[Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch memory issue/question
Henry Huang
red.rain.seven at gmail.com
Wed Apr 14 08:41:14 PDT 2010
Anthony:
yeh, I thought it could be something wrong with my testing setup too. And
you are right, these kind of question requires professional support.
Thanks for taking the time to reply me. But if anyone in the community would
be kind to point out what should be a more proper way of conducting a SIPp
test based on their experience, I am all ears.
Thanks again, and FS 1.0.6 is truly great. Jumping from 1.0.4 to 1.0.6, we
found it more robust and bug free.
Henry
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Anthony Minessale <
anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote:
> We have a policy against load testing issues on this mailing list.
>
> What you are doing is most likely doing something wrong and we don't have
> time to debug it for you.
> We get way too many requests like this and there is a 99% result in proving
> user error and improper load testing.
>
> You can consider paid support from FreeSWITCH Solutions LLC for $175/hr per
> consultant and an ongoing support contract for $10k/yr to deal with business
> related bugfixing and support.
>
> The free help we give here is based on a community shared resource pool and
> we simply do not have enough to go around helping people with your type of
> issue. Please feel free to report bugs if you can pinpoint one using a more
> realistic use case that does not involve DDosing your box with 10 million
> invites.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Henry Huang <b_ball_henry at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Dear developers:
>>
>> Our product is close to sipping stage and we are doing stress tests on FS
>> servers. We have now hit a dead end with our test results and running out of
>> ideas. And the result is pointing to memory issues. We have ran our test on
>> both FS 1.0.4 and 1.0.6 trunk with SIPP to do simply invite tests.
>>
>> Here is the test senario:
>>
>> Send 10,000,000 invites to our test server running FS 1.0.6 with fixed
>> amount of invites per second. The xml dialplan simply bridge the call to an
>> unknown/unregistered user like so (user/500001) and therefore FS would hang
>> up once it doesn't find the user. When running the test, FS is steady, but
>> the memory usage slowly piles up over time. The memory keeps adding up till
>> it hit the ceiling, then FS crash. I don't understand what could be holding
>> the memory and not releasing it since we are not doing anything special and
>> the calls are not being answered. And I forgot to mention, through out the
>> whole test, the CPU usage stays at about 35% .
>>
>> Please help
>>
>>
>> Besides FS native test, we have created our own application module to run
>> the same test. The app is written in C and basically what we did is to point
>> the xml dialplan to the custom app. Inside our app , we are simply doing the
>> same kind of test as the xml dialplan would do. The only thing we did for
>> the stress test is the following code:
>>
>> switch_core_session_execute_application(session, "bridge", "user/500001");
>>
>> Like the xml dialplan test, we are bridging the call to a unregistered
>> user, so the call would hang up right away if system doesn't find the user.
>> But the bizarre thing is this - the memory usage is about 7 ~ 8 times as
>> much as we are running only xml dialplan. This I don't understand. Our app
>> is calling the native FS C function to bridge the call , why would it use
>> more memory than the xml dialplan...
>>
>> your input would be very much appreciated.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henry Huang
>> aka bbhenry
>>
>> VoIP & Open Source software Consultant
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anthony Minessale II
>
> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>
> AIM: anthm
> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale at hotmail.com>
> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale at gmail.com>
> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
>
> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
> pstn:+19193869900
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
--
Henry Huang
VoIP & Open Source software Consultant
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100414/4f99bcc5/attachment.html
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list