > >> David, >> FreePBX v3 is now called blue.box. You're not making any sense? Is >> this an attempt at creating FUD? >> >> - Darren >> >> -- >> >> >> From: David Ponzone > > >> Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> " >> > > >> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:59:16 -0700 >> To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> " >> > > >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue >> >> I had the same feeling about blue.box. >> I think there are more interesting GUIs out there, like FreePBX V3. >> The weird thing is that none of them seems very active. >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service ClientIPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> >> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >> / >> / >> >> >> >> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:55, William Moore a ?crit : >> >>> I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other >>> projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like >>> describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. >>> Peace out. >>> William J. Moore >>> Statira Systems >>> 611 Caroline St >>> Fredericksburg, VA >>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>> >>> On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>> In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>> >>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>> >>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline >>>> toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, >>>> d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, >>>> merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>> / >>>> / >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they >>>>> won't. >>>>> >>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>> >>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>> >>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>>>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline >>>>> toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, >>>>> d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >>>>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >>>>> l'exp?diteur./ >>>>> / >>>>> / >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: >>>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITEsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>>>>> 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>> 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>>>> 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACKsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>> 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTERsip:jnctn.net;transport=udp >>>>>> 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) >>>>>> >>>>>> The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. >>>>>> William J. MooreStatira Systems >>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I >>>>>>> reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it >>>>>>> have to be in that one? >>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>>> correction: missed a line. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: >>>>>>>> INVITE >>>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, >>>>>>>> with session description >>>>>>>> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>>> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy >>>>>>>> Authentication Required >>>>>>>> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>>>> I get this with wireshark >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>>>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 >>>>>>>>> Proxy Authentication Required >>>>>>>>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: >>>>>>>>>> tshark port 5080 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register >>>>>>>>>> expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you >>>>>>>>>> add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>>>>>>>> unregister the gateway >>>>>>>>>> register it again >>>>>>>>>> make an inbound call right away >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels >>>>>>>>>> et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. >>>>>>>>>> Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. >>>>>>>>>> Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>>>>>>>>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous >>>>>>>>>> n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire >>>>>>>>>> imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box >>>>>>>>>>> makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage >>>>>>>>>>> the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file >>>>>>>>>>> however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up >>>>>>>>>>> in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my >>>>>>>>>>> server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the >>>>>>>>>>> settings for incoming correct. >>>>>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> William, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, >>>>>>>>>>>> they don't expect E164: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Numbering* >>>>>>>>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU >>>>>>>>>>>> ) is used. North American numbers are >>>>>>>>>>>> required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers >>>>>>>>>>>> need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels >>>>>>>>>>>> et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. >>>>>>>>>>>> Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. >>>>>>>>>>>> Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>>>>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>>>>>>>>>>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous >>>>>>>>>>>> n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire >>>>>>>>>>>> imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 >>>>>>>>>>>>> format? >>>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West >>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough >>>>>>>>>>>>>> digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> /b >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going out... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/4582090d/attachment-0001.html From bmoore at statirasystems.com Fri Jun 24 19:52:39 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E04B039.6020706@statirasystems.com> References: <4E04B039.6020706@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <4E04B2C7.7060906@statirasystems.com> And yes I got it all working via wireshark and sofia siptrace. Primary issue for incoming was a 1 at the beginning of the number and the loop you mentioned. As you probably saw there were a few other errors in the settings. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/24/2011 11:41 AM, William Moore wrote: > Thanks for responding. I just stayed up all night learning all I could > about both freeswitch and blue.box. I had a client pushing me so I was > a little frustrated with it. I usually troll and learn it on my own > via the code, documentation, bug lists, and so on. I was looking for a > more immediate response than normal. > > I do appreciate the project and all the work put forward by you and > your team. > > The only other software I had as much trouble learning was when I > switched to Gentoo and found out how little I knew about linux. > > You will hear from me again. Hopefully via contributions. > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > On 06/23/2011 10:05 PM, Darren Schreiber wrote: >> OK, well again, I'm happy to help, as is my team and as are the >> open-source folks. Sometimes we do get busy, so please just ping me, >> but the logs pasted by William indicate he doesn't know how to setup >> the authentication for his carriers/phones and since there's 82 >> different ways to do that, I'd need to know more info. >> >> Hence the request to email off list, unless he wants to post his auth >> strategy and IPs publicly :) >> >> -- >> >> >> From: David Ponzone > > >> Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> " >> > > >> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:56:04 -0700 >> To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> " >> > > >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue >> >> No Darren, sorry, I confused FreePBX and FusionPBX. >> >> My bad. >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service ClientIPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> >> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >> / >> / >> >> >> >> Le 24/06/2011 ? 03:14, Darren Schreiber a ?crit : >> >>> David, >>> FreePBX v3 is now called blue.box. You're not making any sense? Is >>> this an attempt at creating FUD? >>> >>> - Darren >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> From: David Ponzone >> > >>> Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> " >>> >> > >>> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:59:16 -0700 >>> To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> " >>> >> > >>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue >>> >>> I had the same feeling about blue.box. >>> I think there are more interesting GUIs out there, like FreePBX V3. >>> The weird thing is that none of them seems very active. >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service ClientIPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> >>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >>> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou >>> falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le >>> d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>> / >>> / >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:55, William Moore a ?crit : >>> >>>> I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other >>>> projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like >>>> describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. >>>> Peace out. >>>> William J. Moore >>>> Statira Systems >>>> 611 Caroline St >>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>> >>>> On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>> In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>> >>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>> >>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message >>>>> ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline >>>>> toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, >>>>> d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >>>>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >>>>> l'exp?diteur./ >>>>> / >>>>> / >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but >>>>>> they won't. >>>>>> >>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>> >>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>> >>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et >>>>>> ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute >>>>>> utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout >>>>>> message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message >>>>>> s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas >>>>>> destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et >>>>>> d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>> / >>>>>> / >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: >>>>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITEsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description >>>>>>> 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>> 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required >>>>>>> 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACKsip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>> 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTERsip:jnctn.net;transport=udp >>>>>>> 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. >>>>>>> William J. MooreStatira Systems >>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>>> When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I >>>>>>>> reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it >>>>>>>> have to be in that one? >>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>>>> correction: missed a line. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: >>>>>>>>> INVITE >>>>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, >>>>>>>>> with session description >>>>>>>>> 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>>>> 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 >>>>>>>>> Proxy Authentication Required >>>>>>>>> 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I get this with wireshark >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying >>>>>>>>>> 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 >>>>>>>>>> Proxy Authentication Required >>>>>>>>>> 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK >>>>>>>>>> sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am looking for the expiration now.. >>>>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, >>>>>>>>>>> tshark: >>>>>>>>>>> tshark port 5080 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You will then see if you receive it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register >>>>>>>>>>> expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend >>>>>>>>>>> you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: >>>>>>>>>>> unregister the gateway >>>>>>>>>>> register it again >>>>>>>>>>> make an inbound call right away >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels >>>>>>>>>>> et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. >>>>>>>>>>> Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. >>>>>>>>>>> Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. >>>>>>>>>>> /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >>>>>>>>>>> message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous >>>>>>>>>>> n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire >>>>>>>>>>> imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box >>>>>>>>>>>> makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage >>>>>>>>>>>> the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file >>>>>>>>>>>> however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing >>>>>>>>>>>> up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my >>>>>>>>>>>> server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the >>>>>>>>>>>> settings for incoming correct. >>>>>>>>>>>> William J. Moore >>>>>>>>>>>> Statira Systems >>>>>>>>>>>> 611 Caroline St >>>>>>>>>>>> Fredericksburg, VA >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.statirasystems.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> William, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, >>>>>>>>>>>>> they don't expect E164: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Numbering* >>>>>>>>>>>>> The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU >>>>>>>>>>>>> ) is used. North American numbers are >>>>>>>>>>>>> required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers >>>>>>>>>>>>> need to be prefixed with "011". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think they are confused about what is E164.... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>>>>>>>>>>>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>>>>>>>>>>>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>>>>>>>>>>>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Service ClientIPeva >>>>>>>>>>>>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>>>>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva.fr - >>>>>>>>>>>>> www.ipeva-studio.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont >>>>>>>>>>>>> confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses >>>>>>>>>>>>> destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non >>>>>>>>>>>>> autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est >>>>>>>>>>>>> susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute >>>>>>>>>>>>> responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, >>>>>>>>>>>>> d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >>>>>>>>>>>>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir >>>>>>>>>>>>> l'exp?diteur./ >>>>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> format? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digits to the gateway usually. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid gateway issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cause this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any case, the OP needs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going out... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/b6d624bd/attachment-0001.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Fri Jun 24 19:57:37 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:57:37 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use session:playAndGetDigits with the "say" command in lua script? In-Reply-To: References: <4E02484F.90907@499x.com> <4E025B13.90701@499x.com> <4E02681A.2070703@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E04B3F1.7020201@499x.com> Thanks!... I took a look, and got one working like this: but when it got to the speak-text function, it gave this error: 2011-06-24 10:54:40.684627 [ERR] switch_core_speech.c:61 Invalid speech module [cepstral]! 2011-06-24 10:54:40.684627 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:2377 Invalid TTS module! I have the flite engine active, so how do I configure speak-text to try using the flite engine instead of cepstral? On 6/22/2011 6:42 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Have you researched the subject of "phrase macros"? That may be your > golden ticket. If you have the FS book then look at the latter half of > ch 6. Otherwise check out these resources: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_phrase > conf/lang/en/vm/sounds.xml > conf/lang/en/vm/tts.xml > > The voicemail system uses phrase macros a ton, and effectively, I > might add. In short, phrase macros let you piece together sound > prompts, calls to the say app, calls to the speak app, calls to the > sleep app, etc. I think you would be most interested in the > "speak-text" action. > > -MC > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Wes > wrote: > > or maybe we just need a new version of this method called > "speakAndGetDigits" that specifically takes a couple of string > parameters for the words to speak, instead of taking the location > of the wav files... > > > On 6/22/2011 4:13 PM, Wes wrote: >> Sorry, I was thrown off by the dialplan example... I'm trying to >> use speak... I changed my example to try the speak command and I >> still have the same issue with the quotes. >> >> Is it possible to send in a "speak" phrase as the phrase to use >> in the PAGD command? Or do I have to record a wav file and pass >> the name of the wave file in for that parameter? >> >> On 6/22/2011 3:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>> Can you confirm: are you trying to use TTS or the say engine? >>> These are two completely different subjects. If you want to use >>> TTS then you need the "speak" app, not the "say" app: >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_speak >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Wes >> > wrote: >>> >>> I'm trying to convert an example from a dialplan: >>> >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits#Examples >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> into a lua statement like this: >>> >>> digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 1, 3000, "#", >>> "say:'press one for technicial support' >>> ", "say:'invalid entry'", "\\d+") >>> >>> but I'm having trouble with the quoting. The log says: >>> >>> 2011-06-22 14:40:52.614654 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1144 >>> Invalid Args >>> >>> I can't find any lua examples that use both playAndGetDigits >>> and "say" >>> >>> any suggestions? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/3dfcabd2/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 20:02:58 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:02:58 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use session:playAndGetDigits with the "say" command in lua script? In-Reply-To: <4E04B3F1.7020201@499x.com> References: <4E02484F.90907@499x.com> <4E025B13.90701@499x.com> <4E02681A.2070703@499x.com> <4E04B3F1.7020201@499x.com> Message-ID: Go look in conf/lang/en/en.xml. Near the top of that file is a place to specify the default TTS engine and TTS voice for your language. Try setting those to "flite" and "kal" or whatever voice you are using. -MC On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Wes wrote: > ** > Thanks!... I took a look, and got one working like this: > > > > > > data="voicemail/vm-press.wav"/> > method="pronounced" type="items"/> > data="voicemail/vm-continue.wav"/> > > > > > > > but when it got to the speak-text function, it gave this error: > > 2011-06-24 10:54:40.684627 [ERR] switch_core_speech.c:61 Invalid speech > module [cepstral]! > 2011-06-24 10:54:40.684627 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:2377 Invalid TTS > module! > > I have the flite engine active, so how do I configure speak-text to try > using the flite engine instead of cepstral? > > > > On 6/22/2011 6:42 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > Have you researched the subject of "phrase macros"? That may be your golden > ticket. If you have the FS book then look at the latter half of ch 6. > Otherwise check out these resources: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_phrase > conf/lang/en/vm/sounds.xml > conf/lang/en/vm/tts.xml > > The voicemail system uses phrase macros a ton, and effectively, I might > add. In short, phrase macros let you piece together sound prompts, calls to > the say app, calls to the speak app, calls to the sleep app, etc. I think > you would be most interested in the "speak-text" action. > > -MC > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Wes wrote: > >> or maybe we just need a new version of this method called >> "speakAndGetDigits" that specifically takes a couple of string parameters >> for the words to speak, instead of taking the location of the wav files... >> >> >> On 6/22/2011 4:13 PM, Wes wrote: >> >> Sorry, I was thrown off by the dialplan example... I'm trying to use >> speak... I changed my example to try the speak command and I still have the >> same issue with the quotes. >> >> Is it possible to send in a "speak" phrase as the phrase to use in the >> PAGD command? Or do I have to record a wav file and pass the name of the >> wave file in for that parameter? >> >> On 6/22/2011 3:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >> Can you confirm: are you trying to use TTS or the say engine? These are >> two completely different subjects. If you want to use TTS then you need the >> "speak" app, not the "say" app: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_speak >> >> -MC >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Wes wrote: >> >>> I'm trying to convert an example from a dialplan: >>> >>> >>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits#Examples >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> into a lua statement like this: >>> >>> digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 1, 3000, "#", "say:'press one >>> for technicial support' >>> ", "say:'invalid entry'", "\\d+") >>> >>> but I'm having trouble with the quoting. The log says: >>> >>> 2011-06-22 14:40:52.614654 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1144 Invalid Args >>> >>> I can't find any lua examples that use both playAndGetDigits and "say" >>> >>> any suggestions? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/6ef2907f/attachment-0001.html From philippe at ppmt.org Fri Jun 24 20:22:28 2011 From: philippe at ppmt.org (Philippe Le Toquin) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org In-Reply-To: References: <1308751418.2780.11.camel@DELL> Message-ID: <4E04B9C4.6070804@ppmt.org> I think what he meant is that when you send an email to the list you don't receive a copy of it from the mailing list It is like that for me at least. I know other receive them as they get answered but it can be confusing I probably won't see this actually :) On 11-06-24 02:48 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > I'm seeing quite a few: > > * [Freeswitch-users] One way audio with Localphone .com > > /Henk Oegema / > * [Freeswitch-users] One way audio with Localphone .com > > /Henk Oegema / > * [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge > > /Henk Oegema / > * [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] > > /Henk Oegema / > * [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Asterisk as gateway for FS] > > /Henk Oegema / > * [Freeswitch-users] No more sessions allowed at this time. > > /Henk Oegema / > * [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working > > /Henk Oegema / > * [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working > > /Henk Oegema / > * [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > /Henk Oegema / > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Henk Oegema > wrote: > > How come I don't see my mails in the FreeSWITCH-Users Archives? > > > Rgds. > Henk > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/0872f8d6/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0x1A0BDC2B.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 1691 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/0872f8d6/attachment.bin From msc at freeswitch.org Fri Jun 24 21:13:54 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:13:54 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org In-Reply-To: <4E04B9C4.6070804@ppmt.org> References: <1308751418.2780.11.camel@DELL> <4E04B9C4.6070804@ppmt.org> Message-ID: Yes, I don't see my own transmissions show up in my inbox, but I'm pretty sure that's by design. -MC On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Philippe Le Toquin wrote: > ** > I think what he meant is that when you send an email to the list you don't > receive a copy of it > from the mailing list > > It is like that for me at least. I know other receive them as they get > answered but it can be confusing > > I probably won't see this actually :) > > > On 11-06-24 02:48 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > > I'm seeing quite a few: > > > - [Freeswitch-users] One way audio with Localphone .com > > *Henk Oegema * > - [Freeswitch-users] One way audio with Localphone .com > > *Henk Oegema * > - [Freeswitch-users] Warning - SIP auth challenge > > *Henk Oegema * > - [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Re: Warning - SIP auth challenge] > > *Henk Oegema * > - [Freeswitch-users] [Fwd: Asterisk as gateway for FS] > > *Henk Oegema * > - [Freeswitch-users] No more sessions allowed at this time. > > *Henk Oegema * > - [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working > > *Henk Oegema * > - [Freeswitch-users] Call internal, otherwise mobile, not working > > *Henk Oegema * > - [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > *Henk Oegema * > > -MC > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Henk Oegema wrote: > >> How come I don't see my mails in the FreeSWITCH-Users Archives? >> >> >> Rgds. >> Henk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/195bb298/attachment.html From vaad.fabi at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 22:15:35 2011 From: vaad.fabi at gmail.com (vaad.fabi at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:15:35 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API In-Reply-To: References: <801B6B74CA73484F96B9BBD9BE125561@e1705> <4E03603B.6020405@livecall.com> Message-ID: <4E04D447.5010804@gmail.com> +1 On 06/23/2011 08:41 PM, Philippe Sultan wrote: > I'm very interested too. We have a Red5 server here and some AS3 audio > apps we'd love to test with mod_rtmp. > > Thanks, > > Philippe > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Anthony Minessale > wrote: >> lets open a new feature JIRA on it and assemble a list of participants >> and we'll discuss it at next Wednesday public meeting, this thread and >> IRC. >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jack wrote: >>> I am interested.... It looks like a clean, simple way to connect to >>> Freeswitch. >>> Nice Job! >>> Jack >>> >>> On 6/22/2011 9:19 AM, Anthony Minessale wrote: >>>> Actually...... >>>> >>>> We have something we are working on that we are considering releasing >>>> if we can build a community base effort around it. >>>> When I get a sign of enough interest we'll go from there. >>>> >>>> It would be nice to do some presentations at ClueCon about it. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Madovsky wrote: >>>>> if I type "actionscript mod_rtmp freeswitch" on google >>>>> nothing that helps a common developer to work on mod_rtmp >>>>> .... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: Madovsky >>>>> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:20 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >>>>> Mike, >>>>> >>>>> I didn't ask tools, but to know at least which function it needs to call to >>>>> the server >>>>> to make it work ! :) >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: Michael Collins >>>>> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:11 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_rtmp client API >>>>> No, it's a DIY project. We provided the server, you provide the client. :D >>>>> Google around and you will find various tools and pieces to start building >>>>> your own. >>>>> -MC >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Madovsky wrote: >>>>>> Is there any client side API to use mod_rtmp ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> -- >> Anthony Minessale II >> >> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire >> >> AIM: anthm >> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com >> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com >> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >> >> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> pstn:+19193869900 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > -- Vadim F. From wes-fs at 499x.com Fri Jun 24 23:39:00 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to use session:playAndGetDigits with the "say" command in lua script? In-Reply-To: References: <4E02484F.90907@499x.com> <4E025B13.90701@499x.com> <4E02681A.2070703@499x.com> <4E04B3F1.7020201@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E04E7D4.4090004@499x.com> worked great, thank you On 6/24/2011 11:02 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > Go look in conf/lang/en/en.xml. Near the top of that file is a place > to specify the default TTS engine and TTS voice for your language. Try > setting those to "flite" and "kal" or whatever voice you are using. > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Wes > wrote: > > Thanks!... I took a look, and got one working like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but when it got to the speak-text function, it gave this error: > > 2011-06-24 10:54:40.684627 [ERR] switch_core_speech.c:61 Invalid > speech module [cepstral]! > 2011-06-24 10:54:40.684627 [ERR] switch_ivr_play_say.c:2377 > Invalid TTS module! > > I have the flite engine active, so how do I configure speak-text > to try using the flite engine instead of cepstral? > > > > On 6/22/2011 6:42 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> Have you researched the subject of "phrase macros"? That may be >> your golden ticket. If you have the FS book then look at the >> latter half of ch 6. Otherwise check out these resources: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_phrase >> conf/lang/en/vm/sounds.xml >> conf/lang/en/vm/tts.xml >> >> The voicemail system uses phrase macros a ton, and effectively, I >> might add. In short, phrase macros let you piece together sound >> prompts, calls to the say app, calls to the speak app, calls to >> the sleep app, etc. I think you would be most interested in the >> "speak-text" action. >> >> -MC >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Wes > > wrote: >> >> or maybe we just need a new version of this method called >> "speakAndGetDigits" that specifically takes a couple of >> string parameters for the words to speak, instead of taking >> the location of the wav files... >> >> >> On 6/22/2011 4:13 PM, Wes wrote: >>> Sorry, I was thrown off by the dialplan example... I'm >>> trying to use speak... I changed my example to try the speak >>> command and I still have the same issue with the quotes. >>> >>> Is it possible to send in a "speak" phrase as the phrase to >>> use in the PAGD command? Or do I have to record a wav file >>> and pass the name of the wave file in for that parameter? >>> >>> On 6/22/2011 3:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>> Can you confirm: are you trying to use TTS or the say >>>> engine? These are two completely different subjects. If you >>>> want to use TTS then you need the "speak" app, not the >>>> "say" app: >>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_speak >>>> >>>> -MC >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Wes >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm trying to convert an example from a dialplan: >>>> >>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_play_and_get_digits#Examples >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> expression="^(6500)$"> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> into a lua statement like this: >>>> >>>> digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 1, 3000, "#", >>>> "say:'press one for technicial support' >>>> ", "say:'invalid entry'", "\\d+") >>>> >>>> but I'm having trouble with the quoting. The log says: >>>> >>>> 2011-06-22 14:40:52.614654 [ERR] >>>> switch_ivr_play_say.c:1144 Invalid Args >>>> >>>> I can't find any lua examples that use both >>>> playAndGetDigits and "say" >>>> >>>> any suggestions? >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/7a12b115/attachment-0001.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Fri Jun 24 23:51:03 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to deal with user pressing extra keys? flush_dtmf? session::flushDigits? Message-ID: <4E04EAA7.2050305@499x.com> I'm writing an ivr script in lua, and using playAndGetDigits in a couple different places. Both places just take a single digit to continue on. If the user presses 2 digits, it seems as if the second digit is being queued and it's being processed in the next call to playAndGetDigits. Often the extra digit is invalid, so when it tells the user to press a certain key, it follows immediately with the message "invalid key", due to the extra key being in the "queue"... is this anything I can protect against? I found a flush_dtmf, but it is not very documented: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_flush_dtmf and I also found this: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Session_flushDigits but calling it before and after playAndGetDigits didn't *seem* to help... should it? script here: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16584 From bmoore at statirasystems.com Sat Jun 25 00:00:57 2011 From: bmoore at statirasystems.com (William Moore) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] CRM Integration or Softphone with CRM integration Message-ID: <4E04ECF9.5080709@statirasystems.com> I tried searching through the archives. It turn up nothing. Were can I find information on integrating freeswitch in to SugarCRM? And/Or does anyone know of a soft phone that could help with this? What I am looking for is something that will pop up or give a choice for popping up a SugarCRM account based on the caller ID. Thanks, -- William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 25 00:10:28 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:10:28 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] CRM Integration or Softphone with CRM integration In-Reply-To: <4E04ECF9.5080709@statirasystems.com> References: <4E04ECF9.5080709@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: Excellent question. I'm not familiar with anyone who has done a FS-specific implementation for SugarCRM (or any other CRM). I am interested in knowing more if anyone has built such a solution. That would be a good candidate for the weekly conference calls. Thanks, MC On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:00 PM, William Moore wrote: > I tried searching through the archives. It turn up nothing. > > Were can I find information on integrating freeswitch in to SugarCRM? > And/Or does anyone know of a soft phone that could help with this? > > What I am looking for is something that will pop up or give a choice for > popping up a SugarCRM account based on the caller ID. > > Thanks, > > -- > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/af445368/attachment.html From gmaruzz at gmail.com Sat Jun 25 00:12:42 2011 From: gmaruzz at gmail.com (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:12:42 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] CRM Integration or Softphone with CRM integration In-Reply-To: References: <4E04ECF9.5080709@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: OpenACD ? On 6/24/11, Michael Collins wrote: > Excellent question. I'm not familiar with anyone who has done a FS-specific > implementation for SugarCRM (or any other CRM). I am interested in knowing > more if anyone has built such a solution. That would be a good candidate for > the weekly conference calls. > > Thanks, > MC > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:00 PM, William Moore > wrote: > >> I tried searching through the archives. It turn up nothing. >> >> Were can I find information on integrating freeswitch in to SugarCRM? >> And/Or does anyone know of a soft phone that could help with this? >> >> What I am looking for is something that will pop up or give a choice for >> popping up a SugarCRM account based on the caller ID. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> William J. Moore >> Statira Systems >> 611 Caroline St >> Fredericksburg, VA >> http://www.statirasystems.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > -- Sent from my mobile device Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Sat Jun 25 00:17:14 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to deal with user pressing extra keys? flush_dtmf? session::flushDigits? In-Reply-To: <4E04EAA7.2050305@499x.com> References: <4E04EAA7.2050305@499x.com> Message-ID: session:flushDigits() right before you collect DTMF and you will never get any old dtmf On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Wes wrote: > I'm writing an ivr script in lua, and using playAndGetDigits in a couple > different places. ?Both places just take a single digit to continue on. > If the user presses 2 digits, it seems as if the second digit is being > queued and it's being processed in the next call to playAndGetDigits. > Often the extra digit is invalid, so when it tells the user to press a > certain key, it follows immediately with the message "invalid key", due > to the extra key being in the "queue"... > > is this anything I can protect against? ? I found a flush_dtmf, but it > is not very documented: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_flush_dtmf > > and I also found this: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Session_flushDigits > > but calling it before and after playAndGetDigits didn't *seem* to > help... should it? > > script here: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16584 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Sat Jun 25 00:22:05 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] CRM Integration or Softphone with CRM integration In-Reply-To: <4E04ECF9.5080709@statirasystems.com> References: <4E04ECF9.5080709@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: write an app with libesl to connect to FS and listen for events and generate the os call to open the link or make a web based one with your favorite comet lib and server side ESL On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:00 PM, William Moore wrote: > I tried searching through the archives. It turn up nothing. > > Were can I find information on integrating freeswitch in to SugarCRM? > And/Or does anyone know of a soft phone that could help with this? > > What I am looking for is something that will pop up or give a choice for > popping up a SugarCRM account based on the caller ID. > > Thanks, > > -- > William J. Moore > Statira Systems > 611 Caroline St > Fredericksburg, VA > http://www.statirasystems.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From wes-fs at 499x.com Sat Jun 25 01:06:37 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to deal with user pressing extra keys? flush_dtmf? session::flushDigits? In-Reply-To: References: <4E04EAA7.2050305@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E04FC5D.4010900@499x.com> I put flushDigits right before playAndGetDigits, but it is still queueing up keypresses... if I type more than one key, weird things start happening in my loop. (the one that prompts for 1 - play back recording, 2=submit recording, 3 = rerecord)... sometimes I get the message "invalid response" followed a few seconds by "your recording has been submitted", and I've not typed anything in between. incidentally, if I press a digit while playAndGetDigits is still speaking, it takes a few seconds for it to stop talking and act on the keypress... ... it just doesn't seem very responsive.... which is why I'm testing extra keypresses... because if users don't immediately get a response, they tend to press the key again. script here: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16584 On 6/24/2011 3:17 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > session:flushDigits() right before you collect DTMF and you will never > get any old dtmf > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Wes wrote: >> I'm writing an ivr script in lua, and using playAndGetDigits in a couple >> different places. Both places just take a single digit to continue on. >> If the user presses 2 digits, it seems as if the second digit is being >> queued and it's being processed in the next call to playAndGetDigits. >> Often the extra digit is invalid, so when it tells the user to press a >> certain key, it follows immediately with the message "invalid key", due >> to the extra key being in the "queue"... >> >> is this anything I can protect against? I found a flush_dtmf, but it >> is not very documented: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_flush_dtmf >> >> and I also found this: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Session_flushDigits >> >> but calling it before and after playAndGetDigits didn't *seem* to >> help... should it? >> >> script here: >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16584 >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > From wes-fs at 499x.com Sat Jun 25 01:26:06 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. Message-ID: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox tool? checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... From wes-fs at 499x.com Sat Jun 25 01:37:39 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] getting rid of hanging sessions? Message-ID: <4E0503A3.5040909@499x.com> in my testing, I'm getting some sessions that are, hung, I guess. Status shows: UP 0 years, 0 days, 2 hours, 7 minutes, 37 seconds, 752 milliseconds, 720 microseconds 23 session(s) since startup 5 session(s) 0/30 1000 session(s) max min idle cpu 0.00/0.00 if I do a shutdown, it waits on them for a while, then eventually shuts down. Is there any way to "clean" these up periodically? Or, what am I doing to leave them out there? thanks! From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Sat Jun 25 01:41:51 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:41:51 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> Message-ID: Wes, it's because you are confusing 2 things. GSM is a codec, so it's a sound format. WAVE is a kind of container (like MKV) that can contain various codecs. In your case, you probably did a mistake using sox (it's not an easy tool), so you ended up with a wav which is still GSM audio inside. You have to tell sox which exact output format you want. AFAIR, you have to use the -s option (for signed linear). David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 24/06/2011 ? 23:26, Wes a ?crit : > In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is > about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. > > I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed > at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav > using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox > tool? > > checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: > RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz > > and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: > RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz > > So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording > parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller > wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/07f35c08/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Sat Jun 25 01:46:00 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:46:00 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> Message-ID: Wav is just a standard file format, the size is decided by the contents. The first format is PCM which is 8000 bytes samples per sec The second is GSM which is compressed voice - so in short you changed the file format, but is was and still is GSM inside. To convert from PCM to GSM you need an application that can do so - WavePad etc. can be recommended. Jan -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Wes Sent: 24. juni 2011 23:26 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox tool? checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org From jan.berger at video24.no Sat Jun 25 01:53:51 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:53:51 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> Message-ID: <14F4842598F24E4EB19AB7735FE9B89F@dell9400> A gentle warning when using GSM codec?s Every codec compress voice at the cost of quality. And some codec?s like GSM and G.729 are not a nice combination. If you use GSM to save disk space and play it back using G.729 the resulting voice might contain some added noise due to algorithmic incompatibility. jan _____ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of David Ponzone Sent: 24. juni 2011 23:42 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. Wes, it's because you are confusing 2 things. GSM is a codec, so it's a sound format. WAVE is a kind of container (like MKV) that can contain various codecs. In your case, you probably did a mistake using sox (it's not an easy tool), so you ended up with a wav which is still GSM audio inside. You have to tell sox which exact output format you want. AFAIR, you have to use the -s option (for signed linear). David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 24/06/2011 ? 23:26, Wes a ?crit : In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox tool? checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/b8c0cc44/attachment-0001.html From d at d-man.org Sat Jun 25 03:09:42 2011 From: d at d-man.org (Darren Schreiber) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:09:42 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E04B039.6020706@statirasystems.com> References: <4E04B039.6020706@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <196C835FADC4D243A06AA032715AE7211E1A2988@EXVMBX020-20.exch020.serverdata.net> So one thing we are working on is an install wizard cause most of the issues we hear about are people not understanding where to go to set things up. The problem is that blue.box, via 3 checkboxes and/or dropdowns, can be: - A premise/hosted single-tenant PBX that simplifies setup by forcing a domain and auto-activating RPort and a few other items - A complex hosted PBX w/ multi-tenant that works based on domain names - A simple routing/bridging tool w/ no PBX features That seems to be how most people are using it. I think we will make those options on startup. Also, we need to simplify ACLs. - Darren From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of William Moore Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:42 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue Thanks for responding. I just stayed up all night learning all I could about both freeswitch and blue.box. I had a client pushing me so I was a little frustrated with it. I usually troll and learn it on my own via the code, documentation, bug lists, and so on. I was looking for a more immediate response than normal. I do appreciate the project and all the work put forward by you and your team. The only other software I had as much trouble learning was when I switched to Gentoo and found out how little I knew about linux. You will hear from me again. Hopefully via contributions. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 10:05 PM, Darren Schreiber wrote: OK, well again, I'm happy to help, as is my team and as are the open-source folks. Sometimes we do get busy, so please just ping me, but the logs pasted by William indicate he doesn't know how to setup the authentication for his carriers/phones and since there's 82 different ways to do that, I'd need to know more info. Hence the request to email off list, unless he wants to post his auth strategy and IPs publicly :) -- From: David Ponzone > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:56:04 -0700 To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue No Darren, sorry, I confused FreePBX and FusionPBX. My bad. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 24/06/2011 ? 03:14, Darren Schreiber a ?crit : David, FreePBX v3 is now called blue.box. You're not making any sense... Is this an attempt at creating FUD? - Darren -- From: David Ponzone > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:59:16 -0700 To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue I had the same feeling about blue.box. I think there are more interesting GUIs out there, like FreePBX V3. The weird thing is that none of them seems very active. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:55, William Moore a ?crit : I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. William J. MooreStatira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: correction: missed a line. 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: I get this with wireshark 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 I am looking for the expiration now.. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: tshark port 5080 You will then see if you receive it. In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: unregister the gateway register it again make an inbound call right away David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: William, If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: Numbering The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". I think they are confused about what is E164.... You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West > wrote: 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. /b On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue can cause this. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins > wrote: The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... -MC _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/3d9e30f8/attachment-0001.html From d at d-man.org Sat Jun 25 03:10:45 2011 From: d at d-man.org (Darren Schreiber) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:10:45 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue In-Reply-To: <4E04AC28.5050402@statirasystems.com> References: <4E04AC28.5050402@statirasystems.com> Message-ID: <196C835FADC4D243A06AA032715AE7211E1A298A@EXVMBX020-20.exch020.serverdata.net> We are working on a get started guide, too. I'll try to post that next week. From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of William Moore Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:24 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue LOL I know it is not difficult. The change I had an issue storing was the expire seconds. It actually stayed on the fifth try. Not sure why it would not but it is there. Actually authentication was not the issue after all. Junction sends the number with a one so I had to add it to the Number setting. Also I had the context setting on the number wrong. It kept trying to send it out the second it came in. My concerns about the project were not about the activity of the project. It was about it's attention to the users. I tried the documentation, which is better then a lot of projects I have looked at, and it failed me. It is only about each specific thing and yet it is not that specific. To someone well versed in freeswitch, they could connect the dots, my green self could not. Also that comments I made were because I had attempted assistance via 2600hz IRC and forum. As you can see I ended up here. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 09:13 PM, Darren Schreiber wrote: Hi William, Sorry to hear that - what exactly makes you think this? We're very active on the blue.box front. There have been 3 new features and over 20 bug fixes in just the past four weeks. Can you email me off-list to get whatever issue you're having sorted out? Also, for authentication, bluebox "replaces" your changes because you're supposed to use the GUI to change that option. Go into Connectivity / SIP Interfaces and edit the SIP port you're trying to change. Uncheck the mark named "Require Authentication". It's not very difficult... - Darren -- From: William Moore > Reply-To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:55:15 -0700 To: "freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org" > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trunk Issue I give up on blue.box. They seem preoccupied by there other projects. Documentation does not explain enough. It is like describing a human by their parts only and not how it interacts. Peace out. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 01:34 PM, David Ponzone wrote: In sipinterface_2, make the following modification: David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:31, David Ponzone a ?crit : The issue is that you are expecting them to authenticate, but they won't. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 19:15, William Moore a ?crit : Ok, I reregistered and called right away. I get the following: 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000766 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002321 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.021120 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 3.272168 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:jnctn.net;transport=udp 3.292076 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Status: 200 OK (1 bindings) The call just states it is a none working number. That means something in my dial plan is incorrect. I am double checking it now. William J. MooreStatira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, William Moore wrote: When I put it in and it reloads, blue.box removes it. Can I reference the gateway in another sip interface file or does it have to be in that one? William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:52 PM, William Moore wrote: correction: missed a line. 0.000000 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2, with session description 0.000814 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 0.002440 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 0.023173 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:50 PM, William Moore wrote: I get this with wireshark 40.345679 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 100 Trying 40.347381 192.168.1.254 -> 66.227.100.20 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required 40.367906 66.227.100.20 -> 192.168.1.254 SIP Request: ACK sip:17036526678 at 173.72.143.16:5080;transport=udp;gw=trunk_2 I am looking for the expiration now.. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 12:25 PM, David Ponzone wrote: Take a sip trace on your box with tcpdump or preferably, tshark: tshark port 5080 You will then see if you receive it. In the config you sent, I don't see anything about register expiration, or NAT keepalive, so I would really recommend you add a ping every 30 seconds to your gateway config. If the issue is there, it's quite easy to see: unregister the gateway register it again make an inbound call right away David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 18:15, William Moore a ?crit : It was the 1 and it needs to be set for e.164(+1). Blue.box makes it a little more difficult since it wants to manage the xmls. I could have set it up as a separate config file however that defeats the purpose of the GUI. I still have the issue of incoming calls not even showing up in sofia. Junction Networks says it is going out, but my server is not responding. I'm not sure if I have the settings for incoming correct. William J. Moore Statira Systems 611 Caroline St Fredericksburg, VA http://www.statirasystems.com On 06/23/2011 04:21 AM, David Ponzone wrote: William, If I believe the example configuraiton on Junction's web, they don't expect E164: But, elsewhere in their knowledgebase, they say: Numbering The standard e.164 numbering plan (ITU) is used. North American numbers are required to be prefixed with a '1'. International numbers need to be prefixed with "011". I think they are confused about what is E164.... You should try to prefix with 1 as Michael recommended. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 23/06/2011 ? 08:19, Michael Collins a ?crit : Perhaps the gateway wants the leading 1 or expects e.164 format? -MC On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian West > wrote: 484 is address incomplete means you didn't send enough digits to the gateway usually. /b On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Brad Mina wrote: Ah, thought it was recv not send. Good to know that an invalid gateway issue can cause this. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Collins > wrote: The 484 I believe is a result of the bad gateway. In any case, the OP needs to figure out what's up w/ that gw or no calls will be going out... -MC _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/4c950ecc/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 25 03:13:54 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:13:54 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to deal with user pressing extra keys? flush_dtmf? session::flushDigits? In-Reply-To: <4E04FC5D.4010900@499x.com> References: <4E04EAA7.2050305@499x.com> <4E04FC5D.4010900@499x.com> Message-ID: Hey, that Lua code looks awfully familiar! (I wrote some of that on a snowy day in hotel room in Wisconsin...) Okay, I think I see what you're trying to do. You just want to have the person press 1 to continue. Do you want something different to happen if the person presses a key other than 1? Just checking. Also, I don't see any flushDigits in your script. Try adding this before your PAGD: session:execute('flush_dtmf'); Try again, report back, etc. -MC On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Wes wrote: > I put flushDigits right before playAndGetDigits, but it is still > queueing up keypresses... if I type more than one key, weird things > start happening in my loop. (the one that prompts for 1 - play back > recording, 2=submit recording, 3 = rerecord)... sometimes I get the > message "invalid response" followed a few seconds by "your recording has > been submitted", and I've not typed anything in between. > > incidentally, if I press a digit while playAndGetDigits is still > speaking, it takes a few seconds for it to stop talking and act on the > keypress... ... it just doesn't seem very responsive.... which is why > I'm testing extra keypresses... because if users don't immediately get a > response, they tend to press the key again. > > script here: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16584 > > > > On 6/24/2011 3:17 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > > session:flushDigits() right before you collect DTMF and you will never > > get any old dtmf > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Wes wrote: > >> I'm writing an ivr script in lua, and using playAndGetDigits in a couple > >> different places. Both places just take a single digit to continue on. > >> If the user presses 2 digits, it seems as if the second digit is being > >> queued and it's being processed in the next call to playAndGetDigits. > >> Often the extra digit is invalid, so when it tells the user to press a > >> certain key, it follows immediately with the message "invalid key", due > >> to the extra key being in the "queue"... > >> > >> is this anything I can protect against? I found a flush_dtmf, but it > >> is not very documented: > >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_flush_dtmf > >> > >> and I also found this: > >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Session_flushDigits > >> > >> but calling it before and after playAndGetDigits didn't *seem* to > >> help... should it? > >> > >> script here: > >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16584 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/e1745505/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 25 03:15:10 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:15:10 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] getting rid of hanging sessions? In-Reply-To: <4E0503A3.5040909@499x.com> References: <4E0503A3.5040909@499x.com> Message-ID: The key is in knowing why those are stuck. Do a "show channels" when you see these so-called phantom sessions, then put it on pastebin so we can take a look. -MC On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Wes wrote: > in my testing, I'm getting some sessions that are, hung, I guess. > > Status shows: > > UP 0 years, 0 days, 2 hours, 7 minutes, 37 seconds, 752 milliseconds, > 720 microseconds > 23 session(s) since startup > 5 session(s) 0/30 > 1000 session(s) max > min idle cpu 0.00/0.00 > > > if I do a shutdown, it waits on them for a while, then eventually shuts > down. > > Is there any way to "clean" these up periodically? Or, what am I doing > to leave them out there? > > thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/c5f39920/attachment.html From clive at lansink.co.nz Sat Jun 25 03:26:18 2011 From: clive at lansink.co.nz (Clive Lansink) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:26:18 +1200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Recovering from database fault Message-ID: <20110624232634.B7E4FE80E4@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/761a0549/attachment.pl From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 25 03:31:14 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:31:14 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> Message-ID: I would caution you to consider adding disk space before you try to compress all your recordings. The 16 bit SLIN that FS normally puts in your wave files are pretty easy to handle, whether playing back in a FS session, or encoding for playback on some other device. An alternative might be to use lame to convert them to MP3's or ogg/vorbis files. If you look on the main FS conf call page you'll see I have the weekly recordings in multiple formats. ( http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call#Past_Calls) Here are some stats for last Wednesday's call. Note that I record wave files in 48kHz then use sox to downsample to 16kHz wave, then I convert that 16kHz file into MP3 and Vorbis (in an ogg container). Here's what the results look like: <2831>:ls -1s conf_call_2011-06-15.* 18736 conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 23044 conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg 199756 conf_call_2011-06-15.wav <2832>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3: MPEG ADTS, layer III, v2, 24 kBits, 16 kHz, Monaural <2833>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, mono, 16000 Hz, ~48000 bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I <2834>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.wav conf_call_2011-06-15.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 16000 Hz Note that the file sizes are in 1K blocks. So, bottom line is this: if you have the disk space then use wave. If you don't have disk space for wave then get some! :D If you REALLY need to use a different format then choose something like MP3 or Vorbis for long-term storage. -MC On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Wes wrote: > In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is > about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. > > I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed > at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav > using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox > tool? > > checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: > RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz > > and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: > RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz > > So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording > parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller > wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/ad6e1a70/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Sat Jun 25 03:36:42 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:36:42 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Recovering from database fault In-Reply-To: <20110624232634.B7E4FE80E4@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> References: <20110624232634.B7E4FE80E4@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Clive Lansink wrote: > Hello Michael and others. > > I deleted the whold db folder which in our case was ok because we don't use > voice mail. Then when I ran Freeswitchconsole, the db folder was recreated. > But that was when we had the problem. The phones could make calls but none > could ring. > Okay, so you removed the whole db folder then restarted FS and everything worked except for the registrations? Then when you did a complete re-install of FS then everything, including registrations, seemed to work? I'd recommend that you update to the latest git and watch and wait. If the symptom returns then maybe you could collect a gcore and open a jira, unless you're on Windows. (We have Windows guys who can guide you on what to do for troubleshooting - I just don't happen to be one of them...) -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110624/2f52f351/attachment.html From clive at lansink.co.nz Sat Jun 25 04:08:08 2011 From: clive at lansink.co.nz (Clive Lansink) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:08:08 +1200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Recovering from database fault Message-ID: <20110625000823.00B8AE80E4@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/7f3f6967/attachment.pl From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Sat Jun 25 06:11:40 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 19:11:40 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Recovering from database fault In-Reply-To: <20110625000823.00B8AE80E4@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> References: <20110625000823.00B8AE80E4@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> Message-ID: Are you running FreeSwitch as a non root user? This makes a huge difference as I might suspect there are file permission issues that's happening here. ie. db folder doesn't allow the fs user account to create or write to that directory On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Clive Lansink wrote: > Yes that's exactly right. You understand the situation correctly. > > I guess this situation is not going to occur often so I'll just watch to see if it ever happens again. > > > Clive Lansink > Email: Clive at Lansink.Co.NZ > Phone: +64 9 520-4242 > Mobile: +64 21 663-999 > Fax: +64 21 789-150 > > -----Original message----- > From: Michael Collins > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Recovering from database fault > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:36:42 -0700 > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Clive Lansink wrote: > >> Hello Michael and others. >> >> I deleted the whold db folder which in our case was ok because we don't use >> voice mail. Then when I ran Freeswitchconsole, the db folder was recreated. >> But that was when we had the problem. The phones could make calls but none >> could ring. >> > > Okay, so you removed the whole db folder then restarted FS and everything > worked except for the registrations? Then when you did a complete re-install > of FS then everything, including registrations, seemed to work? > > I'd recommend that you update to the latest git and watch and wait. If the > symptom returns then maybe you could collect a gcore and open a jira, unless > you're on Windows. (We have Windows guys who can guide you on what to do for > troubleshooting - I just don't happen to be one of them...) > > -MC > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From bwibowo at gmail.com Sat Jun 25 06:29:31 2011 From: bwibowo at gmail.com (mm,m) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:29:31 +0800 (HKT) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mm,m has invited you to join! Message-ID: <857902024.1308968971335.JavaMail.tomcat@wfn-web-fail.meta4-group.com> no text body -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/298022ff/attachment.html From steveu at coppice.org Sat Jun 25 07:11:42 2011 From: steveu at coppice.org (Steve Underwood) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:11:42 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: <14F4842598F24E4EB19AB7735FE9B89F@dell9400> References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> <14F4842598F24E4EB19AB7735FE9B89F@dell9400> Message-ID: <4E0551EE.20105@coppice.org> Practically any conversion of a low bit rate codec to another low bit rate codec gives horrible results. Even low bit rate codec -> linear -> the same low bit rate codec can be pretty horrible, unless the two compression steps are synchronised. A lot of the complaints you will find about the horrible sound from some codec has little to do with the codec's performance. Someone has tried the codec with audio that had already been compressed by some other low bit rate codec. Steve On 06/25/2011 05:53 AM, Jan Berger wrote: > > A gentle warning when using GSM codec?s > > Every codec compress voice at the cost of quality. And some codec?s > like GSM and G.729 are not a nice combination. If you use GSM to save > disk space and play it back using G.729 the resulting voice might > contain some added noise due to algorithmic incompatibility. > > jan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of > *David Ponzone > *Sent:* 24. juni 2011 23:42 > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for > recording calls. > > Wes, > > it's because you are confusing 2 things. > > GSM is a codec, so it's a sound format. > > WAVE is a kind of container (like MKV) that can contain various codecs. > > In your case, you probably did a mistake using sox (it's not an easy > tool), so you ended up with a wav which is still GSM audio inside. > > You have to tell sox which exact output format you want. > > AFAIR, you have to use the -s option (for signed linear). > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > > _www.ipeva.fr _- _www.ipeva-studio.com > _ > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. *IPeva* d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > > __ > > > > Le 24/06/2011 ? 23:26, Wes a ?crit : > > > > In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is > about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. > > I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed > at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav > using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox > tool? > > checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: > RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz > > and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: > RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz > > So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording > parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller > wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From yehavi.bourvine at gmail.com Sat Jun 25 09:53:15 2011 From: yehavi.bourvine at gmail.com (Yehavi Bourvine) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:53:15 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Recovering from database fault In-Reply-To: References: <20110625000823.00B8AE80E4@jlo.kiwilink.co.nz> Message-ID: Hello Clive, If you've deleted all DB files and FS created fresh ones then all the registrations information is lost. If you restart the phones (or wait for the next re-registration) then the phones would register again, __Yehavi: 2011/6/25 curriegrad2004 > Are you running FreeSwitch as a non root user? This makes a huge > difference as I might suspect there are file permission issues that's > happening here. ie. db folder doesn't allow the fs user account to > create or write to that directory > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Clive Lansink > wrote: > > Yes that's exactly right. You understand the situation correctly. > > > > I guess this situation is not going to occur often so I'll just watch to > see if it ever happens again. > > > > > > Clive Lansink > > Email: Clive at Lansink.Co.NZ > > Phone: +64 9 520-4242 > > Mobile: +64 21 663-999 > > Fax: +64 21 789-150 > > > > -----Original message----- > > From: Michael Collins > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Recovering from database fault > > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:36:42 -0700 > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Clive Lansink > wrote: > > > >> Hello Michael and others. > >> > >> I deleted the whold db folder which in our case was ok because we don't > use > >> voice mail. Then when I ran Freeswitchconsole, the db folder was > recreated. > >> But that was when we had the problem. The phones could make calls but > none > >> could ring. > >> > > > > Okay, so you removed the whole db folder then restarted FS and everything > > worked except for the registrations? Then when you did a complete > re-install > > of FS then everything, including registrations, seemed to work? > > > > I'd recommend that you update to the latest git and watch and wait. If > the > > symptom returns then maybe you could collect a gcore and open a jira, > unless > > you're on Windows. (We have Windows guys who can guide you on what to do > for > > troubleshooting - I just don't happen to be one of them...) > > > > -MC > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/7aeaf4d3/attachment-0001.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Sat Jun 25 13:10:38 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:10:38 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Lan redundancy Message-ID: <4E05A60E.7020207@seletech.com> Hi, I'm going to install freeswitch in a system with LAN redundancy (duplicated). All the pc have double LAN interfaces. How can I configure Freeswitch to work with this configuration? Actually in vars, the variable Domains has this value I have to set one ip of the two network interface? I need to set the sub-net mask? (example domain=192.168.2.101/255.255.255.0) Second question: All the PC with softphone will be connect at two LAN and the two LAN are on different Network. (Example one LAN is on network 192.168.2.0 and the other in the LAN 192.168.1.0). I bind the address of one of the two network to freeswitch. I will add the extension in the internal profile. How does freeswitch understand that an extension is in the local network? All the softphone should stay on the same network, right? What happens if an extension configured in the internal profile, try to contact FS from a different network? Best Regards Alessandro Luppi -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/c22f7d5c/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Sat Jun 25 14:07:55 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:07:55 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Lan redundancy In-Reply-To: <4E05A60E.7020207@seletech.com> References: <4E05A60E.7020207@seletech.com> Message-ID: The way I do this is to use ethernet bonding in active-backup mode: http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt http://wiki.debian.org/Bonding You get a virtual network interface named bond0 which is assigned your IP. This effectively replaces your eth0. That simplifies the configuration of everything like FreeSWITCH since you then get a single IP to listen on. The bonding driver monitors the slave devices (eth0,eth1,etc) and uses an active one. If a device goes down it automatically switches over to the other. You can also have different profiles on different IPs, with a profile for each device, but if a device fails any calls going to that IP will fail because the signalling/media is still trying to go to that address. Bonding avoids that problem. Bonding will probably be enough for you, but for some extra information my setup is a little more complex than that... that there's redundancy on the network too - 2 network switches each with 100MBit internet feeds from the data centre, and interconnected with a 2Gbit trunk, running RSTP. Each server has one device going to one switch and the other going to the 2nd. It means that if any switch, device, or cable fails the whole thing will find another route (even between switches via the data centre's switch if necessary). A stacked switch would be better, but isn't currently within budget. -Steve On 25 June 2011 10:10, Alessandro wrote: > ** > Hi, > > I'm going to install freeswitch in a system with LAN redundancy > (duplicated). All the pc have double LAN interfaces. How can I configure > Freeswitch to work with this configuration? Actually in vars, the variable > Domains has this value > > > > > I have to set one ip of the two network interface? I need to set the > sub-net mask? (example domain=192.168.2.101/255.255.255.0) > > Second question: > > All the PC with softphone will be connect at two LAN and the two LAN are on > different Network. (Example one LAN is on network 192.168.2.0 and the other > in the LAN 192.168.1.0). > I bind the address of one of the two network to freeswitch. > I will add the extension in the internal profile. How does freeswitch > understand that an extension is in the local network? All the softphone > should stay on the same network, right? > What happens if an extension configured in the internal profile, try to > contact FS from a different network? > > Best Regards > > Alessandro Luppi > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/ddba0312/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Sat Jun 25 14:23:52 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:23:52 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SpiderMonkey 1.8.5 Message-ID: <5D59B0C07A28436F897691CE12F9CAE9@dell9400> Does anyone know about an existing Visual Studio build for SpiderMonkey 1.8.5? I am interested in testing it out, but I was hoping to find a pre-build or project for VS 2005, 2008 or 2010. It's only a few months old (march 2011), so might be a bit early yet??? Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/72d68745/attachment.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Sat Jun 25 14:55:50 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:55:50 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Lan redundancy In-Reply-To: References: <4E05A60E.7020207@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4E05BEB6.9060306@seletech.com> Very interesting, I was thinking to something similar.. I thought to create e third virtual interface... So I'll have to use network bonding to all the pc in the network... The two networks will have switch/router (i think hircshmann) so the two networks will be the specular image of the other. In the interface named bond0 will be configured on the same network of the two network interface or I have to create an virtual third network? On the softphone for the server proxy I'll set the address of the interface bond0 of the server freeswitch right? Thanks Alessandro Luppi Il 25/06/2011 12:07, Steven Ayre ha scritto: > The way I do this is to use ethernet bonding in active-backup mode: > > http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt > http://wiki.debian.org/Bonding > > You get a virtual network interface named bond0 which is assigned your > IP. This effectively replaces your eth0. That simplifies the > configuration of everything like FreeSWITCH since you then get a > single IP to listen on. The bonding driver monitors the slave devices > (eth0,eth1,etc) and uses an active one. If a device goes down it > automatically switches over to the other. > > You can also have different profiles on different IPs, with a profile > for each device, but if a device fails any calls going to that IP will > fail because the signalling/media is still trying to go to that > address. Bonding avoids that problem. > > Bonding will probably be enough for you, but for some extra > information my setup is a little more complex than that... that > there's redundancy on the network too - 2 network switches each with > 100MBit internet feeds from the data centre, and interconnected with a > 2Gbit trunk, running RSTP. Each server has one device going to one > switch and the other going to the 2nd. It means that if any switch, > device, or cable fails the whole thing will find another route (even > between switches via the data centre's switch if necessary). A stacked > switch would be better, but isn't currently within budget. > > -Steve > > > > > > On 25 June 2011 10:10, Alessandro > wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm going to install freeswitch in a system with LAN redundancy > (duplicated). All the pc have double LAN interfaces. How can I > configure Freeswitch to work with this configuration? Actually in > vars, the variable Domains has this value > > > > > I have to set one ip of the two network interface? I need to set > the sub-net mask? (example domain=192.168.2.101/255.255.255.0 > ) > > Second question: > > All the PC with softphone will be connect at two LAN and the two > LAN are on different Network. (Example one LAN is on network > 192.168.2.0 and the other in the LAN 192.168.1.0). > I bind the address of one of the two network to freeswitch. > I will add the extension in the internal profile. How does > freeswitch understand that an extension is in the local network? > All the softphone should stay on the same network, right? > What happens if an extension configured in the internal profile, > try to contact FS from a different network? > > Best Regards > > Alessandro Luppi > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/99b63489/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Sat Jun 25 15:35:46 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:35:46 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Lan redundancy In-Reply-To: <4E05BEB6.9060306@seletech.com> References: <4E05A60E.7020207@seletech.com> <4E05BEB6.9060306@seletech.com> Message-ID: bond0 becomes your single network interface. eth0/eth1 aren't used any longer - they're still there but they're just slaves of bond0. That means you get a single IP on bond0 (eth0/eth1 don't have an IP) which is the one FS/softphones would use. If you're planning to have two independant networks with eth0 on one and eth1 on the other that'll cause you problems... it's meant to provide the server with two routes into the same network. Between devices on the LAN it'll be problematic - in active-backup one device will be active and the others disabled. There's no guarantee that all servers'll pick the same slave device though, so some might be on eth0 and others on eth1 which'd mean they wouldn't be able to reach each other. My 2 switches are connected together and use RSTP to avoid routing loops to avoid that, which is why I mentioned it in the 1st email. For the routing to the WAN it'll mean different routers so different IPs, which'll drop calls with NAT on switchover, and force you to listen to both public IPs on bond0 / FS if you're not using NAT which'll also mean dropped calls on switching over. Our network setup is here: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16587, how you connect to the WAN really will depend on your ISP/Data Centre though. -Steve On 25 June 2011 11:55, Alessandro wrote: > ** > Very interesting, > > I was thinking to something similar.. I thought to create e third virtual > interface... So I'll have to use network bonding to all the pc in the > network... > The two networks will have switch/router (i think hircshmann) so the two > networks will be the specular image of the other. In the interface named > bond0 will be configured on the same network of the two network interface or > I have to create an virtual third network? On the softphone for the server > proxy I'll set the address of the interface bond0 of the server freeswitch > right? > > Thanks > > Alessandro Luppi > > > Il 25/06/2011 12:07, Steven Ayre ha scritto: > > The way I do this is to use ethernet bonding in active-backup mode: > > http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt > http://wiki.debian.org/Bonding > > You get a virtual network interface named bond0 which is assigned your IP. > This effectively replaces your eth0. That simplifies the configuration of > everything like FreeSWITCH since you then get a single IP to listen on. The > bonding driver monitors the slave devices (eth0,eth1,etc) and uses an active > one. If a device goes down it automatically switches over to the other. > > You can also have different profiles on different IPs, with a profile for > each device, but if a device fails any calls going to that IP will fail > because the signalling/media is still trying to go to that address. Bonding > avoids that problem. > > Bonding will probably be enough for you, but for some extra information my > setup is a little more complex than that... that there's redundancy on the > network too - 2 network switches each with 100MBit internet feeds from the > data centre, and interconnected with a 2Gbit trunk, running RSTP. Each > server has one device going to one switch and the other going to the 2nd. It > means that if any switch, device, or cable fails the whole thing will find > another route (even between switches via the data centre's switch if > necessary). A stacked switch would be better, but isn't currently within > budget. > > -Steve > > > > > > On 25 June 2011 10:10, Alessandro wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm going to install freeswitch in a system with LAN redundancy >> (duplicated). All the pc have double LAN interfaces. How can I configure >> Freeswitch to work with this configuration? Actually in vars, the variable >> Domains has this value >> >> >> >> >> I have to set one ip of the two network interface? I need to set the >> sub-net mask? (example domain=192.168.2.101/255.255.255.0) >> >> Second question: >> >> All the PC with softphone will be connect at two LAN and the two LAN are >> on different Network. (Example one LAN is on network 192.168.2.0 and the >> other in the LAN 192.168.1.0). >> I bind the address of one of the two network to freeswitch. >> I will add the extension in the internal profile. How does freeswitch >> understand that an extension is in the local network? All the softphone >> should stay on the same network, right? >> What happens if an extension configured in the internal profile, try to >> contact FS from a different network? >> >> Best Regards >> >> Alessandro Luppi >> >> -- >> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >> Software development >> Seletech srl >> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >> email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/9c78756a/attachment.html From a.luppi at seletech.com Sat Jun 25 16:42:37 2011 From: a.luppi at seletech.com (Alessandro) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:42:37 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Lan redundancy In-Reply-To: References: <4E05A60E.7020207@seletech.com> <4E05BEB6.9060306@seletech.com> Message-ID: <4E05D7BD.3040406@seletech.com> Ok, I'll going to talk with who is planning the network to understand exactly the architecture of the network. I understand how to manage two interfaces in a LAN. I think that with router i'm going to work in a WAN. I think also that the two network are connected so the server is reachable from both side and the routing protocol should avoid loops in the network. This is what said to me about network configuration: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16588 I've also another question, I'd like also redundancy on FS server (the server machine will be duplicated). I'm going to install 2 server, so if one fails the other is ready to go in service. Have you ever try something similar? I was thinking to an heartbeat daemon to manage this situation... Best Regards Alessandro Luppi Il 25/06/2011 13:35, Steven Ayre ha scritto: > bond0 becomes your single network interface. eth0/eth1 aren't used any > longer - they're still there but they're just slaves of bond0. > > That means you get a single IP on bond0 (eth0/eth1 don't have an IP) > which is the one FS/softphones would use. > > If you're planning to have two independant networks with eth0 on one > and eth1 on the other that'll cause you problems... it's meant to > provide the server with two routes into the same network. > > Between devices on the LAN it'll be problematic - in active-backup one > device will be active and the others disabled. There's no guarantee > that all servers'll pick the same slave device though, so some might > be on eth0 and others on eth1 which'd mean they wouldn't be able to > reach each other. My 2 switches are connected together and use RSTP to > avoid routing loops to avoid that, which is why I mentioned it in the > 1st email. > > For the routing to the WAN it'll mean different routers so different > IPs, which'll drop calls with NAT on switchover, and force you to > listen to both public IPs on bond0 / FS if you're not using NAT > which'll also mean dropped calls on switching over. > > Our network setup is here: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16587, how > you connect to the WAN really will depend on your ISP/Data Centre though. > > -Steve > > > > On 25 June 2011 11:55, Alessandro > wrote: > > Very interesting, > > I was thinking to something similar.. I thought to create e third > virtual interface... So I'll have to use network bonding to all > the pc in the network... > The two networks will have switch/router (i think hircshmann) so > the two networks will be the specular image of the other. In the > interface named bond0 will be configured on the same network of > the two network interface or I have to create an virtual third > network? On the softphone for the server proxy I'll set the > address of the interface bond0 of the server freeswitch right? > > Thanks > > Alessandro Luppi > > > > Il 25/06/2011 12:07, Steven Ayre ha scritto: >> The way I do this is to use ethernet bonding in active-backup mode: >> >> http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt >> http://wiki.debian.org/Bonding >> >> You get a virtual network interface named bond0 which is assigned >> your IP. This effectively replaces your eth0. That simplifies the >> configuration of everything like FreeSWITCH since you then get a >> single IP to listen on. The bonding driver monitors the slave >> devices (eth0,eth1,etc) and uses an active one. If a device goes >> down it automatically switches over to the other. >> >> You can also have different profiles on different IPs, with a >> profile for each device, but if a device fails any calls going to >> that IP will fail because the signalling/media is still trying to >> go to that address. Bonding avoids that problem. >> >> Bonding will probably be enough for you, but for some extra >> information my setup is a little more complex than that... that >> there's redundancy on the network too - 2 network switches each >> with 100MBit internet feeds from the data centre, and >> interconnected with a 2Gbit trunk, running RSTP. Each server has >> one device going to one switch and the other going to the 2nd. It >> means that if any switch, device, or cable fails the whole thing >> will find another route (even between switches via the data >> centre's switch if necessary). A stacked switch would be better, >> but isn't currently within budget. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> >> >> On 25 June 2011 10:10, Alessandro > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm going to install freeswitch in a system with LAN >> redundancy (duplicated). All the pc have double LAN >> interfaces. How can I configure Freeswitch to work with this >> configuration? Actually in vars, the variable Domains has >> this value >> >> >> >> >> I have to set one ip of the two network interface? I need to >> set the sub-net mask? (example >> domain=192.168.2.101/255.255.255.0 >> ) >> >> Second question: >> >> All the PC with softphone will be connect at two LAN and the >> two LAN are on different Network. (Example one LAN is on >> network 192.168.2.0 and the other in the LAN 192.168.1.0). >> I bind the address of one of the two network to freeswitch. >> I will add the extension in the internal profile. How does >> freeswitch understand that an extension is in the local >> network? All the softphone should stay on the same network, >> right? >> What happens if an extension configured in the internal >> profile, try to contact FS from a different network? >> >> Best Regards >> >> Alessandro Luppi >> >> -- >> Ing. Alessandro Luppi >> Software development >> Seletech srl >> Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy >> Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 >> email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Ing. Alessandro Luppi > Software development > Seletech srl > Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy > Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 > email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email:a.luppi at seletech.com - Web:www.seletech.com orwww.seletech.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/89c41c7f/attachment-0001.html From infos at madovsky.org Sat Jun 25 19:05:37 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Lan redundancy References: <4E05A60E.7020207@seletech.com> <4E05BEB6.9060306@seletech.com> Message-ID: <61DFA2F664084D9388ACB5670F9EDE7A@e1705> I used bond0 with 6 interfaces since one year without problems ----- Original Message ----- From: Alessandro To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 6:55 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Lan redundancy Very interesting, I was thinking to something similar.. I thought to create e third virtual interface... So I'll have to use network bonding to all the pc in the network... The two networks will have switch/router (i think hircshmann) so the two networks will be the specular image of the other. In the interface named bond0 will be configured on the same network of the two network interface or I have to create an virtual third network? On the softphone for the server proxy I'll set the address of the interface bond0 of the server freeswitch right? Thanks Alessandro Luppi Il 25/06/2011 12:07, Steven Ayre ha scritto: The way I do this is to use ethernet bonding in active-backup mode: http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt http://wiki.debian.org/Bonding You get a virtual network interface named bond0 which is assigned your IP. This effectively replaces your eth0. That simplifies the configuration of everything like FreeSWITCH since you then get a single IP to listen on. The bonding driver monitors the slave devices (eth0,eth1,etc) and uses an active one. If a device goes down it automatically switches over to the other. You can also have different profiles on different IPs, with a profile for each device, but if a device fails any calls going to that IP will fail because the signalling/media is still trying to go to that address. Bonding avoids that problem. Bonding will probably be enough for you, but for some extra information my setup is a little more complex than that... that there's redundancy on the network too - 2 network switches each with 100MBit internet feeds from the data centre, and interconnected with a 2Gbit trunk, running RSTP. Each server has one device going to one switch and the other going to the 2nd. It means that if any switch, device, or cable fails the whole thing will find another route (even between switches via the data centre's switch if necessary). A stacked switch would be better, but isn't currently within budget. -Steve On 25 June 2011 10:10, Alessandro wrote: Hi, I'm going to install freeswitch in a system with LAN redundancy (duplicated). All the pc have double LAN interfaces. How can I configure Freeswitch to work with this configuration? Actually in vars, the variable Domains has this value I have to set one ip of the two network interface? I need to set the sub-net mask? (example domain=192.168.2.101/255.255.255.0) Second question: All the PC with softphone will be connect at two LAN and the two LAN are on different Network. (Example one LAN is on network 192.168.2.0 and the other in the LAN 192.168.1.0). I bind the address of one of the two network to freeswitch. I will add the extension in the internal profile. How does freeswitch understand that an extension is in the local network? All the softphone should stay on the same network, right? What happens if an extension configured in the internal profile, try to contact FS from a different network? Best Regards Alessandro Luppi -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ing. Alessandro Luppi Software development Seletech srl Via Collodi 8, 20052 Monza (MI) - Italy Tel: +39.039.5962000 - Fax: +39.039.9716905 email: a.luppi at seletech.com - Web: www.seletech.com or www.seletech.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110625/7fff179f/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Sun Jun 26 03:30:33 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 01:30:33 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SpiderMonkey 1.8.5 In-Reply-To: <5D59B0C07A28436F897691CE12F9CAE9@dell9400> References: <5D59B0C07A28436F897691CE12F9CAE9@dell9400> Message-ID: <7E619FFCA9154237AEB776AC6DB3B253@dell9400> Actually realized that MozillaBuild will build for Visual Studio 2010 and various other targets directly. _____ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jan Berger Sent: 25. juni 2011 12:24 To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SpiderMonkey 1.8.5 Does anyone know about an existing Visual Studio build for SpiderMonkey 1.8.5? I am interested in testing it out, but I was hoping to find a pre-build or project for VS 2005, 2008 or 2010. It's only a few months old (march 2011), so might be a bit early yet??? Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110626/c8deeb98/attachment.html From acichocki at supermedia.pl Sun Jun 26 12:07:10 2011 From: acichocki at supermedia.pl (Artur Cichocki) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:07:10 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Removing SDP from 183/180 Message-ID: <4E06E8AE.2080307@supermedia.pl> Hi All. I didn't get any response from fs-dev moderator for one month so it goes here. I just wrote this patch. It ads 'sip_remove_183sdp' flag, which removes SDP from 183 and returns 180 (it also removes SDP from 180, because FS changes 180 with SDP to 183). To turn it on add {sip_remove_183sdp=true} to the dial string. Why? Because in some situations we don't want to transfer voice between clients before a real call establishment (and yes, I know that early media in this stage is allowed by RFC). Real case: Try to setup two clients, one of them using Sipdroid. Turn on bypass mode. Try to call to Sipdroid client, you will hear caller voice together with the ring (because Sipdroid sends 180 with SDP, and puts voice on the speaker). Patch attached. -- Artur Cichocki -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: sip_remove_183sdp.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 3685 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110626/4768127d/attachment-0001.bin From diego.viola at gmail.com Fri Jun 24 23:36:41 2011 From: diego.viola at gmail.com (Diego Viola) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Please let's protect the wiki from spammers Message-ID: Hi, As most of us may alright know, the FreeSWITCH wiki has been abused and attacked by spammers, as seen here: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges Some FreeSWITCH users have been deleting and blocking these spammers, but they are increasing their spamming attacks. I went into #mediawiki in freenode and asked them if there is any solution to this and this is what they suggest: 15:18 < bawolff> !spam | diegoviola 15:18 < mw-bot> diegoviola: For information about combating and handling spam in MediaWiki, see and . I've seen most wikis who have implemented this solution and they no longer get any spamming after applying said solution. If somebody here have administration access to http://wiki.freeswitch.org/ I offer my help to apply this solution. Thanks, Diego Viola From avi at avimarcus.net Sun Jun 26 18:52:42 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:52:42 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Please let's protect the wiki from spammers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Linode uses .htaccess on the edit pages (only those), much like our pastebin, and is probably the easiest thing to add. But yes, something needs to be done.. I got sick of deleting spam months ago. A captcha on normal accounts to make edits is probably OK, too, as long as they can manually be moved to "human-trusted". -Avi On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Diego Viola wrote: > Hi, > > As most of us may alright know, the FreeSWITCH wiki has been abused > and attacked by spammers, as seen here: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges > > Some FreeSWITCH users have been deleting and blocking these spammers, > but they are increasing their spamming attacks. > > I went into #mediawiki in freenode and asked them if there is any > solution to this and this is what they suggest: > > 15:18 < bawolff> !spam | diegoviola > 15:18 < mw-bot> diegoviola: For information about combating and > handling spam in MediaWiki, see > and > . > > > I've seen most wikis who have implemented this solution and they no > longer get any spamming after applying said solution. If somebody here > have administration access to http://wiki.freeswitch.org/ I offer my > help to apply this solution. > > Thanks, > Diego Viola > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110626/a3d47709/attachment.html From kris at kriskinc.com Sun Jun 26 21:45:02 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Removing SDP from 183/180 In-Reply-To: <4E06E8AE.2080307@supermedia.pl> References: <4E06E8AE.2080307@supermedia.pl> Message-ID: Interesting patch for a strange case... BTW, the "broken" client is the one that generates local ringback when there is a 180 w/ SDP. Either way this belongs on Jira: http://jira.freeswitch.org/ On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Artur Cichocki wrote: > Hi All. > > I didn't get any response from fs-dev moderator for one month so it goes > here. > > I just wrote this patch. It ads 'sip_remove_183sdp' flag, which removes SDP > from 183 and returns 180 (it also removes SDP from 180, because FS > changes 180 with SDP to 183). > > To turn it on add {sip_remove_183sdp=true} to the dial string. > > Why? Because in some situations we don't want to transfer voice between > clients before a real call establishment (and yes, I know that early media > in this stage is allowed by RFC). > > Real case: > Try to setup two clients, one of them using Sipdroid. Turn on bypass mode. > Try to call to Sipdroid client, you will hear caller voice together with the > ring (because Sipdroid sends 180 with SDP, and puts voice on the speaker). > > Patch attached. > > -- > Artur Cichocki > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Kristian Kielhofner From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Mon Jun 27 00:31:46 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level Message-ID: As part of creating prompts for my IVRs, I've tried to match the audio gain of my prompts with the gain of the stock English prompts. During this process, I noticed that the English Callie prompts are recorded extremely low (max gain around -16DB). I have the Cepstral Callie voice, and I must set the Cepstral volume to about 50% in order to match the gain of the English prompts. In conferences and other situations where prompts are played over conversations, the level of the prompts are obviously low. I can, of course, renormalize the gain of the prompts up to -10DB or more with a sound editor. However, I wonder if there is a better way to change the level of the prompts, or if there is a good reason for the prompts to be encoded at such a low level. I haven't considered all of the implications yet, but I'm fairly sure that encoding the prompts this quietly is not the best approach, even if it is desirable for the prompts to play quietly on a call. For each 6DB reduction in gain, there is a 50% reduction in perceived volume, and one less significant bit is used for storing the audio. In a 16-bit file, a maximum gain of -16 means that only the 14 least significant bits are actually used for encoding the audio. This results in a reduction in dynamic range, but the difference isn't really noticeable as long as the data remains 16-bit. The problem comes when the audio is converted to a different bit depth. For example, most quickie routines for converting 16-bit audio to 8-bit audio will simply chop off the 8 least significant bits. Therefore, when the prompts are converted to 8-bit audio for use by most of the narrow band codecs, the prompts are only using 6 bits of audio. If the volume of the channel is increased, then the 6 bits are promoted, and the dithering errors at the bottom become louder. In the worst case, since these prompts are only encoded with 14 bits of actual data, and converting to an 8-bit channel will only leave 6 bits of actual data, boosting the gain of the prompts on an 8-bit channel to full loudness would result in the noise floor (the level of the dithering crackle) being about -18DB. That's almost as loud as the prompts themselves sound at the moment. Anyway, regardless of observations, is there a reason why the prompts must be recorded so quietly? If I'd like them louder (without increasing the gain of the entire channel), is there a way other than running them through a tool to renormalize their max levels? Bryan From jan.berger at video24.no Mon Jun 27 01:20:51 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:20:51 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> Wavepad is free and will do bulk changes to sound files. Won't AGC solve this? Jan -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Smart Sent: 26. juni 2011 22:32 To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level As part of creating prompts for my IVRs, I've tried to match the audio gain of my prompts with the gain of the stock English prompts. During this process, I noticed that the English Callie prompts are recorded extremely low (max gain around -16DB). I have the Cepstral Callie voice, and I must set the Cepstral volume to about 50% in order to match the gain of the English prompts. In conferences and other situations where prompts are played over conversations, the level of the prompts are obviously low. I can, of course, renormalize the gain of the prompts up to -10DB or more with a sound editor. However, I wonder if there is a better way to change the level of the prompts, or if there is a good reason for the prompts to be encoded at such a low level. I haven't considered all of the implications yet, but I'm fairly sure that encoding the prompts this quietly is not the best approach, even if it is desirable for the prompts to play quietly on a call. For each 6DB reduction in gain, there is a 50% reduction in perceived volume, and one less significant bit is used for storing the audio. In a 16-bit file, a maximum gain of -16 means that only the 14 least significant bits are actually used for encoding the audio. This results in a reduction in dynamic range, but the difference isn't really noticeable as long as the data remains 16-bit. The problem comes when the audio is converted to a different bit depth. For example, most quickie routines for converting 16-bit audio to 8-bit audio will simply chop off the 8 least significant bits. Therefore, when the prompts are converted to 8-bit audio for use by most of the narrow band codecs, the prompts are only using 6 bits of audio. If the volume of the channel is increased, then the 6 bits are promoted, and the dithering errors at the bottom become louder. In the worst case, since these prompts are only encoded with 14 bits of actual data, and converting to an 8-bit channel will only leave 6 bits of actual data, boosting the gain of the prompts on an 8-bit channel to full loudness would result in the noise floor (the level of the dithering crackle) being about -18DB. That's almost as loud as the prompts themselves sound at the moment. Anyway, regardless of observations, is there a reason why the prompts must be recorded so quietly? If I'd like them louder (without increasing the gain of the entire channel), is there a way other than running them through a tool to renormalize their max levels? Bryan _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org From gcd at i.ph Mon Jun 27 03:04:24 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:04:24 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> Message-ID: you can also run sox on a script to change the volume of the sound files by batch. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Jan Berger wrote: > Wavepad is free and will do bulk changes to sound files. > > Won't AGC solve this? > > Jan > > -----Original Message----- > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Bryan > Smart > Sent: 26. juni 2011 22:32 > To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level > > As part of creating prompts for my IVRs, I've tried to match the audio gain > of my prompts with the gain of the stock English prompts. During this > process, I noticed that the English Callie prompts are recorded extremely > low (max gain around -16DB). I have the Cepstral Callie voice, and I must > set the Cepstral volume to about 50% in order to match the gain of the > English prompts. In conferences and other situations where prompts are > played over conversations, the level of the prompts are obviously low. > > I can, of course, renormalize the gain of the prompts up to -10DB or more > with a sound editor. However, I wonder if there is a better way to change > the level of the prompts, or if there is a good reason for the prompts to > be > encoded at such a low level. > > I haven't considered all of the implications yet, but I'm fairly sure that > encoding the prompts this quietly is not the best approach, even if it is > desirable for the prompts to play quietly on a call. For each 6DB reduction > in gain, there is a 50% reduction in perceived volume, and one less > significant bit is used for storing the audio. In a 16-bit file, a maximum > gain of -16 means that only the 14 least significant bits are actually used > for encoding the audio. This results in a reduction in dynamic range, but > the difference isn't really noticeable as long as the data remains 16-bit. > The problem comes when the audio is converted to a different bit depth. For > example, most quickie routines for converting 16-bit audio to 8-bit audio > will simply chop off the 8 least significant bits. Therefore, when the > prompts are converted to 8-bit audio for use by most of the narrow band > codecs, the prompts are only using 6 bits of audio. If the volume of the > channel is increased, then the > 6 bits are promoted, and the dithering errors at the bottom become louder. > In the worst case, since these prompts are only encoded with 14 bits of > actual data, and converting to an 8-bit channel will only leave 6 bits of > actual data, boosting the gain of the prompts on an 8-bit channel to full > loudness would result in the noise floor (the level of the dithering > crackle) being about -18DB. That's almost as loud as the prompts themselves > sound at the moment. > > Anyway, regardless of observations, is there a reason why the prompts must > be recorded so quietly? If I'd like them louder (without increasing the > gain > of the entire channel), is there a way other than running them through a > tool to renormalize their max levels? > > Bryan > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/71faaa40/attachment-0001.html From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Mon Jun 27 05:23:06 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:23:06 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations Message-ID: Hello FS Users! I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give passwords. However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, and how to remedy that fact. I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed would force this function: However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as the following lines: Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) doesn't help. I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. Thanks for any direction. From sid.kshatriya at gmail.com Mon Jun 27 09:52:01 2011 From: sid.kshatriya at gmail.com (Sidharth Kshatriya) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:22:01 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> Message-ID: Yeah sox is great for command line and batch changes to volume levels // this command invocation outputs the maximum volume increase can go through without any distortion. The maximum volume increase possible is stored as a decimal in max_vol.txt sox -n stat -v 2> max_vol.txt // This command actually boosts the volume level of the input file. Output is stored in sox -v `cat max_vol.txt` On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Nandy Dagondon wrote: > you can also run sox on a script to change the volume of the sound files by > batch. > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Jan Berger wrote: > >> Wavepad is free and will do bulk changes to sound files. >> >> Won't AGC solve this? >> >> Jan >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org >> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Bryan >> Smart >> Sent: 26. juni 2011 22:32 >> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level >> >> As part of creating prompts for my IVRs, I've tried to match the audio >> gain >> of my prompts with the gain of the stock English prompts. During this >> process, I noticed that the English Callie prompts are recorded extremely >> low (max gain around -16DB). I have the Cepstral Callie voice, and I must >> set the Cepstral volume to about 50% in order to match the gain of the >> English prompts. In conferences and other situations where prompts are >> played over conversations, the level of the prompts are obviously low. >> >> I can, of course, renormalize the gain of the prompts up to -10DB or more >> with a sound editor. However, I wonder if there is a better way to change >> the level of the prompts, or if there is a good reason for the prompts to >> be >> encoded at such a low level. >> >> I haven't considered all of the implications yet, but I'm fairly sure that >> encoding the prompts this quietly is not the best approach, even if it is >> desirable for the prompts to play quietly on a call. For each 6DB >> reduction >> in gain, there is a 50% reduction in perceived volume, and one less >> significant bit is used for storing the audio. In a 16-bit file, a maximum >> gain of -16 means that only the 14 least significant bits are actually >> used >> for encoding the audio. This results in a reduction in dynamic range, but >> the difference isn't really noticeable as long as the data remains 16-bit. >> The problem comes when the audio is converted to a different bit depth. >> For >> example, most quickie routines for converting 16-bit audio to 8-bit audio >> will simply chop off the 8 least significant bits. Therefore, when the >> prompts are converted to 8-bit audio for use by most of the narrow band >> codecs, the prompts are only using 6 bits of audio. If the volume of the >> channel is increased, then the >> 6 bits are promoted, and the dithering errors at the bottom become >> louder. >> In the worst case, since these prompts are only encoded with 14 bits of >> actual data, and converting to an 8-bit channel will only leave 6 bits of >> actual data, boosting the gain of the prompts on an 8-bit channel to full >> loudness would result in the noise floor (the level of the dithering >> crackle) being about -18DB. That's almost as loud as the prompts >> themselves >> sound at the moment. >> >> Anyway, regardless of observations, is there a reason why the prompts must >> be recorded so quietly? If I'd like them louder (without increasing the >> gain >> of the entire channel), is there a way other than running them through a >> tool to renormalize their max levels? >> >> Bryan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Sidharth Kshatriya www.sidk.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/cf3d5ea7/attachment.html From mays.david at gmail.com Mon Jun 27 10:27:19 2011 From: mays.david at gmail.com (David Ma) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:27:19 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Hi Michael, Thanks very much for the response. There is no dialplan specified for this call. In the FS setting, G729 is used as preferred stack for originating calls. The leg-A and B are bridged immediately after receiving PROGRESS-MEDIA from leg-B. Calls are originated with following parameters: * -- Leg-A -- "api originate {origination_caller_id_number=,sip_cid_type=pid,privacy=yes,continue_on_fail=true} &park()" **-- Leg-B --* * "api originate {origination_caller_id_number=,originate_timeout=60,sip_cid_type=pid,privacy=yes,continue_on_fail=false} &park()" * The entire debug log for this call follows. Thanks, D.Ma ================================= 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750911] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 1 = [originate_timeout=60] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110624132936888918] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 4 = [privacy=yes] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 5 = [continue_on_fail=true] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212[c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.889072 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-24 13:29:35.889829 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT 2011-06-24 13:29:35.889829 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT send 999 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:36.398490: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE sip:03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110624 INVITE Contact: User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer Privacy: none Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 204 X-FS-Support: update_display P-Asserted-Identity: "" v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1308862405 1308862406 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 t=0 0 m=audio 30970 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:36.404598: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110624 INVITE Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 774 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:37.615248: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110624 INVITE Contact: Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Content-Type: application/sdp Require: 100rel RSeq: 1 Content-Length: 231 v=0 o=- 508539113671071081 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.201 t=0 0 m=audio 25120 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 651 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:37.615605: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PRACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKUZ3F43aUtvj1F Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110625 PRACK Contact: RAck: 1 14110624 INVITE User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "Outbound Call" <03996597632298> 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [proceeding][183] 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: v=0 o=- 508539113671071081 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.201 t=0 0 m=audio 25120 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=ptime:20 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples 8000 bits 2011-06-24 13:29:37.108995 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 2011-06-24 13:29:37.108995 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30970 -> 203.208.207.201 port 25120 codec: 18 ms: 20 2011-06-24 13:29:37.108995 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] 160 bytes per 20ms 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive payload to 101 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212! 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING -> EARLY 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212] 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:37.111618 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:37.111618 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:37.111618 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:37.111618 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE EXECUTE sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 park() recv 382 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:37.620736: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKUZ3F43aUtvj1F;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110625 PRACK Contact: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:37.160714 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port confirmed. recv 512 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:45.146388: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110624 INVITE Contact: Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Require: 100rel RSeq: 2 Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 651 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:45.146628: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PRACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKv8v85yUyQ58KB Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110626 PRACK Contact: RAck: 2 14110624 INVITE User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:44.639310 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "03996597632298" <03996597632298> 2011-06-24 13:29:44.639310 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state [proceeding][183] recv 382 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:45.151718: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKv8v85yUyQ58KB;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110626 PRACK Contact: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 529 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:47.446072: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110624 INVITE Contact: Allow-Events: refer Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:46.938477 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [completing][200] send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:47.446869: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXHp17Sc2meZ6p Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110624 ACK Contact: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:46.939738 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [ready][200] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.939738 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> ACTIVE 2011-06-24 13:29:46.939738 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel [sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered 2011-06-24 13:29:46.942763 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task 27 switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8) to run at 1308896986 2011-06-24 13:29:46.944563 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996597632298] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110624132936888918] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 3 = [privacy=yes] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable string 4 = [continue_on_fail=false] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212[817124e6-26fe-46cc-af55-89715abdfced] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_INIT 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_ROUTING 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING -> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA send 999 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:47.454251: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE sip:03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F To: Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad92011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA CSeq: 14110629 INVITE Contact: 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going to sleep User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer Privacy: none Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 204 X-FS-Support: update_display P-Asserted-Identity: "" v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1308872756 1308872757 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 t=0 0 m=audio 20630 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:46.946974 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:47.460017: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F To: Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110629 INVITE Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:46.960900 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) EXECUTE sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) 2011-06-24 13:29:46.960900 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample rate 11025 doesn't match requested rate 8000 2011-06-24 13:29:46.960900 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has 2 channels, muxing to mono will occur. 2011-06-24 13:29:46.960900 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms 2011-06-24 13:29:46.981203 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - 0x2aaab80894b8 0x5112110 recv 774 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.623941: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110629 INVITE Contact: Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Content-Type: application/sdp Require: 100rel RSeq: 1 Content-Length: 231 v=0 o=- 508550174225779858 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.202 t=0 0 m=audio 25150 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 651 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.624297: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PRACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ38jBge9e0Bce Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110630 PRACK Contact: RAck: 1 14110629 INVITE User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "Outbound Call" <03996563750911> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [proceeding][183] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: v=0 o=- 508550174225779858 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.202 t=0 0 m=audio 25150 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=ptime:20 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples 8000 bits 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP [sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 20630 -> 203.208.207.202 port 25150 codec: 18 ms: 20 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] 160 bytes per 20ms 2011-06-24 13:29:48.119065 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send payload to 101 2011-06-24 13:29:48.119065 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive payload to 101 2011-06-24 13:29:48.119065 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212! 2011-06-24 13:29:48.119065 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING -> EARLY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 park() 2011-06-24 13:29:48.122782 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] recv 382 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.630447: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ38jBge9e0Bce;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110630 PRACK Contact: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:48.122782 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) EXECUTE sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> CS_HIBERNATE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> CS_HIBERNATE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done playing file 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_HIBERNATE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE -> CS_RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.126015 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done playing file 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_HIBERNATE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE -> CS_RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: ORIGINATOR_CANCEL 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 52 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 52 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Ended 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close Channel sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 sofia/external/ 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaaac03fff8 (nil) 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaaac03fff8 (nil) 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaaac068fc8 (nil) 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaaac068fc8 (nil) 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: ORIGINATOR_CANCEL 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to sleep 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> CS_REPORTING 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_REPORTING 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: ORIGINATOR_CANCEL 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to sleep send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.671783: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CANCEL sip:03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F To: Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110629 CANCEL Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 51 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on external entities 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 51 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Ended 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close Channel sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] send 677 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.671936: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0c2BDBZcc91yS Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110627 BYE Contact: User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP -> DOWN 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change CS_DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 sofia/external/ 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaab8030878 (nil) 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaab8030878 (nil) 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaab80894b8 0x5112110 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - 0x2aaab80894b8 (nil) 2011-06-24 13:29:48.166430 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - 0x2aaab80894b8 0x5112110 2011-06-24 13:29:48.166430 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY 2011-06-24 13:29:48.166430 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to sleep recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.679561: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u000000013MCNME Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110629 CANCEL Contact: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 731 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.681395: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ UPDATE sip:mod_sofia at 10.1.1.46:5080 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 203.208.207.212:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bK00151746C47A8307FCE25ED9D752 From: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK To: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 46496 UPDATE Contact: Content-Type: application/sdp Max-Forwards: 70 Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces Content-Length: 231 v=0 o=- 508550174225779858 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 s=session c=IN IP4 203.208.207.202 t=0 0 m=audio 25150 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=ptime:20 a=inactive ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 895 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.681661: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 203.208.207.212:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bK00151746C47A8307FCE25ED9D752 From: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK To: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 46496 UPDATE Contact: User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 216 v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1308872756 1308872758 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 t=0 0 m=audio 20630 RTP/AVP 18 101 3 13 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=inactive a=ptime:20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.681824: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110629 INVITE Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.681913: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACK sip:03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110629 ACK Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.683041: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0c2BDBZcc91yS;received=10.1.1.46 From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm To: ;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 CSeq: 14110627 BYE Contact: Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011-06-24 13:29:48.524051 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:138 Deleting task 27 switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8) On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Pastebin the entire debug log, including the siptrace. Also include the > originate line and any other dialplan config that might be used. > -MC > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:26 PM, David Ma wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> Unfortunately this problem still happens. >> >> I enabled "continue_on_fail" for leg-A when I originated the call. Leg-A >> call went well. Then I originated leg-B call ("continue_on_fail" is NOT set >> for leg-B), which failed for [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER]. As the consequence, >> leg-A was hung up by FS automatically for [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL]. >> >> The log excerpt follows. >> >> Do you think "continue_on_fail" should be also enabled for leg-B call? >> >> Thanks, >> D.Ma >> >> 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >> string 5 = [continue_on_fail=true] >> >> 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212[c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8] >> [...] >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going >> to sleep >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ >> 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> HANGUP >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup >> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >> [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >> CS_HANGUP >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ >> 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup >> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >> [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/external/ >> 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to >> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:52 AM, David Ma wrote: >> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> Thanks very much for your prompt response! I appreciate the information >>> provided. >>> >>> I was actually searching the the existence of such a variable. I was not >>> so luck to find it out and thereby resort to the support forum. >>> >>> I've modified my code to build this parameter into my application. Will >>> feedback to you after verification. >>> >>> Thanks again, >>> D.Ma >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Michael Collins wrote: >>> >>>> How about setting this? >>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#continue_on_fail >>>> >>>> -MC >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:32 AM, dma wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am creating a call-back solution. After leg-A answers, I originate >>>>> leg-B >>>>> call. After receiving SIP 183 from Leg-B, I bridge the 2 legs. However, >>>>> in >>>>> some cases, leg-A is automatically disconnected by FreeSwitch on leg-B >>>>> failure, for example, DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER. The application is not >>>>> given >>>>> a chance to handle leg-B failure event. This should not be a correct >>>>> scenario because I never set "hangup-after-bridge", which is false by >>>>> default. >>>>> >>>>> The right way should be, FreeSwitch doesn't hang up leg-A >>>>> automatically, but >>>>> give a chance for the application to decide what to do. >>>>> >>>>> Please see the logs below: >>>>> >>>>> ================================================= >>>>> >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750914] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>>> string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>>> string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>>> string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>>> string 4 = [privacy=yes] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> [ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> >>>>> CS_INIT >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_INIT >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>>>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.477997: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> INVITE sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D >>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>>>> Privacy: none >>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>> Content-Disposition: session >>>>> Content-Length: 204 >>>>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>>>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46> >>>>> >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307645395 1307645396 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>> s=FreeSWITCH >>>>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 30000 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>>>> a=ptime:20 >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT >>>>> -> >>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>> [calling][0] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN >>>>> -> >>>>> RINGING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_ROUTING -> >>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>> going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.485130: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:56.677788: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>> >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>> s=session >>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>> "Outbound >>>>> Call" <03996590031055> >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>> s=session >>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec >>>>> Compare >>>>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>>>> samples >>>>> 8000 bits >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send >>>>> payload to 101 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>>>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30000 >>>>> -> >>>>> 203.208.207.196 port 30792 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>>>> [soft] >>>>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send >>>>> payload to 101 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>> receive >>>>> payload to 101 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212! >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>> RINGING -> >>>>> EARLY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 >>>>> Originate >>>>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.618770 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port >>>>> confirmed. >>>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.562021: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>> >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=- 421265648 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>> s=session >>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>> "03996590031055" <03996590031055> >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.563178: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>> >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=- 421265648 3 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>> s=session >>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.457169 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>> recv 749 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.365284: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>> Contact: >>>>> Allow-Events: refer >>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>> Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces >>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>> >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>> s=session >>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>> [completing][200] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>> s=session >>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> >>>>> send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.366562: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKyUg0ga7pUZmrS >>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501633 ACK >>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>> [ready][200] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY >>>>> -> >>>>> ACTIVE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel >>>>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.264178 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task 23 >>>>> switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79) to >>>>> run at >>>>> 1307676927 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.265202 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996590031055] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>>> string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>>> string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>>> string 3 = [privacy=yes] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> [30228d2b-756a-4a98-871d-db63a2955b52] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> >>>>> CS_INIT >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_INIT >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT >>>>> -> >>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN >>>>> -> >>>>> RINGING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>>>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.373220: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> INVITE sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN2011-06-10 >>>>> 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>>>> >>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>>>> Privacy: none >>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>> Content-Disposition: session >>>>> Content-Length: 204 >>>>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>>>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46> >>>>> >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307646863 1307646864 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>> s=FreeSWITCH >>>>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 28564 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>>>> a=ptime:20 >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>> [calling][0] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_ROUTING -> >>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>> going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.378710: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File >>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample rate >>>>> 11025 >>>>> doesn't match requested rate 8000 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has 2 >>>>> channels, muxing to mono will occur. >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec >>>>> Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.298764 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - >>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:28.618472: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>> Content-Length: 186 >>>>> >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>>> s=session >>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>> "Outbound >>>>> Call" <03996563750914> >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>>> s=session >>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec >>>>> Compare >>>>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>>>> samples >>>>> 8000 bits >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send >>>>> payload to 101 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>>>> [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 28564 >>>>> -> >>>>> 203.208.207.195 port 45002 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>>>> [soft] >>>>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send >>>>> payload to 101 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>> receive >>>>> payload to 101 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212! >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>> RINGING -> >>>>> EARLY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 >>>>> Originate >>>>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.516887 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_EXECUTE -> >>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_EXECUTE -> >>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done >>>>> playing >>>>> file >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>>>> playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>>>> CS_RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going >>>>> to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.540814: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, >>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>> Content-Length: 186 >>>>> >>>>> v=0 >>>>> o=- 131082 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>>> s=session >>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>>> t=0 0 >>>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>> "03996563750914" <03996563750914> >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [WARNING] switch_core_session.c:1940 Cannot >>>>> execute app 'playback' media required on an outbound channel that does >>>>> not >>>>> have media established >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>>>> CS_RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going >>>>> to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET >>>>> -> >>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET >>>>> -> >>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY >>>>> -> >>>>> HANGUP >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>>> [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_HANGUP >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>> ACTIVE -> >>>>> HANGUP >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.818391: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> CANCEL sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>>>> Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" >>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>>> [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >>>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP >>>>> -> >>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, >>>>> cause: >>>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going >>>>> to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>> going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_HANGUP >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_REPORTING -> >>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session >>>>> 40 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>>>> external >>>>> entities >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session >>>>> 40 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>>>> Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>> HANGUP -> >>>>> DOWN >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >>>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP >>>>> -> >>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, >>>>> cause: >>>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going >>>>> to >>>>> sleep >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>> CS_REPORTING -> >>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>> signal >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session >>>>> 39 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>>>> external >>>>> entities >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session >>>>> 39 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>>>> Channel >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>> HANGUP -> >>>>> DOWN >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 (nil) >>>>> send 662 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.820530: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg >>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>>> Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" >>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - >>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to >>>>> sleep >>>>> recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.823302: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u00000001QXU3LU >>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>>>> Contact: >>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824765: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>> Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" >>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824891: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> ACK sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501649 ACK >>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.826375: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>> To: >>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Leg-A-is-automatically-disconnected-on-Leg-B-orginate-failure-tp6482192p6482192.html >>>>> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/234554ee/attachment-0001.html From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Mon Jun 27 03:11:07 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> Message-ID: <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> I have tools to batch-process audio files. I just was not sure that regaining all of the prompt files was the best approach. I figured that the gain must have been reduced so dramatically for some sort of reason (to avoid clipping in some situation, to work better with the internal resampling, etc). What AGC do you mean? I know that AGC has recently been added to conferencing, but the level of the prompts is a system-wide situation. As far as I know, there isn't AGC that can be applied on every channel, and, even if there was, there would surely be a processing hit, so the goal would be to avoid needing it, right? The root problem, at least for me, is this. I need to add voice prompts and other audio for an IVR. I can't simply normalize all of my prompts to 0DB, as, even though they don't distort, they're so loud when compared to the stock prompts, they'll blow the phone out of my hand. To match them to the stock prompts, I must normalize them to around -16DB. I can do that, but it seems very wrong. At -16DB, nearly 85% of the potential gain of the channel is lost. Try this... With the demo IVR (5000), add this before the sleep command in the dialplan. That is the max gain boost available for a channel. The prompts should be really clipping with that much amplification, but they don't clip at all. At -16DB, you could literally amplify them to 6 times their native level without distorting. Native level is too low. Once I realized this, it became clear to me why Freeswitch sounded more quiet than Asterisk, at least when working with recorded prompts. I suppose I could use set_audio_level on every last call, but I'm sure that real-time amplification, like AGC, is another processor drain that builds up with lots of calls. Besides, it seems weird to dramatically reduce the level of audio, and then waste cycles amplifying it back up in real-time. Bryan On Jun 26, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Jan Berger wrote: > Wavepad is free and will do bulk changes to sound files. > > Won't AGC solve this? > > Jan > > -----Original Message----- > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Bryan > Smart > Sent: 26. juni 2011 22:32 > To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level > > As part of creating prompts for my IVRs, I've tried to match the audio gain > of my prompts with the gain of the stock English prompts. During this > process, I noticed that the English Callie prompts are recorded extremely > low (max gain around -16DB). I have the Cepstral Callie voice, and I must > set the Cepstral volume to about 50% in order to match the gain of the > English prompts. In conferences and other situations where prompts are > played over conversations, the level of the prompts are obviously low. > > I can, of course, renormalize the gain of the prompts up to -10DB or more > with a sound editor. However, I wonder if there is a better way to change > the level of the prompts, or if there is a good reason for the prompts to be > encoded at such a low level. > > I haven't considered all of the implications yet, but I'm fairly sure that > encoding the prompts this quietly is not the best approach, even if it is > desirable for the prompts to play quietly on a call. For each 6DB reduction > in gain, there is a 50% reduction in perceived volume, and one less > significant bit is used for storing the audio. In a 16-bit file, a maximum > gain of -16 means that only the 14 least significant bits are actually used > for encoding the audio. This results in a reduction in dynamic range, but > the difference isn't really noticeable as long as the data remains 16-bit. > The problem comes when the audio is converted to a different bit depth. For > example, most quickie routines for converting 16-bit audio to 8-bit audio > will simply chop off the 8 least significant bits. Therefore, when the > prompts are converted to 8-bit audio for use by most of the narrow band > codecs, the prompts are only using 6 bits of audio. If the volume of the > channel is increased, then the > 6 bits are promoted, and the dithering errors at the bottom become louder. > In the worst case, since these prompts are only encoded with 14 bits of > actual data, and converting to an 8-bit channel will only leave 6 bits of > actual data, boosting the gain of the prompts on an 8-bit channel to full > loudness would result in the noise floor (the level of the dithering > crackle) being about -18DB. That's almost as loud as the prompts themselves > sound at the moment. > > Anyway, regardless of observations, is there a reason why the prompts must > be recorded so quietly? If I'd like them louder (without increasing the gain > of the entire channel), is there a way other than running them through a > tool to renormalize their max levels? > > Bryan > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Mon Jun 27 03:57:21 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Phrase macros in conferences Message-ID: I'm attempting to use phrase macros in mod_conference, but I'm not having success. Perhaps they aren't supported? I have a working phrase macro. In the dialplan, both and Work just fine. The wiki says that, in conference.conf.xml, entries like pin-sound accept, for their value, file paths, strings prefixed with "say" for TTS, and strings prefixed with "tone_stream". This looks almost the same as what can be passed to the playback application in the dialplan. When I try to prefix a string with "phrase", it doesn't work. The console tells me "unknown file format". The console still tells me this if I make up phrase names So it is complaining about the syntax or capability, rather than an unrecognized format of an actual file. If mod_conference doesn't support phrase macros, is this a near-future feature? Phrases would seem to be necessary to ocalize announcements and play announcements that are stitched together from multiple files. Bryan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110626/d2702737/attachment.html From max.asterisk at gmail.com Mon Jun 27 17:05:42 2011 From: max.asterisk at gmail.com (Max Alex) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:35:42 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Answer issue on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Thanks for reply, I have tried the same way and reloaded freeswitch, but still it is answered on first ring of the call. When it is ringing the call on 1001 and the same time it is answered on cell phone, so something is done when it is ringing on 1001. Here is the dialplan for the same --> Please help me for this issue. Thanks, Max Alex Voip Developer On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > Are you using the default dialplan? I think you might just need to ignore > early media on your bridge app. If you are using the default.xml file then > locate "Local_Extension" and the bridge line: > > > > Change it to this, then try again: > > data="{ignore_early_media=true}user/${dialed_extension}@${domain_name}"/> > > If I understand correctly, the "symptom" you are experiencing is the normal > operation of the bridge app (and it's cousin, the originate API command). > When the b-leg sends back media, including ringing, the bridge (or the > originate) will be considered "successful," and in the case of bridge, the > b-leg's audio (the early media) will be connected to the a-leg. If you set > ignore_early_media=true then you are explicitly telling the bridge app that > you only want to connect the b-leg to the a-leg if the b-leg actually > answers. > > I hope that made sense... > > -MC > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Max Alex wrote: > >> Hi, >> Thanks for reply. >> Current scenario is below. >> >> PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to >> 1001 -> ringing (Answered on cellphone) >> Here when it is routed to 1001 the call it is started ringing, but on >> phone that call is answered and hearding sound of ringing. >> >> Required flow: >> PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to >> 1001 -> ringing (Ringing on cellphone) >> >> I hope it is understable, the call should not be answered until 1001 >> answer it, right not when it is started ring it is answered on cell phone. >> that should not be happen as it is not answered yet. >> >> Waiting for your reply. