[Freeswitch-users] Sharing storage between servers

broken dash brokendash at gmail.com
Mon Jan 17 16:51:43 MSK 2011


What are you using for your NFS HA setup? I have previously used
Openfiler to get the job done a few years back but always ran into
problems whenever I hit about 15ish clients attached.  :-)  Have you
ever messed around with iSCSI & Multipath IO?

Cheers,
B

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Bernhard Suttner
<bernhard.suttner at winet.ch> wrote:
> I had the same problem and did store the voicemail stuff on a NFS share. The NFS server does run on a heartbeat/drbd server. All the FreeSWITCH server does mount the high-available NFS share through the high-available IP address. Works very good - also in failover of the NFS Server.
>
> BR,
> Bernhard
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] Im Auftrag von broken dash
> Gesendet: Montag, 17. Januar 2011 08:25
> An: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sharing storage between servers
>
> Your question is also incredibly complex depending on the methods you
> could use as well. Storing the audio files within the mysql database
> would be REALLY slow... :-)
>
> I remember seeing a bounty for some type of Voicemail/IMAP integration
> but I'm not sure if anyone has furthered it. that would be a neat way
> to handle things since you could use an existing IMAP mail server
> setup, or build one and scale/cluster however you wish an basically
> use the IMAP mail system as the storage medium for your users voice
> mail. So the Voicemail's would also be email's and one could use the
> IMAP client on their desktop to also manage their messages. :-)
>
> Also could be done using webdav/fuse etc..
>
> One could also use multiple icecast servers spread around and have
> liquidsoap sit in front of them so that when you go to record the
> message it hits liquidsoap locally where its configured to feed the
> single message out to multiple shoutcast servers spread around the
> globe in different data centers or something.
>
> This one is deff worth checking into tho....
>
> http://www.automatthew.com/2007/12/amazon-simpledb-and-couchdb-compared.html
>
>
> Late 2 cents...
> Cheers,
> B
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Brett Woollum <brett at woollum.com> wrote:
>> Is there a way to store voicemail to a MySQL cluster like Asterisk does?
>> This is one of the issues I have been trying to find an answer for, but I
>> haven't been able to. It would be great if there were a LUA/Javascript
>> command that would stream audio to the call directly from the database, or
>> the other way around. This would be useful for voicemail recordings, IVR
>> prompts, etc, when running several clustered FS servers. I have a MySQL
>> Cluster spread across each of my FS servers that should be able to handle
>> the additional load. Using MySQL cluster as an on-demand audio storage
>> system would make access to the audio files fault-tolerant and distributed
>> (even to other servers such as a web server for web voicemail playback).
>>
>> Any ideas on how this could be achieved?
>>
>> Brett Woollum
>> Brett at Woollum.com
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Yehavi Bourvine" <yehavi.bourvine at gmail.com>
>> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 12:49:51 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sharing storage between servers
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>   We use a NAS server to share the voicemail between two servers (one is FS,
>> the other is WEB interface we wrote to handle  voicemail via WEB).
>>   For the database: we use MySQL with replication.
>>
>>                           Regards, __Yehavi:
>>
>> 2010/10/9 Jody Rudolph <jody.rudolph at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I am curious as to just how far you can take sharing disk storage for the
>>> purpose of clustering. Is anyone doing this with the voicemail storage
>>> directories? Is it possible to share the SQLite internal databases to avoid
>>> resorting to ODBC? I realize that isn't likely, but I have access to some
>>> high performance SAN hardware and want to take the most advantage possible.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jody Rudolph
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing
>> list FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list