[Freeswitch-users] clustering question

[Madovsky]

also from 2007
http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/sems/fostel_2007_coeffic_sems_load_balancing.pdf
that says SEMS can make round robin and hash load balancing.
I don't talk here about failover since this can be resolved with conventional clustering solution
as hearbeat pacemaker redhat cluster etc... but especially load balancing to increase nujmber
of calls

Regards

F


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Madovsky 
  To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:56 AM
  Subject: Re: clustering question


  what FS team thinks about this SIP clustering architecture ?

  http://blogs.sun.com/kshitiz/entry/converged_load_balancer

  Regards

  F
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Madovsky 
    To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org 
    Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:43 AM
    Subject: clustering question


    Hi,

    I searched some articles of FS in a cluster environment
    but there are some unclear writes :

    in http://www.technoclicks.com/article-2545.php from 2006 it says

    "Minessale says FreeSwitch won't be bounded by those same problems. The software is designed to run on a cluster of an unlimited number of servers though realistically that will be gated by the capacity of the network. Early tests on a single server showed simultaneous calls on a Pentium server running at . GHz. The server completed calls per second with bursts to calls per second."

    and this thread from 2008
    http://www.mail-archive.com/freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org/msg05258.html
    that describes contradiction of how to manage clustering.

    so is FS really be built as cluster to expand call capacity ? or is it be clustered by the fact that only serveral FS share a DB ?

    Regards

    F
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100302/77454609/attachment-0002.html