[Freeswitch-users] freeswitch CPU usage

Anthony Minessale anthony.minessale at gmail.com
Fri Aug 20 08:19:45 PDT 2010


also don't forget...

Turn off manage-presence param in sofia.
Put your test extension first in your context so it does not hit the
demo dialplan which is not designed for high cps.
Send me a box like yours cos I only have an 8 core box.



On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Anthony Minessale
<anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yet another load test thread.........................
>
> This is why we don't like them.
>
>
> Too bad you missed my presentation at cluecon.....
>
> Do you hear yourself btw? Quibbling about completely free software
> *only* doing 200cps in your fake test?
> 200cps is 4 times the industry standard FYI and if you were really
> doing 200cps in real life you would be so rich at our expense that you
> could afford more boxes.
>
> you clearly ignored all of our repeated recommendations.
> Use the following or you are on your own.......
>
> This OS
> Centos 5.x x86_64
>
> All of these ulimits in your shell
> ulimit -c unlimited
> ulimit -d unlimited
> ulimit -f unlimited
> ulimit -i unlimited
> ulimit -n 999999
> ulimit -q unlimited
> ulimit -u unlimited
> ulimit -v unlimited
> ulimit -x unlimited
> ulimit -s 240
> ulimit -l unlimited
> ulimit -a
>
>
> run with freeswitch -heavy-timer
>
> if you insist on sipp use our scenario file that fixes several errors
> in the default one.
>
> http://www.freeswitch.org/eg/load_test/dft_cap.xml
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Woody Dickson <woodydickson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am doing some experiments with Freeswitch by torturing it to see how
>> the machine's CPU response to heavy loaded situation.
>> The test is done on a 16 core 5550 dual quad core server running
>> fedora 2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.x86_64 OS.
>>
>> What I found so strange was that while CPU usage remains pretty low
>> and distributed among all cores at 190 - 200 calls per second.  Then,
>> after added a few more calls per second, all CPU becomes fully
>> utilized.
>>
>> Is this due to some wrong setting?  Any idea how I can tweak the
>> configuration and continue my test?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Woody
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Anthony Minessale II
>
> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>
> AIM: anthm
> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
>
> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org
> pstn:+19193869900
>



-- 
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:+19193869900



More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list