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Max Alex >> Voip Developer >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure I understand the problem. What is happening vs. what you >>> believe should be happening? >>> -MC >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Max Alex wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> Thanks for your reply. >>>> Here is my configuration and log >>>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16571 >>>> >>>> I am using A200 analog sangoma device with freeswitch, it is working >>>> fine but when it is routing call to 1001 then it is answered. >>>> Please provider your suggestions. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Max Alex >>>> Voip Developer >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>> >>>>> I thought the A200 was an analog card? Maybe I have my numbers mixed >>>>> up... >>>>> >>>>> Go ahead and collect a debug log of this call. It might help to have >>>>> your configs posted as well. Use pastebin.freeswitch.org. See this >>>>> wiki article for tips on how to collect information: >>>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs >>>>> >>>>> -MC >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Max Alex wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> I have installed freeswitch latest version with sangoma card A200 as >>>>>> well, >>>>>> I have installed and configured freetdm module with wanpipe drivers >>>>>> for freeswitch, >>>>>> We are properly receiving the inbound calls in public context and then >>>>>> we are routing that call to 1001 extension, >>>>>> it is properly routing to 1001 as well, but we have one issue while >>>>>> routing on 1001. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the issue description. >>>>>> I am calling from my cell phone to that DID number of pri line, and >>>>>> then it will start ringing on 1001 extension, >>>>>> When 1001 extension start ringing the call is answered on my cell >>>>>> phone, >>>>>> it is something like freeswitch preanswer or autoanswer the call, how >>>>>> can i stop this answer call when it is ringing on 1001 extension, >>>>>> Waiting for good reply. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Max Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/20952445/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Mon Jun 27 17:25:04 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:25:04 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Just so you know... These will have no effect in the user directory. They only apply to SIP profiles. -Steve On 27 June 2011 02:23, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: > Hello FS Users! > > I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if > they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a > password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is > great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our > SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give > passwords. > > However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in > the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, > instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, > and how to remedy that fact. > > I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed > would force this function: > > > > However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as > the following lines: > > > > > > > > Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) > doesn't help. > > I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems > possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do > not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to > test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of > this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the > nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. > > Thanks for any direction. > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/a2615bb9/attachment.html From steveu at coppice.org Mon Jun 27 17:48:20 2011 From: steveu at coppice.org (Steve Underwood) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:48:20 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> On 06/27/2011 07:11 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: > I have tools to batch-process audio files. I just was not sure that regaining all of the prompt files was the best approach. I figured that the gain must have been reduced so dramatically for some sort of reason (to avoid clipping in some situation, to work better with the internal resampling, etc). > > What AGC do you mean? I know that AGC has recently been added to conferencing, but the level of the prompts is a system-wide situation. As far as I know, there isn't AGC that can be applied on every channel, and, even if there was, there would surely be a processing hit, so the goal would be to avoid needing it, right? > > The root problem, at least for me, is this. I need to add voice prompts and other audio for an IVR. I can't simply normalize all of my prompts to 0DB, as, even though they don't distort, they're so loud when compared to the stock prompts, they'll blow the phone out of my hand. To match them to the stock prompts, I must normalize them to around -16DB. I can do that, but it seems very wrong. At -16DB, nearly 85% of the potential gain of the channel is lost. -16dBM0 or -16dBOv, and average or peak burst power? -16dBOv for the average power is about where you want a voice prompt to be. In some juristictions you could be in breach of a regulation or two if you set the level higher than that on the PSTN. Why would you set a voice prompt to 0dB? It will be clipping like crazy. > Try this... With the demo IVR (5000), add this before the sleep command in the dialplan. > > > > That is the max gain boost available for a channel. The prompts should be really clipping with that much amplification, but they don't clip at all. At -16DB, you could literally amplify them to 6 times their native level without distorting. Native level is too low. Once I realized this, it became clear to me why Freeswitch sounded more quiet than Asterisk, at least when working with recorded prompts. > > I suppose I could use set_audio_level on every last call, but I'm sure that real-time amplification, like AGC, is another processor drain that builds up with lots of calls. Besides, it seems weird to dramatically reduce the level of audio, and then waste cycles amplifying it back up in real-time. > > Bryan Steve From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 27 19:09:10 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:09:10 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: This makes my eyes bleed. Can you please put this on pastebin.freeswitch.org? Use "FreeSWITCH Log" as the syntax highlight. -MC On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:27 PM, David Ma wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks very much for the response. There is no dialplan specified for this > call. In the FS setting, G729 is used as preferred stack for originating > calls. The leg-A and B are bridged immediately after receiving > PROGRESS-MEDIA from leg-B. > > Calls are originated with following parameters: > * > -- Leg-A -- > "api originate > {origination_caller_id_number=,sip_cid_type=pid,privacy=yes,continue_on_fail=true} > &park()" > > **-- Leg-B --* > * "api originate > {origination_caller_id_number=,originate_timeout=60,sip_cid_type=pid,privacy=yes,continue_on_fail=false} > &park()" > * > > The entire debug log for this call follows. > > Thanks, > D.Ma > > ================================= > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750911] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 1 = [originate_timeout=60] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110624132936888918] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 4 = [privacy=yes] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 5 = [continue_on_fail=true] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212[c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.889072 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_INIT > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.889829 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.889829 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT > send 999 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:36.398490: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > INVITE sip:03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110624 INVITE > Contact: > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY > Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces > Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer > Privacy: none > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Disposition: session > Content-Length: 204 > X-FS-Support: update_display > P-Asserted-Identity: "" > > v=0 > o=FreeSWITCH 1308862405 1308862406 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > s=FreeSWITCH > c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > t=0 0 > m=audio 30970 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-16 > a=ptime:20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING -> > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-24 13:29:35.891343 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going > to sleep > recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:36.404598: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 100 Trying > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110624 INVITE > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > recv 774 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:37.615248: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110624 INVITE > Contact: > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Content-Type: application/sdp > Require: 100rel > RSeq: 1 > Content-Length: 231 > > v=0 > o=- 508539113671071081 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.201 > t=0 0 > m=audio 25120 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=ptime:20 > a=sendrecv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > send 651 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:37.615605: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > PRACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKUZ3F43aUtvj1F > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110625 PRACK > Contact: > RAck: 1 14110624 INVITE > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY > Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "Outbound Call" > <03996597632298> > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [proceeding][183] > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: > v=0 > o=- 508539113671071081 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.201 > t=0 0 > m=audio 25120 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=ptime:20 > > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare > [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.107576 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples > 8000 bits > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.108995 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send > payload to 101 > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.108995 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP > [sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30970 -> > 203.208.207.201 port 25120 codec: 18 ms: 20 > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.108995 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] > 160 bytes per 20ms > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send > payload to 101 > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive > payload to 101 > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212! > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING -> EARLY > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate > Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212] > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> > CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.109893 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.111618 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.111618 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.111618 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.111618 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 park() > recv 382 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:37.620736: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 Ok > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKUZ3F43aUtvj1F;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110625 PRACK > Contact: > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:37.160714 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port > confirmed. > recv 512 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:45.146388: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110624 INVITE > Contact: > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Require: 100rel > RSeq: 2 > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > send 651 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:45.146628: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > PRACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKv8v85yUyQ58KB > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110626 PRACK > Contact: > RAck: 2 14110624 INVITE > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY > Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:44.639310 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "03996597632298" > <03996597632298> > 2011-06-24 13:29:44.639310 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state [proceeding][183] > recv 382 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:45.151718: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 Ok > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKv8v85yUyQ58KB;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110626 PRACK > Contact: > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > recv 529 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:47.446072: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 Ok > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKtpaQ28SQXKvem;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110624 INVITE > Contact: > Allow-Events: refer > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.938477 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [completing][200] > send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:47.446869: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXHp17Sc2meZ6p > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110624 ACK > Contact: > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.939738 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [ready][200] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.939738 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> ACTIVE > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.939738 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel [sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.942763 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task 27 > switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8) to run at > 1308896986 > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.944563 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996597632298] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110624132936888918] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 3 = [privacy=yes] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable > string 4 = [continue_on_fail=false] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212[817124e6-26fe-46cc-af55-89715abdfced] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW -> CS_INIT > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_INIT > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT -> CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_ROUTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN -> RINGING > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_ROUTING -> > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_CONSUME_MEDIA > send 999 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:47.454251: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > INVITE sip:03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > To: > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad92011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 > [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA > > CSeq: 14110629 INVITE > Contact: > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.945633 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA going > to sleep > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY > Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces > Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer > Privacy: none > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Disposition: session > Content-Length: 204 > X-FS-Support: update_display > P-Asserted-Identity: "" > > v=0 > o=FreeSWITCH 1308872756 1308872757 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > s=FreeSWITCH > c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > t=0 0 > m=audio 20630 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-16 > a=ptime:20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.946974 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [calling][0] > recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:47.460017: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 100 Trying > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > To: > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110629 INVITE > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.960900 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute > playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) > EXECUTE sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.960900 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File > /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample rate 11025 > doesn't match requested rate 8000 > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.960900 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has 2 > channels, muxing to mono will occur. > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.960900 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec > Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms > 2011-06-24 13:29:46.981203 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - > 0x2aaab80894b8 0x5112110 > recv 774 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.623941: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110629 INVITE > Contact: > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, NOTIFY, > SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE > Content-Type: application/sdp > Require: 100rel > RSeq: 1 > Content-Length: 231 > > v=0 > o=- 508550174225779858 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.202 > t=0 0 > m=audio 25150 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=ptime:20 > a=sendrecv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > send 651 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.624297: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > PRACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ38jBge9e0Bce > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110630 PRACK > Contact: > RAck: 1 14110629 INVITE > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY > Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [INFO] sofia.c:729 sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to "Outbound Call" > <03996563750911> > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 entering state [proceeding][183] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: > v=0 > o=- 508550174225779858 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.202 > t=0 0 > m=audio 25150 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=ptime:20 > > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec Compare > [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 samples > 8000 bits > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf send > payload to 101 > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP > [sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 20630 -> > 203.208.207.202 port 25150 codec: 18 ms: 20 > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.115941 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer [soft] > 160 bytes per 20ms > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.119065 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf send > payload to 101 > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.119065 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf receive > payload to 101 > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.119065 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212! > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.119065 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change RINGING -> EARLY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 Originate > Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> > CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.120495 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE > EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 park() > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.122782 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > recv 382 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.630447: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 Ok > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ38jBge9e0Bce;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110630 PRACK > Contact: > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.122782 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute > playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) > EXECUTE sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> > CS_HIBERNATE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_EXECUTE -> > CS_HIBERNATE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec > Activated L16 at 8000hz 1 channels 20ms > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done playing > file > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_HIBERNATE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE -> CS_RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.124434 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.126015 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done playing > file > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_HIBERNATE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HIBERNATE -> CS_RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET -> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going > to sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] > [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] > [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going > to sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: > DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: > DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: ORIGINATOR_CANCEL > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING > -> CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 52 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on > external entities > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 52 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Ended > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close > Channel sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP -> > DOWN > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 sofia/external/ > 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaaac03fff8 (nil) > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaaac03fff8 (nil) > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaaac068fc8 (nil) > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaaac068fc8 (nil) > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: > ORIGINATOR_CANCEL > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 > sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 > (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to > sleep > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_HANGUP -> > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_REPORTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, cause: > ORIGINATOR_CANCEL > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going to > sleep > send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.671783: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CANCEL sip:03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > To: > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110629 CANCEL > Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_REPORTING > -> CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session 51 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on > external entities > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session 51 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Ended > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close > Channel sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] > send 677 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.671936: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0c2BDBZcc91yS > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110627 BYE > Contact: > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY > Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces > Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change HANGUP -> > DOWN > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change > CS_DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 sofia/external/ > 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaab8030878 (nil) > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaab8030878 (nil) > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaab80894b8 0x5112110 > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - > 0x2aaab80894b8 (nil) > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.166430 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - > 0x2aaab80894b8 0x5112110 > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.166430 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 > sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.166430 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 > (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going to > sleep > recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.679561: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 Ok > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u000000013MCNME > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110629 CANCEL > Contact: > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > recv 731 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.681395: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > UPDATE sip:mod_sofia at 10.1.1.46:5080 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 203.208.207.212:5060 > ;branch=z9hG4bK00151746C47A8307FCE25ED9D752 > From: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK > To: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 46496 UPDATE > Contact: > Content-Type: application/sdp > Max-Forwards: 70 > Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces > Content-Length: 231 > > v=0 > o=- 508550174225779858 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.212 > s=session > c=IN IP4 203.208.207.202 > t=0 0 > m=audio 25150 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=ptime:20 > a=inactive > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > send 895 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.681661: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 OK > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 203.208.207.212:5060 > ;branch=z9hG4bK00151746C47A8307FCE25ED9D752 > From: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK > To: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 46496 UPDATE > Contact: > User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z > Accept: application/sdp > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, > REGISTER, REFER, PRACK, NOTIFY > Supported: 100rel, timer, precondition, path, replaces > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Disposition: session > Content-Length: 216 > > v=0 > o=FreeSWITCH 1308872756 1308872758 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > s=FreeSWITCH > c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 > t=0 0 > m=audio 20630 RTP/AVP 18 101 3 13 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-16 > a=inactive > a=ptime:20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.681824: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110629 INVITE > Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.681913: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ACK sip:03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKytFt9mX5HQNSj > Max-Forwards: 70 > From: "" ;tag=62eBXSt93tr7F > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RV0KORLQK > Call-ID: d0f42376-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110629 ACK > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 05:29:48.683041: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SIP/2.0 200 Ok > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.46:5080 > ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0c2BDBZcc91yS;received=10.1.1.46 > From: "" ;tag=5SNjUy956H2mm > To: >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll000B8RX0S6R1TX > Call-ID: ca5d29b7-18c5-122f-3387-0015c5fc7ad9 > CSeq: 14110627 BYE > Contact: > Content-Length: 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2011-06-24 13:29:48.524051 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:138 Deleting task 27 > switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8) > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> Pastebin the entire debug log, including the siptrace. Also include the >> originate line and any other dialplan config that might be used. >> -MC >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:26 PM, David Ma wrote: >> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> Unfortunately this problem still happens. >>> >>> I enabled "continue_on_fail" for leg-A when I originated the call. Leg-A >>> call went well. Then I originated leg-B call ("continue_on_fail" is NOT set >>> for leg-B), which failed for [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER]. As the consequence, >>> leg-A was hung up by FS automatically for [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL]. >>> >>> The log excerpt follows. >>> >>> Do you think "continue_on_fail" should be also enabled for leg-B call? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> D.Ma >>> >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>> string 5 = [continue_on_fail=true] >>> >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212[c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8] >>> [...] >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE going >>> to sleep >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ >>> 03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY -> HANGUP >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup >>> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>> [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>> CS_HANGUP >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 (sofia/external/ >>> 03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup >>> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>> [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to >>> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send signal >>> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:52 AM, David Ma wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Michael, >>>> >>>> Thanks very much for your prompt response! I appreciate the information >>>> provided. >>>> >>>> I was actually searching the the existence of such a variable. I was not >>>> so luck to find it out and thereby resort to the support forum. >>>> >>>> I've modified my code to build this parameter into my application. Will >>>> feedback to you after verification. >>>> >>>> Thanks again, >>>> D.Ma >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>> >>>>> How about setting this? >>>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#continue_on_fail >>>>> >>>>> -MC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:32 AM, dma wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I am creating a call-back solution. After leg-A answers, I originate >>>>>> leg-B >>>>>> call. After receiving SIP 183 from Leg-B, I bridge the 2 legs. >>>>>> However, in >>>>>> some cases, leg-A is automatically disconnected by FreeSwitch on leg-B >>>>>> failure, for example, DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER. The application is not >>>>>> given >>>>>> a chance to handle leg-B failure event. This should not be a correct >>>>>> scenario because I never set "hangup-after-bridge", which is false by >>>>>> default. >>>>>> >>>>>> The right way should be, FreeSwitch doesn't hang up leg-A >>>>>> automatically, but >>>>>> give a chance for the application to decide what to do. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please see the logs below: >>>>>> >>>>>> ================================================= >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>> variable >>>>>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750914] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>> variable >>>>>> string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>> variable >>>>>> string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>> variable >>>>>> string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>> variable >>>>>> string 4 = [privacy=yes] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> [ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW >>>>>> -> >>>>>> CS_INIT >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_INIT >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>>>>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.477997: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> INVITE sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D >>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>>>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>>>>> Privacy: none >>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>> Content-Disposition: session >>>>>> Content-Length: 204 >>>>>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>>>>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46> >>>>>> >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307645395 1307645396 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>>> s=FreeSWITCH >>>>>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 30000 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>>>>> a=ptime:20 >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT >>>>>> -> >>>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>> [calling][0] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN >>>>>> -> >>>>>> RINGING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_ROUTING -> >>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going >>>>>> to sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>> going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.485130: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:56.677788: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>>> >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>> s=session >>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>>> "Outbound >>>>>> Call" <03996590031055> >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>> s=session >>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec >>>>>> Compare >>>>>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>>>>> samples >>>>>> 8000 bits >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>> send >>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>>>>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30000 >>>>>> -> >>>>>> 203.208.207.196 port 30792 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>>>>> [soft] >>>>>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>> send >>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>> receive >>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212! >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>> RINGING -> >>>>>> EARLY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 >>>>>> Originate >>>>>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>>>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.618770 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port >>>>>> confirmed. >>>>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.562021: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>>> >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=- 421265648 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>> s=session >>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>>> "03996590031055" <03996590031055> >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.563178: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>>> >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=- 421265648 3 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>> s=session >>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.457169 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>> recv 749 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.365284: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>> Contact: >>>>>> Allow-Events: refer >>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>> Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces >>>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>>> >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>> s=session >>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>> [completing][200] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>> s=session >>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> >>>>>> send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.366562: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKyUg0ga7pUZmrS >>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 ACK >>>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>> [ready][200] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>> EARLY -> >>>>>> ACTIVE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel >>>>>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.264178 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task >>>>>> 23 >>>>>> switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79) to >>>>>> run at >>>>>> 1307676927 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.265202 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>> variable >>>>>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996590031055] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>> variable >>>>>> string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>> variable >>>>>> string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>> variable >>>>>> string 3 = [privacy=yes] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> [30228d2b-756a-4a98-871d-db63a2955b52] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW >>>>>> -> >>>>>> CS_INIT >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_INIT >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT >>>>>> -> >>>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change DOWN >>>>>> -> >>>>>> RINGING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>>>>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.373220: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> INVITE sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN2011-06-10 >>>>>> 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>>>>> >>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>>>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>>>>> Privacy: none >>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>> Content-Disposition: session >>>>>> Content-Length: 204 >>>>>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>>>>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46> >>>>>> >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307646863 1307646864 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>>> s=FreeSWITCH >>>>>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 28564 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>>>>> a=ptime:20 >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>> [calling][0] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_ROUTING -> >>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going >>>>>> to sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>> going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.378710: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>>>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File >>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample rate >>>>>> 11025 >>>>>> doesn't match requested rate 8000 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has 2 >>>>>> channels, muxing to mono will occur. >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec >>>>>> Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.298764 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - >>>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>>>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:28.618472: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>> Content-Length: 186 >>>>>> >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>>>> s=session >>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>>> "Outbound >>>>>> Call" <03996563750914> >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>>>> s=session >>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec >>>>>> Compare >>>>>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>>>>> samples >>>>>> 8000 bits >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>> send >>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>>>>> [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 28564 >>>>>> -> >>>>>> 203.208.207.195 port 45002 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>>>>> [soft] >>>>>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>> send >>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>> receive >>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212! >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>> RINGING -> >>>>>> EARLY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 >>>>>> Originate >>>>>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>>>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.516887 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_EXECUTE -> >>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_EXECUTE -> >>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done >>>>>> playing >>>>>> file >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>>>>> playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going >>>>>> to sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>>>>> CS_RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going >>>>>> to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.540814: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>> Content-Length: 186 >>>>>> >>>>>> v=0 >>>>>> o=- 131082 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>>>> s=session >>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>>> "03996563750914" <03996563750914> >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [WARNING] switch_core_session.c:1940 Cannot >>>>>> execute app 'playback' media required on an outbound channel that does >>>>>> not >>>>>> have media established >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going >>>>>> to sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>>>>> CS_RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE going >>>>>> to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET >>>>>> -> >>>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_RESET >>>>>> -> >>>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>> EARLY -> >>>>>> HANGUP >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>>>> [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_HANGUP >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>> ACTIVE -> >>>>>> HANGUP >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>>>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.818391: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> CANCEL sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>>>>> Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" >>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>>>> [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >>>>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_HANGUP -> >>>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, >>>>>> cause: >>>>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going >>>>>> to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>> going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_HANGUP >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_REPORTING -> >>>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session >>>>>> 40 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>>>>> external >>>>>> entities >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session >>>>>> 40 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>>>>> Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>> HANGUP -> >>>>>> DOWN >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>>>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>>>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>>>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>>>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going >>>>>> to sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>>>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, cause: >>>>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_HANGUP -> >>>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, >>>>>> cause: >>>>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING going >>>>>> to >>>>>> sleep >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>> CS_REPORTING -> >>>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>> signal >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session >>>>>> 39 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>>>>> external >>>>>> entities >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 Session >>>>>> 39 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>>>>> Channel >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>> HANGUP -> >>>>>> DOWN >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>>>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>>>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX - >>>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX - >>>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 (nil) >>>>>> send 662 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.820530: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg >>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>>>> Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" >>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - >>>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going >>>>>> to sleep >>>>>> recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.823302: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u00000001QXU3LU >>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>>>>> Contact: >>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824765: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>> Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" >>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824891: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> ACK sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 ACK >>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.826375: >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>> To: >>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Leg-A-is-automatically-disconnected-on-Leg-B-orginate-failure-tp6482192p6482192.html >>>>>> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/3bba9ad6/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 27 19:15:36 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:15:36 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Please let's protect the wiki from spammers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I am okay with updating the wiki so that we can do the captcha thing. I need to work w/ Raymond (intralanman) on some back-end infrastructure stuff before that happens. We'll discuss this further on the Wednesday conf call this week. -MC On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Avi Marcus wrote: > Linode uses .htaccess on the edit pages (only those), much like our > pastebin, and is probably the easiest thing to add. > But yes, something needs to be done.. I got sick of deleting spam months > ago. > > A captcha on normal accounts to make edits is probably OK, too, as long as > they can manually be moved to "human-trusted". > -Avi > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Diego Viola wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As most of us may alright know, the FreeSWITCH wiki has been abused >> and attacked by spammers, as seen here: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges >> >> Some FreeSWITCH users have been deleting and blocking these spammers, >> but they are increasing their spamming attacks. >> >> I went into #mediawiki in freenode and asked them if there is any >> solution to this and this is what they suggest: >> >> 15:18 < bawolff> !spam | diegoviola >> 15:18 < mw-bot> diegoviola: For information about combating and >> handling spam in MediaWiki, see >> and >> . >> >> >> I've seen most wikis who have implemented this solution and they no >> longer get any spamming after applying said solution. If somebody here >> have administration access to http://wiki.freeswitch.org/ I offer my >> help to apply this solution. >> >> Thanks, >> Diego Viola >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/10cbf245/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 27 19:25:44 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:25:44 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Phrase macros in conferences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Phrase macros are not supported inside mod_conference. If you look inside mod_conference.c you will see that it has its own functions for injecting audio into the conference and it does not support phrase macros. You can open up a feature request on Jira. I honestly don't know how easy/difficult this would be, so you may consider offering a bounty to sweeten the deal. Curious: what types of phrases are you trying to play into the conference? -MC On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Bryan Smart wrote: > I'm attempting to use phrase macros in mod_conference, but I'm not having > success. Perhaps they aren't supported? > > I have a working phrase macro. In the dialplan, both > > > > and > > > > Work just fine. > > The wiki says that, in conference.conf.xml, entries like pin-sound accept, > for their value, file paths, strings prefixed with "say" for TTS, and > strings prefixed with "tone_stream". This looks almost the same as what can > be passed to the playback application in the dialplan. When I try to prefix > a string with "phrase", it doesn't work. > > > > The console tells me "unknown file format". The console still tells me this > if I make up phrase names > > > > So it is complaining about the syntax or capability, rather than an > unrecognized format of an actual file. > > If mod_conference doesn't support phrase macros, is this a near-future > feature? Phrases would seem to be necessary to ocalize announcements and > play announcements that are stitched together from multiple files. > > Bryan > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/3b6bc560/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Mon Jun 27 19:45:36 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:45:36 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Answer issue on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Get a complete, unedited, unabridged console debug log w/ siptrace and put it on pastebin w/ "FreeSWITCH Log" for the syntax highlighting. Use "sofia global siptrace on" to make sure you can all SIP traffic. -MC On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Max Alex wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for reply, > I have tried the same way and reloaded freeswitch, but still it is answered > on first ring of the call. > When it is ringing the call on 1001 and the same time it is answered on > cell phone, so something is done when it is ringing on 1001. > > Here is the dialplan for the same > > > > > > > --> > > > > > > data="insert/${domain_name}-call_return/${dialed_extension}/${caller_id_number}"/> > data="insert/${domain_name}-last_dial_ext/${dialed_extension}/${uuid}"/> > data="called_party_callgroup=${user_data(${dialed_extension}@${domain_name} > var callgroup)}"/> > data="insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/${called_party_callgroup}/${uuid}"/> > > data="{ignore_early_media=true}user/${dialed_extension}@${domain_name}"/> > > > > > > > Please help me for this issue. > > > Thanks, > Max Alex > Voip Developer > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> Are you using the default dialplan? I think you might just need to ignore >> early media on your bridge app. If you are using the default.xml file then >> locate "Local_Extension" and the bridge line: >> >> >> >> Change it to this, then try again: >> >> > data="{ignore_early_media=true}user/${dialed_extension}@${domain_name}"/> >> >> If I understand correctly, the "symptom" you are experiencing is the >> normal operation of the bridge app (and it's cousin, the originate API >> command). When the b-leg sends back media, including ringing, the bridge (or >> the originate) will be considered "successful," and in the case of bridge, >> the b-leg's audio (the early media) will be connected to the a-leg. If you >> set ignore_early_media=true then you are explicitly telling the bridge app >> that you only want to connect the b-leg to the a-leg if the b-leg actually >> answers. >> >> I hope that made sense... >> >> -MC >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Max Alex wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Thanks for reply. >>> Current scenario is below. >>> >>> PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to >>> 1001 -> ringing (Answered on cellphone) >>> Here when it is routed to 1001 the call it is started ringing, but on >>> phone that call is answered and hearding sound of ringing. >>> >>> Required flow: >>> PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to >>> 1001 -> ringing (Ringing on cellphone) >>> >>> I hope it is understable, the call should not be answered until 1001 >>> answer it, right not when it is started ring it is answered on cell phone. >>> that should not be happen as it is not answered yet. >>> >>> Waiting for your reply. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Max Alex >>> Voip Developer >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Michael Collins wrote: >>> >>>> I'm not sure I understand the problem. What is happening vs. what you >>>> believe should be happening? >>>> -MC >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Max Alex wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> Thanks for your reply. >>>>> Here is my configuration and log >>>>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16571 >>>>> >>>>> I am using A200 analog sangoma device with freeswitch, it is working >>>>> fine but when it is routing call to 1001 then it is answered. >>>>> Please provider your suggestions. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Max Alex >>>>> Voip Developer >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I thought the A200 was an analog card? Maybe I have my numbers mixed >>>>>> up... >>>>>> >>>>>> Go ahead and collect a debug log of this call. It might help to have >>>>>> your configs posted as well. Use pastebin.freeswitch.org. See this >>>>>> wiki article for tips on how to collect information: >>>>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs >>>>>> >>>>>> -MC >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Max Alex wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> I have installed freeswitch latest version with sangoma card A200 as >>>>>>> well, >>>>>>> I have installed and configured freetdm module with wanpipe drivers >>>>>>> for freeswitch, >>>>>>> We are properly receiving the inbound calls in public context and >>>>>>> then we are routing that call to 1001 extension, >>>>>>> it is properly routing to 1001 as well, but we have one issue while >>>>>>> routing on 1001. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is the issue description. >>>>>>> I am calling from my cell phone to that DID number of pri line, and >>>>>>> then it will start ringing on 1001 extension, >>>>>>> When 1001 extension start ringing the call is answered on my cell >>>>>>> phone, >>>>>>> it is something like freeswitch preanswer or autoanswer the call, how >>>>>>> can i stop this answer call when it is ringing on 1001 extension, >>>>>>> Waiting for good reply. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Max Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/72ad61f3/attachment-0001.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Mon Jun 27 20:20:55 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] getting rid of hanging sessions? In-Reply-To: References: <4E0503A3.5040909@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E08ADE7.5030109@499x.com> Ok, I think they're getting stuck if I hang up while recording the call, line 54 in the pastebin source. When I hang up, I see the message logged in line 55, but then I think it enters the "while (listen)" loop, and never gets out. Because if I uncomment line 58, it scrolls endlessly in the log saying: "flushing digits 2" "flushing digits 2" "flushing digits 2" ... script http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16601 log: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16602 so is the trick to check something else in the while loop like: while (listen and not hung up) ? On 6/24/2011 6:15 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > The key is in knowing why those are stuck. Do a "show channels" when > you see these so-called phantom sessions, then put it on pastebin so > we can take a look. > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Wes > wrote: > > in my testing, I'm getting some sessions that are, hung, I guess. > > Status shows: > > UP 0 years, 0 days, 2 hours, 7 minutes, 37 seconds, 752 milliseconds, > 720 microseconds > 23 session(s) since startup > 5 session(s) 0/30 > 1000 session(s) max > min idle cpu 0.00/0.00 > > > if I do a shutdown, it waits on them for a while, then eventually > shuts > down. > > Is there any way to "clean" these up periodically? Or, what am I > doing > to leave them out there? > > thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/25bfdf8a/attachment.html From elijah at crankenstein.com Mon Jun 27 20:27:38 2011 From: elijah at crankenstein.com (elijah) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:27:38 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] second member to dynamic conference hears only hold music In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: done - http://jira.freeswitch.org/ browse/FS-3374 On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > this really should be in jira. > please open one http://jira.freeswitch.org > > and post the url here > > do the following > > 1) update right now to the latest GIT as of the time you read this. > 2) turn on debugging and sip trace with these commands: > >console loglevel debug > >sofia global siptrace on > 3) reproduce your issue and capture the console log > 4) attach it to your jira report > > Then: > > try version 9df8169d1f3458e0b565a64922a1390ebf324703 > > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:00 PM, elijah wrote: > > That didn't help. Maybe I've screwed this up by running 'git reset > --hard'? > > I've confirmed this version works for me: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head > > (git-5923f71 2011-06-01 22-36-19 -0500) > > and this does not: FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-288455c 2011-06-22 > > 17-05-53 -0400) > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Anthony Minessale > > wrote: > >> > >> could you comment line 1696 of switch_channel.c and > >> make install_core > >> then restart and retest? > >> > >> That is the only one I can think of. > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:53 PM, elijah > wrote: > >> > This setup was working for me until updating against git yesterday. > Via > >> > a > >> > bind statement on the b-leg of inbound calls, a user is able to pull > >> > both > >> > legs into a conference bridge. The problem now is that the a-leg hears > >> > only > >> > hold music. I'm having this and another problem with my dialplan after > >> > updating, w/o changing my own configuration - could there be updates > to > >> > source that would be affecting me? Here's the setup: > >> > > >> > >> > expression="^telifi_sales_queue$"> > >> > >> > data="telifi_call_id=${telifi_call_id}"/> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > data="${telifi_queue_name}@live001.voice.telifi.com"/> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > expression="^dynamic_conference"/> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > data="moderator,*1,exec:execute_extension,ASK_FOR_NUMBER__${telifi_call_id} > >> > XML callsdirect"/> > >> > >> > > >> > > data="moderator,*2,exec:execute_extension,CANCEL_LAST_CALL__${telifi_call_id} > >> > XML callsdirect"/> > >> > data="moderator"/> > >> > >> > data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> > >> > > >> > >> > data="${telifi_call_id}@simple"/> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >> > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >> > > >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> > UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> > http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Anthony Minessale II > >> > >> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > >> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > >> > >> AIM: anthm > >> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > >> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > >> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > >> > >> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > >> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > >> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > >> pstn:+19193869900 > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/a59c20c7/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Mon Jun 27 21:27:23 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:23 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] getting rid of hanging sessions? In-Reply-To: <4E08ADE7.5030109@499x.com> References: <4E0503A3.5040909@499x.com> <4E08ADE7.5030109@499x.com> Message-ID: You need to check session:ready in every loop -Steve On 27 June 2011 17:20, Wes wrote: > ** > Ok, I think they're getting stuck if I hang up while recording the call, > line 54 in the pastebin source. When I hang up, I see the message logged in > line 55, but then I think it enters the "while (listen)" loop, and never > gets out. Because if I uncomment line 58, it scrolls endlessly in the log > saying: "flushing digits 2" "flushing digits 2" "flushing digits 2" ... > > script > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16601 > > log: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16602 > > so is the trick to check something else in the while loop like: while > (listen and not hung up) ? > > > > On 6/24/2011 6:15 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > The key is in knowing why those are stuck. Do a "show channels" when you > see these so-called phantom sessions, then put it on pastebin so we can take > a look. > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Wes wrote: > >> in my testing, I'm getting some sessions that are, hung, I guess. >> >> Status shows: >> >> UP 0 years, 0 days, 2 hours, 7 minutes, 37 seconds, 752 milliseconds, >> 720 microseconds >> 23 session(s) since startup >> 5 session(s) 0/30 >> 1000 session(s) max >> min idle cpu 0.00/0.00 >> >> >> if I do a shutdown, it waits on them for a while, then eventually shuts >> down. >> >> Is there any way to "clean" these up periodically? Or, what am I doing >> to leave them out there? >> >> thanks! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/97333bab/attachment-0001.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Mon Jun 27 21:30:39 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to deal with user pressing extra keys? flush_dtmf? session::flushDigits? In-Reply-To: References: <4E04EAA7.2050305@499x.com> <4E04FC5D.4010900@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E08BE3F.30202@499x.com> Yes, that is your example modified a bit! I did not pastebin the latest version, but I did have it in there. anyway, it seems to be working better now when I tested it again. My intention is to detect a human, so that if I get a voicemail system, it won't end up recording. Is there a difference between: session:execute('flush_dtmf'); and session:flushDigits() ? On 6/24/2011 6:13 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Hey, that Lua code looks awfully familiar! (I wrote some of that on a > snowy day in hotel room in Wisconsin...) > > Okay, I think I see what you're trying to do. You just want to have > the person press 1 to continue. Do you want something different to > happen if the person presses a key other than 1? Just checking. > > Also, I don't see any flushDigits in your script. Try adding this > before your PAGD: > session:execute('flush_dtmf'); > > Try again, report back, etc. > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Wes > wrote: > > I put flushDigits right before playAndGetDigits, but it is still > queueing up keypresses... if I type more than one key, weird things > start happening in my loop. (the one that prompts for 1 - play back > recording, 2=submit recording, 3 = rerecord)... sometimes I get the > message "invalid response" followed a few seconds by "your > recording has > been submitted", and I've not typed anything in between. > > incidentally, if I press a digit while playAndGetDigits is still > speaking, it takes a few seconds for it to stop talking and act on the > keypress... ... it just doesn't seem very responsive.... which is why > I'm testing extra keypresses... because if users don't immediately > get a > response, they tend to press the key again. > > script here: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16584 > > > > On 6/24/2011 3:17 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > > session:flushDigits() right before you collect DTMF and you will > never > > get any old dtmf > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Wes > wrote: > >> I'm writing an ivr script in lua, and using playAndGetDigits in > a couple > >> different places. Both places just take a single digit to > continue on. > >> If the user presses 2 digits, it seems as if the second digit > is being > >> queued and it's being processed in the next call to > playAndGetDigits. > >> Often the extra digit is invalid, so when it tells the user to > press a > >> certain key, it follows immediately with the message "invalid > key", due > >> to the extra key being in the "queue"... > >> > >> is this anything I can protect against? I found a flush_dtmf, > but it > >> is not very documented: > >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_flush_dtmf > >> > >> and I also found this: > >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Session_flushDigits > >> > >> but calling it before and after playAndGetDigits didn't *seem* to > >> help... should it? > >> > >> script here: > >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16584 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/8da1c549/attachment.html From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Mon Jun 27 22:36:56 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:36:56 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: That would explain why removing them didn't do anything! Thanks. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: > Just so you know... > > ? ?? > ? ? ? > > These will have no effect in the user directory. They only apply to SIP > profiles. > > -Steve > > > > On 27 June 2011 02:23, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >> >> Hello FS Users! >> >> I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if >> they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a >> password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is >> great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our >> SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give >> passwords. >> >> However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in >> the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, >> instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, >> and how to remedy that fact. >> >> I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed >> would force this function: >> ? >> ? >> >> However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as >> the following lines: >> ? >> ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? ? >> ? ? >> >> Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) >> doesn't help. >> >> I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems >> possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do >> not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to >> test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of >> this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the >> nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. >> >> Thanks for any direction. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From wes-fs at 499x.com Mon Jun 27 22:51:00 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] getting rid of hanging sessions? In-Reply-To: References: <4E0503A3.5040909@499x.com> <4E08ADE7.5030109@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E08D114.40705@499x.com> thank you, works great now! On 6/27/2011 12:27 PM, Steven Ayre wrote: > You need to check session:ready in every loop > > -Steve > > > On 27 June 2011 17:20, Wes > > wrote: > > Ok, I think they're getting stuck if I hang up while recording the > call, line 54 in the pastebin source. When I hang up, I see the > message logged in line 55, but then I think it enters the "while > (listen)" loop, and never gets out. Because if I uncomment line > 58, it scrolls endlessly in the log saying: "flushing digits 2" > "flushing digits 2" "flushing digits 2" ... > > script > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16601 > > log: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16602 > > so is the trick to check something else in the while loop like: > while (listen and not hung up) ? > > > > On 6/24/2011 6:15 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> The key is in knowing why those are stuck. Do a "show channels" >> when you see these so-called phantom sessions, then put it on >> pastebin so we can take a look. >> -MC >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Wes > > wrote: >> >> in my testing, I'm getting some sessions that are, hung, I guess. >> >> Status shows: >> >> UP 0 years, 0 days, 2 hours, 7 minutes, 37 seconds, 752 >> milliseconds, >> 720 microseconds >> 23 session(s) since startup >> 5 session(s) 0/30 >> 1000 session(s) max >> min idle cpu 0.00/0.00 >> >> >> if I do a shutdown, it waits on them for a while, then >> eventually shuts >> down. >> >> Is there any way to "clean" these up periodically? Or, what >> am I doing >> to leave them out there? >> >> thanks! