[Freeswitch-users] FS does not honour sip-force-contact. Advice?

[Victor Chukalovskiy]

  Anthony,
Thank you. Disabling timers worked out.
Since session timers is a per-profile setting, what do we loose by 
disabling them?
Thank you,
Victor

On 21/10/10 03:56 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:
> disable session timers on both sides of the call, they are interfering
> with the dialog once it's established.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Victor Chukalovskiy
> <victor.chukalovskiy at utoronto.ca>  wrote:
>> Dear Gurus,
>>
>> We have a user behind NAT.
>> Currently we make him work by using
>>        <variable name="sip-force-contact"
>> value="sip:1234 at 171.134.62.106:5060"/>
>> It works since users IP is static and there is a port forwarding setup for
>> port 5060 on the users side.
>>
>> The problem is that after 15 minutes of a call FreeSWITCH attempts re-INVITE
>> (RFC 4028 I guess) and does not honour port specified above.
>> Instead, it uses some 40,000-ish UDP destination port.  Obviously, this
>> never reaches users phone and FS hangups with "expiry on timer" cause.
>>
>> Is the syntax of sip-force-contact above valid?
>>
>> Is it normal for re-INVITEs no to honour sip-force-contact?
>>
>> I'd try NDLB-tls-connectile-dysfunction but I need clarification:
>> -will it be honoured by re-INVITEs?
>> -will it default to port 5060 or should I specify the port?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Victor
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
>