[Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu load

Tue Aug 10 11:10:55 PDT 2010

Latest revisions seem to solve this issue. I'll continue with the tests...

2010/8/6 Rupa Schomaker <rupa at rupa.com>

> Not really.  If you have a test that shows "good/bad" we (devs) can find
> the reason for a problem.  git handles choosing versions for testing and you
> handle the "good/bad" decision.  The end result is "here is the git version
> where performance changes" which tony or whomever can then look at the patch
> and decide what he wants to do about it.
>
> 2010/8/6 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>
>
> I thinkg it is very difficult to find it without a good knowledge of FS
>> internals. Do you know if there is any way to make a profiling which could
>> help?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> 2010/8/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa at rupa.com>
>>
>>> sounds like a good opportunity to try git-bisect to locate where the
>>> performance change occurs.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Eliot Gable <
>>> egable+freeswitch at gmail.com <egable%2Bfreeswitch at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a 25%
>>>> performance drop between the old SVN version I was running and the new
>>>> GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported performance
>>>> drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to 25%. I am
>>>> unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a ramdisk, so
>>>> the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have the db on
>>>> a ramdisk.
>>>>
>>>> 2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>:
>>>> > No one experiment this same issue?
>>>> >
>>>> > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> >
>>>> > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hello!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version downloaded some
>>>> weeks
>>>> >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has some
>>>> problems with
>>>> >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version (FreeSWITCH
>>>> Version
>>>> >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that seems to solve
>>>> this
>>>> >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing with svn
>>>> version.
>>>> >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU load into a
>>>> dual
>>>> >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this 75% cpu. I
>>>> can see
>>>> >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in git
>>>> version) and
>>>> >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now it uses more
>>>> cpu
>>>> >> than before. Any idea?
>>>> >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip provider.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Regards
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>>> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:
>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Eliot Gable
>>>>
>>>> "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow it from our
>>>> children." ~David Brower
>>>>
>>>> "I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not borrowing
>>>> from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not even
>>>> considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
>>>>
>>>> "Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst eat to
>>>> live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:
>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Rupa
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Rupa
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100810/0d8ff28b/attachment.html 