[Freeswitch-users] NAT issue
Aloysius Lloyd
lloyd.aloysius at sunteltech.ca
Sat Feb 19 04:28:46 MSK 2011
May be the Two phones using different firmware.
Try the following parameter in the extension
<param name="sip-force-contact" value="NDLB-connectile-dysfunction"/>
Thanks
Lloyd
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Spencer Thomason <
spencer at 5ninesolutions.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I'm having a strange NAT problem. My Freeswitch server has a public
> ip and the endpoints which are Polycom IP 650s are all behind NAT with
> mainly Netgear SRX 5308 routers at multiple locations. The server is
> on a public class C network and one of the locations has its router on
> the same class C. I.e x.x.x.7/24-router, x.x.x.240/24-server. I'm
> only experiencing this with 2 of about 30 extensions. The first
> endpoint to register from this location gets detected as NAT but the
> others with the ports remapped do not. This maybe explains it better:
>
> Call-ID: 4feea796-bd96e2ed-e16d27ac at 10.6.71.103
> User: 1103 at x.x.x.240
> Contact: "user" <sip:1103 at 10.6.71.103;received=x.x.x.
> 7:5060;fs_nat=yes;fs_path=sip%3A1103%40x.x.x.7%3A5060>
> Agent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_650-UA/3.3.1.0769
> Status: Registered(UDP-NAT)(unknown) EXP(2011-02-18 11:15:47)
> EXPSECS(1143)
> Host: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> IP: x.x.x.7
> Port: 5060
> Auth-User: 1103
> Auth-Realm: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> MWI-Account: 1103 at x.x.x.x
>
> Call-ID: d21b71b2-75baa80d-768c0b08 at 10.6.71.104
> User: 1101 at x.x.x.240
> Contact: "user" <sip:1101 at 10.6.71.104>
> Agent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_650-UA/3.3.1.0769
> Status: Registered(UDP)(unknown) EXP(2011-02-18 11:16:48)
> EXPSECS(1204)
> Host: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> IP: x.x.x.7
> Port: 1036
> Auth-User: 1101
> Auth-Realm: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> MWI-Account: 1101 at x.x.x.x
>
> Call-ID: a74e61a6-1863ea7d-789686c4 at 10.6.71.105
> User: 1102 at x.x.x.240
> Contact: "user" <sip:1102 at 10.6.71.105>
> Agent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_650-UA/3.3.1.0769
> Status: Registered(UDP)(unknown) EXP(2011-02-18 11:17:23)
> EXPSECS(1239)
> Host: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> IP: x.x.x.7
> Port: 1036
> Auth-User: 1102
> Auth-Realm: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> MWI-Account: 1102 at x.x.x.x
>
> Call-ID: 100b5148-6a47060a-13c4-50029-c844-22fc4dd3-c844
> User: 1801 at 97.67.110.240
> Contact: "user" <sip:1801 at 10.6.71.106:5060>
> Agent: MP201 B 1FXS/3.0.1_build_19
> Status: Registered(UDP)(unknown) EXP(2011-02-18 11:26:23)
> EXPSECS(1779)
> Host: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> IP: 97.67.110.7
> Port: 1036
> Auth-User: 1801
> Auth-Realm: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> MWI-Account: 1801 at x.x.x.x
>
> ------- Another Location ----
>
> Call-ID: dca2a276-4eb94f97-c55177b0 at 10.1.10.186
> User: 4204 at x.x.x.240
> Contact: "user" <sip:4204 at 10.1.10.186;received=x.x.x.x:
> 5060;fs_nat=yes;fs_path=sip%3A4204%40x.x.x.x%3A5060>
> Agent: PolycomSoundStationIP-SSIP_5000-UA/3.3.1.0769
> Status: Registered(UDP-NAT)(unknown) EXP(2011-02-18 11:28:04)
> EXPSECS(1880)
> Host: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> IP: x.x.x.x
> Port: 5060
> Auth-User: 4204
> Auth-Realm: pbx10.5ninesolutions.com
> MWI-Account: 4204 at x.x.x.x
>
> The port and IP are detected correctly but the contact is a private
> IP. Any clue as to why the two extension 1101 and 1102 are any
> different?
>
> Thanks,
> Spencer
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110218/1fa7ae78/attachment.html
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list