[Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.
mayamatakeshi
mayamatakeshi at gmail.com
Fri Sep 11 19:03:06 PDT 2009
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com> wrote:
> Following up, did a bug get created for this issue?
>
Hello,
yes.
http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/MODSOFIA-26
>
> On Sep 5, 2009, at 2:40 AM, mayamatakeshi wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, mayamatakeshi <mayamatakeshi at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi <mayamatakeshi at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips).
>>> It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the other and
>>> calls work perfectly.
>>> However, I've noticed that when I register my terminal directly with FS
>>> without going thru the proxy, I receive an unsolicited NOTIFY containing
>>> Message-Waiting information. But when I register via proxy, FS doesn't send
>>> this NOTIFY.
>>> What could be causing this difference of behavior? (enabling debug (F8)
>>> doesn't show anything for registration handling).
>>>
>>
>> I have enabled Sofia debug and I can see NTA is complaining about invalid
>> URI when building the NOTIFY:
>>
>> nua: nua_notify: entering
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): sent signal r_notify
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): recv signal r_notify
>> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): adding notify usage with event message-summary
>> nta_leg_tcreate(0x9b74c68)
>> nta outgoing create: invalid URI
>> nta: outgoing_free(0x9b74928)
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): event r_notify 900 Internal error at nua_client.c:711
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): removing notify usage with event message-summary
>>
>> My REGISTER relayed by opensips is this:
>>
>> REGISTER sip:test.com SIP/2.0
>> Record-Route: <
>> sip:192.168.2.100;lr=on;ftag=AhFSdiltk3H4mrmGXICgRHFiU59ZuCk5>
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.100;branch=z9hG4bKe62c.49e9f6c1.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.121:5060
>> ;received=192.168.2.121;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKPj4uAYgDuRbilYy4lCWcjlDKIDAtf-9RdS
>> Max-Forwards: 69
>> From: <sip:user1 at test.com <sip%3Auser1 at test.com>
>> >;tag=AhFSdiltk3H4mrmGXICgRHFiU59ZuCk5
>> To: <sip:user1 at test.com <sip%3Auser1 at test.com>>
>> Call-ID: JvQ.apMLiJtfHa7z4ShIfgBPi5jIbtBv
>> CSeq: 14872 REGISTER
>> Contact: <sip:user1 at 192.168.2.121:5060;nat=yes>
>> Expires: 60
>> Authorization: Digest username="user1", realm="test.com",
>> nonce="7d911eef-2c16-4deb-99f6-afcff9968a19", uri="sip:192.168.2.100",
>> response="df29caeb78790b4527f1176622cbf192", algorithm=MD5,
>> cnonce="5.EXCbM3RZTx6iOh1cvUzUvEZTs2eheG", qop=auth, nc=00000001
>> Content-Length: 0
>> Path: <sip:opensips at 192.168.2.100 <sip%3Aopensips at 192.168.2.100>
>> ;lr;received=sip:192.168.2.121:5060>
>>
>> I hope someone can point out a problem.
>> I'm looking at NTA with gdb but I'm slow on this.
>
>
> The invalid URI nta is complaining about is the route_uri extracted from
> the Contact stored upon registration.
> The difference of behavior between INVITE (works) and NOTIFY (doesn't work)
> via proxy, seems to be because for INVITE, mod_sofia code (function
> sofia_glue_do_invite in sofia_glue.c) calls sofia_overcome_sip_uri_weakness
> to adjust the route_uri.
> But for a NOTIFY, this function is not called (and it cannot be called, as
> there's no session which is required as a parameter).
>
> In my case I can see that basically what sofia_overcome_sip_uri_weakness
> does is to remove the "<" , ">" around the route_uri.
> I messed with the code in sofia_glue_send_notify to just remove "<" and ">"
> and after that I was able to receive the NOTIFY.
> So I believe there is some code lacking in FS to properly permit UAs
> registering via proxy to receive NOTIFY.
> I might be wrong: if there is anyone using this scenario successfully,
> please let me know. Otherwise, I'll open a ticket on JIRA.
>
> regards,
> takeshi
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090912/32f9ff37/attachment-0002.html
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list