[Freeswitch-users] conferencing

[Sam]

calls would not be TDM it would be ip-ip calls.
Ok G711 uses less CPU than other codecs,how can i utilized multiple
threading/profiles or any other options to scale ? as it would be an
incoming call always on FS.

Regds
Sam

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:

> That will still involve transcoding. FS must combine all speaking
> channels into a single stream that can be sent to the conference
> members. That can't be done in a compressed audio format, so it must
> convert G711 to L16 for each speaking member, combine those pieces of
> audio, then convert L16 back to G711 to send to the conference
> members. Additionally, since the conference members are not
> necessarily all using the same codec that last transcoding step will
> occur once for each member, not just once for the conference. Your
> best bet is to use a codec that uses as little CPU for transcoding as
> possible - in software I'm not sure which is best there (G711 is
> simple so possibly a good choice), in hardware Sangoma D100/D500 would
> almost all the processing off the CPU.
>
> -Steve
>
>
> On 4 January 2011 10:15, Sam <u2nsam at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ok if i remove transcoding out of the picture and all conf are running on
> > g711, what rest would matters ?
> >
> >
> > Regds
> > Sam
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Avi Marcus <Avi at amarcus.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> It's the transcoding that will kill you. If that's truly needed, you may
> >> want to look into multiple machines handling transcoding and then
> bridging
> >> into the conference, or the new transcoding hardware from sangoma.
> >> -Avi
> >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Sam <u2nsam at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> hello,
> >>>
> >>> how to increase the scalability / performance of the conference .
> >>>
> >>> Are there any parameters to be observed that could do a trick ?
> >>>
> >>> The scenario would be multiple conferencing bridges and multiple codecs
> >>> involved.
> >>>
> >>> Is is possible to multiple threading of profiles for conferences so
> that
> >>> it gets the scalability ?
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Sam
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> >>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE:
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> >> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110104/060ac706/attachment.html