[Freeswitch-users] 482 Request merged, in serial forking

[Brian West]

I'm going to gess the call-id is the same for the second  
transaction... can you provide a more detailed trace?

/b

On Sep 4, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Humberto Quintana wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm a new Freeswitch user. After some reading I put Freeswitch  
> (Version 1.0.4) to work as Session Border Controller.  I have only  
> one problem that I dont know how to solve it ( or which parameter to  
> set) and I'd appreciate if someone could give me a clue about this.
>
> Kamailio is sitting behind FS and it selects the route or routes in  
> case of failure (serial forking) .  Freeswitch is configured to use  
> directly the Request-URI sent by Kamailio.
>
> So, when the 1st route fails, Kamailio receives the Reply from FS  
> and sends back the ACK to end the transaction.  More than 1 second  
> later, a new INVITE from Kamailio with the next route is tried (With  
> the To-header's tag is empty. Same Callid, From and Cseq header but  
> different VIA-header's branch parameter) and FS is answering back  
> 482 Merged Request.  It happens the same for the 3rd route.
>
> It seems that the transaction is still 'alive' in FS even if the ACK  
> was received ?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Humberto

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090904/2d355dc4/attachment-0002.html