[Freeswitch-users] OT: Snom phones reporting incorrect port in Contact/Via

[Jonas Gauffin]

I found the problem. The phone uses RPORT and switches to the port reported
by FS instead of using the one specified in the provisioning. :(

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Jonas Gauffin <jonas.gauffin at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I got a problem with Snom phones where they report a different port than
> the one provisioned. I tried to talk with the snom support without success.
>
> REGISTER sip:phone.gateon.se:5070 SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 217.31.xxx.xxx:26062;branch=z9hG4bK-u1y0v7is9ix0;rport
> From: "Helene XXX" <sip:u1000028 at phone.xxxx.se:5070>;tag=kjaa26j1qv
> To: "Helene xxx" <sip:u1000028 at phone.xxxx.se:5070>
> Call-ID: 3c267019ee2d-ni5vq3v88za6
> CSeq: 133 REGISTER
> Max-Forwards: 70
> Contact: <sip:u1000028 at 217.31.xxx.xxx
> :26062;line=yhkplirb>;reg-id=1;q=1.0;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:1f2c528a-18f1-435d-ad61-2be3d1a88425>";audio;mobility="fixed";duplex="full";description="snom360";actor="principal";events="dialog";methods="INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,REFER,OPTIONS,NOTIFY,SUBSCRIBE,PRACK,MESSAGE,INFO"
> User-Agent: snom360/7.3.30
> Supported: gruu
> Allow-Events: dialog
> X-Real-IP: 192.168.3.109
> Expires: 3600
> Content-Length: 0
> The port that I provisioned (and I've doublechecked in the webinterface) is
> 5071 and not 26062.
>
> Have anyone else got this problem and solved it?
>
> Regards,
>   Jonas
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100414/3db36458/attachment.html