[Freeswitch-users] Memory leak in mod_nibblebill or in ODBC core?

[Sergey Okhapkin]

According to valgrind there are no big leaks. 

==12476== LEAK SUMMARY:
==12476==    definitely lost: 146,309 bytes in 189 blocks.
==12476==    indirectly lost: 176 bytes in 12 blocks.
==12476==      possibly lost: 12,336 bytes in 18 blocks.
==12476==    still reachable: 1,077,431 bytes in 550 blocks.
==12476==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.



On Saturday 17 April 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:
> That is a completely incorrect statement.  Using memory (and caching
>  possibly), leaking memory, and unbound growth in memory are all totally
>  different things.  to understand exactly what is going on here, the
>  distinction is important.  If you run under valgrind, you should look when
>  its running to see where all this extra allocation is.
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Apr 17, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > When memory stays at 50-60M without nibblebill and grows to 300M with...
> > It's definetily a leak. valgring log is available, but there is nothing
> > suspicious in it... Try to enable niblebill yourself.
> >
> > On Saturday 17 April 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:
> >> 100M may just be the memory it is really using for what it is doing and
> >> not a leak.  Have you seen anything to tell you this is actually a leak?
> >> Have you run under valgrind or some similar tool to confirm?
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> On Apr 17, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> >>> I want to utilize nibblebill features for prepaid support, but as soon
> >>> as I enable nibble billing with
> >>>
> >>> set nibble_rate=XXX
> >>> set nibble_account=NNNNNN
> >>> set enable_heartbeat_events=60
> >>>
> >>> in dialplan, FS process begins to eat more and more memory, RSS grows
> >>> from 23M to 100M and more after processing few thousands calls and
> >>> continues to grow. If I comment out those 3 lines from dialplan, then
> >>> FS RSS grows from initial 23M to 50-60M (depending on the number of
> >>> concurrent calls) and stays at this value, no memory leaks.
> >>>
> >>> Do anybody use mod_nibblebill?
> >>>
> >>> I'm experiencing this problem with all svn versions I tried including
> >>> latest git version.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> >> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>