[Freeswitch-users] Codec question: about the G729 codec

[Nyamul Hassan]

Not only that, the naughty codec takes around 7% CPU for a single call,
whereas, the FreeSwitch codec is optimized to handled closer to 1000 calls
on a Quad Core Xeon.

Regards
HASSAN


On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:50, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:

>
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 2:25 AM, joy this wrote:
>
> > Dear all:
> >
> >
> > I have some questions about the G729 codec. I will be appreciated if
> someone could help me.
> >
> > 1. If I want to modify the G729 codec, I must compile the module and
> substitute for the original one. Is it correct?
>
> You can't compile your own as the source code for the g729 module isn't out
> there for you to compile.
>
> > 2. It seems that there is an authentication server for G729. Should I
> need authentication when I use the modified G729 codec?
>
> If you're using a naughty codec you'll be on your own, the official
> FreeSWITCH G729 codec is highly optimized and comes with patent indemnity.
>
> > 3. If I want to add my codec which is not in core, how to do it?
>
> You create a codec module just like any of the other codec examples in
> tree.
>
> Using any other codec other then the official G729 and NOT paying for the
> patent royalties is illegal in just about every country on the planet.
>
> /b
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks for helping.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100924/a701f601/attachment-0001.html