[Freeswitch-users] Can FreeSWITCH act as a SIP Proxy with transcoding?

[Michael Jerris]

FreeSWITCH is not a proxy, and proxies don't transcode, they only affect signaling.  You seem to be describing a back to back user agent, which both FreeSWITCH and cudatel are.  All of this functionality is currently available in FreeSWITCH.  We have been working on adding provisioning and configuration support for SRTP and TLS to cudatel, but it is not yet available.  

Mike


On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> i would like to know if FreeSWITCH could be used as a simple SIP Proxy 
> in order to:
> - receive SIP/TLS connections
> - receive SRTP secured connection
> - forward it in "unsecured" way to a backend PBX (plain RTP, plain SIP/UDP)
> - if required configured do simply transcoding before forwarding calls 
> to backend PBX
> 
> So to run it as a "SIP Security Proxy" in front of an existing SIP PBX 
> doing also transcoding if required (in case backend SIP PBX does not 
> support SIP UA codecs) .
> 
> Is this setup feasible with a FreeSWITCH?
> 
> Does anyone know if cudatel (https://www.cudatel.com/) support such kind 
> of configuration scenario?
> 
> Fabio
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org