[Freeswitch-users] Zoiper reject freeswitch calls

[Michael Jerris]

This issue is now fixed in svn.  Thanks Seven for access to your box  
to troubleshoot.

Mike

On Jun 16, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Seven Du wrote:

> What's wrong of the contact string? 639(snom) works but 637(zoiper)  
> doesn't.
>
> "user" <sip:637 at 192.168.1.27:5070;rinstance=e1e47e9a22f3e450;transport=UDP;fs_nat=yes;fs_path=sip%3A637%40192.168.1.27%3A5070%3Brinstance%3De1e47e9a22f3e450%3Btransport%3DUDP 
> >
>
> "seven" <sip:639 at 192.168.1.21:2051;line=298293g2;fs_nat=yes;fs_path=sip%3A639%40192.168.1.21%3A2051%3Bline%3D298293g2 
> >
>
>
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 8:43 PM, Brian West wrote:
>> Ok i'll have to se what I can do about reproducing this issue now  
>> that I have more info on how its happening.
>>
>> /b
>>
>> On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:40 AM, dujinfang wrote:
>>
>>> Almost caught you on IRC Mike.
>>>
>>> Our server is in a NAT'd network and all agents registered in the  
>>> same LAN. I can remotely register by using the public IP and the  
>>> contact string is right.
>>>
>>> Call-ID:        ZTZhMGJkZTE0NzNjZTlmZTkxYmU5NWRlZTU1MzJlYTE.
>>> User:           637 at 192.168.1.16
>>> Contact:        "user" <sip:637 at 210.73.8.180:5090;rinstance=9fc589bbc407518f 
>>> >
>>> Agent:          Zoiper rev.1809
>>>
>>> So it's like only happens on our LAN and where there's a fs_path  
>>> present.
>>>
>>> Just curious, why agents registered on a local LAN has param  
>>> fs_nat=yes; (default internal profile, port 5060) ?
>>>
>>> Seems our time doesn't match, I'm generally available in office  
>>> 9:00AM-6:00PM GMT+0800, so will try to catch you tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090616/7aca339a/attachment-0002.html