[Freeswitch-users] Multiple Subnets

[Andrey Nepomnyaschih]

Hello Brian,

I don't think there is NAT relation between these two subnets (192.168.50/24 and 192.168.60/24) because hosts that reside inside 192.168.60/24 are accessible from 192.168.50/24. I've attached a sofia_trace.zip file with output with sofia loglevel all 9 enabled.

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:04 PM
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Multiple Subnets

Maybe your router isn't really a router and is doing NAT behind NAT?  Need logs and sip traces because we would only be guessing at this point.
/b

On Sep 29, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Andrey Nepomnyaschih wrote:


Hello,

I have some problems running a FreeSWITCH with endpoints located in different subnets. For example a FS is listening at 192.168.50.14/32 and endpoints from the same (192.168.50.0/24) subnet work as expected. But when I try to receive a media from an endpoint located at different subnet, let's say 192.168.60.0/24 the RTP stream cannot be bridged. FS sends an INVITE message asking endpoint to send media to external interface.

Can anyone give me a hint where to look on how to overcome such behavior?

Kind Regards,
Andrey Nepomnyaschih


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090929/745045a5/attachment-0002.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sofia_trace.zip
Type: application/x-zip-compressed
Size: 3966 bytes
Desc: sofia_trace.zip
Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090929/745045a5/attachment-0002.bin