[Freeswitch-users] Is this queue flow correct?
Jingwei Yang
jingwei.yang at gmail.com
Thu Jan 21 17:05:13 PST 2010
Thanks for the reply. All the agents are dynamic and I can't predefine them
in the config file.
Regards,
-Jingwei
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, François Delawarde <
fdelawarde at wirelessmundi.com> wrote:
> Why do you need 2 fifos? You could have callback agents connected to the
> fifo and send incoming calls there, mod_fifo will do the rest.
>
> To configure agents for callback:
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_fifo#Configure_for_Agent_Callback
>
> To place a call into a fifo:
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_fifo#Put_a_caller_into_a_FIFO_queue
>
> François.
>
> On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 23:39 +0800, Jingwei Yang wrote:
> > Sorry about the confusion, I'm just trying to think over all the
> > abnormal situations before the implementation and hope the flow has no
> > design flaws.
> >
> > Client A is parked in Queue 1, multiple consumers will be ringed to
> > answer him. And once the first one is connected, all the rest will
> > hang up. This is the targeted function.
> >
> > To achieve this, I'm considering to originate a call to each consumer
> > and put the calls in Queue 2. Then intercept client A to the first
> > element of Queue 2.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it's the usual or the best way. If you feel not,
> > please don't hesitate to correct me. Any thoughts are warmly
> > appreciated.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Seven Du <dujinfang at gmail.com> wrote:
> > what no errors mean? how do you originate calls to consumers?
> > I don't
> > understand your scenario.
> >
> > 2010/1/21, Jingwei Yang <jingwei.yang at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Please advise whether the following flow makes sense.
> > >
> > > 1. Client A calls in and parked in Queue 1
> > > 2. Originate calls to several consumers simultaneously and
> > park them in
> > > Queue 2
> > > 3. Intercept A's call to the first consumer of Queue 2
> > >
> > > Basically I want A's call picked up by the first among many
> > consumers with
> > > no errors. Please let me know whether I'm on the right
> > track.
> > >
> > > Thanks and best regards,
> > > -Jingwei
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100122/5db832de/attachment-0002.html
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list