[Freeswitch-users] Is this queue flow correct?
João Mesquita
jmesquita at freeswitch.org
Thu Jan 21 17:21:14 PST 2010
Jingwei, check my contrib dir. I think it may help you with one FIFO since
we are able there to sign in and sign off dynamic agents as well as
customize what we do when the FIFO makes a call to them.
Regards,
João Mesquita
FSComm Developer
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Jingwei Yang <jingwei.yang at gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. All the agents are dynamic and I can't predefine them
> in the config file.
>
> Regards,
> -Jingwei
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, François Delawarde <
> fdelawarde at wirelessmundi.com> wrote:
>
>> Why do you need 2 fifos? You could have callback agents connected to the
>> fifo and send incoming calls there, mod_fifo will do the rest.
>>
>> To configure agents for callback:
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_fifo#Configure_for_Agent_Callback
>>
>> To place a call into a fifo:
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_fifo#Put_a_caller_into_a_FIFO_queue
>>
>> François.
>>
>> On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 23:39 +0800, Jingwei Yang wrote:
>> > Sorry about the confusion, I'm just trying to think over all the
>> > abnormal situations before the implementation and hope the flow has no
>> > design flaws.
>> >
>> > Client A is parked in Queue 1, multiple consumers will be ringed to
>> > answer him. And once the first one is connected, all the rest will
>> > hang up. This is the targeted function.
>> >
>> > To achieve this, I'm considering to originate a call to each consumer
>> > and put the calls in Queue 2. Then intercept client A to the first
>> > element of Queue 2.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure if it's the usual or the best way. If you feel not,
>> > please don't hesitate to correct me. Any thoughts are warmly
>> > appreciated.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Seven Du <dujinfang at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > what no errors mean? how do you originate calls to consumers?
>> > I don't
>> > understand your scenario.
>> >
>> > 2010/1/21, Jingwei Yang <jingwei.yang at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > Please advise whether the following flow makes sense.
>> > >
>> > > 1. Client A calls in and parked in Queue 1
>> > > 2. Originate calls to several consumers simultaneously and
>> > park them in
>> > > Queue 2
>> > > 3. Intercept A's call to the first consumer of Queue 2
>> > >
>> > > Basically I want A's call picked up by the first among many
>> > consumers with
>> > > no errors. Please let me know whether I'm on the right
>> > track.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks and best regards,
>> > > -Jingwei
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100121/a443132a/attachment-0002.html
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list