[Freeswitch-users] Question aboutCPU usage.
Anthony Minessale
anthony.minessale at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 22:13:21 MSK 2011
Yes, G729 is a CPU hog, especially the illegal one you are testing with.
The commercial one that you can purchase from
http://www.freeswitch.org probably will do slightly better but you
will always get much less milage out of cpu intensive codecs.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Ricardo Martinez
<rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have the opportunity to use an even more powerful server. I have just
> installed CentOS 5.5 64 bit, and compile freeswitch with 64 bits.
>
> This is the output with 100 simm calls using transcoding from G711 to G729
>
>
>
> top - 16:57:56 up 6:04, 2 users, load average: 11.60, 12.49, 12.58
>
> Tasks: 168 total, 1 running, 167 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
>
> Cpu0 : 35.4%us, 0.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 63.6%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.1%si,
> 0.0%st
>
> Cpu1 : 34.9%us, 0.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 58.8%id, 4.9%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.7%si,
> 0.0%st
>
> Cpu2 : 34.9%us, 0.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 59.6%id, 4.1%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.7%si,
> 0.0%st
>
> Cpu3 : 35.0%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 62.0%id, 1.8%wa, 0.2%hi, 0.3%si,
> 0.0%st
>
> Cpu4 : 35.8%us, 1.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 62.5%id, 0.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.1%si,
> 0.0%st
>
> Cpu5 : 35.6%us, 1.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 60.1%id, 1.8%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.8%si,
> 0.0%st
>
> Cpu6 : 35.8%us, 1.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 59.9%id, 1.5%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.8%si,
> 0.0%st
>
> Cpu7 : 36.5%us, 2.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 60.6%id, 0.7%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si,
> 0.0%st
>
> Mem: 8165808k total, 1208292k used, 6957516k free, 150228k buffers
>
> Swap: 10223608k total, 0k used, 10223608k free, 772980k cached
>
>
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
> COMMAND
>
> 5265 root 18 0 541m 79m 5796 S 469.5 1.0 1077:32
> freeswitch
>
> 1 root 15 0 10348 684 572 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.24
> init
>
> 2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00
> migration/0
>
> 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00
> ksoftirqd/0
>
> 4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00
> watchdog/0
>
> 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00
> migration/1
>
> 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00
>
>
>
> Is normal the load average?
>
>
>
> This is the output with uname –a
>
>
>
> [root at siptrcrv2 snmp]# uname -a
>
> Linux siptrcrv2 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Fri Apr 2 14:58:14 EDT 2010 x86_64
> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ricardo.-
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> De: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] En nombre de Brian
> West
> Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de enero de 2011 16:22
> Para: FreeSWITCH Users Help
>
> Asunto: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Question aboutCPU usage.
>
>
>
> Chances are if you would install a 64bit OS on that there NICE 64bit CPU it
> would work much better.
>
>
>
> /b
>
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Ricardo Martinez wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello.
>
>
>
> [root at ser-ng bin]# uname -a
>
> Linux 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686.PAE #1 SMP Fri Jun 11 09:42:24 UTC 2010 i686
> i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
>
>
> Ricardo.-
>
>
>
> De: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] En
> nombre de Brian West
> Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de enero de 2011 15:41
> Para: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Asunto: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Question aboutCPU usage.
>
>
>
> Depend what does uname -a say?
>
>
>
> /b
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:+19193869900
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list