[Freeswitch-users] Start FreeSWITCH without any SQL but at the same time have all info available on realtime/runtime
Michael Jerris
mike at jerris.com
Sat Mar 14 06:20:51 PDT 2009
To clarify, -nosql turns on and off only the collecting of data for
the show commands, and can now handle higher load than the sip stack
can. The only thing your doing by saying -nosql is turning off the
exact functionality you say you want. Its similar to saying I would
like to support sip but don't want to load mod_sofia. There should be
no reasons to use that command anymore, if you encounter any I would
be interested in knowing what is going on.
Mike
On Mar 14, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Diego Viola wrote:
> Yeah, but still, it would be nice to see the channels with -nosql :)
>
> I don't want to be a pain in the ass, just giving some user feedback.
>
> Regards,
>
> Diego
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org>
> wrote:
>> Since we added indexes to the SQLite DB its not so bad.
>> /b
>> On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Diego Viola wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I thought that SQLite wasn't that great on performance and that
>> people wanted to replace/remove it from the core.
>>
>> "On of the most interesting things about FreeSWITCH to me has been
>> the
>> fact that most data in the system such as registrations are kept in a
>> SQL database. The default installation uses SQLite internally though
>> you can easily point FreeSWITCH at one of a number of other SQL
>> servers such as PostgreSQL or MySQL via UnixODBC. Sadly, SQLite has
>> become somewhat of a bottleneck in the core so future versions of
>> FreeSWITCH will use less of it. For example, doing a "show channels"
>> with over 500 channels in use starts to show issues. While I'm sad to
>> see SQLite go in these cases, I am anxious to see how Minessale
>> replaces it."
>>
>> http://www.anders.com/cms/275/FreeSWITCH/ClueCon/Anthony.Minessale
>>
>> I was just being curious about it :-)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Diego
>>
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list