[Freeswitch-users] FS Confusion with multiple SIP Record-Route headers?

[Kristian Kielhofner]

Hello everyone,

  I have an issue where FS seems to get confused in the presence of
multiple Record-Route headers.  SIP capture here:

http://admin.star2star.com/fs-sip.log

  I've never seen this with FS before but it appears to process the
multiple Record-Route headers backwards, at least in this case.

  I want to verify:

1)  These Record-Route headers are syntactically correct (looks good to me).
2)  FS should, in fact, process Record-Route headers "top down" and
built its Route: headers (and reply) accordingly.

  At first I thought the FS/Sofia SIP parser may have been getting
confused because the Record-Route from my proxy (.186) does not have a
port in the URI.  I tried adding a Record-Route header with a port -
no difference.

  This is currently running trunk rev 12218 but I'm about to update to
12571 to see what happens.

Thanks!

-- 
Kristian Kielhofner
http://blog.krisk.org
http://www.submityoursip.com
http://www.astlinux.org
http://www.star2star.com