[Freeswitch-users] Questions on Building an application for FreeSWITCH

[Kristian Kielhofner]

ESL connecting to a socket actually proves to be more scalable and
more available with fewer components.  Why not have N servers running
your socket app with N servers running FreeSWITCH?

OpenSIPS introduces its own issues with failover and I've yet to see
DNS SRV be the reliability/scalability solution it's made out to be.

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Phillip Jones <pjintheusa at gmail.com> wrote:
> And just a general thought of using ESL vs an in process solution like
> mod_managed, or LUA.
>
> My understanding is, that using a separate server/process does potentially
> give you another point of failure and, if you use a single ESL server
> application to control several FS boxes, potentially a single point of
> failure. It is fairly easy to build a scalable and reliable FS cluster and
> using DNS SRV and OpenSIPS in order to avoid any single points of failure.
> Having independent FS boxes that pull data, but can fail with little impact
> seems attractive to me,

-- 
Kristian Kielhofner
http://www.astlinux.org
http://blog.krisk.org
http://www.star2star.com
http://www.submityoursip.com
http://www.voalte.com