[Freeswitch-users] 100 parallel calls not possible (Performance problems)

[Phillip Jones]

>> The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get the latest
source
code

That would seem like a reasonable thing to do.....

>> In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while calling
parallel
30 number?

In my (limited) experience there are two important things to control:

1) call per second
2) Total number of active sessions

Calls per seconds appears (to me) to have a greater effect on the CPU. So at
1 call per second I would be looking at your CPU utilization and if it is
maxing out then reducing that rate.

My point being here that your box *may* be capable of handling 100 or 1000
sessions, if the cps is lowered.

HTH

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Durmuş Ali Öztürk <ali.stgt at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get the latest
> source
> code?
>
> In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while calling parallel
> 30 number?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5340996.html
> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100727/83ea4a16/attachment-0001.html