[Freeswitch-users] 1.0.4 vs. trunk vs. bugs

[Michael Giagnocavo]

Maybe something that could work is a simple way for people to record the SVN number and config they’re using. It might encourage people to not get so stuck up on a released version number. And once they’re more comfortable with SVN, perhaps they’ll try head more often.

-Michael

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Jerris
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:18 AM
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] 1.0.4 vs. trunk vs. bugs

This seems a good time to note that we are still looking for volunteers to assist in maintaining a stable branch.  I can not do this without additional volunteer resources.  We have asked several times recently to fairly silent response.  If anyone is interested in assisting with this effort, please contact  me offlist and we can discuss further.

Mike

On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:16 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org<mailto:brian at freeswitch.org>> wrote:
OK so I can sign you up for the stable team?  ;)  As per my previous email i'm 100% sure we would do a stable release if we had people tending to issues.  The only problem is you would have to be on IRC tending to issues because if tony sees someone asking about a problem he'll be diving in to fix it before they can say "I have this one".  This also means working in a similar manner we do already.  Our process is very chaotic at times but it has served us well so far.

The goal is to leave Anthony alone so he can move forward and let the stable team manage the jira's and issues on the list related to stable.

/b

On Feb 18, 2010, at 10:10 PM, David Knell wrote:



Lon Baker <lon at kickasspixels.com<mailto:lon at kickasspixels.com>> wrote:

The development branch is where feature requests and non-critical bugs
reports would be filed for the next production release.

The current process leaves a gap between production ready and
development code that may become greater over time.

Going against the grain here, I agree with you.  The current way of
doing things is, in my opinion, not well thought through - there's no
reason to tag and release versions if the answer to any issue is 'make
current', and support is not available unless that's been done.  Far
better to either have meaningful releases with stable and devel
branches, or not to have releases at all.

--Dave

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100219/28ca4ed7/attachment-0002.html