[Freeswitch-users] Load balancing solution using pure FreeSWITCH

[Vitalii Colosov]

Using it you still have one point of failure - only one router and it's on
one internet line...

What if one of these things goes down for a period? :-)

I would prefer to have 2 separate servers on 2 different internet lines
(better different providers even).

Thanks,
vIT


2010/3/16 Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga at gmail.com>

>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Vitalii Colosov <vetali100 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Tihomir,
>>            Could you please add more details to the following?
>>
>>            "So, i'd suggest to bring up a LAN_HA and have a floating
>> address between your routing servers.... of course the you should be using
>> ODBC in the core to have registrations on both servers."
>>
>> Do you have any links that describe how to implement this kind of fail
>> over?
>>
>>
> This is the topic for you:
> http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/topologies/
> and this is what i already have implemented:
> http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/topologies/ha-eg.html
>
>
>
>
>> I thought about configuring 2 DNS servers on 2 Routing servers, so if one
>> will go down, traffic will be addressed to another, but at the moment I
>> don't have enough knowledge how to implement this.
>>
>>
> don't like the idea as you are introducing one more point of failure :)
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> vIT
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100316/b0d0b39f/attachment-0005.html