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/99f4f43e/attachment-0001.html From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Mon Jun 27 23:05:06 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Phrase macros in conferences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <93AE9C49-C6F6-44E6-BC7E-5A31AC659C4C@bryansmart.com> Thanks, Michael. At least I know that it is a limitation, and not me overlooking something. :) I have 3 or 4 years on Asterisk, but only months on Freeswitch, so I'm always concerned that I haven't dug enough before posting requests. For phrases inside conferences, I imagine 3 cases. First are dynamic announcements, such as those that announce when someone joins or leaves a conference. It is helpful if the joining or leaving party can be identified. I imagined combining TTS for the name, along with a pre-recorded fragment like conference/conf-has_joined.wav. The result would be like "John has entered the conference." Right now, I must use entirely TTS for such announcements. I can't use "!" to concatenate files, and I can't defer to a phrase macro to string TTS and recordings together. Second applies to localization. In a dynamic announcement, it might not be appropriate for the noun to be spoken first in languages other than English. Right now, the conference's prompt language must be customized by creating a different conference profile that specifies the correct sound base for the language. That could mean that the number of profiles in use has to be multiplied by the number of languages that should be supported. I know that the profile can omit the sound base, and the sound base of the first person to join will be used, but, particularly in a situation that concatenates TTS and audio, that can be worse. If the first person to join automatically selects sound files for a language, but the concatenation order is different for that language, then any rules in that profile that concatenate TTS and recordings to render announcements could result in strange outcomes. As far as I've been able to discover, the phrase system is the appropriate Freeswitch way to localize announcements, so it would probably be best for Conference to work that way also, rather than depending on per-case localization being handled with multiple profiles. If phrases were supported, then a single conference profile could play both static and dynamic prompts, and could automatically adjust to any language where phrase macros are present on the system. Last are cases when multiple types of notification are desired. For example, notifications might use a combination of cues and speech. An audio cue serves a similar function to a visual icon: attracts attention and conveys general meaning. In a situation like a conference, there might be soft audio cues for joining, leaving, when a new person has the floor, etc. When one of those events takes place, the cue plays first to attract attention and set the listener's expectations regarding the type of spoken information that will follow. Next, an announcement is heard with details about the event. " John has left the conference." On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Michael Collins wrote: Phrase macros are not supported inside mod_conference. If you look inside mod_conference.c you will see that it has its own functions for injecting audio into the conference and it does not support phrase macros. You can open up a feature request on Jira. I honestly don't know how easy/difficult this would be, so you may consider offering a bounty to sweeten the deal. Curious: what types of phrases are you trying to play into the conference? -MC On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Bryan Smart > wrote: I'm attempting to use phrase macros in mod_conference, but I'm not having success. Perhaps they aren't supported? I have a working phrase macro. In the dialplan, both and Work just fine. The wiki says that, in conference.conf.xml, entries like pin-sound accept, for their value, file paths, strings prefixed with "say" for TTS, and strings prefixed with "tone_stream". This looks almost the same as what can be passed to the playback application in the dialplan. When I try to prefix a string with "phrase", it doesn't work. The console tells me "unknown file format". The console still tells me this if I make up phrase names So it is complaining about the syntax or capability, rather than an unrecognized format of an actual file. If mod_conference doesn't support phrase macros, is this a near-future feature? Phrases would seem to be necessary to ocalize announcements and play announcements that are stitched together from multiple files. Bryan _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/1b3f0ef4/attachment.html From brad at tech21.com Mon Jun 27 23:37:52 2011 From: brad at tech21.com (Brad Mina) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:37:52 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Phrase macros in conferences In-Reply-To: <93AE9C49-C6F6-44E6-BC7E-5A31AC659C4C@bryansmart.com> References: <93AE9C49-C6F6-44E6-BC7E-5A31AC659C4C@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: <9CE9932A-AD27-4183-9C2E-75148116A23B@tech21.com> You could have users prompted to record their name to get around the first issue and play it back before "... Has joined the conference" is played back. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Bryan Smart wrote: > Thanks, Michael. At least I know that it is a limitation, and not me > overlooking something. :) I have 3 or 4 years on Asterisk, but only > months on Freeswitch, so I'm always concerned that I haven't dug > enough before posting requests. > > For phrases inside conferences, I imagine 3 cases. > > First are dynamic announcements, such as those that announce when > someone joins or leaves a conference. It is helpful if the joining > or leaving party can be identified. I imagined combining TTS for the > name, along with a pre-recorded fragment like conference/conf- > has_joined.wav. The result would be like "John has entered the > conference." Right now, I must use entirely TTS for such > announcements. I can't use "!" to concatenate files, and I can't > defer to a phrase macro to string TTS and recordings together. > > Second applies to localization. In a dynamic announcement, it might > not be appropriate for the noun to be spoken first in languages > other than English. Right now, the conference's prompt language must > be customized by creating a different conference profile that > specifies the correct sound base for the language. That could mean > that the number of profiles in use has to be multiplied by the > number of languages that should be supported. I know that the > profile can omit the sound base, and the sound base of the first > person to join will be used, but, particularly in a situation that > concatenates TTS and audio, that can be worse. If the first person > to join automatically selects sound files for a language, but the > concatenation order is different for that language, then any rules > in that profile that concatenate TTS and recordings to render > announcements could result in strange outcomes. As far as I've been > able to discover, the phrase system is the appropriate Freeswitch > way to localize announcements, so it would probably be best for > Conference to work that way also, rather than depending on per-case > localization being handled with multiple profiles. If phrases were > supported, then a single conference profile could play both static > and dynamic prompts, and could automatically adjust to any language > where phrase macros are present on the system. > > Last are cases when multiple types of notification are desired. For > example, notifications might use a combination of cues and speech. > An audio cue serves a similar function to a visual icon: attracts > attention and conveys general meaning. In a situation like a > conference, there might be soft audio cues for joining, leaving, > when a new person has the floor, etc. When one of those events takes > place, the cue plays first to attract attention and set the > listener's expectations regarding the type of spoken information > that will follow. Next, an announcement is heard with details about > the event. " John has left the conference." > > > > > > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> Phrase macros are not supported inside mod_conference. If you look >> inside mod_conference.c you will see that it has its own functions >> for injecting audio into the conference and it does not support >> phrase macros. You can open up a feature request on Jira. I >> honestly don't know how easy/difficult this would be, so you may >> consider offering a bounty to sweeten the deal. >> >> Curious: what types of phrases are you trying to play into the >> conference? >> >> -MC >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Bryan Smart > > wrote: >> I'm attempting to use phrase macros in mod_conference, but I'm not >> having success. Perhaps they aren't supported? >> >> I have a working phrase macro. In the dialplan, both >> >> >> >> and >> >> >> >> Work just fine. >> >> The wiki says that, in conference.conf.xml, entries like pin-sound >> accept, for their value, file paths, strings prefixed with "say" >> for TTS, and strings prefixed with "tone_stream". This looks almost >> the same as what can be passed to the playback application in the >> dialplan. When I try to prefix a string with "phrase", it doesn't >> work. >> >> >> >> The console tells me "unknown file format". The console still tells >> me this if I make up phrase names >> >> >> >> So it is complaining about the syntax or capability, rather than an >> unrecognized format of an actual file. >> >> If mod_conference doesn't support phrase macros, is this a near- >> future feature? Phrases would seem to be necessary to ocalize >> announcements and play announcements that are stitched together >> from multiple files. >> >> Bryan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- >> users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- >> users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- > users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/65cf0a3b/attachment-0001.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Mon Jun 27 23:43:38 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:43:38 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E08DD6A.5040306@499x.com> I guess part of my confusion here was due to the term "raw data" mentioned in conjunction with the .gsm extension on the wiki page below... but actually gsm is a compressed format. http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_record_session So, what is the best "compressed" format to use for recording voice (that is available as a direct recording format inside freeswitch)? There are tons of formats listed when I do "show file", but I tried a few and they are also giving me large files like the wav extension did. (au, for example) Even though the PCM/Wave format is preferred for voice quality, when we're talking about a 10:1 compression ratio, if the sound quality is still acceptable, I'd rather just record directly into the compressed format. We're talking about ~10- 20 minute recordings that will need to be transferred over the internet to a third party. On 6/24/2011 6:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > I would caution you to consider adding disk space before you try to > compress all your recordings. The 16 bit SLIN that FS normally puts in > your wave files are pretty easy to handle, whether playing back in a > FS session, or encoding for playback on some other device. > > An alternative might be to use lame to convert them to MP3's or > ogg/vorbis files. If you look on the main FS conf call page you'll see > I have the weekly recordings in multiple formats. > (http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call#Past_Calls) > > Here are some stats for last Wednesday's call. Note that I record wave > files in 48kHz then use sox to downsample to 16kHz wave, then I > convert that 16kHz file into MP3 and Vorbis (in an ogg container). > Here's what the results look like: > > <2831>:ls -1s conf_call_2011-06-15.* > 18736 conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 > 23044 conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg > 199756 conf_call_2011-06-15.wav > > <2832>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 > conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3: MPEG ADTS, layer III, v2, 24 kBits, 16 kHz, > Monaural > > <2833>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg > conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, mono, 16000 Hz, > ~48000 bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I > > <2834>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.wav > conf_call_2011-06-15.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, > Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 16000 Hz > > Note that the file sizes are in 1K blocks. > > So, bottom line is this: if you have the disk space then use wave. If > you don't have disk space for wave then get some! :D If you REALLY > need to use a different format then choose something like MP3 or > Vorbis for long-term storage. > > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Wes > wrote: > > In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is > about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. > > I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it > stayed > at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav > using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for > the sox > tool? > > checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: > RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono > 8000 Hz > > and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: > RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz > > So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording > parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the > smaller > wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/28ca525c/attachment.html From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Tue Jun 28 00:00:01 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> Message-ID: <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> I don't want to maximize peaks all the way to 0DB. I just wondered why a low level like -16DB was used. When I'd previously created prompts on Asterisk systems, I used -6DB as a peak (50% of max gain for the channel). I wasn't aware of any regulations about prompt level. If there is a standardized level, that is what I'd like to use. Perhaps the louder systems are disregarding standards? Does anyone have links to such info? I've been unable to find anything definitive, only opinions. Listen to TellMe (+1-800-555-8355). It's at least 3X the gain of the default FS prompts. Is TellMe in error? I've called them through both FS and Asterisk, using Vitelity and Callcentric, so I'm fairly sure that I'm not being mislead by a switch or ITSP boosting the gain. I always felt their level was strong and intelligible, without sounding overwhelming. One point that caught my attention, though, is that you said -16DB for both average and peak power. Average and peak power don't come out the same, though. So that we can talk about something concrete, consider conference/32000/conf-enter_conf_pin.wav. Its peak power is -15.7DB. However, its average power (RMS) is -31.3DB! -31DB is profoundly quiet. If its average power is boosted to -16DB, then the peak power is now around -2DB. As long as peak power is less than 0DB, then the audio won't clip, but it might be too loud for comfort. I previously used -6DB for a peak, as I couldn't find any real guidelines regarding levels, and -6 sounded good to me. Maybe FS is lower than it should be. Maybe other services are louder than they should be. If FS should be louder, though, I'd like to help to change the levels up-stream, rather than locally reprocessing the prompts. So, is this a personal judgement case, or are their standards available that can be consulted? Bryan On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: > On 06/27/2011 07:11 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: >> I have tools to batch-process audio files. I just was not sure that regaining all of the prompt files was the best approach. I figured that the gain must have been reduced so dramatically for some sort of reason (to avoid clipping in some situation, to work better with the internal resampling, etc). >> >> What AGC do you mean? I know that AGC has recently been added to conferencing, but the level of the prompts is a system-wide situation. As far as I know, there isn't AGC that can be applied on every channel, and, even if there was, there would surely be a processing hit, so the goal would be to avoid needing it, right? >> >> The root problem, at least for me, is this. I need to add voice prompts and other audio for an IVR. I can't simply normalize all of my prompts to 0DB, as, even though they don't distort, they're so loud when compared to the stock prompts, they'll blow the phone out of my hand. To match them to the stock prompts, I must normalize them to around -16DB. I can do that, but it seems very wrong. At -16DB, nearly 85% of the potential gain of the channel is lost. > -16dBM0 or -16dBOv, and average or peak burst power? -16dBOv for the > average power is about where you want a voice prompt to be. In some > juristictions you could be in breach of a regulation or two if you set > the level higher than that on the PSTN. Why would you set a voice prompt > to 0dB? It will be clipping like crazy. >> Try this... With the demo IVR (5000), add this before the sleep command in the dialplan. >> >> >> >> That is the max gain boost available for a channel. The prompts should be really clipping with that much amplification, but they don't clip at all. At -16DB, you could literally amplify them to 6 times their native level without distorting. Native level is too low. Once I realized this, it became clear to me why Freeswitch sounded more quiet than Asterisk, at least when working with recorded prompts. >> >> I suppose I could use set_audio_level on every last call, but I'm sure that real-time amplification, like AGC, is another processor drain that builds up with lots of calls. Besides, it seems weird to dramatically reduce the level of audio, and then waste cycles amplifying it back up in real-time. >> >> Bryan > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Tue Jun 28 00:03:47 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Phrase macros in conferences In-Reply-To: <9CE9932A-AD27-4183-9C2E-75148116A23B@tech21.com> References: <93AE9C49-C6F6-44E6-BC7E-5A31AC659C4C@bryansmart.com> <9CE9932A-AD27-4183-9C2E-75148116A23B@tech21.com> Message-ID: <22CBC366-3CD3-4429-80B6-961AF1566D1C@bryansmart.com> Yes, but not sure how I'd do that. In the conference profile, I can play a single sound file for an enter/leave. I can't join two files with "!" to have them play in series, like "name.wav!conference/conf-enter.wav". Bryan On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Brad Mina wrote: You could have users prompted to record their name to get around the first issue and play it back before "... Has joined the conference" is played back. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Bryan Smart > wrote: Thanks, Michael. At least I know that it is a limitation, and not me overlooking something. :) I have 3 or 4 years on Asterisk, but only months on Freeswitch, so I'm always concerned that I haven't dug enough before posting requests. For phrases inside conferences, I imagine 3 cases. First are dynamic announcements, such as those that announce when someone joins or leaves a conference. It is helpful if the joining or leaving party can be identified. I imagined combining TTS for the name, along with a pre-recorded fragment like conference/conf-has_joined.wav. The result would be like "John has entered the conference." Right now, I must use entirely TTS for such announcements. I can't use "!" to concatenate files, and I can't defer to a phrase macro to string TTS and recordings together. Second applies to localization. In a dynamic announcement, it might not be appropriate for the noun to be spoken first in languages other than English. Right now, the conference's prompt language must be customized by creating a different conference profile that specifies the correct sound base for the language. That could mean that the number of profiles in use has to be multiplied by the number of languages that should be supported. I know that the profile can omit the sound base, and the sound base of the first person to join will be used, but, particularly in a situation that concatenates TTS and audio, that can be worse. If the first person to join automatically selects sound files for a language, but the concatenation order is different for that language, then any rules in that profile that concatenate TTS and recordings to render announcements could result in strange outcomes. As far as I've been able to discover, the phrase system is the appropriate Freeswitch way to localize announcements, so it would probably be best for Conference to work that way also, rather than depending on per-case localization being handled with multiple profiles. If phrases were supported, then a single conference profile could play both static and dynamic prompts, and could automatically adjust to any language where phrase macros are present on the system. Last are cases when multiple types of notification are desired. For example, notifications might use a combination of cues and speech. An audio cue serves a similar function to a visual icon: attracts attention and conveys general meaning. In a situation like a conference, there might be soft audio cues for joining, leaving, when a new person has the floor, etc. When one of those events takes place, the cue plays first to attract attention and set the listener's expectations regarding the type of spoken information that will follow. Next, an announcement is heard with details about the event. " John has left the conference." On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Michael Collins wrote: Phrase macros are not supported inside mod_conference. If you look inside mod_conference.c you will see that it has its own functions for injecting audio into the conference and it does not support phrase macros. You can open up a feature request on Jira. I honestly don't know how easy/difficult this would be, so you may consider offering a bounty to sweeten the deal. Curious: what types of phrases are you trying to play into the conference? -MC On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Bryan Smart <bryansmart at bryansmart.com> wrote: I'm attempting to use phrase macros in mod_conference, but I'm not having success. Perhaps they aren't supported? I have a working phrase macro. In the dialplan, both and Work just fine. The wiki says that, in conference.conf.xml, entries like pin-sound accept, for their value, file paths, strings prefixed with "say" for TTS, and strings prefixed with "tone_stream". This looks almost the same as what can be passed to the playback application in the dialplan. When I try to prefix a string with "phrase", it doesn't work. The console tells me "unknown file format". The console still tells me this if I make up phrase names So it is complaining about the syntax or capability, rather than an unrecognized format of an actual file. If mod_conference doesn't support phrase macros, is this a near-future feature? Phrases would seem to be necessary to ocalize announcements and play announcements that are stitched together from multiple files. Bryan _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/d3d12405/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Tue Jun 28 00:26:00 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:26:00 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53E1375B-A8D6-4C1A-A1DD-055A3527673D@ipeva.fr> The interesting question is then: why are you able to register without password, if this feature is not enabled on the profile... Perhaps you should recap your config once more, and put the relevant files on PB. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 27/06/2011 ? 20:36, Kurtis Heimerl a ?crit : > That would explain why removing them didn't do anything! > > Thanks. > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: >> Just so you know... >> >> >> >> >> These will have no effect in the user directory. They only apply to SIP >> profiles. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> On 27 June 2011 02:23, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >>> >>> Hello FS Users! >>> >>> I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if >>> they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a >>> password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is >>> great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our >>> SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give >>> passwords. >>> >>> However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in >>> the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, >>> instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, >>> and how to remedy that fact. >>> >>> I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed >>> would force this function: >>> >>> >>> >>> However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as >>> the following lines: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) >>> doesn't help. >>> >>> I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems >>> possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do >>> not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to >>> test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of >>> this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the >>> nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. >>> >>> Thanks for any direction. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/c0d87606/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Tue Jun 28 00:29:54 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:29:54 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: <4E08DD6A.5040306@499x.com> References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> <4E08DD6A.5040306@499x.com> Message-ID: You should really consider recording in SLIN, and then, batch compressing that later (during off-peak hours) to MP3 if you really need it to be smaller. Any efficient compression takes CPU, and you may want to avoid doing that live on your server. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 27/06/2011 ? 21:43, Wes a ?crit : > I guess part of my confusion here was due to the term "raw data" mentioned in conjunction with the .gsm extension on the wiki page below... but actually gsm is a compressed format. > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_record_session > > So, what is the best "compressed" format to use for recording voice (that is available as a direct recording format inside freeswitch)? There are tons of formats listed when I do "show file", but I tried a few and they are also giving me large files like the wav extension did. (au, for example) > > Even though the PCM/Wave format is preferred for voice quality, when we're talking about a 10:1 compression ratio, if the sound quality is still acceptable, I'd rather just record directly into the compressed format. We're talking about ~10- 20 minute recordings that will need to be transferred over the internet to a third party. > > On 6/24/2011 6:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >> I would caution you to consider adding disk space before you try to compress all your recordings. The 16 bit SLIN that FS normally puts in your wave files are pretty easy to handle, whether playing back in a FS session, or encoding for playback on some other device. >> >> An alternative might be to use lame to convert them to MP3's or ogg/vorbis files. If you look on the main FS conf call page you'll see I have the weekly recordings in multiple formats. (http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call#Past_Calls) >> >> Here are some stats for last Wednesday's call. Note that I record wave files in 48kHz then use sox to downsample to 16kHz wave, then I convert that 16kHz file into MP3 and Vorbis (in an ogg container). Here's what the results look like: >> >> <2831>:ls -1s conf_call_2011-06-15.* >> 18736 conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 >> 23044 conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg >> 199756 conf_call_2011-06-15.wav >> >> <2832>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 >> conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3: MPEG ADTS, layer III, v2, 24 kBits, 16 kHz, Monaural >> >> <2833>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg >> conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, mono, 16000 Hz, ~48000 bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I >> >> <2834>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.wav >> conf_call_2011-06-15.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 16000 Hz >> >> Note that the file sizes are in 1K blocks. >> >> So, bottom line is this: if you have the disk space then use wave. If you don't have disk space for wave then get some! :D If you REALLY need to use a different format then choose something like MP3 or Vorbis for long-term storage. >> >> -MC >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Wes wrote: >> In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is >> about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. >> >> I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed >> at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav >> using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox >> tool? >> >> checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: >> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz >> >> and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: >> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz >> >> So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording >> parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller >> wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/8bb73322/attachment-0001.html From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Tue Jun 28 00:30:02 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:30:02 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations In-Reply-To: <53E1375B-A8D6-4C1A-A1DD-055A3527673D@ipeva.fr> References: <53E1375B-A8D6-4C1A-A1DD-055A3527673D@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: It's enabled in the acl.conf.xml file, using CIDR. What conf files do you consider relevant? acl.conf.xml, internal.xml, a profile or two, anything else? On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:26 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > The interesting question is then: why are you able to register without > password, if this feature is not enabled on the profile... > Perhaps you should recap your config once more, and put the relevant files > on PB. > David Ponzone ?Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 > Service Client?IPeva > tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il > a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce > message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > Le 27/06/2011 ? 20:36, Kurtis Heimerl a ?crit : > > That would explain why removing them didn't do anything! > > Thanks. > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: > > Just so you know... > > ? ?? > > ? ? ? > > These will have no effect in the user directory. They only apply to SIP > > profiles. > > -Steve > > > > On 27 June 2011 02:23, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: > > Hello FS Users! > > I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if > > they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a > > password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is > > great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our > > SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give > > passwords. > > However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in > > the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, > > instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, > > and how to remedy that fact. > > I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed > > would force this function: > > ? > > ? > > However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as > > the following lines: > > ? > > ? ? > > ? ? ? > > ? ? ? > > ? ? ? > > ? ? > > Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) > > doesn't help. > > I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems > > possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do > > not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to > > test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of > > this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the > > nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. > > Thanks for any direction. > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From wes-fs at 499x.com Tue Jun 28 00:45:44 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:45:44 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> <4E08DD6A.5040306@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E08EBF8.9040207@499x.com> I'm sorry, but what is the SLIN format? I tried that extension and it's invalid. I searched the wiki and found nothing. On 6/27/2011 3:29 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > You should really consider recording in SLIN, and then, batch > compressing that later (during off-peak hours) to MP3 if you really > need it to be smaller. > Any efficient compression takes CPU, and you may want to avoid doing > that live on your server. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > / > / > > > > Le 27/06/2011 ? 21:43, Wes a ?crit : > >> I guess part of my confusion here was due to the term "raw data" >> mentioned in conjunction with the .gsm extension on the wiki page >> below... but actually gsm is a compressed format. >> >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_record_session >> >> So, what is the best "compressed" format to use for recording voice >> (that is available as a direct recording format inside freeswitch)? >> There are tons of formats listed when I do "show file", but I tried a >> few and they are also giving me large files like the wav extension >> did. (au, for example) >> >> Even though the PCM/Wave format is preferred for voice quality, when >> we're talking about a 10:1 compression ratio, if the sound quality is >> still acceptable, I'd rather just record directly into the compressed >> format. We're talking about ~10- 20 minute recordings that will need >> to be transferred over the internet to a third party. >> >> On 6/24/2011 6:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>> I would caution you to consider adding disk space before you try to >>> compress all your recordings. The 16 bit SLIN that FS normally puts >>> in your wave files are pretty easy to handle, whether playing back >>> in a FS session, or encoding for playback on some other device. >>> >>> An alternative might be to use lame to convert them to MP3's or >>> ogg/vorbis files. If you look on the main FS conf call page you'll >>> see I have the weekly recordings in multiple formats. >>> (http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call#Past_Calls) >>> >>> Here are some stats for last Wednesday's call. Note that I record >>> wave files in 48kHz then use sox to downsample to 16kHz wave, then I >>> convert that 16kHz file into MP3 and Vorbis (in an ogg container). >>> Here's what the results look like: >>> >>> <2831>:ls -1s conf_call_2011-06-15.* >>> 18736 conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 >>> 23044 conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg >>> 199756 conf_call_2011-06-15.wav >>> >>> <2832>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 >>> conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3: MPEG ADTS, layer III, v2, 24 kBits, 16 >>> kHz, Monaural >>> >>> <2833>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg >>> conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, mono, 16000 Hz, >>> ~48000 bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I >>> >>> <2834>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.wav >>> conf_call_2011-06-15.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, >>> Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 16000 Hz >>> >>> Note that the file sizes are in 1K blocks. >>> >>> So, bottom line is this: if you have the disk space then use wave. >>> If you don't have disk space for wave then get some! :D If you >>> REALLY need to use a different format then choose something like MP3 >>> or Vorbis for long-term storage. >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Wes >> > wrote: >>> >>> In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is >>> about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. >>> >>> I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it >>> stayed >>> at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for >>> .wav >>> using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for >>> the sox >>> tool? >>> >>> checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: >>> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, >>> mono 8000 Hz >>> >>> and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: >>> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz >>> >>> So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these >>> recording >>> parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the >>> smaller >>> wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/5ad86d77/attachment-0001.html From jmoran at secureachsystems.com Tue Jun 28 01:52:47 2011 From: jmoran at secureachsystems.com (Jason Moran) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UniMRCP Server as daemon won't connect RTSP Message-ID: <361E98F99D3CC3439EED59BC1924ED6950815F@SERVER2003.SecuReachSystems.local> I've been playing around with IVONA's new unimrcp plugin with unimrcp 1.0.0 (r1725) on OpenSuse 11.4 Anyway, when I start it up with the following, it stays in the foreground of my SSH w/ the following command: ./unimrcpserver That works! However, since it's in the foreground when I close the SSH window, it kills the process. If I use the so-called daemon mode (-d or --daemon) it says it is going into daemon mode, but FS will immediately return that it "Failed to Connect to RTSP Server..." at the IP:port I specified. The unimrcpserver process is running, but doesn't seem to respond to anything. ./unimrcpserver -d ./unimrcpserver --daemon If I attempt to background it by either using "&" or ctrl-z it says [1]+ Stopped ./unimrcpserver and FS will successfully make the RTSP connection but then nothing will happen. Mod_unimrcp will spit out a warning about "MRCP session has not opened after 5000 ms" ./unimrcpserver & Those are hard to kill. But when I kill -9 it then FS will finally remove the MRCP handle and tell me that it couldn't allocate the speech engine. Lastly, I can nohup it, but then unimrcpserver eats up 95%+ of the CPU (instead of 1-3% as it does when I have it in the foreground), which it does not do when it runs in any other modes. It also makes a very, very large nohup.out file that keeps on growing. Even if I tell it to not log. nohup ./unimrcpserver & nohup ./unimrcpserver -o 0 & Ideas?? Thanks, Jason Moran -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/11ff625e/attachment.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 02:07:08 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: Have a look at the 48khz versions of the files, those should be the originals. Someone runs a batch sox command on them to get them to the other levels. I will say I find the volume of many phone systems overdriven and I think the goal was to keep the sound files in the neighborhood of what a live person sounds like with no clipping. I am quite sure nobody was looking at the specific dB levels when generating them. I am not really overly picky about what level we distribute at and I would defer it to the majority of users to see if there is a perception of the volume being too low in our sound files. If there is an overwhelming agreement that the volume is too low, I would be willing to adjust it if you are interested in taking ownership of the task. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Bryan Smart wrote: > I don't want to maximize peaks all the way to 0DB. I just wondered why a low level like -16DB was used. When I'd previously created prompts on Asterisk systems, I used -6DB as a peak (50% of max gain for the channel). > > I wasn't aware of any regulations about prompt level. If there is a standardized level, that is what I'd like to use. Perhaps the louder systems are disregarding standards? Does anyone have links to such info? I've been unable to find anything definitive, only opinions. > > Listen to TellMe (+1-800-555-8355). It's at least 3X the gain of the default FS prompts. Is TellMe in error? I've called them through both FS and Asterisk, using Vitelity and Callcentric, so I'm fairly sure that I'm not being mislead by a switch or ITSP boosting the gain. I always felt their level was strong and intelligible, without sounding overwhelming. > > One point that caught my attention, though, is that you said -16DB for both average and peak power. Average and peak power don't come out the same, though. > > So that we can talk about something concrete, consider conference/32000/conf-enter_conf_pin.wav. Its peak power is -15.7DB. However, its average power (RMS) is -31.3DB! -31DB is profoundly quiet. If its average power is boosted to -16DB, then the peak power is now around -2DB. As long as peak power is less than 0DB, then the audio won't clip, but it might be too loud for comfort. I previously used -6DB for a peak, as I couldn't find any real guidelines regarding levels, and -6 sounded good to me. > > Maybe FS is lower than it should be. Maybe other services are louder than they should be. If FS should be louder, though, I'd like to help to change the levels up-stream, rather than locally reprocessing the prompts. > > So, is this a personal judgement case, or are their standards available that can be consulted? > > Bryan > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: > >> On 06/27/2011 07:11 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: >>> I have tools to batch-process audio files. I just was not sure that regaining all of the prompt files was the best approach. I figured that the gain must have been reduced so dramatically for some sort of reason (to avoid clipping in some situation, to work better with the internal resampling, etc). >>> >>> What AGC do you mean? I know that AGC has recently been added to conferencing, but the level of the prompts is a system-wide situation. As far as I know, there isn't AGC that can be applied on every channel, and, even if there was, there would surely be a processing hit, so the goal would be to avoid needing it, right? >>> >>> The root problem, at least for me, is this. I need to add voice prompts and other audio for an IVR. I can't simply normalize all of my prompts to 0DB, as, even though they don't distort, they're so loud when compared to the stock prompts, they'll blow the phone out of my hand. To match them to the stock prompts, I must normalize them to around -16DB. I can do that, but it seems very wrong. At -16DB, nearly 85% of the potential gain of the channel is lost. >> -16dBM0 or -16dBOv, and average or peak burst power? -16dBOv for the >> average power is about where you want a voice prompt to be. In some >> juristictions you could be in breach of a regulation or two if you set >> the level higher than that on the PSTN. Why would you set a voice prompt >> to 0dB? It will be clipping like crazy. >>> Try this... With the demo IVR (5000), add this before the sleep command in the dialplan. >>> >>> >>> >>> That is the max gain boost available for a channel. The prompts should be really clipping with that much amplification, but they don't clip at all. At -16DB, you could literally amplify them to 6 times their native level without distorting. Native level is too low. Once I realized this, it became clear to me why Freeswitch sounded more quiet than Asterisk, at least when working with recorded prompts. >>> >>> I suppose I could use set_audio_level on every last call, but I'm sure that real-time amplification, like AGC, is another processor drain that builds up with lots of calls. Besides, it seems weird to dramatically reduce the level of audio, and then waste cycles amplifying it back up in real-time. >>> >>> Bryan >> Steve >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 02:10:32 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:10:32 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: <4E08DD6A.5040306@499x.com> References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> <4E08DD6A.5040306@499x.com> Message-ID: Its not just voice quality. It's also CPU. If you're using a compressed format, you're doing transcoding step. FS needs to decompress the file to L16 so it can compress it to the codec. Storing as wav containing l16 would avoid that. You can also use mod_native_file to compress the audio file to each codec format so that you don't need to transcode at all at the time because it's already done, although that does mean a file for each codec so more space needed. Steve on iPhone On 27 Jun 2011, at 20:43, Wes wrote: > I guess part of my confusion here was due to the term "raw data" mentioned in conjunction with the .gsm extension on the wiki page below... but actually gsm is a compressed format. > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_record_session > > So, what is the best "compressed" format to use for recording voice (that is available as a direct recording format inside freeswitch)? There are tons of formats listed when I do "show file", but I tried a few and they are also giving me large files like the wav extension did. (au, for example) > > Even though the PCM/Wave format is preferred for voice quality, when we're talking about a 10:1 compression ratio, if the sound quality is still acceptable, I'd rather just record directly into the compressed format. We're talking about ~10- 20 minute recordings that will need to be transferred over the internet to a third party. > > On 6/24/2011 6:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >> I would caution you to consider adding disk space before you try to compress all your recordings. The 16 bit SLIN that FS normally puts in your wave files are pretty easy to handle, whether playing back in a FS session, or encoding for playback on some other device. >> >> An alternative might be to use lame to convert them to MP3's or ogg/vorbis files. If you look on the main FS conf call page you'll see I have the weekly recordings in multiple formats. (http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call#Past_Calls) >> >> Here are some stats for last Wednesday's call. Note that I record wave files in 48kHz then use sox to downsample to 16kHz wave, then I convert that 16kHz file into MP3 and Vorbis (in an ogg container). Here's what the results look like: >> >> <2831>:ls -1s conf_call_2011-06-15.* >> 18736 conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 >> 23044 conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg >> 199756 conf_call_2011-06-15.wav >> >> <2832>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 >> conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3: MPEG ADTS, layer III, v2, 24 kBits, 16 kHz, Monaural >> >> <2833>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg >> conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, mono, 16000 Hz, ~48000 bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I >> >> <2834>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.wav >> conf_call_2011-06-15.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 16000 Hz >> >> Note that the file sizes are in 1K blocks. >> >> So, bottom line is this: if you have the disk space then use wave. If you don't have disk space for wave then get some! :D If you REALLY need to use a different format then choose something like MP3 or Vorbis for long-term storage. >> >> -MC >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Wes wrote: >> In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is >> about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. >> >> I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed >> at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav >> using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox >> tool? >> >> checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: >> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz >> >> and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: >> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz >> >> So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording >> parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller >> wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/48b7c5cb/attachment-0001.html From bill.evergreen at gmail.com Mon Jun 27 20:15:53 2011 From: bill.evergreen at gmail.com (bill evergreen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:15:53 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] does FreeSWITCH care about beeing connected to an IPv4- or IPv6-ISP ? Message-ID: Hello, I intend to setup a little FreeSWITCH test-environment. Does FreeSWITCH care about beeing connected to an IPv4- OR IPv6-isp (it should be possible to operate the same environment under IPv4 OR IPv6) ? Thank's a lot for any feedback! Bill PS I am new to FreeSWITCH :-) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/90103d15/attachment.html From freeswitch at ml102.pinguin.uni.cc Tue Jun 28 00:05:04 2011 From: freeswitch at ml102.pinguin.uni.cc (Al Bogner) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:05:04 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden Message-ID: <20110627220504.377cc403@ml102.pinguin.uni.cc> I am doing my first steps with freeswitch. I have installed on an Ubuntu 11.04 server: ii freeswitch 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 ii freeswitch-codec-passthru-g7231 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 ii freeswitch-codec-passthru-g729 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 ii freeswitch-lang-de 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 ii freeswitch-lang-en 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 Following the tutorial at http://www.onlinesolution.co.nz/viewtopic.php?t=102 I modified /opt/freeswitch/conf/directory/default/1000.xml Then I tried to connect to the server from another machine: +++ 27-6-2011 17:07:30.279796 INFO SIP ::send_sip_udp Send to: udp:192.168.2.100:5060 REGISTER sip:192.168.2.100 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.108;rport;branch=z9hG4bKcvkohckk Max-Forwards: 70 To: "FS Admin" From: "FS Admin" ;tag=nyyvz Call-ID: zmjxppampyrrgxk at client.local.tld CSeq: 645 REGISTER Contact: ;expires=3600 Allow: INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,PRACK,REFER,NOTIFY,SUBSCRIBE,INFO,MESSAGE User-Agent: Twinkle/1.4.2 Content-Length: 0 --- +++ 27-6-2011 17:07:30.281799 INFO SIP ::process_sip_msg Received from: udp:192.168.2.100:5060 SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.108;received=192.168.2.108;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKcvkohckk To: "FS Admin" ;tag=iairy From: "FS Admin" ;tag=nyyvz Call-ID: zmjxppampyrrgxk at client.local.tld CSeq: 645 REGISTER Server: Twinkle/1.4.2 Content-Length: 0 What could be wrong, so I can't connect? Al From dave at dchorton.com Tue Jun 28 01:12:48 2011 From: dave at dchorton.com (Dave Horton) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] building rpm doesn't get me sounds directory Message-ID: I'm building an rpm using the freeswitch.spec in the top-level directory, and it creates a usable rpm for me except that when I install it on a target machine, I don't get the sounds sub-directory and therefore voicemail doesn't work. Do I need to make some changes to the spec file or the rpm build script in order to get an rpm that will install all of the sounds/recordings? From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Tue Jun 28 03:11:33 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:11:33 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations In-Reply-To: References: <53E1375B-A8D6-4C1A-A1DD-055A3527673D@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: Anyhow, here are those three config files: internal.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16609 acl.conf.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16610 1300.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16611 If anything else could help, I'd love to share it. The basic story, so far as I see, is that I allow specific IPs through the ACL. Somehow this is allowing ANY SIP username to register, rather than just those defined (such as 1300). Any help would be appreciated. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: > It's enabled in the acl.conf.xml file, using CIDR. > > What conf files do you consider relevant? acl.conf.xml, internal.xml, > a profile or two, anything else? > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:26 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >> The interesting question is then: why are you able to register without >> password, if this feature is not enabled on the profile... >> Perhaps you should recap your config once more, and put the relevant files >> on PB. >> David Ponzone ?Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 >> Service Client?IPeva >> tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com >> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il >> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >> >> >> >> Le 27/06/2011 ? 20:36, Kurtis Heimerl a ?crit : >> >> That would explain why removing them didn't do anything! >> >> Thanks. >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: >> >> Just so you know... >> >> ? ?? >> >> ? ? ? >> >> These will have no effect in the user directory. They only apply to SIP >> >> profiles. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> On 27 June 2011 02:23, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >> >> Hello FS Users! >> >> I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if >> >> they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a >> >> password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is >> >> great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our >> >> SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give >> >> passwords. >> >> However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in >> >> the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, >> >> instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, >> >> and how to remedy that fact. >> >> I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed >> >> would force this function: >> >> ? >> >> ? >> >> However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as >> >> the following lines: >> >> ? >> >> ? ? >> >> ? ? ? >> >> ? ? ? >> >> ? ? ? >> >> ? ? >> >> Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) >> >> doesn't help. >> >> I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems >> >> possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do >> >> not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to >> >> test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of >> >> this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the >> >> nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. >> >> Thanks for any direction. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Tue Jun 28 03:12:59 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:12:59 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations In-Reply-To: References: <53E1375B-A8D6-4C1A-A1DD-055A3527673D@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: One of those links got screwed up... Anyhow, here are those three config files: internal.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16609 acl.conf.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16610 1300.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16611 If anything else could help, I'd love to share it. The basic story, so far as I see, is that I allow specific IPs through the ACL. Somehow this is allowing ANY SIP username to register, rather than just those defined (such as 1300). Any help would be appreciated. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: > Anyhow, here are those three config files: > > internal.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16609 > acl.conf.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16610 > 1300.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16611 > > If anything else could help, I'd love to share it. > > The basic story, so far as I see, is that I allow specific IPs through > the ACL. Somehow this is allowing ANY SIP username to register, rather > than just those defined (such as 1300). Any help would be appreciated. > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kurtis Heimerl > wrote: >> It's enabled in the acl.conf.xml file, using CIDR. >> >> What conf files do you consider relevant? acl.conf.xml, internal.xml, >> a profile or two, anything else? >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:26 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>> The interesting question is then: why are you able to register without >>> password, if this feature is not enabled on the profile... >>> Perhaps you should recap your config once more, and put the relevant files >>> on PB. >>> David Ponzone ?Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 >>> Service Client?IPeva >>> tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com >>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >>> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >>> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >>> d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il >>> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 27/06/2011 ? 20:36, Kurtis Heimerl a ?crit : >>> >>> That would explain why removing them didn't do anything! >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: >>> >>> Just so you know... >>> >>> ? ?? >>> >>> ? ? ? >>> >>> These will have no effect in the user directory. They only apply to SIP >>> >>> profiles. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> >>> On 27 June 2011 02:23, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >>> >>> Hello FS Users! >>> >>> I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if >>> >>> they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a >>> >>> password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is >>> >>> great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our >>> >>> SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give >>> >>> passwords. >>> >>> However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in >>> >>> the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, >>> >>> instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, >>> >>> and how to remedy that fact. >>> >>> I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed >>> >>> would force this function: >>> >>> ? >>> >>> ? >>> >>> However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as >>> >>> the following lines: >>> >>> ? >>> >>> ? ? >>> >>> ? ? ? >>> >>> ? ? ? >>> >>> ? ? ? >>> >>> ? ? >>> >>> Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) >>> >>> doesn't help. >>> >>> I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems >>> >>> possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do >>> >>> not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to >>> >>> test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of >>> >>> this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the >>> >>> nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. >>> >>> Thanks for any direction. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> > From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Tue Jun 28 03:28:32 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:28:32 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> <4E08DD6A.5040306@499x.com> Message-ID: <3C36C8D8-79C7-46F8-BB09-E9321E8B5425@ipeva.fr> Steven, AFAIR, one of the recording app (not sure which) does not support mod_native_file, meaning for instance you can't dump your call using codec XXX to a raw file. That's a quite old limitation, so perhaps it's not an issue anymore. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 28/06/2011 ? 00:10, Steven Ayre a ?crit : > Its not just voice quality. It's also CPU. > > If you're using a compressed format, you're doing transcoding step. FS needs to decompress the file to L16 so it can compress it to the codec. Storing as wav containing l16 would avoid that. You can also use mod_native_file to compress the audio file to each codec format so that you don't need to transcode at all at the time because it's already done, although that does mean a file for each codec so more space needed. > > Steve on iPhone > > On 27 Jun 2011, at 20:43, Wes wrote: > >> I guess part of my confusion here was due to the term "raw data" mentioned in conjunction with the .gsm extension on the wiki page below... but actually gsm is a compressed format. >> >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_record_session >> >> So, what is the best "compressed" format to use for recording voice (that is available as a direct recording format inside freeswitch)? There are tons of formats listed when I do "show file", but I tried a few and they are also giving me large files like the wav extension did. (au, for example) >> >> Even though the PCM/Wave format is preferred for voice quality, when we're talking about a 10:1 compression ratio, if the sound quality is still acceptable, I'd rather just record directly into the compressed format. We're talking about ~10- 20 minute recordings that will need to be transferred over the internet to a third party. >> >> On 6/24/2011 6:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>> >>> I would caution you to consider adding disk space before you try to compress all your recordings. The 16 bit SLIN that FS normally puts in your wave files are pretty easy to handle, whether playing back in a FS session, or encoding for playback on some other device. >>> >>> An alternative might be to use lame to convert them to MP3's or ogg/vorbis files. If you look on the main FS conf call page you'll see I have the weekly recordings in multiple formats. (http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call#Past_Calls) >>> >>> Here are some stats for last Wednesday's call. Note that I record wave files in 48kHz then use sox to downsample to 16kHz wave, then I convert that 16kHz file into MP3 and Vorbis (in an ogg container). Here's what the results look like: >>> >>> <2831>:ls -1s conf_call_2011-06-15.* >>> 18736 conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 >>> 23044 conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg >>> 199756 conf_call_2011-06-15.wav >>> >>> <2832>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 >>> conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3: MPEG ADTS, layer III, v2, 24 kBits, 16 kHz, Monaural >>> >>> <2833>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg >>> conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, mono, 16000 Hz, ~48000 bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I >>> >>> <2834>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.wav >>> conf_call_2011-06-15.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 16000 Hz >>> >>> Note that the file sizes are in 1K blocks. >>> >>> So, bottom line is this: if you have the disk space then use wave. If you don't have disk space for wave then get some! :D If you REALLY need to use a different format then choose something like MP3 or Vorbis for long-term storage. >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Wes wrote: >>> In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is >>> about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. >>> >>> I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed >>> at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav >>> using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox >>> tool? >>> >>> checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: >>> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz >>> >>> and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: >>> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz >>> >>> So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording >>> parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller >>> wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/f56dce8c/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 28 03:32:35 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:32:35 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > Have a look at the 48khz versions of the files, those should be the > originals. > Someone runs a batch sox command on them to get them to the other levels. > Just for the record, the sox command used to normalize the sounds is: sox -v 0.2 $file_in -r $rate -c 1 $file_out The -v format is the "volume" format and if I read the sox man page correctly it means a "linear amplitude adjustment". What I can't tell from the man page is whether .2 means "reduce by 20%" or "reduce to 20%" or something else. In any case, like Tony says, we are not picky about this as long as it's not pointlessly loud. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/91ca4fdc/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 28 03:42:16 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:42:16 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: <4E08EBF8.9040207@499x.com> References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> <4E08DD6A.5040306@499x.com> <4E08EBF8.9040207@499x.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Wes wrote: > ** > I'm sorry, but what is the SLIN format? I tried that extension and it's > invalid. I searched the wiki and found nothing. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_pulse-code_modulation There's lots of names for it. Just think of SLIN as "the format normally stored in a .wav file." (That's an imperfect definition but it will help you get over the mental hump.) In summary, just record to .wav files and x-code later when there are more system resources available. You could also use "nice" or something like that to prevent the x-coding process from grabbing all your system resources. -MC > > On 6/27/2011 3:29 PM, David Ponzone wrote: > > You should really consider recording in SLIN, and then, batch compressing > that later (during off-peak hours) to MP3 if you really need it to be > smaller. > Any efficient compression takes CPU, and you may want to avoid doing that > live on your server. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 27/06/2011 ? 21:43, Wes a ?crit : > > I guess part of my confusion here was due to the term "raw data" > mentioned in conjunction with the .gsm extension on the wiki page below... > but actually gsm is a compressed format. > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_record_session > > So, what is the best "compressed" format to use for recording voice (that > is available as a direct recording format inside freeswitch)? There are tons > of formats listed when I do "show file", but I tried a few and they are also > giving me large files like the wav extension did. (au, for example) > > Even though the PCM/Wave format is preferred for voice quality, when we're > talking about a 10:1 compression ratio, if the sound quality is still > acceptable, I'd rather just record directly into the compressed format. > We're talking about ~10- 20 minute recordings that will need to be > transferred over the internet to a third party. > > On 6/24/2011 6:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > I would caution you to consider adding disk space before you try to > compress all your recordings. The 16 bit SLIN that FS normally puts in your > wave files are pretty easy to handle, whether playing back in a FS session, > or encoding for playback on some other device. > > An alternative might be to use lame to convert them to MP3's or ogg/vorbis > files. If you look on the main FS conf call page you'll see I have the > weekly recordings in multiple formats. ( > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call#Past_Calls) > > Here are some stats for last Wednesday's call. Note that I record wave > files in 48kHz then use sox to downsample to 16kHz wave, then I convert that > 16kHz file into MP3 and Vorbis (in an ogg container). Here's what the > results look like: > > <2831>:ls -1s conf_call_2011-06-15.* > 18736 conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 > 23044 conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg > 199756 conf_call_2011-06-15.wav > > <2832>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 > conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3: MPEG ADTS, layer III, v2, 24 kBits, 16 kHz, > Monaural > > <2833>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg > conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, mono, 16000 Hz, ~48000 > bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I > > <2834>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.wav > conf_call_2011-06-15.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft > PCM, 16 bit, mono 16000 Hz > > Note that the file sizes are in 1K blocks. > > So, bottom line is this: if you have the disk space then use wave. If you > don't have disk space for wave then get some! :D If you REALLY need to use a > different format then choose something like MP3 or Vorbis for long-term > storage. > > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Wes wrote: > >> In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is >> about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. >> >> I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed >> at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav >> using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox >> tool? >> >> checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: >> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz >> >> and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: >> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz >> >> So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording >> parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller >> wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/58d20e46/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Tue Jun 28 03:55:08 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:55:08 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden In-Reply-To: <20110627220504.377cc403@ml102.pinguin.uni.cc> References: <20110627220504.377cc403@ml102.pinguin.uni.cc> Message-ID: <77CE8968-A79D-4310-964D-E4952F1D436C@ipeva.fr> Al, please, show us the content of the following files: conf/directory/default.xml conf/vars.xml May you also tell us if you see a message in fs_cli when you try to register ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 27/06/2011 ? 22:05, Al Bogner a ?crit : > I am doing my first steps with freeswitch. > > I have installed on an Ubuntu 11.04 server: > > ii freeswitch 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > ii freeswitch-codec-passthru-g7231 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > ii freeswitch-codec-passthru-g729 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > ii freeswitch-lang-de 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > ii freeswitch-lang-en 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > > > Following the tutorial at > http://www.onlinesolution.co.nz/viewtopic.php?t=102 > I modified /opt/freeswitch/conf/directory/default/1000.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value="$${outbound_caller_name}"/> name="outbound_caller_id_number" value="$${outbound_caller_id}"/> > > > > > > Then I tried to connect to the server from another machine: > > > +++ 27-6-2011 17:07:30.279796 INFO SIP ::send_sip_udp > Send to: udp:192.168.2.100:5060 > REGISTER sip:192.168.2.100 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.108;rport;branch=z9hG4bKcvkohckk > Max-Forwards: 70 > To: "FS Admin" > From: "FS Admin" ;tag=nyyvz > Call-ID: zmjxppampyrrgxk at client.local.tld > CSeq: 645 REGISTER > Contact: ;expires=3600 > Allow: > INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,PRACK,REFER,NOTIFY,SUBSCRIBE,INFO,MESSAGE > User-Agent: Twinkle/1.4.2 Content-Length: 0 > > > --- > > +++ 27-6-2011 17:07:30.281799 INFO SIP ::process_sip_msg > Received from: udp:192.168.2.100:5060 > SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 192.168.2.108;received=192.168.2.108;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKcvkohckk > To: "FS Admin" ;tag=iairy From: "FS Admin" > ;tag=nyyvz Call-ID: > zmjxppampyrrgxk at client.local.tld CSeq: 645 REGISTER > Server: Twinkle/1.4.2 > Content-Length: 0 > > > What could be wrong, so I can't connect? > > Al > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/c2250b6a/attachment.html From steveu at coppice.org Tue Jun 28 05:31:00 2011 From: steveu at coppice.org (Steve Underwood) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:31:00 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> On 06/28/2011 04:00 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: > I don't want to maximize peaks all the way to 0DB. I just wondered why a low level like -16DB was used. When I'd previously created prompts on Asterisk systems, I used -6DB as a peak (50% of max gain for the channel). The peaks of voice are general something like 12 to 13dB above the short term RMS value. If the -16dB value you quoted is -16dBOv, its 13dB below clipping. Your peaks should be close to clipping at -16dB. > I wasn't aware of any regulations about prompt level. If there is a standardized level, that is what I'd like to use. Perhaps the louder systems are disregarding standards? Does anyone have links to such info? I've been unable to find anything definitive, only opinions. In many places the regulation says the power on a PSTN line should not exceed -13dBm0. That's why -13dBm0 is the target power level for most PSTN modems. > Listen to TellMe (+1-800-555-8355). It's at least 3X the gain of the default FS prompts. Is TellMe in error? I've called them through both FS and Asterisk, using Vitelity and Callcentric, so I'm fairly sure that I'm not being mislead by a switch or ITSP boosting the gain. I always felt their level was strong and intelligible, without sounding overwhelming. Not everyone bothers to obey regulations these days, and many people do love to blast sound into an overloaded highly distorted mess, because volume is king. Its not good for clarity, though. What the loudest people do is no measure of good engineering. Sadly, this behaviour might make people set their levels around the excessively loud signals, so a properly adjusted signal sounds too quiet. In the early days of my FAX modem work I received many recordings from people who could not get reliable results, where the audio was perpetually in clipping, and any speech through the channel would have sounded awful. They would generally insist that voice was "perfect" on their system. There is a serious lack of engineering in most VoIP work. > One point that caught my attention, though, is that you said -16DB for both average and peak power. Average and peak power don't come out the same, though. > > So that we can talk about something concrete, consider conference/32000/conf-enter_conf_pin.wav. Its peak power is -15.7DB. However, its average power (RMS) is -31.3DB! -31DB is profoundly quiet. If its average power is boosted to -16DB, then the peak power is now around -2DB. As long as peak power is less than 0DB, then the audio won't clip, but it might be too loud for comfort. I previously used -6DB for a peak, as I couldn't find any real guidelines regarding levels, and -6 sounded good to me. You still haven't said whether you are talking dBm0 or dBOv. It makes a 6dB difference. Also, what do you mean by peak power? If the peaks of the short term RMS power are hitting 0dB, the peaks of the waveform will be far into clipping. If you are talking about dBOv, then -6dB is only 3dB from the onset of clipping, and voice will clip a lot. If you are talking dBm0, -6dB is 9dB from clipping, and the voice will only clip a bit, and maybe not sound too bad. However, clipped voice tends to pass through low bit rate codecs worse than clean voice, so you might want to keep the clipping down to a really occasional event. Voice codecs have at least 12 bits of dynamic range. They are designed to allow a voice to bubble along at -30dB with good quality, and burst up to a much higher level in the loud bits. > Maybe FS is lower than it should be. Maybe other services are louder than they should be. If FS should be louder, though, I'd like to help to change the levels up-stream, rather than locally reprocessing the prompts. > > So, is this a personal judgement case, or are their standards available that can be consulted? > > Bryan > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: > >> On 06/27/2011 07:11 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: >>> I have tools to batch-process audio files. I just was not sure that regaining all of the prompt files was the best approach. I figured that the gain must have been reduced so dramatically for some sort of reason (to avoid clipping in some situation, to work better with the internal resampling, etc). >>> >>> What AGC do you mean? I know that AGC has recently been added to conferencing, but the level of the prompts is a system-wide situation. As far as I know, there isn't AGC that can be applied on every channel, and, even if there was, there would surely be a processing hit, so the goal would be to avoid needing it, right? >>> >>> The root problem, at least for me, is this. I need to add voice prompts and other audio for an IVR. I can't simply normalize all of my prompts to 0DB, as, even though they don't distort, they're so loud when compared to the stock prompts, they'll blow the phone out of my hand. To match them to the stock prompts, I must normalize them to around -16DB. I can do that, but it seems very wrong. At -16DB, nearly 85% of the potential gain of the channel is lost. >> -16dBM0 or -16dBOv, and average or peak burst power? -16dBOv for the >> average power is about where you want a voice prompt to be. In some >> juristictions you could be in breach of a regulation or two if you set >> the level higher than that on the PSTN. Why would you set a voice prompt >> to 0dB? It will be clipping like crazy. >>> Try this... With the demo IVR (5000), add this before the sleep command in the dialplan. >>> >>> >>> >>> That is the max gain boost available for a channel. The prompts should be really clipping with that much amplification, but they don't clip at all. At -16DB, you could literally amplify them to 6 times their native level without distorting. Native level is too low. Once I realized this, it became clear to me why Freeswitch sounded more quiet than Asterisk, at least when working with recorded prompts. >>> >>> I suppose I could use set_audio_level on every last call, but I'm sure that real-time amplification, like AGC, is another processor drain that builds up with lots of calls. Besides, it seems weird to dramatically reduce the level of audio, and then waste cycles amplifying it back up in real-time. >>> >>> Bryan >> Steve >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From admin at blindi.net Tue Jun 28 06:20:39 2011 From: admin at blindi.net (Thomas Hoellriegel) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 04:20:39 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Question why repeat the FS the group_confirm_file announcement 3 times? In-Reply-To: <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> Message-ID: Hi all, i created the following dial plan: Fs play the soundfile 3 times befor the connection Can i change these please? thanks. group_confirm_file --------------- Du kannst mich jederzeit kostenlos per Festnetz erreichen unter: http://www.blindi.net/callback homepage: http://www.blindi.net blinde-misc mailingliste f?r blinde. anmeldung unter: http://www.blindi.net/mailman/listinfo/blinde-misc From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 06:25:07 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:25:07 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] does FreeSWITCH care about beeing connected to an IPv4- or IPv6-ISP ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: FreeSwitch supports both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols via it's Sofia SIP stack. There is a default internal profile created for the IPv6 side of things, but then again, you might want to customize that first. