[Freeswitch-users] NAT problem
Jonas Gauffin
jonas.gauffin at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 09:50:07 PST 2009
Ok. It would be a nice feature if outbound_caller_id was used by freeswitch.
I do quite often bridge to both internal and external destinations in the
same bridge command (as in "sofia/internal/5530,sofia/internal/
070123456 at sipgw2.XXXX.se). This forces me to always use complete phone
numbers in the caller id since my gateway would reject the call otherwise.
It would be really neat if FS could use effective_caller_id (5531) for the
internal bridge and outbound_caller_id (+4681235531) for the external
bridge.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:
> outbound_caller_id is a made up variable that is used in the defaults that
> are used in the examples only.
>
> /b
>
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Jonas Gauffin wrote:
>
> Ok. Found the problem. I had started using "sofia/outbound/
> XXXXXX at sipgw2.XXXX.se" as bridge destination to try to get
> outbound_caller_id_name/outbound_caller_id_number working.
> It works if I use the correct profile name, "sofia/internal/
> XXXXXX at sipgw2.XXXX.se"
>
> When do FS use outbound_caller_id instead of effective_caller_id?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20091123/32c8b040/attachment-0002.html
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list