[Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu load

Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum juanito1982 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 5 23:39:43 PDT 2010


I thinkg it is very difficult to find it without a good knowledge of FS
internals. Do you know if there is any way to make a profiling which could
help?

Regards

2010/8/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa at rupa.com>

> sounds like a good opportunity to try git-bisect to locate where the
> performance change occurs.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch at gmail.com<egable%2Bfreeswitch at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
>> My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a 25%
>> performance drop between the old SVN version I was running and the new
>> GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported performance
>> drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to 25%. I am
>> unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a ramdisk, so
>> the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have the db on
>> a ramdisk.
>>
>> 2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>:
>> > No one experiment this same issue?
>> >
>> > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Hello!
>> >>
>> >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version downloaded some weeks
>> >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has some problems
>> with
>> >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version (FreeSWITCH
>> Version
>> >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that seems to solve
>> this
>> >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing with svn
>> version.
>> >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU load into a
>> dual
>> >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this 75% cpu. I
>> can see
>> >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in git version)
>> and
>> >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now it uses more
>> cpu
>> >> than before. Any idea?
>> >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip provider.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Eliot Gable
>>
>> "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow it from our
>> children." ~David Brower
>>
>> "I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not borrowing
>> from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not even
>> considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
>>
>> "Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst eat to
>> live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Rupa
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100806/b37a0b39/attachment.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list