[Freeswitch-users] Proxy Media and Codec Prefer

Sergey Okhapkin sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org
Sun Aug 15 17:48:38 PDT 2010


But what if endpoints have no common codec and disable-transcoding is set? 
Will FS ignore disable-transcoding parameter?

On Sunday 15 August 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Codec_negotiation
> 
> disable-transcoding
> 
> On Aug 15, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > To avoid transcoding if both endpoints have common codec, but one of
> > endpoints is behind NAT.
> >
> > On Sunday 15 August 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:
> >> I don't think there is ever a reason to use proxy_media anymore.  If
> >> anyone can provide an example of a good reason to use it I would be
> >> interested to hear.
> >>
> >> On Aug 2, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> >>> FS has 3 ways (not 2!) to handle media:
> >>>
> >>> 1. bypass_media=true - media path is set to run audio directly between
> >>> leg a and b endpoints. absolute_codec_string variable is ignored in
> >>> this mode. 2. proxy_media=true - media is proxied by FS, but without
> >>> any transcoding etc, frame in - frame out. absolute_codec_string
> >>> variable is ignored in this mode. 3. Neither bypass_media, no
> >>> proxy_media variables are set. FS does full media handling/transcoding,
> >>> absolute_codec_string variable is honored.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> 




More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list