[Freeswitch-users] FS HA-cluster

[Steven Ayre]

If I guess how this works correctly it'll only handle failover, threads will
still be needed in the FreeSWITCH architecture. I think call state is
written to the database in realtime, then if FS fails a new instance of FS
is started on another machine, reads call states from the database and
starts threads for each call. Just a guess though. That'd mean it's read
when FreeSWITCH starts up, so couldn't handle multiple servers on the same
IP but would handle primary and backup servers.

-Steve


On 5 August 2010 07:23, Henry Huang <b_ball_henry at hotmail.com> wrote:

> I am not sure of the term "cluster IP" but here is the example
>
> Load balancer have the actual public IP , while all FS servers has the same
> IP setup on the box as virtual IP and listens on the virtual IP. So in other
> words, all the FS servers are listening to the same IP address through out
> the architecture.
>
> Henry Huang
> Unified Communication System R&D Project Manager
> US: +1 (626) 606-3306
> Chat Skype: unicsolution MSN: b_ball_henry at hotmail.com
> Contact Me [image: Linkedin]<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/henry-huang/1/654/578>[image:
> Facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=595148342>[image:
> Twitter] <http://twitter.com/unicsolution>
>
>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100805/29d1e99c/attachment.html