[Freeswitch-users] multiple leg and multiple rtp

[Sergey Okhapkin]

If you wish FreeSWITCH to be well adopted by the community, then FS should 
follow the real world "rules" but not specs...

Don't you agree that 99% of SIP servers are set up to interconnect 
with "buggy" PSTN and should follow PSTN rules, but not SIP specs?

Some background - I did run asterisk for years, but switched to FS recently 
because of critical asterisk problems with SIP handling when asterisk is not 
in the media path. I spend a lot of time porting the billing system to FS. 
And I did it. What I got? Critical problems with FS early media handling.  
Hopefully I can switch back to asterisk if FS problems with early media will 
begin to draw customers away.

On Wednesday 13 January 2010, Brian West wrote:
> By all accounts its still Media and the first one to provide it in a forked
> dial is to be connected to the channel of the calling party even if its
> early... the call answer time is not started till the 200 is received.
>
> I'm not talking about billing or answered time either.. i'm talking pure
> early media and how it is to be handled in FreeSWITCH.
>
> That my friend is in the specs to behave like that.
>
> /b
>
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > Well, the question is - what is "media"? To me media is what is returned
> > by "200 OK" response to INVITE. 18X provisional responses are NOT media,
> > they are early media indications (well, even with RTP stream inside),
> > which shall be sent back to the caller, but should NOT be accounted in
> > the call processing. Early media is too early to be accounted. Only
> > responses with SIP code 200 or more matter.
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org