[Freeswitch-users] Open source Java based inbound event socket library available
paul.degt
paul.degt at gmail.com
Sat Jun 20 13:15:40 PDT 2009
That's rather bold statement and indicates lack of knowledge on the
subject . I would advise you to look at
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html on GPL information.
In fact proprietary applications can use/modify GPL software with no
limitations or obligations towards authors. The only requirement is if
such applications will be published/distributed it must be done under
GPL license. If that's a problem - just ask authors to release a
commercial version for such purpose.
I think GPL is fair and easy to deal with.
Raffaele P. Guidi wrote:
> Well, GPL for a library is a dead end. Nobody will use it unless for
> open source projects. I would consider any possible choice before
> using it.
>
> Regards,
> Raffaele
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 18:12, paul.degt <paul.degt at gmail.com
> <mailto:paul.degt at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> As I mentioned the decision was influenced by our legal adviser.
> And it
> probably can be relicensed as MPL/GPL, but why?
> My understanding is that for an end user which wants to use a free
> open
> source software there should be absolutely no difference between
> GPL and
> MPL.
> But if any one has has any licensing concern with his particular use
> case - please contact me with the details, I will do what I can to
> help.
>
>
> Brian West wrote:
> > I still say why not MPL or at the very least MPL/GPL?
> >
> > /b
> >
> > On Jun 20, 2009, at 9:37 AM, paul.degt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Yes, that's one of the reasons. Another point is that GPL v.3 is
> >> defined
> >> more clearly from legal perspective, at least from our legal
> adviser
> >> point of view.
> >>
> >> Diego Viola wrote:
> >>
> >>> Because they probably want a stronger copyleft license?
> >>>
> >>> I prefer the GPL because of that reason.
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi
> >>> <raffaele.p.guidi at gmail.com
> <mailto:raffaele.p.guidi at gmail.com>
> <mailto:raffaele.p.guidi at gmail.com
> <mailto:raffaele.p.guidi at gmail.com>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> uhm... nice! But why not MPL license (the same as freeswitch)?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:06, paul.degt at gmail.com
> <mailto:paul.degt at gmail.com>
> >>> <mailto:paul.degt at gmail.com <mailto:paul.degt at gmail.com>>
> <paul.degt at gmail.com <mailto:paul.degt at gmail.com>
> >>> <mailto:paul.degt at gmail.com <mailto:paul.degt at gmail.com>>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> http://versafon.com/versafonweb/Software.jsp
> >>>
> >>> Essentially it's a wrapper around inbound socket interface,
> >>> not all
> >>> events supported yet, and not all event
> parameters/variables.
> >>> It's multi
> >>> threaded and scaled well in testing.
> >>> We offer commercial support and development for
> FreeSwitch as
> >>> well.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> >>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> >>> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>>
> >>>
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >>>
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> >>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> >>> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>>
> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >>>
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> >>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >>>
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> >> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >>
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> >> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freeswitch-users mailing list
> > Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list