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:15 AM, bill evergreen wrote: > Hello, > > I intend to setup a little FreeSWITCH test-environment.? Does FreeSWITCH > care about beeing connected to an IPv4- OR IPv6-isp (it should be possible > to operate the same environment under IPv4 OR IPv6) ? > > > Thank's a lot for any feedback! > > Bill > > > > PS > I am new to FreeSWITCH :-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From admin at blindi.net Tue Jun 28 06:38:01 2011 From: admin at blindi.net (Thomas Hoellriegel) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 04:38:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How can i drop the outcallcontext from the originate callerid? In-Reply-To: References: <4DD547F5.4080504@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi David and michael, sorry for the delay. I was much busy. I have fixed my problem. I insert this action: now it works fine for me thanks for your nice help! --------------- Du kannst mich jederzeit kostenlos per Festnetz erreichen unter: http://www.blindi.net/callback homepage: http://www.blindi.net blinde-misc mailingliste f?r blinde. anmeldung unter: http://www.blindi.net/mailman/listinfo/blinde-misc From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Tue Jun 28 07:04:07 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> Message-ID: <2D33125A-05E0-40DE-92A2-7038940977AB@bryansmart.com> I think that dBm0 only applies if we are measuring the power on an analog circuit, or at the d/a point of a digital circuit. I was performing analysis of a digitally encoded audio file, therefore the measurement is dBFS, and 0DBFS is the point where clipping takes place. Anything below 0DBFS does not clip, even though it might seem loud to someone. I stated that the peak power of the stock prompts are typically -15 to -16 (DBFS), and the short term RMS power is about -32DBFS. I don't know how to properly evaluate how DBFS will convert to DBm0. I gather that the codec and the d/a converter attenuate the level to some extent, but I don't know how much. If I have a digital file with a 1Khz test tone at -10DBFS, and play that over the pstn, what do I get out in DBm0? Speaking just in terms of DBFS, -16DB is only about 15% of the potential power available before the audio reaches 0DB, and clips. Perhaps when -16DBFS is put out over the pstn, it is much closer to clipping than it would be in an entirely digital domain. I don't know enough to make that determination. Do you know? I'm not for clipping and distortion. However, too little power can cause another problem: limited dynamic range and increased dithering artifacts. If audio is quiet on a pstn phone, then the person with the phone might be able to increase the level by turning up the phone's volume, if it has one. However, that raises the noise floor. Companding might make 8-bit channels sound a bit like 14-bit or 15-bit channels in terms of a low noise floor and decreased dithering artifacts, but it is still just an 8-bit channel. Companding hides most of the dithering artifacts in strong signals, but it magnifies them in weak signals. That's why G711 is fairly clear, but will sound scratchy if you put faint signals in to it and try to amplify them back up to normal levels. Over G711 or any pstn call, as you decrease the level of the audio going across, the scratchy dithering static obscures an increasing amount of the audio. This gets worse if you compound it by stacking codecs. Consider if someone calls your IVR from a cell phone, and you play quiet prompts to them. The audio is first passed through G711, where the low gain means that scratchy dithering artifacts are added. Then, it is encoded to GSM for the cell phone,. GSM uses linear predictive coding, and, being tuned for voice, it is not optimized for having smooth waveforms interrupted periodically with random excursions. Thats part of why cell phone calls sound so bad if there is lots of background noise. Anyway, clipping is to be avoided, but simply reducing levels dramatically creates other quality problems on a channel that uses companding. You trade distorted audio for scratchy audio. Same thing happened with cassette tapes that used Dolby noise reduction. Maybe you can help clear up my understanding of how DBFS in a digital file will work out in DBm0 on a pstn line. As things stand, though, I think we have lots of room to increase the level of the prompts before we reach a point where clipping is an issue. Bryan On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Steve Underwood wrote: > On 06/28/2011 04:00 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: >> I don't want to maximize peaks all the way to 0DB. I just wondered why a low level like -16DB was used. When I'd previously created prompts on Asterisk systems, I used -6DB as a peak (50% of max gain for the channel). > The peaks of voice are general something like 12 to 13dB above the short > term RMS value. If the -16dB value you quoted is -16dBOv, its 13dB below > clipping. Your peaks should be close to clipping at -16dB. >> I wasn't aware of any regulations about prompt level. If there is a standardized level, that is what I'd like to use. Perhaps the louder systems are disregarding standards? Does anyone have links to such info? I've been unable to find anything definitive, only opinions. > In many places the regulation says the power on a PSTN line should not > exceed -13dBm0. That's why -13dBm0 is the target power level for most > PSTN modems. >> Listen to TellMe (+1-800-555-8355). It's at least 3X the gain of the default FS prompts. Is TellMe in error? I've called them through both FS and Asterisk, using Vitelity and Callcentric, so I'm fairly sure that I'm not being mislead by a switch or ITSP boosting the gain. I always felt their level was strong and intelligible, without sounding overwhelming. > Not everyone bothers to obey regulations these days, and many people do > love to blast sound into an overloaded highly distorted mess, because > volume is king. Its not good for clarity, though. What the loudest > people do is no measure of good engineering. Sadly, this behaviour might > make people set their levels around the excessively loud signals, so a > properly adjusted signal sounds too quiet. In the early days of my FAX > modem work I received many recordings from people who could not get > reliable results, where the audio was perpetually in clipping, and any > speech through the channel would have sounded awful. They would > generally insist that voice was "perfect" on their system. There is a > serious lack of engineering in most VoIP work. >> One point that caught my attention, though, is that you said -16DB for both average and peak power. Average and peak power don't come out the same, though. >> >> So that we can talk about something concrete, consider conference/32000/conf-enter_conf_pin.wav. Its peak power is -15.7DB. However, its average power (RMS) is -31.3DB! -31DB is profoundly quiet. If its average power is boosted to -16DB, then the peak power is now around -2DB. As long as peak power is less than 0DB, then the audio won't clip, but it might be too loud for comfort. I previously used -6DB for a peak, as I couldn't find any real guidelines regarding levels, and -6 sounded good to me. > You still haven't said whether you are talking dBm0 or dBOv. It makes a > 6dB difference. Also, what do you mean by peak power? If the peaks of > the short term RMS power are hitting 0dB, the peaks of the waveform will > be far into clipping. If you are talking about dBOv, then -6dB is only > 3dB from the onset of clipping, and voice will clip a lot. If you are > talking dBm0, -6dB is 9dB from clipping, and the voice will only clip a > bit, and maybe not sound too bad. However, clipped voice tends to pass > through low bit rate codecs worse than clean voice, so you might want to > keep the clipping down to a really occasional event. Voice codecs have > at least 12 bits of dynamic range. They are designed to allow a voice to > bubble along at -30dB with good quality, and burst up to a much higher > level in the loud bits. >> Maybe FS is lower than it should be. Maybe other services are louder than they should be. If FS should be louder, though, I'd like to help to change the levels up-stream, rather than locally reprocessing the prompts. >> >> So, is this a personal judgement case, or are their standards available that can be consulted? >> >> Bryan >> >> On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: >> >>> On 06/27/2011 07:11 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: >>>> I have tools to batch-process audio files. I just was not sure that regaining all of the prompt files was the best approach. I figured that the gain must have been reduced so dramatically for some sort of reason (to avoid clipping in some situation, to work better with the internal resampling, etc). >>>> >>>> What AGC do you mean? I know that AGC has recently been added to conferencing, but the level of the prompts is a system-wide situation. As far as I know, there isn't AGC that can be applied on every channel, and, even if there was, there would surely be a processing hit, so the goal would be to avoid needing it, right? >>>> >>>> The root problem, at least for me, is this. I need to add voice prompts and other audio for an IVR. I can't simply normalize all of my prompts to 0DB, as, even though they don't distort, they're so loud when compared to the stock prompts, they'll blow the phone out of my hand. To match them to the stock prompts, I must normalize them to around -16DB. I can do that, but it seems very wrong. At -16DB, nearly 85% of the potential gain of the channel is lost. >>> -16dBM0 or -16dBOv, and average or peak burst power? -16dBOv for the >>> average power is about where you want a voice prompt to be. In some >>> juristictions you could be in breach of a regulation or two if you set >>> the level higher than that on the PSTN. Why would you set a voice prompt >>> to 0dB? It will be clipping like crazy. >>>> Try this... With the demo IVR (5000), add this before the sleep command in the dialplan. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That is the max gain boost available for a channel. The prompts should be really clipping with that much amplification, but they don't clip at all. At -16DB, you could literally amplify them to 6 times their native level without distorting. Native level is too low. Once I realized this, it became clear to me why Freeswitch sounded more quiet than Asterisk, at least when working with recorded prompts. >>>> >>>> I suppose I could use set_audio_level on every last call, but I'm sure that real-time amplification, like AGC, is another processor drain that builds up with lots of calls. Besides, it seems weird to dramatically reduce the level of audio, and then waste cycles amplifying it back up in real-time. >>>> >>>> Bryan >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Tue Jun 28 07:25:54 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: <1BB0CF88-DA61-4AB6-9CC6-328CCB9846AD@bryansmart.com> -v is a multiplier. So, -v 0.2 reduces gain to 20% of original. It is typical to supply professionally recorded audio with peaks boosted to 0DBFS. That is probably how the prompts were originally supplied. It makes since that -v 0.2 would reduce the max power to 20%, around -15 to -16 DBFS. The FS build process downloads pre-processed versions of these files. Is there somewhere online that I can find the source recordings+script that produces the pre-processed files that are downloaded by the build process? Bryan On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:32 PM, Michael Collins wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Anthony Minessale > wrote: Have a look at the 48khz versions of the files, those should be the originals. Someone runs a batch sox command on them to get them to the other levels. Just for the record, the sox command used to normalize the sounds is: sox -v 0.2 $file_in -r $rate -c 1 $file_out The -v format is the "volume" format and if I read the sox man page correctly it means a "linear amplitude adjustment". What I can't tell from the man page is whether .2 means "reduce by 20%" or "reduce to 20%" or something else. In any case, like Tony says, we are not picky about this as long as it's not pointlessly loud. -MC _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110627/d8771179/attachment.html From michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de Tue Jun 28 09:47:57 2011 From: michal.bielicki at seventhsignal.de (Michal Bielicki) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:47:57 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] building rpm doesn't get me sounds directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: THere are two spec files, one for freeswitch itself and one for sound files. Did not do a moh spec file yet but the soundfile spec file of course will make a sounds directory too since it installs all sound files in it. Am 27.06.2011 um 23:12 schrieb Dave Horton: > I'm building an rpm using the freeswitch.spec in the top-level directory, and it creates a usable rpm for me except that when I install it on a target machine, I don't get the sounds sub-directory and therefore voicemail doesn't work. Do I need to make some changes to the spec file or the rpm build script in order to get an rpm that will install all of the sounds/recordings? > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org Michal Bielicki Gesch?ftsf?hrer / CEO Seventh Signal Ltd. & Co. KG Weigandufer 45, B?ro 115, D-12059 Berlin Voice: +49 30 60988730 Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRA 44413 B Ust.-ID: DE266981999 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Michal Bielicki Pers?nlich Haftende Gesellschafterin: Seventh Signal Ltd, 69 Great Hampton St. Birmingham, B18 6EW, GB, Company Nr.: 06889439 WWW.: http://www.seventhsignal.de From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Tue Jun 28 09:57:00 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:57:00 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations Message-ID: <7E6172B9-85D8-44E7-AA6E-481A8157BF58@visionutveckling.se> AFAIK this is the intended behaviour. If allowed through ACL using cidr, the user is treated as authenticated, so no registration is required. /Peter ----- Reply message ----- Fr?n: "Kurtis Heimerl" Datum: tis, jun 28, 2011 01:19 Rubrik: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations Till: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" One of those links got screwed up... Anyhow, here are those three config files: internal.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16609 acl.conf.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16610 1300.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16611 If anything else could help, I'd love to share it. The basic story, so far as I see, is that I allow specific IPs through the ACL. Somehow this is allowing ANY SIP username to register, rather than just those defined (such as 1300). Any help would be appreciated. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: > Anyhow, here are those three config files: > > internal.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16609 > acl.conf.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16610 > 1300.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16611 > > If anything else could help, I'd love to share it. > > The basic story, so far as I see, is that I allow specific IPs through > the ACL. Somehow this is allowing ANY SIP username to register, rather > than just those defined (such as 1300). Any help would be appreciated. > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kurtis Heimerl > wrote: >> It's enabled in the acl.conf.xml file, using CIDR. >> >> What conf files do you consider relevant? acl.conf.xml, internal.xml, >> a profile or two, anything else? >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:26 PM, David Ponzone wrote: >>> The interesting question is then: why are you able to register without >>> password, if this feature is not enabled on the profile... >>> Perhaps you should recap your config once more, and put the relevant files >>> on PB. >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> Service Client IPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? >>> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion >>> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >>> d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il >>> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce >>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 27/06/2011 ? 20:36, Kurtis Heimerl a ?crit : >>> >>> That would explain why removing them didn't do anything! >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: >>> >>> Just so you know... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> These will have no effect in the user directory. They only apply to SIP >>> >>> profiles. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> >>> On 27 June 2011 02:23, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >>> >>> Hello FS Users! >>> >>> I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if >>> >>> they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a >>> >>> password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is >>> >>> great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our >>> >>> SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give >>> >>> passwords. >>> >>> However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in >>> >>> the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, >>> >>> instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, >>> >>> and how to remedy that fact. >>> >>> I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed >>> >>> would force this function: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as >>> >>> the following lines: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) >>> >>> doesn't help. >>> >>> I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems >>> >>> possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do >>> >>> not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to >>> >>> test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of >>> >>> this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the >>> >>> nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. >>> >>> Thanks for any direction. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4e090ed032762115621071! From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 11:56:53 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:56:53 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations In-Reply-To: References: <53E1375B-A8D6-4C1A-A1DD-055A3527673D@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: When you use a CIDR it matches the user entry based on IP not on username. You're able to authenticate with other usernames because they're all authenticating to the same user based on IP. -Steve On 28 June 2011 00:12, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: > One of those links got screwed up... > > Anyhow, here are those three config files: > > internal.xml : http://bpastebin.freeswitch.org/16609 > > acl.conf.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16610 > > 1300.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16611 > > If anything else could help, I'd love to share it. > > The basic story, so far as I see, is that I allow specific IPs through > the ACL. Somehow this is allowing ANY SIP username to register, rather > than just those defined (such as 1300). Any help would be appreciated. > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Kurtis Heimerl > wrote: > > Anyhow, here are those three config files: > > > > internal.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16609 > > acl.conf.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16610 > > 1300.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16611 > > > > If anything else could help, I'd love to share it. > > > > The basic story, so far as I see, is that I allow specific IPs through > > the ACL. Somehow this is allowing ANY SIP username to register, rather > > than just those defined (such as 1300). Any help would be appreciated. > > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kurtis Heimerl > > wrote: > >> It's enabled in the acl.conf.xml file, using CIDR. > >> > >> What conf files do you consider relevant? acl.conf.xml, internal.xml, > >> a profile or two, anything else? > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:26 PM, David Ponzone > wrote: > >>> The interesting question is then: why are you able to register without > >>> password, if this feature is not enabled on the profile... > >>> Perhaps you should recap your config once more, and put the relevant > files > >>> on PB. > >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique > >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > >>> Service Client IPeva > >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 > >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > >>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > >>> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion > >>> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > >>> d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message > s'il > >>> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de > ce > >>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Le 27/06/2011 ? 20:36, Kurtis Heimerl a ?crit : > >>> > >>> That would explain why removing them didn't do anything! > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Steven Ayre > wrote: > >>> > >>> Just so you know... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> These will have no effect in the user directory. They only apply to SIP > >>> > >>> profiles. > >>> > >>> -Steve > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 27 June 2011 02:23, Kurtis Heimerl > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello FS Users! > >>> > >>> I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if > >>> > >>> they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a > >>> > >>> password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is > >>> > >>> great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our > >>> > >>> SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give > >>> > >>> passwords. > >>> > >>> However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in > >>> > >>> the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, > >>> > >>> instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, > >>> > >>> and how to remedy that fact. > >>> > >>> I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed > >>> > >>> would force this function: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as > >>> > >>> the following lines: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) > >>> > >>> doesn't help. > >>> > >>> I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems > >>> > >>> possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do > >>> > >>> not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to > >>> > >>> test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of > >>> > >>> this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the > >>> > >>> nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. > >>> > >>> Thanks for any direction. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> > >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >>> > >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >>> > >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>> > >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>> > >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>> > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>> > >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> > >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >>> > >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >>> > >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>> > >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>> > >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>> > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>> > >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >>> > >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >>> > >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/46b54344/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 11:58:10 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:58:10 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] .wav vs .gsm file sizes for recording calls. In-Reply-To: <3C36C8D8-79C7-46F8-BB09-E9321E8B5425@ipeva.fr> References: <4E0500EE.9040506@499x.com> <4E08DD6A.5040306@499x.com> <3C36C8D8-79C7-46F8-BB09-E9321E8B5425@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: You're right I think. :) Was talking about playback... guess it was pretty late. -Steve On 28 June 2011 00:28, David Ponzone wrote: > Steven, > > AFAIR, one of the recording app (not sure which) does not support > mod_native_file, meaning for instance you can't dump your call using codec > XXX to a raw file. > That's a quite old limitation, so perhaps it's not an issue anymore. > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > *Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? > l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible > d'alt?ration. **IPeva** d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce > message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir > l'exp?diteur.* > * > * > > > > Le 28/06/2011 ? 00:10, Steven Ayre a ?crit : > > Its not just voice quality. It's also CPU. > > If you're using a compressed format, you're doing transcoding step. FS > needs to decompress the file to L16 so it can compress it to the codec. > Storing as wav containing l16 would avoid that. You can also use > mod_native_file to compress the audio file to each codec format so that you > don't need to transcode at all at the time because it's already done, > although that does mean a file for each codec so more space needed. > > Steve on iPhone > > On 27 Jun 2011, at 20:43, Wes wrote: > > I guess part of my confusion here was due to the term "raw data" mentioned > in conjunction with the .gsm extension on the wiki page below... but > actually gsm is a compressed format. > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_record_session > > So, what is the best "compressed" format to use for recording voice (that > is available as a direct recording format inside freeswitch)? There are tons > of formats listed when I do "show file", but I tried a few and they are also > giving me large files like the wav extension did. (au, for example) > > Even though the PCM/Wave format is preferred for voice quality, when we're > talking about a 10:1 compression ratio, if the sound quality is still > acceptable, I'd rather just record directly into the compressed format. > We're talking about ~10- 20 minute recordings that will need to be > transferred over the internet to a third party. > > On 6/24/2011 6:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > I would caution you to consider adding disk space before you try to > compress all your recordings. The 16 bit SLIN that FS normally puts in your > wave files are pretty easy to handle, whether playing back in a FS session, > or encoding for playback on some other device. > > An alternative might be to use lame to convert them to MP3's or ogg/vorbis > files. If you look on the main FS conf call page you'll see I have the > weekly recordings in multiple formats. ( > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call#Past_Calls) > > Here are some stats for last Wednesday's call. Note that I record wave > files in 48kHz then use sox to downsample to 16kHz wave, then I convert that > 16kHz file into MP3 and Vorbis (in an ogg container). Here's what the > results look like: > > <2831>:ls -1s conf_call_2011-06-15.* > 18736 conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 > 23044 conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg > 199756 conf_call_2011-06-15.wav > > <2832>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3 > conf_call_2011-06-15.mp3: MPEG ADTS, layer III, v2, 24 kBits, 16 kHz, > Monaural > > <2833>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg > conf_call_2011-06-15.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, mono, 16000 Hz, ~48000 > bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I > > <2834>:file conf_call_2011-06-15.wav > conf_call_2011-06-15.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft > PCM, 16 bit, mono 16000 Hz > > Note that the file sizes are in 1K blocks. > > So, bottom line is this: if you have the disk space then use wave. If you > don't have disk space for wave then get some! :D If you REALLY need to use a > different format then choose something like MP3 or Vorbis for long-term > storage. > > -MC > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Wes < wes-fs at 499x.com>wrote: > >> In my tests, if I record a call in .wav format, a 10 second file is >> about 177,000 bytes, while a 10 second .gsm file is 17,000 bytes. >> >> I then used sox to convert the .gsm file to a .wav file, and it stayed >> at around 17,000 bytes. So, is the default recording format for .wav >> using a higher sample rate? vs the default conversion format for the sox >> tool? >> >> checking the file type using "file" I see that the larger one is: >> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz >> >> and the wav created by sox via the default conversion from .gsm is: >> RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, GSM 6.10, mono 8000 Hz >> >> So apparently the larger wav file is 16 bit... how are these recording >> parameters controlled? Can I set it to record directly into the smaller >> wav format? Or will I have to run sox on every file... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE: >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/2c795e27/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 12:00:39 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:00:39 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] does FreeSWITCH care about beeing connected to an IPv4- or IPv6-ISP ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: You can use SIP on FS on IPv4, IPv6, or both. You can even bridge calls inbetween the two (as long as you avoid bypass_media). When you create a SIP profile it binds to a specific IP, you just need to put the relevant IPv4/IPv6 IP there. Then treat the profiles as normal. ACLs also support IPv6 addresses. Not sure about what the support is in other modules such as mod_h323 -Steve On 27 June 2011 17:15, bill evergreen wrote: > Hello, > > I intend to setup a little FreeSWITCH test-environment. Does FreeSWITCH > care about beeing connected to an IPv4- OR IPv6-isp (it should be possible > to operate the same environment under IPv4 OR IPv6) ? > ong > > Thank's a lot for any feedback! > > Bill > > > > PS > I am new to FreeSWITCH :-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/2d2c01aa/attachment.html From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu Tue Jun 28 12:34:02 2011 From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:34:02 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Reject SIP registrations In-Reply-To: References: <53E1375B-A8D6-4C1A-A1DD-055A3527673D@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: Ah, so it's as I worried. How do I go about creating the situation that I want: users with accounts are able to authenticate without passwords, but any attempts to authenticate other accounts (that don't exist) are rejected? On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: > When you use a CIDR it matches the user entry based on IP not on username. > > You're able to authenticate with other usernames because they're all > authenticating to the same user based on IP. > > -Steve > > > > On 28 June 2011 00:12, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >> >> One of those links got screwed up... >> >> Anyhow, here are those three config files: >> >> internal.xml : http://bpastebin.freeswitch.org/16609 >> >> acl.conf.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16610 >> >> 1300.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16611 >> >> If anything else could help, I'd love to share it. >> >> The basic story, so far as I see, is that I allow specific IPs through >> the ACL. Somehow this is allowing ANY SIP username to register, rather >> than just those defined (such as 1300). Any help would be appreciated. >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Kurtis Heimerl >> wrote: >> > Anyhow, here are those three config files: >> > >> > internal.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16609 >> > acl.conf.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16610 >> > 1300.xml : http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16611 >> > >> > If anything else could help, I'd love to share it. >> > >> > The basic story, so far as I see, is that I allow specific IPs through >> > the ACL. Somehow this is allowing ANY SIP username to register, rather >> > than just those defined (such as 1300). Any help would be appreciated. >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kurtis Heimerl >> > wrote: >> >> It's enabled in the acl.conf.xml file, using CIDR. >> >> >> >> What conf files do you consider relevant? acl.conf.xml, internal.xml, >> >> a profile or two, anything else? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:26 PM, David Ponzone >> >> wrote: >> >>> The interesting question is then: why are you able to register without >> >>> password, if this feature is not enabled on the profile... >> >>> Perhaps you should recap your config once more, and put the relevant >> >>> files >> >>> on PB. >> >>> David Ponzone ?Direction Technique >> >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> >>> tel: ? ? ?01 74 03 18 97 >> >>> gsm: ? 06 66 98 76 34 >> >>> Service Client?IPeva >> >>> tel: ? ? ?0811 46 26 26 >> >>> www.ipeva.fr? -? ?www.ipeva-studio.com >> >>> Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis >> >>> ? >> >>> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou >> >>> diffusion >> >>> non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible >> >>> d'alt?ration.?IPeva?d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce >> >>> message s'il >> >>> a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de >> >>> ce >> >>> message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Le 27/06/2011 ? 20:36, Kurtis Heimerl a ?crit : >> >>> >> >>> That would explain why removing them didn't do anything! >> >>> >> >>> Thanks. >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Steven Ayre >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Just so you know... >> >>> >> >>> ? ?? >> >>> >> >>> ? ? ? >> >>> >> >>> These will have no effect in the user directory. They only apply to >> >>> SIP >> >>> >> >>> profiles. >> >>> >> >>> -Steve >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 27 June 2011 02:23, Kurtis Heimerl >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hello FS Users! >> >>> >> >>> I'm trying to create the following setup. When a user registers, if >> >>> >> >>> they register on a known account (lets say X), they do not need a >> >>> >> >>> password. X's registration is immediately OK'd, and everything is >> >>> >> >>> great. I've gotten that working using the ACL. The IP address of our >> >>> >> >>> SIP clients are added through cidr and the clients do not need to give >> >>> >> >>> passwords. >> >>> >> >>> However, for some reason, if another account that does not exist in >> >>> >> >>> the directory (let's say Y) registers, FS returns with a 200 OK, >> >>> >> >>> instead of rejecting Y. I'm trying to figure out why this is the case, >> >>> >> >>> and how to remedy that fact. >> >>> >> >>> I have the following line in my internal.xml file, which I had assumed >> >>> >> >>> would force this function: >> >>> >> >>> ? >> >>> >> >>> ? >> >>> >> >>> However, it does not work. In my directory, each individual account as >> >>> >> >>> the following lines: >> >>> >> >>> ? >> >>> >> >>> ? ? >> >>> >> >>> ? ? ? >> >>> >> >>> ? ? ? >> >>> >> >>> ? ? ? >> >>> >> >>> ? ? >> >>> >> >>> Though I've found that removing it (from all users in the directory) >> >>> >> >>> doesn't help. >> >>> >> >>> I'm primarily concerned with the line in internal.xml; it seems >> >>> >> >>> possible that the fact that we do not have an auth-user (because we do >> >>> >> >>> not require auth) means that this won't work. However, I have yet to >> >>> >> >>> test that hypothesis. The ACL has been the most confusing aspect of >> >>> >> >>> this installation, with a lot of undocumented aspects, and I get the >> >>> >> >>> nagging feeling this is another. I could very well be wrong though. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks for any direction. >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> >>> >> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >>> >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>> >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >>> >> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>> >> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> >>> >> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >>> >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>> >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >>> >> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>> >> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >>> >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>> >> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >>> >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> >>> >> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From kris at livecall.com Tue Jun 28 13:49:19 2011 From: kris at livecall.com (Kris) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:49:19 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Phrase macros in conferences References: <93AE9C49-C6F6-44E6-BC7E-5A31AC659C4C@bryansmart.com><9CE9932A-AD27-4183-9C2E-75148116A23B@tech21.com> <22CBC366-3CD3-4429-80B6-961AF1566D1C@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: The conference controls/profiles cant be changed after the conference starts. Do You know C? We all have to do some C when Freeswitch can't do what we want.A feature would have to be added to mod_conference to play files unpon joining the conference. It would have to be something like this: To really do the fancier stuff, you have to capture the CUSTOM event. Just do it with 2 API calls. Both are scheduled to play one after the other. Api.Execute("conference", ConferenceName + " play " + "name.wav"); //+MemberID); Api.Execute("conference", ConferenceName + " play " + "conf-enter.wav"); //+MemberID); ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Smart" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 1:03 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Phrase macros in conferences Yes, but not sure how I'd do that. In the conference profile, I can play a single sound file for an enter/leave. I can't join two files with "!" to have them play in series, like "name.wav!conference/conf-enter.wav". Bryan On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Brad Mina wrote: You could have users prompted to record their name to get around the first issue and play it back before "... Has joined the conference" is played back. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Bryan Smart > wrote: Thanks, Michael. At least I know that it is a limitation, and not me overlooking something. :) I have 3 or 4 years on Asterisk, but only months on Freeswitch, so I'm always concerned that I haven't dug enough before posting requests. For phrases inside conferences, I imagine 3 cases. First are dynamic announcements, such as those that announce when someone joins or leaves a conference. It is helpful if the joining or leaving party can be identified. I imagined combining TTS for the name, along with a pre-recorded fragment like conference/conf-has_joined.wav. The result would be like "John has entered the conference." Right now, I must use entirely TTS for such announcements. I can't use "!" to concatenate files, and I can't defer to a phrase macro to string TTS and recordings together. Second applies to localization. In a dynamic announcement, it might not be appropriate for the noun to be spoken first in languages other than English. Right now, the conference's prompt language must be customized by creating a different conference profile that specifies the correct sound base for the language. That could mean that the number of profiles in use has to be multiplied by the number of languages that should be supported. I know that the profile can omit the sound base, and the sound base of the first person to join will be used, but, particularly in a situation that concatenates TTS and audio, that can be worse. If the first person to join automatically selects sound files for a language, but the concatenation order is different for that language, then any rules in that profile that concatenate TTS and recordings to render announcements could result in strange outcomes. As far as I've been able to discover, the phrase system is the appropriate Freeswitch way to localize announcements, so it would probably be best for Conference to work that way also, rather than depending on per-case localization being handled with multiple profiles. If phrases were supported, then a single conference profile could play both static and dynamic prompts, and could automatically adjust to any language where phrase macros are present on the system. Last are cases when multiple types of notification are desired. For example, notifications might use a combination of cues and speech. An audio cue serves a similar function to a visual icon: attracts attention and conveys general meaning. In a situation like a conference, there might be soft audio cues for joining, leaving, when a new person has the floor, etc. When one of those events takes place, the cue plays first to attract attention and set the listener's expectations regarding the type of spoken information that will follow. Next, an announcement is heard with details about the event. " John has left the conference." On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Michael Collins wrote: Phrase macros are not supported inside mod_conference. If you look inside mod_conference.c you will see that it has its own functions for injecting audio into the conference and it does not support phrase macros. You can open up a feature request on Jira. I honestly don't know how easy/difficult this would be, so you may consider offering a bounty to sweeten the deal. Curious: what types of phrases are you trying to play into the conference? -MC On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Bryan Smart <bryansmart at bryansmart.com> wrote: I'm attempting to use phrase macros in mod_conference, but I'm not having success. Perhaps they aren't supported? I have a working phrase macro. In the dialplan, both and Work just fine. The wiki says that, in conference.conf.xml, entries like pin-sound accept, for their value, file paths, strings prefixed with "say" for TTS, and strings prefixed with "tone_stream". This looks almost the same as what can be passed to the playback application in the dialplan. When I try to prefix a string with "phrase", it doesn't work. The console tells me "unknown file format". The console still tells me this if I make up phrase names So it is complaining about the syntax or capability, rather than an unrecognized format of an actual file. If mod_conference doesn't support phrase macros, is this a near-future feature? Phrases would seem to be necessary to ocalize announcements and play announcements that are stitched together from multiple files. Bryan _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org From freeswitch at ml102.pinguin.uni.cc Tue Jun 28 14:42:50 2011 From: freeswitch at ml102.pinguin.uni.cc (Al Bogner) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:42:50 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden In-Reply-To: <77CE8968-A79D-4310-964D-E4952F1D436C@ipeva.fr> References: <20110627220504.377cc403@ml102.pinguin.uni.cc> <77CE8968-A79D-4310-964D-E4952F1D436C@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <20110628124250.688df723@ml102.pinguin.uni.cc> Am Di, 28 Jun 2011 01:55:08 CEST schrieb David Ponzone: Hi David, > please, show us the content of the following files: > conf/directory/default.xml > conf/vars.xml These files are default. See below. > May you also tell us if you see a message in fs_cli when you try to > register ? /opt/freeswitch/bin/fs_cli Type /help to see a list of commands +OK log level [7] I see nothing else. Should I use a specific option? Do you want me to try another sipclient than twinkle? Linphone is installed too. Al cat /opt/freeswitch/conf/directory/default.xml cat /opt/freeswitch/conf/vars.xml > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service Client IPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre > de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes > pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et > d'avertir l'exp?diteur. > > > > > Le 27/06/2011 ? 22:05, Al Bogner a ?crit : > > > I am doing my first steps with freeswitch. > > > > I have installed on an Ubuntu 11.04 server: > > > > ii freeswitch 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > > ii freeswitch-codec-passthru-g7231 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > > ii freeswitch-codec-passthru-g729 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > > ii freeswitch-lang-de 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > > ii freeswitch-lang-en 1.0.7~20110603-0natty6 > > > > > > Following the tutorial at > > http://www.onlinesolution.co.nz/viewtopic.php?t=102 > > I modified /opt/freeswitch/conf/directory/default/1000.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value="$${outbound_caller_name}"/> > name="outbound_caller_id_number" value="$${outbound_caller_id}"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > Then I tried to connect to the server from another machine: > > > > > > +++ 27-6-2011 17:07:30.279796 INFO SIP ::send_sip_udp > > Send to: udp:192.168.2.100:5060 > > REGISTER sip:192.168.2.100 SIP/2.0 > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.108;rport;branch=z9hG4bKcvkohckk > > Max-Forwards: 70 > > To: "FS Admin" > > From: "FS Admin" ;tag=nyyvz > > Call-ID: zmjxppampyrrgxk at client.local.tld > > CSeq: 645 REGISTER > > Contact: ;expires=3600 > > Allow: > > INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,PRACK,REFER,NOTIFY,SUBSCRIBE,INFO,MESSAGE > > User-Agent: Twinkle/1.4.2 Content-Length: 0 > > > > > > --- > > > > +++ 27-6-2011 17:07:30.281799 INFO SIP ::process_sip_msg > > Received from: udp:192.168.2.100:5060 > > SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > > 192.168.2.108;received=192.168.2.108;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKcvkohckk > > To: "FS Admin" ;tag=iairy From: "FS Admin" > > ;tag=nyyvz Call-ID: > > zmjxppampyrrgxk at client.local.tld CSeq: 645 REGISTER > > Server: Twinkle/1.4.2 > > Content-Length: 0 > > > > > > What could be wrong, so I can't connect? > > > > Al > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > From avi at avimarcus.net Tue Jun 28 15:02:06 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:02:06 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] does FreeSWITCH care about beeing connected to an IPv4- or IPv6-ISP ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Just to clarify: each sip profile binds to ONE and only ONE IP address. That can be ipv4 external, local, ipv6, whatever, but you need a separate profile for EACH IP you wish to get calls on. -Avi On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: > You can use SIP on FS on IPv4, IPv6, or both. You can even bridge calls > inbetween the two (as long as you avoid bypass_media). > > When you create a SIP profile it binds to a specific IP, you just need to > put the relevant IPv4/IPv6 IP there. Then treat the profiles as normal. ACLs > also support IPv6 addresses. > > Not sure about what the support is in other modules such as mod_h323 > > -Steve > > > > On 27 June 2011 17:15, bill evergreen wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I intend to setup a little FreeSWITCH test-environment. Does FreeSWITCH >> care about beeing connected to an IPv4- OR IPv6-isp (it should be possible >> to operate the same environment under IPv4 OR IPv6) ? >> ong >> >> Thank's a lot for any feedback! >> >> Bill >> >> >> >> PS >> I am new to FreeSWITCH :-) >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/5bcac493/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 15:08:19 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:08:19 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] does FreeSWITCH care about beeing connected to an IPv4- or IPv6-ISP ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yep, sorry I wasn't clear enough. You can bridge between 4/6 by bridging between different profiles bound to each. Steve on iPhone On 28 Jun 2011, at 12:02, Avi Marcus wrote: > Just to clarify: each sip profile binds to ONE and only ONE IP address. That can be ipv4 external, local, ipv6, whatever, but you need a separate profile for EACH IP you wish to get calls on. > > -Avi > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Steven Ayre wrote: > You can use SIP on FS on IPv4, IPv6, or both. You can even bridge calls inbetween the two (as long as you avoid bypass_media). > > When you create a SIP profile it binds to a specific IP, you just need to put the relevant IPv4/IPv6 IP there. Then treat the profiles as normal. ACLs also support IPv6 addresses. > > Not sure about what the support is in other modules such as mod_h323 > > -Steve > > > > On 27 June 2011 17:15, bill evergreen wrote: > Hello, > > I intend to setup a little FreeSWITCH test-environment. Does FreeSWITCH care about beeing connected to an IPv4- OR IPv6-isp (it should be possible to operate the same environment under IPv4 OR IPv6) ? > ong > > Thank's a lot for any feedback! > > Bill > > > > PS > I am new to FreeSWITCH :-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/f98f5e56/attachment.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Tue Jun 28 15:19:19 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:19:19 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden In-Reply-To: <20110628124250.688df723@ml102.pinguin.uni.cc> References: <20110627220504.377cc403@ml102.pinguin.uni.cc> <77CE8968-A79D-4310-964D-E4952F1D436C@ipeva.fr> <20110628124250.688df723@ml102.pinguin.uni.cc> Message-ID: Yes, please, try another one, juste in case. For instance, Zoiper works fine. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 28/06/2011 ? 12:42, Al Bogner a ?crit : > local -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/7d7d0fbe/attachment.html From sascha.daniels at amooma.de Tue Jun 28 15:27:32 2011 From: sascha.daniels at amooma.de (Sascha Daniels) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:27:32 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Hooks for own call logs In-Reply-To: References: <4DFC96BA.1080306@amooma.de> Message-ID: <4E09BAA4.7040306@amooma.de> Hi. Am 24.06.2011 08:52, schrieb Michael Collins: > Sorry for the late reply... > No problem. I am happy to get answers at all. > Have you tried setting the api_hangup_hook variable? > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#api_hangup_hook I have tried that allready, but nothing was called after the originator has cancelled the call. Could not see anything in CLI. I guess I should make the setup more simple and work with a static dialplan just to test this. Regards Sascha -- AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 124 - 56566 Neuwied --> http://www.amooma.de Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister Montabaur B14998 B?cher: http://das-asterisk-buch.de - http://ruby-auf-schienen.de From kbdfck at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 16:01:28 2011 From: kbdfck at gmail.com (Dmitry Sytchev) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:01:28 +0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] xml_curl directory - reject registration with specific error code? Message-ID: Hi all! Is there a way to reject user with specific error code / message when i use XML directory via curl? For example, I'd like to distinguish between user blocked / user not found errors and so on. In other words, instead of returning default directory stub and 404, I want FS to return some specific code on failed registration attempt. Thanks! -- Best regards, Dmitry Sytchev, IT Engineer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/aea7459b/attachment.html From max.asterisk at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 16:31:07 2011 From: max.asterisk at gmail.com (Max Alex) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:01:07 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Answer issue on inbound call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Thanks for your reply. I have enabled logger as per your help. I have given completed log on following link of pastebin. http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16616 You can see this line as it is showing answered and this call is answered on my cell phone but on softphone it is ringing and i have rejected from there. 2011-06-28 17:47:52.909657 [NOTICE] mod_freetdm.c:1953 Channel [FreeTDM/2:1/ 01234567890] has been answered It is pre answering the cell phone when it is ringing on phone Waiting for your help. Thanks, Max Alex Voip Developer On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Get a complete, unedited, unabridged console debug log w/ siptrace and put > it on pastebin w/ "FreeSWITCH Log" for the syntax highlighting. Use "sofia > global siptrace on" to make sure you can all SIP traffic. > > -MC > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Max Alex wrote: > >> Hi, >> Thanks for reply, >> I have tried the same way and reloaded freeswitch, but still it is >> answered on first ring of the call. >> When it is ringing the call on 1001 and the same time it is answered on >> cell phone, so something is done when it is ringing on 1001. >> >> Here is the dialplan for the same >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --> >> >> > data="transfer_ringback=$${hold_music}"/> >> >> >> >> > data="insert/${domain_name}-call_return/${dialed_extension}/${caller_id_number}"/> >> > data="insert/${domain_name}-last_dial_ext/${dialed_extension}/${uuid}"/> >> > data="called_party_callgroup=${user_data(${dialed_extension}@${domain_name} >> var callgroup)}"/> >> > data="insert/${domain_name}-last_dial/${called_party_callgroup}/${uuid}"/> >> >> > data="{ignore_early_media=true}user/${dialed_extension}@${domain_name}"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please help me for this issue. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Max Alex >> Voip Developer >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >>> Are you using the default dialplan? I think you might just need to ignore >>> early media on your bridge app. If you are using the default.xml file then >>> locate "Local_Extension" and the bridge line: >>> >>> >>> >>> Change it to this, then try again: >>> >>> >> data="{ignore_early_media=true}user/${dialed_extension}@ >>> ${domain_name}"/> >>> >>> If I understand correctly, the "symptom" you are experiencing is the >>> normal operation of the bridge app (and it's cousin, the originate API >>> command). When the b-leg sends back media, including ringing, the bridge (or >>> the originate) will be considered "successful," and in the case of bridge, >>> the b-leg's audio (the early media) will be connected to the a-leg. If you >>> set ignore_early_media=true then you are explicitly telling the bridge app >>> that you only want to connect the b-leg to the a-leg if the b-leg actually >>> answers. >>> >>> I hope that made sense... >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Max Alex wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> Thanks for reply. >>>> Current scenario is below. >>>> >>>> PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to >>>> 1001 -> ringing (Answered on cellphone) >>>> Here when it is routed to 1001 the call it is started ringing, but on >>>> phone that call is answered and hearding sound of ringing. >>>> >>>> Required flow: >>>> PSTN call -> sangoma device -> freeswitch incoming context -> routed to >>>> 1001 -> ringing (Ringing on cellphone) >>>> >>>> I hope it is understable, the call should not be answered until 1001 >>>> answer it, right not when it is started ring it is answered on cell phone. >>>> that should not be happen as it is not answered yet. >>>> >>>> Waiting for your reply. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Max Alex >>>> Voip Developer >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm not sure I understand the problem. What is happening vs. what you >>>>> believe should be happening? >>>>> -MC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Max Alex wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> Thanks for your reply. >>>>>> Here is my configuration and log >>>>>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16571 >>>>>> >>>>>> I am using A200 analog sangoma device with freeswitch, it is working >>>>>> fine but when it is routing call to 1001 then it is answered. >>>>>> Please provider your suggestions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Max Alex >>>>>> Voip Developer >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought the A200 was an analog card? Maybe I have my numbers mixed >>>>>>> up... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Go ahead and collect a debug log of this call. It might help to have >>>>>>> your configs posted as well. Use pastebin.freeswitch.org. See this >>>>>>> wiki article for tips on how to collect information: >>>>>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -MC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Max Alex wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> I have installed freeswitch latest version with sangoma card A200 as >>>>>>>> well, >>>>>>>> I have installed and configured freetdm module with wanpipe drivers >>>>>>>> for freeswitch, >>>>>>>> We are properly receiving the inbound calls in public context and >>>>>>>> then we are routing that call to 1001 extension, >>>>>>>> it is properly routing to 1001 as well, but we have one issue while >>>>>>>> routing on 1001. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here is the issue description. >>>>>>>> I am calling from my cell phone to that DID number of pri line, and >>>>>>>> then it will start ringing on 1001 extension, >>>>>>>> When 1001 extension start ringing the call is answered on my cell >>>>>>>> phone, >>>>>>>> it is something like freeswitch preanswer or autoanswer the call, >>>>>>>> how can i stop this answer call when it is ringing on 1001 extension, >>>>>>>> Waiting for good reply. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Max Alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/0a32975e/attachment-0001.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 17:54:49 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:54:49 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Phrase macros in conferences In-Reply-To: References: <93AE9C49-C6F6-44E6-BC7E-5A31AC659C4C@bryansmart.com> <9CE9932A-AD27-4183-9C2E-75148116A23B@tech21.com> <22CBC366-3CD3-4429-80B6-961AF1566D1C@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: with the new say_string function you can build some stuff, its only one component of phrase macros but its the best we have. ${say_string en en number pronounced 60} This evals to: file_string://digits/60.wav As I was writing this reply I added something to latest get that may make it a little easier to mix with other files. ${say_string en en number pronounced ~60} This evals to: digits/60.wav so you could chain it together with your own file_string url file_string://youhave.wav!${say_string en en number pronounced ~60}!messages.wav This evals to: file_string://youhave.wav!digits/60.wav!messages.wav So you can eval and build these in the conference. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Kris wrote: > The conference controls/profiles cant be changed after the conference > starts. Do You know C? We all have to do some C when Freeswitch can't do > what we want.A feature would have to be added to mod_conference to play > files unpon joining the conference. It would have to be something like this: > data="${forum_ext}-${domain_name}@${conference_controls},PlayOnEntry=${name_var}&conf-enter.wav,PlayOnExit=???"/> > > To really do the fancier stuff, you have to capture the CUSTOM event. Just > do it with 2 API calls. Both are scheduled to play one after the other. > Api.Execute("conference", ConferenceName + " play " + "name.wav"); > //+MemberID); > > Api.Execute("conference", ConferenceName + " play " + "conf-enter.wav"); > //+MemberID); > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bryan Smart" > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 1:03 PM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Phrase macros in conferences > > > Yes, but not sure how I'd do that. In the conference profile, I can play a > single sound file for an enter/leave. I can't join two files with "!" to > have them play in series, like "name.wav!conference/conf-enter.wav". > > Bryan > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Brad Mina wrote: > > You could have users prompted to record their name to get around the first > issue and play it back before "... Has joined the conference" is played > back. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Bryan Smart > > wrote: > > Thanks, Michael. At least I know that it is a limitation, and not me > overlooking something. :) I have 3 or 4 years on Asterisk, but only months > on Freeswitch, so I'm always concerned that I haven't dug enough before > posting requests. > > For phrases inside conferences, I imagine 3 cases. > > First are dynamic announcements, such as those that announce when someone > joins or leaves a conference. It is helpful if the joining or leaving party > can be identified. I imagined combining TTS for the name, along with a > pre-recorded fragment like conference/conf-has_joined.wav. The result would > be like "John has entered the conference." Right now, I must use entirely > TTS for such announcements. I can't use "!" to concatenate files, and I > can't defer to a phrase macro to string TTS and recordings together. > > Second applies to localization. In a dynamic announcement, it might not be > appropriate for the noun to be spoken first in languages other than English. > Right now, the conference's prompt language must be customized by creating a > different conference profile that specifies the correct sound base for the > language. That could mean that the number of profiles in use has to be > multiplied by the number of languages that should be supported. I know that > the profile can omit the sound base, and the sound base of the first person > to join will be used, but, particularly in a situation that concatenates TTS > and audio, that can be worse. If the first person to join automatically > selects sound files for a language, but the concatenation order is different > for that language, then any rules in that profile that concatenate TTS and > recordings to render announcements could result in strange outcomes. As far > as I've been able to discover, the phrase system is the appropriate > Freeswitch way to localize announcements, so it would probably be best for > Conference to work that way also, rather than depending on per-case > localization being handled with multiple profiles. If phrases were > supported, then a single conference profile could play both static and > dynamic prompts, and could automatically adjust to any language where phrase > macros are present on the system. > > Last are cases when multiple types of notification are desired. For example, > notifications might use a combination of cues and speech. An audio cue > serves a similar function to a visual icon: attracts attention and conveys > general meaning. In a situation like a conference, there might be soft audio > cues for joining, leaving, when a new person has the floor, etc. When one of > those events takes place, the cue plays first to attract attention and set > the listener's expectations regarding the type of spoken information that > will follow. Next, an announcement is heard with details about the event. > " John has left ?the conference." > > > > > > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > > Phrase macros are not supported inside mod_conference. If you look inside > mod_conference.c you will see that it has its own functions for injecting > audio into the conference and it does not support phrase macros. You can > open up a feature request on Jira. I honestly don't know how easy/difficult > this would be, so you may consider offering a bounty to sweeten the deal. > > Curious: what types of phrases are you trying to play into the conference? > > -MC > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Bryan Smart > <bryansmart at bryansmart.com> > wrote: > I'm attempting to use phrase macros in mod_conference, but I'm not having > success. Perhaps they aren't supported? > > I have a working phrase macro. In the dialplan, both > > > > and > > > > Work just fine. > > The wiki says that, in conference.conf.xml, entries like pin-sound accept, > for their value, file paths, strings prefixed with "say" for TTS, and > strings prefixed with "tone_stream". This looks almost the same as what can > be passed to the playback application in the dialplan. When I try to prefix > a string with "phrase", it doesn't work. > > > > The console tells me "unknown file format". The console still tells me this > if I make up phrase names > > > > So it is complaining about the syntax or capability, rather than an > unrecognized format of an actual file. > > If mod_conference doesn't support phrase macros, is this a near-future > feature? Phrases would seem to be necessary to ocalize announcements and > play announcements that are stitched together from multiple files. > > Bryan > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com > 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com > 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From avi at avimarcus.net Tue Jun 28 18:10:09 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:10:09 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Send MESSAGE_WAITING Error - Cannot find profile Message-ID: I'm trying to send a MESSAGE_WAITING via ESL on multi-tenant, but I'm getting this error: 2011-06-27 10:46:25.443081 [ERR] sofia_presence.c:405 Cannot find profile 20064.domain.com] the cli lists the domain as an alias to the internal profile. what should I do? I am writing some test code in order to try to send MWI events using the ESL Manager code DLL. Here is my test code: static void InboundMode2(Object stateInfo) { //Initializes a new instance of ESLconnection, and connects to the host $host on the port $port, and supplies $password to freeswitch ESLconnection eslConnection = new ESLconnection(myinfo); if (eslConnection.Connected() != ESL_SUCCESS) { Console.WriteLine("Error connecting to FreeSwitch"); return; } //Set log level //ESL.eslSetLogLevel((int)enLogLevel.DEBUG); eslConnection.Api("reloadxml", string.Empty); // Subscribe to all events ESLevent eslEvent2 = eslConnection.SendRecv("event plain ALL"); if (eslEvent2 == null) { Console.WriteLine("Error subscribing to all events"); return; } ESLevent eslEvent = new ESLevent("MESSAGE_WAITING", null); eslEvent.AddHeader("MWI-Messages-Waiting", "yes"); eslEvent.AddHeader("MWI-Message-Account", "103 at 20064.domain.com<103 at 20064.cmvtesttele.com> "); eslEvent.AddHeader("MWI-Voice-Message", "1/1 (1/1)"); eslEvent = eslConnection.SendEvent(eslEvent); if (eslEvent == null) { Console.WriteLine("event error"); return; } //Turns an event into colon-separated 'name: value' pairs. The format parameter isn't used Console.WriteLine(eslEvent.Serialize(String.Empty)); // Grab Events until process is killed while (eslConnection.Connected() == ESL_SUCCESS) { eslEvent = eslConnection.RecvEvent(); Console.WriteLine(eslEvent.Serialize(String.Empty)); } } When I send the event, I am getting a debug message from FS as follows: 2011-06-27 10:46:25.443081 [ERR] sofia_presence.c:405 Cannot find profile 20064.domain.com] Thanks! -Avi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/3a337e14/attachment.html From jonas at jonasborjesson.com Tue Jun 28 11:19:00 2011 From: jonas at jonasborjesson.com (Jonas Borjesson) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:19:00 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Copy custom SIP headers - {sip_copy_custom_headers=true} doesn't seem to be working Message-ID: Hi all, As many others, I need to copy customer X-headers from leg B back over to leg A and have found a few threads talking about using the sip_copy_custom_headers=true with the dial string but this does not seem to be working. I am doing exactly what is described in the thread below but like that guy, it does not work for me either and that thread never came to any conclusion. Does anyone know the status of this feature or what I may be doing wrong? Any help is greatly appreciated! Of course, I tried on the latest and greatest FS - 1.0.head-git-4962542 2011-06-27 10-15-03 -0500 The tread talking about this very feature: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.freeswitch.user/36287 And documentation: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_sip_copy_custom_headers Thanks, /Jonas From mosbah.abdelkader at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 18:28:38 2011 From: mosbah.abdelkader at gmail.com (mosbah abdelkader) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:28:38 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Forwarding SIP calls between 2 VoIP carriers without using SIP TRUNKING Message-ID: Hi, One client have 2 SIP accounts: SIP1 and SIP2 with 2 different carriers: C1 and C2. He wants to forward all calls destined to SIP1 to SIP2. C2 is using FreeSWITCH. I don't want to register SIP1 as SIP trunk in C2 because if the number of SIP accounts is big, there will be a performance problem as each account will be registered as a SIP trunk. Can anyone help me by giving an idea and a config sample for FreeSWITCH. Thank you. -- Best Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/f997e2f5/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 28 18:59:39 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:59:39 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UniMRCP Server as daemon won't connect RTSP In-Reply-To: <361E98F99D3CC3439EED59BC1924ED6950815F@SERVER2003.SecuReachSystems.local> References: <361E98F99D3CC3439EED59BC1924ED6950815F@SERVER2003.SecuReachSystems.local> Message-ID: How about running unimrcpserver inside of GNU screen? It may not be a perfect solution but it might let you keep working until you figure out why the daemon isn't working. -MC On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Jason Moran wrote: > I?ve been playing around with IVONA?s new unimrcp plugin with unimrcp > 1.0.0 (r1725) on OpenSuse 11.4**** > > ** ** > > Anyway, when I start it up with the following, it stays in the foreground > of my SSH w/ the following command:**** > > ./unimrcpserver**** > > That works! However, since it?s in the foreground when I close the SSH > window, it kills the process.**** > > ** ** > > If I use the so-called daemon mode (-d or --daemon) it says it is going > into daemon mode, but FS will immediately return that it ?Failed to Connect > to RTSP Server...? at the IP:port I specified. The unimrcpserver process is > running, but doesn?t seem to respond to anything.**** > > ./unimrcpserver ?d**** > > ./unimrcpserver --daemon**** > > ** ** > > If I attempt to background it by either using ?&? or ctrl-z it says [1]+ > Stopped ./unimrcpserver and FS will successfully make the RTSP connection > but then nothing will happen. Mod_unimrcp will spit out a warning about > ?MRCP session has not opened after 5000 ms?**** > > ./unimrcpserver &**** > > Those are hard to kill. But when I kill -9 it then FS will finally remove > the MRCP handle and tell me that it couldn?t allocate the speech engine.** > ** > > ** ** > > Lastly, I can nohup it, but then unimrcpserver eats up 95%+ of the CPU > (instead of 1-3% as it does when I have it in the foreground), which it does > not do when it runs in any other modes. It also makes a very, very large > nohup.out file that keeps on growing. Even if I tell it to not log.**** > > nohup ./unimrcpserver &**** > > nohup ./unimrcpserver ?o 0 &**** > > ** ** > > Ideas?? > Thanks,**** > > Jason Moran**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/5709eb17/attachment-0001.html From jmoran at secureachsystems.com Tue Jun 28 19:18:33 2011 From: jmoran at secureachsystems.com (Jason Moran) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UniMRCP Server as daemon won't connect RTSP References: <361E98F99D3CC3439EED59BC1924ED6950815F@SERVER2003.SecuReachSystems.local> Message-ID: <361E98F99D3CC3439EED59BC1924ED69508175@SERVER2003.SecuReachSystems.local> That will technically work, but it is not a good solution. Since SSH is our only allowed remoting option (other methods have been shut down by our security guy), I need to find a way for unimrcp daemon mode to be stable with freeswitch. Can other people successfully connect in daemon mode? -Jason From: Michael Collins [mailto:msc at freeswitch.