[Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch memory issue/question

[Phillip Jones]

Henry,

Realistically - what is your expected traffic? i.e. how big a community are
you building this system for? In your test - now many cps where you hitting
FS with?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Madovsky <infos at madovsky.org> wrote:

>  Henry Huang,
>
> with 10 millions of invites I'm sure you have at least $175 to pay
> to FS to help you !! :D
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com>
> *To:* freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:19 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch memory issue/question
>
> We have a policy against load testing issues on this mailing list.
>
> What you are doing is most likely doing something wrong and we don't have
> time to debug it for you.
> We get way too many requests like this and there is a 99% result in proving
> user error and improper load testing.
>
> You can consider paid support from FreeSWITCH Solutions LLC for $175/hr per
> consultant and an ongoing support contract for $10k/yr to deal with business
> related bugfixing and support.
>
> The free help we give here is based on a community shared resource pool and
> we simply do not have enough to go around helping people with your type of
> issue.  Please feel free to report bugs if you can pinpoint one using a more
> realistic use case that does not involve DDosing your box with 10 million
> invites.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Henry Huang <b_ball_henry at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Dear developers:
>>
>> Our product is close to sipping stage and we are doing stress tests on FS
>> servers. We have now hit a dead end with our test results and running out of
>> ideas. And the result is pointing to memory issues. We have ran our test on
>> both FS 1.0.4 and 1.0.6 trunk with SIPP to do simply invite tests.
>>
>> Here is the test senario:
>>
>> Send 10,000,000 invites to our test server running FS 1.0.6 with fixed
>> amount of invites per second. The xml dialplan simply bridge the call to an
>> unknown/unregistered user like so (user/500001) and therefore FS would hang
>> up once it doesn't find the user. When running the test, FS is steady, but
>> the memory usage slowly piles up over time. The memory keeps adding up till
>> it hit the ceiling, then FS crash. I don't understand what could be holding
>> the memory and not releasing it since we are not doing anything special and
>> the calls are not being answered. And I forgot to mention, through out the
>> whole test, the CPU usage stays at about 35% .
>>
>> Please help
>>
>>
>> Besides FS native test, we have created our own application module to run
>> the same test. The app is written in C and basically what we did is to point
>> the xml dialplan to the custom app. Inside our app , we are simply doing the
>> same kind of test as the xml dialplan would do. The only thing we did for
>> the stress test is the following code:
>>
>> switch_core_session_execute_application(session, "bridge", "user/500001");
>>
>> Like the xml dialplan test, we are bridging the call to a unregistered
>> user, so the call would hang up right away if system doesn't find the user.
>> But the bizarre thing is this - the memory usage is about 7 ~ 8 times as
>> much as we are running only xml dialplan. This I don't understand. Our app
>> is calling the native FS C function to bridge the call , why would it use
>> more memory than the xml dialplan...
>>
>> your input would be very much appreciated.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henry Huang
>> aka bbhenry
>>
>> VoIP & Open Source software Consultant
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anthony Minessale II
>
> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>
> AIM: anthm
> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale at hotmail.com>
> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale at gmail.com>
> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
>
> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
> pstn:+19193869900
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100414/8128eaa0/attachment.html