[Freeswitch-users] SIP2VXML

Raffaele P. Guidi raffaele.p.guidi at gmail.com
Sun Jul 11 09:14:42 PDT 2010


>> the javascript lib [...] we have does not scale along with FS

I think this is a really good one http://code.google.com/p/v8/

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Anthony Minessale <
anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote:

> Our xml parser is very low on memory because its a small barebones lib
> based on c pointer black magic that we came across. Scary to look at but
> fast and low in memory usage.
>
> Our onboard asr and tts is only as bad in resource consumption as the
> engine you choose, but we do have mrcp.
>
> The big one, as you have already identified, is the javascript lib.  The
> one we have does not scale along with FS for sure.  However, that is when
> using the js context to run the whole call.  Maybe in the case of vxml it
> would be a different model?  Lua has shown the best parallel scalibility of
> all the embedded languages because its small and runs a separate interpreter
> for each instance.  If we found a js implementation that works in a similar
> way it might scale.
>
> On Jul 10, 2010 7:56 AM, "Jan Berger" <jan.berger at video24.no> wrote:
>
>
>
> I don’t use OpenVXI for reasons like – dead project, performance,
> reliability, non-scaling architecture, wrong dependencies – and so on. We
> have a target of 20,000 sessions on my laptop alone – and I have already
> secured that and more. We can do more, but we start running out of memory.
> What I expect out of FreeSWITCH/CCXML/VXML is that we can scale up as much
> as FreeSWITCH can without CCXML/VXML being the show-stopper.
>
>
>
> Then OpenVXI came out it was adopted by tier1 companies that still use the
> stack today. Some people consider that a reference, but they fail to
> understand that those companies have the strength needed to pick up
> half-done-work and make it right. Though the ones I know of still struggle
> with performance issues.
>
>
>
> <snip>
>
>
>
>
>
> So when it was first invented, people tried to sell the editors for money,
> the only implementation...
>
> </snip>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100711/f42fc059/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list