[Freeswitch-users] Possible typo on Openzap.conf wiki page specifying fxs/fxo-channels

[Brian May]

On 24 February 2010 20:25, François Legal <devel at thom.fr.eu.org> wrote:
> I use sangoma card and the openzap file is generated by the Setup script
> from sangoma driver.
> It seems that the terminology used by zaptel is not used in wanpipe
> configuration.

Yes, that is correct.

> I have an A400 card with an FXO module (providing ports 11 and 12) and an
> FXS module (providing ports 9 and 10)
>
> My openzap.conf is like this :
>
> [span wanpipe FXS]
> name => Analog phone 1
> number => 9000
> fxs-channel => 1:9
> name => Analog phone 2
> number => 9001
> fxs-channel => 1:10
>
> [span wanpipe FXO]
> name => POTS line 1
> number => 1234567890
> fxo-channel => 1:11
> name => POTS line 2
> number => 0987654321
> fxo-channel => 1:12

So ports 9 and 10 are actually FXO ports - extension ports; ports 11
and 12 are FXS ports, or telephone lines. This is what I have been
saying.

Oh, wait, no it isn't. Looks like I was confused. :-(

It matches my config however.

Hopefully this fixed the problems with the wiki:

http://wiki.freeswitch.org/index.php?title=Openzap.conf_Examples&diff=18693&oldid=18491

My guess is that this change is needed also (not absolutely sure here):

http://wiki.freeswitch.org/index.php?title=Openzap.conf_Examples&diff=18694&oldid=18693
-- 
Brian May <brian at microcomaustralia.com.au>