[Freeswitch-users] Native stacks

[Phone]

I am interested in this discussion of the PRI stack.  We are currently 
using libpri with a Samgoma B601DE.  Things are working fine, except for 
the fact that we are not receiving Caller_ID "Name" on incoming calls.  
In examining traces, it appears that the name comes along milliseconds 
later in a separate facility message, and FS is not picking this up?

I am curious if others using libpri with FS and Sangoma are getting 
Caller-ID "Name" delivery.  Not sure if we are not configured quite 
right, or if there is some other libpri issue with FS.

Jan Berger wrote:
> What E1/T1 hardware are you using?
>
> Libpri is maintained by a larger group. They had started to get QSIG last
> time I checked - they also have basic SS7 for simple ISUP calls in libss7.
> The stack itself is a maintenance problem, but Digium has the strength to
> maintain it - and in the end that is all that matters unless you want to
> maintain things yourself.
>
> Jan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Helmut
> Kuper
> Sent: 9. juli 2010 14:37
> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Native stacks
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> yes, Stefan Knoblich (stkn at freeswitch.org) is working or has worked on a
> new ISDN stack supporting timers for the call states.
>
> I have and using a openzap Q931StateTE stack which is basing on his
> early work. A added and fixed some stuff on it, so that it works quite
> good for basic calls on a Avaya-PRI as well as on a EWSD-PRI.
>
> The changes I did I have sent to Stefan, but got no new informations
> from him since a few months.
>
> Maybe he is busy, maybe things are passed to Sangoma, maybe there is no
> big interest in a native stack, dunno...
>
>
> At least I have a need for a reliable slim isdn stack supporting Q931
> and if possible QSIG.
>
> It looks that libpri is the better choice as a future safe stack. But
> I've  never tested it with FS.
>
>
> regards from sunny and hot germany
>
> Helmut
>
>
>
> On 09.07.2010 14:01, Jan Berger wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>>  
>>
>> Creating a new thread.
>>
>>  
>>
>> If it is any interest for a native stack in FreeSWITCH we could address it
>> later. It lacks the state-engine. Actually, last time I asked I was told
>> someone in Germany was working on this?
>>
>>  
>>
>> But, as I looked at it recently I concluded that with Sangoma supporting
>> their own boards, and Digium maintaining libpri for theirs - we basically
>> have covered a majority of the E1/T1 boards that is used in here. Correct
>>     
> me
>   
>> if I am wrong.
>>
>>     
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFMNxfk4tZeNddg3dwRAqMxAJ0Vh5NnUY3HBEexz7ps8zR3GfGa6ACfTdhk
> Z+nSJ/7WC12tJyG/F3UxIEY=
> =5nmh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>