[Freeswitch-users] Gateway with no registration

[Brian West]

Then make sure register is set to false on the gateawy.

/b

On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Cliff Wells wrote:

> I'd like to setup a gateway with no registration (other end allows by
> IP).
> 
> <include>
>  <gateway name="outbound">
>    <param name="username" value="none"/>
>    <param name="password" value="none"/>
>    <param name="proxy" value="x.x.x.x"/>
>    <param name="register-transport" value="udp"/>
>    <param name="retry-seconds" value="30"/>
>    <param name="caller-id-in-from" value="true"/>
>  </gateway>
> </include>
> 
> As I understand it, the username and password shouldn't matter since
> registration is challenge/auth.
> 
> What happens is I get a 403 when FreeSWITCH attempts to register (before
> any calls are placed), so FreeSWITCH has the gateway marked as
> FAIL_WAIT.   Is this proof the other end is requiring registration?  Or
> is FS expecting a challenge, getting none and marking the gateway down?
> 
> Most of the solutions I've seen for this type of setup involve using a
> dialplan rather than a gateway, but my dialplans are served via
> mod_xml_curl and expect a functional gateway named "outbound" on the FS
> box.   I'd rather not clutter up the xml dialplans with a bunch of
> special cases, so a named gateway is preferred.
> 
> The problem certainly may lie on the other end (I don't have control of
> that system), but I'm not sure how to verify that.
> 
> Regards,
> Cliff
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org