[Freeswitch-users] Is this queue flow correct?

[Jingwei Yang]

Sorry about the confusion, I'm just trying to think over all the abnormal
situations before the implementation and hope the flow has no design flaws.

Client A is parked in Queue 1, multiple consumers will be ringed to answer
him. And once the first one is connected, all the rest will hang up. This is
the targeted function.

To achieve this, I'm considering to originate a call to each consumer and
put the calls in Queue 2. Then intercept client A to the first element of
Queue 2.

I'm not sure if it's the usual or the best way. If you feel not, please
don't hesitate to correct me. Any thoughts are warmly appreciated.

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Seven Du <dujinfang at gmail.com> wrote:

> what no errors mean? how do you originate calls to consumers? I don't
> understand your scenario.
>
> 2010/1/21, Jingwei Yang <jingwei.yang at gmail.com>:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Please advise whether the following flow makes sense.
> >
> > 1. Client A calls in and parked in Queue 1
> > 2. Originate calls to several consumers simultaneously and park them in
> > Queue 2
> > 3. Intercept A's call to the first consumer of Queue 2
> >
> > Basically I want A's call picked up by the first among many consumers
> with
> > no errors. Please let me know whether I'm on the right track.
> >
> > Thanks and best regards,
> > -Jingwei
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100121/f973f0c8/attachment-0002.html