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 11:00 AM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] UniMRCP Server as daemon won't connect RTSP How about running unimrcpserver inside of GNU screen? It may not be a perfect solution but it might let you keep working until you figure out why the daemon isn't working. -MC On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Jason Moran wrote: I've been playing around with IVONA's new unimrcp plugin with unimrcp 1.0.0 (r1725) on OpenSuse 11.4 Anyway, when I start it up with the following, it stays in the foreground of my SSH w/ the following command: ./unimrcpserver That works! However, since it's in the foreground when I close the SSH window, it kills the process. If I use the so-called daemon mode (-d or --daemon) it says it is going into daemon mode, but FS will immediately return that it "Failed to Connect to RTSP Server..." at the IP:port I specified. The unimrcpserver process is running, but doesn't seem to respond to anything. ./unimrcpserver -d ./unimrcpserver --daemon If I attempt to background it by either using "&" or ctrl-z it says [1]+ Stopped ./unimrcpserver and FS will successfully make the RTSP connection but then nothing will happen. Mod_unimrcp will spit out a warning about "MRCP session has not opened after 5000 ms" ./unimrcpserver & Those are hard to kill. But when I kill -9 it then FS will finally remove the MRCP handle and tell me that it couldn't allocate the speech engine. Lastly, I can nohup it, but then unimrcpserver eats up 95%+ of the CPU (instead of 1-3% as it does when I have it in the foreground), which it does not do when it runs in any other modes. It also makes a very, very large nohup.out file that keeps on growing. Even if I tell it to not log. nohup ./unimrcpserver & nohup ./unimrcpserver -o 0 & Ideas?? Thanks, Jason Moran _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/4626b63c/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Tue Jun 28 19:18:12 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:18:12 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <1BB0CF88-DA61-4AB6-9CC6-328CCB9846AD@bryansmart.com> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <1BB0CF88-DA61-4AB6-9CC6-328CCB9846AD@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: You can download the 48kHz files from files.freeswitch.org. The script itself is nothing special - all it does is cycle through the target sampling rates and run each file through sox. Here's a copy of the script: base_dir="48000" rates="48000 32000 16000 8000" version="1.0.16" voice="en-us-callie" voice_dir="en/us/callie" tar_path="../../.." tmp_dir="tmp" CWD=`pwd` for rate in $rates; do \ mkdir -p $tmp_dir/$voice_dir for dir in `ls $base_dir`; do \ test -d $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate || mkdir -p $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate; \ for filename in `ls $base_dir/$dir`; do \ echo sox -v 0.2 $base_dir/$dir/$filename -r $rate -c 1 $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename; \ sox -v 0.2 $base_dir/$dir/$filename -r $rate -c 1 $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename; \ done ; \ done ; \ cd $tmp_dir echo tar -cvzf $CWD/$tar_path/freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz *; \ tar -cvzf $CWD/$tar_path/freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz *; \ cd - rm -rf $tmp_dir done cd $tar_path for rate in $rates; do \ openssl dgst -sha1 freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz > freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz.sha1 ; \ openssl dgst -md5 freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz > freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz.md5 ; \ done cd $CWD Let me know if you have any suggestions. -MC On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Bryan Smart wrote: > -v is a multiplier. So, -v 0.2 reduces gain to 20% of original. > > It is typical to supply professionally recorded audio with peaks boosted to > 0DBFS. That is probably how the prompts were originally supplied. It makes > since that -v 0.2 would reduce the max power to 20%, around -15 to -16 DBFS. > > The FS build process downloads pre-processed versions of these files. Is > there somewhere online that I can find the source recordings+script that > produces the pre-processed files that are downloaded by the build process? > > Bryan > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:32 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Anthony Minessale < > anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Have a look at the 48khz versions of the files, those should be the >> originals. >> Someone runs a batch sox command on them to get them to the other levels. >> > > Just for the record, the sox command used to normalize the sounds is: > sox -v 0.2 $file_in -r $rate -c 1 $file_out > > The -v format is the "volume" format and if I read the sox man page > correctly it means a "linear amplitude adjustment". What I can't tell from > the man page is whether .2 means "reduce by 20%" or "reduce to 20%" or > something else. In any case, like Tony says, we are not picky about this as > long as it's not pointlessly loud. > > -MC > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/18801680/attachment-0001.html From mays.david at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 19:38:37 2011 From: mays.david at gmail.com (David Ma) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:38:37 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Hi Michael, Sorry for the inconvenience. I just pastebin the log. It can be found in path http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16617. Thanks, David Ma On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > This makes my eyes bleed. Can you please put this on > pastebin.freeswitch.org? Use "FreeSWITCH Log" as the syntax highlight. > -MC > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:27 PM, David Ma wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> Thanks very much for the response. There is no dialplan specified for this >> call. In the FS setting, G729 is used as preferred stack for originating >> calls. The leg-A and B are bridged immediately after receiving >> PROGRESS-MEDIA from leg-B. >> >> Calls are originated with following parameters: >> * >> -- Leg-A -- >> "api originate >> {origination_caller_id_number=,sip_cid_type=pid,privacy=yes,continue_on_fail=true} >> &park()" >> >> **-- Leg-B --* >> * "api originate >> {origination_caller_id_number=,originate_timeout=60,sip_cid_type=pid,privacy=yes,continue_on_fail=false} >> &park()" >> * >> >> The entire debug log for this call follows. >> >> Thanks, >> D.Ma >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >>> Pastebin the entire debug log, including the siptrace. Also include the >>> originate line and any other dialplan config that might be used. >>> -MC >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:26 PM, David Ma wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Michael, >>>> >>>> Unfortunately this problem still happens. >>>> >>>> I enabled "continue_on_fail" for leg-A when I originated the call. Leg-A >>>> call went well. Then I originated leg-B call ("continue_on_fail" is NOT set >>>> for leg-B), which failed for [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER]. As the consequence, >>>> leg-A was hung up by FS automatically for [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL]. >>>> >>>> The log excerpt follows. >>>> >>>> Do you think "continue_on_fail" should be also enabled for leg-B call? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> D.Ma >>>> >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 variable >>>> string 5 = [continue_on_fail=true] >>>> >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:35.887830 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212[c0bd700d-913c-42ad-b68f-81001bf658b8] >>>> [...] >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.142264 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>> going to sleep >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change EARLY >>>> -> HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 Hangup >>>> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>> [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>> CS_HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>> (sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change ACTIVE >>>> -> HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup >>>> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>> [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>> (sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>>> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to >>>> sofia/external/03996563750911 at 203.208.207.212 >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>> sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>> 2011-06-24 13:29:48.161779 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>> signal sofia/external/03996597632298 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:52 AM, David Ma wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks very much for your prompt response! I appreciate the information >>>>> provided. >>>>> >>>>> I was actually searching the the existence of such a variable. I was >>>>> not so luck to find it out and thereby resort to the support forum. >>>>> >>>>> I've modified my code to build this parameter into my application. Will >>>>> feedback to you after verification. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks again, >>>>> D.Ma >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> How about setting this? >>>>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#continue_on_fail >>>>>> >>>>>> -MC >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:32 AM, dma wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I am creating a call-back solution. After leg-A answers, I originate >>>>>>> leg-B >>>>>>> call. After receiving SIP 183 from Leg-B, I bridge the 2 legs. >>>>>>> However, in >>>>>>> some cases, leg-A is automatically disconnected by FreeSwitch on >>>>>>> leg-B >>>>>>> failure, for example, DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER. The application is >>>>>>> not given >>>>>>> a chance to handle leg-B failure event. This should not be a correct >>>>>>> scenario because I never set "hangup-after-bridge", which is false by >>>>>>> default. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The right way should be, FreeSwitch doesn't hang up leg-A >>>>>>> automatically, but >>>>>>> give a chance for the application to decide what to do. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please see the logs below: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ================================================= >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>>> variable >>>>>>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996563750914] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>>> variable >>>>>>> string 1 = [originate_timeout=30] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>>> variable >>>>>>> string 2 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>>> variable >>>>>>> string 3 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>>> variable >>>>>>> string 4 = [privacy=yes] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> [ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW >>>>>>> -> >>>>>>> CS_INIT >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_INIT >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.370506 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>>>>>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.477997: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> INVITE sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D >>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>>>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>>>>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>>>>>> Privacy: none >>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>>> Content-Disposition: session >>>>>>> Content-Length: 204 >>>>>>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>>>>>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307645395 1307645396 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>>>> s=FreeSWITCH >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 30000 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>>>>>> a=ptime:20 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT >>>>>>> -> >>>>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.371674 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>>> [calling][0] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>>> DOWN -> >>>>>>> RINGING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_ROUTING -> >>>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going >>>>>>> to sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.373478 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:55.374485 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>>> going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:55.485130: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>>> To: <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:09:56.677788: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>>> s=session >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>>>> "Outbound >>>>>>> Call" <03996590031055> >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=- 421265648 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>>> s=session >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec >>>>>>> Compare >>>>>>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>>>>>> samples >>>>>>> 8000 bits >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>>> send >>>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>>>>>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 30000 >>>>>>> -> >>>>>>> 203.208.207.196 port 30792 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.571839 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>>>>>> [soft] >>>>>>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>>> send >>>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>>> receive >>>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212! >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>>> RINGING -> >>>>>>> EARLY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 >>>>>>> Originate >>>>>>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.573731 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.575262 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>>>>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:09:56.618770 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2933 Correct ip/port >>>>>>> confirmed. >>>>>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.562021: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=- 421265648 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>>> s=session >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>>>> "03996590031055" <03996590031055> >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.455944 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>>> recv 669 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:01.563178: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=- 421265648 3 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>>> s=session >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:01.457169 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>>> recv 749 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.365284: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKXjQ7eFpKypy5D;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 INVITE >>>>>>> Contact: >>>>>>> Allow-Events: refer >>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>>> Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces >>>>>>> Content-Length: 189 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>>> s=session >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>>> [completing][200] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.258092 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=- 421265648 4 IN IP4 203.208.207.219 >>>>>>> s=session >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.196 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 30792 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> send 405 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.366562: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> ACK sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKyUg0ga7pUZmrS >>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501633 ACK >>>>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>>> [ready][200] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2782 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>>> EARLY -> >>>>>>> ACTIVE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.260267 [NOTICE] sofia.c:5175 Channel >>>>>>> [sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212] has been answered >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.264178 [DEBUG] switch_scheduler.c:214 Added task >>>>>>> 23 >>>>>>> switch_ivr_schedule_hangup (ea57b74b-a8c2-4fea-9683-98054dc03a79) to >>>>>>> run at >>>>>>> 1307676927 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.265202 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>>> variable >>>>>>> string 0 = [origination_caller_id_number=03996590031055] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>>> variable >>>>>>> string 1 = [ccd_session_id=20110610105829676824] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>>> variable >>>>>>> string 2 = [sip_cid_type=pid] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:1971 >>>>>>> variable >>>>>>> string 3 = [privacy=yes] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:808 New Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> [30228d2b-756a-4a98-871d-db63a2955b52] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:4129 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_NEW >>>>>>> -> >>>>>>> CS_INIT >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_INIT >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:84 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA INIT >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:124 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change CS_INIT >>>>>>> -> >>>>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:356 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State INIT going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_ROUTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:1657 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>>> DOWN -> >>>>>>> RINGING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING >>>>>>> send 984 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.373220: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> INVITE sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 202.73.56.46:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN2011-06-10 >>>>>>> 11:10:27.266218 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:147 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA ROUTING >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>>>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>>>>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer >>>>>>> Privacy: none >>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>>> Content-Disposition: session >>>>>>> Content-Length: 204 >>>>>>> X-FS-Support: update_display >>>>>>> P-Asserted-Identity: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=FreeSWITCH 1307646863 1307646864 IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>>>> s=FreeSWITCH >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 202.73.56.46 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 28564 RTP/AVP 18 3 101 13 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-16 >>>>>>> a=ptime:20 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>>> [calling][0] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:66 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_ROUTING -> >>>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:359 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State ROUTING going >>>>>>> to sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.267630 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:378 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State CONSUME_MEDIA >>>>>>> going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> recv 307 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:27.378710: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>>>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>>>>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> playback(/usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav) >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_core_file.c:176 File >>>>>>> /usr/local/freeswitch/sounds/clearhub/MusicForCalls_v1.wav sample >>>>>>> rate 11025 >>>>>>> doesn't match requested rate 8000 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [WARNING] switch_core_file.c:189 File has >>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>> channels, muxing to mono will occur. >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.278484 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1244 Codec >>>>>>> Activated L16 at 8000hz 2 channels 20ms >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:27.298764 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:119 ENCODER CREATE - >>>>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>>>>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:28.618472: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>>> Content-Length: 186 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>>>>> s=session >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>>>> "Outbound >>>>>>> Call" <03996563750914> >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4646 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 entering state >>>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4657 Remote SDP: >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=- 131082 1 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>>>>> s=session >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4467 Audio Codec >>>>>>> Compare >>>>>>> [G729:18:8000:20:8000]/[G729:18:8000:20:8000] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2757 Set Codec >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 G729/8000 20 ms 160 >>>>>>> samples >>>>>>> 8000 bits >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:4565 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>>> send >>>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:2987 AUDIO RTP >>>>>>> [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] 10.1.1.46 port 28564 >>>>>>> -> >>>>>>> 203.208.207.195 port 45002 codec: 18 ms: 20 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.513195 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:1607 Starting timer >>>>>>> [soft] >>>>>>> 160 bytes per 20ms >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3228 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>>> send >>>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3233 Set 2833 dtmf >>>>>>> receive >>>>>>> payload to 101 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [NOTICE] sofia_glue.c:3680 Pre-Answer >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212! >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2627 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>>> RINGING -> >>>>>>> EARLY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3408 >>>>>>> Originate >>>>>>> Resulted in Success: [sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] mod_commands.c:3205 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_CONSUME_MEDIA -> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.514938 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:240 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.515884 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:157 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard EXECUTE >>>>>>> EXECUTE sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 park() >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.516887 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:954 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1480 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_EXECUTE -> >>>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:1482 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_EXECUTE -> >>>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.517896 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:771 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1581 done >>>>>>> playing >>>>>>> file >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Command Execute >>>>>>> playback(tone_stream://%(2000,4000,440,480);loops=10) >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going >>>>>>> to sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>>>>>> CS_RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>>>>> going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:66 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:28.519223 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:709 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> recv 666 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.540814: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO, REFER, >>>>>>> NOTIFY, >>>>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE >>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>>> Content-Length: 186 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v=0 >>>>>>> o=- 131082 2 IN IP4 203.208.207.218 >>>>>>> s=session >>>>>>> c=IN IP4 203.208.207.195 >>>>>>> t=0 0 >>>>>>> m=audio 45002 RTP/AVP 18 101 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 >>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >>>>>>> a=sendrecv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [INFO] sofia.c:729 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Update Callee ID to >>>>>>> "03996563750914" <03996563750914> >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.435309 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4641 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 skipping state >>>>>>> [proceeding][183] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [WARNING] switch_core_session.c:1940 >>>>>>> Cannot >>>>>>> execute app 'playback' media required on an outbound channel that >>>>>>> does not >>>>>>> have media established >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:366 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State EXECUTE going >>>>>>> to sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:221 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA HIBERNATE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:731 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_HIBERNATE -> >>>>>>> CS_RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:381 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HIBERNATE >>>>>>> going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:165 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:716 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM RESET >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:723 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_RESET -> >>>>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:362 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State RESET going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:761 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_RESET -> >>>>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:558 SOFIA SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:741 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 CUSTOM SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:204 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.691404 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>>> EARLY -> >>>>>>> HANGUP >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:1045 >>>>>>> Hangup >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>>>>> [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_HANGUP >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2535 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>>> ACTIVE -> >>>>>>> HANGUP >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>>>>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:510 Sending CANCEL to >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> send 390 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.818391: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> CANCEL sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>>> To: <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212> >>>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>>>>>> Reason: Q.850;cause=27;text="DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER" >>>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_bridge.c:772 Hangup >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_SOFT_EXECUTE] >>>>>>> [ORIGINATOR_CANCEL] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, >>>>>>> cause: >>>>>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going >>>>>>> to sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_HANGUP -> >>>>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, >>>>>>> cause: >>>>>>> DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>>>>> going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2551 Send signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [KILL] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:372 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State SOFT_EXECUTE >>>>>>> going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_HANGUP >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_REPORTING -> >>>>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session >>>>>>> 40 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>>>>>> external >>>>>>> entities >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 >>>>>>> Session 40 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>>>>>> Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>>> HANGUP -> >>>>>>> DOWN >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 0x2aaaac013028 (nil) >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 0x2aaaac013088 (nil) >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going >>>>>>> to sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:457 Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 hanging up, cause: >>>>>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:500 Sending BYE to >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard HANGUP, >>>>>>> cause: >>>>>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:557 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State HANGUP going >>>>>>> to sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:351 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_HANGUP -> >>>>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_REPORTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.711798 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard REPORTING, >>>>>>> cause: >>>>>>> ORIGINATOR_CANCEL >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:617 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State REPORTING >>>>>>> going to >>>>>>> sleep >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:345 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State Change >>>>>>> CS_REPORTING -> >>>>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1116 Send >>>>>>> signal >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [BREAK] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1288 Session >>>>>>> 39 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Locked, Waiting on >>>>>>> external >>>>>>> entities >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1306 >>>>>>> Session 39 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Ended >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Close >>>>>>> Channel >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 [CS_DESTROY] >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:449 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Callstate Change >>>>>>> HANGUP -> >>>>>>> DOWN >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:452 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) Running State Change >>>>>>> CS_DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:362 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 SOFIA DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 0x2aaab0031060 (nil) >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:78 ENCODER DESTROYX >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.714001 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:79 DECODER DESTROYX >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 (nil) >>>>>>> send 662 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.820530: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> BYE sip:203.208.207.212:5060 SIP/2.0 >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg >>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>>>>>> Contact: <sip:mod_sofia at 202.73.56.46:5080> >>>>>>> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.7-hacked-20110603T012235Z >>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, >>>>>>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY >>>>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces >>>>>>> Reason: FreeSWITCH;cause=487;text="ORIGINATOR_CANCEL" >>>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [INFO] mod_com_g729.c:83 ENCODER DESTROY - >>>>>>> 0x2aaab00310c0 0x2aaab00b20c0 >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60 >>>>>>> sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 Standard DESTROY >>>>>>> 2011-06-10 11:10:30.715878 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:462 >>>>>>> (sofia/external/03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212) State DESTROY going >>>>>>> to sleep >>>>>>> recv 383 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.823302: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D00000u00000001QXU3LU >>>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 CANCEL >>>>>>> Contact: >>>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> recv 411 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824765: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 INVITE >>>>>>> Reason: SIP;cause=487;text="Request Terminated" >>>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> send 371 bytes to udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.824891: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> ACK sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 SIP/2.0 >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.73.56.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZ49rj5Qtr8aBN >>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996590031055 at 202.73.56.46>;tag=jDSe6ycN62Zar >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996563750914 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ410OWC5F >>>>>>> Call-ID: 082c8244-0db2-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501649 ACK >>>>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> recv 380 bytes from udp/[203.208.207.212]:5060 at 03:10:30.826375: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 200 Ok >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> 10.1.1.46:5080 >>>>>>> ;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bK0D3Hm08XNH1Xg;received=10.1.1.46 >>>>>>> From: "" <sip:03996563750914 at 10.1.1.46>;tag=H4ZN43UH9S9Qc >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> <sip:03996590031055 at 203.208.207.212 >>>>>>> >;tag=2QGB951HCR30000E1D0001Ll0008FJ21EI9PBW >>>>>>> Call-ID: f529ae7e-0db1-122f-c4ab-0015c5fc7ad9 >>>>>>> CSeq: 13501634 BYE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>>> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Leg-A-is-automatically-disconnected-on-Leg-B-orginate-failure-tp6482192p6482192.html >>>>>>> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/298d1d07/attachment-0001.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 19:57:15 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Copy custom SIP headers - {sip_copy_custom_headers=true} doesn't seem to be working In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Problem seems to be we did not support final responses only 1xx and 200. I think I missed that part of the other guy's report. Update again to lastest GIT and it should work. This is one reason we need JIRA for issues of this type because it's easy to lose track of email threads in a big list like this. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Jonas Borjesson wrote: > Hi all, > > As many others, I need to copy customer X-headers from leg B back over > to leg A and have found a few threads talking about using the > sip_copy_custom_headers=true with the dial string but this does not > seem to be working. I am doing exactly what is described in the thread > below but like that guy, it does not work for me either and that > thread never came to any conclusion. Does anyone know the status of > this feature or what I may be doing wrong? Any help is greatly > appreciated! > > Of course, I tried on the latest and greatest FS - > 1.0.head-git-4962542 2011-06-27 10-15-03 -0500 > > The tread talking about this very feature: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.freeswitch.user/36287 > > And documentation: > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_sip_copy_custom_headers > > Thanks, > > /Jonas > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From steveu at coppice.org Tue Jun 28 19:58:11 2011 From: steveu at coppice.org (Steve Underwood) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:58:11 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <2D33125A-05E0-40DE-92A2-7038940977AB@bryansmart.com> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> <2D33125A-05E0-40DE-92A2-7038940977AB@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: <4E09FA13.5030104@coppice.org> On 06/28/2011 11:04 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: > I think that dBm0 only applies if we are measuring the power on an analog circuit, or at the d/a point of a digital circuit. Nope. > I was performing analysis of a digitally encoded audio file, therefore the measurement is dBFS, and 0DBFS is the point where clipping takes place. Anything below 0DBFS does not clip, even though it might seem loud to someone. What is your notion if dBFS? There are two - one where 0dBFS is a sine wave touching the limits of the number range, and the other where 0dBFS is a square wave touching those limits. They are only 3dB apart, but dbOv and dBm0 are better defined scales. Your notion is 0dBFS not clipping is based on a sine wave. For speech you need something lower because of the statistics of speech. > I stated that the peak power of the stock prompts are typically -15 to -16 (DBFS), and the short term RMS power is about -32DBFS. That statement doesn't seem to make much sense. > I don't know how to properly evaluate how DBFS will convert to DBm0. I gather that the codec and the d/a converter attenuate the level to some extent, but I don't know how much. If I have a digital file with a 1Khz test tone at -10DBFS, and play that over the pstn, what do I get out in DBm0? A sine wave touching the limits of the digital range is about +3.14dBm0. > Speaking just in terms of DBFS, -16DB is only about 15% of the potential power available before the audio reaches 0DB, and clips. Perhaps when -16DBFS is put out over the pstn, it is much closer to clipping than it would be in an entirely digital domain. I don't know enough to make that determination. Do you know? Yes, and you should know, since I told you last time. > I'm not for clipping and distortion. However, too little power can cause another problem: limited dynamic range and increased dithering artifacts. If audio is quiet on a pstn phone, then the person with the phone might be able to increase the level by turning up the phone's volume, if it has one. However, that raises the noise floor. Companding might make 8-bit channels sound a bit like 14-bit or 15-bit channels in terms of a low noise floor and decreased dithering artifacts, but it is still just an 8-bit channel. Companding hides most of the dithering artifacts in strong signals, but it magnifies them in weak signals. That's why G711 is fairly clear, but will sound scratchy if you put faint signals in to it and try to amplify them back up to normal levels. Over G711 or any pstn call, as you decrease the level of the audio going across, the scratchy dithering static obscures an increasing amount of the audio. That paragraph is utter drivel. The companding of G.711 ensures that the audio quality is roughly maintained from clipping down to -45dBm0 or so. Below that the quality falls, just like most other digital coding scheme running out of bits. The FS prompts aren't nearly that quiet. > This gets worse if you compound it by stacking codecs. Consider if someone calls your IVR from a cell phone, and you play quiet prompts to them. The audio is first passed through G711, where the low gain means that scratchy dithering artifacts are added. Then, it is encoded to GSM for the cell phone,. GSM uses linear predictive coding, and, being tuned for voice, it is not optimized for having smooth waveforms interrupted periodically with random excursions. Thats part of why cell phone calls sound so bad if there is lots of background noise. Again, this is drivel. > Anyway, clipping is to be avoided, but simply reducing levels dramatically creates other quality problems on a channel that uses companding. You trade distorted audio for scratchy audio. Same thing happened with cassette tapes that used Dolby noise reduction. You really are just making this up as you go along, aren't you. > Maybe you can help clear up my understanding of how DBFS in a digital file will work out in DBm0 on a pstn line. As things stand, though, I think we have lots of room to increase the level of the prompts before we reach a point where clipping is an issue. I tried playing with a few of the prompts. The peaks of the words are about -20dBm0, or -26dBOv. That's probably -23 or -26 on your scale. Every word peaks to a similar level, as prompts are spoken in a pretty flat voice. They seem to be about 15dB away clipping, which would mean the crest factor is about 11dB for the Callie voice, which seems a little low for speech. You usually need to ride a little more than 13dB above the short term power of most voices to bring the crossing rate close to zero. So, there is about 15dB of headroom which could be used to increase the speech level without clipping. Whether doing that is a good idea is questionable. The prompts are at about normal speech level. In normal speech the codecs have plenty of headroom to cope with people getting agitated and shouting, producing only modest amounts of clipping. Is cranking all the prompts up to shouting level appropriate? Steve From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 20:08:50 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:08:50 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: The cases where you have this problem arise because you are originating to the B leg who answers 183 (early media) then hangs up before the call was answered. set the channel variable uuid_bridge_continue_on_cancel=true on the A leg to change the behavior to what you want. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > This makes my eyes bleed. Can you please put this on > pastebin.freeswitch.org? Use "FreeSWITCH Log" as the syntax highlight. > -MC > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:27 PM, David Ma wrote: >> >> Hi Michael, >> -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 21:03:39 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:03:39 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Send MESSAGE_WAITING Error - Cannot find profile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: can you try this on latest too? The line numbers suggest an older build. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Avi Marcus wrote: > I'm trying to send a?MESSAGE_WAITING via ESL on multi-tenant, but I'm > getting this error: > 2011-06-27 10:46:25.443081 [ERR] sofia_presence.c:405 Cannot find > profile?20064.domain.com] > the cli lists the domain as an alias to the internal profile. > what should I do? > I am writing some test code in order to try to send MWI events using the ESL > Manager code DLL. Here is my test code: > > > > static void InboundMode2(Object stateInfo) > > ??? { > > ??????? //Initializes a new instance of ESLconnection, and connects to the > host $host on the port $port, and supplies $password to freeswitch > > ??????? ESLconnection eslConnection = new ESLconnection(myinfo); > > > > ??????? if (eslConnection.Connected() != ESL_SUCCESS) > > ??????? { > > ??????????? Console.WriteLine("Error connecting to FreeSwitch"); > > ??????????? return; > > ??????? } > > > > ??????? //Set log level > > ??????? //ESL.eslSetLogLevel((int)enLogLevel.DEBUG); > > > > ??????? eslConnection.Api("reloadxml", string.Empty); > > > > ??????? // Subscribe to all events > > ????????ESLevent eslEvent2 = eslConnection.SendRecv("event plain ALL"); > > > > ??????? if (eslEvent2 == null) > > ??????? { > > ??????????? Console.WriteLine("Error subscribing to all events"); > > ??????????? return; > > ??????? } > > ??????? ESLevent eslEvent = new ESLevent("MESSAGE_WAITING", null); > > ??????? eslEvent.AddHeader("MWI-Messages-Waiting", "yes"); > > ??????? eslEvent.AddHeader("MWI-Message-Account", "103 at 20064.domain.com"); > > ???? ???eslEvent.AddHeader("MWI-Voice-Message", "1/1 (1/1)"); > > > > ??????? eslEvent = eslConnection.SendEvent(eslEvent); > > ??????? if (eslEvent == null) > > ??????? { > > ??????????? Console.WriteLine("event error"); > > ??????????? return; > > ??????? } > > > > ??????? //Turns an event into colon-separated 'name: value' pairs. The > format parameter isn't used > > ??????? Console.WriteLine(eslEvent.Serialize(String.Empty)); > > > > ??????? // Grab Events until process is killed > > ??????? while (eslConnection.Connected() == ESL_SUCCESS) > > ??????? { > > ??????????? eslEvent = eslConnection.RecvEvent(); > > ??????????? Console.WriteLine(eslEvent.Serialize(String.Empty)); > > ??????? } > > ??? } > > > > When I send the event, I am getting a debug message from FS as follows: > > > > 2011-06-27 10:46:25.443081 [ERR] sofia_presence.c:405 Cannot find profile > 20064.domain.com] > > Thanks! > > -Avi > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From steveayre at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 22:46:40 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:46:40 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UniMRCP Server as daemon won't connect RTSP In-Reply-To: <361E98F99D3CC3439EED59BC1924ED6950815F@SERVER2003.SecuReachSystems.local> References: <361E98F99D3CC3439EED59BC1924ED6950815F@SERVER2003.SecuReachSystems.local> Message-ID: Have you tried doing a strace or gcore of it when it's running with --daemon? If it's running but not listening/responding it could be sonething like a locking problem. Tracing might show you what it is (or isnt) doing. Pid file could be one culprit. Steve on iPhone On 27 Jun 2011, at 22:52, "Jason Moran" wrote: > I?ve been playing around with IVONA?s new unimrcp plugin with unimrcp 1.0.0 (r1725) on OpenSuse 11.4 > > Anyway, when I start it up with the following, it stays in the foreground of my SSH w/ the following command: > ./unimrcpserver > That works! However, since it?s in the foreground when I close the SSH window, it kills the process. > > If I use the so-called daemon mode (-d or --daemon) it says it is going into daemon mode, but FS will immediately return that it ?Failed to Connect to RTSP Server...? at the IP:port I specified. The unimrcpserver process is running, but doesn?t seem to respond to anything. > ./unimrcpserver ?d > ./unimrcpserver --daemon > > If I attempt to background it by either using ?&? or ctrl-z it says [1]+ Stopped ./unimrcpserver and FS will successfully make the RTSP connection but then nothing will happen. Mod_unimrcp will spit out a warning about ?MRCP session has not opened after 5000 ms? > ./unimrcpserver & > Those are hard to kill. But when I kill -9 it then FS will finally remove the MRCP handle and tell me that it couldn?t allocate the speech engine. > > Lastly, I can nohup it, but then unimrcpserver eats up 95%+ of the CPU (instead of 1-3% as it does when I have it in the foreground), which it does not do when it runs in any other modes. It also makes a very, very large nohup.out file that keeps on growing. Even if I tell it to not log. > nohup ./unimrcpserver & > nohup ./unimrcpserver ?o 0 & > > Ideas?? > Thanks, > Jason Moran > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/a32609ef/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Tue Jun 28 22:57:11 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] pause and restart while recording? Message-ID: <4E0A2407.3010704@499x.com> I couldn't find much on this: Is it possible in lua script to let the user press a key to pause recording, and press a key again to continue the recording, just like a traditional recorder? Thanks! From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Tue Jun 28 23:26:12 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <4E09FA13.5030104@coppice.org> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> <2D33125A-05E0-40DE-92A2-7038940977AB@bryansmart.com> <4E09FA13.5030104@coppice.org> Message-ID: <88F60C8D-AFB1-46DB-9A88-4AB295A0376B@bryansmart.com> I must be wrong about DBm0, then. I wasn't familiar with it, so I checked Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't always right, of course. Wikipedia says... ---------- dBm0 is an abbreviation for the power in dBm measured at a zero transmission level point. dBm0 is a concept used (amongst other areas) in audio/telephony processing since it allows a smooth integration of analog and digital chains. Notably, for A-law and ?-law codecs the standards define a sequence which has a 0 dBm0 output. ...... Note 2: 0 dBm0 is often replaced by or used instead of digital milliwatt or zero transmission level point. ---------- Where is my zero level transmission point? Data from a codec is not power being transmitted, only data for reproducing power at some later time. Isn't it all up to the D/A converter at the far end to determine what the power levels yielded by decoding the data will be represented relative to. If it is a hardware SIP phone, maybe the person has the volume cranked up, or turned down. Since the analog representation of the signal starts in the D/A that feeds the handset, what is considered 0? I have no idea. It sounds like this is a scale used for calibrating a D/A that feeds a pstn circuit. I admit feeling frustrated by this discussion. I've mixed music and mastered CDs for nearly 15 years, and I've always felt that 0DB in an entirely digital domain is a near universally understood concept. If I have a sample of 16-bit signed LPCM audio, then -32768 or 32767 represent the max amplitude that can be stored, and is what everyone that I know in pro audio calls 0DB when speaking strictly about a file, rather than a PA, in/out levels to an analog device like a tape machine, etc. If the gain of the encoded signal is boosted to a point where none of the samples are pushed beyond this range, then none of them clip. I thought that you'd think of DB in the same way, given we were talking about levels in files, but it feels like you're nit-picking or antagonizing me. It sounds like you're telling me that they can clip, even if the gain was never increased to a point where this range would be overflowed, but I have no idea how that is possible. It does not happen when I play such audio through the D/A on a computer's sound card, nor when I store it on a CD and play it back through a stereo. I take your point about headroom. Still, I don't feel that the current level matches caller speech. If I felt that the prompts blended well, I wouldn't have even put myself through this thread. I've connected a mix of hardware SIP phones, desktop SIP clients, and iOS SIP clients to a conference, with no modifications to the audio level of the channel, and the level of people speaking to each other in the conference is significantly louder than any prompts that are played through it. Maybe *all* of the clients are pushing audio too strongly. I first thought it was something to do with the conference, but I soon realized that the prompts were quiet everywhere, not just when played in a conference. I don't expect anything to change due to my personal preference, and I realize that a background in digital audio as applies to music and live recording doesn't mean that I'm not ignorant about many things that involve digital audio as it applies to telephony. I raised the issue here to see if I might be doing something wrong. If not, I wondered if the prompt levels are set based on some sort of standard by people that are wiser regarding the details than me? It seems, though, that there really isn't a standard, and the decision is someone else's personal preference. I'd rather that personal preferences never be a default. Since there isn't an official standard/guideline, I suppose that someone has to make a decision, and that decision will be influenced by their own preferences. I have a few suggestions to help improve Michael's sox script, but that's where I'll leave this issue. It isn't worth a big argument when I can fix it myself. I apologize to the list for any smoke, hints of flames, or other frustration that might have leaked through in to my posts. The sound level thing matters to me, but it is really a small thing. I enjoy Freeswitch immensely, and really appreciate everyones' efforts in producing and updating it. I've always been fascinated with phones and any type of interactive phone app, and so Asterisk, and now Freeswitch, really spark my imagination. I'm 34, and the study of phones in my early teens was my first conceptual exposure to a large network. I phreaked a bit at the time. I was fortunate (at least in one regard) to live in the US deep south, where digital switching equipment wasn't common, and so all of the old 1970's techniques weren't unavailable. That didn't last long, but it peaked my curiosity. I used VXML for a project for an employer in 2002 or so, but didn't really feel any excitement about phones, in the way that I used to, until I ran across Asterisk. Asterisk was great for the time, but I wanted to use it more for apps than a PBX, and so was quite excited to discover the different design of Freeswitch. I rarely become excited about new environments and frameworks anymore, but Freeswitch has put me back in to a fun mood of exploration and experimentation. Bryan On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: > On 06/28/2011 11:04 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: >> I think that dBm0 only applies if we are measuring the power on an analog circuit, or at the d/a point of a digital circuit. > Nope. >> I was performing analysis of a digitally encoded audio file, therefore the measurement is dBFS, and 0DBFS is the point where clipping takes place. Anything below 0DBFS does not clip, even though it might seem loud to someone. > What is your notion if dBFS? There are two - one where 0dBFS is a sine > wave touching the limits of the number range, and the other where 0dBFS > is a square wave touching those limits. They are only 3dB apart, but > dbOv and dBm0 are better defined scales. > > Your notion is 0dBFS not clipping is based on a sine wave. For speech > you need something lower because of the statistics of speech. >> I stated that the peak power of the stock prompts are typically -15 to -16 (DBFS), and the short term RMS power is about -32DBFS. > That statement doesn't seem to make much sense. >> I don't know how to properly evaluate how DBFS will convert to DBm0. I gather that the codec and the d/a converter attenuate the level to some extent, but I don't know how much. If I have a digital file with a 1Khz test tone at -10DBFS, and play that over the pstn, what do I get out in DBm0? > A sine wave touching the limits of the digital range is about +3.14dBm0. >> Speaking just in terms of DBFS, -16DB is only about 15% of the potential power available before the audio reaches 0DB, and clips. Perhaps when -16DBFS is put out over the pstn, it is much closer to clipping than it would be in an entirely digital domain. I don't know enough to make that determination. Do you know? > Yes, and you should know, since I told you last time. >> I'm not for clipping and distortion. However, too little power can cause another problem: limited dynamic range and increased dithering artifacts. If audio is quiet on a pstn phone, then the person with the phone might be able to increase the level by turning up the phone's volume, if it has one. However, that raises the noise floor. Companding might make 8-bit channels sound a bit like 14-bit or 15-bit channels in terms of a low noise floor and decreased dithering artifacts, but it is still just an 8-bit channel. Companding hides most of the dithering artifacts in strong signals, but it magnifies them in weak signals. That's why G711 is fairly clear, but will sound scratchy if you put faint signals in to it and try to amplify them back up to normal levels. Over G711 or any pstn call, as you decrease the level of the audio going across, the scratchy dithering static obscures an increasing amount of the audio. > That paragraph is utter drivel. The companding of G.711 ensures that the > audio quality is roughly maintained from clipping down to -45dBm0 or so. > Below that the quality falls, just like most other digital coding scheme > running out of bits. The FS prompts aren't nearly that quiet. >> This gets worse if you compound it by stacking codecs. Consider if someone calls your IVR from a cell phone, and you play quiet prompts to them. The audio is first passed through G711, where the low gain means that scratchy dithering artifacts are added. Then, it is encoded to GSM for the cell phone,. GSM uses linear predictive coding, and, being tuned for voice, it is not optimized for having smooth waveforms interrupted periodically with random excursions. Thats part of why cell phone calls sound so bad if there is lots of background noise. > Again, this is drivel. >> Anyway, clipping is to be avoided, but simply reducing levels dramatically creates other quality problems on a channel that uses companding. You trade distorted audio for scratchy audio. Same thing happened with cassette tapes that used Dolby noise reduction. > You really are just making this up as you go along, aren't you. >> Maybe you can help clear up my understanding of how DBFS in a digital file will work out in DBm0 on a pstn line. As things stand, though, I think we have lots of room to increase the level of the prompts before we reach a point where clipping is an issue. > I tried playing with a few of the prompts. The peaks of the words are > about -20dBm0, or -26dBOv. That's probably -23 or -26 on your scale. > Every word peaks to a similar level, as prompts are spoken in a pretty > flat voice. They seem to be about 15dB away clipping, which would mean > the crest factor is about 11dB for the Callie voice, which seems a > little low for speech. You usually need to ride a little more than 13dB > above the short term power of most voices to bring the crossing rate > close to zero. > > So, there is about 15dB of headroom which could be used to increase the > speech level without clipping. Whether doing that is a good idea is > questionable. The prompts are at about normal speech level. In normal > speech the codecs have plenty of headroom to cope with people getting > agitated and shouting, producing only modest amounts of clipping. Is > cranking all the prompts up to shouting level appropriate? > > Steve > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 00:42:08 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <88F60C8D-AFB1-46DB-9A88-4AB295A0376B@bryansmart.com> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> <2D33125A-05E0-40DE-92A2-7038940977AB@bryansmart.com> <4E09FA13.5030104@coppice.org> <88F60C8D-AFB1-46DB-9A88-4AB295A0376B@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: I don't think anyone is thinking of your post as flames. Like I said, check out the original 48k files and see what the levels are vs what sox does to them. I am not adverse to changing it as long as the majority of people agree. Steve is very pragmatic when it comes to DSP. I often make a fool of myself trying to find the right words to explain myself. I don't believe he in any way is attempting to deter your efforts he just is a stickler for proper terminology and factual info. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Bryan Smart wrote: > I must be wrong about DBm0, then. I wasn't familiar with it, so I checked Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't always right, of course. > > Wikipedia says... > ---------- > dBm0 is an abbreviation for the power in dBm measured at a zero transmission level point. > > dBm0 is a concept used (amongst other areas) in audio/telephony processing since it allows a smooth integration of analog and digital chains. Notably, for > A-law and ?-law codecs the standards define a sequence which has a 0 dBm0 output. > > ...... > > Note 2: 0 dBm0 is often replaced by or used instead of digital milliwatt or zero transmission level point. > ---------- > > Where is my zero level transmission point? Data from a codec is not power being transmitted, only data for reproducing power at some later time. Isn't it all up to the D/A converter at the far end to determine what the power levels yielded by decoding the data will be represented relative to. If it is a hardware SIP phone, maybe the person has the volume cranked up, or turned down. Since the analog representation of the signal starts in the D/A that feeds the handset, what is considered 0? I have no idea. It sounds like this is a scale used for calibrating a D/A that feeds a pstn circuit. > > I admit feeling frustrated by this discussion. I've mixed music and mastered CDs for nearly 15 years, and I've always felt that 0DB in an entirely digital domain is a near universally understood concept. If I have a sample of 16-bit signed LPCM audio, then -32768 or 32767 represent the max amplitude that can be stored, and is what everyone that I know in pro audio calls 0DB when speaking strictly about a file, rather than a PA, in/out levels to an analog device like a tape machine, etc. If the gain of the encoded signal is boosted to a point where none of the samples are pushed beyond this range, then none of them clip. I thought that you'd think of DB in the same way, given we were talking about levels in files, but it feels like you're nit-picking or antagonizing me. It sounds like you're telling me that they can clip, even if the gain was never increased to a point where this range would be overflowed, but I have no idea how that is possible. It does not happen when I play such audio through the D/A on a computer's sound card, nor when I store it on a CD and play it back through a stereo. > > I take your point about headroom. Still, I don't feel that the current level matches caller speech. If I felt that the prompts blended well, I wouldn't have even put myself through this thread. I've connected a mix of hardware SIP phones, desktop SIP clients, and iOS SIP clients to a conference, with no modifications to the audio level of the channel, and the level of people speaking to each other in the conference is significantly louder than any prompts that are played through it. Maybe *all* of the clients are pushing audio too strongly. I first thought it was something to do with the conference, but I soon realized that the prompts were quiet everywhere, not just when played in a conference. > > I don't expect anything to change due to my personal preference, and I realize that a background in digital audio as applies to music and live recording doesn't mean that I'm not ignorant about many things that involve digital audio as it applies to telephony. I raised the issue here to see if I might be doing something wrong. If not, I wondered if the prompt levels are set based on some sort of standard by people that are wiser regarding the details than me? It seems, though, that there really isn't a standard, and the decision is someone else's personal preference. I'd rather that personal preferences never be a default. Since there isn't an official standard/guideline, I suppose that someone has to make a decision, and that decision will be influenced by their own preferences. > > I have a few suggestions to help improve Michael's sox script, but that's where I'll leave this issue. It isn't worth a big argument when I can fix it myself. > > I apologize to the list for any smoke, hints of flames, or other frustration that might have leaked through in to my posts. The sound level thing matters to me, but it is really a small thing. I enjoy Freeswitch immensely, and really appreciate everyones' efforts in producing and updating it. I've always been fascinated with phones and any type of interactive phone app, and so Asterisk, and now Freeswitch, really spark my imagination. I'm 34, and the study of phones in my early teens was my first conceptual exposure to a large network. I phreaked a bit at the time. I was fortunate (at least in one regard) to live in the US deep south, where digital switching equipment wasn't common, and so all of the old 1970's techniques weren't unavailable. That didn't last long, but it peaked my curiosity. I used VXML for a project for an employer in 2002 or so, but didn't really feel any excitement about phones, in the way that I used to, until I ran across Asterisk. Asterisk was great for the time, but I wanted to use it more for apps than a PBX, and so was quite excited to discover the different design of Freeswitch. I rarely become excited about new environments and frameworks anymore, but Freeswitch has put me back in to a fun mood of exploration and experimentation. > > Bryan > > On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: > >> On 06/28/2011 11:04 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: >>> I think that dBm0 only applies if we are measuring the power on an analog circuit, or at the d/a point of a digital circuit. >> Nope. >>> I was performing analysis of a digitally encoded audio file, therefore the measurement is dBFS, and 0DBFS is the point where clipping takes place. Anything below 0DBFS does not clip, even though it might seem loud to someone. >> What is your notion if dBFS? There are two - one where 0dBFS is a sine >> wave touching the limits of the number range, and the other where 0dBFS >> is a square wave touching those limits. They are only 3dB apart, but >> dbOv and dBm0 are better defined scales. >> >> Your notion is 0dBFS not clipping is based on a sine wave. For speech >> you need something lower because of the statistics of speech. >>> I stated that the peak power of the stock prompts are typically -15 to -16 (DBFS), and the short term RMS power is about -32DBFS. >> That statement doesn't seem to make much sense. >>> I don't know how to properly evaluate how DBFS will convert to DBm0. I gather that the codec and the d/a converter attenuate the level to some extent, but I don't know how much. If I have a digital file with a 1Khz test tone at -10DBFS, and play that over the pstn, what do I get out in DBm0? >> A sine wave touching the limits of the digital range is about +3.14dBm0. >>> Speaking just in terms of DBFS, -16DB is only about 15% of the potential power available before the audio reaches 0DB, and clips. Perhaps when -16DBFS is put out over the pstn, it is much closer to clipping than it would be in an entirely digital domain. I don't know enough to make that determination. Do you know? >> Yes, and you should know, since I told you last time. >>> I'm not for clipping and distortion. However, too little power can cause another problem: limited dynamic range and increased dithering artifacts. If audio is quiet on a pstn phone, then the person with the phone might be able to increase the level by turning up the phone's volume, if it has one. However, that raises the noise floor. Companding might make 8-bit channels sound a bit like 14-bit or 15-bit channels in terms of a low noise floor and decreased dithering artifacts, but it is still just an 8-bit channel. Companding hides most of the dithering artifacts in strong signals, but it magnifies them in weak signals. That's why G711 is fairly clear, but will sound scratchy if you put faint signals in to it and try to amplify them back up to normal levels. Over G711 or any pstn call, as you decrease the level of the audio going across, the scratchy dithering static obscures an increasing amount of the audio. >> That paragraph is utter drivel. The companding of G.711 ensures that the >> audio quality is roughly maintained from clipping down to -45dBm0 or so. >> Below that the quality falls, just like most other digital coding scheme >> running out of bits. The FS prompts aren't nearly that quiet. >>> This gets worse if you compound it by stacking codecs. Consider if someone calls your IVR from a cell phone, and you play quiet prompts to them. The audio is first passed through G711, where the low gain means that scratchy dithering artifacts are added. Then, it is encoded to GSM for the cell phone,. GSM uses linear predictive coding, and, being tuned for voice, it is not optimized for having smooth waveforms interrupted periodically with random excursions. Thats part of why cell phone calls sound so bad if there is lots of background noise. >> Again, this is drivel. >>> Anyway, clipping is to be avoided, but simply reducing levels dramatically creates other quality problems on a channel that uses companding. You trade distorted audio for scratchy audio. Same thing happened with cassette tapes that used Dolby noise reduction. >> You really are just making this up as you go along, aren't you. >>> Maybe you can help clear up my understanding of how DBFS in a digital file will work out in DBm0 on a pstn line. As things stand, though, I think we have lots of room to increase the level of the prompts before we reach a point where clipping is an issue. >> I tried playing with a few of the prompts. The peaks of the words are >> about -20dBm0, or -26dBOv. That's probably -23 or -26 on your scale. >> Every word peaks to a similar level, as prompts are spoken in a pretty >> flat voice. They seem to be about 15dB away clipping, which would mean >> the crest factor is about 11dB for the Callie voice, which seems a >> little low for speech. You usually need to ride a little more than 13dB >> above the short term power of most voices to bring the crossing rate >> close to zero. >> >> So, there is about 15dB of headroom which could be used to increase the >> speech level without clipping. Whether doing that is a good idea is >> questionable. The prompts are at about normal speech level. In normal >> speech the codecs have plenty of headroom to cope with people getting >> agitated and shouting, producing only modest amounts of clipping. Is >> cranking all the prompts up to shouting level appropriate? >> >> Steve >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 02:34:14 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon Registration by July 4th Means More Chances to Win Message-ID: Don't forget that anyone who registers for ClueCon before July 4th gets 3 extra tickets to win the prizes! Now is your chance to interact with our fast-paced world-wide development community in person.... http://www.cluecon.com visit our community conference for tomorrow's meeting or anytime at http://conference.freeswitch.org and press the register for ClueCon button to register by web phone right from your browser! -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 29 03:11:10 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:11:10 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] pause and restart while recording? In-Reply-To: <4E0A2407.3010704@499x.com> References: <4E0A2407.3010704@499x.com> Message-ID: Dialplan script or ESL? A dp script is a bad idea for this kind of thing. Anything that requires async ops like listening for digits while doing other things is a candidate for ESL. What cool new app are you working on? :) -MC On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Wes wrote: > I couldn't find much on this: Is it possible in lua script to let the > user press a key to pause recording, and press a key again to continue > the recording, just like a traditional recorder? > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/4a94a51e/attachment.html From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Wed Jun 29 04:47:20 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> <2D33125A-05E0-40DE-92A2-7038940977AB@bryansmart.com> <4E09FA13.5030104@coppice.org> <88F60C8D-AFB1-46DB-9A88-4AB295A0376B@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: <37721EF7-5FCD-43BF-A988-90C806E9E11F@bryansmart.com> Thanks, Anthony. I downloaded http://files.freeswitch.org/freeswitch-sounds-en-us-callie-48000-1.0.16.tar.gz and http://files.freeswitch.org/freeswitch-sounds-en-us-callie-32000-1.0.16.tar.gz I examined them with the statistical analysis tool in Sound Forge. Regardless of what DB scale is involved, both versions register in Sound Forge with identical max sample value and average RMS. This outcome doesn't seem possible if the 48000 set is sent through sox with "-v 0.2" to produce the other sets. Wouldn't the results of that processing be that the sets for other rates would be 20% as loud as the 48000 set? The 48000 set that I discovered must not be the correct set. By the way, the 48000 set that I downloaded also included an 8000 set. Is that expected? Bryan On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > I don't think anyone is thinking of your post as flames. Like I said, > check out the original 48k files and see what the levels are vs what > sox does to them. I am not adverse to changing it as long as the > majority of people agree. Steve is very pragmatic when it comes to > DSP. I often make a fool of myself trying to find the right words to > explain myself. I don't believe he in any way is attempting to deter > your efforts he just is a stickler for proper terminology and factual > info. > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Bryan Smart wrote: >> I must be wrong about DBm0, then. I wasn't familiar with it, so I checked Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't always right, of course. >> >> Wikipedia says... >> ---------- >> dBm0 is an abbreviation for the power in dBm measured at a zero transmission level point. >> >> dBm0 is a concept used (amongst other areas) in audio/telephony processing since it allows a smooth integration of analog and digital chains. Notably, for >> A-law and ?