[Freeswitch-users] Mod_limit questions

[ivdreg ivdreg]

Thanks again Rupa,

Is it possible to have more than one limit per call ? I have an issue in
this case with calls per period limiting.

This is part of my dial-plan before bridge:

<action application="limit_hash" data="caller ${destination_number} 5
!INCOMING_CALL_BARRED" />
<action application="limit_hash" data="crcd_${destination_number}
${caller_id_number} 2 !OUTGOING_CALL_BARRED" />
<action application="limit_hash" data="cr_${sip_h_X-SRC-Oper}
${caller_id_number} 20/86400 !OUTGOING_CALL_BARRED" />

These are vars for 3 calls (not more than 10 sec between them):

variable_limit_usage_caller_111111111111: [1]
variable_limit_rate_caller_111111111111: [0]
variable_limit_usage_crcd_111111111111_99999999999: [1]
variable_limit_rate_crcd_111111111111_99999999999: [0]
variable_limit_usage: [1]
variable_limit_usage_cr_TEST_99999999999: [1]
variable_limit_rate: [1]
variable_limit_rate_cr_TEST_99999999999: [1]
--
variable_limit_usage_caller_111111111111: [1]
variable_limit_rate_caller_111111111111: [0]
variable_limit_usage_crcd_111111111111_99999999999: [1]
variable_limit_rate_crcd_111111111111_99999999999: [0]
variable_limit_usage: [1]
variable_limit_usage_cr_TEST_99999999999: [1]
variable_limit_rate: [1]
variable_limit_rate_cr_TEST_99999999999: [1]
--
variable_limit_usage_caller_111111111111: [1]
variable_limit_rate_caller_111111111111: [0]
variable_limit_usage_crcd_111111111111_99999999999: [1]
variable_limit_rate_crcd_111111111111_99999999999: [0]
variable_limit_usage: [1]
variable_limit_usage_cr_TEST_99999999999: [1]
variable_limit_rate: [1]
variable_limit_rate_cr_TEST_99999999999: [1]

I think that "variable_limit_usage_cr_TEST_99999999999" must be 3 in this
case. Is it true ? Does limit_usage and limit_rate that have no realm need
to exist also ?

Thanks

2010/3/16 Rupa Schomaker <rupa at rupa.com>

> limit and limit_hash should work the same with regards to disconnect cause.
>  If you see a difference, let me know.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, ivdreg ivdreg <ivdreg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Rupa,
>>
>> This was good clarification. I want to use mod_limit via 4 servers but
>> because traffic is equally balanced between them I will use limit_hash and
>> calculate how many calls every server will serve.
>>
>> One more question ? Is it necessary limit to transfer to limit_exceeded or
>> there is a way to set directly disconnect cause like in limit_hash ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> 2010/3/16 Rupa Schomaker <rupa at rupa.com>
>>
>> 1) limit_hash use an in-memory hash for it's storage. There is nor storing
>>> to a database when using limit_hash.  If you want to use the database, then
>>> use plain limit.
>>>
>>> 2) If you want a max calls in a 24hrs period use you rate with
>>> limit_hash.  This should be about a true max per period, not concurrent.
>>>
>>> limit_hash realm id 50/86400
>>>
>>> should do what you want -- from memory.  double check the wiki/help to
>>> verify syntax.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:20 AM, ivdreg ivdreg <ivdreg at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I have some questions regarding mod_limit.
>>>>
>>>> 1. I'm using 16674 in production but tested and with 17001. I try
>>>> mod_limit with odbc/mysql and sqlite and have same problem: mod_limit using
>>>> limit_hash never tries to write data to SQL. It works (counts sessions) on
>>>> log screen but no data in MySQL/Sqlite. It seems that data is cached but
>>>> cache never flushed to DB. Is anyone has this problem. My limits are:
>>>>
>>>> <action application="limit_hash" data="op_${sip_h_X-SRC-Cust}
>>>> ${destination_number} 5 !INCOMING_CALL_BARRED" />
>>>> <action application="limit_hash" data="in_${sip_h_X-SRC-Cust}
>>>> ${caller_id_number} 10/300 !OUTGOING_CALL_BARRED" />
>>>>
>>>> and they are applied on inbound call profile in same extension.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. I need to implement rule maximum of 50 calls per day/24h from the
>>>> same CLID (A NUMBER) after that calls to be limited. I'm not sure but rule
>>>> in example "Limit calls to 5 calls every 10 minutes" is about concurrent
>>>> call but not calls processed as count. Any idea ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any help
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:
>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Rupa
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Rupa
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100317/93d79a50/attachment-0002.html