[Freeswitch-users] INVITE DoS Prevention
Jay Binks
jaybinks at gmail.com
Mon Feb 21 13:24:05 MSK 2011
Auth failure has been working fine for me I the last 2 weeks. What makes you this it's not been working ??
On 21/02/2011, at 7:31 PM, covici at ccs.covici.com wrote:
> I would change sip auth failure to challenge and then have sufficient
> times to only block if there are too many challenges in a certain time.
> I am not even sure the failure works any more in recent gits.
>
> Spencer Thomason <spencer at 5ninesolutions.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that works great if they respond to the challenge with a failed
>> auth. But the scenario I'm trying to prevent is if they just send the
>> INVITE and never respond to the challenge. Fail2Ban will not work as
>> every endpoint will initially send an INVITE and receive a challenge.
>> Legit calls will then respond correctly and not be logged as a SIP
>> auth failure but every call that is challenged will show up as SIP
>> auth challenge in the logs so there is no regex to differentiate
>> between legit an non legit traffic.
>>
>> Spencer
>>
>> On Feb 20, 2011, at 10:39 PM, Ken Rice wrote:
>>
>>> Fail2Ban ... This is block an IP with too many failed attempts from
>>> something like SipVicious pretty quickly
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/20/11 11:07 PM, "Spencer Thomason" <spencer at 5ninesolutions.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> We run hosted Freeswitch instances in VMs with the internal profile
>>>> on
>>>> port 5060 connecting to clients mostly behind NAT and then the
>>>> external profile connecting to our proxies only. Protecting the
>>>> external profile its straightforward.. we only allow traffic to/from
>>>> our proxies at the firewall level. But protecting the internal
>>>> profile seems to be a bit more difficult because the UACs could be
>>>> theoretically anywhere on the network.
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently using Fail2Ban to prevent brute force registration and
>>>> INVITEs on auth failures, e.g.:
>>>> failregex = \[WARNING\] sofia_reg.c:\d+ SIP auth failure \(REGISTER\)
>>>> on sofia profile \'\w+\' for \[.*\] from ip <HOST>
>>>> \[WARNING\] sofia_reg.c:\d+ SIP auth failure \(INVITE\)
>>>> on sofia profile \'\w+\' for \[.*\] from ip <HOST>
>>>>
>>>> My question is, since its part of a normal SIP dialog to challenge
>>>> the
>>>> INVITE, is there any way to prevent a possible DoS from just sheer
>>>> volume of incoming INVITEs on an Internet facing server
>>>> automatically. I.e., If you block the logged challenge, you'd block
>>>> all legitimate INVITEs and registrations. Since its UDP traffic I
>>>> couldn't come up with a way to do it automatically at the iptables
>>>> level. i.e. number of concurrent connections. Is there some option
>>>> to
>>>> just not respond if a client is sending a number of requests over a
>>>> certain threshold? It might not stop them from sending the traffic
>>>> but pretty soon they'd get the idea that it wasn't going to go
>>>> anywhere. My concern is say there are 50 Freeswitch instances on a
>>>> box (albeit 8 core, 32GB ram, 8 15K raid 10 storage) and someone
>>>> starts sending thousands of rouge INVITEs to every VM on a physical
>>>> box that the CPU load from just challenging the incoming INVITEs
>>>> would
>>>> create a DoS. We the logs regularly to try to catch people doing
>>>> this
>>>> sort of thing and drop them at a router upstream of the core network,
>>>> but I'd like to have it happen without human intervention. Have I
>>>> completely over thought this and am missing something obvious?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Spencer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
> --
> Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
> How do
> you spend it?
>
> John Covici
> covici at ccs.covici.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list