-law codecs the standards define a sequence which has a 0 dBm0 output. >> >> ...... >> >> Note 2: 0 dBm0 is often replaced by or used instead of digital milliwatt or zero transmission level point. >> ---------- >> >> Where is my zero level transmission point? Data from a codec is not power being transmitted, only data for reproducing power at some later time. Isn't it all up to the D/A converter at the far end to determine what the power levels yielded by decoding the data will be represented relative to. If it is a hardware SIP phone, maybe the person has the volume cranked up, or turned down. Since the analog representation of the signal starts in the D/A that feeds the handset, what is considered 0? I have no idea. It sounds like this is a scale used for calibrating a D/A that feeds a pstn circuit. >> >> I admit feeling frustrated by this discussion. I've mixed music and mastered CDs for nearly 15 years, and I've always felt that 0DB in an entirely digital domain is a near universally understood concept. If I have a sample of 16-bit signed LPCM audio, then -32768 or 32767 represent the max amplitude that can be stored, and is what everyone that I know in pro audio calls 0DB when speaking strictly about a file, rather than a PA, in/out levels to an analog device like a tape machine, etc. If the gain of the encoded signal is boosted to a point where none of the samples are pushed beyond this range, then none of them clip. I thought that you'd think of DB in the same way, given we were talking about levels in files, but it feels like you're nit-picking or antagonizing me. It sounds like you're telling me that they can clip, even if the gain was never increased to a point where this range would be overflowed, but I have no idea how that is possible. It does not happen when I play such audio through the D/A on a computer's sound card, nor when I store it on a CD and play it back through a stereo. >> >> I take your point about headroom. Still, I don't feel that the current level matches caller speech. If I felt that the prompts blended well, I wouldn't have even put myself through this thread. I've connected a mix of hardware SIP phones, desktop SIP clients, and iOS SIP clients to a conference, with no modifications to the audio level of the channel, and the level of people speaking to each other in the conference is significantly louder than any prompts that are played through it. Maybe *all* of the clients are pushing audio too strongly. I first thought it was something to do with the conference, but I soon realized that the prompts were quiet everywhere, not just when played in a conference. >> >> I don't expect anything to change due to my personal preference, and I realize that a background in digital audio as applies to music and live recording doesn't mean that I'm not ignorant about many things that involve digital audio as it applies to telephony. I raised the issue here to see if I might be doing something wrong. If not, I wondered if the prompt levels are set based on some sort of standard by people that are wiser regarding the details than me? It seems, though, that there really isn't a standard, and the decision is someone else's personal preference. I'd rather that personal preferences never be a default. Since there isn't an official standard/guideline, I suppose that someone has to make a decision, and that decision will be influenced by their own preferences. >> >> I have a few suggestions to help improve Michael's sox script, but that's where I'll leave this issue. It isn't worth a big argument when I can fix it myself. >> >> I apologize to the list for any smoke, hints of flames, or other frustration that might have leaked through in to my posts. The sound level thing matters to me, but it is really a small thing. I enjoy Freeswitch immensely, and really appreciate everyones' efforts in producing and updating it. I've always been fascinated with phones and any type of interactive phone app, and so Asterisk, and now Freeswitch, really spark my imagination. I'm 34, and the study of phones in my early teens was my first conceptual exposure to a large network. I phreaked a bit at the time. I was fortunate (at least in one regard) to live in the US deep south, where digital switching equipment wasn't common, and so all of the old 1970's techniques weren't unavailable. That didn't last long, but it peaked my curiosity. I used VXML for a project for an employer in 2002 or so, but didn't really feel any excitement about phones, in the way that I used to, until I ran across Asterisk. Asterisk was great for the time, but I wanted to use it more for apps than a PBX, and so was quite excited to discover the different design of Freeswitch. I rarely become excited about new environments and frameworks anymore, but Freeswitch has put me back in to a fun mood of exploration and experimentation. >> >> Bryan >> >> On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: >> >>> On 06/28/2011 11:04 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: >>>> I think that dBm0 only applies if we are measuring the power on an analog circuit, or at the d/a point of a digital circuit. >>> Nope. >>>> I was performing analysis of a digitally encoded audio file, therefore the measurement is dBFS, and 0DBFS is the point where clipping takes place. Anything below 0DBFS does not clip, even though it might seem loud to someone. >>> What is your notion if dBFS? There are two - one where 0dBFS is a sine >>> wave touching the limits of the number range, and the other where 0dBFS >>> is a square wave touching those limits. They are only 3dB apart, but >>> dbOv and dBm0 are better defined scales. >>> >>> Your notion is 0dBFS not clipping is based on a sine wave. For speech >>> you need something lower because of the statistics of speech. >>>> I stated that the peak power of the stock prompts are typically -15 to -16 (DBFS), and the short term RMS power is about -32DBFS. >>> That statement doesn't seem to make much sense. >>>> I don't know how to properly evaluate how DBFS will convert to DBm0. I gather that the codec and the d/a converter attenuate the level to some extent, but I don't know how much. If I have a digital file with a 1Khz test tone at -10DBFS, and play that over the pstn, what do I get out in DBm0? >>> A sine wave touching the limits of the digital range is about +3.14dBm0. >>>> Speaking just in terms of DBFS, -16DB is only about 15% of the potential power available before the audio reaches 0DB, and clips. Perhaps when -16DBFS is put out over the pstn, it is much closer to clipping than it would be in an entirely digital domain. I don't know enough to make that determination. Do you know? >>> Yes, and you should know, since I told you last time. >>>> I'm not for clipping and distortion. However, too little power can cause another problem: limited dynamic range and increased dithering artifacts. If audio is quiet on a pstn phone, then the person with the phone might be able to increase the level by turning up the phone's volume, if it has one. However, that raises the noise floor. Companding might make 8-bit channels sound a bit like 14-bit or 15-bit channels in terms of a low noise floor and decreased dithering artifacts, but it is still just an 8-bit channel. Companding hides most of the dithering artifacts in strong signals, but it magnifies them in weak signals. That's why G711 is fairly clear, but will sound scratchy if you put faint signals in to it and try to amplify them back up to normal levels. Over G711 or any pstn call, as you decrease the level of the audio going across, the scratchy dithering static obscures an increasing amount of the audio. >>> That paragraph is utter drivel. The companding of G.711 ensures that the >>> audio quality is roughly maintained from clipping down to -45dBm0 or so. >>> Below that the quality falls, just like most other digital coding scheme >>> running out of bits. The FS prompts aren't nearly that quiet. >>>> This gets worse if you compound it by stacking codecs. Consider if someone calls your IVR from a cell phone, and you play quiet prompts to them. The audio is first passed through G711, where the low gain means that scratchy dithering artifacts are added. Then, it is encoded to GSM for the cell phone,. GSM uses linear predictive coding, and, being tuned for voice, it is not optimized for having smooth waveforms interrupted periodically with random excursions. Thats part of why cell phone calls sound so bad if there is lots of background noise. >>> Again, this is drivel. >>>> Anyway, clipping is to be avoided, but simply reducing levels dramatically creates other quality problems on a channel that uses companding. You trade distorted audio for scratchy audio. Same thing happened with cassette tapes that used Dolby noise reduction. >>> You really are just making this up as you go along, aren't you. >>>> Maybe you can help clear up my understanding of how DBFS in a digital file will work out in DBm0 on a pstn line. As things stand, though, I think we have lots of room to increase the level of the prompts before we reach a point where clipping is an issue. >>> I tried playing with a few of the prompts. The peaks of the words are >>> about -20dBm0, or -26dBOv. That's probably -23 or -26 on your scale. >>> Every word peaks to a similar level, as prompts are spoken in a pretty >>> flat voice. They seem to be about 15dB away clipping, which would mean >>> the crest factor is about 11dB for the Callie voice, which seems a >>> little low for speech. You usually need to ride a little more than 13dB >>> above the short term power of most voices to bring the crossing rate >>> close to zero. >>> >>> So, there is about 15dB of headroom which could be used to increase the >>> speech level without clipping. Whether doing that is a good idea is >>> questionable. The prompts are at about normal speech level. In normal >>> speech the codecs have plenty of headroom to cope with people getting >>> agitated and shouting, producing only modest amounts of clipping. Is >>> cranking all the prompts up to shouting level appropriate? >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Wed Jun 29 06:12:43 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <1BB0CF88-DA61-4AB6-9CC6-328CCB9846AD@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: <7D766BBE-F3D1-4F9C-B7B9-A44B16EB2BF6@bryansmart.com> Hi, Michael. Thanks for posting this. Have you considered using the higher quality sample rate conversion features in new versions of sox? A starting place for info is here: http://sox.sourceforge.net/SoX/Resampling Perhaps change: sox -v 0.2 $base_dir/$dir/$filename -r $rate -c 1 $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename to: sox $base_dir/$dir/$filename -c 1 $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename rate -v -I $rate dither rate -v -I $rate: Replaces -r $rate. Uses the newer "very high quality" mode (instead of "high quality") with Intermediate Phase response (instead of linear). This setting is superior to the default, but slower to process. dither: Applies basic triangular dithering. There are other dithering strategies, but, based on what I've read and experienced, they aren't as useful when down-sampling to low rates. Might produce slightly higher quality files, the next time it is necessary to regenerate them. Bryan On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Michael Collins wrote: You can download the 48kHz files from files.freeswitch.org. The script itself is nothing special - all it does is cycle through the target sampling rates and run each file through sox. Here's a copy of the script: base_dir="48000" rates="48000 32000 16000 8000" version="1.0.16" voice="en-us-callie" voice_dir="en/us/callie" tar_path="../../.." tmp_dir="tmp" CWD=`pwd` for rate in $rates; do \ mkdir -p $tmp_dir/$voice_dir for dir in `ls $base_dir`; do \ test -d $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate || mkdir -p $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate; \ for filename in `ls $base_dir/$dir`; do \ echo sox -v 0.2 $base_dir/$dir/$filename -r $rate -c 1 $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename; \ sox -v 0.2 $base_dir/$dir/$filename -r $rate -c 1 $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename; \ done ; \ done ; \ cd $tmp_dir echo tar -cvzf $CWD/$tar_path/freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz *; \ tar -cvzf $CWD/$tar_path/freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz *; \ cd - rm -rf $tmp_dir done cd $tar_path for rate in $rates; do \ openssl dgst -sha1 freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz > freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz.sha1 ; \ openssl dgst -md5 freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz > freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz.md5 ; \ done cd $CWD Let me know if you have any suggestions. -MC On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Bryan Smart > wrote: -v is a multiplier. So, -v 0.2 reduces gain to 20% of original. It is typical to supply professionally recorded audio with peaks boosted to 0DBFS. That is probably how the prompts were originally supplied. It makes since that -v 0.2 would reduce the max power to 20%, around -15 to -16 DBFS. The FS build process downloads pre-processed versions of these files. Is there somewhere online that I can find the source recordings+script that produces the pre-processed files that are downloaded by the build process? Bryan On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:32 PM, Michael Collins wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Anthony Minessale > wrote: Have a look at the 48khz versions of the files, those should be the originals. Someone runs a batch sox command on them to get them to the other levels. Just for the record, the sox command used to normalize the sounds is: sox -v 0.2 $file_in -r $rate -c 1 $file_out The -v format is the "volume" format and if I read the sox man page correctly it means a "linear amplitude adjustment". What I can't tell from the man page is whether .2 means "reduce by 20%" or "reduce to 20%" or something else. In any case, like Tony says, we are not picky about this as long as it's not pointlessly loud. -MC _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110628/c1adb9ef/attachment-0001.html From sharad at coraltele.com Wed Jun 29 11:47:25 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:17:25 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Profile References: Message-ID: <480E4906DC4F48E2AA9B823F5ADBCD29@sharad> Hi, I want my FS to entertain only those calls which are coming from a specific IP address . For this, I have defined a profile in vars.xml as . & another line in public.xml as As per my understanding, if call is coming from 192.168.4.10, that call should be processed as per the context `sharad'.....correct ? Yes, it works like this. Upto here all is ok. But if the call is coming from 192.168.100 - 192.168.4.109, these calls also are processed as per context `sharad'. Means entire IP is not matched by condition field. Is there any solution for this. Requesting all of you to help me in this regard. Regards Sharad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/094be60b/attachment.html From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Wed Jun 29 12:03:59 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:03:59 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Profile In-Reply-To: <480E4906DC4F48E2AA9B823F5ADBCD29@sharad> References: <480E4906DC4F48E2AA9B823F5ADBCD29@sharad> Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59E54FA23A@cooper> You need to escape the dots, ie 192\.168\.4\.10. That should make things work as expected. /Peter Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r sharad Skickat: den 29 juni 2011 09:47 Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Profile Hi, I want my FS to entertain only those calls which are coming from a specific IP address . For this, I have defined a profile in vars.xml as . & another line in public.xml as As per my understanding, if call is coming from 192.168.4.10, that call should be processed as per the context `sharad'.....correct ? Yes, it works like this. Upto here all is ok. But if the call is coming from 192.168.100 - 192.168.4.109, these calls also are processed as per context `sharad'. Means entire IP is not matched by condition field. Is there any solution for this. Requesting all of you to help me in this regard. Regards Sharad !DSPAM:4e0ada5632766217057301! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/2849fa78/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 12:47:01 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:47:01 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Profile In-Reply-To: <480E4906DC4F48E2AA9B823F5ADBCD29@sharad> References: <480E4906DC4F48E2AA9B823F5ADBCD29@sharad> Message-ID: There are also a few other ways to handle this before the dialplan: 1) ACL on the profile that restricts dialing in to 192.168.4.10 2) User account with cidr="192.168.4.10" and First would prevent anyone calling in except from your IP. Second would automatically authenticate anything from that IP as your user and handle it in the shared context, anyone else would be calling in unauthenticated into the default context. -Steve On 29 June 2011 08:47, sharad wrote: > ** > > Hi, > > I want my FS to entertain only those calls which are coming from a specific > IP address . > > For this, I have defined a profile in vars.xml as > > . > > & another line in public.xml as > > > > > > > > > > > > As per my understanding, if call is coming from 192.168.4.10, that call > should be processed as per the context `sharad'.....correct ? > > Yes, it works like this. Upto here all is ok. > > But if the call is coming from 192.168.100 - 192.168.4.109, these calls > also are processed as per context `sharad'. > > Means entire IP is not matched by condition field. > > Is there any solution for this. > > Requesting all of you to help me in this regard. > > Regards > > Sharad > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/deb9ddc5/attachment.html From mays.david at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 13:35:07 2011 From: mays.david at gmail.com (David Ma) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:35:07 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Hi Anthony, Thanks very much for the information. I appreciate your advice. It is great to learn about such a parameter. FS wiki has only a little description about this parameter. Is there any side effect, or caution for using such a parameter? Thanks, D.Ma On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > The cases where you have this problem arise because you are > originating to the B leg who answers 183 (early media) then hangs up > before the call was answered. > > set the channel variable uuid_bridge_continue_on_cancel=true on the A > leg to change the behavior to what you want. > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Michael Collins > wrote: > > This makes my eyes bleed. Can you please put this on > > pastebin.freeswitch.org? Use "FreeSWITCH Log" as the syntax highlight. > > -MC > > > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:27 PM, David Ma wrote: > >> > >> Hi Michael, > >> > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/421cb408/attachment-0001.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 16:05:01 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:35:01 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_sndfile.c - path separator for windows - system error Message-ID: While executing a lua script, I got this error. I am running FS on window 7. 2011-06-29 17:27:52.265291 [ERR] mod_sndfile.c:195 Error Opening File [C:\ankitw alia\FreeSwitch\freeswitch-1.0.6\Debug\sounds/en/us/callie\blah.wav] [System err or : The system cannot find the file specified. ] This seems to be because of path seperator used as "/" instead of "\" for windows in mod_sndfile.c file. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/5679f4cb/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 16:12:24 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:12:24 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_sndfile.c - path separator for windows - system error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Shouldn't be - all recent versions of Windows accept / as a path separator. Are you sure the file exists in that path? -Steve On 29 June 2011 13:05, ankIT WALiA wrote: > While executing a lua script, I got this error. I am running FS on window > 7. > > 2011-06-29 17:27:52.265291 [ERR] mod_sndfile.c:195 Error Opening File > [C:\ankitw > alia\FreeSwitch\freeswitch-1.0.6\Debug\sounds/en/us/callie\blah.wav] > [System err > or : The system cannot find the file specified. > ] > > This seems to be because of path seperator used as "/" instead of "\" for > windows in mod_sndfile.c file. > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/a969c92d/attachment.html From peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se Wed Jun 29 16:20:10 2011 From: peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se (Peter Olsson) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:20:10 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_sndfile.c - path separator for windows - system error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59E54FA402@cooper> My guess is that the file doesn't exist, \ or / doesn't matter in Windows anymore. However, you might also change the sound_prefix in vars.xml, if you really want to change the path to something else. /Peter Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r ankIT WALiA Skickat: den 29 juni 2011 14:05 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] mod_sndfile.c - path separator for windows - system error While executing a lua script, I got this error. I am running FS on window 7. 2011-06-29 17:27:52.265291 [ERR] mod_sndfile.c:195 Error Opening File [C:\ankitw alia\FreeSwitch\freeswitch-1.0.6\Debug\sounds/en/us/callie\blah.wav] [System err or : The system cannot find the file specified. ] This seems to be because of path seperator used as "/" instead of "\" for windows in mod_sndfile.c file. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns !DSPAM:4e0b166332769092317685! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/7e066027/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 16:35:06 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:05:06 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_sndfile.c - path separator for windows - system error In-Reply-To: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59E54FA402@cooper> References: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59E54FA402@cooper> Message-ID: I'm sorry. I did place the file there. My mistake. On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Peter Olsson < peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se> wrote: > My guess is that the file doesn?t exist, \ or / doesn?t matter in Windows > anymore.**** > > ** ** > > However, you might also change the sound_prefix in vars.xml, if you really > want to change the path to something else.**** > > ** ** > > /Peter**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *Fr?n:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *F?r *ankIT WALiA > *Skickat:* den 29 juni 2011 14:05 > *Till:* FreeSWITCH Users Help > *?mne:* [Freeswitch-users] mod_sndfile.c - path separator for windows - > system error**** > > ** ** > > While executing a lua script, I got this error. I am running FS on window > 7. > > 2011-06-29 17:27:52.265291 [ERR] mod_sndfile.c:195 Error Opening File > [C:\ankitw > alia\FreeSwitch\freeswitch-1.0.6\Debug\sounds/en/us/callie\blah.wav] > [System err > or : The system cannot find the file specified. > ] > > This seems to be because of path seperator used as "/" instead of "\" for > windows in mod_sndfile.c file. > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > !DSPAM:4e0b166332769092317685! **** > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/34f78629/attachment.html From avi at avimarcus.net Wed Jun 29 16:41:46 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:41:46 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Profile In-Reply-To: <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59E54FA23A@cooper> References: <480E4906DC4F48E2AA9B823F5ADBCD29@sharad> <549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59E54FA23A@cooper> Message-ID: Yes, if you take this route, do what Peter said.. but mostly the issue is: ?. So the match is: "it must CONTAIN the variable" - what you want is "it must BE the variable" To do it properly would be: Anyway, Steven's solution is much better. -Avi Marcus On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Peter Olsson wrote: > > You need to escape the dots, ie 192\.168\.4\.10. That should make things work as expected. > > > > /Peter > > > > > > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r sharad > Skickat: den 29 juni 2011 09:47 > Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Profile > > > > Hi, > > I want my FS to entertain only those calls which are coming from a specific IP address . > > For this,?I have defined a profile in vars.xml as > > ??? ??? . > > ??? ??? & another line in public.xml as > > ??? ??? > > ??? ??? > > ??? ??? > > ??? ??? > > ??? ??? > > As per my understanding, if call is coming from 192.168.4.10, that call should be processed as per the context `sharad'.....correct ? > > Yes, it works like this. Upto here all is ok. > > But if the call is coming from 192.168.100 - 192.168.4.109, these calls also are processed as per context `sharad'. > > Means entire IP is not matched by condition field. > > Is there any solution for this. > > Requesting all of you to help me in this regard. > > Regards > > Sharad > > !DSPAM:4e0ada5632766217057301! > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From abid_freeswitch at live.com Wed Jun 29 17:59:41 2011 From: abid_freeswitch at live.com (Abid Saleem) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:59:41 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Load Balance Trunks Message-ID: Hi All, Please help me the following 2 issues. 1- I have 100 Trunks from my SIP Provider. My provider restricts me to send only 120 minutes call duration per Trunk per each day. This means around 30 calls per Trunk per day with an ACD of 3 minutes. Please help me how to configure this if it is possible? 2- I need to send P-Preferred-Identity in SIP header for each Trunk while dialing out to provider. Please help how to configure this. Thanks in Advance. Rgrds-----------Abid SaleemTechnical Manager NGNTerminus Technologies -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/87e3dc92/attachment-0001.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Wed Jun 29 18:00:00 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] pause and restart while recording? In-Reply-To: References: <4E0A2407.3010704@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E0B2FE0.1070801@499x.com> I'm writing the script in LUA... not sure how to answer your question RE dialplan or ESL... The lua script is triggered via the socket library from a php page, and the arguments to the lua script are things like the phone number to dial, and an id number to track things back. The application is pretty simple, it just needs to call the desired number, play instructions via voice commands, take a recording, allow user to review the recording, rerecord it, and then finally submit it. It's going to be for medical dictation. It's pretty much done except for the pause feature. Searching around the archives for the "pause during recording" functionality, I found a few people discussing the need for pause in relation to a transcription app, but couldn't figure out what came of it. I'm pretty close, as I already have a loop that will stop the recording on a "#" keypress, so if it could just pause recording on a different keypress, that would be great... Thanks for the help! On 6/28/2011 6:11 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Dialplan script or ESL? A dp script is a bad idea for this kind of > thing. Anything that requires async ops like listening for digits > while doing other things is a candidate for ESL. > > What cool new app are you working on? :) > > -MC > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Wes > wrote: > > I couldn't find much on this: Is it possible in lua script to let the > user press a key to pause recording, and press a key again to continue > the recording, just like a traditional recorder? > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/ef4bdf2f/attachment.html From avi at avimarcus.net Wed Jun 29 18:26:38 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:26:38 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Load Balance Trunks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Abid.. see inline. On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Abid Saleem wrote: > Hi All, > Please help me the following 2 issues. > > 1- I have 100 Trunks from my SIP Provider. My provider restricts me to send > only 120 minutes call duration per Trunk per each day. This means around 30 > calls per Trunk per day with an ACD of 3 minutes. Please help me how to > configure this if it is possible? You can use: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_distributor OR, a more precise way.. scrape your CDRs and then query them before making calls. Or, have a lua script that picks a random one from the list that a cron updates every 30 minutes to use slightly less resources. > 2- I need to send P-Preferred-Identity in SIP > header for each Trunk while dialing out to provider. Please help how to > configure this. http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_sip_cid_type has some info on using PID. You can use "sofia profile external siptrace on" to see your SIP messages from FS to debug. -Avi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/e7ba81cf/attachment.html From jonas at jonasborjesson.com Wed Jun 29 18:40:46 2011 From: jonas at jonasborjesson.com (Jonas Borjesson) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:40:46 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Copy custom SIP headers - {sip_copy_custom_headers=true} doesn't seem to be working In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Yep, downloaded and verified that it works on latest and greatest. Thanks! /Jonas On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > Problem seems to be we did not support final responses only 1xx and > 200. I think I missed that part of the other guy's report. > Update again to lastest GIT and it should work. > > This is one reason we need JIRA for issues of this type because it's > easy to lose track of email threads in a big list like this. > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Jonas Borjesson > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As many others, I need to copy customer X-headers from leg B back over >> to leg A and have found a few threads talking about using the >> sip_copy_custom_headers=true with the dial string but this does not >> seem to be working. I am doing exactly what is described in the thread >> below but like that guy, it does not work for me either and that >> thread never came to any conclusion. Does anyone know the status of >> this feature or what I may be doing wrong? Any help is greatly >> appreciated! >> >> Of course, I tried on the latest and greatest FS - >> 1.0.head-git-4962542 2011-06-27 10-15-03 -0500 >> >> The tread talking about this very feature: >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.freeswitch.user/36287 >> >> And documentation: >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_sip_copy_custom_headers >> >> Thanks, >> >> /Jonas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > -- > Anthony Minessale II > > FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ > ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire > > AIM: anthm > MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com > GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com > IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch > > FreeSWITCH Developer Conference > sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org > googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org > pstn:+19193869900 > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 18:53:46 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Leg-A is automatically disconnected on Leg-B orginate failure In-Reply-To: References: <1308213151543-6482192.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: The only side effect is that it will give you the behavior you want in this particular situation. On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:35 AM, David Ma wrote: > Hi Anthony, > > Thanks very much for the information. I appreciate your advice. It is great > to learn about such a parameter. > > FS wiki has only a little description about this parameter. Is there any > side effect, or caution for using such a parameter? > > Thanks, > D.Ma > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Anthony Minessale > wrote: >> >> The cases where you have this problem arise because you are >> originating to the B leg who answers 183 (early media) then hangs up >> before the call was answered. >> >> set the channel variable uuid_bridge_continue_on_cancel=true on the A >> leg to change the behavior to what you want. >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Michael Collins >> wrote: >> > This makes my eyes bleed. Can you please put this on >> > pastebin.freeswitch.org? Use "FreeSWITCH Log" as the syntax highlight. >> > -MC >> > >> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:27 PM, David Ma wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> >> >> -- >> Anthony Minessale II >> >> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire >> >> AIM: anthm >> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com >> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com >> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >> >> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org >> pstn:+19193869900 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Wed Jun 29 19:32:38 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:32:38 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] pause and restart while recording? In-Reply-To: <4E0B2FE0.1070801@499x.com> References: <4E0A2407.3010704@499x.com> <4E0B2FE0.1070801@499x.com> Message-ID: <3DE0409A-DDEE-4D09-9C55-F184902EA64A@ipeva.fr> That's interesting, but what does FS do if you record over an existing file ? Does it append or does it overwrite it ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est susceptible d'alt?ration. IPeva d?cline toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur. Le 29/06/2011 ? 16:00, Wes a ?crit : > I'm writing the script in LUA... not sure how to answer your question RE dialplan or ESL... > > The lua script is triggered via the socket library from a php page, and the arguments to the lua script are things like the phone number to dial, and an id number to track things back. > > The application is pretty simple, it just needs to call the desired number, play instructions via voice commands, take a recording, allow user to review the recording, rerecord it, and then finally submit it. It's going to be for medical dictation. It's pretty much done except for the pause feature. > > Searching around the archives for the "pause during recording" functionality, I found a few people discussing the need for pause in relation to a transcription app, but couldn't figure out what came of it. > > I'm pretty close, as I already have a loop that will stop the recording on a "#" keypress, so if it could just pause recording on a different keypress, that would be great... > > Thanks for the help! > > On 6/28/2011 6:11 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >> Dialplan script or ESL? A dp script is a bad idea for this kind of thing. Anything that requires async ops like listening for digits while doing other things is a candidate for ESL. >> >> What cool new app are you working on? :) >> >> -MC >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Wes wrote: >> I couldn't find much on this: Is it possible in lua script to let the >> user press a key to pause recording, and press a key again to continue >> the recording, just like a traditional recorder? >> >> Thanks! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/bbd9bbae/attachment-0001.html From david.ponzone at ipeva.fr Wed Jun 29 19:41:41 2011 From: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr (David Ponzone) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:41:41 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Load Balance Trunks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > 1- I have 100 Trunks from my SIP Provider. My provider restricts me to send only 120 minutes call duration per Trunk per each day. This means around 30 calls per Trunk per day with an ACD of 3 minutes. Please help me how to configure this if it is possible? Can't you find another provider with no such ... limitations ? You can do what Avi told you, or you can write your own piece of LUA script which would check in a DB which trunk to use, and then would bridge using this trunk, and will update the DB after hangup to add the call duration of the last call to the total amount for trunk X and current day (that would have to be done with the hangup_hook thingy, probably). > 2- I need to send P-Preferred-Identity in SIP header for each Trunk while dialing out to provider. Please help how to configure this. > bridge {sip_cid_type=none,sip_h_P-Preferred-Identity=XXXXXXX}sofia/..... -> I am sure of this one or bridge {sip_cid_type=pid}sofia/.... -> never tested > Thanks in Advance. > > Rgrds > ----------- > Abid Saleem > Technical Manager NGN > Terminus Technologies > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/f09682f0/attachment.html From lists at ticm.com Wed Jun 29 13:49:22 2011 From: lists at ticm.com (Bret-lists Watson) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:49:22 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] halp! newb question on setting up providers.. Message-ID: Hi All, getting freeswitch up and running - heaps easier than asterisk.... but.. I can't seem to work out what and where to put things for configuring my provider.. there seems to be a number of ways to do it.. currently I have it set in my vars.xml under default_provider.. when I try and ring my mobile I get.. 2011-06-29 17:39:42.269994 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1329 SIP auth challenge (INVITE) on sofia profile 'internal' for [041xxxxxxx at 192.168.1.76] from ip 192.168.1.22 2011-06-29 17:39:42.610032 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:890 New Channel sofia/internal/102 at 192.168.1.76 [cda831fb-e8f5-4c64-936a-1562691f15cf] 2011-06-29 17:39:42.657134 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:336 Processing Kitchen <102>->041xxxxxxx in context default 2011-06-29 17:39:42.745992 [ERR] mod_sofia.c:4141 Invalid Gateway 2011-06-29 17:39:42.745992 [NOTICE] mod_sofia.c:4508 Close Channel N/A [CS_NEW] 2011-06-29 17:39:42.745992 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:2443 Cannot create outgoing channel of type [sofia] cause: [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] 2011-06-29 17:39:42.745992 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2680 Originate Failed. Cause: INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT 2011-06-29 17:39:42.745992 [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:2799 Hangup sofia/internal/102 at 192.168.1.76 [CS_EXECUTE] [INVALID_NUMBER_FORMAT] 2011-06-29 17:39:42.745992 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 11 ( sofia/internal/102 at 192.168.1.76) Ended 2011-06-29 17:39:42.745992 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close Channel sofia/internal/102 at 192.168.1.76 [CS_DESTROY] the wiki doesn't make it very clear on wher to put things... :( Thanks in advance.. Bret -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/033b3631/attachment.html From lists at ticm.com Wed Jun 29 17:25:04 2011 From: lists at ticm.com (Bret Watson) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:25:04 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] halp! newb question on setting up providers.. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4e0b27ca.9353e70a.2a26.1ef2@mx.google.com> ok things are working better since I found the packt site.. http://www.packtpub.com/freeswitch-1-0-6-build-robust-high-performance-telephony-systems/book much easier to understand than the wiki.... Anyway now got a strange one.. incoming calls from pennytel fail with the following.. 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:890 New Channel sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105 [616f79a7-763d-435b-9038-527483621a38] 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:336 Processing 041xxxxxxx <041xxxxxxx>->618xxxxxxx in context public 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [ERR] switch_core_session.c:413 Could not locate channel type 101 XML default 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:2443 Cannot create outgoing channel of type [101 XML default] cause: [CHAN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED] 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2680 Originate Failed. Cause: CHAN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:2799 Hangup sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105 [CS_EXECUTE] [CHAN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED] 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 Session 1 (sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105) Ended 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close Channel sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105 [CS_DESTROY] The relevant dialplan in usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/public It looks pretty textbook to me, but for some reason it can't create a channel to that extension.. I can call that extension internally no problems however.. Thanks! Bret From wes-fs at 499x.com Wed Jun 29 20:13:24 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:13:24 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] pause and restart while recording? In-Reply-To: <3DE0409A-DDEE-4D09-9C55-F184902EA64A@ipeva.fr> References: <4E0A2407.3010704@499x.com> <4E0B2FE0.1070801@499x.com> <3DE0409A-DDEE-4D09-9C55-F184902EA64A@ipeva.fr> Message-ID: <4E0B4F24.9090404@499x.com> if I reuse the same filename as a previous recording, it just overwrites it. On 6/29/2011 10:32 AM, David Ponzone wrote: > That's interesting, but what does FS do if you record over an existing > file ? Does it append or does it overwrite it ? > > David Ponzone Direction Technique > email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr > tel: 01 74 03 18 97 > gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 > > Service ClientIPeva > tel: 0811 46 26 26 > www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com > > > /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis > ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou > diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est > susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au > titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous > n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire > imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ > / > / > > > > Le 29/06/2011 ? 16:00, Wes a ?crit : > >> I'm writing the script in LUA... not sure how to answer your question >> RE dialplan or ESL... >> >> The lua script is triggered via the socket library from a php page, >> and the arguments to the lua script are things like the phone number >> to dial, and an id number to track things back. >> >> The application is pretty simple, it just needs to call the desired >> number, play instructions via voice commands, take a recording, allow >> user to review the recording, rerecord it, and then finally submit >> it. It's going to be for medical dictation. It's pretty much done >> except for the pause feature. >> >> Searching around the archives for the "pause during recording" >> functionality, I found a few people discussing the need for pause in >> relation to a transcription app, but couldn't figure out what came of it. >> >> I'm pretty close, as I already have a loop that will stop the >> recording on a "#" keypress, so if it could just pause recording on a >> different keypress, that would be great... >> >> Thanks for the help! >> >> On 6/28/2011 6:11 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>> Dialplan script or ESL? A dp script is a bad idea for this kind of >>> thing. Anything that requires async ops like listening for digits >>> while doing other things is a candidate for ESL. >>> >>> What cool new app are you working on? :) >>> >>> -MC >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Wes >> > wrote: >>> >>> I couldn't find much on this: Is it possible in lua script to >>> let the >>> user press a key to pause recording, and press a key again to >>> continue >>> the recording, just like a traditional recorder? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/fe399f5c/attachment-0001.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 29 20:13:30 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:13:30 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <7D766BBE-F3D1-4F9C-B7B9-A44B16EB2BF6@bryansmart.com> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <1BB0CF88-DA61-4AB6-9CC6-328CCB9846AD@bryansmart.com> <7D766BBE-F3D1-4F9C-B7B9-A44B16EB2BF6@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: I will give this a whirl and see what happens. I have no problems trying that out. -MC On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Bryan Smart wrote: > Hi, Michael. > > Thanks for posting this. > > Have you considered using the higher quality sample rate conversion > features in new versions of sox? > > A starting place for info is here: > http://sox.sourceforge.net/SoX/Resampling > > Perhaps change: > > sox -v 0.2 $base_dir/$dir/$filename -r $rate -c 1 > $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename > > > to: > > sox $base_dir/$dir/$filename -c 1 $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename > rate -v -I $rate dither > > rate -v -I $rate: Replaces -r $rate. Uses the newer "very high quality" > mode (instead of "high quality") with Intermediate Phase response (instead > of linear). This setting is superior to the default, but slower to process. > > dither: Applies basic triangular dithering. There are other dithering > strategies, but, based on what I've read and experienced, they aren't as > useful when down-sampling to low rates. > > Might produce slightly higher quality files, the next time it is necessary > to regenerate them. > > Bryan > > On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > > You can download the 48kHz files from files.freeswitch.org. The script > itself is nothing special - all it does is cycle through the target sampling > rates and run each file through sox. Here's a copy of the script: > > base_dir="48000" > rates="48000 32000 16000 8000" > version="1.0.16" > voice="en-us-callie" > voice_dir="en/us/callie" > tar_path="../../.." > tmp_dir="tmp" > CWD=`pwd` > > for rate in $rates; do \ > mkdir -p $tmp_dir/$voice_dir > for dir in `ls $base_dir`; do \ > test -d $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate || mkdir -p > $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate; \ > for filename in `ls $base_dir/$dir`; do \ > echo sox -v 0.2 $base_dir/$dir/$filename -r $rate -c 1 > $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename; \ > sox -v 0.2 $base_dir/$dir/$filename -r $rate -c 1 > $tmp_dir/$voice_dir/$dir/$rate/$filename; \ > done ; \ > done ; \ > cd $tmp_dir > echo tar -cvzf > $CWD/$tar_path/freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz *; \ > tar -cvzf $CWD/$tar_path/freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz > *; \ > cd - > rm -rf $tmp_dir > done > > cd $tar_path > for rate in $rates; do \ > openssl dgst -sha1 freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz > > freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz.sha1 ; \ > openssl dgst -md5 freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz > > freeswitch-sounds-$voice-$rate-$version.tar.gz.md5 ; \ > done > cd $CWD > > Let me know if you have any suggestions. > -MC > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Bryan Smart wrote: > >> -v is a multiplier. So, -v 0.2 reduces gain to 20% of original. >> >> It is typical to supply professionally recorded audio with peaks boosted >> to 0DBFS. That is probably how the prompts were originally supplied. It >> makes since that -v 0.2 would reduce the max power to 20%, around -15 to -16 >> DBFS. >> >> The FS build process downloads pre-processed versions of these files. Is >> there somewhere online that I can find the source recordings+script that >> produces the pre-processed files that are downloaded by the build process? >> >> Bryan >> >> On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:32 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Anthony Minessale < >> anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Have a look at the 48khz versions of the files, those should be the >>> originals. >>> Someone runs a batch sox command on them to get them to the other levels. >>> >> >> Just for the record, the sox command used to normalize the sounds is: >> sox -v 0.2 $file_in -r $rate -c 1 $file_out >> >> The -v format is the "volume" format and if I read the sox man page >> correctly it means a "linear amplitude adjustment". What I can't tell from >> the man page is whether .2 means "reduce by 20%" or "reduce to 20%" or >> something else. In any case, like Tony says, we are not picky about this as >> long as it's not pointlessly loud. >> >> -MC >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/9bceaa07/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 29 20:14:08 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:14:08 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <37721EF7-5FCD-43BF-A988-90C806E9E11F@bryansmart.com> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> <2D33125A-05E0-40DE-92A2-7038940977AB@bryansmart.com> <4E09FA13.5030104@coppice.org> <88F60C8D-AFB1-46DB-9A88-4AB295A0376B@bryansmart.com> <37721EF7-5FCD-43BF-A988-90C806E9E11F@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Bryan Smart wrote: > Thanks, Anthony. > > I downloaded > > > http://files.freeswitch.org/freeswitch-sounds-en-us-callie-48000-1.0.16.tar.gz > > and > > > http://files.freeswitch.org/freeswitch-sounds-en-us-callie-32000-1.0.16.tar.gz > > I examined them with the statistical analysis tool in Sound Forge. > Regardless of what DB scale is involved, both versions register in Sound > Forge with identical max sample value and average RMS. This outcome doesn't > seem possible if the 48000 set is sent through sox with "-v 0.2" to produce > the other sets. Wouldn't the results of that processing be that the sets for > other rates would be 20% as loud as the 48000 set? > > The 48000 set that I discovered must not be the correct set. > I'll email you offlist and see if I can't get you read-only access to our sounds repo so you can see the raw files. -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/de47631b/attachment.html From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 29 20:19:27 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:19:27 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Conf Call Today: Plivo, an OSS Twilio Alternative Message-ID: Hello all! Today's conference call is busy! We have Venky from the Plivo project discussing the new software. We also have quite a few new FS items that have been added in the last month so we need to get some documentation done. :) Here's the agenda: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FS_weekly_2011_06_29 There is a link in there to a PPT for us to look at during Venky's presentation. Talk to you soon! -Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/a5fa7a2a/attachment.html From infos at madovsky.org Wed Jun 29 20:31:13 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail Message-ID: <89F3619D8E6F437F82F3B1C00FA69725@e1705> Where can I force voicemail to use sounds other than .wav ? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/cff11ee1/attachment-0001.html From steveu at coppice.org Wed Jun 29 21:07:26 2011 From: steveu at coppice.org (Steve Underwood) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:07:26 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level In-Reply-To: <88F60C8D-AFB1-46DB-9A88-4AB295A0376B@bryansmart.com> References: <0D3AEFF37C1643B79CE3F7A7EE9EAEC3@dell9400> <66E81300-46E9-4C81-B2E0-123BCADDCAEB@bryansmart.com> <4E088A24.7010002@coppice.org> <3081AB39-6EF0-4C43-9AC1-7D43FCD378CD@bryansmart.com> <4E092ED4.60605@coppice.org> <2D33125A-05E0-40DE-92A2-7038940977AB@bryansmart.com> <4E09FA13.5030104@coppice.org> <88F60C8D-AFB1-46DB-9A88-4AB295A0376B@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: <4E0B5BCE.7010209@coppice.org> On 06/29/2011 03:26 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: > I must be wrong about DBm0, then. I wasn't familiar with it, so I checked Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't always right, of course. > > Wikipedia says... > ---------- > dBm0 is an abbreviation for the power in dBm measured at a zero transmission level point. > > dBm0 is a concept used (amongst other areas) in audio/telephony processing since it allows a smooth integration of analog and digital chains. Notably, for > A-law and ?-law codecs the standards define a sequence which has a 0 dBm0 output. > > ...... > > Note 2: 0 dBm0 is often replaced by or used instead of digital milliwatt or zero transmission level point. > ---------- > > Where is my zero level transmission point? Data from a codec is not power being transmitted, only data for reproducing power at some later time. Isn't it all up to the D/A converter at the far end to determine what the power levels yielded by decoding the data will be represented relative to. If it is a hardware SIP phone, maybe the person has the volume cranked up, or turned down. Since the analog representation of the signal starts in the D/A that feeds the handset, what is considered 0? I have no idea. It sounds like this is a scale used for calibrating a D/A that feeds a pstn circuit. Look in the G.711 spec. It defines a specific digital signal that is 0dBm0 for both u-law and A-law. > I admit feeling frustrated by this discussion. I've mixed music and mastered CDs for nearly 15 years, and I've always felt that 0DB in an entirely digital domain is a near universally understood concept. If I have a sample of 16-bit signed LPCM audio, then -32768 or 32767 represent the max amplitude that can be stored, and is what everyone that I know in pro audio calls 0DB when speaking strictly about a file, rather than a PA, in/out levels to an analog device like a tape machine, etc. If the gain of the encoded signal is boosted to a point where none of the samples are pushed beyond this range, then none of them clip. I thought that you'd think of DB in the same way, given we were talking about levels in files, but it feels like you're nit-picking or antagonizing me. It sounds like you're telling me that they can clip, even if the gain was never increased to a point where this range would be overflowed, but I have no idea how that is possible. It does not happen when I play such audio through the D/A on a computer's sound card, nor when I store it on a CD and play it back through a stereo. This is highly inaccurate. Power is usually measured as an RMS value, and this does not relate directly to the height of the samples. It related to the integral of the samples over time. As I said before, the crest factor (basically the ratio between peak instantaneous power and RMS power) is about 13dB for speech. Its about the same for a voice singing. Its lower for most musical instruments. Nonetheless every musical signal has some peakiness, and 0dBOv RMS power will certainly clip badly. You might be refering the the measurements on PPM or other forms of metering which try to track the audio peaks. If those are working well, you can run up to 0dB on their scale before clipping. The RMS power will be considerably lower, though. Recording desks use peak power meters specifically because RMS power doesn't give you much idea about how close to clipping you are. > I take your point about headroom. Still, I don't feel that the current level matches caller speech. If I felt that the prompts blended well, I wouldn't have even put myself through this thread. I've connected a mix of hardware SIP phones, desktop SIP clients, and iOS SIP clients to a conference, with no modifications to the audio level of the channel, and the level of people speaking to each other in the conference is significantly louder than any prompts that are played through it. Maybe *all* of the clients are pushing audio too strongly. I first thought it was something to do with the conference, but I soon realized that the prompts were quiet everywhere, not just when played in a conference. Gains in the PSTN are largely controlled in a professional manner. On the internet its currently chaos, with many voice signal clipping horribly. Instead of a well balanced set of gains down the signal chain you get people pumping up the gain at one point, the massively attenuating it at another, with no regard for the distortion they are introducing. > I don't expect anything to change due to my personal preference, and I realize that a background in digital audio as applies to music and live recording doesn't mean that I'm not ignorant about many things that involve digital audio as it applies to telephony. I raised the issue here to see if I might be doing something wrong. If not, I wondered if the prompt levels are set based on some sort of standard by people that are wiser regarding the details than me? It seems, though, that there really isn't a standard, and the decision is someone else's personal preference. I'd rather that personal preferences never be a default. Since there isn't an official standard/guideline, I suppose that someone has to make a decision, and that decision will be influenced by their own preferences. Preferences shouldn't be a factor. This is supposed to be engineered. > I have a few suggestions to help improve Michael's sox script, but that's where I'll leave this issue. It isn't worth a big argument when I can fix it myself. > > I apologize to the list for any smoke, hints of flames, or other frustration that might have leaked through in to my posts. The sound level thing matters to me, but it is really a small thing. I enjoy Freeswitch immensely, and really appreciate everyones' efforts in producing and updating it. I've always been fascinated with phones and any type of interactive phone app, and so Asterisk, and now Freeswitch, really spark my imagination. I'm 34, and the study of phones in my early teens was my first conceptual exposure to a large network. I phreaked a bit at the time. I was fortunate (at least in one regard) to live in the US deep south, where digital switching equipment wasn't common, and so all of the old 1970's techniques weren't unavailable. That didn't last long, but it peaked my curiosity. I used VXML for a project for an employer in 2002 or so, but didn't really feel any excitement about phones, in the way that I used to, until I ran across Asterisk. Asterisk was great for the time, but I wanted to use it more for apps than a PBX, and so was quite excited to discover the different design of Freeswitch. I rarely become excited about new environments and frameworks anymore, but Freeswitch has put me back in to a fun mood of exploration and experimentation. There is nothing wrong with what you are doing. Its good to see someone care about gains. Steve From kris at livecall.com Wed Jun 29 23:05:24 2011 From: kris at livecall.com (Kris) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:05:24 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail References: <89F3619D8E6F437F82F3B1C00FA69725@e1705> Message-ID: I am doing testing and I am about to submit changes to the GIT to allow 8000x8 bit wav and 8000x4bit vox recording. What formats would you like to use?..maybe I can add them before I submit. This is my test extension and it works with my modifications: Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:31 AM Subject: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail Where can I force voicemail to use sounds other than .wav ? Thanks From kris at livecall.com Wed Jun 29 23:11:43 2011 From: kris at livecall.com (Kris) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:11:43 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] pause and restart while recording? References: <4E0A2407.3010704@499x.com> <4E0B2FE0.1070801@499x.com><3DE0409A-DDEE-4D09-9C55-F184902EA64A@ipeva.fr> <4E0B4F24.9090404@499x.com> Message-ID: <1CEA045916DF425087440B38B43E905B@stor1> i havn't tried it but it seems if you set this variable Session.SetVariable("RECORD_APPEND", "true"); before record it should append. Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wes" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:13 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] pause and restart while recording? > if I reuse the same filename as a previous recording, it just overwrites > it. > > On 6/29/2011 10:32 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >> That's interesting, but what does FS do if you record over an existing >> file ? Does it append or does it overwrite it ? >> >> David Ponzone Direction Technique >> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >> >> Service ClientIPeva >> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >> >> >> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis >> ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou >> diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est >> susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au >> titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous >> n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire >> imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >> / >> / >> >> >> >> Le 29/06/2011 ? 16:00, Wes a ?crit : >> >>> I'm writing the script in LUA... not sure how to answer your question >>> RE dialplan or ESL... >>> >>> The lua script is triggered via the socket library from a php page, >>> and the arguments to the lua script are things like the phone number >>> to dial, and an id number to track things back. >>> >>> The application is pretty simple, it just needs to call the desired >>> number, play instructions via voice commands, take a recording, allow >>> user to review the recording, rerecord it, and then finally submit >>> it. It's going to be for medical dictation. It's pretty much done >>> except for the pause feature. >>> >>> Searching around the archives for the "pause during recording" >>> functionality, I found a few people discussing the need for pause in >>> relation to a transcription app, but couldn't figure out what came of >>> it. >>> >>> I'm pretty close, as I already have a loop that will stop the >>> recording on a "#" keypress, so if it could just pause recording on a >>> different keypress, that would be great... >>> >>> Thanks for the help! >>> >>> On 6/28/2011 6:11 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>> Dialplan script or ESL? A dp script is a bad idea for this kind of >>>> thing. Anything that requires async ops like listening for digits >>>> while doing other things is a candidate for ESL. >>>> >>>> What cool new app are you working on? :) >>>> >>>> -MC >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Wes >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> I couldn't find much on this: Is it possible in lua script to >>>> let the >>>> user press a key to pause recording, and press a key again to >>>> continue >>>> the recording, just like a traditional recorder? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > From msc at freeswitch.org Wed Jun 29 23:49:38 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:49:38 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Conf Call - Plivo Discussion - Recordings Up Message-ID: Hello all! I knew that today's call would be popular so I did a rush job and got the recordings up: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call#Past_Calls Just grab one of the three file types from June 29. Enjoy! -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/e83ec8f3/attachment.html From jmiller at sirran.com Wed Jun 29 23:38:04 2011 From: jmiller at sirran.com (Jim Miller) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SRTP problem with leg B inbound to FreeSwitch Message-ID: <4E0B7F1C.8040308@sirran.com> I've gotten as far as I can with this problem and could use some help. Here's the problem: - Two soft phones can dial each other (ext 1001 and 1002) and voice works in both directions - Wireshark shows Leg A in/out from phone 1 (10.1.10.5) is SRTP and Leg B out from freeswitch (10.1.10.2) is SRTP. However Inbound from phone 2 (10.1.10.4) to the switch is just RTP. Any ideas? I've read what I could find on the freeswitch wiki and made the obvious changes to the dialplan and then did this to the internal.xml sofia config Using Freeswitch version 1.0.head (git-2486306 2011-06-23 11-57-38 -0500) Blink is being used as the soft phone v0.24.1 released in May 2011. Linux and Mac versions. I've also tried sflphone for a linux host with no change in the behavior. If I bypass the media stream and send the SRTP between the soft clients directly all works fine. I've attached various stripped down dialplans, sip configs, and a wireshark packet dump. Thank you -Jim -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: internal.xml Type: text/xml Size: 17231 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/7a9686a1/attachment-0002.xml -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: default.xml Type: text/xml Size: 7529 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/7a9686a1/attachment-0003.xml -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: freeswitch-debug Type: application/octet-stream Size: 167518 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/7a9686a1/attachment-0001.obj From infos at madovsky.org Thu Jun 30 00:15:20 2011 From: infos at madovsky.org (Madovsky) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail References: <89F3619D8E6F437F82F3B1C00FA69725@e1705> Message-ID: I kris, I just converted all wav in spx, and also G711 would be great.. do yo need I send to you some spx samples ? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kris" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:05 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail >I am doing testing and I am about to submit changes to the GIT to allow > 8000x8 bit wav and 8000x4bit vox recording. What formats would you like to > use?..maybe I can add them before I submit. This is my test extension and > it > works with my modifications: > Kris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > data="tone_stream://%(100,0,1004);loops=5"/> > > > > > > data="tone_stream://%(100,0,1004);loops=5"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Madovsky" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:31 AM > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail > > > Where can I force voicemail to use sounds other than .wav ? > > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From wes-fs at 499x.com Thu Jun 30 00:23:38 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:23:38 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] pause and restart while recording? In-Reply-To: <1CEA045916DF425087440B38B43E905B@stor1> References: <4E0A2407.3010704@499x.com> <4E0B2FE0.1070801@499x.com><3DE0409A-DDEE-4D09-9C55-F184902EA64A@ipeva.fr> <4E0B4F24.9090404@499x.com> <1CEA045916DF425087440B38B43E905B@stor1> Message-ID: <4E0B89CA.5060109@499x.com> I tried it and got interesting results. First, I recorded a file without this variable set. Then, I tried recording using the same filename but with this variable set, and I got this error: 2011-06-29 15:07:21.284642 [ERR] mod_sndfile.c:194 Error Opening File [/tmp/recording.wav] [Error : Cannot open file in read/write mode due to string data in header.] That made me think that when you use record_append, it will save the file differently than when you don't. So I tried again, this time deleting the original wav file so it would create it fresh, and then, using the record_append setting, I was able to record my message. (speaking the number "one") The filesize then was at: -rw-r--r-- 1 transcribe transcribe 89052 2011-06-29 15:08 recording.wav then, I called in again, and this time the recording should append to the existing recording. I recorded my voice, and the filesize went to: -rw-r--r-- 1 transcribe transcribe 162924 2011-06-29 15:09 recording.wav The first message was speaking the number "one", second message was speaking the number "two". Problem is, the message I heard was only the number "one"... even though the filesize doubled.... it did not append, and it kept the original message, even though it increased the filesize. So, the record_append doesn't seem to work. any other ideas on pausing and continuing recording? On 6/29/2011 2:11 PM, Kris wrote: > i havn't tried it but it seems if you set this variable > Session.SetVariable("RECORD_APPEND", "true"); > > before record it should append. > > > > Kris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wes" > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:13 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] pause and restart while recording? > > >> if I reuse the same filename as a previous recording, it just overwrites >> it. >> >> On 6/29/2011 10:32 AM, David Ponzone wrote: >>> That's interesting, but what does FS do if you record over an existing >>> file ? Does it append or does it overwrite it ? >>> >>> David Ponzone Direction Technique >>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr >>> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 >>> gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 >>> >>> Service ClientIPeva >>> tel: 0811 46 26 26 >>> www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com >>> >>> >>> /Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et ?tablis >>> ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou >>> diffusion non autoris?e est interdite. Tout message ?lectronique est >>> susceptible d'alt?ration. /*/IPeva/*/ d?cline toute responsabilit? au >>> titre de ce message s'il a ?t? alt?r?, d?form? ou falsifi?. Si vous >>> n'?tes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le d?truire >>> imm?diatement et d'avertir l'exp?diteur./ >>> / >>> / >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 29/06/2011 ? 16:00, Wes a ?crit : >>> >>>> I'm writing the script in LUA... not sure how to answer your question >>>> RE dialplan or ESL... >>>> >>>> The lua script is triggered via the socket library from a php page, >>>> and the arguments to the lua script are things like the phone number >>>> to dial, and an id number to track things back. >>>> >>>> The application is pretty simple, it just needs to call the desired >>>> number, play instructions via voice commands, take a recording, allow >>>> user to review the recording, rerecord it, and then finally submit >>>> it. It's going to be for medical dictation. It's pretty much done >>>> except for the pause feature. >>>> >>>> Searching around the archives for the "pause during recording" >>>> functionality, I found a few people discussing the need for pause in >>>> relation to a transcription app, but couldn't figure out what came of >>>> it. >>>> >>>> I'm pretty close, as I already have a loop that will stop the >>>> recording on a "#" keypress, so if it could just pause recording on a >>>> different keypress, that would be great... >>>> >>>> Thanks for the help! >>>> >>>> On 6/28/2011 6:11 PM, Michael Collins wrote: >>>>> Dialplan script or ESL? A dp script is a bad idea for this kind of >>>>> thing. Anything that requires async ops like listening for digits >>>>> while doing other things is a candidate for ESL. >>>>> >>>>> What cool new app are you working on? :) >>>>> >>>>> -MC >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Wes>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I couldn't find much on this: Is it possible in lua script to >>>>> let the >>>>> user press a key to pause recording, and press a key again to >>>>> continue >>>>> the recording, just like a traditional recorder? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>>> >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From msc at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 30 01:12:44 2011 From: msc at freeswitch.org (Michael Collins) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:12:44 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Cookbook - New recipes needed Message-ID: Hello all! I've replaced the old recipe list with a new one. The link is still here on the wiki along with other information for prospective authors: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Cookbook#Information_for_prospective_authors We've made a few changes to the content. Specifically, we've removed two chapters: "Call Center Services" and "Carrier Class Services". We do not feel that these can properly be done in "recipe" format. So instead we've take a few of the recipes from those chapters and put them into the "misc." section on the FSCB recipe list. We invite your input on what to replace them with. What do you think? What recipes would you like to see? Send use your ideas. Thanks, Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110629/112e5955/attachment.html From gcd at i.ph Thu Jun 30 02:38:31 2011 From: gcd at i.ph (Nandy Dagondon) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:38:31 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] halp! newb question on setting up providers.. In-Reply-To: <4e0b27ca.9353e70a.2a26.1ef2@mx.google.com> References: <4e0b27ca.9353e70a.2a26.1ef2@mx.google.com> Message-ID: hi bret, change: to: -nandy On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Bret Watson wrote: > ok things are working better since I found the packt site.. > > http://www.packtpub.com/freeswitch-1-0-6-build-robust-high-performance-telephony-systems/book > much easier to understand than the wiki.... > > Anyway now got a strange one.. > > incoming calls from pennytel fail with the following.. > > 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:890 New Channel > sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105[616f79a7-763d-435b-9038-527483621a38] > 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:336 Processing > 041xxxxxxx <041xxxxxxx>->618xxxxxxx in context public > 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [ERR] switch_core_session.c:413 Could not > locate channel type 101 XML default > 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:2443 > Cannot create outgoing channel of type [101 XML default] cause: > [CHAN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED] > 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2680 Originate > Failed. Cause: CHAN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED > 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:2799 Hangup > sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105 [CS_EXECUTE] > [CHAN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED] > 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 > Session 1 (sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105) Ended > 2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close > Channel sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105 [CS_DESTROY] > > The relevant dialplan in usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/public > > > > > > > > > > > It looks pretty textbook to me, but for some reason it can't create a > channel to that extension.. I can call that extension internally no > problems however.. > > Thanks! > > Bret > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/894891a7/attachment.html From lists at ticm.com Thu Jun 30 05:44:39 2011 From: lists at ticm.com (Bret Watson) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:44:39 +0800 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] halp! newb question on setting up providers.. In-Reply-To: References: <4e0b27ca.9353e70a.2a26.1ef2@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <4e0bd610.8f83dc0a.3fcf.1510@mx.google.com> works! :) thanks.. such a small tweak too.. At 06:38 AM 30/06/2011, Nandy Dagondon wrote: >hi bret, > >change: ? ? ? >to: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? application="transfer" data="101 XML default"/> > >-nandy > >On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Bret Watson ><lists at ticm.com> wrote: >ok things are working better since I found the packt site.. >http://www.packtpub.com/freeswitch-1-0-6-build-robust-high-performance-telephony-systems/book >much easier to understand than the wiki.... > >Anyway now got a strange one.. > >incoming calls from pennytel fail with the following.. > >2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:890 New Channel >sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105 >[616f79a7-763d-435b-9038-527483621a38] >2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:336 Processing >041xxxxxxx <041xxxxxxx>->618xxxxxxx in context public >2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [ERR] switch_core_session.c:413 Could not >locate channel type 101 XML default >2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:2443 >Cannot create outgoing channel of type [101 XML default] cause: >[CHAN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED] >2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:2680 Originate >Failed. ? Cause: CHAN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED >2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:2799 Hangup >sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105 >[CS_EXECUTE] [CHAN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED] >2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1308 >Session 1 >(sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105) >Ended >2011-06-29 21:15:36.048108 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1310 Close >Channel >sofia/external/041xxxxxxx at 202.85.243.105 >[CS_DESTROY] > >The relevant dialplan ? in usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan/public > > >? >? ? >? ? ? >? ? ? >? ? >? > > >It looks pretty textbook to me, but for some reason it can't create a >channel to that extension.. I can call that extension internally no >problems however.. > >Thanks! > >Bret > > >_______________________________________________ >Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >http://www.freeswitch.org > > >_______________________________________________ >Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >http://www.freeswitch.org From kris at livecall.com Thu Jun 30 08:23:36 2011 From: kris at livecall.com (Kris) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:23:36 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail References: <89F3619D8E6F437F82F3B1C00FA69725@e1705> Message-ID: <9A9BE76A0D4E4BEBB9415FE456AE48FB@stor1> G711 is 64kbs so my guess is to do 8000 RAW or WAV in PCM 8bits. If you send me the file I can try it. If you put a .wav extension on it doesn't Freeswitch play it? spx may not be doable with sndfile, but I don't know it's real format..who knows. The supported formats are here: http://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile/ and in the source sndfile.h VOX is not listed there but it records and plays now by using RAW|VOX_APCM format, but that's not the only VOX format out there. The thing is all these file extensions could have different formats so you have to know what you have. Kris email: livecallcom at hotmail.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:15 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail >I kris, > > I just converted all wav in spx, and also > G711 would be great.. > do yo need I send to you some spx samples ? > > Thanks > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kris" > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:05 PM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail > > >>I am doing testing and I am about to submit changes to the GIT to allow >> 8000x8 bit wav and 8000x4bit vox recording. What formats would you like >> to >> use?..maybe I can add them before I submit. This is my test extension and >> it >> works with my modifications: >> Kris >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > data="tone_stream://%(100,0,1004);loops=5"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> > data="tone_stream://%(100,0,1004);loops=5"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Madovsky" >> To: >> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:31 AM >> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] change sounds file format of voicemail >> >> >> Where can I force voicemail to use sounds other than .wav ? