[Freeswitch-users] FS HA-cluster

jay binks jaybinks at gmail.com
Wed Aug 4 13:15:39 PDT 2010


Guys,
  further to this interesting discussion, please check out this wiki page

http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Freeswitch_HA

there was an announcement at cluecon that improves Freeswitches ability to
do HA-clustering.
please can you update this wiki page with the information you have learned
doing the pacemaker side of this.

also keep the conversation going now, with this new information :)

Jay


2010/7/12 Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com>

> "As server FS work with share db, there is an impression that at switching
> Cluster-IP with active on
> a passive, passive server can pick up session begun on an active server
> (the necessary data about
> current sessions takes from the share db). Whether So it?
> Testing has shown that at switching Cluster-IP on reserve FS, that does not
> process session which
> have begun on first FS :("
>
> Sorry, but that's not currently possible as the call state information is
> held in memory, not the shared database, and has execution threads started
> for processing the signalling/media which aren't duplicated on the other
> machine(s).
>
> -Steve
>
>
>
> 2010/7/9 viewpoint <yurazilot1 at list.ru>
>
> Many thanks for fast and substantial answers!
>> Has established ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind=1.
>> Now there is no necessity to reboot FS or sofia profile.
>>
>> As a result it has turned out:
>> 1) Two servers FS which kernel works with the shared db through unix ODBC
>> 2) It Is realised Cluster-IP by installations Pacemaker
>> (http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install#From_Source)
>>
>> As server FS work with share db, there is an impression that at switching
>> Cluster-IP with active on
>> a passive, passive server can pick up session begun on an active server
>> (the necessary data about
>> current sessions takes from the share db). Whether So it?
>> Testing has shown that at switching Cluster-IP on reserve FS, that does
>> not process session which
>> have begun on first FS :(
>>
>>
>>
>> Thu, 8 Jul 2010 16:21:40 +0200 (CEST) письмо от Vladimir Klejch <
>> klejch+freeswitch at netbox.cz <klejch%2Bfreeswitch at netbox.cz>>:
>>
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > On linux you can use /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_nonlocal_bind to bind to non
>> local
>> > address on start of FS and then you don't need any restart of FS or
>> > reload of sofia profile if this addres is active on the node
>> >
>> > or you can have this floating address on dummy iface (?or lo )  and then
>> > use right settings in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth?/arp_filter,arp_ignore
>> > and then FS can use this address to bind on start and you don't need
>> > restart of FS?or relaod of sofia profile ...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                               Kleo
>> >
>> > On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, viewpoint wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello.
>> > >
>> > > I currently have a project where I'm researching how to establish a
>> > > clustered platform wieth failover time ~= some milliseconds.
>> > >
>> > > At present we have: 2 identical servers FS, wieth established
>> Pacemaker
>> > > (http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install#From_Source) - heartbeat. On
>> > > the one hand it is possible to tell that all works, as, at refusal of
>> > > the first server, the second server receives cluster-ip. A problem
>> that
>> > > FreeSWITCH it is necessary to restart (or simply to start) that it
>> began
>> > > to work with the new IP-address. As the result, a switching total time
>> > > makes 10-20 sec which basic part is necessary on launch FreeSwitch.
>> > >
>> > > any ideas?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >       klejch+freeswitch at netbox.cz <klejch%2Bfreeswitch at netbox.cz>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>> Я в Моем Мире - http://my.mail.ru/list/yurazilot1/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>


-- 
Sincerely

Jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100805/0a51ea5e/attachment.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list