[Freeswitch-users] Route incoming analog calls.
covici at ccs.covici.com
covici at ccs.covici.com
Wed Feb 2 15:08:15 MSK 2011
I used channel_name like this <condition field="${Channel_Name}"
expression="^FreeTDM/1:1/$"> and that has been working -- freetdm is
not working well, but that is another story.
Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:
> Try this:
>
> <extension name="analog test2" continue="true">
> <condition field="source" expression="mod_freetdm">
> <action application="info"/>
> </condition>
> </extension>
>
> That'll dump all the fields and variables set. Are there any that indicate
> the FXO port? If not, perhaps you need to configure something - check the
> card's documentation.
>
> If you find there is a variable containing the port, you can check more than
> one condition. For example:
> <extension name="analog test2" continue="true">
> <condition field="source" expression="mod_freetdm"/>
> <condition field="${sangoma_fxo_port_variable_name}" expression="^1$">
> <action application="set" data="domain_name=$${domain}"/>
> <action application="set" data="transfer_ringback=$${us-ring}"/>
> <action application="answer"/>
> <action application="transfer" data="1000 XML default"/>
> </condition>
> </extension>
>
> -Steve
>
>
> On 1 February 2011 16:17, Eric Michel <eric at bmcrministries.org> wrote:
>
> > I've got a Sangoma A200 with six FXO ports and two FXS. I can call out
> > just fine, but I'm having trouble figuring out how to route incoming calls.
> > We've got five POTS lines and all I've been able to do is route all
> > incoming calls to a specific extension. How do I go about routing
> > individual POTS lines to different groups/extensions?
> >
> > <extension name="analog test2" continue="true">
> > <condition field="source" expression="mod_freetdm">
> > <action application="set" data="domain_name=$${domain}"/>
> > <action application="set" data="transfer_ringback=$${us-ring}"/>
> > <action application="answer"/>
> > <action application="transfer" data="1000 XML default"/>
> > </condition>
> > </extension>
> >
> > That is my current conf/public/inbound dial plan. Shouldn't I be able to
> > add a second condition that tests what FXO port is receiving the call and
> > allow me to route it accordingly? If yes, could I get an example? The
> > answer may be really simple, I've just been unable to find it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eric
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Alternatives:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
covici at ccs.covici.com
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list