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > From sharad at coraltele.com Thu Jun 30 08:39:18 2011 From: sharad at coraltele.com (sharad) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:09:18 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Profile References: <480E4906DC4F48E2AA9B823F5ADBCD29@sharad><549CFEF87AEDE841A38E9D15EAB4C04C59E54FA23A@cooper> Message-ID: Thanks to all of you you provided the solution. I think the below solution suits my requirement & it works exactly as my requirement is. Thanks Marcus... Best Regards Sharad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Avi Marcus" To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 6:11 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Profile Yes, if you take this route, do what Peter said.. but mostly the issue is: . So the match is: "it must CONTAIN the variable" - what you want is "it must BE the variable" To do it properly would be: Anyway, Steven's solution is much better. -Avi Marcus On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Peter Olsson wrote: > > You need to escape the dots, ie 192\.168\.4\.10. That should make things > work as expected. > > > > /Peter > > > > > > Fr?n: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] F?r sharad > Skickat: den 29 juni 2011 09:47 > Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org > ?mne: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Profile > > > > Hi, > > I want my FS to entertain only those calls which are coming from a > specific IP address . > > For this, I have defined a profile in vars.xml as > > . > > & another line in public.xml as > > > > > > > > > > > > As per my understanding, if call is coming from 192.168.4.10, that call > should be processed as per the context `sharad'.....correct ? > > Yes, it works like this. Upto here all is ok. > > But if the call is coming from 192.168.100 - 192.168.4.109, these calls > also are processed as per context `sharad'. > > Means entire IP is not matched by condition field. > > Is there any solution for this. > > Requesting all of you to help me in this regard. > > Regards > > Sharad > > !DSPAM:4e0ada5632766217057301! > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From bryansmart at bryansmart.com Thu Jun 30 08:48:32 2011 From: bryansmart at bryansmart.com (Bryan Smart) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Public users with internal sip profiles Message-ID: <742FA288-3479-4BAC-A6BF-277C87A39964@bryansmart.com> I'd like both authenticated and unauthenticated users to connect to the same IP and port. I will separate them by dialplan contexts. At the moment, only authenticated users can connect to the internal sip profile. I have a "default" user in the directory. Its password is blank, and I've set it to use the public dialplan context. I thought that would cause unauthenticated users connecting to the internal sip profile to be authenticated as the "default" user. Instead, the console says: Rejected by ACL "domains". Falling back to digest auth. This is all I'm told, even at log level 9. I read about the acls. They seem to cause authentication based on the network address, so I thought they might be blocking connections as the "default" user. They don't seem to block connections to the external sip profile, though. The default internal sip profile is an extremely long read. I've been through it more than a few times, but still don't understand a lot of it. I can disable authentication completely, but I need it to be optional. Are the settings that I want in the sip profile? Thanks for any clues. Bryan From boris at tagnet.ru Thu Jun 30 09:00:43 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:00:43 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media Message-ID: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> Hello! I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR on it. He has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is called. The configuration is: Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go throught Freeswitch (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) and there should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is OK and he has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. What may I do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 22-43-50 -0300) -- Regards, Boris From covici at ccs.covici.com Thu Jun 30 09:27:29 2011 From: covici at ccs.covici.com (covici at ccs.covici.com) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Public users with internal sip profiles In-Reply-To: <742FA288-3479-4BAC-A6BF-277C87A39964@bryansmart.com> References: <742FA288-3479-4BAC-A6BF-277C87A39964@bryansmart.com> Message-ID: <435.1309411649@ccs.covici.com> Look at the public.xml and particularly the comment near the end, you can use the same ip (5060) by default and if a user gets down to the now commented section, and you uncomment that section, if hes authenticated he will be transferred to the default context. Hope that heolps. Bryan Smart wrote: > I'd like both authenticated and unauthenticated users to connect to the same IP and port. I will separate them by dialplan contexts. > > At the moment, only authenticated users can connect to the internal sip profile. > > I have a "default" user in the directory. Its password is blank, and I've set it to use the public dialplan context. I thought that would cause unauthenticated users connecting to the internal sip profile to be authenticated as the "default" user. > > Instead, the console says: > > Rejected by ACL "domains". Falling back to digest auth. > > This is all I'm told, even at log level 9. > > I read about the acls. They seem to cause authentication based on the network address, so I thought they might be blocking connections as the "default" user. They don't seem to block connections to the external sip profile, though. > > The default internal sip profile is an extremely long read. I've been through it more than a few times, but still don't understand a lot of it. I can disable authentication completely, but I need it to be optional. Are the settings that I want in the sip profile? > > Thanks for any clues. > > Bryan > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici at ccs.covici.com From avi at avimarcus.net Thu Jun 30 10:23:01 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:23:01 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] NAT Traversal on SFLphone - FS not Auto Changing port Message-ID: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16627 I've got a Linksys ATA behind NAT and a softphone behind NAT. Both seem to register with the same UDP-NAT string and both have the same type of contact string.. but on one FS is rewriting the RTP IP to work properly - the 1102 works, but on 1000 I don't seem to be getting any audio. Is there some hidden parameter I can't see affecting this? Both are dialing the same extension 9664 default MOH stuff... This softphone actually seems to have a responsive gui in linux. If I can get the audio to actually work, that would great! (Oh, it has tls/srtp too, it seems) Thanks! -Avi Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/34595241/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 12:11:11 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:11:11 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Is that all the signalling? 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate ringing. The Cisco would only be able to send early media if that was a 183/SDP or 180/SDP. The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is when the call is answered. -Steve On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Hello! > > I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR on it. He > has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is > called. The configuration is: > > Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN > > I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: > FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 > Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS > Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS > > I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go > throught Freeswitch > (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) and there > should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is OK and he > has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. What may I > do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? > > P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 22-43-50 -0300) > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/9f20b152/attachment-0001.html From boris at tagnet.ru Thu Jun 30 12:55:29 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:55:29 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> Hello! Yes, this is all. INVITE, 100 and RTP. No other SIP messages. So my knowledge of SIP if right. And customer lies to me or forgot to configure something :) > Is that all the signalling? > > 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. > > That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate ringing. The > Cisco would only be able to send early media if that was a 183/SDP or > 180/SDP. > > The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is when the call > is answered. > > -Steve > > > On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko > wrote: > > Hello! > > I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR on it. He > has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is > called. The configuration is: > > Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN > > I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: > FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 > Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS > Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS > > I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go > throught Freeswitch > (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) and there > should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is OK and he > has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. What > may I > do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? > > P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 22-43-50 > -0300) > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- ? ?????????, ????? ????????? ??? "??????" ???. +7 (3435) 230001 ???? +7 (3435) 230005 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/f9bc5bf1/attachment.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 15:32:14 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:32:14 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Btw, this is the latest SIP spec, better than the draft spec for 183 you posted before. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt -Steve On 30 June 2011 09:55, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > ** > Hello! > > Yes, this is all. INVITE, 100 and RTP. No other SIP messages. So my > knowledge of SIP if right. And customer lies to me or forgot to configure > something :) > > > Is that all the signalling? > > 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. > > That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate ringing. The Cisco > would only be able to send early media if that was a 183/SDP or 180/SDP. > > The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is when the call is > answered. > > -Steve > > > On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR on it. He >> has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is >> called. The configuration is: >> >> Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN >> >> I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: >> FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 >> Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS >> Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS >> >> I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go >> throught Freeswitch >> (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) and there >> should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is OK and he >> has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. What may I >> do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? >> >> P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 22-43-50 -0300) >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > ? ?????????, > ????? ????????? > ??? "??????" > ???. +7 (3435) 230001 > ???? +7 (3435) 230005 > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/843627ee/attachment.html From boris at tagnet.ru Thu Jun 30 16:00:02 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:00:02 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: <4E0C6542.1040206@tagnet.ru> Hello! But even reading this RFC, I found that 100 Trying should be followed by one of 18x response to get media channels connected, isn't? > Btw, this is the latest SIP spec, better than the draft spec for 183 > you posted before. > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt > > -Steve > > > > On 30 June 2011 09:55, Boris Kovalenko > wrote: > > Hello! > > Yes, this is all. INVITE, 100 and RTP. No other SIP messages. So > my knowledge of SIP if right. And customer lies to me or forgot to > configure something :) > > >> Is that all the signalling? >> >> 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. >> >> That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate ringing. >> The Cisco would only be able to send early media if that was a >> 183/SDP or 180/SDP. >> >> The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is when the >> call is answered. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko > > wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR >> on it. He >> has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is >> called. The configuration is: >> >> Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN >> >> I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: >> FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 >> Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS >> Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS >> >> I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go >> throught Freeswitch >> (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) >> and there >> should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is >> OK and he >> has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. >> What may I >> do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? >> >> P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 >> 22-43-50 -0300) >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > ? ?????????, > ????? ????????? > ??? "??????" > ???. +7 (3435) 230001 > ???? +7 (3435) 230005 > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/4b7312cf/attachment-0001.html From covici at ccs.covici.com Thu Jun 30 16:27:07 2011 From: covici at ccs.covici.com (covici at ccs.covici.com) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] segfault after 407 response Message-ID: <23273.1309436827@ccs.covici.com> Hi. I have an fs install from about a week ago, and I am using an extension on the external sip port of 5060. Its default context is public and I have uncommented the last section where it asks for a sip authorization. When it receives the 407 challenge, I am getting a seg fault. I have traces, but they are with the default configs, so a lot of things are optimized out. Should I do them again, file a bug, or is this something which is known? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici at ccs.covici.com From boris at tagnet.ru Thu Jun 30 16:27:07 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:27:07 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: <4E0C6B9B.8080604@tagnet.ru> Hello! Have reread your post. So 100 Trying may be (or may be not) followed by 180/183. And in case of 180/183 early media will be processed (one way only?). And full media will be only after the 200 OK from Cisco side. It this right? In other words - Cisco *MUST* respond with 100 Trying and 200 OK at least? > Btw, this is the latest SIP spec, better than the draft spec for 183 > you posted before. > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt > > -Steve > > > > On 30 June 2011 09:55, Boris Kovalenko > wrote: > > Hello! > > Yes, this is all. INVITE, 100 and RTP. No other SIP messages. So > my knowledge of SIP if right. And customer lies to me or forgot to > configure something :) > > >> Is that all the signalling? >> >> 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. >> >> That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate ringing. >> The Cisco would only be able to send early media if that was a >> 183/SDP or 180/SDP. >> >> The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is when the >> call is answered. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko > > wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR >> on it. He >> has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is >> called. The configuration is: >> >> Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN >> >> I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: >> FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 >> Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS >> Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS >> >> I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go >> throught Freeswitch >> (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) >> and there >> should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is >> OK and he >> has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. >> What may I >> do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? >> >> P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 >> 22-43-50 -0300) >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > ? ?????????, > ????? ????????? > ??? "??????" > ???. +7 (3435) 230001 > ???? +7 (3435) 230005 > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/51b78cbf/attachment.html From kerem.erciyes at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 16:30:11 2011 From: kerem.erciyes at gmail.com (Kerem Erciyes) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:30:11 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: <4E0C6B9B.8080604@tagnet.ru> References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> <4E0C6B9B.8080604@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Hi Boris, I had some trouble with 28xx series before, but I was trying to use it as a PSTN-2-SIP gateway. Try to see if the firmware is up-to-date, as there were some SIP protocol related glithces in the code fixed in newer firmware. Kerem On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Hello! > > ??? Have reread your post. So 100 Trying may be (or may be not) followed by > 180/183. And in case of 180/183 early media will be processed (one way > only?). And full media will be only after the 200 OK from Cisco side. It > this right? In other words - Cisco *MUST* respond with 100 Trying and 200 OK > at least? > > > Btw, this is the latest SIP spec, better than the draft spec for 183 you > posted before. > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt > > -Steve > > > > On 30 June 2011 09:55, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> Yes, this is all. INVITE, 100 and RTP. No other SIP messages. So my >> knowledge of SIP if right. And customer lies to me or forgot to configure >> something :) >> >> Is that all the signalling? >> >> 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. >> >> That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate ringing. The Cisco >> would only be able to send early media if that was a 183/SDP or 180/SDP. >> >> The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is when the call is >> answered. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >>> >>> Hello! >>> >>> ? ? I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR on it. He >>> has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is >>> called. The configuration is: >>> >>> Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN >>> >>> I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: >>> FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 >>> Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS >>> Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS >>> >>> I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go >>> throught Freeswitch >>> (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) and there >>> should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is OK and he >>> has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. What may I >>> do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? >>> >>> P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 22-43-50 -0300) >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Boris >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> -- >> ? ?????????, >> ????? ????????? >> ??? "??????" >> ???. +7 (3435) 230001 >> ???? +7 (3435) 230005 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Kerem Erciyes - Sistem Danismani http://keremerciyes.com From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 16:51:18 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:51:18 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: <4E0C6542.1040206@tagnet.ru> References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> <4E0C6542.1040206@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Yes, either that or 200 (you can skip ringing to go straight to being answered). Generally with 183/180 you'll get ringback but not hear voice in early media, you wouldn't normally hear voice until the 200 OK answers the call. Media can't start up without SDP in the body of the 180/183/200. SDP contains the IP/port used for media and the selected codec. Media can't work without those details. Sometimes you'll see 180/183 without SDP there'll still be no early media containing ringback, in that case the client'll usually generate its own ringback but you'll always see SDP in the 200 OK. -Steve On 30 June 2011 13:00, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > ** > Hello! > > But even reading this RFC, I found that 100 Trying should be followed > by one of 18x response to get media channels connected, isn't? > > Btw, this is the latest SIP spec, better than the draft spec for 183 you > posted before. > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt > > -Steve > > > > On 30 June 2011 09:55, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> Yes, this is all. INVITE, 100 and RTP. No other SIP messages. So my >> knowledge of SIP if right. And customer lies to me or forgot to configure >> something :) >> >> >> Is that all the signalling? >> >> 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. >> >> That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate ringing. The Cisco >> would only be able to send early media if that was a 183/SDP or 180/SDP. >> >> The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is when the call is >> answered. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR on it. He >>> has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is >>> called. The configuration is: >>> >>> Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN >>> >>> I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: >>> FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 >>> Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS >>> Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS >>> >>> I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go >>> throught Freeswitch >>> (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) and there >>> should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is OK and he >>> has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. What may I >>> do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? >>> >>> P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 22-43-50 -0300) >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Boris >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> -- >> ? ?????????, >> ????? ????????? >> ??? "??????" >> ???. +7 (3435) 230001 >> ???? +7 (3435) 230005 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicagohttp://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/e16b4f36/attachment-0001.html From steveayre at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 16:53:01 2011 From: steveayre at gmail.com (Steven Ayre) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:53:01 +0100 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] segfault after 407 response In-Reply-To: <23273.1309436827@ccs.covici.com> References: <23273.1309436827@ccs.covici.com> Message-ID: Can you reproduce it on the latest Git? If so, get a coredump and file a Jira. -Steve On 30 June 2011 13:27, wrote: > Hi. I have an fs install from about a week ago, and I am using an > extension on the external sip port of 5060. Its default context is r > public and I have uncommented the last section where it asks for a sip > authorization. When it receives the 407 challenge, I am getting a seg > fault. I have traces, but they are with the default configs, so a lot > of things are optimized out. Should I do them again, file a bug, or is > this something which is known? > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions. > > -- > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: > How do > you spend it? > > John Covici > covici at ccs.covici.com > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/85c4dd67/attachment.html From ankitwalia4u at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 17:37:56 2011 From: ankitwalia4u at gmail.com (ankIT WALiA) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:07:56 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Could not connect thru GSMOpen Message-ID: Hi all, I have properly compiled the gsmopen module. Added the Dialplan ---------------------------------------------------- And the gsm conf file - - - ------------------------------------------------------------------ I am using a Nokia handset in India --------------------------------------------------------------------- I am getting the below error on gsm_load. gsm reload 2011-06-30 19:03:52.716491 [WARNING] mod_gsmopen.cpp:1860 rev exported[(nil)|37 ][WARNINGA 1860 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] STARTING interface_id=1 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] gsmopen_protocol.cpp:2999 rev exported[(nil)|37 ][ERRORA 2999 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] snd_pcm_open failed with error 'No such file or directory' on device 'plughw:1', if you are using a plughw:n device please change it to be a default:n device (so to allow it to be shared with other concurrent programs), or maybe you are using an ALSA voicemodem and slmodemd is running? 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] gsmopen_protocol.cpp:2891 rev exported[(nil)|37 ][ERRORA 2891 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] Failed opening ALSA capture device: plughw:1 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] mod_gsmopen.cpp:1931 rev exported[(nil)|37 ][ERRORA 1931 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] alsa_init failed 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] mod_gsmopen.cpp:1932 rev exported[(nil)|37 ][ERRORA 1932 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] STARTING interface_id=1 FAILED 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] mod_gsmopen.cpp:3146 rev exported[(nil)|37 ][ERRORA 3146 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] ALARM on interface interface1: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I could not understand what does the error message trying to say? I am connected to friend's mobile with datacable on com1 port. I jsut wanted to check SMS. Please help. Thanks Ankit -- Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/58684f3f/attachment.html From covici at ccs.covici.com Thu Jun 30 18:10:42 2011 From: covici at ccs.covici.com (covici at ccs.covici.com) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] segfault after 407 response In-Reply-To: References: <23273.1309436827@ccs.covici.com> Message-ID: <4524.1309443042@ccs.covici.com> I could not get a core dump, but I can run under gdb and get traces, but I have to compile without optimization and with -g gdb, so are the traces of any use without that? Steven Ayre wrote: > Can you reproduce it on the latest Git? If so, get a coredump and file a > Jira. > > -Steve > > > > On 30 June 2011 13:27, wrote: > > > Hi. I have an fs install from about a week ago, and I am using an > > extension on the external sip port of 5060. Its default context is r > > public and I have uncommented the last section where it asks for a sip > > authorization. When it receives the 407 challenge, I am getting a seg > > fault. I have traces, but they are with the default configs, so a lot > > of things are optimized out. Should I do them again, file a bug, or is > > this something which is known? > > > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions. > > > > -- > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: > > How do > > you spend it? > > > > John Covici > > covici at ccs.covici.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > Alternatives: > > ---------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici at ccs.covici.com From gmaruzz at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 18:04:54 2011 From: gmaruzz at gmail.com (Giovanni Maruzzelli) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:04:54 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Could not connect thru GSMOpen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: the "plughw:1" alsa device does not exists (or is not read-write to the FS user). Are you using a soundcard connected to the cellphone? To be audio enabled, gsmopen need a soundcard connected to the cellphone (as explained in the wiki page). If you're not interested in audio, but only in SMS, then compile gsmopen without audio, so it will not check for the soundcard. Also, I don't know if gsmopen will work with the kind of cellphone you're using. For sure it works with mobigater embedded devices, with motorolas, with ericssons. -giovanni -giovanni On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:37 PM, ankIT WALiA wrote: > Hi all, > > I have properly compiled the gsmopen module. > > Added the Dialplan > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > And the gsm conf file > > - > > > > > > > > > > > - > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > I am using a Nokia handset in India > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > I am getting the below error on gsm_load. > > gsm reload > 2011-06-30 19:03:52.716491 [WARNING] mod_gsmopen.cpp:1860 rev > exported[(nil)|37 ][WARNINGA 1860 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] STARTING > interface_id=1 > > 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] gsmopen_protocol.cpp:2999 rev > exported[(nil)|37 ][ERRORA 2999 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] snd_pcm_open > failed with error 'No such file or directory' on device 'plughw:1', if you > are using a plughw:n device please change it to be a default:n device (so to > allow it to be shared with other concurrent programs), or maybe you are > using an ALSA voicemodem and slmodemd is running? > > 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] gsmopen_protocol.cpp:2891 rev > exported[(nil)|37 ][ERRORA 2891 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] Failed opening > ALSA capture device: plughw:1 > 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] mod_gsmopen.cpp:1931 rev exported[(nil)|37 > ][ERRORA 1931 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] alsa_init failed > > 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] mod_gsmopen.cpp:1932 rev exported[(nil)|37 > ][ERRORA 1932 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] STARTING interface_id=1 FAILED > 2011-06-30 19:03:56.616460 [ERR] mod_gsmopen.cpp:3146 rev exported[(nil)|37 > ][ERRORA 3146 ][interface1][-1, 0, 0] ALARM on interface interface1: > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I could not understand what does the error message trying to say? I am > connected to friend's mobile with datacable on com1 port. I jsut wanted to > check SMS. Please help. > > Thanks > Ankit > > -- > Life is like a rose its upto u feel it as its fragrance or thorns > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618 From brian at freeswitch.org Thu Jun 30 18:14:36 2011 From: brian at freeswitch.org (Brian West) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] segfault after 407 response In-Reply-To: <4524.1309443042@ccs.covici.com> References: <23273.1309436827@ccs.covici.com> <4524.1309443042@ccs.covici.com> Message-ID: <4832486C-1E5B-47F0-90BB-0C86CF41C2F3@freeswitch.org> Unless you did something you can dump core with our default with 'ulimit -c unlimited' because we do NOT compile optimized by default. /b On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:10 AM, covici at ccs.covici.com wrote: > I could not get a core dump, but I can run under gdb and get traces, but > I have to compile without optimization and with -g gdb, so are the > traces of any use without that? From boris at tagnet.ru Thu Jun 30 18:44:35 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:44:35 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> <4E0C6B9B.8080604@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: <4E0C8BD3.6090807@tagnet.ru> Hello! Would You please tell me what IOS version have You used? > Hi Boris, > > I had some trouble with 28xx series before, but I was trying to use it > as a PSTN-2-SIP gateway. Try to see if the firmware is up-to-date, as > there were some SIP protocol related glithces in the code fixed in > newer firmware. > > Kerem > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Have reread your post. So 100 Trying may be (or may be not) followed by >> 180/183. And in case of 180/183 early media will be processed (one way >> only?). And full media will be only after the 200 OK from Cisco side. It >> this right? In other words - Cisco *MUST* respond with 100 Trying and 200 OK >> at least? >> >> >> Btw, this is the latest SIP spec, better than the draft spec for 183 you >> posted before. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> On 30 June 2011 09:55, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> Yes, this is all. INVITE, 100 and RTP. No other SIP messages. So my >>> knowledge of SIP if right. And customer lies to me or forgot to configure >>> something :) >>> >>> Is that all the signalling? >>> >>> 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. >>> >>> That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate ringing. The Cisco >>> would only be able to send early media if that was a 183/SDP or 180/SDP. >>> >>> The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is when the call is >>> answered. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >>>> Hello! >>>> >>>> I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR on it. He >>>> has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is >>>> called. The configuration is: >>>> >>>> Cisco 2821<-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN >>>> >>>> I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: >>>> FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 >>>> Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS >>>> Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS >>>> >>>> I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go >>>> throught Freeswitch >>>> (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) and there >>>> should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is OK and he >>>> has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. What may I >>>> do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? >>>> >>>> P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 22-43-50 -0300) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Boris >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ? ?????????, >>> ????? ????????? >>> ??? "??????" >>> ???. +7 (3435) 230001 >>> ???? +7 (3435) 230005 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > -- Regards, Boris From boris at tagnet.ru Thu Jun 30 18:54:21 2011 From: boris at tagnet.ru (Boris Kovalenko) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:54:21 +0600 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> <4E0C6542.1040206@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: <4E0C8E1D.2000506@tagnet.ru> Hello! Thank You, Steve! > Yes, either that or 200 (you can skip ringing to go straight to being > answered). > > Generally with 183/180 you'll get ringback but not hear voice in early > media, you wouldn't normally hear voice until the 200 OK answers the call. > > Media can't start up without SDP in the body of the 180/183/200. SDP > contains the IP/port used for media and the selected codec. Media > can't work without those details. Sometimes you'll see 180/183 without > SDP there'll still be no early media containing ringback, in that case > the client'll usually generate its own ringback but you'll always see > SDP in the 200 OK. > > -Steve > > > > > On 30 June 2011 13:00, Boris Kovalenko > wrote: > > Hello! > > But even reading this RFC, I found that 100 Trying should be > followed by one of 18x response to get media channels connected, > isn't? > >> Btw, this is the latest SIP spec, better than the draft spec for >> 183 you posted before. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> On 30 June 2011 09:55, Boris Kovalenko > > wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> Yes, this is all. INVITE, 100 and RTP. No other SIP messages. >> So my knowledge of SIP if right. And customer lies to me or >> forgot to configure something :) >> >> >>> Is that all the signalling? >>> >>> 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. >>> >>> That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate >>> ringing. The Cisco would only be able to send early media if >>> that was a 183/SDP or 180/SDP. >>> >>> The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is >>> when the call is answered. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko >> > wrote: >>> >>> Hello! >>> >>> I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use >>> IVR on it. He >>> has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when >>> number is >>> called. The configuration is: >>> >>> Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN >>> >>> I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: >>> FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 >>> Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS >>> Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS >>> >>> I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 >>> can not go >>> throught Freeswitch >>> (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) >>> and there >>> should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this >>> is OK and he >>> has no troubles with same configuration with other >>> provider. What may I >>> do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? >>> >>> P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 >>> 22-43-50 -0300) >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Boris >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> -- >> ? ?????????, >> ????? ????????? >> ??? "??????" >> ???. +7 (3435) 230001 >> ???? +7 (3435) 230005 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Regards, Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/fc37493e/attachment.html From covici at ccs.covici.com Thu Jun 30 19:06:39 2011 From: covici at ccs.covici.com (covici at ccs.covici.com) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] segfault after 407 response In-Reply-To: <4832486C-1E5B-47F0-90BB-0C86CF41C2F3@freeswitch.org> References: <23273.1309436827@ccs.covici.com> <4524.1309443042@ccs.covici.com> <4832486C-1E5B-47F0-90BB-0C86CF41C2F3@freeswitch.org> Message-ID: <11999.1309446399@ccs.covici.com> Well, that is interesting, because in the back trace which I did, a lot of things said they were optimized out. I did not change the default compile in any way, but I thought I remembered having to change CCFLAGS in the past. Brian West wrote: > Unless you did something you can dump core with our default with 'ulimit -c unlimited' because we do NOT compile optimized by default. > > /b > > On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:10 AM, covici at ccs.covici.com wrote: > > > I could not get a core dump, but I can run under gdb and get traces, but > > I have to compile without optimization and with -g gdb, so are the > > traces of any use without that? > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici at ccs.covici.com From wes-fs at 499x.com Thu Jun 30 19:10:39 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] significant delay waiting for response after playAndGetDigits() Message-ID: <4E0C91EF.3090200@499x.com> I am experiencing a delay waiting for the system to respond in a lua script that is using playAndGetDigits. I press a key while the voice is still speaking, and it continues to speak for a few seconds before moving to the part of the script for the particular keypress. Also, related: sometimes it speaks the "invalid" message even though the key pressed is a valid one, and then immediately after speaking the invalid message, it continues with the processing for the key that was pressed. So I know I didn't press an invalid key. -- session:execute('flush_dtmf'); session:flushDigits() local digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 3, 2000, "#", "phrase:play_submit_rerecord:1:2:3", invalid, "\\d{1}") if ( digits == "1") then ETC here is the phrase: Is the speak-text just too cpu intensive and causing it to be slow to respond to the DTMF? Any help would be appreciated... thanks! From wstephen80 at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 19:21:22 2011 From: wstephen80 at gmail.com (Stephen Wilde) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:21:22 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Optimize Freeswitch build Message-ID: Hi all, it's possible to optimize the Freeswitch build to maximize the performance? Or this is the default configuration? I have not found any reference to this argument. Stephen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/af37f573/attachment.html From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 19:45:48 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:45:48 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Optimize Freeswitch build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: You can always use the cflags and cxxflags "-g -O2 -march=proc" to optimize FreeSwitch altogether during the build process. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Stephen Wilde wrote: > Hi all, > it's possible to optimize the Freeswitch build to maximize the performance? > Or this is the default configuration? > I have not found any reference to this argument. > Stephen > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From wstephen80 at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 20:11:10 2011 From: wstephen80 at gmail.com (Stephen Wilde) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:11:10 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Optimize Freeswitch build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you for the info, but how I can set this flags? I have to change the Makefile? I build Freeswitch with a "make install". On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:45 PM, curriegrad2004 wrote: > You can always use the cflags and cxxflags "-g -O2 -march=proc" to > optimize FreeSwitch altogether during the build process. > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Stephen Wilde > wrote: > > Hi all, > > it's possible to optimize the Freeswitch build to maximize the > performance? > > Or this is the default configuration? > > I have not found any reference to this argument. > > Stephen > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/108efd8c/attachment.html From jan.berger at video24.no Thu Jun 30 20:17:04 2011 From: jan.berger at video24.no (Jan Berger) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:17:04 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Optimize Freeswitch build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Assuming "maximum performance" is for the purpose of getting more calls when it hardly matters unless CPU is your actual bottleneck. Jan _____ From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Wilde Sent: 30. juni 2011 18:11 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Optimize Freeswitch build Thank you for the info, but how I can set this flags? I have to change the Makefile? I build Freeswitch with a "make install". On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:45 PM, curriegrad2004 wrote: You can always use the cflags and cxxflags "-g -O2 -march=proc" to optimize FreeSwitch altogether during the build process. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Stephen Wilde wrote: > Hi all, > it's possible to optimize the Freeswitch build to maximize the performance? > Or this is the default configuration? > I have not found any reference to this argument. > Stephen > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/fc2c1131/attachment.html From curriegrad2004 at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 20:23:22 2011 From: curriegrad2004 at gmail.com (curriegrad2004) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:23:22 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Optimize Freeswitch build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: You enable the optimizations by this following command in the configure stage: "CFLAGS="-g -O2 -march=native" CXXFLAGS="-g -O2 -march=native" ./configure" after that simply run a make and you should be good. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Jan Berger wrote: > Assuming "maximum performance" is for the purpose of getting more calls when > it hardly matters unless CPU is your actual bottleneck. > > > > Jan > > > > ________________________________ > > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Stephen > Wilde > Sent: 30. juni 2011 18:11 > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Optimize Freeswitch build > > > > Thank you for the info, but how I can set this flags? > > I have to change the Makefile? > > I build Freeswitch with a "make install". > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:45 PM, curriegrad2004 > wrote: > > You can always use the cflags and cxxflags "-g -O2 -march=proc" to > optimize FreeSwitch altogether during the build process. > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Stephen Wilde wrote: >> Hi all, >> it's possible to optimize the Freeswitch build to maximize the >> performance? >> Or this is the default configuration? >> I have not found any reference to this argument. >> Stephen > >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > From wstephen80 at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 21:24:10 2011 From: wstephen80 at gmail.com (Stephen Wilde) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:24:10 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Optimize Freeswitch build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you curriegrad2004, I'll rebuild Freeswitch with these settings. Stephen On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:23 PM, curriegrad2004 wrote: > You enable the optimizations by this following command in the configure > stage: > "CFLAGS="-g -O2 -march=native" CXXFLAGS="-g -O2 -march=native" ./configure" > > after that simply run a make and you should be good. > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Jan Berger wrote: > > Assuming "maximum performance" is for the purpose of getting more calls > when > > it hardly matters unless CPU is your actual bottleneck. > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org > > [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of > Stephen > > Wilde > > Sent: 30. juni 2011 18:11 > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Optimize Freeswitch build > > > > > > > > Thank you for the info, but how I can set this flags? > > > > I have to change the Makefile? > > > > I build Freeswitch with a "make install". > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:45 PM, curriegrad2004 < > curriegrad2004 at gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > You can always use the cflags and cxxflags "-g -O2 -march=proc" to > > optimize FreeSwitch altogether during the build process. > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Stephen Wilde > wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> it's possible to optimize the Freeswitch build to maximize the > >> performance? > >> Or this is the default configuration? > >> I have not found any reference to this argument. > >> Stephen > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > >> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/30858541/attachment-0001.html From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 21:32:27 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:32:27 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] segfault after 407 response In-Reply-To: <11999.1309446399@ccs.covici.com> References: <23273.1309436827@ccs.covici.com> <4524.1309443042@ccs.covici.com> <4832486C-1E5B-47F0-90BB-0C86CF41C2F3@freeswitch.org> <11999.1309446399@ccs.covici.com> Message-ID: there was a jira on this issue, its already fixed in tree as of like 10 min ago. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:06 AM, wrote: > Well, that is interesting, because in the back trace which I did, a lot > of things said they were optimized out. ?I did not change the default > compile in any way, but I thought I remembered having to change CCFLAGS > in the past. > > Brian West wrote: > >> Unless you did something you can dump core with our default with 'ulimit -c unlimited' because we do NOT compile optimized by default. >> >> /b >> >> On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:10 AM, covici at ccs.covici.com wrote: >> >> > I could not get a core dump, but I can run under gdb and get traces, but >> > I have to compile without optimization and with -g gdb, so are the >> > traces of any use without that? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- > Your life is like a penny. ?You're going to lose it. ?The question is: > How do > you spend it? > > ? ? ? ? John Covici > ? ? ? ? covici at ccs.covici.com > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From kerem.erciyes at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 21:43:10 2011 From: kerem.erciyes at gmail.com (Kerem Erciyes) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:43:10 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SIP 100 response and media In-Reply-To: <4E0C8E1D.2000506@tagnet.ru> References: <4E0C02FB.2060703@tagnet.ru> <4E0C3A01.7040006@tagnet.ru> <4E0C6542.1040206@tagnet.ru> <4E0C8E1D.2000506@tagnet.ru> Message-ID: Sorry Boris, As I do not have access to the device anymore I am unable to check the version. I remember we started out with 12.4 something and pushed to at least 12.11. Regards, Kerem On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Hello! > > ??? Thank You, Steve! > > Yes, either that or 200 (you can skip ringing to go straight to being > answered). > > Generally with 183/180 you'll get ringback but not hear voice in early > media, you wouldn't normally hear voice until the 200 OK answers the call. > > Media can't start up without SDP in the body of the 180/183/200. SDP > contains the IP/port used for media and the selected codec. Media can't work > without those details. Sometimes you'll see 180/183 without SDP there'll > still be no early media containing ringback, in that case the client'll > usually generate its own ringback but you'll always see SDP in the 200 OK. > > -Steve > > > > > On 30 June 2011 13:00, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> ??? But even reading this RFC, I found that 100 Trying should be followed >> by one of 18x response to get media channels connected, isn't? >> >> Btw, this is the latest SIP spec, better than the draft spec for 183 you >> posted before. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> On 30 June 2011 09:55, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >>> >>> Hello! >>> >>> Yes, this is all. INVITE, 100 and RTP. No other SIP messages. So my >>> knowledge of SIP if right. And customer lies to me or forgot to configure >>> something :) >>> >>> Is that all the signalling? >>> >>> 100 Trying only acknowledges the INVITE. >>> >>> That *may* be followed by 183 or 180 which'll indicate ringing. The Cisco >>> would only be able to send early media if that was a 183/SDP or 180/SDP. >>> >>> The voice will only start when it sends 200/SDP which is when the call is >>> answered. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> On 30 June 2011 06:00, Boris Kovalenko wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello! >>>> >>>> ? ? I have a customers with Cisco 2821 which want to use IVR on it. He >>>> has configured Cisco and told me there is no voice when number is >>>> called. The configuration is: >>>> >>>> Cisco 2821 <-- FreeSwitch (full proxy mode) --> PSTN >>>> >>>> I looked at tcpdump and the call flow is: >>>> FS (INVITE) --> Cisco 2821 >>>> Cisco 2821 (100 Trying) --> FS >>>> Cisco 2821 (RTP) --> FS >>>> >>>> I think the call flow is wrong in that case and SIP100 can not go >>>> throught Freeswitch >>>> (http://jdrosen.net/papers/draft-donovan-mmusic-183-00.txt) and there >>>> should be SIP180 to get it work. But customers said this is OK and he >>>> has no troubles with same configuration with other provider. What may I >>>> do in this sutiation? Any specific Freeswitch configuration? >>>> >>>> P.S. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-1c95ad9 2011-01-20 22-43-50 -0300) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Boris >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>>> >>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ? ?????????, >>> ????? ????????? >>> ??? "??????" >>> ???. +7 (3435) 230001 >>> ???? +7 (3435) 230005 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > -- > Regards, > Boris > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Kerem Erciyes - Sistem Danismani http://keremerciyes.com From robert.hadley at teotech.com Thu Jun 30 21:44:39 2011 From: robert.hadley at teotech.com (Robert Hadley) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:44:39 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] How to send Outbound Caller ID Name out Sangoma A101 PRI Message-ID: Hi FS Users, Is there a way to send the outbound caller ID name when using FreeTDM, wanpipe, and a Sangoma A101 PRI? I am setting the effective_caller_id_name and _number and the number goes out but not the name. I also tried setting the origination_caller_id_name on the bridge but that didn't work either. I receive the incoming caller_id_name in a separate Facility message. Thanks, Robert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/b2b3d89f/attachment.html From spencer at 5ninesolutions.com Thu Jun 30 22:40:18 2011 From: spencer at 5ninesolutions.com (Spencer Thomason) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:40:18 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] t38-passthru sofia param Message-ID: <724715C2-4970-4594-9346-167EA8B89C0F@5ninesolutions.com> Hello all, I have a few questions regarding the t38-passthru sofia param. One of the ways we are using FreeSWITCH is as a simple B2BUA in our SBCs. The topology looks like this: Freeswitch /\ \/ FS and Asterisk boxen -> OpenSIPS -> PSTN The Freeswitch instance is setup with inbound late negotiation and bypass media = true and the dialplan consists of a very simple bridge statement that sends a call back to the proxy. The problem is that when someone sends a fax and the GW send a t.38 reINVITE, Freeswitch is sending the original SDP (PCMU in this case) back to Leg A and the fax then fails using PCMU. Is this parameter needed when bypass media is already enabled? Thanks, Spencer From jerry.richards at teotech.com Thu Jun 30 22:42:17 2011 From: jerry.richards at teotech.com (Jerry Richards) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:42:17 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Call Dropped When Answered If Bridged To Internal Extension And PSTN Number Via Message-ID: <2BF7FB90DF25EA4485949F3AF2B9D69624F481C617@VA3DIAXVS351.RED001.local> Hello, If I bridge a call to both an internal extension and a PSTN number (via FreeTDM), and then answer the call at the internal extension, the call is dropped. I posted the log at http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16634 The log shows many errors of the type: reading on a session with no media! I have bypass-media 'true' (not sure if this has anything to do with it). Any clue why this is happening? Thanks, Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/dac2b4f3/attachment.html From wes-fs at 499x.com Thu Jun 30 22:46:39 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] significant delay waiting for response after playAndGetDigits() In-Reply-To: <4E0C91EF.3090200@499x.com> References: <4E0C91EF.3090200@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E0CC48F.6060703@499x.com> I've narrowed it down a bit. I think this may be a bug (memory leak maybe?) It seems that the pagd function is very responsive on the first use, but on each repeated call to this function, it takes longer to respond to the user's keypress. The following test script illustrates the problem. It asks user to press a key, then it starts counting up to 10. The first time, it stops right away after you press a key, telling you what key you pressed, the second time, it gets as far as the number 3, the third time, it counts up to six, and so on, until it completes the count all the way to 10, and then it says you've pressed an invalid entry, even though you indeed pressed a key at the beginning of the message. lua script: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16637 phrase xml: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16636 Log: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16635 Could someone try this example on their own system to see if they could duplicate the behavior? Thanks in advance! On 6/30/2011 10:10 AM, Wes wrote: > I am experiencing a delay waiting for the system to respond in a lua > script that is using playAndGetDigits. I press a key while the voice is > still speaking, and it continues to speak for a few seconds before > moving to the part of the script for the particular keypress. > > Also, related: sometimes it speaks the "invalid" message even though the > key pressed is a valid one, and then immediately after speaking the > invalid message, it continues with the processing for the key that was > pressed. So I know I didn't press an invalid key. > > -- session:execute('flush_dtmf'); > session:flushDigits() > local digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 3, 2000, "#", > "phrase:play_submit_rerecord:1:2:3", invalid, "\\d{1}") > if ( digits == "1") then > > ETC > > here is the phrase: > > > > > data="To listen to your dictation, press $1, To submit > your dictation , press $2, To discard your dictation and start over, > press $3."/> > > > > > Is the speak-text just too cpu intensive and causing it to be slow to > respond to the DTMF? > > Any help would be appreciated... thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org From anthony.minessale at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 22:50:45 2011 From: anthony.minessale at gmail.com (Anthony Minessale) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] significant delay waiting for response after playAndGetDigits() In-Reply-To: <4E0CC48F.6060703@499x.com> References: <4E0C91EF.3090200@499x.com> <4E0CC48F.6060703@499x.com> Message-ID: have you monitored your dtmf ? is it 2833? Try console loglevel debug and look at the message saying when you got the dtmf. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Wes wrote: > I've narrowed it down a bit. ?I think this may be a bug (memory leak maybe?) > > It seems that the pagd function is very responsive on the first use, but > on each repeated call to this function, it takes longer to respond to > the user's keypress. > > The following test script illustrates the problem. ?It asks user to > press a key, then it starts counting up to 10. ?The first time, it stops > right away after you press a key, telling you what key you pressed, the > second time, it gets as far as the number 3, the third time, it counts > up to six, and so on, until it completes the count all the way to 10, > and then it says you've pressed an invalid entry, even though you indeed > pressed a key at the beginning of the message. > > lua script: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16637 > > phrase xml: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16636 > > Log: > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16635 > > Could someone try this example on their own system to see if they could > duplicate the behavior? > > Thanks in advance! > > > On 6/30/2011 10:10 AM, Wes wrote: >> I am experiencing a delay waiting for the system to respond in a lua >> script that is using playAndGetDigits. ?I press a key while the voice is >> still speaking, and it continues to speak for a few seconds before >> moving to the part of the script for the particular keypress. >> >> Also, related: sometimes it speaks the "invalid" message even though the >> key pressed is a valid one, and then immediately after speaking the >> invalid message, it continues with the processing for the key that was >> pressed. ?So I know I didn't press an invalid key. >> >> -- ? ? ? ?session:execute('flush_dtmf'); >> ? ? ? ? ? session:flushDigits() >> ? ? ? ? ? local digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 3, 2000, "#", >> "phrase:play_submit_rerecord:1:2:3", invalid, "\\d{1}") >> ? ? ? ? ? if ( digits == "1") then >> >> ETC >> >> here is the phrase: >> >> >> >> >> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? data="To listen to your dictation, press $1, To submit >> your dictation , press $2, To discard your dictation and start over, >> press $3."/> >> >> >> >> >> Is the speak-text just too cpu intensive and causing it to be slow to >> respond to the DTMF? >> >> Any help would be appreciated... thanks! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 From wes-fs at 499x.com Thu Jun 30 23:01:04 2011 From: wes-fs at 499x.com (Wes) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] significant delay waiting for response after playAndGetDigits() In-Reply-To: References: <4E0C91EF.3090200@499x.com> <4E0CC48F.6060703@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E0CC7F0.201@499x.com> I'm in fs_cli, and I think the loglevel is already at debug, since I set it to debug and saw the same messages that I have in the pastebin http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16635 in line 12, you can see that it received DTMF 1 right after speaking "One" but then, the second time I called pagd, you can see that in line 39, it got as far as speaking the number "Three" And, the third time, in line 81, it gets to speaking "Six", before detecting the DTMF. So, is that what you mean by monitoring the DTMF? Even though I press the number immediately when the message says "go", it takes longer and longer each time to respond. On 6/30/2011 1:50 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > have you monitored your dtmf ? > is it 2833? > > Try console loglevel debug and look at the message saying when you got the dtmf. > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Wes wrote: >> I've narrowed it down a bit. I think this may be a bug (memory leak maybe?) >> >> It seems that the pagd function is very responsive on the first use, but >> on each repeated call to this function, it takes longer to respond to >> the user's keypress. >> >> The following test script illustrates the problem. It asks user to >> press a key, then it starts counting up to 10. The first time, it stops >> right away after you press a key, telling you what key you pressed, the >> second time, it gets as far as the number 3, the third time, it counts >> up to six, and so on, until it completes the count all the way to 10, >> and then it says you've pressed an invalid entry, even though you indeed >> pressed a key at the beginning of the message. >> >> lua script: >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16637 >> >> phrase xml: >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16636 >> >> Log: >> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/16635 >> >> Could someone try this example on their own system to see if they could >> duplicate the behavior? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> >> On 6/30/2011 10:10 AM, Wes wrote: >>> I am experiencing a delay waiting for the system to respond in a lua >>> script that is using playAndGetDigits. I press a key while the voice is >>> still speaking, and it continues to speak for a few seconds before >>> moving to the part of the script for the particular keypress. >>> >>> Also, related: sometimes it speaks the "invalid" message even though the >>> key pressed is a valid one, and then immediately after speaking the >>> invalid message, it continues with the processing for the key that was >>> pressed. So I know I didn't press an invalid key. >>> >>> -- session:execute('flush_dtmf'); >>> session:flushDigits() >>> local digits = session:playAndGetDigits(1, 1, 3, 2000, "#", >>> "phrase:play_submit_rerecord:1:2:3", invalid, "\\d{1}") >>> if ( digits == "1") then >>> >>> ETC >>> >>> here is the phrase: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> data="To listen to your dictation, press $1, To submit >>> your dictation , press $2, To discard your dictation and start over, >>> press $3."/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Is the speak-text just too cpu intensive and causing it to be slow to >>> respond to the DTMF? >>> >>> Any help would be appreciated... thanks! >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >>> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >>> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago >> http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > From jmoran at secureachsystems.com Thu Jun 30 23:09:56 2011 From: jmoran at secureachsystems.com (Jason Moran) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] UniMRCP Server as daemon won't connect RTSP References: <361E98F99D3CC3439EED59BC1924ED6950815F@SERVER2003.SecuReachSystems.local> Message-ID: <361E98F99D3CC3439EED59BC1924ED695081F7@SERVER2003.SecuReachSystems.local> I have a solution to the unimrcpserver daemon mode! strace helped me narrow it down (also turning on unimrcp?s logger.xml settings to full DEBUG). Final solution was to execute with: ./unimrcpserver ?r /usr/local/unimrcp/ -d Why? I noticed that unimrcpserver failed whenever I started it from elsewhere when using the full path (/usr/local/unimrcp/bin/unimrcpserver ). It couldn?t find various relative config files. So I downloaded the unimrcp source to see where it was looking (?../?). It turns out there is a startup switch called ?r which allows you to put the full path to the default starting directory. It always worked in SSH because I was always starting it from in the bin directory with ./unimrcpserver. The ?../? that it defaults with found the correct directories. However, by starting it in daemon mode it was not able to reach the same directory structure from the same starting point. The fully qualified path made it work. -Jason Moran From: Steven Ayre [mailto:steveayre at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 2:47 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] UniMRCP Server as daemon won't connect RTSP Have you tried doing a strace or gcore of it when it's running with --daemon? If it's running but not listening/responding it could be sonething like a locking problem. Tracing might show you what it is (or isnt) doing. Pid file could be one culprit. Steve on iPhone On 27 Jun 2011, at 22:52, "Jason Moran" wrote: I?ve been playing around with IVONA?s new unimrcp plugin with unimrcp 1.0.0 (r1725) on OpenSuse 11.4 Anyway, when I start it up with the following, it stays in the foreground of my SSH w/ the following command: ./unimrcpserver That works! However, since it?s in the foreground when I close the SSH window, it kills the process. If I use the so-called daemon mode (-d or --daemon) it says it is going into daemon mode, but FS will immediately return that it ?Failed to Connect to RTSP Server...? at the IP:port I specified. The unimrcpserver process is running, but doesn?t seem to respond to anything. ./unimrcpserver ?d ./unimrcpserver --daemon If I attempt to background it by either using ?&? or ctrl-z it says [1]+ Stopped ./unimrcpserver and FS will successfully make the RTSP connection but then nothing will happen. Mod_unimrcp will spit out a warning about ?MRCP session has not opened after 5000 ms? ./unimrcpserver & Those are hard to kill. But when I kill -9 it then FS will finally remove the MRCP handle and tell me that it couldn?t allocate the speech engine. Lastly, I can nohup it, but then unimrcpserver eats up 95%+ of the CPU (instead of 1-3% as it does when I have it in the foreground), which it does not do when it runs in any other modes. It also makes a very, very large nohup.out file that keeps on growing. Even if I tell it to not log. nohup ./unimrcpserver & nohup ./unimrcpserver ?o 0 & Ideas?? Thanks, Jason Moran _______________________________________________ Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/6091a423/attachment.html From avi at avimarcus.net Thu Jun 30 23:19:39 2011 From: avi at avimarcus.net (Avi Marcus) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:19:39 +0300 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ESL Send MESSAGE_WAITING Error - Cannot find profile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Anthony, FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-3e6cca9 2011-06-28 10-27-00 -0700) It still produces an error: "sofia_presence.c:432 Cannot find profile 20064.domain.com" -Avi On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > > can you try this on latest too? > The line numbers suggest an older build. > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Avi Marcus wrote: > > I'm trying to send a?MESSAGE_WAITING via ESL on multi-tenant, but I'm > > getting this error: > > 2011-06-27 10:46:25.443081 [ERR] sofia_presence.c:405 Cannot find > > profile?20064.domain.com] > > the cli lists the domain as an alias to the internal profile. > > what should I do? > > I am writing some test code in order to try to send MWI events using the ESL > > Manager code DLL. Here is my test code: > > > > > > > > static void InboundMode2(Object stateInfo) > > > > ??? { > > > > ??????? //Initializes a new instance of ESLconnection, and connects to the > > host $host on the port $port, and supplies $password to freeswitch > > > > ??????? ESLconnection eslConnection = new ESLconnection(myinfo); > > > > > > > > ??????? if (eslConnection.Connected() != ESL_SUCCESS) > > > > ??????? { > > > > ??????????? Console.WriteLine("Error connecting to FreeSwitch"); > > > > ??????????? return; > > > > ??????? } > > > > > > > > ??????? //Set log level > > > > ??????? //ESL.eslSetLogLevel((int)enLogLevel.DEBUG); > > > > > > > > ??????? eslConnection.Api("reloadxml", string.Empty); > > > > > > > > ??????? // Subscribe to all events > > > > ????????ESLevent eslEvent2 = eslConnection.SendRecv("event plain ALL"); > > > > > > > > ??????? if (eslEvent2 == null) > > > > ??????? { > > > > ??????????? Console.WriteLine("Error subscribing to all events"); > > > > ??????????? return; > > > > ??????? } > > > > ??????? ESLevent eslEvent = new ESLevent("MESSAGE_WAITING", null); > > > > ??????? eslEvent.AddHeader("MWI-Messages-Waiting", "yes"); > > > > ??????? eslEvent.AddHeader("MWI-Message-Account", "103 at 20064.domain.com"); > > > > ???? ???eslEvent.AddHeader("MWI-Voice-Message", "1/1 (1/1)"); > > > > > > > > ??????? eslEvent = eslConnection.SendEvent(eslEvent); > > > > ??????? if (eslEvent == null) > > > > ??????? { > > > > ??????????? Console.WriteLine("event error"); > > > > ??????????? return; > > > > ??????? } > > > > > > > > ??????? //Turns an event into colon-separated 'name: value' pairs. The > > format parameter isn't used > > > > ??????? Console.WriteLine(eslEvent.Serialize(String.Empty)); > > > > > > > > ??????? // Grab Events until process is killed > > > > ??????? while (eslConnection.Connected() == ESL_SUCCESS) > > > > ??????? { > > > > ??????????? eslEvent = eslConnection.RecvEvent(); > > > > ??????????? Console.WriteLine(eslEvent.Serialize(String.Empty)); > > > > ??????? } > > > > ??? } > > > > > > > > When I send the event, I am getting a debug message from FS as follows: > > > > > > > > 2011-06-27 10:46:25.443081 [ERR] sofia_presence.c:405 Cannot find profile > > 20064.domain.com] > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Avi > > From spencer at 5ninesolutions.com Thu Jun 30 23:25:50 2011 From: spencer at 5ninesolutions.com (Spencer Thomason) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:25:50 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] t38-passthru sofia param In-Reply-To: <724715C2-4970-4594-9346-167EA8B89C0F@5ninesolutions.com> References: <724715C2-4970-4594-9346-167EA8B89C0F@5ninesolutions.com> Message-ID: Just a quick follow up. The fact that the reINVITE wasn't being passed correctly across the bridge was pilot error.. I had enable-soa=false on the profile. I am however a little confused as when to use the t38-passthru parameter. Is it needed even when doing bypass media or proxy media? On Jun 30, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Spencer Thomason wrote: > Hello all, > I have a few questions regarding the t38-passthru sofia param. One of the ways we are using FreeSWITCH is as a simple B2BUA in our SBCs. The topology looks like this: > > Freeswitch > /\ \/ > FS and Asterisk boxen -> OpenSIPS -> PSTN > > The Freeswitch instance is setup with inbound late negotiation and bypass media = true and the dialplan consists of a very simple bridge statement that sends a call back to the proxy. > > The problem is that when someone sends a fax and the GW send a t.38 reINVITE, Freeswitch is sending the original SDP (PCMU in this case) back to Leg A and the fax then fails using PCMU. Is this parameter needed when bypass media is already enabled? > > Thanks, > Spencer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > From sharad2710 at hotmail.com Thu Jun 30 08:35:57 2011 From: sharad2710 at hotmail.com (sharad garg) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:05:57 +0530 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject) Message-ID: Hi to all, This is just let to know this forum that we have completed the work on Alarm Service. All this is done using our great Freeswitch only. The GUI also is designed for the same. You can have a view at the attached PPT for the details. Thanks to Freeswitch developers & community off course who helped us in this project directly or indirectly. Regards Sharad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/52bdeafe/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Alarm Service.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 1431552 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/52bdeafe/attachment-0001.ppt From rzhang at gosilverplus.com Thu Jun 30 21:59:31 2011 From: rzhang at gosilverplus.com (ran zhang) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:59:31 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] please help!!! how to set flag 'endconf' in bridging conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E0CB983.8060407@gosilverplus.com> hi all: I'm trying to creating a conference, so when first member enters the conference, he has to invite another members and have at least 1 other member to join to have the conference established, so i'm using bridging conference. I need this conference to be terminated when the original creator of the conference leaves no matter how many members are still left in the conference. i'm trying to set 'endconf' flag in a bridging conference using 'bridge:confname+flag{endconf}:user/10', so it wil invite user extension 10, but its giving me config error while running. can someone tell me what to do to solve this problem or get around? the key is i only want the original member to be able to terminate the conference when he leaves, not other members assuming there are at least 2 members. From netcentrica at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 12:54:51 2011 From: netcentrica at gmail.com (Mateusz Bartczak) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:54:51 +0200 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch dynamic routing of all calls Message-ID: Hi all I'm new to FS and I would like to know is it possible to implement following scenario: 1. User dials number 2. Routing script detects outgoing call event. Every call needs to be handled by routing script. 3. Routing script takes in input: user name, domain, dialed number. Than it query database to find best SIP trunk to route the call, it also checks destination price per minute and calculates maximum call time for prepaid user. 4. Routing script output is: SIP trunk to use, SIP call parameters (ie. callerid), maximum call duration 5. FS read output from routing script and make call using returned parameters Preferred routing implementation technology: background running unix deamon written in Java or PHP. Connection with FS via socket. Event routing script will be multi-threaded, must be able to deal with a lot of calls in parallel and processing of one call should not block processing of other calls (I have this problem with Yate voip server, and that's really big problem) Is it possible to do this using FS? Any advices where to search for additional info? I know that there is event handler but can it return "dialstring" for outgoing call events? Some code examples? I will really appreciate your help -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110630/2a8e402e/attachment.html From rzhang at gosilverplus.com Thu Jun 30 23:02:11 2011 From: rzhang at gosilverplus.com (ran zhang) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:02:11 -0700 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to send text messages between sip phones via freeswitch In-Reply-To: <4E0CC48F.6060703@499x.com> References: <4E0C91EF.3090200@499x.com> <4E0CC48F.6060703@499x.com> Message-ID: <4E0CC833.6050005@gosilverplus.com> can someone tell me if it is is possible to send text messages between sip phones via freeswitch? From kris at kriskinc.com Thu Jun 30 23:59:14 2011 From: kris at kriskinc.com (Kristian Kielhofner) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Freeswitch-users] how to send text messages between sip phones via freeswitch In-Reply-To: <4E0CC833.6050005@gosilverplus.com> References: <4E0C91EF.3090200@499x.com> <4E0CC48F.6060703@499x.com> <4E0CC833.6050005@gosilverplus.com> Message-ID: FreeSWITCH supports MESSAGE if that's what you're asking. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:02 PM, ran zhang wrote: > can someone tell me if it is is possible to ?send text messages between > sip phones via freeswitch? > > _______________________________________________ > Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago > http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Kristian Kielhofner