[Freeswitch-users] Proxy Media and Codec Prefer

[Sergey Okhapkin]

Yes, it's supposed to be passed directly (and it is passed directly on 200 
OK), but only 1st codec is passed to leg A on SIP 183!

On Monday 16 August 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:
> In bypass media we pass the sdp through directly.  I am unsure what you are
>  trying to show me here and what it has to do with the problem you
>  describe.
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/13643 , note lines 185 (SDP from B leg, 3
> > codecs) and 260 (SDP sent to A leg, only 1 codec). The call is running
> > with bypass_media=true.
> >
> > On Monday 16 August 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:
> >> This is a case of your nat settings simply not being right on the
> >> FreeSWITCH side I suspect, study the acl settings and come up with an
> >> example of a failure here with full sip trace and debug.
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> On Aug 16, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> >>> I use proxy_media as a default because i use only mobile clients.
> >>>
> >>> In mobile networks there are good chance that FS NAT detection does not
> >>> work.
> >>>
> >>> That's because several mobile carriers use as "internal ip address" IP
> >>> that are not inside the standard 192.168/16 10/8 and 172.16/16
> >>> networks.
> >>>
> >>> For example H3G in italy use 1/8 networks and in other countries there
> >>> are other fancy approach that are unpredictable.
> >>> In such condition proxy_media is the only solution to have a 100%
> >>> working solution, otherwise in a X% of the case on some mobile operator
> >>> it will just don't work.
> >>>
> >>> And following all the "particular" internal networks that mobile
> >>> operators follow is not a good way to manage the issue as there are too
> >>> many mobile operators in the world and too many different internal
> >>> network conditions.
> >>>
> >>> It would be really nice to have some kind of "dynamic" approach, like
> >>> the ones provided by ICE, that are client-independent and server-side
> >>> based to handle such particular issues (IE: without the ability to rely
> >>> on client IP address being inside a particular network).
> >>>
> >>> Fabio
> >>>
> >>> On 16/08/10 01.56, Michael Jerris wrote:
> >>>> I don't think there is ever a reason to use proxy_media anymore.  If
> >>>> anyone can provide an example of a good reason to use it I would be
> >>>> interested to hear.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> >> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>