[Freeswitch-users] freeswitch CPU usage

[David Ponzone]

I already removed the stress tests part from the table.
I will try to add other information that was given here.

For the disclaimer part, as english is not my native language, I would  
appreciate if someone could recommend one with the right content, thus  
avoiding our dear FreeSWITCH devs to go to jail in the future :)

David Ponzone  Direction Technique
email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr
tel:      01 74 03 18 97
gsm:   06 66 98 76 34

Service Client IPeva
tel:      0811 46 26 26
www.ipeva.fr  -   www.ipeva-studio.com

Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis  
à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou  
diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est  
susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au  
titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si  
vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire  
immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur.




Le 20/08/2010 à 18:21, François Delawarde a écrit :

> Stress test results are only useful to make the headlines or for PhD
> students, those tests should only be made by experts (unbiased if
> possible) that and results should be shown in a special "cool-pure-raw
> performance testing" page.
>
> For the rest of us, real life scenarios with a small description of  
> the
> modules involved would be useful to help with server dimensioning. If
> people contribute, with enough data it could give a pretty nice idea  
> of
> what to expect.
>
> Of course those results can vary a lot so a huge disclaimer must be
> there to avoid having special people (mainly US citizens) suing the  
> wiki
> owner. ;-)
>
> François.
>
>
> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 11:01 -0500, Anthony Minessale wrote:
>> Its an ok thing as long as it comes with a disclaimer that "results
>> may vary" and "you have to know what you are doing"
>> And those who work on it need to volunteer to help with the emails it
>> may generate asking why they can't match the results =D
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn at gmail.com 
>> > wrote:
>>> Le Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:32 -0500,
>>> Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> The problem is that performance testing is very fluid and  
>>>> relevant to
>>>> each machine and OS and test performed and you can't get concrete
>>>> expectations without some advanced skills in deploying FS.
>>>
>>> Well, it could have a real interest by adding the tweaked  
>>> parameters,
>>> may be there are some, yet unexplored, that would raise the  
>>> response.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Why don't elephants eat penguins ?
>>> Because they can't get the wrappers off ...
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100821/80385160/attachment.html