[Freeswitch-users] Two bridged FreeSWITCH servers - both in bypass_media mode - possible?

[David Ponzone]

No, it's a B2BUA, with an embedded RTP Proxy.
FS can't be a SIP Proxy.

David Ponzone  Direction Technique
email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr
tel:      01 74 03 18 97
gsm:   06 66 98 76 34

Service Client IPeva
tel:      0811 46 26 26
www.ipeva.fr  -   www.ipeva-studio.com

Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis  
à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou  
diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est  
susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre  
de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes  
pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et  
d'avertir l'expéditeur.




Le 14/06/2010 à 17:39, Vitalii Colosov a écrit :

> Thank you!
>
> Can I name the FreeSWITCH as a powerful B2BUA that contains all SIP  
> Proxy functionality?
>
> Vitalie
>
>
> 2010/6/14 Kristian Kielhofner <kris at kriskinc.com>
> Vitali,
>
>  You can call anything whatever you want.  However, the purpose of
> any language is to effectively communicate meaning to others.  Calling
> FreeSWITCH a "SIP Proxy" in SIP circles (with SIP people) will only
> confuse them and make you seem ignorant.
>
>  When discussing SIP signaling a "proxy" looks very distinct.  They
> basically slap on a Record-Route/Route/Via header and forward the
> message.  FreeSWITCH builds a completely new and separate call leg
> with rewritten headers for each call leaving the system.  This makes
> it a B2BUA.
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Vitalii Colosov  
> <vetali100 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> > I did not find the mandatory requirement for the proxy server to  
> proxy also
> > media:
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt
> > Proxy, Proxy Server: An intermediary entity that acts as both a
> >          server and a client for the purpose of making requests on
> >          behalf of other clients.  A proxy server primarily plays  
> the
> >          role of routing, which means its job is to ensure that a
> >          request is sent to another entity "closer" to the targeted
> >          user.  Proxies are also useful for enforcing policy (for
> >          example, making sure a user is allowed to make a call).  A
> >          proxy interprets, and, if necessary, rewrites specific  
> parts of
> >          a request message before forwarding it.
> > So I am still not convinced that I cannot name FreeSWITCH in  
> Bypass Media
> > mode as a PROXY :-)
> > Because it does all the things described:
> > 1.intermediary entity
> > 2.plays the role of routing
> > 3.its job is to ensure that a request is sent to another entity  
> "closer" to
> > the targeted user
> > Please pay attention that nothing is written about media here.
> > Vitalie
> >
>
> --
> Kristian Kielhofner
> http://www.astlinux.org
> http://blog.krisk.org
> http://www.star2star.com
> http://www.submityoursip.com
> http://www.voalte.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100614/720fb1fb/attachment.html