[Freeswitch-users] Building Freeswitch + FreeTDM + LibSng-ISDN RPMs

[Octavio Ruiz]

I'm trying to build Freeswitch with full Sangoma's ( FreeTDM +
LibSng-ISDN ) support from SRPMs for Centos 5, but there are two not
satisfied dependencies for what looks like non existing RPMs, fact
that raises many questions on my head,

An extract from the freeswitch SPEC file:

-- from freeswitch.spec
Requires: libsng_isdn
BuildRequires: wanpipe
BuildRequires: libsng_isdn

even if looks quite easy to bypass this and get it to compile
satisfying those, either creating the missing libsng_isdn SPEC file
needed for building the package (libsng_isdn is only a bunch of
headers and an already-build shared object) and modifying the
wanpipe.rpmspec in order to change the naming behavior which doesn't
comply with the above (Wanpipe's resulting RPM is named
'wanpipe-<kernel-version>' which do not satisfy the solely string
'wanpipe') or either worst, in terms of cleanliness, creating dummy
RPM packages or removing dependencies on the  freeswitch.spec, I
wonder what is supposed to be the correct environment and proper
procedure for building Freeswitch and Wanrouter + SNG-ISDN following
what the SPEC file states.

-- from wanpipe.rpmspec
%define KERNEL_VERSION    %{?kern_ver}
%define WANPIPE_VER       wanpipe
%define name              %{WANPIPE_VER}

Am I missing something? Has anyone tested this before?  Someone else
is packaging Sangoma's Wanrouter on RPM with other naming scheme?  Are
they on the SPEC file merely to denote upcoming work?